Text

Annual Radioactive Effluent Release and Radiological Environmental Operating Reports
	ML031250333
Person / Time
Site:	Fermi
Issue date:	04/29/2003
From:	O'Connor W; Detroit Edison
To:	; Document Control Desk, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
	NRC-03-0043, RG-1.021, Rev 1
	Download: ML031250333 (165)
	v • d • e

William T. O'Connor, Jr.

\'icc President, Nuclear Generation Fermi 2 6400 North Dixie Hwy., Newport, Michigan 48166 Tel: 734-586-5201 Fax 734-586-4172 DTE Energy-

.9c April 29, 2003 .10 NRC-03-0043 U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attention: Document Control Desk Washington D C 20555-0001

References:

1) Fermi 2 NRC Docket No. 50-341 NRC License No. NPF-43

2) Appendix A, Facility Operating License No.

NPF-43, Technical Specifications 5.6.2 and 5.6.3

Subject:

Annual Radioactive Effluent Release and Radiological Environmental Operating Reports The 2002 Annual Radiological Effluent Release and Radiological Environmental Operating Reports for Fermi 2 are enclosed. This combined report is being transmitted in accordance with Reference 2 and Regulatory Guide 1.21, Revision 1.

The attached report covers the period from January 1, 2002 through December 31, 2002.

Should you have any questions regarding this report, please contact Dan Craine, Supervisor, Radiological Engineering at (734) 586-1516.

Sincerely, wcao,' ',

Attachment cc: w/Attachment M. A. Ring J. F. Stang, Jr.

NRC Resident Office Regional Administrator, Region III Supervisor, Electric Operators, 2::Jc 1 z:f,, 4a 5 Michigan Public Service Commission

'0

FERMI 2 NUCLEAR POWER PLANT DETROIT EDISON COMPANY OPERATING LICENSE NO. NPF - 43 Fermi 2 - 2002 Annual Radioactive Effluent Release and Radiological Environmental Operating Reports for the period of January 1, 2002 through December 31, 2002 Prepared by:

Fermi 2 Radiological Engineering

Fermi2 - 2002 Annual Radioactive Effluent Release and RadiologicalEnvironmentalOperatingReport Table of Contents Page Executive Summary I Introduction 2 Noble Gases 2 lodines and Particulates 2 Tritium 3 PlantEffluent Monitoring 3 Exposure Pathways to People 4 Dose Assessment 5 PreoperationalSurveillance Program 6 OperationalSurveillance Program Objectives 7 ProgramOverview 7 Sample Analysis 8 QualityAssurance 10 RadiologicalEffluent MonitoringResults 12 Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program Results 16 Direct Radiation Monitoring 16 ThermoluminescentDosimeters 16 Atmospheric Monitoring 17 Air Sampling 18 TerrestrialMonitoring 20 Milk Sampling 20 GroundwaterSampling 21 Garden Sampling 22 Aquatic Monitoring 23 Drinking Water Sampling 23 Surface Water Sampling 25 Sediment Sampling 26 Fish Sampling 28 Land Use Census 30 2002 Land Use Census Results 31 Appendix A Sampling Locations A-i Appendix B Environmental Data Summary B-i ii

Fermi2 - 2002 Annual Radioactive Effluent Release and RadiologicalEnvironmental OperatingReport Table of Contents Page Appendix C Environmental Data Tables C-1 Appendix D Environmental ProgramExecution D-l DirectRadiation Monitoring D-l Atmospheric Monitoring D-1 TerrestrialMonitoring D-2 Milk Sampling D-2 Garden Sampling D-2 GroundwaterSampling D-2 Aquatic Monitoring D-3 Drinking Water Sampling D-3 Surface Water Sampling D-3 Sediment Sampling D-3 Fish Sampling D-3 Correctionsto the 2001 Annual Radiological EnvironmentalMonitoring Report D-3 Appendix E Effluent and Radwaste Data E-1 Regulatory Limits for Radioactive Effluents E-1 Gaseous Effluents E-l Liquid Effluents E-2 Measurements andApproximations of Total Activity in Radioactive Effluents E-3 GaseousEffluents E-3 Fission and Activation Gases E-3 Radioiodines E-3 Particulates E-4 Tritium E-4 Gross Alpha E-5 Liquid Effluents E-5 StatisticalMeasurement Uncertainties E-5 iii

Fermi2 - 2002 Annual Radioactive Effluent Release and RadiologicalEnvironmental OperatingReport Table of Contents Page Gaseous Release by Individual Nuclide E-5 ParticulateRadionuclides E-6 Noble Gases E-6 Radioiodines E-7 Shipments of Radwaste E-7 Spent resins, sludges, etc. E-7 Dry compressible waste, contaminatedequipment, etc. E-8 Irradiatedcomponents, control rods, etc. E-9 Other E-9 Appendix F InterlaboratoryComparison Data F-i InterlaboratoryComparisonProgramfor 2002 F-i Appendix G MeteorologicalData G-i Fermi 2 Joint Frequency DistributionTables - 2002 G-i 2002 Wind Rose G-8 Appendix H ODCM revision H-i iv

Fermi 2 - 2002 Annual Radioactive Effluent Release and RadiologicalEnvironmental OperatingReport List of Figures Page Figure1 Fermi 2 Annual Average TLD Gamma Exposure 17 Figure2 HistoricalGross Beta andI-131 Activity in Air Samples 19 Figure3 Fermi 2 Air ParticulateGross Beta 2002 19 Figure4 HistoricalStrontium-90 Activity in Local Milk Samples 21 Figure5 HistoricalGross Beta Activity in Drinking Water Samples 25 Figure6 HistoricalCesium-137Activity in Sediment Samples 28 Map I Sampling Locations By Station Number (within I mile) App.-A Map 2 Sampling Locations By Station Number (1 to 5 miles) App.-A Map 3 Sampling Locations By Station Number (greaterthan 5 miles) App.-A Figure7 2002 Wind Rose G-8 V

Fermi2 - 2002 Annual Radioactive Effluent Release and RadiologicalEnvironmental OperatingReport List of Tables Page Table 1 Fissionand Activation Gases (Noble Gases) Summary 12 Table 2 Radioiodines Summary 13 Table 3 ParticulatesSummary 13 Table 4 Tritium Summary 13 Table 5 2002 GaseousEffluent Dose to Receptor with Highest Single OrganDose 14 Table 6 Solid Waste Received at Barnwell, SC 15 Table 7 Solid Waste Shipments 15 Table 8 2002 Average GrossBeta Concentrationsin Air Particulates 18 Table 9 Closest Residences 32 Table 10 Closest Gardens 33 Table 11 Milk Locations 34 Table 12 Closest Meat Locations 35 Table A-1 Direct Radiation Sample Locations A-]

Table A-2 Air ParticulateandAir Iodine Sample Locations A-7 Table A-3 Milk Sample Locations A-7 Table A-4 Garden Sample Locations A-8 Table A-5 Drinking Water Sample Locations A-8 Table A-6 Surface Water Sample Locations A-9 Table A-7 GroundwaterSample Locations A-9 Table A-8 Sediment Sample Locations A-10 Table A-9 Fish Sample Locations A-10 Table B-I RadiologicalEnvironmentalMonitoring ProgramSummary B-1 Table F-i Analytics Cross Check Comparison Program2002 F-2 Table G-1 Stability Class A G-1 Table G-2 Stability Class B G-2 Table G-3 Stability Class C G-3 Table G-4 Stability Class D G-4 Table G-5 Stability Class E G-5 Table G-6 Stability Class F G-6 Table G-7 Stability Class G G-7 vi

Fermi2 - 2002 Annual Radioactive Effluent Release and RadiologicalEnvironmental OperatingReport Executive Summary This report is published to provide information regarding effluent and radiological environmental monitoring at the Fermi 2 Nuclear Power Plant. The 2002 Annual Radioactive Effluent Release and Radiological Environmental Operating Reports cover the period from January 1, 2002 through December 31, 2002.

The Radioactive Effluent Release and Radiological Environmental Operating Report is produced annually, as required by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission, to present detailed results of careful monitoring and measuring of radiation in the environment around the plant. This report also includes details of the independent oversight incorporated into the Radiological Effluent and Environmental Monitoring Programs to ensure program accuracy.

This report describes both the continual environmental radiation monitoring and effluent monitoring of plant systems. Both types of monitoring indicate that the operation of Fermi 2 does not result in significant exposure of people or the environment surrounding Fermi 2 and is well below the levels set by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) and the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

There were no releases of liquid radioactive effluents from Fermi 2 in 2002. In fact, there has not been a liquid radioactive discharge from Fermi 2 since 1994. Also, noble gases were not detected in noble gas effluent samples in 2002.

The highest potenial single organ dose to a person living offsite due to iodines and particulates released from the plant was calculated to be 0.2 mrem, which is 1% of the applicable Appendix I of 10 CFR 50 limit.

Also during 2002, there was no measurable direct radiation dose due to Fermi 2 above natural background beyond the site boundary as shown by offsite TLD readings. The offsite dose due to effluents is an extremely small fraction of the 40 CFR 190 limits.

Therefore, Fermi 2 was in compliance with 40 CFR 190 in 2002.

Environmental samples show no radioactivity attributable to the operation of Fermi 2.

The results of environmental sampling show that radioactivity levels have not increased from background radioactivity detected prior to the operation of Fermi 2. The operation of Fermi 2 continues to have no measurable radiological impact upon the environment.

1

Fermi 2 - 2002 Annual Radioactive Effluent Release and RadiologicalEnvironmental OperatingReport Introduction During the normal operation of a nuclear power plant, most of the fission products are retained within the fuel and fuel cladding. However, small amounts of radioactive fission products and trace amounts of the component and structure surfaces which have been activated are present in the primary coolant water. The four types of radioactive material released are noble gases, iodine, particulates, and tritium.

Noble Gases Some of the fission products released in airborne effluents are radioactive radionuclides of noble gases, such as xenon and krypton. These noble gases are released continuously at low levels while the reactor is operating, and releases may be increased when the reactor is depressurized or when there are leaks in the fuel cladding. Noble gas releases to the environment are reduced by plant systems which delay release of these gases from the plant, which allows a portion of the noble gas activity to decay within plant systems after it is released from the fuel.

Noble gases are biologically and chemically nonreactive. They do not concentrate in humans or other organisms. They contribute to human radiation dose by being an external source of radiation exposure to the body. They are readily dispersed in the atmosphere. In 2002, noble gases were not detected in noble gas effluent samples.

Iodines and Particulates Fermi 2 is required to calculate offsite dose due to releases of iodine-131 and iodine-133, which are radioisotopes of iodine with half lives of 8 days and 1 day, respectively, and particulates with half-lives greater than 8 days in gaseous and liquid effluents. The principal radioactive particulates released are fission products (e.g., cesium-134 and cesium-137) and activation products (e.g., cobalt-58 and cobalt-60). Annual releases of these radionuclides are small. Factors such as their high chemical reactivity and solubility in water, combined with the high efficiency of gaseous and liquid processing and radwaste systems, minimize their discharge.

2

Fermi2 - 2002 Annual Radioactive Effluent Release and RadiologicalEnvironmental OperatingReport The main contribution of radioactive iodine to human radiation dose is to the thyroid gland, where the body concentrates iodine, resulting from inhalation or ingestion of these iodines. Radioactive cesiums and cobalts, when ingested or inhaled, contribute to radiation exposure of tissues such as the muscle, liver, and intestines. These iodines and particulates are also a source of external radiation exposure if deposited on the ground.

Tritum Tritium, a radioactive isotope of hydrogen, is the predominant radionuclide in liquid effluents. It may also be present in gaseous effluents, but it has usually been at such low levels that it has been below detection limits in gaseous effluent samples at Fermi 2.

Tritium is produced in the reactor coolant as a result of neutron interaction with deuterium (also a hydrogen isotope) present in the water, and it is also a fission product.

PlantEffluent Monitoring Effluents are strictly monitored to ensure that radioactivity released to the environment is as low as reasonably achievable and does not exceed regulatory limits. Effluent control includes the operation of monitoring systems, in-plant and environmental sampling and analyses programs, quality assurance programs for effluent and environmental programs, and procedures covering all aspects of effluent and environmental monitoring.

The radioactive waste treatment systems at Fermi 2 are designed to collect, process, and/or delay the release of liquid and gaseous wastes which contain radioactivity. For example, the 2.0 and 2.2 minute holdup pipes delay the release of radioactive gases so that radioactive decay can occur prior to release. The offgas system provides additional delay for such gases.

Radioactivity monitoring systems are used to ensure that all releases are below regulatory limits. These instruments provide a continuous indication of the radioactivity present at the release points. Each instrument is equipped with alarms and indicators in the control room. The alarm setpoints are low enough to ensure that applicable limits will not be exceeded. In some cases these alarms restrict the release. For example, if the liquid radwaste effluent monitor alarms, a release in progress is automatically stopped. Also, several alarms cause building ventilation systems to be shut down and/or gaseous releases to be diverted to the standby gas treatment system.

3

Fermi2 - 2002 Annual Radioactive Effluent Release and RadiologicalEnvironmental OperatingReport All wastes are evaluated to identify the specific concentrations of radionuclides being released. Sampling and analysis provide a more sensitive and precise method of determining effluent composition than monitoring instruments.

A meteorological tower is located on the Fermi 2 site. It is linked to computers which record the meteorological data. This data is used in calculating dispersion and deposition factors, which are essentially dilution factors between plant release points and points offsite. Coupled with the effluent release data, these factors are used to calculate dose to the public.

Beyond the plant, devices maintained in conjunction with the Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program constantly sample the air in the surrounding environment. Frequent samples of other environmental media, such as water and vegetation, are also taken to determine if buildup of deposited radioactive material has occurred in the area.

Exposure Pathways to People Radiological exposure pathways define the methods by which people may become exposed to radioactive material. The major pathways of concern are those which could cause the highest calculated radiation dose. These projected pathways are determined from the type and amount of radioactive material released, the environmental transport mechanism, and the use of the environment. The environmental transport mechanism includes consideration of physical factors, such as the hydrological (water) and meteorological (weather) characteristics of the area.

An important factor in evaluating the exposure pathways is the use of the environment.

This is evaluated in the annual Land Use Census. Many factors are considered, such as the locations of homes, gardens, and milk or meat animals in the area.

The release of radioactive gaseous effluents involves pathways such as external whole body exposure, deposition of radioactive material on plants, deposition on soil, inhalation and ingestion by animals raised for human consumption, and inhalation by humans. The release of radioactive material in liquid effluents involves pathways such as drinking water and fish consumption.

4

Fermi2 - 2002 Annual Radioactive Effluent Release and RadiologicalEnvironmental OperatingReport Although radionuclides can reach humans by many different pathways, some result in greater dose than others. The most significant pathway is the exposure pathway which will provide the greatest dose to a population, or to a specific individual. Identification of the most significant pathway depends on the radionuclides involved, the age and diet of the individual, and the location of the individual's residence. The doses calculated may be delivered to the whole body or to a specific organ. The organ receiving the greatest fraction of the dose is important in determining compliance with dose limits.

Dose Assessment Dose is energy deposited by radiation in an exposed individual. Whole body exposure to radiation involves the exposure of all organs. Most exposures due to external sources of radiation are of this type. Both non-radioactive and radioactive elements can enter the body through inhalation or ingestion. When they do, they are usually not distributed evenly. For example, iodine concentrates in the thyroid gland, cesium collects in muscle and liver tissue, and strontium collects in bone tissue.

The total dose to organs from a given radionuclide depends on the amount of radioactive material present in the organ and the amount of time that the radionuclide remains in the organ. Some radionuclides remain for very short times due to their rapid radioactive decay and/or elimination rate from the body, while other radionuclides may remain in the body for longer periods of time. Also the form of the radionuclide (soluble vs. insoluble) and the method of uptake also influence residence times in the body.

The dose to the general public in the area surrounding Fermi 2 is calculated for periods of gaseous release and for each liquid release. The dose due to radioactive material released in gaseous effluents is calculated using factors such as the amount of radioactive material released, the concentration beyond the site boundary, the locations of exposure pathways (cow milk, goat milk, vegetable gardens and residences), and usage factors (inhalation, food consumption). The dose due to radioactive material released in liquid effluents is calculated using factors such as the total volume of liquid, the total volume of dilution water, near field dilution, and usage factors (water and fish consumption). These calculations produce a conservative estimation of the dose.

The Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program (REMP) was established at Fermi 2 for several reasons: to provide a supplementary check on the effluent controls, to assess the radiological impact of the plant's operation on the surrounding area, and to determine compliance with applicable radiation protection guides and standards. The REMP was established in 1978, seven years before the plant became operational. This preoperational surveillance program was established to describe and quantify the 5

Fermi2 - 2002 Annual RadioactiveEffluent Release and RadiologicalEnvironmental OperatingReport radioactivity, and its variability, in the area prior to the operation of Fermi 2. After Fermi 2 became operational in 1985, the operational surveillance program continued to measure radiation and radioactivity in the surrounding areas.

A variety of environmental samples are collected as part of the REMP at Fermi 2. The selection of sample types is based on the established pathways for the transfer of radionuclides through the environment to humans. The selection of sampling locations is based on sample availability, local meteorological and hydrological characteristics, local population characteristics, and land usage in the area of interest. The selection of sampling frequencies for the various environmental media is based on the radionuclides of interest, their respective half-lives, and their behavior in both the biological and physical environment.

Preoperational Surveillance Program The federal government requires nuclear facilities to conduct radiological environmental monitoring prior to constructing the facility. This preoperational surveillance program is aimed at collecting the data needed to identify pathways, including selection of the radioisotope and sample media combinations to be included in the surveillance program conducted after facility operation begins. Radiochemical analyses performed on the environmental samples should include not only those nuclides expected to be released during facility operation, but should also include typical radionuclides from nuclear weapons testing and natural background radioactivity. All environmental media with a potential to be affected by facility operation, as well as those media directly in the major pathways, should be sampled on at least an annual basis during the preoperational phase of the environmental surveillance program.

The preoperational surveillance design, including nuclide/media combinations, sampling frequencies and locations, collection techniques, and radioanalyses performed, should be carefully considered and incorporated in the design of the operational surveillance program. In this manner, data can be compared in a variety of ways (for example: from year to year, location to location, etc.) in order to detect any radiological impact the facility has on the surrounding environment. Data collection during the preoperational phase should be planned to provide a comprehensive database for evaluating any future changes in the environment surrounding the nuclear facility.

6

Fermi2 - 2002 Annual Radioactive Effluent Release and RadiologicalEnvironmental OperatingReport Fermi 2 began its preoperational environmental surveillance program seven years before the plant began operating in 1985. Data accumulated during those early years provide an extensive database from which environmental monitoring personnel are able to identify trends in the radiological characteristics of the local environment. The environmental surveillance program at Fermi 2 will continue after the plant has reached the end of its economically useful life and decommissioning has begun.

OperationalSurveillance Program Objectives The operational phase of the environmental surveillance program at Fermi 2 was designed with the following objectives in mind:

to determine whether any significant increase occurs in the concentration of radionuclides in major pathways;

to identify and evaluate the buildup, if any, of radionuclides in the local environment, or any changes in normal background radiation levels;

to verify the adequacy of the plant's controls for the release of radioactive materials;

to fulfill the obligations of the radiological surveillance sections of Fermi 2's Offsite Dose Calculation Manual.

Program Overview The Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program (REMP) at Fermi 2 is conducted in accordance with Title 10, Code of Federal Regulations, Part 50; Regulatory Guide 4.8; the Fermi 2 Offsite Dose Calculation Manual (ODCM) and plant operating procedures.

Samples are collected either weekly, monthly, quarterly, semiannually, or annually, depending upon the sample type and nature of the radionuclides of interest.

Environmental samples collected by Fermi 2 personnel are divided into four general types:

7

Fermi2 - 2002 Annual RadioactiveEffluent Release and RadiologicalEnvironmentalOperatingReport

direct radiation -- measured by thermoluminescent dosimeters (TLDs).

atmospheric -- including samples of airborne particulates and airborne radioiodine.

terrestrial -- including samples of milk, groundwater, and broad leaf vegetation.

aquatic -- including samples of drinking water, surface water, fish, and shoreline and bottom sediments.

REMP samples are collected onsite and offsite up to 20 miles away from the plant.

Sampling locations are divided into two general categories: indicator and control.

Indicator locations are those which would be most likely to display the effects caused by the operation of Fermi 2. Generally, they are located within ten miles of the plant.

Control locations are those which should be unaffected by plant operations. Typically, these are more than ten miles away from the plant. Data obtained from the indicator locations are compared with data from the control locations. This comparison allows REMP personnel to take into account naturally occurring background radiation or fallout from weapons testing in evaluating any radiological impact Fermi 2 has on the surrounding environment. Data from indicator and control locations are also compared with preoperational data to determine whether significant variations or trends exist.

Sample Analysis When environmental samples are analyzed, several types of measurements may be performed to provide information about the radionuclides present. The major analyses that are performed on environmental samples collected for the Fermi 2 REMP include:

Gross beta analysis measures the total amount of beta emitting radioactive material present in a sample. Beta radiation may be released by many different radionuclides.

Since beta decay gives a continuous energy spectrum rather than the discrete lines or "peaks" associated with gamma radiation, identification of specific beta emitting nuclides is much more difficult. Therefore, gross beta analysis only indicates whether the sample contains normal or abnormal concentrations of beta emitting radionuclides; it does not identify specific radionuclides. Gross beta analysis merely acts as a tool to identify samples that may require further analysis.

8

Fermi 2 - 2002 Annual Radioactive Effluent Release and RadiologicalEnvironmental OperatingReport Gamma spectral analysis provides more specific information than does gross beta analysis. Gamma spectral analysis identifies each gamma emitting radionuclide present in the sample, and the amount of each nuclide present. Each radionuclide has a very specific "fingerprint" that allows for swift and accurate identification. For example, gamma spectral analysis can be used to identify the presence and amount of iodine-131 in a sample. Iodine-131 is a man-made radioactive isotope of iodine that may be present in the environment as a result of fallout from nuclear weapons testing, routine medical, or routine releases from nuclear power stations.

Tritium analysis indicates whether a sample contains the radionuclide tritium (H-3) and the amount present. Tritium is an isotope of hydrogen that emits low energy beta particles.

Strontium analysis identifies the presence and amount of strontium-89 and strontium-90 in a sample. These man-made radionuclides are found in the environment mainly as a result of fallout from nuclear weapons testing. Strontium is usually incorporated into the calcium pool of the biosphere. In other words, strontium tends to replace calcium in living organisms and becomes incorporated in bone tissue. The principle strontium exposure pathway is via milk produced by cattle grazed on pastures exposed to deposition from airborne releases.

Gamma Doses measured by thermoluminescent dosimeters while in the field are determined by a special laboratory procedure.

Often samples will contain little radioactivity, and may be below the lower limit of detection for the particular type of analysis used. The lower limit of detection (LLD) is the smallest amount of sample activity which can be detected with a reasonable degree of confidence, at a predetermined level. When a measurement of radioactivity is reported as less than LLD (<LLD), it means that the radioactivity is so low that it cannot be accurately measured with any degree of confidence by that particular method for an individual analysis.

Many radionuclides are present in the environment due to sources such as cosmic radiation and fallout from nuclear weapons testing. Some of the radionuclides present are:

tritium, present as a result of the interaction of cosmic radiation with the upper atmosphere, as a result of routine release from nuclear facilities, and due to fallout from past atmospheric nuclear weapons testing.

beryllium-7, present as a result of the interaction of cosmic radiation with the upper atmosphere.

9

Fermi 2 - 2002 Annual RadioactiveEffluent Release and RadiologicalEnvironmentalOperatingReport

cesium-137, a man-made radionuclide which has been deposited in the environment, (for example, in surface soils) as a result of fallout from nuclear weapons testing and routine releases from nuclear facilities.

potassium-40, a naturally occurring radionuclide normally found throughout the environment (including humans)

fallout radionuclides from nuclear weapons testing, including strontium-89, strontium-90, cesium-137, cerium-141, cerium-144, and ruthenium-106. These radionuclides may also be released in minute amounts from nuclear facilities The radionuclides listed above are expected to be present in many of the environmental samples collected in the vicinity of the Fermi 2. The contribution of radionuclides from the operation of Fermi 2 is assessed by comparing sample results with preoperational data, operational data from previous years, control location data, and the types and amounts of radioactivity normally released from the Fermi 2 in liquid and gaseous effluents.

Quality Assurance An important part of the environmental monitoring program at Fermi 2 is the Quality -

Assurance Program (QA). It is conducted in accordance with the guidelines specified in NRC Regulatory Guide 4.15, "Quality Assurance for Radiological Monitoring Programs."

The QA program is designed to identify possible deficiencies in the REMP so that corrective actions can be initiated promptly. Fermi 2's Quality Assurance program also provides confidence in the results of the REMP through:

performing regular audits (investigations) of the REMP, including a careful examination of sample collection techniques and record keeping;

performing audits of the vendor laboratory which analyzes the environmental samples;

requiring the analytical vendor laboratory to participate in an approved Cross-Check Program; 10

Fermi 2 - 2002 Annual Radioactive Effluent Release and RadiologicalEnvironmentalOperatingReport

splitting samples prior to analysis by an independent laboratory, and then comparing the results for agreement, and, finally;

requiring the analytical laboratory to perform in-house spiked sample analyses.

11

Fermi 2 - 2002 Annual Radioactive Effluent Release and RadiologicalEnvironmental OperatingReport Radioactive Effluent MonitoringResults This section summarizes the results of effluent monitoring and offsite dose calculation for the year 2002, as well as a listing of radioactivity contained in Fermi 2 waste shipped for burial. Calculations of offsite doses are compared with Nuclear Regulatory Commission limits, and these limits are summarized in Appendix E. Appendix E also contains a detailed discussion of the methods used to determine quantities of radioactivity released in effluents, the types of solid radwaste, as well as tables of individual radionuclides released in effluents and shipped as solid radwaste.

There were no releases of liquid radioactive effluents from Fermi 2 in 2002. In fact, there has not been a liquid radioactive discharge from Fermi 2 since 1994. The 2002 gaseous effluent releases are summarized in the following tables. There were no abnormal releases of radioactive material, i.e. releases not performed in accordance with the Fermi 2 license and implementing procedures, in 2002.

The data in the following tables represent continuous releases, since in 2002 there were no batch releases (containment purges) in which radioactivity was detected.

Note that the values in the fission and activation gases summary table, and two values in the tritium summary table are preceded by the "less than" symbol. These values represent the lower limit of detection (LLD) in units of microcuries per cubic centimeter (uCi/cc) for individual samples, and indicate that noble gases were not detected in noble gas effluent samples in 2002, and that tritium was not detected in tritium samples in 2 of the 4 quarters of 2002. (For noble gases, the value <3.OE-07 is the sum of the LLD values for 4 common noble gases isotopes listed in Appendix E.)

Table 1 - Fission and Activation Gases (Noble Gases) Summary

<-Qu3irtr I K:Quartei 2 Quarter 3 Quarter 4 Total Release <3.OE-07 <3.0E-07 <3.0E-07 <3.OE-07 (curies)

Average Release NA NA NA NA Rate for Period (puCi/sec) 12

Fermi2 - 2002 Annual Radioactive Effluent Release and RadiologicalEnvironmental OperatingReport Table 2 - Radioiodines Summary 1I Qumer 2 Quarter ^-'- I-Quarter 3;-}- Z Quarter 4 a.

Total 1-131 1.77E-03 2.26E-03 2.43E-03 2.82E-03 (curies)

Average Release 2.28E-04 2.87E-04 3.06E-04 3.55E-04 Rate for Period (jiCi/sec)

Table 3 - Particulates Summary Quiarte Qart2 ' ', Qua er 3 Q>uarter

<>iH

§ 4l Particulates with 3.36E-04 1.80E-03 4.52E-03 1.29E-04 half lives > 8 days (curies)

Average 4.33E-05 2.29E-04 5.70E-04 1.63E-05 Release Rate for Period (gCilsec)

Gross Alpha 4.88E-07 1.54E-06 1.64E-06 5.90E-07 Radioactivity (curies)

Table 4 - Tritium Summary

.______________ Quarter 1im Quarter 2- '3 XQuarer Quare 4 Total Release <4.OE-08 <4.OE-08 1.07E+00 1.66E-01 (LLD in uCi/cc)

Average Release N.A. N.A. 1.35E-01 2.09E-02 Rate for Period (p.Ci/sec)

The offsite dose impact of the above releases was evaluated by calculating organ doses to the most highly exposed individual living near the plant due to I-131, I-133, tritium, and particulates with half lives greater than 8 days. This exposure is assumed to be occurring via the pathways of inhalation, vegetation ingestion, and direct radiation from material deposited on the ground. The results of this calculation are shown in the following table:

13

Fermi2 - 2002 Annual RadioactiveEffluent Release and RadiologicalEnvironmental OperatingReport Table 5 A,, r ,,,§4^q9,-9,:'53,53 *92002 Gasou EfuentD'ose toge5 Organ B Receptoriwith HighestSnge ranV >

one 0.02 mrem iver "Fi30.01 mrem yri 93z 0.2 mrem ydney 0.01 mrem u~g }0.01 mrem GILIt 0 > 0.01 mrem Total body, 0.01 mrem The highest single organ dose is 0.2 mrem to the thyroid. This is 1% of the federal limit of 15 mrem specified in 10CFR50, Appendix I.

Another dose calculation performed on the above release data is that for gamma and beta air dose at the site boundary due to noble gases. In 2002, gamma and beta air dose was not calculated because noble gases were not detected in noble gas effluent samples.

Title 40, Part 190 of the Code of Federal Regulations requires that dose to an individual in the unrestricted area from the uranium fuel cycle, including direct radiation dose, be limited to 25 mrem/year to the total body and 75 mrem/year to the thyroid. During 2002, there was no measurable direct radiation dose beyond the site boundary as shown by offsite TLD readings. Also, offsite dose due to effluents is an extremely small fraction of the 40 CFR 190 limits. Therefore, Fermi 2 was in compliance with 40 CFR 190 in 2002.

Potential dose to visitors at Fermi 2 due to all radioactive effluents, including noble gases, was also calculated. The ODCM considers persons visiting the Fermi 2 Visitors Center (4 hour4.62963e-5 days 0.00111 hours 6.613757e-6 weeks 1.522e-6 months s/year), and persons ice fishing on Lake Erie near the plant (240 hour0.00278 days 0.0667 hours 3.968254e-4 weeks 9.132e-5 months s/year), to be

-visitors. Using ODCM assumptions about these categories of visitors, the maximum potential dose to a visitor to Fermi 2 in 2002 was 0.01 mrem to the maximally exposed organ (thyroid) and 0.003 mrem to the total body.

Also, the dose to the entire population within a fifty mile radius of Fermi 2 (about 6 million people) was calculated. This dose was estimated to be less than one person-rem for 2002. This dose is insignificant compared to the background radiation dose to this population of approximately 1.8 million person-rem.

14

Fermi2 - 2002 Annual Radioactive Effluent Release and RadiologicalEnvironmentalOperatingReport The radioactivity and volume of Fermi 2 solid waste received at the Barnwell, SC, burial facility, or at the Envirocare, UT, facility in 2002 is summarized in the following table.

Table 6 - Solid Waste Received At Burial Sites l~moth ; activity Tye faste.--u )unit.ceraefo, Spent resins, sludges, etc. - m3 3.50E+01 curies 5.74E+01 +/- 25 Dry compressible waste, m3 1.92E+01 contaminated equipment, etc. curies 1.12E+00 +/- 25 Irradiated components, control m3 0 rods, etc. curies 0 NA Other m3 0 curies 0 NA Radioactive solid waste shipments from Fermi 2 in 2002 are summarized in the following table.

Table 7 - Solid Waste Shipments Ty shi he of estination solidification process f 'shipmntis'. tansortation,_____________itx,_i_'_',

Spent resin, sludges, etc. 6 tractor trailer Chem Nuclear, Barnwell, SC with cask Dry compressible waste, 9 tractor trailer Duratek contaminated equipment, etc.

One revision to the ODCM was implemented in 2002. Appendix H of this report contains the revised ODCM pages, together with supporting documentation for the changes made.

In 2002, no liquid or gaseous effluent monitoring instrumentation was out of service longer than the time limits specified in the ODCM. Also, no outside temporary tank exceeded the 10 curie content limit, and there were no major changes to radioactive waste systems in 2002.

15

Fermi2 - 2002 Annual Radioactive Effluent Release and RadiologicalEnvironmental OperatingReport RadiologicalEnvironmentalMonitoringProgramResults Direct Radiation Monitoring Radiation is a normal component of the environment resulting primarily from natural sources, such as cosmic radiation and naturally occurring radionuclides; and to a lesser extent, from manmade sources such as fallout from past nuclear weapons testing. The earth is constantly bombarded by cosmic radiation in the form of high energy gamma rays and particulates. The earth's crust also contains natural radioactive material, such as uranium and potassium-40, which contributes to the background radiation. Direct radiation monitoring primarily measures ionizing radiation from cosmic and terrestrial sources.

Thermoluminescent Dosimeters Detroit Edison uses thermoluminescent dosimeters (TLDs) to measure direct gamma radiation in the environs of Fermi 2. In this process, ionizing radiation interacts with a phosphor which is the sensitive material in the TLD. Energy is trapped in the TLD material and can be stored for several months or years. This provides an excellent method to measure the dose received over long periods of time. The energy that was stored in the TLD as a result of interaction with radiation is released and measured by a controlled heating process in a calibrated reading system. As the TLD is heated, the phosphor releases the stored energy in the form of light. The amount of light detected is directly proportional to the amount of radiation to which the TLD was exposed. This reading process then rezeros the TLD and prepares it for reuse.

Fermi 2 has 67 TLD locations within a 15 mile radius of the plant. Of the 67 TLD locations 18 are located on-site and are not used for comparison with the control locations. These 18 TLDs are affected by Hydrogen Water Chemistry's sky shine and are not representative of off site dose. The TLDs are thoroughly tested to comply with NRC Regulatory Guide 4.13 and American National Standards Institute's (ANSI) publication N545-1975, which assure accurate measurements under varying environmental conditions before being placed in the field. Indicator TLDs are located within a ten mile radius of the plant and control TLDs are located at a distance that is outside the influence of the plant. While in the field, TLDs are exposed to background radiation and, if measurable, gaseous effluents and direct radiation from Fermi 2. Environmental TLDs are exchanged and processed on a quarterly basis. The TLDs' data are reported in terms of milliroentgen per standard quarter (mR/std qtr), a standard quarter being 91 days. Regardless of the duration of TLD exposure in the field, the data have been normalized to a standard quarter to allow convenient intercomparisons with the net value.

16

Fermi2 - 2002 Annual Radioactive Effluent Release and RadiologicalEnvironmental OperatingReport In 2002, the average exposure for TLDs at all off-site indicator locations was 13.8 mR/std qtr and for all control locations was 13.3 mR/std qtr. These exposures are consistent with preoperational and past operational measurements as shown in Figure 1.

Fermi 2 Annual Average TLD Gamma Exposure 25 -

20-Cr 15-

~10 5 Preoperational Operational 0

CND D 0 -O _ I X0 t- cD M 0 N M Rr t to rD co 0 _- N t-_ t- co co D oo co co co co co co 4M CCD Im Cn CD CD CDCD CD0 a CD a0 0 CD a) C Om C CD CD CD CD CD CD CD CD CD C CD 4D CD CD Ce 0 CD0 0 a Year

- Indicator --- Control Figure 1 - Fermi 2 Annual Average TLD Gamma Exposure; The similarity between indicator and control results demonstrates that the operation of Fermi 2 has not caused any abnormal gamma exposure.

Atmospheric Monitoring A potential exposure pathway to people is inhalation of airborne radioactive materials.

Detroit Edison continuously samples the ambient air surrounding Fermi 2 for radioactivity. Air sampling began in 1979, during the preoperational program. At each sampling location, a mechanical air sampler is used to draw a continuous volume of air through two filters designed to collect particulates and radioiodines. Air samples are collected weekly and analyzed for gross beta radiation and iodine-131 gamma radiation.

The particulate filters for each sampling location are combined on a quarterly basis to form a "composite sample" and are analyzed for gamma emitting radionuclides. There are four indicator sampling locations which were selected based on an evaluation of the predominant wind directions. A fifth sampling location is approximately 14 miles west of the plant and is considered to be in a location unaffected by the operation of the plant.

This is used as the control location.

17

Fermi2 - 2002 Annual Radioactive Effluent Release and RadiologicalEnvironmental OperatingReport Air Sampling On October 16, 1980, the Peoples Republic of China conducted an atmospheric nuclear weapon test. The fallout from this test was detected in Fermi 2 preoperational environmental air samples in 1981 (see Figure 2). The average gross beta for 1981 was 1.60E-1 pCi/cubic meter for indicator samples and 2.40E-I pCi/cubic meter for control samples which was a factor of ten times greater than background gross beta. Gamma spectroscopic analyses of the particulate filters indicated cesium-137, cerium-141, cerium-144, ruthenium-103, ruthenium-106, zirconium-95, niobium-95, manganese-54, and antimony-125 in the atmosphere as a result of this test. In 1986, as shown in Figure 2, there was a slight increase in gross beta activity and a 2.70E-1 pCi/cubic meter "spike" in the iodine-131 activity. These elevated levels in 1986 are attributed to the nuclear accident at Chernobyl on April 26, 1986. For all other years, the iodine-131 activity was below the lower limit of detection (LLD) of 7.OE-2 pCi/cubic meter.

During 2002, two hundred and forty-eight (248) particulate air filters and charcoal cartridges were collected and analyzed for gross beta activity and iodine-131 respectively.

The average gross beta for indicator samples was 2.63E-2 pCi/cubic meter and 2.61E-2 pCi/cubic meter for control samples. None of the charcoal filters collected showed detectable levels of iodine-131. The following table contains the annual average gross beta results of all five sample locations for 2002.

2002 Average Gross Beta Concentrations in Air Particulates (pCi/M 3 )

Table 8 Stationi Descrntinon++(sect6r/distance) V'Annual Averageo F API-1 (I) Estral Beach (NE/1.4 mi.) 2.47E-2 API-2 (I) Site Boundary (NNW/0.6 mi.) 2.66E-2 API-3 (D) Site Boundary (NW/0.6 mi.) 2.62E-2 API-4 (C) North Custer Rd. (W/14 mi.) 2.61E-2 API-5 (I) Site Boundary (S/1.2 mi.) 2.76E-2 (D)= Indicator Station (C) = Control Station Twenty (20) quarterly particulate filter composites were prepared and analyzed for gamma emitting radionuclides. Naturally occurring beryllium-7 was detected in both indicator and control samples.

18

Fermi 2 - 2002 Annual Radioactive Effluent Release and RadiologicalEnvironmental OperatingReport In conclusion, the atmospheric monitoring data are consistent with preoperational and prior operational data and show no adverse long-term trends in the environment attributable to operation of Fermi 2 as illustrated in Figures 2 and 3.

