ML20197A417
| ML20197A417 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | NuScale |
| Issue date: | 06/19/2020 |
| From: | Bergman T NuScale |
| To: | Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| Cranston G | |
| References | |
| NUSCALESMRDC, NUSCALESMRDC.SUBMISSION.12, NUSCALEPART03.NP, NUSCALEPART03.NP.5 | |
| Download: ML20197A417 (133) | |
Text
NuScale Standard Plant Design Certification Application Applicant's Environmental Report -
Standard Design Certification PART 3 Revision 4.1 June 2020
©2020, NuScale Power LLC. All Rights Reserved
COPYRIGHT NOTICE This document bears a NuScale Power, LLC, copyright notice. No right to disclose, use, or copy any of the information in this document, other than by the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC), is authorized without the express, written permission of NuScale Power, LLC.
The NRC is permitted to make the number of copies of the information contained in these reports needed for its internal use in connection with generic and plant-specific reviews and approvals, as well as the issuance, denial, amendment, transfer, renewal, modification, suspension, revocation, or violation of a license, permit, order, or regulation subject to the requirements of 10 CFR 2.390 regarding restrictions on public disclosure to the extent such information has been identified as proprietary by NuScale Power, LLC, copyright protection notwithstanding. Regarding nonproprietary versions of these reports, the NRC is permitted to make the number of additional copies necessary to provide copies for public viewing in appropriate docket files in public document rooms in Washington, DC, and elsewhere as may be required by NRC regulations. Copies made by the NRC must include this copyright notice in all instances and the proprietary notice if the original was identified as proprietary.
Applicants Environmental Report -
Standard Design Certification Table of Contents TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 2.0 Abbreviations and Definitions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 3.0 Approach and Methodology Overview . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 4.0 SAMDA Candidate Identification . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 4.1 SAMDA Generation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15 4.1.1 Emergency Core Cooling System . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15 4.1.2 Containment Isolation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18 4.1.3 Control Rod Drive System . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19 4.1.4 Reactor Trip System. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19 4.1.5 Decay Heat Removal System . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19 4.1.6 Reactor Coolant System . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20 4.1.7 Backup Power Supply System . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21 4.1.8 Containment Flooding and Drain System . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21 4.1.9 Chemical and Volume Control System . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21 4.1.10 Module Protection System . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22 4.1.11 Reactor Building Crane Failures. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22 4.1.12 Internal Events. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23 4.1.13 Fires, Floods, High Winds, External Floods, Seismic, and Low Power and Shutdown Events. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23 5.0 Maximum Benefit . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24 5.1 Present Value Factor . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25 5.2 Averted Public Exposure. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26 5.3 Averted Off-Site Costs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27 5.4 Averted Occupational Exposure. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 28 5.4.1 Short-Term Dose to Personnel. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 28 5.4.2 Long-Term Dose to Personnel . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 29 5.4.3 Total Averted Occupational Exposure . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 30 5.5 Averted On-Site Costs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 30 5.5.1 Cleanup and Decontamination Costs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 30 5.5.2 Replacement Power Cost. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 31 Part 3 i Revision 4.1
Applicants Environmental Report -
Standard Design Certification Table of Contents TABLE OF CONTENTS 5.5.3 Total Averted On-Site Costs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 33 5.6 Single NuScale Power Module Severe Accident Impact . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 34 5.7 Maximum Benefit . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 34 5.8 Maximum Benefit Sensitivity Study . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 36 6.0 Assessment of SAMDA Candidates . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 39 6.1 Initial "Phase I" SAMDA Screening Categories . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 39 6.1.1 Not Applicable. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 39 6.1.2 Already Implemented . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 39 6.1.3 Combined . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 40 6.1.4 Excessive Implementation Cost. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 40 6.1.5 Very Low Benefit. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 40 6.1.6 Not Required for Design Certification . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 41 6.1.7 Considered for Further Evaluation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 41 6.2 Phase I Screening Results . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 41 6.3 Phase II SAMDA Screening . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 42 6.4 Screening Sensitivity . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 42 7.0 Summary and Conclusions. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 43 8.0 References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 43 8.1 Referenced Documents . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 43 Appendix A List of Candidate SAMDAs and Screening Results . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . A-1 Appendix B Off-site Consequence Calculation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . B-1 B.1 Off-site Models . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . B-1 B.1.1 Meteorological Modeling . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . B-1 B.1.2 Dose Conversion Factors . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . B-1 B.1.3 Economic Data Updates. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . B-2 B.1.4 Population Data Extrapolation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . B-2 B.1.5 Surry Site . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . B-3 B.1.6 Peach Bottom Site . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . B-5 B.1.7 Emergency Sheltering and Evacuation Modeling Information . . . . . . . . . . . . . . B-8 B.1.8 Core Inventory at Accident Initiation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . B-9 B.1.9 Chemical Groups . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . B-11 Part 3 ii Revision 4.1
Applicants Environmental Report -
Standard Design Certification Table of Contents TABLE OF CONTENTS B.2 Release Categories . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . B-12 B.2.1 Release Category 1: CVCS LOCA Inside Containment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . B-13 B.2.2 Release Category 2: Pipe Break Outside Containment, Isolated . . . . . . . . . . . . B-18 B.2.3 Release Category 3: CVCS Pipe Break Outside Containment, Unisolated. . . . B-23 B.2.4 Release Category 4: ECCS Spurious Actuation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . B-26 B.2.5 Release Category 5: Steam Generator Tube Failure . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . B-31 B.2.6 Release Category 6: General Transient With RSV Stuck Open. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . B-34 B.2.7 Release Category 7: General Transient With No RSVs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . B-39 B.2.8 Release Category 8: Dropped NuScale Power Module During Transport. . . . B-44 B.2.9 Summary of Base Case Release Category Results . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . B-46 B.3 MACCS Sensitivity Analyses. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . B-49 B.3.1 Sensitivity Case 1: Standard Evacuation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . B-49 B.3.2 Sensitivity Case 2: Updated Site Data File . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . B-49 B.3.3 Sensitivity Case 3: Release Site. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . B-49 B.3.4 Sensitivity Case 4: Height of Release . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . B-49 B.3.5 Sensitivity Case 5: Initial Core Inventory. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . B-49 B.3.6 Sensitivity Case 6: Start of Release . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . B-50 B.3.7 Sensitivity Case 7: Off-site Decontamination . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . B-50 B.3.8 Sensitivity Case 8: Other Economic Parameters. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . B-50 B.3.9 Sensitivity Case 9: Containment Deposition. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . B-50 B.3.10 Sensitivity Case 10: Aerosol Dry Deposition in the Environment . . . . . . . . . . . B-50 B.3.11 Sensitivity Case 11: Plume Buoyancy. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . B-51 B.3.12 Sensitivity Results. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . B-51 B.4 Seismic . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . B-53 Part 3 iii Revision 4.1
Applicants Environmental Report -
Standard Design Certification List of Tables LIST OF TABLES Table 2-1: Acronyms and Abbreviations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 Table 2-2: Definitions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 Table 4-1: NuScale Risk-Significance Criteria . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 Table 4-2: NuScale Basic Events Used for SAMDA Generation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 Table 5-1: Frequency of Occurrence and Off-site Consequences for Each Release Category . . . . . . . . . 27 Table 5-2: Frequency of Occurrence and Off-site Consequences for Each Release Category . . . . . . . . . 28 Table 5-3: Summary of Results Related to Calculating Single NuScale Power Module SAI . . . . . . . . . . . 34 Table 5-4: 12 NuScale Power Module Maximum Benefit for the Surry Site . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 36 Table 5-5: Maximum Benefit Sensitivity . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 38 Table 6-1: Candidate Risk-Significant Systems for the NuScale Design . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 40 Table 6-2: Candidate Risk-Significant Components for the NuScale Design. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 40 Table A-1: Screening of Proposed SAMDAs. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . A-2 Table B-1: Surry 2060 Population Distribution. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . B-3 Table B-2: Surry Economic Parameters . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . B-5 Table B-3: Peach Bottom 2060 Population Distribution . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . B-5 Table B-4: Peach Bottom Economic Parameters . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . B-8 Table B-5: Best Estimate Core Inventory. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . B-10 Table B-6: High Burnup Core Inventory . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . B-11 Table B-7: PRA Sequences that Contribute Significantly to Release Category 1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . B-14 Table B-8: Release Category 1 Hourly Release Information . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . B-15 Table B-9: PRA Sequences that Contribute Significantly to Release Category 2 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . B-19 Table B-10: Release Category 2 Hourly Release Information . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . B-20 Table B-11: Particle Size Distribution for Release Category 3 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . B-23 Table B-12: PRA Sequences that Contribute Significantly to Release Category 3 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . B-24 Table B-13: Release Category 3 Hourly Release Information . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . B-25 Table B-14: PRA Sequences that Contribute Significantly to Release Category 4 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . B-27 Table B-15: Release Category 4 Hourly Release Information . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . B-28 Table B-16: PRA Sequences that Contribute Significantly to Release Category 5 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . B-31 Table B-17: Particle Size Distribution for Release Category 5 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . B-31 Table B-18: Release Category 5 Hourly Release Information . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . B-32 Table B-19: PRA Sequences that Contribute Significantly to Release Category 6 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . B-35 Table B-20: Release Category 6 Hourly Release Information . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . B-36 Part 3 iv Revision 4.1
Applicants Environmental Report -
Standard Design Certification List of Tables LIST OF TABLES Table B-21: PRA Sequences that Contribute Significantly to Release Category 7 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . B-40 Table B-22: Release Category 7 Hourly Release Information . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . B-41 Table B-23: Particle Size Distribution for Release Category 8 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . B-45 Table B-24: Release Category 8 Hourly Release Information . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . B-45 Table B-25: Release Categories and Associated NuScale Power Module Core Damage Frequency (per module-year) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . B-47 Table B-26: Release Fraction to the Environment, Start of Release, and Release Duration for each Release Category Calculated by MELCOR . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . B-47 Table B-27: Frequency of Occurrence and Off-site Consequences for each Release Category . . . . . . . B-48 Table B-28: Population Dose Results . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . B-51 Table B-29: Economic Consequence Results. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . B-51 Table B-30: Seismic Core Damage Frequencies for Peach Bottom and Surry Sites . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . B-54 Part 3 v Revision 4.1
Applicants Environmental Report -
Standard Design Certification List of Figures LIST OF FIGURES Figure 4-1: Schematic Depicting Steady State ECCS Conditions (FSAR Figure 6.3-2) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16 Figure 4-2: ECCS Valve Design (FSAR Figure 6.3-3) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17 Part 3 vi Revision 4.1
Applicants Environmental Report -
Standard Design Certification Introduction Applicants Environmental Report - Standard Design Certification 1.0 Introduction The purpose of this report is to document the evaluation of severe accident mitigation design alternatives (SAMDAs) associated with the NuScale Power Plant design and the bases for not incorporating SAMDAs in the design to be certified. The SAMDA evaluation described in this report was performed in support of the NuScale Design Certification Application.
The U.S. Court of Appeals decision in Limerick Ecology Action versus NRC, 869 F.2d 719 (3rd Cir. 1989), has effectively required the NRC to include consideration of SAMDAs in the environmental impact review performed under Section 102(2)(c) of the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA). This report forms the basis of the NRC's environmental assessment of the NuScale Power Plant design, per 10 CFR 51.30(d), to assure compliance with Section 102(2)(c) of the NEPA of 1969. 10 CFR 52.47(b)(2) and 10 CFR 51.55(a) also require the submission of this environmental report for standard design certifications.
The SAMDA analysis is a cost-benefit analysis wherein the costs of modifying the nuclear power plant's design is weighed against the potential financial risk of consequences stemming from a possible severe accident. Nuclear Energy Institute (NEI) NEI 05-01 (Reference 8.1-1) and NUREG/BR-0184 (Reference 8.1-2) provide guidance for performing the SAMDA analysis. These guidance documents are cited throughout this report. The Environmental Standard Review Plan (NUREG-1555) Section 7.3 (Reference 8.1-29) provides guidance for reviewing severe accident mitigation alternatives (SAMAs). Note that the term SAMA is used when making reference to similar analyses performed by operating reactors and the terms SAMA and SAMDA will be used interchangeably at times in the context of this report, particularly in Appendix A.
2.0 Abbreviations and Definitions Table 2-1: Acronyms and Abbreviations Term Definition AAPS auxiliary AC power source AC alternating current AOC averted off-site property damage costs AOE averted occupational exposure AOSC averted on-site costs APD avoided public dose APE averted public exposure APL actuation and priority logic ATWS anticipated transient without scram BDG backup diesel generator BPSS backup power supply system BWR boiling water reactor CCDF conditional core damage frequency CCF common cause failure CDF core damage frequency CES containment evacuation system CFDS containment flooding and drain system Part 3 1 Revision 4.1
Applicants Environmental Report -
Standard Design Certification Abbreviations and Definitions Table 2-1: Acronyms and Abbreviations (Continued)
Term Definition CFWS condensate and feedwater system CIS containment isolation signal CLRF conditional large release frequency CNTS containment system CNV containment vessel COE cost of enhancement CPI Consumer Price Index CRDS control rod drive system CST condensate storage tank CTG combustion turbine generator CVCS chemical and volume control system DC direct current DHRS decay heat removal system DWS demineralized water system ECCS emergency core cooling system EDSS highly reliable DC power system EEM external events multiplier EIM equipment interface module EOP emergency operating procedure EPZ emergency planning zone ESFAS engineered safety features actuation system FGR Federal Guidance Report FSAR Final Safety Analysis Report FWIV feedwater isolation valve HVAC heating ventilation and air conditioning IE internal events LOCA loss-of-coolant accident LOOP loss of off-site power LPSD low power and shutdown LRF large release frequency MPS module protection system MSIV main steam isolation valve NEI Nuclear Energy Institute NEPA National Environmental Policy Act NPM NuScale Power Module NRC Nuclear Regulatory Commission PD population dose PPI producer price index PRA probabilistic risk assessment PWR pressurized water reactor RC release category RCCWS reactor component cooling water system RCS reactor coolant system RHR residual heat removal RPV reactor pressure vessel RRV reactor recirculation valve RSV reactor safety valve Part 3 2 Revision 4.1
Applicants Environmental Report -
Standard Design Certification Approach and Methodology Overview Table 2-1: Acronyms and Abbreviations (Continued)
Term Definition RTB reactor trip breaker RTS reactor trip system RVV reactor vent valve SAI severe accident impact SAMA severe accident mitigation alternative SAMDA severe accident mitigation design alternative SBO station blackout SCWS site cooling water system SGTF steam generator tube failure SMA seismic margin analysis SOARCA State-of-the-Art Reactor Consequence Analysis SOV solenoid-operated valve SRV safety relief valve SVM scheduling and voting module UHS ultimate heat sink Table 2-2: Definitions Term Definition C present value factor DIO immediate occupational dose DLTO long term occupational dose F core damage frequency m on-site cleanup period The benefit that a SAMDA could achieve if it eliminated all severe accident risk. Or Maximum Benefit in other words, the monetary value attributed to eliminating all severe accident risk from the NuScale design.
PVCD present value of the cost of cleanup and decontamination PVRP present value of replacement power for a single event r real discount rate (taken as some percent per year)
R monetary value associated with unit of dose tf years remaining until end of facility life ti years before facility begins operation present value of the cleanup and decontamination costs over the remaining life UCD of the facility monetary value of occupational health risk avoided due to immediate doses, WIO after discounting monetary value of long term dose risk avoided, accounting for present value WLTO factor 3.0 Approach and Methodology Overview This report consists of identifying the potential causes and impacts of severe accidents, identifying SAMDAs to prevent or mitigate severe accidents, evaluating the costs and benefits associated with the SAMDAs, and documenting whether or not particular SAMDAs were Part 3 3 Revision 4.1
Applicants Environmental Report -
Standard Design Certification SAMDA Candidate Identification judged cost-beneficial to incorporate into the NuScale Power Plant design. NuScale's SAMDA analysis methodology is based on the approaches suggested in Reference 8.1-1.
The process to identify SAMDA candidates for the NuScale design used generic industry SAMDAs described in Reference 8.1-1. Top cutsets and candidate risk significant events from NuScale probabilistic risk assessment (PRA) models, described in Final Safety Analysis Report (FSAR) Section 19.1, were used to assist in the development of NuScale Power Plant specific SAMDAs. This identification process is described in Section 4.0.
Rather than begin by explicitly calculating the benefits associated with a particular SAMDA, a simpler conservative analysis approach is taken by calculating "the maximum benefit". The maximum benefit is the benefit that a SAMDA could achieve if it eliminated all risk. Or in other words, the maximum benefit is the monetary value attributed to eliminating all risk from the NuScale design. The derivation of the maximum benefit is described in Section 5.0 and relies on inputs from severe accident modeling calculations described in Section B.2 to assess off-site consequences of severe accidents. Key assumptions of these off-site consequence analyses are given in Appendix B. The calculated off-site effects are based on data associated with the Surry Power Station, which was seen as a reasonably representative site for the purposes of this report. A moderate response from the local population is modeled, per Section B.1.7 description of off-site consequence modeling. The calculation of the maximum benefit accounts for the effect of seismic events and multiple NuScale Power Modules (NPMs). A series of sensitivity studies on the maximum benefit (including the use of Peach Bottom instead of Surry data to assess off-site consequences) are described in Section 5.8.
The SAMDA candidates are then qualitatively screened into one of seven possible categories.
The intent of the screening is to identify the SAMDA candidates that warrant a detailed cost-benefit evaluation or to provide a basis for why a particular SAMDA does not require further consideration. Part of the screening process involves comparing the estimated cost associated with a SAMDA to the maximum benefit. If the estimated cost associated with a SAMDA is higher than the maximum benefit, then the SAMDA is not cost-beneficial to incorporate into the NuScale design. The screening process is described in Section 6.0 and the results are shown in Appendix A.
A summary of results and conclusions are provided in Section 7.0 of this report.
4.0 SAMDA Candidate Identification The first step in the SAMDA analysis process is to identify a robust list of possible candidate SAMDAs to analyze. This section describes the SAMDA identification process.
The list of industry standard SAMDAs for pressurized water reactors (PWRs) described in Table 14 of Reference 8.1-1 are identified as candidates and shown as SAMDA ID numbers 1 through 153 in Appendix A of this report. The list of industry standard SAMDAs for boiling water reactors (BWRs) described in Table 13 of Reference 8.1-1 were reviewed, but determined to add no additional value compared to the list of PWR SAMDAs already considered. Therefore, the list of industry standard SAMDAs for BWRs is not formally dispositioned or listed in this report.
Part 3 4 Revision 4.1
Applicants Environmental Report -
Standard Design Certification SAMDA Candidate Identification NuScale design-specific SAMDA candidates for plants with 1 to 12 NPMs are identified through the use of PRA insights. The PRA, as discussed in Chapter 19 of the NuScale FSAR, identifies various different combinations of events that could lead to radiological releases from the NuScale Power Plant and each unique combination of events is referred to as a cutset.
Section 5 of Reference 8.1-1 recommends the examination of dominant accident sequences, or cutsets, in addition to dominant equipment or human failures based on importance measures.
This recommendation is accomplished by the following:
- Examination of components from the Level 1 and Level 2 NuScale PRAs that meet the NuScale risk significance criteria
- Examination of Level 1 and Level 2 cutsets that contribute to more than one percent of the core damage frequency (CDF) or large release frequency (LRF) of each individual PRA, to determine significant equipment failures for that internal or external hazard. Cutsets that are above this one percent cutoff are referred to as "top cutsets" throughout this report.
Top cutsets and candidate risk significant events from the following PRAs are used as the basis for SAMDA identification:
- full power internal events (FSAR Tables 19.1-18, 19.1-20, 19.1-26, and 19.1-27)
- internal fires (FSAR Tables 19.1-45 and 19.1-64)
- internal flooding (FSAR Tables 19.1-53 and 19.1-64)
- low power and shutdown (LPSD) (FSAR Tables 19.1-69 and 19.1-70)
- external flooding (FSAR Tables 19.1-57 and 19.1-64)
- high winds (FSAR Tables 19.1-62, 19.1-63, and 19.1-64)
Insights into the dominant contributors to seismic risk were obtained by calculating seismic CDF cutsets for an NPM located at the Surry and Peach Bottom sites with Surry as the base case and Peach Bottom as a sensitivity study. Seismic risk and potential SAMDAs are discussed in Section 4.1.13 and seismic CDFs are reported in Table B-30.
Risk significance criteria for the NuScale Power Plant design are presented in Table 4-1. These risk significance criteria are described in the NuScale topical report TR-0515-13952-NP-A (Reference 8.1-3). Key insights from the Level 1 PRA and Level 2 PRA evaluations are provided in FSAR Tables 19.1-23 and 19.1-32, respectively.
Table 4-1: NuScale Risk-Significance Criteria Parameter Risk Significant Criteria Notes Component CCDF 3 x 10-6/yr Conditional CDF (CCDF) or conditional LRF (CLRF) that would result if the component always fails to operate in Component CLRF 3 x 10-7/yr response to a plant upset System CCDF 1 x 10-5/yr CCDF or CLRF that would result if the system always fails System CLRF 1 x 10-6/yr to operate in response to a plant upset Percent contribution to CDF or LRF; applies to individual Component Total FV 0.20 components and human actions Part 3 5 Revision 4.1
Applicants Environmental Report -
Standard Design Certification SAMDA Candidate Identification NuScale design specific SAMDAs that are identified by examining the top cutsets and candidate risk significant basic events are numbered from 154 to 199. These SAMDAs are shown in Appendix A.
Note that the terminology risk significant basic events is used throughout the text for simplicity whereas the PRA only identifies candidate risk significant basic events.
Individual basic events are also tied to respective components and systems in Table 4-2.
The basic events from the NuScale PRAs that meet the Table 4-1 criteria or are in the PRA top cutsets are presented in Table 4-2. In many cases, the same basic event is risk significant or in the top cutsets of multiple PRAs. In these cases, the basic event is presented once in Table 4-2.
SAMDA numbers relevant to each basic event are listed. In some cases, general PWR SAMDAs were sufficient to address the basic event and no NuScale specific SAMDAs were added.
However, in the majority of cases, new SAMDAs were developed. The process for creating these NuScale specific SAMDAs is described in Section 4.1.1 through Section 4.1.13.
The dominant contributor to LPSD risk was determined to be a dropped NPM event due to Reactor Building crane failure and potential SAMDAs related to Reactor Building crane failure are discussed in Section 4.1.11. Reactor Building crane failure is not shown in Table 4-2 because it is evaluated separately from the LPSD internal events model. No specific components are modeled in the NPM drop portion of the LPSD PRA. The NPM drop portion of the LPSD PRA is modeled as a crane failure initiating event combined with a probability of the NPM remaining upright following the drop. A Reactor Building crane evaluation was performed to establish the frequency of the NPM drop event, as discussed in FSAR Section 19.1.6.1.2. Insights from this Reactor Building crane PRA are used to derive SAMDAs meant to reduce the probability of crane failure.
Part 3 6 Revision 4.1
Part 3 Applicants Environmental Report -
Table 4-2: NuScale Basic Events Used for SAMDA Generation Top CDF Top LRF Basic Event Description SAMDA ID System PRA CCDF CLRF FVCDF FVLRF Cutsets Cutsets Component: Containment Isolation Valves Common cause failure (CCF) of two of two containment system (CNTS) HW - - - X9 - X8 containment evacuation system (CES) containment isolation valves fail SAMDA 182 CNTS EF - - - X9 - X7 Standard Design Certification to close IE - - - X4 X1 X3 FI - - - X9 - X5 CCF of two of two CNTS chemical and volume control system (CVCS) discharge line containment isolation valves fail to close SAMDA 183 CNTS HW - - - X9 - X8 EF - - - X9 - X7 LPSD - - - X11 - X10 IE - - - X4 - -
CNTS CVCS discharge line containment isolation valve A fails to close SAMDA 183 CNTS FI - - - X9 - -
IE - - - 4 - -
X 7 CNTS CVCS discharge line containment isolation valve B fails to close SAMDA 183 CNTS FI - - - X9 - -
CCF of two of two CNTS condensate and feedwater system SAMDA 178, containment isolation valves fail to close SAMDA 179 CNTS FI - - - - X5 -
CCF of two of two CNTS main steam system containment isolation SAMDA 180, valves fail to close SAMDA 181 CNTS FI - - - - X5 -
Component: Makeup Valves IE - - - - X1 -
SAMDA 158, CVCS makeup combining valve fails to open SAMDA 161 CVCS FI - - - - X5 -
LPSD - - - - X10 -
SAMDA Candidate Identification IE - - - - X1 -
Demineralized water system (DWS) north Reactor Building CVCS pump SAMDA 160, isolation valve fails to open SAMDA 161 CVCS FI - - - - X5 -
LPSD - - - - X10 -
Containment flooding and drain system (CFDS) NPM makeup valve fails IE - - - - - X3 SAMDA 156 CFDS to open Revision 4.1 LPSD - - - - - X10 IE - - - - - X3 CNTS CFDS containment isolation valve A fails to open SAMDA 156 CNTS LPSD - - - - - X10
Table 4-2: NuScale Basic Events Used for SAMDA Generation (Continued)
Part 3 Applicants Environmental Report -
Top CDF Top LRF Basic Event Description SAMDA ID System PRA CCDF CLRF FVCDF FVLRF Cutsets Cutsets IE - - - - - X3 CNTS CFDS containment isolation valve B fails to open SAMDA 156 CNTS LPSD - - - - - X10 Component: Control Rods IE - - - - X1 -
Standard Design Certification SAMDA 130 Given actuation, at least three of 16 rods fail to insert CRDS FI - - - - X5 -
SAMDA 184 IF - - - - X6 -
Component: DHRS Actuation Valves SAMDA 171, IE - - - - X1 -
CCF of four of four decay heat removal system (DHRS) actuation valves SAMDA 172, fail to open SAMDA 176, DHRS IF - - X9 - X6 -
SAMDA 177 LPSD - - - - X10 -
SAMDA 171, SAMDA 172, CCF of two of two DHRS train one actuation valves fail to open SAMDA 176, DHRS IF - - X9 - - -
8 SAMDA 177 SAMDA 171, SAMDA 172, CCF of two of two DHRS train two actuation valves fail to open SAMDA 176, DHRS IF - - X9 - - -
SAMDA 177 SAMDA 172, Actuation valve A for DHRS train one fails to open SAMDA 176, DHRS IF - - X9 - - -
SAMDA 177 SAMDA 172, Actuation valve B for DHRS train one fails to open SAMDA 176, DHRS IF - - X9 - - -
SAMDA 177 SAMDA Candidate Identification SAMDA 172, Actuation valve A for DHRS train two fails to open SAMDA 176, DHRS IF - - X9 - - -
SAMDA 177 SAMDA 172, Actuation valve B for DHRS train two fails to open SAMDA 176, DHRS IF - - X9 - - -
SAMDA 177 Revision 4.1
Table 4-2: NuScale Basic Events Used for SAMDA Generation (Continued)
Part 3 Applicants Environmental Report -
Top CDF Top LRF Basic Event Description SAMDA ID System PRA CCDF CLRF FVCDF FVLRF Cutsets Cutsets Component: DHRS Heat Exchangers SAMDA 173, CCF of two of two DHRS heat exchangers plugging SAMDA 174, DHRS IF - - - - X6 -
SAMDA 177 Component: ECCS Reactor Vent Valves Standard Design Certification IE - - X2 - X1 -
FI - - X9 - X5 X5 SAMDA 164, IF - - - - X6 -
CCF of three of three emergency core cooling system (ECCS) reactor SAMDA 165, ECCS vent valves (RVVs) fail to open HW - - X9 X9 X8 X8 SAMDA 170 EF - - X9 X9 X7 X7 LPSD - - X11 - X10 -
FI - - 9 - - -
X ECCS RVV A fails to open SAMDA 170 ECCS EF - - X9 X9 - -
9 IE - - X2 - - -
FI - - X9 - - -
ECCS RVV A passive actuation to open valve fails SAMDA 170 ECCS HW - - X9 X9 - -
EF - - X9 X9 - -
FI - - 9 - - -
X ECCS RVV B fails to open SAMDA 170 ECCS EF - - X9 X9 - -
IE - - X2 - - -
FI - - X9 - - -
ECCS RVV B passive actuation to open valve fails SAMDA 170 ECCS SAMDA Candidate Identification HW - - X9 X9 - -
EF - - X9 X9 - -
FI - - 9 - - -
X ECCS RVV C fails to open SAMDA 170 ECCS EF - - X9 X9 - -
Revision 4.1
Table 4-2: NuScale Basic Events Used for SAMDA Generation (Continued)
Part 3 Applicants Environmental Report -
Top CDF Top LRF Basic Event Description SAMDA ID System PRA CCDF CLRF FVCDF FVLRF Cutsets Cutsets IE - - X2 - - -
FI - - X9 - - -
ECCS RVV C passive actuation to open valve fails SAMDA 170 ECCS HW - - X9 X9 - -
EF - - X9 X9 - -
Standard Design Certification Component: ECCS Reactor Recirculation Valves IE - - X2 - X1 -
9 9 5 FI - - X X X X5 SAMDA 162, IF - - X9 - X6 -
CCF of two of two ECCS reactor recirculation valves (RRVs) fail to open SAMDA 163, ECCS SAMDA 170 HW - - X9 X9 X8 X8 EF - - X9 X9 X7 X7 LPSD - - X11 - X10 -
IE - - X2 - - -
10 FI - - X9 X9 - -
ECCS RRV A fails to open SAMDA 170 ECCS IF - - X9 - - -
HW - - X9 X9 - -
EF - - X9 X9 - -
IE - - X2 - - -
FI - - X9 X9 - X5 ECCS RRV A passive actuation to open valve fails SAMDA 170 ECCS IF - - X9 - X6 -
HW - - X9 X9 X8 -
SAMDA Candidate Identification EF - - X9 X9 X7 X7 IE - - X2 - - -
FI - - X9 X9 - -
ECCS RRV B fails to open SAMDA 170 ECCS IF - - X9 - - -
HW - - X9 X9 - -
Revision 4.1 EF - - X9 X9 - -
Table 4-2: NuScale Basic Events Used for SAMDA Generation (Continued)
Part 3 Applicants Environmental Report -
Top CDF Top LRF Basic Event Description SAMDA ID System PRA CCDF CLRF FVCDF FVLRF Cutsets Cutsets IE - - X2 - - -
FI - - X9 X9 - X5 ECCS RRV B passive actuation to open valve fails SAMDA 170 ECCS IF - - X9 - X6 -
HW - - X9 X9 X8 -
Standard Design Certification EF - - X9 X9 X7 X7 Component: ECCS Reactor Vent Trip Valves SAMDA 166, CCF of three of three ECCS RVV trip valves fail to open SAMDA 167, ECCS FI - - X9 - - -
SAMDA 193 SAMDA 167, ECCS RVV trip valve A fails to open SAMDA 193 ECCS FI - - X9 - - -
SAMDA 167, ECCS RVV trip valve A fails due to hot short SAMDA 189, ECCS FI - - X9 - X5 -
SAMDA 193 11 SAMDA 167, ECCS RVV trip valve B fails due to hot short SAMDA 189, ECCS FI - - - - X5 -
SAMDA 193 Component: ECCS Reactor Recirculation Trip Valves FI - - - - - X5 SAMDA 166, IF - - - - X6 -
CCF of two of two ECCS RRV trip valves fail to open SAMDA 167, ECCS SAMDA 193 HW - - - - X8 -
EF - - - - X7 -
Component: Auxiliary AC Power Supply SAMDA Candidate Identification SAMDA 13, Combustion turbine generator fails to start SAMDA 154, BPSS IE - - X2 - - -
SAMDA 155 SAMDA 13, Combustion turbine generator fails to run (hours two through 48) SAMDA 154, BPSS IE - - X2 - - -
SAMDA 155 Revision 4.1 Component: Actuation and Priority Logic CCF of four of four actuation and priority logic (APL) modules in DHRS actuation valves SAMDA 193 MPS IF - - - - X6 -
Table 4-2: NuScale Basic Events Used for SAMDA Generation (Continued)
Part 3 Applicants Environmental Report -
Top CDF Top LRF Basic Event Description SAMDA ID System PRA CCDF CLRF FVCDF FVLRF Cutsets Cutsets IE - - - - - X3 CCF of two of two APL modules in CVCS discharge isolation valves SAMDA 193 MPS FI - - - - - X5 FI - - - - X5 -
CCF of two of two APL modules in top branch reactor trip breakers SAMDA 193 MPS IF - - - - X6 -
Standard Design Certification FI - - - - 5 -
X CCF of two of two APL modules in bottom branch reactor trip breakers SAMDA 193 MPS IF - - - - X6 -
Component: Equipment Interface Modules Division I engineered safety features actuation system (ESFAS) IE - - - - - X3 SAMDA 194 MPS equipment interface module (EIM) one fails to operate LPSD - - - - - X10 IE - - - - - X3 Division I ESFAS EIM two fails to operate SAMDA 194 MPS LPSD - - - - - X10 Division II ESFAS EIM one fails to operate SAMDA 194 MPS IE - - - - - X3 12 IE - - - - - X3 Division II ESFAS EIM two fails to operate SAMDA 194 MPS LPSD - - - - - X10 Component: Manual Switches Manual division I containment isolation override switch fails to close SAMDA 195 MPS IE - - - - - X3 Manual division I ESFAS nonsafety enable switch fails to close SAMDA 195 MPS IE - - - - - X3 Manual division II containment isolation override switch fails to close SAMDA 195 MPS IE - - - - - X3 Manual division II ESFAS nonsafety enable switch fails to close SAMDA 195 MPS IE - - - - - X3 Component: Scheduling and Voting Module X5 SAMDA Candidate Identification CCF of two of three division I ESFAS scheduling and voting modules SAMDA 196 MPS FI - - - - -
CCF of two of three division II ESFAS scheduling and voting modules SAMDA 196 MPS FI - - - - X5 -
Component: Reactor Safety Valves IE - - X2 - X1 -
SAMDA 190, CCF of two of two reactor coolant system (RCS) reactor safety valves FI - - X9 X9 X5 X5 SAMDA 191, RCS Revision 4.1 (RSVs) fail to open IF - - X9 - X6 -
SAMDA 192 LPSD - - - - X10 -
Table 4-2: NuScale Basic Events Used for SAMDA Generation (Continued)
Part 3 Applicants Environmental Report -
Top CDF Top LRF Basic Event Description SAMDA ID System PRA CCDF CLRF FVCDF FVLRF Cutsets Cutsets IE - - X2 - -
RCS RSV A fails to open SAMDA 192 RCS FI - - X9 X9 - -
IF - - X9 - X6 -
RCS RSV B fails to open SAMDA 192 RCS FI - - X9 X9 - -
Standard Design Certification IE - - X2 - X1 -
FI - - X9 X9 X5 -
RCS RSV A fails to reclose SAMDA 192 RCS IF - - X9 - X6 -
LPSD - - - - X10 -
Component: Reactor Trip Breakers SAMDA 132, SAMDA 137, CCF of two of two top branch reactor trip breakers fail to open SAMDA 185, RTS IF - - - - X6 -
SAMDA 186 13 SAMDA 132, SAMDA 137, CCF of two of two bottom branch reactor trip breakers fail to open SAMDA 185, RTS IF - - - - X6 -
SAMDA 186 Human Actions IE - - - X4 X1 X3 Operator fails to initiate CFDS injection SAMDA 157 CFDS LPSD - - - X11 - X10 IE - - - - X1 X3 Operator fails to initiate CVCS injection SAMDA 159 CVCS FI - - - - X5 -
SAMDA Candidate Identification LPSD - - X11 - X10 -
System: Highly Reliable DC Power Initiator is CCF of four of four highly reliable DC power system (EDSS) IE - - - - X1 -
SAMDA 5 EDSS buses to operate LPSD - - - X10 Revision 4.1
Table 4-2: NuScale Basic Events Used for SAMDA Generation (Continued)
Part 3 Applicants Environmental Report -
Top CDF Top LRF Basic Event Description SAMDA ID System PRA CCDF CLRF FVCDF FVLRF Cutsets Cutsets System: Ultimate Heat Sink IE X2 - - - - -
FI X9 X 9 - - - -
SAMDA 168, Heat transfer to reactor pool fails UHS IF X9 - - - X6 -
Standard Design Certification SAMDA 169 HW X9 - - - - -
EF X9 - - - X7 -
Note: The terms "HW", "EF", "IE", "LPSD", "FI", and "IF" refer to high winds, external floods, internal events, low power and shut down, internal fires, and internal flood PRAs, respectively.
1 FSAR Table 19.1-18 2 FSAR Table 19.1-20 3 FSAR Table 19.1-26 4 FSAR Table 19.1-27 5 FSAR Table 19.1-45 6 FSAR Table 19.1-53 14 7 FSAR Table 19.1-57 8 FSAR Tables 19.1-62 and 19.1-63 9 FSAR Table 19.1-64 10 FSAR Table 19.1-69 11 FSAR Table 19.1-70 SAMDA Candidate Identification Revision 4.1
Applicants Environmental Report -
Standard Design Certification SAMDA Candidate Identification 4.1 SAMDA Generation Design alternatives are grouped based on the PRA function affected by the component. For example, although a containment evacuation system (CES) containment isolation valve is on the CES line, the component is a part of the containment system (CNTS) and affects the containment isolation function. The SAMDAs postulated for events and systems with failures identified in Section 4.0 are discussed in Section 4.1.1 through Section 4.1.13. Table 4-2 provides a comprehensive list of the SAMDAs generated for the NuScale design, the PRA basic events that these SAMDAs mitigate, and the information used to identify the PRA basic events as significant to risk in the NuScale design.
4.1.1 Emergency Core Cooling System The emergency core cooling system (ECCS) is described in FSAR Section 6.3. The ECCS consists of five main valves: three reactor vent valves (RVVs) and two reactor recirculation valves (RRVs).
The RVVs are located on top of the reactor pressure vessel (RPV) above the pressurizer. The RRVs are located on opposite sides of the RPV, above the RPV flange. The five ECCS valves are closed during normal operation, and are part of the reactor coolant pressure boundary. Upon ECCS actuation, and when the differential pressure across the valves is small enough, the valves open to allow flow paths between the RPV and the containment vessel (CNV). ECCS steady state operation is shown in FSAR Figure 6.3-2, reprinted here as Figure 4-1.
The ECCS valve design consists of a trip valve, a reset valve, an arming valve, and a main valve.
The trip and reset valves are located outside of the CNV and are connected to the arming and main valves, which are located inside the CNV and outside of the RPV, through a vent line. The ECCS valve design is shown in FSAR Figure 6.3-3, reprinted here as Figure 4-2.
The ECCS is actuated by removing power to the trip valves corresponding to each main valve.
Upon opening the trip valve, the main valve control chamber discharges through the vent line.
As shown in Table 4-2, there are 18 basic events from Chapter 19 PRAs that are related to ECCS and considered risk significant or are in the top cutsets. These events include the common cause failure (CCF) of the RRVs, the CCF of the RVVs, the CCF of the RRV trip valves, the CCF of the RVV trip valves, failure of any RVV to passively actuate, failure of any RRV to passively actuate, and the failure of the ECCS heat transfer to the ultimate heat sink (UHS).
The diversification of the existing ECCS valves or the addition of another, diverse valve are proposed design changes for the CCFs of the RRVs or RVVs (SAMDA 162, SAMDA 163, SAMDA 164, and SAMDA 165). To mitigate the trip valve failures, SAMDA 167 was identified to implement a manual bypass of the ECCS trip valve to allow the actuation of ECCS when the trip valves fail to operate.
Part 3 15 Revision 4.1
Applicants Environmental Report -
Standard Design Certification SAMDA Candidate Identification Figure 4-1: Schematic Depicting Steady State ECCS Conditions (FSAR Figure 6.3-2)
Reactor Vent Valves Pressurizer Containment Vessel Steam Generator Reactor Vessel Reactor Reactor Recirculation Recirculation Valve Valve Reactor Core Part 3 16 Revision 4.1
Applicants Environmental Report -
Standard Design Certification SAMDA Candidate Identification Figure 4-2: ECCS Valve Design (FSAR Figure 6.3-3)
Reactor Vessel Pilot Valve Assembly Containment Vessel Trip Valve Main Valve Assembly IAB Main Valve Control Chamber Reset Supply Main Valve (RRV)
Reset Valve The context of these common cause ECCS valve failures is also important when considering the design alternatives. There are loss of all AC power sequences that are on a success path and decay heat removal is being accomplished by other systems. Then, a partial actuation of ECCS occurs due to battery depletion, and leads to core damage. An ECCS partial actuation occurs Part 3 17 Revision 4.1
Applicants Environmental Report -
Standard Design Certification SAMDA Candidate Identification when there is a CCF of three RVVs to open and the RRVs open successfully, or when there is a CCF of two RRVs to open and the RVVs open successfully. To mitigate these events where ECCS is actuated due to loss of all AC power when ECCS is not required, one existing SAMDA is considered and one new SAMDA is suggested. The first, SAMDA 3, suggests adding a battery charger or portable generator to the existing DC system. SAMDA 3 would allow the ECCS valves to remain powered and prevent actuation following a loss of AC power. The second, SAMDA 166, suggests implementing block valves into the ECCS design to prevent the ECCS from actuating during a loss of AC power where the ECCS is not required to mitigate an event.
