|
---|
Category:SAFETY EVALUATION REPORT--LICENSING & RELATED ISSUES
MONTHYEARML20216H8481999-09-23023 September 1999 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amends 190 & 187 to Licenses DPR-29 & DPR-30,respectively ML20212J0501999-09-21021 September 1999 Safety Evaluation Re Licensee Implementation Program to Resolve USI A-46 at Plant,Per GL 87-02,Suppl 1 ML20210U7831999-08-0404 August 1999 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amends 189 & 186 to Licenses DPR-29 & DPR-30,respectively ML20210L8661999-08-0202 August 1999 Safety Evaluation Accepting License 60-day Response to GL 96-05, Periodic Verification of Design-Basis Capability of Safety-Related Movs ML20196F4261999-06-25025 June 1999 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amends 188 & 185 to Licenses DPR-29 & DPR-30,respectively ML20195K1481999-06-16016 June 1999 Safety Evaluation Authorizing Relief Request RV-23A for Duration of Current 10 Yr IST Interval on Basis That Compliance with Code Requirements Would Result in Hardship Without Compensating Increase in Level of Quality & Safety ML20205Q5291999-04-16016 April 1999 SER Concluding That Quad Cities Nuclear Power Station,Unit 1,can Be Safely Operated for Next Fuel Cycle with Weld O2BS-F4 in Current Condition Because Structural Integrity of Weld Will Be Maintained ML20205J6011999-04-0707 April 1999 Safety Evaluation Accepting Proposed Merger of Calenergy Co, Inc & Midamerican Holdings Co for Quad Cities Nuclear Power Station,Units 1 & 2 ML20205F4791999-03-31031 March 1999 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amends 187 & 184 to Licenses DPR-29 & DPR-30,respectively ML20205D4171999-03-26026 March 1999 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amends 186 & 183 to Licenses DPR-29 & DPR-30,respectively ML20204D9751999-03-17017 March 1999 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amends 185 & 182 to Licenses DPR-29 & DPR-30,respectively ML20198S6841998-12-22022 December 1998 Safety Evaluation Re Proposed Merger of Calenergy Co,Inc & Midamarican Energy Holdings Co.Nrc Should Approve Application with Listed Condition ML20196F8931998-12-0303 December 1998 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amend 182 to License DPR-29 ML20196D9651998-11-30030 November 1998 Safety Evaluation Supporting Relief Requests CR-21 & CR-24, Respectively.Relief Request CR-23,proposed Alternative May Be Authorized,Per 10CFR50.55a & Relief Request CR-22 Was Withdrawn by Licensee ML20196A9761998-11-20020 November 1998 Safety Evaluation Re Licensee 180-day Response to GL 95-07, Thermal Binding of Safety-Related Power-operated Gate Valves ML20153C5061998-09-21021 September 1998 SER Accepting Qualified Unit 1 Supervisor Initial & Continuing Training Program for Dresden Nuclear Power Station,Unit 1 ML20151T2711998-09-0404 September 1998 Safety Evaluation Accepting Licensee Response to NRC Bulletin 95-002 ML20237A1341998-08-0707 August 1998 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amend 163 to License DPR-25 ML20216F0221998-03-0606 March 1998 Safety Evaluation Accepting Request Re Temporary Use of Current Procedure for Containment Repair & Replacement Activities at Plant ML20203K5201998-02-25025 February 1998 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amends 165 & 160 to Licenses DPR-19 & DPR-25,respectively ML20203H2441998-02-25025 February 1998 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amends 166 & 161 to Licenses DPR-19 & DPR-25,respectively ML20202E2971998-01-0505 January 1998 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amends 164,159,179 & 177 to Licenses DPR-19,DPR-25,DPR-29 & DPR-30,respectively ML20211P3151997-10-0707 October 1997 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amends 178 & 176 to Licenses DPR-29 & DPR-30,respectively ML20216J8861997-09-10010 September 1997 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amends 162 & 157 to Licenses DPR-19 & DPR-25,respectively ML20210Q4461997-08-21021 August 1997 