|
|---|
Category:LEGAL TRANSCRIPTS & ORDERS & PLEADINGS
MONTHYEARML20212K8711999-09-30030 September 1999
Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Elimination of Requirements for Noncombustible Fire Barriers Penetration Seal Matls
ULNRC-04117, Comment Supporting Proposed Rules 10CFR50 & 72 Re Reporting Requirements for Nuclear Power Reactors & Draft NUREG-1022, Rev 2, Event Reporting Guidelines 10CFR50.72 & 50.731999-09-22022 September 1999
Comment Supporting Proposed Rules 10CFR50 & 72 Re Reporting Requirements for Nuclear Power Reactors & Draft NUREG-1022, Rev 2, Event Reporting Guidelines 10CFR50.72 & 50.73
ML20217M2091998-03-19019 March 1998
Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Industry Codes & Stds Amended Requirements. NRC Justification for Avoiding Backfit Analysis,Nonstantial.Backfit Analysis,As Required by Law as Mandatory for Proposed Rule Changes
ML20217J9691997-10-16016 October 1997
Order Approving Application Re Corporate Merger Agreement Between Union Electric Co & Cipsco,Inc to Form Holding Company.Commission Ordered to Approve Subj Application
ML20148N0511997-06-19019 June 1997
Comment Opposing Proposed NRC Bulletin 96-001,Suppl 1, CR Insertion Problems
ML20140G1691997-06-0606 June 1997
Requests Extension of Comment Period Expiration Date from 970619 to 970719,for Comments on Control Rod Insertion Problems
ML20077E9041994-12-0202 December 1994
Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re TS Improvements. Advises That PSA Portion of Fourth Criterion Should Be Clarified to Include Only Those Equipment Items Important to risk-significant Sequences as Defined in GL 88-20,App 2
ML20071L1951994-07-21021 July 1994
Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR26 Re Changes to fitness-for-duty Requirements.Urges NRC to Revise Scope of 10CFR26 to Limit Random Drug & Alcohol Testing to Only Workers Who Have Unescorted Access to Vital Areas at NPP
ML20065D3851994-03-22022 March 1994
Comment on Draft NUREG-1022, Event Reporting Systems, 10CFR50.72 & 50.73
ML20113H4281992-07-23023 July 1992
Comment Commending Proposed Suppl One to GL 83-28 4.2.3 & 4.2.4 Closing All GL 83-28 Actions for Callaway But Staff Conclusion Should Be Expanded
ML20101P4091992-06-26026 June 1992
Comment Supporting low-level Radwaste After Treatment to Reduce Volume & Represents Safest,Most Cost Effective Solution
ML20091F9501991-12-0202 December 1991
Submits Comments Opposing Draft NUREG-1022, Event Reporting Sys,10CFR50.72 & 50.73. Licensee Feels That Changes to Intial NUREG-1022 Increases Util Expenses W/O Improving Public Health & Safety
ML20058D2741990-10-15015 October 1990
Comment Supporting Proposed Rules 10CFR2,50 & 54 Re Nuclear Power Plant License Renewal
ML20058N9891990-08-0101 August 1990
Comment Re Proposed Rules 10CFR20,30,40 & 70, Notifications of Incidents. Language of Rule Should Be Clarified by Referring to Applicable Reporting Requirements of 10CFR50.72 & 73 for Commercial Nuclear Power Reactors
ML20063Q1771990-07-0606 July 1990
Comment on Petition for Rulemaking PRM-50-55 Re Revs to Fsar.Revs Should Be Driven by Circumstances Rather than by Arbitrary Time Schedule
ML20235V9301989-02-27027 February 1989
Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Maint Programs for Nuclear Power Plants.Endorses NUMARC Comments.Major Concern Is Lack of Demonstrated Need for Rule Since Most Utils Already Have Effective Maint Programs
ML20235T7901989-02-20020 February 1989
Comment Opposing Proposed Rules 10CFR50 & 55 Re Educ & Experience Requirements for Senior Reactor Operators & Supervisors at Nuclear Power Plants.Establishment of Programs for Operators to Earn Degress Would Be Expensive
ML20235T7011989-02-17017 February 1989
Comment Opposing Proposed Rules 10CFR50 & 55 Which Require Degrees of Senior Operators & Shift Supervisors.Both Alternatives Would Contribute to Lower Morale Among Reactor Operators
ML20195J3191988-11-25025 November 1988
Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR26 Re Fitness for Duty Program.Policy of Yearly Testing & Testing for Cause,Backed Up by Training for Drug Prevention Supported