These block valves would be normally open and manually closed upon recognition that ECCS is not required for core cooling prior to battery depletion. If the ECCS were to completely actuate, rather than partially actuate, then core damage would be avoided. Suggested SAMDAs to actuate ECCS after a failure to open were considered in the previous paragraph.
Failure of heat transfer to the UHS could occur following ECCS actuation. In some sequences the differential pressure between the RPV and the CNV may be large enough that the coolant in the RPV is forced into the CNV and the hydraulic head of the coolant in the CNV is not large enough to overcome the RPV pressure and recirculate the coolant to the RPV. To mitigate this failure mode, SAMDA 168 suggests lowering the RRV elevation to just above the top of the fuel.
SAMDA 169 suggests redesigning the CNV to reduce the volume below the RRV level. These SAMDAs increase the available hydraulic head above the ECCS RRVs to increase the reliability of coolant recirculation to the RPV and promote effective heat transfer to the UHS. Existing SAMDA 97 and SAMDA 98 also apply to this scenario, and suggest improvements to retain core debris in the event of a full core melt.
One additional design alternative, SAMDA 170, suggests improving testing and maintenance of the ECCS valves to improve the reliability of the system.
4.1.2 Containment Isolation Containment isolation is described in FSAR Section 6.2.4. There are six basic events from the PRA related to containment isolation from Table 4-2 that are considered risk significant or are in the top cutsets. These basic events can be separated into two groups: the containment isolation valves fail to close or the containment isolation valves fail to open.
4.1.2.1 Containment Isolation Valves Fail to Close There are four PRA basic events shown in Table 4-2 that include or are affected by the containment isolation valves failing to close when demanded. These are the CCF of both CES containment isolation valves to close, the failure of either chemical and volume control system (CVCS) discharge line containment isolation valve to close, and the CCF of both CVCS discharge line containment isolation valves to close.
SAMDA 182 suggests diversifying the existing CES containment isolation valves to reduce the probability of CCFs of these valves.
The NuScale PRA demonstrated that CVCS containment isolation valve failures are dominated by the CCF of the discharge line containment isolation valves to close. SAMDA 183 suggests diversifying the existing CVCS discharge line containment isolation valves to reduce the probability of CCFs of these valves.
Part 3 18 Revision 4.1
Applicants Environmental Report -
Standard Design Certification SAMDA Candidate Identification 4.1.2.2 Containment Isolation Valves Fail to Open There are two PRA basic events shown in Table 4-2 that include the containment isolation valves failing to open when demanded. These basic events include the failure of either containment flooding and drain system (CFDS) containment isolation valves to open. SAMDA 156 suggests improving the reliability of the CFDS containment isolation valves to reduce the probability of these failures to open.
4.1.3 Control Rod Drive System The control rod drive system (CRDS) is described in FSAR Section 4.6. There is one PRA basic event shown in Table 4-2 related to the CRDS that is considered risk significant or is in the top cutsets, which is the failure of at least 3 of the 16 control rods to insert into the reactor core upon actuation of the CRDS. SAMDA 130 applies to this event and suggests adding an independent boron injection system (in addition to the CVCS) to improve the availability of boron injection and control of reactivity during an anticipated transient without scram (ATWS).
The reactor trip breakers that signal the CRDS are part of the reactor trip system and are discussed in Section 4.1.4.
One additional design alternative, SAMDA 184, suggests improving the testing and maintenance of the CRDS.
4.1.4 Reactor Trip System The reactor trip system (RTS) is described in FSAR Section 7.0.4.1.2. There are two PRA basic events shown in Table 4-2 related to the RTS that are considered risk significant or are in the top cutsets. These basic events include the CCF of the top branch of two reactor trip breakers (RTBs) to fail to open and the CCF of the bottom branch of two RTBs to fail to open.
SAMDA 132 applies to the failure of the RTS and suggests providing an additional control system for rod insertion to improve redundancy and reduce ATWS frequency. SAMDA 137 also applies to the failure of the RTS to de-energize the CRDS and suggests providing the capability to remove power from the bus powering the control rods to decrease the time required to insert control rods if the RTBs fail. The control rods are controlled by electromagnetic coils.
When the power is removed from the coils, the control rods insert into the core. SAMDA 185 suggests providing an additional, diverse division of RTBs to reduce the probability of CCFs and improve the reliability of the RTS to insert the control rods when demanded.
One additional design alternative, SAMDA 186, suggests improving the testing and maintenance of the RTBs to improve the reliability of the RTS.
4.1.5 Decay Heat Removal System The decay heat removal system (DHRS) is described in FSAR Section 5.4.3.2. There are 10 PRA basic events shown in Table 4-2 related to the DHRS that are considered risk significant or are in the top cutsets. These basic events can be binned into three categories: the failure of the DHRS actuation valves to open, the failure of the DHRS due to the heat exchangers plugging, and the feedwater isolation valves (FWIVs) or main steam isolation valves (MSIVs) failing to close.
Part 3 19 Revision 4.1
Applicants Environmental Report -
Standard Design Certification SAMDA Candidate Identification There are seven basic events that apply to the DHRS valves failing to open. These basic events include the failure of any of the four individual DHRS actuation valves to open (two valves for each of the two DHRS trains), the CCF of both DHRS actuation valves to open on train one of the DHRS, the CCF of both DHRS actuation valves to open on train two of the DHRS, and the CCF of all four DHRS actuation valves to open. These failures are dominated by the CCF of the DHRS valves to open (both the CCF of two valves for either division of DHRS and the CCF of all four DHRS valves in both divisions). SAMDA 171 suggests diversifying the DHRS actuation valves to improve the reliability of the DHRS and reduce the probability of CCFs of these valves to open.
SAMDA 176 suggests improving the reliability of the DHRS actuation valve components.
The CCF of both trains of DHRS due to plugging is the one basic event that applies to the failure of the DHRS heat exchangers due to plugging. SAMDA 174 suggests adding removable screens to the DHRS, which would be cleaned every refueling cycle and reduce the probability that the DHRS fails due to plugging.
There are two basic events that apply to the failure of the FWIVs and MSIVs to close. These basic events are the CCF of both FWIVs to close (one on each DHRS train) and the CCF of both MSIVs to close (one on each DHRS train). If either the FWIVs or MSIVs fail to close, the DHRS inventory will be lost and the DHRS is assumed to fail. SAMDA 178 suggests providing a redundant, diverse FWIV on each DHRS train to reduce the probability of the CCF of these valves to close.
SAMDA 180 suggests providing a redundant, diverse MSIV on each DHRS train to reduce the probability of the CCF of these valves to close.
SAMDA 177 suggests providing a backup means of removing decay heat to improve the availability of decay heat removal when the DHRS is not functional, which applies to all ten basic events.
Five additional design alternatives, SAMDA 172, SAMDA 173, SAMDA 175, SAMDA 179, and SAMDA 181 suggest procedural changes to improve the reliability of the DHRS.
4.1.6 Reactor Coolant System The reactor coolant system (RCS) is described in FSAR Section 5.1. There are four PRA basic events shown in Table 4-2 related to the RCS that are considered risk significant or are in the top cutsets. These basic events include the failure of either reactor safety valve (RSV) to open, the CCF of both RSVs to open, and the failure of one RSV to reclose after opening. The RSVs are described in FSAR Section 5.2.2.4.1.
The CCF of both RSVs to open contributes more to risk than the independent failure of each RSV to open individually. Therefore, two SAMDAs are postulated to reduce the probability of CCF of the RSVs to open. SAMDA 190 suggests diversifying the existing RSVs to reduce the probability of common cause failure. SAMDA 191 suggests providing an additional, diverse, RSV to provide further defense in depth and reduce the probability of CCF.
SAMDA 192 suggests improving the reliability of the RSV components, which would reduce the probability of failure for all four basic events.
Part 3 20 Revision 4.1
Applicants Environmental Report -
Standard Design Certification SAMDA Candidate Identification 4.1.7 Backup Power Supply System The backup power supply system (BPSS) is described in FSAR Section 8.3.1.1.2. There are two PRA basic events shown in Table 4-2 related to the BPSS, specifically the auxiliary AC power supply (AAPS, modeled in the PRA as a combustion turbine generator [CTG]), are considered risk significant or are in the top cutsets. These basic events include the failure of the CTG to start, and the failure of the CTG to run during hours 2 through 48 of service.
SAMDA 13 suggests installing an additional, buried off-site power source to reduce the probability of a loss of off-site power. SAMDA 14 suggests installing a gas turbine generator to increase the availability of on-site AC power. SAMDA 155 suggests providing a redundant AAPS to improve the availability of AC power in the event of a loss of off-site power. All three design alternatives reduce the probability of failure for both basic events.
One additional design alternative, SAMDA 154, suggests improving AAPS testing and maintenance procedures.
4.1.8 Containment Flooding and Drain System The CFDS is described in FSAR Section 9.3.6.2.2. There are two PRA basic events shown in Table 4-2 related to the CFDS that are considered risk significant or are in the top cutsets. The first basic event is the failure of CFDS NPM makeup valve to open when demanded to allow the CFDS to supply inventory from the common (to six NPMs) system to the containment of one NPM. The second basic event is the failure of the operator to start containment flooding.
SAMDA 156 suggests improving the reliability of the CFDS containment isolation valves to improve the probability that the valves will function when demanded.
SAMDA 157 suggests improving operator training to start containment flooding.
4.1.9 Chemical and Volume Control System The CVCS is described in FSAR Section 9.3.4.2. There are three PRA basic events shown in Table 4-2 related to the CVCS that are considered risk significant or are in the top cutsets. The first basic event is the failure of the CVCS makeup combining valve to open, which supplies reactor coolant to the CVCS. The second basic event is the failure of the valve that isolates the demineralized water system (DWS) from the CVCS makeup pumps. The final basic event is the failure of the operator to initiate CVCS injection.
SAMDA 158 suggests providing an alternate source of inventory for the CVCS, which reduces the impact of the failure of the CVCS makeup combining valve to open to the DWS, limiting the inventory available to CVCS.
SAMDA 160 suggests incorporating an additional, diverse, parallel DWS CVCS makeup pump isolation valve, which applies to the failure of the CVCS makeup pump isolation valve to open.
A parallel isolation valve increases the probability that inventory is made available to the CVCS makeup pumps when demanded.
Part 3 21 Revision 4.1
Applicants Environmental Report -
Standard Design Certification SAMDA Candidate Identification SAMDA 159 suggests improving operator training to start CVCS injection. SAMDA 161 suggests training operators to divert CVCS flow from one NPM to another through the module heat-up system. Both of these SAMDAs mitigate CVCS failures to operate.
4.1.10 Module Protection System The module protection system (MPS) is described in FSAR Section 7.0.4.1. There are 14 PRA basic events shown in Table 4-2 that apply to the MPS that are risk significant or are in the top cutsets. These basic events can be separated into four categories: the CCF of actuation and priority logic (APL) modules to operate, the failure of equipment interface modules (EIMs) to operate, the failure of manual override switches to close, and the CCF of scheduling and voting modules (SVMs) to operate.
Four basic events apply to the CCF of APL modules to operate, which include the failure of APLs to the DHRS actuation valves, the CVCS discharge line containment isolation valves, the top branch RTBs, and the bottom branch RTBs. Four basic events apply to the failure of EIMs to operate, which include the failure of the CFDS containment isolation valve EIMs (i.e., the two EIMs for each CFDS containment isolation valve for a total of four). SAMDA 193 suggests improving redundancy in removing control power to equipment. SAMDA 193 applies to the EIM and the APL (a subcomponent of the EIM) basic events. When an EIM fails to operate on an actuation signal, control power is not removed from a component and the component does not actuate. Providing additional means to remove control power mitigates these failures.
Additionally, SAMDA 194 suggests improving the reliability of EIM components, reducing the probability of failure for both categories.
Four basic events apply to the failure of the manual switches to operate. These basic events include the failure of both divisions of the containment isolation signal override switch to close and the failure of both divisions of the nonsafety enable override switch to close. SAMDA 195 suggests improving the reliability of the manual override switch components, reducing the probability of failure for all four basic events.
Two basic events apply to the failure of the SVMs to operate. These basic events include the CCF of two of three division I engineered safety features actuation system (ESFAS) SVMs and the CCF of two of three division II ESFAS SVMs. SAMDA 196 suggests improving the reliability of the SVM components, reducing the probability of failure.
4.1.11 Reactor Building Crane Failures As shown in Table 5-4, failures of the Reactor Building crane during NPM transport, leading to a dropped NPM, contribute the greatest proportion of any equipment failure to the maximum benefit of risk elimination in the NuScale design, contributing over 99 percent of the maximum benefit. A PRA on the Reactor Building crane is described in FSAR Section 19.1.6.1.2. The hoist portion of the crane contributes the majority of the Reactor Building crane failure probability. A review of the top cutsets in the Reactor Building crane PRA shows that operator errors of commission during Reactor Building crane operation are important to Reactor Building crane risk, and therefore reducing the contribution of human errors warrants further consideration.
Other important contributors to Reactor Building crane risk in the top cutsets are CCFs.
However, review of the PRA cutsets indicates that there is no single CCF that dominates the Reactor Building crane risk (i.e., risk is distributed across CCF groups). While it is possible to Part 3 22 Revision 4.1
Applicants Environmental Report -
Standard Design Certification SAMDA Candidate Identification postulate Reactor Building crane changes involving specific components, reduction in Reactor Building crane risk would be small because the potential for CCF of redundant components would remain. The Reactor Building crane is designed as a NOG-1 Type 1 single-failure-proof crane, meeting the best available design standard for cranes used to handle critical loads.
Mitigating systems and redundancy exist in the Reactor Building crane design and CCFs are not significantly affected by increased redundancy, thus no SAMDAs related to specific components of the Reactor Building crane are postulated.
To mitigate Reactor Building crane risk, three SAMDAs are postulated. SAMDA 197 suggests improving the automation of Reactor Building crane operation to the extent permitted by the control system design, reducing the potential for operator errors of commission. SAMDA 198 suggests incorporating a railway system in the reactor pool design to reduce the reliance on the hoist system during NPM transport. SAMDA 199 suggests improving testing and maintenance of the Reactor Building crane.
4.1.12 Internal Events There are many generic PWR SAMDAs that suggest design changes to mitigate internal events.
Additionally the majority of basic events in Table 4-2 occur in response to internal events (but some are specific to an external event, e.g., fire damage). Therefore, the SAMDAs generated in Section 4.1.1 through Section 4.1.11 also apply to the NuScale internal events.
4.1.13 Fires, Floods, High Winds, External Floods, Seismic, and Low Power and Shutdown Events The internal fire PRA is described in FSAR Section 19.1.5.2. One SAMDA is proposed to mitigate failures of plant equipment due to internal fires. SAMDA 189 suggests using three hour rated fire cable for safety related equipment. This SAMDA would prolong the time to cable damage and reduce the probability of spurious operation of plant equipment during an internal fire, allowing more time to suppress fires in the plant.
The internal flooding PRA is described in FSAR Section 19.1.5.3. No NuScale specific SAMDAs are proposed to mitigate failures of plant equipment due to internal flooding. The internal flooding PRA shows that the DHRS, ECCS, and RCS components are significant to internal flooding risk in the NuScale design. Existing SAMDAs discussed in Section 4.1.1, Section 4.1.5, and Section 4.1.6 are considered adequate to address internal flood mitigation in the NuScale design.
The high-wind PRA is described in FSAR Section 19.1.5.5. High wind events are modeled in the PRA as causing a loss of off-site power. SAMDAs 1 through 24, 154, and 155 suggest design alternatives to mitigate a loss of off-site power, and therefore no additional SAMDAs are suggested to address high winds.
The external flooding PRA is described in FSAR Section 19.1.5.4. The external flooding PRA is similar to high winds, in that an external flood is modeled as causing an extended loss of off-site power. Damage to equipment is similar to that of internal flooding, therefore no new SAMDAs are postulated that apply to external flooding.
The seismic risk evaluation, discussed in FSAR Section 19.1.5.1, determined that the dominant contributors to seismic risk are structural failures. Seismically induced equipment failures also appear in the top cutsets. SAMDA 140 suggests increasing the seismic ruggedness of plant Part 3 23 Revision 4.1
Applicants Environmental Report -
Standard Design Certification Maximum Benefit components to reduce the probability of failure in a seismic event. Reactor Building crane failures are considered in the evaluation of seismic risk in the NuScale design. Seismically induced failures of the Reactor Building crane are captured by SAMDA 140. SAMDA 187 suggests base mat isolation to reduce the seismic stresses on equipment during seismic events. SAMDA 188 suggests improving the RPV support skirt to increase the seismic ruggedness of the RPV.
The LPSD PRA, described in FSAR Section 19.1.6, is similar to the internal events PRA, but considers the reactor operating at low power rather than full power. Therefore, any SAMDAs that apply to equipment failures in the internal events PRA also apply to the LPSD PRA. The LPSD PRA also considers Reactor Building crane failures, which are discussed in Section 4.1.11.
Therefore, any SAMDAs that apply to Reactor Building crane failures also apply to the LPSD PRA.
5.0 Maximum Benefit The base case calculation is discussed throughout this section. Sensitivity cases are described in Section 5.8. A key equation for the initial cost-benefit assessment of implementing a particular SAMDA is adapted from Section 4 of Reference 8.1-1 as follows:
Net Value = APE + AOC + AOE + AOSC - COE Equation 5-1 where, APE = present value of averted public exposure ($),
AOC = present value of averted off-site property damage costs ($),
AOE = present value of averted occupational exposure ($),
AOSC = present value of averted on-site costs ($), and COE = cost of enhancement [or cost of implementing SAMDA] ($).
If the net value is positive, then the SAMDA would warrant further consideration for incorporation into the NuScale design. If the net value is negative, then the SAMDA would be unbeneficial to implement.
Any particular SAMDA would only reduce the probability of a small subset of severe accident scenarios. However, to be conservative (and to simplify the evaluation), the process of calculating the maximum benefit includes the summation of contributions from all severe accidents and assume that any particular SAMDA would reduce the probability of all severe accidents to zero.
The remainder of Section 5.0 establishes present values associated with severe accident risk and discusses the various calculational procedures implemented to determine the maximum benefit of SAMDAs in the NuScale design.
Part 3 24 Revision 4.1
Applicants Environmental Report -
Standard Design Certification Maximum Benefit 5.1 Present Value Factor In order to account for the time value of money, a real discount rate is assigned in order to determine a present value factor (C), per Section B.2 of Reference 8.1-2. This time value of money is different than the update of the economic data in the Surry site file from 2005 to 2017 mentioned in Section B.1.5.2 of this report. The updating of the economic data in the site file is to bring past values up to date.
The present value factor applies to the economic and dose consequences of an accident. The dose and economic costs are multiplied by the point estimate CDF, giving a dollar amount saved or a dose avoided per year. The dose avoided per year is converted to a dollar amount per year based on a dollar per rem factor suggested in NUREG-1530 (Reference 8.1-4, page 26).
The present value factor accounts for the costs saved over the entire lifetime of the plant from avoiding an accident, and expresses those dollars in present value.
As discussed in Section B.2 of Reference 8.1-2, the costs saved over a period of years must be summed. However, this summation cannot be done directly as money in the present is more valuable than the same amount at a future date. Discounting is used to compare amounts of money expended at different times. The result of discounting is called the present value.
Reference 8.1-2 recommends the use of continuous discounting in regulatory analyses in which the cost is weighed by an accident frequency over the remaining life of a facility, as is done throughout Section 5.0 of this report where appropriate. The accident frequency is a continuous variable (Reference 8.1-2, Section B.2.3). Reference 8.1-2 gives the present value factor (C) as
- rt i - rt f C = (e -e )r Equation 5-2 where, r = real discount rate (per year),
tf = years remaining until end of facility life, and ti = years before facility begins operation.
This report will calculate the net present value relative to the first year of a plant's operation, which sets ti=0 and simplifies the present value factor to
- rt f 1-e C = -------------------- Equation 5-3 r
Taking r to be 7 percent per year, as recommended by Reference 8.1-2, and tf to be 60 years yields C=14.1 years.
Part 3 25 Revision 4.1
Applicants Environmental Report -
Standard Design Certification Maximum Benefit 5.2 Averted Public Exposure The present value associated with averted public exposure (APE) is determined by multiplying the avoided public dose (APD) by a surrogate monetary value associated with each person-rem of dose avoided and multiplying that product by the present value factor.
APE = APD x R x C Equation 5-4 where, APD = avoided public dose (person-rem/year),
R = monetary value associated with unit of dose ($/(person-rem)) = $5,100 per person-rem (per Reference 8.1-4, Table 3)
C = present value factor (years) = 14.1 years NUREG-1530 suggests a surrogate monetary value of R=$5,100 per person-rem (Reference 8.1-4, page 26).
The avoided public dose (before discounting) can be calculated by multiplying the population dose (PD) for each release category (RC) by the frequency of the RC and summing the result of this product across all the RCs.
APD = [ release category frequency x release category PD ] Equation 5-5 Release Categories The population dose for each RC is calculated with MELCOR-derived release information and a MACCS model using site data from the Surry SOARCA Analysis with a 50-mile radius, which was developed to support this report. The results of these calculations are documented in Table 5-1, which describes the population dose associated with each RC, the frequency associated with each RC, and the total APD of 8.17E-04 person-rem per year. For a more detailed description of MACCS modeling, see Appendix B Section B.1 and Section B.2.
A short description of the SAMDA-specific RCs is given here to aid interpretation of Table 5-1 and other release category discussions later in this report. For a more detailed description of RCs, see Appendix B Section B.2. Note that these RCs are different from the two release categories (core damage with intact containment and core damage with containment bypass) given in the NuScale Level 2 PRA, described in FSAR Section 19.1.4.2.1.4, as a more precise treatment is desired for the purposes of this report. Also note that RC associated information (and Table 5-1 results) is based on internal events (FSAR Section 19.1.4), LPSD (FSAR Section 19.1.6), internal flooding (FSAR Section 19.1.5.3), internal fires (FSAR Section 19.1.5.2),
external floods (FSAR Section 19.1.5.4), and high winds PRAs (FSAR Section 19.1.5.5). The frequencies corresponding to each RC are shown in Table B-25.
RC 1: CVCS loss-of-coolant accident (LOCA) Inside Containment RC 2: Pipe Break Outside Containment, Isolated Part 3 26 Revision 4.1
Applicants Environmental Report -
Standard Design Certification Maximum Benefit RC 3: CVCS Pipe Break Outside Containment, Unisolated RC 4: ECCS Spurious Actuation RC 5: Steam Generator Tube Failure RC 6: General Transient with RSV Stuck Open RC 7: General Transient with No RSVs RC 8: Dropped NPM During Transport Table 5-1: Frequency of Occurrence and Off-site Consequences for Each Release Category Release Frequency Off-site Dose per Event Off-site Dose per Year RC (per year) (person-rem/event) (person-rem/year) 1 2.15E-11 3.16E+01 6.80E-10 2 1.06E-12 2.29E+01 2.43E-11 3 1.79E-11 1.21E+06 2.16E-05 4 2.44E-09 2.06E+01 5.03E-08 5 1.39E-13 2.36E+05 3.27E-08 6 2.06E-10 1.50E+01 3.09E-09 7 2.70E-10 2.20E+01 5.94E-09 8 1.05E-06 7.57E+02 7.95E-04 Total 1.05E-06 - 8.17E-04 Utilizing these values and a present value factor of 14.1 years yields an APE of $58.60.
person-rem $5,100 APE = 8.17E ----------------------------- x ------------------------------ x 14.1 years = $58.6 Equation 5-6 year person-rem 5.3 Averted Off-Site Costs The averted off-site property damage costs (AOC) are calculated using an equation adapted from Reference 8.1-2, Equation 5-7.
AOC = C x off-site economic impact -----------
Equation 5-7 year The off-site economic impact for each RC is calculated with MELCOR-derived release information and a MACCS model (see Appendix B), using site data from the Surry SOARCA analysis (Reference 8.1-28) with a 50-mile radius, which was developed to support this report.
The results of these calculations are documented in Table 5-2, which describes the off-site economic impact per event associated with each RC, the frequency associated with each RC, and the annual monetary value of off-site economic impact associated with each RC. The total monetary value of off-site economic impact is determined by a summation of the off-site economic impact calculated for each RC and calculated to be 5.37E-02 dollars per year. For a more detailed description of MACCS calculation procedure, see Appendix B Section B.1.
Part 3 27 Revision 4.1
Applicants Environmental Report -
Standard Design Certification Maximum Benefit Table 5-2: Frequency of Occurrence and Off-site Consequences for Each Release Category Release Frequency Off-site Economic Impact per Off-site Economic Impact RC (per year) Event ($) ($/year) 1 2.15E-11 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 2 1.06E-12 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 3 1.79E-11 2.72E+09 4.87E-02 4 2.44E-09 0.0E+00 0.0E+00 5 1.39E-13 8.42E+07 1.17E-05 6 2.06E-10 0.0E+00 0.0E+00 7 2.70E-10 0.0E+00 0.0E+00 8 1.05E-06 4.77E+03 5.01E-03 Total 1.05E-06 - 5.37E-02 Multiplying by the present value factor (14.1 years) gives an AOC value of:
AOC = 14.1 years x 5.37E - 02 ----------- = $0.755 Equation 5-8 year 5.4 Averted Occupational Exposure The averted occupational exposure (AOE) is estimated by combining the estimated values associated with averting short-term and long-term dose to personnel in response to a severe accident. The methodology for performing these estimates is based on Reference 8.1-2.
5.4.1 Short-Term Dose to Personnel The short-term dose to personnel is estimated with Equation 5-9.
W IO = R x CDF x D IO x C Equation 5-9 where, WIO = monetary value of occupational health risk avoided due to "immediate" doses, after discounting ($),
R = monetary value associated with unit of dose ($/(person-rem)) = $5,100 per person-rem (per Reference 8.1-4, Table 3)
CDF = Core damage frequency (events per year) = 1.05E-06 events per year DIO = immediate occupational dose, (person-rem per event) = 3,300 person-rem per event (best estimate value based on Three Mile Island and Chernobyl data per Section 5.7.3.1 of Reference 8.1-2)
C = present value factor (years) = 14.1 years Part 3 28 Revision 4.1
Applicants Environmental Report -
Standard Design Certification Maximum Benefit Therefore,
$5,100 events person-rem W IO = ------------------------------ x 1.05E-06 ---------------- x 3300 ------------------------------ x 14.1 years = $249 Equation 5-10 person-rem year event 5.4.2 Long-Term Dose to Personnel The long-term occupational dose associated with the cleanup and decontamination process following the severe accident is given by Equation 5-11 which is derived from Reference 8.1-2 Section 5.7.3.1.
-rm 1-e W LTO = R x CDF x D LTO x C x -------------------- Equation 5-11 rm where, WLTO = monetary value of long term dose risk avoided, accounting for present value factor, R = monetary value associated with unit of dose ( ------------------------------ ) = $5,100 per person-rem (per person-rem Reference 8.1-4, Table 3)
CDF = core damage frequency (events per year) = 1.05E-06 events per year DLTO = long term occupational dose, (person-rem per event) = 20,000 person-rem per event (per Reference 8.1-2 best estimate)
C = present value factor (years) = 14.1 years r = real discount rate (percent per year) = 0.07 per year m = on-site cleanup period (years) = 10 years (per Reference 8.1-2)
Therefore,
$5100 events person-rem W LTO = ------------------------------ x 1.05E-06 ---------------- x 20,000 ------------------------------ x Equation 5-12 person-rem year event 0.07
- ----------- x 10 years year 1-e 14.1 years x -------------------------------------------- = $1,090 0.07
x 10 years year Part 3 29 Revision 4.1
Applicants Environmental Report -
Standard Design Certification Maximum Benefit 5.4.3 Total Averted Occupational Exposure Combining the immediate and long-term on-site exposure costs results in a total on-site exposure cost, WO, given by Equation 5-13:
W O = W IO + W LTO Equation 5-13 Using the values for WIO and WLTO calculated above:
- WIO = $249
- WLTO = $1,090 The total averted on-site exposure costs are calculated to be:
W O = $249 + $1,090 = $1,339 = $1,340 Equation 5-14 5.5 Averted On-Site Costs The averted on-site costs (AOSC) associated with on-site property damage from a severe accident can be broken down into cleanup and decontamination costs, repair and refurbishment costs, and costs associated with replacement power over the remaining life of the facility. Since it is assumed that the NPM undergoing core damage will be irrecoverably damaged, the repair and refurbishment component of the AOSC will not be considered further.
Decommissioning a nuclear facility at the end of the facility lifetime also has an associated cost, which is included in the cleanup and decontamination cost estimate recommended in Reference 8.1-2.
The AOSC calculated in Section 5.5.1 through Section 5.5.3 applies to a single NPM. The AOSC for a 12 NPM plant is discussed in Section 5.7.
5.5.1 Cleanup and Decontamination Costs A cleanup period of 10 years is assumed per Reference 8.1-2. Reference 8.1-2 estimated the value associated with total cleanup and decontamination costs as $1.5E+09 in 1993. This value of $1.5E+09 is the sum of the estimated cleanup and decontamination cost of $1.1E+09 and the estimated decommissioning cost of $4E+08 (Reference 8.1-2, page 5.42-5.43). This value is updated to 2017 dollars by multiplying by the ratio of the September 2017 consumer price index (CPI) of 246.819 to the January 1993 CPI of 142.6 (Reference 8.1-10, Table 24). The net present value of a single event is determined through Equation 5-15:
( 2017 CPI )
C CD x ----------------------------
( 1993 CPI ) 1-e
- rm PV CD = ----------------------------------------------- x -------------------- Equation 5-15 m r Part 3 30 Revision 4.1
Applicants Environmental Report -
Standard Design Certification Maximum Benefit where, PVCD = net present value of a single event ($),
CCD = total cost of cleanup and decontamination = $1.5E+09, m = cleanup period (years) = 10 years, and r = real discount rate (per year) = 0.07 per year.
Therefore,
$1.5E+09 x ---------------------
246.819 0.07
- ----------- x 10 years 142.6 1-e year PV CD = ------------------------------------------------------------ x ------------------------------------------------ = $1.87E + 09 Equation 5-16 10 years 0.07 year The present value of the cleanup and decontamination costs over the remaining life of the facility (UCD) is determined through Equation 5-17:
U CD = PV CD x C Equation 5-17 where, PVCD = net present value of a single event ($) = $1.87E+09, and C = present value factor (years) = 14.1 years.
Therefore, U CD = $1.87E + 09 x 14.1 years = 2.63E+10$ - years Equation 5-18 5.5.2 Replacement Power Cost Following a severe accident it is assumed the plant's owner is responsible for replacement power costs. Replacement power costs are calculated per the guidance of Reference 8.1-2, which is based on a reference 910 MWe plant that operates at roughly a 60 percent capacity factor in 1993 dollars.
To convert the 1993 dollar basis to modern day dollars, the Bureau of Labor Statistics' annual, non-seasonally adjusted producer price index (PPI) for the commodity "Electric Power" is used.
The PPI measures the average change over time in the selling prices received by producers for their respective outputs and is a widely accepted means for adjusting long-term pricing contracts. The 1993 PPI for electric power is 128.6 and the preliminary 2017 PPI for electric power is 210.9 (Reference 8.1-5). Multiplying the 1993 replacement power cost estimate by the ratio of the 2017 to 1993 PPI is a reasonable means of estimating the 2017 cost of replacement Part 3 31 Revision 4.1
Applicants Environmental Report -
Standard Design Certification Maximum Benefit power associated with a severe accident. The 2017 PPI is the most recent annual PPI available at the time of this report's creation.
Note further that the value from Reference 8.1-2 is based on old data that assumes a roughly 60 percent capacity factor for a nuclear power plant. The NuScale design is assumed to achieve a capacity factor of 100 percent, to bound the expected range of capacity factors. Therefore, to adjust this estimate to account for the larger capacity factor, a simple multiplication of the previously determined replacement power costs by the ratio of the NuScale assumed capacity factor (CFNuScale) to the previously assumed 60 percent capacity factor (CF0184) is a reasonable estimate.
Equation 5-19 is derived from Reference 8.1-2 and adjusts the reference 910 MWe plant (MWe0184) to the 50 MWe NPM (MWeNuScale). Equation 5-19 approximates the average value of net present value replacement power costs for a single event:
CF NuScale MWe NuScale B x ---------------------- x ----------------------- x ----------------------------
2017 PPI CF 0184 1993 PPI MWe 0184 -rt 2 PV RP = - x [1 - e f]
Equation 5-19 r
where, PVRP = net present value of replacement power for a single event, B = a constant representing a string of replacement power costs that occur over the lifetime of a reactor after an event = 1.2E+08 $/year (1993 dollars, 910 MWe, 60 percent capacity factor),
r = real discount rate (per year) = 0.07 per year, and tf = years remaining until end of facility life = 60 years.
Therefore, 1.2E + 08 ----------- x ----------- x -------------- x -------------------------
$ 1.0 210.9 50 MWe year 0.60 128.6 910 MWe PV RP = --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- x Equation 5-20 0.07 year 0.07 2
- ----------- x 60 years year 1 - e = $2.50E + 08 The net present value of replacement power over the life of the facility can be determined with the following equation from Reference 8.1-2 (Equation 5-21). Note that the squared term in Equation 5-21 is a proxy for the fact that the costs for events in future years decline due to the Part 3 32 Revision 4.1
Applicants Environmental Report -
Standard Design Certification Maximum Benefit reduced number of years of possible power production left on the license for which replacement power would need to be procured.
PV RP -rt f 2 U RP = ------------ x ( 1 - e ) Equation 5-21 r
Therefore, 0.07 2
- ----------- x 60 years U RP = ------------------------------- x 1 - e = 3.46E + 09$-years
$2.50E + 08 year Equation 5-22 0.07 year 5.5.3 Total Averted On-Site Costs The total on-site economic costs, WOSC, are calculated by summing the cleanup and decontamination costs and the replacement power costs, then multiplying this value by the CDF, as shown in Equation 5-23:
W OSC = ( U CD + U RP ) x CDF Equation 5-23 where, UCD = total cost of cleanup and decontamination over the analysis period ($-years) and URP = net present value of replacement power over the life of facility ($-years).
Using the values calculated above and from the NuScale PRA:
- UCD = 2.63E+10 $-years
- URP = 3.46E+09 $-years
- CDF = 1.05E-06 per year The total on-site economic costs are calculated to be:
1.05E - 06 W OSC = ( ( 2.63E + 10 $years ) + ( 3.46E + 09 $years ) ) x ---------------------------- Equation 5-24 year
= $31,300 Part 3 33 Revision 4.1
Applicants Environmental Report -
Standard Design Certification Maximum Benefit 5.6 Single NuScale Power Module Severe Accident Impact Calculations throughout Section 5 are performed for all RCs individually and then summed together. An interim step in the calculation of the maximum benefit involves the summation of APE (Section 5.2), AOC (Section 5.3), AOE (Section 5.4), and AOSC (Section 5.5) to obtain a term referred to as the severe accident impact (SAI). Table 5-3 shows a summary of the values calculated in Section 5.2 through Section 5.5 separated by RC and summed together to calculate the SAI for the base case. The total single NPM SAI calculates the monetary value attributed to the consequences of an accident involving a single NPM at a 12 NPM plant, considering internal events, low power shutdown, internal floods, internal fires, external floods, high winds, and dropped NPM events as $32,700.
Table 5-3: Summary of Results Related to Calculating Single NuScale Power Module SAI APE (public AOC (off-site AOE (on-site AOSC (on-site Percent of RC SAI ($)
exposure, $) cost, $) exposure, $) cost, $) total SAI 1 4.88E-05 0.00E+00 2.73E-02 6.40E-01 6.67E-01 2.04E-03 2 1.74E-06 0.00E+00 1.35E-03 3.16E-02 3.29E-02 1.01E-04 3 1.55E+00 6.85E-01 2.27E-02 5.32E-01 2.79E+00 8.54E-03 4 3.61E-03 0.00E+00 3.10E+00 7.27E+01 7.58E+01 2.32E-01 5 2.35E-03 1.64E-04 1.76E-04 4.13E-03 6.82E-03 2.08E-05 6 2.22E-04 0.00E+00 2.62E-01 6.13E+00 6.39E+00 1.95E-02 7 4.27E-04 0.00E+00 3.43E-01 8.03E+00 8.38E+00 2.56E-02 8 5.70E+01 7.05E-02 1.33E+03 3.12E+04 3.26E+04 9.97E+01 Total 5.86E+01 7.55E-01 1.34E+03 3.13E+04 3.27E+04 1.00E+02 Percent of 1.79E-01 2.31E-03 4.09E+00 9.57E+01 1.00E+02 -
total SAI 5.7 Maximum Benefit In Section 5.6, the SAI for a single NPM due to internal events, LPSD events, internal flooding events, internal fire events, external flooding events, high winds events, and dropped NPM events is calculated. However, the effect of seismic events and multiple NPMs co-located in the same Reactor Building must also be taken into account to calculate the maximum benefit. The maximum benefit calculated in this section is for a 12 NPM plant, which is bounding for a NuScale plant with a smaller number of NPMs.
Following the guidance in Reference 8.1-1, seismic events are accounted for using an external events multiplier (EEM) on the SAI calculated in Section 5.6. The seismic margin assessment (SMA) event tree sequences do not match the sequences of the other PRAs because the SMA contains additional failures (i.e., structural failures) that cannot be directly matched with the sequences of the other PRAs. These differences in sequences are accounted for by using an EEM. An EEM is calculated and applied to all release categories. The seismic CDF for the Surry Part 3 34 Revision 4.1
Applicants Environmental Report -
Standard Design Certification Maximum Benefit site is 3.17E-08 per year as shown in Table B-30 and is combined with the summed NuScale RC CDF of 1.05E-06 for a total CDF of 1.08E-06 per year. Therefore, the EEM is:
CDF seismic + CDF RCs1-8 EEM = -------------------------------------------------------------------- = Equation 5-25 CDF RCs1-8 3.17E - 08 per year + 1.05E - 06 per year
= 1.03 1.05E - 06 per year The NuScale design is unique in that there are 12 operating NPMs housed in one Reactor Building. To conservatively account for the total number of NPMs, an additional multiplier of 12 is simply applied to the SAI calculated in the previous section for RCs 1 through 7. The contribution to the maximum benefit for the Surry site from RCs 1 through 7 is calculated as follows:
Maximum Benefit RCs 1-7 = ( APE + AOC + AOE + AOSC )i, per NPM Equation 5-26 x EEM x 12 NPMs = $94.1 x 1.03 x 12 = $1,160 As described in FSAR Section 19.1.7.4, the low power and shutdown PRA analysis has established that the maximum number of NPMs that can be damaged in an NPM drop accident is three. Therefore, a multiplier of three is applied to RC 8 to account for multiple NPMs, with the exception of the AOSC, which is equivalent to assuming an off-site release from three horizontal NPMs. This approach is conservative as it is unlikely that an event will impact multiple NPMs and cause core damage. For the AOSC calculated in RC 8, it is assumed that replacement power is required for the entire NuScale plant following an accident. Therefore, in calculating the contribution to the maximum benefit for the Surry site from RC 8, the APE, AOC, AOE, and cleanup and decontamination (UCD) portion of the AOSC are all multiplied by three.
However, the replacement power costs (URP) are multiplied by 12. The contribution to the maximum benefit for the Surry site from RC 8 is calculated as follows:
Maximum Benefit RC 8 = ( 3 x [ APE RC8 + AOC RC8 + AOE RC8 ] + Equation 5-27
[ 12 x U RP,RC8 + 3 x U CD,RC8 ] x CDF ) x EEM =
3 x [ $57.0 + $7.05E-2 + $1,330 ] +
1.05E - 06
[ 12 x 3.46E + 09 $ years + 3 x $2.63E + 10 $years ] x ---------------------------- x 1.03 = $134,000 year The maximum benefit for the Surry site is calculated in Equation 5-28 and is shown in Table 5-4.
Maximum Benefit = Maximum Benefit RCs1-7 + Maximum Benefit RC8 = Equation 5-28
$1,160 + $134,000 = $135,600 = $136,000 Part 3 35 Revision 4.1
Applicants Environmental Report -
Standard Design Certification Maximum Benefit Table 5-4: 12 NuScale Power Module Maximum Benefit for the Surry Site Percent of APE (public AOC (off-site AOE (on-site AOSC (on-site Maximum RC maximum exposure, $) cost, $) exposure, $) cost, $) Benefit ($)
benefit 1 6.03E-04 0.00E+00 3.38E-01 7.91E+00 8.25E+00 6.08E-03 2 2.16E-05 0.00E+00 1.67E-02 3.90E-01 4.07E-01 3.00E-04 3 1.92E+01 8.46E+00 2.81E-01 6.58E+00 3.45E+01 2.55E-02 4 4.47E-02 0.00E+00 3.83E+01 8.98E+02 9.37E+02 6.91E-01 5 2.90E-02 2.03E-03 2.18E-03 5.10E-02 8.43E-02 6.21E-05 6 2.74E-03 0.00E+00 3.23E+00 7.58E+01 7.90E+01 5.83E-02 7 5.27E-03 0.00E+00 4.24E+00 9.93E+01 1.04E+02 7.63E-02 8 1.76E+02 2.18E-01 4.12E+03 1.30E+05 1.34E+05 9.91E+01 Total 1.96E+02 8.68E+00 4.16E+03 1.31E+05 1.36E+05 1.00E+02 Percent of maximum 1.44E-01 6.40E-03 3.07E+00 9.68E+01 1.00E+02 -
benefit Dropped NPM events are significant risk contributors to the NuScale design with the NPM drop RC (RC 8) contributing approximately 99.7 percent of the SAI (Table 5-3) and approximately 99.1 percent of the total maximum benefit (Table 5-4).
