|
---|
Category:OPERATING LICENSES-APPLIATION TO AMEND-RENEW EXISTING
MONTHYEARJAFP-99-0278, Application for Amend to License DPR-59,providing Rev C to Proposed TS Change Converting Current TSs to Improved Standard Tss.Withdrawal of JPTS-95-004,proposed TS Changes Re Inservice Leak & Hydrostatic Testing Operation,Reflected1999-10-14014 October 1999 Application for Amend to License DPR-59,providing Rev C to Proposed TS Change Converting Current TSs to Improved Standard Tss.Withdrawal of JPTS-95-004,proposed TS Changes Re Inservice Leak & Hydrostatic Testing Operation,Reflected JAFP-99-0279, Correction to 980226 Application for Amend to License DPR-59,revising Ref 19 to Assume 90% SBGT Sys Charcoal Efficiency,Instead of 99%.Ref 19 on TS Page 285 Needs to Be Changed from Rev 0 to Rev 1,based on Revised Calculation1999-10-14014 October 1999 Correction to 980226 Application for Amend to License DPR-59,revising Ref 19 to Assume 90% SBGT Sys Charcoal Efficiency,Instead of 99%.Ref 19 on TS Page 285 Needs to Be Changed from Rev 0 to Rev 1,based on Revised Calculation ML20216J8321999-09-29029 September 1999 Application for Amend to License DPR-59,proposing Change to TS 3.5.B.3 & Associated Bases.Change Extends LCO for RHRSW Sys from 7 Days to 11 Days with Special Conditions to Allow for Installation of Mod to Division a RHRSW Strainer ML20196F5931999-06-22022 June 1999 Application for Amend to License DPR-59,changing to Pressure Temp limits.Pressure-temp Curves & Associated LCO & Bases Changes Included in Proposed Amend ML20195B8741999-06-0101 June 1999 Revised Application for Amend to License DPR-59,converting Plant CTS to Be Consistent with Improved Std TS in NUREG-1433,Rev 1,dtd Apr 1995 ML20206U1351999-05-19019 May 1999 Application for Amend to License DPR-59,requesting 14 Day AOT for EDG Sys ML20205K1041999-04-0505 April 1999 Application for Amend to License DPR-59,removing Position Title of General Manager from Sections & Will State That If Site Executive Officer Is Unavailable,Responsibilities Will Be Delegated to Another Staff Member,In Writing ML20205D8271999-03-26026 March 1999 Application for Amend to License DPR-59,converting CTS to Be Consistent with Improved Std TS in NUREG-1433,Rev 1 ML20199H3511999-01-15015 January 1999 Application for Amend to License DPR-59,removing Local Power Range Monitor (LPRM) Signal Calibr Method from TS Table 4.1-2 JAFP-98-0385, Revised Application for Amend to License DPR-59,revising Design Features.Rev 7 to non-proprietary & Proprietary Versions of HI-971661, Licensing Rept for Reracking of Ja FitzPatrick SFP, Encl.Proprietary Info Withheld1998-12-0303 December 1998 Revised Application for Amend to License DPR-59,revising Design Features.Rev 7 to non-proprietary & Proprietary Versions of HI-971661, Licensing Rept for Reracking of Ja FitzPatrick SFP, Encl.Proprietary Info Withheld ML20236X7811998-08-0303 August 1998 Application for Amend to License DPR-59,proposing Rev to Note Which Will Allow TS Section 1.1.A Re SLMCPR to Be Applicable During Cycle 14 ML20236M6151998-07-10010 July 1998 Application for Amend to License DPR-59 to Relocate Portions of TS 3/4.6.C, RCS - Coolant Chemistry, from TS to UFSAR & Applicable Plant Procedures Controlled by 10CFR50.59 Process ML20236L2741998-07-0606 July 1998 Application for Amend to License DPR-59,amending Tech Specs Section 3.5.b.1 Re Main Condenser Steam Jet Air Ejector & Table 3.10-1 Re Radiation Monitoring Sys That Initiates &/Or Isolates Sys ML20249B1551998-06-16016 June 1998 Application for Amend to License DPR-59,relocating Safety Review Committee Review,Audit & Related Record Keeping Requirements from Tech Specs to Chapter 17 of Fsar,Per Administrative Ltr 95-06 ML20217K0361998-03-30030 March 1998 Application for Amend to License DPR-59,changing Interval of Selected LSFT from Semiannually to Once Per 24 Months & Revising Definition of LSFT to Be Consistent w/NUREG-1433 ML20247F7791998-02-26026 February 1998 Application for Amend to License DPR-59,changing Allowable Containment Leakage Rate to 1.5 Percent Per Day & Assumed Value of Filter Efficiency for SBGT Used in Calculations to Determine Dose Effects to Onsite ML20202G8551998-02-0606 February 1998 Revised Application for Amend to License DPR-59,to Revise TS Tables 3.2-2 & 4.4-2,revising Allowed Outage Times for 4kV Emergency Bus Undervoltage Trip Functions & Replace Generic Actions for Inoperable Instrument Channels ML20202D5391998-02-0606 February 1998 Application for Amend to License DPR-59,allowing RCS Pressure Tests to Be Performed in Cold Shutdown Mode ML20202D3881998-02-0606 February 1998 Application for Amend to License DPR-59,revising RPS Normal Supply Electrical Protection Assembly Undervoltage Trip Setpoint as Result of Reanalysis Based on Most Limiting Min Voltage Requirements of Applied Loads ML20203J6671997-12-12012 December 1997 Application for Amend to License DPR-59,revising TS Section 6.2.2.6 Re Administrative Controls for Normal Working Hours of Plant Staff Who Perform Safety Related Functions ML20217H9801997-10-14014 October 1997 Application for Amend to License DPR-59,proposing Revision to TS Re Design Features Section,Including Revised Limits for Fuel Storage.Changes Correct Maximum Exposure Dependent, Infinite Lattice Multiplication Factor for Fuel Bundles ML20217G2991997-10-0808 October 1997 Application for Amend to License DPR-59,reflecting Change in LCO ML20140D8011997-04-14014 April 1997 Application for Amend to License DPR-59,deleting Plant Staff Performance Audit Requirement from Section 6.5.2.9.b & Incorporating Plant