ML20195E8561988-10-28028 October 1988
Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Renewal of Licenses
ML20133B7711985-08-0202 August 1985
Response to 850705 Petitioner Response in Opposition to Util Request That Show Cause Order Not Be Issued.Util Actions Demonstrate Dedication to QA & Safe Plant Operation. Certificate of Svc Encl
ML20128K2111985-07-0505 July 1985
Response Opposing Util Request That Show Cause Order Not Be Issued.Requests NRC Independent Investigation & Suspension or Revocation of OL During Period of Investigation
ML20129H7511985-06-0606 June 1985
Response to Missouri Coalition for Environ & K Drey 850325 Show Cause Petition Requesting Suspension or Revocation of OL Due to Questionable QC Inspector Certification.Denial of Petition Recommended.Certificate of Svc Encl
ML20129H7741985-06-0505 June 1985
Affidavit of DF Schnell Re Issues Raised in Missouri Coalition for Environ & K Drey Petition to Show Cause Requesting Suspension or Revocation of Ol.Root Causes of Questionable QC Certifications Addressed
ML20100F4301985-03-25025 March 1985
Show Cause Petition Requesting Suspension or Revocation of License NPF-30,due to Failure to Comply W/Qa Regulations & Guidelines Re Proper Training of QA Personnel
ML20092H1141984-06-22022 June 1984
Answer Opposing Petitioners 840613 Instant Motion for Order Setting Aside or Staying Permit for Ol.Certificate of Svc Encl
ML20197H4321984-06-13013 June 1984
Motion for Commission Order Setting Aside Low Power Testing Permit Granted on 840611,or in Alternative,Stay to Permit & Prohibit Taking of Any Action.Certificate of Svc Encl
ML20091R6401984-06-13013 June 1984
Request That Commission Enter Order Setting Aside Low Power Testing Permit Allegedly Granted on or About 840611,due to Joint Intervenors 840418 Motion for Leave to File Supplemental Contention
ML20084G1791984-05-0303 May 1984
Affidavit of Cw Mueller Re Financial Integrity of Util
ML20084G1561984-05-0303 May 1984
Answer Opposing Coalition for Environ,Missourians for Safe Energy & Crawdad Alliance 840418 Motion for Leave to File Supplemental Contention Re Financial Qualifications of Util. Certificate of Svc Encl
ML20084G1731984-05-0202 May 1984
Affidavit of DF Schnell Re Financial Stability of Util
ML20083Q3671984-04-18018 April 1984
Supplemental Contention Re Applicant Financial Qualification to Construct & Operate Facility.Certificate of Svc Encl
ML20083Q3521984-04-18018 April 1984
Motion for Leave to File Supplemental Contention Re Financial Qualification of Applicant to Construct & Operate Facility.Certificate of Svc Encl
ML20083Q2601984-04-18018 April 1984
Notice of Appearance of LC Green & Withdrawal of KM Chackes as Counsel for Intervenors.Certificate of Svc Encl
ML20082B4641983-11-15015 November 1983
Comments on Applicant & NRC Responses to Aslab 831020 Memorandum & Order Re Safety of Manually Welded Embedded Plates.Appointment of Independent Expert Requested. Certificate of Svc Encl
ML20082A6631983-11-15015 November 1983
Comments on NRC & Applicant Responses to Aslab 831020 Order Requesting Addl Info.Responses Contain Nothing More than Description of Activities & Conclusion of No Safety Significance.Certificate of Svc Encl
ML20078P7131983-11-0404 November 1983
Response to Aslab 831020 Memorandum & Order for Addl Info on Observation 4-1 of Integrated Design Insp Program Rept Re Original Design Floor Response Spectra.Spectra Have No Safety Significance.Certificate of Svc Encl
ML20078P7251983-11-0303 November 1983
Affidavit of Ew Thomas Re Revised Design Response Spectra
ML20081C3031983-10-27027 October 1983
Reply to Reed 831006 Proposed Findings of Fact & Conclusions of Law Re Contention 6.Findings Mischaracterized Fda Recommendation & Position of Applicant & State of Mo. Certificate of Svc Encl
ML20078H1751983-10-12012 October 1983
Response to Joint Intervenors 830823 Petition for Reconsideration of ASLB 830914 Decision ALAB-740. Insufficient Showing Made to Justify Reopening Record. Certificate of Svc Encl
ML20080Q4471983-10-0606 October 1983
Findings of Fact & Conclusions of Law.Certificate of Svc Encl
ML20080M6381983-09-29029 September 1983