5.8 Maximum Benefit Sensitivity Study To examine the sensitivity of the maximum benefit to input parameters and MACCS modeling assumptions, several sensitivity calculations are performed. MACCS sensitivity analyses are discussed in detail in Section B.3 of this report. Maximum benefit sensitivity cases 1 through 11 are calculated using MACCS sensitivity results. Maximum benefit sensitivity cases 12 through 14 are not calculated using MACCS sensitivity results, but are sensitivities of suggested cost-benefit analysis values in Reference 8.1-2 and the NUREG-1530 Revision 1 draft for public comment (Reference 8.1-4). Maximum benefit values are calculated for the following scenarios:
- 1) A 10 mile emergency planning zone (EPZ) evacuation is modeled, compared to a site boundary EPZ in the base case.
- 2) The site population and economic information is based on SecPOP 4.3 (2010 census data and 2012 economic data), compared to the previous SecPOP version (2000 census data and 2002 economic data) used in the base case.
- 3) Radionuclide release occurs at the Peach Bottom site (see Section B.1.6), compared to the Surry site (see Section B.1.5) in the base case.
- 4) Radionuclide release occurs at the top of the Reactor Building (24.689 m above grade, see FSAR Section 1.2.2.1), compared to 0 m in the base case.
- 5) High burnup core inventory, shown in Table B-6, compared to the best estimate core inventory in the base case shown in Table B-5.
- 6) The release occurs immediately at transient initiation, compared to the time to first gap release predicted by MELCOR in the base case.
Part 3 36 Revision 4.1
Applicants Environmental Report -
Standard Design Certification Maximum Benefit
- 7) The maximum non-farmland decontamination cost and duration allowed by MACCS is used for all decontamination levels, compared to the CPI scaled values from the SOARCA analysis used in the base case.
- 8) The value of economic parameters listed in Table B-2, except DPRATE and DSRATE, are multiplied by two compared to the base case.
- 9) All radionuclides are available for release from containment, compared to only the airborne fraction calculated by MELCOR in the base case.
- 10) Radionuclide aerosol dry deposition velocity (0.01 m/s) from NUREG-1150 (Reference 8.1-34) for all radionuclide classes, compared to the base case deposition velocities calculated by MELMACCS (see Appendix B) using the methodology in NUREG/CR-7161 (Reference 8.1-6, Section 3.0).
- 11) Radionuclide release is buoyant with a heat content of 100,000 W per plume segment, compared to the assumed value of 0 W in the base case.
- 12) High estimate of immediate and long-term occupational (on-site) dose, which is 14,000 person-rem immediate and 30,000 person-rem long term (Reference 8.1-2, pages 5.30, 5.31), compared to 3,300 person-rem immediate and 20,000 person-rem long term in the base case.
- 13) High estimate of dollar-per-person-rem value, which is $7,500 per person-rem (Reference 8.1-4, page 26), compared to $5,100 per person-rem in the base case.
- 14) Real discount rate of three percent per year, compared to seven percent per year in the base case (Reference 8.1-2, Section B.2.1).
The same process outlined in Section 5.0 through Section 5.7 is used to calculate the maximum benefit for the sensitivity cases outlined above. With the exception of case three, which uses a Peach Bottom site-specific seismic CDF (see Section B.4), the CDF and release category frequencies remain unchanged. Peach Bottom is more seismically active than Surry and therefore has a larger seismic CDF of 2.01E-06, per Table B-30. The external events multiplier for the Peach Bottom site is calculated below.
1.05E - 06 + 2.01E - 06 year EEM Peach Bottom = --------------------------------------------------------------- = 2.91 Equation 5-29 1.05E - 06 year Intact containment MACCS simulations required additional assumptions to analyze off-site dose, compared to containment bypass simulations. These assumptions include plume buoyancy, particle size distribution/deposition velocity in the environment, and containment deposition. Thus, these sensitivities were not performed for release category three and release category five and instead the base case results are used to calculate the maximum benefit.
The results of the sensitivity cases are presented in Table 5-5.
Part 3 37 Revision 4.1
Applicants Environmental Report -
Standard Design Certification Maximum Benefit Table 5-5: Maximum Benefit Sensitivity Case Description Maximum Benefit
- Base Case $136,000 1 10 mile EPZ $152,000 2 2010 population and 2012 economic site data $136,000 3 Peach Bottom site $383,000 4 24.689 m release height $136,000 5 High burnup inventory $136,000 6 Immediate Release $136,000 7 Maximum TIMDEC and CDNFRM $136,000 8 Table B-2, except DPRATE and DSRATE, multiplied by two $136,000 9 Airborne and deposited release from CNV $136,000 10 0.01m/s deposition velocity $136,000 11 100000 W plume heat content $136,000 12 High on-site dose estimate $140,000 13 High $/person-rem estimate $138,000 14 Three percent real discount rate $341,000 There are five general insights that can be extracted from the results of the sensitivities in Table 5-5.
- 1) MACCS modeling of the release, and off-site dose and economic consequences are not important contributors to the maximum benefit.
- 2) On-site dose consequences are not important contributors to the maximum benefit.
- 3) The monetary value attributed to dose is not an important contributor to the maximum benefit.
- 4) The site at which the release occurs is an important contributor to the maximum benefit.
- 5) The inherent value of money is an important contributor to the maximum benefit.
Sensitivity cases 1 through 11 are all related to off-site modeling assumptions and off-site consequences. Of these 11 cases, only case 1 (10 mile EPZ) and case 3 (Peach Bottom site) show any deviation from the base case results.
The 10 mile EPZ sensitivity (case 1) shows an increase of $16,000 over the base case maximum benefit. Evacuation within 10 miles of the release is costly, effectively creating a minimum off-site economic impact of $3.45E+08 per event for all RCs. Even considering that five of eight RCs have no off-site economic impacts per event in the base case (Table 5-2), there is only a slight increase to the maximum benefit value when 10 mile EPZ evacuation is considered. This small impact on the maximum benefit from the large increase in economic consequences is because the economic consequences are frequency weighted, and the RC frequencies are exceedingly small.
The Peach Bottom site sensitivity shows an increase of $247,000 in the maximum benefit compared to the base case Surry site. This is almost entirely due to the much larger seismic CDF of 2.01E-06 per year at the Peach Bottom site, compared to the seismic CDF of 3.17E-08 per year Part 3 38 Revision 4.1
Applicants Environmental Report -
Standard Design Certification Assessment of SAMDA Candidates at the Surry site. Before applying the external events multiplier (which accounts for seismic risk) to the single NPM SAI, the Peach Bottom SAI and the Surry SAI are both calculated to be
$32,700.
Based on the discussion above and the results of sensitivity cases 1 through 11, it can be concluded that radionuclide releases are not important contributors to the maximum benefit value, unless their frequency of occurrence is increased dramatically. However, site-specific hazards, such as seismic events, are an important contributor to the maximum benefit.
Sensitivity cases 12 and 13 are related to the on-site dose consequences and dollar per person-rem estimate, respectively. Cases 12 and 13 show an increase of $4,000 and $2,000, respectively, in the maximum benefit compared to the base case. This is expected, because the dose consequences (the APE and AOE) contribute less than five percent of the base case maximum benefit.
Sensitivity case 14 is related to the rate at which the value of money decreases over time. This case shows an increase in the maximum benefit of nearly a factor of three over the base case.
Therefore, the rate at which the value of money decreases over time is an important factor in estimating the current dollar value of the maximum benefit.
6.0 Assessment of SAMDA Candidates The candidate SAMDAs identified in Section 4.0 of this report are qualitatively screened into one of seven initial screening categories. The intent of the screening is to identify the candidates that warrant a detailed cost-benefit evaluation. These categories and the screening process itself were based on the "Phase I" analysis screening criteria described in Reference 8.1-1. These seven categories include "not applicable," "already implemented,"
"combined," "excessive implementation cost," "very low benefit," "not required for design certification," and "considered for further evaluation." These seven categories are described in greater detail in Section 6.1. Screening results are shown along with the list of candidate SAMDAs in Appendix A and summarized in Section 6.2.
6.1 Initial "Phase I" SAMDA Screening Categories 6.1.1 Not Applicable SAMDA candidates that are not considered applicable to the NuScale design are those developed for systems specifically associated with PWR equipment that is not in the NuScale design.
6.1.2 Already Implemented Candidate SAMDAs that are already included in the NuScale design or whose intent is already fulfilled by a different NuScale design feature are considered "already implemented" in the NuScale design. If a particular SAMDA has already been implemented in the NuScale design, it is not retained for further analysis.
Part 3 39 Revision 4.1
Applicants Environmental Report -
Standard Design Certification Assessment of SAMDA Candidates 6.1.3 Combined The SAMDA candidates that are similar to one another are combined and evaluated in conjunction with each other. This combination of SAMDA candidates leads to a more comprehensive or plant-specific SAMDA candidate set. The combined SAMDA are then assessed against the remaining six screening categories.
6.1.4 Excessive Implementation Cost The maximum benefit is $136,000, as described in Section 5.7, and is used to screen SAMDA candidates in this analysis. The maximum benefit is the monetary value attributed to eliminating all risk in the NuScale design. If a SAMDA requires extensive changes that would exceed the maximum benefit of $136,000 even without an implementation cost estimate, it is not retained for further analysis. The 12 NPM benefit is compared to the 12 NPM cost of implementation in this screening category.
6.1.5 Very Low Benefit If a generic SAMDA is related to a system whose improved reliability would have a negligible impact on overall plant risk, then the SAMDA is considered to have a very low benefit for implementation and is not retained for further analysis. The Level 1 and Level 2 PRA listings of candidate risk significant SSC from all NuScale PRAs, discussed in FSAR Tables 19.1-20, 19.1-27, and 19.1-64, are used to inform the risk-significance of systems and components in the NuScale design for the SAMDA screening process. The systems that are considered risk-significant to the NuScale design are shown in Table 6-1. If a system is not considered risk-significant to the NuScale design, then implementing a SAMDA related to that system is of very low benefit. The components that are considered risk-significant to the NuScale design are shown in Table 6-2.
If a component is not considered risk-significant to the NuScale design, then implementing a SAMDA related to that component is of very low benefit.
Table 6-1: Candidate Risk-Significant Systems for the NuScale Design System Description CNTS containment system ECCS emergency core cooling system MPS module protection system UHS ultimate heat sink Table 6-2: Candidate Risk-Significant Components for the NuScale Design Description CNTS CES CNV isolation valve 1 CNTS CES CNV isolation valve 2 CNTS CVCS discharge line CNV isolation valve 1 CNTS CVCS discharge line CNV isolation valve 2 DHRS train 1 actuation valve A DHRS train 1 actuation valve B DHRS train 2 actuation valve A DHRS train 2 actuation valve B ECCS RVV main valve A Part 3 40 Revision 4.1
Applicants Environmental Report -
Standard Design Certification Assessment of SAMDA Candidates Table 6-2: Candidate Risk-Significant Components for the NuScale Design (Continued)
Description ECCS RVV main valve B ECCS RVV main valve C ECCS RRV main valve A ECCS RRV main valve B ECCS RVV trip valve A Combustion turbine generator Reactor safety valve A Reactor safety valve B NuScale design-specific SAMDAs are not screened in Phase I as very low benefit as these SAMDAs are generated in response to the risk-significant basic events and are, therefore, risk significant by definition. However, NuScale design-specific SAMDAs may still be screened by the other categories.
6.1.6 Not Required for Design Certification SAMDA candidates related to potential procedural enhancements, surveillance action enhancements, multiple 12 NPM sites, or design elements that are to be finalized in a later stage of the design process are outside of the scope of this report and are categorized as "not required for design certification."
6.1.7 Considered for Further Evaluation Any SAMDA candidate that did not screen into any of the previous six screening categories is subject to a more in-depth cost-benefit analysis.
6.2 Phase I Screening Results A total of 199 SAMDA candidates developed from industry and NuScale documents were evaluated in this phase of the analysis. The screening of each SAMDA and the basis for the screening is shown in Appendix A.
- 45 SAMDA candidates are not applicable to the NuScale design.
- 18 SAMDA candidates are already implemented into the NuScale design either as suggested in the SAMDA or as an equivalent replacement that fulfilled the intent of the SAMDA.
- 13 SAMDA candidates are combined with another SAMDA because the candidates had the same intent.
- 37 SAMDA candidates are not required for design certification because the candidates are related to a procedural or surveillance action, are related to a multiple plant site, or are related to design elements to be finalized at a later stage in the design process that is outside the scope of the design certification.
- 34 SAMDA candidates are of very low benefit to reducing risk in the NuScale design.
- 1 SAMDA candidate is categorized as having an excessive implementation cost.
- 51 SAMDA candidates are retained for further evaluation.
Part 3 41 Revision 4.1
Applicants Environmental Report -
Standard Design Certification Assessment of SAMDA Candidates 6.3 Phase II SAMDA Screening Reference 8.1-1 prescribes that any SAMDA candidates that screened into the "considered for further evaluation" category in the Phase I screening should be subjected to a more realistic cost-benefit analysis referred to as a "Phase II analysis". Phase II analysis entails subtracting the value of the severe accident risk associated with the design after the SAMDA has been incorporated in the design from the maximum benefit derived in Section 5.0 (which conservatively assumed that the implementation of any SAMDA would reduce the total plant risk to zero). The Phase II cost-benefit analysis is based on the costs associated with 12 NPMs and the benefits associated with 12 NPMs. The 51 SAMDAs that are screened as "considered for further evaluation" in Phase I are evaluated in this section.
None of the SAMDAs from Phase I that are considered for further analysis in Phase II involve changes to the Reactor Building crane design. To provide a more realistic estimate of the benefit of implementing SAMDAs that do not involve the Reactor Building crane, all contributions to the maximum benefit from dropped NPM risk are subtracted in Phase II.
Therefore, an upper bound estimate of the benefit of implementing all non-crane SAMDAs is
$1,160 (Equation 5-26), which considers the contributions from RCs 1 through 7 and does not consider the contributions from RC 8.
All SAMDAs are evaluated in Phase II assuming a $100,000 minimum cost of implementation.
This assumption is in alignment with previous evaluations accepted by the NRC, which use an estimated cost range of $100,000 to $1,000,000 for hardware modifications in place of a detailed cost estimate for industry standard SAMDAs. This cost estimate range is used in analysis supporting many license renewal applications, including the Cooper Nuclear Station (Reference 8.1-21, page E.2-3) and Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Station (Reference 8.1-27, page E.2-4) applications. As the $100,000 estimate is on the lower end of the range, it is considered a conservative estimate for the cost of hardware modifications to a 12 NPM plant.
Using the conservative estimate of the benefit of implementing any of the 51 SAMDAs and the minimum cost of implementation, none of the SAMDAs are determined to be cost beneficial to implement.
6.4 Screening Sensitivity A sensitivity study was performed to determine if any of the SAMDAs would screen in for a Phase II analysis and be considered potentially cost beneficial when using different assumptions to calculate the maximum benefit. Re-screening the list of candidate SAMDAs using either the case 3 "Peach Bottom site" sensitivity study maximum benefit of $383,000 or the case 14 three percent real discount rate sensitivity study maximum benefit of $341,000 instead of the base case maximum benefit of $136,000 shown in Table 5-5 resulted in 51 SAMDAs being retained for Phase II analysis. Of these 51 SAMDAs that would no longer screen out in Phase I analysis, none apply to the Reactor Building crane. Similar to the base case evaluation, the maximum benefit of implementing non-crane SAMDAs is estimated to be the total benefit attributed to non-crane risk in the NuScale design for each case. This approach yields a benefit of $3,320 for case 3 and a benefit of $2,800 for case 14. However, because Peach Bottom (case 3) is more seismically active than Surry and the Peach Bottom seismic risk is a significant contributor to the maximum benefit, seismic SAMDAs are assumed to have a benefit equal to the maximum benefit weighted by the fraction of the total CDF attributed to seismic CDF, for a benefit of $252,000 for seismic SAMDAs.
Part 3 42 Revision 4.1
Applicants Environmental Report -
Standard Design Certification Summary and Conclusions Three SAMDAs are determined to be potentially cost beneficial for the Peach Bottom site (case
- 3) in the sensitivity screening. These potentially cost beneficial SAMDAs are SAMDA 140, SAMDA 187, and SAMDA 188, which are all related to seismic improvements. This shows that design changes to improve the seismic ruggedness of the NuScale design may be beneficial to implement at sites that are seismically active. However, it is likely that with a more detailed cost estimate for implementing these SAMDAs, the SAMDAs would not be cost beneficial. The cost of implementing SAMDA 140 is estimated to be greater than $5,000,000 in the Kewaunee license renewal analysis (Reference 8.1-22, pages F-27 and F-228); therefore, the cost of implementing a similar SAMDA in the NuScale design would exceed the Peach Bottom maximum benefit of $383,000. SAMDA 187 and SAMDA 188 are potential design changes to the NPM and the Reactor Building, respectively. These SAMDAs would require extensive redesigns of the NPM and Reactor Building; therefore, the cost of implementing these SAMDAs are likely to exceed the Peach Bottom maximum benefit of $383,000.
7.0 Summary and Conclusions A list of generic and NuScale-specific SAMDAs were identified and considered for implementation in the NuScale design. The maximum benefit that could be associated with implementing a SAMDA was established and sensitivity studies on this value were performed.
An analysis was conducted, with the result that none of the SAMDAs are considered to be cost beneficial to implement in the design certification stage of the design process. The NuScale design is robust and already mitigates the likelihood and the consequences of severe accidents such that any additional severe-accident mitigation features beyond those already incorporated in the NuScale design are difficult to justify from a cost-benefit perspective.
8.0 References 8.1 Referenced Documents 8.1-1 Nuclear Energy Institute, "Severe Accident Mitigation Alternatives (SAMA) Analysis Guidance Document," NEI 05-01, Revision A, November 2005.
8.1-2 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, "Regulatory Analysis Technical Evaluation Handbook," NUREG/BR-0184, January 1997.
8.1-3 NuScale Topical Report, Risk Significance Determination, TR-0515-13952-NP-A, Revision 0, October 2016, ADAMS Accession Number ML16284A016.
8.1-4 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, "Reassessment of NRC's Dollar Per Person-Rem Conversion Factor Policy" (Draft Report), NUREG-1530, Revision 1, August 2015.
8.1-5 U.S. Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics, Producer Price Indexes, Accessed January 15, 2018, http://www.bls.gov/ppi/, Series ID WPU054, Electric Power.
8.1-6 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, "Synthesis of Distributions Representing Important Non-Site-Specific Parameters in Off-Site Consequence Analyses,"
NUREG/CR-7161, SAND2010-3380P, April 2013.
Part 3 43 Revision 4.1
Applicants Environmental Report -
Standard Design Certification References 8.1-7 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, "Code Manual for MACCS2: Volume 1, User's Guide," NUREG/CR-6613, SAND97-0594, May 1998.
8.1-8 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, "Manual of Protective Action Guides and Protective Actions for Nuclear Accidents," EPA-400-R-92-001, May 1992.
8.1-9 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, "State-of-the-Art Reactor Consequence Analyses Project: Uncertainty Analysis of the Unmitigated Long-Term Station Blackout of the Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station," NUREG/CR-7155, May 2016.
8.1-10 U.S. Department of Labor Bureau of Labor Statistics, Archived Consumer Price Index Supplemental Files, Accessed January 10, 2018, https://www.bls.gov/cpi/tables/
supplemental-files/home.htm.
8.1-11 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, "MACCS Best Practices as Applied in the State-of-the-Art Reactor Consequence Analyses (SOARCA) Project," NUREG/CR-7009, August 2014.
8.1-12 U.S. Census Bureau, "Projections of the Size and Composition of the U.S. Population:
2014-2060," P25-1143, March 2015.
8.1-13 U.S. Census Bureau, "Annual Estimates of the Population for the United States and States, and for Puerto Rico: April 1, 2000 to July 1, 2005," NST-EST2005-01, December 2005.
8.1-14 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, "SOARCA Surry 2005 Site File," April 2015, ADAMS Accession Number ML15097A078.
8.1-15 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, "SOARCA Surry 2004 Meteorological File,"
April 2015, ADAMS Accession Number ML15097A117.
8.1-16 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, "SOARCA Peach Bottom 2005 Site File,"
April 2015, ADAMS Accession Number ML15097A076.
8.1-17 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, "SOARCA Peach Bottom 2006 Meteorological File," April 2015, ADAMS Accession Number ML15097A114.
8.1-18 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, "State-of-the-Art Reactor Consequences Analyses Project, Volume 1: Peach Bottom Integrated Analysis," NUREG/CR-7110, Revision 1, May 2013.
8.1-19 Exelon, "Peach Bottom Seismic Hazard and Screening Report", RS-14-071, Revision 1, March 2014, Adams Accession Number ML14090A247.
8.1-20 Virginia Electric and Power, "Surry Power Station Units 1 and 2 Seismic Hazard and Screening Report", RS-14-134, Revision 0, March 2014, ADAMS Accession Number ML14092A414.
Part 3 44 Revision 4.1
Applicants Environmental Report -
Standard Design Certification References 8.1-21 Nebraska Public Power District, Attachment E, Severe Accident Mitigation Alternatives Analysis Submittal Related to Licensing Renewal for the Cooper Nuclear Station, September 2008, ADAMS Accession Number ML083030246.
8.1-22 Dominion, Attachment F, Severe Accident Mitigation Alternatives Analysis Submittal Related to License Renewal for Kewaunee Power Station, August 2008, ADAMS Accession Number ML082341039.
8.1-23 Reserved.
8.1-24 Reserved.
8.1-25 Reserved.
8.1-26 Reserved.
8.1-27 Entergy Nuclear, Appendix E-Attachment E, Severe Accident Mitigation Alternatives Analysis Submittal Related to Licensing Renewal for the Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Station, January 2006, ADAMS Accession Number ML060300086.
8.1-28 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, "State-of-the-Art Reactor Consequence Analyses Project, Volume 2: Surry Integrated Analysis," NUREG/CR-7110, Revision 1, August 2013.
8.1-29 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, "Standard Review Plans for Environmental Reviews for Nuclear Power Plants: Environmental Standard Review Plan," NUREG-1555, Section 7.3, "Severe Accident Mitigation Alternatives," Revision 1, July 2007.
8.1-30 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, "Alternative Radiological Source Terms for Evaluating Design Basis Accidents at Nuclear Power Reactors," Regulatory Guide 1.183, July 2000.
8.1-31 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, "State-of-the-Art Reactor Consequence Analyses (SOARCA) Report," NUREG-1935, November 2012.
8.1-32 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, "Evaluation of Severe Accident Risks:
Quantification of Major Input Parameters, MACCS Input," NUREG/CR-4551, Volume 2, Revision 1, Part 7, December 1990.
8.1-33 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Memorandum and Order, CLI-16-07, May 2016.
8.1-34 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, "Severe Accident Risks: An Assessment for Five U.S. Nuclear Power Plants," NUREG-1150, December 1990.
Part 3 45 Revision 4.1
Applicants Environmental Report -
Standard Design Certification List of Candidate SAMDAs and Screening Results Appendix A List of Candidate SAMDAs and Screening Results Table A-1 lists the candidate SAMDAs considered in this analysis, provides a description of each SAMDA, details the screening disposition of the candidate SAMDA, and provides a basis for the assessment. Note that some of the SAMDAs in Table A-1 discuss a loss of off-site power (LOOP).
A LOOP, as used in the PRA analysis, is a loss of normal AC power. The expected response to a LOOP is startup of the on-site CTG or a backup diesel generator (BDG). See Chapter 19 of the NuScale Final Safety Analysis Report for more information on LOOP in the context of the NuScale PRA.
Part 3 A-1 Revision 4.1
Part 3 Applicants Environmental Report -
Table A-1: Screening of Proposed SAMDAs Screening SAMDA ID Potential Enhancement Result of Potential Enhancement Basis Category Generic PWR Improvements Related to AC and DC Power The result of this generic SAMDA has been considered in previous SAMA analyses by operating reactors to extend battery capacity to 24 hours2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br /> (Reference 8.1-21, page E.2-Standard Design Certification Extended DC power availability during Already 4; Reference 8.1-27, page E.2-7). As described in FSAR SAMDA1 Provide additional DC battery capacity.
an SBO. implemented Table 8.3-5, the NuScale design provides for 24 hours2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br /> of battery life to maintain ECCS valve closure, and 72 hours8.333333e-4 days <br />0.02 hours <br />1.190476e-4 weeks <br />2.7396e-5 months <br /> of post accident monitoring. Additionally, each DC separation group has redundant battery capacity.
Combined with SAMDA 1. The intent of this SAMDA is Extended DC power availability during SAMDA 2 Replace lead-acid batteries with fuel cells. Combined similar to SAMDA 1, which is already implemented by an SBO.
the NuScale design.
The BDG switchgear is designed with a 480 V plug-in Add additional battery charger or connection to accept portable equipment (see FSAR Improved availability of DC power Already SAMDA 3 portable diesel-driven battery charger to Section 8.3.1.1.2). Additionally, each DC bus is supplied system. implemented existing DC system. by two redundant battery chargers (see FSAR A-2 Section 8.3.2.1.1).
Manual load shedding is not required in the NuScale design. The MPS automatically deenergizes all loads that Extended DC power availability during Already SAMDA 4 Improve DC bus load shedding. are not required for post accident monitoring or an SBO. implemented required to hold ECCS valves closed (see FSAR List of Candidate SAMDAs and Screening Results Section 7.0.4.1.4).
The NuScale design has four highly reliable DC power Improved availability of DC power Already divisions (see FSAR Section 8.3.2.1.1). The redundancy SAMDA 5 Provide DC bus cross-ties.
system. implemented and capacity of the battery divisions meets the intent of this SAMDA.
The NuScale design does not rely on AC power as a vital power source (see FSAR Section 8.3). Power is supplied to maintain components in the non-actuated position, Provide additional DC power to the 120/ Increased availability of the 120 V vital Not applicable to and power is removed to actuate components (see FSAR SAMDA 6 240V vital AC system. AC bus. the NuScale design Section 7.0.4.1.3). Safety related systems, such as the DHRS (see FSAR Section 5.4.3.1) and ECCS (see FSAR Revision 4.1 Section 6.3), do not require electric power to perform their safety functions.
Table A-1: Screening of Proposed SAMDAs (Continued)
Part 3 Applicants Environmental Report -
Screening SAMDA ID Potential Enhancement Result of Potential Enhancement Basis Category Add an automatic feature to transfer the Increased availability of the 120 V vital SAMDA 7 120V vital AC bus from normal to standby Combined Combined with SAMDA 6, as they have the same intent.
AC bus.
power.
The NuScale design does not rely on AC power as a vital Increase training on response to loss of power source (see FSAR Section 8.3). The MPS is supplied Standard Design Certification Improved chances of successful Not applicable to SAMDA 8 two 120 V AC buses, which causes directly by DC power (see FSAR Section 7.0.4.1.4). The response to loss of two 120 V AC buses. the NuScale design inadvertent actuation signals. safety function of MPS is to remove power from the actuator (see FSAR Section 7.0.4.1.3).
The backup diesel generators are not risk significant components (Table 6-2) and therefore implementing Increased availability of on-site SAMDA 9 Provide an additional diesel generator. Very low benefit this SAMDA would be of very low benefit. Additionally, a emergency AC power.
connection for a portable diesel generator is available, as discussed in SAMDA 3.
Not required for the Revise procedure to allow bypass of NuScale design Training/procedural changes are not required for design SAMDA 10 Extended diesel generator operation.
diesel generator trips. certification certification.
application A-3 Cross tie capability available for all medium voltage AC Increased availability of on-site AC Already electrical distribution system buses, as described in FSAR SAMDA 11 Improve 4.16 kV bus cross-tie ability.
power. implemented Section 8.3.1.1.1. Intent considered satisfied by existing design.
Create AC power cross-tie capability with Increased availability of on-site AC Combined with SAMDA 11, which already implements List of Candidate SAMDAs and Screening Results SAMDA 12 Combined other unit (multi-unit site). power. this change in the multi-module NuScale plant.
Install an additional, buried off-site Reduced probability of loss of off-site Considered for SAMDA 13 Evaluated in Phase II.
power source. power. further evaluation1 As described in FSAR Section 8.3.1.1.2, the auxiliary AC Increased availability of on-site AC Already power source is available in the event of a loss of AC SAMDA 14 Install a gas turbine generator.
power. implemented power. BDGs are also available. Intent considered satisfied by existing design.
Install tornado protection on gas turbine Increased availability of on-site AC Considered for SAMDA 15 Evaluated in Phase II.
generator. power. further evaluation1 Approximately 72 hours8.333333e-4 days <br />0.02 hours <br />1.190476e-4 weeks <br />2.7396e-5 months <br /> of battery power are available Revision 4.1 following accident, as described in FSAR Section 8.3.2.
Increased availability of power supplies Already SAMDA 16 Improve uninterruptible power supplies. Backup diesel generators and alternate AC power source supporting front-line equipment. implemented are available in addition to batteries, as described in FSAR Section 8.3.1.1.2. Intent considered satisfied.
Table A-1: Screening of Proposed SAMDAs (Continued)
Part 3 Applicants Environmental Report -
Screening SAMDA ID Potential Enhancement Result of Potential Enhancement Basis Category While the NuScale design is technically a multiunit site, it is not a multiunit site in the context implied here.2 As Not required for the described in FSAR Section 8.3.1.1.2, there will be two Create a cross-tie for diesel fuel oil NuScale design collocated BDGs that service all 12 NPMs. The intent of SAMDA 17 Increased diesel generator availability.
(multiunit site). certification this SAMDA is to combine the fuel oil for diesel Standard Design Certification application generators in different locations. The design certification application is for a single plant site in the context of this SAMDA.
Not required for the Develop procedures for replenishing NuScale design Training/procedural changes are not required for design SAMDA 18 Increased diesel generator availability.
diesel fuel oil. certification certification.
application Each BDG has an independent cooling system and does Use fire water system as a backup source Not applicable to SAMDA 19 Increased diesel generator availability. not rely on external water sources (see FSAR for diesel cooling. the NuScale design Section 8.3.1.1.2).
Add a new backup source of diesel SAMDA 20 Increased diesel generator availability. Combined Combined with SAMDA 19.
A-4 cooling.
Increased probability of recovery from Not required for the Develop procedures to repair or replace failure of breakers that transfer 4.16 kV NuScale design Training/procedural changes are not required for design SAMDA 21 failed 4 KV breakers. nonemergency buses from unit station certification certification.
service transformers. application List of Candidate SAMDAs and Screening Results Not required for the In training, emphasize steps in recovery Reduced human error probability NuScale design Training/procedural changes are not required for design SAMDA 22 of off-site power after an SBO. during off-site power recovery. certification certification.
application Not required for the Improved off-site power recovery Develop a severe weather conditions NuScale design Training/procedural changes are not required for design SAMDA 23 following external weather-related procedure. certification certification.
events.
application Improved off-site power reliability Considered for SAMDA 24 Bury off-site power lines. Evaluated in Phase II.
during severe weather. further evaluation1 Generic PWR Improvements Related to Core Cooling Systems Revision 4.1 Install an independent active or passive Improved prevention of core melt Considered for SAMDA 25 Evaluated in Phase II.
high pressure injection system. sequences. further evaluation1
Table A-1: Screening of Proposed SAMDAs (Continued)
Part 3 Applicants Environmental Report -
Screening SAMDA ID Potential Enhancement Result of Potential Enhancement Basis Category Provide an additional high-pressure Reduced frequency of core melt from Considered for SAMDA 26 Evaluated in Phase II.
injection pump with independent diesel. small LOCA and SBO sequences. further evaluation1 The CVCS injection pumps can operate at low RCS Revise procedure to allow operators to Not applicable to pressures (see FSAR Section 9.3.4 for a description of the SAMDA 27 inhibit automatic vessel depressurization Extended HPCI and RCIC operation.
the NuScale design CVCS). Therefore, slowing reactor depressurization will Standard Design Certification in non-ATWS scenarios.
not likely extend CVCS operation.
Add a diverse low pressure injection Considered for SAMDA 28 Improved injection capability. Evaluated in Phase II.
system. further evaluation1 Provide capability for alternate injection SAMDA 29 Improved injection capability. Combined Combined with SAMDA 28.
via diesel-driven fire pump.
The NuScale design does not have insulation or other material that could come loose and interfere with the ECCS RRVs (see FSAR Section 6.3.2.5). The CNV is Not applicable to SAMDA 30 Improve ECCS suction strainers. Enhanced reliability of ECCS suction. maintained in a partial vacuum, precluding the need for the NuScale design insulation, as described in FSAR Section 6.2.1.1.2.
Therefore, the addition of strainers to the ECCS design A-5 would not improve reliability (see FSAR Section 6.3.2.5).
As described in FSAR Section 6.3, the ECCS does not have both injection and recirculation modes of operation, Add the ability to manually align only a recirculation mode. The ECCS does not include or Not applicable to SAMDA 31 emergency core cooling system Enhanced reliability of ECCS suction. require a safety grade source of water for injection.
the NuScale design List of Candidate SAMDAs and Screening Results recirculation. Therefore, manually realigning the ECCS is not applicable for ECCS operation and would not improve ECCS reliability (see FSAR Section 6.3.2.5).
Add the ability to automatically align emergency core cooling system to Combined with SAMDA 31, as both SAMDAs discuss SAMDA 32 Enhanced reliability of ECCS suction. Combined recirculation mode upon refueling water manual realignment of the ECCS.
storage tank depletion.
Provide hardware and procedure to refill Extended reactor water storage tank Not applicable to NuScale design does not have a reactor water storage SAMDA 33 the reactor water storage tank once it capacity in the event of a steam the NuScale design tank.
reaches a specified low level. generator tube rupture.
Revision 4.1
Table A-1: Screening of Proposed SAMDAs (Continued)
Part 3 Applicants Environmental Report -
Screening SAMDA ID Potential Enhancement Result of Potential Enhancement Basis Category Continuous source of water to the The ECCS does not have both injection and recirculation safety injection pumps during a LOCA modes of operation, only a recirculation mode. The ECCS event, since water released from a does not include or require a safety grade source of breach of the primary system collects water for injection. Therefore, realigning the ECCS is not Provide an in-containment reactor water Not applicable to SAMDA 34 in the in-containment reactor water applicable for ECCS operation. Additionally, reactor storage tank. the NuScale design Standard Design Certification storage tank, and thereby eliminates coolant collects in containment for LOCAs inside the need to realign the safety injection containment and the ECCS transfers coolant from the pumps for long-term post-LOCA containment to the RPV upon actuation (see FSAR recirculation. Section 6.3.2), which is the intent of this SAMDA.
The NuScale design does not contain large diameter primary coolant system piping, therefore a large break Throttle low pressure injection pumps LOCA cannot physically be postulated for the NuScale earlier in medium or large-break LOCAs Extended reactor water storage tank Not applicable to design (see FSAR Section 15.6.5). Additionally, the ECCS SAMDA 35 to maintain reactor water storage tank capacity. the NuScale design does not have an injection mode, only a recirculation inventory. mode. The ECCS does not include or require a safety grade source of water for injection. Therefore, this SAMDA does not apply to the NuScale design.
A-6 Reactor coolant recirculation is accomplished through Emphasize timely recirculation alignment Reduced human error probability Not applicable to SAMDA 36 ECCS, which is actuated automatically and does not in operator training. associated with recirculation failure. the NuScale design require operator action (see FSAR Section 6.3.2.8).
For a plant like the Westinghouse AP600, where the chemical and The CVCS is capable of preventing core damage in List of Candidate SAMDAs and Screening Results Upgrade the chemical and volume volume control system cannot Already sequences involving pipe breaks outside of containment SAMDA 37 control system to mitigate small LOCAs. mitigate a small LOCA, an upgrade implemented that are not isolated and SGTFs that are not isolated (see would decrease the frequency of core top event CVCS-T01 in FSAR Table 19.1-7).
damage.
Change the in-containment reactor water storage tank suction from four check Reduced common mode failure of Combined with SAMDA 34, as both SAMDAs discuss SAMDA 38 Combined valves to two check and two air-operated injection paths. improving reliability of ECCS injection.
valves.
Revision 4.1
Table A-1: Screening of Proposed SAMDAs (Continued)
Part 3 Applicants Environmental Report -
Screening SAMDA ID Potential Enhancement Result of Potential Enhancement Basis Category Reduced common cause failure of the The NuScale ECCS design consists of 5 main valves and safety injection system. This SAMA was does not include pumps (see FSAR Section 6.3.2).
originally intended for the Replace two of the four electric safety Therefore, reducing the CCF probability of ECCS pumps Westinghouse-CE System 80+, which Not applicable to SAMDA 39 injection pumps with diesel-powered is not applicable to the NuScale design. Additionally, the has four trains of safety injection. the NuScale design pumps. ECCS does not include or require a safety grade source of Standard Design Certification However, the intent of this SAMA is to water for injection and therefore diversifying injection provide diversity within the high- and systems is not applicable to the NuScale design.
low-pressure safety injection systems.
Improved chance of successful There are no pilot-operated valves on the secondary side Provide capability for remote, manual operation during station blackout in the NuScale design. The NuScale design is capable of operation of secondary side pilot- Not applicable to SAMDA 40 events in which high area 100 percent turbine bypass steam dump to the operated relief valves in a station the NuScale design temperatures may be encountered (no condenser that aids in preventing overpressurization of blackout.
ventilation to main steam areas). the secondary side, as described in FSAR Section 10.4.4.1.
ECCS components have design temperatures and pressures that bound the expected conditions in the Allows low pressure emergency core RPV, CNV, and UHS for normal and post-accident Create a reactor coolant depressurization cooling system injection in the event of Not applicable to SAMDA 41 environments, as described in FSAR Section 6.3.2.4. The A-7 system. small LOCA and high-pressure safety the NuScale design ECCS does not include or require a safety grade source of injection failure.
water for injection. Therefore, implementing a SAMDA to allow low pressure ECCS injection is not applicable.
Allows low pressure emergency core Make procedure changes for reactor cooling system injection in the event of Combined with SAMDA 41, as both SAMDAs produce List of Candidate SAMDAs and Screening Results SAMDA 42 Combined coolant system depressurization. small LOCA and high-pressure safety the same result.
injection failure.
Generic PWR Improvements Related to Cooling Water The site cooling water system (SCWS) is not risk Add redundant DC control power for SW SAMDA 43 Increased availability of SW. Very low benefit significant (Table 6-1). The SCWS only supports auxiliary pumps.
systems, as described in FSAR Section 9.2.7.
The ECCS consists of valves only and does not interface Replace ECCS pump motors with air- Elimination of ECCS dependency on Not applicable to with the reactor component cooling water system SAMDA 44 cooled motors. component cooling system. the NuScale design (RCCWS) (see FSAR Section 9.2.2). Intent considered satisfied.
The SCWS pumps and RCCWS pumps are not cross-tied.
Enhance procedural guidance for use of Reduced frequency of loss of Revision 4.1 Not applicable to The SCWS interfaces with RCCWS only through SAMDA 45 cross-tied component cooling or service component cooling water and service the NuScale design providing cooling water to the RCCWS heat exchangers water pumps. water.
(see FSAR Section 9.2.2).
Table A-1: Screening of Proposed SAMDAs (Continued)
Part 3 Applicants Environmental Report -
Screening SAMDA ID Potential Enhancement Result of Potential Enhancement Basis Category The SCWS is not risk significant (Table 6-1). The SCWS SAMDA 46 Add a service water pump. Increased availability of cooling water. Very low benefit only supports auxiliary systems, as described in FSAR Section 9.2.7.
The SCWS is not risk significant (Table 6-1). The SCWS Reduced potential for loss of SW due to SAMDA 47 Enhance the screen wash system. Very low benefit only supports auxiliary systems, as described in FSAR Standard Design Certification clogging of screens.
Section 9.2.7.
Reduced frequency of loss of The RCCWS is not a risk-significant system (Table 6-1).
Cap downstream piping of normally component cooling water initiating The RCCWS does not support any systems that are SAMDA 48 closed component cooling water drain events, some of which can be Very low benefit required for safe shutdown or to maintain safe and vent valves. attributed to catastrophic failure of shutdown (see FSAR Section 9.2.2.1).
one of the many single isolation valves.
Enhance loss of component cooling Reduced potential for reactor coolant water (or loss of service water) Not applicable to There are no reactor coolant pumps in the NuScale SAMDA 49 pump seal damage due to pump procedures to facilitate stopping the the NuScale design design, as described in FSAR Section 5.1.
bearing failure.
reactor coolant pumps.
Enhance loss of component cooling A-8 SAMDA 50 water procedure to underscore the Reduced probability of reactor coolant Not applicable to There are no reactor coolant pumps in the NuScale desirability of cooling down the reactor pump seal failure. the NuScale design design, as described in FSAR Section 5.1.
coolant system prior to seal LOCA.
The RCCWS is not risk significant Table 6-1). The RCCWS Improved success of operator actions Additional training on loss of component does not support any systems that are required for safe SAMDA 51 after a loss of component cooling Very low benefit cooling water. shutdown or to maintain safe shutdown (see FSAR List of Candidate SAMDAs and Screening Results water.
Section 9.2.2.1).