SE Supporting Amends 161 & 156 to Licenses DPR-19 & DPR-25, Respectively ML20197B9171997-07-23023 July 1997 Safety Evaluation Re Concrete Expansion Anchor Safety Factors for High Energy Line Break Restraints ML20141E5091997-05-16016 May 1997 Safety Evaluation Supporting TR EMF-96-051(P), Application of Anfb Critical Power Correlation to Coresident GE Fuel for Plant,Unit 2 Cycle 15 ML20141E1681997-05-16016 May 1997 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amends 159 & 154 to Licenses DPR-19 & DPR-25,respectively ML20138F2881997-05-0101 May 1997 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amends 176 & 172 to Licenses DPR-29 & DPR-30,respectively ML20140E9741997-04-30030 April 1997 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amends 157 & 152 to Licenses DPR-19 & DPR-25,respectively ML20138D1791997-04-25025 April 1997 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amends 158 & 153 to Licenses DPR-19 & DPR-25,respectively ML20137R6431997-04-10010 April 1997 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amends 156 & 151 to Licenses DPR-19 & DPR-25,respectively ML20137F7751997-03-27027 March 1997 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amends 175 & 171 to Licenses DPR-29 & DPR-30,respectively ML20136G7731997-03-14014 March 1997 Safety Evaluation Approving Amends 155,150,174 & 170 to Licenses DPR-19,DPR-25,DPR-29 & DPR-30,respectively ML20137G6071997-03-13013 March 1997 Safety Evaluation Supporting Proposed Changes to TS & Bases Ceco ML20135E1551997-02-28028 February 1997 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amends 153,148,172 & 168 to Licenses DPR-19,DPR-25,DPR-29 & DPR-30,respectively ML20134H7601997-02-0707 February 1997 Safety Evaluation Approving Rev 65c of Ceco QA TR CE-1-A ML20112E3921996-05-31031 May 1996 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amend 144 to License DPR-25 ML20092M5091995-09-21021 September 1995 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amends 140,134,162 & 158 to Licenses DPR-19,DPR-25,DPR-29 & DPR-30,respectively ML20092G9351995-09-11011 September 1995 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amends 159 & 155 to Licenses DPR-29 & DPR-30,respectively ML20086C1941995-06-23023 June 1995 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amends 136,130,157 & 153 to Licenses DPR-19,DPR-25,DPR-29 & DPR-30,respectively ML20085L6961995-06-14014 June 1995 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amends 135,129,156 & 152 to Licenses DPR-19,DPR-25,DPR-29 & DPR-30,respectively ML20085H0301995-06-13013 June 1995 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amends 134,128,155 & 151 to Licenses DPR-19,DPR-25,DPR-29 & DPR-30,respectively ML20085K3391995-06-0808 June 1995 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amends 133,127,154 & 150 to Licenses DPR-19,DPR-25,DPR-29 & DPR-30,respectively ML20084R6411995-05-30030 May 1995 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amends 153 & 149 to Licenses DPR-29 & DPR-30,respectively ML20078S8681995-02-22022 February 1995 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amends 132 & 126 to Licenses DPR-19 & DPR-25,respectively ML20078S8301995-02-16016 February 1995 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amends 131,125,152 & 148 to Licenses DPR-19,DPR-25,DPR-29 & DPR-30,respectively ML20149F4151994-08-0404 August 1994 Safety Evaluation Concluding That Unit 1 Can Be Safely Operated During Next Operating Cycle (Cycle 14) ML20070G4541994-07-13013 July 1994 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amends 149 & 145 to Licenses DPR-29 & DPR-30,respectively ML20071G1671994-07-0606 July 1994 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amends 128,122,148 & 144 to Licenses DPR-19,DPR-25,DPR-29 & DPR-30,respectively 1999-09-23
[Table view] Category:TEXT-SAFETY REPORT
MONTHYEAR05000254/LER-1999-004-03, :on 990910,CREVS Air Filtration Unit Was Declared Inoperable.Caused by Airflow Rate in Excess of TS Allowable.Airflow Was Adjusted During Performance of Surveillance Procedure Qcos 5750-021999-10-12012 October 1999