Staff Performance Review Requirement in Section 6.5.2.8 ML20135B1871996-11-26026 November 1996 Application for Amend to License DPR-59,requesting That Snubber Operability,Surveillance & Records Requirements in TS Be Relocated to Plant Controlled Documents ML20115G0581996-07-12012 July 1996 Application for Amend to License DPR-59,revising Min Critical Power Ratio Safety Limit ML20113B6261996-06-20020 June 1996 Application for Amend to License DPR-59,supporting Adoption of Primary Containment Leakage Rate Testing Requirements of Option B 10CFR50,App J at Plant ML20112D5661996-05-30030 May 1996 Application for Amend to License DPR-59,eliminating Selected Response Time Testing Requirements ML20112D1501996-05-30030 May 1996 Application for Amend to License DPR-59,revising Minimum Critical Power Ratio Safety Limit & Associated Basis ML20112D2671996-05-30030 May 1996 Application for Amend to License DPR-59,revising ATWS Recirculation Pump Trip Reactor Pressure ML20112B6411996-05-16016 May 1996 Application for Amend to License DPR-59,deleting Requirement for PORC to Review Fire Protection Program & Implementing Procedures.Addl Deletion of Insp & Audit Requirements of Specs 6.14.A & 6.14.B ML20108D1151996-04-24024 April 1996 Application for Amend to License DPR-59,supporting Adoption of Primary Containment Lrt Requirements of Option B to 10CFR50,App J & Clarifying Numerical Value of Allowable Containment Leakage Rate as 1.5% Per Day ML20107M4461996-04-24024 April 1996 Application for Amend to License DPR-59,relocating TS 3.11.B/4.11.B Crescent Area Ventilation & Associated Bases from TS to Controlled Procedure ML20101H6671996-03-27027 March 1996 Application for Amend to License DPR-59,adopting Primary Containment Lrt Requirements of Option B to 10CFR50,App J at Plant & Clarifies Numerical Value of Allowable Containment Lrt as 1.5% Per Day ML20101F8311996-03-22022 March 1996 Application for Amend to License DPR-59,revising TS to Implement BWROG Option I-D long-term Solution for Thermal Hydraulic Stability ML20101H3671996-03-22022 March 1996 Application for Amend to License DPR-59,changing TS Table 3.2-2, Core & Containment Cooling Sys Initiation & Control Instrumentation Operability Requirements ML20097A1921996-02-0101 February 1996 Application for Amend to License DPR-59,allowing RCS Pressure Tests to Be Performed While Remaining in Cold Shutdown Mode ML20100C2911996-01-25025 January 1996 Application for Amend to License DPR-59,revising Allowed out-of-service Times for Single Inoperable EDGs to Accommodate on-line Maint of EDGs ML20097J6661996-01-25025 January 1996 Application for Amend to License DPR-59,revising TS to Extend Instrumentation & Miscellaneous Surveillance Test Intervals to Support 24-month Operating Cycle ML20095F7051995-12-14014 December 1995 Application for Amend to License DPR-59,revising TSs to Incorporate IST Requirements of Section XI of ASME Boiler & Pressure Vessel Code JPN-95-051, Application for Amend to License DPR-59,proposing to Extend Surveillance Test Intervals for SLC Sys to Support 24 Month Operating Cycles1995-11-30030 November 1995 Application for Amend to License DPR-59,proposing to Extend Surveillance Test Intervals for SLC Sys to Support 24 Month Operating Cycles ML20094B6471995-10-25025 October 1995 Application for Amend to License DPR-59,revising TS Re Extensionof Containment Sys Surveillance Test Intervals to Accommodate 24 Month Operating Cycles ML20092H5341995-09-15015 September 1995 Application for Amend to License DPR-59,proposing TS by Extending Surveillance Test Intervals for Auxiliary Electrical Sys to Support 24 Month Operating Cycles ML20086P6421995-07-21021 July 1995 Application for Amend to License DPR-59.Amend Would Replace title-specific List of Members on PORC W/More General Statement of Membership Requirements ML20085G3561995-06-15015 June 1995 Application for Amend to License DPR-59,proposing Changes to Ts,By Extending Surveillance Test Intervals for Control Rod Sys to Support 24 Month Operating Cycles ML20083M8081995-05-12012 May 1995 Application for Amend to License DPR-59,extending Surveillance Test Intervals for Esws to Support 24 Month Operating Cycles,Per GL 91-04 JPN-95-022, Application for Amend to License DPR-59.Amend Would Extend Surveillance Test Intervals for Nuclear Steam Supply Sys to Support 24 Month Operating Cycles1995-04-12012 April 1995 Application for Amend to License DPR-59.Amend Would Extend Surveillance Test Intervals for Nuclear Steam Supply Sys to Support 24 Month Operating Cycles JPN-95-011, Application for Amend to License DPR-59,to Extend Surveillance Test Intervals for Snubber Systems to Support 24 Month Operating Cycles1995-03-0202 March 1995 Application for Amend to License DPR-59,to Extend Surveillance Test Intervals for Snubber Systems to Support 24 Month Operating Cycles JPN-95-007, Application for Amend to License DPR-59,to Impose Operability & Surveillance Requirements for Rv Overfill Protection Instrumentation1995-02-22022 February 1995 Application for Amend to License DPR-59,to Impose Operability & Surveillance Requirements for Rv Overfill Protection Instrumentation JPN-94-065, Application for Amend to License DPR-59,revising TSs Re PORC Membership & Review Responsibilities1994-12-0202 December 1994 Application for Amend to License DPR-59,revising TSs Re PORC Membership & Review Responsibilities ML20076F4631994-10-0707 October 1994 Application for Amend to License DPR-59,changing TS Re Safety/Relief Valve Testing Requirements 1999-09-29
[Table view] Category:TEXT-LICENSE APPLICATIONS & PERMITS
