ML20244D644
| ML20244D644 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Seabrook  |
| Issue date: | 04/18/1989 |
| From: | Callendrello A, Ellis S, Frank C, Grew T ABB IMPELL CORP. (FORMERLY IMPELL CORP.), PUBLIC SERVICE CO. OF NEW HAMPSHIRE |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20244D592 | List: |
| References | |
| OL, NUDOCS 8904240051 | |
| Download: ML20244D644 (270) | |
Text
{{#Wiki_filter:- _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ ESNNDSg D{. .iLE l '89 APR 20 P5 :21
,y gg April 18,,,1989 00CKLW. - ci r"; Y. fi UNITED STATES OF AMERICA NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION before the I ATOMIC SAFETY AND LICENSING BOARD I
i In the Matter of i
)
PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY OF ) Docket Nos. 50-443-OL I NEW HAMPSHIRE, et al. ) 50-444-OL l
)
(Seabrook Station, Units 1 and 2) ) (Off-site Emergency
) Planning Issues)
APPLICANTS' REBUTTAL TESTIMONY NO. 20 (ORO PREREQUISITES AND TRAINING) I. Panel Members: Anthony M. Callendrello, Manager, Emergency l Preparedness Licensing, New Hampshire Yankee S. Joseph Elli,s, Manager, Response and l Implementation, New Hampshire Yankee l I Catherine M. Frank, Emergency Planner, Impell Corporation Thomas F. Grew, Specialty Training Manager, New Hampshire Yankee I I I 8904240051 890418 PDR ADOCK 05000443 T PDR I
. i l
TABLE OF CONTENTS
. .. . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . 1 I. INTRODUCTION
. . . 1 II. PREREQUISITE QUALIFICATIONS FOR ORO POSITIONS Regulatory Requirements . . . . . . . . . . . 1 A.
Use of Prerequisites . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 B.
... . . . . . . . . . . . 3 III. NHY ORO TRAINING PROGRAM Training Modules . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 A.
B. Training Program Basis . . . . . . . . , . . . . 4 l l C. Evaluation and Improvements of the NHY ORO Training Program . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . 7 9 D. Qualification of NHY ORO Personnel . . . . . . E. Drills and Additional Training Activities .. 10 F. Evaluation of NHY ORO Training Through Performance in the Graded Exercise' . . . . 11 G. No Deficiencies Were Found for Any Exercise Objective . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12 l IV. SPECIFIC PREREQUISITES AND TRAINING . . . . . . . . .12 A. Protective Action Recommendation Training . . 13 B. Procedural Direction for Development of l 15 i Protective Action Recommendations . . . . . . C. Offsite Response Director . . . . . . . . . . 16 D. Assistant Offsite Response Directors . . . . . 20
- 1. Assistant offsite Response Director, i Response Implementation . . . . . . . . . 20 l
- 2. Assistant Offsite Response Director, Support Liaison . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22 !
-ii-
E. Technical Advisor . . . .. . . . . . . . . . 23 F. Radiological Health Advisor . . . . . . . . . 26 G. Public Notification Coordinator . . . . . . . 28 H. Traffic Guides . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 31 I. Bus Drivers . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 34 Attachment A: Summary of NHY ORO Training Modules Attachment B: INPO 87-019, Pages 13-17, Appendix D Attachment C: Seabrook Nuclear Training Procedure NT-4010, Conducting Job and Task Analysis Attachment D: Seabrook Nuclear Training Procedure NT-5000, Performance-based Design Training Attachment E: Seabrook Nuclear Training Procedure NT-6000, Development of Training Materials, Instructor Guides Attachment F: Seabrook Nuclear Training Procedure NT-7000, ) Implementation of Training Attachment G: Seabrook Nuclear Training Procedure NT-8000, l l Evaluation of Training Effectiveness Attachment H: Summary of Issues and Recommendations , Extracted From the FEMA Final Exercise Report ! for the June 1988 Graded Exercise Which Pertain to NHY ORO Training 1 Attachment I: Letter from George R. Gram (NHY) to Richard W. , Donovan (FEMA RAC Chairman) Dated August 18, i 1988 Providing NHY Proposed Resolution of Each )' l Training Issue R&ised by the Exercise Report and a Schedule for Implementation f Attachment J: Letter from H. Vickers (FEMA) to G. Gram (NHY) l Dated September 1, 1988, Finding Proposed $ Resolutions Adequate and Timely Attachment K: Module 19, Protective Action Decisions Attachment L: Module 11, Traffic and Access Control
-lii-
l Attachment'M: Practical Traffic Guide Training Material 1 I f l ) 1 -iv-
\
I. INTRODUCTION This testimony addresses Joint Intervenor (JI) Contention 13. This contention challenges the Seabrook Plan for Massachusetts Communities (SPMC) definition of prerequisite experience for selected Offsite Response ; i Organization (ORO) positions and the adequacy of training provided for these positions. II. PREREQUISITE QUALIFICATIONS FOR ORO POSITIONS A. Regulatory Requirements There are no regulatory requirements or guidance for inclusion of prerequisites for persons filling positions in
~
an offsite emergency response plan. B. Use of Prerequisites Prerequisites are provided in the SPMC as screening criteria for the selection of individuals to fill ORO positions. The prerequisites alone do not qualify a volunteer to perform a specific job. Meeting the i prerequisites for a given position does, however, indicate f that an individual is capable of completing training and then I 1 beconing qualified. As stated in the SPMC, Section 2.1, prerequisite experience "is required for training and l qualification," leadina to placement in a given position. l The initial development of prerequisites and refinement of screening criteria were iterative, relying on the on-going
I i
'l
'l development of the basic-position descriptions during the l planning process.
ORO personnel recruitment and screening were conducted in the following manner. Applications were accepted and reviewed to determine the best candidates for each position. Approximately 2,000 applications were received to fill j i approximately 1,000 ORO non-contract positions. The applications were grouped by using job-specific prerequisite ; requirements established in the SPMC as initial guidelines. Once grouped, the applications were reviewed to determine l which individuals had the combination of background, work, (
-and educational experience best suited to filling a given position. To obtain additional input, contacts were made
.)
with individuals who either supervised or worked with the applicants. Applicants were assigned to positions which I would best utilize their previous experience. One generally applied screening criterion for all positions was to give priority to personnel who had prior f experience in emergency response. The utilities were i i considered a good source for recruiting such individuals t because utility workers routinely respond and work under l ) l emergency conditions. In addition, because utilities share t I- common job titles and work functions, they also share a common understanding of the general level of expertise, training, and experience required for those titles and l
a i functions. Thus, New Hampshire Yankee (NHY) could assume 1 that a uti).ity dispatcher could be trained as an ORO dispatcher. By recruiting non-contract position volunteers from a uniform environment, NHY could utilize the applications to make a preliminary assessment of training requirements. Once individuals were selected for positions in the ORO, they were entered into the training program. As ' I will be discussed in the following paragraphs, use of the i present SPMC prerequisites for recruitment results in the identification of personnel who are able to successfully I complete training. Their performance was demonstrated to be adequate during the FEMA-observed 1988 exercise. III. NHY ORO TRAINING PROGRAM j The training program for NHY ORO personnel is described generally in SPMC, Section 6.3 and more specifically in SPMC, Appendix K. : A. Training Modules The classroom training co'urses required for each position in the NHY ORO are delineated on Table 6.3-1 of SPMC, Section 6.3. Table 6.3-1. identifies a total of twenty-one individual training modules that have been developed for instruction of NHY ORO personnel. These training modules I range from Emergency Planning Overview, which is the prerequisite course for all NHY ORO members, to training , modules which focus on individual functions of NHY ORO 3 -
]
1 i 1 members. Table 6.3-1 shows contractor positions including bus drivers, ambulance drivers, and road crews who also 1 receive the NHY ORO training. A description of the contents of each of the twenty-one modules is contained in SPMC, Section 6.3. For convenience, summarized descriptions are provided as Attachment A hereto. B. Training Program Basis SPMC, Appendix K provides guidance and direction for the systematic development and presentation of all training of the NHY ORO. Appendix K provides the basis underlying the development of the training program and explains the requirements for qualification of NHY ORO members. Qualification requirements are explained below. In addition to defining training requirements, Appendix K describes the l composition of classroom materials, prescribes the rules for administration of classroom training and for administration l i of tests, establishes guidelines for test security, and provides guidance for the conduct of tabletop exercises, walkthroughs, and drills. l The NHY ORO Training Program was developed to meet the planning guidance of NUREG 0654/ FEMA-REP-1, Rev. 1, Supp. 1, II.0:
"4. The offsite response organization shall establish a training program for instructing and
} qualifying personnel who will implement radiological emergency response plans. The j specialized initial training and periodic 1 l
I retraining programs (including the. scope, nature and frequency) shall be provided in the following categories:
.a.: ' Directors or coordinators.of the response organizations;
'b. Personnel responsible for' accident' assessment;
- c. Radiological. monitoring teams and radiological.
analys*is personnel;
- d. Police, security and firefighting personnel;
- e. .First aid'and rescue personnel; i
- f. Local support services personnel including Civil Defense / Emergency Service personnel; ,
i
- g. Medical support personnel;
- h. Persons. responsible for transmission of emergency information and instructions; and
- i. Liaison personnel responsible for interfacing with-State and local responders."
Each of~the applicable elements delineated under item 4 of the evaluation criteria of this planning standard has been
- addressed by the NHY ORO training. program as described in the SPMC, Section 6'and Appendix K.
The NHY ORO training program was generally developed. using a methodology known as Training System Development (TSD), which is endorsed by the' Institute of Nuclear Power
. Operations (INPO) and is described in INPO 87-019, )
' Maintaining Emergency Preparedness Manual, dated November, 1987. 'Because TSD has been shown to be effective', this j
}> l-method was chosen for development of the ORO training 3-L:-_______ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
program. While INpo 87-019 is directed to onsite emergency response programs, its principles have been adapted where ; I applicable to development of an offsite training program. l The relevant section of INPO 87-019 is Attachment B hereto. l INPO is an experienced evaluator of training programs utilized by commercial nuclear power plants. Emergency preparedness training programs are planned for inclusion in 1 the INPO accreditation process. ; TSD is a method whereby the program material is based on l the tasks to be performed by the student. Also referred to as performance-based training, TSD involves five steps: analysis, design, development, implementation, and evaluation. The ORO training program was developed according to established procedures, which are provided as Attachments C through G hereto. These procedures are the current versions, and, as such, post-date development of the initial ORO Training Program. However, the essential content was included in the versions of the procedures in use at the time f of program development. Despite the fact that the procedures are site-oriented, their methodology is applicable to the ) offsite program. } TSD contributed to the following attributes, among i others, of the NHY ORO training program: l l
- Content of Modules: The content of each NHY
.ORO training module is determined by evaluating the task s to. l be performed and the trainees' experience.
- Lenath of Modules: The appropriate length of f each training module is determined during the development phase of training, which includes development of a schedule for lesson presentation based on the elements identified for )
I each training module in the training program design phase.
- Ouality Control: Prior to use, lesson plans and accompanying materials are reviewed by the Training Supervisor and by a Subject Matter Expert, and are approved by the Training Manager or designee. The lesson plans generally follow the Seabrook Training Organization format as described in Attachment 4 to SPMC, Appendix K. (l C. Evaluation and Improvements of the NHY ORO-Training l Program l l
The FEMA Review and Evaluation of the Seabrook Plan for [ Massachusetts Communities, dated December, 1988 (Applicants' I Exhibit 43C) evaluated the NHY ORO training program described in the SPMC. Each applicable element of the evaluation criteria of NUREG-0654, FEMA-REP-1, Rev. 1, Supp. 1, II.O was t h found to be adequately addressed by the SPMC. The FEMA evaluation of the SPMC with respect to planning standard O is j included in Applicants' Exhibit 43C. ) i ) _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ w
] ] The NHY ORO training program incorporates an instructor i observation and student evaluation feedback mechanism. Training attendees are requested to complete a NHY ORO \ Training Program Feedback Form which is contained in SPMC, Attachment 9 of Appendix K. This feedback mechanism contributes to improvements in the training program. Training for the NHY ORO was initiated in 1987 prior to completion of the SPMC, Revision O. Because the SPMC was not yet issued and the NHY ORO emergency response facilities were being equipped and modified at this time, it was expected that training would require modification and improvement as procedural enhancements were identified and implemented. The following modifications and additions to the training program were made as a result of instructor observations and trainee feedback: 1) an instrumentation module was added for personnel responsible for operating radiation detection instruments; 2) a communications module was provided for all field personnel; 3) a protective action recommendation decision module was added for ORO Response Directors and key ORO managers; 4) public information and liaison personnel were provided modules on emergency management, protective action recommendation decisions, and transportation; 5) EOC staff, public information staff, and health physics personnel were provided supplemental training on the ingestion exposure I
pathway and recovery / reentry. These additional modules and assignments have been incorporated into Table 6.3-1. SPMC, Appendix K commits to an ongoing program of training improvement.. In accordance with Appendix K, improvements will be made in course conduct, content, or instruction methods, as necessary, based on a review of class records. The class record consists of trainee test results, ! completed attendance sheets,and feedback forms. D. Qualification of NHY ORO Personnel l SPMC, Appendix K explains the qualification requirements of NHY ORO personnel. NHY ORO members are required to complete successfully all modules designated for their position. Successful completion is demonstrated through satisfactory performance during classroom tabletops, demonstration of equipment u'se, and passing grades on examinations, as applicable. Tabletops are an integral part of the NHY ORO training program. Tabletops along with'other training activities are conducted by NHY ORO training instructors to 1) provide experience and knowledge in the use of emergency procedures and equipment, 2) identify areas of concern, and 3) develop the level of competence necessary to perform emergency actions using a team concept. SPMC, Appendix K, page K-13. Tabletop sessions are identified for each NHY ORO position on l 1
i ) Table 6.3-1. After completion of the requirements of Table 6.3-1, an ORO member is qualified. E. Drills and Additional Training Activities Once qualified, training of NHY ORO personnel continues l with drills and additional training activities. Supplemental training, above and beyond the required classroom modules, may be scheduled in response to: changes to the emergency plan or implementing procedures,' performance evaluations such as drill or exercise comments, and requests or recommendations for the development of additional training. The normal progression of acqu' iring emergency response skills, as described in SPMC Sections 6.4 and 6.5, involves:
- 1) Walkthroughs for performance-based facility and equipment familiarity;
- 2) NUREG-0654 required drills (Communications, Radiological Monitoring / Health Physics, Medical Emergency);
- 3) Facility Activation / Operation drills; and
- 4) Exercises testing the integrated capability of the ORO.
SPMC, Section 6.4, Section 6.5, and Appendix K describe the conduct of walkthroughs, drills, and exercises. SPMC, Section 6.4.2, page 6.4-1 provides the following description of walkthroughs:
"Walkthroughs will be conducted among various emergency response groups to practice assigned functions and interface activities. Timelines and messages will be used to stimulate emergency response I
i 1
]
personnel to utilize Implementing Procedures while interacting with each other. Walkthroughs will give participants hands-on experience for using emergency procedures, equipment, and facilities."
'If appropriate, a full-scale walkthrough,may be conducted using the above mentioned timelines and messages simultaneously.
SPMC, Section 6.5, provides a description of the types of drills and exercises to be conducted. SPMC, Section 6.5, Table 6.5-1 indicates the types'of drills conducted and which emergency response positions are involved in each drill. SPMC, Appendix K, identifies the specified minimum frequency for the conduct of drills and exercises. F. Evaluation of NHY ORO Training Through Performance in the Graded Exercise A measure for evaluating the effectiveness of the NHY ORO training program is the performance demonstrated during the graded exercise. The FEMA Exercise Report for the June 1988 FEMA graded exercise of the Offsite Plans and Preparedness for the Seabrook Nuclear Power Station, dated September 1, 1988 (Applicants' Exhibit No. 43F), includes an ! assessment of the level of skill demonstrated by NHY ORO i members and identified issues to be resolved by improved or additional training. f l ) l l i G. No Deficiencies Were Found for Any Exercise f Objective 1 There were twelve exercise objectives rated as Areas Requiring Corrective Action under which training issues were ! identified.- In some cases the FEMA Exercise Report provided recommendations for improvement of the training program. A summary of issues and recommendations extracted from the FEMA' Exercise Report for the June 1988 Graded Exercise which i I pertain to NHY ORO training is Attachment H hereto. NHY has proposed a resolution for each training issue raised by the . Exercise Report and a schedule for implementation. This. was l
/
submitted to FEMA on August 18, 1988. See Attachment I hereto. FEMA found the proposed resolutions to be adequate and timely and incorporated them into the FEMA Exercise -l Report dated September 1, 1988. See letter from H. Vickers, FEMA, to G. Gram, NHY, dated September 1, 1988, Attachment J hereto. I IV. SPECIFIC PREREQUISITES AND TRAINING JI Contention 13 Basis C alleges inadequate prerequisite experience and training in the area of protective action decisionraking for five positions: Offsite Response Director; Radiological Health Advisor; Technical Advisor; Assistant Offsite Response Director, Response Implementation; and Assistant Offsite Response Director, Support Liaison. ) ~
\
1 A. Protective Action Recommendation Training Protective action recommendations (PARS) are provided as part of five different Training Modules. Overview training (Module 1) generally provides training in the development of a protective action recommendation and the constraints to be considered in evaluating it. The constraints-identified in this training are the area / population at risk, special needs individuals, weather / highway conditions, time constraints, manpower / resources available, and transportation resources available. Emergency management training (Module 2) generally defines protective actions and discusses the specific assignment of responsibility to the Offsite Response Director for approval of a PAR and to the Radiological Health Advisor for presenting a recommended protective action to the offsite Response Director. Procedures checklist training (Module 15) reviews the specific tasks assigned to each individual in the ORO and familiarizes the trainee with the content, organization, and int'erfaces of the procedures he is required to implement. This module provides an opportunity l for reviewing and discussing the specific PAR-related duties of aach position. Protective Action Decisions (Module 19), Attachmeni ; hereto, was added to the ORO curriculum in late 1987 a a separate module to satisfy trainee feedback requesting more detailed instruction on the process of developing a
1 l l protective action recommendation. This module considers'in why and how certain protective actions relate to the
~
detail: 10-mile plume exposure pathway Emergency Planning Zone (EPZ); Emergency Response Planning Areas (ERPAs) within the EPZ and J the application of protective actions to them; how (in general terms) the Radiological Health Advisor arrives at the PAR that is presented to the Offsite Response Director for consideration; how doses are projected and compared for protective actions of sheltering and evacuation; how the benefits to be derived from implementation of a specific protective action are weighed against the risks of implementation; specific constraints, such as environmental conditions, number of people involved, time available, resources available, and exposure duration, which are to be considered in formulating a protective action recommendation; the choice of an appropriate Evacuation Time Estimate; whether there are special population groups at risk; whether there are precautionary measures that could be implemented; which, if any, of the constraints might modify the final recommendation; the use of predetermined PARS to improve f decisionmaking, expedite response, provide consistency, and ) improve communications; and implementation of access control } ) as a dose reduction measure. 7 The tabletop training (Module 16) provides an s %_m_______m____ _ _ _ _
l I l environment for each position to actually engage in the decisionmaking process itself. i j B. Procedural Direction for Development of Protective Action Recommendations IP 2.5, Plume Exposure Pathway Protective Action Recommendations, is the guiding document in the SPMC for plume exposure pathway protective action decisionmaking. This procedure identifies the individuals who are responsible for this area as: the Offsite Response Director; the Radiological Health Advisor; the Technical Advisor; and the Assistant Offsite Response Director, Response Implementation. The Assistant Offsite Response Director, Support Liaison is not responsible for input into this process. See tso Applicants' Rebuttal Testimony No. 26 (Protective Action Recommendations Made By NHY,ORO During the Exercise). All five positions attend the training modules described above. Each of the positions discusssed in this testimony as regards protective action recommendations has an associated procedure that establishes the position and describes the' continuing actions and conditional activities for specific initiating conditions. These are IP 1.1, IP 1.2, and IP 1.'7. I Upon the occurrence of an initiating condition that requires the development of a protective action. recommendation, each of the identified positions is referred to procedure IP 2.5, Protective Action Recommendations. 1 \
i 1 C. Offsite Response. Director The Offsite Response Director is responsible for determining the PAR, obtaining authorization from the Commonwealth of Massachusetts to implement the PAR, coordinating ~the implementation of protective actions with the State of New Hampshire, and ensuring notification of the general public. .IP 2.5, Section 2.1. ! The Offsite Response Director (ORD) evaluates the PAR !. l received from the Seabrook Station Response Manager (should j initial emergency classification have required an immediate PAR) or the Radiological Health Advisor and consults with the Response Manager on plant conditions which initiated the PAR, if necessary. Once the EOC is staffed, information on plant conditions is provided to the ORD by the Technical Advisor. Determination of the protective action recommendation is accomplished through a meeting with the Assistant Offsite Response Directors, the Radiological Health Advisor, the Technical Advisor, and the Public Notification Coordinator. IP 2.5, Step 5.1.3. The role of the Offsite Response Director in this meeting is to approve a PAR formulated through discussion of the recommendations presented by the Radiological Health Advisor and/or the Technical Advisor and evaluation of any constraints to implementation as indicated by either Assistant Offsite Response Director. While not assigned any specific responsibility in IP 2.5, the Assistant
i
~
\
offsite Response Director, Support Liaison, may contribute information obtained through his network of State and local ( ' EOC Liaisons. The Public Notification Coordinator attends these meetings in preparation for issuing the appropriate EBS 4 message. , Authorization from the Commonwealth of Massachusetts for PAR implementation may be obtained solely by the Offsite Response Director or in conjunction with the Assistant Offsite Response Director, Support Liaison. The Assistant Offsite Response' Director, Support Liaison will, if possible, also coordinate PAR implementation with the State of New Hampshire through his normal liaison functions (IP 1.1) . The Offsite Response Director ensures notification of the general public by directing the preparation and issuance of an EBS message and by approving this message. The Offsite Response Director does not make decisions independent of the Commonwealth's efforts to protect its citizens. As stated in the SPMC at pg. 3.1-1, " Ultimate authority for implementing protective actions for the publ'ic in Massachusetts lies with the Governor"; and at pg. 3.1-3, ) "The NHY Offsite Response Director in turn will provide recommendations to the Governor of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts through his representatives at the f , Massachusetts EOC concerning precautionary and protective L ,
I I . ( I actions, notifying the general public, and available NHY l l Offsite Response Organization resources and response". The prerequisites listed for the Offsite Response q Director in the SPMC are the positions of Director or Vice l l
- President. These prerequisites.were chosen because the capabilities needed for the position of Offsite Response Director include demonstrated management of personnel and resources, knowledge of the utility environment and the specific resources available through it, overall leadership qualities, and the ability to make sound and timely decisions under critical or emergency circumstances. The level of skill required for the position of Offsite Response Director is supported by Table 2 of NUREG-0737, " Clarification of TMI Action Plan Requirements," which states that the requisite title or expertise of " Senior Manager" is required for the position of the " EOF Director" (Seabrook Station ERO Response Manager). The ERO Response Manager is generally comparable to the Offsite Response Director in that both are responsible for the formulation of protective action recommendations for the public. The basic requirement for the Offsite Response Director is the ability to manage a multifaceted response and to make protective action decisions on the basis of input provided by his technical staff. Therefore, prerequisite experience as a Vice President or Director is required for training and qualification as a NHY Offsite Response I I
J Director. SPMC, 2.1.3. All personnel filling this position are experienced managers whose non-emergency positions require the ability to make sound decisions that are based on a variety of input. The Offsite Resnonse Director receives training on the concepts of PARS and constraints to be considered, and of his role in the approval of a PAR in overview and emergency management training. The Procedure Review and Tabletop modules provide familiarity with the specific procedures and decision-making process to be used in accomplishing his assigned responsibilities. The protective action decisions module provides decision-making detail and reinforces the interaction of the individuals involved in PAR formulation and the weighing of all factors in the determination of a final recommendation. 4 Further, the Offsite Response Director position requires completion of 21 hours of classroom training consisting of Emergency Plan Overview, Emergency Management, Public Alert and Notification System (PANS) Activation,. Emergency l t Operations Center (EOC) Operations, Staging Area Operations, L Reception Center Operations, Transportation, Public Information, Procedure Checklist, Tabletop, and Protective { ( }' j j Action Decisions. ! FEMA noted the satisfactory performance of the ORO Director during the 1988 Exercise as follows: I I I "During all 3 phases (plume, ingestion, reentry and recovery) of the exercise, the NHY ORO Offsite Response I Director (s) satisfactorily demonstrated their ability to direct, coordinate, and control emergency activities. The NHY ORO provided notification, information and I protective action recommendations to the FEMA Control cell which simulated the Commonwealth of Massachusetts No and local governments within the Seabrook Plume EPZ. response activities requiring governmental approval were undertaken without securing such approval and I authorization from the FEMA Control Cell." FEMA Exercise Report, page 211 of 428. D. Assistant Offsite Response Directors Assistant Offsite Response Director, Response I
- 1.
Implementation. The role of the Assistant Offsite Response Director, Response Implementation in the ORO is broadly defined in the SPMC at page 2.1-4 as assisting the NHY Offsite Response Director and relieving or assuming the duties of the Director, as necessary. The Assistant Offsite Response Director, Response Implementation is additionally assigned responsibility for implementing protective actions through mobilization of resources, facilities, and personnel and for the continuous operation of the NHY Offsite Response Emergency Operations Center during an emergency. With respect to the development of Protective Action Recommendations, the Assistant Offsite Response Director, Response Implementation is responsible for collecting data and summarizing the impact of current weather conditions on evacuation routes, identifying any special evacuation problems, and evaluating the mobilization status of the New I I
l Hampshire Yankee Offsite Response Organization and resources available to determine an applicable Evacuation Time Estimate I for the Radiological Health Advisor to formulate a PAR. IP 2.5, Section 2.5. i The Assistant Offsite Response Director, Response Implementation reviews current meteorological conditions and weather forecasts and uses Attachment 6 of IP 2.5 to evaluate their impact on the implementation of PARS. Attachment 6 lists weather conditions (wind speeds, air turbulence, rainfall) and the potential results of such conditions, e.g., change in protective actions area likely with high air turbulence. This individual also reviews Attachments 7 and 8 of IP 2.5 to evaluate the impact of local conditions on implementing PARS. These tables present possible constraints to be evaluated in the impidmentation of PARS and actions that are to be considered in response. Input on local conditions,and the deployment status of staff at the Staging Area and at field locations is' supplied to the Assistant offsite Response Director, Response Implementation by the Evacuation Support Coordinator. By using Attachment 4 of IP 2.5, the Assistant offsite Response Director, Response Implementation determines the applicable Evacuation Time Estimate. The Evacuation Time Estimate (ETE) is chosen based on the time of year, time of week, time of day, and weather conditions. This input is I
provided to and discussed with the Radiological Health Advisor for his use in the formulation of a PAR. At the PAR determination meeting, all factors are jointly weighed by the individuals tasked with reaching a decision. At page 2.1-5, the SPMC specifies Assistant Offsite Response Directors' experience as a Director or Manager as the prerequisite for this position. The Assistant Offsite Response Director, Response Implementation must complete the same 21 hours of training as that of the Offsite Response Director.
- 2. Assistant Offsite Re'sponse Director, Support Liaison.
IP 2.5 assigns nr. specific protective action decisionmaking responsibilities to the Assistant Offsite Response Director, Support Liaison. However, this position i shares with the Assistant Offsite Response Director, Response Implementation, the responsibility of assisting the NHY Offsite Response Director and relieving or assuming the duties of the Director, as necessary. Other functions assigned to the Assistant Offsite Response Director, Support Liaison are the establishment and maintenance of commun-ications between the ORO and State / Federal organizations and ! the Utility, as well as the coordination of such support as i may be provided by these organizations. At protective action recommendation formulation meetings, the Assistant offsite
~22-i
I I 1 l ( I Response Director, Support Liaison may supply information about local conditions obtained from ORO state and local EOC Liaisons. He is present to obtain information about the conditions giving rise to a specific recommendation which will then be relayed to other agencies. Training and prerequisites required for this position i are identical to those required for the Assistant Offsite Response Director, Response Implementation. E. Technical Advisor The SPMC description of the position is that this individual is responsible for " interpreting plant operational conditions during an emergency and for advising the Radiological Health Advisor and NHY Offsite Response EOC staff . . . evaluat[ing) plant data and mak(ing) recommendations for protective actions based on plant conditions." SPMC, pg. 2.1-5. Specifically, "the Technical Advisor is responsible for collecting and summarizing information on accident status and
~
plant conditions required by the Radiological Health Advisor for formulating a PAR." IP 2.5, Section 2.4. Through IP 1.7, the Technical Advisor is assigned on an ongoing basis to
"[o)btain information from the Seabrook Station Technical Staff by interfacing with the EOF Coordinator and keep apprised of plant conditions. Concentrate on the condition 4
l of safety systems to perform their functions and on the !5 l I !I
I I lI status of the three primary bcundaries (fuel, reactor vessel, and containment) . . . Keep the Radiological Health Advisor updated on plant conditions, and immediately relay any need to evaluate protective actions for the public based upon occurring or potentially occurring changes in the plant status ... Inform the Radiological Health Advisor of any preliminary considerations or discussions occurring in the EOF relating to making a change in the emergency classification. Relay preliminary information and the reason for the consideration." IP 1.7. The Technical Advisor uses the Briefing Sheet (Attachment 3 of IP 1.7) to record plant conditions, safety I system status, and condition prognosis obtained from the EOF, and to record the PAR to be relayed to the Radiological Health Advisor. The Technical Advisor refers to two flowcharts (Attachments 1 and 2) in IP 2.5 to arrive at a predetermined protective action based on wind direction and post-LOCA monitor readings. The prerequisite experience required for this position is designed to ensure the recruitment of individuals familiar with PWR operations and systems and therefore capable of interfacing with the EOF Technical Staff, understanding the implications of plant conditions, and presenting this information to the appropriate Offsite Response Organization staff. Therefore, the prerequisite experience defined in the I I
1 I I ! l I SPMC for the position of Technical Advisor is " knowledge of , l plant operations and systems." SPMC, pg. 2.1-5. All individuals filling this position possess engineering degrees and have nuclear power plant experience. Dose / Accident Assessment training (Module 4) required for the Technical Advisor addresses the methodology and basis for calculations used to estir. ate the offsite consequences from a radiological accident and includes specific material on meteorological dispersion models, core damage assessment, and release pathways. Primary boundaries are covered in detail. Other training modules provide the Technical Advisor familiarity with emergency planning concepts, the structure of the ORO, interaction of the ORO with the Seabrook Station Emergency Response Organization, information flow between the two organizations, and the specific function of the Technical Advisor in the protective action decisionmaking process. During the 1988 Graded Exercise, the Technical Advisors I demonstrated the ability to periodically brief the ORO dose assessment staff on plant conditions. FEMA Exercise Report, page 211 of 428. The assessment of plant conditions and projected meteorology provided by the Technical Advisor formed the basis for the initial protective action recommended by the ORO during the exercise. Exercise Report, , page 221 of 428. I I I . I
I I Technical Advisors are required to complete 17 hours of instruction consisting of: Emergency Plan overview, Emergency Management, Dose / Accident Assessment, EOC Operations, Procedure Checklist, Tabletop, and Protective Action Decisions. F. R a d'i o l o g i c a l H e a l t h A d v i s o r The position of Radiological Health Advisor is defined at page 2.1-6 of the SPMC as follows. "The Radiological Health Advisor is responsible for providing direction and control to the Offsite Response Organization radiological assessment staff and exposure control personnel . . . [a]nd will provide precautionary action recommendations and protective action recommendations to the NHY Offsite Response Director for consideration." Specific assignment of responsibility to the Radiological Health Advisor for implementing exposure control and formulation of plume exposure and ingestion pathway protective action recommendations is presented in IP 1.2. As directed in IP 2.5, the Radiological Health Advisor is provided input for proposing a protective action recommendation to the Offsite Response Director from three sources: radiological and meteorological data from the Accident Assessment Coordinator; plant conditions and wind fl l
=
direction from the Technical Advisor; and constraints to implementation of the recommended protective action from the . I
i l Assistant Offsite Response Director, Response Implementation. The Radiological Health Advisor is the individual responsible for assessing and integrating this information into a j proposed protective action recommendation to be presented to the Offsite Response Director. i The prerequisite (SPMC, page 2.1-6) of Radiological Department Manager indicates both management and technical expertise. At NHY, the holder of such a title or its, equivalent generally possesses approximately six years of experience in nuclear power plant radiation protection or radiological engineering. Six years experience in this area ; is the required eligibility level for the Health Physics j i certification examination. Personnel filling this function ! possess technical degrees and years of radiological experience. Classroom training for the Radiological Health Advisors consists of 13 hours of instruction. In the specific training module conducted for'protectivo action decisionmaking, Protective Action Guides and protective action recommendations are discussed in detail. 1 Accident / Dose Assessment training is attended by the Accident l Assessment Coordinator, who reports to the Radiological I l Health Advisor and is responsible for performing dose assessment. I
Additional training modules required for the Radiological Health Advisor are: Emergency Plan Overview, Emergency Management, EOC Operations, Procedure Checklist, ) 1 and Tabletop. Radiological Health Advisor performance during the Exercise effectively demonstrated the ability of the Radiological Health Advisor to perform decision-making where the health and safety of the gendral public is concerned. In the Exercise Report, FEMA noted specifically that the Radiological Health Advisor was " clearly in charge,"
" effectively demonstrated" direction and control of the ORO dose assessment group (page 211 of 428), and " effectively" utilized dose projections and plume location projections to formulate Protective Action Recommendations (page 221 of 428). In evaluating the ability of the NHY ORO to make appropriate protective action decisions, FEMA stated that
"(o]v .311, the NHY ORO EOC staff performed in a very commendable and satisfactory manner" (page 221 of 428).
