|
---|
Category:AFFIDAVITS
MONTHYEARML20129H7741985-06-0505 June 1985 Affidavit of DF Schnell Re Issues Raised in Missouri Coalition for Environ & K Drey Petition to Show Cause Requesting Suspension or Revocation of Ol.Root Causes of Questionable QC Certifications Addressed ML20084G1791984-05-0303 May 1984 Affidavit of Cw Mueller Re Financial Integrity of Util ML20084G1731984-05-0202 May 1984 Affidavit of DF Schnell Re Financial Stability of Util ML20078P7251983-11-0303 November 1983 Affidavit of Ew Thomas Re Revised Design Response Spectra ML20076F0891983-08-22022 August 1983 Affidavit of Jd Hurd Re Hydrostatic Pressure Requirements for SA-312 Piping,Per Aslab 830815 Order.Applicant Exhibits Corrected.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20071J0631983-05-18018 May 1983 Affidavit of JW Baer Re Reed Contention 20 on Authorization of Excess Radiological Worker Exposures & Spec of Decontamination Action Levels.Certificate of Svc & Prof Qualifications Encl ML20071J0591983-05-18018 May 1983 Affidavit of Wm Clark Re Reed Contention 20 on Authorization of Excess Exposures to Workers & Spec of Decontamination Action Levels.Planning Need for Authorization Per NUREG-0654,Section III.E.3,met.Prof Qualifications Encl ML20071H5961983-05-18018 May 1983 Affidavit of Ma Stiller Re Reed Contention 5,Parts B & C on Radio Communications.Commitment to Supply Addl Transceivers for Designated Patrol & Rescue Vehicles Provides Sufficient Communication for Patrol & Rescue ML20071H5271983-05-17017 May 1983 Affidavit of T Mitchell Re Reed Contention 3 on Emergency Mgt Director staffing.Full-time Emergency Mgt Director in Montgomery County Unnecessary.Vb Eldringhoff Is Alternate Director ML20071H9961983-05-17017 May 1983 Affidavit of RG Wright Re Reed Contention 19 on Impediments to Use of Evacuation Routes.Resources & Planning Efforts Available to Overcome Impediments ML20071H9561983-05-17017 May 1983 Affidavit of Kv Miller Re Reed Contention 17 on Radiological Monitoring.State Resources in Trained Personnel & Radiation Monitoring Equipment Adequate.Prof Qualifications Encl ML20071H4361983-05-16016 May 1983 Affidavit of Wm Clark Re Reed Contention 1 on Staffing of Sheriff Ofcs.Adequate Personnel Available W/Law Enforcement Training to Provide Emergency Law Enforcement Svcs for Callaway County & City of Fulton ML20071H5091983-05-16016 May 1983 Affidavit of Wm Clark Re Reed Contention 2 on Staffing of Callaway County & City of Fulton Clerk Ofcs.No Addl Clerical Personnel Needed to Provide Assistance During Emergency Shifts.Prof Qualifications Encl ML20071H5311983-05-16016 May 1983 Affidavit of H Lalk Re Reed Contention 3 on Emergency Mgt Director staffing.Full-time Emergency Mgt Director for Gasconade County Unnecessary ML20071H6471983-05-16016 May 1983 Affidavit of Ng Slaten Re Reed Contentions 6 & 16 on Protective Actions Against Radioiodines & Messages W/ Instructions for long-term Sheltering.Explains Effectiveness of Sheltering as Protective Action ML20071H6551983-05-16016 May 1983 Affidavit of Harris Re Reed Contentions 6 & 16 on Protective Actions Against Radioiodines & Messages W/ Instructions for long-term Sheltering.Explains Effectiveness of Ad Hoc Respiratory Protection ML20071J0351983-05-16016 May 1983 Affidavit of H Matthews Re Reed Contention 19 on Impediments to Use of Evacuation Routes.Resources & Planning Efforts Available to Overcome Impediments ML20071H9691983-05-16016 May 1983 Affidavit of Ng Slaten Re Reed Contention 17 on Radiological Monitoring.Util Radiological Emergency Organization Includes Extensive Radiological Monitoring Capability & Resources. Prof Qualifications Encl ML20071H9371983-05-16016 May 1983 Affidavit of Wm Clark Re Reed Contention 15 on Ltrs of Agreement.Sufficient Ltrs of Agreement Exist or Will Exist Prior to Plant Operation to Ensure Necessary Emergency Support & Resources to Implement Util/Fulton