- on 990910,CREVS Air Filtration Unit Was Declared Inoperable.Caused by Airflow Rate in Excess of TS Allowable.Airflow Was Adjusted During Performance of Surveillance Procedure Qcos 5750-02
05000254/LER-1999-003-05, :on 990907,noted That HPCI Was Inoperable Due to Manual Closure of HPCI Steam Supply Isolation Valve.Cause Indeterminate.Suppl LER Will Be Issued Upon Determination of Root Cause of Control Switch Failure1999-10-0707 October 1999
- on 990907,noted That HPCI Was Inoperable Due to Manual Closure of HPCI Steam Supply Isolation Valve.Cause Indeterminate.Suppl LER Will Be Issued Upon Determination of Root Cause of Control Switch Failure
SVP-99-204, Monthly Operating Repts for Sept 1999 for Quad Cities Nuclear Power Station,Units 1 & 2.With1999-09-30030 September 1999 Monthly Operating Repts for Sept 1999 for Quad Cities Nuclear Power Station,Units 1 & 2.With ML20217A9931999-09-30030 September 1999 NRC Regulatory Assessment & Oversight Pilot Program, Performance Indicator Data ML20249C8491999-09-30030 September 1999 1999 Third Quarter Rept of Completed Changes,Tests & Experiments Evaluated,Per 10CFR50.59(b)(2), for Dresden Nuclear Power Station. with ML20216H8481999-09-23023 September 1999 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amends 190 & 187 to Licenses DPR-29 & DPR-30,respectively ML20217A1691999-09-22022 September 1999 Part 21 Rept Re Engine Sys,Inc Controllers,Manufactured Between Dec 1997 & May 1999,that May Have Questionable Soldering Workmanship.Caused by Inadequate Personnel Training.Sent Rept to All Nuclear Customers ML20212J0501999-09-21021 September 1999 Safety Evaluation Re Licensee Implementation Program to Resolve USI A-46 at Plant,Per GL 87-02,Suppl 1 SVP-99-179, Monthly Operating Repts for Aug 1999 for Quad Cities Nuclear Power Station,Units 1 & 2.With1999-08-31031 August 1999 Monthly Operating Repts for Aug 1999 for Quad Cities Nuclear Power Station,Units 1 & 2.With ML20210U7831999-08-0404 August 1999 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amends 189 & 186 to Licenses DPR-29 & DPR-30,respectively ML20210L8661999-08-0202 August 1999 Safety Evaluation Accepting License 60-day Response to GL 96-05, Periodic Verification of Design-Basis Capability of Safety-Related Movs SVP-99-155, Monthly Operating Repts for July 1999 for Quad Cities Nuclear Power Station,Units 1 & 2.With1999-07-31031 July 1999 Monthly Operating Repts for July 1999 for Quad Cities Nuclear Power Station,Units 1 & 2.With ML20210R6081999-07-31031 July 1999 Monthly Operating Repts for July 1999 for Dresden Nuclear Power,Units 1,2 & 3.With ML20209E1291999-06-30030 June 1999 Monthly Operating Repts for June 1999 for Dresden Nuclear Power Station,Units 1,2 & 3.With ML20210D3071999-06-30030 June 1999 Corrected Page 8 to MOR for June 1999 for DNPS Unit 3 ML20209J3481999-06-30030 June 1999 1999 Second Quarter Rept of Completed Changes,Tests & Experiments, Per 10CFR50.59.With SVP-99-148, Monthly Operating Repts for June 1999 for Quad Cities Nuclear Power Station,Units 1 & 2.With1999-06-30030 June 1999 Monthly Operating Repts for June 1999 for Quad Cities Nuclear Power Station,Units 1 & 2.With ML20196H8621999-06-30030 June 1999 NRC Regulatory Assessment & Oversight Pilot Program, Performance Indicator Data, June 1999 Rept ML20196F4261999-06-25025 June 1999 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amends 188 & 185 to Licenses DPR-29 & DPR-30,respectively 05000265/LER-1999-002-04, :on 990527,station Personnel Discovered Unsealed One Inch Diameter Pipe Penetrating Secondary Containment.Caused by Lack of Proper Work Control.Util Will Permanently Cap Spare Subject Pipe by 9907151999-06-25025 June 1999
- on 990527,station Personnel Discovered Unsealed One Inch Diameter Pipe Penetrating Secondary Containment.Caused by Lack of Proper Work Control.Util Will Permanently Cap Spare Subject Pipe by 990715