MONTHYEARJAFP-99-0279, Correction to 980226 Application for Amend to License DPR-59,revising Ref 19 to Assume 90% SBGT Sys Charcoal Efficiency,Instead of 99%.Ref 19 on TS Page 285 Needs to Be Changed from Rev 0 to Rev 1,based on Revised Calculation1999-10-14014 October 1999 Correction to 980226 Application for Amend to License DPR-59,revising Ref 19 to Assume 90% SBGT Sys Charcoal Efficiency,Instead of 99%.Ref 19 on TS Page 285 Needs to Be Changed from Rev 0 to Rev 1,based on Revised Calculation JAFP-99-0278, Application for Amend to License DPR-59,providing Rev C to Proposed TS Change Converting Current TSs to Improved Standard Tss.Withdrawal of JPTS-95-004,proposed TS Changes Re Inservice Leak & Hydrostatic Testing Operation,Reflected1999-10-14014 October 1999 Application for Amend to License DPR-59,providing Rev C to Proposed TS Change Converting Current TSs to Improved Standard Tss.Withdrawal of JPTS-95-004,proposed TS Changes Re Inservice Leak & Hydrostatic Testing Operation,Reflected ML20216J8321999-09-29029 September 1999 Application for Amend to License DPR-59,proposing Change to TS 3.5.B.3 & Associated Bases.Change Extends LCO for RHRSW Sys from 7 Days to 11 Days with Special Conditions to Allow for Installation of Mod to Division a RHRSW Strainer ML20196F5931999-06-22022 June 1999 Application for Amend to License DPR-59,changing to Pressure Temp limits.Pressure-temp Curves & Associated LCO & Bases Changes Included in Proposed Amend ML20195B8741999-06-0101 June 1999 Revised Application for Amend to License DPR-59,converting Plant CTS to Be Consistent with Improved Std TS in NUREG-1433,Rev 1,dtd Apr 1995 ML20206U1351999-05-19019 May 1999 Application for Amend to License DPR-59,requesting 14 Day AOT for EDG Sys ML20205K1041999-04-0505 April 1999 Application for Amend to License DPR-59,removing Position Title of General Manager from Sections & Will State That If Site Executive Officer Is Unavailable,Responsibilities Will Be Delegated to Another Staff Member,In Writing ML20205D8271999-03-26026 March 1999 Application for Amend to License DPR-59,converting CTS to Be Consistent with Improved Std TS in NUREG-1433,Rev 1 ML20199H3511999-01-15015 January 1999 Application for Amend to License DPR-59,removing Local Power Range Monitor (LPRM) Signal Calibr Method from TS Table 4.1-2 JAFP-98-0385, Revised Application for Amend to License DPR-59,revising Design Features.Rev 7 to non-proprietary & Proprietary Versions of HI-971661, Licensing Rept for Reracking of Ja FitzPatrick SFP, Encl.Proprietary Info Withheld1998-12-0303 December 1998 Revised Application for Amend to License DPR-59,revising Design Features.Rev 7 to non-proprietary & Proprietary Versions of HI-971661, Licensing Rept for Reracking of Ja FitzPatrick SFP, Encl.Proprietary Info Withheld ML20236X7811998-08-0303 August 1998 Application for Amend to License DPR-59,proposing Rev to Note Which Will Allow TS Section 1.1.A Re SLMCPR to Be Applicable During Cycle 14 ML20236X5831998-07-29029 July 1998 Amend 245 to License DPR-59,consisting of Changes to TS in Response to Application Transmitted by ,Requesting Rev of Reactor Protection Sys Normally Supply Electrical Protection Assembly Undervoltage Trip Setpoint ML20236M6151998-07-10010 July 1998 Application for Amend to License DPR-59 to Relocate Portions of TS 3/4.6.C, RCS - Coolant Chemistry, from TS to UFSAR & Applicable Plant Procedures Controlled by 10CFR50.59 Process ML20236L2741998-07-0606 July 1998 Application for Amend to License DPR-59,amending Tech Specs Section 3.5.b.1 Re Main Condenser Steam Jet Air Ejector & Table 3.10-1 Re Radiation Monitoring Sys That Initiates &/Or Isolates Sys ML20249B1551998-06-16016 June 1998 Application for Amend to License DPR-59,relocating Safety Review Committee Review,Audit & Related Record Keeping Requirements from Tech Specs to Chapter 17 of Fsar,Per Administrative Ltr 95-06 ML20217K0361998-03-30030 March 1998 Application for Amend to License DPR-59,changing Interval of Selected LSFT from Semiannually to Once Per 24 Months & Revising Definition of LSFT to Be Consistent w/NUREG-1433 ML20247F7791998-02-26026 February 1998 Application for Amend to License DPR-59,changing Allowable Containment Leakage Rate to 1.5 Percent Per Day & Assumed Value of Filter Efficiency for SBGT Used in Calculations to Determine Dose Effects to Onsite ML20202G8551998-02-0606 February 1998 Revised Application for Amend to License DPR-59,to Revise TS Tables 3.2-2 & 4.4-2,revising Allowed Outage Times for 4kV Emergency Bus Undervoltage Trip Functions & Replace Generic Actions for Inoperable Instrument Channels ML20202D3881998-02-0606 February 1998 Application for Amend to License DPR-59,revising RPS Normal Supply Electrical Protection Assembly Undervoltage Trip Setpoint as Result of Reanalysis Based on Most Limiting Min Voltage Requirements of Applied Loads ML20202D5391998-02-0606 February 1998 Application for Amend to License DPR-59,allowing RCS Pressure Tests to Be Performed in Cold Shutdown Mode ML20203J6671997-12-12012 December 1997 Application for Amend to License DPR-59,revising TS Section 6.2.2.6 Re Administrative Controls for Normal Working Hours of Plant Staff Who Perform Safety Related Functions ML20217H9801997-10-14014 October 1997 Application for Amend to License DPR-59,proposing Revision to TS Re Design Features Section,Including Revised Limits for Fuel Storage.Changes Correct Maximum Exposure Dependent, Infinite Lattice Multiplication Factor for Fuel Bundles ML20217G2991997-10-0808 October 1997 Application for Amend to License DPR-59,reflecting Change in LCO