Motion for Extension to File,W/Commission,Petition for Review of Aslab 830914 Decision ALAB-740.Extension Should Be Granted Until 15 Days After Aslab Rules on Joint Intervenors 830923 Reconsideration Petition.Certificate of Svc Encl
ML20078B4981983-09-23023 September 1983
Petition for Reconsideration of 830914 Decision ALAB-740 in Light of New Evidence Re Adequacy of Applicant QA Program. Many Items Remain Open in Integrated Design Insp Program Rept.Certificate of Svc Encl
ML20078B8151983-09-23023 September 1983
Proposed Findings of Fact & Conclusions of Law in Form of Proposed Initial Decision
ML20078B8201983-09-23023 September 1983
Proposed Corrections to 830913 Evidentiary Hearing Transcript.Certificate of Svc Encl
ML20024E8211983-08-31031 August 1983
Comments on Applicant Response to Aslab 830815 Order Re Failure to Provide Safe SA-312 Piping & Adequate QA Program.Certificate of Svc Encl
ML20080C7121983-08-24024 August 1983
Testimony of Re Linnemann in Response to Reed Contentions 6 & 16 Re Protective Actions Against Radioiodines & Messages W/Instructions for long-term Sheltering.Related Correspondence
ML20080C7061983-08-24024 August 1983
Testimony of DF Paddleford in Response to Reed Contentions 6 & 16 Re Protective Actions Against Radioiodines & Messages W/Instructions for long-term Sheltering.Related Correspondence
ML20080C6991983-08-24024 August 1983
Testimony of Ng Slaten in Response to Reed Contentions 6 & 16 Re Protective Actions Against Radioiodines & Messages W/Instructions for long-term Sheltering.Related Correspondence
ML20080C7141983-08-24024 August 1983
Testimony of Kv Miller in Response to Reed Contention 6 Re Protective Actions Against Radioiodines.State of Mo Decided Not to Administer Potassium Iodide to General Public Based on Federal Guidance & Weighing of Advantages/Disadvantages
1999-09-30
[Table view]
Category:PUBLIC COMMENTS ON PROPOSED RULES & PETITIONS FOR
MONTHYEARML20212K8711999-09-30030 September 1999
Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Elimination of Requirements for Noncombustible Fire Barriers Penetration Seal Matls
ULNRC-04117, Comment Supporting Proposed Rules 10CFR50 & 72 Re Reporting Requirements for Nuclear Power Reactors & Draft NUREG-1022, Rev 2, Event Reporting Guidelines 10CFR50.72 & 50.731999-09-22022 September 1999
Comment Supporting Proposed Rules 10CFR50 & 72 Re Reporting Requirements for Nuclear Power Reactors & Draft NUREG-1022, Rev 2, Event Reporting Guidelines 10CFR50.72 & 50.73
ML20217M2091998-03-19019 March 1998
Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Industry Codes & Stds Amended Requirements. NRC Justification for Avoiding Backfit Analysis,Nonstantial.Backfit Analysis,As Required by Law as Mandatory for Proposed Rule Changes
ML20148N0511997-06-19019 June 1997
Comment Opposing Proposed NRC Bulletin 96-001,Suppl 1, CR Insertion Problems
ML20140G1691997-06-0606 June 1997
Requests Extension of Comment Period Expiration Date from 970619 to 970719,for Comments on Control Rod Insertion Problems
ML20077E9041994-12-0202 December 1994
Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re TS Improvements. Advises That PSA Portion of Fourth Criterion Should Be Clarified to Include Only Those Equipment Items Important to risk-significant Sequences as Defined in GL 88-20,App 2
ML20071L1951994-07-21021 July 1994
Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR26 Re Changes to fitness-for-duty Requirements.Urges NRC to Revise Scope of 10CFR26 to Limit Random Drug & Alcohol Testing to Only Workers Who Have Unescorted Access to Vital Areas at NPP
ML20065D3851994-03-22022 March 1994
Comment on Draft NUREG-1022, Event Reporting Systems, 10CFR50.72 & 50.73
ML20113H4281992-07-23023 July 1992
Comment Commending Proposed Suppl One to GL 83-28 4.2.3 & 4.2.4 Closing All GL 83-28 Actions for Callaway But Staff Conclusion Should Be Expanded
ML20101P4091992-06-26026 June 1992
Comment Supporting low-level Radwaste After Treatment to Reduce Volume & Represents Safest,Most Cost Effective Solution
ML20091F9501991-12-0202 December 1991