Reduced effect of loss of component The RCCWS is not risk significant (Table 6-1. The RCCWS Provide hardware connections to allow cooling water by providing a means to does not support any systems that are required for safe SAMDA 52 another essential raw cooling water maintain the charging pump seal Very low benefit shutdown or to maintain safe shutdown (see FSAR system to cool charging pump seals. injection following a loss of normal Section 9.2.2.1).
cooling water.
Increased time before loss of On loss of essential raw cooling water, The RCCWS is not risk significant (Table 6-1). The RCCWS component cooling water (and reactor proceduralize shedding component does not support any systems that are required for safe SAMDA 53 coolant pump seal failure) during loss Very low benefit cooling water loads to extend the shutdown or to maintain safe shutdown (see FSAR of essential raw cooling water component cooling water heat-up time. Section 9.2.2.1).
sequences.
Revision 4.1 The RCCWS is not risk significant (Table 6-1). The RCCWS Increased time before charging pump does not support any systems that are required for safe SAMDA 54 Increase charging pump lube oil capacity. failure due to lube oil overheating in Very low benefit shutdown or to maintain safe shutdown (see FSAR loss of cooling water sequences.
Section 9.2.2.1).
Table A-1: Screening of Proposed SAMDAs (Continued)
Part 3 Applicants Environmental Report -
Screening SAMDA ID Potential Enhancement Result of Potential Enhancement Basis Category Install an independent reactor coolant Reduced frequency of core damage Not applicable to There are no reactor coolant pumps in the NuScale SAMDA 55 pump seal injection system, with from loss of component cooling water, the NuScale design design, as described in FSAR Section 5.1.
dedicated diesel. service water, or station blackout.
Reduced frequency of core damage Install an independent reactor coolant from loss of component cooling water Not applicable to There are no reactor coolant pumps in the NuScale Standard Design Certification SAMDA 56 pump seal injection system, without or service water, but not a station the NuScale design design, as described in FSAR Section 5.1.
dedicated diesel.
blackout.
Reduced frequency of core damage Use existing hydro test pump for reactor from loss of component cooling water Not applicable to There are no reactor coolant pumps in the NuScale SAMDA 57 coolant pump seal injection. or service water, but not a station the NuScale design design, as described in FSAR Section 5.1.
blackout.
Install improved reactor coolant pump Reduced likelihood of reactor coolant Not applicable to There are no reactor coolant pumps in the NuScale SAMDA 58 seals. pump seal LOCA. the NuScale design design as described in FSAR Section 5.1.
Reduced likelihood of loss of Install an additional component cooling Not applicable to There are no reactor coolant pumps in the NuScale SAMDA 59 component cooling water leading to a water pump. the NuScale design design, as described in FSAR Section 5.1.
reactor coolant pump seal LOCA.
A-9 Reduced frequency of loss of reactor coolant pump seal cooling if spurious Prevent makeup pump flow diversion high pressure injection relief valve Not applicable to There are no reactor coolant pumps in the NuScale SAMDA 60 through the relief valves. opening creates a flow diversion large the NuScale design design, as described in FSAR Section 5.1.
enough to prevent reactor coolant pump seal injection.
List of Candidate SAMDAs and Screening Results Change procedures to isolate reactor coolant pump seal return flow on loss of Reduced frequency of core damage Not applicable to There are no reactor coolant pumps in the NuScale SAMDA 61 component cooling water, and provide due to loss of seal cooling. the NuScale design design, as described in FSAR Section 5.1.
(or enhance) guidance on loss of injection during seal LOCA.
Not required for the Implement procedures to stagger high Extended high pressure injection prior NuScale design Training/procedural changes are not required for design SAMDA 62 pressure safety injection pump use after to overheating following a loss of certification certification.
a loss of service water. service water.
application Use fire prevention system pumps as a Reduced frequency of reactor coolant Not applicable to There are no reactor coolant pumps in the NuScale SAMDA 63 backup seal injection and high pressure Revision 4.1 pump seal LOCA. the NuScale design design, as described in FSAR Section 5.1.
makeup source.
Table A-1: Screening of Proposed SAMDAs (Continued)
Part 3 Applicants Environmental Report -
Screening SAMDA ID Potential Enhancement Result of Potential Enhancement Basis Category Implement procedure and hardware modifications to allow manual alignment The RCCWS is not risk significant (Table 6-1). The RCCWS of the fire water system to the Improved ability to cool residual heat does not support any systems that are required for safe SAMDA 64 Very low benefit component cooling water system, or removal heat exchangers. shutdown or to maintain safe shutdown (see FSAR install a component cooling water Section 9.2.2.1).
Standard Design Certification header cross-tie.
Generic PWR Improvements Related to Feedwater and Condensate Reduced chance of loss of main The condensate and feedwater system (CFWS) is not risk SAMDA 65 Install a digital feedwater upgrade. Very low benefit feedwater following a plant trip. significant (Table 6-1).
Create ability for emergency connection SAMDA 66 of existing or new water sources to Increased availability of feedwater. Very low benefit The CFWS is not risk significant (Table 6-1).
feedwater and condensate systems.
Install an independent diesel for the Extended inventory in CST during an SAMDA 67 Very low benefit The CFWS is not risk significant (Table 6-1).
condensate storage tank makeup pumps. SBO.
SAMDA 68 Add a motor-driven feedwater pump. Increased availability of feedwater. Very low benefit The CFWS is not risk significant (Table 6-1).
As discussed in FSAR Section 5.4.3, the DHRS removes A-10 Install manual isolation valves around heat from the steam generators, and is analogous to an Reduced dual turbine-driven pump Not applicable to auxiliary feedwater system in the NuScale design. The SAMDA 69 auxiliary feedwater turbine-driven steam maintenance unavailability. the NuScale design DHRS does not contain pumps, but relies on natural admission valves.
circulation to remove decay heat. Therefore, this SAMDA does not apply to the NuScale design.
List of Candidate SAMDAs and Screening Results As discussed in FSAR Section 5.4.3, the DHRS removes heat from the steam generators, and is analogous to an Eliminates the need for local manual auxiliary feedwater system in the NuScale design. The Install accumulators for turbine-driven action to align nitrogen bottles for Not applicable to DHRS does not contain pumps, but relies on natural SAMDA 70 auxiliary feedwater pump flow control control air following a loss of off-site the NuScale design circulation to remove heat. No operator action or valves.
power. electrical power is required to actuate the DHRS valves.
Therefore, this SAMDA does not apply to the NuScale design.
As discussed in FSAR Section 5.4.3.2, the DHRS maintains the appropriate liquid water level during standby in Install a new condensate storage tank Increased availability of the auxiliary Not applicable to normal plant operations. When the DHRS is actuated, it SAMDA 71 (auxiliary feedwater storage tank). feedwater system. the NuScale design relies on the existing inventory to remove decay heat to Revision 4.1 the UHS through a closed loop. Therefore, this SAMDA does not apply to the NuScale design.
Table A-1: Screening of Proposed SAMDAs (Continued)
Part 3 Applicants Environmental Report -
Screening SAMDA ID Potential Enhancement Result of Potential Enhancement Basis Category As discussed in FSAR Section 5.4.3, the DHRS removes heat from the steam generators, and is analogous to an Modify the turbine-driven auxiliary Improved success probability during a Not applicable to auxiliary feedwater system in the NuScale design. The SAMDA 72 feedwater pump to be self-cooled. station blackout. the NuScale design DHRS does not contain pumps, but relies on natural circulation to remove heat. Therefore, this SAMDA does Standard Design Certification not apply to the NuScale design.
As discussed in FSAR Section 5.4.3, the DHRS removes Extended auxiliary feedwater heat from the steam generators, and is analogous to an Proceduralize local manual operation of availability during a station blackout. auxiliary feedwater system in the NuScale design. The Not applicable to SAMDA 73 auxiliary feedwater system when control Also provides a success path should DHRS is actuated by removing power to the actuation the NuScale design power is lost. auxiliary feedwater control power be valves and relies on natural circulation to remove heat.
lost in non-station blackout sequences. Therefore, this SAMDA does not apply to the NuScale design.
As discussed in FSAR Section 5.4.3, the DHRS removes Provide hookup for portable generators heat from the steam generators, and is analogous to an to power the turbine-driven auxiliary Extended auxiliary feedwater Not applicable to auxiliary feedwater system in the NuScale design. The SAMDA 74 feedwater pump after station batteries availability. the NuScale design DHRS does not contain pumps, but relies on natural A-11 are depleted. circulation to remove heat. Therefore, this SAMDA does not apply to the NuScale design.
Use fire water system as a backup for Increased availability of steam The CFWS, which supplies the water for the steam SAMDA 75 Very low benefit steam generator inventory. generator water supply. generator tubes, is not risk significant (Table 6-1).
As discussed in FSAR Section 5.4.3, the DHRS removes List of Candidate SAMDAs and Screening Results Allows greater inventory for the heat from the steam generators, and is analogous to an Change failure position of condenser auxiliary feedwater pumps by Not applicable to auxiliary feedwater system in the NuScale design. The SAMDA 76 makeup valve if the condenser makeup preventing condensate storage tank the NuScale design DHRS does not contain pumps, but relies on natural valve fails open on loss of air or power.
flow diversion to the condenser. circulation to remove heat. Therefore, this SAMDA does not apply to the NuScale design.
Provide a passive, secondary-side heat As discussed in FSAR Section 5.4.3, the DHRS is a passive Reduced potential for core damage Already SAMDA 77 rejection loop consisting of a condenser closed loop system that removes decay heat to the UHS due to loss-of-feedwater events. implemented and heat sink. using natural circulation.
The CFWS does not include startup pumps and the Modify the startup feedwater pump so normal feedwater pumps provide for the full range of that it can be used as a backup to the Increased reliability of decay heat Not applicable to operations (see FSAR Section 10.4.7.2.3). As discussed in SAMDA 78 Revision 4.1 emergency feedwater system, including removal. the NuScale design FSAR Section 5.4.3, the DHRS, which does not contain during a station blackout scenario. pumps, acts as a backup to the CFWS in the event CFWS is not available to remove heat.
Table A-1: Screening of Proposed SAMDAs (Continued)
Part 3 Applicants Environmental Report -
Screening SAMDA ID Potential Enhancement Result of Potential Enhancement Basis Category In the NuScale design, successfully cycling one RSV is sufficient to cool the fuel by adding water to the CNV Replace existing pilot-operated relief (see top event RCS-T02 in FSAR Table 19.1-7). This valves with larger ones, such that only Increased probability of successful Not applicable to SAMDA 79 provides a heat transfer path to the UHS. Additionally, one is required for successful feed and feed and bleed. the NuScale design the NuScale design does not have a safety-related bleed.
Standard Design Certification injection system for feed and bleed. Therefore, feed and bleed is not a relevant option.
Generic PWR Improvements Related to Heating, Ventilation, and Air Conditioning Provide a redundant train or means of Increased availability of components SAMDA 80 Very low benefit HVAC system is not risk significant (Table 6-1).
ventilation. dependent on room cooling.
Add a diesel building high temperature Improved diagnosis of a loss of diesel SAMDA 81 alarm or redundant louver and Very low benefit HVAC system is not risk significant (Table 6-1).
building HVAC.
thermostat.
Increased availability of ventilation in SAMDA 82 Stage backup fans in switchgear rooms. the event of a loss of switchgear Very low benefit HVAC system is not risk significant (Table 6-1).
ventilation.
A-12 SAMDA 83 Add a switchgear room high temperature Improved diagnosis of a loss of Very low benefit HVAC system is not risk significant (Table 6-1).
alarm. switchgear HVAC.
Create ability to switch emergency Continued fan operation in a station SAMDA 84 feedwater room fan power supply to Very low benefit HVAC system is not risk significant (Table 6-1).
blackout.
station batteries in a station blackout.
List of Candidate SAMDAs and Screening Results Generic PWR Improvements Related to Instrument Air and Nitrogen Supply Not required for the The design certification application is for a single unit SAMDA 85 Provide cross-unit connection of Increased ability to vent containment NuScale design site in the context of this SAMDA.2 This SAMDA will be uninterruptible compressed air supply. using the hardened vent. certification re-evaluated by the COL applicant for a site that contains application multiple plants.
Modify procedure to provide ability to Increased availability of instrument air SAMDA 86 align diesel power to more air Very low benefit Instrument air is not risk significant (Table 6-1).
after a LOOP.
compressors.
Replace service and instrument air compressors with more reliable Elimination of instrument air system SAMDA 87 Very low benefit Instrument air is not risk significant (Table 6-1).
compressors which have self-contained dependence on service water cooling.
Revision 4.1 air cooling by shaft driven fans.
NuScale RSVs are passive and open when pressure Install nitrogen bottles as backup gas Not applicable to SAMDA 88 Extended SRV operation time. exceeds threshold. No air supply is required (see FSAR supply for safety relief valves. the NuScale design Section 5.2.2.4.1).
Table A-1: Screening of Proposed SAMDAs (Continued)
Part 3 Applicants Environmental Report -
Screening SAMDA ID Potential Enhancement Result of Potential Enhancement Basis Category RSVs are passive and do not require pneumatic Improve SRV and MSIV pneumatic Improved availability of SRVs and Not applicable to SAMDA 89 components (see FSAR Section 5.2.2.4.1). Primary MSIVs components. MSIVs. the NuScale design are not air operated (see FSAR Section 6.2.4).
Generic PWR Improvements Related to Containment Phenomena The CNV floods from CFDS or ECCS and a natural Standard Design Certification circulation path from the core to the CNV is available through the ECCS RRVs. The CVCS is available to add RCS Enhanced debris coolability, reduced Already inventory. Intent of cooling ex-vessel debris is SAMDA 90 Create a reactor cavity flooding system. core concrete interaction, and implemented considered satisfied by existing design. Refer to FSAR increased fission product scrubbing.
Sections 6.2.1, 6.3, 9.3.6, and 9.3.4 for descriptions of the containment system, ECCS, CFDS, and CVCS, respectively.
Install a passive containment spray Improved containment spray Considered for SAMDA 91 Evaluated in Phase II.
system. capability. further evaluation1 Combined with SAMDA 91, as a containment spray Use the fire water system as a backup Improved containment spray SAMDA 92 Combined system would first have to be incorporated in the A-13 source for the containment spray system. capability.
NuScale design.
Increased decay heat removal A containment vent would not reduce the risk for the Install an unfiltered, hardened capability for non-ATWS events, SAMDA 93 Very low benefit NuScale design as containment overpressure failures are containment vent. without scrubbing released fission not a risk significant event (see FSAR Section 19.2.4).
products.
List of Candidate SAMDAs and Screening Results Install a filtered containment vent to Increased decay heat removal A containment vent would not reduce the risk for the remove decay heat. Option 1: gravel bed SAMDA 94 capability for non-ATWS events, with Very low benefit NuScale design as containment overpressure failures are filter; Option 2: multiple venturi scrubbing of released fission products. not a risk significant event (see FSAR Section 19.2.4).
scrubbers.
Enhance fire protection system and Improved fission product scrubbing in Considered for SAMDA 95 standby gas treatment system hardware Evaluated in Phase II.
and procedures.
severe accidents. further evaluation1 Hydrogen and carbon monoxide gas combustion is not a Provide post-accident containment Reduced likelihood of hydrogen and risk significant event (see FSAR Section 19.2.3.3.2).
SAMDA 96 Very low benefit inerting capability. carbon monoxide gas combustion. Containment overpressurization is also not a risk significant event (see FSAR Section 19.2.4).
Revision 4.1
Table A-1: Screening of Proposed SAMDAs (Continued)
Part 3 Applicants Environmental Report -
Screening SAMDA ID Potential Enhancement Result of Potential Enhancement Basis Category Increased cooling and containment of molten core debris. Molten core debris Create a large concrete crucible with heat escaping from the vessel is contained The core debris will be retained successfully during all SAMDA 97 removal potential to contain molten core within the crucible and a water cooling Very low benefit severe accidents with intact containment for the NuScale debris. mechanism cools the molten core in design (see FSAR Section 19.2.3.2.1).
Standard Design Certification the crucible, preventing melt-through of the basemat.
Increased cooling and containment of molten core debris. Refractory material would be placed underneath the reactor vessel such that a molten core Create a core melt source reduction falling on the material would melt and SAMDA 98 Combined Combined with SAMDA 97.
system. combine with the material.
Subsequent spreading and heat removal from the vitrified compound would be facilitated, and concrete attack would not occur.
A-14 The CNV is a second pressure vessel with a design Strengthen primary/secondary pressure of 1050 psi. See FSAR Section 6.2.1 for a Reduced probability of containment SAMDA 99 containment (e.g., add ribbing to Very low benefit description of the containment system. Containment overpressurization.
containment shell). overpressurization is not a risk significant event (see FSAR Section 19.2.4).
List of Candidate SAMDAs and Screening Results Increase depth of the concrete basemat Reduced probability of basemat melt-SAMDA 100 or use an alternate concrete material to Combined Combined with SAMDA 98.
through.
ensure melt-through does not occur.
The CNV is a second pressure vessel surrounding the Increased potential to cool a molten Provide a reactor vessel exterior cooling Already RPV. The CNV floods, creating a heat transfer path from SAMDA 101 core before it causes vessel failure, by system. implemented the RPV to the UHS (reactor pool). See FSAR Section 6.2.1 submerging the lower head in water.
for a description of the containment system.
Containment overpressurization is not a risk significant event (see FSAR Section 19.2.4). Containment Construct a building to be connected to Reduced probability of containment overpressurization is mitigated by a high design SAMDA 102 primary/secondary containment and Very low benefit overpressurization. pressure of 1050 psi and cooling from the UHS on the maintained at a vacuum.
exterior of the CNV and cooling from containment Revision 4.1 flooding on the interior of the CNV.
Table A-1: Screening of Proposed SAMDAs (Continued)
Part 3 Applicants Environmental Report -
Screening SAMDA ID Potential Enhancement Result of Potential Enhancement Basis Category Not required for the Institute simulator training for severe Improved arrest of core melt progress NuScale design Training/procedural changes are not required for design SAMDA 103 accident scenarios. and prevention of containment failure. certification certification.
application Increased piping surveillance to Not required for the Standard Design Certification identify leaks prior to complete failure. NuScale design Training/procedural changes are not required for design SAMDA 104 Improve leak detection procedures.
Improved leak detection would reduce certification certification.
LOCA frequency. application There is no containment spray system in the NuScale Delay containment spray actuation after Extended reactor water storage tank Not applicable to SAMDA 105 design. See FSAR Section 6.2.1 for a description of the a large LOCA. availability. the NuScale design containment system.
Extended time over which water There is no containment spray system in the NuScale Install automatic containment spray remains in the reactor water storage Not applicable to SAMDA 106 design. See FSAR Section 6.2.1 for a description of the pump header throttle valves. tank, when full containment spray flow the NuScale design containment system.
is not needed.
Containment overpressurization is not a risk significant A-15 event in the NuScale design (see FSAR Section 19.2.4).
Install a redundant containment spray Increased containment heat removal Additionally, the CNV is submerged in the UHS and heat SAMDA 107 Very low benefit system. ability. is removed to the UHS directly through conduction. See FSAR Section 6.2.1 for a description of the containment system.
Install an independent power supply to List of Candidate SAMDAs and Screening Results the hydrogen control system using either new batteries, a nonsafety grade Hydrogen detonation in the containment is not risk Reduced hydrogen detonation SAMDA 108 portable generator, existing station Very low benefit significant in the NuScale design (see FSAR potential.
batteries, or existing AC/DC independent Section 19.2.3.3.2).
power supplies, such as the security system diesel.
Reduced hydrogen detonation Combined with SAMDA 108, as they have the same SAMDA 109 Install a passive hydrogen control system. Combined potential. intent.
Erect a barrier that would provide enhanced protection of the containment High pressure melt ejection is not a threat to Reduced probability of containment SAMDA 110 walls (shell) from ejected core debris Very low benefit containment integrity in the NuScale design (see FSAR failure.
Revision 4.1 following a core melt scenario at high Section 19.2.3.3.4).
pressure.
Table A-1: Screening of Proposed SAMDAs (Continued)
Part 3 Applicants Environmental Report -
Screening SAMDA ID Potential Enhancement Result of Potential Enhancement Basis Category Generic PWR Improvements Related to Containment Bypass The MPS monitors multiple different parameters that Install additional pressure or leak Already may be used to detect CNV bypass LOCAs (see FSAR SAMDA 111 monitoring instruments for detection of Reduced ISLOCA frequency.
implemented Table 7.1-2). The use of additional monitoring ISLOCAs.
instruments is considered satisfied.
Standard Design Certification Add redundant and diverse limit switches Reduced frequency of containment Considered for SAMDA 112 Evaluated in Phase II.
to each containment isolation valve. isolation failure and ISLOCAs. further evaluation1 Not required for the Increase leak testing of valves in ISLOCA NuScale design Training/procedural changes are not required for design SAMDA 113 Reduced ISLOCA frequency.
paths. certification certification.
application CNV isolation valves fail closed on loss of power, as Install self-actuating containment Already described in FSAR Section 6.2.4.2.1. ESFAS monitors SAMDA 114 Reduced frequency of isolation failure.
isolation valves. implemented multiple parameters for automatic containment isolation.
DHRS depends on being located outside containment to A-16 remove decay heat to UHS. Additionally, the DHRS is Locate residual heat removal (RHR) inside Reduced frequency of ISLOCA outside Not applicable to designed to primary system operating pressure which SAMDA 115 containment. containment. the NuScale design reduces the risk of a leak path that bypasses containment. See FSAR Section 5.4.3 for a description of the DHRS.
List of Candidate SAMDAs and Screening Results Ensure ISLOCA releases are scrubbed.
One method is to plug drains in potential Considered for SAMDA 116 Scrubbed ISLOCA releases. Evaluated in Phase II.
break areas so that break point will be further evaluation1 covered with water.
Increased likelihood that LOCAs outside containment are identified as Not required for the such. A plant had a scenario in which Revise EOPs to improve ISLOCA NuScale design Training/procedural changes are not required for design SAMDA 117 an RHR ISLOCA could direct initial identification. certification certification.
leakage back to the pressurizer relief application tank, giving indication that the LOCA was inside containment.
Not required for the Revision 4.1 Improve operator training on ISLOCA NuScale design Training/procedural changes are not required for design SAMDA 118 Decreased ISLOCA consequences.
coping. certification certification.
application
Table A-1: Screening of Proposed SAMDAs (Continued)
Part 3 Applicants Environmental Report -
Screening SAMDA ID Potential Enhancement Result of Potential Enhancement Basis Category Institute a maintenance practice to Not required for the perform a 100 percent inspection of Reduced frequency of steam generator NuScale design Training/procedural changes are not required for design SAMDA 119 steam generator tubes during each tube ruptures. certification certification.
refueling outage. application The NuScale design uses helical coil steam generators, Standard Design Certification which differ from the steam generator design of a typical PWR. The NuScale steam generators have the high Replace steam generators with a new Reduced frequency of steam generator Already pressure primary coolant on the outside of the steam SAMDA 120 design. tube ruptures. implemented generator tubes, maintaining the tubes in a constant state of compression and minimizing the likelihood of tube failure. See FSAR Section 5.4.1 for a description of the steam generator system.
Increase the pressure capacity of the Eliminates release pathway to the secondary side so that a steam generator Already Secondary side piping that interfaces with the RCS is SAMDA 121 environment following a steam tube rupture would not cause the relief implemented rated for operating pressure (see FSAR Table 10.3-1).
generator tube rupture.
valves to lift.
A-17 Install a redundant spray system to Enhanced depressurization capabilities Considered for SAMDA 122 depressurize the primary system during a Evaluated in Phase II.
during steam generator tube rupture. further evaluation1 steam generator tube rupture.
There are no pressurizer vent valves, in the context of the functionality envisioned by this SAMDA, in the NuScale Backup method to using pressurizer Proceduralize use of pressurizer vent design. See FSAR Section 5.4.5 for a description of the List of Candidate SAMDAs and Screening Results sprays to reduce primary system Not applicable to SAMDA 123 valves during steam generator tube pressurizer. The RSVs are available for primary system pressure following a steam generator the NuScale design rupture sequences. overpressure protection. See FSAR Section 5.2.2 for a tube rupture.
description of the reactor coolant system overpressure protection features in the NuScale design.
Provide improved instrumentation to Considered for Improved mitigation of steam SAMDA 124 detect steam generator tube ruptures, Evaluated in Phase II.
such as Nitrogen-16 monitors.
generator tube ruptures. further evaluation1 Route the discharge from the main steam safety valves through a structure where a Reduced consequences of a steam Considered for SAMDA 125 Evaluated in Phase II.
water spray would condense the steam generator tube rupture. further evaluation1 and remove most of the fission products.
Revision 4.1 Install a highly reliable (closed loop) DHRS is a closed loop steam generator shell-side heat steam generator shell-side heat removal Reduced consequences of a steam Already removal system that relies on natural circulation and SAMDA 126 system that relies on natural circulation generator tube rupture. implemented stored water sources. See FSAR Section 5.4.3 for a and stored water sources. description of the DHRS.
Table A-1: Screening of Proposed SAMDAs (Continued)
Part 3 Applicants Environmental Report -
Screening SAMDA ID Potential Enhancement Result of Potential Enhancement Basis Category Not required for the Revise emergency operating procedures Reduced consequences of a steam NuScale design Training/procedural changes are not required for design SAMDA 127 to direct isolation of a faulted steam generator tube rupture. certification certification.
generator.
application Not required for the Standard Design Certification Direct steam generator flooding after a Improved scrubbing of steam NuScale design Training/procedural changes are not required for design SAMDA 128 steam generator tube rupture, prior to generator tube rupture releases. certification certification.
core damage.
application The steam generator tubes are located inside the RPV (see FSAR Section 5.4.1). Main steam system piping inside containment is designed for full RCS pressure (see FSAR Section 10.3-1) and a Steam Generator Tube Failure Vent main steam safety valves in Reduced consequences of a steam Not applicable to (SGTF) can be isolated by closing the MSIVs and FWIVs.
SAMDA 129 containment. generator tube rupture. the NuScale design MPS signals that detect a SGTF also isolate containment (see FSAR Section 15.6.3). The main steam safety valves are located downstream of the MSIVs and are not expected to lift following a reactor trip (see FSAR A-18 Section 10.3).
Generic PWR Improvements Related to ATWS Add an independent boron injection Improved availability of boron Considered for SAMDA 130 Evaluated in Phase II.
system. injection during ATWS. further evaluation1 List of Candidate SAMDAs and Screening Results Add a system of relief valves to prevent Improved equipment availability after Considered for SAMDA 131 equipment damage from pressure spikes Evaluated in Phase II.
during an ATWS.
an ATWS. further evaluation1 Provide an additional control system for Improved redundancy and reduced Considered for SAMDA 132 Evaluated in Phase II.
rod insertion (e.g., AMSAC). ATWS frequency. further evaluation1 Containment overpressurization is not a risk significant event in the NuScale design (see FSAR Section 19.2.4).
Install an ATWS sized filtered Increased ability to remove reactor Additionally, the CNV is submerged in the UHS and heat SAMDA 133 Very low benefit containment vent to remove decay heat. heat from ATWS events. is removed to the UHS directly through conduction. See FSAR Section 6.2 for a description of the containment system.
Revision 4.1
Table A-1: Screening of Proposed SAMDAs (Continued)
Part 3 Applicants Environmental Report -
Screening SAMDA ID Potential Enhancement Result of Potential Enhancement Basis Category Affords operators more time to perform actions. Discharge of a substantial fraction of steam to the main condenser (i.e., as opposed to Not required for the into the primary containment) affords Revise procedure to bypass MSIV NuScale design Training/procedural changes are not required for design Standard Design Certification SAMDA 134 the operator more time to perform isolation in turbine trip ATWS scenarios. certification certification.
actions (e.g., SLC injection, lower water application level, depressurize RPV) than if the main condenser was unavailable, resulting in lower human error probabilities.
Allows immediate control of low pressure core injection. On failure of Low pressure injection (CFDS) must be initiated by the Revise procedure to allow override of low high pressure core injection and Not applicable to operators under appropriate conditions and is not SAMDA 135 pressure core injection during an ATWS condensate, some plants direct reactor the NuScale design automatic. See FSAR Section 9.3.6 for a description of the event. depressurization followed by five CFDS.
minutes of automatic low pressure A-19 core injection.
Combined with SAMDA 137. The intent of these SAMDAs Install motor generator set trip breakers Reduced frequency of core damage SAMDA 136 Combined is to remove power from the control rods, allowing rod in control room. due to an ATWS.
insertion.
Decreased time required to insert List of Candidate SAMDAs and Screening Results Provide capability to remove power from control rods if the reactor trip breakers Considered for SAMDA 137 Evaluated in Phase II.
the bus powering the control rods. fail (during a loss of feedwater ATWS further evaluation1 which has rapid pressure excursion).
Generic PWR Improvements Related to Internal Flooding Not required for the Reduced frequency of internal flooding Improve inspection of rubber expansion NuScale design Training/procedural changes are not required for design SAMDA 138 due to failure of circulating water joints on main condenser. certification certification.
system expansion joints.
application Modify swing direction of doors separating turbine building basement Not applicable to Safeguards equipment is not in danger of damage due SAMDA 139 Prevents flooding propagation.
from areas containing safeguards the NuScale design to turbine building flooding.
Revision 4.1 equipment.
Table A-1: Screening of Proposed SAMDAs (Continued)
Part 3 Applicants Environmental Report -
Screening SAMDA ID Potential Enhancement Result of Potential Enhancement Basis Category Generic PWR Improvements to Reduce Seismic Risk Increased availability of necessary Considered for Increase seismic ruggedness of plant SAMDA 140 plant equipment during and after Evaluated in Phase II.
components.
seismic events. further evaluation1 Provide additional restraints for CO2 Increased availability of fire protection Seismically induced fires are not risk significant in the Standard Design Certification SAMDA 141 Very low benefit tanks. given a seismic event. NuScale design (see Task 13 of FSAR Section 19.1.5.2.1).
Generic PWR Improvements to Reduce Fire Risk NuScale safe shutdown equipment is designed to Replace mercury switches in fire Decreased probability of spurious fire withstand the effects of flooding events, including SAMDA 142 Very low benefit protection system. suppression system actuation. spurious actuations of the fire protection system (see FSAR Section 3.4.1).
Considered for SAMDA 143 Upgrade fire compartment barriers. Decreased consequences of a fire. Evaluated in Phase II.
further evaluation1 Install additional transfer and isolation Reduced number of spurious Considered for SAMDA 144 Evaluated in Phase II.
switches. actuations during a fire. further evaluation1 A-20 Not required for the NuScale design Training/procedural changes are not required for design SAMDA 145 Enhance fire brigade awareness. Decreased consequences of a fire.
certification certification.
application Not required for the Enhance control of combustibles and Decreased fire frequency and NuScale design Training/procedural changes are not required for design List of Candidate SAMDAs and Screening Results SAMDA 146 ignition sources. consequences. certification certification.
application Generic PWR Other Improvements The NuScale design does not contain large diameter Install digital large break LOCA Reduced probability of a large break Not applicable to primary coolant system piping, therefore a large break SAMDA 147 protection system. LOCA (a leak before break). the NuScale design LOCA cannot physically be postulated for the NuScale design (see FSAR Section 15.6.5).
The NuScale design does not contain large diameter Enhance procedures to mitigate large Reduced consequences of a large Not applicable to primary coolant system piping, therefore a large break SAMDA 148 break LOCA. break LOCA. the NuScale design LOCA cannot physically be postulated for the NuScale design (see FSAR Section 15.6.5).
Revision 4.1 Install computer aided instrumentation Improved prevention of core melt The control room uses computer aided digital Already SAMDA 149 system to assist the operator in assessing sequences by making operator actions monitoring. See FSAR Section 7.2.13 for a description of implemented post-accident plant status. more reliable. the displays and monitoring.
Table A-1: Screening of Proposed SAMDAs (Continued)
Part 3 Applicants Environmental Report -
Screening SAMDA ID Potential Enhancement Result of Potential Enhancement Basis Category Not required for the Improved prevention of core melt NuScale design Training/procedural changes are not required for design SAMDA 150 Improve maintenance procedures. sequences by increasing reliability of certification certification.
important equipment.
application Not required for the Standard Design Certification Increase training and operating Improved likelihood of success of NuScale design Training/procedural changes are not required for design SAMDA 151 experience feedback to improve operator operator actions taken in response to certification certification.
response. abnormal conditions.
application Not required for the Reduced consequences of Develop procedures for transportation NuScale design Training/procedural changes are not required for design SAMDA 152 transportation and nearby facility and nearby facility accidents. certification certification.
accidents.
application Prevents secondary side depressurization should a steam line break occur upstream of the main Install secondary side guard pipes up to steam isolation valves. Also guards Considered for SAMDA 153 Evaluated in Phase II.
A-21 the main steam isolation valves. against or prevents consequential further evaluation1 multiple steam generator tube ruptures following a main steam line break event.
NuScale Specific Improvements Related to AC and DC Power Not required for the List of Candidate SAMDAs and Screening Results Improve auxiliary AC power supply Improved reliability of the AAPS in the NuScale design Training/procedural changes are not required for design SAMDA 154 testing and maintenance procedures. event of a loss of AC power. certification certification.
application Improved availability of the AAPS in Considered for SAMDA 155 Provide redundant AAPS. Evaluated in Phase II.
the event of a Loss of AC power. further evaluation1 NuScale Specific Improvements Related to Core Cooling Systems Reduced core damage frequency. Considered for Improve reliability of CFDS isolation SAMDA 156 Improved availability of reactor Evaluated in Phase II.
valves.
coolant makeup. further evaluation1 Not required for the Improve operator training to start NuScale design Training/procedural changes are not required for design Revision 4.1 SAMDA 157 Reduced core damage frequency.
containment flooding. certification certification.
application
Table A-1: Screening of Proposed SAMDAs (Continued)
Part 3 Applicants Environmental Report -
Screening SAMDA ID Potential Enhancement Result of Potential Enhancement Basis Category Allows coolant injection when the Provide an alternate source of inventory CVCS combining valve fails to open to Considered for SAMDA 158 Evaluated in Phase II.
for the CVCS. the DWS, limiting the inventory to further evaluation1 CVCS.
Not required for the Standard Design Certification Improve operator training to start CVCS NuScale design Training/procedural changes are not required for design SAMDA 159 Reduced core damage frequency.
injection. certification certification.
application Install an additional, diverse, parallel DWS Considered for SAMDA 160 Improved reliability of CVCS injection. Evaluated in Phase II.
CVCS pump isolation valve. further evaluation1 Establish capability and train operators to Not required for the divert CVCS flow from one NPM to Improve CVCS injection availability NuScale design Training/procedural changes are not required for design SAMDA 161 another through the module heat-up when CVCS injection to a NPM fails. certification certification.
system. application Improved reliability of ECCS. Common cause failure of these valves is risk Considered for A-22 SAMDA 162 Diversify ECCS recirculation valves. Evaluated in Phase II.
significant. Only one recirculation further evaluation1 valve is required.
Improved reliability of ECCS. Common cause failure of these valves is risk Considered for SAMDA 163 Provide additional, diverse ECCS RRV. Evaluated in Phase II.
significant. Only one recirculation further evaluation1 List of Candidate SAMDAs and Screening Results valve is required.
Improved reliability of ECCS. Common cause failure of these valves is risk Considered for SAMDA 164 Diversify ECCS vent valves. Evaluated in Phase II.
significant. Only one vent valve is further evaluation1 required.
Improved reliability of ECCS. Common cause failure of these valves is risk Considered for SAMDA 165 Provide additional, diverse ECCS RVV. Evaluated in Phase II.
significant. Only one vent valve is further evaluation1 required.
ECCS valves fail open on loss of battery power. In an event where ECCS valves are not required for successful Considered for Revision 4.1 SAMDA 166 Add block valves to ECCS. Evaluated in Phase II.
mitigation of an event, block valves further evaluation1 would prevent the ECCS valves from opening.
Table A-1: Screening of Proposed SAMDAs (Continued)
Part 3 Applicants Environmental Report -
Screening SAMDA ID Potential Enhancement Result of Potential Enhancement Basis Category This would allow ECCS to actuate when Considered for Add remote manual bypass of ECCS trip SAMDA 167 the trip valve in the control portion of Evaluated in Phase II.
valve.
ECCS fails. further evaluation1 Improved ability of the ECCS to remove decay heat in a scenario where the CNV Standard Design Certification Lower elevation of ECCS RRVs to just liquid level is higher in elevation than Considered for SAMDA 168 Evaluated in Phase II.
above the top of the reactor core. the top of the fuel, but not high further evaluation1 enough in elevation to recirculate to the RPV through the RRVs.
Improved availability of the ECCS to Considered for Reduce CNV volume below ECCS RRV SAMDA 169 remove decay heat by required less Evaluated in Phase II.
elevation.
coolant to support recirculation. further evaluation1 Not required for the Improve testing and maintenance on NuScale design Training/procedural changes are not required for design SAMDA 170 Improved reliability of ECCS.
ECCS valves. certification certification.
application A-23 Improved reliability of DHRS. Common Considered for SAMDA 171 Diversify DHRS actuation valves. cause failure of these valves is risk Evaluated in Phase II.
significant. further evaluation1 Not required for the Improved reliability of DHRS. Common Improve testing and maintenance of NuScale design Training/procedural changes are not required for design SAMDA 172 cause failure of these valves is risk DHRS actuation valves. certification certification.
List of Candidate SAMDAs and Screening Results significant.
application Not required for the Institute a maintenance practice to Improved reliability of DHRS. Common NuScale design Training/procedural changes are not required for design SAMDA 173 perform a 100 percent inspection of cause failure of both trains of DHRS certification certification.
DHRS during each refueling outage. due to plugging is risk significant.
application Improved reliability of DHRS. Common Considered for SAMDA 174 Add removable screens to DHRS. cause failure of both trains of DHRS Evaluated in Phase II.
due to plugging is risk significant. further evaluation1 Not required for the Improve operator training to actuate Improve DHRS availability when DHRS NuScale design Training/procedural changes are not required for design SAMDA 175 DHRS. fails to actuate automatically. certification certification.
Revision 4.1 application Improve reliability of DHRS actuation Considered for SAMDA 176 Reduced core damage frequency. Evaluated in Phase II.
valve components. further evaluation1
Table A-1: Screening of Proposed SAMDAs (Continued)
Part 3 Applicants Environmental Report -
Screening SAMDA ID Potential Enhancement Result of Potential Enhancement Basis Category Provide backup means of removing Improved availability of decay heat Already ECCS actuation creates direct heat removal path to UHS.
SAMDA 177 decay heat. removal when DHRS is not functional. implemented See FSAR Section 6.3 for a description of the ECCS.
Reduces the probability of common Considered for Provide redundant, diverse FW isolation SAMDA 178 cause failures of feedwater isolation. Evaluated in Phase II.
valve.
Improves DHRS availability. further evaluation1 Standard Design Certification Not required for the Improve testing and maintenance Improved reliability of feedwater NuScale design Training/procedural changes are not required for design SAMDA 179 procedures on FWIVs. isolation. Improves DHRS availability. certification certification.
application Reduces the probability of common Considered for Provide redundant, diverse MS isolation SAMDA 180 cause failures of main steam isolation. Evaluated in Phase II.
valve.
Improves DHRS availability. further evaluation1 Not required for the Improve testing and maintenance Improved reliability of main steam NuScale design Training/procedural changes are not required for design SAMDA 181 procedures on MSIVs. isolation. Improves DHRS availability. certification certification.
application A-24 NuScale Specific Improvements Related to Feedwater and Condensate None identified.
NuScale Specific Improvements Related to Containment Bypass Improve reliability of CES containment isolation valves to close to prevent List of Candidate SAMDAs and Screening Results Diversify CES containment isolation release outside of containment. Considered for SAMDA 182 Evaluated in Phase II.
valves. Common cause failure of both CES further evaluation1 isolation valves to close is risk significant.
Improve reliability of CVCS containment isolation valves to close Diversify CVCS containment isolation to prevent release outside of Considered for SAMDA 183 Evaluated in Phase II.
valves. containment. Common cause failure of further evaluation1 both CVCS isolation valves to close is risk significant.
NuScale Specific Improvements Related to ATWS Revision 4.1 Not required for the Improved reliability of control rods to Improve testing and maintenance of NuScale design Training/procedural changes are not required for design SAMDA 184 insert. Failure of rods to insert upon control rod system. certification certification.
demand is in the top cutsets.
application
Table A-1: Screening of Proposed SAMDAs (Continued)
Part 3 Applicants Environmental Report -
Screening SAMDA ID Potential Enhancement Result of Potential Enhancement Basis Category Add a third, diverse division of reactor Improved reliability of reactor trip Considered for SAMDA 185 Evaluated in Phase II.
trip breakers. system. further evaluation1 Not required for the Improve testing and maintenance of Improved reliability of reactor trip NuScale design Training/procedural changes are not required for design SAMDA 186 reactor trip breakers. system. certification certification.
Standard Design Certification application NuScale Specific Improvements Related to Internal Flooding None identified.
NuScale Specific Improvements to Reduce Seismic Risk Reduced seismic stresses during Considered for SAMDA 187 Base mat isolation. Evaluated in Phase II.
seismic event. further evaluation1 Increase the ruggedness of the NPM in Considered for SAMDA 188 Improve RPV support skirt. Evaluated in Phase II.
a seismic event. further evaluation1 NuScale Specific Improvements to Reduce Fire Risk Use 3 hour3.472222e-5 days <br />8.333333e-4 hours <br />4.960317e-6 weeks <br />1.1415e-6 months <br /> fire cable for safety related Increased reliability of equipment Considered for A-25 SAMDA 189 equipment. during a fire. further evaluation1 Evaluated in Phase II.
