ML20134A890
See also: IR 05000389/1975001
Text
.
,
.
c-)
')_
'~
,
.
.
.
I-I
IE Rpt. No. 50-389/75-1
,
..
,
.
.
7[
DETAILS I
Prepared by:
-
.
'
.
,
I,..E. Foster, Reactor,Inspeg, tor
Date
Facilities Section
'
. Facilities Construction Branch
]
,
,
.
,
j
Dates of Inspection: March 13-14, 1975
6 ff'
/
Reviewed by:
J.g. Yryan't,68'enior I'nspector
Data
Fdilities Section
Facilities Construction Branch
'
]
'
-
j
1.
Persons Contacted
,
l
.;
'
Florida Power and Light Company (FP&L)
'
.
Dr. R. G. Cockrell - Manager, QA
l
H. D. Mantz - Assistant Manager, QA Construction
1
A. M. Anderson - Senior QA Engineer, Electrical
' -g
R. P. Krolicki - QA Engineer, NDE
l
D. McAfee - Senior QA Engineer, Mechanical
!
J. Forbes - QA Engineer, Civil
'
2.
Scope of Inspection
.}
'
"
This inspection was performed to determine if the licensee's QA program
in the areas of site preparation, foundations and containment is
comensurate with the work to be performed under the Limited Work
'
(
Authorization (LWA-2).
l
'
3.
Quality Assurance Program
Implementation of the licensee's QA Program associated with site prepara-
tion, foundatians and containment (concrete) was av==4ned in detail.
Areas av==4ned included the QA/QC organization, audits and functional
relationships of the licensee and contractor personnel. Within the
areas av==ined, the inspector has no further questions.
a.
Organizational / Functional Alignment
The present QA organizational charts do not meet the constitments
made in the SAR; however, the licensee is in the process of
revising Chapter 17 of the SAR to depict the present organization.
The reason for the above change is that the licensee will perform
the site QA and QC functions instead of Ebasco.
The site QA
.
personnel will report to the Assistant QA Manager.
The site QC
Supervisors will report administrative 1y to the Superintendent of
Construction Quality Control and functionally to the Construction
.
8508150456 050703
LEIGHTOB4-293
--
. _ .
. _ - . . . . . . _ _ _ _ _ _ .
.
- - - - _ _ .
-_ -_
- - - . _ _ _ . -
- . _ - . -
,
_ . - - -
-
v
'
O
O
.
s.
..
-_
-
. .
,
IE Rpt. No. 50-389/75-1
4
I-2
j'
-
-
.
]
l
. . , -
Superintendent. The licensee stated that additional QA and QC
f
personnel will,be added to. handle the increased workload 3
The
inspector a-ined the new orgadizatio'nal efutrts, position
'
f
descriptions, duties and responsibilities cLf the QA/QC personnel.
The licensee stated that revisions to the SAR and QA =manal would
!
j
be submitted prior to start of work.
.I
b.
Audits / Surveillance
The inspector avamined QA audit procedures which specify that audits
j
and surveillance of construction activities will be performed weekly,
,'
i
l
1
monthly, semi-annually and. annually depending upon the activity
l
being audited. Surveillances of certain activities may be performed _
l
on a daily basis. Each QA* engineer is required to prepara a schedule
for performing audits /survaillances for his discipline. Each audit /
l
1
surveillance must be documented and submitted to appropriate levels
l
1
l
1
of management.
Construction audit schedules for St. Lucie 2 were
l
l
not available for avamination; however, the licensee stated that
schedules would be available for IE:II review prior to start of
j
'
work.
r
Is
l
'
4.
Documents Framined
l
Organizational Chart of Nuclear Affairs dated February 28, 1975,
a.
which includes the QA organization.
.
,
b.
Proposed organizational chart for construction quality control.
,
Position deacriptions for quality control personnel.
c.
Organizational description of construction quality control.'
This
d.
document specifies responsibilities and interfaces with other FP&L
,
organizations and outside organizations.
Quality Instruction Form QI 6. QAD.1-1 and QI 5.
a.
f.
List of QC procedures to be developed for St. Lucie 2.
.
g.
QA audit procedures Nos. 18.1, 18.2, 18.3 and 18.4.
,
I
e
h
-.-
. _ -
- - - _
, _ . . .
- -.-- - _ . . -
S
g
r
.
.
l
l ..
ns
.)e
v
,
..
.
,
,
,
- ..
s
'~
IE Rpt. No. 50-389/75-1
II-l
,
,
, . , -
.
j
DETAILS II
Prepared by:
$!2.l!T6
j
R. 'W. Wrigh::, Req) tor Inspector
Date
'J
~
' '
' Engineering'SectioE .
'P
- i
, Facilities Construetion, Branch
, ,
-
.
'
Dates of Inspection: March 13-14, 1975
Reviewed ~by:
b4 dim
3 .2 /- 7f
-
j
L. L. Beratan, Senior Inspector
Date
.i
Engineering Section
j
Facilities Construction Branch
!
.
I
1.-
Individuals Contacted
-
}
!
Florida Power and Light Company (FP&L)
._
l
t
(
$
Dr. R. G. Cgekrell - Manager of QA
l
i
H. D. Mantz - Assistant QA Manager
!
I
A. M. Anderson - QA Engineer
- 3
l
J. R. Forbes - QA Engineer, Civil
'
C. F. Harron - QA Engineer, Civil
!
l
2.
Scope
'
i
j
-
This inspection was conducted to determine whether quality.:. control
',
procedures, work performance procedures and recordkeeping require-
j
ments for activities to be conducted under Limited Work Authorization-2
'
(LWA-2) have been or are being developed in the areas of site
preparation, foundation materials, concreting, fabrication and
installation.
,
,
3.
