ML20127B608
| ML20127B608 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Waterford  |
| Issue date: | 11/30/1975 |
| From: | EBASCO SERVICES, INC. |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML17198A241 | List:
|
| References | |
| FOIA-84-455 NUDOCS 8506220007 | |
| Download: ML20127B608 (244) | |
Text
{{#Wiki_filter:- _. . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ 9
.)
. .) / t i .) ) l O I -
LOUISIANA POWER AND I.ICHT COMPANY t.. WATERFORD STEAM EI.ECTRIC STATION NUCLEAR UNIT - NO. 3 t r
+
, CIAM SHELL FILTER BIMG.T TEST REPORT .
'{' ~
ERASCO SERVICES INCORPORATED l WO RECTOR STREET i NEW YORK, NEW YORK 10006 j NOVEMBER, 1975 FREEDOM OF INFUM4ATEN
. . ACT REQUEST 94-t5r 8506220007 850222 l 4lgg*
PDR FOIA - GARDE 84-455 PDR E I [ 4
.b
- a- . - - - - -- -- -
l I.' . , n
.j j / J J J v i 1 1'i -
T
, . , ,- ~
, TA3LE C CONTE'fTS
_ PACE
- 1. INTRODUCTION 1
- 2. PURPOSE (, 1
- 3. SCOPE 2
~.\ .
4.' CONCLUSIONS AFD RECO M NDATIONS 5
- 5.
SUMMARY
OF iT.CT IESULTS 6
'/." Laboratory Test Results - Teble 12 6
A. Grain Size Distribution 6
- 3. X,iximum Tabpratory Density 6 C. Optimum Conpactfve Moircure s 7 D. Minimum Laboratory Density '
7 E. Parmatbility 8
, F. Settlement '
8. t
- 2. 71 eld Tesc 'Results 9
. A. EL-40 S st Till 9
- 1) Settic= cat 9
- 2) Percent compaction 9 .
- 3) Grain Size Distribution 10 1 ".3 ' ; 4) Permeability . s II -
e f *- \ B. EL-48 Test Fill 12
;5
\
- 1) Test tection No. I ' 12
- 2) Test Geetion No. 2.~ 12
, 3) Test ljection No. 3 , 13
- 4) Tate Section ho. 4 .
14 -
- 6. ATC.CHMENTS i
- 1. Summary Tables
- T.sble No. 1 - Laboratory
- test Rest:lta-r ,
' Table No. 2 - EL40 Test Fill Reales Tab.!e No. 3 'EL-48 Shell Lensity Test Fill Results
, Tabis No. 4 - EL-48 Fouodation Density Test Fill Results
, '2 . Appendix A - Laboratory Test Results *
' Figure A.1 - Clam Shell Natural y
Gradation
, Figure A.2 - Clam Shell Cor+ acted Gradation-Vibratory Shake Table Figure A.3.- Clam Shell Compacted Gradation-Modified Proctor
),
j e I-4 j 4 l 2 -
-e-
. dI/ j } .} ) j 3 Figure A.4 - Laboratory Maz.imum Density Statistical Determination Figure A.5 - Clam Shell Compaction Curve Figure A.6 - Clam Shell - Load Deflection N. .
. Curve
3. Appendix B - EL-40 Test Fill Results Figure 3.1 - Settlement Vs. Number of Passes Figure B.2 - % Compaction vs. Number of Passes Figure 3.3 - Gradation Vs. Number of Passes Figure B.4 - % Passing, #4, Fineness Modules ir Coefficient of Uniformity vs. Number of Passes Figure B.5 - Clam Shell Gradation - Before Vs.
After Compaction Figure B.6 - Pictorial of Field Permeability Test .
- 4. Appendix C - EL-48 Test Till Figure C.1 - Pictorial of EL-48 Clam Shell Test Fill Construction
- 5. Appendix D - Ebasco Construction Procedure CP-203, Clam Shell Filter Blanket Test Fill
/ '
- g. , , .,
V..r 3j; 4 a t e s i i i _ r. i L t h
-._,__m . __
*b.
. ) ) / i i 1 > i 3
' ~
CIAM SHELL FILTER BLANKrf
, TEST REPORT
- 1. INTRODUCTION The Louisiana Power and Light Company's Waterford Nuclear Unit No. 3 is to be founded on a common mat in the upper portion of the stiff pleistocene clay formation at elevation -48. The Nuclear Plant Island Foundation is designed according to the " Floating Foundation" principle, that is, it is designed to have sufficient buoyancy to maintain soil pressures on its foundation mat which are approximately equal to and which are no greater than the existing overburden pressure prior to the start of construction. To encure the required buoyancy under the common foundation mat, a twelve inch thick permeable filter blanket connected to a series of recharge walls is included in the design of the Y.'i '. foundation.