ML20140D8011997-04-14014 April 1997 Application for Amend to License DPR-59,deleting Plant Staff Performance Audit Requirement from Section 6.5.2.9.b & Incorporating Plant Staff Performance Review Requirement in Section 6.5.2.8 ML20135B1871996-11-26026 November 1996 Application for Amend to License DPR-59,requesting That Snubber Operability,Surveillance & Records Requirements in TS Be Relocated to Plant Controlled Documents ML20115G0581996-07-12012 July 1996 Application for Amend to License DPR-59,revising Min Critical Power Ratio Safety Limit ML20113B6261996-06-20020 June 1996 Application for Amend to License DPR-59,supporting Adoption of Primary Containment Leakage Rate Testing Requirements of Option B 10CFR50,App J at Plant ML20112D2671996-05-30030 May 1996 Application for Amend to License DPR-59,revising ATWS Recirculation Pump Trip Reactor Pressure ML20112D1501996-05-30030 May 1996 Application for Amend to License DPR-59,revising Minimum Critical Power Ratio Safety Limit & Associated Basis ML20112D5661996-05-30030 May 1996 Application for Amend to License DPR-59,eliminating Selected Response Time Testing Requirements ML20112B6411996-05-16016 May 1996 Application for Amend to License DPR-59,deleting Requirement for PORC to Review Fire Protection Program & Implementing Procedures.Addl Deletion of Insp & Audit Requirements of Specs 6.14.A & 6.14.B ML20107M4461996-04-24024 April 1996 Application for Amend to License DPR-59,relocating TS 3.11.B/4.11.B Crescent Area Ventilation & Associated Bases from TS to Controlled Procedure ML20108D1151996-04-24024 April 1996 Application for Amend to License DPR-59,supporting Adoption of Primary Containment Lrt Requirements of Option B to 10CFR50,App J & Clarifying Numerical Value of Allowable Containment Leakage Rate as 1.5% Per Day ML20101H6671996-03-27027 March 1996 Application for Amend to License DPR-59,adopting Primary Containment Lrt Requirements of Option B to 10CFR50,App J at Plant & Clarifies Numerical Value of Allowable Containment Lrt as 1.5% Per Day ML20101F8311996-03-22022 March 1996 Application for Amend to License DPR-59,revising TS to Implement BWROG Option I-D long-term Solution for Thermal Hydraulic Stability ML20101H3671996-03-22022 March 1996 Application for Amend to License DPR-59,changing TS Table 3.2-2, Core & Containment Cooling Sys Initiation & Control Instrumentation Operability Requirements ML20097A1921996-02-0101 February 1996 Application for Amend to License DPR-59,allowing RCS Pressure Tests to Be Performed While Remaining in Cold Shutdown Mode ML20100C2911996-01-25025 January 1996 Application for Amend to License DPR-59,revising Allowed out-of-service Times for Single Inoperable EDGs to Accommodate on-line Maint of EDGs ML20097J6661996-01-25025 January 1996 Application for Amend to License DPR-59,revising TS to Extend Instrumentation & Miscellaneous Surveillance Test Intervals to Support 24-month Operating Cycle ML20095F7051995-12-14014 December 1995 Application for Amend to License DPR-59,revising TSs to Incorporate IST Requirements of Section XI of ASME Boiler & Pressure Vessel Code JPN-95-051, Application for Amend to License DPR-59,proposing to Extend Surveillance Test Intervals for SLC Sys to Support 24 Month Operating Cycles1995-11-30030 November 1995 Application for Amend to License DPR-59,proposing to Extend Surveillance Test Intervals for SLC Sys to Support 24 Month Operating Cycles ML20094B6471995-10-25025 October 1995 Application for Amend to License DPR-59,revising TS Re Extensionof Containment Sys Surveillance Test Intervals to Accommodate 24 Month Operating Cycles ML20092H5341995-09-15015 September 1995 Application for Amend to License DPR-59,proposing TS by Extending Surveillance Test Intervals for Auxiliary Electrical Sys to Support 24 Month Operating Cycles ML20086P6421995-07-21021 July 1995 Application for Amend to License DPR-59.Amend Would Replace title-specific List of Members on PORC W/More General Statement of Membership Requirements ML20085G3561995-06-15015 June 1995 Application for Amend to License DPR-59,proposing Changes to Ts,By Extending Surveillance Test Intervals for Control Rod Sys to Support 24 Month Operating Cycles ML20083M8081995-05-12012 May 1995 Application for Amend to License DPR-59,extending Surveillance Test Intervals for Esws to Support 24 Month Operating Cycles,Per GL 91-04 JPN-95-022, Application for Amend to License DPR-59.Amend Would Extend Surveillance Test Intervals for Nuclear Steam Supply Sys to Support 24 Month Operating Cycles1995-04-12012 April 1995 Application for Amend to License DPR-59.Amend Would Extend Surveillance Test Intervals for Nuclear Steam Supply Sys to Support 24 Month Operating Cycles JPN-95-011, Application for Amend to License DPR-59,to Extend Surveillance Test Intervals for Snubber Systems to Support 24 Month Operating Cycles1995-03-0202 March 1995 Application for Amend to License DPR-59,to Extend Surveillance Test Intervals for Snubber Systems to Support 24 Month Operating Cycles JPN-95-007, Application for Amend to License DPR-59,to Impose Operability & Surveillance Requirements for Rv Overfill Protection Instrumentation1995-02-22022 February 1995 Application for Amend to License DPR-59,to Impose Operability & Surveillance Requirements for Rv Overfill Protection Instrumentation JPN-94-065, Application for Amend to License DPR-59,revising TSs Re PORC Membership & Review Responsibilities1994-12-0202 December 1994 Application for Amend to License DPR-59,revising TSs Re PORC Membership & Review Responsibilities 1999-09-29
[Table view] |
Text
-..