NuScale Specific Other Improvements Improve reliability of RSVs to prevent RPV overpressurization. Common Considered for SAMDA 190 Diversify existing RSVs. Evaluated in Phase II.
cause failure of both RSVs to open is further evaluation1 List of Candidate SAMDAs and Screening Results risk significant.
Improve reliability of RSVs to prevent RPV overpressurization. Common Considered for SAMDA 191 Add a third, diverse RSV. Evaluated in Phase II.
cause failure of both RSVs to open is further evaluation1 risk significant.
Considered for SAMDA 192 Improve reliability of RSV components. Reduced core damage frequency. Evaluated in Phase II.
further evaluation1 Improved reliability of ECCS, DHRS, Considered for Improve redundancy in removing control SAMDA 193 CVCS, and RTBs when APLs fail to de- Evaluated in Phase II.
power to equipment.
energize control solenoids. further evaluation1 Improved reliability of component Considered for Revision 4.1 SAMDA 194 Improve reliability of EIM components. Evaluated in Phase II.
actuation. further evaluation1 Improve reliability of manual switch Improved reliability of component Considered for SAMDA 195 Evaluated in Phase II.
components. actuation. further evaluation1
Table A-1: Screening of Proposed SAMDAs (Continued)
Part 3 Applicants Environmental Report -
Screening SAMDA ID Potential Enhancement Result of Potential Enhancement Basis Category Improved reliability of component Considered for SAMDA 196 Improve reliability of SVM components. Evaluated in Phase II.
actuation. further evaluation1 Not required for the The Reactor Building crane control system design is a Automate the NPM transport process to Reduction in operator errors of NuScale design design element to be finalized at a later stage of the SAMDA 197 the extent permitted by the Reactor commission during NPM transport. certification design process. Therefore, this SAMDA is not required for Standard Design Certification Building crane control system design.
application the design certification application.
Excessive This would require the redesign of the Reactor Building.
Provide a railway system on the reactor Reduced core damage frequency from implementation The cost of implementing this SAMDA is expected to be SAMDA 198 pool floor to assist in transporting the Reactor Building crane failures. greater than $450,000. This exceeds the maximum NPM to the refueling area. cost1 benefit of $136,000.
Not required for the Improve testing and maintenance Reduced core damage frequency from NuScale design Training/procedural changes are not required for design SAMDA 199 procedures for the Reactor Building Reactor Building crane failures. certification certification.
crane.
application Note:
1 SAMDA candidates evaluated based on implementation cost compare the 12 NPM maximum benefit to the 12 NPM cost of implementation.
A-26 2 SAMDA candidates for "multiunit sites" are evaluated in the context of multiple 12 NPM plants at the same site.
List of Candidate SAMDAs and Screening Results Revision 4.1
Applicants Environmental Report -
Standard Design Certification Off-site Consequence Calculation Appendix B Off-site Consequence Calculation The purpose of this appendix is to show key assumptions used in the calculation of the APD and the Monetary Value of Off-site Economic Impact. These two parameters are used in Section 5.2 and Section 5.3 to calculate the APE and AOC, respectively, as part of the calculation of the maximum benefit.
The MACCS 3.10.1.2 code in conjunction with Level 2 PRA results and Environmental Report-specific MELCOR 2.2.9541 analyses were utilized. MELMACCS 2.0.1 is used to extract the required release information from the MELCOR containment bypass simulation results.
B.1 Off-site Models A goal of this design certification SAMDA analysis is to use realistic, representative site data for the evaluation of off-site consequences. Since there is no specific site associated with the NuScale design certification application, the Surry Power Station with population extrapolated to 2060 is used in this analysis. The Surry Power Station in 2060 is viewed as a realistic and representative site given the large amount of available data and research performed by the NRC State-of-the-Art Reactor Consequence Analysis (SOARCA) project on the Surry site. A sensitivity study using data representative of the Peach Bottom site is also provided.
NUREG-7110 Volumes 1 & 2 (Reference 8.1-18 & Reference 8.1-28) were used to form the basis of the inputs to the NuScale MACCS model. As noted in NUREG-1935 (Reference 8.1-31), the SOARCA study was intended to realistically evaluate the off-site emergency response and radiological health consequences at the Surry and Peach Bottom sites. Therefore, adaptation of site modeling used in the SOARCA analysis is considered representative for off-site dose consequence evaluation. It is important to note, however, that the SOARCA study was not intended to evaluate off-site economic consequences of severe accidents at the Surry and Peach Bottom sites. Sensitivity studies on off-site economic inputs are performed to evaluate the impact of SOARCA economic consequence inputs in the calculation of off-site economic impact. These sensitivities are discussed in Section B.3.
B.1.1 Meteorological Modeling The site and weather information is in 64 azimuthal sectors. Meteorological data is sampled in a stratified, random manner, taking readings for wind speed, wind direction, atmospheric stability category, and rain rate from the file every hour over the entire year. Using this sampling approach, start times are randomly sampled from equally-spaced intervals specified by the parameter NSMPLS, the number of sequences to be chosen from each day of the year. In these analyses NSMPLS is set to 24, and each hour of the year of the supplied meteorological data is used as the starting point for the atmospheric transport and dispersion calculations.
B.1.2 Dose Conversion Factors The dose conversion factors are used from the Fgr13dcf.inp file included in the MACCS 3.10.1.2 installation package, which includes factors from Federal Guidance Report (FGR)-11 (for inhaled exposure), FGR-12 (for external exposure), and FGR-13 (for cancer risk coefficients), with the chronic inhalation dose factors for the 69 SOARCA nuclides updated with Part 3 B-1 Revision 4.1
Applicants Environmental Report -
Standard Design Certification Off-site Consequence Calculation the mean values from NUREG/CR-7155 SOARCA Uncertainty Analysis Table 4.2-8 (Reference 8.1-9).
B.1.3 Economic Data Updates The economic data is updated by multiplying the regional economic data block values corresponding to the total annual farm sales for the region, farmland property value for the region, and nonfarm property value for the region by a factor of 1.294. This value is calculated as shown below:
September 2017 Urban Consumer Price Index 246.819
= --------------------- = 1.294 January 2005 Urban Consumer Price Index 190.7 The values for the CPI were used from the Archived Consumer Price Index Files Historical CPI-U for November 2017 (Reference 8.1-10, Table 24), which includes the historical CPI dating back to 1913 for each month of the year. The CPI from January 2005 is used because this is the lowest CPI value for 2005, and therefore generates the largest possible CPI scaling factor for bringing values from 2005 up to date. The CPI for September 2017 is used as it is the largest CPI available at the time of the creation of this report.
This economic projection approach is adequate because the same process is used in NUREG/CR-7009, "MACCS Best Practices as Applied in the State-of-the-Art Reactor Consequence Analyses (SOARCA) Project" (Reference 8.1-11, Section 4.1.2). In the SOARCA project, the site file economic information is updated to the target year by first determining the ratio of the present CPI to the past CPI. Then, the economic information is multiplied by this ratio to perform the update. The regional CPIs for Virginia and Pennsylvania are also viable for updating economic parameters at the Surry and Peach Bottom sites, respectively. Using regional CPIs produces a similar ratio to the national CPI, thus national CPI is preferred for the ease of updating multiple U.S. sites.
B.1.4 Population Data Extrapolation Reference 8.1-1 recommends a population distribution within 50 miles (80 km) of the site that is extrapolated to a predicted population for a year within the second half of the period of operation. The expected lifetime of a NuScale plant is 60 years. Extrapolation of the population from 2005 to 2060 satisfies this recommendation.
The population data was updated by multiplying the population data block values by a factor of 1.406. This value was calculated as shown below:
U.S. Population 2060 416,795,000
= -------------------------------- = 1.406 U.S. Population 2005 296,410,404 The value for the estimated population of the U.S. in 2060 was used from Projections of the Size and Composition of the U.S. Population: 2014-2060 (Reference 8.1-12). The value for the population of the U.S. in 2005 was used from Annual Estimates of the Population for the United States and States, and for Puerto Rico: April 1, 2000 to July 1, 2005 (Reference 8.1-13). The population is not estimated to a year later than 2060 because that is the latest date to which Part 3 B-2 Revision 4.1
Applicants Environmental Report -
Standard Design Certification Off-site Consequence Calculation the U.S. national population was projected by the U.S. Census Bureau in a referenceable document at the time this report was constructed.
This population projection approach is adequate as the same process is used in Reference 8.1-11. In the SOARCA project, the site file population information is updated to the target year by applying a ratio of a projected future national population to the previous national population at the time of site file creation. The SOARCA projects also used the U.S.
Census for the total U.S. population data for the population projection. Available regional population projections were not significantly different than the national average population projections and therefore the choice of using national instead of regional data is not taken to be of consequence in the context of the scope of this report.
B.1.5 Surry Site The Surry site is defined in the SOARCA Surry 2005 site file (Reference 8.1-14), with a surface roughness of 0.1m (suburban) and the population distribution defined in Section B.1.5.1. The SOARCA Surry site file has been updated from 2005 to 2017 economic information and the population extrapolated to 2060 (Table B-1) per Section B.1.3 and Section B.1.4 derived factors.
B.1.5.1 Surry Population Information The extrapolated population distribution is shown in Table B-1.
Table B-1: Surry 2060 Population Distribution Sector 0-10 mi 10-20 mi 20-30 mi 30-40 mi 40-50 mi 50 mi total 1 [N] 5115 1840 1450 1227 1549 11181 2 5115 1840 1450 1227 1549 11181 3 4365 2507 2439 2591 2116 14018 4 3614 3174 3428 3954 2683 16853 5 [NNE] 3614 3174 3428 3954 2683 16853 6 3614 3174 3428 3954 2683 16853 7 2249 3151 3001 2549 1341 12291 8 889 3129 2573 1143 0 7734 9 [NE] 889 3129 2573 1143 0 7734 10 889 3129 2573 1143 0 7734 11 1303 3607 1519 591 1019 8039 12 1719 4082 463 39 2037 8340 13 [ENE] 1719 4082 463 39 2037 8340 14 1719 4082 463 39 2037 8340 15 6241 9226 273 325 1346 17411 16 10762 14370 83 612 652 26479 17 [E] 10762 14370 83 612 652 26479 18 10762 14370 83 612 652 26479 19 10675 35953 19689 15976 16866 99159 20 10586 57536 39299 31343 33079 171843 21 [ESE] 10586 57536 39299 31343 33079 171843 22 10586 57536 39299 31343 33079 171843 23 5294 34297 47029 94153 50527 231300 24 0 11060 54761 156963 67974 290758 Part 3 B-3 Revision 4.1
Applicants Environmental Report -
Standard Design Certification Off-site Consequence Calculation Table B-1: Surry 2060 Population Distribution (Continued)
Sector 0-10 mi 10-20 mi 20-30 mi 30-40 mi 40-50 mi 50 mi total 25 [SE] 0 11060 54761 156963 67974 290758 26 0 11060 54761 156963 67974 290758 27 96 8308 32661 83282 34835 159182 28 194 5558 10563 9600 1696 27611 29 [SSE] 194 5558 10563 9600 1696 27611 30 194 5558 10563 9600 1696 27611 31 346 3313 6741 7460 2070 19930 32 498 1068 2916 5320 2445 12247 33 [S] 498 1068 2916 5320 2445 12247 34 498 1068 2916 5320 2445 12247 35 320 760 2244 5597 1929 10850 36 144 453 1575 5874 1414 9460 37 [SSW] 144 453 1575 5874 1414 9460 38 144 453 1575 5874 1414 9460 39 180 426 1198 3303 1618 6725 40 219 404 823 730 1824 4000 41 [SW] 219 404 823 730 1824 4000 42 219 404 823 730 1824 4000 43 299 458 1061 1189 1651 4658 44 382 515 1303 1648 1479 5327 45 [WSW] 382 515 1303 1648 1479 5327 46 382 515 1303 1648 1479 5327 47 301 407 1208 12184 7823 21923 48 223 302 1112 22722 14167 38526 49 [W] 223 302 1112 22722 14167 38526 50 223 302 1112 22722 14167 38526 51 147 720 1375 19275 46319 67836 52 72 1141 1638 15827 78472 97150 53 [WNW] 72 1141 1638 15827 78472 97150 54 72 1141 1638 15827 78472 97150 55 1310 1004 1631 10551 60423 74919 56 2550 868 1622 5273 42375 52688 57 [NW] 2550 868 1622 5273 42375 52688 58 2550 868 1622 5273 42375 52688 59 3974 3197 2018 3020 22552 34761 60 5401 5526 2414 768 2730 16839 61 [NNW] 5401 5526 2414 768 2730 16839 62 5401 5526 2414 768 2730 16839 63 5257 3683 1932 998 2140 14010 64 5115 1840 1450 1227 1549 11181 Total 169461 444095 504088 1052173 1018303 3188120 B.1.5.2 Surry Economic Information Reference 8.1-1 prescribes that economic data be expressed in current dollars. Extrapolation of the economic data from 2005 to 2017 satisfies this prescription. MACCS economic parameter Part 3 B-4 Revision 4.1
Applicants Environmental Report -
Standard Design Certification Off-site Consequence Calculation values for the Surry site are shown in Table B-2. The depreciation rate and investment rate of return are unchanged.
Table B-2: Surry Economic Parameters Variable Description Value DPRATE Property depreciation rate (per year) 0.2 DSRATE Investment rate of return (per year) 0.12 EVACST Daily cost for a person who has been evacuated ($/person-day) 223 POPCST Population relocation cost ($/person) 15531 RELCST Daily cost for a person who is relocated ($/person-day) 223
- 1) 1721 CDFRM Cost of farm decontamination for various levels of decontamination ($/hectare)
- 2) 3831 Cost of non-farm decontamination per resident for various levels of decontamination 1) 9202 CDNFRM
($/person) 2) 24951 DLBCST Average cost of decontamination labor ($/person-year) 108719 VALWF Value of farm wealth ($/hectare) 8931 VALNWF Value of non-farm wealth ($/person) 284741 B.1.5.3 Surry Weather Information Meteorological data used in this evaluation is the same as that used in the Surry SOARCA analysis (Reference 8.1-15). The licensee of the Surry power plant provided two years of meteorological information to Sandia National Laboratories and the NRC. Different trends in the meteorology over the two years were estimated to have a relatively minor effect on end results (Reference 8.1-11, Section 4.3.5). The data recovery rate for the Surry 2004 meteorological data was approximately 99 percent, meaning that wind speed, wind direction, atmospheric stability, and precipitation were measured for a given hour for approximately 99 percent of the hours of the year.
B.1.6 Peach Bottom Site The Peach Bottom site is defined in the SOARCA Peach Bottom 2005 site file (Reference 8.1-16) with a surface roughness of 0.1m (suburban) and the population distribution defined in Section B.1.6.1. The SOARCA Peach Bottom site file has been updated from 2005 to 2017 economic information and the population extrapolated to 2060 per Section B.1.3 and Section B.1.4 derived factors.
B.1.6.1 Peach Bottom Population Information The extrapolated population distribution is shown in Table B-3.
Table B-3: Peach Bottom 2060 Population Distribution Sector 0-10 mi 10-20 mi 20-30 mi 30-40 mi 40-50 mi 50 mi total 1 [N] 867 33495 39001 10891 20497 104751 2 867 33495 39001 10891 20497 104751 3 1047 20550 25462 14788 49313 111160 Part 3 B-5 Revision 4.1
Applicants Environmental Report -
Standard Design Certification Off-site Consequence Calculation Table B-3: Peach Bottom 2060 Population Distribution (Continued)
Sector 0-10 mi 10-20 mi 20-30 mi 30-40 mi 40-50 mi 50 mi total 4 1227 7603 11923 18687 78130 117570 5 [NNE] 1227 7603 11923 18687 78130 117570 6 1227 7603 11923 18687 78130 117570 7 987 5479 12368 16432 59575 94841 8 744 3356 12815 14177 41020 72112 9 [NE] 744 3356 12815 14177 41020 72112 10 744 3356 12815 14177 41020 72112 11 716 2933 12148 32573 56218 104588 12 688 2511 11482 50969 71415 137065 13 [ENE] 688 2511 11482 50969 71415 137065 14 688 2511 11482 50969 71415 137065 15 888 4753 18337 74280 75274 173532 16 1091 6996 25195 97590 79134 210006 17 [E] 1091 6996 25195 97590 79134 210006 18 1091 6996 25195 97590 79134 210006 19 1080 6392 26086 67491 42683 143732 20 1073 5788 26976 37390 6231 77458 21 [ESE] 1073 5788 26976 37390 6231 77458 22 1073 5788 26976 37390 6231 77458 23 987 5395 15149 21207 7424 50162 24 906 5000 3324 5024 8615 22869 25 [SE] 906 5000 3324 5024 8615 22869 26 906 5000 3324 5024 8615 22869 27 894 8740 2095 4627 6075 22431 28 882 12481 866 4232 3537 21998 29 [SSE] 882 12481 866 4232 3537 21998 30 882 12481 866 4232 3537 21998 31 967 15522 8931 2759 3014 31193 32 1052 18564 16993 1286 2491 40386 33 [S] 1052 18564 16993 1286 2491 40386 34 1052 18564 16993 1286 2491 40386 35 1050 18970 32221 118637 58215 229093 36 1050 19376 47453 235987 113938 417804 37 [SSW] 1050 19376 47453 235987 113938 417804 38 1050 19376 47453 235987 113938 417804 39 1199 12627 36942 193490 103075 347333 40 1349 5876 26430 150992 92214 276861 41 [SW] 1349 5876 26430 150992 92214 276861 42 1349 5876 26430 150992 92214 276861 43 1133 4078 15632 82819 58118 161780 44 917 2283 4835 14646 24023 46704 45 [WSW] 917 2283 4835 14646 24023 46704 46 917 2283 4835 14646 24023 46704 47 1220 3065 6466 17642 19820 48213 48 1531 3846 8097 20640 15618 49732 49 [W] 1531 3846 8097 20640 15618 49732 50 1531 3846 8097 20640 15618 49732 Part 3 B-6 Revision 4.1
Applicants Environmental Report -
Standard Design Certification Off-site Consequence Calculation Table B-3: Peach Bottom 2060 Population Distribution (Continued)
Sector 0-10 mi 10-20 mi 20-30 mi 30-40 mi 40-50 mi 50 mi total 51 1043 4160 25816 21827 13291 66137 52 558 4477 43533 23013 10965 82546 53 [WNW] 558 4477 43533 23013 10965 82546 54 558 4477 43533 23013 10965 82546 55 469 3896 30426 21727 52195 108713 56 380 3315 17318 20440 93423 134876 57 [NW] 380 3315 17318 20440 93423 134876 58 380 3315 17318 20440 93423 134876 59 667 6812 22256 18389 62826 110950 60 955 10310 27191 16338 32228 87022 61 [NNW] 955 10310 27191 16338 32228 87022 62 955 10310 27191 16338 32228 87022 63 910 21902 33096 13614 26363 95885 64 867 33495 39001 10891 20497 104751 Total 61067 581105 1293727 2889208 2773916 7599023 B.1.6.2 Peach Bottom Economic Information Reference 8.1-1 prescribes that economic data be expressed in current dollars. Extrapolation of the economic data from 2005 to 2017 satisfies this prescription. MACCS economic parameter values for the Peach Bottom site are shown in Table B-4. The depreciation rate and the investment rate of return are unchanged.
Part 3 B-7 Revision 4.1
Applicants Environmental Report -
Standard Design Certification Off-site Consequence Calculation Table B-4: Peach Bottom Economic Parameters Variable Description Value DPRATE Property depreciation rate (per year) 0.2 DSRATE Investment rate of return (per year) 0.12 EVACST Daily cost for a person who has been evacuated ($/person-day) 223 POPCST Population relocation cost ($/person) 15531 RELCST Daily cost for a person who is relocated ($/person-day) 223
- 1) 1721 CDFRM Cost of farm decontamination for various levels of decontamination ($/hectare)
- 2) 3831 Cost of non-farm decontamination per resident for various levels of decontamination 1) 9202 CDNFRM
($/person) 2) 24951 DLBCST Average cost of decontamination labor ($/person-year) 108719 VALWF Value of farm wealth ($/hectare) 11700 VALNWF Value of non-farm wealth ($/person) 271799 B.1.6.3 Peach Bottom Weather Information Meteorological data used in this evaluation is the same as that used in the Peach Bottom SOARCA analysis (Reference 8.1-17). The licensee of the Peach Bottom power plant provided two years of meteorological information to Sandia National Laboratories and the NRC. Different trends in the meteorology over the two years were estimated to have a relatively minor effect on end results (Reference 8.1-11, Section 4.3.5). The data recovery rate for the Peach Bottom 2006 meteorological data was approximately 99 percent, meaning that wind speed, wind direction, atmospheric stability, and precipitation were measured for a given hour for approximately 99 percent of the hours of the year.
B.1.7 Emergency Sheltering and Evacuation Modeling Information The Surry and Peach Bottom sites are modeled similar to the SOARCA studies. Emergency sheltering and evacuation are not modeled in the base case NuScale analysis, but relocation is modeled in the same manner as was done in the SOARCA studies. Early-phase and long-term relocation are modeled as part of the SAMDA economic model as relocation, interdiction, and condemnation costs are considered in the calculation of the overall cost of the radionuclide release. The economic parameters are shown in Table B-2 and Table B-4.
There is a subtle difference between the terms "evacuation" and "relocation" in the context of MACCS simulations. Evacuation refers to the ordered evacuation of the population from within the emergency planning zone during the emergency phase immediately following accident initiation with the goal of reducing plume exposure dose by removing the population from the pathway of the released plume. The emergency phase is modeled as having a duration of one week in the NuScale analysis. Relocation occurs in both the emergency phase and the long-term action phase. The long-term action phase has a duration of five years. The long-term action phase begins immediately after the emergency phase and dose projections are used to determine if certain segments of the population should be temporarily relocated (or, if they were already relocated during the early phase then they continue to remain relocated), to avoid exceeding a habitability dose threshold. If a population segment was relocated in the early phase, then the long term dose projections are used to determine if that population Part 3 B-8 Revision 4.1
Applicants Environmental Report -
Standard Design Certification Off-site Consequence Calculation segment should continue to be relocated or if they are allowed to return at the start of the long-term phase. The emergency phase habitability dose threshold in the NuScale analysis is the Environmental Protection Agency protective action guides of one- to five-rem whole body dose. The long-term habitability dose threshold in this analysis is four rem over the five-year action period. The early- and long-term habitability decision making and the relocation processes modeled by MACCS are discussed in Section 6.0 and Section 7.0, respectively, of the Code Manual for MACCS2 (Reference 8.1-7). A 50 year long-term exposure duration is modeled for the population that remains in the impacted area following the five year long-term action phase.
B.1.8 Core Inventory at Accident Initiation Best estimate core radionuclide inventories are used in the base case, presented in Table B-5.
These best estimate radionuclide inventories are calculated at the end of the irradiation of the equilibrium fuel cycle for the NuScale reactor core, using SCALE 6.1.3. A high burnup core inventory was also calculated at 102 percent core power and is presented in Table B-6. The high burnup core inventory is used in a sensitivity analysis described in Section B.3.5.
Part 3 B-9 Revision 4.1
Applicants Environmental Report -
Standard Design Certification Off-site Consequence Calculation Table B-5: Best Estimate Core Inventory NuScale Best Estimate Core Inventory (Bq)
Kr-85 2.52E+15 I-135 3.13E+17 Ce-144 2.18E+17 Kr-85m 4.54E+16 Te-127 1.40E+16 Np-239 2.95E+18 Kr-87 9.04E+16 Te-127m 2.22E+15 Pu-238 4.99E+14 Kr-88 1.19E+17 Te-129 4.07E+16 Pu-239 9.76E+13 Xe-133 3.31E+17 Te-129m 7.01E+15 Pu-240 1.08E+14 Xe-135 1.41E+17 Te-131m 2.89E+16 Pu-241 2.75E+16 Xe-135m 6.93E+16 Te-132 2.27E+17 Zr-95 2.79E+17 Cs-134 2.40E+16 Te-131 1.37E+17 Zr-97 2.76E+17 Cs-136 7.77E+15 Rh-105 1.47E+17 Am-241 4.52E+13 Cs-137 2.52E+16 Ru-103 2.35E+17 Cm-242 8.29E+15 Rb-86 2.07E+14 Ru-105 1.53E+17 Cm-244 3.14E+14 Rb-88 1.21E+17 Ru-106 8.05E+16 La-140 2.92E+17 Ba-139 2.95E+17 Rh-103m 2.33E+17 La-141 2.69E+17 Ba-140 2.85E+17 Rh-106 8.60E+16 La-142 2.60E+17 Sr-89 1.66E+17 Nb-95 2.80E+17 Nd-147 1.07E+17 Sr-90 1.94E+16 Co-58 5.07E+12 Pr-143 2.49E+17 Sr-91 2.08E+17 Co-60 2.33E+13 Y-90 1.98E+16 Sr-92 2.22E+17 Mo-99 3.00E+17 Y-91 2.12E+17 Ba-137m 2.39E+16 Tc-99m 2.64E+17 Y-92 2.24E+17 I-131 1.58E+17 Nb-97 2.77E+17 Y-93 2.50E+17 I-132 2.31E+17 Nb-97m 2.62E+17 Y-91m 1.22E+17 I-133 3.30E+17 Ce-141 2.70E+17 Pr-144 2.19E+17 I-134 3.72E+17 Ce-143 2.55E+17 Pr-144m 2.58E+15 Part 3 B-10 Revision 4.1
Applicants Environmental Report -
Standard Design Certification Off-site Consequence Calculation Table B-6: High Burnup Core Inventory NuScale High Burnup Core Inventory (Bq)
Kr-85 4.96E+15 I-135 3.16E+17 Ce-144 2.17E+17 Kr-85m 3.57E+16 Te-127 1.94E+16 Np-239 4.59E+18 Kr-87 6.89E+16 Te-127m 3.20E+15 Pu-238 3.06E+15 Kr-88 8.98E+16 Te-129 5.41E+16 Pu-239 1.27E+14 Xe-133 3.31E+17 Te-129m 9.24E+15 Pu-240 2.56E+14 Xe-135 1.31E+17 Te-131m 3.66E+16 Pu-241 6.34E+16 Xe-135m 7.73E+16 Te-132 2.37E+17 Zr-95 2.51E+17 Cs-134 9.88E+16 Te-131 1.44E+17 Zr-97 2.65E+17 Cs-136 2.18E+16 Rh-105 2.51E+17 Am-241 1.59E+14 Cs-137 6.05E+16 Ru-103 3.27E+17 Cm-242 3.91E+16 Rb-86 5.90E+14 Ru-105 2.67E+17 Cm-244 1.63E+16 Rb-88 9.21E+16 Ru-106 2.11E+17 La-140 2.89E+17 Ba-139 2.86E+17 Rh-103m 3.24E+17 La-141 2.58E+17 Ba-140 2.74E+17 Rh-106 2.27E+17 La-142 2.46E+17 Sr-89 1.24E+17 Nb-95 2.52E+17 Nd-147 1.06E+17 Sr-90 4.18E+16 Co-58 6.22E+12 Pr-143 2.31E+17 Sr-91 1.63E+17 Co-60 6.88E+13 Y-90 4.28E+16 Sr-92 1.81E+17 Mo-99 3.00E+17 Y-91 1.67E+17 Ba-137m 5.76E+16 Tc-99m 2.66E+17 Y-92 1.83E+17 I-131 1.72E+17 Nb-97 2.67E+17 Y-93 2.13E+17 I-132 2.45E+17 Nb-97m 2.52E+17 Y-91m 9.61E+16 I-133 3.30E+17 Ce-141 2.60E+17 Pr-144 2.18E+17 I-134 3.66E+17 Ce-143 2.35E+17 Pr-144m 2.62E+15 B.1.9 Chemical Groups The following isotopes are associated with the corresponding chemical groups as shown.
"Xe" group: Kr-85, Kr-85m, Kr-87, Kr-88, Xe-133, Xe-135, & Xe-135m.
"Cs" group: Cs-134, Cs-136, Cs-137, Rb-86, & Rb-88.
"Ba" group: Ba-139, Ba-140, Sr-89, Sr-90, Sr-91, Sr-92, & Ba-137m.
"I" group: I-131, I-132, I-133, I-134, & I-135.
"Te" group: Te-127, Te-127m, Te-129, Te-129m, Te-131m, Te-132, & Te-131.
"Ru" group: Rh-105, Ru-103, Ru-105, Ru-106, Rh-103m, & Rh-106.
"Mo" group: Nb-95, Co-58, Co-60, Mo-99, Tc-99m, Nb-97, & Nb-97m.
"Ce" group: Ce-141, Ce-143, Ce-144, Np-239, Pu-238, Pu-239, Pu-240, Pu-241, Zr-95, & Zr-97.
Part 3 B-11 Revision 4.1
Applicants Environmental Report -
Standard Design Certification Off-site Consequence Calculation "La" group: Am-241, Cm-242, Cm-244, La-140, La-141, La-142, Nd-147, Pr-143, Y-90, Y-91, Y-92, Y-93, Y-91m, Pr-144, & Pr-144m.
B.2 Release Categories There are various combinations of events that could lead to radiological releases from the NuScale plant (referred to as cutsets). Each of these cutsets may lead to different off-site radiological consequences, which will be referred to as public dose in this report, and each of these cutsets may occur at a different frequency than the other cutsets. In the NuScale PRA (FSAR Chapter 19), these cutsets are grouped into sequences based on the systems affected by the specific equipment failures in a cutset. Since there are numerous sequences in the NuScale PRA, to make the calculation more manageable many of these sequences can be conservatively grouped into general RCs for the SAMDA analysis. In this manner, only a small number of RCs need to be analyzed and described.
The NuScale severe-accident sequences are binned into eight RCs based on initiating event and mitigating system availability. In this manner, sequences with similar accident progressions are grouped together. Containment bypass sequences and intact containment sequences are not grouped together, even if the initiating event and mitigating systems available are similar, because the magnitude of the release is larger in containment bypass sequences when compared to intact containment sequences. Sequences that do not reach core damage are not included in a RC, as core damage must occur to allow a significant release to the environment. A core damage event due to Reactor Building crane failure, where the NPM fails to remain upright and is completely submerged in the reactor pool, is a unique event and is considered separately as RC 8 (Section B.2.8).
Initiating events for many sequences may have different causes (e.g. a reactor trip could be caused by a random equipment failure or a fire), but have similar accident progressions due to mitigating system availability and are binned together. For example, sequences where coolant is lost to containment due to an ECCS RVV spurious actuation in which no coolant makeup is available, are expected to progress similarly, independent of how the ECCS is actuated (e.g.,
spurious ECCS, loss of power to ECCS control solenoids) and are grouped together in RC 4. The constituent sequences of each RC are identified by Level 1 PRA event tree (FSAR Chapter 19.1) and the numbered end state in that event tree, as shown in Section B.2.1 through Section B.2.7.
Reference 8.1-1 recommends that sequences are grouped into release categories based on timing of release and radionuclide release fractions to the environment. Both the timing and magnitude of release to the environment are expected to be dependent upon the mitigating systems available.
To calculate the RC frequencies, the following NuScale PRAs are used as inputs. These PRAs are discussed in more detail in Chapter 19 of the NuScale FSAR. Each PRA calculates a CDF for each sequence. The frequencies associated with sequence binned into a specific RC are summed together to establish the frequency associated with that specific RC, as shown in Table B-25.
- internal events PRA
- LPSD PRA
- internal fires PRA Part 3 B-12 Revision 4.1
Applicants Environmental Report -
Standard Design Certification Off-site Consequence Calculation
- external floods PRA
- high winds PRA The release associated with each RC (shown in Table B-26) is selected to be the sequence that is completely unmitigated, with the exception of ECCS failures, and is described in Section B.2.1 to Section B.2.8. ECCS failures are handled separately for intact CNV sequences and CNV bypass sequences. Intact CNV sequences assume that the failure of ECCS is a partial failure, with only the RVVs actuating successfully, which removes reactor coolant from the RPV to the CNV and does not allow core reflood and the possible termination of release from fuel. CNV bypass sequences assume complete ECCS failure, which removes the possibility of radionuclides depositing in the CNV, allowing the largest amount of radionuclides to bypass containment. To simplify the analysis, the Reactor Building is not credited for radionuclide deposition, with the exception of the Reactor Building pool in RC 8. This simplification is bounding, as some amount of the release from the module will deposit or be held up in the Reactor Building before reaching the environment.
B.2.1 Release Category 1: CVCS LOCA Inside Containment The first RC consists of intact containment LOCAs involving the CVCS. ECCS and RSV spurious actuations, which challenge nearly the same systems and equipment as the CVCS intact containment LOCAs, are handled separately in RC 4. The PRA sequences that have a significant contribution to RC 1 are shown in Table B-7. RC 1 is an intact containment scenario.
The conservative release sequence is a high-break CVCS injection line LOCA inside containment. ECCS failure is incomplete actuation with the RRVs failing to open and CVCS injection through the pressurizer spray line fails to operate, which produces a scenario where reactor coolant is lost to containment through the CVCS line break and the RVVs and coolant is not available either through RRV recirculation or through CVCS pressurizer spray injection. The core is uncovered and unable to be cooled, leading to core support failure and core relocation to the RPV lower plenum. Radionuclides released from the core relocate to the CNV, where the majority of aerosols deposit in the reactor coolant present in the CNV and on the CNV walls. In the MELCOR simulations, the CNV is modeled as sealed with no leakage. Therefore, the radionuclide release to the environment is calculated separately based on the fraction of the core inventory airborne in containment and the design basis containment leak rate of 0.2 weight percent per day (see FSAR Table 6.5-1).
The plume release information for RC 1 that is used as input for MACCS calculations is shown in Table B-8. As a result of modeling the CNV as sealed, assumptions relating to the particle size distribution and plume buoyancy are required as inputs to MACCS. The particle size distribution for RC 1 was assumed to be the same as the particle size distribution for RC 3 (see Table B-11). RC category 3 is a containment bypass accident, and the particle size distribution of a containment bypass accident is expected to cause increased deposition in the environment as compared to the actual particle size distribution for an intact containment sequence. The plume buoyancy is simulated using the heat model with an assumed plume heat content of zero watts for each plume segment. The result of this assumption is that the plume does not rise upon release, which maximizes the ground level radionuclide concentrations. Sensitivity studies evaluating the impact of the aerosol deposition in the CNV predicted by MELCOR, the assumed particle size distribution, and the non-buoyant plume are discussed in Section B.3.