05000254/LER-1999-004-02, :on 990521,reactor Scram Occurred.Caused by Steam Intrusion Into Scram Discharge Volume.Procedure Qcop 12200-11, RWCU Sys Startup & Pump Operation, Revised1999-06-18018 June 1999
- on 990521,reactor Scram Occurred.Caused by Steam Intrusion Into Scram Discharge Volume.Procedure Qcop 12200-11, RWCU Sys Startup & Pump Operation, Revised
ML20195K1481999-06-16016 June 1999 Safety Evaluation Authorizing Relief Request RV-23A for Duration of Current 10 Yr IST Interval on Basis That Compliance with Code Requirements Would Result in Hardship Without Compensating Increase in Level of Quality & Safety SVP-99-123, Monthly Operating Repts for May 1999 for Quad Cities Nuclear Power Station,Units 1 & 2.With1999-05-31031 May 1999 Monthly Operating Repts for May 1999 for Quad Cities Nuclear Power Station,Units 1 & 2.With ML20195G6381999-05-31031 May 1999 Monthly Operating Repts for May 1999 for Dresden Nuclear Power Station,Units 1,2 & 3.With ML20210H3501999-05-25025 May 1999 Rev 1 to Quad Cities Station IPEEE Submittal Rept ML20207E1621999-05-25025 May 1999 Rev 1 to Quad Cities IPEEE, Consisting of Revised Chapter 4.0 Re Internal Fire Analysis ML20195B2591999-05-19019 May 1999 Rev 66a to CE-1-A,consisting of Proposed Changes to QAP for Dnps,Qcs,Znps,Lcs,Byron & Braidwood Stations 05000254/LER-1999-001-04, :on 970715,three Spare Valves Were Determined to Require Monthly Verification in Accordance with TS SR 4.7.A.2.Caused by Inadequate Review of Procedure Rev. Surveillance Revised to Ensure to Continued Compliance1999-05-12012 May 1999
- on 970715,three Spare Valves Were Determined to Require Monthly Verification in Accordance with TS SR 4.7.A.2.Caused by Inadequate Review of Procedure Rev. Surveillance Revised to Ensure to Continued Compliance
SVP-99-102, Summary Rept of Changes,Tests & Experiments Completed, Covering Period 990201-0430. with1999-04-30030 April 1999 Summary Rept of Changes,Tests & Experiments Completed, Covering Period 990201-0430. with SVP-99-104, Monthly Operating Repts for Apr 1999 for Quad Cities Nuclear Power Station,Units 1 & 2.With1999-04-30030 April 1999 Monthly Operating Repts for Apr 1999 for Quad Cities Nuclear Power Station,Units 1 & 2.With ML20206N2821999-04-30030 April 1999 Monthly Operating Repts for Apr 1999 for Dresden Nuclear Power Station,Units 1,2 & 3.With ML20205Q5291999-04-16016 April 1999 SER Concluding That Quad Cities Nuclear Power Station,Unit 1,can Be Safely Operated for Next Fuel Cycle with Weld O2BS-F4 in Current Condition Because Structural Integrity of Weld Will Be Maintained ML20205J6011999-04-0707 April 1999 Safety Evaluation Accepting Proposed Merger of Calenergy Co, Inc & Midamerican Holdings Co for Quad Cities Nuclear Power Station,Units 1 & 2 SVP-99-071, Monthly Operating Repts for Mar 1999 for Quad Cities Nuclear Power Station,Units 1 & 2.With1999-03-31031 March 1999 Monthly Operating Repts for Mar 1999 for Quad Cities Nuclear Power Station,Units 1 & 2.With ML20205N7491999-03-31031 March 1999 Monthly Operating Repts for Mar 1999 for Dresden Nuclear Power Station,Units 1,2 & 3.With ML20206B1901999-03-31031 March 1999 First Quarter Rept of Completed Changes,Tests & Experiments Per 10CFR50.59 for Dresden Nuclear Power Station. with ML20205F4791999-03-31031 March 1999 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amends 187 & 184 to Licenses DPR-29 & DPR-30,respectively ML20205D4171999-03-26026 March 1999 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amends 186 & 183 to Licenses DPR-29 & DPR-30,respectively ML20205C5671999-03-19019 March 1999 Simulator Four-Yr Certification Rept ML20204D9751999-03-17017 March 1999 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amends 185 & 182 to Licenses DPR-29 & DPR-30,respectively ML20207D2341999-03-0101 March 1999 Post Outage (90 Day) Summary Rept, for ISI Exams & Repair/Replacement Activities Conducted 981207-1205 ML20204B1571999-02-28028 February 1999 Monthly Operating Repts for Feb 1999 for Quad Cities,Units 1 & 2.With ML20207M6921999-02-28028 