Plan ML20071J0141983-05-16016 May 1983 Affidavit of G Epple Re Reed Contention 19 on Impediments to Use of Evacuation Routes.Resources & Planning Efforts Available to Overcome Impediments ML20071J0271983-05-14014 May 1983 Affidavit of VB Eldringhoff Re Reed Contention 19 on Impediments to Use of Evacuation Routes.Resources & Planning Efforts Available to Overcome Impediments ML20071H8831983-05-13013 May 1983 Affidavit of JW Baer Re Reed Contention 13 on Organizations Requiring Sops.Functional Procedures Will Provide Adequate Instructions to Organizations Assigned Emergency Response Role ML20071H8321983-05-13013 May 1983 Affidavit of JW Baer Re Reed Contention 11 on Reentry/ Recovery Radiation Stds.Offsite Emergency Plans Reentry Decision Process Description Complies W/Planning Criteria. Prof Qualifications Encl ML20071H9631983-05-13013 May 1983 Affidavit of Wk Johnson Re Reed Contention 17 on Radiological Monitoring.State Resources in Trained Personnel & Radiation Monitoring Equipment Adequate.Prof Qualifications Encl ML20071H5701983-05-13013 May 1983 Affidavit of JW Baer Re Reed Contention 4 on Emergency Action Level Scheme/Worker Notification.Emergency Classification Sys & Worker Notification Provisions Reflect Sound Operational Concepts.Prof Qualifications Encl ML20071H4901983-05-12012 May 1983 Affidavit of Gw Stanfill Re Reed Contention 1 on Staffing of Sheriffs Ofc.Sufficient Personnel Available Per Shift to Fulfill Law Enforcement Functions Assigned to Montgomery, Gasconade & Osage Counties ML20071H5131983-05-12012 May 1983 Affidavit of Gw Stanfill Re Reed Contention 2 on Staffing of Clerk ofcs.Emergency-related Clerical Functions Described in County Plans Will Be Properly Incorporated in Montgomery, Gasconade & Osage Counties.Prof Qualifications Encl ML20071H6251983-05-11011 May 1983 Affidavit of Kv Miller Re Reed Contention 6 on Protective Actions Against Radioiodines.State of Mo Will Not Administer Potassium Iodine to General Public in Event of Accident,But Drug Will Be Available to State Emergency Workers ML20071H5411983-05-0909 May 1983 Affidavit of J Crowe Re Reed Contention 3 on Emergency Mgt Director staffing.Full-time Emergency Mgt Director for Osage County Unnecessary ML20071H6361983-04-28028 April 1983 Affidavit of Re Linneman Re Reed Contention 6 on Protective Actions Against Radioiodines.Describes Risks & Benefits Associated W/Ingestion of Potassium Iodine & Endorses State of Mo Policy Re Distribution of Potassium Iodine ML20071H7401983-04-28028 April 1983 Affidavit of Re Linnemann Re Reed Contention 8 on Radiation Detection Equipment.State of Mo & Local Govts Have Sufficient Equipment,Lab Facilities & Expertise to Evaluate External & Internal Radiation Exposures ML20071H7611983-04-28028 April 1983 Affidavit of Re Linnemann Re Reed Contention 9 on Radiological Exposure.Means for Controlling Radiological Exposure of Local Emergency Workers During Accident Established Per 10CFR50.47(b)(11) ML20071H7901983-04-28028 April 1983 Affidavit of Re Linnemann Re Reed Contention 10 on Medical Treatment.Upon Completion of Training Program,Callaway Memorial Hosp Will Provide Adequate Local Medical Resources to Handle All Types of Radiation Injuries ML20042A4031982-03-16016 March 1982 Affidavit of Kg Parikh.Data in Table Supports Bechtel Engineering Analysis That Deviations from Required Weld Detail Identified on Manually Weld Embeds Would Not Adversely Affect Load Carrying Capacity ML20009C9431981-07-16016 July 1981 Affidavit Re Joint Intervenor Opposition to Applicant & NRC Motion to Compel.Discusses Consequences of Whistleblowing ML19347D3071981-03-0606 March 1981 Affidavit Re Ed Background & Research on Nuclear Power & Specific Facilities.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20154A1381976-07-13013 July 1976 Affidavit of Westinghouse Requesting That Proprietary Info Be Withheld from Public Disclosure (Ref 10CFR2.790) 1985-06-05