Attechment i to JPN-99-030 l
- REVISED TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION PAGES ONE-TIME-ONLY CHANGE TO THE TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS REGARDING RHRSW ALLOWABLE OUT-OF-SERVICE TIME (JPTS-99-005) l l
l l
l l
1 l
l l
i l
i New York Power Authority JAMES A. FITZ?ATRICK NUCLEAR POWER PLANT Docket No. 50-333
' 9-59 9910060219 ADOCK O 633 P,DR ._
k.
. lE
. r t
o eey m c a
e m e hdl eeb e t r t oet s d he e ,ma s yyth sil st o e u -
t b gd l
i ebay sft in f an e mud o s duse b od t n
o s s orlim eo c y
a r
a ppom cgnsti e na he ni re f
r, e
D Y e moc n ie bi l olycn v n
a*Y y 3 1
5 s nb ect epe r e s#
c n r e
r e
p Wiea Svnp emre ynd t
sti seepc aoll a
inmbt e a f W'
S' e p Roio a R#
u e bmmmgsehr H a e c H bt e u n R '" .
e r
c n n Ran b o simun a i pin s t h * *
F O O e 1 co o e t gt nnl eWimy a ei l h'
e' n B. h d t 5. t e liob oc arReysd Smt a t o"
)
t#
h criti r c s ha3ff i
oi r otnp eHr sd c S*5 _
a e at oi n s t n is e t nd aoRebn hua 9 DA -
ew mahdd e yle d edn t v e r en e mubno engle et s
, y 9*
n e ebe 9' t
apto ot leee beaz .
n r h n.
ir h ,uhaut la thr l
po z minuoll t f ndo nbi a iet l
t o' tla at ec o sn r qpaa ar e raoi l i t
a n urp a seini hn c #'
,s ss it sotndn eemhe t r n ed t
e hepcode i #'
f io n o t a ,
a wde seio ,p tde s a e
dst o c sh sre ohiWot c ,e t f i m do" I" cmdo efl ki n cwo t t e em mn s sn iegmt ee v r
r.ieinnm m
f N i(
f r
t ieaeoric eir t e r ri iaf o atd r
e t ni tl n ey nb l
oa ef t e nl esme o# n" I e
m ev rhl vlap et otthsr oo r na neoe in on pi yd s ia a s n rbamib el er ot aa i*
o t i avoinopcn e r e e pl
) It apch hmo mbd e sa un hon ha e cne na* '*'
d
't n
Wcr Wistbcoheop i t
s*
n o . e c e f m
( . .
g 2 3 n 5 n P u P 4 D N 6 -
F 1 A l 1
J n la e i
h t e4 g in d d sd yo c n d e
r e a a m2n in ie _
iui u
n dm s e n d 7 ei bh t iaef rr ic qt 0g mir en 3i n tept e o e t i tu rt o rap e
r och e ho l smc c ow n s s co y u ax n n t
a rps e l ne gst u c t ,t bpr s ee ao e a i el u o ct i
pm ) 2 nbn r g en sWdt i
otes(t o ai n 3. ^r per u im gSuoet o r 3 m pd run nRnn B. c o tn n 0 o nl o yd a i i Hi t
- 5. d ta cl n e 2 cint t loRnd o oio 3l o aoo eop 1 ed hnet oa ho c
n cecr n ,e r o c r
cm 7 1
t ul t
n o lep dr no oc f oi b de of seh edba 2. a at 3 pro iisdt mlu raro B. w gac e l 5
m mvfoe i noef ahp 5. de neb ir a 1
u er or a l
tn saie 3c a t r p appt sb sh et pe 7
de r nb fl 5 s nr o op c oii s ti Wmsiy enp e e es se sw c
on 1 a tb Rbon d o o Se id i S pe helbmim n l sen i t a o r el a yt a det0ma i r f r c e eep mh hi t l
Pva3o r opb es pm ie h t
5 e o egc s eo s r r r n bpngm o a oidn e nnmi o et ie on ir uo qt e ewv wp Fbo 9
d 1 ro eiy e n i s t si ec r a oe a 3 t
lu B. ct c a s d lu m osr y a 's. e er pb *2 B. o wll 1 a ucmb ocbey h t e a25 N
- )
d ho 5. e S3rsr s eu heupa Sbsod fhrth oh Ls<3 t
't I
n n e o . . . m c 2 3 4 5 d
(
n 5 e m
3 A
[
~
. hef ithc nr goser er ad e w#'
'o epw e n wt yt i r et ot he n e gh Ca y dnt w dt u ro l
gea nf e m#eeKyu r htes e o on sp it f l
'. i nhs nwe oa o e v t n d i a
t s p e wco ie f
ice r
t yr r
l no ht f o sl nCe s is t
cusiLoPht es I
y hs nNh s
e
'sh kt r, 8 e e n p
p o of t cyr s e s t a
d e eh ereb ot h
s a rd r e
pt e u i
f f
e pepfr d r h pee o bss *"e osb e e
r t
t t w ocq e eTur s heec t
s C" m new '" m p d u er ht w f we -
o r d o . eTf i
r e
o nto e pF h a m"*ah c
y p tcco n n a t
. y -
nw r
a e i s iw2 m 1 a t Fl e A"bp
- en eo i
a r eR r el o 2h*0s t r m sn p b H t 7 e o oe e
r y
d nl aifl R dnegww1 v d i oo e da s*ht t
s - yo s f e
d a woe totceh l ubs e cb e o*
ss*n "se cna g ed n n d s e it st o dnr n xt n rv #c v snm aoo mc oi et on o e n e
s t ee ng ne t t alaol iwee
o s/u ri gi s*.