Historical Gross Beta and Iodine-131 3.OE-01 Activity in Air Samples Chin eWeapons Test Chernobyl Event 2.OE E

.5- 1.OE U l1-131 LLD O.OE+00- -. . . . . . . . . . ..

O0 a) Go a) co CD co X co X 0c CD _n 0 X M00 U1)on 0 0M C0 Year l- Indicator Gross Beta -a--Control Gross Beta -Iodine - 131 Figure 2 - Historical Gross Beta and Iodine-131 Activity in Air Samples; The similarity between indicator and control gross beta results demonstrates that the operation of Fermi 2 has had no adverse long-term trends in the environment. The lower limit of detection (LLD) for iodine-131 is 0.07 pCi/cubic meter.

Fermi 2 Air Particulate Gross Beta for 2002 6.OE-02 5.0E-02 E 4.OE-02

-~3.OE-0:2 2.OE-02 c1.0E4

a. 1.OE O.OEi.OO c

Cu c 0 D0 , UCa - C

- 0.0.0. C >. > CUC CU C C B3. S3. e. . - ?- - > >. . .

- C) - _ 0 - CM ,e - mJ Collection Date l-Indicator -cl-Control Figure 3 - Fermi 2 Air Particulate Gross Beta for 2002; The concentration of beta emitting radionuclides in airborne particulates samples was essentially identical at indicator and control locations. Gross beta activity varies throughout the year and is primarily an effect of seasonal precipitation.

19

Fermi2 - 2002 Annual Radioactive Effluent Release and RadiologicalEnvironmental OperatingReport Terrestrial Monitoring Radionuclides released to the atmosphere may deposit on soil and vegetation, and therefore, may eventually be incorporated into the human food chain. To assess the impact of Fermi 2 operations to humans from the ingestion pathway, samples of milk, green leafy vegetables, and groundwater are collected and analyzed for radioactivity. The following sections discuss the type and frequency of terrestrial sampling, analyses performed, and a comparison of 2002 data to previous operational and preoperational data.

Milk Sampling The milk sampling portion of the REMP is perhaps one of the most important aspects of the program. This is because a major pathway in the human food chain is the consumption of milk from grazing animals (dairy cows or goats) due to biological concentration and the short turn around time in this pathway. Milk is collected from one indicator location and one control location semimonthly when animals are in the pasture, and monthly when the animals are on stored feed. The milk is analyzed for iodine-131, gamma emitting radionuclides, and strontium-89/90. At times when milk samples are not available, grass samples are collected at both the control milk sample location and the location where milk is not available. Grass samples are analyzed for iodine-131 and other gamma emitting radionuclides.

Milk sampling began in 1979 during the preoperational program. During this time period, milk samples were analyzed for iodine-131 and other gamma emitting radionuclides. Cesium-137 and naturally occurring potassium-40 were the only radionuclides detected in milk samples during the preoperational program. The cesium-137 concentration averaged 3.60E+0 pCi/liter and is due to past atmospheric nuclear weapons testing. In 1986, after the nuclear accident at Chernobyl iodine-131 and cesium-137 were detected in both indicator and control milk samples. The average concentration for iodine-131 was 3.70E+O pCi/liter and 6.60E+O pCi/liter for cesium-137.

The analysis for strontium-89/90 began in 1988, and strontium-90 is routinely detected in both indicator and control milk samples because of past atmospheric nuclear weapons testing. Since 1988, the average concentration for strontium-90 has been 1.72E+0 pCi/liter.

During 2002, thirty six (36) milk samples were collected and analyzed for iodine-131, gamma emitting radionuclides, and strontium-89/90. No iodine-131 was detected in any of the samples. Strontium-90 was detected in both indicator and control milk samples and is due to fallout from past atmospheric weapons testing (see Figure 4). The indicator 20

Fermi 2 - 2002 Annual Radioactive Effluent Release and RadiologicalEnvironmentalOperatingReport samples had an average strontium-90 concentration of 1.95E+0 pCi/liter and the control samples had an average concentration of 2.33E+0 pCi/liter. During 2002, no grass samples were scheduled or collected for the REMP program.

In 1970, the concentration of strontium-90 in Monroe County milk was 6.OOE+0 pCi/liter according to the Michigan Department of Health's "Milk Surveillance", Radiation Data and Reports, Vol. 11-15, 1970-1974. Figure 4 shows the calculated radiological decay curve for the 1970 concentration of strontium-90 and the average concentrations since 1988. This graph illustrates that the inventory of strontium-90 in the local environment is decreasing with time and closely follows the calculated decay curve. This supports the fact that the inventory of strontium-90 in the environment is due to fallout from past atmospheric nuclear weapons testing and not the operation of Fermi 2.

Historical Strontium-90 Activity in Local Milk Samples 0._4..0 2.0 I I I I I I 0.0 0r'-

ori

('4 t-o)

R t0 c00 t-M I

r-.

C)

I P.

C) co C)

('4 C) co Rr o)

CD CD o)

W c c oD o

0 C) o)

04 o) on C$

C)

CD c

C) o 0

C 0

C) 80 CD cm 0D C

0 Year Average Sr-90 Activity -Calculated Decay Figure 4 - Historical Strontium-90 Activity in Local Milk Samples; The concentration of strontium-90 in local milk samples is decreasing with time and is below the calculated decay curve. This supports the fact that strontium-90 in local milk is due to fallout from past atmospheric nuclear weapons testing and not the operation of Fermi 2.

Groundwater Sampling In areas not served by municipal water systems, water supplies for domestic use are generally obtained from private wells. The network of private wells presently in use forms the source of water for domestic and livestock purposes in farms and homes west and north of the site. However, with the construction of new water plants and distribution systems, the water use trend in the area is from groundwater to surface water.

21

Fermi 2 - 2002 Annual Radioactive Effluent Release and RadiologicalEnvironmental OperatingReport Groundwater is collected on a quarterly basis from four wells surrounding Fermi 2. The groundwater is analyzed for gamma emitting radionuclides and tritium. Sampling location GW-4 which is located approximately 0.6 miles west north west is designated as the control location because it is up-gradient and is least likely to be affected by the operation of the plant. The other three sampling locations are down-gradient from Fermi 2 and designated as indicator locations.

Groundwater sampling began in 1987, during the operational period of the REMP program. From 1987 to 1996 naturally occurring potassium-40, cesium-137, and tritium were detected in both indicator and control samples. The average concentration was 7.71E+0 pCi/liter for cesium-137 and l.50E+2 pCi/liter for tritium. The presence of cesium-137 and tritium in groundwater samples is due to fallout from past atmospheric nuclear weapons testing leaching into the soil and becoming incorporated into the groundwater. From 1997 to 2001 no activity was detected in groundwater samples.

In 2002, sixteen (16) groundwater samples were collected and analyzed for gamma emitting radionuclides and tritium. No activity was detected in any of these groundwater samples.

Garden Sampling Fermi 2 collects samples of broad leaf vegetables from indicator locations identified by the Annual Land Use Census. Samples are also collected at a control location that is at a distance and direction which is considered to be unaffected by plant operations. Samples are collected once a month during the growing season (June through September) and are analyzed for iodine-131 and other gamma emitting radionuclides.

Vegetable sampling started in 1982. During the preoperational period from 1982 to 1985, only naturally occurring potassium-40 was detected in both indicator and control vegetable samples. During the operational period from 1985 to 1990 and 1994 to 1995, only naturally occurring potassium-40 was detected in both indicator and control vegetable samples. However, in 1991, 1992, and 1993 cesium-137 was detected in one indicator sample each year and had an average concentration of 1.2E+l pCi/kilogram.

Cesium-137 may become incorporated into plants by either uptake from the soil or direct deposition on foliar surfaces. Since cesium-137 is normally not detected in gaseous effluent samples from Fermi 2, and there have been no recent atmospheric weapons testing or nuclear accidents, the incorporation of cesium-137 by direct deposition is highly unlikely. The most probable source of cesium-137 in vegetable samples is the uptake of previously deposited cesium-137, which has leached into the soil. This cesium activity is attributed to fallout from past atmospheric weapons testing and to the nuclear accident at Chernobyl.

22

Fermi2 - 2002 Annual Radioactive Effluent Release and RadiologicalEnvironmental OperatingReport During 2002, eighteen (18) vegetable samples were collected and analyzed for iodine-131 and other gamma emitting radionuclides. No iodine-131 was detected in vegetable samples during 2002. The only gamma emitting radionuclide detected was naturally occurring potassium-40.

Terrestrial monitoring results for 2002 of milk, groundwater and leafy garden vegetable samples, showed only naturally occurring radioactivity, and radioactivity associated with fallout from past atmospheric nuclear weapons testing. The radioactivity levels detected were consistent with levels measured prior to the operation of Fermi 2 and no radioactivity attributable to activities at Fermi 2 was detected in any terrestrial samples.

In conclusion, the terrestrial monitoring data show no adverse long-term trends in the terrestrial environment.

Aquatic Monitoring Lake Erie, on which Fermi 2 borders, is used as a source for drinking water, as well as for recreational activities such as fishing, swimming, sunbathing, and boating. For this reason, Lake Erie and its tributaries are routinely monitored for radioactivity.

The aquatic monitoring portion of the REMP consists of sampling raw municipal drinking water, surface water, lake sediments, and fish for the presence of radioactivity.

The following sections discuss the type and frequency of aquatic sampling, analyses performed, a comparison of 2002 data to previous operational and preoperational data.

Drinking Water Sampling Detroit Edison monitors drinking water at one control location and one indicator location using automatic samplers. The automatic samplers collect samples, known as aliquots, at time intervals that are very short (hourly) relative to the sample collection period (monthly) in order to assure that a representative sample is obtained. Indicator water samples are obtained at the Monroe water intake located approximately 1.1 miles south of the plant. Detroit municipal water is used for the control samples and is obtained at the Allen Park water intake located approximately 18.6 miles north of the plant. Drinking water samples are collected on a monthly basis and analyzed for gross beta, strontium-89/90, and gamma emitting radionuclides. The monthly samples for each location are combined on a quarterly basis and analyzed for tritium activity.

23

Fermi2 - 2002 Annual Radioactive Effluent Release and RadiologicalEnvironmental OperatingReport In late 1980, as shown in Figure 5, an atmospheric nuclear weapon test was conducted by the Peoples Republic of China. As a result of this test, the average gross beta for 1981 was 9.80E+0 pCifliter for water samples. Figure 5 also shows that, except for the Chinese weapons testing, the historic drinking water sample data are below the lower limit of detection (4.OOE+0 pCi/liter) required by US Environmental Protection Agency's National Interim Primary Drinking Water regulations. Even during the Chinese weapons -

testing, the drinking water samples did not exceed the USEPA's maximum allowable criteria of 5.OOE+1 pCi/liter gross beta. In 1980 and 1983, cesium-137 was detected in drinking water sampleg at levels ranging from 5.40E+0 pCifliter to l.90E+l pCifliter.

Tritium was also detected during the preoperational program and had an average of 3.25E+2 pCi/liter. The presence of cesium-137 and detectable levels of tritium in these water samples is due to fallout from past atmospheric nuclear weapons testing and naturally occurring tritium.

From 1985 to 2001, the average annual gross beta activity for indicator samples was 3.21E+0 pCi/liter and 2.56E+0 pCi/liter for control samples. The analysis for strontium-89/90 began in 1988 and strontium-90 has been detected in both indicator and control samples. The average strontium-90 activity for indicator samples was 7.25E-1 pCi/liter and 7.56E-1 pCi/liter for control samples during this time period. Tritium was also detected in both indicator and control drinking water samples during this time period.

The average tritium activity for indicator samples was 2.52E+2 pCi/liter and 2.60E+2 pCi/liter for control samples. The presence of strontium-90 and detectable levels of tritium in these water samples is due to fallout from past atmospheric nuclear weapons testing and naturally occurring tritium.

In 2002, twenty-four (24) drinking water samples were collected and analyzed for gross beta, gamma emitting radionuclides, strontium-89/90, and tritium. The average gross beta for indicator samples was 5.56E+0 and also 4.44E+0 pCi/liter for control samples.

No gamma emitting radionuclides or strontium-89/90 activity was detected in drinking water samples during 2002. Six (6) quarterly composite drinking water samples were prepared and analyzed for tritium. No tritium activity was detected in drinking water samples during 2002.

24

Fermi 2 - 2002 Annual Radioactive Effluent Release and Radiological Environmental Operating Report Historical Gross Beta Activity 12.0- in Drinking Water Samples 10.0 Chines Weapons Test 8.0-M a) 6.0 -

C~4.0-2.0-0.0 I Go 0 Cli RT CD CD 0 C%1 qT W c CD CJ

_ co _ co co co _

a) ) _

a) _ C0 0 IM oM o) oM C Co C Co Co C o 0D 0D Year

-l----Indicator Gross Beta C3-Control Gross Beta ------ EPA LLD Figure 5 - Historical Gross Beta Activity in Drinking Water Samples; Since 1982, the annual concentrations of beta emitting radionuclides in drinking water samples collected from indicator locations have been consistent with those from control locations.

This shows that Fermi 2 has had no measurable radiological impact on local drinking water.

Surface Water Sampling Detroit Edison monitors surface water at two locations using automatic samplers. As with drinking water, surface water samples are collected at time intervals that are very short (hourly) relative to the sample collection period (monthly) in order to assure obtaining a representative sample. Indicator surface water samples are obtained at the Fermi 2 General Service Water building, located approximately 0.3 miles south southeast from Fermi 2. The control surface water samples are obtained from Trenton Channel Power Plant's cooling water intake on the Detroit River which is approximately 11.7 miles north north east of Fermi 2. Surface water samples are collected on a monthly basis and analyzed for strontium-89/90 and gamma emitting radionuclides. The monthly samples for each location are combined on a quarterly basis to form a quarterly composite sample and are analyzed for tritium.

25

Fermi 2 - 2002 Annual Radioactive Effluent Release and RadiologicalEnvironmental OperatingReport Surface water sampling began in 1979 and the samples were analyzed for gamma emitting radionuclides, and tritium. During this preoperational program no gamma emitting radionuclides, except for naturally occurring potassium40, were detected.

Tritium was detected in both indicator and control samples during this time period and had an average concentration of 3.15E+2 pCi/liter. This tritium activity represents the background concentration due to naturally occurring tritium and tritium produced during past atmospheric nuclear weapons testing.

From 1985 to 2001, as part of the operational program, surface water samples were analyzed for gamma emitting radionuclides and tritium. The analysis for strontium-89/90 did not begin until 1988, and strontium-90 was detected in both indicator and control samples. The average strontium-90 concentration for this time period was 1.1 3E+0 pCilliter. In 1990, two indicator samples showed detectable activity for cesium-137 at an average concentration of 1.20E+1 pCi/liter. The presence of cesium-137 and strontium-90 in these water samples is due to fallout from past atmospheric nuclear weapons testing. Tritium was detected in both indicator and control surface water samples during this time period at a concentration of 2.3 1E+2 pCi/liter. This tritium activity is consistent with background levels measured during the preoperational program.

In 2002, twenty-five (25) surface water samples were collected and analyzed for gamma emitting radionuclides and strontium-89/90. From these samples, six (6) quarterly composite samples were prepared and analyzed for tritium. During 2002, no gamma emitting radionuclides, strontium-89/90, or tritium were detected.

Sediment Sampling Sediments often act as a sink (temporary or permanent) for radionuclides, but they may also become a source, as when they are resuspended during periods of increased turbulence or are dredged and deposited elsewhere. Sediment, in the vicinity of the liquid discharge point, represents the most likely site for accumulation of radionuclides in the aquatic environment and, with long-lived radionuclides, a gradual increase in radioactivity concentration would be expected over time if discharges occur. Sediment, therefore, provides a long-term indication of change that may appear in other sample media (i.e., water and fish samples).

26

Fermi2 - 2002 Annual Radioactive Effluent Release and RadiologicalEnvironmentalOperatingReport Lake Erie shoreline and bottom sediments from five locations are collected on a semiannual basis (Spring and Fall) and are analyzed for gamma emitting radionuclides and strontium-89/90. There is one control location and four indicator locations. The control sample is collected near the Trenton Channel Power Plant's cooling water intake.

The indicator samples are collected at Estral Beach, near the Fermi 2 liquid discharge area, the shoreline at the end of Pointe Aux Peaux, and Indian Trails Community Beach.

During the preoperational program there was not a control location, and indicator samples were analyzed for gamma emitting radionuclides. During the preoperational program, except for naturally occurring radionuclides, only Cesium- 137 was detected in sediment samples. For this time period the average cesium-137 concentration was 3.27E+2 pCi/kilogram. The presence of cesium-137-in these sediment samples is due to fallout from past atmospheric nuclear weapons testing.

From 1985 to 2001, cesium-137, strontium-90, and naturally occurring radionuclides were detected in sediment samples. The average cesium-137 concentration for indicator samples was 1.77E+2 pCi/kilogram and 1.13E+2 pCi/kilogram for control samples. The analysis for strontium-89/90 began in 1988, and strontium-90 has been routinely detected at similar concentrations in both indicator and control samples. The average strontium-90 activity for indicator samples was 1.80E+2 pCi/kilogram and 1.98E+2 pCi/kilogram for control samples. The presence of cesium-137 and strontium-90 in these sediment samples is due to fallout from past atmospheric nuclear weapons testing.

In 1990 and 1991, the Spring samples taken at the Fermi 2 liquid discharge line (Location S-2) showed activity for plant related radionuclides (manganese-54, cobalt-58, cobalt-60, and zinc-65) and was determined to be a result of liquid effluent from Fermi 2. The sample results were well below any regulatory reporting limits and were consistent with the activity released from the plant in liquid effluents and the dose impact was negligible.

In 2002, ten (10) sediment samples were collected and analyzed for gamma emitting radionuclides and strontium 89/90. Cesium-137 was detected in two control samples with an average concentration of 8.20E+1 pCi/kilogram. The presence of cesium-137 in sediment samples is due to fallout from past atmospheric nuclear weapons testing.

Naturally occurring radionuclides of potassium and beryllium were also detected in sediment samples for this sampling period.

27

Fermi 2 - 2002 Annual Radioactive Effluent Release and RadiologicalEnvironmental OperatingReport Historical Cesium-137 Activity in Sediment Samples 7.OE+02 6.OE+02 - -

E 5.OE+02-3.OE+02--

o 2.OE+02 - -

C.

1.OE+02--

CM co c co CO 0 b' t (0 (O 0 N

_ _' _ _ eJ lrAverage Activity Calculated Trend Figure 6 - Historical Cesium-137 Activity in Sediment Samples; As the calculated trend shows, the concentration of cesium-137 in Lake Erie sediments is decreasing with time. This supports the fact that cesium-137 in Lake Erie sediments is due to fallout from past atmospheric nuclear weapons testing and not the operation of Fermi 2.

Figure 6 shows the historical concentration of cesium-137 in sediment samples from 1978 to 2002. Using the data from these years, and the statistical method of least squares, an exponential curve can be calculated that represents the cesium- 137 concentration in sediment. This curve has a negative slope which indicates the overall concentration of cesium-137 in the environment is decreasing with time. This supports the fact that the inventory of cesium-137 in the environment is due to fallout from past atmospheric nuclear weapons testing and not from the operation of Fermi 2.

Fish Sampling Samples of fish are collected from Lake Erie at three locations on a semiannual basis.

There are two control locations and one indicator location. The two control locations are offshore of Celeron Island and in Brest Bay. The indicator location is approximately 1200 feet offshore of the Fermi 2 liquid effluent discharge. Edible portions of the fish are analyzed for gamma emitting radionuclides and strontium-89/90.

During the preoperational program fish samples were analyzed for gamma emitting radionuclides. Only cesium-137 and naturally occurring potassium-40 were detected during this time period. The average concentration of cesium-137 for indicator samples was 3.53E+1 pCi/kilogram and 4.20E+1 pCilkilogram for control samples. The presence of cesium-137 in these fish samples is due to fallout from past atmospheric nuclear weapons testing.

28

Fermi 2 - 2002 Annual Radioactive Effluent Release and RadiologicalEnvironmental OperatingReport From 1985 to 2001, cesium-137 and naturally occurring potassium-40 were detected in fish samples. The average cesium-137 concentration for indicator samples was 3.95E+1 pCi/kilogram and 3.92E+l pCi/kilogram for control samples. Figure 7 shows a graphical representation of cesium- 137 comparing preoperational and operational average concentrations. The analysis for strontium-89/90 began in 1990, and strontium-90 has been routinely detected at similar concentrations in both indicator and control samples.

The average strontium-90 concentration for indicator samples was 3.84E+1 pCi/kilogram and 3.15E+1 pCi/kilogram for control samples. The presence of cesium-137 and strontium-90 in these fish samples is due to fallout from past atmospheric nuclear weapons testing.

In 2002, thirty-one (31) fish samples were collected and analyzed for gamma emitting radionuclides and strontium-89/90. Only naturally occurring potassium-40 was detected in fish samples.

Aquatic monitoring results for 2002 of water, sediment, and fish, showed only naturally occurring radioactivity and radioactivity associated with fallout from past atmospheric nuclear weapons testing and were consistent with levels measured prior to the operation of Fermi 2. In conclusion, no radioactivity attributable to activities at Fermi 2 was detected in any aquatic samples during 2002 and no adverse long-term trends are shown in the aquatic monitoring data.

29

Fermi 2 - 2002 Annual Radioactive Effluent Release and Radiological Environmental Operating Report Land Use Census The Land Use Census is conducted in accordance with the Fermi 2 Offsite Dose Calculation Manual (ODCM), control 3.12.2, and satisfies the requirements of Section IV.B.3 of Appendix I to 10 CFR Part 50. This census identifies changes in the use of unrestricted areas to permit modifications to monitoring programs for evaluating doses to individuals from principal pathways of exposure. The pathways of concern are listed below:

Inhalation Pathway - Internal exposure as a result of breathing radionuclides carried in the air.

Ground Exposure Pathway - External exposure from radionuclides deposited on the ground.

Plume Exposure Pathway - External exposure directly from a plume or cloud of radioactive material.

Vegetation Pathway - Internal exposure as a result of eating vegetables which have absorbed deposited radioactive material or which have absorbed radionuclides through the soil.

Milk Pathway - Internal exposure as a result of drinking milk which may contain radioactive material as a result of dairy animals grazing on a pasture contaminated by radionuclides.

The Land Use Census is conducted during the growing season and is used to identify, within a radius of 5 miles, the location of the nearest residences, milk animals, meat animals, and gardens (greater than 50 square meters and containing broad leaf vegetation) in each of 16 meteorological sectors surrounding Fermi 2. Gardens greater than 50 square meters are the minimum size required to produce the quantity (26 kg/year) of leafy vegetables assumed in Regulatory Guide 1.109 for consumption by a child. To determine this minimum garden size, the following assumptions were made: (1) 20% of the garden is used for growing broad leaf vegetation (i.e., lettuce and cabbage); and (2) a vegetation yield of 2 kg/square meter.

30

Fermi2 - 2002 Annual Radioactive Effluent Release and RadiologicalEnvironmental OperatingReport 2002 Land Use Census Results The Land Use Census is conducted in accordance with ODCM control 3.12.2 and satisfies the requirements of Section IV.B.3 of Appendix I to 10 CFR Part 50. This census identifies changes in the use of unrestricted areas to permit modifications to monitoring programs for evaluating doses to individuals from principal pathways of exposure. The annual Land Use Census is conducted during the growing season and is used to identify, within a radius of 5 miles, the location of the closest residences, milk animals, meat animals, and gardens in each of the 16 meteorological sectors surrounding Fermi 2.

The 2002 Land Use Census was performed during the month of August. The 2002 census data were obtained with the use of a hand-held Global Positioning System (GPS).

These data were compared to the 2001 data to determine any significant changes in the use of the land. The results of the census are tabulated in Tables 9 - 12 of this report.

No significant changes in the land use between 2001 and 2002 were found that would require changing the location of the "maximum exposed individual". There were no changes in the category of closest residences. However, there were slight changes in all but three Met Sectors in the category of closest gardens. See Table 10 for these changes.

The "maximum exposed individual" is located in'the West-North-West sector and no longer participates in the REMP program. However, the location still maintains a potential for a garden. In the category of closest milk locations, no new milk cow locations were identified. All other milk locations are goat milk and are not used for human consumption. There were no changes in the category of closest meat location in 2002. As with 2001, this census identified new residential housing construction that shows a continuing trend of converting agricultural land to other uses in the area surrounding Fermi 2.

As stated above, there were no significant changes in the 2002 land use that would require changing the location of the "maximum exposed individual". For that reason the location of "maximum exposed individual" remains the same and is described as follows:

Azimuth Distance Age Maximum Pathway Sector (degrees) (meters) Group Organ Ingestion WNW 303.5 1103 Child thyroid (vegetation) 31

Fermi2 - 2002 Annual Radioactive Effluent Release and RadiologicalEnvironmental OperatingReport 2002 LAND USE CENSUS Closest Residences Table 9 Distance Change l Year Sector I Azimuth (degrees) (meters) I (meters) 2001 NE 34.7 1773 2002 NE 34.7 1773 2001 NNE 11.2 1646 2002 NNE 11.2 1646 2001 N 7.7 1776 2002 N 7.7 1776 2001 NNW 332.8 1743 2002 NNW 332.8 1743 2001 NW 309.9 1700 2002 NW 309.9 1700 2001 (a) WNW 303.5 1103 2002 WNW 303.5 1103 2001 W 258.3 1861 2002 W 258.3 1861 2001 WSW 238.2 2547 2002 WSW 238.2 2547 2001 SW 230.3 2025 2002 SW 230.3 2025 2001 SSW 200.4 1826 2002 SSW 200.4 1826 2001 S 170.0 1640 2002 S 170.0 1640 ESE-SSE Lake Erie NA (a) = Location of "maximum exposed individual" 32

Fermi 2 - 2002 Annual Radioactive Effluent Release and RadiologicalEnvironmental OperatingReport 2002 LAND USE CENSUS Closest Gardens Table 10 Distance Change Year I Sector I Azimuth (degrees) (meters) I (meters) 2001 NE 32.9 3173 2002 NE 39.4 3200 27 -

2001 NNE 15.9 1750 2002 NNE 30.6 2894 1144 2001 N 358.9 3516 2002 N 0.54 2633 883 2001 NNW 332.3 4087 2002 NNW 327.0 2256 1831 2001 NW 309.9 1700 2002 NW 325.0 2179 479 2001(a) WNW 303.5 1103 2002 WNW 303.5 1103 0 2001 W 265.8 2488 2002 -W 269.0 5130 2642 2001 WSW 240.4 4502 2002

WSW 247.0 4740 238 2001 SW 234.1 7066 2002 SW 234.1 7066 0 2001 SSW 194.9 2463 2002 SSW 194.9 2463 0 2001 S 181.9 1938 2002 S None NA ESE - SSE Lake Erie NA (a) = Location of "maximum exposed individual" 33

Fermi2 - 2002 Annual Radioactive Effluent Release and RadiologicalEnvironmentalOperatingReport 2002 LAND USE CENSUS Milk Locations Table 11 Distance Change l Year I Sector I Azimuth (degrees) I (meters) I (meters) I 2001 NE None 2002 NE None N/A 2001 NNE None 2002 NNE None N/A 2001 N 9.06 6686 2002 N None N/A 2001 NNW None 2002 NNW None N/A 2001 NW 310.5 5874 Cow/Goat 2002 NW 310.5 5874 0 2001 WNW 301.0 3672 Goat 2002 WNW 301.0 3672 0 2001 W None 2002 W None N/A 2001 WSW None 2002 WSW None N/A 2001 SW None 2002 SW None N/A 2001 SSW None 2002 SSW None N/A 2001 S None 2002 S None N/A ESE - SSE Lake Erie N/A 34

Fermi2 - 2002 Annual RadioactiveEffluent Release and RadiologicalEnvironmentalOperatingReport 2002 LAND USE CENSUS Closest Meat Locations Table 12 Distance Change; Year I Sector Azimuth (degrees) I (meters) (meters) 2001 NE None 2002 NE None N/A 2001 NNE None 2002 NNE None N/A 2001 N 1.1 2899 Beef 2002 N 1.1 2899 0 2001 NNW None 2002 NNW None N/A 2001 NW 319.5 5225 Sheep 2002 NW 319.5 5225 0 2001 WNW 285.6 2602 Beef 2002 WNW 285.6 2602 0 2001 W None 2002 W None N/A 2001 WSW 248.5 4606 2002 WSW None N/A 2001 SW None 2002 SW None N/A 2001 SSW None 2002 SSW None N/A 2001 S None 2002 S None N/A ESE - SSE Lake Erie - N/A 35

Appendix A Sampling Locations

Fermi2 - 2002 Annual Radioactive Effluent Release and RadiologicalEnvironmental OperatingReport Direct RadiationSample Locations Table A-1 Meteorological Distance Station Sector/Azimuth from Reactor Collection Number (Degrees) (Approx.) Description Frequency Type T1 NE/38 0 1.3 mi. Estral Beach, Pole on Q I Lakeshore 23 Poles S of Lakeview (Special Area)

T2 NNE/22 0 1.2 mi. East of termination of Q I Brancheau St. on post (Special Area)

T3 N/9 0 1.1 mi. Pole, NW corner of Swan Q I Boat Club fence (Special Area)

T4 NNW/337 0 0.6 mi. Site boundary and Toll Rd. Q I on Site fence by API #2 T5 NW/3 13° 0.6 mi. Site boundary and Toll Rd. Q I on Site fence by API #3 T6 WNW/294 0 0.6 mi. On Site fence at south end Q I of N. Bullit Rd..

T7 W/270 0 14.0 mi. Pole, at Michigan Gas - Q C substation on N. Custer Rd., 0.66 miles west of Doty Rd.

TS NW/305 0 - 1.9 mi. Pole on Post Rd. near NE Q I corner of Dixie Hwy. and Post Rd.

T9 NNW/334 0 1.5 mi. Pole, NW corner of Q I Trombley and Swan View Rd.

T1O N/60 2.1 mi. Pole, S side of Massarant- Q I 2 poles W of Chinavare.

I = Indicator C = Control 0 = On-site Q = Quarterly A-1

Fermi 2 - 2002 Annual RadioactiveEffluent Release and RadiologicalEnvironmental OperatingReport DirectRadiation Sample Locations (Table A-I continued)

Meteorological Distance Station Sector/Azimuth from Reactor Collection Number (Degrees) (Approx.) Description Frequency Type T11 NNE/23 0 6.2 mi. Pole, NE corner of Q I Milliman and Jefferson T12 NNE/29 0 6.3 mi. Pointe Mouille Game Area Q I Field Office, Pole near tree, N area of parking lot T13 N/356 0 4.1 mi. Labo and Dixie Hwy. Pole Q I on SW corner with light T14 NNW/337 0 4.4 mi. Labo and Brandon Pole on Q I SE corner near RR T15 NW/315 0 3.9 mi. Pole, behind Newport Post Q I Office.

T16 WNW/283 0 4.9 mi. Pole, SE corner of War and Q I Post Rd.

T17 W/271 0 4.9 mi. Pole,NEcornerofNadeau Q I and Laprad near mobile home park.

T18 WSW/247 0 4.8 mi. Pole, NE corner of Mentel Q I and Hurd Rd.

T19 SW/236° 5.2 mi. Fermi siren pole on Q I Waterworks Rd. NE corner of intersection - Sterling State Park Rd. Entrance Drive/Waterworks T20 WSW/257° 2.7 mi. Pole, S side of Williams Q I Rd, 8 poles W of Dixie Hwy. (Special Area)

T21 WSW/239 0 2.7 mi. Pole, N side of Pearl at Q I Parkview Woodland Beach (Special Area)

I = Indicator C = Control 0 = On-site Q = Quarterly A-2

Fermi2 - 2002 Annual Radioactive Effluent Release and RadiologicalEnvironmental OperatingReport Direct RadiationSample Locations (Table A-I continued)

Meteorological Distance Station Sector/Azimuth from Reactor Collection Number (Degrees) (Approx.) Description Frequency Type T22 S/1720 1.2 mi. Pole, N side of Pointe Aux Q I Peaux 2 poles W of Long -

Site Boundary T23 SSW/1950 1.1 mi. Pole, S side of Pointe Aux Q I Peaux 1 pole W of Huron next to Vent Pipe - Site Boundary T24 SW/2250 1.2 mi. Fermi Gate along Pointe Q I Aux Peaux Rd. on fence wire W of gate Site Boundary T25 WSW/252 0 1.4 mi. Pole, Toll Rd. - 12 poles S Q I of Fermi Drive T26 WSW/259 0 1.1 mi. Pole, Toll Rd. - 6 poles S Q I of Fermi Drive T27 SW/2250 6.8 mi. Pole, NE corner of Q I McMillan and East Front St. (Special Area)

T28 SW/2290 10.7 mi. Pole, SE corner of Mortar Q C Creek and LaPlaisance.

T29 WSW/2370 10.3 mi. Pole, E side of S Dixie, 1 Q C pole S of Albain.

T30 WSW/247 0 7.8 mi. Pole, St. Mary's Park Q I corner of Elm and Monroe St., S side of parking lot next to river (Special Area)

T31 WSW/255° 9.6mi. lstpoleWofentrance Q C drive Milton "Pat" Munson Recreational Reserve on North Custer Rd.

I = Indicator C = Control 0 = On-site Q = Quarterly A-3

Fermi2 - 2002 Annual RadioactiveEffluent Release and RadiologicalEnvironmental OperatingReport DirectRadiation Sample Locations (Table A-I continued)

Meteorological Distance Station Sector/Azimuth from Reactor Collection Number (Degrees) (Approx.) Description Frequency Type T32 WNW/295 0 10.3 mi. Pole, corner of Stony Creek Q I and Finzel Rd.

T33 NW/317 0 9.2 mi. Pole, W side of Grafton Q I Rd. 1 pole N of Ash and Grafton intersection.

T34 NNW/338 0 9.7 mi. Pole, W side of Port Creek, Q I 1 pole S of Will-Carleton Rd.

T35 N/359 0 6.9 mi. Pole, S Side of S Huron Q I River Dr. across from Race St. (Special Area)

T36 N/358 0 9.1 mi. Pole, NE corner of Q I Gibraltar and Cahill Rd.

T37 NNE/21 0 9.8 mi. Pole, S corner of Adams Q I and Gibraltar across from Humbug Marina.

T38 WNW/294 0 1.7 mi. Residence - 6594 N. Dixie Q I Hwy.

T39 S/176 0 0.3 mi. SE corner of Protected Q 0 Area Fence (PAF).

T40 S/170° 0.3 mi. Midway along OBA - Q 0 (PAF)

T41 SSE11610 0.2 mi. Midway between OBA and Q 0 Shield Wall on PAF.

T42 SSE/1490 0.2 mn. Midway along Shield Wall Q 0 on PAF.

T43 SE/131 0 0.1 mi. Midway between Shield Q 0 Wall and Aux Boilers on PAF.

T44 ESE/1090 0.1 mi. Opposite OSSF door on Q 0 PAFR I = Indicator C = Control 0 = On-site Q = Quarterly A-4

Fermi2 - 2002 Annual Radioactive Effluent Release and RadiologicalEnvironmentalOperatingReport DirectRadiation Sample Locations (Table A-i continued)

Meteorological Distance Station Sector/Azimuth from Reactor Collection Number (Degrees) (Approx.) Description Frequency Type T45 E/86 0 0.1 mi. NE Comer of PAR. Q 0 T46 ENE/67 0 0.2 mi. NE side of barge slip on Q 0 fence.

T47 S/1850 0.1 mi. South of Turbine Bldg. Q 0 rollup door on PAP.

T48 SW/235 0 0.2 mi. 30 ft. from comer of AAP Q 0 on PAF.

T49 WSW/251 0 1.1 mi. Comer of Site Boundary Q I fence north of NOC along Critical Path Rd.

T50 W/270 0 0.9 mi. Site Boundary fence near Q I main gate by the south Bullit Street sign.

T51 N/3 0 0.4 mi. Site Boundary fence north Q 0 of north Cooling Tower.

T52 NNE/20 0 0.4 mi. Site Boundary fence at the Q 0 comer of Arson and Tower.

T53 NE/55 0 0.2 mi. Site Boundary fence east of Q 0 South Cooling Tower.

T54 S/1890 0.3 mi. Pole next to Fermi 2 Q 0 Visitors Center.

T55 WSW/251° 3.3 mi. Pole, north side of Nadeau Q I Rd. across from Sodt Elementary School Marquee T56 WSW/256 0 2.9 mi. Pole, entrance to Jefferson Q I Middle School on Stony Creek Rd.

I = Indicator C = Control 0 = On-site Q = Quarterly A-5

Fermi 2 - 2002 Annual RadioactiveEffluent Release and RadiologicalEnvironmental OperatingReport DirectRadiationSample Locations (Table A-I continued)

Meteorological Distance Station Sector/Azimuth from Reactor Collection Number (Degrees) (Approx.) Description Frequency Type T57 W/260 0 2.7 mi. Pole, north side of Q I Williams Rd. across from Jefferson High School entrance.

T58 WSW/249 0 4.9 mi. Pole west of Hurd Q I Elementary School Marquee T59 NW/3250 2.6 mi. Pole north of St. Charles Q I Church entrance on Dixie Hwy.

T60 NNW/341 0 2.5 mi. 1st pole north of North Q I Elementary School entrance on Dixie Hwy.

T61 W1268 0 10.1 mi. Pole, SW corner of Stewart Q I and Raisinville Rd.

T62 SW/2320 9.7 mi. Pole, NE corner of Albain Q I and Hull Rd.

T63 WSW/2450 9.6 mi. Pole, NE corner of Dunbar Q I and Telegraph Rd.

T64 WNW/286 0 0.2 mi. West of switchgear yard on Q 0 PAF T65 NW/3220 0.1 mi. PAF switchgear yard area Q 0 NW of RHR complex.

T66 NE/50 0 0.1 mi. Behind Bldg. 42 on PAF Q 0 T67 NNW/338 0 0.2 mi. Site Boundary fence West Q 0 of South Cooling Tower.

I = Indicator C = Control 0 = On-site Q = Quarterly A-6

Fermi2 - 2002 Annual Radioactive Effluent Release and RadiologicalEnvironmentalOperatingReport Air ParticulateandAir Iodine Sample Locations Table A-2 Meteorological Distance Station Sector/Azimuth from Reactor Collection Number (Degrees) (Approx.) Description Frequency Type API-1 NEJ39 0 1.4 mi. Estral Beach Pole on W I Lakeshore, 18 Poles S of Lakeview (Nearest Community with highest X/Q)

API-2 NNW/337 0 0.6 mi. Site Boundary and Toll W I Road, on Site Fence by T-4 API-3 NW/3 130 0.6 mi. Site Boundary and Toll W I Road, on Site Fence by T-5 API-4 W/270 0 14.0 mi. Pole, at Michigan Gas W C substation on N. Custer Rd., 0.66 miles west of Doty Rd.