G. Public Notification Coordinator JI Contention 13 Basis B asserts that for the Public Notification Coordinator, the SPMC fails to address "such qualifications as a professional degree, knowledge of the research record regarding characteristics of good and poor emergency information, prior experience in drafting emergency
I l-I Additional training modules required for the Radiological Health Advisor are: Emergency Plan Overview, Emergency Management, EOC Operations, Procedure Checklist, and Tabletop. Radiological Health Advisor performance during the Exercise effectively demonstrated the ability of the Radiological Health Advisor to perform decision-making where the health and safety of the general public is concerned. In the Exercise Report, FEMA noted specifically that the l Radiological Health Advisor was " clearly in charge,"
"ef fectively demonstrateri" directirfn and control of the oho dose assessment group (page 211 of 428), and " effectively" utilized dose projections and plume location projections to formulate Protective Action Recommendations (page 221 of 428). In evaluating the ability of the NHY ORO to make appropriate protective action decisions, FEMA stated that
"(ojverall, the NHY ORO EOC staff performed in a very commendable and satisfactory manner" (page 221 of 428).
G. Public Notification Coordinator JI Contention 13 Basis B asserts that for the Public Notification Coordinator, the SPMC fails to address "such qualifications as a professional degree, knowledge of the research record regarding characteristics of good and poor l emergency information, prior experience in drafting emergency I
1 I ! il I I warnings, knowledge of human behavior in emergencies" and that training provided is inadequate. The prerequisite established in the SPMC for the Public Notification Coordinator is public information. experience. The Public Notification Coordinator is responsible for a timely and coordinated activation of the Public Alert and , Notification System, development of Emergency Broadcast System (EBS) messages, and coordination of EBS messages with New Hampshire and Massachusetts. SPMC, pg. 2.1-13. j In developing an EBS message, the Public Notification Coordinator will use one of several types of message, in accordance with IP 2.13. One type may be the prerecorded messages in place at the EBS radio station. In this case, no modification of the messages will occur. The second type of message that may be used is a prescripted message. In this case, the Public Notification Coordinator will finalize a prescripted message by inserting information such as the names of the communities affected. The prerecorded and prescripted sample messages utilized by the offsite Response organization were based on the messages used in the NHRERP and have been reviewed by Dr. Mileti to ensure that they properly account for human behavior and have the attributes needed for good emergency information. See l Applicants' Rebuttal Testimony No. 19 (Media Center / Rumor I Control and Operation of EBS). !I l l l
1 The Public Notification Coordinator may need to modify ) I or originate an EBS message. These messages will be l developed using the prescripted messages as a basis. Once l the message is developed, the Public Notification Coordinator is required by procedure to obtain the review and approval of the message from the Offsite Response Director. In all cases l l the EBS messages will be provided to the Commonwealth for their review, input, and concurrence with the content. In addition, the Offsite Response Director will obtain concurrence from the Commonwenith before a message is issued. IP 1.1, Attachment 2, page 3. To address an Area Requiring Corrective Action (ARCA) arising from the 1988 Exercise, New Hampshire Yankee has committed to providing to the Public Notification Coordinator additional training dealing with the modification and development of EBS messages and the characteristics of good emergency messages. See Applicants' Rebuttal Testimony No. 19 (Media Center / Rumor Control and Operation of EBS). Such training will be in addition to the required classroom instruction of approximately 15 hours. This training consists of: Emergency Plan Overview, Emergency f Management, PANS Activation, EOC Operations, Transportation, } Procedure Checklists, and Tabletops. i h )
I I I H. Traffic Guides I JI Contention 13 Basis A alleges that ORO Traffic Guides may be " required to direct extremely congested traffic under adverse weather conditions and deal with thousands of disorderly, frustrated, and frightened drivers, many of whom may have been in traffic queues for six or more hours" and that many of the drivers "will recognize that these Traffic Guides are not state / local police, but agents of the owners of Seabrook." Basis A concludes that it "is inconceivable that Traffic Guides would not be required to have some substantial prior experience directing congested traffic" and that training provided is not adequate. Traffic Guides, as defined at page 2.1-28 of the SPMC, "take direction from the Evacuation Support Dispatcher. They perform traffic and access control functions including setup
. . . of traffic and access control points and directing of traffic, if authorized. They also perform traffic impediment I spotting functions." Specific direction for performance of these duties is provided in SPMC, Appendix J, pages J-1 through J-10.
The criterion applied in screening Traffic Guide recruits was to identify as many volunteers as possible with traffic direction background. In fact, fifty persons have ) been recruited for this position who do have prior experience in public safety functions including directing traffic. I l L________.____________ __
/
k .' Whether drivers rec'ognize that Traffic Guides are " agents of the owners of Seabrook" has no bearing on the issue of prerequisites for this position because law enforcement functions play no role in the Traffic Guide duties. The Traffic and Access Control Training Module provides classroom instruction on the procedures to be employed by Traffic Guides at Access and Traffic Control Points'. A copy i of this training modulo is provided as Attachment L hereto. Traffic Guide functions do not include advice to motorists , except at Access Control Points. SPMC, App. J, pg. J-2 and pg. J-5. Public information is released through EBS messages, the Media Center, and Rumor Control. Traffic Guides are provided written instruction in their procedures on the placement of cones. App. J, pg. J-2 and J-
- 5. This instruction, used in conjunction with the specific TCP or ACP intersection map provides guidance on cone placement. Traffic Guides are also trained to report the exact location of. impediments including accidents (town, route or street, direction of travel, and nearest
} intersection) and the extent of damages (injuries, hazards, i types and numbers of vehicles involved) in reporting i impediments including accidents. Traffic Guides are required to attend 6 training modules l comprising approximately 10 hours of instruction. These modules are: Emergency Plan Overview, Staging Area 1 !
l
.)
I 4 Operations, Traffic and Access Control, Procedure Checklists, Tabletop, and Communications. Supplemental training sessions were conducted on l November 9, 1987 and June 7, 1988 which involved the practical aspects of controlling traffic, i.e., directing actual traffic through mock intersections set up in accordance with SPMC, Appendix J. This supplemental training will be incorporated in the training for all Traffic Guides. A copy of materials used in conducting practical training is i i Attachment M hereto, i i FEMA-'found that the NHY ORO demonstrated that it had organizational ability and resources to control evacuating traffic and'to contro'l access to restricted areas. In particular, " Traffic guides . . . were found to be well-equipped and prepared for their mission." Exercise Report, page 234 of 428. I. Bus Drivers JI Contention 13 Basis D' alleges that the SPMC fails to , t [ quantify "the experience and training needed" for Bus Drivers a and that these personnel need training "in the transport of special populations ... designated routes, and ... the rules and regulations of the state and towns they will be f- servicing . " This basis alleges further that the training ; provided is inadequate. 1 ,
'i 1 1
l i The position of ORO Bus Driver is defined in the SPMC at page 2.1-31 as " . . . contract personnel who take direction l from the Bus Dispatcher. The drivers are responsible for providing evacuation support to the general public and special' populations (including school children) by driving predesignated routes .cn reporting to special facilities and schools, and transporting evacuees to the Reception Centers. Drivers will be ascigned to transport evacuecs to designated congregate care centers or other host facilities." The prerequisites stated at 2.1-31 are experience as a Bus Driver and requisite license. There are no emergency operations in the SPMC definition of bus driver functions. Drivers are required to do what they normally do, which is drive buses. No special procedures or training are required because bus operation does not change when a bus is used during an emergency. The navigation of designated routes is defined as the responsibility of Route Guides. SPMC, page 2.1-27. Buses and drivers are deployed to evacuation bus routes, k On the evacuation routes, special facilities, and schools. buses are used to pick up general population who do not have access to transportation. These buses are not expected to l l encounter members of the public who require special transportation, since these persons either will have preregistered or will call the telephone number listed in the ) 34
l Public Information Calendar. Appropriate transportation has i l been allocated for preregistered individuals and will be j provided to those that call during an emergency. At special facilities, the bus drivers will not be required to transport i evacuees for whom buses would be inappropriate vehicles. It is expected that those persons needing assistance in entering a bus, such as the elderly, would be assisted by the special ; facility's staff. See Applicants' Rebuttal Testimony No. 6. The number of bus drivers required to implement the SPMC is 367. The number of bus drivers currently available on the NHY ORO bus driver roster is (as of February 22, 1989) 673. The number of bus drivers who have received the training modules designated on Table 6.3-1 as of February 22, 1989 is , 531. Training for bus drivers consists of the following modules: Bus Driver Training, Procedure Checklists, and Tabletop. ! l l I
f ATTACHMENT A (Summary of NHY ORO Training Modules) I l t i l
\
f,
- Attachmant A (Page 1 of 4) l I
ATTACHMENT A Module 1, Emergency Plan Overview, covers basic planning concepts, terminology, purpose and regulatory basis; notification and communications sequences, capabilities, and methodologies; definition and overview of the protective action decisionmaking process; evacuation concepts; characteristics and hazards of ionizing radiation; overview of plant operations and containment; and radiological exposure control, limits, and protective equipment. Module 2, Emergency Management, covers Emergency Action Levels, Protective Action Recommendations, management responsibilities, and coordination of the ORO's responses with those of other emergency response organizations. Module 3, Public Alert and Notification System
= Activation, discusses the vehicular Alert and Notification System / Airborne Alert and the Emergency Broadcast System; coordination of activities with State: authorities and the applicable time constraints for system activation.
Module 4, Dose / Accident Assessment, covers the methods for obtaining current and projected doses and determining the area impacted by the plume. Use et the METPAC and HP-41CX programs, exposure control, and us( of field data are included. Module 5, Radiation Surveys and Analysis, covers field ! team mobilization and field communications; use of protective I E
Attachment A (Page 2 of 4) I clothing, exposure control, dosimetry, and exposure records; sampling techniques, field monitoring equipment, and instruction on operation of air samplers, count meters and probes. Module 6, Monitoring / Decontamination Operations, covers trailer and Emergency Worker Facility activation; protective clothing; survey methods; and decontamination procedures. Module 7, Dosimetry Recordkeeping, contains instruction on the forms used, issuance of dosimetry, techniques for rezeroing dosimetry, and proper authorizations for personnel i to exceed standard limits. Module 8, EOC Operations, covers the responsibilities of the EOC staff, internal facility coordination; communications; recordkeeping; facility security; and use of I maps, status boards, logs, and message forms. Module 9, Staging Area Operations, covers the same material as Module 8 but is structured for the Staging Area. Dispatch of personnel, equipment issue, and dosimetry are also included. Module 10, Reception Center Operations, focuses on
- evacuee registration and directions to congregate care facilities. ;
Module 11, Traffic and Access Control, covers SPMC traffic management strategies, equipment, and methods for dealing with road impediments. I I
I Attachment A (Page 3 of 4) E Module 12, Transportation, discusses mobilization of resources, dispatch of vehicles, routes, and contingencies for impassible routes. Module 13, Public Information, covers Media Center operations including rumor control, media relations, news release development, and coordination with other agencies. Module 14, Medical Emergency, is geared to ambulance l drivers and covers care of contaminated injured individuals; decisions on immediate medical care vs. contamination control; and methods of contamination control for the accident site, en route to the hospital, and at the hospital. Module 15, Procedures Checklists, consists of a review of the tasks to be completed, by position, according to the implementing procedures. Module 16, Tabletop, consists of use of a mini-scenario as a milieu for procedure use. "What if" situations are posed and discussed. Module 17, Bus Drivers, combines information from Module 1.(Overview) and Module 12 (Transportation). Module 18, Road Crews, is structured similarly to Module 17. . Module 19, Protective Action Qecisionmaking, covers the regulatory bases for protective action decisions, Emergency Action Levels, Protective Action Guides. These are discussed in detail. I E
Attachment A (Paga 4 of 4)' Module 20, Communications, covers practical
. demonstration of radios, radio etiquette, and specific instruction on each radio system employed by the ORO.
Module 21, Instrument Use, is designed to review i instrument theory and provide hands-on practice for field j l monitoring teams, sample collection teams, and l monitoring / decontamination personnel. 1 8 ) i 1
ATTACHMENT B (INPO 87-019, Pages 13-17, Appendix D) I k l 1 ] i
l Attachment B (Page 1 of 10) j i INPv ' :.s - e. W
. . . . ' . . .a;
- o W . .;.;. . yi. :...G.i. 9 .. .P. '.k' .'.' ?.'- , %:-e'..Do ~-i
>.. ?..: - i;;.-T.y:.>y;i..
. . ;, :. ,- . . . ..:- -r43 -
(, . my-' n .. .y
~..m-
,, g..
.a so un l , ., ;. , v :,p:~: . . ;w-- r =
... '. . m.
Q2 ysu.b: p, ..
.'..w r:n3 c;'. -m '
- gy _;.m:,.L u s- ; ,
w .e.- y+ .:.cq. .; 6,,,...z.;m. g.m w.y W,, -- c
.::.e .. - ~:% 1:..,. :r
,n;:
.n-r w-T'... %; ~ a;a..
"n " p~ g e; g...
y.*.m.;m'y.
- e qp I T ?c. "-.
-w n.?. -c ,.y,v..a...w;:; a : 1.: ,.;.:, a.&O a:++* W .- . . .
o;f n I y s"t .>-.=a+0.: t ww -, , c n.
'.,-f I"E/M" gM:r.,. a
- .- :* v= .=/v.!%.wri~-h;.t ., %_-,.M: frn_V-=
44.l M fM/ ..- 9 4 rW -
- .so... p y,s~ .
='= , : ,"has,...
., g
- am' e.- j];' %
- -= .s _
? ,c g[$ t ' t [; N3' EedM ,.a::.v:-;;.
b".k-1"*-
.?
a .-jEgg25
.., gaff . - . . ' JE *3dG411 : T R ,,,, % T p g @ @ y '-:.y.. y_wGN.y g,n F 1, 7 t.W.. ' y M. ..~. -:
- c. =
s M_M.WQI.**..*". . . 1.
,k -J , . i I'$.
q- . . g1r hT' g . 'j J 7 *i' ypG' .v . .. . . a . ~
. 'w mt .r
..; a ?M .
~..' .,a u .c veev ,f., .: - '
4*;1. - (u. .
. pe *. .. .
. :.'r f
~
-f,o a.. m ~.. $
.s w,.'..wS e.& f . -Ek l w;
i y, . y
'.-, =;- n5;ti- a
'-Te$eI.
,: .f* _-c., Y
; .j. ,
f :bb- _;35W$$W - - .. . -.-="
~
5Y5.?.':'$ - .h
. ,-* T .
.X- RW, . ,8.,!' :. .
m .p ,,, , ycy .. . <.-.:..... -. ,::..
, . , . , ~~ -[
m 3-- ((- $_N ~ " -+ pf ' ,,- , L b " ., :N - .S T P 1ERNUAL
.7.
-~
.,.f.
.. ' .;;yf=P",M
... ...-. c<sr:
9 QY
. .gy; Y
?>~n -
.s!,.;- -
- - - - - - - ~
l s .t. .. g -. ..% .
'* fi *
* .7. . J*?% ~~ ,e
., ;s M f -
*T-(,. . .- -)e *- -
, .ayras- m
Attachment B (Page 2 of 10) 7.
?r n..
i..
.s.
-1 7,.
MAINTAINING EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS MANUAL :
, :r. '
y , 1
+-
O,. ., f:s- , 9
' csemcer 1987
~.
i
.NPO E7-019
[ . 4... 9
?
T 4
'NSTiT'JTE C F %C'_E.2.R PCwER CPE?ATIONS !
,.i 4
- P! ant Area: Emergency Precarecness z-
'.i Kev Worcs: Emergencv, Precarecness r.
C. r W ." ' MITED CIS318UT CN: C:cvnget *9E"tvinstitute cr Nue: ear Fewer C: erat:crs. Al r:qnts 'esewec. z
; Net 'cr sa e. Unautnen:ec recrecu:t::n s a viciat:en er acenca:'e eau. Fe recuct:en er net .T:re inan
'- 'ea ::::es v e acn re::c:ent ?:r :ts ;rterran.se Or use v its ::ntra:t: s :n t-e rermai c:urse et :usiness s cermmec. TNs recort snouic net Oc cinerwise transferred or ceuverec to any incre : arty. anc :ts ::n-I:. :ents sncute net ce mace cu=nc. mincut tre Cne' agreement of INPO.
b-----_______
Attachment B (Page 3 of 10,)O g m u. 3
- SECTP S 4 2
CONDUCTING AN EFFECTIVE EMERGENCY
-l PREPAREDNESS TRAINING PROGRAM q 1
'i 4.1.2 Continuing Training Emergency crecarecness t aining snouid deseico Contmuing trainmg should maintain and imoreve ano maintain ne knowiecge anc skills for emergency emergency resconse task relatec knowiecge ano skills
,es ponse oe' sonnei to rescono effectveiv to an emer-ano snould inciuce tne roifowing:
t, gency. Programs snouic be imoiementec ter initial traming, e3ercises, anils, anc continuing ecucation.
- a review oithe items listec in initial traming o.
) hese training programs snouia inciuce metnoes.
- industry emergency coerating excenence tiessons 1
(.; ecaiuation stancaras, and implementation resconsi- teameo from actual emergencies;
- bilities. Emegency preparedness training should be
- i. conouceo witnin tne coiicies of the uttiity ano station.
- changes in emergency preparedness policies'
. Emergency preparedness training snould be an on- lans, anc crocecures 1 going runcion ano snoulo not ce limiteo to crecaring
- a review of past onll anc exerc:se ceriormance
.. for me annual exercise. prooiems Continuing training for tne emergency resoonse F 4.1 Elements of an Effecive Training Program An eriecive training program snouid be ceseioped organization snouia be oroviceo at least annually.
. using tre training system ceseicoment aoproacn, whien suggests iise phases in formulating trainmg:(1) 4.1.3 Drills and Exercises anaivzing piant soecific training neecs. (21 designing, A dnll is a supervisec instrucuen period aimec j
- 0) deseiocing, ano (4) imoiementing pro 6 rams tailore at testing, ce.eiocing, and imoroving skills. A dnli
' to those needs, ano (5) evaiuatmg program effecte should be supervised and evaivatec bv a cualified drill ness. Successful ceriormance in cf assroom anc cractr- instrucer, who provides immeciate feeoback on suo-cal trainmg should be a requirement for filling an stancard penormance.
eme gency resconse organization oosition. An exere:se is an esent that tests the integrated i ne toilowing elements snould orovide the basis cacao lity of tne emergency resoonse organization as weil as a maior pcmon of the casic eiements or the
!cr an e~e=ise emergency crecareoness training
' *
- I '* * ' emergency olan. All maior elements of the emergency pian snouto be testec witnin a rise-sear genot.l.
< Drills ano exercises should be conoucec to evaiu-u 4.1.1 InitialTraining ate tne proficiency of all designateo emergency pre-Initial traming snould deseico emergency pre-paredness positions ano should be a routme part of
;areoness task relatec knowiecge ano skills in me traming. It is througn drills and exercises thattraining icilowmg areas:
T effeciseness can be evaluatec. All individuals should
- emergency plan and implementing procedures articicate cenocically in a dnli or exercise tc demon.
i strate proficiency in tneir designated emergency po. '
- emergency facilities and ecuipment sition.
a comrnunications systems Planning, conducing, and evaluating drills ano ex.
- basics of reacor power plant operation ercises should be tne responsibility oithe emergency pmpam nes epanmentan sn ec anated a specialty training, such as media relations and with other cecartments and organizations. Drills ano confrontation training for seieced emergency exercMes Wu nci em wmg:
" ouolic information personnel ano otner seteced l ,
- ersonnel t m i
a 13 e .__ _____ _
~
Attachment B (Page 4 of 10) - q APO3709 l I i I
- potential acc: cents of born large and smail conse.
- recomng cuences. some or wnicn snouia test tne uttiitv's e assessment
-acacility to mitigate furtner camage anc control .. ,
releases aner a core camaging ewnt nas occurrec protec:ve anc correcne ac:: ens a I
- objecives cased on program needs and previously identifica weaxnesses
- communications systems
".J e.w a
information flow within anc among eme'gency M
- scenanos that challenge personnei, eculpment. facilities .' M
*""*"'C"
- information flow to the news mecia and the puolic
- pamcipation 'tu kev oersonnei from aoprepnate . 3:,
on-site suppen groups I 4.1A.3 Specialdrills and/ortraining /
- cnticues tnat include a oian for correcing weak-nesses anc improving training e~eciwness
. Special dnlis ana/or trainmg snould be conduced for coorcinaiors or tne emergency resconse organiza-
}]*l tion, ace: cent assessment eersonnei, communicanons i 4.14 Specialized Training pen nne . racyogicai rnonitonng reams. 6+iightmg , !
personnet, ano first aio anc rescue eersonnel. Soecial i dnlis ano training provice cocortunities to minimize n M I 4.1A.1 Emergency publicinformation simulation and maximize realism tnat may not be avail. i Pe' sonnet assigned to tne emergency puolic infor- aole cunng larger scaie anils ano exercises. These . . .sr j mation organization outies anc responsibilities snould training occortunities also eermit more focused and i
'eceive soecializec traming for tneir respecive assign- in-depen cowrage ci these specialized areas.
ments. Exemonons may be given for expenence in-
'volving actions similar to those penormeo dunng an 4.1.5 Ceneral Employee Training !
emergencv. Exemotions snould be cocumentea. Ex. Emergency preparedness training should be an irw amples or specialized training inciuce tne followmg: tegral part of general empiowe training. Employees
- communication, presentauon. and confrontation well ecucatec in their cuties in tne event of an emer-traming for spoxesperson ano tecnnicai briefers gency neio protec: heir own realth ano safety ano en-I
- training for soecializec audiovisual acuvities sucn as meara monitonng anc eciting
" ' ' " " l' ** #"
"5.instrucu n sn uid enaole the trainee to penorm tne toilowing:
recognize emergency alarms and state tne appro- . More information on emergency public informa- nate action for eacn type cialarm ,' I' non organizanon training is anilable in IN PO docu. ment 86-015, Emergency Public Communicanons
- list the types of emergencies in oreer.or sewnty Cooramators Manual.
- explain the reasons for emergency plans 7
- state the actions recuired of the emolom during .;
4.1A.2 State /localorganization tramms emergency plan implementanon
- I Personnel from state and local emergency pre-
- areoness and related organizations should be invited
- idenuiy where emolovees and their families can obtain current informanon dunng an emergency I on an annual basis to pamcteate in a training program tnat relates tne importance cieffeciw planning ano in- '
- state the purpose oisite assembly and accounta- l erfaces among the vanous organizations insolved in a bili'Y .'1, I resoonse to an emergency situation. The following 1 areas snould be remewea:
- state the location of the empiovee s assigned ,,
*"* ' I
- emegency plan and procedures owrview
- discuss site evacuation,inciucing identificanon of ;
I
- emergency classincanon evacuation routes ano the neec for meeung at off-
.e
?
- emergency acion lewis site assemoly points for racioiogical monitonns 5
5 ,
c I; - Attachment B (Page 5 of 10) VO ST J9 ( I L..,
? j t,
)
* 'esuits cicuizzes. examinanons. or etner evalu.
. discuss cian: cc icv :n eaung. ennning, smoking.
acons ,
.,. chewing. anc etner precautions curing raciciogi-7 cat emegenc'es Training recorcs shouia he maintainea for eacn in-
. state the roie of tne comeany sockesce son ano civicuai. The recorcs snouta cocument tne caoacitv in f
,5 - wnicn eacn inaivicual carticipateo during eacn dnli i 5 ,'.
the comoany s coiicy conceming tne retease of emergency mrormanen to me cuciic anc tne ano exercise. i
"'. mecia I 4.1.10 Tramee Evaluation The knowiecge anc cacacilities elemergency re-i 4.1.6 Lesson Plans sponse oersonnet snouic ce evaiuatec cunng initial '
Lesson plans mat cescnce tne ooiectives oitne esson ano provice sutiicient guicance to ensure cen. training ano cencaicai!v therearter to monitor cerior-mance ano ensure an erfecne response. The cuaiity of sistency snould be crecarea for all classroom instruc. trainin g, progra ms. c:u rse content, anc instrucionai
' . , . non. Lesson pian format snouia be consistent witn tnat
" usec in otner stauon training programs. metnoas are cest evaluatec ov monitonng tne cerror.
mance of trainees. Different metnoas cievaluating l these ecucanon anc training programs are aoproonate. i 4.1.7 Training Matrices Among me metnocs are wntten examinat.Ons ana f Training requirements snouia be ceterminec casec cuizzes. oral crecxouts ano examinations anc cerior.
/ on a training matnx. A training matnx snouic list les.
mance evaluanons. It is imcortant mat evaluauon sons ov title anc numcer ano snouia inoicate. cv metnoas are comistent witn the training setting.
.I groues, wno snouid receive tne lessons. The groues are assignec for training purposes av joo similantv. A sam-pie training matnx anc a compiete creakcown of the 4.1.10.1 Performance evaluation Performance evaiyauons snould be measured groups usec in the matnx is provicec in Apcencix D.
against estaotishec cntena or stancares rather tnan relauve to otner trainee performance. The following 4.1.8 Training Schedule areas snould be coverec: A training senecule snould be ceveiocea annuaily and reviewec ano accrosec ov cne emegene< orecar.
- knowledgeof plan !
ecness coercinator. The senecule snouia inciuce tne
- n wieage and aooiication of procecures cates of ail emegency creparecness training, inciuc-mg anils ano exercises.
- selecuenoiorecerecuipment i
w
- operanon ciecuipment 4.1.9 Training Records A training recora snould be comoletec for eacn
- cecision making and management orwork skills training class. The following are examples of items that during dnlls ano exercises may oe inciucca in these receras:
4.1.10.2 Knowledge evaluation ;
..
- topicitask In knowiecge areas such as emergency response j
= trainingcates crganizauon acivauen, autnontv anc responsibilities.
emergency classification, emergency response facili-I
- fengtn of training thouru ties, ano personnel protecuen, wntten snort. answer
- mstructor examinations or multicie-cnoice e.xaminauens may be
,7 used to measare acniewment. Performance on wntten l
. focanon examinauons e ould be measurec against estaclishec
- t.
- cesencuan of training or coev cilesson clan f eaming ooiectives. For a score oiless tnan tne estao.
lishec cntena, remecial training snouid be omvicec g, a name anc signature ot incivicual receiving anc retesting conouctec. Fanure to demonstrate saus. training J, factorv knowiease snouid resuit in removai trem tne roster cicualifiec ce sonnei for emegency resconse {
- training sucervisor s review signature functions.
l .I
- l. .
r' 15 L _____________
Attachment B (Page 6 of 10) 7 O NPO3 09 j m 1 1 I l 4.1.103 Exemotions e information cistnoution 8ersonner may ce exemotec from training tnrougn J
- seneculing
- he metnocs cescnceo cetow. A test snouid be oro-vicea tnat. ucon successful comoietion, wouia exemot
- timeliness of training l excenenceo. newiv nirec personnel from certam ini-tial training. Individuals considerec for exemotion Necessary changes to tne orogram content,instrue-snouia cass wntten examinations on gnowiecee areas d nai matenah Uamsg memocs. nammanon tecn. ,
anc demonstrate comoetency m tne praeucai e'xeretse.' P'".ues. Uaingg racmtres or mstrucional statishould Qualifiea personnei shouid be consicerca for ex. '..""E".t me accroonate cecartment. Reso.onsi. - bility for initiating ano tracking cor ecise actions j emotion from contmumg trainmg if they nave ;oo. , specific knowiedge of the miermation to ce taugnt. snoMe amgm l Exemotion from trainmg requirements snouid not ! incluce exempnons from tne wntten examination 43 Training Program Review - ( process. The emergency oianning coore:nator snould re. The oractical exeretse comoetency demonstration view rne emergency resconse organization training couta be exemotec cunng continuing training ror programs cenocically to ensure tnat traming ace.
- nose eersonnel who routineiv use tnese oracical cuately succorts me neecs of tne emergency resoonse f abilities in tneir lobs. organization.
Management shouid use caution on tne acoiica- The rollowmg areas of the training program snould tion et any or these exemptions. be reviewea annually:
- Trainmg needs should be c:eariy identified. ,-
4.1.11 Qualification oilnstructors
- Training matenais, including lesson clans seii-Instrucors should be cemiiec in accorcance with stucy guides, anc reference matenals snould be training cepartment requirements.
current and compiete. ; 4.2 Training Program Evaluation
#8 " "I "
- D * " * ' ' U'#' "'
To estachsh anc maintain an enecise emergency
* '""***IC"IC "#'#' '
"*" "' # * ' *** P ' " * " # "* '" # I resoor.se organization trainmg proeram. continums -
evaiuation of the orogram is necess'arv. Communica- sh uld be enecmeiv useo. non among nemeers of tne uniity trammg orgamza.
- The training senedule snouia be uo-u>.cate and tion. cecartn.antai supervisors. ano trainees is complete.
essentiai. ENecive communication among tnese *
- All traming including comoiecon oiself study groues will facilitate orogram uccating ano making "'
guides anc camcicauon m crills ano exercises, improwments. The program evaluations snouid should be documented. . inciuce at least tne rollowing items:
- The qualification of all persons in the emergency -
- examination results response organnation shouid oe current.
- feeoback reports
- Supervisors should ensure mat tneir personnel 3 g-Y
- emolowe job performance receive requireo training. 'l ':
- regulations and stancarcs affecing emergency
- Feeoback from classroom traming sessions, drills. z[
t preparedness trainmg and exercises snould be incorporated into tne , ,y
- status of trainirg aeiiciene:es from otner evalua.
Unimng pmgm j ' tions anc resulting correcme acions
- Remecial training should be orovided when need- 3 eo anc tne erfecmeness of tne training assessec. .,-
e imorcr.ements in training metnocs } 16
ig e Attachment B (Page 7 of 10) l
- f 16 '.
t i
?:
.e =. ,
*4 &4*. ?. i
*h.
s ! aj QgaiiiiC3t:Cn Uti t s 2. rn J 5 :e ,---
- - - g 1 C.,0 Of **3:n:3;r8C "'.'
*-e traininS Ce0 A~- ear 1 C UCCatec Cef'CC:C3..V. a 70 l .
',"3' e"* e'it*C. M*
l # [. ;,.2:nsn a Ce:3 n e-! IPCg, e a t * 'e Spon$e Of33...... - - ~ '
, ce,1Cr..-e: ece".e init;ai as aen l '
as CCntinutnE leg: :r.g in t, etr CW85. l- , a
>t
( ye*
.s lr . .
e t 1 eg i g*8 f n! I l l **
.'T l &
v i l . l , l
- I e
$ h.
o l l
- i .
l l a ge W* 9" 4 .a o. lh S-F n,. o- .. . .. .. . .
~
Attachment B (Page 8 of 10) NFC 37-;;9 1 APPENDIX D -: SAMPM MATRIX GROUPS AND ! SAMPGTRAINING MATRIX ! 1 i, I i l ,
+.u _er -
~
Attachment B (Page 9 of 103. cog g APPENDlX D SAMPLE MATPIX GROUPS i Groupi Group IV Emergency Coordinator / Director Corporate Emergencv Succort Personnel Emergencv Durv Officer Environmental Assessment Penannei Shift Sucervisor Secunty Penonnet Shift Tecnnicalhfvisor Suoport Coordinator , Covernment Liaison Coordinator I Recovery Manager Station Direcer ! Operations Director Tecnnical Director Group V Senior ReacerOperators Emergency News Center Direcors Public information Managers Tecnnical Aavisors Group ll Rumor Control Croues maintenance Director Spokescersorus) Stores Direcer Administranen ano Logistics Direcer RadianorvChemistry Direcer Group VI Communications Director Communicators Clerical Group ill - Group VI Reactor O::erators Off site Suoport Croues (Fire ano Medical)
. Ecuipment/ Auxiliary Operators Radwaste Ocerators Health Physics Technicians Chemistrv Technicians maintenance Technicians I
l } O-1
~
Attachment B (Page 10 of 10) APPENDlX D SAMPLE TRAINING MATRIX
=> - n -
n n n n = i e i a g
- h. in i 3 g 3 5 g 3 i a ta
~
71.*I 4 m 9g 5 5 < E E 15y - c 21 2 r ti1 38 l 5
! =
ll Emergency Resxnse Organization x x x x x x x Emergency Plan ineocuction & Cherview j w Emergency Response
> 0 0 > 0 0
, Support Organir.ations l 1'
%%>0 > > 0 w Emergency Classification
, , Acedent Assessment anc Protecuw I
$ $ > U > # U Moon Recommencanons I
, Ere. Personnel Searen and Rescue. I
- O w
= $ > > -
Repairand Damage Contret
> 30 0 0 0 0 e Emergency facilities anc Ecuipment Orwite ana Off-site Raciation gO ' > -
, y Emergenev reams y>>0 > 0 > ** Communicanons anc Nonncation 1
~ ;: > 0 > 0 O 4 Recmery P ocecures !