a s pl on i ei l eh glc uni l
w d nin f ks s or e s
n i
cmo s o co bwicws nai n
l l
f r
daop rf e u
r ia m
e h
yc p~
ee t
n e
var e te haCt ivr iae t uy s m
e#nE#c dn o
n e6 n
o *" o f A r
rbmt n l
Or at a ** so cf4 s m Yaye m e wri an a sL n
o s ra spa ov t r aS e
r eyA s'r "t W t t
e s optealp po n e iti a senmrC e'u6m h
e t
n6sE s
y apo e pO t n oh a e oe n#n l
s uboct SL optr h P
e n
wict o
lca m 7
2 P o L C
F A t eeoe Rrfeoamsege t
. enc s gh t e al J nhht et t id Ht ee sznr e e i i t vl ahb m r eodv Ra wle htsL odnh ri aaoe i
t ar -
nmFiot aa t ueo impr e bey p t e o m cee e ql cecp heahsbn i
ao t l
baf on _
t r nf .l o f v icpt uioe er nddt a _
o t ns t
ore cgah st j i aonr ei
/c y e i e l
(
u er nl h cyes sme mpt eh se l gd e p e s h roh ust .i o Cecumri r d t f u o f sdgn oianieoo nm Pncsa L o Rtahi Hp t E gi o t nil jm eas inr e er ootn b de c
.l o eo t
e ht e t nph en r a mRwl g o swmpc ooeb t eri tr ct s a s t a el a n wfoloot pnot nmt n yiu an d Bme y t eco o hom i
S f or e l
ot pe ee R ne - c t o er o ,aon n s nq a er remhfi t i
r .ts H c s isie e s n ersy ovfogm. -
pd stamo aga amvubs yi R
e it on it oms sloi sy r
t nmn e uap roia e n.n d yi nd nt or i sc cu pe mP o s l
h r ot ,i l
p ct pt i o y- of r n
l t
l l
n r a eb Resruyonmiot r b r c em ng a
ac pu apetciepe oi n v o aeop ia f
o t Hg hh t
(
o t f mfe a nRneme il st o md to ainrel c t
e o ah t r ih r ah ect a f to syd o i
d coh c pt ,o nc _
o ee rd nt enth vao t
M t ivvo , ht ewxmeot r o gagyt nwisemml nf f eb e oc n t 1
a a oecd i il e t ae e nm e t
k m e lot e r f f 5 n c oscy ayt sr s vm f ot a reac froic 1
h peear o -
n ye on i
lo hh s sp obi a o
t ns t t ga t set ab re r t v n ab S _
mtsh at
)
d C ein id ph m et ie
,ise ei s t wdn fpseenaduge c n snh e no i
l sne yonga oRmsu n pd enTt c t h _
n n nf 8 d i
't n e id e n r o
c m taoeic nmme ni r
bscoiel t eHimrenia Rt a u o m n.heen ne N
r.
(
i n o npau i sh q u) smsu na,l agb eoce npef e o S
E t a
n cya t er ht epcrh apn a mori os c wney t t
n e
S o e ratnws e csmicc c o ere sse nyhl iLs ofon d u woa ayu ESpr e e.s x otf thh m A h poos n B C Tscf leh l t i d n
e 5 . m 3 B A
i Attachm nt 11 to JPN-99-030 SAFETY EVALUATION ONE-TIME-ONLY CHANGE TO THE TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS REGARDING RHRSW ALLOWABLE OUT-OF-SERVICE TIME (JPTS-99-005) I l
i l
i l
l New York Power Authority l JAMES A. FITZPATRICK NUCLEAR POWER PLANT Docket No. 50-333 DPR-59
F Attichm:nt ll t) JPN-99-030 SAFETY EVALUATION l Page 1 of 5
- 1. -
DESCRIPTION l l
This proposed change to the James A. FitzPatrick Nuclear Power Plant (JAF)
Technical Specifications (TS) extends the Limiting Condition for Operation (LCO) for the Residual Heat Removal (RHR) Service Water (RHRSW) system from 7 days to 11 l days with special conditions to allow for installation of a modification to the division l
"A" RHRSW strainer.
The applicability of this proposed change is limited to the one-time-only installation of this mod fication on the "A" RHRSW strainer.
The Specific changes are as follows:
1 Technical Specification 3.5.B.3 l Add the following qualifying note:
I "During the installation of modification 99-095 to the "A " RHRSW strainer, l
continued reactor operation is permissible for a period not to exceed 11 days. "
Bases for Technical Specification 3.5.B.
Add the following qualifying note:
"During the installation of modification 99-095 to the "A " RHRSW strainer, the seven day repair period may be extended to eleven days. The l
Conditional Core Damage Probability with the plant in this configuration for '
eleven days has been determined to be below the thresholdprobability of 1 E-6 for risk significance of temporary changes to the plant configuration in the EPRI PSA Applications Guide."
ll. PURPOSE OF THE PROPOSED CHANGE Each train of the JAF RHRSW system has two RHRSW pumps, configured with a i common header. The common header discharges into a duplex strainer, which then discharges to the system loads. Each duplex strainer is configured with a flow porting mechanism for directing RHRSW flow through either of the two strainer baskets to allow on-line cleaning of the other basket. The flow porting mechanism consists of two opposing crank operated piston / cylinder assemblies, which perform the flow porting function. Each piston / cylinder assembly is configured with a compression packing / stuffing box to minimize leakage between the piston ram and the strainer body.
The packing gland on the A RHRSW strainer is degrading due to corrosion. To ensure RHRSW strainer operability, the packing gland has been tack-welded in place in accordance with the FitzPatrick Ternporary Modification Program. This temporary repair effectively mitigates the effects of this degraded condition.
l l
[
T .
~
I Attichm:nt 11 ta JPN-99-030 SAFETY EVALUATION Page 2 of 5 in order to correct this degraded condition, a permanent modification has been developed which will replace the degraded packing gland with that of a new design. l This new packing gland design is a significant improvement over the existing design in terms of leak-tight peformance and reliability.
The Authority staff has estimated that the RHRSW strainer modification installation l will require approximately 7 days to complete. The current LCO allowable out of l service time for a single division of the RHRSW system is 7 days. The projected l modification installation schedule does not allow for unforeseen eventualities during modification installation, which could extend the RHRSW system outage beyond the ,
7 day LCO allowable out of service time in the current TS and would therefore result '
in a forced plant shutdown.