Part 3 B-13 Revision 4.1
Applicants Environmental Report -
Standard Design Certification Off-site Consequence Calculation Table B-7: PRA Sequences that Contribute Significantly to Release Category 1 Event Tree Sequence Description FSAR Reference CVCS--ALOCA-CIC-ET 3 Reactor trip, ECCS fails, CVCS injection fails Figure 19.1-4 Part 3 B-14 Revision 4.1
Part 3 Applicants Environmental Report -
Table B-8: Release Category 1 Hourly Release Information Plume Start of Release Plume Heat Chemical Group (fraction of initial core inventory)
Segment Release (s) Duration (s) Content (W) Xe Cs Ba I Te Ru Mo Ce La 1 13440 3600 0 4.31E-06 6.75E-07 4.88E-08 4.96E-07 5.31E-07 1.04E-09 1.27E-07 2.36E-14 2.36E-14 2 17040 3600 0 2.28E-05 9.86E-07 3.19E-09 5.75E-07 6.04E-07 4.24E-09 2.76E-07 7.63E-14 7.63E-14 3 20640 3600 0 2.87E-05 1.37E-07 2.70E-10 1.50E-07 8.37E-08 1.05E-09 3.65E-08 2.53E-14 2.53E-14 Standard Design Certification 4 24240 3600 0 3.19E-05 6.27E-08 8.18E-10 8.26E-08 1.35E-07 8.20E-10 1.65E-08 1.91E-14 1.91E-14 5 27840 3600 0 3.40E-05 4.49E-08 3.33E-10 4.06E-08 4.87E-08 1.06E-09 1.24E-08 2.04E-14 2.04E-14 6 31440 3600 0 3.88E-05 8.27E-08 6.77E-10 8.14E-08 9.03E-08 1.54E-09 2.13E-08 4.16E-14 4.20E-14 7 35040 3600 0 4.19E-05 7.80E-08 2.61E-09 2.00E-07 2.40E-07 1.16E-10 1.73E-08 1.45E-14 1.66E-14 8 38640 3600 0 4.23E-05 3.91E-08 8.57E-10 1.56E-07 8.08E-08 2.89E-11 6.85E-09 6.40E-15 7.33E-15 9 42240 3600 0 4.08E-05 1.23E-08 2.14E-10 4.55E-08 2.32E-08 7.21E-12 2.09E-09 1.74E-15 1.96E-15 10 45840 3600 0 4.05E-05 4.44E-09 7.41E-11 1.82E-08 8.16E-09 2.56E-12 7.64E-10 6.15E-16 6.91E-16 11 49440 3600 0 4.05E-05 2.31E-09 3.25E-11 1.15E-08 3.77E-09 1.43E-12 3.96E-10 2.99E-16 3.32E-16 12 53040 3600 0 4.05E-05 1.45E-09 1.57E-11 8.95E-09 1.99E-09 1.05E-12 2.31E-10 1.70E-16 1.86E-16 13 56640 3600 0 4.04E-05 1.64E-09 7.43E-12 9.71E-09 1.24E-09 1.15E-12 1.49E-10 1.21E-16 1.28E-16 B-15 14 60240 3600 0 3.95E-05 2.09E-09 4.93E-12 1.18E-08 1.25E-09 1.16E-12 1.30E-10 1.11E-16 1.16E-16 15 63840 3600 0 3.92E-05 1.30E-09 2.64E-12 9.32E-09 7.87E-10 6.37E-13 8.52E-11 6.98E-17 7.32E-17 16 67440 3600 0 3.90E-05 8.20E-10 1.59E-12 7.05E-09 4.11E-10 7.24E-13 8.55E-11 4.45E-17 4.60E-17 17 71040 3600 0 3.87E-05 1.47E-09 2.86E-12 9.59E-09 4.28E-10 2.41E-12 2.70E-10 7.10E-17 7.14E-17 18 74640 3600 0 3.85E-05 2.36E-09 5.27E-12 1.75E-08 8.91E-10 4.52E-12 3.79E-10 1.54E-16 1.56E-16 19 78240 3600 0 3.82E-05 1.63E-09 3.64E-12 1.39E-08 8.05E-10 2.79E-12 2.58E-10 1.38E-16 1.40E-16 20 81840 3600 0 3.81E-05 1.01E-09 2.31E-12 1.04E-08 6.24E-10 1.54E-12 1.64E-10 1.06E-16 1.08E-16 21 85440 3660 0 3.88E-05 9.35E-10 2.17E-12 1.03E-08 7.32E-10 1.08E-12 1.61E-10 1.30E-16 1.32E-16 22 89100 3600 0 3.83E-05 1.40E-09 3.29E-12 1.38E-08 1.20E-09 1.02E-12 2.59E-10 2.46E-16 2.48E-16 Off-site Consequence Calculation 23 92700 3600 0 3.84E-05 1.07E-09 2.57E-12 1.34E-08 9.46E-10 6.73E-13 2.02E-10 2.02E-16 2.03E-16 24 96300 3600 0 3.87E-05 6.45E-10 1.60E-12 1.52E-08 5.97E-10 3.68E-13 1.23E-10 1.30E-16 1.30E-16 25 99900 3600 0 3.93E-05 4.88E-10 1.30E-12 2.34E-08 5.21E-10 2.52E-13 9.47E-11 1.08E-16 1.08E-16 26 103500 3600 0 3.94E-05 3.22E-10 9.18E-13 2.51E-08 3.63E-10 1.70E-13 6.29E-11 7.80E-17 7.82E-17 27 107100 3600 0 3.95E-05 1.13E-10 3.59E-13 2.64E-08 1.36E-10 6.60E-14 2.24E-11 3.17E-17 3.17E-17 28 110700 3600 0 3.96E-05 2.97E-11 1.02E-13 2.81E-08 4.03E-11 1.87E-14 5.88E-12 9.22E-18 9.23E-18 Revision 4.1 29 114300 3600 0 3.98E-05 1.89E-11 6.84E-14 3.10E-08 2.74E-11 1.33E-14 3.73E-12 6.37E-18 6.37E-18 30 117900 3600 0 4.03E-05 4.47E-12 2.06E-14 3.66E-08 8.34E-12 4.72E-15 8.58E-13 2.16E-18 2.17E-18 31 121500 3600 0 4.09E-05 2.47E-12 1.41E-14 4.35E-08 5.35E-12 3.77E-15 4.63E-13 1.89E-18 1.91E-18
Table B-8: Release Category 1 Hourly Release Information (Continued)
Part 3 Applicants Environmental Report -
Plume Start of Release Plume Heat Chemical Group (fraction of initial core inventory)
Segment Release (s) Duration (s) Content (W) Xe Cs Ba I Te Ru Mo Ce La 32 125100 3600 0 4.15E-05 1.31E-12 8.74E-15 5.04E-08 3.04E-12 2.53E-15 2.44E-13 1.31E-18 1.30E-18 33 128700 3600 0 4.20E-05 6.17E-13 5.21E-15 5.73E-08 1.61E-12 1.66E-15 1.14E-13 7.91E-19 7.82E-19 34 132300 3600 0 4.26E-05 4.81E-13 5.37E-15 6.46E-08 1.50E-12 2.07E-15 8.62E-14 8.08E-19 7.98E-19 35 135900 3600 0 4.32E-05 3.50E-13 4.97E-15 7.17E-08 1.37E-12 2.57E-15 6.14E-14 7.32E-19 7.22E-19 Standard Design Certification 36 139500 3600 0 4.43E-05 6.01E-12 1.03E-13 8.61E-08 3.29E-11 7.54E-14 1.07E-12 1.40E-17 1.37E-17 37 143100 3600 0 4.71E-05 3.86E-11 6.89E-13 1.25E-07 2.25E-10 5.76E-13 7.04E-12 8.57E-17 8.37E-17 38 146700 3600 0 4.93E-05 5.46E-11 1.01E-12 1.54E-07 3.62E-10 8.92E-13 1.05E-11 1.07E-16 1.05E-16 39 150300 3600 0 5.06E-05 6.73E-11 1.24E-12 1.74E-07 5.22E-10 1.02E-12 1.38E-11 1.10E-16 1.09E-16 40 153900 3600 0 5.15E-05 9.41E-11 1.66E-12 1.90E-07 7.75E-10 1.19E-12 2.04E-11 1.24E-16 1.23E-16 41 157500 3600 0 5.23E-05 1.15E-10 1.94E-12 2.03E-07 8.56E-10 1.16E-12 2.61E-11 1.21E-16 1.21E-16 42 161100 3600 0 5.29E-05 1.26E-10 2.13E-12 2.14E-07 8.64E-10 1.01E-12 2.93E-11 1.07E-16 1.08E-16 43 164700 3600 0 5.34E-05 1.01E-10 1.98E-12 2.24E-07 7.35E-10 6.81E-13 2.39E-11 7.51E-17 7.63E-17 44 168300 3600 0 5.39E-05 6.94E-11 1.78E-12 2.33E-07 6.06E-10 4.05E-13 1.63E-11 4.75E-17 4.91E-17 45 171900 3600 0 5.43E-05 4.35E-11 1.61E-12 2.42E-07 5.06E-10 2.22E-13 1.00E-11 2.88E-17 3.05E-17 B-16 46 175500 3600 0 5.47E-05 3.11E-11 1.70E-12 2.50E-07 5.02E-10 1.36E-13 6.99E-12 2.05E-17 2.25E-17 47 179100 3600 0 5.51E-05 2.41E-11 1.88E-12 2.58E-07 5.35E-10 8.74E-14 5.27E-12 1.62E-17 1.85E-17 48 182700 3600 0 5.55E-05 1.70E-11 1.83E-12 2.66E-07 5.08E-10 4.78E-14 3.61E-12 1.18E-17 1.40E-17 49 186300 3600 0 5.59E-05 1.33E-11 1.84E-12 2.73E-07 5.05E-10 2.71E-14 2.74E-12 9.55E-18 1.16E-17 50 189900 3600 0 5.62E-05 1.11E-11 1.86E-12 2.79E-07 5.07E-10 1.54E-14 2.24E-12 8.20E-18 1.02E-17 51 193500 3600 0 5.65E-05 9.68E-12 1.86E-12 2.85E-07 5.04E-10 8.87E-15 1.93E-12 7.30E-18 9.28E-18 52 197100 3600 0 5.68E-05 8.92E-12 1.88E-12 2.91E-07 5.08E-10 5.29E-15 1.77E-12 6.80E-18 8.72E-18 53 200700 3600 0 5.70E-05 8.15E-12 1.82E-12 2.96E-07 4.93E-10 3.16E-15 1.62E-12 6.23E-18 8.04E-18 54 204300 3600 0 5.72E-05 7.35E-12 1.71E-12 3.01E-07 4.63E-10 1.91E-15 1.46E-12 5.58E-18 7.22E-18 Off-site Consequence Calculation 55 207900 3600 0 5.74E-05 6.59E-12 1.57E-12 3.05E-07 4.26E-10 1.21E-15 1.32E-12 4.92E-18 6.39E-18 56 211500 3600 0 5.76E-05 5.71E-12 1.39E-12 3.09E-07 3.76E-10 8.01E-16 1.14E-12 4.18E-18 5.42E-18 57 215100 3600 0 5.78E-05 4.98E-12 1.23E-12 3.13E-07 3.33E-10 5.81E-16 9.98E-13 3.55E-18 4.61E-18 58 218700 3600 0 5.79E-05 4.50E-12 1.13E-12 3.16E-07 3.06E-10 4.67E-16 9.01E-13 3.13E-18 4.05E-18 59 222300 3600 0 5.81E-05 4.11E-12 1.05E-12 3.19E-07 2.85E-10 4.00E-16 8.25E-13 2.79E-18 3.60E-18 60 225900 3600 0 5.82E-05 3.84E-12 9.99E-13 3.22E-07 2.70E-10 3.63E-16 7.70E-13 2.52E-18 3.26E-18 Revision 4.1 61 229500 3600 0 5.83E-05 3.54E-12 9.37E-13 3.24E-07 2.53E-10 3.35E-16 7.10E-13 2.26E-18 2.91E-18 62 233100 3600 0 5.84E-05 3.25E-12 8.74E-13 3.26E-07 2.34E-10 3.10E-16 6.50E-13 2.01E-18 2.59E-18 63 236700 3600 0 5.85E-05 2.87E-12 7.86E-13 3.28E-07 2.07E-10 2.77E-16 5.73E-13 1.73E-18 2.22E-18
Table B-8: Release Category 1 Hourly Release Information (Continued)
Part 3 Applicants Environmental Report -
Plume Start of Release Plume Heat Chemical Group (fraction of initial core inventory)
Segment Release (s) Duration (s) Content (W) Xe Cs Ba I Te Ru Mo Ce La 64 240300 3600 0 5.86E-05 2.58E-12 7.21E-13 3.30E-07 1.87E-10 2.52E-16 5.15E-13 1.51E-18 1.94E-18 65 243900 3600 0 5.86E-05 2.27E-12 6.47E-13 3.31E-07 1.65E-10 2.24E-16 4.54E-13 1.30E-18 1.67E-18 66 247500 3600 0 5.87E-05 1.90E-12 5.53E-13 3.33E-07 1.39E-10 1.91E-16 3.83E-13 1.11E-18 1.42E-18 67 251100 3600 0 5.87E-05 1.55E-12 4.53E-13 3.34E-07 1.13E-10 3.06E-16 3.12E-13 9.75E-19 1.24E-18 Standard Design Certification 68 254700 3600 0 5.87E-05 1.11E-12 3.12E-13 3.35E-07 7.88E-11 1.28E-15 2.27E-13 8.25E-19 1.02E-18 69 258300 3600 0 5.87E-05 8.42E-13 2.19E-13 3.35E-07 5.71E-11 1.89E-15 1.73E-13 7.01E-19 8.43E-19 70-96 261900 3600 0 5.87E-05 8.35E-13 2.16E-13 3.35E-07 5.65E-11 1.90E-15 1.72E-13 6.97E-19 8.37E-19 Total 13440 345660 0 4.80E-03 2.14E-06 5.80E-08 2.07E-05 1.88E-06 9.93E-09 5.19E-07 2.33E-13 2.37E-13 B-17 Off-site Consequence Calculation Revision 4.1
Applicants Environmental Report -
Standard Design Certification Off-site Consequence Calculation B.2.2 Release Category 2: Pipe Break Outside Containment, Isolated The second RC consists of pipe breaks that occur either through the CVCS injection line, CVCS discharge line, or steam generator tubes and are subsequently isolated with the failure of the RSVs to open. Scenarios where the RSVs are demanded and an RSV sticks open are included in RC 6 in Section B.2.6. The PRA sequences that have a significant contribution to RC 2 are shown in Table B-9. RC 2 is an intact containment scenario.
The conservative release sequence is a CVCS injection line pipe break outside containment that is isolated, with a complete failure of DHRS and the RSVs, which creates an RPV overpressure scenario where the RPV fails at the pressurizer heater inspection port and the RVVs actuate on low RPV level after sufficient leakage to containment. The containment remains intact. The RRVs fail to open upon low RPV level actuation and the main valve spring fails to force the ECCS valve open at low differential pressure between the RPV and CNV. Due to incomplete ECCS actuation, reactor coolant completely relocates to the CNV and is unable to recirculate back to the RPV. The core is uncovered and unable to be cooled, leading to core support failure and core relocation to the RPV lower plenum. Radionuclides released from the core relocate to the CNV, where the majority of aerosols deposit in the reactor coolant present in the CNV and on the CNV walls. In the MELCOR simulations, the CNV is modeled as sealed with no leakage.
Therefore, the radionuclide release to the environment is calculated separately based on the fraction of the core inventory airborne in containment and the design basis containment leak rate of 0.2 weight percent per day (see FSAR Table 6.5-1).
The plume release information for RC 2 that is used as input for MACCS calculations is shown in Table B-10. As a result of modeling the CNV as sealed, assumptions relating to the particle size distribution and plume buoyancy are required inputs to MACCS. The particle size distribution for RC 2 is assumed to be the same as the particle size distribution for RC 3 (see Table B-11).
RC 3 is a containment bypass accident, and the particle size distribution of a containment bypass accident is expected to cause increased deposition in the environment as compared to the actual particle size distribution for an intact containment sequence. The plume buoyancy is simulated using the heat model with an assumed plume heat content of zero watts for each plume segment. The result of this assumption is that the plume does not rise upon release, which maximizes the ground level radionuclide concentrations. Sensitivity studies evaluating the impact of the aerosol deposition in the CNV predicted by MELCOR, the assumed particle size distribution, and the non-buoyant plume are discussed in Section B.3.
Part 3 B-18 Revision 4.1
Applicants Environmental Report -
Standard Design Certification Off-site Consequence Calculation Table B-9: PRA Sequences that Contribute Significantly to Release Category 2 Event Tree Sequence Description FSAR Reference Reactor trip, LOCA isolated, DHRS fails, RSVs fail to 5
CVCS--ALOCA-COC-ET open Figure 19.1-2 12 ATWS, LOCA isolated, RSVs fail to open Reactor trip, LOCA isolated, DHRS fails, RSVs fail to 6
CVCS--ALOCA-LOC-ET open Figure 19.1-3 16 ATWS, LOCA isolated, RSVs fail to open Reactor trip, LOCA isolated, DHRS fails, RSVs fail to 6
MSS---ALOCA-SG--ET open Figure 19.1-7 16 ATWS, LOCA isolated, RSVs fail to open Part 3 B-19 Revision 4.1
Part 3 Applicants Environmental Report -
Table B-10: Release Category 2 Hourly Release Information Plume Start of Release Plume Heat Chemical Group (fraction of initial core inventory)
Segment Release (s) Duration (s) Content (W) Xe Cs Ba I Te Ru Mo Ce La 1 29400 3600 0 2.86E-06 3.23E-07 4.38E-08 2.79E-07 2.91E-07 9.81E-11 3.25E-08 5.20E-15 5.20E-15 2 33000 3600 0 1.73E-05 1.58E-06 6.50E-09 9.59E-07 9.84E-07 5.49E-09 4.40E-07 1.02E-13 1.02E-13 3 36600 3600 0 2.66E-05 9.29E-08 1.35E-10 6.37E-08 5.83E-08 8.85E-10 2.51E-08 2.07E-14 2.07E-14 Standard Design Certification 4 40200 3600 0 2.88E-05 1.04E-07 4.64E-10 2.15E-07 1.25E-07 7.42E-10 2.53E-08 1.93E-14 1.92E-14 5 43800 3600 0 3.03E-05 4.20E-08 1.34E-09 6.14E-08 1.22E-07 4.05E-10 1.07E-08 1.11E-14 1.11E-14 6 47400 3600 0 3.07E-05 1.07E-07 4.76E-10 8.15E-08 8.34E-08 1.30E-09 2.97E-08 3.04E-14 3.07E-14 7 51000 3600 0 3.69E-05 6.17E-08 4.77E-10 6.47E-08 7.85E-08 2.22E-10 1.41E-08 7.42E-15 7.59E-15 8 54600 3600 0 3.70E-05 8.83E-09 4.12E-10 4.00E-08 3.46E-08 9.03E-12 1.34E-09 9.96E-16 9.02E-16 9 58200 3600 0 3.73E-05 3.16E-09 1.29E-10 1.57E-08 1.01E-08 2.42E-12 4.43E-10 3.11E-16 2.70E-16 10 61800 3600 0 3.74E-05 1.12E-09 3.90E-11 7.17E-09 3.04E-09 6.88E-13 1.46E-10 9.53E-17 8.15E-17 11 65400 3600 0 3.74E-05 4.36E-10 1.28E-11 4.43E-09 1.02E-09 2.22E-13 5.21E-11 3.17E-17 2.69E-17 12 69000 3600 0 3.72E-05 1.85E-10 4.49E-12 3.44E-09 3.71E-10 8.03E-14 1.95E-11 1.13E-17 9.53E-18 13 72600 3600 0 3.70E-05 8.93E-11 1.73E-12 3.06E-09 1.48E-10 3.19E-14 7.76E-12 4.36E-18 3.67E-18 B-20 14 76200 3600 0 3.67E-05 4.91E-11 6.95E-13 2.89E-09 6.16E-11 1.32E-14 3.19E-12 1.76E-18 1.48E-18 15 79800 3600 0 3.65E-05 3.19E-11 2.89E-13 2.81E-09 2.66E-11 5.57E-15 1.34E-12 7.30E-19 6.14E-19 16 83400 3600 0 3.63E-05 4.05E-11 1.56E-13 2.79E-09 1.52E-11 3.05E-15 7.30E-13 3.93E-19 3.30E-19 17 87000 3600 0 3.60E-05 1.29E-10 8.08E-14 2.87E-09 9.47E-12 1.63E-15 3.81E-13 2.04E-19 1.71E-19 18 90600 3600 0 3.56E-05 3.24E-10 2.10E-14 3.04E-09 4.15E-12 4.46E-16 9.83E-14 5.30E-20 4.45E-20 19 94200 3600 0 3.53E-05 3.83E-10 3.97E-15 3.16E-09 1.95E-12 1.28E-16 1.94E-14 1.06E-20 9.00E-21 20 97800 3600 0 3.50E-05 1.44E-10 1.48E-15 3.25E-09 2.13E-12 7.41E-17 9.12E-15 4.31E-21 3.65E-21 21 101400 3600 0 3.47E-05 7.87E-11 3.84E-16 3.50E-09 3.67E-12 2.09E-17 4.09E-15 9.70E-22 6.98E-22 22 105000 3600 0 3.46E-05 9.45E-11 1.51E-16 3.94E-09 6.06E-12 7.78E-18 2.48E-15 3.11E-22 3.22E-23 Off-site Consequence Calculation 23 108600 3600 0 3.51E-05 2.98E-10 1.40E-16 6.84E-09 2.13E-11 4.24E-18 3.64E-15 1.76E-22 1.09E-22 24 112200 3600 0 3.48E-05 2.66E-10 6.76E-16 6.42E-09 1.99E-11 1.42E-17 4.58E-15 1.50E-21 1.15E-21 25 115800 3600 0 3.43E-05 2.46E-10 1.72E-16 6.12E-09 1.92E-11 3.63E-18 1.17E-15 2.45E-22 6.40E-23 26 119400 3600 0 3.42E-05 3.41E-10 3.25E-17 7.44E-09 3.02E-11 6.88E-19 5.15E-16 5.53E-25 2.50E-29 27 123000 3600 0 3.40E-05 1.58E-10 4.98E-18 4.90E-09 4.50E-11 1.05E-19 5.10E-16 6.55E-32 3.02E-32 28 126600 3600 0 3.39E-05 2.70E-11 6.59E-19 3.09E-09 5.10E-11 1.34E-20 5.11E-16 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 Revision 4.1 29 130200 3600 0 3.37E-05 4.44E-12 8.53E-20 2.77E-09 5.31E-11 1.11E-21 4.12E-16 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 30 133800 3600 0 3.36E-05 1.02E-12 1.06E-20 2.71E-09 5.18E-11 0.00E+00 1.40E-16 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 31 137400 3600 0 3.38E-05 5.40E-13 5.91E-22 2.72E-09 8.45E-11 8.67E-30 2.51E-16 4.05E-35 1.87E-35
Table B-10: Release Category 2 Hourly Release Information (Continued)
Part 3 Applicants Environmental Report -
Plume Start of Release Plume Heat Chemical Group (fraction of initial core inventory)
Segment Release (s) Duration (s) Content (W) Xe Cs Ba I Te Ru Mo Ce La 32 141000 3600 0 3.35E-05 4.35E-13 3.12E-28 2.70E-09 6.38E-11 4.49E-30 2.10E-16 2.10E-35 9.68E-36 33 144600 3600 0 3.34E-05 2.60E-13 2.22E-28 2.69E-09 4.55E-11 3.19E-30 6.28E-17 1.49E-35 6.89E-36 34 148200 3600 0 3.33E-05 1.99E-13 3.27E-29 2.68E-09 4.72E-11 4.70E-31 2.97E-17 2.20E-36 1.01E-36 35 151800 3600 0 3.32E-05 3.31E-11 7.69E-14 2.78E-09 3.10E-11 5.18E-14 5.12E-12 1.99E-19 1.85E-19 Standard Design Certification 36 155400 3600 0 3.31E-05 6.33E-11 5.34E-14 2.86E-09 6.45E-12 3.60E-14 9.80E-12 1.38E-19 1.28E-19 37 159000 3600 0 3.30E-05 3.61E-11 2.10E-14 2.77E-09 2.88E-12 1.42E-14 5.58E-12 5.45E-20 5.02E-20 38 162600 3600 0 3.30E-05 1.94E-11 1.01E-14 2.71E-09 1.85E-12 6.78E-15 2.98E-12 2.59E-20 2.38E-20 39 166200 3600 0 3.29E-05 1.10E-11 5.48E-15 2.68E-09 1.36E-12 3.69E-15 1.69E-12 1.40E-20 1.26E-20 40 169800 3600 0 3.29E-05 6.70E-12 3.24E-15 2.66E-09 1.07E-12 2.19E-15 1.02E-12 8.24E-21 6.92E-21 41 173400 3600 0 3.28E-05 4.24E-12 1.99E-15 2.65E-09 9.14E-13 1.34E-15 6.43E-13 4.80E-21 4.06E-21 42 177000 3600 0 3.28E-05 2.77E-12 1.25E-15 2.65E-09 8.17E-13 8.44E-16 4.17E-13 2.90E-21 2.24E-21 43 180600 3600 0 3.27E-05 1.84E-12 7.92E-16 2.64E-09 7.16E-13 5.34E-16 2.75E-13 1.72E-21 1.09E-21 44 184200 3600 0 3.27E-05 1.23E-12 4.99E-16 2.64E-09 6.36E-13 3.36E-16 1.83E-13 9.38E-22 5.52E-22 45 187800 3600 0 3.27E-05 9.06E-13 3.41E-16 2.63E-09 6.20E-13 2.30E-16 1.34E-13 5.24E-22 2.48E-22 B-21 46 191400 3600 0 3.26E-05 6.30E-13 2.18E-16 2.63E-09 5.35E-13 1.47E-16 9.23E-14 2.88E-22 5.56E-23 47 195000 3600 0 3.26E-05 4.70E-13 1.49E-16 2.63E-09 5.47E-13 1.00E-16 6.85E-14 1.20E-22 3.97E-23 48 198600 3600 0 3.26E-05 3.53E-13 9.98E-17 2.62E-09 5.14E-13 6.73E-17 5.11E-14 3.69E-23 1.90E-23 49 202200 3600 0 3.26E-05 2.64E-13 6.62E-17 2.62E-09 5.09E-13 4.46E-17 3.76E-14 2.45E-23 7.15E-24 50 205800 3600 0 3.25E-05 2.03E-13 4.45E-17 2.62E-09 4.53E-13 3.00E-17 2.86E-14 1.17E-23 7.41E-25 51 209400 3600 0 3.25E-05 1.61E-13 3.09E-17 2.62E-09 4.97E-13 2.08E-17 2.23E-14 4.99E-24 2.12E-25 52 213000 3600 0 3.25E-05 1.19E-13 1.98E-17 2.62E-09 4.08E-13 1.33E-17 1.63E-14 1.36E-24 1.28E-25 53 216600 3600 0 3.25E-05 1.01E-13 1.44E-17 2.61E-09 4.10E-13 9.69E-18 1.37E-14 4.39E-25 1.05E-25 54 220200 3600 0 3.25E-05 8.17E-14 9.93E-18 2.61E-09 4.66E-13 6.69E-18 1.07E-14 8.50E-26 5.61E-28 Off-site Consequence Calculation 55 223800 3600 0 3.24E-05 6.21E-14 6.46E-18 2.61E-09 3.91E-13 4.36E-18 8.03E-15 3.63E-26 3.73E-28 56 227400 3600 0 3.24E-05 4.86E-14 4.34E-18 2.61E-09 3.22E-13 2.93E-18 6.21E-15 3.22E-28 2.39E-28 57 231000 3600 0 3.24E-05 3.87E-14 2.97E-18 2.61E-09 2.72E-13 2.00E-18 4.89E-15 2.16E-28 1.11E-28 58 234600 3600 0 3.24E-05 3.80E-14 2.40E-18 2.61E-09 4.27E-13 1.62E-18 4.60E-15 1.21E-28 2.22E-38 59 238200 3600 0 3.24E-05 2.95E-14 1.57E-18 2.61E-09 4.31E-13 1.05E-18 3.43E-15 2.31E-31 2.51E-39 60 241800 3600 0 3.24E-05 2.36E-14 1.06E-18 2.60E-09 3.69E-13 7.13E-19 2.68E-15 1.73E-38 2.80E-40 Revision 4.1 61 245400 3600 0 3.23E-05 1.92E-14 7.29E-19 2.60E-09 3.17E-13 4.91E-19 2.14E-15 1.91E-39 3.09E-41 62 249000 3600 0 3.23E-05 1.57E-14 5.05E-19 2.60E-09 2.80E-13 3.40E-19 1.73E-15 2.06E-40 3.33E-42 63 252600 3600 0 3.23E-05 1.29E-14 3.51E-19 2.60E-09 2.53E-13 2.37E-19 1.40E-15 2.15E-41 3.48E-43
Table B-10: Release Category 2 Hourly Release Information (Continued)
Part 3 Applicants Environmental Report -
Plume Start of Release Plume Heat Chemical Group (fraction of initial core inventory)
Segment Release (s) Duration (s) Content (W) Xe Cs Ba I Te Ru Mo Ce La 64 256200 3600 0 3.23E-05 1.19E-14 2.68E-19 2.60E-09 2.98E-13 1.81E-19 1.26E-15 2.21E-42 3.64E-44 65-96 259800 3600 0 3.23E-05 1.34E-14 2.78E-19 2.60E-09 4.22E-13 1.88E-19 1.38E-15 9.04E-43 1.40E-44 Total 29400 345600 0 3.14E-03 2.33E-06 5.38E-08 2.04E-06 1.79E-06 9.16E-09 5.79E-07 1.97E-13 1.97E-13 Standard Design Certification B-22 Off-site Consequence Calculation Revision 4.1
Applicants Environmental Report -
Standard Design Certification Off-site Consequence Calculation B.2.3 Release Category 3: CVCS Pipe Break Outside Containment, Unisolated The third RC consists of pipe breaks that bypass containment through the CVCS injection or discharge lines and are not isolated, allowing a direct release path to the Reactor Building, and the containment flooding and drain system (CFDS) is unavailable to provide coolant to the CNV. Deposition in the CVCS pipe is not credited for mitigation. The total release from the NPM is considered to be directly to the environment. The PRA sequences that have a significant contribution to RC 3 are shown in Table B-12. RC 3 is a bypassed containment scenario.
The conservative release sequence is a CVCS injection line pipe break outside containment that remains unisolated with the complete failure of all mitigating systems. The reactor coolant bypasses containment through the CVCS line break, completely uncovering the core leading to core support failure and core relocation to the RPV lower plenum. A significant portion of the core inventory of the Xe, Cs, I, and Te groups is released from the fuel and to the environment, due to the lack of crediting CVCS pipe deposition and Reactor Building retention. Because there is a direct release path to the environment modeled in MELCOR, all release information is calculated directly from MELCOR for RC 3. The particle size distribution for RC 3 is presented in Table B-11. The plume release information for RC 3 that is used as input for MACCS calculations is shown in Table B-13. The flow rate and density plume buoyancy model is used for RC 3 because hydrogen is generated during the accident and the flow rate and density model in MACCS better represents the plume buoyancy when releases contain hydrogen (Section 4.3.2 of Reference 8.1-11).
Table B-11: Particle Size Distribution for Release Category 3 Particle Chemical Group Size Xe Cs Ba I Te Ru Mo Ce La 0.15 m 1.00E-01 1.06E-02 1.14E-02 1.50E-02 6.49E-03 6.36E-03 6.73E-03 6.53E-03 6.53E-03 0.29 m 1.00E-01 1.65E-02 3.60E-03 1.11E-02 9.78E-03 2.65E-02 1.68E-02 2.57E-02 2.57E-02 0.53 m 1.00E-01 9.58E-02 2.87E-02 6.73E-02 6.54E-02 1.63E-01 1.02E-01 1.59E-01 1.59E-01 0.99 m 1.00E-01 2.71E-01 1.35E-01 2.64E-01 2.10E-01 3.38E-01 2.81E-01 3.28E-01 3.28E-01 1.84 m 1.00E-01 3.16E-01 3.31E-01 3.44E-01 2.96E-01 2.55E-01 3.14E-01 2.53E-01 2.53E-01 3.43 m 1.00E-01 1.71E-01 2.62E-01 1.77E-01 2.02E-01 1.13E-01 1.66E-01 1.18E-01 1.18E-01 6.38 m 1.00E-01 6.74E-02 1.12E-01 6.69E-02 1.02E-01 5.01E-02 6.56E-02 5.48E-02 5.48E-02 11.9 m 1.00E-01 2.80E-02 5.55E-02 2.89E-02 5.44E-02 2.56E-02 2.66E-02 2.88E-02 2.88E-02 22.1 m 1.00E-01 1.26E-02 3.11E-02 1.38E-02 2.89E-02 1.30E-02 1.16E-02 1.49E-02 1.49E-02 41.2 m 1.00E-01 1.09E-02 2.90E-02 1.16E-02 2.56E-02 9.18E-03 1.02E-02 1.20E-02 1.20E-02 Part 3 B-23 Revision 4.1
Applicants Environmental Report -
Standard Design Certification Off-site Consequence Calculation Table B-12: PRA Sequences that Contribute Significantly to Release Category 3 Event Tree Sequence Description FSAR Reference Reactor trip, LOCA unisolated, ECCS success, CFDS 7
CVCS--ALOCA-COC-ET fails Figure 19.1-2 13 ATWS, LOCA unisolated, ECCS fails Reactor trip, LOCA unisolated, ECCS success, CVCS CVCS--ALOCA-LOC-ET 9 Figure 19.1-3 injection fails, CFDS fails Part 3 B-24 Revision 4.1
Part 3 Applicants Environmental Report -
Table B-13: Release Category 3 Hourly Release Information Release Plume Plume Chemical Group (fraction of initial core inventory)
Plume Start of Density Duration Flow Rate Segment Release (s) Xe Cs Ba I Te Ru Mo Ce La (s) (kg/s) (kg/m3) 1 8640 3600 2.31E-01 2.06E-01 3.57E-01 2.81E-01 9.06E-03 1.62E-01 1.89E-01 1.05E-03 6.80E-02 2.07E-08 2.07E-08 2 12240 3600 1.25E-01 1.87E-01 7.67E-02 6.44E-02 5.59E-04 1.12E-01 9.05E-02 9.12E-04 1.65E-02 1.67E-08 1.67E-08 Standard Design Certification 3 15840 3600 2.30E-01 1.64E-01 4.67E-02 3.70E-02 2.53E-04 4.12E-02 4.46E-02 6.87E-04 9.77E-03 1.19E-08 1.19E-08 4 19440 3600 3.93E-02 1.70E-01 2.75E-03 9.60E-04 3.68E-05 4.35E-03 3.06E-03 4.52E-06 8.87E-05 1.12E-10 1.11E-10 5 23040 3600 1.00E-06 2.66E-02 8.61E-06 5.19E-06 1.86E-08 2.71E-06 2.00E-06 6.89E-08 1.24E-06 1.68E-12 1.67E-12 6 26640 3600 2.05E-05 5.15E-02 8.07E-04 2.45E-04 9.97E-08 3.31E-05 9.98E-06 6.17E-06 7.14E-05 1.16E-10 1.16E-10 7 30240 3600 1.85E-05 8.89E-02 3.03E-04 2.00E-05 9.31E-09 5.60E-06 2.98E-08 3.56E-07 5.43E-06 6.69E-12 6.68E-12 8 33840 3660 9.22E-06 1.08E-01 9.84E-05 2.35E-06 9.31E-10 2.80E-06 5.96E-08 3.05E-08 5.59E-07 5.72E-13 5.86E-13 9 37500 3600 1.00E-06 2.28E-01 1.49E-07 5.96E-08 9.31E-10 2.68E-07 2.09E-07 0.00E+00 2.24E-08 5.68E-14 6.75E-14 10 41100 3600 1.00E-06 3.41E-01 5.96E-08 5.96E-08 9.31E-10 1.19E-07 5.96E-08 0.00E+00 1.49E-08 7.11E-15 1.07E-14 11 44700 3600 3.35E-05 3.43E-01 2.07E-05 6.08E-06 2.29E-07 2.91E-05 4.18E-05 0.00E+00 1.07E-06 1.89E-12 1.37E-12 12 48300 3600 3.66E-05 3.52E-01 3.56E-05 7.39E-06 5.53E-07 3.00E-05 1.61E-04 4.66E-10 1.28E-06 2.43E-12 3.10E-12 13 51900 3600 9.03E-06 3.54E-01 8.85E-06 1.07E-06 8.20E-08 3.70E-06 1.21E-05 0.00E+00 1.56E-07 3.06E-13 3.55E-13 B-25 14 55500 3280 6.92E-04 2.59E-01 6.97E-04 7.12E-05 3.62E-06 3.49E-04 3.21E-04 1.16E-09 1.25E-05 3.09E-12 3.23E-12 Total 8640 50140 - - 4.85E-01 3.84E-01 9.92E-03 3.21E-01 3.28E-01 2.66E-03 9.44E-02 4.96E-08 4.96E-08 Off-site Consequence Calculation Revision 4.1
Applicants Environmental Report -
Standard Design Certification Off-site Consequence Calculation B.2.4 Release Category 4: ECCS Spurious Actuation The fourth RC consists of loss of RPV inventory into containment due to the spurious opening of an RSV or ECCS valve. A spurious opening of an RSV is similar to RC 6, where an RSV opens and remains open; therefore, ECCS spurious actuation is considered in the representative RC 4 sequence. DHRS success does not always preclude core damage; therefore, sequences that contain DHRS success and sequences that contain DHRS failure are both considered in this RC.
The PRA sequences that contribute to RC 4 are shown in Table B-14. RC 4 is an intact containment scenario.
The conservative release sequence for this RC is a spurious opening of an ECCS RVV, with a partial actuation of ECCS (only the remaining RVVs open) and a failure of all other mitigating systems. This accident produces a scenario where reactor coolant is lost to containment through the RVVs, and coolant is not available either through RRV recirculation or through CVCS injection. The core is uncovered and unable to be cooled, leading to core support failure and core relocation to the RPV lower plenum. Radionuclides released from the core relocate to the CNV, where the majority of aerosols deposit in the reactor coolant present in the CNV and on the CNV walls. In the MELCOR simulations, the CNV is modeled as sealed with no leakage.
Therefore, the radionuclide release to the environment is calculated separately based on the fraction of the core inventory airborne in containment and the design basis containment leak rate of 0.2 weight percent per day (see FSAR Table 6.5-1).
The plume release information for RC 4 that was used as input for MACCS simulations is shown in Table B-15. As a result of modeling the CNV as sealed, assumptions relating to the particle size distribution and plume buoyancy are required inputs to MACCS. The particle size distribution for RC 4 was assumed to be the same as the particle size distribution for RC3 (see Table B-11). RC 3 is a containment bypass accident, and the particle size distribution of a containment bypass accident is expected to cause increased deposition in the environment as compared to the actual particle size distribution for an intact containment sequence. The plume buoyancy is simulated using the heat model with an assumed plume heat content of zero watts for each plume segment. The result of this assumption is that the plume does not rise upon release, which maximizes the ground level radionuclide concentrations. Sensitivity studies evaluating the impact of the aerosol deposition in the CNV predicted by MELCOR, the assumed particle size distribution, and the non-buoyant plume are discussed in Section B.3.
Part 3 B-26 Revision 4.1
Applicants Environmental Report -
Standard Design Certification Off-site Consequence Calculation Table B-14: PRA Sequences that Contribute Significantly to Release Category 4 Event Tree Sequence Description FSAR Reference ECCS--ALOCA-RV1-ET 3 Reactor trip, ECCS fails, CVCS injection fails Figure 19.1-6 RCS---ALOCA-IC--ET 3 Reactor trip, ECCS fails, CVCS injection fails Figure 19.1-5 Reactor trip, DHRS success, ECCS fails, CVCS EDSS--LODC-----ET 3 Figure 19.1-10 injection fails CTG fails, BDG fails, Reactor trip, DHRS success, 5
Off-site power not recovered, ECCS fails EHVS--LOOP-----ET CTG fails, BDG fails, Reactor trip, DHRS success, RSV Figure 19.1-9 8 opens, RSV cycles, Off-site power not recovered, ECCS fails Part 3 B-27 Revision 4.1
Part 3 Applicants Environmental Report -
Table B-15: Release Category 4 Hourly Release Information Plume Start of Release Plume Heat Chemical Group (fraction of initial core inventory)
Segment Release (s) Duration (s) Content (W) Xe Cs Ba I Te Ru Mo Ce La 1 26160 3600 0 2.84E-06 3.27E-07 4.73E-08 2.85E-07 2.99E-07 6.71E-11 2.91E-08 4.52E-15 4.51E-15 2 29760 3600 0 1.74E-05 1.34E-06 6.61E-09 6.94E-07 8.01E-07 4.24E-09 3.74E-07 8.11E-14 8.11E-14 3 33360 3600 0 2.48E-05 9.94E-08 1.21E-10 1.20E-07 5.62E-08 9.38E-10 2.58E-08 2.02E-14 2.02E-14 Standard Design Certification 4 36960 3600 0 2.66E-05 8.60E-08 5.37E-10 1.82E-07 1.29E-07 9.62E-10 2.14E-08 2.16E-14 2.16E-14 5 40560 3600 0 2.84E-05 6.91E-08 9.77E-10 8.91E-08 1.33E-07 6.24E-10 1.77E-08 1.51E-14 1.51E-14 6 44160 3600 0 3.16E-05 3.85E-08 1.48E-10 2.74E-08 3.51E-08 4.66E-10 1.07E-08 9.40E-15 9.40E-15 7 47760 3600 0 3.62E-05 7.34E-08 3.49E-10 1.12E-07 5.25E-08 4.90E-10 1.72E-08 2.47E-14 2.48E-14 8 51360 3600 0 3.98E-05 2.17E-08 1.27E-09 3.64E-08 5.29E-08 1.00E-12 5.26E-09 2.53E-15 2.99E-15 9 54960 3600 0 3.91E-05 1.16E-08 5.52E-10 2.39E-08 2.32E-08 3.51E-13 2.71E-09 1.20E-15 1.42E-15 10 58560 3600 0 3.81E-05 4.84E-09 1.82E-10 1.26E-08 1.01E-08 1.22E-13 1.04E-09 4.11E-16 4.85E-16 11 62160 3600 0 3.79E-05 1.77E-09 5.70E-11 7.06E-09 3.38E-09 3.53E-14 3.35E-10 1.17E-16 1.37E-16 12 65760 3600 0 3.78E-05 6.76E-10 2.10E-11 4.84E-09 1.13E-09 2.75E-14 1.09E-10 3.40E-17 3.85E-17 13 69360 3600 0 3.76E-05 2.74E-10 6.77E-12 3.89E-09 3.93E-10 2.80E-14 3.43E-11 9.43E-18 1.04E-17 B-28 14 72960 3600 0 3.76E-05 1.28E-10 1.98E-12 3.47E-09 1.43E-10 1.50E-14 1.06E-11 2.56E-18 2.80E-18 15 76560 3600 0 3.75E-05 6.78E-11 5.75E-13 3.27E-09 5.37E-11 6.27E-15 3.30E-12 7.13E-19 7.72E-19 16 80160 3600 0 3.74E-05 3.88E-11 1.71E-13 3.17E-09 2.04E-11 2.38E-15 1.05E-12 2.04E-19 2.20E-19 17 83760 3840 0 3.94E-05 4.94E-11 6.30E-14 3.33E-09 1.22E-11 1.27E-15 4.43E-13 7.03E-20 7.46E-20 18 87600 3600 0 3.70E-05 9.65E-11 2.56E-14 3.18E-09 1.58E-11 7.92E-16 2.32E-13 2.61E-20 2.71E-20 19 91200 3600 0 3.68E-05 5.62E-11 9.09E-15 3.12E-09 9.10E-12 3.37E-16 9.51E-14 8.81E-21 8.93E-21 20 94800 3600 0 3.65E-05 3.32E-11 2.64E-15 3.05E-09 3.38E-12 1.04E-16 2.95E-14 2.42E-21 2.27E-21 21 98400 3600 0 3.63E-05 3.99E-11 8.99E-16 3.04E-09 2.14E-12 4.21E-17 1.21E-14 6.82E-22 4.83E-22 22 102000 3600 0 3.63E-05 6.79E-11 3.58E-16 3.05E-09 2.31E-12 2.25E-17 7.10E-15 1.39E-22 5.65E-23 Off-site Consequence Calculation 23 105600 3600 0 3.61E-05 6.00E-11 1.28E-16 3.03E-09 1.62E-12 1.02E-17 3.59E-15 1.44E-23 1.03E-28 24 109200 3600 0 3.60E-05 9.10E-11 5.26E-17 3.05E-09 1.67E-12 6.21E-18 2.27E-15 4.35E-30 0.00E+00 25 112800 3600 0 3.59E-05 1.43E-10 2.11E-17 3.08E-09 1.85E-12 3.92E-18 1.85E-15 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 26 116400 3600 0 3.57E-05 1.88E-10 7.44E-18 3.11E-09 1.76E-12 1.70E-18 1.73E-15 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 27 120000 3600 0 3.56E-05 2.33E-10 2.42E-18 3.14E-09 1.54E-12 5.93E-19 9.95E-16 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 28 123600 3600 0 3.55E-05 3.12E-10 7.55E-19 3.20E-09 1.43E-12 1.91E-19 4.81E-16 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 Revision 4.1 29 127200 3600 0 3.53E-05 2.60E-10 2.23E-19 3.30E-09 1.37E-12 5.63E-20 2.64E-16 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 30 130800 3600 0 3.52E-05 1.37E-10 6.27E-20 3.40E-09 1.26E-12 1.55E-20 1.67E-16 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 31 134400 3600 0 3.50E-05 7.81E-11 1.76E-20 3.34E-09 9.74E-13 4.24E-21 1.00E-16 0.00E+00 0.00E+00
Table B-15: Release Category 4 Hourly Release Information (Continued)
Part 3 Applicants Environmental Report -
Plume Start of Release Plume Heat Chemical Group (fraction of initial core inventory)
Segment Release (s) Duration (s) Content (W) Xe Cs Ba I Te Ru Mo Ce La 32 138000 3600 0 3.49E-05 5.61E-11 5.37E-21 3.29E-09 7.61E-13 9.27E-22 6.04E-17 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 33 141600 3600 0 3.48E-05 4.82E-11 1.32E-21 3.27E-09 6.95E-13 1.33E-22 4.20E-17 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 34 145200 3600 0 3.47E-05 4.03E-11 5.31E-22 3.21E-09 6.58E-13 1.93E-24 2.97E-17 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 35 148800 3600 0 3.46E-05 3.45E-11 2.85E-22 3.17E-09 7.15E-13 0.00E+00 3.74E-17 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 Standard Design Certification 36 152400 3600 0 3.46E-05 5.30E-11 2.12E-14 3.18E-09 1.83E-12 1.48E-14 5.23E-12 1.53E-19 1.50E-19 37 156000 3600 0 3.45E-05 1.07E-10 4.89E-14 3.10E-09 2.68E-12 3.41E-14 2.22E-11 3.53E-19 3.48E-19 38 159600 3600 0 3.45E-05 8.89E-11 4.47E-14 3.02E-09 2.47E-12 3.12E-14 1.95E-11 3.23E-19 3.18E-19 39 163200 3600 0 3.45E-05 6.38E-11 3.29E-14 2.97E-09 1.84E-12 2.29E-14 1.41E-11 2.37E-19 2.34E-19 40 166800 3600 0 3.44E-05 4.86E-11 2.51E-14 2.94E-09 1.43E-12 1.75E-14 1.07E-11 1.81E-19 1.78E-19 41 170400 3600 0 3.44E-05 3.84E-11 1.97E-14 2.92E-09 1.14E-12 1.37E-14 8.36E-12 1.42E-19 1.40E-19 42 174000 3600 0 3.44E-05 3.16E-11 1.60E-14 2.91E-09 9.46E-13 1.12E-14 6.78E-12 1.16E-19 1.14E-19 43 177600 3600 0 3.43E-05 2.63E-11 1.32E-14 2.90E-09 7.95E-13 9.19E-15 5.56E-12 9.50E-20 9.35E-20 44 181200 3600 0 3.43E-05 2.21E-11 1.09E-14 2.89E-09 6.74E-13 7.62E-15 4.60E-12 7.87E-20 7.74E-20 45 184800 3600 0 3.43E-05 1.86E-11 9.03E-15 2.89E-09 5.70E-13 6.30E-15 3.79E-12 6.51E-20 6.40E-20 B-29 46 188400 3600 0 3.43E-05 1.75E-11 8.40E-15 2.88E-09 5.45E-13 5.86E-15 3.51E-12 6.06E-20 5.96E-20 47 192000 3600 0 3.42E-05 1.48E-11 7.05E-15 2.88E-09 4.70E-13 4.92E-15 2.94E-12 5.08E-20 5.00E-20 48 195600 3600 0 3.42E-05 1.28E-11 6.04E-15 2.87E-09 4.15E-13 4.22E-15 2.51E-12 4.35E-20 4.28E-20 49 199200 3600 0 3.42E-05 1.13E-11 5.32E-15 2.87E-09 3.77E-13 3.71E-15 2.20E-12 3.83E-20 3.77E-20 50 202800 3600 0 3.42E-05 9.88E-12 4.60E-15 2.86E-09 3.38E-13 3.21E-15 1.90E-12 3.32E-20 3.27E-20 51 206400 3600 0 3.41E-05 8.34E-12 3.86E-15 2.86E-09 2.95E-13 2.69E-15 1.59E-12 2.78E-20 2.74E-20 52 210000 3600 0 3.41E-05 7.19E-12 3.31E-15 2.86E-09 2.63E-13 2.31E-15 1.36E-12 2.38E-20 2.35E-20 53 213600 3600 0 3.41E-05 6.08E-12 2.78E-15 2.85E-09 2.31E-13 1.94E-15 1.14E-12 2.00E-20 1.97E-20 54 217200 3600 0 3.41E-05 5.55E-12 2.52E-15 2.85E-09 2.21E-13 1.76E-15 1.03E-12 1.82E-20 1.79E-20 Off-site Consequence Calculation 55 220800 3600 0 3.41E-05 5.23E-12 2.35E-15 2.85E-09 2.20E-13 1.64E-15 9.65E-13 1.70E-20 1.67E-20 56 224400 3600 0 3.40E-05 4.36E-12 1.94E-15 2.85E-09 1.94E-13 1.36E-15 7.96E-13 1.40E-20 1.38E-20 57 228000 3600 0 3.40E-05 3.52E-12 1.56E-15 2.84E-09 1.65E-13 1.09E-15 6.39E-13 1.12E-20 1.10E-20 58 231600 3600 0 3.40E-05 3.14E-12 1.38E-15 2.84E-09 1.55E-13 9.61E-16 5.65E-13 9.93E-21 9.76E-21 59 235200 3600 0 3.40E-05 3.10E-12 1.35E-15 2.84E-09 1.67E-13 9.39E-16 5.53E-13 9.68E-21 9.51E-21 60 238800 3600 0 3.40E-05 2.57E-12 1.10E-15 2.84E-09 1.48E-13 7.70E-16 4.55E-13 7.93E-21 7.77E-21 Revision 4.1 61 242400 3600 0 3.39E-05 2.09E-12 8.90E-16 2.84E-09 1.27E-13 6.21E-16 3.68E-13 6.38E-21 6.23E-21 62 246000 3600 0 3.39E-05 2.20E-12 9.18E-16 2.83E-09 1.49E-13 6.41E-16 3.82E-13 6.59E-21 6.43E-21 63 249600 3600 0 3.39E-05 1.46E-12 6.04E-16 2.83E-09 1.03E-13 4.21E-16 2.52E-13 4.29E-21 4.17E-21
Table B-15: Release Category 4 Hourly Release Information (Continued)
Part 3 Applicants Environmental Report -
Plume Start of Release Plume Heat Chemical Group (fraction of initial core inventory)
Segment Release (s) Duration (s) Content (W) Xe Cs Ba I Te Ru Mo Ce La 64 253200 3600 0 3.39E-05 4.38E-12 1.72E-15 2.83E-09 4.49E-13 1.20E-15 7.33E-13 1.23E-20 1.20E-20 65 256800 3600 0 3.39E-05 7.37E-12 2.68E-15 2.84E-09 1.10E-12 1.87E-15 1.18E-12 1.93E-20 1.88E-20 66-96 260400 3600 0 3.39E-05 8.10E-12 2.88E-15 2.84E-09 1.32E-12 2.01E-15 1.28E-12 2.07E-20 2.02E-20 Total 26160 345840 0 3.27E-03 2.08E-06 5.81E-08 1.84E-06 1.60E-06 7.79E-09 5.05E-07 1.81E-13 1.82E-13 Standard Design Certification B-30 Off-site Consequence Calculation Revision 4.1
Applicants Environmental Report -
Standard Design Certification Off-site Consequence Calculation B.2.5 Release Category 5: Steam Generator Tube Failure The fifth RC consists of SGTFs that are unisolated for which both CVCS injection and CFDS injection fail to supply additional coolant inventory. ECCS success does not always preclude core damage in a SGTF scenario; therefore, sequences that include ECCS success and sequences that include ECCS failure are both considered in this RC. The PRA sequences that contribute to RC 5 are shown in Table B-16. RC 5 is a bypassed containment scenario.