[Table view] Category:LEGAL TRANSCRIPTS & ORDERS & PLEADINGS
MONTHYEARML20212K8711999-09-30030 September 1999 Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Elimination of Requirements for Noncombustible Fire Barriers Penetration Seal Matls ULNRC-04117, Comment Supporting Proposed Rules 10CFR50 & 72 Re Reporting Requirements for Nuclear Power Reactors & Draft NUREG-1022, Rev 2, Event Reporting Guidelines 10CFR50.72 & 50.731999-09-22022 September 1999 Comment Supporting Proposed Rules 10CFR50 & 72 Re Reporting Requirements for Nuclear Power Reactors & Draft NUREG-1022, Rev 2, Event Reporting Guidelines 10CFR50.72 & 50.73 ML20217M2091998-03-19019 March 1998 Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Industry Codes & Stds Amended Requirements. NRC Justification for Avoiding Backfit Analysis,Nonstantial.Backfit Analysis,As Required by Law as Mandatory for Proposed Rule Changes ML20217J9691997-10-16016 October 1997 Order Approving Application Re Corporate Merger Agreement Between Union Electric Co & Cipsco,Inc to Form Holding Company.Commission Ordered to Approve Subj Application ML20148N0511997-06-19019 June 1997 Comment Opposing Proposed NRC Bulletin 96-001,Suppl 1, CR Insertion Problems ML20140G1691997-06-0606 June 1997 Requests Extension of Comment Period Expiration Date from 970619 to 970719,for Comments on Control Rod Insertion Problems ML20077E9041994-12-0202 December 1994 Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re TS Improvements. Advises That PSA Portion of Fourth Criterion Should Be Clarified to Include Only Those Equipment Items Important to risk-significant Sequences as Defined in GL 88-20,App 2 ML20071L1951994-07-21021 July 1994 Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR26 Re Changes to fitness-for-duty Requirements.Urges NRC to Revise Scope of 10CFR26 to Limit Random Drug & Alcohol Testing to Only Workers Who Have Unescorted Access to Vital Areas at NPP ML20065D3851994-03-22022 March 1994 Comment on Draft NUREG-1022, Event Reporting Systems, 10CFR50.72 & 50.73 ML20113H4281992-07-23023 July 1992 Comment Commending Proposed Suppl One to GL 83-28 4.2.3 & 4.2.4 Closing All GL 83-28 Actions for Callaway But Staff Conclusion Should Be Expanded ML20101P4091992-06-26026 June 1992 Comment Supporting low-level Radwaste After Treatment to Reduce Volume & Represents Safest,Most Cost Effective Solution ML20091F9501991-12-0202 December 1991 Submits Comments Opposing Draft NUREG-1022, Event Reporting Sys,10CFR50.72 & 50.73. Licensee Feels That Changes to Intial NUREG-1022 Increases Util Expenses W/O Improving Public Health & Safety ML20058D2741990-10-15015 October 1990 Comment Supporting Proposed Rules 10CFR2,50 & 54 Re Nuclear Power Plant License Renewal ML20058N9891990-08-0101 August 1990 Comment Re Proposed Rules 10CFR20,30,40 & 70, Notifications of Incidents. Language of Rule Should Be Clarified by Referring to Applicable Reporting Requirements of 10CFR50.72 & 73 for Commercial Nuclear Power Reactors ML20063Q1771990-07-0606 July 1990 Comment on Petition for Rulemaking PRM-50-55 Re Revs to Fsar.Revs Should Be Driven by Circumstances Rather than by Arbitrary Time Schedule ML20235V9301989-02-27027 February 1989 Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Maint Programs for Nuclear Power Plants.Endorses NUMARC Comments.Major Concern Is Lack of Demonstrated Need for Rule Since Most Utils Already Have Effective Maint Programs ML20235T7901989-02-20020 February 1989 Comment Opposing Proposed Rules 10CFR50 & 55 Re Educ & Experience Requirements for Senior Reactor Operators & Supervisors at Nuclear Power Plants.Establishment of Programs for Operators to Earn Degress Would Be Expensive ML20235T7011989-02-17017 February 1989 Comment Opposing Proposed Rules 10CFR50 & 55 Which Require Degrees of Senior Operators & Shift Supervisors.Both Alternatives Would