This proposed change to the FitzPatrick TS allows for unforeseen eventualities in the modification installation schedule described above. The applicability of this proposed change is limited to the one-time-only installation of the RHRSW strainer modification on the division "A" of RHRSW.
Ill. SAFETY IMPLICATIONS OF THE PROPOSED CHANGE This proposed change extends the Limiting Condition for Operation (LCO) for the Residual Heat Removal Service Water (RHRSW) system from 7 days to 11 days with special conditions to allow for installation of a modification to the division "A" RHRSW strainer. This modification corrects a degraded condition in the "A" RHRSW strainer and therefore results in improved safety system reliability.
The core damage frequency (CDF) impact associated with removing one division of RHRSW from service with the plant at pcwer is currently evaluated in support of the JAF Configuration Risk Management Program (CRMP) (Reference 1). The increase in CDF, over the base, for this configuration is 2.14 E-6 per year (Reference 2). For an 11-day allowable outage time, the Conditional Core Damage Probability is 6.4 E-8.
Plant risk will be managed during this proposed, extended LCO timeframe in accordance with FitzPatrick's existing Configuration Risk Management Program (CRMP) (Reference 1). This is an appropriate control because the Core Damage Frequency used to compute the Conditional Core Damage Probability due to this proposed char.ge is consistent with the existing risk assessment program Configuration Risk Management Program.
An element of this program is the development of a contingency plan for this plant configuration. For the RHRSW modification installation, the contingency plan will be l to provide an alternate means of achieving flow on the division "A" of RHRSW via a j temporary connection to the Fire Protection system header. This will provide a means of achieving limited containment cooling in the event the "B" division of RHRSW were rendered inoperable during the "A" RHRSW strainer modification.
i
Attichm:nt il to JPN 99-030 SAFETY EVALUATION )
Page 3 of 5 This temporary connection is achieved by connecting a temporary hose to cross tie connections, which are permanently installed, between the RHRSW system and the Fire Protection system. Instructions for installing this crosstie exist in current plant j procedures and the material required for crosstie installation is permanently pre- )
staged in an equipment cabinet in the RHRSW pump room. During the time the "A" RHRSW strainer pressure boundary is breached, system pressure boundary integrity will be maintained to support this contingency by the uso of a temporary plug. This plug will be located at the work site and instructions will be developed for installation and use of the plug prior to the start of the "A" RHRSW modification
' installation.
The conditional core damage probability of 6.4 E-8 falls below the threshold probability of 1 E-6 for risk significance of temporary changes to the plant '
configuration in the EPRI PSA Applications Guide (Reference 3) and is therefore not considered to be risk significant.
IV. EVALUATION OF SIGNIFICANT HAZARDS CONSIDERATION Operation of the FitzPatrick plant in accordance with the proposed amendment would not involve a significant hazards consideration as defined in 10 CFR 50.92 since it would not:
Involve an increase in the probability or consequences of an accident previously evaluated.
The Conditional Core Damage Prc bability due to this proposed change is calculated to be 6.4 E-8. This value falls below the threshold probability of 1 E-6 for risk significance of temporary changes to the plant configuration in the EPRI PSA Applications Guide (Reference 3).
This proposed change does not increase the consequences of an accident previously evaluated because all relevant accidents (LOCA) would result in the transfer of decay heat to the suppression pool. For this scenario, the same compliment of equipment will be available to achieve and maintain cold shutdown as is required by the current Technical Specification LCO.
Create the possibility of a new or different kind of accident from any accident previously evaluated.
The proposed change does not physically alter the plant. As such, no new or different types of equipment will be installed. The new design for the RHRSW strainer packing gland will be evaluated under a separate 10 CFR 50.59 uvaluation and is considered to be functionally equivalent for the purposes of this one-time-only proposed Technical Specification change. I 1
The implementation and use of the contingency plan for achieving limited )
containment heat removal in the event the B division of RHRSW is rendered i inoperable will be evaluated under the Authority's 10 CFR 50.59 program.
l
1 f
- l. ~
! Att: chm:nt 11 tn JPN-99-030 SAFETY EVALUATION Page 4 of 5 Involve a significant reduction in a margin of safety.
l l Tho Conditional Core Damage Probability due to this proposed change is
! calculated to be 6.4 E-8. This value falls below the threshold probability of 1 E-l 6 for risk significance of temporary changes to the plant configuration in the EPRI PSA Applications Guide (Reference 3) .
The consequences of a postulated accident occurring during the extended allowable out-service time are bounded by existing analyses therefore there is no significant reduction in a margin of safety. 1 V. IMPLEMENTATION OF THE PROPOSED CHANGE This amendment request meets the eligibility criteria for categorical exclusion set forth in 10 CFR 51.22(c)(9) is follows:
(i) The amendment involves no significant hazards consideration.
As described in Section IV of this evaluation, the proposed change involves no significant hazards consideration.
I (ii) There is no significant change in the types or significant increase in the i amounts of any effluents that may be released offsite.
The proposed change does not involve the installation of any new equipment, or the modification of any equipment that may affect the types or amounts of effluents that may be released offsite. Therefore, there is no significant change in the types or significant increase in the amounts of any effluents that may be released offsite.
(iii) There is no significant increase in individual or cumulative occupational radiation exposure.
The proposed changes do not involve plant physical changes, or introduce any new mode of plant operation. Therefore, there is no significant increase in individual or cumulative occupational radiation exposure.