The conservative release sequence for this RC is an SGTF with the complete failure of all mitigating systems, including failure of all five ECCS valves to open. A secondary line break, which is not a failure mode in the RC 5 PRA sequences, is also modeled for convenience to allow a direct release path from the NPM. The reactor coolant bypasses containment through the SGTF and secondary line break, completely uncovering the core leading to core support failure and core relocation to the RPV lower plenum. A significant portion of the core inventory of Xe, Cs, I, and Te groups is released from the fuel and to the environment due to the lack of crediting Reactor Building retention. Because there is a direct release path to the environment modeled in MELCOR, all release information is calculated directly from MELCOR for RC 5. The particle size distribution for RC 5 is presented in Table B-17. The plume release information for RC 5 that is used as input for MACCS calculations is shown in Table B-18. The flow rate and density plume buoyancy model in MACCS is used for RC 5 due to the hydrogen generated during the accident. The flow rate and density model better represents the plume buoyancy when releases contain hydrogen (Section 4.3.2 of Reference 8.1-11).
Table B-16: PRA Sequences that Contribute Significantly to Release Category 5 Event Tree Sequence Description FSAR Reference Reactor trip. LOCA unisolated, ECCS success, CVCS 9
injection fails, CFDS fails MSS---ALOCA-SG--ET Figure 19.1-7 ATWS, LOCA unisolated, ECCS fails, CVCS injection 18 fails Table B-17: Particle Size Distribution for Release Category 5 Particle Chemical Group Size Xe Cs Ba I Te Ru Mo Ce La 0.15 m 1.00E-01 1.93E-01 4.75E-02 1.80E-01 2.65E-01 4.28E-01 2.34E-01 3.91E-01 3.89E-01 0.29 m 1.00E-01 5.49E-02 1.52E-02 3.87E-02 8.93E-02 7.42E-02 6.62E-02 6.77E-02 6.72E-02 0.53 m 1.00E-01 8.18E-02 3.70E-02 1.15E-01 6.47E-02 4.49E-02 7.65E-02 4.64E-02 4.52E-02 0.99 m 1.00E-01 3.12E-01 3.42E-01 3.60E-01 2.78E-01 2.24E-01 2.91E-01 2.62E-01 2.65E-01 1.84 m 1.00E-01 3.10E-01 4.94E-01 2.76E-01 2.66E-01 2.00E-01 2.82E-01 2.04E-01 2.05E-01 3.43 m 1.00E-01 4.70E-02 6.38E-02 3.01E-02 3.62E-02 2.67E-02 4.81E-02 2.62E-02 2.61E-02 6.38 m 1.00E-01 1.49E-03 8.10E-04 9.11E-04 1.30E-03 1.69E-03 1.76E-03 1.56E-03 1.55E-03 11.9 m 1.00E-01 1.28E-04 1.93E-04 1.59E-04 3.53E-04 4.11E-04 1.43E-04 4.30E-04 4.37E-04 22.1 m 1.00E-01 9.75E-06 1.37E-05 2.33E-05 4.08E-05 2.62E-05 9.78E-06 4.51E-05 4.79E-05 41.2 m 1.00E-01 1.34E-06 1.07E-06 1.73E-06 3.23E-06 3.61E-06 1.53E-06 3.88E-06 3.97E-06 Part 3 B-31 Revision 4.1
Part 3 Applicants Environmental Report -
Table B-18: Release Category 5 Hourly Release Information Release Plume Plume Chemical Group (fraction of initial core inventory)
Plume Start of Density Duration Flow Rate Segment Release (s) Xe Cs Ba I Te Ru Mo Ce La (s) (kg/s) (kg/m3) 1 44340 3660 3.48E-01 3.89E-01 1.90E-01 1.63E-02 1.28E-03 9.84E-03 9.41E-03 1.88E-05 2.68E-03 4.05E-10 4.04E-10 2 48000 3540 1.78E-01 3.57E-01 1.87E-01 9.51E-03 1.29E-05 9.20E-03 4.65E-03 5.42E-05 2.58E-03 9.80E-10 9.79E-10 Standard Design Certification 3 51540 3660 2.13E-01 4.67E-01 4.89E-02 3.20E-03 3.80E-05 1.51E-03 7.00E-03 2.81E-05 9.04E-04 5.52E-10 5.52E-10 4 55200 3580 1.37E-01 4.03E-01 1.18E-02 6.47E-04 4.75E-06 8.80E-04 7.00E-04 1.88E-05 1.68E-04 3.72E-10 3.71E-10 5 58780 3600 8.36E-02 4.92E-01 1.42E-02 2.01E-04 1.56E-06 1.12E-04 1.97E-04 5.60E-06 5.65E-05 1.06E-10 1.06E-10 6 62380 3600 5.37E-01 5.30E-01 6.02E-02 7.71E-04 1.82E-06 6.55E-04 5.11E-04 1.12E-05 2.17E-04 2.16E-10 2.16E-10 7 65980 3600 2.57E-01 4.53E-01 8.56E-03 4.78E-04 2.45E-06 5.03E-04 2.46E-04 1.28E-06 1.21E-04 4.16E-11 4.24E-11 8 69580 3600 7.47E-02 3.71E-01 2.12E-03 3.37E-04 1.05E-06 1.84E-04 2.44E-04 6.25E-07 9.32E-05 2.96E-11 2.94E-11 9 73180 3600 2.53E-02 5.12E-01 1.66E-03 5.58E-05 5.95E-08 3.82E-05 7.34E-06 2.15E-07 1.56E-05 6.96E-12 7.05E-12 10 76780 3600 3.99E-02 5.44E-01 3.02E-03 1.18E-04 7.54E-08 4.62E-05 1.16E-05 7.27E-07 3.38E-05 1.07E-11 1.07E-11 11 80380 3600 3.66E-02 5.50E-01 1.80E-03 8.34E-05 4.13E-08 3.29E-05 1.01E-05 7.92E-07 2.39E-05 4.10E-12 4.07E-12 12 83980 3620 2.74E-02 5.35E-01 3.16E-04 1.64E-07 1.16E-10 7.10E-07 3.35E-08 2.02E-09 4.70E-08 1.04E-14 9.77E-15 13 87600 3600 2.45E-02 4.89E-01 3.15E-04 1.49E-08 0.00E+00 7.28E-07 3.73E-09 5.09E-10 5.59E-09 2.22E-15 2.22E-15 B-32 14 91200 3600 1.05E-01 4.32E-01 2.50E-02 6.24E-04 3.66E-05 4.34E-03 3.12E-03 2.70E-06 9.66E-05 3.70E-10 4.06E-10 15 94800 3600 1.32E-01 3.46E-01 1.38E-03 1.03E-04 6.90E-07 2.05E-04 1.28E-05 7.52E-09 2.09E-05 1.09E-11 1.17E-11 16 98400 3600 2.49E-02 3.42E-01 5.03E-05 8.33E-06 1.35E-08 4.10E-05 3.88E-05 4.09E-09 1.17E-06 3.15E-13 3.77E-13 17 102000 3600 2.54E-02 6.62E-01 2.75E-03 3.71E-05 1.21E-06 1.84E-04 1.26E-04 1.01E-07 6.26E-06 1.07E-11 1.17E-11 18 105600 3600 4.37E-03 7.34E-01 4.92E-04 3.83E-05 8.52E-08 5.54E-05 7.88E-06 9.78E-09 7.98E-06 1.31E-11 8.44E-13 19 109200 3600 4.60E-03 5.81E-01 3.05E-04 6.73E-05 1.32E-07 5.03E-05 7.27E-06 7.59E-08 1.68E-05 2.53E-12 2.33E-12 20 112800 3600 4.08E-03 6.20E-01 2.39E-04 4.03E-05 1.06E-07 2.55E-05 2.95E-06 2.41E-08 1.06E-05 7.82E-13 7.70E-13 21 116400 3600 3.82E-03 5.57E-01 9.34E-05 7.65E-05 6.71E-08 6.96E-05 1.45E-06 1.41E-08 8.91E-06 4.22E-13 4.28E-13 22 120000 3600 7.33E-03 5.10E-01 7.36E-05 2.13E-04 1.87E-07 2.58E-04 5.57E-06 5.45E-08 4.96E-05 1.66E-12 1.69E-12 Off-site Consequence Calculation 23 123600 3600 1.22E-02 4.59E-01 2.28E-05 6.72E-04 1.13E-06 9.88E-04 8.21E-05 4.59E-07 1.60E-04 1.53E-11 1.55E-11 24 127200 3600 1.37E-02 4.28E-01 5.90E-06 7.82E-04 1.33E-06 1.27E-03 1.42E-04 6.69E-07 1.82E-04 2.26E-11 2.29E-11 25 130800 3600 1.39E-02 4.19E-01 1.85E-06 7.89E-04 6.85E-07 1.22E-03 1.45E-04 5.62E-07 1.80E-04 1.87E-11 1.90E-11 26 134400 3600 1.40E-02 4.18E-01 8.34E-07 7.27E-04 1.76E-07 1.08E-03 1.69E-04 2.80E-07 1.61E-04 1.02E-11 1.03E-11 27 138000 3600 1.41E-02 4.14E-01 2.98E-07 7.26E-04 9.46E-07 8.20E-04 1.71E-04 1.01E-06 1.78E-04 3.31E-11 3.36E-11 Revision 4.1 28 141600 3600 1.58E-02 4.11E-01 1.19E-07 6.07E-04 6.02E-07 7.77E-04 2.78E-04 6.53E-07 1.37E-04 2.16E-11 2.19E-11 29 145200 3600 1.44E-02 4.10E-01 0.00E+00 1.77E-04 2.78E-08 3.79E-04 3.18E-04 2.47E-08 2.50E-05 8.19E-13 8.32E-13 30 148800 3600 1.10E-02 4.23E-01 0.00E+00 6.53E-05 5.03E-08 1.04E-04 2.12E-04 3.10E-08 4.89E-06 8.92E-13 9.06E-13
Table B-18: Release Category 5 Hourly Release Information (Continued)
Part 3 Applicants Environmental Report -
Release Plume Plume Chemical Group (fraction of initial core inventory)
Plume Start of Density Duration Flow Rate Segment Release (s) Xe Cs Ba I Te Ru Mo Ce La (s) (kg/s) (kg/m3) 31 152400 3600 6.62E-03 4.58E-01 0.00E+00 3.71E-05 2.03E-08 4.64E-05 2.23E-04 1.31E-08 5.31E-06 3.73E-13 3.79E-13 32 156000 3600 2.12E-03 5.22E-01 1.79E-07 3.07E-06 5.82E-10 4.38E-06 8.44E-05 3.78E-10 7.45E-08 1.04E-14 1.07E-14 33 159600 3600 1.49E-03 7.39E-01 1.07E-04 2.16E-07 6.98E-10 1.71E-06 3.74E-07 1.46E-10 1.21E-08 4.22E-15 4.00E-15 Standard Design Certification 34 163200 3600 4.22E-03 5.19E-01 3.34E-05 3.96E-05 1.16E-06 4.54E-05 1.90E-07 5.38E-10 2.24E-08 1.53E-14 1.60E-14 35 166800 3600 3.96E-03 5.20E-01 7.51E-06 5.71E-06 6.54E-07 1.25E-05 5.59E-08 1.46E-11 9.31E-10 4.44E-16 0.00E+00 36 170400 3600 9.29E-04 5.43E-01 2.56E-06 2.73E-06 4.66E-10 1.95E-06 1.30E-08 0.00E+00 9.31E-10 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 37 174000 3600 2.28E-02 5.54E-01 1.25E-04 9.93E-06 1.98E-09 1.50E-05 6.33E-08 8.73E-11 4.19E-08 2.00E-15 2.22E-15 38 177600 3600 4.46E-04 5.04E-01 2.62E-06 1.68E-07 1.16E-10 1.42E-07 7.45E-09 0.00E+00 9.31E-10 2.22E-16 4.44E-16 39 181200 3600 5.92E-03 5.98E-01 2.05E-04 1.69E-06 6.98E-10 4.11E-06 1.86E-08 5.82E-11 1.68E-08 1.33E-15 1.33E-15 40 184800 3600 1.02E-02 5.06E-01 6.04E-05 2.85E-06 0.00E+00 4.59E-06 9.31E-09 0.00E+00 2.61E-08 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 41 188400 3600 2.38E-03 5.40E-01 2.92E-06 2.98E-07 0.00E+00 5.18E-07 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 9.31E-10 2.22E-16 0.00E+00 42 195600 3600 6.48E-04 8.28E-01 3.62E-05 3.73E-09 1.16E-10 3.84E-07 1.86E-09 1.46E-11 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 4.44E-16 43 199200 3600 8.51E-03 5.17E-01 1.56E-04 2.65E-07 0.00E+00 2.69E-06 1.86E-09 0.00E+00 4.28E-08 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 B-33 44 202800 3600 5.86E-04 5.45E-01 7.33E-06 1.12E-08 0.00E+00 1.08E-07 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 9.31E-10 2.22E-16 0.00E+00 45 206400 3600 8.47E-04 7.91E-01 4.01E-05 3.73E-09 1.16E-10 3.99E-07 1.86E-09 2.91E-11 9.31E-10 2.22E-16 4.44E-16 46 210000 3600 2.60E-03 6.45E-01 4.27E-05 2.98E-08 4.66E-10 5.33E-07 1.12E-08 5.82E-11 3.73E-09 1.33E-15 1.11E-15 47 213600 3600 2.45E-03 6.12E-01 1.65E-05 3.73E-09 1.16E-10 1.71E-07 1.86E-09 1.46E-11 9.31E-10 2.22E-16 2.22E-16 48 217200 3600 3.76E-04 6.03E-01 2.38E-06 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 2.61E-08 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 49 220800 3600 3.23E-03 6.14E-01 7.46E-05 1.01E-07 5.82E-10 7.45E-07 1.30E-08 5.82E-11 2.70E-08 1.55E-15 1.33E-15 50 224400 3600 3.09E-03 5.54E-01 1.58E-05 7.08E-08 0.00E+00 1.68E-07 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 2.05E-08 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 51 228000 3600 1.80E-03 5.68E-01 8.40E-06 3.73E-09 0.00E+00 8.57E-08 1.86E-09 1.46E-11 9.31E-10 2.22E-16 4.44E-16 52 231600 3600 6.09E-04 5.90E-01 4.35E-06 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 4.10E-08 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 Off-site Consequence Calculation 53 235200 3600 1.29E-03 7.04E-01 4.84E-05 3.58E-07 3.49E-10 4.77E-07 7.45E-09 4.37E-11 1.04E-07 8.88E-16 6.66E-16 54 238800 3600 8.23E-04 8.05E-01 4.74E-05 1.49E-08 1.16E-10 4.69E-07 1.86E-09 1.46E-11 3.73E-09 4.44E-16 4.44E-16 55 242400 3600 9.73E-03 6.53E-01 1.60E-04 2.12E-07 6.98E-10 4.91E-06 1.68E-08 7.28E-11 6.24E-08 1.78E-15 2.00E-15 56 246000 3600 1.08E-03 6.54E-01 4.79E-05 1.12E-08 2.33E-10 5.96E-07 5.59E-09 4.37E-11 1.86E-09 6.66E-16 6.66E-16 57 249600 3600 9.95E-04 7.04E-01 4.43E-05 5.22E-08 2.33E-10 5.33E-07 3.73E-09 1.46E-11 1.40E-08 6.66E-16 6.66E-16 58 253200 3600 1.18E-03 8.00E-01 1.19E-04 2.61E-08 2.33E-10 1.44E-06 5.59E-09 4.37E-11 7.45E-09 6.66E-16 4.44E-16 Revision 4.1 59 256800 2400 1.63E-03 7.35E-01 1.76E-04 1.12E-08 2.33E-10 2.34E-06 1.86E-09 1.46E-11 1.86E-09 4.44E-16 8.88E-16 Total 44340 211260 - - 5.63E-01 3.76E-02 1.39E-03 3.50E-02 2.81E-02 1.47E-04 8.14E-03 3.26E-09 3.28E-09
Applicants Environmental Report -
Standard Design Certification Off-site Consequence Calculation B.2.6 Release Category 6: General Transient With RSV Stuck Open The sixth RC consists of general transients where an RSV is demanded and subsequently sticks open, with the failure of ECCS and CVCS injection (when available). DHRS success does not always preclude core damage; therefore, sequences that contain DHRS success and sequences that contain DHRS failure are both considered in this RC. The PRA sequences that contribute to RC 6 are shown in Table B-19. RC 6 is an intact containment scenario.
The conservative release sequence for this RC is a transient where pressure builds in the RPV until an RSV is demanded to relieve primary system pressure. The RSV sticks open, followed by incomplete actuation of ECCS with the RVVs opening and a failure of all other mitigating systems, which produces a scenario where reactor coolant is lost to containment through the RVVs and coolant is not available either through RRV recirculation or through CVCS injection.
The core is uncovered and unable to be cooled, leading to core support failure and core relocation to the RPV lower plenum. Radionuclides released from the core relocate to the CNV, where the majority of aerosols deposit in the reactor coolant present in the CNV and on the CNV walls. In the MELCOR simulations, the CNV is modeled as sealed with no leakage.
Therefore, the radionuclide release to the environment is calculated separately based on the fraction of the core inventory airborne in containment and the design basis containment leak rate of 0.2 weight percent per day (see FSAR Table 6.5-1).
The plume release information for RC 6 that was used as input for MACCS simulations is shown in Table B-20. As a result of modeling the CNV as sealed, assumptions relating to the particle size distribution and plume buoyancy are required inputs to MACCS. The particle size distribution for RC 6 was assumed to be the same as the particle size distribution for RC 3 (see Table B-11). RC 3 is a containment bypass accident, and the particle size distribution of a containment bypass accident is expected to cause increased deposition in the environment as compared to the actual particle size distribution for an intact containment sequence. The plume buoyancy is simulated using the heat model with an assumed plume heat content of zero watts for each plume segment. The result of this assumption is that the plume does not rise upon release, which maximizes the ground level radionuclide concentrations. Sensitivity studies evaluating the impact of the aerosol deposition in the CNV predicted by MELCOR, the assumed particle size distribution, and the non-buoyant plume are discussed in Section B.3.
Part 3 B-34 Revision 4.1
Applicants Environmental Report -
Standard Design Certification Off-site Consequence Calculation Table B-19: PRA Sequences that Contribute Significantly to Release Category 6 Event Tree Sequence Description FSAR Reference Reactor trip, DHRS success, RSV opens, RSV stays open, 1-5 ECCS fails, CVCS injection fails CTG fails, Reactor trip, DHRS success, RSV opens, RSV stays EHVS--LOOP-----ET 2-5 Figure 19.1-9 open, ECCS fails, CVCS injection fails CTG fails, BDG fails, Reactor trip, DHRS success, RSV opens, 10 RSV stays open, ECCS fails Reactor trip, DHRS success, RSV opens, RSV stays open, 5
ECCS fails, CVCS injection fails TRN---TRAN--NPC-ET Figure 19.1-11 Reactor trip, DHRS fails, RSV opens, RSV stays open, ECCS 9
fails, CVCS injection fails Reactor trip, DHRS success, RSV opens, RSV stays open, TGS---TRAN--NSS-ET 4 Figure 19.1-12 ECCS fails Part 3 B-35 Revision 4.1
Part 3 Applicants Environmental Report -
Table B-20: Release Category 6 Hourly Release Information Plume Start of Release Plume Heat Chemical Group (fraction of initial core inventory)
Segment Release (s) Duration (s) Content (W) Xe Cs Ba I Te Ru Mo Ce La 1 36600 3600 0 2.42E-06 2.99E-07 3.68E-08 2.45E-07 2.55E-07 1.00E-10 3.29E-08 5.00E-15 5.00E-15 2 40200 3600 0 1.04E-05 4.74E-07 3.44E-09 2.93E-07 2.84E-07 1.38E-09 1.30E-07 2.56E-14 2.56E-14 3 43800 3600 0 2.57E-05 4.18E-07 5.82E-10 2.22E-07 2.92E-07 2.93E-09 1.18E-07 5.38E-14 5.39E-14 Standard Design Certification 4 47400 3600 0 2.89E-05 5.04E-08 1.99E-10 1.71E-07 4.92E-08 6.16E-10 1.11E-08 1.43E-14 1.44E-14 5 51000 3600 0 2.99E-05 4.52E-08 1.07E-09 8.48E-08 1.45E-07 6.27E-10 1.11E-08 1.65E-14 1.64E-14 6 54600 3600 0 3.10E-05 4.19E-08 3.20E-10 5.82E-08 4.87E-08 2.80E-10 1.09E-08 1.25E-14 1.25E-14 7 58200 3600 0 3.19E-05 3.47E-08 1.73E-10 3.87E-08 2.34E-08 1.71E-10 9.28E-09 9.00E-15 9.03E-15 8 61800 3600 0 3.38E-05 6.04E-08 2.73E-10 9.64E-08 4.61E-08 2.19E-10 1.46E-08 1.86E-14 1.87E-14 9 65400 3600 0 3.61E-05 7.74E-09 1.52E-10 1.51E-08 3.08E-08 1.85E-13 1.82E-09 2.55E-16 2.55E-16 10 69000 3600 0 3.58E-05 1.83E-08 5.60E-10 5.04E-08 4.81E-08 1.37E-13 4.00E-09 4.70E-16 4.70E-16 11 72600 3600 0 3.45E-05 1.78E-08 3.55E-10 1.09E-07 1.70E-08 8.12E-14 2.86E-09 3.23E-16 3.22E-16 12 76200 3600 0 3.40E-05 7.82E-09 9.53E-11 6.23E-08 6.38E-09 4.20E-14 9.31E-10 1.00E-16 9.95E-17 13 79800 3600 0 3.41E-05 2.30E-09 2.40E-11 1.88E-08 1.78E-09 3.24E-14 2.64E-10 2.91E-17 2.87E-17 B-36 14 83400 3600 0 3.44E-05 7.09E-10 6.39E-12 7.12E-09 5.13E-10 2.33E-14 7.89E-11 8.93E-18 8.71E-18 15 87000 3600 0 3.44E-05 2.24E-10 1.80E-12 3.95E-09 1.62E-10 1.20E-14 2.41E-11 2.72E-18 2.64E-18 16 90600 3600 0 3.43E-05 8.06E-11 5.42E-13 3.06E-09 5.69E-11 5.20E-15 7.77E-12 8.74E-19 8.42E-19 17 94200 3600 0 3.42E-05 3.05E-11 1.66E-13 2.77E-09 2.02E-11 1.96E-15 2.49E-12 2.78E-19 2.67E-19 18 97800 3600 0 3.39E-05 1.33E-11 5.36E-14 2.66E-09 7.67E-12 7.52E-16 8.43E-13 9.36E-20 8.93E-20 19 101400 3600 0 3.39E-05 5.85E-12 1.78E-14 2.63E-09 2.83E-12 2.78E-16 2.95E-13 3.18E-20 3.03E-20 20 105000 3600 0 3.38E-05 3.35E-12 6.54E-15 2.61E-09 1.19E-12 1.14E-16 1.22E-13 1.19E-20 1.09E-20 21 108600 3600 0 3.37E-05 2.46E-12 2.80E-15 2.60E-09 5.87E-13 5.39E-17 6.83E-14 4.95E-21 4.09E-21 22 112200 3600 0 3.41E-05 1.15E-11 1.27E-14 2.65E-09 3.01E-12 6.21E-17 1.29E-12 4.86E-21 3.91E-21 Off-site Consequence Calculation 23 115800 3600 0 3.40E-05 1.80E-11 2.22E-14 2.66E-09 5.35E-12 5.69E-17 2.47E-12 4.15E-21 3.36E-21 24 119400 3600 0 3.38E-05 1.50E-11 1.92E-14 2.66E-09 5.19E-12 2.00E-17 2.24E-12 5.26E-21 4.68E-21 25 123000 3600 0 3.36E-05 1.03E-11 1.31E-14 2.64E-09 3.93E-12 7.34E-18 1.57E-12 1.66E-19 1.65E-19 26 126600 3600 0 3.35E-05 1.02E-11 1.33E-14 2.64E-09 4.67E-12 4.06E-18 1.64E-12 5.68E-19 5.68E-19 27 130200 3600 0 3.35E-05 1.27E-11 1.75E-14 2.63E-09 6.81E-12 4.00E-18 2.20E-12 1.05E-18 1.05E-18 Revision 4.1 28 133800 3600 0 3.34E-05 1.53E-11 2.20E-14 2.63E-09 8.93E-12 4.85E-18 2.78E-12 1.45E-18 1.45E-18 29 137400 3600 0 3.33E-05 1.70E-11 2.46E-14 2.63E-09 1.01E-11 5.55E-18 3.10E-12 1.69E-18 1.69E-18 30 141000 3600 0 3.33E-05 1.93E-11 2.67E-14 2.63E-09 1.11E-11 6.18E-18 3.35E-12 1.89E-18 1.89E-18 31 144600 3600 0 3.31E-05 4.68E-11 5.54E-14 2.64E-09 2.31E-11 1.28E-17 6.82E-12 3.97E-18 3.97E-18
Table B-20: Release Category 6 Hourly Release Information (Continued)
Part 3 Applicants Environmental Report -
Plume Start of Release Plume Heat Chemical Group (fraction of initial core inventory)
Segment Release (s) Duration (s) Content (W) Xe Cs Ba I Te Ru Mo Ce La 32 148200 3600 0 3.30E-05 9.13E-11 9.73E-14 2.67E-09 4.14E-11 2.12E-17 1.18E-11 6.59E-18 6.59E-18 33 151800 3600 0 3.29E-05 1.24E-10 1.23E-13 2.69E-09 5.32E-11 2.56E-17 1.48E-11 7.80E-18 7.80E-18 34 155400 3600 0 3.28E-05 1.49E-10 1.33E-13 2.71E-09 5.82E-11 2.77E-17 1.57E-11 8.29E-18 8.29E-18 35 159000 3600 0 3.27E-05 1.46E-10 1.12E-13 2.70E-09 4.87E-11 2.36E-17 1.27E-11 7.08E-18 7.08E-18 Standard Design Certification 36 162600 3600 0 3.26E-05 1.49E-10 8.85E-14 2.70E-09 3.81E-11 1.90E-17 9.09E-12 5.83E-18 5.83E-18 37 166200 3600 0 3.25E-05 1.48E-10 7.04E-14 2.69E-09 3.02E-11 1.51E-17 6.37E-12 4.78E-18 4.78E-18 38 169800 3600 0 3.24E-05 1.32E-10 5.53E-14 2.67E-09 2.38E-11 1.06E-17 4.65E-12 3.44E-18 3.44E-18 39 173400 3600 0 3.23E-05 1.66E-10 5.75E-14 2.73E-09 7.21E-12 3.05E-14 2.61E-11 1.03E-18 1.03E-18 40 177000 3600 0 3.23E-05 1.58E-10 2.62E-14 2.73E-09 1.56E-12 1.69E-14 3.34E-11 2.93E-19 2.91E-19 41 180600 3600 0 3.22E-05 1.31E-10 2.06E-14 2.70E-09 1.28E-12 1.32E-14 2.95E-11 2.27E-19 2.26E-19 42 184200 3600 0 3.22E-05 1.09E-10 1.66E-14 2.67E-09 1.11E-12 1.05E-14 2.50E-11 1.81E-19 1.79E-19 43 187800 3600 0 3.21E-05 9.03E-11 1.36E-14 2.65E-09 9.83E-13 8.49E-15 2.09E-11 1.46E-19 1.44E-19 44 191400 3600 0 3.21E-05 7.53E-11 1.13E-14 2.64E-09 8.92E-13 6.94E-15 1.74E-11 1.19E-19 1.18E-19 45 195000 3600 0 3.20E-05 6.31E-11 9.43E-15 2.62E-09 8.19E-13 5.71E-15 1.45E-11 9.78E-20 9.69E-20 B-37 46 198600 3600 0 3.20E-05 5.30E-11 7.91E-15 2.61E-09 7.51E-13 4.71E-15 1.20E-11 8.04E-20 7.98E-20 47 202200 3600 0 3.20E-05 4.43E-11 6.63E-15 2.60E-09 6.85E-13 3.87E-15 9.91E-12 6.60E-20 6.55E-20 48 205800 3600 0 3.19E-05 3.70E-11 5.54E-15 2.59E-09 6.20E-13 3.17E-15 8.15E-12 5.41E-20 5.37E-20 49 209400 3600 0 3.19E-05 3.30E-11 4.93E-15 2.59E-09 6.07E-13 2.76E-15 7.10E-12 4.71E-20 4.67E-20 50 213000 3600 0 3.19E-05 3.04E-11 4.51E-15 2.59E-09 6.34E-13 2.44E-15 6.27E-12 4.16E-20 4.12E-20 51 216600 3600 0 3.19E-05 2.54E-11 3.75E-15 2.59E-09 5.87E-13 1.97E-15 5.04E-12 3.35E-20 3.32E-20 52 220200 3600 0 3.19E-05 2.08E-11 3.06E-15 2.58E-09 5.19E-13 1.56E-15 4.00E-12 2.66E-20 2.64E-20 53 223800 3600 0 3.19E-05 1.71E-11 2.50E-15 2.58E-09 4.53E-13 1.26E-15 3.20E-12 2.14E-20 2.12E-20 54 227400 3600 0 3.19E-05 1.41E-11 2.06E-15 2.57E-09 3.92E-13 1.02E-15 2.58E-12 1.73E-20 1.72E-20 Off-site Consequence Calculation 55 231000 3600 0 3.18E-05 1.17E-11 1.70E-15 2.57E-09 3.36E-13 8.28E-16 2.09E-12 1.41E-20 1.40E-20 56 234600 3600 0 3.18E-05 9.70E-12 1.41E-15 2.56E-09 2.87E-13 6.78E-16 1.71E-12 1.16E-20 1.13E-20 57 238200 3600 0 3.18E-05 8.11E-12 1.17E-15 2.55E-09 2.46E-13 5.62E-16 1.41E-12 9.58E-21 8.92E-21 58 241800 3600 0 3.18E-05 6.81E-12 9.86E-16 2.55E-09 2.12E-13 4.69E-16 1.17E-12 7.96E-21 7.18E-21 59 245400 3600 0 3.17E-05 5.74E-12 8.32E-16 2.55E-09 1.83E-13 3.93E-16 9.77E-13 6.48E-21 5.96E-21 60 249000 3600 0 3.17E-05 4.86E-12 7.05E-16 2.54E-09 1.58E-13 3.32E-16 8.22E-13 5.30E-21 5.03E-21 Revision 4.1 61 252600 3600 0 3.17E-05 4.13E-12 6.00E-16 2.54E-09 1.38E-13 2.80E-16 6.94E-13 4.43E-21 4.29E-21 62 256200 3600 0 3.17E-05 3.53E-12 5.13E-16 2.54E-09 1.20E-13 2.39E-16 5.91E-13 3.77E-21 3.69E-21
Table B-20: Release Category 6 Hourly Release Information (Continued)
Part 3 Applicants Environmental Report -
Plume Start of Release Plume Heat Chemical Group (fraction of initial core inventory)
Segment Release (s) Duration (s) Content (W) Xe Cs Ba I Te Ru Mo Ce La 63-96 259800 3600 0 3.17E-05 3.36E-12 4.88E-16 2.54E-09 1.15E-13 2.27E-16 5.61E-13 3.58E-21 3.51E-21 Total 36600 345600 0 3.05E-03 1.48E-06 4.40E-08 1.69E-06 1.25E-06 6.32E-09 3.47E-07 1.57E-13 1.57E-13 Standard Design Certification B-38 Off-site Consequence Calculation Revision 4.1
Applicants Environmental Report -
Standard Design Certification Off-site Consequence Calculation B.2.7 Release Category 7: General Transient With No RSVs The seventh RC consists of general transients where an RSV is demanded and subsequently fails to open. In scenarios where the DHRS or CFDS could mitigate core damage, these systems are assumed to be unavailable. The PRA sequences that contribute to RC 7 are shown in Table B-21. RC 7 is an intact containment scenario.
The conservative release sequence for this release category is a general transient where the RSVs fail to open, leading to RPV overpressure failure at the pressurizer heater inspection port.
The containment remains intact. The DHRS and CFDS fail to operate. The ECCS partially actuates upon high CNV level, with the RVVs opening. Due to incomplete ECCS actuation, reactor coolant completely relocates to the CNV and is unable to recirculate to the RPV. The core is uncovered and unable to be cooled, leading to core support failure and core relocation to the RPV lower plenum. Radionuclides released from the core relocate to the CNV, where the majority of aerosols deposit in the reactor coolant present in the CNV and on the CNV walls. In the MELCOR simulations, the CNV is modeled as sealed with no leakage. Therefore, the radionuclide release to the environment is calculated separately based on the fraction of the core inventory airborne in containment and the design basis containment leak rate of 0.2 weight percent per day (see FSAR Table 6.5-1).
The plume release information for RC 7 that is used as input for MACCS simulations is shown in Table B-22. As a result of modeling the CNV as sealed, assumptions relating to the particle size distribution and plume buoyancy are required inputs to MACCS. The particle size distribution for RC 7 is assumed to be the same as the particle size distribution for RC 3 (see Table B-11).
RC 3 is a containment bypass accident, and the particle size distribution of a containment bypass accident is expected to cause increased deposition in the environment as compared to the actual particle size distribution for an intact containment sequence. The plume buoyancy is simulated using the heat model with an assumed plume heat content of zero watts for each plume segment. The result of this assumption is that the plume does not rise upon release, which maximizes the ground level radionuclide concentrations. Sensitivity studies evaluating the impact of the aerosol deposition in the CNV predicted by MELCOR, the assumed particle size distribution, and the non-buoyant plume are discussed in Section B.3.