2.0 PURPOSE The purpose of this report is to present the results of a laboratory and f,ield testing program performed on representative samples of locally available clam shelli che material to be usad for the construction of. the filter blanket. The Laboratory Testing Program was aimed toward the development of the engineering properties of a compacted clam shall filter blanket; while the Field Test Fill Program was aimed at the development of the optimum construction techniques for the placement'and compaction of the l clam shell blanket. . t In the development of the laboratory testing program, the Engineering i properties investigated.were in the areas of sectiement, in-place density, j breakdown during compaction, and permeability. In the field test fill j i program, type of roller, and number, of passes were investigated with respec. :. j t t to their influence on sectiement,in-place density, breakdown and permeability. I I I I
~
= _ _ - - . ~ . . . _ , _ , _ . . . _
w J 3/ i I 'l 9'i 7 2
~
- 3. SCOPE The Scope of the testing program was divided into two areas; Laboratory Testing and Field Testing. A detailed description of the testing performed in each of these areas follows:
A. Laboratorv Testine Program , , The significant properties required from the compacted clam shall filter blanket are those of low settlement, and high pernmability. The investigation of these properties required the laboratory compaction of the clam shell on a 'small scale. The small scale compaction of the clam shall presented somewhat of a problem due . to material breakdown. For this reason, two types of compaction methods were used to scan the range of breakdown; Vibratory Compaction (ASTM-D-2049) yielding a minimum amount of breakdown and impact compaction (ASTM-D-1557) yielding a maximum amount of breakdown. For gagh,, type of laboratory 3
)] ., compaction, the following tests were performed:
- 1) Grain Size Distribution (ASTM-D-422) - on a sample of natural clam shall to determine the natural gradation. coefficient of uniformity,and fineness modulus of the shall prior to compaction.
- 2) Grain Size Distribution (ASTM-D-422) - On samples compacted by each method to determine the percent of breakdown, the coefficient of uniformity,and the fineness modulus after compaction.
- 3) Permeability Tests on 'ompacted c samples.
- 4) Load deflection tests to determine the amount of settlement induced by various ranges of loads.
The results of these tests are sununarized in table No.1, discussed g .
; in detail in Section 5.1 of this report and presented in Appendix A.
e i . l t" i ! l e
.. - . . . - , -- .- . -- _. . . - - , -..n - , . ., - . , ,,
1 .) / i i 1 1 i ') 3-
~
- 3. Field Testine Procram Settlement characteristics,in-place density and permeability of
^
an actual clam shall filter blanket were determined by evaluation on two test fill sections; one constructed on the top of the pleistocene clay at N EL-40 and the second testfill constructed in a test pit on top of the more silty pleistocene material at approximate foundation level, EL-48. The first test fill section, constructed on firm pleistocene clay at EL-40 was run in accordance with Ebasco Construction Procedure CP-203, attached in Appendix D. The main parameter varied was the number of roller passes (amount of compactive energy). Settlement pictes and . embedded test molds were used to determine the required Engineering characteristics with the use of the following tests and measurements:
- 1) Settlement Plates - The elevation of each of three plates
, was taken after each two roller passes to' determine the settlement L. *
. characteristics of the compacted clam shell fill.
'.C'.. ?
- 2) In-Place Density - These tests were run using the rubber
~
balloon gage (ASTM-D-2167) at three locations in the fill after each two passes to determine density and percent compaction. In addition, densities
. were calculated from seven test molds embedded in the fill prior to compaction one being removed after each two passes.
- 3) Grain Size Distribution (ASTM-D-4.22) - Twelve inch diameter, perforated test molds were embedded in the fill prior to compaction. After each two passes, a mold was dug out and removed from the test fill to determine the compceted gradation. coefficient of uniformity,and fineness modules of the Shell.