QC System Review
a.
General
Discussions with FP&L onsite civil engineers, examination of
the developing QA/QC program and review of available QC
specifications and procedures pertinent to Unit No. 2 confirms
that FP&L is in the process of implementing an onsite QC pro-
gram that is consistent with its LWA-2 needs and the SAR
requireaants.
FP&L's onsite control procedures are not
approved or final as yet; however, considering the antici-
pated start of construction date (June 1975), the licensee's
civil quality control procedure development appears to be at
a reasonable stage of development and implementation.
,
l
.
.
.
e
- 4.exe
. _, ..
....
.
- * wp
- ,
,
e
- ---
. -- - - -
.
- - _ _ - - . . , - . .
-
.
.j
/
4
- - -
i' 'n
l
-
n -
.
.
d .~
IE Rpt. No. 50-389/75b.
II-2 -
'
~
.
.:
, . > -
,
b.
Organization Change and Anticipated Construction Developments
1 t
.
'
1
FP&L is in the process of developinf and'idanaging the
j
QA/QC and record. control functions for Unit 2 utilizing
1
licensee personnel exclusively.
Conversation with FP&L
1
management revealed that FP&L had hired a Field QC Super-
j
visor for Lucie No. 2, and he will eventually be assisted
j
by seven people, three clerical and four area QC super-
!
visory type personnel. The above subject personnel are to
j
report onsite shortly to become familiar with the site and
j
the contractor to effect a smooth transition.
The licensee
'
stated in the event FP&L pas unable to setup for the above
l
opera;;1on prior to work commencing, Ebasco is prepared to
-
'
handle the QA/QC, record-* control tasks as they did for Unit
'
y
No. 1.
i
-
l
FP&L ;La currently receiving work package bids from various
'i
material suppliers, contractors and service organizations
l
j
for work connected with LWA-2.
A new concrete batch plant
-
l
1
has been recommended and is being considered by FP&L to
1
increase concrete production and permit larger monolithic
.)
-
pours.
a
c.
QC Specification and Procedure Review
1
c.
}
The following specifications and quality control pro'cedures for
groundwater and earthwork operations, the manufacturing, placing,
testing and control of structural grade concrete were examined
for conformance to SAR commitments and applicable codes and
standards.
1
.-
,
1
Specification FLO 2998.471 " Excavation and Backfill"
Procedure
CSP-1
" Excavation and Backfill"
l
Procedure
ASP-1
" Environmental Protection Control Procedi
Specification FLO 2998.473 " Concrete, Seismic Class I"
i
Specification FLO 2998.474 " Concrete Reinforcing Steel, Furnishing,
Fabrication and Delivery"
No items of noncompliance were identified; however, the
inspector expressed concern in that the above procedures
were in general all-inclusive but they did not clearly
delineate or specify specific inspector involvement,
responsibility and duties.
The licensee commented that
these civil inspection procedures are being prepared and
"
will be available for review prior to the LWA-2 work
conmencing.
The following inspection procedures are to
l
be provided:
.
.
. -
. , . . . . _ ,
- . . - . ..- .
.m..
___.
0
. - - -
-- -.
--
--
,b
._ _ - - _ _ .-- ..
_.
. . _ _ -
. .. _ _ - . .. .
n
3.
l
.-
x.1 -
wJ
,
%
s
<
.
IE Rpt. No.. 50-389/75-1
II-3
.
-
h
e- 8
,
i
(1) Concrete pre-po,ur ins'pection
,
,
,i
,
(2) Corcrat'a inspection - during p6sr ' !'
'
t
.
.
,
l
(3) Post placement concrete inspection ~
.
'
[
'
.
-
i
(4) Rabar installation inspection
1
.
J
j
(5) Compaction of fill inspection
-
4
l
4
e
e
O
e
$
l
,
u
..l
i
.
ts
~
u
_
l
I
r
,
9
.
6
9
e
e
@
e
!
I
F
e
e
"' = * + * .
=w
,,.em.,,
6
a_ . .
..
O
h
-
. - . _ _ . _ . . . - _ _ . , _ _ . _ . . - _ _ . . . .
...-,,...____,..________._____.,_____,._...,___,._____..____,.m
. . . _ , _ _ . _ _ - _ . _ _ - _ _ _ . .
.
_
y
'
.
.. ... .
.
IE 1pt. No. 50-389/75-1
-2-
-
.
,
,
.. . -
~,_
e
j
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS
+
.
g
.
-. . . .
4
.
.
. . . .
,,
.
..,,
'
I.
Deviations
,
!
.
.
.
i
-
.
J
None
,
,
.
II. Licensee Action on Previously Identified Deviations
None
,
.
III. New Unresolved Items
'
.
$
None
-
. . . . .
,
IV.
Status of Previously Reported Unresolved Items
.
}
.]
None
1
.l
V.
Design Channes
!
.:;f
None
.g
t
VI.
Unusual Occurrences
,
!.I
.
"
.j
None
1
VII. Other Significant Findings
-
The licensee is planning to perform site QA and QC activities instead
of subcontracting to Ebasco.
Excavation work under an LWA is expected
'
to start by mid-June 1975.
VIII. Management Interview
A management interview was held with Dr. R. G. Cockrell, QA Manager,
and members of his staff at the conclusion of the inspection.
The
results and findings of the inspection were discussed in detail.
.
.
-- - - - - -___.
..
-. _._ . .. _ . . .
. __
_
.
- - - - -
. .
. .
,n
- - .-n.-
. _ . _ . . _ . . .,.c.,
..---..--- - . - . - - . ,-._- - - , -- - . _ - _ _ , , - . , - , ~ . , , - , - - - . , . . .
- _ _ - _ . , .- , , , - , , - - . ,