S a 1, j 3> 30 > > 5 Chemistry Emergency Procecures O $> > > > > , Secunev Emergency Procecures l 1 0 y>>0 0 > ;ll Medical Emergency Procecures 3>>>>0 0 = Contro6 Room Personnel
%>>0 > 0 0 2 TSC Personnel J>>>0 0 0 3 05C Personnel 3> > 0 > 0 0 5 EOF Personnel
} >0 0 > > 0 C Emergener hews Center Perscrum -
I D2
ATTACHMENT C (Seabrook Nuclear Training Procedure NT-4010, Conducting Job and Task Analysis) l i f 1 s 1 I. ] _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ . _ _ . . _ _ _ _ i
I_ Attachment C (Page 1 of 9) , l cfcABROOg g g 1 I Y t . N- , j W \- /Vq ' 9 4 l 'N/N o GB SEABROOK NUCLEAR TRAINING PROCEDURE I a l Identification Numcer NT-4010 Revision 0 f Titi. JOB ANo TASK ANALYSIS Origin. tor Rov E. Hickok f i R.visee ey l I Approval and implementation
,,.c. ,. .. m.,.ev ..., v.e .n .u.c ,v. em ,e. ... e., _ .
g 1s. ....ce. l AuM m Tr.ining arou, u.n.s., e4 ,,rovee m o... I I I ag, go g* . i ng.i g
Attachment C (Pago 2 of 9) ! Procedure No. NT-4010 Page 01 of 08' Revision No. 0
+
JOB AND TASK ANAL SlS TABLE OF CONTENTS 4 Section Title Page 1.0 PURPOSE 3 2.0 APPLICABILITY 3
3.0 REFERENCES
3
.1 C DEFINITIONS 3 5.0 RESPONSIBILITIES 5 6,0 INSTRUCTIONS 5 6,1 Conducting a Job Analysis 6 6.2 Updating a Job Analysis 7
' 6.3 Conducting a Task Analysis '7 I
6.4 Using Task Lists 7 ATTACHMENTS 7 7.0 S S.0 FORMS i ! k-l i 1 1 i
.l
~
Attachment C.-(PagaL3.of 9) <
.T ,
f
' Procedure No. NT-.1010 Page 02 of 08-Revision No,' 0-
' JOB AND TASK ANAYLSIS
.. j UST OF EFFECTNE PAGES i Page No. Effective' R evision 1 0
'2 0 3 0
.t 0 5 0 6 o 7 0 .
8 0 I I l l l
E- ' Attachment C (Pago 4 of 9) Procedure No. NT-4010 Page 03 of 08 l Revision No. Il- 0 l I 1.0 PUR g E, This procedure establishes the requirements for conducting job and task analysis . to develop a new training program or moolfy an existing one. l 2.0 APPLICABILITY l This procedure applies to all Seabrook Station training programs that are subject to accreditation by the Institute for Nuclear Power Operations (INPO). In addition. It snould serve as a guide for conducting the analvsis phase of tne Training System Development (TSD) process for all otner performance cased training.
3.0 REFERENCES
3.1 INPO-85-006, Principles of Training System Development 3.2 INPO-85-006 (Supplement). Principles of Training System Development Supplement 3.3 New Hampshire Yankee SeacrooK Station Training Oroup Management Manual 3.4 Seabrook Training Group Proceoure NT-4000. Training Development Recommeda-tions 3.5 Seabrook Training Group Procedure NT-5000. Training Design 3.6 INPO 83-009. Task Analysis Procedure 3.7 INPO 83-033. Job ana Task Analysis User s Manual j 3.8 INPO 83-008. Job and Task Analysis Retrieval Manual
.I 3.9 INPO Job Analysis Procedure. October 1984 I 4.0 DEFINITIONS l
4.1 Curriculum Advisory Committee (CAC) Reviews. discusses, and recommends measures and actions relating to all new and existing training programs of the Training Group. ! 4.2 Critical Task l Task if performed correctly or incorrectly impacts equipment, personnel or ' l E public safety. 4 3 Olfficulty Relative mental and physical effort requir er1 to achi ve task proficiency.
I ~ Attachment C (Page 5 of 9) Procedure No. NT-4010 Page 04 of 08
.I Revision No. O I 44 EreQuenCV How often a job incumoent performs a task.
45 Generic Task List A task iist. usually derivea from an outside source such as INPO. wnicn has - not been suDlected to lob analysis and thus is not plant specific. l 46 Importance Relative consequence of inadequate task cerdermance in terms of aaverse safety effects to personnel. the puolic or tne plant / component system. 47 Job The cuties and tasks performed by a single .vorker. i e. control room cperator 48 Job / Task Analysis (JTA) A method used to obtain a detailed lisbng of the duties and tasks of a specific job. Job analysis supplies data reoutred for task analysis. 4.9 Needs Analysis A process to identify potential or existing training needs by documenting gaps I between actusi performance and performance requirements. Outcomes of this pro-cess could identify needs for additional training or procedural enanges. 4.10 Performance Based Training Training designed around identified tasks and the related knowledge and skills required for competent 100 performance. I 4.11 Subiect Matter Expert (SME) I A worker qualified and experienced in performing a partictIt'ar task, including the necessary skills and knowledge. 4.12 Tabletop Process whereby a group of SMEs analyze jobs or tasks to derive consensus in the analysis process. 4.13 Task i A well defined unit of work having an identifiable beginning and end, as well I as two or more task elements. 1 I I
a
'd
.,'~
- j Attachment,C (Page 6 of 9) .
)
Procedure No NT-4010 Page 05 of O'8 I Revision No. O J 4 14 Task Analysis Systematic process of examining a task to identify conditions. standards, ele-monts, and required skills or knowledge. 4.15 Task Element (action step) Discrete action or step executed during the performance of a task. i 4.16 Training System Development (TSD) , 1 A method of ' evaluating performance-cased training for meeting specific job -{ requirements, )
)
4.17 Validated Task List .!
)
A ta5K list that has oeen suolect to analysis and accroveo by the CAC. !
.;r 5.0 RESPONSIBILITIES j 5.1 Curriculum Advisory Committee (CAC)
Responsible for determining how an initial joD analysis for any position is to be conducted. Also responsible for approving plant-specific task lists and ) modifications to tnose lists. l 5.2 Training Department Manager .i Responsible for assigning training staff members to conduct job / task analysis. 5.3 Training Supervisor , Responsible for overseeing that plant-specific task lists are developed and updated througn job analysis. Also responsible for subnt.tting new or modified ! task lists to the appropriate CAC for approval. 5.4 Instructor / Assigned Subject Matter Expert ! l Responsible for providing technical expertise in identifying tasks to be j included in a plant-specific task list. , I 6.0 INSTRUCTIONS f NOTE: Analysis is the first step in the Training System Development process. The ) purpose of this step is to gather the information needed te develop effective I training that meets the requirements for a particular need, job or task. ! Analysis includes tnres steps: needs analysis, job analysis and task analysis. I 1
Attachmsnt C (Page'7 of-9)
)
Procedure No 'NT-4010 Page 06 of 08 Revision No. 0 1 Needs analysis is the process of identifying requirements and performance deficiencies. The outcome of needs analysis is the identification of deficien-cies that can be addressed by developing training. Needs analysis is custo-marily initiated through the TDR procedure. NT-4000. ] ; I 6.1 Conducting a Job Analysis ] I 6.1.1 A job analysis snail be conducted when no previous job analysis has been done for tne position affected or an existing 10 0 analysis is inadequate for training to os developed. 6.1.2 The Training Oeoartment Manager or Training Supervisor snali determine the scope of the reouireo job analysis. 6.1.3 The minimum reoutrement for any job analysis is that it snall result in a validateo olant-specific task list. , I 6.1.4 A preliminary tasx :ist' is develooed for tne tasks performeo in a particular 100. Groues of tasks are categorized by 10 0, cutv. and acti-vity. This list may be prepared , using one of the following methods: 6.1.4.1 Survey SMEs or job incumeents using questionnaires or inter-views to determine which tasks are performed by tne job incum-bent: 6.1.4.2 Use an existing task list from INPO or a similarly configured plant; 6.1.4.3 Analyze procedures and other documentation tnat describe duties. tasks and responsibilities of the job. l 1 6.1.4.4 A preliminary task list should include, as a minimum, task i numbers with descriptions as well as references. System / duty j areas and activities. l l 6.1.5 The Training Supervisor gives the preliminary list to at least one SME and the assigned instructors for verification. 6.1.5.1 The task list is verified by reviewing tasks. adding missing '} tasks, and deleting r.edundant or incorrect tasks. Verification l can be performed by surveys which rate tasks for fregency. dif-ficulty and importance or in tabletop sessions where tasks are ; selected for initial or continuing training and settings recom-mended for selected tasks. 6.1.5.2 The Training Supervisor resolves conflicts in data. Once 1 conflicts are resolved. the data can be entered into the job analysis data base, and a verified task list can be produced.
~
Attachment C (Page 8 of 9)- Procedure No. NT-4010 Page 07 of 08 -j Revision No. O i 6.2 Upaating a Job Analysis Updates to a job analysis may .be initiated through the TOR process. TO R's that affect the 100 analysis should be incorporated into the JTA data base. Changes in tasks will be tracked througn all the related training areas: JTA data base, exam bank, training matrix, and lesson plans. 6.3 Conductir.g a Task Analysis 6.3.1 Task analysis shall be conducted . when new or additional training is required on a task. This may be an intuitive process in wnich learning objectives are developed directly from tasks. The outcome of task analy- , I sis is to determine knowieage and acilities tnat must be considereo in the development of specific learning objectives for training. 6.3.2 Once tne knowledge and acilities are determined, soecific learning j objectives can be deveicoed and incorporated into the appropriate training programs. 6.4 Using Tssk Lists i Verified plant specific task lists are the princloal tool used in designing performance-based training programs. Training design is the next stage in the TSD process and is covered by Procedure NT-5000. 7.0 ATTACHMENTS None I i I
~
1 l 1 I b
~
Attachment C (Page 9 of 9) . l Procedure No. NT-4010 Page 08 of 0_8 l Revision No. _ 0 .j 8.0 FORMS r LIST OF ASSOCIATED FORMS . Form No. T:tle Effective Revision j i None e I l ) > 4 f- }
> u.
i l I i I
')
i l 1 ATTACHMENT D i (Seabrook Nuclear Training Procedure NT-5000, Performance-based Design Training) j 7 l )
M. > Attachment D (Page 1 of 9) g,%.ABROo l i y i [ .
<NduY' l 4 l
j WN /y q h/gg Gb SEABROOK NUCLEAR TRAINING PROCEDURE l Identification - Number NT-5000 Revision 0 Title TRAINING OESIGN 1 Originator Roy E. Hickok l Revised by i Approval and implementation f f The attached procedure is hereby approved and effective on the date below. ( ) Training Group Manager Approved Date
,, ,.. e .......
) .
.~
Attachmsnt D (Pago 2 of.9) Procedure No. NT-5000 Page 01 of 08 s Revision No. 0 I I TRAINING DESIGN j 1 i TABLE OF CONTENTS Section Title Page 1.0 PURPOSE 3 2.0 APPLICABILITY 3
3.0 REFERENCES
3 40 DEFINITIONS 3 5.0 RESPONSIBILITIES 4 6.0 INSTRUCTIONS 5 -l 6.1 Selecting Tasks for Training 5 6.2 Determining Training Settings 5 6.3 Developing a Training Matrix 5 6.4 Task Correlation 6 6.5 Developing Objectives 6 6.6 Developing Mechanisms for Student 6 Evaluation l 6.7 Training Program Description 7 7.0 ATTACHMENTS 7 i 8.0 FORMS 8 I i L l l ) ,
.-~
- 5. l Attachmont-D (Paga 3 of 9)
Procedure No. NT-5000 Page 02 of 08 Revision No. 0 TRAINING DESIGN
' UST OF EFFECTNE PAGES Page Effective Revision
-1 0 2 0 3 0 4 0 5 0 6 0 7 0 8 0 l
L
\
f ). .- i
Attachment D (PGge 4 of 9) Procedure No. NT-5000 Page 03 of 08
. Revision No. 0 l
1.0 PURPOSE This croceuure provides guicance in designing performance-cased t.'3:nin g in accercance witn the Training System Development (TSO) process. 1 2.0 APPLICABILITY j This procedure aceties to all SeabrooK training programs that are suolect to accredi-tation by tne institute for Nuclear Power Operations (INPO). In addition it should serve as a guide for cenducting tne assign phase of the TSD process for all otner performance-cased training. 3.0 S REFERE_N,Cf,S 3.1 INPO-85-002. The Accreditation of Training in tne Nuclear Power Industry
's . 2 INPO-55-006. Principles of Training System Development 33 INPO-85-006 (Supplement!. Principles of Training System Development Supple- ;
ment i 3.4 New Hampsnire Yankee SeacrooK Station Training Grouo Management Manual 3.5 New Hampsnsre Yankee Procedure 18700. NHY Training Program 3.6 - Seabrook Trairing Group Procecure NT-4000. Training Development Recom-mancations j 3.7 Seabrook Train.ng Group Procecure NT-4010. Job sna Task Analysis 4.0 DEFINITIONS 4.1 Enabling Objective l A statement trat specifies measurable behavior that a trainee should exhibit after instruction. including the conditions and standards for per- i formance. ! 42 Job Performance Measures ) The minimum standard required for a job incumeent to perfor m tasks adequately. 4.3 Performance Based Training A systematic program of instruction designed around tasks and the related knowledge and skills required for competent job performance. / 44 Setting The environment in which training is conducted and learning occurs. Settings include classroom. ' simulator, laboratory, on-the loh training (OJT). etc.
Attachment D (Page'5.of 9)- Procedure No. NT-5000 Page 04 of 08 Revision No.' O.
.15 System /Outy Area A logical groucing of tasks around a plant system or tob function. For examole.
nuclear instrumentavon is a system. and adminis'. ration is a duty area. 46 Task 1.ist The product of joD analysis which lists tasks for that 100. 4.7 Terminal Objective A brief statement summarizing the desired training result in measurable terms. The terminal objective should be written to reflect conditions. Stancaros. and behavioral outcome. 4.8 Training Matrix A meenanism wnien tracks elements of the TSO orocess. 5.0 - RESPONSIBILITIES 5.1 Curriculum Advisory Committee (CAC) Reviews and approves according to its charter such design elements as tasks selected for training, lthe training matrix. program descriptions, training ' schedules, and terminal colectives. l I 5.2 Training Group Manager. Responsible for approving all program descriptions. 5.3 Training Suoervisor Coordinates and assigns instructors to act as liaisons in the TSD process. r 5.4 Instructors / Job incumbents /SMEs l l' Oasign training according to the TSD process specified in this procedure. l I- 6.0 INSTRUCTIONS 6.1 Selecting Tasks for Training 6.1.1 Once a validated plant-specific task list is developed using the analysis procedure (NT-4010), appropriate tasks are selected for training. 6.1.2 SMEs, job incumbents, instructors, or other knowledgeable individuals j shall determine appropnate tasks for training. This process can j generally be performed concurrent with a consensus group job analysis, j
( Attachment D (Page 6 of 9) 1 Procedure No. NT-5000 Page 05 of 08_ I Revision No. 0 6.1.3 The individuals assigned shall review each task. considering anal-ysis information such as FID (frecuency, importance, difficulty) ' data and whether improper task performance is likely to affect personnel or equipment safety. Tasks are also assigned to be covered by initial and/or continuing training at this time. 6.1.4 Criteria used to select tasks for training will be documented and forwarded with the task list to the training supervisor for review. 6.2 Determining Training Settings 6.2.1 The setting in which training for a task is to be conducted must be determined orior to any training development. Typical settings i may include: classroom, laboratory, simulator. OJT, and self-study. i l 6.2.2 Analysis information sucn as task ratings and performance stan-darcs are considered to determine training settings. Constraints. sucn as time and resources, must also be considered wnen recom- j mencing settings. 6.2.3 The selection of training settings can be performed by the consen-sus group selecting tasks for training (see Section 6.1). TN selection is generally verified by instructors during train.ng development. with any changes documented using tne training development recommendation (TDR) process (see procedure flT- g 4000). 6.3 Developing a Training Matrix 6.3.1 The training suoervisor shall assign an instructor or staff member to develop a ; raining matrix to track information during the pro-cess of analysis and design. The training matrix incorporates a large data base wnich tracks such factors as system / duty area. l activity, task. lesson plan, reference, comments. etc. i 6.3.2 Updates to the training matrix, including adding or deleting tasks [ or changes in training setting, are routine!y accomplished through the TOR process. : 6.3.3 The training supervisor shall review the revised matrix periodically. j I 6.4 Task Correlation I 6.4.1 The assigned instructor shall compare the task list with objectives h developed for existing programs in order to identify objectives that already cover the tasks selected for training. Form NT-5000-1,
" Task-Objective Correlation Sheet." should be used to document tasks )
with existing objectives. This form may also be used when lesson plans l are reviewed or revised for upcoming training programs. l l
- l
)
Attachment D (Page 7 of 9) i i l Procedure No. NT-5000 Page 06 of 08 Revision No. 0 6.4 2 In correlating tasks to objectives, the instructor snail review the task and any procedures related to it. The revision numcer for eacn related procedure snould be inoicatea on NT-5000-1 to I I ensure that the information in the current matrix is correct. The instructor shoule identify tasks and related colectives by r umcer and provide a orief description of each. 6.5 Deveioping Objectives 6.5.1 The instructor shall develop terminal and enaoling objectives for any tasks selected for training that are not covered by existing oblectives. Objectives developeo from tasks should be grouped togetner oy training setting, as appropriate. 6.5.2 Terminal objectives may also be developed for lessons for wnien no specific task exists (for e'xample, recent industry events). 6.5.3 Deveteo or review the enabling oolectives for eacn terminal objec-tiv e. The colectives should suDoort the performance of all plant-specific tasks tnat relate to tne terminal oblective. 6.5.4 Consider entry level skitis within the training setting when writing enacting oclsetives. These objectives should be ordered to reflect the sequence of training. 6.5.5 The training sucerviso or another cualified SME shall review all lists of terminal and enabling objectives. 6.6 Developing Mechanisms for Student Evaluation 6.6.1 Develop test cuestions using procecure flT-5010. Examination Develop-m ent. 6.6.2 Devetoo 100 performance measures using procedure NT-5020. Job Performance Measures. 6.6.3 Develop simulatnr exam questions using procedure NT-5700, Simulator Examination Development. 6.7 Training Program Description I 6.7.1 Eacn program requiring INPO accreditation shall have a Training Program Description which specifies the program requirements, con-tent, course loading, scheduling, instructor qualifications, grading, evaluation, and program records. 6.71 The Training Group Manager. the appropriate Training Department Manager, the appropriate station department manager, and the I Station Manager shall review and approve all program descriptions for training conducted for station personnel. The Training Group Manager shall determine the review and approval process for all other training. 7.0 ATTACHMENTS NONE
~
Attachment D'(Page 8 of 9) 6 -. Procedure No, NT-5000 Page 07 of 08 - Revision No. 0 8.0 FORMS
, LIST OF ASSOCIATED FORMS Form Numcer ' Title Effective Revision NT-5000-1 Task-Objective Correlation Sheet 0 i
i l 1
l 3lll I ' I .
- Pt gO'DBDyte O _ 'OW2D t ( d(- e OHi *
. 1 ~ _
_ . ~ . 0 l _ . _ . 0 - i . 0 ~' i n n. " 5 0~
- ~
8 1 u __ _. . I s_ _ _ N_ " e_ " e - g i., " _ _ - o a " P r o " N No' e, m. r v
)
a: oe ff l M h _ I P _. H _ S . I N o N o. _ _ eN s un _ d. t s o i . n _. ci o vc eo vi . . t _ r hp _ t PI . ci . - erc g b s _ _ _ O )e _ _. 1 I .- i . l l i S N s O I T e v r ie A l t c b _ i H em g H e b u O s r ON C E u o _ - V C . I ~ I # _. C " . E i M I O _- - K ee - S r _ - tum A t e 1 er ce of r e PH e t _ a _ - D n o
.i t
p
.ir c
s e m D r o k f s a g m l n - a it r e g l p o _ r P b _ _ m o J o _ _ ---- C _ N o t r o c k u r s t a s l I n l f'
i ATTACHMENT E (Seabrook Nuclear Training Procedure NT-6000, Development of Training Materials, Instructor Guides) 1 i I l [ i 1
-- ~ ,
Attachment E (Page 1 of 12) l gt.gBRo o , t I Y > M ; j wN /y q
%/Ng G SEABROOK NUCLEAR TRAINING PROCEDURE l identification Numcer NT-6000 Revision 0 Title 'NSTRUCTOR GUiOES )
Originator Rov E. Hickok , Revised by Approval and implementation The attached procedure is hereby approved and effective on the date below. h ' ) Training' Group Manager - Approved Date r f
..~.....e., l
)
_- ~. Attachment E (Pago 2 of 12) Procedure No.' NT-6000 Page 01 of 11 Revision No. O INSTRUCTOR GUIDES TABLE OF CONTENTS Section Title Page 1.0 PURPOSE. 3 I 2.0 APPLICABILITY 3
3.0 REFERENCES
3 40 DEFINITIONS 3 5.0 RESPONSIBILITIES 3 60 INSTRUCT lONS 4 6.1 Instructor Guide Develecment 4 6.2 Lesson Plan Numcars and Review 6 6.3 Instructor Guide Approval 6 7.0 ATTACHMENTS 6 8.0 FORMS 8 l ). l I l 1 l 1
~
Attachment E.(Page 3 of 12). Procedure No. NT-6000 Page 02 of 11 I Revision No. O ! I d NSTRUCTOR GUIDES UST OF EFFECTNE PAGh$ Pace ~ EMecttve Revision 1 0 2 o i O .O a 0 5 o 6 o 7 o 8 0 9 0 10 0 11 o i t I I > i I 1
Attachment E (Page 4 of 12) Procedure No. NT-6000 Page 03 of 11 Revision No. 0 1.0 PURPOSE This croceaure provides the format for comaleting. organizing, and cresenting tne
.nstructor guiaes usea ov tne Seacroox Training Grouc (STG).
2.0 APPUCABluTY The instructor 'suide format snall be used . tv STG instructors. vendors and consultants assigned or centracted to creoare instructor guides. Instructor guides , prepared oefore tne cate of this revision are exempted until the next time tney 1 are revised.
3.0 REFERENCES
3.1 INPO 85-002. The Accreditation of Training in tne Nuclear Power incustry 32 Procecure No. NT '020. Training Recores 3.3 Procecure No. NT-5010. Examination Deveicament 3.4 Procedure No. NT-5020, Joe Performance Measures Development 3.5 Procedure No. NT-5700. Simulator Examination Devetooment 3.6 Preceaure No. NT-5000. Training Design 4.0 DEFINIT 10NS 41 Handouts 1 Sucotementary instructional material develooea or comolled tv tne Training Group staff and approved by tne Training Oeoartment Manager for distribution to tne students in connection with a specific lesson. 42 Instructor Guide A compilation of materials to be used Dy STG instructors in developing and . I implementing training. 43 Lesson Plan . ) - The instructional portion of the instructor guide, including the overview, t objectives, references, body content. etc. ?vpical duration of a lesson covered by a lesson clan is one to four hours. A single instructor guide may contain several relatea lesson plans. 5.0 RESPONSIBluTIES 5.1 Training Department Managers Responsible for approving all instructor guides within their cecartments.
Attachment E.(Page'S of>12) Procedure No. NT-6000 Page 04 of 11 Revision No. 0 5.2 Training Supervisors Rosconsible for tne content, format ana review of instructor guides witnin programs tney suoervise. 5.3 ~ Assigneo STG ' instructor Responsible for tne actual preparation of the instructor guide according to the format prescrioed in Section 6.0. 6.0 INSTRUCTIONS 6.1 Instructor Guide Development NOTE: The following items are typically included in an instructor guide. Items that are not approonate for a particular instructor guide will be designated N.A.-in the table of
~
contents. In addition. sneets with the statement. %is section not applicable * ! snail be placea Denind any tabs that are not used in a particular instructor guide.- ! 6 1.1 :nstructor Guide Acerovat Page 8 ooare an accroval page listing tne program. course, onase. ano all tne lesson clan numcers and titles included in tne instructor guide. 6.1.2 *able of Contents - Drepare an outline of the instructor guide inctuaing neaaings for eacn tao witn appropriate suoneadings. Indicate not applicaote (N.A.) for tabs not used in tne instructor guide. Sub-heacings under the lesson clan heading snall be in sufficient detail-to indicate the content of the lesson plan.- 6.1.3 Time Schedule - A schedule of lesson presentation should be included. 6.1.4 List of Student Obiectives - inctuos .a list of all student objectives - coverea oy tne instructor guide. 6.1.5 Individual Lesson Plans - D i scare a lesson plan for eacn individual lesson. using tne components axplained below. 6.1.5.1 An overview of the lesson bnefly describes what the lesson is supposec to accomottsn. Mention any special instructions l about the presentation. 6.1.5.2 Prerequisites state any qualifications or previous training I (lessons, courses, etc.) reautred. l 6.1.5.3 The instructional celectives include a terminal objective. ! ) which descrioes a student's expected performance following or during training, and associated enabling oDjectives. wnien support the attainment of the terminal objective. Eacn ensoling objective is assignea an individual numoor. See Attacnment 7.1 j for tne lesson plan and culective numoering system. .l i 6.1.5.4 References used fer cackground. develcoment and cresent:: tion {. snould be listed. Se as specific as possible. [ l /
_. ~ Attachmsnt E (Page 6 of 12) l Procedure No. NT-6000 Page 05 of 11 j Revision No. 0
)
6.1.5.5 Ths eouioment/ materials section of the lesson plan informs tne instructor of any materials neeaed to imolement tne lesson. I Examoles are controlled plant croceaures. plant drawing s. . Detatied Systems texts. hancout pacxages etc. Se sure to I specify quantity, if possiole. 6.1.5.6 The content / outline of the lesson is formarted in two columns. Use tne tne left-nand column forlesson content. The ragnt-hand , column provides space to note the maior features of the lesson, sucn as slides, transparencies, key information. notes, com-ments, review questions, etc. 6.1.5.7 The summarv/ review ouestions highlignt the key points or . cDiectives of tne lesson. This is the accroariate section for clarification, follow-up, informal evaluation. ano student feed- ' back. 5 1.6 Slide Weeram - Obtain anc secuence any slides useo in the lesson. I Inoicate wnere tne slides are located if tney are not included in tne instructor guice. 6.1.7 Hancouts - The handouts section should include t1e following stems; (1) A taote of contents listing all materials to be nancea cut to students in connection witn the lesson, (2) A cover sneet tor the nandout packet. (3) Reproducible coc.ss of the handout items, including student oclectives anc errata sneets. (When a controlled document is to ce nanced out in its entiretv. it is not necessary to include a copy in the handout section.) 6.1.8 {ranscarencies -include all transparencies used in the lesson. A repro- 1 ducioie print may De substituted. 5.1.9 Uodate stovide information to the next user of the instructor guide tv tilling out the comment / history log (Form NT-6000-2). This log provides an nistorical record of eacn presentation of the lesson and lists enanges and corrections maae byinstructors. If an instructor discovers a deficiency in a lesson plan that cannot be corrected immediately, he/sne snall describe the deficiency completely in the update section. When the deficiency is corrected the instructor snali enter the action j that was taken and its completion date. The training supervisor shall review this log sheet to verify lesson updates. 6.1.10 Notes - Use the Task-Objective Correlation Sheet (Form NT-5000-1) to h snow the correlation Oetween each objective covered by the lesson plan and soecific tasks. The notes section of the instructor guide also provides a place for any comments, suggestions, and reference materials that the instructor would like to include. 6.1.11 Evaluation - Describe the method (s) of student evaluation for the lesson plants) included in the instructor guide. Include references to written { exams, quizzes, oral exams. job performance measures, walk-throughs and their location. l l l
._ ~
s Attachment E (Pago.7 of 12) Procedure No. NT-6000 ' Page 06 of 11 Revision No. 0 3.2 . '. essen P!an Numoors and Review 6.2.1 ' esson plan numoers snail be assigned following tne guidance provided in Attacnment 7.1, 6.2.2 ' Newly develoosa instructor guides shall be reviewea using the initial instructor Guide Review Checklist, Fe m . NT-6000-1. Reviewers' comments can ce incluced on Form NT-6000-2. Comment / History Log. After initial review tne training suoervisor will cerlocically review instructor _ guides for instructional quality. 6.3 Instructor Guide Aoproval Allinstructor guices snall be reviewed by the Training Sucervisor and soproved
. by the Training Oscanment Manager. using the approval cage whien precedes tne tao for the taole of contents (see section 6.1.11. The Training Suoervisor may also cesignate a suolect matter expert to review tne instructor guide.
7.0 ATTACHMENTS 7.1 Lesson Plan and Objective Numooring System I e e 9
~
l
~
) }
.~
Attachment'E-(Page 8.of 12)
' Proceoure No. NT-6000 Page 07'of 11 ,
Revision No. O ; I
' LESSON PLAN AND OBJECTIVE NUMBERING SYSTEM i
JM l S etting
! Seouential Numoer Series Objective Numoer Level
-XX -< -<XX -< -XX -XX DEFINITIONS
' -Job A two-character coas identifying the positionis) for which the training is conductea. (Examole: CH-enemistry tecnnician). The training supervisor will have a list of assigrica job codes.
Setting A numcer representing tne site or location wnere the pre-poncerance of a lesson takes place. Possicle settings are: 1 Classroom 2 OJT 3 Simulator ; 4 Laboratory 5 Self Study Secuential Number Three-digit numbers are assigned in sequential order to each lesson plan in a 0, articular foD category. ! i Series The lesson plan may be identified as: I initial Training C Contenuting Training J Obiective Numoer Objectives covered by the lesson plan are identified by sequen- { i ) tial numbers. I J Level The level of training is represented by a two-digit code. (Example: SR - senior reactor ocerator). The training supervisor will have a list assignea level coces. Attachment 7.1
;_7 1
g
~ Attachment E (Page 9-of'12)-
Procedure No. NT-6000 Page'08 of 11 1 Revision No. O !< i 8.0 FORMS j UST OF ASSOCIATED FORMS Form Numeer Titie Effective Revision NT-6000-1 initial Instructor Guide Review 0 Checklist (2 pagest NT-6000-2^ Comment / History Lo9 0
- k 1
h f l l } ee k ~ l
~
?
d s s.
Attachment E (Page 10 of 12) Procedure No. NT-6000 Page 09 of 11 Revision No. O INITIAL INSTRUCTOR GUIDE REVIEW CHECKLIST COVER SHEET YES NO Nh
- 1. Are there titles for crogram. date, course, chase and 4 lesson wnere applicaole?
- 2. Is the author identified?
TABLE OF CONTENTS
- 3. Does tne Table of Contents reflect the content of the ;
instructor guide? l l TIME SCHEDULE
.1 's there a time Scnedule for lesson clan presentation? l l OBJECTNES
- 5. Are student oclectives consistent with lesson plan ooiectives?
LESSON Pt.ANS
- 6. Does tne lesson plan adhere to the format accorcing to sample lesson plans of prococure NT-6000?
- 7. Is the pnmary intent of the lesson clearly stated?
- 3. Are applicaDie tasks identifloo in the lesson plan? l
- 9. Does tne terminal oclective state a measurable outcome? l l ;
- 10. hAhbh,Ns hh,ekhh.b,h,$chh
- 11. Do the enabling objectives support the terminal objective?
}
- 12. Do the enabling objectives focus on the essential knowledge and skJils of the lesson? -
h 13. Does seen objecitve specify, with an ap' prog,rtate vero, how trainees will demonstrate skills? I
- 14. Are conditions and performance standards stated for applicable f
oDioctives?
- 15. Is the wording of eacn objective clear and concise?
- 16. Are applicable references identified?
i Form No.NT-6000-1 Page 1 of 2 Riev. No. 0 h_h - - _ . . _ _ - - - ____.____--__-m.m___
_ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _.-- _ ____ ___. ~ - - - . - - . _ - _ - - - - - - - --
~ Attachment E (Page 11 of! 12) a Procedure No. NT-6000 Page 10 of 11
' Revision No. 0 I
INITIAL INSTRUCTOR GUIDE REVIEW CHECKUST l YES NO N/A d
- 17. Are accrocriate instructional materials listea? l l 1
- 18. Does the lesson olan aadress audiovisual media seneduling and use? l
- 19. Does tne lesson content clearly address all of the iden-tifisc learning colectives? .l
- 20. Are notes, cues, questions inclucea for student cartici -
pation?