- 4) Permeability Tests - Twelve inch diameter perforated test
. molds were embedded in the fill prior to compaction. After each two passes,
't a mold was dug out and removed from the test fill and a permeability test was performed. f
_. . m --
~ . , . _ . . _ _ . . __
-ii
.) -) / 1 I ) ) i ) 4, The results of these tests are summarized in Tatle No. 2 discussed in detail in Section 5.2 of this report and prese.,ted in ,
Appendix B. Based on a preliminary interpretation of the test results of the vibratory compaction half of the' test program, the static compaction half of the program as stated in CP-203 was not performed. Several days after the completion of the first test fill, a second test fill was constructed in a test pit at EL-48. This test fill was constructed on top of the more silty pleistocene materials at the final foundation level; the main objective being to determine whether the resulting method procedure derived from the,first test fill ,(Compacted on Clay) would apply on the mors silty pleistocene materials. Four small test sections were constructed with testing as described below:
, 1) Twelve inch thick shell blanket - 10 passes vibratory fOl.' .
compaction, visual inspection, foundation testing prior to compaction.
- 2) Twelve inch thick shell blanket - 10 passes static compaction, visual inspection, foundation testing prior to compaction.
- 3) Twelve inch thich shell blanket placed and compacted on a sheet of Mirafi 140 filter cloth; The Mirafi placed directly on top of pleist'ocene silts; 10 passes vibratory compaction, visual. inspection plus density testing of the compacted shell as well as the foundation silts below.
- 4) Two six inch lifts, the bottom lift placed and compacted on a sheet of Mirafi 140 Filter cloth, the Mirafi placed density on top of pleistocene silts; six passes static compaction on each six inch lift; visual inspection plus density testing of the compacted shell as well as the foundation silts below.
The results of these tests are summarized in Table No. 3 and No. 4,
! discussed in detail in Section 5.3 of this report and presented in Appendix C.
l-i j
! )
e 4-
.) 1 / i : I / ! J 5.
- 4. CONCI.USIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
~
. Table No'.'s 1 through 4 summarize the entire scope of testing including laboratory testing and field test fills. The results of each individual test are discussed in detail in Section No. 5 of this report.
The following conclusions can be drawn from these test results:
- 1) The change in gradation of the clam shall due to breakdown .
during vibratory compaction is basically limited to the 3/4 inch to number 16 screens with no affect on the material passing the No. 200 screen. Therefore, breakdown dt: ring compaction will not affect the permeability of the clam shell filter blanket which is more than adequate at are_ agar ths;i . 1.6 x 10" cm/sec.
- 2) Some type of filter cloth or membrane must be used when compacting the clam shall on the more silty pleistocene materials t'o prevent silt I.!: contamination of the clam shell and drain'the silts during compaction.
- 3) With ten passes of a twelve ton smooth drum vibratory compactor, 93% shall compaction is achieved with 88% of the settlement taking place with a 3% increase in the foundation density; A very desirable condition.
Incorporating these considerations of breakdown, permeability, density, settlement and construction technique, along with other
- engineering requirements, the following construction specification is
, reconsnanded: e 4 s k
?.
I n T l
.. ._ . .a .. . . - -
-e Sn.
.) ; /. I ! )
CLAM S11 ELL FILTER BT.AN[~ET
' PLACEMENT AND COMPACTTON PROCEDURES
. CENEpAL -
Prior to the placement of any Cism Shell, the final exposed
- Pleistocene Found.. tion shall be mapped by the Site Soils Engineer in accordance with Ebasco Specification LOU-1564.469. After completion of the mapping, the Clam Shell Filter Blanket shall be placed and compacted in accordance with the criteria stated herein. Final foundation testing shall then be performed by the Engineer in accordance with Ebasco Specification LOU 1564.469.
'Ihe guniting of the final exposed vertical faces around the perimeter of the .
foundation mat shall be coordinated with the earthwork contractor to the extent possible.so that all exposed faces to be gunited shall be gunited within 8 hours after excavation and exposure to the elements. No vehicular traffic shall be per- mitted on the exposed foundation material during the guniting operation.
- Prio'r to'the placement of any Clam Shell, in any strip, a drainage system shall '
i , be designed, detailed submitted and approved by the engineer. 5ubsequently, the approved drainage system shall be constructed in a timely sequence prior to or along with the placement of the Clam Stiell Blanket. . CONSTRUCTION Scheduling of the Clam Shell Placement and Compaction shall be coordinated with
- the ear"thwork contractor and the Soils Engineer, to the extent possible so.that al'1 final exposed surfaces excavated each day shall be either covered with cor.pacted shell or covered with a protective membrane to' prevent over-wetting the exposed foundation materials due to rain. , . .