API-5 S/1880 1.2 mi. Pole, N corner of Pointe W I Aux Peaux and Dewey Rd.

I = Indicator C = Control W = Weekly Milk Sample Locations Table A-3 Meteorological Distance Station Sector/Azimuth from Reactor Collection Number (Degrees) (Approx.) Description Frequency Type M-2 NW/3 190 5.4 mi. Reaume Farm - 2705 E M-SM I Labo M-8 WNW/289 0 9.9 mi. Calder Dairy - 9334 Finzel M-SM C Rd I = Indicator C = Control M = Monthly SM = Semimonthly A-7

Fermi 2 - 2002 Annual Radioactive Effluent Release and RadiologicalEnvironmentalOperatingReport Garden Sample Locations Table A-4 Meteorological Distance Station Sector/Azimuth from Reactor Collection Number (Degrees) (Approx.) Description Frequency Type FP-l NNE/210 3.8 mi. 9501 Turnpike Highway M I FP-9 W/2610 10.9 mi. 4074 North Custer Road - M C I = Indicator C = Control M = Monthly (when available)

Drinking Water Sample Locations Table A-S Meteorological Distance Station Sector/Azimuth from Reactor Collection Number (Degrees) (Approx.) Description Frequency Type DW-1 S/174 0 1.1 mi. Monroe Water Station N M I Side of Pointe Aux Peaux 1/2 Block W of Long Rd DW-2 N/8 0 18 5 mi. Detroit Water Station M C 14700 Moran Rd, Allen Park I = Indicator C = Control M = Monthly A-8

Fermi2 - 2002 Annual Radioactive Effluent Release and RadiologicalEnvironmentalOperatingReport Surface Water Sample Locations Table A-6 Meteorological Distance Station Sector/Azimuth from Reactor Collection Number (Degrees) (Approx.) Description Frequency Type SW-2 NNE/20 0 11.7 mi. DECo's Trenton Channel M C Power Plant Intake Structure (Screenhouse #1)

SW-3 SSE/1600 0.2 mi. DECO's Fermi 2 General M I Service Water Intake Structure I = Indicator C = Control M = Monthly GroundwaterSample Locations Table A-7 Meteorological Distance Station Sector/Azimuth from Reactor Collection Number (Degrees) (Approx.) Description Frequency Type GW-1 S/1750 0.4 mi. Approx. 100 ft W of Lake Q I Erie, EF-1 Parking lot near gas fired peakers GW-2 SSW/2080 1.0 nu. 4 ft S of Pointe Aux Peaux Q I (PAP) Rd. Fence 427 ft W of where PAP crosses over Stoney Point's Western Dike GW-3 SW/2260 1.0 mi. 143 ft W of PAP Rd. Gate, Q I 62 ft N of PAP Rd. Fence GW-4 WNW/299 0 0.6 mi. 42 ft S of Langton Rd, 8 ft Q C E of Toll Rd. Fence I = Indicator C = Control Q = Quarterly A-9

Fermi 2 - 2002 Annual Radioactive Effluent Release and RadiologicalEnvironmental OperatingReport Sediment Sample Locations Table A-8 Meteorological Distance Station Sector/Azimuth from Reactor Collection Number (Degrees) (Approx.) Description Frequency Type S-1 SSE/1650 0.9 mi. Pointe Aux Peaux, SA I Shoreline to 500 ft offshore sighting directly to Land Base Water Tower S-2 E/810 0.2 mi. Fermi 2 Discharge, approx. SA I 200 ft offshore S-3 NE/39 0 1.1 mi. Estral Beach, approx. 200 SA I ft offshore, off North shoreline where Swan Creek and Lake Ene meet S-4 WSW/241 0 3.0 mi. Indian Trails Community SA I Beach S-5 NNE/20 0 11.7 mi. DECo's Trenton Channel SA C Power Plant intake area.

I = Indicator C = Control SA = Semiannually Fish Sample Locations Table A-9 Meteorological Distance Station Sector/Azimuth from Reactor Collection Number (Degrees) (Approx.) Description Frequency Type F-I NNE/31 0 9.5 mi. Near Celeron Island SA C F-2 E/86 0 0.4 mi. Fermi 2 Discharge (approx. SA I 1200 ft offshore)

F-3 SW/227 0 3.5 mi. Brest Bay SA C I = Indicator C = Control SA = Semiannually A-10

MAP - I l SAMPLING LOCATIONS N BY STATION NUMBER WITHIN 1 MILE LEGEND o T- DIRECT RADIATION O API- AIR PARTICULATES/AIR IODINE A S- SEDIMENTS L DW/SW- DRINKING WATER/SURFACE WATER E GW- GROUND WATER D M- MILK 0- 0.5 E FP- FOOD PRODUCTS

F- FISH SCALE IN MILES

AX AL T 16/ / 81$_R .......................... h-?e*R. - ' ?T 7o AIR API-PART-'ICULATE/AR IODIN l */\@/ \ @ / /w *_T22 -- 6t'-:/-:.. -.-- :^-'-/ -'2w'/-:

MA -2 /4/ N F

o T-IREC RADATIO T5 WT MAP - 2 SAMPLING LOAIN BY SATIO NUMER (1 To5 MIES)4 LEGND8 O DIEC T- RADATIN O ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~

AP-ARPRIULTSARIDN ~ i

~ 5FFIS>T4@- SCAL IN MILES -*^//.

FIHSCLF-: AK N IE

3 PETRERS BRR

\l~~~~~OT BAS._H@0 ISLAND^!~ .l BY STTION UMBE Z" W/ DRIKIG

\2SW/il\- WAE/UfAC LEGENDD WAE - * - - . 1..............

0 i:4 - :'

SYT-ADIRCRADITO OB M-QMIL '-6

.£-- t-----6---t--=<8 - :,--

\.MOLBS 2s, SA o API-ORrAI IR IODIN PARICULATE A -SDMENTS DWSWAMDRIINNG WOATER/SURAEWTR5 0 5

(~GW-GRUNEATERTHN5MLS E T- MILKTRDITO EJ FP- FOOD PRODUCTS SCALE IN MILES

F- FISH

Appendix B Environmental Data Summary

Fermi2 - 2002 Annual Radioactive Effluent Release and RadiologicalEnvironmental OperatingReport Table B-I Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program Summary Name of Facility: Enrico Fermi Unit 2 Docket No.: 50-341 Reporting Period: January - December 2002 Location of Facility: 30 miles southeast of Detroit, Michigan (Frenchtown Township)

'and p, Location wit hiHighest s <h

'SampleTyTyp e ype ~:", Indiatr Anulean10 Coto Umbro a'(Units) 'e Number of , s ' cati.ns ' Locations 'No- r.utineA

,Malysis > LLD 'i e aiid Range } L'cation Mean nd Rang Mejin and Range& ;-Resuts' Direct Radiation Gamma (TLD) 1.0 13.8 (177/177) T-49 (Indicator) 18.7 (4/4) 13.3 (16/,16) None mR/std qtr 193 9.1 to 21.8 16.6 to 21.8 11.6 to 17.5 Airborne Gross Beta 248 1.00E-2 2.63E-2 (197/197) API-5 (Indicator) 2.76E-2 (48/48) 2.61E-2 (51/51) None Particulates 1.02E-2 to 4.86E-2 1.3 1E-2 to 4.77E-2 9.70E-3 to 4.88E-2 pCi/cu. m. Gamma Spec. 20 Be-7 N/A 8.81E-2 (12/16) API-5 (Indicator) 1.03E-1 (4/4) 9.08E-2 (4/4) None 4.90E-2 to 1.13E-I 9.80E-2 to l.10E-I 7.30E-2 to 1.33E-I K-40 N/A <MDA <MDA None Mn-54 N/A <MDA <MDA None Co-58 . N/A <MDA <MDA None Fe-59 N/A <MDA <MDA None Co-60 N/A <MDA <MDA None Zn-65 N/A <MDA <MDA None Zr-95 N/A <MDA <MDA None Ru- 103 N/A <MDA <MDA None Ru- 106 N/A <MDA <MDA None Cs-134 5.OOE-2 <MDA <MDA None Cs- 137 6.00E-2 <MDA <MDA

None Ba-140 N/A <MDA <MDA None La-140 N/A <MDA <MDA None Ce- 141 N/A <MDA <MDA None Ce- 144 N/A <MDA <MDA None Airborne Iodine I-131 246 7.00E-2 <MDA <MDA None pCi/cu. m.

B-I

Fermi2 - 2002 Annual Radioactive Effluent Release and RadiologicalEnvironmentalOperating Report Table B-I Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program Summary (cont.)

Name of Facility: Enrico Fermi Unit 2 Docket No.: 50-341 Reporting Period: January - December 2002 Location of Facility: 30 miles southeast of Detroit, Michigan (Frenchtown Township) gLocation with Highestc SaplLTpeType *and IndictrAna en oto~i ,,

Lb:'# ' ubo~

jf;, ; ...............

IXno^ ti ..............

(Units) Number of '6ocatio-nsv N oine

_ _ #rAnalyi, LLD; Mean a;d R ne' LLa6 K Mean an ange' , . e ni a g, Reslti Milk I-131 36 l.OOE+0 <MDA <MDA None pCi/l Sr-89 36 N/A <MDA <MDA None Sr-90 N/A 1.95E+O (6/18) M-8 (Control) 2.33E+O (2/18) 2.33E+O (2/18) None 1.70E+O to 2.34E+0 2.13E+0 to 2.53E+O 2.13E+O to 2.53E+O Gamma Spec. 36 Be-7 N/A <MDA <MDA None K-40 N/A 1.38E+3 (18/18) M-8 (Control) 1.41E+3 (18/18) 1.41E+3 (18/18) None 1.24E+3 to 1.5 1E+3 1.28E+3 to 1.53E+3 1.28E+3 to 1.53E+3 Mn-54 N/A <MDA <MDA None Co-58 N/A <MDA <MDA None Fe-59 N/A <MDA <MDA None Co-60 N/A <MDA <MDA None Zn-65 N/A <MDA <MDA None Zr-95 N/A <MDA <MDA None Ru- 103 N/A <MDA <MDA None Ru- 106 N/A <MDA <MDA None Cs- 134 1.50E+1 <MDA <MDA None Cs-137 1.80E+I <MDA <MDA None Ba-140 1.50E+I <MDA <MDA None La-140 1.50E+I <MDA <MDA None Ce- 141 N/A <MDA <MDA None Ce-144 N/A <MDA <MDA None Vegetation I-131 18 6.00E+1 <MDA <MDA None pCil/kg wet Gamma Spec. 18 Be-7 N/A <MDA <MDA None K-40 N/A 4.21E+3 (6/6) FP-9 (Control) 6.44E+3 (3/3) 6.44E+3 (3/3) None 2.44E+3 to 5.37E+3 5.46E+3 to 7.68E+3 5.46E+3 to 7.68E+3 B-2

Fermi2 - 2002 Annual Radioactive Effluent Release and RadiologicalEnvironmentalOperating Report Table B-i Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program Summary (cont.)

Name of Facility: Enrico Fermi Unit 2 Docket No.: 50-341 Reporting Period: January - December 2002 Location of Facility: 30 miles southeast of Detroit, Michigan (Frenchtown Township)

Location with Highest.:,.--

i.Siamrple Type .,,,Type and Indicator . ZmeC...... t Number of (Units) "Qd ,Numberof

,Locationi's } ctions No uti

.Anialysis LLD - Mean and Range Lo ation Mean' nd Ran id R e Rsl Vegetation Mn-54 N/A <MDA <MDA None (cont.) Co-58 N/A <MDA <MDA None pCi/kg wet Fe-59 N/A <MDA <MDA None Co-60 N/A <MDA <MDA None Zn-65 N/A <MDA <MDA None Zr-95 N/A <MDA <MDA None Ru-103 N/A <MDA <MDA None Ru- 106 N/A <MDA <MDA None Cs- 134 6.00E+I <MDA <MDA None Cs- 137 8.OOE+1 <MDA <MDA None Ba-140 N/A <MDA <MDA None La-140 N/A <MDA <MDA None Ce-141 N/A <MDA <MDA None Ce-144 N/A <MDA <MDA None Drinking Water Gross Beta 24 4.OOE+0 5.56E+0 (11/12) DW-1 (Indicator) 5.56E+0 (11/12) 4.44E+0 (10/12) None pCi/7 3.05E+0 to 1.06E+1 3.05E+0 to 1.06E+1 2.46E+0 to 8.80E+O Sr-89 24 N/A <MDA <MDA None Sr-90 N/A <MDA <MDA None Gamma Spec. 24 Be-7 N/A <MDA <MDA None K-40 N/A <MDA <MDA None Cr-SI N/A <MDA <MDA None Mn-54 I.50E+l <MDA <MDA None Co-58 1.50E+1 <MDA <MDA None Fe-59 3.OOE+l <MDA <MDA None Co-60 1.50E+1 <MDA <MDA None Zn-65 3.OOE+I <MDA <MDA None Zr-95 1.501E+1 <MDA <MDA None B-3

Fermi2 - 2002 Annual Radioactive Effluent Release and RadiologicalEnvironmentalOperatingReport Table B-I Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program Summary (cont.)

Name of Facility: Enrico Fermi Unit 2 Docket No.: 50-341 Reporting Period: January - December 2002 Location of Facility: 30 miles southeast of Detroit, Michigan (Frenchtown Township)

Location with Highest- > 4 YpeSap Tye T an 3ndi- tor aNumb AnnualMean Contrl of N<i5(Units) 3,,'> Numibfro XB Locations vL 3Locations,- Non-r t ;________"_ Aiinalysis LLD 'Mean and Ran Locatioi M an and Rang "Mean nd Range - e.sut Drinking Water Ru-103 N/A <MDA <MDA None (cont.) pCiAl Ru-106 N/A <MDA <MDA None Cs-134 1.50E+ I <MDA <MDA None Cs-137 1.80E+I <MDA <MDA None Ba-140 1.50E+1 <MDA <MDA None La- 140 1.50E+1 <MDA <MDA None Ce- 141 N/A <MDA <MDA None Ce-144 N/A <MDA <MDA None H-3 8 2.00E+3 <MDA <MDA None Surface Water Sr-89 25 N/A <MDA <MDA None pCi/l Sr-90 N/A <MDA <MDA None Gamma Spec. 25 Be-7 N/A <MDA <MDA None K-40 N/A <MDA <MDA None Cr-51 N/A <MDA <MDA None Mn-54 1.50E+1 <MDA <MDA None Co-58 1.50E+l <MDA <MDA None Fe-59 3.OOE+1 <MDA <MDA None Co-60 I.50E+I <MDA <MDA None Zn-65 3.00E+I <MDA <MDA None Zr-95 1.50E+l <MDA <MDA None Ru-103 N/A <MDA <MDA None Ru-106 N/A <MDA <MDA None Cs-134 1.50E+1 <MDA <MDA None Cs-137 1.80E+1 <MDA <MDA None Ba-140 I.50E+I <MDA <MDA None La- 140 1.50E+ I <MDA <MDA None Ce-141 N/A <MDA <MDA None B-4

Fermi2 - 2002 Annual Radioactive Effluent Release and RadiologicalEnvironmental OperatingReport Table B-i Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program Summary (cont.)

Name of Facility: Enrico Fermi Unit 2 Docket No.: 50-341 Reporting Period: January - December 2002 Location of Facility: 30 miles southeast of Detroit, Michigan (Frenchtown Township)

..'LocationwithHighest e, -, Z % , ,, j Sample Type Tpead j nd i6-ato-r- T'nnial eanontrol ubro (Units) Number of-' catio. Locations>' Non-routine'

_____Y ?Analysise

___ LL Mean and Range L tMean andRr. Mean atd R Surface Water Ce- 144 N/A <MDA <MDA None (cont.) pCI/i H-3 6 2.OOE+3 <MDA <MDA None Groundwater Gamma Spec. 16 pCi0 Be-7 N/A <MDA <MDA None K-40 N/A <MDA <MDA None Cr-51 N/A <MDA <MDA None Mn-54 1.SOE+I <MDA <MDA None Co-58 1.50E+1 <MDA <MDA None Fe-59 3.00E+1 <MDA <MDA None Co-60 I .SOE+I <MDA <MDA None Zn-65 3.00E+1 <MDA <MDA None Zr-95 1.50E+I <MDA <MDA None Ru- 103 N/A <MDA <MDA None Ru-106 N/A <MDA <MDA None Cs-134 1.50E+1 <MDA <MDA None Cs-137 1.80E+I <MDA <MDA None Ba-140 1.SOE+1 <MDA <MDA None La-140 I.SOE+I <MDA <MDA None Ce-141 N/A <MDA <MDA None Ce- 144 N/A <MDA <MDA None H-3 16 2.OOE+3 <MDA <MDA None Sediment Sr-89 10 N/A <MDA <MDA pCi/kg dry Sr-90 N/A <MDA <MDA None Gamma Spec. 10 Be-7 N/A <MDA S-5 (Control) 5.95E+2 (2/2) 5.95E+2 (2/2) None 5.20E+2 to 6.70E+2 5.20E+2 to 6.70E+2 K-40 N/A 1.16E+4 (8/8) S-2 (Indicator) l.50E+4 (2/2) 1.14E+4 (2/2) 9.02E+3 to 1.73E+4 1.27E+4 to 1.73E+4 1.07E+4 to 1.21E+4 None B-S

Fermi2 - 2002 Annual Radioactive Effluent Release and RadiologicalEnvironmental OperatingReport Table B-i Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program Summary (cont.)

Name of Facility: Enrico Fermi Unit 2 Docket No.: 50-341 Reporting Period: January - December 2002 Location of Facility: 30 miles southeast of Detroit, Michigan (Frenchtown Township) a e .Typend n A lM Control, . N-ero (Units)'-, Number 2 :Analysids f .Loatiotns .- dations.; Noo-tu LLD -M and Rage 61 Location Mean and Ran a aig S tst Sediment (cont.) Mn-54 N/A <MDA <MDA None pCi/kg dry Co-58 N/A <MDA <MDA None Fe-59 N/A <MDA <MDA None Co-60 N/A <MDA <MDA None Zn-65 N/A <MDA <MDA None Zr-95 N/A <MDA <MDA None Ru- 103 N/A <MDA <MDA None Ru-106 N/A <MDA <MDA None Cs-134 1.50E+2 <MDA <MDA None Cs-137 1.80E+2 <MDA S-5 (Control) 8.20E+l (2/2) 8.20E+1 (2/2) None 5.50E+l to 1.09E+2 5.50E+1 to l.09E+2 Ba-140 N/A <MDA <MDA None La- 140 N/A <MDA <MDA None Ce-141 N/A <MDA <MDA None Ce-144 N/A <MDA <MDA None Fish Sr-89 31 N/A <MDA <MDA None pCi/kg wet Sr-90 N/A <MDA <MDA None Gamma Spec. 31 Be-7 N/A <MDA <MDA None K-40 N/A 3.OOE+3 (11/11) F-3 (Control) 3.29E+3 (8/8) 3.15E+3 (19/19) None 1.62E+3 to 4.1OE+3 1.96E+3 to 4.7 1E+3 1.96E+3 to 4.7 1E+3 Mn-54 1.30E+2 <MDA <MDA None Co-58 1.30E+2 <MDA <MDA None Fe-59 2.60E+2 <MDA <MDA None Co-60 1.30E+2 <MDA <MDA None Zn-65 2.60E+2 <MDA <MDA None B-6

Fermi 2 - 2002 Annual Radioactive Effluent Release and RadiologicalErnvironmental OperatingReport Table B-i Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program Summary (cont.)

Name of Facility: Enrico Fermi Unit 2 Docket No.: 50-341 Reporting Period: January - December 2002 Location of Facility: 30 miles southeast of Detroit, Michigan (Frenchtown Township)

>-Location with Highest Indicator 4 'sAn-ual'Meantr Nuimber of Number of n,' eLoatioons L.(Units) Non-rouine

_^'_,^- ^ A' alysis ^ 'adRange

" .ean '" . Location Lo< Meand RALge Mea iand RA 'ie e aResuts.

Fish (cont.) Zr-95 N/A <MDA None pCi/kg wet Ru-103 N/A <MDA <MDA None Ru- 106 N/A <MDA <MDA None Cs-134 1.30E+2 <MDA <MDA None Cs- 137 1.50E+2 <MDA <MDA None Ba-140 N/A <MDA <MDA None La- 140 N/A <MDA <MDA None Ce-141 N/A <MDA <MDA None Ce- 144 N/A <MDA <MDA None Direct Radiation mean and range values are based on off-site TLDs LLD = Fermi 2 ODCM LLD: nominal lower limit of detection based on 4.66 sigma error for background sample.

<MDA = Less than the lab's minimum detectable activity which is less than the LLD.

Mean and range based upon detectable measurements only. Fraction of detectable measurements at specified locations is indicated in parentheses (F).

Locations are specified by Fermi 2 code and are described in Appendix A Sampling Locations.

Non-routine results are those which are reportable according to Fermi 2 ODCM control 3.12.1.

Note: Other nuclides were considered in analysis results, but only those identifiable were reported in addition to ODCM listed nuclides.

B-7

Appendix C Environmental Data Tables

Fermi 2 - 2002 Annual Radioactive Effluent Release and RadiologicalEnvironmental OperatingReport FERMI 2 TLD ANALYSIS (mRIStd Qtr)

STATION He FIRST i S J THIRD

>SECON 1a.. TFOURTH NUMBER QUT JQUARTER-I JQUARTER .3Q` QUARTER T-1 10.87 11.44 . 11.76 14.36 T-2 13.49 15.10 14.76 18.05 T-3 9 07 9.89 9.39 12.74 T-4 11.67 12.44 14.23 16.59 T-5 12.89 13.77 14.42 17.16 T-6 13.21 13.06 13.28 17.17 T-7 11.60 11.58 11.84 14.64 T-8 13.46 13.92 14.76 17.27 T-9 12.51 13.32 12.53 16.83 T-10 12.64 12.61 13.30 16.92 T-11 10.92 (a) 11.72 14.70 T-12 10.84 10.52 11.07 15.05 T-13 12.82 13.57 14.66 17.91 T-14 13.27 13.88 14.35 17.84 T- 15 10.97 11.23 - 11.38 14.99 T-16 14.89 15.13 15.36 19.78 T-17 10.84 12.68 11.02 14.57 T-18 11.84 12.20 12.13 15.91 T-19 12.29 13.03 13.71 18.48 T-20 14.09 15.13 16.23 20.17 T-21 11.00 11.06 11.01 14.86 T-22 12.19 11.82 12.54 15.88 T-23 11.64 13.16 11.98 16.06 T-24 10.89 11.19 10.66 14.98 T-25 15.62 15.65 16.62 19.36 T-26 14.49 15.17 15.86 19.60 T-27 9.75 10.09 9.70 13.45 T-28 12.36 12.98 12.53 17.46 T-29 13.14 12.21 12.77 17.10 T-30 12.59 13.33 (a) 16.60 T-31 11.77 12.28 12.76 15.68 T-32 12.46 13.67 13.76 16.51 T-33 10.55 11.33 11.05 15.04 T-34 11.08 14.06 11.41 15.21 T-35 11.45 11.69 11.63 15.72 T-36 12.52 13.12 12.76 16.81 T-37 12.27 12.64 12.71 16.73 T-38 13.32 13.52 14.20 17.69 T-39 40.14 53.86 53.94 65.32 T-40 34.27 45.43 46.66 47.40 T-41 62.40 82.50 84.08 90.62 T-42 60.19 86.52 81.42 93.26 T-43 63.61 84.34 88.49 103.30 T-44 57.67 75.51 50.87 87.87 T-45 36.67 49.31 50.87 57.03 T-46 28.42 35.54 37.49 39.19 T-47 67.45 68.35 73.90 82.93 C-1

Fermi 2 - 2002 Annual Radioactive Effluent Release and Radiological Environmental Operating Report FERMI 2 TLD ANALYSIS (CONT.)

(mR/Std Qtr)

STATION FIRST 1 'SECONDW "THIRD FOURTH NUMBER QUARTER QUAR R QUARTER Q T-48 30.95 36.53 41.06 45.06 T-49 17.15 16.64 19.19 21.78 T-50 13.66 13.02 13.64 16.94 T-51 10.15 9.95 9.25 14.19 T-52 12.96 13.03 12.64 17.93 T-53 19.21 22.63 22.66 26.55 T-54 14.35 15.27 15.06 18.64 T-55 12.70 12.73 13.43 (a)

T 12.57 12.41 12.37 17.11 T-57 15.64 14.48 15.69 19.55 T-58 11.78 11.86 11.66 15.34 T-59 12.05 11.06 11.49 15.10 T-60 13.43 13.23 13.75 16.43 T-61 14.06 13.43 14.95 17.95 T-62 14.22 13.53 15.94 20.74 T-63 11.26 11.03 13.47 14.94 T-64 17.94 19.99 20.99 24.21 T-65 19.72 22.35 23.45 26.79 T-66 99.63 117.71 124.66 135.76 T-67 14.87 15.70 16.44 20.29 (a) TLD missing, see Appendix D - Program Execution.

C-2

Fermi2 - 2002 Annual RadioactiveEffluent Release and RadiologicalEnvironmentalOperatingReport FERMI 2 AIR PARTICULATE GROSS BETA (pCi/cubic meter)

API-i FIRST QUARTER Stait Date l :%F

> -- y IDiti-1/2/2002 1/8/20021 4.46E-02 +/ 3.40E-03 1/8/2002 1/15/20021 2.53E-02 +/- 2.50E-03 1/15/2002 1/22/2002 2.94E-02 +/- 2.70E-03 1/22/2002 1/29/2002 2.18E-02 +/- 2.soE-03 1/29/2002 2/5/2002 (a) 2/5/2002 2/12/2002 4.26E-02 +- 2.20E-03 2/12/2002 2/19/2002 2.OOE-02 +/- 2.20E-03 2/19/2002 2/26/2002 1.5 IE-02 + 2.50E-03 2/26/2002 3/5/2002 1.76E-02 +/- 2. 1OE-03 3/5/2002 3/12/2002 3.09E-02 +/- 2.30E-03 3/12/2002 3/20/2002 2.69E-02 + 2.20E-03 3/20/2002 3/26/20021 2.82E-02 +- 2.50E-03 3/26/2002 4/2/20021 2.22E-02 +/- 2.40E-03 API-i SECOND QUARTER Start-Date I1End Date <",Activity 4/2/2002 4/9/2002 1.76E-02 +/- 2.10E-03 4/9/2002 4/16/2002 1.66E-02 +/- 2.20E-03 4/16/2002 4/23/2002 2.04E-02 +/ 2.20E-03 4/23/2002 4/30/2002 1.87E-02 +/- 2.20E-03 4/30/2002 5n72002 1.7 1E-02 +/- 2.10E-03 5/7/2002 5/14/2002 1.90E-02 +/ 2.40E-03 5/14/2002 5/22/2002 1.02E-02 + 2.1E-03 5/22/2002 5/28/2002 1.88E-02 +/ 2.50E-03 5/28/2002 6/4/2002 1.9 IE-02 +/- 2.20E-03 6/4/2002 6/11/2002 2. 10E-02 +/- 1.80E-03 6/11/2002 6/18/2002 1.45E-02 +/- 1.80E-03 6/18/2002 6/25/2002 2.36E-02 +/- 3.20E-03 6/26/2002 7/2/2002 (a) _

(a) Sample not collected see Appendix D, Program Execution.

C-3

Fermi 2 - 2002 Annual Radioactive Effluent Release and Radiological Environmental Operating Report FERMI 2 AIR PARTICULATE GROSS BETA (pCi/cubic meter)

API-1 THIRD QUARTER Start Date-I End Date i l .~tivit AcV,,y h 7/2/2002 7/9/2002 (a) 7/16/2002 7/23/2002 3.21E-02 +/- 2.10E-03 7/23/2002 7/30/2002 1.89E-02 +1- 2.00E-03 7/30/2002 8/6/2002 2.05E-02 +1 2.20E-03 8/6/2002 8/13/2002 2.12E-02 +1 2.30E-03 8/13/2002 8/20/2002 1.80E-02 +/ 2.50E-03 8/20/2002 8/27/2002 1.93E-02 2.40E-03 8/27/2002 9/3/2002 1.86E-02 +/ 2.30E-03 9/3/2002 9/10/2002 2.88E-02 +/ 2.40E-03 9/10/2002 9/17/2002 3.20E-02 +/ 2.70E-03 9/17/2002 9/24/2002 2.76E-02 +/ 2.50E-03 9/24/2002 10/1/2002 3.59E-02 +/- 2.80E-03 API-1 FOURTH QUARTER Start Date I 'End Date I Activity ' l 10/1/2002 10/8/2002 1.87E-02 +/ 2.50E-03 10/8/2002 10/15/2002 3.56E-02 +/ 2.70E-03 10/15/2002 10/22/2002 1.54E-02 +- 2.60E-03 10/22/2002 10/30/2002 1.54E-02 +/ 2.60E-03 10/30/2002 11/5/2002 3.16E-02 +/ 3. 1OE-03 11/5/2002 11/12/2002 4.18E-02 +t 2.60E-03 11/12/2002 11/19/2002 2.59E-02 +/- 2.20E-03 11/19/2002 11/26/2002 1.97E-02 +/ 2.00E-03 11/26/2002 12/3/2002 1.90E-02 +/ 2.20E-03 12/3/2002 12/10/2002 4.32E-02 +J 2.50E-03 12/10/2002 12/17/2002 3.96E-021+ 2.70E-03 12/17/2002 12/23/2002 2.80E-021 2.50E-03 12/23/2002 12/30/2002 3.77E-02 +1 2.60E-03 (a) Sample not collected see Appendix D, Program Execution.

C-4

Fermi 2 - 2002 Annual Radioactive Effluent Release and RadiologicalEnvironmental OperatingReport FERMI 2 AIR PARTICULATE GROSS BETA (pCi/cubic meter)

API-2 FIRST QUARTER ni I'.Cft T. I At7'Aiv 1/2/2002 1/8/2002 3.23E-02 +1 3.70E-03 1/8/2002 1/15/2002 2.0 1E-02 +1 2.70E-03 1/15/2002 1/22/2002 2.46E-02 +/ 2.80E-03 1/22/2002 1/29/2002 2.27E-02 +/ 2.90E-03 1/29/2002 2/6/2002 2.69E-02 +1 2. 1OE-03 2/6/2002 2/12/2002 3.70E-02 +/ 3.OOE-03 2/12/2002 2/19/2002 2.1 1E-02 +/ 2.60E-03 2/19/2002 2/26/2002 1.22E-02 +/ 2.20E-03 2/26/2002 3/5/2002 1.98E-02 +/ 2.40E-03 3/5/2002 3/12/2002 3.26E-02 +/ 2.60E-03 3/12/2002 3/20/2002 2.46E-02 +/ 2.40E-03 3/20/2002 3/26/2002 2.76E-02 +/ 2.70E-03 3/26/2002 412/2002 2.41 E-02 +/ 2.80E-03 API-2 SECOND QUARTER Start Date End Date. k 4. Adtivit' i 4/2/2002 4/10/2002 1.72E-02 +/ 2.20E-03 4/10/2002 4/16/2002 1.70E-02 +/ 2.40E-03 4/16/2002 4/23/2002 2.35E-02 +/ 2.10E-03 4/23/2002 4/30/2002 2.06E-02 +/- 2.OOE-03 4/30/2002 5/7/2002 2.08E-02 +/ 2.20E-03 5/7/2002 5/14/2002 1.72E-02 +/ 2.30E-03 5/14/2002 5/22/2002 1.15E-02 +/ 1.90E-03 5/22/2002 5/28/2002 1.37E-02 +/ 2.20E-03 5/28/2002 6/4/2002 2.26E-02 +/ 2.1 OE-03 6/4/2002 6/11/2002 2.37E-02 +/ 2.20E-03 6/11/2002 6/18/2002 1.74E-02 +/ 2.OOE-03 6/18/2002 6/25/2002 3.93E-02 +/ 2.50E-03 6/25/2002 7/2/2002 2.90E-02 +- 2.30E-03 C-5

Fermi 2 - 2002 Annual Radioactive Effluent Release and RadiologicalEnvironmental OperatingReport FERMI 2 AIR PARTICULATE GROSS BETA (pCilcubic meter)

API-2 THIRD QUARTER I~s , $4ot at-r - -q- ...vsxJA.t t,.i:

'.zi4t nst T I XTl'nA V4SG.i~ii~

f^ I v&g Aptivitv .

7/2/2002 7/9/2002 2.70E-02 +1 2.50E-03 7/9/2002 7/16/2002 2.47E-02 +1 2.20E-03 7/16/2002 7/23/2002 3.81E-02 +/ 2.40E-03 7/23/2002 7/30/2002 2.29E-02 +/ 2.1 OE-03 7/30/2002 8/6/2002 3.04E-02 +/ 2.60E-03 8/6/2002 8/13/2002 3.12E-02 +1 2.30E-03 8/13/2002 8/20/2002 2.19E-02 +t 2.40E-03 8/20/2002 8/27/2002 2.15E-02 +1 2.20E-03 8/27/2002 9/3/2002 2.42E-02 +/ 2.20E-03 9/3/2002 9/10/2002 3.23E-02 +/ 2.40E-03 9/10/2002 9/17/2002 3.64E-02 +1 2.70E-03 9/17/2002 9/24/2002 3.13E-02 +1- 2.40E-03 N

9/24/2002 10/1/2002 3.22E-02 +/ 2.60E-03 API-2 FOURTH QUARTER I E

'Stdftt. .aWWIG&

S t

'Ejd Dnati I <= YDae I tvt X<ictinty1stg' ffi;.w>R.'1;>,-^

10/1/2002 10/8/2002 2.18E-02 +/ 2.50E-03 10/8/2002 10/15/2002 4.64E-02 +/ 3. 1OE-03 10/15/2002 10/22/2002 1.95E-02 +/ 2.70E-03 10/22/2002 10/30/2002 2.17E-02 +1 2.40E-03 10/30/2002 11/5/2002 3.37E-02 +/- 3.20E-03 11/5/2002 11/12/2002 4.55E-02 l +/- 2.90E-03 11/12/2002 11/19/2002 2.64E-02+ 2.60E-03 11/19/2002 11/26/2002 2.76E-02 +/ 2.40E-03 11/26/2002 12/3/2002 2.17E-02 +/ 2.50E-03 12/3/2002 12/10/2002 3.82E-02 +/ 2.80E-03 12/10/2002 12/17/2002 4.02E-02 +/- 3.10E-03 12/17/2002 12/23/2002 3.35E-02 +/ 3.OOE-03 12/23/2002 12/30/2002 3.66E-02 +/- 3.OOE-03 C-6

Fermi2 - 2002 Annual Radioactive Effluent Release and RadiologicalEnvironmentalOperatingReport FERMI 2 AIR PARTICULATE GROSS BETA (pCi/cubic meter)

API-3 FIRST QUARTER s WtaI <nd t Date i Date.j j .i -ly.Atin , 4t 1/2/2002 1/8/2002 4.42E-02 +/- 4.20E-03 1/8/2002 1/15/2002 2.79E-02 +/- 3.1 OE-03 1/15/2002 1/22/2002 2.83E-02 +1 3.40E-03 1/22/2002 1/29/2002 1.93E-02 +1- 3.00E-03 1/29/2002 2/6/2002 2.27E-02 +/- 2.50E-03 2/6/2002 2/12/2002 3.43E-02 +/- 3.1 OE-03 2/12/2002 2/19/2002 2.17E-02 +/ 2.60E-03 2119/2002 2/26/2002 1.60E-02 +1 2.30E-03 2/26/2002 3/5/2002 1.78E-02 +/ 2.OOE-03 3/5/2002 3/12/2002 2.52E-02 +/ 2.30E-03 3/12/2002 3/21/2002 2.12E-02 +/ 8.90E-03 3/21/2002 3/26/2002 (a) 3/26/2002 3/29/2002 2.54E-02 +/- 6.60E-03 API-3 SECOND QUARTER

[StitDitei sEnjd Dite l AOt iA6vityb-r >t 4/2/2002 4/10/2002 1.76E-02 +1 2.OOE-03 4/10/2002 4/16/2002 1.38E-02 +1 2.70E-03 4/16/2002 4/23/2002 1.87E-02 +/ 2.30E-03 4/23/2002 4/30/2002 1.86E-02 1/2. 1OE-03 4/30/2002 5/72002 1.78E-02 +1- 2.10E-03 5//2002 5/14/2002 1.66E-02 +/ 2.30E-03 5/14/2002 5/22/2002 1.02E-02 +/ 2.00E-03 5/22/2002 5/28/2002 1.42E-02 +/ 2.30E-03 5/28/2002 6/4/2002 1.98E-02 +l 2.1 OE-03 6/4/2002 6/11/2002 (a) 6/11/2002 6/18/2002 1.58E-02 +/ 1.90E-03 6/18/2002 6/25/2002 4.65E-02 +1- 3.50E-03 6/25/2002 7/212002 2.36E-02 +/- 1.80E-03 (a) Sample not collected see Appendix D, Program Execution.

C-7

Fermi 2 - 2002 Annual Radioactive Effluent Release and RadiologicalEnvironmental OperatingReport FERMI -2 AIR PARTICULATE GROSS BETA (pCi/cubic meter)

API-3 THIRD QUARTER Staft Date lEd Date l i Activit 7/2/2002 7/9/2002 2.35E-021 +/- 2.30E-03 7/9/2002 7/16/2002 2.15E-02 +1 2.20E-03 7/16/2002 7/23/2002 3.59E-02 +/ 2.40E-03 7/23/2002 7/30/2002 2.1 lE-02 +/ 2.20E-03 7/30/2002 8/6/2002 2.63E-02 +/ 2.60E-03 8/6/2002 8/13/2002 2.39E-02 +/ 2.20E-03 8/13/2002 8/20/2002 2.42E-02 +/ 2.50E-03 8/20/2002 8/27/2002 2.54E-02 +t 2.40E-03 8/27/2002 9/3/2002 2.66E-02 +/ 2.30E-03 9/3/2002 9/10/2002_ 3.711E-02 2.50E-03 9/10/2002 9/17/2002 3.721E-02 +/ 2.80E-03 9/17/2002 9/24/2002 3.710E-02 +1 2.40E-03 9/24/2002 10/1/2002 3.38E-02 +1 2.70E-03 API-3 FOURTH QUARTER Stift Date IlEnd Datei l Activity 9"', El 10/1/2002 10/8/2002 2.54E-02 +/ 2.90E-03 10/8/2002 10/15/2002 4.34E-02 +/ 3.OOE-03 10/15/2002 10/2212002 2.19E-02 2.70E-03 10/122/2002 10/30/2002 2.12E-02 +1 2.30E-03 10/30/2002 11/5/2002 3.54E-02 +/ 3.20E-03 11/5/2002 11/13/2002 4.86E-02 +1 3.20E-03 11/13/2002 11/19/2002 (a) 11/19/2002 11/26/2002 2.48E-02 +/ 3.10E-03 11/26/2002 12/3/2002 1.58E-02 +/ 2.70E-03 12/3/2002 12/10/2002 4.02E-02 +/ 2.80E-03 12/10/2002 12117/2002 4.26E-02 +/ 3.1 OE-03 12/17/2002 12/23/2002 2.54E-02 +l 2.80E-03 12123/2002 12/30/2002 3.53E-021 +/- 3.OOE-03 (a) Sample not collected see Appendix D, Program Execution.