- 21. Does tne summary review tne maior learning colectives of 1 tne lesson? l l
l
- 22. Do the lesson, summary or review cuestions tie togetner the -
material covereo in lessen segments or cetween lessons? ! ! ! HANDOUTS !
- 23. Are trainee nancouts included or identified? l l SUDE PROGRAM
- 24. Are slides provided or indicatea wnere they can os co- i j taineo? f '
- 25. Are instructions providea for proper slide sequencing? l l TRANSPARENCIES
- 26. Are transparencies of good instructional quality? l ,
'27. Are instructions provided for proper transparency -
sequencing? l SIMULATOR . I
- 28. Are simulator instructions providea for skmulator lesson j plans?
l ) NOTES j
- 29. Is the task-to-oojec;No correlation included? l t
Form No. NT-6000-1 Page 2 of 2 Rev.No. O
Attachment E (Page 12 of.12). i l ! 5 6 b
. ,I e
~3
=* # h c '
1 2 i i { H
' Z l {,i Q
c 3 I $ Z. ' o E- I ( 3
- w. j l
1 2e ! i 3
- 3 3' J i d '
zd ) 92 ' 18a gs. ll: e I i, !j i d I - l E l ' l l s
.= -l g flO
> i 1
a_ o. Z l w I 2 U W 2 l e Jll1 0 3 E 8 N o 1 f ) ,
, I O
, 1
l ATTACHMENT F I (Seabrook Nuclear Training Procedure NT-7000, Implementation of Training)
.I
._ ~ I Attachment F (Page 1 of 11) l cfc.ABROo i
ur + . Y l N- ws /y I q j$ D i
'N/No GB SEABROOK NUCLEAR TRAINING PROGDURE faentificatior:
Number NT-7000 Revision 0 - Title IMPLEMENTATION OF TRAINING Originator Roy E. Hickok Revised by i Approval and Implementation The attached procedure is hereoy approved and effective on the date below. I }
^~.m i M W N Training Group Manager Appro'ved Date
}
. ~ . 3 j
\
l
Attachrent'F,(Pago 2 of 11)' Procedure No. NT-7000 Page 01 of 10 Revision No. O IMPLEMENTATION'OF TRAINING TABLE OF CONTENTS Section Title Page j 1 1.0 PURPOSE 3 2.0 APPLICABILITY 3'-
3.0 REFERENCES
3 4.0 DEFINITIONS 3-5.0 RESPONSIBILITIES 3 6.0 INSTRUCTIONS .1 6.1 Implementation of Training 4 6.2 Preparations for Training 4 6.3 Selection of Students 5 6.4 Presentation of Training . 5 6.5 Evaluation of Student Performance ~ 6-6.6 Training Records 6' 6.7 Training Evaluation 6 7.0 ATTACHMENTS 6 i 7 l 8.0 FORMS 1 j ) i l l
Attachment F-(Page'3 of.11)- Procedure No. NT-7000 Page 02 'of 10
. Revision No. 0 -
IMPLEMENTATION OF TRAINING LIST OF EFFECTIVE PAGES , Page Effective Revisioni 1 0
-2 0~
3 0 4 0 5 0 6 0 1 7 0 8 0 9- 0 10 0 l ) J I
~
Attachment F'(Page 4 of'11)
. Procedure No. NT-7000 Page 03 of 10 Revision No. 0 1.0 PURPOSE This crocedure provides directions for implementing the training outlined in a train-ing program description.
2.0 - APPUCABILITY This procedure applies to all training programs conoucted by the Seabrook Training Grou p.
3.0 REFERENCES
3.1 INPO 85-006 Principles of Training System Development 3.2 INPO 85-006 (Succlement), Principles of Training System Development Suople-ment 33 Seabrook Training Group Procedure NT-1020. Operations Training Deoartment Training Records 3.4 Seabrook Training Group Proceoure NT-2000. Instructor Qualification l I 3.5 Seabrook Training Group Procedure NT-2010, Academic Performance Review 3.6 Seabrook Training Group Procedure NT-5000 Training Design l 3.7 Seabrook Training Group Procedure NT-5020. Job Performance Measures 3.8 Seabrook Training Group Procedure NT-5700, Simulator Examinations 3.9 Seabrook Training Group Procedure NT-6000, Instructor Guides 3.10 Seabrook Training Group Procedure NT-7010. Examination Administration and integrity l 4.0 DEFINITIONS j 1 4.1 Frequency Distribution , The number of times that various ratings or responses appear dt. ring survey or test. 4.2 Pre-test A test adml.ilstered to all students before beginning a course to confirm that each student 13 Qualified to enter the training. A pretest is also used to identify remedial training requirements and to identify areas that require special I emphasis in the training. 4.3 Program Description A training plan created during the design phase of the Training System Develop-ment process.
-Attachment-F (Page 5 of 11)
Procedure No. NT-7000 Page 04 of io <
- Revision No. 0 5.0 RESPONSIBlUTIES .
5.1 - Curriculum Advisory Committe9 Approves deviations from the' program description. 5.2 Training Department Manager Coordinates 'with NHY ' department managers to schedule training and select students to attend. 5.3 NHY Manager / Supervisor Identifies individuals within the department who require training and ensures that they attend training when seneauled. 5.4 Training Supervisor Assigns instructors to deliver training. Oversees training preparations, conducts instructor observations. and ensures.tnat materials necessary for evaluation .
' of training effectiveness are compiled.
5.5 instructor Prepares for and conducts training, evaluates student performance, and main-tains training recorcs. 6.0 INS 1 RUCTIONS 5.1 Implementation of Training 6.1.1 Trr.ning shall be implemented as specified in the training program ' description developed in the design phase of the Training System Development process (see procedure NT-5000 Training Design.) 6.1.2 Deviations from the program description require the approval of the Curriculum Advisory Committee. Any such deviations shall be docu-mented.
- j. 6.2 Preparations for Training 6.2.1 The Training Supervisor shall assign the instructors to deliver the training.
l 6.2.1.1 The assigned instructors shall be qualified for the level of training they are to present. 6.2.1.2 The Training Supervisor shall ensure that instructors have sufficient preparation time to f amiliarize themselves with the material to be covered and to verify that the instructor guides are complete and up to date.
Attachm nt F (Paga 6 of 11) J t Procedure No. NT-7000 Page 05 of 10 Revision No. O J l 6.2.2 The Training Supervisor or a designated instructor shall ensure that necessary training factlities are scheduled and required equipment and I training materials are available. 6.3 Selection of Students ] 6.3.1 The Training Department Manager coordinates with the appropriate NHY l department managers / supervisors to select students to atteno training. J 6.3.2 A pre-test may be administered to measure the students' entry level knowledge and skills ano to ensure that they meet any prerequisites for the course. 6.4 Presentation of Training 6.4.1 Instructors should provide students with a written list of objectives 1 for eacn lesson taugnt. 6.4 2 Instructors snould deliver lessons as outlined in the approved instructor guides. 6.4.3 At appropriate intervals during the conduct of training, students shall be reouested to fill out form NT-7000-1 Student Evaluation of Training. 6.4.3.1 The instructor should fill in the lesson identification infor-mation at the top of page 1 before distributing the form to tne students. 6.4 3.2 The instructor shall review the students' recommendations, pro-vide written responses to comments, on page 3 of the form. and i forward the form to the next reviewer. 6.4 3.3 The Training Supervisor should determine whether any sugges-ted improvements in training can be implemented immediately. Suggestions that cannot be implemented immediately should be considered during the -program evaluation after the training has been completed. 6.4 4 At appropriate intervals during the conduct of training, instructors shall shall be observed in accordance with procedure NT-2000, instructor Qualification. . 6.4.4.1 The instructor and the Training Supervisor shall review the I observer's recommendations and determine whether suggested I improvements can be implemented immediately. 6.4.4.2 Recommendations resulting from instructor observations should be considered during the program evaluation after the l training has been completed.
Attachment F (Pago 7 of 11) Procedure No. NT-7000 Page 06 of 10 Revision No. 0 6.5 Evaluation of Student Performance J 6.5.1 Student performance shall be evaluated regularly as specified in the program description. Examinations ano other measures of performance shall be administered in accordance with the following procedures: NT-7010. Examination Administration and Integrity: NT-5020. JoD ; Performance Measures: and NT-5700. Simulator Examinations. 6.5.2 Unacceptable performance by students. as defined by the program de scription, shall require implementation of procedure NT-2010. Academic Performance Review. 6.5.3 The instructor or evaluator shall consolidate test performance data as recuired for use in evaluating the effectiveness of training. Test performance data typically consists of frequency distribution of scores on inoividual test items. 6.6 Training Records 6.6.1 The instructor shall document tne training in accordence with the requirements of the program description and the applicaDie training recoras proceoure. 6.6.2 The instructor shall use the ' Update' section of the instructor guide to recommend changes in training materials or presentation or to reflect changes identified during the presentation of the training. 6.7 Training Evaluttion After a training program, course, or phase has been completed the Training Supervisor shall ensure that the materials required to conduct an evaluation of training effectiveness have been compiled. Procedure NT-8000. Evaluation of Training Effectiveness, provides guidelines for conducting an evaluation. 7.0 ATTACHMENTS None i l
I.- ~ Attachment F (Page 8 of 11) i I Procedure No. NT-7000 Page 07 of 10 Revision No. 0 8.0 FORMS I UST OF ASSOCIATEO FORMS Form Numoer Title Effective Revision NT-7000-1 Student Evaluation of Training 0 I . I I - I I . I I-I I I I I I
~
Attachmsnt F (Page 9 of 11) Procedure No. NT-7000 Page 08 of 10 Revision No. 0 l STUDENT EVALUATION OF TRAINING LESSON IDENTIFICATION l Program. Course, and Phase Title (s): I Lesson Title (s) Instructor (s) 1 Date(s) of Presentation: PURPOSE and INSTRUCTIONS The purpose of this form is to obtain an assessment of training you have completed. Your evaluation and comments will help us to ensure continous quality and effectiveness of training. Please respond to the statements below by checking the appropriate box and by' , providing additional comments of training on page 2. Additional sheets may be attacned as necessary. Please include your name on the form: tnis enaDies tne staff to contact you if any comments are not thorougnty understood. Name Oste __ ASSESSMENT ITEMS ' Always $m,l* Never N/A
- 1. Objectives were clearly written and relevant.
- 2. Instruction supported objectives and was job l relevant.
~
- 3. Presentation sequence and pace was logical and l l appropriate.
- 4. Visuals and board materials were clear and l l l Supported objectives.
- 5. Handouts and texts were clear, relevant.
and supported objectives. l 6. Instructor was adequately prepared for material presented.
- 7. Instructor encouraged student participation. j
- 8. Koy, complex material was summarized and objectives were reviewed.
- 9. Exams and quizzes tested objective!/.
- 10. Exams and quizzes graded objectively.
- 11. Sites for training, practice and study were acceptable.
- 12. Instruction provided will likely improve job performance
- co_e_ on ,b. ..ove ,, ems e,. on ..g. z ; = r a.e y fy
Attachment F (Paga 10 of 11) Procedure No. NT-7000 Page 09 of 10 Revision No. O STUDENT EVALUATION OF TRAINING . Item No. Student's Comments and Recommendations i
.l' Additional Sheets Attached (Circle) Yes No Form No. NT-7000-1 Page 2 of 3
) Rev.No. 0 , J I
~
I_ Attachment F (Page 11 of 11) l Procedure No. NT-7000 Page 10 of 10 Revision No. O INSTRUCTIONAL DEVELOPMENT REVIEW ltem No. Instructor's/ Reviewers' Comments and Suggested Actions I ' I , ,I I I
- I i
lI l lI !l I instructor Other Reviewer Date Date Date Training Supervisor Date Training Department Manager Form No.NT-7000-1 Page 3 of 3 Rev.No. O
ATTACHMENT G (Seabrook Nuclear Training Procedure NT-8000, Evaluation of Training Effectiveness) l i f
?
- )
! I l l / I i i )
~
. ?.
Attachment G (Page 1 of 14) ggBRo o i j WA /y
'9 \
4'N/NG G SEABROOK NUCLEAR TRAINING PROCEDURE i
> I Identification Numcer NT-8000 Revision 0 -
Title EVALUATION OF TRAINING EFFECTIVENESS Originator Rov E. Hickok Revised by Approval and Implementation I ) The attached procedure is hereby approved and effective on the date below.
~
Ah i Training Group Manager Approved Oate t
.... = . ~ r . i ooe . ,
a .w. 3
n t Attachment G (Page 2 of 14) , l Procedure No. NT-8000 Page 01 of 13 l
, ' Revision No. O !
EVALUATION OF TRAINING EFFECTIVENESS TABLE OF CONTENTS Section Title Page 1.0 . PURPOSE 3 2.0 . APPLICABILITY 3
3.0 REFERENCES
3 1 4.0 DEFINITIONS 3 5.0 RESPONSIBILITIES 3 6.0 INSTRUCTIONS 4 ! 6.1 Monitoring Training Effectiveness 4 6.2 Conducting Training Evaluation Surveys 4 6.3 Evaluation Meetings 5 6.4 Analyzing Training Effectiveness 5 6.5 Implementing Training improvements 6 70 ATTACHMENTS 6 8.0 FORMS. 7
?
I 1 l j l
Attachment G (Page 3 of 14) i 1 Procedure No. NT-8000 Page 02 of 13 Revision No. O o, EVALUATION OF TRAINING EFFECTIVENESS UST OF EFFECTIVE PAGES Page Effective Revision 1 0 2 0 3 0 4 0 5 0-6 0 7 0 8 0 9 0 10 0 11 0 r 12 0 r- 13 0 I b l
~
Attachment G (Page 4 of 14)
- Procedure No. NT-8000 Page 03 of 13 Revision No. 0 1.0 PURPOSE This procedure provides directions for evaluating the effectiveness of training and identifying improvements to be made in future presentations of L course or program.
2.0 APPLICABILITY This procedure applies to all training conducted by the Seabrook Training Group.
3.0 REFERENCES
3.1 INPO 85-006. Pnnciples of Training System Development 3.2 ' INPO 85-006 (Supplement), Principles of Training System Development Supple-ment 3.3 SeaorooK Training Group Procedure NT-2000, instructor Qualification 3.3 Seabrook Training Group Procedure NT-4000. Training Development Recom-menoations 3.4 Seabrook Training Group Procedure NT-7000, implementation of Training 4.0 DEFINITIONS 4.1 Training Evaluation Report Document in wnich information used to measure training effectiveness is I compiled and analyzed for presentation to the Curriculum Advisory Committee. 5.0 RESPONSIBluTIES 5.1 Curriculum Advisory Committee (CAC) Reviews recommendations resulting from training evaluations and approves revisions to training programs. 5.2 Training Department Manager r Reviews training evaluation reports and makes recommendations to the CAC 5.3 Training Supervisor Conducts or supervises training evaluations and the preparation of training evaluation reports.
Attachment G (Page'51of 14):
; Prtcoduro No. NT-8000 PJg3 04 of 13.
Revision No.- 0 l 6.0 INSTRUCTIONS . 6.1 Monitonng Training Effectiveness 6,1.1 The Training Suoervisor shall ensure that information necessary to . evaluate' training effectiveness is collected by instructors wnen the ! training is implemented, as specified in procedure NT-7000 implemen- ., tation of Training. This information -includes Student'. Evaluation of. Training forms (form NT-7000-1). test performance data, and instructors recommendations and comments recorded in the ' Update ~'section of the instructor guides. 6.1.2 Instructor Observation Reports Instructor observation reports completed by the Training Manager. the Training Suoervisor, and the instructor development staff may also oro-vice useful information for tne training evaluation. The process for conoucting ano documenting instructor observations is coscribea in pro-cedure NT-2000, instructor Qualification.
. 6.1.3 ' The training development recommendation (TOR) process provides addi-.
tional information that snould be considered during an evaluation of training effectiveness. This process is described in procedure NT-4000. Training Development Recommendations. Among the indicators mons-tored through TDRs are the following: o industry and plant operating and maintenance experiences. o Audit findings. o Changes in regulations. plant eouipment, and proceoures. o NRC ano INPO publications. o Recommendations from NHY employees. 6.1.4 Improvements in training identified through the mechanisms'discussea above snould be implemented as soon as possible. Some improvements . I can be implemented immediately; others require review and approval by the CAC. Suggestions that cannot be implemented immediately shall be considered during the training evaluation following the completion of tne course or program. 6.2 Conducting Training Evaluation Surveys After the completion of a course or program, The Training Supervisor shall solicit feedback from the supervisors of the newly-trained employees and from the trainees themselves. / 6.2.1.1 Form NT-8000-1. Supervisor's Evaluation of Training Effec-tiveness, should be used to record feedback from supervisors. )
asscosasaw w guege w eux ewv - Prccedure.ND. NT-8000 Pags 05 cf 13 Revision No. 0 6.2.12 ' Form NT _8000-2, Trainee's Evaluation of Training Effectiveness) l should be used to record feeaback from trainees. 'l 6.2.2 Training evaluation surveys should be conducted after the trainees have - l been on the.100 long enough to become familiarawith the actual joo i requirements and after their supervisors have had an opportunity to observe their performance. 6.2.2.1 The preferred method for obtaining evaluations is by means of an interview conducted by the Training Supervisor or an assign-ed instructor. 6.2.2.2 A less desirable alternative is. to mail the evaluation forms to the trainees and supervisors. If this method is ' used. follow-up interviews should be conducted. 6 2.3 It may not de oossible to conduct tne evaluation surveys before the course or orogram is repeated. However, the survey results should be inciuoed as part of a training evaluation wnen they cecome available, and - any improvements in training identified tnrough the surveys should be - ~i implemented as soon as possible. 6.3 Evaluation Meetings-Following the conclusion of a course or program, the Training Supervisor l may conduct an evaluation meeting with the instructors wno participated in the training The object of this meeting should be to identify any probisms with - the training and make specifle recommendations for improvements. Any rec-ommenoations snould be recoroed and included is the training evaluation report. 6.4 ' Analyzing Training Effectiveasss 6.4.1 The Training Suoervisor or his designes shall analyze the data compiled' in sections 6.1,6.2. and 6.3. The analysis should focus on finding spe-cific tasks or training areas in which refinements seem necessacy. It snould also address problems that cannot be corrected through cnanges , in training content or presentation (a need for improved facillities for p example). 6.4.2 The individual responsible for conducting the analysis _ shall prepare l_ a traming eveluation report to be submitted to the.Trairung Department ( Manager and the CAC. A sample of an evalaation report will be provided by the Training Supervisor, s L 6.4.3 All observations about the training, both pro and con, shall be summarized I in the report. [ G.4.4 The CAC shall review the recort and responu to all r6 commendations, ) whether they are accepted, rejected, or deferred. i 6.4.5 A cooy of the training evaluation report shall be filed with the training for the course or program. Actions taken by the CAC in response to the report shall be recorded in the CAC minutes. } I4
Attachment G (Page.7 of 14) Proceduro No. NT-8000 Pag 3 06 of 13-Revision No. 0 6.5 implementing Training' improvements if training has proven to be _ fully effective as is then no corrective action .) neecs to ce taken. If the training evaluation indicates that improvement can De realized througn changes in the training, then steos'to make the necessary changes snall be initiated at the appropriate stages of the TSD process. 7.0 ATTACHMENTS
' None f -4 1
i 1 \; }
Attachment G.(Page 8 of 14)' I I Prsceduro No. NT-8000 Page 07 et 13 Revision No. 0 ) l 8.0 FORMS-LIST OF ASSOCIATED FORMS Form Numcer Title Effective Revision - NT-8000-1 Suoervisor's Evaluation of Training 0 Effectiveness NT-8000-2 Trainee's Evaluation of Training o Effectiveness l l ( l l. f f [ l ;
Attachment G (Page 9 of 14) Prscedure No. NT-8000 Page 08 of 13 Revision No. 0 SUPERVISOR'S EVALUATION OF TRAINING EFFECTIVENESS i TRAINING GROUP PROGRAM / COURSE PHASE LESSON ATTENDEE S DATE(S)
- 1. How well do trainees perform on the job compareo to experienced emoloyees?
I i
- 2. What tasks were newly trained employees best preDared to perform?
I For which tasks were they inaceouately prepared?
- 3. Are new trainees aole to ciagnose conditions and identify alternate solutions for accomolisning a task?
- 4. What kinds of errors have employees committed?
) h ? 1 Form No. NT-8000-1 Page 1 of 3 Rev.No. O
Attachment G (Page 10 of 14) Proceduro No. NT-8000 Pago 09 of 13 Revision No. O SUPERVISOR'S EVALUATION OF TRAINING EFFECTIVENESS (Continued)
- 5. Whien tasks require excessive time for trainees to complete?
- 6. How do recent trainees compare to.those who received earlier training?
' 7. What additional training nave they received since they were assigned joo responsibilities.
- 8. Have trainee errors caused equipment damage or failure?
Has rework by maintenance personnel been required due to personnel errors or lack of adequate training?
- 9. Have employees been commended or warned for unusually good or bad job performances?
)
- 10. Have you observed unexpected results from training?
I 1 I l ) ) Form No. NT-8000-1 Page 2 of 3 ) Rev.No. 0
Attachment-G'(Page 11 of 14)
\
t Proceduro No. NT-8000 Pego 10 of 13 Revision No. 0 SUPERVISOR'S EVALUATION OF TRAINING EFFECTIVENESS. (Continuso)
' 11. Has training createo any new problems?
I
- 12. What suggestions would you make to -improve . initial or centinuing. . training?
- 13. Do you expect any changes in lob assignments or equipment that will reauire additional
~
training or enanges in current training?
- 14. What current training do you consider to be excessive or unnecessary?
- 15. Other comments:
1 I l 1 L- -I 1 Supervisor Date Review (Team Leader) (Training Supervisor) (Training Center Manager) Form No.NT-8000-1 Page 3 of 3 Rev.No. O
~
Attachannt G (Page 12 of 14) l Proceduro No. NT-8000 Page 11 of 13 Revision No. 0 ) { TRAINEE'S EVALUATION OF TRAINING EF5ECTIVENESS , l I TRAINING GROUP l PROGRAM /CO UP.S E PHASE-LESSON } ATTENDEES > DATE(S)
- 1. What additional training have you received since being assigned to your job?
- 2. What unexoected difficulties or problems in job performance have you experienced?
)
- 3. Has your supervisor given you instructions diMarent from those you learned during training?
i l What were they? I Ha've you noticed other differences between the training you received and what is expected of you now? ) ) Form No.NT-8000-2 Page 1 of 3 Rev.No. 0
Attachment G (Page 13 cf 14) Procedure No. NT-8000 Page 12 of 13 Revision No. 0 l TRAINEE'S EVALUATION OF TRAINING EFFECT!VENESS' (Continueo)
- 4. Have enanges occurred in your 100 since you were assigneo?
l 1
'I
- 5. What tasks do you find easiest? i
)
i
- 6. Which tasks do you find esDecially challenging?
i
- 7. Looking back. what specific training benefited you most?
- 8. What kinds of errors have been committed on the job? !
- 9. How could training nave better prepared you for your job?
I
- 10. What suggestions would you make to improve training?
l t
- 11. What additional training do you need for your job?
f l I [
\
l Form No. NT-8000-2 Page 2 of 3 Rev.No. 0
Attachmnnt G (Page 14 of 14) i Pr:ceduro No. NT-8000 Page 13 c.f 13 Revision No. :3 TRAINEE *S EVALUATION OF TRAINING EFFECTIVENESS (Continueo)
- 12. Other comments: ,
l 1 e i l i I h Trainee (optional) Date f Review (Team Leader) (Training Supervisor) . (Training Center Manager) l Form No. NT-8000-j Page 3 of 3 Rev.No. 0 l
l l l l l l ATTACHMENT H (Summary of Issues and Recommendations Extracted ; From the FEMA Final Exercise Report for the June 1988 Graded Exercise Which Pertain to NHY ORO Training) i
?
1 I l i I i 1 ) .
. l
Attachment H (Paga 1 of 6)' Summary of Issues and Recommendations Which Pertain to NHY ORO Training.
. Extracted From the FEMA Exercise Report for the June. 1988 Graded E.5ercise Objective s3: Demonstrate the ability to direct. coordinate and control emergency activities.
Evaluation: Met. Issue sl: Direction of Activities at the Staging Area. ARCA (REP-1 Supplement 1. A.1.d) i Evaluation: There was a delay at the Staging Area in responding to an impediment to evacuation traffic. ;
., Recommendation: Review and revise. If appropriate, the Staging Area Leader's Action Check Off List with regard to the impor-tance of making certain that immediate response is initiated for situations that are interfering with the flow of evacuation traffic. Review and revise. if appropriate. the training ,
module / program for Staging Area with regard to specific, 1 guidance on handling traf fic impediments. Train Staff. Objective s4: Demonstrate the ability to communicate with all appropriate locations, organizations and field personnel. Evaluation: Met. Issue sl: Field Communication: Radio Protocol and System Coverage. ARCA (REP-1 Supplement 1. F) Evaluation: In some instances, directives to field workers were not received in the field. In part. this was due to the ranges of the radios and in part due to heavy radio traffic. Recommendation: Review and revise Attachment 5 of IP 1.4 to include roll-call process or other means to insure appropriate communications are complete. Repair EMS radio. The range of f radio coverage should be enhanced. If appropriate. Train staff. Objective #5: Demonstrate the adecuacy of facilities, equipment, displays and other materials to support emergency operations.
~ =
Evaluation: Met. ~ Issue #1: Adequate Displays: Media Center. ARCA (REP-1 Supplement 1. G.3.a) i Evaluation: Status boards were not available in the Media Center staff work area. L/1140SS.B
Attachment H'(Page 2 of 6) Page 2 1 Recommendation: Develop appropriate displays to support Media l Center operations. Train staff on use and maintenance of I displays. Objective s6: Demonstrate the ability to continuously monitor and control Emergency Worker exposure. I Evaluation: Met.
]
( Issue s1: Exposure Control: Frequency of Dosimeter Reading. ARCA (REP-1 Supplement 1. K.3.a & b) l Evaluation: The reading of dosimeters at 15 minute intervals l was not accomplished in a minority of cases. In spite of the'15 minute radio tone to promote dosimeter reading. This was a more frequent problem for the drivers of vehicles. Recommendation: Emergency workers should be trained to read dosimeters every 15 minutes. Training program should include the recognition of the radio tone as a reminder to read and j record exposure. Route Guides should be trained to provide i assistance to bus drivers in reading and recording / logging dosimeter readings. Objective s13: Demonstrate the ability to coordinate the formulation and , dissemination of accurate information and instructions to the ' public in a timely fashion after the initial alert and notifi- j cation has occurred. Evaluation: Met. Issue sl: Adequate Instructions. ARCA (REP-1 Supplement 1. E.5. G.4.b). Evaluation: One of the EBS messages contained some incon-sistencies. One of the news releases contained an error. Recommendation: Train staff to review instructions (EBS messages and information (press releases) for consistency and I accuracy. Drafters and reviewers of this information should give attention to detail and possible misinterpretations. Issue *2: Distribution of Instruction and Information. ARCA (REP-1 h Supplement 1., E.4. G.4.b).' Evaluation: EBS messages and press releases were sometimes withheld from distribution to the media relations and rumor control staf f at the JTIC pending receipt of approved copy as a l news releases form the Media Center. L/1140SS.B1 1 ___
Attachment H (Page 3 of 6) l l Page 3 Recommendation: Revise Procedures and Train Staff. An expe-dited process should be followeo for distribution of approved EBS messages and press releases to the JTIC. They should be reproduced and distributed as soon as copy is brought over from the NKY ORO EOC. Once the messages and releases have been finalized and authorized by the NHY ORO Director, they should be made available for dissemination without going through the Media Center. Issue a3: Dissemination of Instructions. ARFI (REP-1 Supplement 1. G.4.b). Evaluation: At the Media Center and at the JTIC. It was not l always easy to tell which releases were EBS messages and which l weren't. EBS messages should be sent to the Media Center and l the JTIC on a distinct letterhead for easy identification. This was done in some, but not all, cases during the exercise. Recommendation: Train staff to utilize correct letterhead. Objective *16: Demonstrate the ability to make the decision to recommend the use of KI to Emergency Workers and institutionalized persons, based on predetermined criteria, as well as to distribute and administer it once the decision is made. if necessitated by radiolodine releases. Evaluation: Met. Issue al: KI Instruction: ARCA (REP-1 Supplement 1. J.10.,f) l Eva 3.ua tion : Some briefings by dosimetry recordkeepers to erergency workers did not include possible side effects from lagesting KI. or what to do if side effects occur. Information materials provided to the homebound individuals did not include this information. Recommendation: Train staff on adequate KI Briefings. Revise procedures on distribution of KI instructions. Issue s2: KI Administration. ARCA (REP-01 Supplement 1. J.10.f). Evaluation: Some Route Guldes assigned to school evacuation did not tell their bus drivers (2 of 4) that the use of KI had been recommended. nor did they tall the bus drivers that they had simulated taking KI. Recommendation: Train staff on responsibilities for exposure control /KI administration. All Route Guides should advise their drivers of all appropriate protective action recommen-dations for exposure control. L/1140SS.B2 I
Attachment H (Page 4 of 6) Page 4 I Objective *18: Demonstrate the ability and resources necessary to implement appropriate Protective Actions for the impacted permanent and! transient plume EPZ population (including transit-dependent persons. special needs populations, handicapped persons and institutionalized persons!. Evaluation: Met. Issue s1: Adequacy of Maps. ARCA (REP-1 Supplement 1. J.10.d) Evaluation: Some Route Guides encountered difficulty in I reading their maps. The main problem seems to be a lack of detail on the maps. Five of 38 addresses for the Hearing Impaired individuals could not be located. Recommendation: Maps should be reviewed and revisec. as appropriate, to include highlighting of routes and' pertinent addresses and locations. Train staff. Cbjective s19: Demonstrate the ability and resources necessary to implement I appropriate Protective Actions for school children within the plume EPZ. Evaluation: Met. Issue si: Instructions for Bus Drivers and Route Guides. ARCA (REP-1 Supplement 1. J.10.g) Evaluation: Some Route Guides did not insist that the bus dri-vers follow.the designated routes. Other Route Guides gave directions to Bus Drivers to deviate from designated routes. Recommendation: Review and revise procedures (Attachment 4 and 5 of IP 2.10) to clearly indicate that Route Guides and Bus I Drivers should follow designated routes. Provide additional training to Route Guides on their responsibilities for insuring that designated routes are followed. Train Route Guides and drivers on responsibilities.
~
Objective s22: Demonstrate the adequacy of facilities, equipment and personnel for congregate care of evacuees. t Evaluation: Met.
- t
]
I l Issue *1: Assignment of Handicapped Persons to Congregate Care Centers. ) ARCA (REP-1 Supplement 1, J.10.h) I Evaluation: The database for Congregate Care Centers (CCCs) and the current procedure does not indicate which CCCs cannot accommodate handicapped persons who evacuate by themselves or with families or friends. I
Attachment H '(Page 5 of'.' 6) 4.
'l .
Page 5. l Recommendation: Review and revise.(annotated) the Congregate P Care Center database (Appendix M) as-appropriate. Review and j revise Attacnment 1 of Procedure IP 1-6 so that. Reception Center Leaders are informed about specific Congregate Care l Centers that do not have the facilities to handle handicapped [ persons. Train staff.
]
Objective 823: Demonstrate the adequacy.of vehicles, equipment.' procedures and personnel for transporting contaminated. Injured or exposed individuals. Evaluation: Met. Issue sl: Contaminated Control for Ambulance Attendants. ARCA (REP-1 Supplement 1. L.4) , Evaluation: Ambulance attenaants need additional hands-on training on the procedures for contamination control. Recommendation: Provide training. Objective 824: Demonstrate the adequacy *of medical facilities equipment, pro-cedures and personnel for-handling contaminated. injured or exposed individuals. Evaluation: Met. Issue al: Contamination Control: Understanding the effects of radiation and results of radiological monitoring. ARCA (REP-1 Supplement
- 1. L.1)
Evaluation: Medical and nursing staff members did not fully understand the biological effects of radiation and the signifi-cance of counts per minute, contamination, and millires per hour dose rate. Recommendation: Provide additional training as stated above. Objective s25: Demonstrate the adequacy of facilities, equipment. supplies. procedures and personnel for decontamination of Emergency Workers. equipment and vehicles and for waste disposal.