Submits Comments Opposing Draft NUREG-1022, Event Reporting Sys,10CFR50.72 & 50.73. Licensee Feels That Changes to Intial NUREG-1022 Increases Util Expenses W/O Improving Public Health & Safety
ML20058D2741990-10-15015 October 1990
Comment Supporting Proposed Rules 10CFR2,50 & 54 Re Nuclear Power Plant License Renewal
ML20058N9891990-08-0101 August 1990
Comment Re Proposed Rules 10CFR20,30,40 & 70, Notifications of Incidents. Language of Rule Should Be Clarified by Referring to Applicable Reporting Requirements of 10CFR50.72 & 73 for Commercial Nuclear Power Reactors
ML20063Q1771990-07-0606 July 1990
Comment on Petition for Rulemaking PRM-50-55 Re Revs to Fsar.Revs Should Be Driven by Circumstances Rather than by Arbitrary Time Schedule
ML20235V9301989-02-27027 February 1989
Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Maint Programs for Nuclear Power Plants.Endorses NUMARC Comments.Major Concern Is Lack of Demonstrated Need for Rule Since Most Utils Already Have Effective Maint Programs
ML20235T7901989-02-20020 February 1989
Comment Opposing Proposed Rules 10CFR50 & 55 Re Educ & Experience Requirements for Senior Reactor Operators & Supervisors at Nuclear Power Plants.Establishment of Programs for Operators to Earn Degress Would Be Expensive
ML20235T7011989-02-17017 February 1989
Comment Opposing Proposed Rules 10CFR50 & 55 Which Require Degrees of Senior Operators & Shift Supervisors.Both Alternatives Would Contribute to Lower Morale Among Reactor Operators
ML20195J3191988-11-25025 November 1988
Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR26 Re Fitness for Duty Program.Policy of Yearly Testing & Testing for Cause,Backed Up by Training for Drug Prevention Supported
ML20195E8561988-10-28028 October 1988
Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Renewal of Licenses
1999-09-30
[Table view] |
Text
~ . - . ..s
.....v u :m EUNED ?ULE .1_ .2.4, Ji a berte
[Qg g3 pq3p wasningion D.C. 20555 8 c' 25 P12:33 This letter is in response to the proposed NRC rule on fitness for duty. I agree in principal on the requirement ofo- -
a drug f ree environment when working in the Control Room. JABC a Shift Supervisor in the Control Room, I am very aware of the requirements that Operators have full mental faculties while operating a Nuclear Power Plant.
What I don't agree with is the heavy handed I..ethod proposed by the NRC in this rule making. As seems to be '.he trend in this business negative motivation is used to "make the workplsco better". This assumes that anyone in the Control Room must be on drugs. I am proud of what I do and where I work. Yet repeatedly I hear f rom the Commissioners in newspaper articles and transcripts that the operators are not up to "Par" as the NRC would like them to be. Increasingly the answer has been to monitor the operator as in drug testing. inspection visits to the Control Room on back shif ts and NRC requalification. This makes some of us who had intenced to make Nuclear Power a career wonder about our choice of profession.
To motivate the people under your charge such as the license operator a pcsitive motivation approach should be used. This would include drug training with yearly testing and testing for cause. The latter two programs are in place at the Callaway Plant. I believe wit's these testing programs in place now that as f ar as I cari determine the Callaway Plant is a drug free environment.
If the commission would like to make my job better, I would suggest the Corrmission devise a training program on large l core accident analysis and design base accident studies. I would also propose to the Corraission that middle and upper level management spend some time on shift with the Operators they regulate. This would give them some experience in the day to day operation and concerns we have.
In closing. I would like to see a policy of yearly testing l along with testing for cause and backed up by training for drug prevention. If I may be of any service please feel free i to con act me. '
G y JoN T. Patterson - ~
Shif t Supervisor, Crew 5 Callaway Nuclear Plant P. O. Box 620 Fulton, Missouri 65251 (314)676-6234 0012020007 00112
i PDR PR 26 53FR36795 P! R p MU