C-8

Fermi2 - 2002 Annual Radioactive Effluent Release and RadiologicalEnvironmental OperatingReport FERMI 2 AIR PARTICULATE GROSS BETA (pCi/cubic meter)

API-4 FIRST QUARTER

,Stat.Date I End Dite I I Ativity 1/2i2002 1/8/2002 4.10E-02 +/ 3.90E-03 1/8/2002 1/15/2002 2.27E-02 +1 2.90E-03 1/15/2002 1/22/2002 2.88E-02 +1 3.20E-03 1/22/2002 1/29/2002 2.1 IE-02 +/ 2.90E-03 1/29/2002 2/5/2002 2.32E-02 +/ 2.80E-03 2/5/2002 2/12/2002 3.38E-02 +/ 2.40E-03 2/12/2002 2/19/2002 2.50E-02 +1 2.40E-03 2/19/2002 2/26/2002 1.65E-02 +/_2.OOE-03 2/26/2002 3/5/2002 2.18E-02 +/ 2.20E-03 3/5/2002 3/12/2002 3.33E-02 +1 2.40E-03 3/12/2002 3/20/2002 2.72E-02 2.20E-03 3/20/2002 3/26/2002 2.9 IE-02 +/ 2.60E-03 3/26/2002 4/26/2002 2.93lE-02 +/- 2.60E-03 3nD2 4/2/2002, 2.38E-021+ 2.50E-03 API-4 SECOND QUARTER

-Stait'Date llEnda Date t A1t ivityJ I 4/2/20021 4/9/2002 1.5 1E-02 +/ 2. 1OE-03 4/9/2002 4/16/2002 2.05E-02 +1 2.40E-03 4/16/2002 4/23/2002 1.95E-02 2.30E-03 4/23/2002 4/30/2002 1.56E-02 +/ 2.20E-03 4/30/2002 5/3/2002 1.75E-02 +/ 2.30E-03 5/7/2002 5/14/2002 1.79E-02 +1 2.50E-03 5/14/2002 5/221/2002 9.70E-03 +1 2.20E-03 5/22/2002 5/28/2002 1.85E-02 +/ 2.60E-03 5/28/2002 6/4/2002 2.47E-02 +/ 2.40E-03 6/4/2002 6/11/2002 2.5 IE-02 +/ 2.40E-03 6/11/2002 6/18/2002 1.61E-02 +/ 1.90E-03 6/18/2002 6/25/02 4.19E-02 +/ 2.40E-03 65/2002 7/22002 2.49E-02 +1 2.20E-03 C-9

Fermi2 - 2002 Annual RadioactiveEffluent Release and RadiologicalEnvironmentalOperatingReport FERMI 2 AIR PARTICULATE GROSS BETA (pCi/cubic meter)

API-4 THIRD QUARTER Fstt-nrfate, I ~ird Wte %V,' ~A-Ctivity §1 id 7/2/2002 7/9/2002 2.38E-02 +1 2.60E-03 7/9/2002 7/16/2002 2.15E-02 +1 1.90E-03 7/16/2002 7/23/2002 4.OOE-02 +1 2.20E-03 7/23/2002 7/30/2002 1.85E-02 +1 1.90E-03 7/30/2002 8/6/2002 2.58E-02 +1 2.60E-03 8/6/2002 8/13/2002 2.88E-021 2.40E-03 8/13/2002 8/20/2002 2.36E-02 +/ 2.40E-03 8/20/2002 8/27/2002 2.87E-02 2.30E-03 8/27/2002 9/3/2002 2.36E-02 +1 2.30E-03 9/3/2002 9/10/2002 3.41E-021 +/ 2.50E-03 9/10/2002 9/17/2002 3.36E-02 +/ 2.70E-03 9/17/2002 9/24/2002 3.09E-021 +/- 2.40E-03 9/24/2002 10/1/2002 3.22E-02 +/ 2.70E-03 API-4 FOURTH QUARTER Start Date 1 End Date]j <*1> Ativity !

10/1/20021 10/8/2002 2.50E-02 +/- 2.50E-03 10/8/20021 10/15/2002 3.84E-02 +/- 2.60E-03 10/15/2002_ 10/222002 2.19E-2+ 2.60E-03 10/22/20021 10/30/2002 2.23E-02 +1 2.20E-03 10/30/2002 11/5/2002 4.88E-02 +/ 3.30E-03 11/5/2002 11/12/2002 4.18E-02 +/ 2.90E-03 11/12/2002 11/19/2002 2.41E-02 +/ 2.40E-03 11/19/2002 11/26/2002 2.51E-02 +/ 2.30E-03 11/26/2002 12/3/2002 1.30E-02 +/ 2.30E-03 12/3/2002 12/10/2002 3.84E-02 +/ 2.40E-03 12/10/2002 12/17/2002 (a) 12/17/2002 12/23/2002 1.88E-02 +/- 4:OOE-03 12/23/2002 12/30/2002 3.19E-02 +/- 2.90E-03 (a) Sample not collected see Appendix D, Program Execution.

C-10

Fermi2 - 2002 Annual Radioactive Effluent Release and RadiologicalEnvironmentalOperatingReport FERMI 2 AIR PARTICULATE GROSS BETA (pCilcubic meter)

API-5 FIRST QUARTER StAt Date' J nd Date .[l jjK j< ctivity l ;A 1/2/2002 1/8/2002 4.37E-02 +/- 4.OOE-03 1/8/2002 1/15/2002 2.50E-02 +/- 2.90E-03 1/15/2002 1/22/2002 3.22E-02 +1- 3.20E-03 1/22/2002 1/29/2002 2.42E-02 +1 2.90E-03 1/29/2002 2/5/2002 2.02E-02 +/- 2.20E-03 2/5/2002 2/12/2002 3.17E-02 +_- 2.60E-03 2/12/2002 2/19/2002 1.98E-02 +/- 2.90E-03 2/19/2002 2/126/2002 1.72E-02 +/- 2.50E-03 2/26/2002 3/5/2002 2.02E-02 +/- 2.40E-03 3/5/2002 3/12/2002 2.80E-02 +1- 2.50E-03 3/12/2002 3/20/2002 2.47E-02 +/- 2.40E-03 3/20/2002 3/26/2002 3.1OE-02 +/- 2.80E-03 3/26/2002 4/2/2002 2.1 6E-02 +/- 2.60E-03 API-5 SECOND QUARTER iSt~trt T qtsite IIDieT~nr Dstl

.Wji fn I I-- <"I= 5,J ActivitV

.1 . I %-9I,'-

.1 . fi :=, 5 d 4/2/2002 4/9/2002 1.53E-021 +1- 2.30E-03 4/9/2002 4/16/2002 1.31E-02 +1- 2.30E-03 4/16/2002 4/23/2002 1.80E-02 +1- 2.1OE-03 4/23/2002 4/30/2002 2.04E-02 +/- 2.80E-03 4/30/2002 5n/2002 1.82E-02 +/ 2.90E-03 5f/72002 5/14/2002 1.67E-02 +/- 4.OOE-03 5/14/2002 5/22i2002 (a) 5/22/2002 5/28/2002 1.75E-02 +/ 4.50E-03 5/28/2002 6/4/2002 2.21E-02 +t 2.20E-03 6/4/2002 6/11/2002 2.45E-02 +/ 2.30E-03 6/11/2002 6/18/2002 1.33E-02 +/ 2.OOE-03 6/18/2002 6/25/2002 4.01E-02 +/- 2.50E-03 6/25/2002 7/212002 (a) _

(a) Sample not collected see Appendix D, Program Execution.

C-ll

Fermi 2 - 2002 Annual Radioactive Effluent Release and RadiologicalEnvironmental OperatingReport FERMI 2 AIR PARTICULATE GROSS BETA (pCi/cubic meter)

API-5 THIRD QUARTER L

,4 - 4T'

. tI ""L 4

-[

I -XL'..zITL UijU IJa4 d

I 'I" "W

~- it A ,-4+

llLV Ly 4 7/212002 7/9/2002 (a) -

7/9/2002 7/16/2002 (a) =

7/16/2002 7/23/2002 3.90E-02 +1 2.70E-03 7/23/2002 7/30/2002 2.25E-02 +1 2.30E-03 7/30/2002 8/6/2002 2.59E-02 +1- 2.90E-03 8/6/2002 8/13/2002 3.09E-02l+1- 2.70E-03 8/13/2002 8/20/2002 2.06E-02 +/ 2.60E-03 8/20/2002 8/27/2002 2.46E-02 +/ 2.60E-03 8/27/2002 9/3/2002 2.61 E-02 +/ 2.60E-03 9/3/2002 9/10/2002 3.82E-02 +/ 2.80E-03 9/10/2002 9/17/2002 3.52E-02 +/- 3. 1OE-03 9/17/2002 9/24/2002 3.05E-02 +/- 2.60E-03 9/24/2002 101/2002 4.31E-02 +/ 3.10E-03 API-5 FOURTH QUARTER r

Stift Date -End DateWk` I Activity '- kj 10/1/2002 10/8/2002 2.77E-02 +/ 2.80E-03 10/8/2002 10/15/2002 4.77E-02 +/ 3.OOE-03 10/15/20021 10/2212002 2.26E-02 +/ 3.OOE-03 10/22/2002 10/30/2002 2.24E-02 +/ 2.60E-03 10/30/2002 11/5/2002 3.99E-02 +/ 3.50E-03 11/5/2002 11/12/2002 4.54E-02 +1 2.60E-03 11/12/2002 11/19/2002 2.48E-02 +/ 2.10E-03 11/19/2002 11/26/2002 2.66E-02 +/ 2.1OE-03 11/26/2002 12/3/2002 2.05E-02 +/ 2.1 OE-03 12/3/2002 12/10/2002 4.05E-02 +t 2.50E-03 12/10/2002 12/17/2002 3 1 2.70E-03 12/17/2002 12/23/2002 3.15E-021 2.60E-03 12/23/2002 12/30/2002 3.74E-02 +1 2.70E-03 (a) Sample not collected see Appendix D, Program Execution.

C-12

Fermi 2 - 2002 Annual RadioactiveEffluent Release and RadiologicalEnvironmentalOperatingReport FERMI 2 AIR IODINE - 131 (pCi/cubic meter)

API-1 FIRST QUARTER

. . S IQiw4 ibf v.1iir ntI-f~ I--%A~;'t .

1/2/2002 1/8/2002 < 5.OOE-02

- 1/8/2002 1/15/2002 < 3.50E-02 1/15/2002 1/22/2002 < 4.50E-02 1/22/2002 1/29/2002 < 3.50E-02 1/29/2002 2/5/2002 _ (a) 2/5/2002 2/12/2002 < 2.20E-02 2/12/2002 2/19/2002 < 2.80E-02 2/19/2002 2/26/2002 < 3.30E-02 2/26/2002 3/5/2002 < 3.40E-02 3/5/2002 3/12/2002 < 4.10E-02 3/12/2002 3/20/2002 < 4.10E-02 3/20/2002 3/26/2002 < 3.50E-02 3/26/2002 4/2/2002 < 3.1 OE-02 API-1 SECOND QUARTER lLStart Date I End Date2> xt ^Activity4<]t6 4/2/2002 4/9/2002 <15.30E-02 4/9/2002 4/16/2002 < 3. 1OE-02 4/16/2002 4/23/2002 < 6.30E-02 4/23/2002 4/30/2002 < 4.40E-02 4/30/2002 5/72002 <I 3.50E-02 5n/2002 5/14/2002 < 3.40E-02 5/14/2002 5/22/20021 < 5.OOE-02 5/22/2002] 5/28/20021 < 4.OOE-02 5/28/20021 6/4/20021 < 3.70E-02 6/4/20021 6/11/2002 < 5.50E-02 6/11/2002 6/18/2002 < 3.50E-02 6/18/2002 6/25/2002 < 5.1OE-02 6/25/2002 7/2/2002 (a)

(a) Sample not collected see Appendix D, Program Execution.

C-13

Fermi 2 - 2002 Annual Radioactive Effluent Release and RadiologicalEnvironmental OperatingReport FERMII 2 AIR IODINE - 131 (pCi/cubic meter)

API-i THIRD QUARTER

[Start Date End Date [ Activity 7/2/2002 7/9/2002 (a) 7/16/2002 7/23/2002 < 3.50E-02 7/23/2002 7/30/2002 < 4.20E-02 7/30/2002 8/6/2002 < 3.90E-02 8/6/2002 8/13/2002 < 4.80E-02 8/13/2002 8/20/2002 < 3.20E-02 8/20/2002 8/27/2002 < 2.60E-02 8/27/2002 9/3/2002 < 4.60E-02 9/3/2002 9/10/2002 < 4.50E-02 9/10/2002 9/17/2002 < 5.70E-02 9/17/2002 9/24/2002 < 4.80E-02 9/24/2002 10/1/2002 < 3.60E-02 API-1 FOURTH QUARTER lStaft Date I -End Date I ' Actiity 10/1/2002 10/8/20021 < 4.20E-02 10/8/2002 10/15/2002 < 5.OOE-02

- 10/15/2002 10/22/2002 < 2.80E-02 10/22/2002 10/30/2002 < 6.90E-02 10/30/2002 11/5/2002 <I 4.60E-02 11/5/2002 11/12/2002 <12.30E-02 11/19/2002 11/26/2002 <12.50E-02 11/26/2002 12/3/2002 < 4.70E-02 12/3/2002 12/10/2002 < 4.40E-02 12/10/2002l 12/17/2002 < 4.50E-02 12/17/2002l 12/23/20021 < 2.80E-02 12/23/2002] 12/30/20021 < 2.90E-02 (a) Sample not counted see Appendix D, Program Execution.

C-14

Fermi2 - 2002 Annual Radioactive Effluent Release and RadiologicalEnvironmental OperatingReport FERMI 2 AIR IODINE - 131 (pCi/cubic meter)

API-2 FIRST QUARTER

.tairt1-tp 1/2/2002 F n anr ""T v a 1/8/2002

",-Activitv',

< 5.70E-0 a 1/2/2002 1/8/2002 < 5.70E-02 1/8/2002 1/22/2002 < 3.20E-02 1/15/2002 1/22/2002 < 3.80E-02 1/22/2002 1/29/2002 < 4.20E-02 1/29/2002 2/6/2002 < 3.70E-02 2/6/2002 2112/2002 < 3.50E-02 2/12/2002 2/19/2002 < 3.50E-02 2/19/2002 2/26/2002 < 2.90E-02 2/26/2002 3/5/2002 < 3.30E-02 3/5/2002 3/12/2002 < 4.40E-02 3/12/2002 3/20/2002 < 3.70E-02 3/20/2002 3/26/2002 < 3.60E-02 3/26/2002 4/2/2002 < 3.70E-02 API-2 SECOND QUARTER Start Date gEd Date t Actmity 7l 4/2/20021 4/10/2002 < 5.80E-02 4/10/2002 4/16/2002 < 3.40E-02 4/16/2002 4/23/2002 < 4.90E-02 4/23/2002 4/30/2002 <1 3.1OE-02 4/30/20021 5/7/2002 < 3.60E-02 5/7/20021 5/14/2002 < 3.20E-02 5/14/2002 5/22/2002 < 4.70E-02 5/22/2002 5/28/2002 < 4.1 OE-02 5/28/2002 6/4/2002 < 3.50E-02 6/4/2002 6/11/2002 < 3.70E-02 6/11/2002 6/18/2002 < 4.20E-02 6/18/2002 6/25/2002[ <I 3.90E-02 6/25/2002 7/2120021[ <4.20E-02 C-15

Fermi 2 - 2002 Annual Radioactive Effluent Release and Radiological Environmental Operating Report FERMI 2 AIR IODINE - 131 (pCi/cubic meter)

API-2 THIRD QUARTER Start Dateil - End Date I -

Activity >

7/2/2002 7/9/2002 < 4.20E-02 7/9/2002 7/16/2002 < 3.OOE-02 7/16/2002 7/23/2002 < 3.90E-02 7/23/2002 7/30/2002 < 4.50E-02 7/30/2002 8/6/2002 < 3.50E-02 8/6/2002 8/13/2002 < 4.60E-02 8/13/2002 8/20/2002 < 3.30E-02 8/20/2002 8/27/2002 < 2.70E-02 8/27/2002 9/3/2002 < 3.40E-02 9/3/2002 9/10/2002 < 3.50E-02 9/10/2002 9/17/2002 < 5.60E-02 9/17/2002 9/24/2002 < 4.10E-02 9/24/2002 10/1/2002 < 3.60E-02 API-2 FOURTH QUARTER Start Date End DateW . *t>-7 10/1/2002 10/8/2002 < 3.40E-02 10/8/2002] 10/15/2002 < 5.20E-02 10/15/2002 10/22/2002 < 3.20E-02 10/22t2002 10/30/2002 < 5.50E-02 10/30/2002 11/5/20021 < 4.20E-02 11/5/2002 11/12t2002 < 3.1OE-02 11/12/2002 11/19/2002 < 2.50E-02 11/19/2002 11/26/2002 < 3 60E-02 11/26/2002 12/3/2002 < 5.OOE-02 12/3t2002 12/10/2002 < 7.OOE-02 12/10/2002 12/17/2002 < 3.5 OE-02 12/17/2002 12/23/2002 - <3.30E-02 12/23/20021 12/30/2002 < 3.90E-02 C-16

Fermi2 - 2002 Annual Radioactive Effluent Release and RadiologicalEnvironmental OperatingReport FERMI 2 AIR IODINE - 131 (pCi/cubic meter)

API-3 FIRST QUARTER

~

+ I a IL 1L/A vl - ~ int E~

ourarlua~rl;4XCavvse-X L. [ JjJ1/8/I 002I

~~jifot

< 5.LL kL3

~

1/2/2002 1/8/2002 < 5.30E-02 1/8/2002 1/15/2002 < 3.20E-02 1/15/2002 1/22/2002 < 4.30E-02 1/22/2002 1/29/2002 < 4.30E-02 1/29/2002 2/6/2002 < 4.70E-02 2/6/2002 2/12/2002 < 3.90E-02 2/12/2002 2/19/2002 < 3.90E-02 2/19/2002 2/26/2002 < 2.80E-02 2/26/2002 3/5/2002 < 2.90E-02 3/5/2002 3/121/2002 < 3.90E-02 3/12/02 3/21/2002 < 5.80E-02 3/21/2002 3/26/2002 (a) 3/26/2002 3/29/2002 < 6.90E-02 API-3 SECOND QUARTER

[Stait Date' l End Date ,, VX ActiyitY'.-'Y:

4/2/2002 4/10/2002 < 4.80E-02 4/10/2002 4/16/2002 < 3.30E-02 4/16/2002 4/23/2002 < 4.90E-02 4/23/2002 4/30/2002 < 3.90E-02 4/30/2002 5n/2002 <3.40E-02 5/7/2002 5/14/2002 < 3.50E-02 5/14/2002 5/22/2002 < 4.80E-02 5/22/2002 5/28/2002 < 4.1 OE-02 5/28/20021 6/4/2002 < 2.80E-02 6/4/2002 6/12/2002 (a) 6/12/2002 6/20/2002 < 3.90E-02 6/18/2002 6/25/2002 < 4.40E-02 6/25/2002 7/2/2002 < 4.1OE-02 (a) Sample not collected see Appendix 1D, Program Execution.

C-17

Fermi2 - 2002 Annual Radioactive Effluent Release and RadiologicalEnvironmentalOperatingReport FERMI 2 AIR IODINE - 131 (pCi/cubic meter)

API-3 THIRD QUARTER Start Date "End Date Activityhdtj::

7/2/2002 7/9/20021 < 3.70E-02 7/9/2002 7/16/2002 < 3.1 OE-02 7/16/2002 7/23/2002 < 3.70E-02 7/23/2002 7/30/2002 < 4.50E-02 7/30/2002 8/6/2002 < 3.70E-02 8/6/2002 8/13/2002 < 5.90E-02 8/13/2002 8/20/2002 < 3.1OE-02 8/20/2002 8/27/2002 < 3.40E-02 8/27/2002 9/3/2002 < 4.30E-02 9/3/2002 9/10/2002 < 4.OOE-02 9/10/2002 9/17/2002 < 6.OOE-02 9/17/2002 9/24/2002 < 4.1 OE-02 9/24/2002 10/1/2002 < 5.90E-02 API-3 FOURTH QUARTER Start Date .lJEnd DitelI Activity;-'

10/1/2002 10/8/2002 < 4.60E-02 10/8/2002, 10/15/2002 < 6.60E-02 10/15/2002 10/22/2002 < 2.80E-02 10/22/20021 10/30/2002 < 6.60E-02 10/30/20021 11/5/2002 < 4.50E-02 11/5/2002 11/13/2002 < 3 30E-02 11/13/2002 11/19/2002 :__ _(a) 11/19/2002 11/26/2002 < 3.70E-02 11/26/2002 12/3/2002 < 5.OOE-02 12/3/2002 12/10/2002 < 3.50E-02 12/10/2002 12/17/2002 < 3.90E-02 12/17/2002 12/23/2002_ < 3.OOE-02 12/23/2002 12/30/2002 < 4.1 OE-02 (a) Sample not collected see Appendix D, Program Execution.

C-18

Fermi2 - 2002 Annual Radioactive Effluent Release and RadiologicalEnvironmentalOperatingReport FERMI 2 AIR IODINE - 131 (pCi/cubic meter)

API-4 FIRST QUARTER I Vtobrt i 5tp I v.n'i flrit.I4: oAetivri I 1/2/2002 1/8/2002 < 5.40E-02 1/8/2002 1/15/2002 < 3.00E-02 1/15/2002 112212002 < 3.50E-02 1/22/2002 1/29/2002 < 3.60E-02 1/29/2002 2/5/2002 < 4.80E-02 2/5/2002 2/1212002 < 3.20E-02 2/12/2002 2/19/2002 < 3.OOE-02 2/19/2002 2/26/2002 < 2.90E-02 2/26/2002 3/5/2002 < 3.20E-02 3/5/2002 3/12/2002 < 4.30E-02 3/12/2002 3/20/2002 < 4.20E-02 3/20/2002 3/26/2002 < 3.OOE-02 3/26/2002 4/2/2002 < 3.60E-02 API-4 SECOND QUARTER Start Date-l Tind Date -lI Activty,>X 4/2/20021 4/9/2002 < 5.80E-02 4/9/20_21 4/16/2002 < 3.70E-02 4/16/2002 4/23/2002 < 5.50E-02 4/23/2002 4/30/2002 < 4.70E-02 4/30/2002 5/7/2002 < 3.90E-02 5/7/2002 5/14/2002 < 4.30E-02 5/14/2002 5/22/2002 < 5.30E-02 5/22/2002 5/28/2002 < 4.30E-02 5/28/2002 6/4/2002 <_3.30E-02 6/4/2002 6/11/2002 < 3.90E-02 6/11/2002 6/18/2002_ < 4.OOE-02 6/18/2002 6/25/2002 < 2.90E-02 6/25/20021 7/2/20021 < 3.50E-02 C-19

Fermi2 - 2002 Annual Radioactive Effluent Release and RadiologicalEnvironmental OperatingReport FERMI 2 AIR IODINE - 131 (pCi/cubic meter)

API-4 THIRD QUARTER I _A .Z A

[-I 0U1L LfhIAe AnuU "aILM I -r !Mtk UVL y P~ 1 7/2/2002 7/9/2002 < 4.40E-02 7/9/2002 7/16/2002 < 2.50E-02 7/16/2002 7/23/2002 < 3.20E-02 7/23/2002 7/30/2002 < 3.40E-02 7/30/2002 8/6/2002 < 3.60E-02 8/6/2002 8/13/2002 < 5.OOE-02 8/13/2002 8/20/2002 < 3.20E-02 8/20/2002 8/27/2002 < 3. 1OE-02 8/27/2002 9/3/2002 < 3.60E-02 9/3/2002 9/10/2002 < 3.50E-02 9/10/2002 9/17/2002 < 4.70E-02 9/17/2002 9/24/2002 < 5.60E-02 9/24/2002 10/1/2002 < 5.50E-02 API-4 FOURTH QUARTER Stait Date; End Datek Activityj j---

10/1/2002 10/8/2002 < 3.50E-02 10/8/2002 10/15/2002 < 5.50E-02 10/15/2002 10/22/2002 < 3.60E-02 10/22/2002 10/30/2002 < 3.50E-02 10/30/20021 11/5/2002 < 4.30E-02 11/5/2002 11/12/2002 < 3.10E-02 11/12/20021 11/19/2002 < 5.50E-02 11/19/2002 11/26/2002 < 3. 1OE-02 11/26/2002 -12/3/2002 __< 4.40E-02 12/3/2002 12/10/2002 < 4.80E-02 12/10/2002 12/17/2002 l (a) 12/17/20021 12/23/2002 <I 6.70E-02 12/23/20021 12130/2002 < 3.60E-02 (a) Sample not collected see Appendix D, Program Execution.

C-20

Fermi 2 - 2002 Annual Radioactive Effluent Release and RadiologicalEnvironmental OperatingReport FERMI 2 AIR IODINE - 131 (pCi/cubic meter)

API-5 FIRST QUARTER l Start Date j -Enid Date - j Activit :7 1/2/2002 1/8/2002 < 5.OOE-02 1/8/2002 1/15/2002 < 2.70E-02 1/15/2002 1/22/2002 < 3.50E-02 1/22/2002 1/29/2002 < 3.70E-02 1/29/2002 2/5/2002 < 4.70E-02 2/5/2002 2/12/2002 < 3.50E-02 2112/2002 2/19/2002 < 3.20E-02 2/19/2002 2/26/2002 < 3.60E-02 2/26/2002 3/5/2002 < 4.30E-02 3/5/2002 3/12/2002 < 4.90E-02 3/12/2002 3/20/2002 < 4.40E-02 3/20/2002 3/26/2002 < 3.60E-02 3/26/2002 4/2/2002 < 3.40E-02 API-5 SECOND QUARTER IStrat Date End Date]IjA CtiVity 4/2/20021 4/9/20021 < 5.1 OE-02 4/9/2002 4/16/20021 < 3.20E-02 4/16/2002 4/23/20021 < 4.40E-02 4/23/2002 4/30/20021 < 4.90E-02 4/30/2002 5/7/20021 < 3.70E-02 5no2002 5/14/2002 <4.00E-02 5/14/2002 5/22/20021 (a) 5/22/2002 5/28/2002 < 5.30E-02 5/28/2002 6/4/20021 < 3.60E-02 6/4/2002 6/11/2002 < 3.70E-02 6/11/2002 6/18/2002 < 4.70E-02 6/18/2002 6/25/2002 < 3.70E-02 6/25/2001 7/2/2002 (a)

(a) Sample not collected see Appendix D, Program Execution.

C-21

Fermi2 - 2002 Annual Radioactive Effluent Release and RadiologicalEnvironmental OperatingReport FERMI 2 AIR IODINE - 131 (pCi/cubic meter)

API-5 THIRD QUARTER

.fk wtp I 'nId 'K Atp twtv I 7/2/2002 7/9/2002 (a) 7/9/2009 7/16/2001 (a) 7/16/2002 7/23/2002 < 4.OOE-02 7/23/2002 7/30/2002 < 4.80E-02 7/30/2002 8/6/2002 < 3 .40E-02 8/6/2002 8/13/2002 < 6.60E-02 8/13/2002 8/20/2002 < 3.60E-02 8/20/2002 8/27/2002 < 3.70E-02 8/27/2002 9/3/2002 < 4.90E-02 9/3/2002 9/10/2002 < 4.40E-02 9/10/2002 9/17/2002 < 6.60E-02 9/17/2002 9/24/2002 < 5.40E-02 9/24/2002 10/1/2002 < 5.90E-02 API-5 FOURTH QUARTER Stit DatelIAnd Date -l Actityil 10/1/20021 10/8/2002 < 5.OOE-02 10/8/20021 10/15/2002 < 5.80E-02 10/15/2002 10/22/2002 < 2.90E-02 10/22/2002 10/30/2002 < 5.80E-02 10/30/2002 11/5/2002 < 4.20E-02 11/5/2002 11/1212002 < 2.70E-02 11/12/2002 11/19/2002 < 5.81E-02 11/19/2002 11/26/2002 < 2.70E-02 11/26/2002 12/3/2002 < 3.50E-02 12/3/2002 12/10/2002 < 3.90E-02 12/10/2002 12/17/2002 < 2.50E-02 12/17/2002 12/23/2002 < 3.60E-02 12/23/2002 12/30/2002 < 3.40E-02 (a) Sample not counted see Appendix D, Program Execution.

C-22

Ferni2 - 2002 Annual Radioactive Effluent Release and RadiologicalEnvironmental OperatingReport FERMI 2 AIR PARTICULATE QUARTERLY COMPOSITE ANALYSIS API-1 (indicator)

(pCi/cubic meter) lNuclide, l Qu~terP ~ i 6rst, Scond Quarter(a)<i3 ]

Be-7 1.13E-01 +1 2.20E-02 <l 7.10E-021 K-40 < 2.50E-02 <1 2.20E-02 I Mn-54 < 1.70E-03 <1 3.60E-031 Co-58 < 4.20E-03 < 3.80E-03 Fe-59 < 1.90E-02 < 1.90E-02 Co-60 j < 2.90E-03 < 1.50E-03 Zn-65 < 5.70E-03 < 7.90E-03 Zr-95 < 7.OOE-03 <1 1.10E-02 Ru-103 < 4.90E-03 _ <1 1.OOE-02 I Ru-106 < 2.50E-02_ <1 2.10E-02 I Cs-134 < 2.1OE-03 <1 1.90E-03 I Cs-137 < 2.30E-03 < 1.70E-03 Ba-140 < 2.OOE-01 < 4.90E-01 La-140 < 2.30E-01 < 5.70E-01 _ -

Ce-141 < 9.60E-03 _ < 1.70E-02 I Ce-144 < 7.OOE-03 I < 1.20E-02 _ I API-1 (indicator)

(pCi/cubic meter) lNuclide I Third Quarter (a) > -26C lls,4 Fourth Quarteri jm Be-7 8.60E-021 +/- 1.50E-02 4.90E-021 +/- 1.1OE-02 K-40 < 2.30E-02 < 1.70E-02 Mn-54 < 1.80E-03 < 1.30E-031 Co-58 < 2.OOE-03 < 1.90E-031 Fe-59 < 1.1 OE-02 < 7.701-03 Co-60 < 2.00E-03 <l 1.60E-03_

Zn-65 < 4.70E-03 <l 3.40E-031 Zr-95 < 6.90E-03 _ _ 4.50E-03 Ru-103 < 3.30E-03 c< 4.30E-031 Ru-106 < 1.40E-02_ <I 1..I OE-02_

Cs-134 < 2.00E-03 < 1.20E-03 Cs-137 < 2.10E-03 < 1.30E-03 Ba-140 < 4.30E-02 < 8.20E-02 l La-140 1 < 4.90E-02 <1 9.40E-02 l Ce-141 < 4.90E-03 <1 5.50E-03 l Ce-144 I < 6.80E-03 I < 4.70E-03 =I=

(a) See Appendix D, Program Execution.

C-23

Fermi 2 - 2002 Annual Radioactive Effluent Release and RadiologicalEnvironmental OperatingReport FERMI 2 AIR PARTICULATE QUARTERLY COMPOSITE ANALYSIS API-2 (indicator)

(pCi/cubic meter)

[Nuclide - First Quarter l Second Quarter .'.

Be-7. < 5.40E-02 I 8.OOE-02 +1-12.10E-02 K-40 < 2.20E-02 < 1.90E-02 Mn-54 < 2.30E-03 < 5.OOE-04 j_

Co-58 < 3.90E-03 < 4.90E-03 _

Fe-59 < 6.OOE-03 < 2.20E-02 I Co-60 < 3.OOE-03 < 1.70E-03 Zn-65 < 7.30E-03 < 4.90E-03 Zr-95 < 9.50E-03 < 6.50E-03 Ru-103 < 8.20E-03 < 8.40E-03 u-106 < 1.60E-02 < 1.1OE-021 Cs-134 < 3.80E-03= < 2.20E-03 =-

Cs- 137 < 1.90E-03 < 1.60E-03 Ba-140 < 6.80E-02 < 1.1OE-O1 La-140 < 7.80E-02 < 1.20E-Ol l1l Ce- 141 < 1.40E-02 < 1.20E-021 l Ce-144 < 8.90E-03 < 6.60E-031 API-2 (indicator)

(pCi/cubic meter)

[Ndcide b< St7 irdQuarter% ^L.-,'FourthQuarteri b Be-7 1.04E-01 +1 1.40E-02 6.80E-02 +1- 1.60E-02 K-40 <- 1.50E-021_ < 2.30E-02_

Mn-54 l< 2.1OE-03 _ < 1.90E-03 -

Co-58 < 3.1 OE-03 < 4.OOE-03 _

Fe-59 1 < 8.1 OE-03 < 1.1OE-02 Co-60 1 < 1.30E-03 < 1.70E-03_

Zn-65 < 4.OOE-03 = = < 4.90E-03 =

Zr-95 < 4.30E-03 < 7.70E-03 Ru-103 < 3.10E-03 = < 5.10E-03 = _=

Ru-106 < 1.40E-02 _ < 1.40E-02 _

Cs-134 < 1.70E-03 < 1.30E-03 _

Cs-137 < -1.30E-03 <l 1.30E-03 Ba-140 < 4.10E-02 <1 1.30E-O1 =

La-140 1 < 4.80E-02 < 1.50E-O _j Ce-141 l < 4.30E < 6.90E-03 Ce-144 I < 4.80E-03 I_ <1 6.70E-031 C-24

Fermi2 - 2002 Annual Radioactive Effluent Release and RadiologicalEnvironmentalOperatingReport FERMI 2 AIR PARTICULATE QUARTERLY COMPOSITE ANALYSIS API-3 (indicator)

(pCi/cubic meter) lNuclide [I First Quarter(a) - P tSecond Quarter(a)

Be-7 < 7.70E-02 I 7.OOE-02 +1- 1i.70E-02 K-40 < 3.30E-02 < 2.30E-02 Mn-54 < 2.30E-03 < 2.20E-03 _

Co-58 < 5.60E-03 < 3.50E-03 _-

Fe-59 < 8.70E-03 < 9.60E-03 Co-60 < 2.60E-03 < 2.60E-03 Zn-65 < 8.40E-03 < 5.60E-03 Zr-95 < 1.IOE-02 < 5.1OE-03 Ru- 103 < 8.30E-03 < 8.20E-03 Ru-106 < 1.80E-02 < 1.70E-02 _

Cs-134 < 2.30E-03 < 1.40E-03 Cs-137 < 1.40E-03 <1 1.30E-03l Ba-140 < 2.70E-01 < 2.70E-O1 La-140 < 3.10E-01 < 3.10E-011 I Ce-141 < 1.30E-02 < 8.90E-031_ _

Ce-144 < 7.60E-03 < 6.60E-031 API-3 (indicator)

(pCi/cubic meter)

[Nuclide lThird Quarter - - ,iFourthQuarter(a) l Be-7 1 7.40E-02 +1 1.40E-02 <1 4.20E-02 I K-40 < 2.30E-02 __ < 2.50E-02 _- -- _ l Mn-54 < 2.20E-03 <1 1.70E-03l Co-58 < 2.90E-03 _ < 2.70E-03 _

Fe-59 < 2.OOE-03 < 1.OOE-02 Co-60 < 2.30E-03 < 4.70E-041 1_ 1 Zn-65 l< 4.80E-03 _ 4.70E-03_

Zr-95 < 6.OOE-03 <_ 7.30E-03 Ru-103 < 4.60E-03 < 5.1OE-03_

Ru-106 < 1.20E-02_ < 1.40E-02 _

Cs-134 < 2.1OE-03 _< 1.80E-03 Cs-137 < 1.70E-03 _< 1.70E-03 Ba-140 < 5.30E-02 _< 1.OOE-01 La-140 < 6.1OE-02 _< 1.20E-01 Ce-141 < 6.10E-03 _ < 6.30E-03_

Ce- 144 < 7.00E-03 _ __ < 6.OOE-03l I (a) See Appendix D, Program Execution C-25

Fermi2 - 2002 Annual RadioactiveEffluent Release and RadiologicalEnvironmental OperatingReport FERMI 2 AIR PARTICULATE QUARTERLY COMPOSITE ANALYSIS API-4 (control)

(pCi/cubic meter)

INuclide? j <I First Quarter . - Second Quarter. 7l Be-7 I 7.30E-02 +1- 1.70E-02 I 1.33E-01 +1- 2.40E-02 K-40 < 2.80E-02 _ < 2.40E-02 I Mn-54 < 5.1OE-04 < 1.80E-03l Co-58 < 3.30E-03 < 4.20E-03 l Fe-59 < 2.80E-02 < 1.70E-02 Co-60 < 3.20E-03_ < 2.30E-03 Zn-65 < 8.80E-03 < 6.60E-03 =

Zr-95 < 7.90E-03 < 1.OOE-02 Ru-103 < 6.40E-03 < 1.20E-02 Ru-106 < 2.10E-02 < 2.30E-02 Cs-134 < 2.OOE-03 <. 2.60E-03 Cs-137 < 2.OOE-03 <_ 1.40E-03 Ba-140 < 2.60E-01 < 3.60E-O1 _

La-140 < 2.90E-01 =_< 4.1OE-O1 Ce- 141 < 8.50E-03_ _ _ < 1.60E-02 _

Ce-144 < 6.90E-03 < 9.OOE-03 API-4 (control)

(pCi/cubic meter)

NuCide [f Third Quarter ,f -l - Fourth Quarter(a) ]

Be-7 I 8.20E-021 1.70E-02 I 7.50E-02 1 1.50E-02 K-40 I < 3.10E-02 < 2.20E-02 _

Mn-54 < 2.30E-03 _ < 2.20E-03 Fe-59 < 1.20E-02 < 1.30E-02_ _

Co-60 < 1.60E-03 = < 2.1OE-03_

Zn-65 < 5.90E-03 < 4.70E-03 _

Zr-95 < 6.OOE-03 = _ < 4.60E-03 Ru-103 < 6.70E-03 < 5.10E-03 Ru-106 < 1.70E-02 < 1.30E-021 Cs-134 < 2.20E-03 = < .70E-03 Cs-137 l < 2.1OE-03 _ < 1.40E-03 Ba-140 < 7.50E-02 < 1.IOE-0 I La-140 l < 8.60E-02 < 1.30E-O1 Ce-141 < 6.80E-03 < 6.70E-03 Ce-144 l < 8.90E-03 _ < 5.00E-03 ---- _---

(a) See Appendix D, Program Execution.