~
\. ' f Evaluation: Met. Issue at: Exposure Control: Frequency of Dosimetry Monitoring. ARFI (REP-1 Supplement 1, K.t.a.1.b) Evaluation: EWF personnel honitors did not read dosimetry and check themselves for contamination at frequent intervals. i l j L/1140SS.B4
' Attachment'H (Pago 6 of 6)
Page 6 Recommendation: Train staff. The Monitoring / Decontamination-- Leaders in the EWF should instruct personnel monitors to read dosimetry and check themselves for contamination at frequent intervals. e O 4 M
) ,
) L/1140SS.B5
.- .h L N.
r, 4 ATTACHMENT I (Letter form George R. Gram (NHY) to Richard W. Donovan (FEMA RAC Chairman) Dated August'18, 1988 Providing NHY Proposed Resolution of Each Training' Issue Raised by the
. Exercise. Report and a Sc h edu l e for Implementation) j L
[ y e _.__2__.__.________.__..___ __
Attachmnnt I (Pag 3L1 of 8) ..
'I.JI BL @i !ll Public Semce of New Hampsnife l New r.amosnee 4. nee Division f1 i
Augus; 13, 1928 l Richarc W. Donovan RAC Chairman for Seabrock Nuclear Pcwer Plant Exercise Feceral Emergency Management Agency Federal Reg 1onal Center Botnell, Wasning::n 95021-9796 Cear Mr. ::novan: Encicsec is'the NHY CR0 technical assistance response to the craft reocr: Of t.e June 1998 Feceral Gracec Exercise f:r the SeacrocX Nuclear > Power Plant catec August 2.1988 anc preparea by the Federal Emergency Management Agency, Region 1. The response provides NHY ORO's plan to resolve issues identified in the report and an intenced e:mpletion schecule. Thank you f:r your continued assistance. Sincerely, o b ge R. ra, h g cutive Director of Emergency Preparedness and Community Relations ) Enclosure i . GRG: sis
]
cc: Mr. William Lazarus, NRC RegiorCI f p.o.eox300.s.. ,oox.usoss7a.r.i.onen.<eosi47a..s7, )
jl!llj ;)l j
#ty0$@t r r y _ft$S
' o o" 5, t
d s _. d e e e' t u t e e l a' i l u" _ l p a a l p c d - m i n 9 e - m T o n 8 _co o C t C l 9 A / a8 0
- n et y ' g.P ing s
ui 19 : t e3 xl / y min /i E : e pl i sn N . n . ec6 O c A - c N y K ii nnt NT o C ucnaa qa al e OS a u e r :
- t gn c EFHPT _ I E. P : l P :
gc gnt n Tf & nid p ===== E. l &8 ny na I m EFHPT I P/ H s/ H l iC e sR niR i ME n1 l g nNi a OT a/ an a/arS
/
A =_ CA l 8 a I l 6 rTM .- - I I P T P T E N e r . 8 8 i I H h ' l f 8 8 s V / / O / O 1 R 1 p R D I R 1 O 1 m P R I
- a l' O / O / /
A l 8' 8 l H i a e e s v nw - e- a ,g y s t r g - b u e o Oi e a ce n rR aN - e l em.o t c l ae m tk i c~ kl cl oeil pt osl y pO l a nh n er e. nt t i anaeth rh ai p-l
=
i it ~t sd h e i p I een A 0l l l ll a A ee1 l r ce l hi ,b al C i aiI l . ag at n 'l e v i y (' ,nt l at i , er m i
.e tah ;a x np o e al r e ,I cr l a r l i d r nl r x I
o f. . I i wnT e oS s ol e t iit e n _i h t t h yr wuenif t e oesd sl ao E n
- 8. t s s t
_ A r n I. yd u t N i
& i ouuy a t b t at or n St ga n. esl I
K ni mmnt .n 2 a sf I d r n ut nscaid t e C eosnn t moat i t r d oai l at d oeel t ov A h cseesil un PI l. r eoadi s ah aeC gB u a. f nn s a mio-a e. me c ed I oht r ed sd vt I R E t t sues T .V & i d i nt r uvid eaa me ypc f npt sycrcd e t aee . e 1 eah s . sneyr it ,- I N t o regct e) anl o TO ad t seuut edi . oaiaeve eil N a md si eve i pS pvapS nvc ena mdl gon E0 CI h n siexM oy his sn el r oec S1 ET t a yh A ns1 pol 6 m RC mt , e amr c onit l eE erc t msaier eos It RA emit ny o i py t cod c I h p r r ew htC I nn Cl I. R1 O r ol nir ot n c n i e . e . T g e i em eertt al smin e oa E0 C uct a at ice est ersh s en f t ef npesonet e s i t 2 s e i bl mual ir e . hi XS l sd sef a dH t cd eoid n rd oiarnrol at EE nst s i e h peat pb t n R enxi3 eensf l u n ci k t cel i t sgc i rnsoni ies ct oial n eeah er nxl a l 8 oal sP eaprri n mhveh oseiir f aoaf wt oerea 8T Ttf aI ngsat wa AtEVt wigf wt A wl mo( Crpmm 9R 1 O I P i EE a NR l e t l Y r o s I. R A n o e A e g n N gt n r a o l i it e sei sl t t gn w ae eia l. I E t m s mmc Si r i i R d e esn P ee k ncu . hp r i amC t m o . tf mO i wdl u oE t oeC an . d e rh O E ac li t eR l i y i ef f hO S aof i ot t S l t f e a
,f h
e I
- sgd.ai nH Y
I N d gr ot nt t oeh ai ni l vt e~ d n si krih sno e cewt aoi vd as wpt ie bb nn sa t v ooi i eeu ci e i _
.' rrc -
ee . get a rrae e a rc aet r hnv ie - Tie Dr LwsA _ _ E
)
e e v v e 2 x C . v 1 i 1
# i # _
N O i # ETN t t c e t c e _ RR EOM FPE EET Dj Rb3 e c e
, s e
n Oj,s Rb4 s e u Oj Rb4 s OO#I e ,s u - RRI OO#l OO#I ,- - . T . RO O P N. 0 7 2 5 7 2 _ 5 1
! l l l' fl ljlljl'(
ep1 i s n It n n . n Ki1 nni o _ A - A - c A - uc n i. a T : o n e r e t qa al r sroS e P : l eEFl PTt I E. e : l gc
- l gc gc s Tl t ny ny &8 n y gI p=
m
= = = =
EF HPT E. l I
* /
I ll oT i t E l l i t c iC i n an g i n ig an C s/n n1 a/a n 3 i i C g CA a ri ri l 8 rI D F T T P T e r M i h I 8 8 8 8
/
8 8
/
8 8
/
s V / p R O 1 o t 1 O R 1 1 O R I l m P R 1 Ml 1 t
- a P O / O / O / O /
ll A H 8 8 8 a e & v nu - n oOi e e l
- o osr n rR a lal- s e EA f l bd ad t - i i pol t i p- = ll r t n er n ot et 0P l so n l a r o d a r in r n l i
it y p e _ l t e pt p e e r p m _ is g c l. ey i C l. wr n i l gc 2 r& t G i u m v a n 1 t a v ps o _ ei o lf I s c _ gv n1 os e . s si . o nir n r st 2 i edd r K E C A i d t s i i r e a nd c pes mi P d ge ep aH v oe R E r? h i n y .e s I l s V e et s asor h un es e rb T r a ct eo f l eh p I N t d i ol mt pl N TO naf Tb e . l l c a s me l v al E EO SI CI er o ETC g R C p n eoet r t t d s u
.i er wro f 6 r r o a ot ew e i .
]T a os . t pf c l CI I. RA auo i go y n s ng c R1 O i t id ud o eas e on y C d et reg p nt t c E0 pd x i na m s s i c X S eb i f
,n E EE R
M l l i o oieoe r vt pougg nf e r i f t u aan c d sea nec eCi t ed ol I a x 8 l l s pr onn rt o c mir eT r e 8T l i e A v p r l. T n 9R A wr A prI i Ts ca 1 O E EE P ee t e r 1 it R ,rh u at en l na e ea r o T s et ei I. R nw n
- i mni e
m r o . l h ct wt g A o t urns E 1 ni ,a o i t msr sb oiw 1 ot s c 5 e t d l l i a ad 1 df t a e oes o eimd e sr unn r f t c eel y eoo v nt a o I. a or y al t h msi awh at r e e l ul a act as eoa r st c es ps t E c l i n it r wD a ekS l id a n e E R P ar gpge v ens ot d
. sl i p r pp s s w
s1 r9 5 u5 c/ ed nC r m aI yC T p et i i l s e ems oiu e# t - sosJ o a nnd oin t o t hB s rn c i ecn T g I d en r si a er ef oe d ecar on a mcie i a n r. o s sen r ihd e E E l l i np a o l oeot s e t cn i s ot st g
,o .f L
s ab o eem pd t t e M l a el t o v e i S t iy gHt a d o e n m ml uc d nh ear h S et b n om ns oi,e. S r el f i ah r p t I d a c nf i
.n d f
os cd a bI aid l B E sea df siaf t f p a, m E h ooeren t l it er a a gwf rr r n o aeo1 p eert . wnr ewia g d t f o r i et r t e y a seso f wr ah nwd is er h nu t gt t sem dl yt et s ,unC sy l e e aat ut n Orni sm eieop l t e s ps pi n a evinee f R eiu a E l aeo mt pdii p aol rrri mu eomiq oO vk g eY ! oci ob S mth ri
- et t e m nc l e
u ed t s et n s e B oooe e oors eii hni5 or n! nl m r N rouMdd Ti m1 df ON ab a Est cr E E C . e v 1 l e v 1 e v 1 i e v 2
# i #
N O i # i t t ETN t t c c ,eu RR c e c e e ,eu e EOM e u e u Ojl s E FPE0j EE" t l b5 s
,s Oj Rb6 s
,s Dj3 s Rb1 s OO# I Rbi s OOfI RPIOOf I OOI I T .
1 2 3 RO 0 E 0 N. 5 1 8 2 8 2 ~2 9 9 2
,l i' l> ,;l ! ,ifl
,llf tr 7oyM$" H ,,
2 y d a s o "' 3 e
- - _ n n
i n i i u'
- t. 9 o%
i a a r a r - e 8 t 5 r T T .
- c~ / T .
. t o H re 9 l 9 l9 ov a8 ny .g ) l 8 aR _
- et nr n / i o a9 u9 u9 .
y miu/i E t i rb u1 n1 9 n1 . _ e p1 l sn N P a i n n 8 n ._ K iI nni O i- A - / A - _ ucna a NT : : s A 0 t l r s. al r . OS s t n e e 3 e _ e EFl eT t I E. e eo : l gc
- l gc
/ : l gc s TI i et ny ny 6 _
p = = = - = E. I t h s ny _ m .l l f i S ariC iC iC 2Fl rT i P/ l ren n' : n ME i c oewig ig an s p i g an _ OT f poan ri - a CA ^ a nOP ri ri _ D F I T T H T e r _
.i t 8 8 8 8 h ' 8 l f 8 8 _
s V / / O / O / _ p R O 1 O I R 1 R 1 m P N 1 R l O 1 O 1
. a P U / O / / /
l l f A 8 8 8 8 _ a e v nw y . o Oi e - - - rR aN sg - s h gr g e n pO t t " i n/ d ai c nr n r i p- = l di s emd aie a . _ A0ii l e i r .t nm si ed _ t l t r sg n oI e. t t t t en syt e eo a af pn eA as o _ d r e aead G t n p s. mil b eTd l e l uc d t uv e h ri . N I ea e o l ae C n e col K C m ceit S o oI d ecrc C e ct w . t ecK arapy A ads aa e e t / r ie c R E i n H. . ihh . l d udl gs& e T V diI - erct) pe . oeo . pn hl I N ec s r pi 1 md s Rd r n uee a
.N TO i t ure aohheair rvni i t o eoil n sl u
. EO CI l os sp rwt r sve op ooot bt cin SI ET d a t u nwa f
I T RC el e ept wc rre oope f rca p r l yo C t. l RA sl ml i ae g et l rcgt RI O i i se l cd rf k ners nx EO C v wis pnl ep i e i a XS e n past I bd ih ui n s n wssnnn ,ie EE rsas u un r il oi seai R yh s sh nhetl o al pm pceae 8 eac e t ot h nl c rixd ael rh 8T hl er I i ir weie 9R , Tpmp Kwt t( mwr Twea HncTt 1 O P .l EE y NR s I a t t s l e I I. Y w c o l o h k R na d nmea - o t d c A et ef r odii h s a . a N ri v od ri r v c uf dh sl I e i s cif sei sb oi p ~ H wt gi ed t d d y aa l a h r sf an ore e d m i l sh at sti mi t i s rh e e E nt yrc euot rrb R o f t reeond s dh n ei P i you t kf d oni et e ,ta t eo t a o ert iuh n h nht cwsh moeot ot gl t dh ut u et iW t ab il et o s . r aii s e me setd cgms nnep _ ' E U t sho ucce u pw n o yd t r ed d cia omu ye nshf ol wdh c st ans . a so h erI tt meK mv eiea sa d sm - S l sl o bge 1 n en) oig eeme d reh, S 1 l g . rjr ei d 4 crn .. . - I nna t sebo ..h id edi t unb l t ai en gml i r t t uif r sa k Cion rb e nEa ,d o . gd o ' ro
~
nd o r i sI eonn nut eyp oef oa f ooK ct o en2 eb t t l i t t p et p o di t o( e d t ue p i g dit ui b ee ul ni - abl ea mibs rriag: ot sen rsensed a brdi td eut cisr e pl eevl o m ot s rard t a uea ecvhl u ht l ouia Rcat ef ime d f ssl i ni e c gf oaf mai l m mf e nioee oennf run ovrI ei oihf I d prb Skii e pd i S edKt s SdTo
. (
E e e e e C N o i v 1
# i v 1
#' i v 2 r
y t ETN t t t' c ,e c e e - RR EOM FPE EET Oj4 s Rb1 s c e , u i Oj6 s Rb1 s c e ,eu Oj6 s Rb1 s e u Oj8 o Rp} OO(y e ,u t JRI OO#I OO#I pO#I T . 4 RO 7 0 1 ! 9 0 0 . l. 4 p1 O P N. 1 1 1'
;('l IlI l
l epl t s n a t . n 1 l 8 . Kii ni o c A - / / c u c n n. ari _ iT t n 0 0 3 r o t q a i. l ni: i e 1 cEF l t PT I E. P : l / / P a T1 gc 6 6 p = = = = = E. 1 & n y &8 m I t t i C : I EF !
! PT P/ s n :
s s/ I E i g s n1 t in. a n p p a/ 0 T a CA l rI a l D P T l f M P e r i t 1 1 8 8 h ' 1 I 8 8 s V / / / p H o 1 o t 1 O R I O R m I' H l 1 l
- a P n / Ol / O / D l
l l A 1 1 8 8 a e v nu l o0i e 7 i e e rR al l l t - p0 a t - un r . r . p= I
=
l l 4 nc i ae ae A Ol l it e -nl i :.a t s y a t 1 mi c e r s y a ! _ a er _ nd t i ct aer G a nsit v u ,h u x
' I _
en r t l .h t c t c i t i 3 mI c i a l. c d c l. K s l n e ea e ea nd C s A. c e i o d r d r e A t nir si a id a u1 pi H E nif p i i t r s n r s n p e hi ;ca gna A T V i i pe pe I N md c w d e N TO h ee o & d s e u f E0 CI c spl a i os os o S1 ET i. i sl s et i et i I T R C t v o ed h c h c 6
,n ,n C I I. R A t eef d e yo l yo t R1 O A rd l d 1 E0 C uo ui I r c i r c nr X S .el t .C v t a t a e EE 0b c s o uss ,
uss , m R 1 ns e e r n n d 8 . l i nt t p ; . s e a se a n 8 T 2 i o o uueng pce pc e e 9 R Pt ot o a el ael m 1 O I ut t rR b i l t nc H n c Ai P ' EE N R t d I I a e e e h t t . I. Y t R t a a a c A n i l d g t e lt t gc v l n s e e r i si v e aa er a l i s nd t eg , Ct l s eg es un s e l. l nd o d r c o e E i st e aC i t R ee d rt v ec a t hd s eon eot n gu P e ot i r n e g t a e r n ue . i sc ut wgv s an nsqs ge d o i e t oe i r ei n i l ert nir t ed s o dl t d u ot a ct a n C E ou o ccc enn o li sf os r s r y ut iC rei c n r o S e r u f S l. s hd pt a d di I t r r e a sd na ueeot mni roh , e _ C vht a i g oi s - s a i t n e n f t r n pe o bC erO s g h ei . t d ni t t t s s et i u os eae pcnt a os .ie f l ci a ee c t R ust d opor mRC u a e b ec meur o t e m eo.e mcrr ml s emgt mor s r d e oh oir onou ora n h T S t rdf Sif n SfCI _ l E e e e v v e C . v 1 v 2 1 i N o i # I # i #* t' ETN t t t c c
,eu
- RR EOM FPEDj9 s EETRbl s c e ,eu Oj9 s Rb1 s c e ,eu Oj1 s Rb2 s e Oj2 Rb2 e RRI OOfI OO# I OO(I OO#I T . 0 2 RO 7 7
}'
4 0 0*. N. 05 1 } - 4 i
; ll' iI ;]1' Il 4 ! ,
, i li 1) i jJ
~
s
%t,o[ee s tr g Qje o Om 3 s -
n n e n i i i i u a a a r 9 r r d T e T 8 T c 9 1 l 9 l 9 t o l 9 a8 a8 ny r g a8
. et gP n u9 u9 u9 y E n1 9 : n1 n1 min /i 8 . n n e pl i sn l
t n K ii n ni. o A - / c A - A - ucn aa i t T 0 o t q i. al r nS e 3 r e e
- l c EFHPT i : l /P : l E. gc 6 gc gc 7 '
Tl ny & e ny ny p = - ,- = = E. l l t i C iC m l t iC n I EFMPT. P/ n : sa i g n ig ME ig snd OT an pap an an CA rI al l i ri ri D T MP T T e r . 8 8 8 i t 8 h ' 8 8 8 8 s V / / _/ / p R 0 1 O 1 O 1 O 1 P 1 R 1 R 1 R 1 m 1 O / O / O /
- a P 01 /
8 l l A 8 8 8 l a e s v nw , o Oi e . e l l al d r R aN . b t i e e e pol = t b h p- = l rl i w s9 l l oi p si8 l A 0t it f t s1 ev9 t 1 e o - r e1 l 1 n L M s u hS ur e l t n uos t el e Hd u i r oc l ecnt edh g gre K ur n l aroa n ner C l. t a ar r i i pu A enl y n n s Pd o R T E V coctom f h ef i i F o I N r m i c w a aHp N TO pna t i . e , r rE x CI o nhdi y t t e EO ewevr o SI ET nio . pea l t g
}T RC ot t s d l a . a n C I. I RA a t i eors R1 O gnd n sl s nd ndi .
E0 C niea ooeee . oe oenl - XS imdd t h vb ce id id ro nain t e et ti ti er EE s dl na i v i vct R i t ve anot pd l d d o d onn 8 a neisp d r d roo 8T rort A pcc - 9R Tcpa Mabwau Ap 1 O EE P y NR l - f t o li JY a oo eogo r r dl a s e R ns r vy A oe ps r pn sc nyusil ri l l N i r eoad nna eg et I t o t sn bi meaet bo M id d e t crt i ml ome _ I. d c oayot ap eoe nei hc l E aor t cer es mih r dti R . oh prro bt e d pl dl t ehh f p i f P dkf e o e evt f ed cu eer eghh ot ah ns
. nht nncTces . t t at ses t n ii f el S n rh _
- s o swh oira d nu oct
. t nc t ow.tl at gnoo t a . _
E no nh s ei naic id s _ ssa" nnnl y I a n asotidhnp it t t S l. go d t net s oaoa m v n u, s esieo iiwh rrif i _ S nni yt r _ I eit ep t I ued o t na t alg v t Nd a l rae - . ti n aai t maoet a t prno-1 d u nre c et nt nein . rm hi et S n f n nmmi et a et pt ei M ayoa oia c cisrbt s l c . sst t nnn t nwoo aet ll ronn s i "e - aoo a h p d pi s re autf edoe p cuq w c l ld sl cf cit ud ue1nuaur i enu d Ware bnr bd - ao ja dtf gn mao mis rhf ne eofii eor Ahf AvMt soin Mnesm Erff -q e i e e
-i E e v v v 2 v l l
e KO A=
. 1 y i # i' f i t
i g ,i t ETN t t' e c ,eu p RR c e c e c -e e c e p EOM FPE EET Oj3 s Rb2 s e , u Oj3 s Rb2 s e , u Oj4 s Rb2 s e ,u 0j5 s lb2 s t e g h t KlI t OO#I OO(I O '0 # i Op(I
=
c q T . 7 j s RO 4 4* j e-
- 0p N.
1 1
}
}
}
}' e^ j. M' 3 ,? tE llll 7j!i li ! ,
. : n1 rmI n E : u1 n
e p1 N . n ; . n Fl t i n 3
- O r n- c A - o
. uc n _
NT o A o i t t s a a _ OS r e r e s cEF l _ I P : l P : l i t E. - gc gc v a ._. TI &8 n y e p= = = , E. I &8 n y r l niC 8i C PEF ti l f P/ HE s/ n n1 l g s/n n1 i g t x OT a/a n a/a n CA l 8 rI l 8 rI e e D P T P T N r i h t 8 H s ' 8 8 p / V / m l 4 O 1 O 1
- a P R 1 R 1 l l P O / O /
l A 8 8 a e v nu l . - & o0I e a s r s rR p0 lal t u i n n e a n n p =c l
=
l c ni p e g I o A Ol l i l ee hi l r n di t n ph ect d noA oi I. t et n S h a a e nio k n ua . t . t _ e t e c l. e h g a l. n ec y i . og G _ _ .(> en i s t t l w e b e6 c n y m S it v ein sv n l i r a N I l I 8 gi n ol t i i e u s I t t ws1 o l t s E en e. oit r c e ne al i r ci mh r m v e nnl s o p y v eh t i pysi1 m e C c a mt Sb r c ot eo c A a mgnl s n p e e H T E V hdi s aa nsl gh l e hd nnexh i e bl a eh gl e e .bC n I N s es a& on a s egh et . TO ema t i l u emit l osl ut t nl t s N t. n k l n rA s f nl ni i i a a EO CI r A I s o h oinssf wr SI ET u y eyai n u RC l. nl nr t mw a d nat eci wa n ee o , ( T ei h at ot i ep d C I. I RA eit oat n gt c yst e a gt a r r r e RI O c ni i s EO C od et gl i n x odl n cnxY nb uo r e na nb i e r et ost i i eil i dC i X S psal r n n psn s wsf nnNd se v EE mugmei i t i ei oiii r s ch e R i evr p aeh a e evn al st a eeo eot r 8 'T h eeot l t r h h e a l s orhh or r i 8 T r m1 l. aa nTt T cppu & 9R 1 O T r pPSf oT t P EE . NR l
)
l I. Y s a. R d d ge ge 3 A n e N ne i N G I i n f f H f g , f g l ,
- l. an1 an a1 l
E t i - t i . m-rP R S nP S n) iE i g oE P f R mR m . n(
- r( : r0 ee ee1 I a
_ ut n ut s eo seJ sD : d i
- sdi ,i ee E I t I r1 uM li r a go- s S gol S nf u n(P E s e I i p i I h t
nso nsRA ne( g neP ac ac nf i o l rl l rs P ua P ul n oo ng oi . ao O sc) O so l f R R eh OR e ep d. S0' orc S
- Pf e*
Yd 1 Yd Yi I nf . i nf l l i r - NB I N a o l. N ao
,l E 2 3 C . 1 N O ,# ,# ,#
ETN - RR EOM FPEOh s re eu Oh s R t s re eu Ohs Rt s re eu 1 EETR t s OOI RRI OOI OOI T . 6 7 RO 5 3 3 ON 3
Attachment I (Page 8 of 8)
;. m C C I:C HOW POTASSIUM IOct0E WORKS estioni Pscange innen for Certain for=s of tocam neio your tavroio gtano wora nsat. Most peopas get tne socme they neec item toocs. uit iocaso sait or fish. The snyroto can " store ' or nom oruy a certain acnount of oame.
THYRO. BLOCK r , In a ramauen emergency. racaoacuve iocane may oe reieased in TABLETS l
'h' D ** "* * '* Y " D "' '"" ' * *'I8 * ** I ' **
- ACTASSIUM ICC:CE TABLEI. LEP) enter to
' e tavrono glanc anc camage it. The camage wouad pro-tronounceo oce.iaSS e vm EVE on.oveo' bably not snow itseti for years. Children an most hkaly to nave iacotenaiec. M thyroso camaga.
If you ta.no potassium iodido. it wdl fl!! up your thyroid gland. This recuces the enance that narmful ranicacuve socme wul TAKE FOTASS!Uh! IODIDE ONLY WHEN PUB! 7 WHO SHOULD HOT TAKE POTASSIUM IOQ10E HEALTH OFFICIALS TELL YOU. IN A RADIATION ' The oniy peopie wno snound not tase potasstum todido are people EMEROENCY. RADIOACTIVE LODINE COULD SE who know sney are silergic to toc 2de. You mar taxe potassium RELEASED INTO THE AIR. POTASSIUM ICDIDE iA ! iodids even if you are samms sceo.temes tot a tavecio prontamifor FORM OF IODINE) CAN HELP PROTECT YOU. l eaampie. a (nyroid hormone or antitavroic drugh Pregnant ana l nursms women anc bacies anc chdcten may siso case snas arug. IF YOU ARE TOLD TO TAKE THIS MEDICINE.TAKE IT ONE T ME EVERY 24 HOURS. CO NOT TAKE !T MORE HOW ANO WHEN TO TAKE POTASSIUM IO010E OFTEN. MORE WILL NOT HE:.? YOU AND M AY lN- Potassium iodice snound be tasen as soon as posstoie after CREASE THE RISK OT S!DE ETTEC S. "O NCT "'AKE puobe hea2Ln of f acists tad vou. You snouto use one cose everv 24 TR15 CRCO !T YOU KNOW YOU A.RE A;.LEROlC 70 ICDICE. ;SEE SIDE EFTEC S SELCW > hours. More wul not neio you oecause one tavroia can ' hold" on-l ly limitec amounts of ioame. Lateer cases wulincrease toe nsa of side effects. You wtil procaciy oe toia not to taxe trte arvg for mors snan 10 days. S10E EFFECTS INDICAtlCNS Usually. side effects of potassium iocade happen when people THYROID BLOCKING IN A RADIATION EMEROENCY take higber ooses for a long st=e. You snould be careful not to ONLY. take more than the recommenced dose or taae it for longer than you are told. Side effects are uruisely occause of the low cose ana OfRECTlCNS FOR USE the short um yn wdl bi casang sne nrug. Use cruv e carectec by State or ioems puebe hesich autnanues m the event of a ra tauon emergency. Possible side effects melude saan rasnes. sweding of the saiivary glanns. anc Modism ' tmetanic taste. nnung mata ano throat. COSE " '"sn ano gums. symptoms os a nuo cold. ano somumu Tablets: ADULTS AND CHILDREN 1 YEAR OF stamaca upset ana danuai. AOE OR OLDER: One ill taolet once a A few peopie have en allergic rescuen with more eenous syinp-c.ar. Crusa f or smad children. toms. These couad be fever ano somt paans. or swedag of part.: of BABIES UNDER 1 YEAR OF AGE: the f ace anc body ano at ttmas severe snortness of breatn requir-One.naaf (1l:1 tantet ones a cay. Crusa Erst. ing unmecaste mecacal attenuen. TaMag iodide may rarely cause overacuvity of tha thyroid Take for 10 days utdess neectec otherwise by State or local gland, underacuvsty of the tayroio glanc. or enlargement of the puebe hesich autnonues, thyroid gland Igostart Stors a t contreiled room temperature oetween 15' ann 30'C t19' WHAT TO 00 IF SiOE EFFECTS OCCUR to 86*F). heep contamer tigntly cacseo ans protect from usht. g g g ,gg, ,,, g,,, ,, y y,y g,y, ,, gig,,p, ,,,gg, stop taking potassium sodide. Then. si posstola. caAl a doctor or i WARNING public haaah autaanty for tastrucuona. Pota.sssum sodido shouki not ce usea by peopio alfarve so sodida. HOW SUPPLIED Kaeo out of the reacs of chudren. In czae of overcose or allarge ~ rescuen. contaes a parvean or sta punne henna aussanty. l THYRO. BLOCKS TABLETS (Potassium lodide tableta. USP) bottles of 14 tablete INDC 0037 0472 201.Each wtute. round, scored tablet contama 130 eng potassum madida. DESCRIPTION Each THYRO BLOCKS TABLET contains 130 mg of
-- iodide. Other mgmusms: magnemum eteerssa. ~
i r s %.adine esiinlose. sdica get. soasum thaaru2 fate. . , WALLAct 1.AsORATORits f Division of } CARTEW aLLACif., INC. CraAbury. New Jersey 06SQ e Rev 2185 IH 0472 01
- f. ~. ..
lt.
~ - - - _ - - _ . - - - _ - _ - _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ __ __
I I I I ATTACHMENT J ! (Letter from H. Vickers (TTMA) to G. Gram 1988, Finding (NHY) Dated September 1, , Proposed Resolutions Adequate and Timely) I , I ! I I I I I I I I
Attachment J (cage 1 of 1) Federal Emergency Management Agency 8 Region I J.W.~ McCorrnack Post Ofiice and Court House l
'. . Boston. Massachusetts 02109 l September 1.1988 George R. Gram. Executive Director of Emergency Preparedness and Community Relations
?ublic Service of New Hampsnire New Hampsnire Yankee Division
?.O. Box 300 )
Senorook. NH 038~4 l j
Dear Mr. Gram:
Enclosed is ene copy of FEMA's Exercise Report for the June 1988 FEMA graded exercise
- ( the Offsite Plans and Preparedness for .the Senorook Nuclear Power Station, dated September 1. 1988. I have transmitted the exercise report to FEMA Headquarters today. It is our understanding that FEMA Headquarters will transmit the exercise report to the Nuclear Regulatory Commission tomorrow, September 2.1988. In accordance vith the schedule set by the Seaoreox Atomic Safetej Licensing Board (ASLB), FEMA will
- ransmit copies of the exercise report to the Seaorock ASLB's service :ist on Septemoer
.1988. Next wer;K. Mr. Donovan will forward additional copies of the report to you in l
accordance with yo.c joint discussions. ! l
- want to thanx you for your cooperation in promptly reviewing the draf t exercise reports, discussmg the exercise facts and issues with Mr. Donovan, forwarding your plans i t: resolve issues, and providing intended completion schedules. TEMA Region I finds ;
your plans to resolve issues and intended completion schedules to ce adequate and i tim ely. We will monitor your progress in resolving these issuas and in meeting your completion schedules. We request that 'you advise us of any changes in your plans to ( L resolve issues or intended completion schedules.
~
If you have any questions, please contact Mr. Richard Donovan. \ I Since ly,
/F
/l linh'!?/
/Y 1
Henry 91ckers Regional Director f
Enclosure:
Seebrook Exercise Report, dated September 1,1988 i
J I . l l I ATTACHMENT K (Module 19, Protective Action Decisio.is) I 1 i I I , I l I I I 4 I I I I i I I I I I
Attochment K (Page 1 of 47) efe.gBROo 1 1 IY . SM wN /s j j j t
/N/NG G l I,
EMERGENCY PLANNING TRAINING PROGRAM MASS E-PLAN PROTECTIVE ACTION DECISIONS l i
~
LESSON PLAN EM1019C . INSTRUCTOR GUIDE ; l This material was developed for Seabrook training programs by the Seabrook Training Group staff. The text material and figures contained in this document were developed for the purpose of instruction and should not be used in connection with either plant maintenance or plant ! operation. This material may not be reproduced without the authorization of the STG Manager. I i PREPARED BY: '
@ V DATE: N7/FT l
INSTRCrCTOR , , REVIEWED BY: DATE: TRAINING SUPERVISOR l L APPROVED BY: [b TRAINING MANAGER DATE: 2/7/M ' l REVIEWED BY: hOmSME (gonal) DATE: 4.////89 l
' Attachment K (Page 2 of 47) -
Lesson Plan No. EM1019C l PROGRAM Emergency Planning LESSON Protective Action Decisions - Mass. E - Plan DATE April 14,1988 COURSE PHASE NA PAGE 1 of 21 l i
- 1. OVERVIEW:
This training introduces protective action decision making to NHY Offsite Directors, Technical Advisors, Radiological Health Advisors, Accident Assessment Coordinators, and Dose Assessment Technicians. l
- 11. PREREQUISITES:
l None 111. INSTRUCTIONAL OBJECTIVES Terminal Objective Upon completion of this training, the students will be able to formulate protective l action recommendations for the general public in accordance with current regulatory l guidance. l l Enabling Objectives EM1019C01 DISCUSS why decisions concerning protective actions are pre-determined. ; i EM1019C02 STATE the purpose for each of the four emergency classifications. EM1019C03 IDENTIFY the offsite dose rates that would initiate each of the four j emergency classifications, EM1019C04 DELETED DELETED ! EM1019C05 t EM1019C06 DISCUSS the rationale used in setting Emergency Action Levels (EAls) for each emergency classification. ) EM1019C07 STATE the purpose for Emergency Action Levels (EALs). I EM1019C08 DEFINE the exposure pathways of concern during a radiological release; and after a release from the deposited radioactivity. EM1019C09 STATE the purpose for each of the two offsite emergency planning zones (EPZs). l l
-__ l
Attachment K (Page 3 of 47) i Lesson Pf an No. EM1019C PROGRAM Emergency Planning LESSON Protective Action Decisions COURSE Mass. E - Plan DATE April 14,1988 I PHASE NA PAGE 2 of 21 I EM1019C10 DISCUSS the rationale that was used to determine the size of the two offsite emergency planning zones. EM1n19C11 DEFINE a protective action guide (PAG). Of W C12 DEFINE a protective action. I EM1019C13 RECOGNIZE the possible constraints that could hinder implementation of protective actions. STATE the PAGs for whole body and thyroid exposure for the Plume I EM1019C14 , Exposure Pathway. l EM1019C15 DEFINE a precautionary protective action. EM1019C16 IDENTIFY populations groups at special risk. t.;uv0 EM1019C17 DEFINE thethree types of protective actions that can be taken for beaches. EM1019C18 DEFINE the conditions which initiate protective actions for beaches. EM1019C19 IDENTIFY the five protective actions that can be taken for the Plume Exposure Pathway. EM1019C20 DISCUSS the two time considerations when considering an evacuation of the general public. EM1019C21 DELETED EM1019C22 DISCUSS the purpose for Emergency and Preventative PAGs. EM1019C23 STATE the dose commitments that correspond to the emergency l preventative response levels for whole body and thyroid exposure. EM1019C24 DEFINE the five assessments made to initiate preventative and emergency protective actions. i I EM1019C25 DISCUSS the exposure pathways considered in establishing restricted zones. EM1019C26 DISCUSS the purpose for Relocation and Reentry PAGs. EM1019C27 STATE the Relocation and Reentry PAGs. B l
Attachment K (Page 4 of 47) I Lesson Plan No. EM1019C PROGRAM Emergency Planning LESSON Protective Action Decisions COURSE Mass. E - Plan DATE April 14,1988 PHASE NA PAGE 3 of 21 EM1019C28 To EM1019C41 DELETED EM1019C42 Using NRC 1 & E Information Notice 83-28, relate the following to plant ' specific indicators:
- Core damage in progress
- Large fission product inventory in containment
- Imminent projected containment failure I l 5
I I I I I I l i I I I
Attachment K (Page 5 of 47) i I Lesson Plan No. EM1019C _ PROG RAM Emergency Planning LESSON Protective Action Decisions COURSE Mass. E - Plan DATE April 14,1988 q I PHASE NA PAGE 4 of 21 1 IV.