Based on the above, the Authority concludes that the proposed changes meet the criteria specified in 10 CFR 51.22 for a categorical exclusion from the requirements of 10 CFR 51.21 relative to requiring a specific environmental assessment by the Commission.
l
Att: chm:;nt 11 to JPN 99-030 SAFETY EVALUATION Page 5 of 5 i VI. - ' CONCLUSION The core damage frequency (CDF) impact associated with removing one division of RHRSW from service with the plant at power is currently evaluated in support l of the FitzPatrick CRMP. The increase in CDF, over the base, for this '
configuration is 2.14 E-6 per year. For an 11-day allowable outage time, the Conditional Core Damage Probability is 6.4 E-8. This Conditional Core Damage Probability falls below the threshold probability of 1 E-6 for risk significance of temporary changes to the plant configuration in the EPRI PSA Applications Guide j and is therefore not considered to be risk significant. In addition, Modification 99-095 corrects a degraded condition in the "A" RHRSW strainer and therefore results in improved safety system reliability. Based on the above, no question of ,
safety exists.
The Plant Operating Review Committee (PORC) and Safety Review Committee l (SRC) have reviewed this proposed change to the TS and have concluded that it !
does not involve an unreviewed safety question or a significant hazards consideration and will not endanger the health and safety of the public. {
Vll. REFERENCES
- 1. New York Power Authority, Administrative Procedure AP10.02, Rev.
7, "13-Week Rollina Schedule", July 1998
- 2. JAF-ANAL-RHR-03422, Probabilistic Evaluation in Support of Technical Soecification Amendment to Extend RHR Service Water Looo A Outane , Rev. O, September,1999.
- 3. EPRI TR-105396, PSA Applications Guide, August 1995 l
1 l
)
I
f
l MARKED-UP TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION PAGES l ONE TIME-ONLY CHANGE TO THE TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS REGARDING RHRSW ALLOWABLE OUT-OF-SERVICE TIME .
l (JPTS-99 005) ,
l l 1 1
l l
l l
l l
l l i l
l l i New York Power Authority JAMES A. FITZPATRICK NUCLEAR POWER PLANT Docket No. 50-333 DPR-59
) ) ) )
( (
s eo y D
y a- s r
a hdl t o e e ,m :_ s 2,yth m
ee be N e he l e 5liy a st o
)
1 Y f t
bangM m A-dsft bo d y
c 3
r 5 orlis eo o c duse n e r e ppom cgnsti e ni f e p , p moci n binaheroycn e A ao v er,x u e e uit e l e
a c n c p s nb l
moe ect epe l e ht -
r F O O n Wiea Svnp eme r t yndimbto-sti an ol ol f o
t .s 5 n y is h,is c
i c
R oi o Hbt e R
e 1 co anobe seepce bmmmgso-u n simun a i pin s ht hr 9
0id- t 9 a1 9 e1 npd o
r o or ee a
f nnl eWimy gt a.ti e atrn oi~ s n8et a ei l i
t a oc ma e yle o.hd t 5. t e l
i ob RSmt e syd a ct ex ic t
ohdd eee.'beez ocar o f a i
deo hat,uhautrhn ha3foi r t i l
l thrz l
po f
ct eHr sd o rt mdt t
sn dt n ts vm e eo ec niWhn ndao n epRethua ebs yn ~ r iat o e t un n surpessi o t i
en f,
ind -
sot'ndn edn t
i o n,wd
,e i s s ne e e r. m u b n , gle- nt o
~
t a e .i o tde oe nt o nir it oe minbe a ir c n d o ke t. n, t te em s s ndo l p la cp l
rqu pea oll t f iet nbi l a ibef c n n o c r n ee tere mhe r ar e l a r,,
e r aoif f t i
reaeo i t
ne e d hepce rod t is m ew rhl ei tre i af otd e o sre nm a ,o viett v sr rna ds ohiWot f m r sn csh e ap o ioo ct ,i et ie l
t Evoinvpc n i neoe epch iegmt it ni t t
onss n ey t i
ee e r.i ei nbaef o
l r
v tesme nnm_
e nl s ht s e, g W ;is nS iruH, R m, N
n pi yd e as n e el rbamib pl e aa DR,
)
d h m bd r ot r m honha heop ecne
't e f
Wcrsa o e un n
5
(
o c
2
. Wistbcoa4 3
j P
P 4 N
F A
J n l
l a e i
h t g i n
dd sd e4 e e yo c n d wu a e m2n i n e un dmg s s 7 i i ei aei f qti mir n bh t r rc en 3i 0n epot d ee ue t
ro sct c oe ho l
smcc t
ti ow n ortaps r
n e,h u c t y uex s nn a t
rpe es b por e ao el gst nbn air g en u o cit pm) e 2 o
per unim sWdt et 3. dn i
o tes (t 3 gSuo r t mpdrun o nl o yd a i nRnn Hit 8. co to nen T-i l
oRnd 5. d clan eo cint tn o oop o o 3l r o cen oi
?
edoa cr hnetho t
ul c t n o,ep e
o c a
r dro cm ?
?
fofoibde seh edba l
- 2. n noc at 3 prsdt ml u roar B. i gal ce 5 m
oiif mv o oe i no ef 5. d e neb ira u
pder e p trsba l ah p t s ole 3c a t she r 1 ap n rnb fl et p 5 Wmsy s enr npe o oii c s op ti swn o
a se ,
Rbond opeo hbmim Se cd i tb n
t a o r ela l se e
yt an '
Het0mr i rce I mh t
Rva3o a f eep hih oregcs o eo s pb es r p mit .e 5 neb o a oi pn gm oimi nn ir uo eewv rr wpFb o 9
eteon -
qt ,
dn e ec 3 d 1 o reit ns ra oe*a dmsi$. e l
u 8. t ei y l yat e pb2 ccas u osrs r l1 8 o
)
d ho 5. eu a cmb eu o cbey h heupa t e fh
't S3rsrs Sbsod I t Ls<3 t n
n e o m
(
c 2 3 4 5 d n
5 e 3 m A -
~
F
~
lfi!!i/iid!u!;5 3gll"'1ls,Q'I *% q l 10101 '
I[
li'jlI 5! }{0!!! /
l1lI lh!l!
!!Il!ll!ll!r,fllNf! / ,
I B
jamio dhI!!pprpgju d$
p)llkI'hf
!we lil{
ll!!;lh{ililH ll!!0!!!alhl i
lil0illllill I I