C-26

Fermi2 - 2002 Annual Radioactive Effluent Release and RadiologicalEnvironmental OperatingReport FERMI 2 AIR PARTICULATE QUARTERLY COMPOSITE ANALYSIS API-5 (Indicator)

(pCi/cubic meter)

INUClideQ [ - 7 First Quarter> ' [ ,Second Quatrtei(a)'

Be-7 1.1OE-01 +I - 2.20E-02 I 1.06E-01 +1- 2.80E-02 K-40 < 3.OOE-02 < 3.20E-02 Mn-54 < 2.40E-03 < 3.80E-03 _ -

Co-58 < 4.60E-03 = < 5.40E-03 Fe-59 < 3.00E-02 <_ 6 20E-03 _

Co-60 < 7.30E-04 = < 2.90E-03 Zn-65 < 4.20E-03 <1 5.20E-03 -

Zr-95 < 7.60E-03 <l 1.20E-02 Ru- 103 < 7.50E-03 < 1.30E-02 Ru-106 < 2.10E-02 < 1.50E-02 Cs-134 < 2.OOE-03 _ < 3.40E-03 Cs-137 < 2.20E-03 < 1.90E-03 Ba-140 < 7.90E-02 < 7.90E-01 La-140 < 9.1OE-02 _ < 9.1OE-01 Ce-141 < 8.60E-03 < 1.70E-02 Ce-144 < 7.80E-03 = < 8.30E-03l API-5 (Indicator)

(pCi/cubic meter)

[Nuclide -- l "4Third Quarter (a) ': Fo'urth Quarter(a)

Be-7 I 9.90E-02 +1 1.80E-02 9.80E-021 +1- 1.30E-02 K-40 I< 1.90E-021 < 1.60E-02 Mn-54 < 1.70E-03 _ < 1.50E-03 Co-58 I < 3.60E-03 _< 2.40E-03 Fe-59 '

< 1.20E-02 _ < 5.60E-03 Co-60 < 3.1OE-03 - < 1.10E-03 2n-65 < 6.20E - < 3.60E-03 Zr-95 < 6.40E-03 < 3.40E-03 Ru-103 < 3.80E-03 < 4.OOE-03 -

Ru-106 < 1.60E-02 < 1.30E-02 Cs-134 < 1.70E-03 < 1.20E-03 Cs-137 < 2.20E-03 < 1.20E-03 Ba-140 < 3.90E-02 O 5.50E-02 La-140 < 4.50E-02 <I 6.40E-_

Ce-141 < 4.80E-031 <i 5.40E-03 Ce-144 < 6 5OE-03 I < 4.90E-03 I (a) See Appendix D, Program Execution.

C-27

Fermi 2 - 2002 Annual Radioactive Effluent Release and RadiologicalEnvironmental OperatingReport FERMI 2 MILK ANALYSIS M-2 (Indicator)

(pCiliter) l-2NuJclide

' i22-JAN- l

_______ 14 -FEB 14-MAR _________

I-131 < 7.50E-01 < 4.OOE-01 < 6.90E-O1 I Sr-89 < 7.20E+00 < 5.90E+00 1<

_6.80E+OO Sr-90 1.96E+00 +/- 5.40E-01 1.74E+-T+/- 3.80E-01 1.73E+00 +/- 3.60E-O1 Be-7 < 4.60E+01 = < 4.1OE+01 < 5.90E+O1 =

K-40 1.36E+03 +/- 6.70E+01 1.41E+03 +/-4.90E+01 1.47E+03 +1- 6.80E+O1 Mn-54 < 6.90E+00 < 4.80E+00 < 5.70E+OO I Co-58 < 5.80E+00 < 5.20E+OO < 7.40E+OO =

Fe-59 < 2.30E+O1I < 1.50E+01 < 2.30E+O1 Co-60 < 6.80E+00 < 5.70E+00 < 8.20E+OO Zn-65 < 1.60E+01 < 1.30E+01 < 1.80E+O1 _

Zr-95 < 1.lOE+OI < 8.60E+00 I < 1.20E+O1 =

Ru-103 < 5.90E+00 < 5.20E+00 < 6.20E+OO Ru-106 < 4.80E+01 < 3.90E+01 < 5.80E+O1 =

Cs-134 < 7.50E+00 - < 6 60E+00 < 6.80E+OO Cs-137 < 6.1OE+00 < 5.-OE+00 < 6.60E+OO Ba-140 < 1.1OE+O1 _ < 8.OOE+001 < 9.OOE+OO _

La-140 < 1.20E+01= < 9.20E+001 _ < 1.OOE+Ol Ce-141 < 7.70E+00 < 8.40E+OO < 1.1OE+Ol1 Ce-144 < 2.90E+01 <I 2.90E+O1 T < 3.80E+O1_

1Nuclide ---- &A-9.50-O18 IRiI 16- _ _ _ _ _________

1-131 < 9.50E-01l l <l 9.00E-O01 I <i 9.80E-01 Sr-89 < 7.70E+OO ___ l < 7.50E+00l l_ _ < 6.40E+OO Sr-90 < 1.40E+OOI < 1.70E+001 1_ 1 < 1.70E+OO Be-7 < 4.40E+01 < 3.40E+01 < 4.60E+01 K-40 1.33E+031 +/- 5.90E+O1 1.41E+03 +/-5.OOE+O1 1.46E+03 +/-6.1OE+O1 Mn-54 < 6.60E+OO, < 4.50E+OO < 6.10E+OO Co-58 < 6.20E+OO < 4.20E+OO < 5.90E+00 ___

Fe-59 < 2.OOE+O1 < 1.20E+01 < 1.60E+0I Co-60 < 6.80E+OO < 5.50E+OO < 6.70E+OO Zn-65 < 2.40E+O1 < 1.OOE+O 1 < 2.20E+O1I 1 Zr-95 < 9.20E+OO <T 7.60E+OO <1 9.70E+OOj _ _ _

Ru-103 < 5.90E+OO <I 4.1OE+00 <1 6.30E+OO 1_1 Ru-106 < 4.70E+O1 '4 4.30E+01 <1 5.30E+01 _

Cs-134 < 5.10E+OO <1 4.90E+OO - _ j 6.50E+O0 -

Cs-137 <I 6.10E+OO L 4.60E+00 < 6.20E+OO0 Ba-140 < 8.40E+OO <1 6.70E+00 < 1.OOE+O1 La-140 < 9.70E+00 l< 7.80E+OO < 1. 1OE+O1 Ce-141 < 5.40E+OO <T 6.30E+OOj I < 7.40E+00 Ce-144 <l 2.50Ei+0-1l < 2.30E+Ol1 I l < 2.90E+O1 I_ _

C-28

Fermi 2 - 2002 Annual Radioactive Effluent Release and RadiologicalEnvironmental OperatingReport FERMI 2 MILK ANALYSIS M-2 (Indicator)

(pCifliter)

Nuclide ?i fT' 13-J _ ^ : , '.127-J

-,_ ? 11-JUL __:'_?__

1-131 < 9.50E-01 _I < 6.90E-O1 <1 7.20E-01 LI_

Sr-89 < 8.20E+00- < 8.00E+00 < 9.50E+OO Sr-90 < 1.70E+00 < 1.40E+00 < 1.70E+OO __

Be-7 < 5.20E+01 < 5.10E+01 < 4.30E+01 K-40 1.42E+03 +/ 6.90E+01 1.30E+03 +/- 5.90E+01 1.24E+03 +t- 7.OOE+01 Mn-54 < 6.60E+00 < 6.30E+00 < 7.OOE+OO . -

Co-58 < 6.1OE+00 < 6.20E+00 < 5.60E+OO Fe-59 < 2.50E+01 < 1.80E+01 _ < 2.00E+O1 Co-60 < 8.1OE+00 < 6.90E+00 l< 6.70E+OO Zn-65 < 2.50E+01 < 1.90E+01 < 1.60E+01 Zr-95 < 1.1OE+O1 < 1.1OE+O1 < 7.90E+OO Ru-103 < 6.OOE+00 < 6.80E+00 < 6.30E+OO Ru-106 < 5.60E+01 < 5.30E+01 < 5.OOE+01 Cs-134 < 6.30E+00 < 6.OOE+00 < 6.30E+OO Cs-137 < 7.20E+00 < 6.50E+00 < 5.40E+OO Ba-140 < 8.50E+00 < 1.20E+01 < 8.70E+OO La-140 < 9.70E+00 < 1.40E+O1 < 1.OOE+o1 Ce-141 < 900E+OO < 1.lOE+O1 l < .20E+OO Ce-144 < 3f.4i0_

_ _ < 3.60E+O1 _< _

Nuclide l JiI 25-J ___? ? * ' 8-AUG>

? 22-AUG .

1-131 1 < 9.20E-O1 __ I <1 8.80E-011 I <l 9.90E-01 I Sr-89 < 6.40E+OO < 9.50E+OO < 700E+OO -

Sr-90 < 1.30E+00 l_ _ < 1.80E+00, < 1.20E+OO Be-7 < 3.90E+01 __ l < 5.OOE+01 < 3.30E+O1 _

K-40 1.35E+03 +/- 5.20E+O1 1.37E+03 +/- 7.50E+O1 1.28E+03 +/-4.OOE+O1 Mn-54 < 5.1OE+00 __ l < 6.80E+00 - < 3.90E+OO l Co-58 < 5.20E+OO < 7.40E+OO <1 4.50E+OO Fe-59 < 1.40E+01 l_ l < 1.50E+01 < 1.30E+OI Co-60 < 5.1OE+00 l < 6.50E+00 < 4.70E+OO Zn-65 < 1.20E+O1 - < 1.90E+01 < 9.50E+OO zr-95 < 9.OOE+OO - < 1.1OE+O1 <

_7.60E+_______

Ru-103 < 4.80E+OO, < 7.40E+OO <1 4.90E+OO ___

Ru-106 < 4.60E+Ol - < 5.OOE+O1 < 3.60E+01t_

Cs-134 < 4.80E+OOl < 5.90E+OO < 3.90E+OO Cs-137 j < 4.70E+OO < 7.40E+00- < 3.70E+007 Ba-140 < 8.30E+OOl 6.30E+- 0 < 9.50E+OO La-140 < 9.50E+00 < 7.30E+OO <1 1.10E+01 Ce-141 < 7.90E+OO l_ l < 1.lOE+Ol < 8.1OEOOt Ce-144 < 2.80E+O1 I I I< 3.40E+01 1<I2.3OE+Oj

< I C-29

Fermi2 - 2002 Annual Radioactive Effluent Release and RadiologicalEnvironmental OperatingReport FERMI 2 MILK ANALYSIS M-2 (Indicator)

(pCdliter)

Nuclide [M2-S-'^ 1226-PS-- k3 (iAit r) J 7OCT_ I I-131 < 9.80E-O1l < 1.OOE+001 < 9.50E-O1 I Sr-89 < 7. 70E+00 < 8.OOE+00 < 6.30E+OO Sr-90 < 1.60E+00 < 1.80E+0 2.24E+00 +/- 4.50E-01 Be-7 < 4.70E+01 < 3.50E+01 < 3.80E+O1 K-40 1.39E+03 +/- 6.40E+01 1.42E+03 4.90E+01 1.41E+03 +/- 5.60E+O1 Mn-54 < 6.OOE+OO- < 4.50E+00_ < 5.20E+OO Co-58 < 6.OOE+OO < 5.1 OE+100 < 4.50E+0O Fe-59 < 1.30E+01 < 1.40E+01 _ < 1I.1OE+O1 Co-60 < 6.1 OE+OO < 6.1 OE+O0 < 5.70E+OO Zn-65 < 2.30E+01 < 1.60E+O1 < 1.50E+01 Zr-95 < 1.1OE+Ol1- < 7.30E+00 < 8.40E+0O Ru-103 _

< 5.70E+00 << 4.80E+00 48 E O __ _ ____

< 4.60E+0O __ _ _

Ru-106 < 5.OOE+O1 < 4.1OE+O1 < 4.70E+01 Cs-134 < 6.40E+00 < 5.30E+OO < 5.50E+0O Cs-137 < 5.90E+OO < 5.50E+0O < 5.30E+OO Ba-140 < 9.90E+00 < 7.40E+00 < 8.70E+OO La-140 < 1.1OE+O1 < 8.50E+OO < 1.OOE+O1 Ce-141 < 1.20E+01 < 1.20E+01 < 9.90E+OO Ce-144 < 3.90E+01 < 2.50E+01 <1 2.20E+O1

[Nuclide ,. 30-OCT 21N _____ 1 19-DEC _ _

I-131 j < 9.80E-01 <1 8.40E-01 I <1 6.20E-O1 lIl Sr-89 < 5.70E+00 < 9.40E+OO < 8.60E+00 Sr-90 2.34E+001 +/- 4.70E-O1 1.70E+00 +1- 5.OOE-01 < 1.80E+00 Be-7 l< 5.40E+01 i - <1 3.50E+01l <l 4.50E+01l-K-40 1.36E+03 +/- 6.50E+O1 _ 1.43E+03 +/- 4.90E+O1 1.51E+03 +1- 16.1OE+O1 Mn-54 < 7.50E+00 <l 5.lOE+0 l <1 5.OOE+00 Co-58 < 6.20E+0O0 I <1 3.80E+O0 _____ <'I 5.70E+o0 ____

Fe-S9 l< 1.40E+01l <1 1.30E+01t l<i' 1.20E+01l l Co-60 < 6.70E+O0 I < 6.OOE+001 __ 1 < 6.30E+O0 Zn-65 < 1.80E+O1 i < 1.1OE+Oi1 I_ I < 1.1OE+0 I Zr-95 < 1.2 0E+011 1 < 7.70E+00i <I 9.00E+00 i_ I Ru-103 < 7.10E+00 < 4.60E+_

< <1 4 .7 0E+00OI Ru-106 < 6.OOE+01o - <, 4.00E+O1 < 5.OOE+O1l Cs-134 < 6.70E+00 l < 4.70E+00, <_ 4.90E+00_

Cs-137 < 6.40E+OO < 4.90E+00. l _ l <l 5.40E+OO____

Ba-140 < 1.30E+01 < 8.50E+00' < 7.60E+O0 __ I La-140 < 1.40E+O1 < 9.80E+00 < 8.70E+OO0 ___

Ce-141 < 1. IOE+O I < 6. 1OE+00 _ __ < 7.30E+OO Ce-144 < 4.OOE+Oll I i i<1_ 2.30_+0_ 1 _ l <i 2.70E+01 _

C-30

Fermi2 -2002 Annual Radioactive Effluent Release and RadiologicalEnvironmental OperatingReport FERMIl 2 MILK ANALYSIS M-8 (Control)

(pCi/liter)

Nuclide ' 22-JAN u, 14-FEB I - I ^__ A4-MR 14__ .__

1-131 < 6.30E-011 < 3.60E-01 I < 7.OOE-O1 Sr-89 < 7.30E+00 < 6.80E+00 < 4.80E+O I Sr-90 < 1.70E+00 < 1.40E+00_ < 1.80E+OO Be-7 < 3.70E+O1 _I < 3.60E+01 < 4.1OE+O1 K-40 1.44E+03 +/- 5.OOE+O1 1.45E+03 +/- 5.70E+01 1.311E+03 +1- 5.40E+O1 Mn-54 < 4.50E+00 < 5.70E+00 < 4.90E+OO Co-58 < 4.OOE+00 < 5.40E+00 < 4.50E+OO Fe-59 < 1.40E+01 < 2.10E+01 <1 1.80E+O1 Co-60 < 5.1 OE+OO < 6.60E+00 <. 7.30E+OO Zn-65 < 1.20E+01 < 1.40E+01 <1 1.30E+O1 Zr-95 < 7.30E+00 < 8.50E+00 < 8.1OE+OO Ru-103 < 4.20E+00 < 5.50E+00 < 5.30E+OO Ru-106 < 4.30E+01 - < 5.OE+01 < 4.30E+O1 Cs- 134 < 4.70E+00 < 5.40E+00 < 5.40E+OO Cs- 137 < 4.60E+00 < 5.20E+00 < 4.90E+OO Ba-140 < 6.20E+OO < 1.OOE+O1 _ < 9.50E+OO La-140 < 7.20E+OO < 1.1OE+O1l < 1. 1OE+O1 Ce-141 < 6.OOE+00 _< 6.80E+OO < 6.70E+OO Ce-144 < 2.40E+01 < 2.30E+O1 < 2.30E+O1 l Nuclide^','< 18-APR- - ; .2 - 16-MAY ______ J 23-MAY ___'____

I-131 I < 9.80E-01 I <1 9.40E-01 I l <1 9.20E-01 I Sr-89 < 9.70E+OO < 9.OOE+OO0 ___ <1 5.90E+OO Sr-90 < 1.70E+00 < 1.50E+00 < 1.50E+00l Be-7 < 3.80E+O1 < 3.70E+Oll < 4.20E+O1 K-40 1.34E+03 +/- 5.50E+01 1.53E+03 +/- 5.10E+01 1.51E+03 +/- 5.90E+O1 Mn-54 < 5.70E+00 <1 4.60E+00 < 4.80E+OO !_ _

Co-58 < 5.20E+00 ___ < 4.90E+00 - < 5.10E+OO l_

Fe-59 < 1.80E+01l < 1.30E+O1 - I < 1.80E+01 I_ _

Co-60 < 6.1OE+00 __ l < 4.50E+00 < 5.30E+00 ___

Zn-65 < 1.40E+01 < 1.30E+01 < 1.40E+01 Zr-95 < 8.60E+00 _ i < 7.30E+00 < 8.60E+0 l Ru-103 < 4.90E+00 < 4.80E+00 < 5.80E+00, __ -_---__

Ru-106 < 4.70E+01 < 4.20E+01 < 5.OOE+01 Cs-134 < 5.60E+00 < 5.30E+00 < 4.40E+00 Cs-137 < 5.70E+00 ___ < 4.80E+00 < 5. 10E+00 Ba-140 < 8.60E+00 < 7.00E+00 < 9.30E+00 La-140 < 9.9013+00 < 8.0013+00 < l.lOE+0ll I Ce-141 < 6. +_ II <_ 6.60E+0_ <

< 7.40E+00 1< 2.30Ei1 <_ 2.5E÷O11 <_I___0+

C-31

Fermi 2 - 2002 Annual Radioactive Effluent Release and RadiologicalEnvironmental OperatingReport FERMI 2 MILK ANALYSIS M-8 (Control)

(pCi/liter)

Nu6lide L 13-JUN* k >> S7 N V' 91-JUL P27-JUN:

I JUL ____

I-131 < 8.30E-01 <1 6.80E-01l < 8.40E-O1 I Sr-89 < 6.50E+00 = < 8.50E+00 _ < 8.60E+OO Sr-90 < 1.60E+OO < 1.50E+OO_ < 1.50E+OO Be-7 < 5.1 OE+O1 __I < 3.60E+01 < 3.20E+01 K-40 1.45E+03 +/- 6.90E+01 1.39E+03 +1- 4.70E+01 1.43E+03 +/- 5.40E+01 Mn-54 < 7.40E+00 < 4.90E+00 < 4.40E+OO Co-58 < 6.00E+ 00 <, 4.40E+00 < 3.80E+OO Fe-59 < 1.50E+O1 < 1.70E+01 < 1.40E+01 Co-60 < 7.OOE+OO < 4.70E+00 < 4.40E+OO Zn-65 < 1.70E+01 < 1.1 OE+O 1 < 1.20E+O I Zr-95 < 1.20E+01_ < 6.70E+00 < 7.00E+OO Ru-103 < 6.20E+OO _ < 5.OOE+OO < 4.40E+OO Ru-106 < 5.20E+01 < 4.20E+01 < 3.90E+O1 _I Cs-134 < 6.60E+00 < 4.30E+00 < 3.70E+OO Cs-137 < 6.1 OE+OO _0 _ < 4.90E+00 < 4.50E+OO _

Ba-140 < 1.OOE+Ol < 1.1OE+O1 < 6.90E+OO La-140 < 1.20E+O 1 < 1.20E+0 1 < 7.90E+OO Ce-141 < 1.OOE+O1 < 6.90E+00 < 6.90E+OO Ce-144 < 3.50E+01 _ < 2.40E+0 Ill <_ 2.70E+O1 Nuclide" [z 25 JUL _ _ "'K 8-AUG; _ _ 7 t 22-AUG ____ I I-131 <i 8.30E-011 <1 9.80E-01 - <l 9.60E-O1; Sr-89 < 6.40E+OO < 7.60E+ 00, _ll < 6.70E+OO Sr-90 <, 1.40E+OOI < 1.40E+001 l I < 1.70E+001 lI Be-7 < 3.90E+01 <l 4.90E+01 l< 3.90E+O1,,

K-40 1 1.43E+03 +/- 5.70E+01 1.28E+03 +/- 7.40E+O11 1.29E+03 +1- 5.20E+01 Mn-54 l< 5.1OE+00, <T 6.70E+OO <1 5.501SE+OO I Co-58 <I 4.70E+OOI I_ l < 7.20E+OOI I_ I < 4.80E+OO, l_ I Fe-59 < 1.60E+O1 < 1.60E+01 < 1.80E+O1 _ -_ _

Co-60 < 4.70E+OO < 6.80E+00 < 6.90E+O00 ! _

Zr-95 < 9.00E+OOI, <, 1.LOE+O1l - l < 8.90E+OO, _ _

Ru-103 < 5.20E+00l <1 6.60E+00 1 < 5.20E+OO' __ I Ru-106 < 5.20E+01j < 5.80E+011 ___ _ < 4.60E+01 Cs-134 i< 5.20E+00 < 6.40E+OO ___ < 4.80E+OO l Cs-137 < < 5. 10E+O0 ___

Ba-140 < 8.40E+00, < 1.30E+011 !_ ! < 1.30E+O1 La-140 < 9.70E+OOt < 1.50E+O1[ < 1.40E+O1 ___

Ce-141 < 6.80E+001 <1 1.10E+01[ 1_ ', <, 6.90E+OOI Il lCe-144 1 <Cf I

i2.70E+O1I 2_ I I_ f ___ _ _ __< 1,_I <,__ 3.30E+O1[

< 1.__ _ _ _ _ _ _ ___

__ [ _______ <1 2.30E+O1

_l _ ____ I_

C-32

Fermi2 - 2002 Annual Radioactive Effluent Release and RadiologicalEnvironmentalOperatingReport FERMI 2 MILK ANALYSIS M-8 (Control)

(pCi/liter)

Nuclide 4- 12-SEP'IUY ;Xi4t 'K, 26-SEP _________ J 17-0CT,- _ _ r I-131 < 9.90E-01I < 9.80E-01 I < 9.40E-O I Sr-89 < 8.50E+OO < 6.90E+O _ _< 7.OOE+OC Sr-90 < i1.70E+00 < 1.60E+00 _ 2.13E+OC +/- 4.80E-01 Be-7 < 3.80E+011 _ __ < 5.20E+01 < 3.40E+O1 =

K-40 1.49E+03 +/- 5.40E+01 1.36E+03 +/- 5.90E+01 = 1.34E+03 +/- 4.70E+01 Mn-54 < 4. 10E+00 < 6.00E+00- < 4.30E+OO Co-58 < 4.30E+00 < 6. 10E+00 < 4.10E+OO Fe-59 < l.lOE+O1 < 2.10E+O1 < l.lOE+O1 Co-60 < 5.1 OE+OO < 7.OOE+00 < 5.1 OE+OO Zn-65 < 1.30E+01 < 2.40E+01 < 9.70E+OO Zr-95 < 7.90E+OO < 1.OOE+O1 < 6.70E+OO Ru-103 < 4.30E+W < 6.30E+00 < 4.20E+OO Ru-106 < 4.iOE+0i < 5.OOE+01l < 3.70E+O1 Cs-134 < 4.20E+OC _ < 6.20E+00 < 4.80E+OO Cs-137 < 4.30E+00 < 6.OOE+00 < 4.60E+OO Ba-140 < 5.30E+00 _ < 1.OOE+O1 l < 7.70E+OO La-140 < 6.1OE+OO _ < 1.20E+01 < 8.90E+OO ___

Ce- 141 < 7.30E+_ I_ _ < 1.OOE+O 1 < 6.30E+OO Ce-144 < 2.60E+01lI < 3.30E+O1 IlI < 1.90E+O1 I lNuclide l>t 31-OCT V jIYW ",1-NOV

__ _ :,1,I19-DEC

_ -* _ _ _iN I-131 I < 9.40E-O I <d 9.20E-011 <1 8.70E-01 I Sr-89 <) 7.20E+00 - l < 9.50E+00l <1 7.1OE+OO Sr-90 < 1.70E+00 2.53E+00 +I- 5.1OE-01 < 1.40E+00 Be-7 < 2.40E+01 < 3.1OE+O I < 3.60E+O1 ___

K-40 1.44E+03 +/- 3.40E+01 1.41E+03 +/- 4.90E+01 1.44E+03 +/- 4.90E+01 Mn-54 I< 2.80E+00O < 4.70E+00 < 4.30E+OO _____

Co-58 < 3.20E+00 < 5.L1OE+00 < 4.70E+OO _____

Fe-59 < 7.OOE+00l l_ _ < 1.20E+01 < 9.30E+OO ___

Co-60 < 3.50E+00 < 5.80E+00 < 4.80E+00 Zn-65 < 1.30E+01 < 1.20E+01 < 1.1O3E+0 I Zr-95 < 5.90E+00 < 8.30E+OO < 7.20E+OO l_ _

Ru- 103 < 3.20E+00 < 4.90E+OO < 4:80E+OO __ I Ru- 106 < 2.80E+01 < 4.1IOE+01 < 3.90E+01 ______

Cs-134 < 2.90E+OO < 5.1OE+OO ! 4.50E+OO Cs-137 < 3.20E+00 < 4.40E+OO < 4.20E+O0 Ba-140 < 4.80E+OOI < 8.OOE+OO < 6.40E+OO La-140 < 5.50E+00l <1 9.20E+00 < 7.40E+OO'i ___

Ce-141 < 4.30E+00 I < 1.20E+014 - _ o

< 6.301_+00 Ce-144 < I 1.50E+01 <1 2.40E+013 I l <_3 2. 101+0 C-33

Fermi2 - 2002 Annual Radioactive Effluent Release and RadiologicalEnvironmentalOperatingReport FERMI 2 -

VEGETABLE ANALYSIS FP-1 (Indicator)

(pCi/kg wet)

INuclide'" J '--1i-;'25-JL 'Broccoli r TT1h25-JULCabbae4 i25J Swiss Chard 4 I-131 < 4.1OE+O1 1= < 5.OOE+O1 I _ < 5.70E+O1 Be-7 < 3.OOE+02 < 3.60E+02 _< 2.60E+02 K-40 3.40E+03 +/ 4.OOE+02 2.44E+03 +1- 3.20E+02 4.85E+03 +/- 2.50E+02 Mn-54 < 4.20E+01 < 5.70E+01 < 2.20E+O1 Co-58 < 4.60E+01 < 4.70E+01 < 2.40E+O1 Fe-59 < 1.80E+02 < 1.70E+02 < 6.80E+O1 Co-60 < 7.20E+O1 < 4.1OE+O1 < 2.60E+O1 Zn-65 < 1.30E+02 < 1.50E+02 < 5.60E+O1 Zr-95 < 8.90E+01 < 8.70E+01 < 4.50E+O1 Ru-103 < 4.60E+01 < 5.20E+01 < 2.70E+O1 Ru-106 < 3.80E+02 < 3.80E+02 I _ < 2.40E+02 _

Cs-134 < 5.70E+01 < 4.70E+01 I < 2.30E+O1 _

Cs- 137 < 5.OOE+01 < 4.30E+01 < 2.60E+O1 Ba-140 < 1.lOE+02 < 8.70E+01 < 3.80E+O1 _

La-140 < 1.30E+02 _ < 1.OOE+02 < 4.40E+O1 Ce-141 < 5.50E+01 _ < 8.OOE+01 < 3.30E+O1 _

Ce-144 < 1.80E-+02 < 2.50E+02 - < 1.lOE+02 FP-1 (Indicator)

(pCilkg wet)

Nuclide J l 5-SEP Broccoli [ 5-SEP Cabbage- - 7' ,,5-SEP Swiss Chard

,91, I-131 < 5.90E+O1 <1 5.80E+01 - < 5.70E+O1 I Be-7 < 3.70E+02 < 4.70E+02 I_< 5.60E+02 K-40 4.43E+03 +/- 3.50E+02 4.76E+03 +/- J 4.OOE+02 5.37E+03 +/- 5.OOE+02 Mn-54 < 3.90E+01 < 4.70E+01 < 6.70E+O1 _

Co-58 < 4.40E+01 < 5.70E+01 l < 7.10E+O1 Fe-59 < 9.50E+01 _ < 1.50E+02 < 1.70E+02 _

Co-60 < 4.70E+01 _ < 5.50E+O1 < 7.60E+O1

-65 < 1.1OE+02 < 1.60E+02 < 1.90E+02 Zr-95 < 8.40E+01 < 8.50E+O1 < 1.OOE+02 Ru- 103 < 5.OOE+01 _ < 5.80E+01 < 6.40E+O1 _

Ru-106 < 3.30E+02 < 5.10E+02 < 4.30E+02 Cs-134 < 4.20E+01 < 4.80E+01 < 4.50E+O1 Cs-137 < 3.70E+01 < 5.50E+01 l_ l < 6.40E+O1 Ba-140 < 2.OOE+02 < 2.OOE+02 L_'1< 2.1OE+02 La-140 < 2.30E+02 < 2.30E+02 ___ < 2.40E+02 Ce-141 1 < 7 80E+01 < 9.20E+01 I_ I <I 9.80E+O1 Ce-1441< 2.0+ I < 2.50E+02 I < 2.20E+02 ___ __

C-34

Fermi2 - 2002 Annual Radioactive Effluent Release and RadiologicalEnvironmental OperatingReport FERMI 2 VEGETABLE- ANALYSIS FP-9 (Control)

(pCi/kg wet) iNuclide- J 2 J5-SEP-Cibba&e"j j 5-SEP Horseradish L.

I-131 I < 6.OOE+01 < 5.90E+OI1 Be-7 - < 3.70E+02 < 4.40E+02 K-40 7.68E+03 +/- 5.OOE+02 6.19E+03 +/- 4.70E+02 Mn-54 < 5.60E+O I < 5.OOE+O1 Co-58 < 5.OOE+O1 < 5.50E+01 Fe-59 < 1.50E+02_ <1 1.20E+02 Co-60 < 6.90E+01 <f 5.80E+01 Zn-65 < 1.40E+02 < 1.40E+02 Zr-95 < 9.30E+01 < 9.90E+01 Ru-103 < 5.20E+O1 < 5.50E+01 Ru-106 < 4.30E+02 < 5.OOE+02 Cs-134 < 5.OOE+O1 < 4.80E+O1 Cs-137 < 4.60E+01 <_ 5.60E+Ol Ba-140 < 1.50E+02 < 2.OOE+02 La-140 < 1.70E+02 < 2.30E+02 Ce-141 < 7.60E+01 < 7.70E+01 Ce-144 < 2.00E+02 < 1.90E+02 FP-9 (Control)

(pCi/kg wet)

Nuclide l 2 5-SEPRed Cabbage%>]'

1-131 5<

.90E+O1 I Be-7 < 4.50E+02 K-40 5.46E+03 +/_ 4.80E+02 Mn-54 < 6.00E+O1 Co-58 < 4.80E+01 Fe-59 < 1.50E+02 Co-60 < 6.50E+01 Zn-65 < 1.30E+02 Zr-95 < 9.70E+01 Ru-103 < 6.60E+01 Ru-106 < 4.60E+02 Cs-134 < 5.IOE+Ol Cs-137 < 5.20E+01 Ba-140 < 1.40E+02 La-140 < 1.60E+02 Ce-141 < 7.40E+O1 = _______

Ce-144 < 2.OOE+02 I C-35

Fermi2 - 2002 Annual RadioactiveEffluent Release and RadiologicalEnvironmental OperatingReport FERMI 2 DRINKING WATER ANALYSIS DW-1 (Indicator)

(pCi/liter)

Nuclide-l 2.9-JAN - 26-FEB - l_; ,5-,26-MAR.-

GR-B _ 3.59E+00! +/- 6.30E-01 < 3.20E+00 5.76E+00 +I- 18.80E-01 Sr-89 < 5.80E+00, < 7.OE+00 < 5.80E+00 Sr-90 < 1.50E+OO < 1.70E+00 < 1.60E+OO Be-7 < 3.20E+01 < 3.1OE+O1 < 3.40E+01 K-40 < 6.1OE+01 < 5.80E+01 < 6.10E+01 Mn-54

< 4.00E+00 __ < 3.90E+00 _-__ < --

4.30E+00 Co-58 < 3.90E+00 _ < 4.00E+00 _ < 3.80E+00 Fe-59 < l.1OE+01 < 1.20E+ IO1I < 1.1OE+O1 Co-60 < 4.30E+00 < 4.70E+001, < 4.20E+OO Zn-65 < 9.30E+00 < 7.70E+OO < 1.OOE+O1 Zr-95 < 6.90E+00, < 6.80E+00 < 6.70E+00 Ru- 103 < 4.20E+00 _ < 4.30E+00 < 3.90E+0Ol_

Ru-106 < 3.90E+O1 < 3.90E+O1 < 3.70E+01 Cs-134 < 3.70E+00_ < 4.30E+00 < 3.70E+00 Cs-137 < 4.50E+00 <_ 4.1_0E+

Ba- 140 < 6.20E+00 _ < 6.60E+00 < 7.1OE+OO La-140 < 7.20E+00 _ < 7.60E+00 O O _

Ce-141 < 5.60E+ < 5.80E+0;0 < 5.70E+00 Ce-144 < i2.10E+011 < 2.20E+O1I I <I 2.10E_01_I

[Nuclide J 30-APR -d: __^l

30-A _ _ - e 25-JUN e-GR-B 3.40E+00; +/- 1.1OE+O0 I 5.44E+00 +/- 16.80E-01 l 5.27E+00' +/- 7.80E-01 Sr-89 < 8.40E+00, < 9.30E+00 -. < 8.30E+OO Sr-90 < 1.60E+00 l < 1.70E+00 < 1.80E+O01 Be-7 < 3.10E+O1l1 < 3.60E+011 11 < 3.70E+O1 1 l K-40 l <l 6.1OE+O1l < 6.30E+01l < 6.80E+O1 Mn-54 < 3.40E+00 < 4.1OE+00' < 4.20E+O0 Co-58 < 3.60E+00 < 4.50E+000 _*_ l < 4.60E+OO Fe-59 < 1.1OE+O1 < 1.lOE+Ol I <I 1.60E+Oll Co-60 1< 3.70E+00 < 4.50E+00 - j < 5.60E+OO Zn-65 < 8.70E+00 < 9.OOE+00 < 9.50E+00 Zr-95 < 6.50E+00 < 6.40E+00 <I 7.50E+00 Ru-103 < 4.1OE+00 < 4.70E+00 < 5.20E+00 Ru-106 < 3.60E+01 < 4. 1OE+O < 4.20E+01 Cs-134 < 3.70E+OO, < 4.30E+0 i < 4.60E+OO Cs-137 < 4. OE+O0 < 4.30E+00 < 4.30E+OOl II Ba-140 < 6.1 OE+00 < 9.OOE+000 _ _ < 1.00E+01 La-140 < 7.OOE+00 < 1.OOE+01 < 1.20E+01 Ce-141 < 6. 1OE+00 < 7.30E+OO < 6.10E+O1 I Ce-144 <I-EIl l <l 2.20E+01 <- 2.OE+O I I I C-36

Fermi2 - 2002 Annual Radioactive Effluent Release and RadiologicalEnvironmental OperatingReport FERMI 2 DRINKING WATER ANALYSIS DW-1 (Indicator)

(pCiAiter)

Nuclide ' *3O-JL:>& 'iil - 27-AUG' - ` j 24-SEP -"

GR-B I 4.70E+OO +1 1.1OE+OO I 1.OOE+O1 +/- 1.40E+00 I 3.59E+00 +/- 9.80E-O1 Sr-89 < 9.1OE+00 <1 6.10E+00 < 6 80E+OO Sr-90 < 1.80E+OO < 1.50E+iOO < 1.60E+OO _

Be-7 < 4.60E+01 <' 3.10E+01 < 3.90E+O1 K-40 < 9.20E+01 < 4.1OE+O1 < 6.60E+O1 Mn-54 < 5.40E+00 <_3.1OE+OO < 5.20E+OO Co-58 < 6.60E+00 < 3.70E+00 < 5.20E+OO

_._ __ _ _ __ _ _ _ < 3 7 E O_ _ _ _ ___ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

Fe-59 < 1.20E+O1 < 1.1OE+O1 < 9.80E+OO Co-60 < 6.80E+00 _ < 3.OOE+00 < 5.20E+OO _

Zn-65 < 1.40E+01 < 1.30E+01 < 1.90E+O1 Zr-95 < 1.OOE+O 1 < 6.20E+OO < 8.40E+OO _

Ru-103 < 5.90E+00 < 4.40E+00 < 5.80E+OO Ru-106 < 5.OOE+O1 < 3.203E+01 < 4.20E+O1 Cs-134 < 5.50E+00 < 3.20E+00 < 5.OOE+OO Cs-137 < 6.OOE+OO < 3.80E+00 < 6.20E+OO Ba-140 < 1.IOE+O1 _ < 9.40E+00' < 8.80E+OO La-140 < 1.30E+O1 < 1.lOE+O1 < 1.OOE+O1 Ce-141 < 7.20E+00 < 7.00E+OO < 1.1OE+O1 Ce-144 < 2.50E+01 - < 2.30E+1 <1 3.90E+O1 Nuclide 30-0 _ 26-NOV, 26- +7 30-DEC -

GR-B 1.06E+01l +/- 1.40E+00 4.1OE+00 +/- 1.IOE+O0 3.05E+000 +/- 9.60E-01 Sr-89 < 6.20E+00' 1_1 < 8.OOE+OO < 7.70E+0 I Sr-90 < 1.70E+00 ___ < 1.60E+00 < 1.60E+00, Be-7 < 5.1OE+01 I < 3.80E+O1 < 3.OOE+01 K-40 < 7.90E+01[ < 7.OOE+01 < 5.80E+O1 Mn-54 < 7.20E+OO <, 4.50E+00 1I1 <I 3.60E+OO iI Co-58 < 6.OOE+00 - < 4.10E+00 < 3.40E+00 ___