REFERENCES:
- 1. NRC I & E Information Notice 83-28
- 2. EPA 520/1-75-001
- I g 3. Federal RegisterNolume 47, No. 205/ Friday, October 22,1982 g- 4. 10CFR50, Append!x E, " Emergency Planning and Preparedness for Production and 4
i Utilization Facilities"
- 5. EPA-520/1-75-001, " Manual of Protective Action Guides and Protective Actions for Nuclear incidents".
- 6. NUREG 0654/ FEMA-REP-1, " Criteria fov Preparation and Evaluation of Radiological !
Emergency Response Plans and Preparedness in Support of Nuclear Power Plants, Revision 1, November 1980.
- 7. NUREG 0654/ FEMA-REP-1," Criteria for Preparation and Evaluation of Radio-logical Emergency Response Plans and Preparedness in Support of Nuclear Power Plants, Revision 1, Supplement 1, November 1987.
- 8. NURGE-0737, " Clarification of the TMl Action Plan Requirements", October 1980.
- 9. Seabrook Plan for Massachusetts Communities.
- 10. Implementing Procedures for the Seabrook Plan for Massachusetts Communities.
I 11. INPO 86-008, " Dose Assessment Manual for Emergency Preparedness Coordinator institute of Nuclear Power Operations, Februray 1986. V. EQUIPMENT / MATERIALS: Student Handout I NRC IE Information Notice 83-28 l ig i i
Attachmnnt K (Pagn 6 of 47) I.esson Plan No. EM101gC Page 5 of 21 VI. BOCY CONTENT / OUTLINE:
1.0 INTRODUCTION
j 1.1 Attention Getter. 1.2 Introduce Instructor (s). I 1.3 Introduce lesson. !
- a. State' expected class duration.
- b. State break schedule.
- c. Describe examination as applicabfe.
- d. Pass out the handouts.
- e. Start the class roster.
1.4 Major Topics. TP-01
- a. Emergency Planning Concepts, 1.5 Lesson Objectives.
Review the terminal and enabling objectives. 2.0 EMERGENCY PLANNING CONCEPTS 2.1 Pre-determined Protective Actions. EM4019C01 TP-02
- a. Improves decision makirg. Review the flow paths for protective action decision i making. l
- b. Expedites response actions.
- c. Provides consistency,
- d. Improves communication.
1 < 2.2 Classification of Emergencies EM4019C02 ) TP-03 I
- a. Unusual Event.
(1) Provides early and prompt notification of minor events. which could lead to more serious consequences. p
Attachment'K (Pago 7 of 47) i l l Lesson Plan No. EM1019C Page 6 of 21 (2) No releases of radioactivity are expected that would require off-site monitoring. j l
- b. Alert. ,
(1) Provides for prompt notification of ' more serious conditions which warrant response preparations. : (2) Onsite facilities activated. (3) Offsite facilities on standby. NHY ORO activates EOC and - Staging Area. (4)
' Localized protective actions onsite may j be warranted.
(5) No protective actions for the general Evacuation of beaches in NH [ public would be expected, aro considered at an alert. - l (6) Off-site monitoring may be implemented (by onsite teams),
- c. Site Emergency.
(1) Some significant releases of radio- i activity are likely or are occurring, but l
?
a core melt situation is not indicated. WASH 1400 concluded that releases would not occur that would require protective actions for the general public unless core melting occurred. (2) Onsite protective actions are expected. (3) Off-site monitoring is expected. (4) Precautionary protective actions for the general public may be considered. (5) Off-site facilities are activated.
- d. General Emergency.
(1) A core melt situation is likely or is occurring. }
l Attachment K (Page 8 of 47) ; Lesson Plan No. EM1019C Page 7 of 21 (2) Both on-site and off-site protective Beach closures are considered protective actions would be for Mass. beaches. NHY ORO mobilizes field per-sonnel, Needed to implement an evacuation. 2.3 Offsite dose rates. EM4019C03 TP-04
- a. Unusual Event.
(1) The guideline (EAL) for an effluent release is 500 mrem / year or .06 l mRom/hr whole body beyond the site bounda ry. ; (2) Corresponds to the Technical Spe- i
. -l cification Limit for instantaneous release of noble gases, ,
I
- b. Alert.
Emergency Action Level for an effluent release is 0.6 mrem /hr whole body, which i corresponds to 10X the technical speci-fication limit. l l
- c. Site Emergency.
Emergency Action Levels for effluent releases. (a) Whole body - 50 mrem / hour (b) Thyroid - 250 mrem / hour
- d. General Emergency.
Emergency Action Levels for an effluent i release. ) (a) Whole body - 1 Rem / hour ) (b) Thyroid - 5 Rem / hour t l )
Attachment K (Page 9 of 47) Lesson Plan No. EM1019C Page 8 of 21 2.4 Classification scheme. TP-05
- a. If radiological releases are occurring, classification is made according to measured or projected dose rates,
- b. Classification can also be made if there is a potential for a significant release, according to how many fission product barriers are challenged or breached.
(1) Three fission product barriers are considered. (a) Cladding failure. Indications of high RCS activity. (b) RCS pressure boundary. Indications of reactor coolant leakage or steam leakage. (c) Primary containment. Indications that primary containment as defined in technical specifications does not exist. (2) Methodology. EM4019C06 (a) Alert- One barrier. (b) Site- Two barriers. (c) General- Three barriers. l c. The effectiveness of protective actions depends on the time it would take for implementation. Classifications should ) be m-ede before an actual release is in I progress. I d. The classification scheme is designed to ) provide the appropriate level of response according to the severity of the accident. l ! l ) } !
'Attachmsnt K (Page 10 of 47) 1 I
Lesson Plan No. EM1019C Page 9 of 21 1 2.5 Emergency Action Levels (EALs). ., EM4019C07 TP-06 j
- a. EALs are the conditions which, if ?
reached or exceeded, will initiate an emergency classification. l
- b. EALs are indicated, when practical, by specific plant instrumentation or alarms. ,
(1) Provides for rapid response. l (2) Eliminates time consuming procedures . for analyzing plant conditions,
- c. Examples.
(1) Unusual Event. A credible bomb threat to the protected area. (2) Alert. (a) Reactor Coolant gross activity greater than 600 uCl/cc. (b) RCS leakage greater than 50 GPM. (3) Site Emergency. Containment Monitors greater than 2500 R/hr. (4) General Emergency. Containment Monitors greater than 25,000 R/hr.
- d. Seabrook's classification scheme also
) uses Critical Safety Functions. l (which will be discussed later). 2.6 Exposure Pathways. EM4019C08 TP-07 I . ) a. Radiological release. l (1) Direct whole body exposure. (2) Inhalation of radiolodines. )
Attachment K (Page 11 of 47) l.esson Plan No. EM1019C Page 10 of 21 (3) Inhalation of particulate (limiting if long hold-up period before release),
- b. Deposited materials (1) Ingestion of food and water conta-minated from the soll either by re-suspension or uptake through the roots.
(2) Whole body exposure from deposited ! material. (3) Inhalation of re-suspension material, j 2.7 Emergency Planning Zones. EM4019C09 EM4019C10 .
- a. Exclusion Area.
(1) Size. Contains all the area within the site boundary.. Estimated at 0.6 mile radius from the plant. . (2) Purpose. Designed for protective actions for site personnel, t b.10 Mile EPZ. TP-08 (1) Size. (a) Circle with a radius of approximately l 10 miles surrounding plant. Based on political and geographical con-siderations. (b) Rationale. I (1) includes bounderles of affected N, j towns. - (2) Projected doses for the tradi-tional design basis accidents would not exceed PAGs outside I this zone. l
4 Attachmsnt K (Page 12 of 47) Lesson Plan No. EM1019C Page 11 of 21 (3) Projected doses for most core melt sequences would not exceed PAGs outside this zone. , (4) For the worst core melt sequences, immediate life threatening doses would not generally occur outside - this zone. (5) Detailed planning for this zone would provide a substantial base for expansion of response efforts . If needed. (2) Purpose. Designed for protective action against , a passing radioactive plume. . (1) Inhalation of radioactive materials. . (2) Direct whole body exposure.
- c. 50 Mlle EPZ (1) Size (a) Circle with a 50 mile radius surrounding the plant.
(b) Rationale. , (1) Contamination levels would not exceed PAGs outside this zone (due to wind shifts and travel periods). j ! (2) There may be conversion of lodine to chemical forms that do not readily enter the ) ingestion exposure pathway. (3) Much of the particulate material would be deposited within this zone. (4) The likelihood of exceeding PAGs for this zone is comparable to ' the likelihood of exceeding PAGs for the 10 Mile EPZ. __ l
Attachmant K (Page 13 of 47) Lesson Plan No. EM1019C Page 12 of 21 (2) Purpose. Designed for protective actions against ingesting contaminated materials.
- d. Water Safety Zones (1) USCG initally establishes a Water Safety Zone that includes water-ways within a 5 mile radius from the plant.
(2) The Water Safety Zone is extended out to 10 miles if other protective actions go beyond 5 miles.
- e. FAA restricts air traffic over Seabrook - l Station,
- f. DOI closes the Parker River Wildlife Refuge.
2.8 Protective Action Guides (PAGs) for Plume .TP-11 i Exposure Pathway.
- a. Purpose of PAGs.
(1) PAGs are the numerical projected EM4019C11 doses which act as trigger points to initiate protective actions for the general public. (2) PAGs are not dose limits, and do represent acceptable doses,
- b. Protective Actions. EM4019C12 A protective action is an action taken to reduce or mitigate the consequences
) of a radiological release.
- c. Decision making.
(1) When making a decision to take a protective action, the benefit should be compared to the risk of taking the action. 1 :
Attachment K (Page 14 of 47) I Lesson Plan No. EM1019C Page 13 of 21 I (2) Only projected dose is considered, as dose already received cannot be saved. u (3) Constraints. EM4019C13 (a) Environmental conditions. (b) Number of persons involved. (c) Time available. . . (d) Resources available (e) Exposure duration.
- d. Format. EM4019C14 Expressed in ranges. .
(a) Lower guide. Protective actions should be co isloered, I particularly for more sensitive populations. (b) Higher gulde. I Mandatory level at which protective actions should be taken, unless constraints impede or prevent the 5 protective action from being taken.
- e. Whole Body PAGs.
1-5 Rem. T
- f. Thyroid PAGs.
5-25 Rom.
- g. Types of protective actions. EM1019C15 TP-12 (1) Precautionary. EM1019C16 A protective action taken for selected populations at special risk.
(a) Transient populations (beaches). I g
Attachment K (Page 15 of 47) E Lesson Plan No. EM1019C Page 14 of 21 I (b) Radiosensitive (pregnant women, children and Infants). J
, (c) PC,9ulations difficult to transport
(:'chools, hospitals, daycare centers). - (2) General. l I A protective action taken for the entire population. I h. Massachusetts Beaches (not including per-manent populations). (1) Types of protective actions. EM1019C17 TP-13 (a) Beach closures (notifying transient - population to go home). > (b) Beach evacuations (controlled evacuation of transient population). (1) Access Control (2) Transportation Provided (3) Verification of Notifications
,~f f(c) Sheltering (Population Instructed to y I seek shelter in nearly buildings.
(2) Decisions EM1019C18 TP-13 I (a) Time of year (5/15 to 9/15). y (ht conditions (degrading or notN as determined by Critical Safety Functions). - (14 Site or General emergency.
, NH may at an alert).
(b)(for ; 8 (3) Critical Safety Functions (those parameters monitored by SPDS). I lI I
Attachmant K (Page 16 of 47) Lesson Plan No. EM1019C Page 15 of 21 S - Subcriticality. The inventory Critical Safety Function is not C - Core Cooling. used for classification. , l H - Heat Sink. l l P - RCS Integrity.
. \
Z - Containment integrity. (a) S-red, C-orange, H-red, P-red, Z-orange or red pathway exists. (b) Condition is unmitigated. 2.9 Protective Actions for Plume Exposure EM4019C19 Pathway. TP-15
- a. Notification of the Public.
(1) Public Notification System. Notification equipment used to meet the requirement to notify the public within 15 minutes. May have the capability to issue advisory messages in a,PA mode. (2) Emergency Broadcast System (EBS). Broadcasts instructional messages on radio stations (must be authorized by governmental agency). (3) Tone Alert Radios. (a) A::tivated by EBS. (b) Located at special facilities, I businesses with more then 50 I employees, and at residences in isolated areas. (c) Tone Alert radios with visual alerting lights will be distributed to hearing impaired persons within the 10-mile EPZ. ; 1
Attachmsnt K (Paga 17 of 47) Lesson Plan No. EM1019C Page 16 of 21 (4) Route Alerting may be conducted by the USCG for the waterways. (5) News releases may be disseminated to the news media from the Media Center. (6) Public service and advisory me,ssages may be broadcast over the local TV and radio stations. )
- b. Evacuation.
(1) Effectiveness. Can be up to 100 % effective, but also the most disruptive and should be used only as a last resort. (2) Time Considerations. EM4019C20 A calculation is made in the (a) Will the plume arrive before the ORO procedures that calculates , evacuation can be completed? the dose that the population i would receive if they shletered - Compare the plume arrival time and if they evacuated. The the with the evacuation time. two numbers arpopared to make a decision. A 100% redutionTg (b) Will the plume pass before the in taken for sheltering. X evacuation can be completed? 4
/ O'j/*
Compare the release duration with redoc.hc.1 the evacuation time, fqm (4) Types of evacuations. (a) Precautionary.
- 1) Evacuation of groups at special risk.
State of NH does not provide
- 2) Can be voluntary or mandatory, for mandatory evacuations.
(b) General. Discuss 2 keyholes: I l
- 1) Evacuation of the entire 1. Evacuate out to 2 miles population. 5nillas downward, shelter rest of EPZ (out
- 2) Can be voluntary or mandatory to 10 miles).
(if state laws allow). d d*MMd 1 l
= Attachment K (Page.18'of 47) !
I Lesson Plan No. EM1019C Page 17 of 21
- 2. var : ate out to 5 miles,
- c. Sheltering. tC imles dcwn#;;i. Shelter restfof Ei1(out to 10 (1) Effectiveness.
mi{es
,I enfM
-(a) Provides good protection from Discuss Emergency Response Plan-Inhalation of gases for a short ning Areas (ERPA):
period, l.a. one hour.
- 1. ERPA B - Salisbury & Amesbury
- 1) Windows and doors must be closed ( #( % =-
and ventilation shut off. 2. ERPAE - Newbury, Merrimac, West
.Newbury and Newbury port.
- 2) The shelter would be ineffective 4 ansr abou' two hours due to the i natural ve stilation.
(b) Provides shielding frcm a passing radioactive cloud. - w/ Considerations. . (a) Sheltering may be used as a precau-tionary measure while determining
- the need for an evacuation.
(b) Sheltering offers less protection than evacuation, but takes less time to implement and costs less,
- d. Access Control.
(1) Effectiveness. Access control is effective in preventing exposure to persons who might otherwise enter affected areas. I (2) Considerations. (a) Access control should always be used ! In conjunction with evacuation and/or ) sheltering. (b) Access control should not be used before the public has been notified of an order to evacuate or shelter. l ) l
~
Attachmant X (Pago 19 of 47) Lesson Plan No. EM1019C Page 18 of 21
- e. Thyroid Blocking.
This protective action is not . considered for Massachusetts (1) The uptake of inhaled or ingested radiolodine by the thyroid gland may be reduced by prior ingestion of KI, a stable form of lodine, l 1 (2) May cause allergic reactions or other f adverse side effects (FDA estimates the risk as somewhere between 1 in a million and 1 in 10 million). (3) Ki should be considered if the ERO has set this criteria projected dose to the thyroid at 500 MPC-hours. exceeds 25 Rom.
- a. Emergency workers.
- b. Special populations.
2.10 Protective Action Guides for trigestion TP-16,TP-17,TP-18 Exposure Pathway.
- 1. Emergency PAGs. EM1019C22
- a. Purpose.
(1) Initiate emergency actions, which primarily involve the isolation of contaminated food sources.
- b. Rationale for PAGs. EM1019C23 (1) 15 Rom thyrold.
(2) 5 Rom whole body.
- 2. Preventative PAGs.
)
- a. Purpose.
(1) Initiate preventative actions, which primarily involves decontamination of contaminated food sources. ) b. Rationale. (1) 1.5 Res) thyrold. (2) 0.5 Rem whole body.
Attachmant K (Page 20 of 47) ] i Lesson Plan No. EM1019C Page 19 of 21
- 3. Types of environmental samples collected for decision making.
- a. Surface water, drinking water, snow, vegetation, soil, milk (raw and pasteur-Ized), meat and meat products, eggs, I food crops, and shellfish.
- 4. Assessments (made by Mass. ORO). EM1019C24
- a. Area deposition.
(1) Projected values are used initially I to initiated preventative actions or environmental sampling. (2) Measured values intiate preventative or emergency actions. -
- b. Forage (crops) concentration.
(1) Measured values initiate preventative or emergency actions,
- c. Milk.
(1) Measured values initiate preventative or emergency actions.
- d. Drinking water.
(1) Measured values initlate preventative tive actions.
- e. Total intake.
(1) Measured values of the other food samples are used to calculate a total intake value. ) 2.11 Relocation PAGs.
- 1. Definition- Relocation PAG. TP-19
- s. Projected whole body dose from 1 year of exposure to deposited material from all sxposure pathways, except food and water. ,
1
Attachmant K (Page 21 of 47) l Lesson Plan No. EM1019C Page 20 of 21 , s l (1) Primarily direct whole body dose EM1019C25 ' from ground deposition. (2) Inhalation of resuspended materialis considered,if air sample results are available, although the contribution is expected to be small compared . with the total whole body dose. 1
- 2. Assessments (by Mass. ORO).
- a. Measurements used in projected first year whole body integrated dose.
(1) Soll/ vegetation environmental samples. (2) Air sample results (of resuspended material). (3) Gamma dose rate at 1 meter.
- b. Calculation includes weathering factors which accounts for radioactive decay and weathering. -
- 3. Purpose.
- a. Designate restricted zones. EM1019C26
- 4. Rationale.
- a. Expressed as range 1-5 Rom EM1019C27
- b. Upper level represents the level at which relocation of the public is
} recommended. l
- c. Lower level represents the level et which relocation should be considered, especially for populations at special risk.
- d. Considerations that may warrant
} I adhsting PAGs. (1) Special risk populations. (2) Difficulty / expense of implementation. 1
Attachment K (Page 22 of 47) I Lesson Plan No. EM1019C Page 21 of 21 I I (3) Natural boundaries. i i (4) Radioactive decay. (5) Ingestion dose. l 2.12 Reentry PAG. TP-20 i l .
- 1. Definition - Reentry PAG.
- a. Projected dose from all exposure path-ways, except food and water, for the I one year after clean-up operations are completed.
- 2. Purpose.
- a. Decontaminate unrestricted zones.
- b. Re-occupy restricted zones.
- 3. Reentry dose - 0.5 Rem.
I . I I I I I -
\
I i I I I
Attachment K (Page 23 of 47) g efc.ABROo g A h WN
/Fg 1
l
, Nw% ;
EMERGENCY PLANNING TRAINING PROGRAM I MASS E-PLAN l l PROTECTIVE ACTION DECISIONS LESSON PLAN EM1019C STUDENT HANDOUT g i This material was developed for Seabrook training programs by the Seabrook Training Group staff. The text material and figures contained l in this document were developed for the purpose of instruction and should not be used in connection with either plant maintenance or plant operation. This material may not be reproduced without the authorization of the STG Manager. PREPARED BY:
- DATE: 2/7/El INSTRUCTOR REVIEWED BY: DATE: !
TRAINING SUPERVISOR I APPROVED BY: h-TRAINING MANAGER DATE: 2./7/M
'f :
g REVIEWED BY: DATE: A/7[89 SME (OptJbnal) I .
Attachment K (Page 24 of 47) 1 EMERGENCY PLANNING MASS E-PLAN PROTECTIVE ACTION DECISIONS STUDENT OBJECTIVES TERMINAL OBJECTIVE: , Upon completion of this training, the students will be able to formulate protective . action recommendations for the general public in accordance with current regulatory guidance. ENABLING OBJECTIVES: .
- 1. DISCUSS why decisions concerning protective actions are pre-determined.
- 2. STATE the purpose for each of the four emergency classifications.
- 3. IDENTIFY the offsite dose rates that would initiate each of the four emergency classifications.
- 4. DISCUSS the rationale used in setting Emergency Action Levels (EALs) for each' emergency classification.
- 5. STATE the purpose for Emergency Action Levels (EALs).
- 6. DEFINE the exposure pathways of concern during a radiological release: and after a release from the deposited radioactivity.
- 7. STATE the purpose for each of the two offsite emergency planning zones (EPZs).
- 8. DISCUSS the rationale that was used to determine the size of the two offsite emergency planning zones.
- 9. DEFINE a protective action guide (PAG).
- 10. DEFINE a protective action.
- 11. RECOGNIZE the possible constraints that could hinder Implementation of protective actions.
! 12. STATE the PAGs for whole body and thyroid exposure for the Plume Exposure l Pathway. I 13. DEFINE a precautionary protective action. I
- 14. IDENTIFY populations groups at special risk.
1 l 1 1
Attachment K (Page 25 of 47) I-
- 15. DEFINE this two types of protective actions that can be taken for beaches.
- 16. DEFINE the conditions which initiate protectiu actions for beaches.
- 17. IDENTIFY the five protective acaons that can b 'a%n for the Plume Exposure I Pathway.
- 18. DISCUSS the two time considerations when considering an evacuation of the general public.
- 19. DISCUSS the purpose for Emergency and Preventative Pads.
- 20. STATE the dose commitments that correspond to the emergency preventative response levels for whole body and thyroid exposure.
- 21. DEFINE the five assessments made to initiate preventative and emergency protective actions.
- 22. DISCUSS the exposure pathways considered in establishing restr;cted zones.
- 23. DISCUSS the purpose for Relocation and Reentry PAGs. I
- 24. STATE the Relocation and Reentry PAGs.
I I I I I I 1I 'I t -
Attachment K (Page 26 of 47) I I PROTECTIVE ACTION DECISONS ! I g MAJOR TOP CS l l EMERGENCY PLANNING CONCEPTS l
- Predetermined protective actions l e Emergency classes l 8 Phases of an emergency g e Emergency Planning Zones g
- Protective Action Guides (PAGs) g
- Protective Actions I
EM1019C TP/01 ; g I
.I l I
'I I -
Attachment K (Page 27 of 47) I l PREDETER\AINED PROTECTIVE g ACTIONS I PLUME EXPOSURE PATHWAY l
- Emergency classifications l e Protective Action Guides (PAGs) l INGESTION EXPOSURE PATHWAY l
- Preventative PAGs.
l
- Emergency PAGs l REENTRY / RECOVERY g e Relocation PAGs
- Reentry PAGs g
I EM1019C TP/02 g I I I I
Attachment K (Page 28 of 47) I. l l EMERGENCY CLASSIF CATIONS ! Unusual Event
- Notification of minor events .
Alert i e Required activation of on-site facilities
! Site Area e Planned on-site protective actions l
- Required activation of off-site facilities l General 4
l 8 Planned off-site protective actions I l EM1019C TP/03 l - I rI I
Attachmnnt K (Page-29 of 47) l OFFSITE COSE RATES ! l Unusual Event - e Whole body - 0.06 mrem /hr Alert e Whole body - 0.6 mrem /hr Site Area e Whole Body - 50 mrem /hr e Thyroid - 250 mrem /hr General e Whole Body - 1000 mrem /hr e Thyroid - 5000 mrem /hr ) EM1019C TP/04 r i 4 L 1
'\
Attachmsnt K (Page 30 of 47) FISSION PRODUCT BARR ERS i Failed Fuel e Indcations of high activity in RCS RCS Pressure Boundary e Indcations of reactor coolant leakage Primary Containment , e Loss of containment integrity l ll CLASSIFICATION \ ME"HOJOLOGY Alert --- One Barrier Site --- Two Barriers N 1 General --- Three Barriers L
- EM1019C TP/05
Attachment K (Page 31 of 47) EMERGENCY ACTION LEVELS Conditions, which if reached or exceeded, will initiate an i emergency classification , Examples l Unusual Event l
- RCS gross activity greater than 60 uCi/cc 4 Alert e RCS leakage greater than 50 GPM Site Area e Post-LOCA monitors greater than 2500 R/hr General i e Post-LOCA monitors greater than 25,000 R/hr 1
) EM1019C TP/06 ) 1 ; 1
Attachment K (Page 32 of 47) EXPOSURE PATHWAYS RELEASE IN PROGRESS Direct whole body exposure inhalation of radoiodines and particulate \ GROUND DEPOSITION Ingestion of contaminated mik, food and water Whole body exposure from deposited materials Inhalation of resuspended materials EM1019C TP/07 i i i i I ;
1 Attachmsnt K (Paga 33 of 47) PLUME EXPOSURE PATHWAY 10 - Mile Emergency Planning Zone 1 l
- Protective actions are planned to reduce or prevent exposure from a passing radoactive plume I
i \
\
l y EM1019C TP/08 1
Attachmant K (Page 34 of 47) l 10 MILE PLUME EPZ NW \ NNW \ '-
/ Ng j
NEW HAMPSHIRE g SAINE J, . . . . . . . . . ) 1 nEw
% PORT OUTH CASTLE NEWFIELDS gggg,t3 Nt egy BRENTWOOD 101 ,
l RTH EXETER ( tAMPTON-I [Ni KINGSTON AMNON i AST HAMPTON ) KEN 5lHGTON FALLS 51 - 125 KIN TON, y
/' s0utii- 'l - SEABROOK STATION
,,,ng, san 00K
(
,, , __.____.__-c.
AMES8URY MERRIMAC ESE SALfuRY
^ '
s 495 ' g NEWBJYPOR NEWlVRY' NEWBURY } 10 MILE si 7
- MA55ACHUSETT5 j (. 1 95 \
) SW
/ ssw / J s \ sst ,
EM1001C REV 2
Attachms-h K (Page 35 of 47) l l NGESTION EX3OSURE PAT-iWAY 1 50 - Mile Emergency Planning Zone o Protective actions are planned to reduce or prevent exposure from ingesting contaminated mik, water, or food l i i t I EM1019C TP/09 l 1
Attachment K (Page 36 of 47) 50 MILE INGESTION PATHWAY EPZ NW \ NNW \ t N / NNE g ! TLAND g 16 ) I 95 1 93 NEW HAMP5 HIRE MAINE NE ROCHESTER e D0VER e f CONCORD ENE
'bkT5bbTH MANCHESTER
- w 93 ,,
* ,....SEABROOK
%,. ...... STATION E 3 SALEM '
NASHUA [ 0W
....,........................,.......,.,/- EsE LOWELL
- 95 MA SACHUSGS $$b (idif " s WSW 495 BEVERLY SE i
) - 128 BOSTON 90 WORCESTER
- 3 c 50 MILE sw / 55W L. 5 \ SSE
\ EM1001C REV 2
Attachmsnt K (Page 37 of 47) i LETTERS OF AGREEMENT United States Coast Guard (USCG)- Control, notify, restrict waterborne traffic ' e Establish a Water Safety Zone e Coordnated through the State of NH Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) Restrict air traffic e Coordinated through the State of NH Department of Interior (DOI) i Close the Parker River Wildife Refuge r EM1019C TP/10 b i h ) 1
s Attachmont X (Page 38 of 47) PROTECTIVE ACTION GUIDES 4 Projected doses which act as trigger points to to initiate pfotective actions i Whole Body Thyroid e Lower level - Consider 1 Rem 5 Rem o Higher level - Mandatory 5 Rem 25 Rem Constraints e Environmental conditions e Number of people affected e Resources available
- Time available e Exposure duration I <
EM1019C TP/11 ) l
Attachment K (Page 39 of 47) TWO TYPES OF PROTECTIVE ACTION PRECAUTIONARY l Protective actions taken for selected groups Populations at special risk i e Radiosensitive l
- Difficult to transport Transient populations e Beaches GENERAL Protective actions taken for entire populations EM1019C TP/12
) ) l
1 Attachmont K (Page 40 of 47)' PROTECTIVE ACTIONS FOR BEACHES OPTIONS i CLOSE - Massachusetts Beaches e instruct beach populations to leave o Instruct public to stay away EVACUATE - New Hampshire Beaches e Control access
- Provide transportation l
- Verify that public received notification
. EM1019C TP/13 I
l l } !
Attachment K (Page 41 of 47) PROTECTIVE ACTIONS FOR BEACHES CONSIDERATIONS ! Time of year l e May 15 to September 15 l l Ernergency Classification e Site Area or General ; i l l i EM1019C TP/14 l ) l
Attachmsnt K (Page 42 of 47) l 9LUME EXPOSURE PATHWAY i PROTECTIVE ACTIONS ; i Notification of the public Evacuation Sheltering Access Control Thyroid Blocking EMERGENCY RESPONSE PLANNING AREAS Protective actions will be implemented by ERPA e Out to 5 miles , e Out to 10 miles ) EM1019C TP/15 h ! ) 1
Attachment K (Page 43 of 47) NGESTION EXPOSURE PATHWAY PREVENTATIVE ACTIONS Prevent contamination of food
- Placing animals on stored food and water Decontaminate food sources
-
- Spray fruits and vegetables e Hold-up
. EMERGENCY ACTIONS isolate contaminated food sources e Disposal EM1019C TP/16
) h I )
~ - -- Attachment K (Page 44 of 47) LI I INGESTON EXPOSURE PAGS iI i ASSESSMENTS I Area Deposition lI Forage (crops) i E , Mik I Drinking water
- Totalintake
'g 1 ENVIRONMENTAL SAMPLES , I Surface water, drinking water, snow, vegetation, soil, mik, eggs,
-l food crops, shellfish, meat and meat products I
'I l EM1019C TP/17
- g. l
!I l I 'I
Attcchment K (Pcgo 45 of 47) i lhGES-~ ON EXPOSURE PAGS i RESPONSE LEVELS l Area deposition (microcuries/ square meter) Forage (microcuries/ kilogram) Peak mik activity (microcuries/ liter) Totalintake (microcuries) DOSE COMMITMENTS Emergency e Whole body - 5 Rem o Thyroid - 15 Rem Preventative o Whole body - 0.5 Rem I o Thyroid - 1.5 Rem EM1019C TP/18 l 1 1
Atta nment K (Page 46 of 47) i RELOCATION PAGs , i
)
PURPOSE Designate restricted zones Relocate public l DEFINITION Projected one year dose from all exposure paths, except ingestion of food and water
- Direct exposure from the ground e Inhalation of resuspended material RANGE
) Consider 1 Rem Mandatory - 5 Rem EM1019C TP/19 l l
Attachment K (Paga 47 of 47) l REENTRY PAG PURPOSE Decontamination of unrestricted zones Re-occupation of restricted zones DEFINITION : Projected dose from all exposure pathways, except ! food and water, for the'one year after clean-up - i operations are completed ! e Direct exposure from the ground
- Inhalation of resuspended material LIMIT i
Reentry dose - 0.5 Rem l ) ' EM1019C TP/20 l 1 1
i I 1 1 1 I ATTACHMENT L , (Module 11, Traffic and Access Controh l i l l 3 I I l l ) 1
Attachmsnt L (Pcgo 1 of 38) gfABRoo im ! l N ! A WN W 1
%'N/NG G EMERGENCY PLANNING MASS E - PLAN TRAFFIC & ACCESS CONTROL LESSON PLAN NO. EM1011C INSTRUCTOR GUIDE This materiai was developed for Seabrook training programs by the Seabrook Training Group staff. The text material and figures contained in this document were developed for the purpose of instruction and should not be used in connection with either plant maintenance or plant operation. This material may not be reproduced without the authorization of the STG TAanager.