Contribute to Lower Morale Among Reactor Operators ML20195J3191988-11-25025 November 1988 Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR26 Re Fitness for Duty Program.Policy of Yearly Testing & Testing for Cause,Backed Up by Training for Drug Prevention Supported ML20195E8561988-10-28028 October 1988 Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Renewal of Licenses ML20133B7711985-08-0202 August 1985 Response to 850705 Petitioner Response in Opposition to Util Request That Show Cause Order Not Be Issued.Util Actions Demonstrate Dedication to QA & Safe Plant Operation. Certificate of Svc Encl ML20128K2111985-07-0505 July 1985 Response Opposing Util Request That Show Cause Order Not Be Issued.Requests NRC Independent Investigation & Suspension or Revocation of OL During Period of Investigation ML20129H7511985-06-0606 June 1985 Response to Missouri Coalition for Environ & K Drey 850325 Show Cause Petition Requesting Suspension or Revocation of OL Due to Questionable QC Inspector Certification.Denial of Petition Recommended.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20129H7741985-06-0505 June 1985 Affidavit of DF Schnell Re Issues Raised in Missouri Coalition for Environ & K Drey Petition to Show Cause Requesting Suspension or Revocation of Ol.Root Causes of Questionable QC Certifications Addressed ML20100F4301985-03-25025 March 1985 Show Cause Petition Requesting Suspension or Revocation of License NPF-30,due to Failure to Comply W/Qa Regulations & Guidelines Re Proper Training of QA Personnel ML20092H1141984-06-22022 June 1984 Answer Opposing Petitioners 840613 Instant Motion for Order Setting Aside or Staying Permit for Ol.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20197H4321984-06-13013 June 1984 Motion for Commission Order Setting Aside Low Power Testing Permit Granted on 840611,or in Alternative,Stay to Permit & Prohibit Taking of Any Action.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20091R6401984-06-13013 June 1984 Request That Commission Enter Order Setting Aside Low Power Testing Permit Allegedly Granted on or About 840611,due to Joint Intervenors 840418 Motion for Leave to File Supplemental Contention ML20084G1561984-05-0303 May 1984 Answer Opposing Coalition for Environ,Missourians for Safe Energy & Crawdad Alliance 840418 Motion for Leave to File Supplemental Contention Re Financial Qualifications of Util. Certificate of Svc Encl ML20084G1791984-05-0303 May 1984 Affidavit of Cw Mueller Re Financial Integrity of Util ML20084G1731984-05-0202 May 1984 Affidavit of DF Schnell Re Financial Stability of Util ML20083Q3671984-04-18018 April 1984 Supplemental Contention Re Applicant Financial Qualification to Construct & Operate Facility.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20083Q3521984-04-18018 April 1984 Motion for Leave to File Supplemental Contention Re Financial Qualification of Applicant to Construct & Operate Facility.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20083Q2601984-04-18018 April 1984 Notice of Appearance of LC Green & Withdrawal of KM Chackes as Counsel for Intervenors.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20082A6631983-11-15015 November 1983 Comments on NRC & Applicant Responses to Aslab 831020 Order Requesting Addl Info.Responses Contain Nothing More than Description of Activities & Conclusion of No Safety Significance.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20082B4641983-11-15015 November 1983 Comments on Applicant & NRC Responses to Aslab 831020 Memorandum & Order Re Safety of Manually Welded Embedded Plates.Appointment of Independent Expert Requested. Certificate of Svc Encl ML20078P7131983-11-0404 November 1983 Response to Aslab 831020 Memorandum & Order for Addl Info on Observation 4-1 of Integrated Design Insp Program Rept Re Original Design Floor Response Spectra.Spectra Have No Safety Significance.