ML20235C358

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Comments on Amend 7 of PSAR for Plant.Applicant Should Outline Probable Adverse Effects on Fish & Wildlife Resources Should Temp Inversions Occur
ML20235C358
Person / Time
Site: Limerick, 05000000
Issue date: 09/02/1971
From: Berryman J
INTERIOR, DEPT. OF, FISH & WILDLIFE SERVICE
To: Price H
US ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION (AEC)
Shared Package
ML20235B311 List: ... further results
References
FOIA-87-111 NUDOCS 8709240428
Download: ML20235C358 (1)


Text

- _ _ - - -

I APPb

'I -38 f.lETEE$.

A t

.~

  • 3 UNITED STATES p

DEPARTMENT OF Ti1E ItBERIOR j

FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVJCE f

j

- BUREAU OF EFORT FICHERIES AND WILDLIFE.

I WAsmoroN, D.C. 4240 i

$tt I M

' Mr. Rarold L. Price Director of Regulation U,8. Atcaic Energy Cosmission washington, D.C.

20$5 Dear Mr. Price

~

We have reviewed Amendment No. 7 of the Preliminary Safety Analysis Eeyurt, sur u c Lin.orici. Gs tating Str.tict., L'aite 1 sid I A*:0 Dockets Nos. 50-352 and 50-353, Philadelphia Electric Ctwpaqr. The following conscents are presented for your eensiderations h,

Temperature inversims and their effect on dispersion of stack. gas releases is discussed in Section 2 3 5 of the amendment. Thereis it is stated "it may serve as as e Hitional holdup, wherein the adverse effects of poor-I I

dispersion are counteracted by a longer period for radio-l setive deosir to occur." Although such circumstances would allow a 1coger period for radioactive doeny, the immediate environment would be subjected to concentrated radiation levels for a langer than moraal period. The applicant should outline the probable adverse effects on fish sad a

wildlife ::wuurcu should this situation arise.

y h

In idection 12.2.7, Schuylkill River intake P.nd puny stnetures tre discussed, but velocities at the intake i

screens are not delineated. Since velocities greater j

j than 0.75 fps could lapose hasardous conditions to squatie a

i organisms, the applicant should state the upected velte-

.i j

ities et this stneture.

'l l

f Appendix I, Section 1.1.1. discusses class IV emergencies.

While we realise the public safety mast be of the first I

priority, contingency plans to protect fish and wildlife I

resources also should be provided. We wish to point out that hypert>olic cooling towers and, meteorological towers pose potential hazards to flying birds, particularly migrat-g ing waterfowl during certain atmospheric conditions which I;

induce fog.

We appreciate the oryva-aty to review and comment on the amendnent.

Sincerely s,

j eg'98He87o'21 gg m-MEN'ZB7-111 PDR

+gl***!*d Director bb w --

m