February 1999 Monthly Operating Repts for Feb 1999 for Dresden Nuclear Power Station,Units 1,2 & 3.With ML20207E9311999-02-26026 February 1999 Part 21 Rept Re Sprague Model TE1302 Aluminum Electrolytic Capacitors with Date Code of 9322H.Caused by Aluminum Electrolytic Capacitors.Affected Capacitors Replaced SVP-99-021, Quarterly Summary SER of Changes,Tests & Experiments Completed, Covering Period of 981101-990131,IAW 10CFR50.59 & 10CFR50.71(e).With1999-01-31031 January 1999 Quarterly Summary SER of Changes,Tests & Experiments Completed, Covering Period of 981101-990131,IAW 10CFR50.59 & 10CFR50.71(e).With ML20199M0891999-01-22022 January 1999 Part 21 Rept Re Failure of Square Root Converters.Caused by Failed Aluminum Electrolytic Capacitory Spargue Electric Co (Model Number TE1302 with Mfg Date Code 9322H).Sent Square Root Converters Back to Mfg,Barker Microfarads,Inc ML20199C8951998-12-31031 December 1998 Monthly Operating Repts for Dec 1998 for Dnps,Units 1,2 & 3 ML20199D3261998-12-31031 December 1998 10CFR50.59 SER for 1998-04 Quarter, of Changes,Tests & Experiments.With ML20205M7061998-12-31031 December 1998 Unicom Corp 1998 Summary Annual Rept. with ML20205D1311998-12-31031 December 1998 1998 Decommissioning Funding Status Rept for Yr Ending 981231 for Quad Cities Nuclear Power Station,Units 1 & 2 1999-09-30
[Table view] |
Text
.
l g
4 UNITED STATES s
g
,j NUCLEAR RECULATORY COMMISSION f
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20666 4 001 o% *****/
4 SAFETY EVALVATION BY THE OFFICE OF NVCLEAR REACTOR REGULATION 9
RELATED TO AMENDMENT NO.155 TO FACILITY OPERATING LICENSE NO. DPR-19.
AMENDMENT NO.150 TO FACILITY' OPEPATING LICENSE N0. DPR-25.
AMENDMENT N0. 174 TO FACILITY OPERATING LICENSE N0. DPR-29 AND AMENDMENT NO. 170 TO FACILITY OPERATING LICENSE N0. DPR-30 COMMONWEALTH EDIS0N COMPANY AND MIDAMERICAN ENERGY COMPANY DRESDEN NUCLEAR POWER STATION. UNITS 2 AND 3. AND OVAD CITIES NUCLEAR POWER STATION. UNITS 1 AND 2 DOCKET NOS. 50-237. 50-249. 50-254 AND 50-265
1.0 INTRODUCTION
By letter dated January 6,1997, Commonwealth Edison Company (Comed, the licensee) submitted an amendment requesting to clarify and maintain consistency between the operability requirements for protective instrumentation and associated bypass features of the Technical Specifications (TS) for the Dresden Nuclear Power Station, Units 2 and 3, and the Quad Cities Nuclear Power Station, Units 1 and 2.
2.0 EVALUATION A.
Tables 3.1. A-1 and 4.1. A-1: Items 9. 10. and 11 Tables 3.1. A-1 and 4.1. A-1, Items 9,10, and 11 include functional units for the turbine stop valve closure scram (Item 9), the turbine EHC control oil low pressure scram (Item 10), and the turbine - control valve fast closure scram (Item 11).
These items include a footnote with the applicable OPERATIONAL MODE which addresses when these functional units are applicable.
The current footnote (d) in Table 3.1.A-1 states that the function shall be automatically bypassed when thermal power is less than 45 percent of RATED THERMAL POWER and current footnote (1) in Table 4.1.A-1 states that the function is not required to be OPERABLE when THERMAL POWER is less than 45 percent of RATED THERMAL POWER.
The current Reactor Protection System (RPS) design at Dresden and Quad Cities incorporates an automatic bypass of these functions when first stage pressure 9703180193 970314 PDR ADOCK 05000237 P
PDR
s v is less than 400 psi, or approximately 45 percent of rated steam flow. When reactor power is below 45 percent of RATED THERMAL POWER, the applicable transient for these protective functions do not threaten the fuel integrity.
Also when the RPS system instrumentation for these items don't meet the specified minimum number of OPERABLE CHANNELS, ACTION 16 requires that a power reduction be initiated within 15 minutes and THERMAL POWER be reduced to less than 45 percent of RATED THERMAL POWER within 2 hours2.314815e-5 days <br />5.555556e-4 hours <br />3.306878e-6 weeks <br />7.61e-7 months <br />.