-Fe59 < 1.20E+O1 <1 8.70E+00 <I 6.90E+OO Co-60 < 4.50E+00, <1 4.60E+0 ! < 3.1OE+OO Zn-65 < 2.70E+01 < 1.20E+01 < 8.70E+O0 Zr-95 < 1.30E+01 < 8.40E+00 < 6.OOE+O0 II Ru- 103 < 6.60E+00 < 4.60E+00' __ l < 3.70E+0O l__

Ru-106 < 5.OOE+01 < -4.20E+o I < 3.30E+o1 Cs-134 < 5.80E+00, <, 4.60E+00, < 3.30E+OO, l_

Cs-137 < 5.70E+00 <1 4.70E+00 ___ < 3.60E+O0 Ba-140 < 1.OOE+O1 < 8.90E+00 < 5.80E+00_

La-140 < 1. OE+O1I __ I < 1.OOE+O1 < 6.70E+i0O l Ce-141 < 9.90E+00 - < 6.40E+00' l < 5.50E+00 Ce-144 <, 3.70E+01 I <

'I______l< 2.1OE+O11 _ 1_______

C-37

Fermi2 - 2002 Annual Radioactive Effluent Release and RadiologicalEnvironmental OperatingReport FERMI 2 DRINKING WATER ANALYSIS DW-2 (Control)

(pCi/liter)

NuclideP j ,.>~t 7' 29-JANiE ;:;v ?s 26-FEBiS ~

- _ _ rj 26-MR GR-B 2.46E+00 +/- 5.80E-01 3.60E+00 +/ 1.OOE+O0 5.37E+00 +/- 8.30E-01 Sr-89 < 6.30E+00 < 6.70E+00 < 6.1OE+OO Sr-90 < 1.70E+00 < 1.60E+00 < 1.70E+OO Be-7 < 3.30E+01 < 2.60E1+01 < 3.50E+01 K-40 < 5.90E+01 < 5.OOE+01 < 6.1OE+Ol Mn-54 < 3.80E+00 _ < 3.20E+00 < 4.10E+O0O Co-58 < 4.20E+00 < 3.30E+00 < 4.50E+00 Fe-59 < 1.OOE+O1 < 8.60E+O00 < 1.lOE+Ol Co-60 < 4.10E+00 < 3.50E+00 < 3.70E+0O _ -

Zn-65 < 1.1OE+01 < 7.70E+00 < 9.60E+0O Zr-95 < 6. 1OE+00 < 4.90E+00 < 6.80E+00 Ru-103 < 4.10E+00 < 3.50E+00, < 4.20E+0O Ru-106 < 3.90E+01 < 2.80E+01 < 3.80E+O1 _-

Cs-134 < 4.40E+00 < 3.30E+00 < 4.70E+OO Cs-137 < 4.60E+00' < 3.20E+00 < 4.60E+00 Ba-140 _ 6.60E+00 < 5.70E+00 < 6.20E+O0l La-140 < 7.60E+00 < 6.60E+00 < 7.10E+OO Ce-141 < 7.90E+00 < 8.30E+00_ < 5.80E+O00 Ce-144 < _ < 1.80E+011 I < 2.30E+O1_

lNuclide ] 30-APR7 < J

}30-MAY I- I,-,. -;25-U _ _

GR-B I 4.90E+O0I +/- 1.1OE+OO I 2.87E+00 +/- l5.60E-01 3.53E+00! +/- 6.50E-01 Sr-89 < 8.OOE+00 < 8.20E+00 < 6.90E+OO Sr-90 < 1.50E+00 < 1.60E+00 < 1.80E+OO Be-7 < 4.60E+01 _ < 3.30E+01 < 2.80E+l01 K-40 < 7.90E+O1 __ i < 5.90E+01 < 5.00E+O1 Mn-54 < 5.30E+00 <I 3.40E+00 < 4.OOE+00' Co-58 < 5.80E+00 <1 4.10E+00 < 3.40E+O0 Fe-59 < 1.70E+o1 I < 9.80E+oo I_ _ < l.1OE+o1 Co-60 < 5.20E+00 <§ 3.70E+00 < 4.30E+Oi zn-65 <, 1.30E+01 < 1.OOE+O1 <l 7.60E+OO Zr-95 < 9.40E+00 ___ < 6. 1OE+00 <1 6.OOE+00 Ru-103 < 6.1OE+O0 <I 3.60E+00 <l 4.30E+

Ru-106 < 4.40E+01 < 3.50E+01 < 340E+O1 _ _

Cs-134 < 5.70E+00 __ l < 3.90E+OO < 3.60E+O0 l__

Cs-137 < 5.50E+O0 - < 3.90E+OOt 00_ < 4.10E+OO Ba-140 < 9.70E+o0 < 8.10E+00 < 7.60E+00 _

La-140 < 1.1OE+O1 <i 9.30E+00! ___ < 8.70E+OO _ _ _

Ce-141 < 9.20E+00 < 5.40E+00[ < 6.70E+OO _ _ _

C-144 <1 3.40E+01 _____ < 2.10E+01 ____ < 2.20E+01 ____

C-38

Fermi2 - 2002 Annual RadioactiveEffluent Release and RadiologicalEnvironmental OperatingReport FERMI 2 DRINKING WATER ANALYSIS DW-2 (Control)

(pCilliter)

'Nuclide 4 30 -J g<K+<^'S j 27-AUG . t J 24-SEP GR-B I 5.30E+O0 +1 l.IOE+OO I 8.80E+00i +/- 1.30E+00 I 4.19E+00l +/- 9.40E-01 Sr-89 < 9.60E+O0 < 6.80E+00 < 7.20E+0O Sr-90 < 1.80E+00 < 1.70E+00 _ < 1.70E+OO _

Be-7 < 4.50E+01 < 3.90E+01 < 3.90E+0O K-40 < 9.10E+01 < 5.80E+01 < 6.OOE+O1 Mn-54 < 5.40E+00 < 4.10E+00 < 4.00E+OO Co-58 < 5.90E+00 < 4.10E+0OO < 4.90E+OO Fe-59 < 1.30E+01 < 9.50E+00 < 7.1 OE+00 _

Co-60 < 6.80E+00 < 4.30E+00 < 4.30E+OO Zn-65 < 1.30E+01 < 8.40E+00 < 2.1OE+O1I Zr-95 < 1.OOE+O1 < 7.70E+00 < 8.60E+0O Ru-103 < 6.60E+00 < 4.20E+00 < 4.90E+OO_

Ru-106 < 5.OOE+01 < 4.30E+01 < 4.OOE+OI _ _

Cs-134 < 6.30E+00 < 3.50E+0O - < 5.20E1+00 Cs-137 < 6.20E+001 < 4.OOE+OO =< 5.60E3+0 Ba-140 < 1.20E+01 1.lOE+O1 7.60E+00_

La-140 < 1.40E+01 1.20E+l1 l < 8 80E+

Ce-141 < 7.30E+00l < 8.30E+00 _ <0 8.50E+OO Ce-144 < 2.50E+1 <1 2.50E+O1 _< 3.20E+Oll Nuclide , ooc-J,<

30-OT : -T26-NOV- 18-DEC - ________

GR-B < 2.90E+O0 - - - 3.40E+00 +/- I1.OOE+O0 <1 2.80E+00 Sr-89 1< 6.60E+001 - < 8.10E+00 <I 8.50E+OO I Sr-90 < 1.80E+OO' < 1.60E+OO - < 1.80E+OO Be-7 < 3.50E+O1 < 3.70E+01 ___ < 2.80E+01 K-40 < 4.70E+Oll < 7.OOE+01 < 6 20E+O I Mn-54 < 4.00E+00 ___ < 4.90E+00l < 4.1OE+00 Co-58 < 4.50E+00i I_ I < 4.20E+00& I_ I < 3.60E+OOi II Fe-59 < 8.80E+OO ___ < 9.20E+O0 - < 8.90E+O0 Co-60 < 3.80E+O0 I _ <I 4.901_+00 _ _ <_ 3.80E+OO Zn-65 < 1.50E+O1 <I l.OOE+I0l <I 9.E+004 Zr-95 < 6.OOE+O I <I 7.60E+OO- I0f <I 6.50E+OOI Ru-103 < 4.40E+OO < 4.30E+OO' 3.80E+00_____

Ru-106 < 4.50E+OI1 < 3.70E+0 I < 3.60E+01 II Cs-13 4.60E+00 < ,<4.11,+O, 3.70I,+0,,I Cs-137 < 4.80E+00 - < 4.60E+00 < 4.OOE+0 l Ba-140 < 7.1OE+

0 0 <_ 8.90+00 ll <_ 6.30E+OO La-140 < 8.20E+00 < 1.OOE+O1 d 7.20E+0 Ce-141 < 7.30E+0O - < 6.OOE+00 <____

4.70E+0O Ce-144 < 2.90E+O1l ' __ __ < l.90E+O1l ______ 1.80+11 I C-39

Fermi2 - 2002 Annual Radioactive Effluent Release and RadiologicalEnvironmentalOperatingReport FERMI 2 SURFACE WATER ANALYSIS SW-2 (Control)

(pCi/liter)

Nuclide J- 29-JANi i ,- _ 26-FEB F r 26-MR P___7____

Sr-89 < 5.90E+00 < 6=50E+00 I < 6.20E+00 I Sr-90 < 1.50E+00 < 1.60E+00_ < 1.70E+-00 Be-7 < 4.10E+01 < 3.30E+01 < 4.60E+O1 _

K-40 < 7.90E+01 < 6.50E+01 < 8.40E+01 Mn-54 < 5.OOE+00 _ < 4.00E+00 < 5.60E+00 _

Co-58 < 4.60E+00 < 4.1OE+00 < 4.20E+00 Fe-59 < 1.40E+01 < 1.40E+01 < 1.50E+01_

Co-60 < 5.10E+00 - < 4.90E+00 < 6.00E+00 Zn-65 < 1.40E+01 - < 9.90E+00 < 1.70E+01 _

Zr-95 < 9.6013+00 < 8.00E+00 < 8.70E+00

_ _____ < O+0 ____ _

Ru-103 < 5.40E+00_ < 4.40E+00 < 5.70E+00 Ru-106 < 4.3013+01 < 3.60E+01 _ < 4.6013+01 _

Cs-134 < 5.60E+00 _ < 3.80E+00 < 6.20E+00 _

Cs-137 < 6.00E+0O0 < 4.70E+00 < 5.70E+00 Ba-140 < 9.70E+00 _ < 9.20E+00 < 9.90E+00 _

La-140 < 1.1lOE+O < 1.1OE+01 < 1.1OE+Ol Ce-141 < 1.40E+01 < 5.30E+00 _ < 9.00E+00 Ce-144 < 3.30E+01 _ <2.00E+01I < 3.30E+01 .

Nuclidevi J -, lk-30-APRi- ' S30-MAY ¢Z 25-JUN Sr-89 < 8.60E+001 <I 8.5OE+OO I <I 7.30E+OO Sr-90 < 1.70E+00 < 1.60E+00 l < 1.70E+OO Be-7 < 3.30E+01 _< 4.1OE+0 I K-40 < 6.1013+01 < 6.70E+01 < 6.80E+01 Mn-54 < 4.0013+00 l _ < 4.80E+00 < 4.00E+00 Co-58 < 4.30E+00 < 4.50E+00 < 5.20E+00 Fe-59 < iE013 .Z _ _ < 1.40E+01 < 1.10E+04 Co-60 < 4.30E+00 < 4.40E+00 < 5.40E+00 Zn-65 < 8.30E+00, l_ _ < 1.30E+01 < 1.1OE+O I Zr-95 _ 6.70E+00 7.20E+00 < 8.50E+00 Ru-103 < 4.10E+00 <_ 5.10E+00 < 5.70E+00 Ru-106 < 3.70E+01 <I 3.40E+01 < 4.00E+Ol0 Cs-134 < 3.90E+00 l_ l < 4.20E+00 l ? < 5.60E+00 ___

Cs-137 < 4.30E+00 l_ l < 4.60E+00 l_ l < 4.90E+00 !

Ba-140 < 7.00E+001 ___ < 9.50E+00 __ i < 1.20E+01 ___

La-140 < 8.001+00 _ l < 1.1lOE+O1I_ 1.301+01 Ce-141 < 5.70E+00 <_1 8.40E+00 i___ < 1.OOE+01 _____

Ce-144 < 2. 10E+01I lLl <1 2.60E+01 l_ l < 3.30E+01 ____

C-40

Fermi 2 - 2002 Annual Radioactive Effluent Release and RadiologicalEnvironmental OperatingReport FERMI 2 SURFACE WATER ANALYSIS SW-2 (Control)

(pCi/liter)

INuclide >J' < , 30-L..,l t >27-AUGi

-` ___ I 24-SEPs Sr-89 < 8.40E+00 < 6.20E+00 < 7.1OE+O0 Sr-90 < 1.60E+00 < 1.60E+00 < 1.70E+OO Be-7 < 3.20E+01 < 5.90E+01 < 3.30E+OI _

K-40 < 6.50E+01 < 6.70E+01 < 5.40E+01 __

Mn-54 < 3.20E+00 < 5.50E+O0 _ < 3.50E+0O Co-58 < 3.50E+00 < 6.20E+00 < 4.OOE+0O Fe-59 < 7.20E+00 _ < 1.70E+01 _ < 8.OOE+0O Co-60 < 4.20E+00 < 5.50E+00 < 3.40E+O0 Zn-65 < 1. IOE+OI < 1.30E+01 < 9.OOE+0O Zr-95 < 7.90E+00 < 9.50E+00 < 6.10E+_00 Ru-103 < 4.1OE+00 < 6.70E+00 < 4.50E+0O Ru-106 < 3.40E+01 < 4.40E+01 < 3.1 OE+Ol Cs-134 < 3.60E+00 = < 5.80E+00 = < 4.30E+OO =

Cs-137 < 4.30E+00 _ < 5.90E+O0 _ < 4.20E+0O Ba-140 < 6.30E+00 < 1.1OE+01 < 6.40E+OO _

La-140 < 7.30E+00 < 1.20E+01 _ < 7.40E+0O Ce-141 < 6.1OE+00 < 1.20E+01 _ < 6.20E+0O Ce-144 <l 1.90E+01 _ < 3.70E+01 _ < 2.30E+O1_

lc_°, 30-oC _*?l 26NOV - 30-DEC ,7 __

N dclide >,,] , __ __ __ _ __ __ _ _ __ __ __I__ _ __ __ _ __ _ _ __ _ _ __ __ _

Sr-89 < 6.80E+00 = <1 8.30E+OO I <1 8.60E+O0 I Sr-90 < 1.60E+00 <1 1.70E+OO < 1.80E+00 Be-7 < 3.00E+01 <j 2.70E+O1 <1 2.60E+O1 _ _ _

K-40 < 5.40E+01 < 4.70E+O1 < 4.90E+01 Mn-54 < 3.60E+00 < 2.70E+00 < 3.30E+00 ___

Co-58 < 4.10E+00 < 3.50E+OI < 2.90E+0O f _f Fe-59 < 7.50E+00 < 7.40E+Oj1 < 6.40E+00 Co-60 < 3.10E+00 < 3.60E+00 < 3.10E+00 Zn-65 < 1.50E+011 < 9.60E+00 <1 5.60E+00 Zr-95 < 5.90E+00 < 4.90E+00 ! < 4.90E+00 _

Ru-103 < 4.80E+00 < 4.1OE+00 < 3.20E+00 Ru-106 < 4.OOE+O1 < 3.40E+O1 < 2.90E+O1 Cs-134 < 4.50E+00 < 3.20E+00 < 3.30E+O0_

Cs-137 < 4.70E+00 - < 3.30E+00 __ l <1 3.40E+00 l _

Ba-140 < 6.30E+00l <- 5.701+00 < 5.40E+00 l La-140 < 7.30E+OO < 6.60E+00 __ l < 6.20E+0OO ___

Ce-141 < 7.OOE+00 < 5.60E+00 < 7.00OOE f0f Ce-144 < 2.60E+011 < 2.20E+Ol I_ I <I 1.70E+01 i 1_ _

C-41

Fermi2 - 2002 Annual Radioactive Effluent Release and RadiologicalEnvironmental'OperatingReport FERMI 2 SURFACE WATER ANALYSIS SW-3 (Indicator)

(pCilliter)

Nuclide Jbl8a , 29-JAN -. _ 26 EB ____ I 26-MAR&

Sr-89 < 6.60E+001 < 6.60E+00 I < 5.40E+00 I Sr-90 < 1.70E+00 < 1.60E+00 _ < 1.50E+0O Be-7 < 4.50E+01 < 3.20E+01 < 2.60E+01 K-40 < 8.30E+01 < 7.70E+01 < 5.40E+01O Mn-54 < 5.20E+00 < 4.40E+00_ < 2.90E+0O Co-58 < 6.OOE+00 < 4.80E+Os < 3.20E+00 _

Fe-59 < 1.40E+01 < 1.20E+01 < 9.10E+OO _

Co-60 < 6.50E+00 < 5.50E+00 < 3.30E+00 Zn-65 < 1.40E+O 1 < 1.1 OE+O I < 7.OOE+OO Zr-95 < 9.30E+00 < 7.90E+00 < 5.50E+00 Ru-103 < 5 40E+0 - 0E+00 < 3.20E+00 _

Ru-106 < 4.60E+01_ < 4. 1E+0 < 3.10E+01 _-

Cs-134 < 5.30E+00 < 5.00E+00 < 3.OOE+O0 _

Cs-137 < 6.OOE+00_ < 4.30E+00 < 3.30E+00 Ba-140 < 1.1OE+01 < 80E+00jI < 5.30E+OO La-140 < 1.20E+01 _ <_ l1.OOE+Ol l < 6.1OE+OO Ce- 141 < 6.80E+00 < 9.40E+00 < 7.40E+O0 Ce-144 < 2.60E+1j < 2E0 1.60E+O1 _

I Nuclide [ g30-APR _ __ 1 _,r, -_Ni.-J -

Sr-89 < 8.90E+00'_ <1 8.50E+00 - <1 7.50E+OO Sr-90 < 1.70E+00 - < 1.60E+00 <1 1.70E+OOl Be-7 < 4.50E+01 < 3.20E+O1 < 4.60E+013 K-40 < 7.50E+01 < 6.50E+01 < 8.30E+O1, Mn-54 < 4.80E+00 < 4.50E+00 < 5.50E+00j Co-58 < 5.OOE+00 } <1 4.20E+00J I_ _ < 5.60E+00 I Fe-59 < 1.60E+01 < 1.30E+01 l <, 1.30E+O1 _ _ _

Co-60 < 6.20E+00 < 5.40E+00 l < 7.70E+0O _ _ _

Zn-65 1 < 1.70E+01 < 9.90E+00 , _ _ <_ 9.70E+00_ _

Zr-95 < 9.80E+00 - l < 7.40E+00 l_ , < 8.60E+00 Ru-103 < 5.50E+001 < 4.50E+00 1 < 6.30E+00 Ru-106 < 4.80E+01 __ l < 4.1OE+O I <1 5.00E+01 j Cs- 134 < 5.40E+OO 1___ < 4.70E+00.i < 5.70E+00 ,

Cs-137 < 4.70E+00 ___ _ <1 4.40E+O00 - _ < 4.80E+OO0 Ba-140 < 9.50E+O0 1_ _ <I 1.20E+01I < 1.30E+01 La-140 < 1.1OE+011 - _ <I 1.30E+01] < 1.50E+01 Ce-141 < 9.20E+O0 I <I 9.30+OO, <I 8.40E+00 Ce-144 l <1 3.10E+Oll l_ l___ l.90E+Oll lI <i1 3.OOE+OlZ _ __

C-42

Fermi 2 - 2002 Annual Radioactive Effluent Release and RadiologicalEnvironmental OperatingReport FERMI 2 SURFACE WATER ANALYSIS SW-3 (Indicator)

(pCi/liter)

Nuclide < 30-JUL - - ^ 27-AUG ____ .l 24-SEP -_______

Sr-89 I < 7.90E+00 < 6.70E+OO < 7.OOE+OO I Sr-90 <1 1.50E+OO < 1.70E+00 < 1.60E+OO Be-7 <1 4.60E+0<1 _ 3.1 OE+O1 < 3.20E+O1 K-40 < 7.90E+01- < 4.30E+01 < 5.10E+O1 Mn-54 < 6.30E+00 < 3.40E+00 < 3.30E+OO Co-58 < 5.70E+OO < 3.80E+OO < 4.50E+O0 Fe-59 < 1.20E+01 < 9.30E+00 __< 7.30E+00_

Co-60 < 6.30E+00 < 3.00E+00 < 3.50E+OO Zn-65 < 2.OOE+01 = < 1.20E+01 < 1.40E+01 Zr-95 < 9.70E+00 < 5.90E+00 < 6.30E+OO_

Ru-103 < 6.1OE+00 < 4.00E+00 < 4.40E+00 Ru-106 < 4.50E+01 < 3.OOE+01 < 3.80E+01 Cs-134 < 6.OOE+00 = <4 3.40E+OO < 4.40E+0 Cs-137 < 5.90E+00 < 3.OOE+00 _< 4.80E+OO Ba-140 < 1.20E+01 _ << 8.80E+00 < 7.40E+OO La-140 < 1.30E+O1 <l 1.OOE+01 < 8.60E+00 Ce-141 < 9.30E+00 =< 7.40E+O0 < 6 50E+0O Ce-144 < 3.30E+01 _ <1 2.20E+01 < 2 40E+O I INuclide ] ~ 30-OCT., 26-NOV(a)< 5K~,' 30-NOVA Sr-89 < 6.10E+00_ <1 9.40E+00 I <1 7.50E+O0 I Sr-90 < 1.70E+OO < 1.90E+00 <1 1.60E+00 I Be-7 < 3.50E+01 = _ l < 2.40E+01 < 2.60E+01 K-40 < 6.70E+01 < 4.90E+O1 < 5.OOE+01 Mn-54 < 6.40E+00 __ l < 2.80E+00 < 3.40E+OO Co-58 < 4.40E+00 < 2.70E+00 < 3.30E+00 l Fe-59 < 1.30E+O1 < 5.70E+_0 < 700E+00 I Co-60 < 5.30E+00 < 3.OOE+00 1 < 3.60E+OO Zn-65 < 1.30E+01 < 5.60E+OO < 1.OOE+O1 Zr-95 < 8.60E+00 l < 5.50E+00 < 5.50E+OO Ru-103 < 4.80E+00 l <1 3.10E+00 < 3.30E+O0 Ru-106 < 4.80E+01 - _ l < 2.80E+01 <1 3.OOE+01 I Cs-134 < 3.70E+00 -l < 2.80E+OO < 3.40E+0O Cs-137 < 5.70E+00 < 2.90E+00 < 3.40E+O0O Ba-140 < 5.50E+000 < 4.30E+OO < 4.90E+OO La-140 < 6.30E+00 l < 4.90E+00 l _l < 5.70E+O0 Ce-141 <_ 8.20E+00 _l < 390E+00 lIl <l 7.60E+O0 l _

Ce-144 <1 3.00E+01 = _ _ <1.50E+01l lIl <1 1.80E+011 I (a) See Appendix D - Program Execution.

C-43

Fermi2 - 2002 Annual RadioactiveEffluent Release and RadiologicalEnvironmentalOperatingReport FERMI 2 DRINKING AND SURFACE WATER QUARTERLY COMPOSITE SAMPLES Tritium (pCilliter) itztion t ,rtr I - . = t. h X.'-'I I I .4 O"tr '

1.30E__ _ 031 - _ _ _ _ _ILE -0 DW- < 1.^0E+03 1.70E 03 DW-2 < 1.0E+03 < 1.7<E+03

,SW-2 <1 1.30E+031 I < 1.70E+031 I_ ___

[Station " I'T hird Q iait& E~f "K. o rt Q are DW-1 < 1.30E+03 _ _ _ _ __ < 1.30E+03__ ___I DW-2 < 1.30E+03 - < 1.30E+03 ,__ __

SW-2 < 1.30E+03 < 1.30E+03 i SW-3 < 1.30E+03 < I_1.30E+03 (a) See Appendix D - Program Execution.

C-44

Fermi2 - 2002 Annual Radioactive Effluent Release and RadiologicalEnvironmental OperatingReport FERMI 2 GROUNDWATER ANALYSIS GW-1 (Indicator)

(pCiffiter)

Nuclide i[- r irst QuarterF jle ^ Second Quarteir 8 Be- I < 2.90E+01 _ I-< 2.80E+01jI K-40 f < 4.80E+O1 <1 4.80E+01 Mn-54 [ < 3.70E++00 < 2.80E+00 <

Co-58 < 3.40E+00 < 3.5OE+OO Fe-59 < 9.80E+00 __ < 8.60E+OO Co-60 < 3.30E+OO _<__________

Zn-65 j < 8.60E+OO <1 7.60 Zr-95 _ < 5.50O+E+O Ru-103 J< 3.90E+OO <I 4.0OE+OO Ru-106 l < 3.60E+01 < 3.30E+OI Cs-134 < 3.20E+00_ < 2.90E+OO _

Cs-137 < 3.60E+oo _ < 3_50E___

Ba-140 < 5.20E+OO < 530E+O La- 140 < 6.OOE+00 < 6______

Ce-141 < 8.60E+OO < 5.80E+OO Ce-144 < i 2.20E+O1 < 2 2E-O1 H-3 1< 1.20E+03 _ < I1.20E+03

[Nuclide i -" t-Third b Quatiertr i4-M.,..._. t Fourth Quarter Be-7 < 4.50E+O1 ___ _ _ <j 3.30E+01 I K40 < 7.20E+O1 <1 4.60E+O1 - l Mn-54 < 6.10E+OO T< 3_80E+OO _ I Co-58 < 5.70E+OO ___ < 3.40E+OO0 _

Fe-59 < 1.40E+O1 lI_ < 8.40E+OO0 l Co-60 < 6.20E+00 < 4.40E+OO Zn-65 < 1.80E+01 ______ < 7.90E+OO Zr-95 < 8.80E+OO < 6.40E+OO Ru-103 < 4.80E+00 < 4.30E+OOl i Ru-106 < 5.70E+01 < 3.90E+01, l Cs-134 < 6.10E+OO < 3.30E+0O l Cs-137 < 5.30E+OO____ <f 3.30E+001.

Ba-140 < 9.80E+OO l_ l < 6.80E+O0 l La-140 < 1.10E+01 f_ _ < 7.80E+00 Ce-141 < 8.20E+00 <l 6.20E+00 _

Ce-144 < 3.20E+01 <1 2.50E+01 H-3 l_< 1.50E+03 _ <1 1.20E+031 !_I C-45

Fermi2 - 2002 Annual Radioactive Effluent Release and RadiologicalEnvironmental OperatingReport FERMI 2 GROUNDWATER ANALYSIS GW-2 (Indicator)

(pCv/liter) i t Thf 4- ~4pI -Q ^ fernltrtpr -

Be-7 < 2.80E+O1I <1 4.OOE+0 !

K-40 < 3.80E+01 l < 7.20E+O l Mn-54 < 2.50E+00 < 5.80E+OO Co-58 < 3.10E+00 < 4.80E+OO Fe-59 < 1.OOE+Ol <_ 1.20E+O1 Co-60 < 3.30E+00 < 6.40E+OO Zn-65 < 7.30E+00 < 1.20E+O 1 Zr-95 < 6.OOE+00 < 8.50E+OO Ru-103 < 3.50E+00 < 5.70E+OO Ru-106 < 2.80E+01 < 5.30E+Ol Cs-134 < 2.90E+00 _ < 5.80E+oo Cs-137 < 3.30E+00 _ < 5.50E+OO Ba-140 < 5.90E+OO < 1.1OE+OlI La-140 < 6.80E+00 < 1.20E+O1 l Ce-141 < 5.80E+00 _ < 7.80E+OO Ce-144 < 2.1OE+O1 _ < 2.70E+O1 _

H-3 < 1.20E+03 < 1.20E+03 J<4 I Nuclide "l^L ,IgThird Quiartert - Foi Quarter4 Be-7 I < 4.60E+O1 < 4.20E+O1 _

K-40 < 8.50E+O1 <

Mn-54 < 7.40E+00 < 4.80E+00 1 I __ l Co-58 < 7.90E+00 < 5.OOE+0_

Fe-59 < 1.40E+01 < 9.50E+0 I Co-60 < 6.70E+OO _ <1 5.20E+0O, lj _

Zn-65 < 1.40E+01 <I 1.40E+01 __ I Zr-95 < 9.40E+00 <1 8.1OE+00 _

Ru-103 l < 6.50E+00 <1 6.30E+00'-

Ru-106 < 4.60E+01 <1 4E+01 Cs-134 l < 6.20E+00, < 5.60E+00O ___

Cs-137 I < 7.90E+001 < 460E+00- I Ba-140 i < 1.20E+O I <6 E+00 La-140 l < 1.40E+01 < 7.OOE+00 _ _ I Ce-141 < 1.00E+01 < 8.70E+00l

,Ce-144 13 < 4.00E+011 <I 3.10 E+O1 1--I JH 1<

I .< , , _ _ _ _

140E+03

__ _ _I

< 1

<i 1 _ _

1.20E+03]

._I C-46

Fermi 2 - 2002 Annual Radioactive Effluent Release and RadiologicalEnvironmental OperatingReport FERMI 2 GROUNDWATER ANALYSIS GW-3 (Indicator)

(pCi/liter) l Nuclide .J First Quarter kg 'ZNw lsi',6,1,aJSecond Qdaiteier,]

Be-7 < 3.90E+O1 <'I 3.70E+O1I I K-40 < 6.30E+01 < 4.90E+Ol

__ _.0+O~ ______

Mn-54 < 5.20E+00 < 3.20E+OO Co-58 < 5.OOE+00 _< 3 0E+

Fe-59 < 1.40E+01 < 7.70E+OO Co-60 < 4.40E+00 < 3.303+.30O_

Zn-65 < 9.70E+00 < 1.40E+O1 Zr-95 < 6.50E+00 < 5.1OE+00 Ru-103 < 6.OOE+00 < 4.10E+00 Ru-106 < 4.20E+01 < 3.9OE+0l Cs-134 < 5.30E+00 < 3.90E+OO Cs-137 < 4.70E+00 < 4.1 OE+OO_

Ba-140 < 8.80E+00 < 5.90E+OO La-140 < 1.OOE+Ol < 6.80E+OO _

Ce-141 < 8.80E+00 < 7.30E+OO Ce-144 < 3.10E+01 <1 2.50E+O1i H-3 < 1.20E+03 < 1.20E+03

[ Nuclide' - NI-Third QuariK' 'JFotirth Quarter Be-7 < 4.OOE+O1I <1 4.70E+°1 I K-40 < 7.1OE+Ol < 6.70E+OlI Mn-54 < 4.OOE+OO <1 5.70E+OO -

Co-58 < 4.30E+O I <I 5.50E+OO Fe-59 < 1.40E+O1 < 1.20E+O1 ___

Co-60 I <I 4.30E+OO < 4.60E+OOI I_ I Zn-65 _< 8.60E+0 < 1.50E+O1 Zr-95 1<I 7.50E+O I < 8.80E+OO i_ i Ru-103 < 4.801E+00 < 6.70E+OO _____

Ru-106 < 4.40E+O1I _< < 4.50E+O1 ___

Cs-134 < 4.60E+OOT _ <I 6.OOE+OO ___

Cs-137 < 4.40E+00 <I 6.20E+OO _

Ba-140 < 7.80E+OO__ <I 1.OOE+O1 ___

La-140 < 9.OOE+OOT TI <T 1.20E+Ol l ___

Ce-141 < 7.90E+OOT I I <I 7.90E+OO I I Ce-144 < 2.80E+O1 _ _ _ < 3.OOE+O1L H-3 < 1.30E+03 ____ <1.20E+03[____

C-47

Fermi2 - 2002 Annual Radioactive Effluent Release and RadiologicalEnvironmental OperatingReport FERMI 2 GROUNDWATER ANALYSIS GW-4 (Control)

(pCiAiter)

Nuclide J , First Quarter . . Second Quarter,`- =

Be-7 < 4.50E+O1 < 2.SOE+O1 =

K-40 < 7.1OE+O1 < 3.80E+O I Mn-54 < 4.90E+00 < 3.1 OE+OO _

Co-58 < 5.9OE+00 < 3.1 OE+OO Fe-59 < l.SOE+0l < 6 OOE+0O _

Co-60 < 6.00E+OC- < 4.10E+OO _

Zn-65 < 1.50E+O1 < 8.40E+OO _

Zr-95 < 7.0E+00 <1 6.20E+OO Ru-103 < 6.30E+00 <1 3.60E+OO Ru- 106 < 4.20E+01 <1 3.40E+01 Cs-134 < 4.OOE+00 <I 3.1OE+OO Cs-137 < 5.30E+00 <1 3.80E+OO _

Ba-140 < 8.60E+00 < 5.10E+00 _

La-140 < 9.90E+00 <1 5.901_+00 Ce-141 < 8.40E+00 <1 5.80E+OOl Ce-144 H-3

< 3.OOE+01

< 1.20E+03 I

< 2.20E+O

<, 1.20E+031 I

lNu~clide~ Jl &rI'<2¢hird Quarter~$ >,2<<>lfi ' ,- ^Fout Quarters g ~t'S Be-7 1 < 3.40E+01_ <1 3.OOE+O1 I K-40 I < 5.70E+01 < 5.10E+OI I Mn-54 I < 3.50E+0O <1 4.20E+00 Co-58 < 4.10E+OO < 3.70E+_0 Fe-59 I< 1.l( E+O < 9.30E+0O _______l Co-60 < 4.1OE+00 4.1=E+0 Zn-65 l < 6.10E+0 < _1.OE+01 Zr-95 1< 6.1OE+00 < 6.80E+0O0 L Ru-103 l< 4.30E+OO < 4.80E+0 i Ru-106 l< 3.70E+O- < 3.70E+01 1_ i Cs-134 < 3.90E+O <, 4.70E+0O0 ____

Cs-137 I < 4.00E+00' <1 4.OOE+00 __ I Ba-140 l < 7.30E+O0 :_______

La-140 < 8.40E+00 <1 8.40E+O0, _l____

Ce- 141 < 5.60E+OO0__ <1 7.10E+00 __ ____

Ce-144 < 2.1OE+O1 <j 2.60E+01 H-3 I< 1.40E+03 <J 1.20E+_

C-48

Fermi2 - 2002 Annual Radioactive Effluent Release and RadiologicalEnvironmental OperatingReport FERMI 2 SEDIMENT ANALYSIS S-1 (Indicator)

(pCi/kg dry) 4 LNuclide l27-JUN C tK j ; 22-OCIW Sr-89 < 2.40E+02 < 2.20E+02 Sr-90 < 1.40E+02 < 2.90E+02l Be-7 < 2.20E+02 _<1 .1OE+02 I K-40 1.IOE+04 +/- 3.30E+02 9.02E+03 +/- 1.70E+02 Mn-54 < 2.80E+01 <I 1.30E+01 Co-58 < 3.OOE+01 <1 1.40E+01 Fe-59 < 1.30E+02 < 3.50E+01 Co-60 < 2.70E+01 < 1.30E+O1 Zn-65 < 1.20E+02 < 5.40E+01 Zr-95 < 5.40E+01 < 2.30E+01 _

Ru-103 < 3.30E+O1 1.50E+O1 __

Ru-106 < 2.OOE+02 < 9.40E+01 Cs-134 < 1.OOE+02 < 4.1OE+O1 _ -

Cs-137 < 2.30E+01 < 1.20E+01Il Ba-140 < 6.1OE+02 < 1.20E+02 _

La-140 < 3.1OE+02 r_ r1

< 6.1OE+O1 1_ __ _

Ce-141 < 6.40E+01 < 2.80E+01 _

Ce-144 < 1.50E+02 _ < 8.E+1IL S-2 (Indicator)

(pCi/kg dry)

Nuclide"li. 27-JUNs 5 A I22-OCT t Sr-89 < 2.90E+02 < 2.70E+02 l Sr-90 < 2.80E+02 < 2.20E+02 l_ _

Be-7 < 4.80E+02 < 1.90E+02 K-40 1 1.73E+04 +/- 5.20E+02 1.27E+04 +/- 2.60E+02 Mn-54 < 4.30E+01 < 2.1OE+1I Co-58 j < 5.70E+01 < 2.1OE+O1 Fe-59 * < 2.10E+02 __ < 5.50E+01 j o-60 < 3.80E+01 < 2.20E+01 n-65 < 2.20E+02 91 OE+O1

<9_

Zr-95 < 1.1OE+02 < 4.50E+O1 Ru-103 < 7.50E+01 < 2.60E+01 1_ 1 Ru-106 < 3.40E+02 < 2.OOE+02 tl Cs-134 < 3.70E+01 < 7.70E+01 I Cs-137 < 5.40E+01 <1 2.30E+01 Ba-140 < 1.lOE+03 <_ 2.1OE+02 La-140 < 5.60E+02 <1 1.1OE+02 ___

Ce-141 < 1.40E+02 <I S.OOE+OlI I Ce-144 < 3.1OE+02 <11.50E+021 I C-49

Fermi2 - 2002 Annual RadioactiveEffluent Release and RadiologicalEnvironmental OperatingReport FERMI 2 SEDIMENT ANALYSIS S-3 (Indicator)

(pCi/kg dry)

I Ndclidec1!i 4 27-JUJN- - __r_=__I t eC 21 -OCT _____

Sr-89 < 2.50E+02 I < 2.20E+02 I Sr-90 < 1.50E+02 < 2.80E+02 Be-7 < 3.60E+02 < 8.20E+01 I K-40 1.35E+04 +/- 4.70E+02 1.05E+04 +/- 1.50E+02 Mn-54 < 3.20E+O1 < 1.OOE+OI l Co-58 l < 3.80E+01_ < 9.50E+OO Fe-59 < 1.40E+02 _ < 2.60E+O1_

Co-60 < 4.50E+01 < 9.80E+OO Zn-65 < 1.70E+02 _ < 4.50E+O1_

Zr-95 < 6.20E+01 < 1.80E+01 Ru-103 < 4.20E+O 1 < 1. IOE+OI Ru-106 < 2.40E+02 < 8.70E+01 Cs-134 < 2.80E+01 < 7.90E+OO_

Cs-137 < 3.30E+01 < 9.40E+00_

Ba-140 < 7. 1OE+02_ < 9.60E+O1 La-140 < 2.70E+02 < 4.60E+01 Ce-141 < 7.60E+01 < 2.00E+O1 _

Ce-144 I < 1.50E+02 < 5.90E+01 S-4 (Indicator)

(pCi/kg dry)

