ML20127C180

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Rev 0 to Nuclear Project Operating Procedure POP-N-713, Use of Insp Cleanup Repts
ML20127C180
Person / Time
Site: Waterford Entergy icon.png
Issue date: 12/08/1975
From: Greathouse G
J.A. JONES CONSTRUCTION CO.
To:
Shared Package
ML17198A241 List: ... further results
References
FOIA-84-455 POP-N-713, NUDOCS 8506220162
Download: ML20127C180 (17)
v • d • e


Text

Y e .

4 J. A. JONES CONSTRUCTION COMPANY CORPORATE STANDARD NUCLEAR PROJECT OPERATING PRCCEDURE

-Modified to Fit Waterford Unit 3 l

Concrete Phase ! Construction

_ Contract No. W3-NY-4 l

l l

l I

I i

I USE OF INSPECTION CLEAN-UP REPORTS f

l ACT REQUEST IV-Vff _

l B506220162 850222 j SLdM55 PDR

J.A. JO. S CONSTRUCTION COMPANY Page 1 of 4 i

PROCEDURE NO.

NUCLEAR PROJECT OPERATING PROCEDURE POP N -713 TITLE OF PROCEDURE: lssue Date.

USE OF INSPECTION CLEAN-UP REPORTS 12/8/75 PROJECT TITLE: Rev. No. & Date:

Revision 0 WATERFORD SES UNIT NO. 3 CONTRACT NO. W3-NY-4 PREPARED BY: DATE APPROVED BY: /

oris g'.'.'yJ*.;Mewe<.PROJ. MGR.

- M *6-7J~

G. Greathouse 12/8/75  % Mgg

~

s &G'N a QA MGR.

1.0 PURPOSE 1.1 This procedure provides the methods for initiating, processing and closure of J. A. Jones inspection Clean-Up Reports.

2.0 SCOPE 2.1 Minor discrepancies discovered during routine day to day inspections and/or the Owner / Customer's on-the-job, verbal approvals for minor deviations are to be documented and processed in accordance with this procedure.

3.0 DEFINITIONS 3.1 M_inor Discrepan'ev: A discrepancy ' discovered during casual inspections which is consicered normal to construction activities and can be readily corrected by a standard construction rework or repair. Exam-ple: Rework of minor voids in concrete after form removal, replacing of reinforcing steel bars which have been temporarily. relocated, clean-up of work areas, etc.

3.2 Nonconformance

A deficiency in characteristic, documentation or pro-cedure which renders the quality of an item unacceptable or indeter-

-minate. Eicamples of nonconformance include: physical defects, test failures, incorrect or inadequate documentation, or deviations from prescribed processing, inspection or test procedures.

33 Minor Rework: An operation to correct a discrepancy by regal'ning conformance to specification or drawing including the replacement of ,

.a discrepant item or material. 1 3.4 Minor Repair: An operation to correct a discrepancy in accordance

.with normally accepted construction practices where the spetITic application would not induce adverse effect upon safety, reliability,

<lurability, maintainabili ty, interchangeability or performance.

3.5 Verbal Acoroval: On-the-job direction given verbally by an authorized l Owner / Customer Engineer to deviate from established practices, draw- )

Ing, specification or approved procedural requirements.

se g g

<~-. . ~ . 2.% . m... . . . .. w .n .~....~ ~  :. - - .-

~

FORM NO 1122 0G JUNE 74  ;

T-

t

.s

' Page 2 of 4 1 J.A. JONES CONSTRUCTION COMPANY PROCEDURE NO.

NUCLEAR PROJECT OPERATING PROCEOURE POP N-713 TITLE OF PROCEDURE: Issue Date.

USE OF INSPECTION CLEAN-UP REPORTS 12/8/75 PROJECT TITLE: Rev. No. & Date.

n0 WATERFORD SES UNIT NO. 3 CONTRACT NO. W3-NY-4 efsj 3.6 Inspection Clean-Uo Recort: A pre-serialized manifolded inspection document utilized by J. A. Jones Quality Verification personnel to report, provide traceability and assure closure action of those minor discrepancies not reported via the Nonconformance Report in accord-ance with J. A. Jones Project Operating Procedure, POP-N-703

4.0 REFERENCES

4.1 "Nonconformance Reporting and Corrective Action", POP-N-703 4 .~2 " Permanent Project Records", PDP-N-709 5.0 GENERAL 5.1 Quality Verification is responsible for the preparation, issuing and controlling of Inspection Clean-Up Rsports.

52 . construction operations is responsible for the corrective action taken to close these items involving physical work operations.

53 This procedure does not take precedence over the requirements of P0P-N-703, "Nonconformance Reporting and Corrective Action." Should there be a conflict, the requirements set forth in POP-N-703 shall prevail.

6.0 PROCEDURE 6.1 Minor Discrepancies:

6.1.1 Whenever a minor discrepancy has been identified or direction is verbally given by the Owner / Customer Engineer and addi-tional action is required by an organization other than 1 Quality Verification, the inspector shall:

6.1.1.1 Complete the top half of the Inspection Clean-Up Report, Reference Appendix 'A".

6.1.1.2 Remove the original copy and forward to the respon'-

sible Supervisor for corrective action.

6.1.1.3 Remove the number 2 copy and forward to the Quality Verification Supervisor and maintain copy number 3 i . . , ,

for reference. ,

.. s-FORM NO 1122 oG JUNE '74 1

, . - - ,-- -,n , , , - - , - - - . ,

,n,--e ,a - - - - - - - - -n .