The licensee proposes to make footnote (d) of Table 3.1.A-1 and footnote (1) for Table 4.1.A-1 identical.
This change would clarify the APPLICABLE MODE for Items 9, 10, and 11 as being MODE 1 when THERMAL POWER is greater than or equal to 45 percent of RATED THERMAL POWER.
This is consistent with the Improved Standard Technical Specifications (ISTS) (NUREG-1433).
This change is administrative in nature and is consistent with the design of the systems at Dresden and Quad Cities and is, therefore, acceptable.
B.
Table 3.2.E-1: Items 1.a. b and c Table 3.2.E-1, Items 1.a, b, and c are functional units for the Rod Block Monitors (RBM), upscale, inoperative, and downscale trips.
The RBM is designed with an automatic bypass feature when a peripheral control rod is selected and when the power level is less than 30 percent RATED THERMAL POWER.
When reactor power is less than 30 percent of RATED THERMAL POWER, the worst case rod withdrawal error will not challenge fuel integrity limits.
Footnote (a) for the RBM in Table 3.2.E-1 states that the RBM shall be automatically bypassed when the referenced average power range monitor (APRM) channel indicates less than 30 percent of RATED THERMAL POWER.
Footnote (e) states that the applicable OPERATIONAL MODE for the RBM is MODE 1 when THERMAL POWER is greater than or equal to 30 percent RATED THERMAL POWER.
The licensee proposes to eliminate the reference to the automatic bypass feature in footnote (a).
Footnote (e) clearly indicates when the RBM shall be operable.
By deleting the automatic bypass reference in footnote (a) these footnotes become consistent with other table notations in providing clearer guidance regarding the applicability of this TS. The actual automatic feature will not be affected.
This change is also consistent with the ISTS.
Because this change maintains consistency with the RBM design and provides clarity as to the applicability of the RBM, it is acceptable.
C. Tables 3.2.E-1 and 4.2.E-1: Item 3.a Tables 3.2.E-1 and 4.2.E-1 define the applicability and surveillance requirements for the control rod block instrumentation, respectively. A design feature of Item 3.a, Source Range Monitors (SRM), " detector not full in," rod block position is to be automatically bypassed if the Intermediate Range Monitor (IRM) channels are on range 3 or higher or when the count rate exceeds 100 counts per second (cps). These features ensure that the SRM is available at low power operation only when there is posit.ive detection of an adequate neutron flux (100 cps) to be detected up to when the IRMs are
6 A
i,.
adequately detecting neutron flux which is at range 3 or higher, otherwise there is a rod block.
The licensee is proposing to eliminate the reference of the count rate in footnote (b) for Table 3.2.E-1 and footnote (f) for Table 4.2.E-1 and provide a new footnote (j) for Table 3.2.E-1 and footnote (k) for Table 4.2.E-1 to specifically identify that there is a rod block if the detector count rate is less than or equal to 100 cps when determining the operability of the SRM when the detector is not full in. This change maintains the design of the control rod block instrumentation, however, more clearly defines the operability requirements of the system.
This change is acceptable.
3.0 STATE CONSULTATION
In accordance with the Commission's regulations, the Illinois State official l
was notified of the proposed issuance of the amendments.
The State official had no comments.
4.0 ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATION
The amendments change a requirement with respect to the installation or use of a facility component located within the restricted area as defined in 10 CFR Part 20.
The NRC staff has determined that the amendments involve no significant increase in the amounts, and no significant change in the types, of any effluents that may be released offsite, and that there is no significant increase in individual or cumulative occupational radiation exposure.
The Commission has previously issued a proposed finding that the amendments involve no significant hazards consideration, and there has been no i
public comment on such finding (62 FR 6573). Accordingly, the amendments meet the eligibility criteria for categorical exclusion set forth in 10 CFR 51.22(c)(9).
Pursuant to 10 CFR 51.22(b), no environmental impact statement or environmental assessment need be prepared in connection with the issuance of the amendments.
5.0 CONCLUSION
The Commission has concluded, based on the considerations discussed above, that:
(1) there is reasonable assurance that the health and safety of the public will not be endangered by operation in the proposed manner, (2) such activities will be conducted in compliance with the Commission's regulations, and (3) the issuance of the amendments will not be inimical to the common defense and security or to the health and safety of the public.
Principal Contributor: Robert M. Pulsifer Date:
March 14, 1997 5
w