,6JNuclide lJUL' _____ 4i Sr-89 < 2.80E+02_ <1 2.60E+021 ___

Sr-90 < 2.80E+02 <1 2.50E+02 ,_ _

Be-7 < 2.40E+02 l_l < 8.30E+01 K-40 9.84E+03 +_- 4.OOE+02 9.22E+03 +1- 1.40E+02 Mn-54 < 2.50E+OI < 9.90E+00 Co-58 < 3.40E+01,1 < 1.OOE+O1l Fe-59 1< 1.OE+02 < 2.50E+01 Co-60 < 3.20E+O1 < 1.lIOE+O1 _ _ _

Zn-65 < 1.50E+02 < 4.60E+01 _ 1 Zr-95 < 5.1OE+O1 lIl < 1.70E+O1 l ,i Ru-103 < 3.OOE+01 _____ < 9.60E+OO__0 ____

Ru-106 < 2.20E+02 <I 8.00E+01 l Cs-134 < 1.lOE+02 1 1 <1 3.50E+01 1 1 Cs-137 < 2.60E+01 _ _ <, 1.OOE+O1 l_ _

Ba-140 < 3.00E+02 1 I <I 5.30E+01 La-140 < 1.20E+02 ______ < 2.50E+01 _ _ _

Ce-141 i < 4.90E+01 < 1.90E+01 Ce-144 <~ 1.40E+02 _____ < 7.40E+01 ____

C-50

Fermi 2 - 2002 Annual Radioactive Effluent Release and RadiologicalEnvironmental OperatingReport FERMI 2 SEDIMENT ANALYSIS S-5 (Control)

(pCi/kg dry)

_ _ _ -_ _ _ _" _-1 . _ _ I _ - -

Sr-89 I < 2.70E+02= < 2.90E+021 Sr-90 < 2.10E+02 < 2.60E+02 Be-7 5.20E+02 +/- 1.OOE+02 6.70E+02 +/- 1.20E+02 K-40 1.07E+04 +/- 3.40E+02 1.211E+04 +/- 2.90E+02 Mn-54 < 2.40E+O1 <i 2.60E+01 Co-58 < 2.90E+O1 <j 2.50E+01 Fe-59 < 9.20E+01 < 6.70E+O1 __

Co-60 < 2.40E+01 <, 2.30E+1 01 Zn-65 < 5.50E+O1 < 1.1 OE+02 _

Zr-95 < 5.30E+01 <I 4.70E+01 Ru-103 < 2.80E+01 < 3.OOE+O1 _

Ru-106 < 2.30E+02 < 2.40E+02 Cs-134 < 2.40E+01 < 8.60E+01 Cs-137 5.50E+O1 +/- 1.OOE+O1 1.09E+02 +1 1.1 OE+O1 Ba-140 < 2.40E+02 < 2.80E+02 La-140 Ce-141 Ce-144 l 1.20E+02 5.30E+01 _

1.70E+02_

< 1.30E+02I

< 5.50E+01

< 1.70E+021 F

C-51

Fermi2 - 2002 Annual RadioactiveEffluent Release and RadiologicalEnvironmentalOperatingReport FERMI 2 FISH ANALYSIS F-1 (Control)

(pCi/kg wet)

Nuclide -lV28-JUN Bass 4 3-JULBullhead l 25-JUN+Crappie Sr-89 < 1.90E+021 < 2.00E+02 I < 2.60E+02_ I Sr-90 < 1. 1OE+02 < 1.20E+02 < 9.70E+O1 Be-7 < 2.70E+02 < 2.80E+02 < 7.40E+02 K-40 3.29E+03 +/- 1.50E+02 2.37E+03 +/- 1.50E+02 3.02E+03 +/- 3.30E+02 Mn-54 < 2.40E+01 < 2.30E+01 < 5.50E+Ol1 Co-58 < 3.40E+01 < 3.10E+01 < 7.30E+O1 Fe-59 < 8.20E+01 < 8.20E+01 < 2.OOE+02 Co-60 < 2.20E+01 < 2.40E+01 _ < 5.20E+O1 __

Zn-65 < 6.50E+01 <l 9.80E+01 < 1.80E+02 Zr-95 < 5.70E+01 < 5.20E+01 < 1.40E+02 Ru-103 < 4.30E+O1 < 4.30E+O1 < 1.1OE+02 Ru-106 < 2.1OE+02 < 2.20E+02 < 4.90E+02 f____

Cs-134 < 2.OOE+01 < 2.40E+01 < 5.1OE+O1 Cs-137 < 2.20E+01 < 2.30E+O1 < 5.20E+01 Ba-140 < 2.70E+02 <1 2.40E+02 < 9.30E+02 C-4 _.OEO _ 7.0+1 _ .O+2_

La-140 __

< 3.1OE+02 < 2.80E+02 < 1.1OE+03 Ce- 141 <1 6.10E+01 < 7.40E+701 < 2.00E3+021 Ce-144 < 1. OE+02 < 1.20E+02 < 2.70E+02 Nuclide o- 3-I13L3i ' lJUL-Perch .11-Octl Cary___=

Sr-89 < 2.70E+02 <1 2.80E+02 < .50E+02 I Sr-90 < 1.1OE+02 <1 1.20E+02 I <1 2.10E+02 I Be-7 < 5.90E+02 < 5.40E+02 <1 4.30E+02 I K-40 2.68E+03 +/- 3.50E+02 2.02E+03 3.20E+02 2.01E+03 +/- 2.50E+02 Mn-54 < 5.30E+O1 < 5.20E+O1 < 3.40E+O1 Co-58 < 6.90E+O1 < 5.OOE+01 < 3.80E+Ol1 Fe-59 < 2.10E+02 _ <1 1.80E+02 < 1.20E+02 ___

Co-60 < 3.60E+01 < 4.30E+O1 <1 4.OOE+01 Zn-65 < 1.80E+02 < 1.40E+02 < 1.1OE+02 1_1 Zr-95 < 1.20E+02 < 9.80E+01 ___ < 7.1OE+OlI _ _

Ru-103 < 1.OOE+02 < 5.10E+O1 __ l < 5.20E+O1 Ru-106 < 3.90E+02 <, 2.70E+02 ___ < 3.40E+02 i_ _

Cs-134 < 5.10E+O1 _3.90E+1 < _4.OOE+01 Cs-137 < 6.20E+01 - 3.60E+O1 ____ < 3.50E+01 Ba-140 < 5.30E+02_ < 3.80E+02 l_ _ < 3.60E+02 La-140 < 6.10E+02 - <_ 4.40E+02 < 4.20E+02 Ce-141 < 1.60E+02 I I <1 9.60E+01 l_ _ < 7.40E+01 Ce-144 < 2.40E+02 I_ I <1 1.60E+02 l <1 1.50E+02 I C-52

Fermi 2 - 2002 Annual Radioactive Effluent Release and Radiological Environmental Operating Report FERMI 2 FISH ANALYSIS F-1 (Control)

(pCi/kg wet)

Nuclide [ l 1-OCT'Catfish - l-OCT .RockBass 41-OC, sSucker Sr-89 < 2.70E+02 < 2.80E+02 I < 2.70E+02 I Sr-90 < 2.30E+02 < 2.40E+02 < 2.30E+02 Be-7 < 6.80E+02 < 5.60E+02 _ < 6.90E+02 K-40 3.5 1E+03 +/- 3.60E+02 3.71E+03 +/- 2.90E+02 4.1 1E+03 +/- 3.80E+02 Mn-54 < 5.90E+01 < 4.60E+01 < 6.OOE+O1 Co-58 < 7.70E+O1 < 5.80E+01 < 8.OOE+o1 Fe-59 < 2.OOE+02 < 1.60E+02 < 2.1OE+02 Co-60 < 5.90E+01 < 4.50E+01 < 5.70E+O1 Zn-65 < 2.OOE+02 < 1.50E+02 < 1.30E+02 Zr-95 < 1.20E+02 < 1.20E+02 < 1.60E+02 Ru- 103 < 9.20E+01 < 8.OOE+01 < 9.20E+01 __

Ru- 106 < 5.20E+02= < 4.70E+02 < 6.20E+02 I Cs-134 < 5.60E+O1 < 5.20E+01 < 5.60E+01 Cs-137 < 6.OOE+01 _ __ < 4.70E+01 _ < 6.1OE+O I Ba-140 < 5.70E+02 < 3.60E+02 < 4.OOE+02 __ _

La-140 < 6.50E+02 < 4.20E+02 < 4.60E+02 Ce-141 < 1.30E+02 < 1.20E+02 < 1.50E+02 _ -

Ce-144 < 2.40E+02 _ < 2.OOE+02 _ < 3.OOE+02 _

Nuclide?

____________ Ž >il ]

Sr-89 < 2.80E+021 ___

Sr-90 < 2.40E+02 Be-7 < 2.90E+02 K-40 3.59E+03 +/- 2.60E+02 Mn-54 < 3.40E+O1 Co-58 < 4.10E+01 Fe-59 <1 9.20E+O1 Co-60 < 4.OOE+01 I_ I Zn-65 < 8.50E+01 Zr-95 < 6.80E+01 Ru-103 < 5.40E+01, Ru-106 < 3.50E+02 Cs-134 < 3.OOE+01 Cs-137 < 3.40E+O1 Ba-140 < 2.40E+02 La-140 < 2.80E+02 Ce-141 < 8.20E+o1 Ce-144 < 1.50E+02 C-53

Fermi 2 - 2002 Annual Radioactive Effluent Release and RadiologicalEnvironmental OperatingReport FERMI 2 FISH ANALYSIS F-2 (Indicator)

(pCi/kg wet)

Nuclfde [ 3-JU - Catfish 3-JUL Drum 3 3 LPike Sr-89 < 2.20E+02 < 2.40E+02 I <j 2.10E+02_I Sr-90 < 1.70E+02 < 1.70E+02 ___ j<c 1.20E+02 Be-7 < 5.1OE+02 < 6.20E+02 < 4.30E+02 K-40 1.62E+03 +/- 3.OOE+02 2.76E+03 +/- 3.OOE+02 3.25E+03 +/- 4.OOE+02 Mn-54 < 5.60E+01 < 5.40E+01 -< 5.80E+O1 _

Co-58 < 5.40E+01 < 7.1OE+O1 < 7.60E+O1 Fe-59 < 1.30E+02 < 1.70E+02 < 1.90E+02 Co-60 < 5.1OE+O1 < 5.OOE+01 < 6.20E+O1 Zn-65 < 2.40E+02 < 1.50E+02 < 2.40E+02 Zr-95 < 1.1OE+02 < 1.20E+02 < 1.lOE+02 Ru-103 < 6.70E+O1 < 8.10E+01 < 8.40E+O1 Ru-106 < 3.50E+02 < 4.80E+02 < 4.70E+02 Cs-134 < 5.OOE+01 < 4.70E+01 < 5.30E+O1 Cs-137 < 5.20E+01 < 4.20E+01 < 4.40E+O1 Ba-140 < 7.30E+02 _ < 7.80E+02 < 5.OOE+02 La-140 < 8.40E+02 < 9.OOE+02 < 5.80E+02 Ce-141 < 1.20E+02 < 1.40E+02 < 1.30E+02 Ce-144 < 2.00E+02- < 2.10E+02 < 2.30E+02 lNucide- 3 t 3-JULSucker l 2

3-JULWalle eqA j>l- -e-3-JUL'WhtePerch i I Sr-89 < 2.80E+02- <1 2.60E+021 < 2 . 6 0 E+ 0 2 1 lI _

1 1 . 1 OE+ 02 Sr-90 < 1.40E+02 1 < 1.30E+02 <

1 _

1 Be-7 < 7.50E+02 < 5.10E+02 < 5.OOE+02 ___

K-40 2.62E+03 +/- 3.OOE+02 3.01E+03 +/- 3.90E+02 2.35E+03 +/- 3.OOE+02 Mn-54 < 5.40E+01 _ < 5.1OE+O1 < 3.60E+O1 ___

Co-58 < 7.40E+01 < 5.50E+01 < 5.00E+Ol1 Fe-59 < 1.90E+02 < 2.40E+02 < 1.60E+02 Co-60 < 4.1OE+O1 < 3.50E+01 I < 5.30E+O1 iI Zn-65 < 1.60E+02 '< 1.60E+02 _ < 1.30E+021 ___

Zr-95 < 1.20E+02 <I 1.50E+02 < 9.90E+O1 Ru-103 < 1.1OE+02 < 6.90E+O1 < 6.30E+01 Ru-106 < 4.70E+02 < 2.90E+02 < 3.90E+02 Cs-134 < 5.60E+01 <} 4.60E+01 11<I 3.50E+O1 Cs-137 < 5.20E+01 - <l 5.90E+01l 1 <__ I 4.OOE+O1 ___

Ba-140 < 7.40E+02 <l 6.60E+02j < 4.40E+02 _ _

La-140 < 8.50E+02 < 7.60E+021 __ I < 5.10E+02 1_1 Ce-141 < 1.70E+02 _ < 1.30E+02[ < 1.1OE+02 1_ 1 Ce-144 < 3.OOE+02 < 1.90E+021 << 2.OOE+02 _ __

C-54

Fermi2 - 2002 Annual Radioactive Effluent Release and RadiologicalEnvironmentalOperatingReport FERMI 2 FISH ANALYSIS F-2 (Indicator)

(pCi/kg wet)

I~Nuclide-i 3-JUL Yellow*Perch 9t:i16-OC .Ca4 niI ai 0CT Walleye:=

Sr-89 < 2.1OE+02 - < 2.30E+02 I < 2.40E+02 _

Sr-90 < 1.50E+02 < 2.1 OE+02 _ < 2.1 OE+02 Be-7 < 7.40E+02 < 3.30E+02 < 4.1OE+02 K-40 2.65E+03 +1 3.60E+02 2.09E+03 +/- 2.70E+02 3.42E+03 +/- 3.30E+02 Mn-54 < 6.30E+01 < 3.30E+01 < 3.70E+O1 Co-58 < 7.30E+01 < 4.40E+O1 < 5.50E+O1 Fe-59 < 2.OOE+02 < 1.1OE+02 < 1.30E+02 Co-60 < 5. 1OE+O1 < 4.1OE+O1 < 4.80E+O1 Zn-65 < 1.60E+02 < 8.70E+01 < 1.20E+02 Zr-95 < 1.40E+02 < 7.60E+01 < 8.1OE+O1 Ru-103 < 1.OOE+02_ < 5.OOE+O1 < 5.70E+O1 Ru-106 < 4.50E+02 < 3.70E+02 < 3.30E+02 Cs-134 < 5.90E+01 < 2.1OE+O1 < 3.80E+O1 Cs- 137 < 5.70E+O1 < 3.1OE+O 1 < 2.70E+O1 B a- 140 < 7.70E+02 < 1.40E+02 < 2.20E+02 _

La-140 < 8.90E+02 < 1.60E+02 _ < 2.50E+02 _

Ce-141 < 1.70E+02 < 6.80E+O1 < 6.80E+O1 Ce-144 < 3.1 OE+02- < 1.60E+02 _ < 1.60E+02 _

iNuclide -['t" 16-OCT rWhite Bass 3/4": -, 16-OCIWhite Perch Vvj i 16-OCTYelowPerch Sr-89 < 2.40E+02 - < 2.40E+02 Ij< 2.40E+02 I <

Sr-90 < 2.20E+02 < 2.10E+02} < 2.10E+021__

Be-7 < 5.70E+02 < 6.00E3+02l < S.lOE+02l K-40 4.1OE+03 +/- 3.20E+02 3.91E+03 +/- 3.60E+02 17E+03 +- 2.90E+02 Mn-54 < 5.OOE+O1 < 5.90E+01 < 4.70E+O1 l_ ___

Co-58 < 6.50E+01 _ < 6.60E+O1 I < 5.30E+O1 1II Fe-59 I < 1.80E+02 < 1.90E+02 _ < 1.40E+02 Co-60 < 6.10E+01 < 6. OE+O I < 5.50E+01 Zn-65 < l.90E+02

_ __________ < 1.50E+02 < 1.40E+02 Zr-95 < 1.20E+02 < 1.20E+02 l < 9.80E+01 l l Ru-103 < 8.40E+01 < 8.OOE+01 < 7.20l+01 Ru-106 < 5.20E+02 _ < 5.30E+02 l < 4.30E+02 Cs-134 < 5.70E+01 < 5.50+01 < 4.50E+01 Cs-137 < 5.50E+01 < 5.60E+01 < 4.30E+01 l _

Ba-140 < 4.40E+02 < 4.70E+02 _ < 3.50E+021 l_

La-140 < 5.OOE+02 < 5.40E+02l _ < 4.OOE+02 l__

Ce-141 < 1.20E+02 <I 1.20E+02i I < 1.20E+02 1_1 Ce-144 < 2.50E+02 I <I 2.30E+02_ I < 2.20E+02 C-55

Fermi2 - 2002 Annual Radioactive Effluent Release and RadiologicalEnvironmental OperatingReport FERMI 2 FISH ANALYSIS F-3 (Control)

(pCi/kg wet) l Nuclide '-l .3- Dr3 3 ___________3- Sucm - L_ Walleye Sr-89 <1 2.9E+02 I < 2.10E+02 I < 2.70E+02 Sr-90 < 2.10E+02 < 1.50E+02 < 1.90E+02 Be-7 < 6.80E+02 < 8.40E+02 _ < 5.40E+02 K-40 2.48E+03 +1- 3.1 OE+02 1.96E+03 +1- 3.70E+02 2.96E+03 +/- 3.50E+02 Mn-54 < 4.00E+01 < 5.1 OE+O I < 4.70E+01 Co-58 < 7.802+01 < 8.OOE+01 < 7.00E+01 _

Fe-59 < 2.00E+02 <1 2.502+02 < 2.10E+02 Co-60 < 4.60E+01 < 3.80E+01 < 4.50E+01 Zn-65 < 1.302+02 < 2.50E+02 < 1.30E+02 Zr-95 < 1.30E+02 < 1.40E+02 < 1.30E+02 Ru-103 < 9.00E+01 < 8.40E+01 < 7.80E+01 Ru-106 < 4.80E+02 < 5.60E+02 < 4.60E+02 Cs-134 < 4.40E+01 < 6.00E+01 < 3.40E+01 Cs-137 < 4.90E+01 < 6.20E+01 < 3.90E+01 Ba-140 < 7.20E+02 < 9.50E+02 < 6.60E+02 La-140 < 8.30E+02 < 1.1OE+03 < 7.60E+02 Ce-141 < 1.60E+02 <1 1.60E+02 < 1.40E+02 Ce- 144 < 2.1 OE+02 I < I2.70E+02, < 2.60E+02 Nuclide - -. 3-JUL- White Perch -PerchL 3-JUL>Y1lY14-OCellow _

Sr-89 < 2.70E+02 < 2.80E+02 I <1 2.50E+02 Sr-90 < 1.30E+02 < 2.OOE+02 I < 2.20E+02 _

Be-7 < 5.20E+02 < 5.50E+02 < 5.10E+02 K-40 3.01E+03 +/- 2.40E+02 I 3.23E+03 +/- 2.702+02 4.61E+03 +/- 3.OOE+02 Mn-54 < 3.60E+01 <I 4.30E+01 < 4.20E+01 I Co-58 < 5.20E+01 <1 5.90E+01 < 5.90E+01 _

Fe-59 < 1.30E+02 <1 1.70E+02 1 < 1.40E+02 I Co-60 < 4.10E+01 < I3.40E+1 < 4.60E+01_

Zn-65 < 1.50E+02 <1 1.20E+02 I < 1.40E+02 Zr-95 < 9.50E+01 < 1.OOE+02 <_ 1.20E+02 Ru-103 < 6.20E+O1 < 8.30E+01 < 6.50E+O1 Ru-106 < 3.70E+02 < 4.10E+02 < 4.402+02 I Cs-134 < 3.60E+01 < 4.302+01 < 3.90E+01 _

Cs-137 < 3.90E+O1 < 4.00E+0 1 < 4.80E+O1 I Ba-140 < 5.00E+02 l < 5.80E+02 <1 3.40E+02 I La-140 < 5.80E+02 I < 6.70E+02 < 3.90E+02 I Ce-141 < 1.1OE+02 l < 2.20E+02 < 1.OOE+02 __

Ce-144 < 1.80E+02 I <I 3.20E+021 < 2.10E+02 C-56

Fermi2 - 2002 Annual Radioactive Effluent Release and RadiologicalEnvironmental OperatingReport FERMI 2 FISH ANALYSIS F-3 (Control)

(pCi/kg wet) lNuclide" l1 -..- 14-OCT,,WbiteBass K l14-OCTWhite Perch A l 14-OCT YellowPerch Sr-89 < 2.40E+02 < 2.50E+02 _ < 2.50E+02 _ -

Sr-90 < 2.OOE+021 < 2.20E+02 < 2.20E+02 Be-7 < 6.30E+021 < 3.50E+02 < 4.50E+02 K-40 4.71E+03 +/- 3.30E+02 2.66E+03 +/- 2.80E+02 3.96E+03 +/- 2.60E+02 Mn-54 < 5.70E+01 < 3.80E+01 < 4.30E+O1 __ __

Co-58 < 7.1OE+O1 < 4.10E+01 < 5.50E+O1 _

Fe-59 < 1.60E+02 < 1.OOE+02 < 1.40E+02 Co-60 < 4.60E+01 <___3.60E+01 < 4.40E+Ol1 Zn-65 < 1.80E+02 < 9.60E+01 < 1.30E+02 Zr-95 < 1.1 OE+02 < 8.60E+O1 < 9.1OE+O1 Ru-103 < 9.20E+01 < 5.90E+01 < 6.60E+O1 _ _

Ru-106 < 5.1OE+02 <1 3.70E+02 < 4.00E+02 _

Cs-134 < 5.10E+01 <l 2.80E+01 < 4.30E+O1 Cs-137 < 5.1OE+O1 < 4.10E+01 < 4.30E+O1 Ba-140 < 3.80E+02 < 2.90E+02 < 2.80E+02 La-140 < 4.30E+02 < 3.30E+02 < 3.20E+02 _

Ce-141 < 1.50E+02 < 7.80E+O1I _< 1 .lIOE+02 Ce-144 < 2.80E+02 _ < 1.80E+021 < 2.00E_+02 C-57

Appendix D Environmental Program Execution

Fermi 2 - 2002 Annual Radioactive Effluent Release and RadiologicalEnvironmental OperatingReport EnvironmentalProgram Execution On occasions, samples cannot be collected. This can be due to a variety of events, such as equipment malfunction, loss of electrical power, severe weather conditions, or vandalism. In 2002, missed samples were a result of missing field TLDs, loss of electrical power to sampling equipment, and lack of good growing conditions in a local garden. The following sections list all missed samples, changes and corrective actions during 2002. These missed samples did not have a significant impact on the execution of the REMP.

DirectRadiation Monitoring All TLDs are placed in the field in inconspicuous locations to minimize the loss of TLDs due to vandalism. During 2002, two hundred sixty-eight (268) TLDs were placed in the field for the REMP program and all but three TLDs were collected and processed. T-l 1 was found missing during the second quarter collection, T-30 during the third quarter and T-55 was found missing during the fourth quarter. These TLDs were missing as a result of vandalism.

Atmospheric Monitoring During 2002, two hundred sixty (260) air samples were placed in the field, all but eleven particulate filters and charcoal filters were processed. New sampling equipment has been purchased and will be deployed in 2003. There were no changes to the Atmospheric Monitoring program in 2002.

API-I filters collected on 2/5/2002 were not counted due to low volume caused by an equipment failure. Sampling equipment was replaced. For this reason the first quarter composite sample for this location is considered to be less than representative.

API-1 filters collected on 7/2/2002 and 7/9/2002 were not counted due to low volume caused by an equipment failure due to over heating. Sampling equipment was replaced. For this reason the second and third quarter composite samples for this location are considered to be less than representative.

API-3 filters collected on 3/26/2002 were not counted due to low volume caused by a power failure. The power was restored and sampling equipment was reset. For this reason the first quarter composite sample for this location is considered to be less than representative.

D-1

Fermi2 - 2002 Annual Radioactive Effluent Release and RadiologicalEnvironmental OperatingReport

API-3 filters for 6/11/2002 were not collected due to a power failure. The power was restored and sampling equipment was reset. For this reason the second quarter composite sample for this location is considered to be less than representative.

API-3 filters for 11/19/2002 were not counted due to low volume caused by a short in the power cord. Sampling equipment was replaced. For this reason the fourth quarter composite sample for this location is considered to be less than representative.

API-4 filters for 12/17/2002 were not collected due to a power failure. The power was restored and sampling equipment was reset. For this reason the fourth quarter composite sample for this location is considered to be less than representative.

API-5 filters for 5/22/2002 were not counted due to low volume caused by equipment failure. Sampling equipment was repaired. For this reason the second quarter composite sample for this location is considered to be less than representative.

API-5 filters for 7/2/2002 were not counted due to low volume caused by a equipment failure. Sampling equipment was replaced. For this reason the second quarter composite sample for this location is considered to be less than representative.

API-5 filters for 7/9/2002 and 7/16/2002 were not counted due to low volume caused by overheating. Sampling equipment was repaired and reset. For this reason the third quarter composite sample for this location is considered to be less than representative.

Terrestrial Monitoring During 2002, all scheduled Terrestrial Monitoring samples were collected except at two garden locations. The two garden location were dropped from the REMP program.

Milk Sampling All scheduled milk samples were collected in 2002.

Garden Sampling No samples were collected from location FP-7 and FP-3 due to landowners declining to participate in 2002. These two locations have been dropped from the REMP program.

Groundwater Sampling All scheduled groundwater samples were collected in 2002.

D-2

Fermi 2 - 2002 Annual Radioactive Effluent Release and RadiologicalEnvironmental OperatingReport Aquatic Monitoring During 2002, twenty-four (24) drinking water samples, twenty-five (25) surface water samples, and ten (10) sediment samples were collected. In addition, thirty-one (31) fish samples were collected for the Aquatic Monitoring program. Due to a frozen sample line, one grab surface water sample was collected. There were no changes to the Aquatic Monitoring program during 2002.

Drinking Water Sampling All scheduled drinking water samples were collected in 2002.

Surface Water Sampling On November 26, surface water sampler SW-3 was found not operating due to a frozen sample line. A grab sample was taken. For this reason the fourth quarter composite sample is considered less than representative.

Sediment Sampling All scheduled sediment samples were collected in 2002.

Fish Sampling All scheduled fish samples were collected in 2002.

Corrections to the 2001 Annual Radiological Environmental Monitoring Report.

Three typos were found in the 2001 annual report after it had been submitted to the NRC.

The corrections are as follows:

1. On page C-36, food product location FP-9, swiss chard sample collected on 8/28/2002 should read < 6.OOE+01 not < 6.01E+01 for Cs-134.

2. On page C-47, location SW-2 for the fourth quarter, should read < 1.28E+03 not <

1.28E+02 pCi/liter.

3. On page D-2, API-5 should read collected on 11/6/2001 not 10/30/2001 the sample start date.

D-3

Appendix E Effluent and Radwaste Data

Fermi2 - 2002 Annual Radioactive Effluent Release and RadiologicalEnvironmental OperatingReport Regulatory Limits for Radioactive Effluents The Nuclear Regulatory Commission limits on liquid and gaseous effluents are incorporated into the Fermi 2 Offsite Dose Calculation Manual. These limits prescribe the maximum doses and dose rates due to radioactive effluents resulting from normal operation of Fermi 2. These limits are described in the following sections.

A. Gaseous Effluents I. Dose rate due to radioactivity released in gaseous effluents to areas at and beyond the site boundary shall be limited to the following:

a) Noble gases Less than or equal to 500 mrem/year to the total body Less than or equal to 3000 mremlyear to the skin b) Iodine-131, Iodine-133, tritium, and for all radionuclides in particulate form with half lives greater than 8 days Less than or equal to 1500 mrem/year to any organ.

II. Air dose due to noble gases to areas at and beyond the site boundary shall be limited to the following:

a) Less than or equal to 5 mrad for gamma radiation Less than or equal to 10 mrad for beta radiation

- During any calendar quarter b) Less than or equal to 10 mrad for gamma radiation Less than or equal to 20 mrad for beta radiation

- During any calendar year

m. Dose to a member of the public from Iodine-131, Iodine-133, tritium, and all radionuclides in particulate form with half lives greater than 8 days in gaseous effluents released to areas at and beyond the site boundary shall be limited to the following:

E-1

Fermi2 - 2002 Annual Radioactive Effluent Release and RadiologicalEnvironmentalOperatingReport a) Less than or equal to 7.5 mrem to any organ

- During any calendar quarter b) Less than or equal to 15 mrem to any organ

- During any calendar year Note: The calculated site boundary dose rates for Fermi 2 are based on identification of individual isotopes and on use of dose factors specific to each identified isotope or a highly conservative dose factor. Average energy values are not used in these calculations, and therefore need not be reported.

B. Liquid Effluents I. The concentration of radioactive material released in liquid effluents to unrestricted areas shall be limited to ten times the concentrations specified in Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR) Part 20 (Standards for Protection Against Radiation), Appendix B, Table 2, Column 2 for radionuclides other than dissolved or entrained noble gases, as required by the Fermi 2 Offsite Dose Calculation Manual. For dissolved or entrained noble gases, the concentration shall be limited to 2E-4 (.0002) microcuries/ml total activity. This limit is based on the Xe-135 air submersion dose limit converted to an equivalent concentration in water as discussed in the International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP) Publication 2.

II. The dose or dose commitment to a member of the public from radioactive materials in liquid effluents released to unrestricted areas shall be limited to the following:

a) Less than or equal to 1.5 mrem to the total body Less than or equal to 5 mrem to any organ

- During any calendar quarter b) Less than or equal to 3 mrem to the total body Less than or equal to 10 mrem to any organ

- During any calendar year E-2

Fermi2 - 2002 Annual Radioactive Effluent Release and RadiologicalEnvironmental OperatingReport Measurements and Approximations of Total Activity in Radioactive Effluents As required by NRC Regulatory Guide 1.21, this section describes the methods used to measure the total radioactivity in effluent releases and to estimate the overall errors associated with these measurements. The effluent monitoring systems are described in Chapter 11.4 of the Fermi 2 Updated Final Safety Analysis Report (UFSAR).

A. Gaseous Effluents

1. Fission and Activation Gases Samples are obtained from each of the six plant radiation monitors which continuously monitor the five ventilation exhaust points. The fission and activation gases are quantified by gamma spectroscopy analysis of periodic samples.

The summary values reported are the sums of all fission and activation gases quantified at all monitored release points.

I. Radioiodines Samples are obtained from each of the six plant radiation monitors which continuously monitor the five ventilation exhaust points. The radioiodines are entrained on charcoal and then quantified by gamma spectroscopy analysis.

For each sample the duration of sampling and continuous flow rate through the charcoal are used in determining the concentration of radioiodines. From the flow rate of the ventilation system a rate of release can be determined.

The summary values reported are the sums of all radioiodines quantified at all continuously monitored release points.

E-3

Fermi2 - 2002 Annual Radioactive Effluent Release and RadiologicalEnvironmental OperatingReport Ill. Particulates Samples are obtained from each of the six plant effluent radiation monitors which continuously monitor the five ventilation exhaust points. The particulates are collected on a filter and then quantified by gamma spectroscopy analysis.

For each sample, the duration of sampling and continuous flow rate through the filter are used in determining the concentration of particulates. From the flow rate of the ventilation system a rate of release can be determined.

Quarterly, the filters from each ventilation release point are composited and then radiochemically separated and analyzed for strontium (Sr)-89/90 using various analytical methods.

The summary values reported are the sums of all particulates quantified at all monitored release points.

IV. Tritium Samples are obtained for each of the six plant effluent radiation monitors which continuously monitor the five ventilation exhaust points. The sample is passed through a bottle containing water and the tritium is "washed" out to the collecting water. Portions of the collecting water are analyzed for tritium using liquid scintillation counting techniques. For each sample, the duration of sample and sample flow rate is used to determine the concentration. From the flow rate of the ventilation system a release rate can be determined.

The summary values reported are the sums of all tritium quantified at all monitored release points.

E-4

Fermi 2 - 2002 Annual Radioactive Effluent Release and RadiologicalEnvironmental OperatingReport V. Gross Alpha The gaseous particulate filters from the six plant effluent radiation monitors are stored for one week to allow for decay of naturally occurring alpha emitters. These filters are then analyzed for gross alpha radioactivity by gas proportional counting, and any such radioactivity found is assumed to be plant related. The quantity of alpha emitters released can then be determined from sample flow rate, sample duration, and stack flow rate.

The summary values reported are the sums of all alpha emitters quantified at all monitored release points.

B. Liquid Effluents The liquid radwaste processing system and the liquid effluent monitoring system are described in the Fermi 2 UFSAR. Fermi 2 released no radioactive liquid effluents in 2002.

C. Statistical Measurement Uncertainties The statistical uncertainty of the measurements in this section has been calculated and summarized in the following table:

Measurement Type Sample Type One Sigma Uncertainty Fission and Activation Gaseous 30%

Gases Radioiodines - Gaseous 17%

Particulates Gaseous 16%

Tritium Gaseous 30%

Gross Alpha Gaseous 16%

Gaseous Releases by Individual Nuclide Values in the following tables which are preceded by the "less than" symbol represent the lower limit of detection (LLD) in units of microcuries per cubic centimeter (RCi/cc) for individual samples, and indicate that the nuclide in question was not detected in gaseous effluent samples in the indicated quarter of 2002. For quantities of gross alpha radioactivity and tritium in gaseous effluents, see Tables 3 and 4 on page 13 of this report.

E-5

Fermi2 - 2002 Annual Radioactive Effluent Release and RadiologicalEnvironmental OperatingReport A. Particulate Radionuclides (Curies)

Cr-51 <3.6E-13 1.69E-04 9.67E-04 <3.6E-13 Mn-54 <3.4E-14 1.1413-04 2.55E-04 2.57E-06 Co-58 <2.713-14 4.35E-04 1.08E-03 2.6413-06 Co-60 9.1OE-06 3.12E-04 6.50E-04 8.95E-06 Fe-59 <2.3E-14 <2.3E-14 5.14E-06 <2.3E-14 Zn-65 <1.OE-13 3.83E-04 9.44E-04 <1.OE-13 Zn-69m <3.3E-13 3.61E-03 1.O1E-02 <3.3E-13 Na-24 1.60E-05 4.4413-03 1.19E-02 <4.8E-13 Mo-99 <4.9E-13 2.76E-04 1.30E-03 <4.9E-13 Tc-99m <5.8E-13 3.72E-03 1.1113-02 <5.8E-13 Ba-139 3.13E-01 2.66E-01 1.8313-01 3.59E-01 La-140 3.08E-04 5.13E-04 8.94E-04 1.49E-04 Ba-140 2.111E-04 2.64E-04 4.96E-04 6.1413-05 Y-91m 2.58E-02 6.64E-02 1.78E-01 1.34E-02 Sr-91 1.88E-03 4.04E-03 6.47E-03 5.2413-04 Sr-92 - <1.10E-12 4.71E-03 1.1013-02 <1.10E-12 Rb-89 4.53E-01 3.67E-01 2.6613-02 3.47E-01 Cs-138 2.46E-01 1.81E-01 1.26E-01 2.511E-01 Re-188 <1.1E-12 1.4613-03 4.74E-03 <1.113-12 Mn-56 <1.6E-11 <1.6E-11 5.20E-03 <1.6E-11 As-76 2.41E-02 5.01E-03 6.58E-03 3.68E-03 Br-82 2.97E-05 8.56E-05 5.47E-05 7.3 1E-05 Hf-181 2.90E-06 <4.4E-14 <4.4E-14 <4.4E-14 Sr-89 1.16E-04 1.24E-04 1.24E-04 5.39E-05 Sr-90 <1.7E-14 <1.7E-14 <1.7E-14 <1.713-14 Cs-134 <5.5E-14 <5.513-14 <5.5E-14 <5.5E-14 Cs-137 <6.3E-14 <6.3E-14 <6.3E-14 <6.3E-14 Ce-141 <1.lE-13 <1.113-13 <1.1E-13 <.11E-13 Ce-143 <6.3E-13 <6.313-13 <6.3E-13 <6.3E-13 Ce-144 <4.8E-13 <4.8E-13 <4.8E-13 <4.8E-13 Total 1.06E+00 9.10E-01 5.87E-01 9.75E-01 B. Noble Gases

. . 5 0.

Xe-133 <6.5E-08 <6.5E-08 <6.5E-08 <6.5E-08 Xe-135 <2.0E-08 <2.013-08 <2.013-08 <2.0E-08 Xe-135m <2.7E-08 <2.713-08 <2.7E-08 <2.713-08 Xe-138 <1.8E-07 <1.8E-07 <1.8E-07 <1.8E-07 Total <3.OE-07 <3.OE-07 <3.OE-07 <3.OE-07 E-6

Fermi2 - 2002 Annual Radioactive Effluent Release and RadiologicalEnvironmentalOperatingReport C. Radioiodines 1-131 I -_--I 1.77E-03 2.26E-03 2.43E-03

-2.82E-03 I 1-132 1.42E-02 2.07E-02 2.24E-02 1.78E-02 1-133 1.05E-02 1.53E-02 1.72E-02 1.26E-02 1-134 2.02E-02 5.55E-02 4.71E-02 2.06E-02 1-135 1.34E-02 2.14E-02 2.95E-02 1.76E-02 Total I 6.01E-02 1.15E-01 1.19E-01 7.14E-02 Shipments of Radwaste Fermi 2 complies with the extensive federal regulations which govern radioactive waste shipments. Radioactive solid waste shipments from the Fermi 2 site consist of waste generated during water treatment, radioactive trash, irradiated components, etc. Shipment destinations are either licensed burial sites or intermediate processing facilities. Waste shipped to intermediate processing facilities is shipped directly from these facilities to licensed burial sites after processing. The following tables contain estimates of major nuclide composition, by class of waste, of Fermi 2 solid radwaste received at the Barnwell, SC, burial facility or at the Envirocare, UT, facility in 2002.

a. Spent resins, sludges, etc. Waste in this category in 2002 consisted of spent resins only. All spent resin waste shipped for disposal in 2002 was shipped in High Integrity Containers or Polyethylene Liners to the Barnwell, SC, disposal facility. All waste in this category was Class A waste. All quantities were determined by measurement.

