ML20136B222

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Forwards Five Addl Issues for Addition to Issues Requiring Further Qa/Qc Review Identified from Structural/Civil Sser 8
ML20136B222
Person / Time
Site: Comanche Peak  Luminant icon.png
Issue date: 03/15/1985
From: Jeng D
NRC - COMANCHE PEAK PROJECT (TECHNICAL REVIEW TEAM)
To: Workinger T
NRC - COMANCHE PEAK PROJECT (TECHNICAL REVIEW TEAM)
Shared Package
ML20136A539 List: ... further results
References
FOIA-85-59 NUDOCS 8601020479
Download: ML20136B222 (2)


Text

.

$ $/J/ W

. s "' '

u*.1TED STATES I

REGULATORY CCMMISS ON

\\.j,9

i. AF.HINGTON. O C. 20555

)

, >= ;.g "j i

....~

MAR 15 %

MEMORANDU.'! FOR:

T. R. Workinger, TRT FROM:

J. C. Jen:. Civil / Structural Subgroup 2.w.:ne Peak TRT

SUBJECT:

SUPPLEMENT NO. 8 REFERENCES TO QA/QC SSER 4

REFERENCE:

March 8,1985 Memo from T. R. Workinger to H. Livermore, QA/QC Group Leader The Civil / Structural Staff has reviewed the list of issues requiring further QA/QC review as identified by you from the Civi.1/ Structural SSERs in Supplement No. 8 (Attachment 1 to the reference). We believe that this list should be expanded to include the five additional issues provided in the enclosure to this memoranaum.

If you have any questions, please contact T. Langowski at 443-7956 or D. Jeng at 443-7974.

2t c l

0. C. Jeng, Ci-ructural j

Subgroup, TRT

Enclosure:

As stated cc: w/ encl.

V. Noonan J. Calvo L. Shao R. C. Tang R. Keimig i

H. Live o I

D. Hunter R. Philleo

{

C. Hofmeyer J. Devers T. Langowski l

7" N,3 j1 o g K O 0

ivb. gyva

~

8601020479 B51113 PDR FogA l

l j

l OARDEBS-39 pop

4,..

g Y.AR 1513c5 i

ENCLOSURE ppK-291/Theresultsoftheevaluationpertainingtolackoflaboratory

. signatures on batch tickets will be further assessed as part of the overall programmatic review concerning procedures under QA/QC Category 6 "QC Inspection."

ppK-42f/Theresultsoftheevaluationpertainingtoinadequateconsoli-dation of concrete will be further assessed as part of the over-all programmatic review concerning procedures under QA/QC Category 6 "QC Inspection."

ppK-64f/TheresultsoftheseevaluationspertainingtoQCinspection procedures (falsification) will be further assessed as a part of the overall programmatic review concerning procedures addressed under QA/QC Category 3 " Records".

pp K-84 This (control room ceiling design) would indicate failure of the quality assurance program to ensure that applicable provisions of Regulatory Guide 1.29 were fully met.

ppK-961/TheresultsofthisevaluationpertainingtoQCcontrolsatthe batch plant will be further assessed as part of the overall i

programmatic review concernirc :recedures adcressed under QA/QC Category 6 "QC Inspection."

f/CommitsNRCtoprepareasupplementtothisSSER; based,inpart,upon the findings of the QA/QC Group.

4 b

9 6

9 e

i o

-e-..

. - ~, - -. -. -

-.m---

--..,,, - we r-,-

e-

.y e

.