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20078P7251983-11-0303 November 1983 Affidavit of Ew Thomas Re Revised Design Response Spectra ML20081C3031983-10-27027 October 1983 Reply to Reed 831006 Proposed Findings of Fact & Conclusions of Law Re Contention 6.Findings Mischaracterized Fda Recommendation & Position of Applicant & State of Mo. Certificate of Svc Encl ML20078H1751983-10-12012 October 1983 Response to Joint Intervenors 830823 Petition for Reconsideration of ASLB 830914 Decision ALAB-740. Insufficient Showing Made to Justify Reopening Record. Certificate of Svc Encl ML20080Q4471983-10-0606 October 1983 Findings of Fact & Conclusions of Law.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20080M6381983-09-29029 September 1983 Motion for Extension to File,W/Commission,Petition for Review of Aslab 830914 Decision ALAB-740.Extension Should Be Granted Until 15 Days After Aslab Rules on Joint Intervenors 830923 Reconsideration Petition.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20078B4981983-09-23023 September 1983 Petition for Reconsideration of 830914 Decision ALAB-740 in Light of New Evidence Re Adequacy of Applicant QA Program. Many Items Remain Open in Integrated Design Insp Program Rept.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20078B8201983-09-23023 September 1983 Proposed Corrections to 830913 Evidentiary Hearing Transcript.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20078B8151983-09-23023 September 1983 Proposed Findings of Fact & Conclusions of Law in Form of Proposed Initial Decision ML20024E8211983-08-31031 August 1983 Comments on Applicant Response to Aslab 830815 Order Re Failure to Provide Safe SA-312 Piping & Adequate QA Program.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20080C6991983-08-24024 August 1983 Testimony of Ng Slaten in Response to Reed Contentions 6 & 16 Re Protective Actions Against Radioiodines & Messages W/Instructions for long-term Sheltering.Related Correspondence ML20080C7141983-08-24024 August 1983 Testimony of Kv Miller in Response to Reed Contention 6 Re Protective Actions Against Radioiodines.State of Mo Decided Not to Administer Potassium Iodide to General Public Based on Federal Guidance & Weighing of Advantages/Disadvantages ML20080C7121983-08-24024 August 1983 Testimony of Re Linnemann in Response to Reed Contentions 6 & 16 Re Protective Actions Against Radioiodines & Messages W/Instructions for long-term Sheltering.Related Correspondence ML20080C7061983-08-24024 August 1983 Testimony of DF Paddleford in Response to Reed Contentions 6 & 16 Re Protective Actions Against Radioiodines & Messages W/Instructions for long-term Sheltering.Related Correspondence 1999-09-30
[Table view] |
Text
.. v.* , ,
's
ss COUNTY OF ALLEGHENY:
Before me, the undersigned authori'.y personally appeared .
R'abert A. Wiesemann, who, being by ma, duly sworn according to law, de-poses and says that he is authorized to execute this Affidavit on behalf I of Vestinghouse Electric Corporatior. ("Westinghouse") and that the aver-l ments of fact set forth in this Affidavit are true and correct to the 1
best of his knowledge, informatior., and belief:
b 'd4ZldttitL j Robert A. Wiesemann, Manager .'
Licensing Programs Sworn to and subscribed befo m this "I day of 1976.
g i
, ifN$$
Notery Et61ic R ';;
s . . . t h . t.wM t 181 COMMiss60a (APIRt3 APR.13.1978 8809120083 8G0830 PDR ADOCK 05000483 P PDC
a
..j -
- AW-75-31 (1) I am Manager, Licensing Programs, in the Pressurized Water Reactor Systems Division, of Westinghouse Electric Corporation and as such, I have been specifically delegated the function of reviewing the proprietary infcrmation sought to be withheld from public dis-closure in connection with nuclear power plant licensing or rule-making proceedings, and am authorized to apply for its withhoiding on behalf of the Westinghouse Water Reactor Divisions.
