ML20134B158

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Forwards Schedule for Internal Review of Rev of Encl Draft Congressional Rept.Comments & Markup of Draft Rept Should Be Submitted to B Altman by 840116.W/o Draft Rept
ML20134B158
Person / Time
Site: 05000000
Issue date: 01/06/1984
From: Ankrum G
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE)
To: Deyoung R, Partlow J, Taylor J
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE)
Shared Package
ML17198A269 List: ... further results
References
FOIA-84-293 NUDOCS 8508150532
Download: ML20134B158 (3)


Text

- --

y %,c a

r

+-

UNITED STATES

.i.,M,

3

[ " y, e c h NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION k,'N['nh!

C W ASHING TON, 0. C. 20$$5

%,,.....f January 6,1984 MEM3RANDUM FOR:

Richard C. DeYoung, Director, IE James M. Taylor, Deputy Directer, IE Janes G. Partlow, Acting Dire: tor, DOASIP, IE Robert F. Heishman, 0:PB, DOAS:0, IE e

Thomas F. Dorian, ELD 4

FROM:

G. Ted Ankrum, Chief, OUA3, DCASIP, IE SUEJECT:

SCHEDULE FOR REPORT TO C0',GRESS AND REVIEW OF D;A T FEP0;T En:icture 1 is cur schedule for internal revit, at: revision cf the Congres-sional Report.

It allows for a revision cf the en:lesed draf t based on ::ments by you and the review group prior to sending it cut for ACRS, ECD, and inter-cffice review cn January 27.

Our WITS schedule fc forwarcing the repert to the EDO is February 1, so we will be three days early.

The time rer.aining c:es not per-it a secuential review by these organizations, 50 their reviews veill hase 10 be :trformed in parallel.

It appears that the perted of January 27 to February

1 nill Le the best time for the meeting with key ::ngressicnal, CYE, an: cther c tside groups to explain our CCnClusions.

Ihe s c*idule tercets Februa r,. 22 as the date for sending the report to the EDO for fer arding to the Comission.

The schedule targets the week of March 5 for a Ccm-issicn briefing with the fcilowing v.eek as our second choice, if we brief later than that, time will be otremely short for making any changes required Dy the Comission.

I believ_e the best time for the meeting with Mr. Dircks and Mr. Denton to discuss the feasibility of an open ACRS meeting cr, the report tc be January 26 or January 27, simultaneous with our sending the report out for interoffice review.

I suggest that Bill Olmstead also attend.

ELD has been closely involved in the report preparation and plans for $Losequent r.eetings with cutside groups.

This issue nay be moot,,however.

The attorney assigned to the ACRS indicates that the meeting can be closed ursuant to 10 CFR 9.104(b):

The reeting may be closed "if opening any netting r disclesing any infor ation requested by or testimony or posposals to be given to other agencies of govern-mcnt, including the Congress and the Eyecutive Bra *.:h before the requesting agency would receive the information, testim ny cr proposals."

Please ncte that the schedule shows an ACRS briefing tentatively scheduled for the wcek of Februa ry 21.

We have to schedule the ACRS brie'ing in advance but we can cancel it later if necessary.

Obout00932 OD0703 ICH I -293 ppy L./t'12,

(

J o

Multiple Addressees

-2 January 6,1984 is a revision of the earlier draft Congressional Report.

It has been revised significantly to reflect comments from you and project staff and contractors.

Please provide your comments / markup of this draf t to Bill Altman by January 16.

G. Ted Ankrun, Chief Quality Assurance Eranch Division of Quality Assurance.

Safeguards, and Inspecticn Programs Office of Inspection and En'orcement

Enclosures:

1.

Revised Schedule 2.

Revised Draft Congressional Report Distribution:

(w/oenclosures)

E. L. Jordan, IE G. T. Ankrum, IE W. D. Altman, IE QAS!P Reading QUAB Reading WD Altman Reading

/

/

/

OUAB:QAS!P:IE*

q BTQAS!P:!E WD Altran G.Ankrum 1/

/84 klo

!/ (s /84 k

F o

o a 1

i SCHEDULE Date Activity Janua ry 9 - 16 Review by DeYoung, Taylor, Portlow, Heishman, Dorian l

l January 10 - 11 Review Group tieeting January 16 - 23 Revision based on Coments of IE Management, ELD and Review Group

.e l

January 24 - 26 IE Concurrence Chain 4

l January 27 Sent Out for Interof' ice and ACRS review:

AC:lS, EDO, NRR, ELD, Regions January 27 - Feb.10 ACRS and Interoffice Review Ferico l

February 11 - 21 Revision based on Inter:" ice Review anc Frelir.inary ACRS Reaction

,;ee of February 21 ACES Subcommittee Erie'it;

ebruery 21 - 22 IE Concurrence Chain Fe:rsary 22 Sent to EDO February 22 - Mar.13 EDO, Commission Review l

l i;eek of March 5 Commission Eriefing (~irst Preference) 1: arch 12 Alternate for Commission Eriefing l

Ma r:h 14 - 23 Revision based on Cormission and ACRS Corents (ACRS Full Committee Meeting March 15-17)

March 24 - 26 Report Printing March 27 Forward to EDO for Trarsrittal to Commission i

April 2 Commission Transmittti tc Congress 9

L