Part 3 B-39 Revision 4.1
Applicants Environmental Report -
Standard Design Certification Off-site Consequence Calculation Table B-21: PRA Sequences that Contribute Significantly to Release Category 7 Event Tree Sequence Description FSAR Reference CTG fails, ATWS, DHRS success, RSVs fail to open, CVCS 2-17 injection fails EHVS--LOOP-----ET CTG fails, BDG fails, Reactor trip, DHRS fails, RSVs fail to Figure 19.1-9 16 open 22 CTG fails, BDG fails, ATWS, RSVs fail to open 11 Reactor trip, DHRS fails, RSVs fail to open, CFDS fails ATWS, DHRS success, RSV fail to open, CVCS injection TGS---TRAN--NPC-ET 17 Figure 19.1-11 fails 22 ATWS, DHRS fails, RSVs fail to open 8 Reactor trip, DHRS fails, RSVs fail to open TGS---TRAN--NSS-ET Figure 19.1-12 12 ATWS, DHRS fails, RSVs fail to open Part 3 B-40 Revision 4.1
Part 3 Applicants Environmental Report -
Table B-22: Release Category 7 Hourly Release Information Plume Start of Release Plume Heat Chemical Group (fraction of initial core inventory)
Segment Release (s) Duration (s) Content (W) Xe Cs Ba I Te Ru Mo Ce La 1 26160 3600 0 2.92E-06 3.48E-07 4.89E-08 3.03E-07 3.16E-07 8.90E-11 3.22E-08 5.10E-15 5.09E-15 2 29760 3600 0 1.75E-05 1.46E-06 7.18E-09 8.53E-07 9.17E-07 4.90E-09 4.04E-07 9.22E-14 9.22E-14 3 33360 3600 0 2.48E-05 9.55E-08 1.09E-10 7.62E-08 4.93E-08 7.24E-10 2.51E-08 1.79E-14 1.79E-14 Standard Design Certification 4 36960 3600 0 2.66E-05 7.74E-08 2.97E-10 1.83E-07 7.65E-08 7.19E-10 1.88E-08 1.71E-14 1.72E-14 5 40560 3600 0 2.85E-05 6.43E-08 8.25E-10 7.88E-08 1.17E-07 5.92E-10 1.70E-08 1.42E-14 1.42E-14 6 44160 3600 0 3.16E-05 1.38E-07 5.60E-10 1.67E-07 1.04E-07 1.08E-09 3.53E-08 3.00E-14 3.00E-14 7 47760 3600 0 3.46E-05 2.62E-08 1.04E-09 4.36E-08 7.27E-08 2.96E-12 5.57E-09 1.36E-15 1.38E-15 8 51360 3600 0 3.39E-05 1.70E-08 5.58E-10 2.20E-08 4.38E-08 7.34E-13 3.56E-09 7.10E-16 7.17E-16 9 54960 3600 0 3.37E-05 6.33E-09 1.73E-10 1.00E-08 1.43E-08 1.95E-13 1.18E-09 2.21E-16 2.22E-16 10 58560 3600 0 3.37E-05 2.09E-09 4.54E-11 4.46E-09 3.94E-09 7.98E-14 3.42E-10 6.12E-17 6.14E-17 11 62160 3600 0 3.35E-05 7.45E-10 1.25E-11 2.75E-09 1.19E-09 4.80E-14 1.02E-10 1.76E-17 1.75E-17 12 65760 3600 0 3.33E-05 2.91E-10 3.59E-12 2.15E-09 3.80E-10 2.13E-14 3.11E-11 5.19E-18 5.11E-18 13 69360 3600 0 3.31E-05 1.86E-10 1.05E-12 1.93E-09 1.26E-10 8.27E-15 9.50E-12 1.54E-18 1.51E-18 B-41 14 72960 3600 0 3.29E-05 1.74E-10 3.14E-13 1.85E-09 4.35E-11 3.08E-15 2.98E-12 4.70E-19 4.58E-19 15 76560 3600 0 3.26E-05 1.11E-10 1.01E-13 1.78E-09 1.60E-11 1.19E-15 1.00E-12 1.54E-19 1.50E-19 16 80160 3600 0 3.25E-05 4.63E-11 3.91E-14 1.74E-09 7.14E-12 5.54E-16 4.05E-13 6.05E-20 5.85E-20 17 83760 3840 0 3.45E-05 2.40E-11 1.69E-14 1.83E-09 3.51E-12 2.70E-16 1.81E-13 2.65E-20 2.53E-20 18 87600 3600 0 3.22E-05 1.30E-11 6.36E-15 1.71E-09 1.43E-12 1.08E-16 6.94E-14 9.87E-21 9.00E-21 19 91200 3600 0 3.21E-05 9.28E-12 2.96E-15 1.70E-09 6.97E-13 5.23E-17 3.26E-14 4.39E-21 4.05E-21 20 94800 3600 0 3.20E-05 7.20E-12 1.48E-15 1.69E-09 3.60E-13 2.68E-17 1.64E-14 2.19E-21 2.04E-21 21 98400 3600 0 3.19E-05 5.78E-12 7.86E-16 1.68E-09 1.95E-13 1.44E-17 8.72E-15 1.14E-21 1.05E-21 22 102000 3600 0 3.18E-05 6.96E-12 5.38E-16 1.68E-09 1.40E-13 9.91E-18 5.96E-15 7.49E-22 3.82E-22 Off-site Consequence Calculation 23 105600 3600 0 3.19E-05 1.35E-11 4.88E-16 1.69E-09 1.61E-13 9.02E-18 5.39E-15 7.15E-22 1.85E-22 24 109200 3600 0 3.18E-05 1.90E-11 3.30E-16 1.69E-09 1.58E-13 6.11E-18 3.63E-15 4.90E-22 1.14E-23 25 112800 3600 0 3.18E-05 2.35E-11 1.93E-16 1.70E-09 1.44E-13 3.57E-18 2.09E-15 2.70E-22 5.38E-25 26 116400 3600 0 3.17E-05 2.81E-11 1.04E-16 1.70E-09 1.29E-13 1.93E-18 1.12E-15 6.38E-23 9.32E-28 27 120000 3600 0 3.16E-05 4.33E-11 5.73E-17 1.71E-09 1.41E-13 1.06E-18 6.07E-16 1.98E-23 1.52E-28 28 123600 3600 0 3.18E-05 2.15E-10 3.23E-17 1.87E-09 4.12E-13 5.92E-19 3.46E-16 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 Revision 4.1 29 127200 3600 0 3.13E-05 1.41E-10 1.07E-17 1.79E-09 2.46E-13 1.95E-19 1.16E-16 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 30 130800 3600 0 3.12E-05 1.34E-10 3.67E-18 1.77E-09 2.16E-13 6.59E-20 4.14E-17 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 31 134400 3600 0 3.11E-05 2.09E-10 1.28E-18 1.83E-09 3.83E-13 2.21E-20 2.09E-17 0.00E+00 0.00E+00
Table B-22: Release Category 7 Hourly Release Information (Continued)
Part 3 Applicants Environmental Report -
Plume Start of Release Plume Heat Chemical Group (fraction of initial core inventory)
Segment Release (s) Duration (s) Content (W) Xe Cs Ba I Te Ru Mo Ce La 32 138000 3600 0 3.09E-05 3.22E-10 4.20E-19 1.95E-09 7.35E-13 6.46E-21 2.59E-17 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 33 141600 3600 0 3.07E-05 3.08E-10 1.27E-19 2.09E-09 1.15E-12 1.04E-21 3.09E-17 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 34 145200 3600 0 3.06E-05 2.01E-10 3.65E-20 2.19E-09 1.55E-12 7.77E-23 3.23E-17 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 35 148800 3600 0 3.05E-05 1.06E-10 9.86E-21 2.29E-09 1.99E-12 0.00E+00 3.43E-17 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 Standard Design Certification 36 152400 3600 0 3.04E-05 7.61E-11 2.10E-21 2.40E-09 2.48E-12 0.00E+00 3.51E-17 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 37 156000 3600 0 3.03E-05 7.41E-11 3.45E-22 2.54E-09 3.10E-12 0.00E+00 3.75E-17 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 38 159600 3600 0 3.03E-05 6.38E-11 0.00E+00 2.46E-09 2.93E-12 0.00E+00 3.26E-17 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 39 163200 3600 0 3.02E-05 5.73E-11 0.00E+00 2.39E-09 2.80E-12 0.00E+00 2.95E-17 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 40 166800 3600 0 3.02E-05 5.97E-11 0.00E+00 2.43E-09 3.08E-12 0.00E+00 3.10E-17 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 41 170400 3600 0 3.01E-05 6.01E-11 0.00E+00 2.44E-09 3.21E-12 0.00E+00 3.15E-17 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 42 174000 3600 0 3.01E-05 6.01E-11 0.00E+00 2.45E-09 3.27E-12 0.00E+00 3.19E-17 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 43 177600 3600 0 3.00E-05 6.24E-11 0.00E+00 2.48E-09 3.44E-12 0.00E+00 3.35E-17 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 44 181200 3600 0 3.00E-05 6.49E-11 5.51E-15 2.43E-09 2.02E-12 3.87E-15 1.08E-12 2.38E-20 2.38E-20 45 184800 3600 0 2.99E-05 5.41E-11 8.25E-15 2.12E-09 7.95E-13 5.79E-15 3.12E-12 3.57E-20 3.56E-20 B-42 46 188400 3600 0 2.98E-05 3.94E-11 6.90E-15 1.92E-09 6.01E-13 4.84E-15 3.00E-12 2.98E-20 2.97E-20 47 192000 3600 0 2.98E-05 2.75E-11 5.11E-15 1.81E-09 4.35E-13 3.59E-15 2.33E-12 2.21E-20 2.20E-20 48 195600 3600 0 2.97E-05 1.89E-11 3.63E-15 1.74E-09 3.13E-13 2.55E-15 1.70E-12 1.57E-20 1.56E-20 49 199200 3600 0 2.97E-05 1.30E-11 2.55E-15 1.69E-09 2.26E-13 1.79E-15 1.21E-12 1.10E-20 1.10E-20 50 202800 3600 0 2.96E-05 9.08E-12 1.79E-15 1.67E-09 1.66E-13 1.25E-15 8.53E-13 7.69E-21 7.68E-21 51 206400 3600 0 2.96E-05 6.42E-12 1.26E-15 1.65E-09 1.24E-13 8.86E-16 6.06E-13 5.43E-21 5.43E-21 52 210000 3600 0 2.96E-05 4.61E-12 9.05E-16 1.64E-09 9.52E-14 6.35E-16 4.36E-13 3.88E-21 3.88E-21 53 213600 3600 0 2.96E-05 3.36E-12 6.55E-16 1.63E-09 7.47E-14 4.59E-16 3.16E-13 2.81E-21 2.80E-21 54 217200 3600 0 2.95E-05 2.49E-12 4.80E-16 1.62E-09 6.00E-14 3.37E-16 2.33E-13 2.05E-21 2.05E-21 Off-site Consequence Calculation 55 220800 3600 0 2.95E-05 1.87E-12 3.56E-16 1.62E-09 4.94E-14 2.50E-16 1.73E-13 1.52E-21 1.51E-21 56 224400 3600 0 2.95E-05 1.42E-12 2.66E-16 1.62E-09 4.16E-14 1.87E-16 1.31E-13 1.13E-21 8.08E-22 57 228000 3600 0 2.95E-05 1.10E-12 2.01E-16 1.61E-09 3.59E-14 1.41E-16 9.97E-14 8.54E-22 3.84E-22 58 231600 3600 0 2.95E-05 8.57E-13 1.53E-16 1.61E-09 3.15E-14 1.07E-16 7.68E-14 5.75E-22 2.52E-22 59 235200 3600 0 2.95E-05 6.76E-13 1.17E-16 1.61E-09 2.82E-14 8.21E-17 5.97E-14 2.69E-22 1.89E-22 60 238800 3600 0 2.94E-05 5.38E-13 8.99E-17 1.61E-09 2.55E-14 6.31E-17 4.68E-14 1.64E-22 1.48E-22 Revision 4.1 61 242400 3600 0 2.94E-05 4.32E-13 6.93E-17 1.61E-09 2.35E-14 4.86E-17 3.71E-14 1.21E-22 1.17E-22 62 246000 3600 0 2.94E-05 4.03E-13 5.88E-17 1.60E-09 3.57E-14 4.13E-17 3.28E-14 1.10E-22 1.03E-22 63 249600 3600 0 2.94E-05 3.83E-13 4.68E-17 1.60E-09 5.89E-14 3.28E-17 2.80E-14 9.73E-23 9.02E-23
Table B-22: Release Category 7 Hourly Release Information (Continued)
Part 3 Applicants Environmental Report -
Plume Start of Release Plume Heat Chemical Group (fraction of initial core inventory)
Segment Release (s) Duration (s) Content (W) Xe Cs Ba I Te Ru Mo Ce La 64 253200 3600 0 2.94E-05 3.22E-13 3.37E-17 1.60E-09 5.89E-14 2.36E-17 2.20E-14 7.79E-23 6.50E-23 65 256800 3600 0 2.94E-05 2.68E-13 2.47E-17 1.60E-09 5.25E-14 1.73E-17 1.76E-14 6.07E-23 4.31E-23 66-96 260400 3600 0 2.94E-05 2.58E-13 2.31E-17 1.60E-09 5.09E-14 1.62E-17 1.67E-14 5.74E-23 3.91E-23 Total 26160 345840 0 2.87E-03 2.24E-06 5.97E-08 1.90E-06 1.72E-06 8.10E-09 5.43E-07 1.79E-13 1.79E-13 Standard Design Certification B-43 Off-site Consequence Calculation Revision 4.1
Applicants Environmental Report -
Standard Design Certification Off-site Consequence Calculation B.2.8 Release Category 8: Dropped NuScale Power Module During Transport The final RC consists of core damage and environmental release due to a dropped NPM during refueling transport. The NPM transport process begins 48 hours5.555556e-4 days <br />0.0133 hours <br />7.936508e-5 weeks <br />1.8264e-5 months <br /> after reactor shutdown. In this event, the Reactor Building crane fails to hold the NPM during transport, causing the NPM to rest horizontally on the reactor pool floor. The NPM does not rest perfectly horizontally on the reactor pool floor, and the NPM is not completely flooded; therefore, the fuel is partially uncovered when the NPM is in this orientation. The containment can become damaged during impact with the pool floor or subsequent horizontal relocation, creating a release path to the environment. Depending on the angle at which the NPM tips over, the NPM may strike other NPMs. The NPM drop induced CDF is estimated as 8.75E-08 per module critical year in the LPSD PRA. Consistent with a NuScale 12 NPM plant, that frequency is multiplied by 12 for a NPM drop CDF of 1.05E-06 per year. The PRA sequences considered in RC 8 are shown in FSAR Figures 19.1-30, 19.1-32, 19.1-33, 19.1-34, 19.1-35, 19.1-36, and 19.1-37. RC 8 is conservatively treated as a bypassed containment scenario.
The conservative release sequence for this RC is an NPM drop accident where the containment is damaged during the drop and the CNV fails with an opening of 0.5 cm2 on the bottom of the NPM (i.e., the side of the NPM facing the reactor pool floor). The NPM pressurizes, forcing the reactor coolant from the NPM while precluding any reactor pool water from entering the NPM.
The accident progresses to core damage, with approximately 60 percent of the core inventory of iodine releasing to the reactor pool. However, the radionuclide aerosols released from the NPM are scrubbed by the pool, and the majority of the release to the environment is in the form of noble gases and methyl iodide, which greatly reduces the off-site impact of the release.
Reactor pool scrubbing of the release follows the approach outlined in Appendix B of Regulatory Guide 1.183 (Reference 8.1-30). The initial core inventory of organic iodide is assumed to comprise 0.15 percent of the total initial core inventory of iodine. All radionuclide groups, except for Xe and iodine, are assumed to be completely scrubbed by the pool. Xe and organic iodide are assumed not to be scrubbed by the reactor pool. Elemental iodine is assumed to have a decontamination factor of 500 due to reactor pool scrubbing. The particle size distribution for RC 8 is shown in Table B-23. The plume release information for RC 8 that is used as input for MACCS simulations is shown in Table B-24.
Part 3 B-44 Revision 4.1
Applicants Environmental Report -
Standard Design Certification Off-site Consequence Calculation Table B-23: Particle Size Distribution for Release Category 8 Chemical Group Particle Size Xe Elemental Iodine Organic Iodide 0.15 m 1.00E-01 9.78E-02 1.00E-01 0.29 m 1.00E-01 5.97E-01 1.00E-01 0.53 m 1.00E-01 3.02E-01 1.00E-01 0.99 m 1.00E-01 2.61E-03 1.00E-01 1.84 m 1.00E-01 3.28E-09 1.00E-01 3.43 m 1.00E-01 0.00E+00 1.00E-01 6.38 m 1.00E-01 0.00E+00 1.00E-01 11.9 m 1.00E-01 0.00E+00 1.00E-01 22.1 m 1.00E-01 0.00E+00 1.00E-01 41.2 m 1.00E-01 0.00E+00 1.00E-01 Table B-24: Release Category 8 Hourly Release Information Plume Start of Release Plume Heat Chemical Group (fraction of initial core inventory)
Segment Release (s) Duration (s) Content (W) Xe Elemental Iodine Organic Iodide 1 191580 3600 0 0.00E+00 8.16E-08 0.00E+00 2 195180 3600 0 0.00E+00 2.24E-07 0.00E+00 3 198780 3600 0 0.00E+00 4.16E-07 0.00E+00 4 202380 3600 0 0.00E+00 6.30E-07 0.00E+00 5 205980 3600 0 0.00E+00 8.00E-07 0.00E+00 6 209580 3600 0 0.00E+00 9.42E-07 0.00E+00 7 213180 3600 0 0.00E+00 1.00E-06 0.00E+00 8 216780 3600 0 0.00E+00 1.09E-06 0.00E+00 9 220380 3600 0 0.00E+00 1.42E-06 0.00E+00 10 223980 3600 0 0.00E+00 1.97E-06 0.00E+00 11 227580 3600 0 0.00E+00 3.30E-06 0.00E+00 12 231180 3600 0 0.00E+00 5.60E-06 0.00E+00 13 234780 3600 0 0.00E+00 9.58E-06 0.00E+00 14 238380 3600 0 0.00E+00 1.36E-05 0.00E+00 15 241980 3600 0 0.00E+00 1.69E-05 0.00E+00 16 245580 3600 0 0.00E+00 2.04E-05 0.00E+00 17 249180 3600 0 0.00E+00 2.54E-05 0.00E+00 18 252780 3600 0 0.00E+00 2.80E-05 0.00E+00 19 256380 3600 0 0.00E+00 3.08E-05 0.00E+00 20 259980 3600 0 0.00E+00 3.56E-05 0.00E+00 21 263580 3600 0 0.00E+00 4.20E-05 0.00E+00 22 267180 3600 0 0.00E+00 4.80E-05 0.00E+00 23 270780 3600 0 0.00E+00 5.24E-05 0.00E+00 24 274380 3600 0 0.00E+00 5.70E-05 0.00E+00 25 277980 3600 0 0.00E+00 6.36E-05 0.00E+00 26 281580 3600 0 0.00E+00 7.14E-05 0.00E+00 27 285180 3600 0 0.00E+00 7.80E-05 0.00E+00 28 288780 3600 0 0.00E+00 8.34E-05 0.00E+00 29 292380 3600 0 0.00E+00 8.68E-05 0.00E+00 30 295980 3600 0 0.00E+00 8.86E-05 0.00E+00 31 299580 3540 0 0.00E+00 9.40E-05 0.00E+00 Part 3 B-45 Revision 4.1
Applicants Environmental Report -
Standard Design Certification Off-site Consequence Calculation Table B-24: Release Category 8 Hourly Release Information (Continued)
Plume Start of Release Plume Heat Chemical Group (fraction of initial core inventory)
Segment Release (s) Duration (s) Content (W) Xe Elemental Iodine Organic Iodide 32 303120 3600 0 0.00E+00 8.58E-05 0.00E+00 33 306720 3600 0 0.00E+00 8.22E-05 0.00E+00 34 310320 3600 0 2.32E-01 4.10E-05 2.56E-01 35 313920 3600 0 2.56E-01 1.63E-05 2.79E-01 36 317520 3600 0 1.22E-01 7.72E-06 1.31E-01 37 321120 3600 0 2.78E-02 1.76E-06 2.97E-02 38 324720 3600 0 2.14E-03 1.51E-07 2.27E-03 39 328320 3600 0 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 40 331920 3600 0 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 41 335520 3600 0 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 42 339120 3600 0 0.00E+00 6.92E-08 0.00E+00 43 342720 3600 0 0.00E+00 9.40E-09 0.00E+00 44 346320 3600 0 0.00E+00 1.16E-08 0.00E+00 45 349920 3600 0 0.00E+00 5.26E-08 0.00E+00 46 353520 3600 0 0.00E+00 9.08E-08 0.00E+00 47 357120 3600 0 0.00E+00 1.21E-07 0.00E+00 48 360720 3600 0 0.00E+00 1.59E-07 0.00E+00 49 364320 3600 0 0.00E+00 2.08E-07 0.00E+00 50 367920 3600 0 0.00E+00 1.39E-07 0.00E+00 51 371520 3600 0 0.00E+00 2.86E-08 0.00E+00 52 375120 3600 0 0.00E+00 2.10E-08 0.00E+00 53 378720 3600 0 0.00E+00 2.10E-08 0.00E+00 54 382320 3600 0 0.00E+00 3.18E-08 0.00E+00 55 385920 3600 0 0.00E+00 3.50E-08 0.00E+00 56 389520 3600 0 0.00E+00 3.60E-08 0.00E+00 57 393120 3600 0 0.00E+00 4.62E-08 0.00E+00 58 396720 3600 0 0.00E+00 9.36E-08 0.00E+00 59 400320 3600 0 0.00E+00 1.43E-07 0.00E+00 60 403920 3600 0 0.00E+00 1.81E-07 0.00E+00 61 407520 3600 0 0.00E+00 2.06E-07 0.00E+00 62 411120 3600 0 0.00E+00 2.34E-07 0.00E+00 63-96 414720 3600 0 0.00E+00 2.46E-07 0.00E+00 Total 191580 345540 0 6.40E-01 1.21E-03 6.99E-01 B.2.9 Summary of Base Case Release Category Results The CDFs for each sequence of each PRA in a RC are summed to give the total RC frequency.
Engineering judgment is used to select the conservative release sequence for each RC. The eight RCs are presented in Table B-25. The release fraction to the environment, start of release, and release duration for each RC are shown in Table B-26.
Part 3 B-46 Revision 4.1
Applicants Environmental Report -
Standard Design Certification Off-site Consequence Calculation Table B-25: Release Categories and Associated NuScale Power Module Core Damage Frequency (per module-year1)
Release Category Hazard 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Total IE 7.02E-12 1.06E-12 1.79E-11 1.60E-10 1.39E-13 4.06E-11 4.52E-11 - 2.72E-10 LPSD 3.21E-15 - 2.31E-14 3.91E-13 - 2.13E-14 4.37E-14 - 4.82E-13 FI 1.45E-11 - - 4.85E-10 - 1.33E-10 1.92E-10 - 8.25E-10 IF - - - - - 2.96E-11 3.03E-11 - 5.98E-11 EF - - - 9.30E-10 - 4.16E-15 3.06E-13 - 9.30E-10 High Winds - - - 8.68E-10 - 2.92E-12 2.62E-12 - 8.73E-10 Dropped NPM - - - - - - - 1.05E-06 1.05E-06 RC Total 2.15E-11 1.06E-12 1.79E-11 2.44E-09 1.39E-13 2.06E-10 2.70E-10 1.05E-06 1.05E-06
% of Total 2.04E-03 1.01E-04 1.70E-03 2.32E-01 1.32E-05 1.96E-02 2.57E-02 9.97E+01 1.00E+02 Note:
1 The dropped NPM frequency is "per plant year" rather than "per module year".
Table B-26: Release Fraction to the Environment, Start of Release, and Release Duration for each Release Category Calculated by MELCOR Release Category Chemical Group 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Xe 4.80E-03 3.14E-03 4.85E-01 3.27E-03 5.63E-01 3.05E-03 2.87E-03 6.40E-01 Cs 2.14E-06 2.33E-06 3.84E-01 2.08E-06 3.76E-02 1.48E-06 2.24E-06 0.00E+00 Ba 5.80E-08 5.38E-08 9.92E-03 5.81E-08 1.39E-03 4.40E-08 5.97E-08 0.00E+00 I 2.07E-05 2.04E-06 3.21E-01 1.84E-06 3.50E-02 1.69E-06 1.90E-06 2.26E-03 Te 1.88E-06 1.79E-06 3.28E-01 1.60E-06 2.81E-02 1.25E-06 1.72E-06 0.00E+00 Ru 9.93E-09 9.16E-09 2.66E-03 7.79E-09 1.47E-04 6.32E-09 8.10E-09 0.00E+00 Mo 5.19E-07 5.79E-07 9.44E-02 5.05E-07 8.14E-03 3.47E-07 5.43E-07 0.00E+00 Ce 2.33E-13 1.97E-13 4.96E-08 1.81E-13 3.26E-09 1.57E-13 1.79E-13 0.00E+00 La 2.37E-13 1.97E-13 4.96E-08 1.82E-13 3.28E-09 1.57E-13 1.79E-13 0.00E+00 Start of Release (hr) 3.73 8.17 2.40 7.27 12.3 10.2 7.27 53.2 Release Duration (hr) 96.0 96.0 13.9 96.1 58.7 96.0 96.1 96.0 Table B-27 summarizes the results for the Surry site for each RC discussed in Section B.2.1 to Section B.2.8 for a single NPM. The off-site consequences are mean MACCS results over a year of weather trials and the RC frequencies are point estimates. Off-site doses encompass the emergency and long-term phases of the accident, as described in Section 6.15 of Reference 8.1-7. Off-site economic consequences are described in Section 7.15 of Reference 8.1-7. The off-site consequences per event are converted to per year by multiplying the values by the respective RC frequency. Summation of all RCs yields an estimated off-site dose risk of 8.17E-04 person-rem whole body dose per year for the NuScale design (utilized in Section 5.2). Summation of all RCs yields an estimated off-site economic risk (excluding the dollar value of public dose accrued) of 5.37E-02 dollars per year for the NuScale design (utilized in Section 5.3).
Part 3 B-47 Revision 4.1
Applicants Environmental Report -
Standard Design Certification Off-site Consequence Calculation Table B-27: Frequency of Occurrence and Off-site Consequences for each Release Category Off-site Dose per Off-site Dose per Off-site Economic Release Frequency Off-site Economic RC Event Year Impact (per year) Impact per Event ($)
(person-rem/event) (person-rem/year) ($/year) 1 2.15E-11 3.16E+01 6.80E-10 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 2 1.06E-12 2.29E+01 2.43E-11 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 3 1.79E-11 1.21E+06 2.16E-05 2.72E+09 4.87E-02 4 2.44E-09 2.06E+01 5.03E-08 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 5 1.39E-13 2.36E+05 3.27E-08 8.42E+07 1.17E-05 6 2.06E-10 1.50E+01 3.09E-09 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 7 2.70E-10 2.20E+01 5.94E-09 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 8 1.05E-06 7.57E+02 7.95E-04 4.77E+03 5.01E-03 Total 1.05E-06 - 8.17E-04 - 5.37E-02 Part 3 B-48 Revision 4.1
Applicants Environmental Report -
Standard Design Certification Off-site Consequence Calculation B.3 MACCS Sensitivity Analyses Sensitivity studies that evaluate the impact of MACCS modeling assumptions made in the calculation of off-site consequences are discussed in this section.
B.3.1 Sensitivity Case 1: Standard Evacuation The base case MACCS results used in the calculation of maximum benefit in Section 5.0 of this report assumed a site boundary emergency planning zone, where the public would only relocate if the EPA protective action guides are exceeded at a given location. In this sensitivity case a typical 10 mile emergency planning zone evacuation is modeled to investigate the effect of evacuation modeling on the calculation of the maximum benefit.
B.3.2 Sensitivity Case 2: Updated Site Data File The base case MACCS results used in the calculation of the maximum benefit in Section 5.0 of this report uses population distribution and economic information for the Surry site based on 2005 population data and 2005 economic data to estimate the population distribution in 2060 and the economic data to 2017, as described in Section B.1.3 and Section B.1.4. To evaluate the effect of the initial population and economic information used to extrapolate to a 2060 population and 2017 dollars on the off-site consequences, in this sensitivity case 2010 U.S.
Census and 2012 U.S. Agricultural Survey information is used as the starting point to estimate the population distribution in 2060 and the economic information in 2017.
B.3.3 Sensitivity Case 3: Release Site The base case MACCS results used in the calculation of the maximum benefit in Section 5.0 of this report uses the Surry site as the location of the radionuclide release, because there is no standard site for a design certification application. To evaluate the impact of the site of release on the off-site consequences, in this sensitivity case the release is assumed to occur at the Peach Bottom site.
B.3.4 Sensitivity Case 4: Height of Release The base case MACCS results used in the calculation of the maximum benefit in Section 5.0 of this report assume the radionuclide release to the environment occurs at ground level (zero m) because a release height of zero meters maximizes the ground level radionuclide concentration. To evaluate the impact of the release height on the off-site consequences, in this sensitivity case the release is assumed to occur at the height of the Reactor Building (81 ft or 24.689 m, per FSAR Section 1.2.2.1).
B.3.5 Sensitivity Case 5: Initial Core Inventory The base case MACCS results used in the calculation of the maximum benefit in Section 5.0 of this report use the best estimate core inventory as input (Table B-5), which assumes 100 percent power operations. To evaluate the impact of the initial core inventory on the off-site consequences, in this sensitivity case a high burnup core inventory is used (Table B-6),
which is derived by calculating the fuel assembly with the highest radioisotope inventory, Part 3 B-49 Revision 4.1
Applicants Environmental Report -
Standard Design Certification Off-site Consequence Calculation assuming 102 percent power operation, and assuming every assembly in the core has that radioisotope inventory.
B.3.6 Sensitivity Case 6: Start of Release The base case MACCS results used in the calculation of the maximum benefit in Section 5.0 of this report release radionuclides to the environment at the start of gap release predicted by MELCOR. However, because each RC represents multiple sequences, it is possible that a release to the environment may begin a different time when different mitigating systems are available.
To evaluate the impact of the start of release on the off-site consequences, in this sensitivity case the release is assumed to begin immediately at transient initiation.
B.3.7 Sensitivity Case 7: Off-site Decontamination The base case MACCS results used in the calculation of the maximum benefit in Section 5.0 of this report assume the time of decontamination (TIMDEC) and cost of decontamination (CDNFRM) for non-farmland from Reference 8.1-28, which are updated values based on Reference 8.1-34. However, as noted in Reference 8.1-33, there are not traceable bases for the TIMDEC and CDNFRM values from Reference 8.1-34. Therefore, consistent with the commission order issued in Reference 8.1-33, in this sensitivity case the TIMDEC and CDNFRM values are set to the maximum allowed MACCS input values for both decontamination levels modeled.
B.3.8 Sensitivity Case 8: Other Economic Parameters The base case MACCS results used in the calculation of the maximum benefit in Section 5.0 of this report assume economic inputs from Reference 8.1-28 (shown in Table B-2). However, it is recognized on page C-14 of Reference 8.1-31 that the objective of the SOARCA analysis was to realistically evaluate the off-site dose consequences, not the economic impacts, of a severe accident. Therefore, in this sensitivity case the values of the economic parameters in Table B-2 that are expressed in terms of dollar amounts are increased by a factor of two to investigate the sensitivity of the maximum benefit calculation to these economic parameters.
B.3.9 Sensitivity Case 9: Containment Deposition The base case MACCS results for radionuclide releases that do not bypass containment (release categories 1, 2, 4, 6, and 7) used in the calculation of the maximum benefit in Section 5.0 of this report assume that some fraction of the radionuclides deposit within the CNV (as calculated by MELCOR) and are unavailable for release to the environment. This sensitivity case unrealistically assumes that both the airborne and deposited radionuclides present in the containment are available for release to show the extent to which more conservative MELCOR radionuclide deposition rate calculation models could affect the maximum benefit calculation.
B.3.10 Sensitivity Case 10: Aerosol Dry Deposition in the Environment The base case MACCS results for radionuclide releases that do not bypass containment (RCs 1, 2, 4, 6, and 7) or the reactor pool (RC 8) used in the calculation of the maximum benefit in Section 5.0 of this report assume aerosol particle size distributions for the release, which affects the aerosol dry deposition in the environment. The intact containment cases assume the particle size distribution from RC 3 is representative of intact containment releases. RC 8 assumes that the particle size distribution calculated from the flow path connecting the Part 3 B-50 Revision 4.1
Applicants Environmental Report -
Standard Design Certification Off-site Consequence Calculation containment to the reactor pool is unaffected by reactor pool scrubbing. To evaluate the impact of these assumed particle size distributions on the off-site consequences, in this sensitivity case all aerosols present in the release are assumed to deposit at a velocity of 1 cm/s, consistent with the MACCS inputs on page A-5 of Reference 8.1-32. The particle size distribution that corresponds to the base case deposition velocities are calculated directly from MELCOR for RCs 3 and 5, and therefore this sensitivity does not apply to RCs 3 and 5.
B.3.11 Sensitivity Case 11: Plume Buoyancy The base case MACCS results for radionuclide releases that do not bypass containment (RCs 1, 2, 4, 6, and 7) or the reactor pool (RC 8) used in the calculation of the maximum benefit in Section 5.0 of this report assume the radionuclide release to the environment occurs as a cold plume (0 watts) and therefore does not rise. The release energy of the plume segments from an intact containment or from beneath the reactor pool is uncertain. Therefore, a release energy of zero watts is used in the base case to maximize the ground level radionuclide concentration. To evaluate the impact of the release energy on the off-site consequences, in this sensitivity case the release is assumed to occur with an internal energy content of 1E+05 W in each plume segment, which corresponds to the energetic portion of a containment bypass release and will cause the plume to rise upon release. The plume buoyancy parameters are directly calculated from MELCOR for RCs 3 and 5, which bypass the containment, and therefore this sensitivity does not apply to RCs 3 and 5.
B.3.12 Sensitivity Results The off-site consequence results for all sensitivity cases are shown in Table B-28 for population dose and Table B-29 for economic consequences.
Table B-28: Population Dose Results L-ICRP60ED Population Dose (rem) 50 mile Case RC 1 RC 2 RC 3 RC 4 RC 5 RC 6 RC 7 RC 8 Base Case 3.16E+01 2.29E+01 1.21E+06 2.06E+01 2.36E+05 1.50E+01 2.20E+01 7.57E+02 Case 1 2.85E+01 2.19E+01 1.16E+06 1.97E+01 2.25E+05 1.42E+01 2.11E+01 4.48E+02 Case 2 2.94E+01 2.20E+01 1.19E+06 1.98E+01 2.32E+05 1.44E+01 2.11E+01 7.18E+02 Case 3 4.52E+01 2.63E+01 1.05E+06 2.37E+01 2.23E+05 1.75E+01 2.52E+01 1.06E+03 Case 4 3.37E+01 2.45E+01 1.25E+06 2.21E+01 2.43E+05 1.61E+01 2.35E+01 7.53E+02 Case 5 6.70E+01 6.04E+01 1.72E+06 5.41E+01 5.01E+05 3.89E+01 5.80E+01 8.15E+02 Case 6 3.22E+01 2.34E+01 1.21E+06 2.11E+01 2.40E+05 1.56E+01 2.24E+01 7.75E+02 Case 7 3.16E+01 2.29E+01 1.21E+06 2.06E+01 2.34E+05 1.50E+01 2.20E+01 7.57E+02 Case 8 3.16E+01 2.29E+01 1.21E+06 2.06E+01 2.36E+05 1.50E+01 2.20E+01 7.57E+02 Case 9 1.87E+04 1.82E+04 - 1.82E+04 - 1.50E+04 1.81E+04 -
Case 10 4.37E+01 3.42E+01 - 3.07E+01 - 2.23E+01 3.28E+01 8.95E+02 Case 11 3.20E+01 2.32E+01 - 2.09E+01 - 1.52E+01 2.23E+01 7.57E+02 Table B-29: Economic Consequence Results Economic Cost Measures ($) 50 mile Case RC 1 RC 2 RC 3 RC 4 RC 5 RC 6 RC 7 RC 8 Base Case 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 2.72E+09 0.00E+00 8.42E+07 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 4.77E+03 Case 1 3.45E+08 3.45E+08 2.82E+09 3.45E+08 3.72E+08 3.45E+08 3.45E+08 3.45E+08 Case 2 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 2.70E+09 0.00E+00 8.28E+07 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 2.87E+03 Part 3 B-51 Revision 4.1
Applicants Environmental Report -
Standard Design Certification Off-site Consequence Calculation Table B-29: Economic Consequence Results (Continued)
Economic Cost Measures ($) 50 mile Case RC 1 RC 2 RC 3 RC 4 RC 5 RC 6 RC 7 RC 8 Case 3 2.68E+02 6.57E+00 8.19E+09 4.17E+00 2.85E+08 5.17E-01 5.40E+00 4.84E+04 Case 4 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 2.90E+09 0.00E+00 8.96E+07 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 2.42E+03 Case 5 2.25E+01 4.92E+01 7.26E+09 3.21E+01 4.83E+08 2.85E+00 4.06E+01 5.33E+03 Case 6 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 2.73E+09 0.00E+00 8.64E+07 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 4.90E+03 Case 7 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 1.01E+10 0.00E+00 3.52E+08 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 4.77E+03 Case 8 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 5.43E+09 0.00E+00 1.66E+08 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 7.15E+03 Case 9 9.86E+04 9.55E+04 - 9.53E+04 - 7.57E+04 9.60E+04 -
Case 10 9.62E+01 2.27E+01 - 1.53E+01 - 5.43E-01 1.81E+01 6.46E+04 Case 11 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 - 0.00E+00 - 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 3.97E+03 The results of Case 10 show that while the aerosol dry deposition modeling does noticeably impact the off-site consequences, the aerosol dry deposition modeling is reasonable for the base case analysis. The off-site consequences, for all RCs where the particle distribution is assumed, remain small in magnitude regardless of the inputs used. RC 8 is most impacted by changes to aerosol dry deposition modeling. This is expected, because this release consists mostly of gases that do not deposit and small particles that deposit more slowly using the Reference 8.1-6 methodology than the 0.01 m/s velocity used in Case 10, and therefore the release is more likely to deposit within 50 miles of the release than the base case.
The value of economic inputs (Case 7 and Case 8) has a noticeable impact on economic consequences when protective actions are performed, as expected. The increase is not consistent across RCs 3, 5, and 8, which are the only RCs with non-zero economic costs. In RCs 3 and 5 the off-site economic consequences are largely influenced by population dependent decontamination and interdiction, and the increase of the decontamination cost and duration in Case 7 significantly impacts those two results and therefore the economic consequences increase. However, RC 8 does not experience any population dependent decontamination or interdiction, and therefore is not sensitive to changes in population dependent decontamination inputs.
Evacuation within the 10 mile EPZ (Case 1) has a large impact on the off-site consequences, as expected. The impact is the largest among release categories that contain small releases to the environment. RCs 1, 2, 4, 6, 7, and 8 all have small releases that do not demand emergency phase protective actions in the base case where evacuation is not modeled.
The use of updated site population and economic information (Case 2) has a small, but noticeable impact on the off-site consequences as expected. However, the base case is conservative compared to Case 2 and is therefore considered appropriate for this analysis.
The results show that assumptions related to plume buoyancy (Case 11) and release height (Case 4) have an insignificant impact on both the dose and economic results, with the exception of the economic costs in RC 8. The economic costs for RC 8 show a significant reduction in case 4 and case 11, compared to the base case. The base case assumptions are conservative for RC 8, and the maximum benefit for Case 4 and Case 11 are unchanged from the base case; therefore, the base case assumptions are considered appropriate for this analysis.
Part 3 B-52 Revision 4.1
Applicants Environmental Report -
Standard Design Certification Off-site Consequence Calculation Assumptions related to the magnitude of radionuclides released to the environment (Case 9 and Case 5) have a noticeable impact on the off-site consequences. Case 9, which assumes all radionuclides present in containment (airborne and deposited) are available for release to the environment, produces release fractions of the core inventory three orders of magnitude larger than the base case releases. The base case releases experience significant radionuclide deposition in containment. Accordingly, the off-site dose and economic consequences of Case 9 releases show a significant increase compared to the base case. However, it is important to note that assuming all radionuclides present in containment, which contains a large amount of water due to ECCS actuation, are available for release is unrealistically conservative. Case 5, which uses the high burnup core inventory (Table B-6) in place of the best estimate core inventory (Table B-5), shows a small increase in off-site consequences compared to the base case results.
The choice of site at which releases are evaluated has a noticeable impact on the off-site consequences, as expected. Postulating that radionuclide releases occur at the Peach Bottom site (Case 3) instead of the Surry site in the base case, generally results in an increase in off-site consequences across release categories. This is expected, as the population within 50 miles of the release at Peach Bottom is approximately twice as large as the population at Surry.
However, the off-site dose consequences at the Peach Bottom site are reduced from the base case for the large releases in RCs 3 and 5. The Peach Bottom site has smaller long-term dose thresholds compared to Surry, and therefore a larger portion of the population is permanently relocated from the Peach Bottom site, reducing the overall population dose compared to the Surry site.
The timing of the start of release (Case 6) has a small impact on the off-site consequences, as expected. This is because the change in release timing is generally on the order of hours, whereas the exposure time in MACCS is 50 years, and therefore the reduced radioactive decay before release is insignificant compared to the exposure duration.
B.4 Seismic The seismic CDF is considered in Section 5.7 through an external events multiplier to the SAI as part of the calculation of the maximum benefit. NuScale is not preparing a seismic PRA for the design certification application as there is not a standard seismic hazard curve associated with the standard design process. NuScale is instead performing a seismic margins analysis which generates conditional core damage probabilities and not CDFs. In order to quantify a representative seismic risk for the purposes of this report, the updated seismic hazard curves based on Near Term Task Force Recommendation 2.1 for Surry (Reference 8.1-20) and Peach Bottom (Reference 8.1-19) are combined with the conditional core damage probabilities from the seismic margins analysis to generate CDFs for a NuScale plant located at those sites.
However, the seismic core damage sequences do not match one-to-one with the sequences in the internal events, LPSD, internal flooding, internal fires, external floods, and high winds PRAs, and so the seismic risk is accounted for through an external events multiplier to the SAI using the total seismic CDF shown in Table B-30 in the interest of simplifying the analysis. This simplification is not expected to drastically affect the results. This seismic CDF analysis used a preliminary NuScale PRA model, however in the context of the results of this report the use of the preliminary PRA model compared to the final PRA model to establish seismic CDF produces a more conservative seismic CDF and shouldn't significantly affect the identification of SAMDAs.
Part 3 B-53 Revision 4.1
Applicants Environmental Report -
Standard Design Certification Off-site Consequence Calculation Table B-30: Seismic Core Damage Frequencies for Peach Bottom and Surry Sites Site Peach Bottom Surry Core Damage Frequency 2.01E-6 per year 3.17E-8 per year The difference of nearly two orders of magnitude between the seismic CDFs is a consequence of their hazard curves, because results are proportional to initiator frequencies. The fragilities used in the NuScale seismic margin assessment use enveloping soil profiles that are independent of local geology. A site-specific PRA would reduce the seismic core damage frequencies for both sites.
Part 3 B-54 Revision 4.1