PREPARED BY: Y INSTRUCTg N W DATE: M/o/P9
//
REVIEWED BY: DATEi ~ TRAINING SUPERVISOR APPROVED BY: himm TRAINING MANAGER DATE: 1 //3/87
/
REVIEWED BY: DATE: l .
// ,( c, _ .o N.
l
r I t Attachmsnt L (Pago 2 of 38) EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS TRAINING PROGRAM MASS E - PLAN EM1011C - TRAFFIC & ACCESS CONTROL STUDENT OBJECTIVES (3/4/88) TERMINAL OBJECTIVES: Upon completion of this Training Module, students will be able to describe Traffic and Access Control Operations necessary in response to an emergency at Seabrook Nuclear Power Station. I ENABLING OBJECTIVES-
\
I 1. STATE the emergency classification at which Stage 1,2 and 3 personnel are notified, and at which classification they report to their assigned facility.
- 2. IDENTIFY how the following will be notified:
Stage 1 personnel
~
Stage 2 personnel Stage 3 personnel 3. DIFFERENTIATE between a Traffic Control Point and an Access Control Point.
- 4. EXPLAIN Peripheral Access Control.
- 5. DEFINE a Restricted Area.
- 6. IDENTIFY the lowest emergency classification at which ORO personnel will staff the following:
Emergency Operations Center (EOC) Staging Area Traffic and Access Control Points
- 7. 1DENTIFY the Traffic and Access Control Point staffing associated with Emergency Response Planning Areas (ERPA's).
l I 8. STATE who dispatches the Traffic Guides from the Staging Area.
- 9. STATE the assignments that Traffic Guldes may receive at the Staging Area.
- 10. STATE who maintains Radio Communications with Traffic Guides.
- 11. STATE who road impediments should be reported to.
- 12. STATE four actions which require Governmental Authorization.
- 13. DESCRIBE how the Traffic Guides' function would be carried out for an emergency lasting several days. ,
I I
Attachment L (Page 3 of 38) I Lesson Plan No. EM1011C PROGRAM Emergency Preparedness '.ESSON Traffic & Access Control COURSE Mass E - Plan OATE March 2.1989 PHASE PAGE 1 of 12 A. OVERVIEW: This lesson provides an overview of Traffic and Access Control and how it is ac-complished. B. PREREQUISITES: Students should have previously attended Module 1. Emergency Plan Overview Training. C. INSTRUCTIONAL OBJECTIVES: Terminal Objectives: Upon completion of this Training Module, students will be able to describe Traffic and Access Control Operations necessary in response to a radiological emergency at Seabrook Nuclear Power Station. Enabling Objectives: EM1011C03 STATE the emergency classification at which Stage 1,2 and 3 personnel are notified, and at which classification they report to their assigned facility. EM1011C04 IDENTIFY how the following will be notified: Stage 1 personnel j Stage 2 personnel Stage 3 personnel EM1011C06 DIFFERENTIATE between a Traffic Control Point and an Access Control Point. EM1011C01 EXPLAIN Peripheral Access Control. EM1011C07 DEFINE a Restricted Area. EM1011C08 IDENTIFY the lowest emergency classification at which ORO personnel will staff the following: Emergency Operations Center (EOC) Staging Area Traffic and Access Control Points EM1011C11 IDENTIFY the Traffic and Access Control Point Staffing associated with Emergency Response Planning Area's (ERPAs). 1
Attachment L (Paga 4 of 38) Lesson Plan No. EM1011C PROGRAM Emergency Preparedness LESSON Traffic & Access Control COURSE Mass E - Plan DATE March 2.1989 PHASE PAGE 2 of 12 EM1011CO2 STATE who dispatches the Traffic Guides from the Staging Area. EM1011C05 STATE the assignments that Traffic Guides may receive at the Staging Area. EM1011C09 STATE who maintains Radio Communications with Traffic Guides. EM1011C13 STATE who road impediments should be reported to. EM1011C10 STATE four actions which require Governmental Authorization. EM1011C12 DESCRIBE how the Traffic Guides' function would be carried out for an emergency lasting several days. D.
REFERENCES:
Appendix J Procedure 1.3 Procedure 2.11 Seabrook Station Evacuation Time estimates and Traffic Management Plan update, August 12,1986. E. EQUIPMENT / MATERIALS: Overhead Projector Transparencies Student Handout Exam Dostmetry Traffic and Access Control Point Maps ) ] 1 l
Attcchment L (Page 5 of 38) Lesson Plan No. EM1011C Page 3 of 12 F. BODY OF CONTENT /OUTUNE l
1.0 INTRODUCTION
This lesson will cover basic Traffic and Access Control activities. At the end of this lesson there will be an exam covering Lesson Plan Objectives. 1.1 Briefly Review Objectives OBJ/TP 2.0 FUNCTION The functions of Traffic and Access Control Personnel are: o directing and guiding traffic out of the EPZ. TP/2 o discouraging unnecessary Traffic into the EPZ. o reporting traffic impediments, o directing traffic around road impediments 2.1 Traffic Control i 2.1.1 Traffic Control Point, direct traffic out of the EM1011C06 Plume Exposure EPZ to the primary evacuation TP/4 routes, o Road barriers and cones are used to assist 3 cones = 1 barrier Traffic Control. The Traffic Control Area may include all or part of the Plume Expo-sure EPZ. 2.2 Types of Access Control Points
'2.3 Peripheral Access Control EM1011C01 Peripheral Access Control is to discourage TP/3 unauthorized entry into the periphery of a
, specific area. Peripheral access control re- ) duces the volume of traffic in the EPZ so that evacuation is expedited. Peripheral Access Control Points can be located at: a 10 mile radius o 5 mile radius o Massachusetts /New Hampshire border ) i
I Lesson Plan No. EM1011C Page 4 of 12 2.3.1 Personnel located at peripheral access control TP/4 . points should discourage entry except for: ' o Persons returing to pick-up family i o Federal, State or Local authorities
'(with ID badges)
I o Emergency response personnel (with 10 badges) 2.3.2 These personnel should also provide the I. following information if requested. I o Advise public of EBS Stations for emergency updates o Advise public of locations for j reception centers l 2.4 Restricted Zones I Restricted Zone, established aher a radio-logical plume passes EM1011C07 . n Represents the " plume footprint" 2.4.1 Personnel assigned to restricted access TP/5 control should limit access to: o Farmers returning for animal care o Business operators o Federal, state or local authorities o Emergency response perconnel 2.4.2 Dosimetry recordkeepers will be assigned to I these locations after the evacuation to: o Conduct briefings q o Distribute dosimetry l 2.4.3 Personnel entering restricted areas should l 3 be instructed to exit through the same access jg 1 corarol point they entered. 3.0 INFORMATION CARDS 3.1 Information cards will be given out to TP/6 Traffic Guides at the Staging Ares prior I to dispatching. The purpose of this card is to provide information and guldance in completing their duties. { I I
. Attachment L (Page 7 of 38)
I Lesson Plan No. EM1011C Page 5 of 12 I I 3.2 Information that can be found on the card inciudes the following: o " Exposure ' Control = 15 minute intervals I - DRD reading frequency and reporting level
- Abnormal Dosimetry contiltions Lost, damaged or off-scale
- Ingestion of Kl when directed by This instruction would come the Rad Health Advisor via the Dispatcher o Emergency Phone Numbers
,I i
- In the event of questions from the public or press, they would be directed to use these numbers.
I E o in the event of radio failure, the Staging Area number is provided. o EBS Radio Stations for the Public to stay abreast of current emergency conditions. I I o Radio Procedures
- Brief description of radio usage.
- Usts procedures specific to traffic Mod 20 will be given which covers radio usage in detall.
Guldes 4.0 Emergency Response Planning Areas's (ERPA's) EM1011C11 4.1 The initial staffing of the TCP's and ACP's in the Emergency Planning Zone (EPZ) will be done according to Regions and ERPA's. 4.1.1 ERPAs are made up of towns: TP/7 I ERPA B includes o Salisbury and Amesbury ERPA E includes o Newbury, Merrimac, Newburyport, West Newbury 4.2 Regions constitute groups of ERPAs related to o Wind Dlrection o 2,5, and 10 mile radius I I .
Attachmsnt L (Page 8 of 38) I Lesson Plan No. EM1011C l Page 6 of 12 .!
-g.
5 4.3 Specifically, peripaeral ACPs would be manned We could potentially establish first to limit access into the 10 mile EPZ. peripheral ACPs at the 5 mile
*g These would include ACPs at the boundary of EPZ boundary.
g the 10 mile EPZ and certain areas located TP/8 Region 1 along the law Hampshire and Massachusetts B6rder. 4.3.1 In the event of beach closures, Traffic Guides TP/g Region 10 would be dispatched to Salisbury Beach to Beach closures only : man Traffic Control Points. , 4.3.2 If an evacuation is implemented for any TP/10 Region 5 other region, additional supplement access l I control points need to be staffed to estab-lish access control at the perimeter of the out to 5 miles TP/11 Region 7 5 mile EPZ or on the NH state border. state boundary 4.3.3 If this happens some traffic contral points Manning of traffic & access will become access control points as a control points will be I result that individual or Individuals now must assum6 the role of access control Instead of traffic control. reviewed during the tabletop session I 5.0 STAGES OF NOTIFICATION EM1011C03 TP/12 l 5.1 There are three stages of notification: o Stage 1 personnel are notified at an Un-Stage 1-Unusual Event Alert I usual Event and report at an alert or higher emergency o Stage 2 personnel are notified at an Alert Stage 2-Alert / Alert , and report at an Alert or higher emergency I. o Stage 3 personnel are notified at an Alert and report at a Site Area Emergency or Stage 3-Alert / Site Area Emergency General Emergency 6.0 PERSONNEL NOTIFICATION EM1011C04 6.1 There are three methods of personnel notifi-cation:
- a. Pagers Pagers - Stage 1 personnel I To ensure notification of Stage 1 Emergency Response Personnel, the Offsite Response Organization utilizs a Pager System. Each The pager system is activated by Melita however,if Melita falls the pager system can be I Pager displays a code to indicate the Emer-gency Classification Level Associated with these Pagers, METS is used to ensure receipt activated independently.
of notification.
\
i
Attachmant L (Page 9 of 38) l l l Lesson Plan No. EM1011C Page 7 of 12
- b. Melita Emergency Telenotification System METS Stage 2 & 3 (METS)
A computerized automatic dialing system TP/13 Verification which dials Stage 2 and Stage 3 personnel
]
, by telephone and plays a prerecorded in- q
'structional message. There is also a built- . ;
in Verification System for the METS callout. .{
- c. Manual Callout System.
7.0 EMERGENCY CLASSIFICATION STAFFING 7.1 Alert EM1011C20 At the Alert classification, the following i facilities will be manned by Stage 1 and i Stage 2 personnel:
- Emergency Operation Center (EOC) 1
- Staging Area j
- Vans Acoustic locations 7.2 Site Area Emergency TP/14 !
The following Facilities / Areas will be manned at a Site Area Emergency
- Transfer Points
- Reception Centers
- Traffic and Access Control Points TP/14A Example of Traffic
- Bus Yards Control 8.0 RESPONSE AND IMPLEMENTATION If you were to look at the organization TP/15
. starting with the Assistant Director, This will be demonstrated j Response and implementation the position when we discuss road impediments in that chain would include the following:
l o Evacuation Support Coordinator o Staging Area Leader e Evacuation Support Dispatcher l j o Traffic Guides 1
Attachannt L (Page 10 of 38) lesson Plan No. EM1011C Page 8 of 12 8.1 Evacuation Support Dispatchers are respon-sible for:
- Designate and brief Traffic Guides.
- Making Traffic and Access Control Point TP/16 assignments based on Region and ERPAs. EM1011C02
- Staffing additional TCPs/ACPs due to the rerouting of traffic or a change in Regions ..
and ERPAs.
- Coordinating Exposure Control EM1011C05
- Reassigning Traffic Guides to Restricted Area ACPs, if necessary.
- Monitor Radio Communications Traffic Guldes will be dispatched to their Notified to be activated at (PAD)
TCP/ACP where they will wait until notified Protective Action Decision that the TCP/ACP is to be activated, g.0 GOVERNMENT AUTHORIZATION TP/17 EM1011C10 g.1 By law, Massachusetts is required to respond in the event of a real emergency. However, they are not participating in the - Emergency Planning Process for Seabrook. In the event of an emergency, we will re-quest authorization to implement our plan. If Mass. does net give us authorization, we will implement eur plan up to the legal limits of the law. i o The specific actions taken by us that would '! would require governmental authorization are:
- Use of the Emergency Broadcasting System l - Actual placement of Traffic Control f Points in the road to direct traffic.
- Actually establishing Access Control Points for controlling access into the affect area. '
- Prtvate Property
- Removal of road impediments l 4 l
Attachment L (Page 11 of 38) Lesson Plan No. EM1011C Page 9 of 12 10.0 ORO RESPONSE MODES TP/18 10.1 Uttimate authortty for impimenting protec-tive actions for the public in Massachu-setts rests with the Governor. 10.1.1 Legal authorization must be obtained from the Govemor, or designes, before imple-menting certain provisions of our plan. 1 10.1.2 Once authorization has been received the )' ORO will function in one of the following modes. l 10.2 Standby Mode 1 Commonwealth of Massachusetts responds to the emergency and indicates that they have the necessary resources. The ORO activates its facilities according to plan and pre-pares to respond, if needed. i 10.3 Mcde 1 10.3.1 Commonwealth of Massachusetts responds to the emergency, but lacks the resources. The ORO supplies resources, as requested. The emergency response is under the direc-tion of the state or local officials. 10.4 Mode 2 i 10.4.1 Commonwealth of Massachusetts or local ' communities delegate authority which authorizes the ORO to implement the Seabrook Plan for Massachusetts Commu-nities. 11.0 TRAFFIC OUIDE AUGMENTATION EM1011C12 11.1 in the event of a radiological emergency, TP/19 Traffic Guides could be required to man ACPs (Restricted) for several days. In the event '. of this happening, relief for these personnel must be addressed. 11.2 New Hampshire Yankee has made arrangements under the Yankee Atomic Electric Company (YAEC) Mutual Assistance Plan to provide personnel for augmenting Traffic Guides. _ _ _ _ . _ _ . _w
Attachment L (Page 12 of 38) l I Lesson Plan No. EM1011C Page 10 of 12 l 11.3 If you are going to be rolleved by one of these individuals, you must remember that they have not had the benefits of this train-ing. As a result, you will need to indoctrin-ste your relief and ensure they have a firm grasp and are comfortable with their position prior to leaving the area. 11.4 Items to be covered during briefings should ! include: i o Status of Emergency o Procedures o Facility o Equipment o Paperwork 12.0 ROAD IMPEDIMENTS 12.1 The Evacuation Support Dispatcher conveys The Staging Area Leader and direction from the EOC through the Staging Evacuation Support Coordinator Area Leader to the Traffic Guides and Route routinely communicate with one Guides. another o Traffic Guides will be in direct radio EM1011C09 contact with the Evacuation Support Dis-patcher. 12.1.2 Due to the fact that Traffic Guides are out in the EPZ at TCPs and ACPs, the probability of encountering road impediments exists. 12.1.3 Any road impediments encountered should be EM1011C13 reported to the Evacuation Support Dispatcher immediately so that they may be tracked and
- the necessary arrangements for their removal
) con be made. 12.2 Recognizing Road impediments TP/20 o Any situation that slows or blocks traffic flow should be recognized as a road Impediment, such as:
- Stalled, overtumed, or wrecked vehicles
~
- Inoperable traffic lights
- Downed power lines
- Floods, fires, etc
- Road construction
' Attachment L (Page 13 of 38)
Lesson Plan No.' EM1011C Page 11 of 12 o Two road crews are prestaged at each of the six Transfer Points. 12.3 Reporting Road Impediments TP/21 i Report exact location.
- Town
- Route or Street
- Direction of travel
- Nearest intersection o Extent of damage.
- Injuries
- Hazards
- Types of vehicles involved I
- Numbers of vehicles involved o Type of equipment needed.
o Status of Traffic Flow 12.4 Romoving Road Impediments TP/22 o The response should be made at the lowest levels (as resources permit). o Road Impediments should be reported to the highest levels. ! i o Responsibilities:
. - The A/D, Response and implementation l initiates response and track status.
. Evacuation Support Coordinator develops
) specific plans to remove impediment or reroute traffic. l l - Staging Area Leader implements plan. NOTE: The addition of the Assistant Staging Area Leader will leave more
- Evacuation Support Dispatcher communi- . time for SAL to deal with this type
) cates instructions, of situation. l
- Transfer Point Dispatcher dispatches .
I road crews. 1 1 l
Attachment L (Page 14 of 38) )- Lesson Plan No. EM1011C Page 12 of (2. 1
- Road crews remove impediments. '
- Traffic Guides reroute traffic.
13.0
SUMMARY
We should mention that Traffic
, Guldes will get hands-on training during scheduled drills.-
13.1 At some later date, you will have an oppor- ,. tunity to get hands on training during l staging area drills. 13.2 Review Objectives and quiz individuals as the review progresses. f I L 1 l l
I Attachmsnt L (Pcga 15 of 38) cfc.gBROo l tems . Y ; jwx / / ! 4'N/NG G i EMERGENCY PLANNING l l MASS E - PIAN l TRAFFIC & ACCESS CONTROL LESSON PLAN NO. EM1011C , STUDENT HANDOUT ! l l l This material was developed for Seabrook training programs by the j Seabrook Training Group staff. The text material and figures contained in this document were developed for the purpose of instruction and should not be used in connection with either plant maintenance or plant l operation. This material may not be reproduced without the authorization ; of the STG Manager. ! I PREPARED BY: Y INSTRUCTOIC " ' s DATE: 1//S
/ /
~
S , REVIEWED BY: DATE: TRAINING SUPERVISOR f APPROVED BY: . pf DATE: 2-[/ 3 /gr? TRAlNiNG MANAGER I d REVIEWED BY: h1(bS@ptional) DATE: h 0
)
Attachment L (Pags 16 of 38) EMERGENCY PLANNING MASS E - PLAN EM1011C - TRAFFIC & ACCESS CONTROL l STUDENT OBJECTIVES TERMINAL OBJECTIVES: , Upon completion of this Training Module, students will be able to describe Traffic and Access Control Operations necessary in response to an emergency at Seabrook Nuclear Power Station. ENABLING OBJECTIVES:
- 1. STATE the emergency classification at which Stage 1,2 and 3 personnel are notified, and at which classification they report to their assigned facility.
- 2. IDENTIFY how the following will be notified: <
Stage personnel f Stage 2 personnel 1 l Stage 3 personnel
-(
- 3. DIFFERENTIATE between a Traffic Control Point and an Access Control Point. '
- 4. EXPLAIN Peripheral Access Control.
I
- 5. DEFINE a Restricted Area. i
- 6. IDENTIFY the lowest emergency classification at which ORO personnel will staff the following: i Emergency Operations Center (EOC)
Staging Area Traffic and Access Control Points
- 7. IDENTIFY the Traffic and Access Control Point staffing associated with Emergency i Response Planning Areas (ERPA's). i
)
- 8. STATE who dispatches the Traffic Guides from the Staging Area.
) 9. STATE the assignments that Traffic Guides may receive at the Staging Area.
- 10. STATE who maintains Radio Communications with Traffic Guides.
1 ' I 11. STATE who road impediments should be reported to. ( 12. STATE four actions which require Governmental Authorization. l
- 13. DESCRIBE how the Traffic Guides' function would be carried out for an emergency lasting several days.
l )
Attachment L (Page 17 of 38) FUNCTIONS Traffic Control e Directing traffic out of the EPZ a Access Control i
- Restricting traffic from entering the EPZ Road Impediments e Reporting road impediments I
1
- Directing traffic around road impediments !
I L EM1011C TP/02 f REV 3 ) l \
Attachment L (Page 18 of 38) TY3ES 0: ACCESS COK- RO_ Peripheral
- 10 Mile Radius e 5 Mile Radius
- Massachusetts /New Hampshire Border Restricted Zones e Established after a radiological plume passes >
- Represents the " plume footprint" ..
l f EM1011C TP/03 REV 3 [ l - i
Attachment L-(Page 19 of 38) l PER 3HERAL ACCESS CONTROL 1 Discourage entry, except for
- Persons returning to pick-up family
- Federal, State or Local authorities (with ID badges) l
- Emergency response personnel (with ID badges)
Provide emergency information e Advise public of EBS Stations e Advise public of locations for Reception Centers Dosimetry Recorckeepers conduct briefings and issue dosimetry to those entering the EPZ h i > t j EM1011C TP/04 REV3 } }
Attachmsnt L (Pags 20 of 38) l l l RESTRCTEJ ACCESS CONTROL Allow entry for farmers, business operators, etc... Dosimetry Recorckeepers (after the evacuation)
- Conduct briefings e Distribute dosimetry Persons entering Restricted Areas are to exit the same Access Control Point they entered
)
h f EM1011C TP/05 REV 3 ) )
Attachment L (Page 21 of 38) I l\l:ORVA- lON CARJS l TRAFFIC GUIDE EXPOSURE CONTROL
- 1. Road DRD approximately every 15 minutes and notify the Evacuation Support Dispatcher if:
- [0-200 mR) DRD approaches 175 mRom
- [0-20 R] DRO approaches 1 R,5 R,10 R,15 R, or 20 R
- DRDs or T1.D becomes lost, damaged or off-scale
- 2. Ingest Ki only when directed by the Radiological Health Advisor via the Evacuation Support Dispatener;
- Record date and time on Emergency Worker Dose Record Form
- Report any adverse side effects to the Evacuation Support Dispatcher EMERGENCY NUMBERS _
Staging Area (603) 893-7879 Questions from the general public (800) 458-2407 . Questions from news reporters (2
- 458-2408 EBS Radio Stations WD T 92.5 FM WHAV 1490 AM RECEPTION CENTERS Salisbury, Newbury, and Newburyport evacuate to Beverly Reception Center Amesbury, Merrimac and West Newbury evacuate to North Andover Reception Center USE OF RADIO g
Slide on-off switch (front) on HEPEATER TALK AROUND I Adjust volume - press VOL button (top) Select c5annel - press CHAN button (top) to TRAF RPT Press HOME to return to TRAF RPT TRAF RPT THAF TA TRANS RPT TRANS TA FACIL RPT FACIL TA Press Transmit button (side) to send 01/FLWRPT 01/FLW TA g PROCEDURES iM1011C TP/06 Refer to Appendix J, NHY ORO Traffic Management Manual. REV 3
Attachmsnt L (Paga 22 of 38) f S-~AFF hG SEQUENCE E.mergency Response Planning Areas (ERPAs) l] ERPA B i e Salisbury, Amesbury ERPA E e Newburyport, Newbury e West Newbury, Merrimac Regions Groups of ERPAs related to: e Wind Direction
# 2,5 and 10 Mile Radius l
EM1011C TP/07 l f REV3 [ ) i i l _ _ _ - - l
Attechmnnt L (Page 23 of 38) REGION 1 - ALL ERPAs .
, s. .
e
,_ _ _ l. , il i '"
4 " I i
%rr I s s , ,
em t
\, \ -
NN
.-_ i
~ \_ '
j s XN .. .
\ ,.
I -
\ ,
' ~
%2rtg l
h -
?
- 1 i
e
= j se ,, -
% - i l
' %gl h *
, r% NN.? !
,i ~
~
1
/ NN^ -
a l % ,s == r
%,, 5 ,
4 g r#' / , e '" %, e
% l l y Wi% / /%I J ') !
's, L 1 '
REGION 1 (ERPA'S A THRU G) EM1011C TP/08 REV 3 l 1 J
Attachment L (Page 24 of 38) REG O\ ~ 0 - BEACHES s.
* * * * ** ~ a. , l #
- lf"" ~ ~n s' '~~~)
\ CTf5 -
,, fy EPP g
=3"-"-"f M wrjgt Y %
"/ C
~
g / r-----di I
' ,7,, , 5 '
*r i .w,, g w
/- ,
% g Exg ,% "
, i - %, / ~s
\ i , W
-- q L -
. ,, ,,,, __ g u ~~ .,
l ! rw
*'*ST # 'M I
sr,(4 i* '%
%1t.cc : .
y
, i
' --- e d ', i g ,/
,' ._ %- ~ .a ,. ., ..
~ -
i . %
\ Jw .* * ""
g ,, .
% / ,
\ **
l 4 . % y b.
%g Q ;4 1 kl *
'L*1 stow %,q 'm
'*~ % gl~' ,' d'lg=1Q _.-
s - e- L I ~,,,c, fa
~~
;g
,/ '% # *%, -
I ' ' l % ,-,s$%' -
./-.,
5
- g <
i
- s, , - % ,r -
% ,\ / /, ,, .
\
/ /
\..WT%,# ,,# u.\ -
%p*
REGION 10 (BEACH ' CLOSING ONLY )
~
l EM1011C TP/09 g REV 3
Attachment L (Paga 25 of 38) REG 04 5 - 5 M LE RADIUS
,. . "#~'*"==g / p# .,
I es i
\
I
**%rtr / % i t* ~ ~ ,g- - -
- s cqq NM , s y : ,'
, y m u .< ,cL,, '
. - - ,- - - - - - ) .t z , , .-
~~
\w ..
f g p ,,
,,,,,, **.% s y r..
a s a,, % I \ I 7 t
---,L-- _ _, -_ _ _
, \
'=
"'<n, r r <> ,, .
% ,,, , l 1
I s I ~ A .l e R' M ;y E
~~7 , - - . ,
's s I Jw '
i
% / ,.
x E EM (s ,.
#I*
hetsrcy %f' ,.
,.. l 's -
\
E i
~ , . .
.. W--- E F, 4 D"'
wa v %~ 4, ,' , mygNMILL s'I# y Y *\ ' N .
\s \_
/ * *** r '
M
, %vC% ,/ %
s
\
pr. ,,,, ;Iw . ,
/
- g. s **
/ s/* , - 40kLtr 4
~,z ,- ,/ v .
E p ur' z ,
\ Town f
'"~~% / ,s' L ,*
E % s,s' g REIGON 5 (ERPA'S A, B, C, AND D) EM1011C TP/10 REV 3
Attachmsnt L (Paga.26 of 38) REGION 7 - NH/ MASS. BORJER s.
- u ,
g i #k.' .
-/ c -
i n i . . y.-
**~r, '~~- a t
.- - - - y4'w .,,.
j i- - c . _ ,, %,% e,qp,.
<,~ L * ,co, y t -
~
s
%' f../ .- '
-1 z, i ,
r-----4 ,1. , i (,~ i 4,. ar r.(-
,i ,,,,,*ooo -
r., . , s -
, 1 ,,, - , ,, ..
i s
~~ ,, s .
t-- - - I ,' ) EW l KQgy YA T gj gy g
%ILtt l i :
-;.I
./s /
,_ _i w
(I N gg 6 N i s i _ s 14 -
/
\
s 'T N g
- ESE 3
%1,10,
's ',q[*. ,,, 1 A28 .
l
,.. %,l N s
= 's ,.. ,
y _
,< r
-=-* ..
%%u s. -
,/['s g- *%,
l %,-,'$,
/ .
a i , sa w ar c i ' ,. - 5 q % ,\ s, -N.,..
/
/
g. M
--%1g , 'j,' /%f k.u.\'
) 's, REGION 7 (ERPA'S A AND C) ) gu1011C TP/11 ) REV 3 r
Attcchmsnt L (Pags 27 of 38) NOTI:lCATION STAGES STAGE 1 Notified via pager at an Unusual Event or higher Notified again/ report at an Alert or higher i STAGE 2 Notified via METS at an Alert or higher Report at an Alert or higher ; STAGE 3 Notified via METS at an Alert or higher Notified again/ report at a Site Area or higher EM1011C TP/12 REV 3 l )
Attachmsnt L (Paga 28 of 38) I VERIFICATION STAGE 3 OFF-HOURS , l
- Answer
- Type in PIN number
- Type in R (digit 7) if responding PIN number is your home phone number Area Code is not required for NH numbers Tone generators may be needed l
i EM1011C TP/13 ' REV 3 } } }
Att?'.chment L (Paga 29 of 38) 1 I I R$SPONSE AT A SITE AREA I f I := I SITE Transfer etchers
- Dosionetcy E
= = e.s Recordkeepers
. .s
=
(M RG) ' I I E
-I Access Control SITE Treffec Guides Treff trol I
I I EM1011C TP/14 REV3 I I
T S T S
, Nmo 7!ao p . ;3e $ om u g H TH UT NU H
T A 3 OU OO SO S TD S 4 V M NNN 1 E g D E D E C O5 R9 F-l EUO MG E8D VTN
/
P R T A E GO OSU MEO S T A R D NT I WB E T U V g I LO C C I A C I ON MO D T NTST UNAN D A C C A SEER I D NR SD OEEE SSN 1 - FDI 8M M EER 1 UO A EA HEDP DNA TT CCB LO TVNU l 0 ROA QuOB - NN CR I g- EECCC MMFFF EEF I VVAA A O OORRR T I I F F N I N ED VN EL A OM.E N EN CAD O/ CCC DRR E FFF CC III FFF 1 M E - MMTTT P TT R AO A N W R5A O P AAA RRR TTT C TC
= r eOX U9L N g :
Y E K - S E D IS L I CO A I OT A C SNC I DOS 1 O M 399 FA L 2 -e 3 0 N a W-E ePA O N T S O M P mE L N O O R S T A .E E N R E S T C L O ES M- S A L I aPM C A T O MF C I UF SO
', WS P, D
R F 22 D F :
/ N A
Y f, mA.A R T L . I T T R 4 O O
/, C X Y I R
R P U - S% . E 8 W E A N E '
- x T G ,
S N 5 - E A 9 < . W H - C 1 x T H m R E T N .
/,
xx
' x G
I L IO 5R I lt , y 9 D - m R U 8 w 1 TT N
.A
.L 3
5 T x * , E SO 6 l = N C 2 x HS E T T n m S E W UD ON SAE2 2 6 8oO.&. / Y, t f N T
- t 8
S O yEwN m I T A L AE h , H N ED T W C U O T O L RO I N_ O S /, m ** o# t m m { ! lIII lill
Attochmsnt L (Pags_31 of 38) RES30NSE & IM3LENENTATION Assistant Director, Response & Implementation
- JL 1r Evacuation Support Coordinator JL i
Y Staging Area Leader JL Y Evacuation Support Dispatchers JL ( if I Traffic Guides EM1011C TP/15 REV 3 ) }
6 Attachment L (Page 32 of 38) EVACUATION SU33 ORT . JS3ATCHERS Make assignments
- Traffic Control Points e Access Control Points e Supplemental Access Control Points 1
- Reroute Traffic Control Points Monitor radio communications l
l EM1011C TP/16 I REV 3 l l
Attachment L (Pega 33 of 38) I 3 LEGAL AUTHORIZATION Use of Emergency Broadcast System (EBS) Traffic Control Access Control Removal of Road Impediments f EM1011C TP/17 ) REV 3 I l
Attachmnnt L (Pagn 34.of 38) l ORO RESPONSE MODES STANDBY e Mobilize, but do not implement protective actions i Example: Traffic Guides locate at Control Points, but do not drect traffic l MODE 1 e implement actions under State authority l Example: Traffic Guides drect traffic under drections from the State MODE 2 e I.mplement actions under State authority delegated to the ORO Example: Traffic Guidos drect traffic under drections ! from the ORO j ' l i EM1011C TP/18 REV3
Attachment L'(Pcgn 35 of 38) SilFT TURNOVER Yankee Emergency Mutual Assistance Agreement / . o YAEC Nuclear Support Services Agreement 1 e Provides replacement personnel for Traffic , Guides Briefings !