\ m ,

4 J.A. JONES CONSTRUCTION COMPANY PROCEDURE NO.

NUCLEAR PROJECT OPERATING PROCEDURE POP-N-713 TITLE OF PROCEDURE
Issue Date:

USE OF INSPECTION CLEAN-UP REPORTS 12/8/75 PROJECT TITLE; Rev. No. & Date:

n0 WATERFORD SES UNIT NO. 3 CONTRACT NO. W3-NY-4 l 6.1.2 The Quality Verification Supervisor shall:

l I . 6.1.2.1 Review the reported discrepancy to assure a Non-conformance Report is not required.

6.1.2.2 Record the report number, the report date, and a i brief description of the discrepancy in the In-spection Clean-Up Report Accountability Log (Re-

forence B), and file copy number 2 for reference.

6.1.3 The responsible Construction Supervisor shall:

6.1 3 1 Enter the corrective action to be taken on the ori-ginal copy of the inspection Clean-Up Report and j

obtain the Engineer's approval if required, or:

6.1. 3. 2 Take corrective action as required and document it i

on the original copy of the inspection Clean-Up Sheet. .

4.133 Afte.r corrective action has been completed, return

, the original copy of the inspection Clean-Up Report

- to the Quality Verification Supervisor.

l 6.1.4 The Quality Verification inspector shall inspect the corrective action taken and if acceptable shall:

6.1. 4.1. Signify acceptance by signing and dating the appli-1 4.able block on the original copy and forwarding it to the Quality Verification Supervisor for closure.

i . 4.1.5 If the corrective action taken is not acceptable, the ori-

! , ginal shall be returned to the responsible Construction Super-

! -visor for further action.

-6.1. 6 The Quality Verification Supervisor upon receipt of the com-Plated original copy of the Inspection Clean-Up Report shall:

6.1.6.1 Record the date of closure in the applicable column of the inpsection Clean-Up Report Accountability Log.

i 6.1.6.2 Maintain the original copy in file for inclusion g in the historical Quality Records, t

SORM NO 1122 oG JUNE ~74

I . .

. / J.A. JONES CONSTRUCTION COMPANY Page 4 of 4 PROCEDURE NO.

NUCLEAR PROJECT OPERATING PROCEDURE POP.N-713 TITLE OF PROCEDURE: Issue Date.

USE OF INSPECTION CLEAN-UP REPORTS 12/8/75 PROJECT TITLE. Rev. No. & Date:

WATERFORD SES UNIT NO. 3 CONTRACT NO. W3-NY-4 Revision 0 17 /8 /7c 6.2 Owner / Customer Direction:

6.2.1 Whenever verbal approval or direction contrary to established practices, drawing, specification or approved procedural re-quirements is given by the Owner / Customer Engineer on the job the quality Verification inspector will:

6.2.1.1 Complete the top half of the Inspection Clean-Up Report documenting the deviation as approved or di-rected by the Engineer.

6.2.1.2 Present the Inspection Clean-Up Sheet to the ap-proving / directing Engineer and request his signa'ture in the applicable bcx.

6.2.1.3 Forward the signed off copy to the quality Verifi-cation Supervisor. Forward copy 2 to the Project Engineer and provide the signee with copy number'3 6.2.2 The Quality Verification Supervisor shall record all informa-tion required in the inspection Clean-Up Report Accountability Log and file the original copy.

6.2 3 .in the event the Owner / Customer Engineer should refuse to sign the inspection Clean-Up Sheet, the quality Verification inspector should forward the original and number 2 copy to the Quality Verification Supervisor who will:

6.2.3.1 Log the appropriate information in the account-ability Log, file the original copy and forward the copy number 2 to the Project Engineer for re-solution.

6.2.3.2 Upon receipt of adequate resolution, complete clo-sure action per paragraphs 6.1.6.1 and 6.1.6.2.

7.0 QUALITY ASSURANCE 7.1 Project Quality Assurance Auditor shall periodically audit inspection activities for compliance with this procedure.

8.0 RECORDS AND REPORTS

,8, .1 , inspection Clean-Up Report (Appendix A). -

8.2 Inspection Clean-Up Report Accountability Log (Appendix B).

$CMM NO 1122 06 JUNE *74

. . . . . . . - . ~ . . . Appandix A INSPECTION CLEAM-UP

.. (7.? ?/ \'

REPORT NUMBER.

AP.EA (l'-

DATE (2) ,

DISCREPANCY /P'103LEM (3)

I 1

REPORTED BY (4)

RECOMMENDED ACTION / ACTION TAKEN (5) i RECOMMENDED BY EBASCO APPROVAL JAJ INSPECTOR ACCEPTANCE (6) (7) (8)

'(1) Enter location of problem.

(2) Enter date problem reported.

(3) Enter a concise, legible description of the problem or discrepancy.

~ ~

(4) Enter signature of reporting inspector.

(5) Description of action taken to be entered by the actionee.

(6) Signature of the actionee.

(7) Signature of Owner / Customer Engineer (if applicable).

(8) Accepting q. V. Inspectors Signature and date.

1 unsa.

)

~ v ---

_ ._ _ _ _ _ . . . . - . . _ - - _ _ _ . . _ _ _ - ._ , . _ - _ _ . _ . _ __ . . _ _ _ . . . _ ... . ~ _ _ _

O ed Appendix B J. A. J0NES CONSTRUCTION COMPANY -

WATERFORD UNIT NO. 3 INSPECTION CLEAN-UP REPORT ACCOUNTABILITY LOG 8

j REPORT N0. DATE WRITTEN PROBLEM DESCRIPTION DATE CLOSED i

i

    • 5 j , .j

.' j' s IJ

\ .-

! *j

/

) ,.

f j s i

1 .

v

) II 6 k*

l  ! .

l 'i .

i T

  • i .-

-)

.t I

i 1

__

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML20127C180&oldid=2903958"