Radionuclide Total Activity (mCi) Percent of Total Activity C-14 4.41 E+03 7.68%

Co-58 9.83E+02 1.71%

Co-60 1.89E+04 32.91%

Cr-51 3.05E+02 0.53%

Cs-134 1.80E+01 0.03%

Cs-137 5.74E+02 1.00%

Fe-55 1.86E+04 32.47%

Fe-59 3.95E+01 0.07%

H-3 1.12E+02 0.19%

Hf-181 7.03E+00 0.01%

1-129 1.16E-01 0.00%

Mn-54 5.47E+03 9.52%

Nb-95 3.11 E+00 0.01%

Ni-63 7.18E+02 1.25%

Sr-89 3.44E+03 6.00%

E-7

Fermi2 - 2002 Annual Radioactive Effluent Release and RadiologicalEnvironmental OperatingReport Sr-90 1.98E+02 0.34%

Tc-99 2.79E+02 0.49%

Zn-65 3.32E+03 5.79%

Totals 5.74E+04 100.00%

b. Dry compressible waste, contaminated equipment, etc. Waste in this category in 2002 was shipped in strong tight containers, and was classified as dry active waste (DAW). All waste in this category was Class A waste. The DAW was compacted on site or by an intermediate processor, or else it was incinerated by an intermediate processor.

After incineration by an intermediate processor, some of the residue from this waste was solidified in concrete. All quantities were determined by measurement.

Radionuclide Total Activity (mCi) Percent of Total Activity Ba-140 1.89E-01 0.02%

C-14 4.83E+00 0.43%

Ce-141 9.41 E-02 0.01%

Ce-144 1.09E+00 0.10%

Co-57 9.92E-03 0.00%

Co-58 8.30E+00 0.74%

Co-60 2.29E+02 20.43%

Cr-51 7.86E+01 7.01%

Cs-134 1.56E+00 0.14%

Cs-1 37 9.03E+00 0.81%

Fe-55 6.67E+02 59.53%

Fe-59 1.75E+00 0.16%

H-3 4.1OE+01 3.65%

Hf-181 6.96E-01 0.06%

1-129 3.35E-01 0.03%

Mn-54 3.07E+01 2.74%

Nb-95 6.31 E-01 0.06%

Ni-59 3.44E-03 0.00%

Ni-63 1.30E+01 1.16%

Ru-1 03 3.39E-02 0.00%

Sb-124 1.65E-01 0.01%

Sn-113 1.21 E-02 0.00%

Sr-89 2.48E-03 0.00%

Tc-99 1.27E+01 1.13%

Zn-65 1.95E+01 1.74%

Zr-95 3.80E-01 0.03%

Totals 1.12E+03 100.00%

E-8

Fermi2 - 2002 Annual Radioactive Effluent Release and RadiologicalEnvironmental OperatingReport

c. Irradiated components, control rods, etc. No waste in this category was shipped.

d. Other No waste in this category was shipped to a disposal site.

E-9

Appendix F Interlaboratory Comparison Data

Fermi2 - 2002 Annual Radioactive Effluent Release and RadiologicalEnvironmental OperatingReport InterlaboratoryComparison Programfor 2002 In an interlaboratory comparison program, participant laboratories receive from a commerce source, environmental samples of known activity concentration for analysis.

After the samples have been analyzed by the laboratory, the manufacturer of the sample reports the known activity concentration of the samples to the laboratory. The laboratory compares its results to the reported concentrations to determine any significant deviations, investigates such deviations if found, and initiates corrective action if necessary. Participation in this program provides assurance that the contract laboratory is capable of meeting accepted criteria for radioactivity analysis.

In 2002, Framatome ANP performed eighty-seven (87) analyses of environmental samples from Analytics. All but one of the results were within the acceptance criteria.

The results are shown in the following table and all deviations, investigations and corrective actions taken by Framatome ANP are described in the foot notes.

F-I

Fermi2 - 2002 Annual Radioactive Effluent Release and RadiologicalEnvironmental OperatingReport ANALYTICS CROSS CHECK COMPARISON PROGRAM 2002 Table F-1 I l Framatome ANP Analytics l Media I Nuclide I Result(a) Result I Ratio(b)

Water H-3 13510 14060 0.96 Filter Gr,Alpha 14 16 0.88 Filter Gr,Beta 50 48 1.04 Filter Sr-89 66 82 0.80 Filter Sr-90 54 61 0.89 Milk 1-131 62 61 1.02 Milk Ce-1 41 384 379 1.01 Milk Cr-51 527 497 1.06 Milk Cs-1 34 198 199 0.99 Milk Cs-1 37 325 318 1 02 Milk Co-58 94 90 1.04 Milk Mn-54 158 149 1.06 Milk Fe-59 109 102 1.07 Milk Zn-65 231 206 1.12 Milk Co-60 353 353 1.00 Milk 1-131LL 99 90 1.09 Milk Ce-1 41 32 29 1.10 Milk Cr-51 262 241 1.09 Milk Cs-134 103 110 0.94 Milk Cs-137 248 240 1.03 Milk Mn-54 224 202 1.11 Milk Fe-59 112 104 1.08 Milk Zn-65 215 199 1.08 Milk Co-60 144 142 1.01 Charcoal 1-131 74 77 0.96 Charcoal 1-131 65 69 0.94 Charcoal 1-131 91 87 1.05 Water Gr Alpha 56 7 53 1.08 Water Gr Beta 310.3 313 0.99 Water 1-131 54 5 61 0.90 Water 1-131LL 63.4 61 1.04 Water Ce-1 41 239 4 242 0.99 Water Cr-51 175 7 198 0.89 Water Cs-134 87.8 91 0.97 Water Cs-137 197.7 197 1.01 Water Mn-54 168.5 166 1.02 Water Fe-59 87.6 86 1.02 Water Zn-65 157.2 164 0.96 Water Co-60 114.6 117 0.98 Soil Ce-1 41 350.7 383 0 92 Soil Cr-51 274 314 0 87 Soil Cs-134 136.6 143 0 96 Soil Cs-137 405.7 439 0.92 F-2

Fermi2 - 2002 Annual Radioactive Effluent Release and RadiologicalEnvironmental OperatingReport ANALYTICS CROSS CHECK COMPARISON PROGRAM 2002 Table F-1 (cont.)

l l Framatome ANP Analytics I Media I Nuclide I Result(a) Result I Ratio(b) I Soil Mn-54 245 8 263 0 94 Soil Fe-59 140 2 136 1.03 Soil Zn-65 248.1 259 0.96 Soil Co-60 168.1 185 0.91 Filter Gr Alpha 21.8 23 0.96 Filter Gr Beta 149 136 1.1 Milk 1-131 87 9 92 0.96 Milk 1-131LL 93 92 1.01 Milk Ce-141 317.8 326 0.98 Milk Cr-51 277 267 1.04 Milk Cs-134 119 122 0.98 Milk Cs-1 37 271.2 266 1.02 Milk Mn-54 231.2 224 1.03 Milk Fe-59 123.6 116 1.07 Milk Zn-65 225.9 221 1.02 Milk Co-60 152.9 158 0.97 Milk Sr-89 79 9 83 0.96 Milk Sr-90 24 7 27 0.93 Water H-3 6970 6970 1.00 Water Sr-89 42 64 0.66 (c)

Water Sr-90 36 39 0.92 Filter Gr Alpha (d)

Filter Gr Beta (d)

Filter Ce-1 41 59 61 0.97 Filter Cr-51 165 160 1.03 Filter Cs-1 34 77 82 0.94 Filter Cs-1 37 64 62 1.03 Filter Co-58 68 68 1.00 Filter Mn-54 69 65 1.06 Filter Fe-59 62 55 1.13 Filter Zn-65 131 122 1.07 Filter Co-60 82 85 0.96 Filter Sr-90 41 48 0 85 Milk 1-131 88 87 1.01 Milk 1-131 LL 85 87 0.98 Milk Ce-141 86 90 0 96 Milk Cr-51 230 235 0.98 Milk Cs-1 34 121 120 1.01 Milk Cs-1 37 89 91 0.98 Milk Co-58 100 100 1.00 Milk Mn-54 97 95 1.02 Milk Fe-59 83 81 1.02 Milk Zn-65 179 180 0.99 Milk Co-60 127 125 1.02 F-3

Fermi2 - 2002 Annual Radioactive Effluent Release and RadiologicalEnvironmentalOperatingReport Footnotes:

(a) FramatomeANP Results - Units are pCi/literfor water, soil, and milk. Units are total pCiforairparticulatefilters.

(b) Ratio of FramatomeANP to Analytics Results.

(c) Sr-89failed low, investigation ongoing (d) Filterdamaged during sample preparation.No results issued.

F-4

Appendix G Meteorological Data

Fermi2 - 2002 Annual Radioactive Effluent Release and RadiologicalEnvironmentalOperatingReport Fermi 2 Joint Frequency DistributionTables - 2002 Table G-1 Stability ClassA Wind Speed (MPH) N NNE NE ENE E ESE SE SSE S SSW SW WSW W WNW NW NNW 0 to 0.75 076 to 2.5 3 1 2 1 2 1 2 5 8 2 5 2.51 to 45 1 2 3 4 2 4 6 3 6 2 8 24 32 35 19 8 4 51 to 65 5 9 23 9 11 42 46 20 19 16 25 31 39 32 32 10 651 to 8.5 13 13 32 32 23 58 53 37 19 17 42 43 22 37 28 17 8.51 to 11.5 13 6 5 25 22 26 19 29 25 37 55 57 30 27 16 26 11 51 to 14 5 7 3 12 21 8 2 3 3 16 31 12 16 9 6 9 14 51 to 18.5 3 2 9 1 6 11 4 3 1 2 18.51 to 23 5 1 1 Total 45 34 65 84 88 140 128 93 72 95 175 176 150 143 106 72 G-1

Fermi 2 - 2002 Annual RadioactiveEffluent Release and RadiologicalEnvironmentalOperatingReport Table G-2 Stability ClassB Wind Speed (MPH) N NNE NE ENE E ESE SE SSE S SSW SW WSW W WNW NW NNW 0 to 0 75 0.76 to 25 2 1 1 1 1 9 3 1 251 to 4.5 3 3 3 3 2 4 6 2 9 5 11 8 10 14 6 4.51 to 65 4 3 6 4 3 12 17 19 7 11 15 18 10 17 10 10 651 to 85 5 5 4 8 5 8 11 20 7 14 17 13 7 8 4 7 8 51 to 11.5 3 4 4 2 2 4 4 4 17 24 4 9 6 2 4 1151 to 145 3 1 1 1 1 4 6 1 5 1 14.51 to 18.5 2 3 2 1 4 1 1 18.51 to 23 5 Total 15 16 21 24 15 27 38 45 18 57 71 48 49 46 31 28 G-2

Fermi2 - 2002 Annual Radioactive Effluent Release and RadiologicalEnvironmentalOperatingReport Table G-3 Stability Class C Wind Speed (MPII) N NNE NE, ENE E ESE SE SSE S SSW SW WSW W WNW NW NNW 0 to 0.75 076 to 2.5 4 1 3 2 1 6 5 3 2 4 2.51 to 45 4 8 3 2 2 7 2 2 4 9 7 20 13 22 14 9 451 to 65 3 4 6 3 5 9 15 13 10 15 18 14 14 15 8 13 6 51 to 8.5 9 5 13 7 6 8 8 11 9 15 28 5 10 22 10 10 8.51 to 11 5 12 7 2 3 8 3 2 2 1 34 31 4 7 8 6 1 11 51 to 14.5 1 4 3 4 6 3 2 1 1 13 21 2 5 4 2 14.51 to 18 5 1 5 1 1 11 1 1 1851 to 235 Total 29 32 28 25 28 30 29 29 28 89 117 51 54 75 41 39 G-3

Fermi 2 - 2002 Annual Radioactive Effluent Release and RadiologicalEnvironmentalOperating Report Table G-4 Stability Class D Wind Speed (MPTH) N NNE NE ENE E ESE SE SSE S SSW SW WSW W WNW NW NNW 0 to 0 75 1 0.76 to 25 14 6 10 2 2 4 2 2 5 7 13 20 8 13 8 2 51 to 4.5 18 27 16 9 17 9 8 8 12 14 47 55 40 41 40 24 4 51 to 6.5 26 34 34 14 15 32 21 14 25 36 101 51 50 36 57 50 6 51 to 85 19 17 58 37 28 26 38 20 36 44 103 44 32 36 27 48 8 51 to 11.5 31 22 87 62 47 13 15 28 21 108 133 24 18 23 9 23 11.51 to 14.5 10 29 25 19 30 4 3 4 36 81 11 6 6 4 12 14 51 to 18 5 5 2 1 2 10 2 9 19 9 1 1 18 51 to 23 5 6 1 1 4 Total 123 137 231 145 155 90 85 76 98 252 492 211 166 151 150 166 G-4

Fermi2 - 2002 Annual Radioactive Effluent Release and RadiologicalEnvironmentalOperatingReport Table G-5 Stability Class E Wind Speed (MPH) N NNE NE ENE E ESE SE SSE S SSW SW WSW W WNW NW NNW 0 to 0.75 I 1 1 0.76 to 25 11 5 9 9 3 7 6 5 16 11 24 39 37 34 21 14 2.51 to 4.5 26 37 8 11 10 12 15 21 38 46 91 86 45 44 56 37 4 51 to 65 24 29 38 19 18 36 34 34 41 91 55 22 21 20 15 25 6 51 to 8.5 13 23 31 23 22 33 31 36 49 133 31 15 4 5 1 9 8 51 to 11.5 10 11 4 1 14 8 12 19 34 92 19 2 2 2 6 11.51 to 14.5 2 3 3 5 1 2 5 11 23 13 1 14.51 to 18 5 2 1 1 2 1 3 1 18.51 to 23 5 1 1 1 1 Total 86 108 94 67 75 98 100 121 193 398 234 166 109 103 95 91 G-5

Fermi 2 - 2002 Annual Radioactive Effluent Release and Radiological Environmental OperatingReport Table G-6 Stability Class F Wind Speed (~MPIDI N NNE, NE, ENE, E ESE SE SSE S SSW SW WSW W WNW NW NNW 0 to 0.75 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 0.76 to 2.5 6 4 2 1 2 2 2 9 17 20 26 43 34 47 34 15 2 51 to 45 22 8 2 1 3 5 13 10 34 23 22 12 21 11 18 4.51 to 6.5 14 6 1 1 1 4 13 13 13 17 1 1 2 6 51 to 85 3 6 6 11 9 17 2 8 51 to 11.5 1 6 10 7 19 2 11.51 to 14 5 1 2 1 4 14 51 to 18 5 1 18 51 to 23.5 Total 43 18 5 2 8 15 34 60 58 112 54 65 47 70 46 37 G-6

Fermi 2 - 2002 Annual Radioactive Effluent Release and RadiologicalEnvironmentalOperatingReport Table G-7 Stability Class G Wind Speed (MPII) N NNE NE ENE E ESE SE SSE S SSW SW WSW W WNW NW NNW 0 to 0.75 1 0.76 to 2.5 1 3 1 1 1 2 3 4 16 31 50 17 19 2.51 to 4.5 14 1 3 7 4 6 6 29 8 12 4.51 to 65 6 3 3 1 . 3 2 651 to 85 1 1 1 1 1 851 to 115 3 5 2 11.51 to 14 5 3 14 51 to 18.5 18.51 to 23.5 Total 21 3 1 7 5 12 6 16 9 23 37 79 25 33 G-7

Fermi 2 - 2002 Annual Radioactive Effluent Release and RadiologicalEnvironmentalOperatingReport 2002 Wind Rose All Stability Classes N

WNW ENE W E WSW ESE S

Figure 7 Direction and number of hours the wind was traveling from at 10 meters.

G-8

Appendix H ODCM Revision I

LICENSING CHANGE REQUEST LCR l0 12 1 - lo 12 13 l- 10 ID IM l Revision 0 Page I of I PARTI: UFSAR, TRAf, PLAN, OR PROGRAMREVISION ONA A) Document Offsite Dose Calculation Manual B) Section(s), Table(s), Figure(s), etc. Affected 4.0.3, Control 3.3.7.12, Table 3.12.1-1, 7.1.2, and Equations 7-11 and 7-14 C) Reason for Change Conform to Technical Specification Amendment 145, take actions required by CARD 00-20701

-an-CARD 00-11758, and miscellaneous corrections.

D) Source References and Other Reference (Identify): E) Attached Documents (If Applicable)

Source Reference Other Reference EDP 0 0 Effectiveness Review El Yes 0 No TSR 0 0 Commitment Review E Yes 0 No DERICARD 103 0 Applicability Determination (required)

Test 0 U 10 CFR 50 59 Screen 0 Yes U No Tech Spec 0 0 10 CFR 50 59 Evaluation 0 Yes Z; No Temp Mod 3 0 Procedure O 0 Other 0 0 Document Revs. (MLS08007) 0 Yes E No 0 NA F) Drawing Numbers: (list) rRTa2:, EK4IN JCENSE.(HANGES !1VNA7 '

A) Document O Operating License 0 Tech Specs 0 Environmental Protection Plan B) Section(s), Table(s), Figure(s), etc. Affected C) Reference and Source Documents Attached O NA 0 Other 0 Marked-up pages O Significant Hazards Consideration 0 Environmental Evaluation O Environmental Impact/Categorical Exclusion 0 Justification D) Is change to UFSAR, TRM, and/or approved plans/programs required?

O Yes 0 No 0 LCR No(s) MCR REGEI'IEu D E) Priority 0 NA NUCLEAR UCENSING NRC approval required by (date):

Explanation MAR 0 5 2002 F) NRC Letter No. G) Amendment No.

-w.- ,7 :2-PART3RAPPROVALS~j' ^

A) Originator Date Z-Z7-o0

&',,ze/ , , ,' 4< Date Z/z~S /O -

C) ,nsblbe Supervisor o0 anig al Unit ad ,

,r.,

Cd/LL/.,4s ,9 5_ />Date -¢ 3/ 6c 2 -

D) Other 2 >Date!

14r O E) Director, Nuclear Licensing O Attach Management Review Sheet / Date 3/&jo F) OSRO (Fire Protection, RERP, PCP, ODCM, SEP, TS) 0 NA 0 Attach Management Review S Date 3z G) Plant Manager O NA 0 Attach Management Review Sheet Date o DOL H) V'ce President, Nuclear Generation (QA only)

W NA Date I) N RG (OL, TS, EPP)

W NA 0 Attach Management Review Sheet Date DTC: TPMMLS DSN: MLS08001 Rev. 7 P1/I File: 1703.22 Approved: 3-22-01 Issued: 4-16-01 DTC: TDLCR or TCLCR DSN: File: 1701.03 IP: I Date: Recipient:

EFFECTIVENESS REVIEW Reference LCR O l -10 12 12 13 l- Io IDIM I Reviinn A

- P-n.

b' I. of

PART 1: UFSAR E NA -

A~~ \aw '.+ ......

I .. o I __

Ai) Quait~y Assuranice rrograrn n Yes Li No ElNA Does the change(s) cease to satisfy the criteria of I OCFR50, Appendix B or reduce UFSAR program commitments previously accepted by the NRC?

U Yes U No U NA Can an exception be taken in accordance with NRC "Final Rule/ 64FR9029" (see MLSO8)9 If Yes, then NRC prior approval is not required Provide the basis for each change on MLS08003 B) Fire Protection Program IU Yes L No U NA Does the change(s) adversely affect the ability to achieve and maintain safe shutdown in the event of a fire?

Provide the basis for each change on MLS08003.

,, , Bego ,: 4 , +> 5- -;-,, v 8;, .'.Z. I- be-.=4zr<

4O

\ I.%. ' -. PART2: RADIOLOGICAL EMERGENVCYRESPONSEPREPARED - -

NESS PL4AA NA, ' ' :

A) El Yes El No . Does the change(s) decrease the effectiveness of the RERP Plan?

El Yes El No Does the RERP Plan, as changed, cease to meet the standards of IOCFR50 47(b) and I OCFR50 Appendix E?

Provide the basis for each change on MLS08003.

4,W-~ , z A)3SEC&AdtPI7ANS [El N Acument A) Document B) El Yes El No Does the change(s) decrease the effectiveness of the Physical Security Plan or Security Personnel Training and Qualification Plan prepared pursuant to IOCFR50 34(c) or IOCFR73) r- - r-i --

LJ Yes LJ No Does the change(s) decrease the effectiveness of the first four categories of Informational Background, Generic Planning Base, Licensee Planning Base, and/or responsiblity matrix of the Safeguards Contingency Plan prepared pursuant to IOCFR50.34(d) or IOCFR73?

Provide the basis for each change on MLS08003.

P T ;0ji A) Li Yes L No Does the change(s) reduce the overall conformance of the solidified waste product required by IOCFR61.55 and 10CFR61.56?

Provide the basis for each change on MLS08003.

A) Li Yes EJ No Does the change(s) reduce the level of radioactive effluent control required by IOCFR20.106 or IOCFR20.1302, 40CFR Part 190, IOCFR50 36a, and Appendix I to I OCFR Part 509 (Technical Specification 5.5.1)

Li Yes [3 No Does the change(s) adversely impact the accuracy or reliability of effluent, dose, or setpoint calculations? (Technical Specifications 5.5 1)

Provide the basis for each change on MLS08003.

ALAR&

- APPROVALS, - 15 A~

A) Originator at D1 2 2-7 o-

> ( ._ X XDate 2. 2..7-07 B) Technical Expert IT TC Date C) Quality Assurance(Sec Plans, Date Dartogrw

, z/,c Dt DTC: TPMMLS DSN: MLS08002 Rev. 3 P 1/1 File: 1703.22 Approved: 2-21-01 Issued: 2-26-01 File: 1701.03 IP: I:

EFFECTIVENESS REVIEW DOCUMENTATION Reference LCR 10 2 - I 2° l - 10 ID ,M I Revision 0 Page 2 of 3 Document Listed below is each change by section and page, the reason for the change. and the basis for concluding that the revised plan or program continues to satisfy the criteria for that plan or program. Attach all appropriate analyses or evaluations iustifying the change(s).

Section/Page Chhange Basis 3.0 / 3-4 l In section 4.0.3, substitute "greater" This conforms the ODCM to for "less" in statement on when to Technical Specification declare a Control not met. Add Amendment 145. This is an statement requiring a risk administrative change which does, evaluation for some missed not affect regulatory compliance or surveillances. ODCM calculations.

3.0/ 3-10 Separate sentences in Action b of i Under current revision, Action b Control 3.3.7.12, and renumber may be interpreted as not requiring accordingly. Change Applicability repair of standby gas treatment of second sentence, now Action c, system gaseous effluent monitoring and last action statement, now I instrumentation unless the SGTS is Action d, to "at all times". operating. The proposed change clarifies that such repair is required whenever this instrumentation is not functionally capable. This change enhances effluent control since it requires timely repair of the SGTS effluent instrumentation.

This change is required under the action plan for CARD 00-20701.

Regulatory compliance and ODCM calculations are not affected.

3.0 / 3-35 In item 2 of Table 3.12.1-1, change This change clarifies that the X/Q, "D/Q" to "X/Q" under the not-the D/Q, should be considered description of locations a and b. in choosing offsite airborne sampling locations. This is an administrative correction which does not affect regulatory compliance or ODCM calculations.

7.0 / 7-2 In section 7.1.2, change Technical This change implements the Specification reference to offgas required action specified in CARD system hydrogen monitor to current 00-1 1758. This is an Technical Requirements Manual administrative change to monitor references, and correct noble gas descriptions, and as such it does not activity monitor Technical affect regulatory compliance or Specification reference. ODCM calculations.

DTC: TPMMLS DSN: MLS08003 Rev. I PIl/l File: 1703.22 Date: 041996 File: 1701.03 IP: I

EFFECTIVENESS REVIEW DOCUMENTATION ReferenceLCR 1° 12 l - 1° 12 13 l- I0 l D I M I

'Reviszion f) nP- ' -rf 'I 7.0/ 7-13 and 7-14 In equations 7-11 and 7-14, add This correction is necessary missing parenthesis at end of because of a difference between the equation. electronic and printed version of this section. The use of these equations has not been affected and this change is strictly administrative. As such, it does not affect regulatory compliance or ODCM calculations.

DTC: TPMMLS DSN: MLS08003 Rev. 1 P2/1 File: 1703.22 Date: 041996 File: 1701.03 IP: I

FERMI 2 - TECHNICAL REQUIREMENTS MANUAL VOLUME 11- LIST OF EFFECTIVE PAGES OFFSITE DOSE CALCULATION MANUAL Page Revision Paqe Revision 0-1 15 3-15 13 0-2 13 3-16 13 0-3 13 3-17 13 0-4 13 3-18 14 0-5 13 3-19 13 0-6 13 3-20 14 3-21 14 1-1 13 3-22 14 1-2 14 3-23 13 3-24 13 2-1 13 3-25 13 2-2 14 3-26 14 2-3 14 3-27 14 2-4 14 3-28 14 2-5 14 3-29 14 2-6 14 3-30 14 2-7 14 3-31 13 3-32 14 3-1 13 3-33 14 3-2 14 . 3-34 13 3-3 14 3-35 14 3-4 15 3-36 13 3-5 13 3-37 - 13 3-6 14 3-38 13 3-7 14 3-39 13 3-8 14 3-40 13 3-9 13 3-41 13 3-10 14 3-42 13 3-11 13 3-43 113 3-12 13 3-44 13 3-13 13 3-45 13 3-14 13 3-46 13 FERMI 2 ODCM - TRM VOLUME 11 LEP-1 Rev.15 032002

FERMI 2 - TECHNICAL REQUIREMENTS MANUAL VOLUME II - LIST OF EFFECTIVE PAGES OFFSITE DOSE CALCULATION MANUAL Page Revision Paqe Revision 4-1 13 6-19 13 4-2 13 6-20 13 4-3 13 6-21 13 4-4 13 6-22 13 4-5 13 4-6 13 4-7 13 7-1 13 4-8 13 7-2 14 7-3 13.

5-1 13 7-4 14 5-2 13 7-5 13 5-3 13 7-6 13 5-4 14 7-7 13 5-5 13 7-8 13 7-9 13 6-1 13 . 7-10 13 6-2 13 7-11 13 6-3 14 7-12 14 6-4 13 7-13 14 6-5 13 7-14 14 6-6 13 7-15 13 6-7 - 14 7-16 13-6-8 14 7-17 13 6-9 13 7-18 13 6-10 13 7-19 - 13.

6-11 13 7-20 13 6-12 13 7-21 13 6-13 13 7-22 13 6-14 13 . 7-23 ,13 6-15 13 7-24 13 6-16 13 7-25 13 6-17 13 7-26 13 6-18 13 FERMI 2 ODCM - TRM VOLUME II LEP-2 Rev.15 032002

FERMI 2 - TECHNICAL REQUIREMENTS MANUAL VOLUME II - LIST OF EFFECTIVE PAGES OFFSITE DOSE CALCULATION MANUAL Page Revision Paqe Revision 7-27 13 9-1 13 7-28 13 9-2 13 7-29 13 9-3 13 7-30 13 9-4 13 7-31 13 7-32 13 10-1 13 7-33 - 13 10-2 13 7-34 13 10-3 13 7-35 13 10-4 13 7-36 13 10-5 13 7-37 13 10-6 13 7-38 13 10-7 13 7-39 13 10-8 13 7-40 13 10-9 13 7-41 13 10-10 13 7-42 13 10-11 13 7-43 13 10-12 13 7-44 13 10-13 13 7-45 13 10-14 13 7-46 13 10-15 13 7-47 - 13 7-48 13 7-49 13 7-50 13 8.0-1 13 8.0-2 13 8.0-3 13 8.0-4 13 8.0-5 13 8.0-6 - 13 8.0-7 13 8.0-8 13-8.0-9 13 FERMI 2 ODCM - TRM VOLUME II LEP-3 Rev.15 032002

OFFSITE DOSE CALCULATION MANUAL Pages Revised in Latest Revision 0-1, 3-4, 3-10, 3-35, 7-2, 7-13, and 7-14 Implementation Plan These revisions go into effect concurrently with implementation of Technical Specification Amendment 145 FERMI 2 ODCM - TRM VOLUME 11 0-1 Rev. 15

314.0 APPLICABILITY SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS 4.0 1 Surveillance Requirements shall be met during the MODES or other specified conditions in the Applicability for individual Controls, unless otherwise stated in the Surveillance Requirements Failure to meet a Surveillance, whether such failure is experienced during the performance of the Surveillance or between performances of the Surveillance, shall be failure to meet the Control. Failure to perform a Surveillance within the specified Frequency shall be failure to meet the Control except as provided in Surveillance Requirement 4.0.3. Surveillances do not have to be performed on equipment which is not FUNCTIONALLY CAPABLE or variables outside specified limits 4.0 2 The specified Frequency is met if the Surveillance is performed within 1.25 times the interval specified in the Frequency, as measured from the previous performance or as measured from the time a specified condition of the Frequency is met.

For Frequencies specified as "once," the above interval extension does not apply.

If a Completion Time requires periodic performance on a "once per . " basis, the above Frequency extension applies to each performance after the initial performance Exceptions to this Control are stated in the individual Controls.

4.0.3 If it is discovered that a Surveillance was not performed within its specified Frequency, then compliance with the requirement to declare the Control not met may be delayed, from the time of discovery, up to 24 hours2.777778e-4 days 0.00667 hours 3.968254e-5 weeks 9.132e-6 months or up to the limit of the specified Frequency, whichever is greater. This delay period is permitted to allow performance of the Surveillance. A risk evaluation shall be performed for any Surveillance delayed greater than 24 hours2.777778e-4 days 0.00667 hours 3.968254e-5 weeks 9.132e-6 months and the risk impact shall be managed.

If the Surveillance is not performed within the delay period, the Control must immediately be declared not met, and the applicable ACTIONS must be entered When the Surveillance is performed within the delay period and the Surveillance is not met, the Control must immediately be declared not met, and the-applicable ACTIONS must be entered 4 04 Entry into a MODE or other specified condition in the Applicability of a Control shall not be made unless the Control's Surveillances have been met within their specified Frequency This provision shall not prevent entry into MODES or other specified conditions in the Applicability that are required to comply with ACTIONS or that are part of a shutdown of the unit 4 0 4 is only applicable for entry into a MODE or other specified condition in the Applicability in MODES 1, 2, and 3.

FERMI 2 ODCM - TRM VOLUME II 3-4 Rev. 15

INSTRUMENTATION RADIOACTIVE GASEOUS EFFLUENT MONITORING INSTRUMENTATION CONTROLS 3 3.7.12 The radioactive gaseous effluent monitoring instrumentation channels shown in Table 3 3.7.12-1 shall be FUNCTIONALLY CAPABLE with their alarm/trip setpoints set to ensure that the limits of Control 3 11.2 1 are not exceeded. The alarm/trip setpoints of these channels, with the exception of the offgas monitoring system, shall be determined and adjusted in accordance with the methodology and parameters in the ODCM.

APPLICABILITY: Actions a and b As shown in Table 3.3.7.12-1 Actions c and d At all times ACTION a With a radioactive gaseous effluent monitoring instrumentation channel alarm/trip setpoint less conservative than required by the above Control, immediately suspend the release of radioactive gaseous effluents monitored by the affected channel, or declare the channel not FUNCTIONALLY CAPABLE, or change the setpoint so it is acceptably conservative.

b. With less than the minimum number of radioactive gaseous effluent monitoring instrumentation channels FUNCTIONALLY CAPABLE, take the ACTION shown in Table 3.3 7.12-1.

c Restore radioactive gaseous effluent monitoring instrumentation which is not FUNCTIONALLY CAPABLE to FUNCTIONALLY CAPABLE status within 30 days and, if unsuccessful, explain why this condition was not corrected in a timely manner in the next Annual Radioactive Effluent Release Report d The provisions of Controls 3 0.3 and 3 0.4 are not applicable.

SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS 4 3 7 12 Each radioactive gaseous effluent monitoring instrumentation channel shall be demonstrated FUNCTIONALLY CAPABLE by performance of the CHANNEL CHECK, CHANNEL CALIBRATION, and CHANNEL FUNCTIONAL TEST operations at the frequencies shown in Table 4 3 7 12-1 FERMI 2 ODCM - TRM VOLUME II 3-10 Rev. 14

TABLE 3.12.1-1 RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM Number of Representative Sampling and Exposure Pathway 'Samples and Sample Collection Type and Frequency and/or Sample Locationsa Frequency of Analysis 67 routine monitoring stations, Quarterly Gamma dose quarterly

1. DIRECT RADIATIONb with two or more dosimeters placed as follows- 1) an inner ring of stations inthe general area of the SITE BOUNDARY and additional rings at approximately 2, 5. and 10 miles, with a station in at least every other meteorological sector for i each ring with the exception of those sectors over Lake Erie The balance of the stations, 8, should be placed in special interest areas such as population centers, nearby residences, schools, and in 2 or 3 areas to serve as control stations

2 AIRBORNE Samples from 5 locations ,Continuous sampler Radioiodine Canister Radioiodine and joperation with sample 1-131 analysis weekly

Particulates ,a 3 samples from close to the . collection weekly, or 3 SITE BOUNDARY more frequently If Particulate Sampler-locations. in different sectors, ,irequired by dust Gross beta radioactivity of the highest calculated loading analysis following filter annual average ground level change d XIQ Gamma isotopic b 1 sample from the vicinity of ! analysise of composite a community having the (by location) quarterly highest calculated annual average ground level X/Q c 1 sample from a control location, as for example 15-30 km distant and in the least prevalent wind directionC FERMI 2 ODCM - TRM VOLUME II 3-35 Rev. 14

7.0 GASEOUS EFFLUENTS 7.1 Radiation Monitoring Instrumentation and Controls 7.1.1 Effluent Monitoring - Ventilation System Releases The gaseous effluent monitoring instrumentation required at Fermi 2 for controlling and monitoring radioactive effluents are specified in ODCM 3.3.7.12.

The monitoring of each identified gaseous effluent release point must include the following:

- Noble Gas Activity Monitor

- Iodine Sampler (sample cartridge containing charcoal or silver zeolite)

- Particulate Sampler (filter paper)

- Sampler Flow Rate Monitor Meeting these requirements, a total of six Eberline SPING Monitoring Systems are installed on the five gaseous release points (Onsite Storage Facility, Radwaste Building, Turbine Building, Reactor Building Exhaust Plenum, and Standby Gas Treatment System Division 1 and Division 2) The SPING Monitor outputs are recorded electronically in the CT-2B Control Terminal in the Main Control Room In general, a reading exceeding the High alarm setpoint of the SPING Monitors causes an alarm in the Control Room Fermi 2 ODCM Table 3.3.7 12-1 identifies these alarm functions.

7.1.2 Main Condenser Offgas Monitoring ODCM Table 3 3 7 12-1 and Technical Requirements Manual Volume 1, section TR 3 3 12, specify monitoring requirements for the Offgas System at the 2 2 minute delay line The following monitors are required

- Hydrogen Monitor - used to ensure the hydrogen concentration in the Offgas Treatment System is maintained less than 4% by volume as required by Technical Requirements Manual Volume 1, section TRLCO 3 3 12

- Noble Gas Activity Monitor - used to ensure the gross activity release rate is maintained within 340 millicuries per second after 30 minute decay as required by Technical Specification 3.7.5.

These two monitors perform safety functions The-Hydrogen Monitor monitors the potential explosive mixtures in the Offgas System The Noble Gas Monitor monitors the release rate from the main condenser ensuring doses at the exclusion area boundary will not exceed a small fraction of the limits of 10 CFR 100 in the event this effluent is inadvertently discharged directly to the environment bypassing the Offgas Treatment System FERMI 2 ODCM - TRM VOLUME II 7-2 Rev. 14

7.8 Noble Gas Effluent Dose Calculations - 10 CFR 50 7.8.1 UNRESTRICTED AREA Dose - Noble Gases ODCM 4.11.2.2 requires that an assessment of releases of noble gases be performed at least once per 31 days to evaluate compliance with the quarterly dose limits of 5 mrad, gamma-air and 10 mrad, beta-air and the calendar year limits 10 mrad, gamma-air and 20 mrad, beta-air. The following equations may be used to calculate the gamma-air and beta-air doses If noble gases are detected at multiple release points, these equations must be performed for each such release point, and the calculated air doses must be summed.

D, =3.17E-08* XI/Q*Z(M,* )

(7-10) and Da = 3.17E-08*X/Q*Z(N, *Q.)

(7-11)

Where:

D= air dose due to gamma emissions for noble gas radionuclides (mrad)

DA = air dose due to beta emissions for noble gas radionuclides (mrad)

X/Q = atmospheric dispersion to the controlling SITE BOUNDARY location (sec/M 3)

Q = cumulative release of noble gas radionuclide i over the period of interest (pCi)

Ml = air dose factor due to gamma emissions from noble gas radionuclide i (mrad/yr per pCi/M 3, from Table 7.0-2)

N, = air dose factor due to beta emissions from noble gas radionuclide i (mrad/yr per pCi/M3, Table 7 0-2) 3 17 E -08= 1/315 E + 07 (year/sec)

FERMI 2 ODCM - TRM VOLUME II 7-13 Rev. 14

7.9 Radioiodine and Particulate Dose Calculations -10 CFR 50 7.9.1 UNRESTRICTED AREA Dose - Radioiodine, Particulates, and Tritium In accordance with requirements of ODCM 4.11.2.3, a periodic assessment (at least once per 31 days) is required to evaluate compliance with the quarterly dose limit of 7.5 mrem and the calendar year limit of 15 mrem to any organ. The following equation may be used to evaluate the maximum organ dose due to releases of 1-131, 1-133, tritium, and particulates with half-lives greater than 8 days:

D.,, =LZ(W,*SFp*3.17E-8*RRpo

Qr,)

P r4 (7-14)

Where:

Dao dose or dose commitment to Organ o of age group a (identified in Table 7.0-3 or plant procedures)

Wr atmospheric dispersion parameter for release point r and the residence location identified in Table 7.0-3 or plant procedures.

Either:

a) X/Q, atmospheric dispersion for inhalation pathway and H-3 and C-14 dose contribution via other pathways (sec/m 3 ), or b) D/Q, atmospheric deposition for vegetation, milk and ground plane exposure pathways (m-2)

Raipo= dose factor (mrem/yr per pC0/mi3 ) or (m2 - mrem/yr per pCi/sec) from Table 7.0-4 for radionuclide i, age group a, pathway p, and organ o as identified in Table 7.0-3 or plant procedures. Values for Raipo were derived in accordance with the methods described in NUREG-0133 As noted in NUREG-0133 section 5.3 1.3, in the case that the milk animal is a goat, parameter values from Reg Guide 1.109 should be used. For 1-131, for example, use of the goat feed/forage consumption rate given in Table E-3 and the stable element transfer factor given in Table E-2 of Reg Guide 1.109 results in grass-goat-milk dose factors which are equivalent to the grass-cow-milk dose factors in Table 7.0-4 multiplied by 1 2 FERMI 2 ODCM - TRM VOLUME II 7-14 Rev. 14

NRC-03-0043, Annual Radioactive Effluent Release and Radiological Environmental Operating Reports

Text

References:

Subject:

Navigation menu

NRC-03-0043, Annual Radioactive Effluent Release and Radiological Environmental Operating Reports

Text

References:

Subject:

Navigation menu

Search