(2) I am making this Affidavit in conformance with the provisions of 10 CFR Section 2.790 of the Commission's regulations and in con-junction with the Westinghouse application for withholding ac-companying this Affidavit.
(3) I have personal knowledge of the criteria and procedures utilized '
by Westinghouse Nuclear Energy Systems in designating informatiOn as a trade secret, privileged or an confidential commercial or financial information. .
(4) Pursuant to the provisions of paragraph (b)(4) of Section 2.799 of the Commission's regulations, the following is furnished for consideration by the Commission in determining whether the in-formation sought to be withheld from public disclosure should be withheld. -
(1) The information sought to be withheld from public disclosure is owned and has been held in confidence by Westinghouse.
e i
n 9
'1 l
- t. ,
i AW-76-31 D
(ii) The information is of r type customarily held in confidence . l by Westinghouse and not custocarily disclosed to the public.
Westinghouse has a rational basis for determining toe types of information customtri7,y held in confidence by it and, in that connection, utilizes a system to determine when and whether to hold certaia types of in. form 6 tion in confidence.
The application of that system and the substance of that system constitutes Westir.ghouse policy and provides the rational basis required.
i Under that system, information is held in confidence if it falls in one or more af several types, the release of which
- might result in the loss of an existing or potential com ,
petitive advar.tage, as follows:
'a -
(a) The information reveals the distinguishing aspects of j ,
a process (or component, structure, tool, method, etc.)
where prevention of its use by any of Westinghouse's.
._ competitors without license from Westinghouse consti-tutes a competitive economic advantage over other companies.
(b) It consists of supporting data, including test data, relative to a process (or component, structure, tool, method, etc.), the application cf which data secures a competitive economic advantage, e.g. , by optimization or improved marketability.
I e
I e
AW-76-31 N
(c) Its use by a competitor would reduce his expenditure ,
of resources or improve his competitive position in the design, manufacture, shipment, installation, assurance of quality, or licansing a similar product.
(d) It reveals cost or price information, production cap-acities, budget levels, or commercial strategies of ,
Westinghouse, its customers or suppliers.
(e) It reveals aspects of past, present, or future West-inghouse or customer funded development plans and pro-grams of potential commercial value to Westinghouse.
(f) It contains patentable ideas, for which patent pro-taction may be desirable. ' -' . ,
,- (g) It is not the property of Westinghouse, but must %e -
treated as proprietary by Westinghouse according to .
agreements with the owner.
. There are sound policy reasons behind the Westinghouse system which include the following:
(a) The use of such information by Westinghousa gives Westir.ghouse a corrpetitive advantage over its cC-petitors. It is, therefore, withheld from disclosure to protect the Westinghouse competitive position.
l 1
1
+ , w
e AW-76-31 D
(b) It is infonnation which is marketable in many ways. .
The extent to which such information is available to competitors diminishes the Westinghouse ability to sell products and services involving the use of the ,
, infonnation.
(c) Use by our competitor would put Westinghouse at a competitive disadvantage by reducing his expenditure of resources at our expense.
(d) Each component of proprietary infonnation pertinent to a particular competitive advantage is potentially as valuable as the total competitive advantage. If ,
competitors acquire components of propriel:ary infor-mation, any one component may be the key to the entir,e puzzle, thereby depriving Westinghouse of a competitive
. advantage. .
(e) Unrestricted disclosure would joopardize the position of prominence of Westinghouse in the world market, and thereby give a market advantage to the competition in those countries. ,
(f) The Westinghouse capacity to int tt corporate assets in research and deve'iopment depends upon the success in obtaining and malataining a competitive advantage.
e, e
,.-..-,,_,--,v-,
, , . . .--,-,- -,n .
.n.... - , . . - - - - - . - - - - ,,, -
', AW-76-31
}l (iii) The information is being transmitted to the Commission in ,
confidence and, under the provisions of 10 CFR Section 2.790, it is to be received in confidence by the Commission.
1 (iv) The infonnation is not available in public sources to the best of our knowledge and belief.