- Status of emergency o Procedures e Equipment
- Paperwork l
l EM1011C TP/19 REV3
Attachment L (Paga 36 of 38) l l ROAD IMPEDIV ENTS a ,' EXAMPLES Stalled vehicles Draw bridges Wrecked vehicles inoperable traffic lights Downed powerlines Floods j Fires Road construction ROAD IMPEDIMENT REMOVAL Two road crews are prestaged at each of the six transfer points l EM1011C TP/20 [ REV3
Attachment L (Paga 37 of 38) i I i 9EPOR-~ \G ROAD IV 3EDVE\TS . Location i e Town
- Route number or street e Direction of travel i i
- Nearest intersection i Extent of Damage '
- Injuries
- Hazards '
i e Types of vehicles involved
- Number of vehicles involved l Type of equipment needed i
) Status of traffic flow } EM1011C TP/21 I REV3 )
Attachment L (Paga 38 of 38) g l 1 3 REMOVI\G ROAD IM?ED V ENTS i ASSISTANT DIRECTOR, RESPONSE AND IMPLEMENTATION s e initiates response and maintains status l EVACUATION SUPPORT COORDINATOR l l e Develops plan to remove impediment / reroute traffic l STAGING AREA LEADER 1 ,l
- Coordinates implementation of plan l
l EVACUATION SUPPORT DISPATCHER l e Communicates assignments l l TRANSFER POINT DISPATCHER !
- Dispatches Road Crews
-l .
t g ROAD CREWS / TRAFFIC GUIDES g
- Removes road impedment / reroutes traffic I EM1011C TP/22 I REV S I
I -
l i 1 I
)
i 1 ATTACHMENT M . (Practical Traffic Guide Trainincj Material) i
\
t i 1
'1 I
i
I Attachannt. M (Page 1 of 49) MEMORANDUM TO: D. Sherwin
~
I D. Bovino FROM: DATE: May 16, 1988
SUBJECT:
TRAFFIC GUIDE TRAINING The subject training will be conducted on Tuesday, June 7, 1988. Classroom training will be followed by a practical factors aussion conducted by Drills and Exercises personnel with assistance from the Training section. The following support is required from your area to ensure effective training is attained. Request contractor that is removing dirt and rocks from the
" South 40" to stop his activities on the afternoon of June 6, 1988 and not resume his activities until June 8, 1988.
Purchase lime or other suitable marking material to noe in outlining intersections (see attachments). Prepare and mark intersections identified on the attached sheets in the " South 40" and equipment Laydown areas. Bring Traffic Guide equipment identified on the attached sheets plus the Traffic Guide equipment listed in Appendix J to the site. 70 portable hand hel radios with fully charged batteries I need to be brought from the staging area to the site. These requirements were discussed with Bruce Mizzau on May 13, 1988. If you have any questions please call Floyd Calegar at ext. 3160. ec: D. Tailleart F. Straccia F. Galegar P#
Attachment M (Pago 3 of 49) KEY
~
' Movement Facilitated Movement Discouraged P:ict:ty 1 Summer
@ , Traffic Guide O Traffic Cone 1 Off Season X Barricace b
N Route 1 State S treet t o Parker Str c 0% 3 l' - Licht e I' g o
,o coo O
\
o* i . N s
\
No o,
, i I
Ligh T. i N s
,U.S. Route '.
e Traffic TOWR Control Post No. E NP 01 Newouryoort LOCATION: ERPA: E Intersection of Route 1. Parker SL anc State SL NOCE:97 DESCRIPTION
- 1. Olscourage trartic movement nortn on Route 1 and State Street
- 2. Focustate anc State SL onto Route trartic 1 movement soutn from Route 1 Patter SL l MANPOWER / EQUIPMENT 3 Traffic Guides t 7 Traffic Cones REVISION r NP-3
Attachmnnt,M ,(Pcgn 4 of 49) KEY Movement Facilitated -
; ; Movement OlScouraged Priority 2 - Summer [ -
Traffic Guide 2-Off Season Traffic Cone X Barncace i A i Main l , St. l l d i,/ t O O_C , Ma c .- st.
/
Route 110 3 O O O Oi 1 t 1 . ll, Light e i
~
j l - 1 7 e Traffic Control Post No. 8 AM . 04 TOWN: Amesoury l LOCATION: Macy SL anc Main SL } ER8A: B NOCE;44 DESCRIPTION l 1. Fac:htate traffic movement west on Macy SL (Route 1101 } 2. Discourage tratfc movement east on Route 110 l MANPOWER / EQUIPMENT l 1 Traffic Guide ,, j 9 Traffic Cones ; A-6
. Attachmsnt M (Page 5 of 49) ,
KEY n-Movement Facilitated
---=- Movement OlScouraged Priority 3 Summer
@ Traffic Guide 3.Off Season Q Traffic Cone X Barneade 1 l
/
/ /
oM 00 u N'N \p s O - l t
. ea #ch i
- t. l 1f N
Main Street Oo-Nd
@ de S
tr'e e ; if Whe:stene St. Route 113 l -N L : i e Traffic Control Poet No. E WM . 04 TOWN: West Nowoury , f LOCATION: West Nowoury Square ! EMPA E ! NOOE.152 .! DESCRIPTION.
- 1. Discourage traffic movement north to Main SL
- 2. Facilitate trattic movement on Main SL ,,
MANPOWER / EQUIPMENT (, 2 Trathe GuHies \ 6 Traffte Cones n-a REVISION
_ _ _ _ - _ _ _ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- ~ ._- i NHY-ORO EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS SUPPLEMENTAL TRAINING PROGRAM TITLE: 6RO / TRAFFIC GUIDE TRAINING START DATE/ TIME: 6/7/88 0800 FINISH DATE/ TIME: 6/7/88 1630 INSTRUCTOR: M. POUDRIER ; F. STRACCIA ; G. CATAPANO ; P. I PRUGNAROIA ; D. STUHLER ; P. RYAN ;F. GALEGAR OBJECTIVE: UPON COMPLETION OF THIS TABLETOP, THE ATTENDEE WILL HAVE REVIEWED: PLAYER-CONTROLLER INTERACTION ; NOTIFICATION, REPORTING AND ASSIGNMENT METHODOLOGY; TRAFFIC / ACCESS CONTROL MECHANICES ; AND PROPER RADIO USAGE . AGENDA:
- 1. DISCUSSION OF PLAYER-CONTROLLER COMMENTS FROM )
PREVIOUS DRILL CFD #88-04 .
- 2. NOTIFICATION , REPORTING , ASSIGNMENT , SHIFT TURNOVER METHODOLOGY .
- 3. PRACTICE TRAFFIC / ACCESS CONTROL MECHANICS AND RADIO !
OPERATIONS .
- 4. REVIEW OF GOOD DRILLSMANSHIP PRACTICES .
1 i I ] - -9
Attachmsnt M (Pago 7 of 49) ACTIVITY: TRAFFIC GUIDE' CLASSROOM TRAINING DAY /DATE: TUESDAY, JUNE 7, 1988 REPORTING TIME: 8:00am DURATION: 8:00am - 4:30pm LOCATION: GREENHOUSE MEETING ROOM, ROUTE 1, SEABROOK, NH (1 MILE NORTH FROM ENTRANCE TO SEABROOK STATION, ON LEFT). PARTICIPANTS: RED TEAM: TRAFFIC GUIDES TOPICS: Radio Use May-June schedule Review of reporting transportation process Traffic Control in a mock intersection (classroom and practical) Shift change Dri11manship 1 L l )
Attachment M (Page 8 of 49) TRAF3'IC GUIDE t EXPOSURE CONTROL 1. Road DRD approximately every 15 minutes and notify the Evacuation Support Dispatcher if:
-(0-200 mR) DRD approaches 175 mrem
- (0-20 R) DRD approaches 1 R,5 R,10 R.15 R, or 20 R
- DRDs or TLD becomes lost. damaged or off-scale
- 2. Ingest Kl only when directed by the Radiological Health Advisor via the Evacuation Support Dispatcher:
- Record date and time on Emergency Worker Dose Record Form
- Report any adverse side effects to the Evac"nion Support Dispatcher EMERGENCY NUMBERS Staging Area (603) 893-7879 Questions from the general public (800) 458-2407 Questions from news reporters (800) 458-2408 EBS Radio Stations WLYT 92.5 FM WHAV 1490 AM RECEPTION CENTERS I Salisbury, Newbury, and Newburyport evacuate to Beveriy Reception Center AmesDury. Mornmac and West Newbury evacuate to North Andover Reception Center l USE OF RADIO Silde on-off switch (front) on REPEATER TALK AROUND Adjust volume - press VOL button (top) '
TRAF RPT TRAF TA Select channel - press CHAN button (top) to-TRAF RPT I Press HOME to retum to TRAF RPT Press Transmit button (side) to send TRANS RPT TRANS TA FACIL RPT FACIL TA 01/FLWRPT- 01/FLW TA PROCEDURES I R.f., ,o Appenm. ~~v eRo T,a Mana emen, Manua< l
I Attachmont M (Page 9 of 49) ATTACHMENT 6 I HANDOUT APPROVAL PAGE I Handout: EM 1020C Revision Number: n I This material was developed for training of the New Hamosnire Yankee Offsite I Response Organization. The text materials and figures contained in this docu-ment were oeveloooo for instructional purposes only ano should not be used in connection with implementation of the plan. I I I , . I - M i ,)--.se %
, ! . / ". -"
Prepared by: /// A es 's . L s ~.' Date: - 111str ctor 4 Reviewed by: / WC l Date: Y Tr4Jning Supervisor / ' l - Reviewed by: - Date:
.I SME (Optional) -
l 5 Approved by: lI. dk -t Date: 3!!d!EE
~
Training Manager / ' lI I h Revision 0 I~
t Attachmant M (Page 10 of 49). COMMUNICATIONS AND ETIQUETTE FOR FIELD RADIO-OPERATORS l
. RADIO SYSTEM OPERATION AND THE DISPATCHER i
Radio operators using the Emergency Radio Network need to be aware that there may be more than 100 field radios in use on an 800 MHz radio channel during a drill or exercise and many radio messages will be generated. Uncontrolled radio use will rapidly cause
-l chaos on a radio channel because only one radio may be heard on a channel at a time.
There must be one radio unit to control the use of a radio channel. The Dispatch-ers at the Stagmg Area control field units in the New Hampshire Yankee Off Site Re- ' sponse Organization. There is a separate Olspatcher for eacn radio channel.' The Dispatcher is the -communications " policeman" . He directs the flow of radio traffic between all field units on a channel. A field radio operator must always make a request to the Dispatcher for permission to transmit a message on the radio. Be. fore granting the request, a Dispatcher will take into consideration the ongoing events and make a determination if the radio channel is clear for use. This process ansures that - the highest priority message is transmitted first. i The Dispatchers at the Staging Area are responsible for receiving and controlling the tactical communications of a drill or exercise. Another set of radio operators, located in the EOC at Newington Station, are responsible for monitoring the operations of a dnll or exercise and disseminating policy information affecting field units from officials at the EOC. The EOC stations are referred to as "Not Control." The Net Control radio operators will interrupt communications on the radio channel only if there is important information to be communicated from the EOC. They will transmit an
" alert" tone before transmitting information to obtain the attention cf all units. The-EOC stations also serve as backup Dispatchers.
MORSE CODE REPEATER IDENTIFICATION ) - (. Each 800 MHz repeater is equipped with a rnorse code identification device that trans-mits the radio call letters approximately every 15 minutes. Use tnic identification ! r signal as a reminder to check your dosimetry. ). 8 ; e _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ - - - - - - - -- - - - - ~
Attachmsnt M (Pags 11 of 49) RADIO MESSAGES I Messages are "cackets' of information communicated from one oorson to anotner The l urgency to communicate tnis information can ce generally classified into tnroe ' categories. EMERGENCY Messages are tne most imoonant message category. Emergency Messages contain information tnat reports _immeoiste aanger to life and procerty. Messages cf tnis type are those relating to fire. accidents with injuries, ano severe meoical oroolems reoutring immeolate medical attention. i PRIORITY SIESSAGES are tne secono most imoonant message categorv : i P riority Message centains information tnat recons 'octential" danger or information tnat must De communicate cuickly to' crevent wasteo time, money or cualitation of i effort. Examores of situaticns reoutring Priority Messages could be:
~i
- 1. Reporting a non-injury accicent blocking traffic;
- 2. Notification of a enangeo status of a orill: ano !
- 3. Messages regaroing fast breaking events affecting tne placement of personnet.
Messages cisseminatec from tne EOC are usually considered Priority Messages Priority Messages are lower in oriority tnan Emergency Messages. ROUTINE SIESSAGES are ine iniro categorv. Au remaining message information falls into tnis category Routine *.*essages are of lowest =riority ano must give way te Emergency anc Priority Messages ) e W l / )
\.
Attachment M (Paga 12 of 49) RADIO OPERATING PROCEDURE The following are examples of radio messages to demonstrate correct radio usage: Traffic Unit Two: Traffic Dispatcher from Traffic Two. This is a drill. Over. Traffic Dispatcher: Go ahead Traffic Two. Over. Traffic Unit Two: Traffic Two is in position at Traffic Point Two. Over. Traffic Dispatcher: This is a drill. Message received. Traffic Dispatcher clear. This example shows a Routine Message that is directed to the Dispatcher. It will be the standard practice in most cases. Notice that the message required _ only four radio transmissions and the whole process took less than 30 seconds. Never assume that a message has been received unless you receive verification. In this case, there is no need for the field unit to make another transmission because the Dispatcher has verified that the message was received.
'l The use of the word "over" at the end of a radio transmission indicates that you have ficished the transmission and that you are turning the channel over to the other unit for a reply. The use of the word " clear" or "out" at the end of a message indicates that you have finished communicating and you expect no further messages from that unit.
The use of "This is a drill" at the approximate beginning and end of a series of radio transmissions serves as a reminder to all, including casual observers, that a drill is being conducted on the radio channel. It is not necessary to say "This is a drill
- on every radio transmission. Mort on this topic will be discussed later in this document.
The following example demonstrates the correct way to call a radio unit other than the dispatcher: Traffic Unit Two: Traffic Dispatcher from Traffic Two. This is a drill. Over. Traffic Dispatcher: Go ahead Traffic Two. Over. Traffic Unit Two: Request permission to call Traffic Five. Over. Traffic Dispatcher: Traffic Two call Traffic Five. Over. L Traffic Unit Two: Traffic Five from Traffic Two. Over. L Traffic Unit Five: Go ahead Traffic Two. Over. Traffic Unit Two: Please meet me at the intersection of Main and West Streets to pick up your traffic cones. Over. l \ ) Traffic Unit Five: I will meet you there in five minutes. This is a drill. Traffic Five clear. 3 i __.__n____.__._____. _ _ _ _ _ _ 1
Attachment M (Page 13 of 49)' ! i Traffic Unit Two: Traffic Dispatcher from Traffic Two. Over. Traffic Dispatcher: Go ahead Traffic Two, Over. Traffic Unit Two: Traffic Two is clear. Traffic Dispatcher: This is a drill. Traffic Dispatcher clear. The :abovo example demonstrates the correct procedure for one field unit 'to call another. Notice that the Traffic Dispatcher passed control of the radio channel to Traffic Two. Traffic Two later returned control back to the Dispatcher. The proco-dure is lengthy, but it is absolutely necessary to maintain control and keep order on a radio channel. Notice that the words used are brief, clear and precise. The fo!!owing example demonstrates the correct way to transmit fictitious Public Safety information during a drill or exercise: l Traffic Unit Two: This is a drill. Traffic Dispatcher from Traffic Two with a test : emergency message. Over. Traffic Dispatcher: Go ahead Traffic Two. Over. 1 Traffic Unit Two: This is a test message. I am reporting a traffic accident with injuries to two people at the intersection of High and Maple Streets. ' This is a test message. Over. Traffic Dispatcher: Traffic Two, I have received your test emergency message. Please ! standby for further instructions. Over.
]
Traffic Unit Two: This is a drill. Traffic Two will be standing by for further infor-motion. (A FEW MINUTES ELAPSE) Traffic Dispatcher: Traffic Two from Traffic Dispatcher. Over. Traffic Unit Two: Go ahead Traffic Dispatcher. Over. Traffic Dispatcher: As part of the drill, we are actually sending a tow truck to your loca-tion. Please standby at that location and notify us when the truck j arrives. Also, as part of the drill, we are simulating the notifi-j cation of Public Safety Personnel. Over. J Traffic Unit Two: This is a drill. I underitand that you are actually sending a tow truck to my location. 'I will notify you when it arrives. Traffic L' Two is clear. ' Traffic Dispatcher: This is a drill. Traffic Dispatcher clear.
Attachmsnt M (Page 14 of 49) The words "This is a test message must be used directly before and after any fictitious Public Safety information is transmitted over a radio. This action is required by FCC rules. It is possible for the general public to interce t these radio transmissions. Reception of information during a drill or exercise could possibly cause concern or panic to someone if they thought the information was real. It is important that personnel taking part in the drill understand when fictitious Public Safety information is being exchanged. if you have to - report a real emergency during a drill or exercise. make certain that it is understood by the perso'n to whom you are reporting the information. in the initial portion of this example. Traffic Unit Two ' called the Dispatcher and indi-cated that he had a " test Emergency Message." This information tells the Dispatcher that he has a simulated emergency message to report. This form of request is also used to report Priority Messages (" test Priority Message"). No special announcements are used for Routine Messages. GENERAL CONSIDERATIONS OF RADIO OPERATION When using a portable radio, hold the radio so that the antenna is vertical. LISTEN before transmitting. se sure you are not interrupting a conversation in pro-gress. Press the transmit button and wait a second before you begin to speak. There is a slight delay between the time you press the transmit button and the time the repeater is ready to retransmit your signal. SPEAK SLOWLY AND PRONOUNCE EACH WORD CLEARLY. If the Dispatcher tells you that you have a weak signal, try to move a few feet to a more open location and try again. , LEAVE A SHORT PAUSE between eacn transmission. someone may have an Emergency Message to transmit. DIRECT initisi COMMUNICATIONS TO THE DISPATCHER The Dispatcher is in charge of the radio channel. All requests to transmit must be directed ' to the Dispatcher. , 1 f Always make your radio transmissions as short as possible. REMEMBER YOU SHARE the channel with up to 100 other radio units.
- Make sure the other station has verified the receipt of your message.
DO NOT COMMENT on a conversation unless absoluteiy necessary. use the correct operating procedure. ) ' )
Attachmant M (Page 15 of 49) lI EMERGENCY PLANNING 'l MASS E . PLAN COMMUNICATIONS I STUDENT OBJECTIVES (4/19/88) l TERMINAL OBJECTIVE: l Upon completion of this training module, the trainee will be able to receive and transmit messages in compliance with FCC regulations and I good radio operating practices using the following radio equipment as appropriate: GE M.PD 800 MHz Portable Radio, GE CMX 800 MHz Radio Console, GE Phoenix-SX EMS Radio Console and the Motorola "Converta-l -Com" Mobile Radio Console with a MX 300 series "Handi-Talkie" Radio, the Motorola Portable Radios, the GE Phoenix-SX Radio Console, the l GE Phoenix with GE S-950 Control Heads, the ICOM IC-27A FM g Transceiver, the ICOM IC-551D Transceiver and the MA. Command and Control Radio Console. I ENABLING OBJECTIVES:
- 1. DIFFERENTIATE between Base Stations, Mobile Radios, Portable Radios, Converta-Coms and Repeaters.
I 2. LIST the FCC radio regulations identified in this training module. I 3. LIST six radio etiquette items. l 4. STATE the Radio Control Unit for the NHY Offsite Response Organization. I 5. DIFFERENTIATE between thethree radio message categories of g Emergency, Priority and Routine;
- E '
- 6. DESCRIBE the correct protocol for initiating and terminating a g conversation on the radio. j
- 7. l DEMONSTRATE the operation of the appropriate radio equipment.
I . EM10200 TP/1 l l.
Attachm2nt M (Page 16 of 49) RADIO DEFINITIONS I Base Station: Radio station licensed by FCC and typically high-powered (i.e.,100 watts). i Mobile: Vehicle - mounted radios and typically moderate - powered (i.e.,10 watts). Portable: Huid - held unit "walkie -talkie" and typically low-powered (i.e., 4 watts) Repeaters: Reaotely -located receivers and transmitters that boost the power and extend the range of mobile, portable and base radios. 1 I Converta-Coms: Mobile console tised to amplify a portable radio's signal to extem'-its range using a vehicle's power source and an uternal antenna. t ) EM1020C TP/2 f REV1
Attachmsnt M (P ga 17 of 49) i FCC RADIO REGULATIONS l Restrict radio transmissions to the minimum practical time needed. Monitor radio channel before transmitting to prevent interference. Do not intentionally interfere with another radio unit by trans-mitting at the same time. Do not make inappropriate use of the radio. Do not use inappropriate language on the radio. For radio systems without the Morse Code identifier, use your given unit identifier to identify yourself on the radio. Do not transmit false emergency information on a radio, i Always use "This is a drill" before and after you transmit any fictitious or simulated information. Always use "This is a test message" before and after any fictitious I Public Safety information is transmitted over a radio. f l EM1020C TP/3 { } l
Attachmnnt M (Page 18 of 49) l I. I RADIO ETIQUETTE I. l l l Use correct operating procedure. I Listen before transmitting. Leave a short pause between each transmission. I g Direct initial communications to Dispatcher. I Make radio transmissions as short and precise as possible. i Make certain that the other station has verified receipt of your message. I ! L Use the radio only when needed. . E i g Do not interject comments into a conversation unless absolutely nec- ) essary. LI I EM1020C TP/4 iI-4
Attachmant M (Page 19 of 49) I RADIO DISPATCHER ! I 1 l Communications " policeman." Designated control unit for the Off-Site Response Organization is the l Dispatcher at the Staging Area. I Dispatcher grants permission to transmit message on radio after con-I sidering: l . Ongoing events
. Message priority
. Radio channel clearance I ;
I I. - I i 'I: tI I.
- EM1020C TP/5
R~ Attachment M (Page 20 or 49) 1 I RADIO MESSAGE PRIORITY I ! I Em6rgency: l Most important message category. Contains infor-mation that reports immediate danger to life and l property. I I l Priority: Second most important message category. Contains information that reports " potential" danger or infor-I mation that must be communicated shortly to prevent wasted time, money or duplication of action. I Routine: Lowest priority message category. All messages not l meeting Emergency or Priority Message category requirements. Must give way to Emergency and Priority Messages. l I i I EM1020C TP/6 1 I
Attachment M (Page 21 of 49) I I RADIO OPERATING PROCEDURE I I ROUTINE MESSAGE TO DISPATCHER
.l
^
I Traffic Unit Two: Traffic Dispatcher from Traffic Two. This is a I drill. Over. I
! Traffic Dispatcher: Go ahead Traffic Two. Over.
I Traffic Unit Two: Traffic Two is in position at Traffic Point Two. Over. I Traffic Dispatcher: This is a drill. Message received. Traflic Dis-l patcher clear. I i II I 'I EM1020C TPn h REV 1
I Attachmsnt M (Paga 22-of 49) I RADIO OPERATING PROCEDURE 'I. ,I
- CALL TO UNIT OTHER THAN i I DISPATCHER
'I '3 Traffic Unit Two: Traffic Dispatcher from Traffic Two. This is a E drill. Over. l Traffic Dispatcher: Go ahead Traffic Two. Over. 1 g Traffic. Unit Two: Request permission to call Traffic Five. Over. ! Traffic Dispatcher: Traffic Two call Traffic Five. Over. Traffic Unit Two: Traffic Five from Traffic Two. Over. ! I Traffic Unit Five: Go ahead Traffic Two. Over. I Traffic Unit Two: Please meet me at the intersection of Main and West Streets to pick up your traffic cones. Over I Traffic Unit Five: I will meet you there in five minutes. This is a drill. Traffic Five clear. Traffic Unit Two: Traffic Dispate'her from Traffic Two. Over. I . Traffic Dispatcher: Go ahead Trafiic Two. Over. l Traffic Unit Two: Traffic Two is clear. ll Traffic Dispatcher: This is a drill. Traffic Dispatcher clear. I EM1020C TP/8 l REV1
Attachmsnt M (Page 23 of 49) RADIO OPERATING PROCEDURE l l _ TRANSMISSION OF FICTITIOUS 1 PUBLIC SAFETY INFORMATION l Traffic Unit Two: This is a drill. Traffic Dispatcher from Traffic Twe with a test emergency message. Over. i Traffic Dispatcher: Go ahead Traffic Two. Over. Traffic Unit Two: This is a test message. I am reporting a ; traffic accident with injuries to two people i at the intersection of High and Maple Streets. This is a test message. Over. Traffic Dispatcher: Traffic Two, I have received your test emergency message. Please standby for further instructions. Over. Traffic Unit Two: This is a drill. Traffic Two will be standing l by for further information. Over. i Traffic Dispatcher: This is a drill. Traffic dispatcher clear. " l I } EM10200 TP/9 f REV1
. 1 - -
Attachmant M (Paga 24 of 49) l TECHNICAL CONSIDERATION:S'S OF l RADIO OPERATIONS 1 i Eneure portable radio's antenna is vertical. t Press transmit button firmly prior to speaking. Talk in front of the radio or microphone in a firm but normal voice: i
~
. Do not speak fast i
. Pronounce each word clearly ;
i If Dispatcher reports a weak signal, move to a more open location. I If using a desk microphone with a base unit, speak into the micro-phone from a distance of 12 inches. L f , EM1020C TP/10 } REV1
Attachmsnt M (Paga 25 of 49) 800 MHz GE M-PD I PORTABLE RADIO CONTROLS
'l
'. l OFF/ON Front, left side of battery pack.
Switch: Controls power to radio. ;
\
VOL Button: Sets the receive audio level. ! Adjust by depressing button. Listen to sound level of " beep." Display indicates volume level. I i CHAN Button: Selects transmit / receive channel. Select by depressing button. i Display indicates channel. HOME Button: Selects a pre-programmed transmit / receive repeater l channel. Button returns radio to "home" channel. t L EM1020C TP/11 I REV 1
Attachmont M-(Page 26 of 49) g 800 :MHz GE M-PD-I g PORTABLE RADIO DISPLAY { I CHAXXEL TKDICATION I I . I g NO. DISPLAY CHANNEL TRAF RPT l Traffic Repeater 1 2 TRAF TA Traffic Talk-around i 3 TRANS RPT Transportation Repeater- ! g 4 TRANS TA Transportation Talk-around 5 FACIL RPT Facilities Repeater 6 FACIL TA I 7 OVFLW RPT Facilities Talk-around Overflow Repeater i 8 OVFLW TA Overflow Talk-around . 'I I 1 1 - lI II 'I EM1020C TP/12 I>
Attachment M (Page 27 of 49) m MZ MC M M Ne Z Z
*2 m m --
i m-E O3 ' . ZZ l ' n i a I C C Z Qc Ze Z w Mew -- i W e a
= z '
e
!m E O'
C :
=
I m == x , I Eg m N ; N Tm df E hec ' - m m 3"
-' gN
'-]/ g Z -m CM E ul A "- .
g I , mes= !* 3 4 " g b.
- -2G y C 1 g \y _s n. m g n}le s .. . M M !
- - " . 4: !
.O .? : y l Z *: 3 l ;;?i',
~ _
'? auf M E FT1 l h$
e ;:; , s x i
'fj'A..#
~
/
N Z M m M C C-
., 's
( '- l 5 K amas
- m O')
33 ; m
- M m
O Mm ) m .m =r _s 4 J S E ZE 3 eg Z$ n- r 2m q m =C EM t Z M w M =E = m F" W M 1 I
- _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ 1
n t 2 1 g g h e f diR , s e
- a pe t
n RT ct a ee X F F_X .*. d ,,- sr 21 p
, 9 s
p ,
., , p
}$ i
~ # .
- 5 R
P T MRT XX s' ~ 1F2F R N[.- .1 _~ g w ,~ ,'
~
g
.J , ~
G.>> SY ,, . . " ~ s'
- ~,.
N i g , ( g ' ~
.a D
~
y D
~
P
,~
f o r T" RT E al . ,,~, . R X X2_ . t s k FF - h oA r r 22 A t o T
~~*
u dn I i d" s t RT O a c e n X X1. d FF . 22 N s S 1
Attachmant M (Page 29 of 49) , 800 MHz GE M-PD , PORTABLE RADIO OPERATIONAL MODE INDICATORS HI: High power indicator
. Radio has been programmed for high power oper-
. ation TX: Transmit indicator
. Radio is in the transmit mode '-
1 BSY: Channel busy indicator ; l
. Radio channel is in use l
SIG: Channel guard indicator i
. Radio functions the same regardless of SIG
) BAT: Low battery indicator
. Radio battery pack is discharged EM1020C TP/13 ,
l
Attachmant M (Pcga 30 of 49) 800 MHz GE M-PD PORTABLE RADIO i i ALERT TONES Continuous Beep:
- 1. Transmit key depressed for more than two minutes:
. Provides warning
. Radio ceases transmitting l
-2. Circuitry Failure: .
. Provides warning l
. Radio ceases transmitting
. May select another channel i
1 MORSE CODE REPEATER IDENTIFICATION: ! ) l Transmits radio call letters every 15 minutes: i.
. Use as a reminder to check dosimetry
[ EM10200 TP/14
.st
Attachmsnt M (Page 31_of 49) l 800 MHz GE M-PD
.)
I PORTABLE RADIO OPERATION l t Slide ON/ OFF switch on battery pack to ON. Press VOL button to desired listening level. Press HOME or CHAN button to obtain desired channel. 1 Transmit as follows: i
. Hold radio so antenna is vertical ,,
I
. Listen to channel before transmitting
-1
. Press PUSH -TO ' TALK switch l
. Pause for a second 1
. Speak directly into grille
)
- Firm but normal voice
^
1 - Do NOT shout { . Release PUSH-TO-TALK switch
. Listen for reply EM1020C TP/15
Attachmant M (Page 32 of 49) ! i 800 MHz GE M-PD i PORTABLE RADIO l BATTERY PACK REPLACEMENT l Removal of battery pack from radio c Turn radio OFF Press down on battery release latch Slide battery pack out
. Do NOT twist battery pack Connection of battery pack to radio i s
ON/OFF switch on battery pack is OFF h Align battery pack with slide grooves Insert battery pack into grooves
. Do NOT twist battery pack l
EM10200 TP/16
Attachment M (Page 33 of 49) l l OVERFLOW CHAXXEL USE l i When radio communications trafHe is excessively heavy on one of the Field Radio Communications channels i For radio communications not - directly ! related to any assigned channel 1
-i i
For Field Radio Communications System
~
radio channel equipment failure ! 1 ) 1 i ) 1 / f EM10200 TP/17 i ).
J. Attachment M (Page 34 of 49)
..., e s.
s:- k ,\s s l f- *4:s'y 4 8 .
)
)
/
I. e
. 8 ,
e*
j Attachment M (Page 35 of 49)
~
\
x ..f s 1.n t/
. /
e O 9 I f' .. l
.- O D .
,;[ ,
Attachmsnt M (Page 36 of 49) 1 s. l k
\.:i W .
\ \
F c' h( i e l[ l' O T . 1 .
- t. _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
Attachment M (Page 37 of 49)
~
Nu
~
/)
- q. .
t I Tq ' f i I
]
Y
\l
// t i
\
- - s 3
I l
- l. ..
) .
. Attachment M (Pago 38 of 49)
/ * * *
/ ..e***
- e' ,, , , ,
+ .
% I r
o ( i I .
,p
\
l r . J ] . 4
w . J. - .'ii.,_,__... Attachment M (Page 39 of 49) A g. O h l
" \ .
/
- I C
l l '
,i 1
O 1
- 7. . r.
l 1 1 J
Attachment M-(Page 40 of 49) l l
.. H l
4 g i l
'\./ *
\
t f ; 4 j' ) l
- l. . .
.. \
; Attachment M (Page 41 of 49) )
I i W l
~
6 4 N'/. .
. 1 c
5 y
, r, f .
Q . i e O g. i k f 1 .
Attachment M .(Page 42 of 49) 8 I' g l 8~ - q \ .
/ ,,
l i - w . ' l i Ms , h av I \ g . g. '~ I. g I
-, Attachment M (Page 43 of 49) i i
1 I k s .
/
/
6 j.' f I l P . I ) 4
Attachment M (Page 44' of 49)
/
JJ c g<p7 , w .f l M .
\ l
/
i. ) l
,, Attachment M,(Page 45 of 49)
%( j, il I _ d .
~
.Ff j' .
8 . I NI I i lh W' M i ry
-y
\I ,
I {/?4./
~
F1 _ '( N # g , - -
/
I 1 s\ g 'o I . I .
l, Attachment M (Page 46 of 49)
# N O
A~
' 1 e6. u e
.a*
t \W l
+ s, 1 0
e 4 6
\ / '
i a i e l
_ v. _ . _ _ . _ _ _
, Attachment M (Page 47 of 49) h y
s = e ) w% \ r B y
~.
,p
/ <
(. ) .
. .....s
Attachment M (Page 48 of 49)
\
?
e I. - g;TM, . g . . I
~
I . I~ I -
{ .** , Attachment M (pag, 49 0f 4g) e t l
- E \ l Is'
\\ .
f* r l a )
. . ' .}}