(v) The proprietary information sought to be withheld in this submittal is that which is appropriately marked in the attach-ment to Westinghour.: letter No. NS-CE-1142, Eiche1dinger to Eisenhut dated July 27, 1976 concerning reproductions of view-graphs used in the Westinghouse presentation to the NRC during the meeting on July 27, 1976 on the subject of Westinghouse Reload Safety Evaluation Methodology.
's This infonnation enables Westinghouse to:
(a) Jus',ify the deisign for the reload core , ,
(b) Assist its customers to obtain licenses (c) Meet contractual requirements (d) Provide greater flexibility to customers assuring them ,
of safe and reliable operation.
'S
. . 1
. AW-76-31 l Further, this information has substantial connercial value as follows:
(a) Westinghouse sells the use of the information to its customers for purposes of meeting NRC requirements for licensing documentation.
(b) Westinghouse uses the information to perform and justify analyses which are sold to customers.
(c) Westinghouse uses the information to sell nuclear fuel and related services to its customers.
Public disclosure of this information is likely to cause sub-stantial harm to the competitive position of Westinghousa'jn selling nuclear fuel and related services.
Westinghouse retains a marketing advantage by virtue of the knowledge, experience and competence it has gained through long involvement and considerable investment in all aspects t of the nuclear power generation industry. In particular Westinghouse has developed a unique understanding of the factors and parameters which are variable in the process of design of nuclear fuel and which do affect the in service performance of the fuel and its suitability for the purpose for which it was provided.
3 s .._s,
r w .-,
AW-76-31
.- 1
~
In all cases that purpose is to generate energy in a saf'e and I efficient manner while enabling the operating nuclear gener-ating station to meet all regulatory requirer.ents affected by the core loading of nuclear fuel. Confidence in being able to accomplish this comes from the exercise of judgement based on experience.
Thus, the essence of the competitive advantage in this field lies in an understanding of which analyses should be performed and in the methods and models used to perfonn these analyses.
A substantial part of this competitive advantage will be lost if the competitors of Westinghouse are able to use the results of the Westinghouse experience to connalize or verify their own process or if they are able to claim an equivalent under-standing by demonstrating that they can arrive at the saGetor similar conclusions. Its use by a competitor would reduce
, his expenditure of resources or improve his ccmpetitive -
position in the design and licensing of s similar product. l This infonnation is a product of Westinghouse design technology. "
As such, it is broadly 6plicable to ths sale and licensing of ,
fuel in pressurized wat9r reactors. The development of this infonnatico is the result of many years of We;,tinghouse effort and the expenditura cf a considerable sum of money. In order for competi^ ors of Westinghouse to duplicate this process e
a - - -- r -.--,,.,,-.-n- - - - - . . . , . , ,._.------,n. -~- --
r q
>.:. p -
l
' l AW-76-31 ;
I
. l 3,
would require the investment of substantially the same amount of effort and expertise that Westinghouse po:sesses and which was acquired over a period of more than fiftcen years and by l the investment of millions of dollars,. i Further the deponent sayeth not.
I t-l j , . -
,, e I
1
{
4 4
i 1
,.n.--,e ,,,-.,.,,__-,--,.,,,e.- - - , , , r,-,,,, _ , , - - ,,,-m w.----- - - - , - - ---, - - -- -,
.e --- .- --- - --,w, -- -,
P 4
Attachment -3 ULHRC-1822 PROCESS CONTROL BLOCK DIAGRAMS, FUNCTIONAL DIAGRAMS,AND ,
INTERCONNECTING WIRING DIAGRAMS (FOR TYPICAL CCANNEL)
STEAM GENERATOR LEVEL REACTOR TRIP MODIFI,CliTION LIST _OF ENCLOSED DRAWINGS
- l. Process Control Block Diagramst 8756D37, Sheets ;
i 7,8,9,10,14,17,19,20, 22,43
- 2. Functional Diagrams: 7250D64, Sheets 1,2,7,15,19
- 3. Interconnecting Wiring Diagrams For Protection Set 2:
8309D52, Sheets 3,4a,7,11,14,15,30,31,49,50 E
b o
L____._.________.