Traffic on the exposed foundation materials' or the Clam Shell Filter Blanket shall be limited to the spreading and compacting equipment specified herein. No other vehicles shall be allowed in the final excavated scrip without approval of the. ER*gineer. - Any special constructien operations required for the placement or compaction I
- i
. =
i
- ~ -
J -) / i ! u [*3'3 55. of the Clam Shell Filter Blanket shall be perfor'med with a minimum amount of
. setivity on the shell material and foundation material after approval by the
. Engineer. -
l Care shall be taken not to disturb or damage any instrumentation which may be in place. Damage to any instrumentation shall be repaired immediately. In areas where Clam Shell is to be placed against a gunited surface, care'shall be taken not to disturb or damage the gunite. MATERT.AL *
- Haterial shall be locally available clam shell. It shall be fraa of ve::etation, organic matter, rubbish, debris or other unsuitable material. The delivered clam shell shall have a maximum moisture content of 20". prior to - tion. One moisture content test shall be conducted for every 5 e yards of shell fill.
PIACUENT ' , .
. , , ..' When the final foundation surface materials consist of stiff clays, as deter =ined.
(~.- . by the; Engineer, one layer of shell shall be spread and leveled directly on top of the clay foundation materials such that the final compacted in place thickness shall be 12 inches. The tolerable range shall be fr'om 1 b to 13) W j nches. When the final foundation surface materials consist of lenses of silty and/or
. sandy materials as determined by the Engineer, a filter cloth material shall be placed on top of the foundation materials prior to the placement of any shell.
The type of filter cloth to be used shall be the "Mirafi Filter" as used in the
" test section oc an equal approved by the Engineer prior to its use. One layer of shell shall then be spread and leveled on top of the filter cloth using what-
, ever means is necessary to minimize construction activity on the shell. .The final compacted h since thickness shall be 12 . inches. The tolerance shall range from ne s to 13 Care shall be taken to avoid damaging the filter A _#
cloth. Any sections uf filter cloth determined to be damaged, shall be removed and replaced. T'he shell materini shall be spread in a uniform horizontal lif t' by
** a steel cread bulldozer of size JD-450 or equal. The surface of the co=pic cd
)
shc11 , blanket shall be kept reasonably smooth and free of rid;;cs, grooves and ruer
~
i
~
, which might affcet compaction. ,
r. b.
~~- ,-
c
, g i) / l' ) 4 ) 3 j' -
Sc. PLACDET (Cont'd) . Any clam shell material found to be contaminated or unacceptabic, shall be removed and replaced at the discretion of the engineer. . COMPACTION - The shell fill material spread and leveled in a single layer as specified herein shall be compacted using a 12 ton self propelled smooth drum vibrating rolice. Compaction shall be uniform throughout the shell blanket over the entire area. 4 The'shell blanket shall be compacted to its full width using 10 passes of the
,specified roller traveling at 1.5 to 3.0 mph at full vibration on all passes or as directed by the Engineer.
- In restricted areas where,it is not possible to compact the material with large scale equipment, the shell material shall be compacted with a mechanical camper,
.small vibratory r'oller, vibration plate or other method to the suitability of the Engineer. Care shall be taken to insure that the fill in these areas is' integral with the rest of the blanket.
e.u . . . [ j Any compact ed material which in any way has become unsuitable, as determined by ] the Engineer, shall be removed and replaced with new material. IN-PLACE DENSI'N TESTTKO - One In-Place Density Test '(ASTM D-1556 or AST)! D,-216 ) shall be conducted by the Engineer for every 5000 ft.2of Clam Shell Filter Blanket placed and ce=pacted in order to document the density of the complaced blanket. All test locations shall s be randomly selected by the Site Soils Engineer. . In-Place Density Test results shall be completed and forwarded to the Site Soils j
, Engineer for his review on the same day that the . tests were performed.
INSTRUMENTATION Five pneumacie type pore pressure indicators shall bc installed in the compacted ,
}
i l Clam Shell Filter Blanket in accordance with drawing LOU 1564-C499-SO9.
. Scheduling
!i of this activity shall be coordinated wit.h the contractor to the extent possibic r
. so as not.to delay the placement of the concretc and mat.
- s; -
5
. - _ ~ . - _ _ . . -. _ .. -. ._. _ . . . _ . - _ _ . = .
. . _ . _ . _ . . . ~ . ~ --
J )/ ! J ; / ! d 6. i .
, 5.
SUMMARY
OF TEST RESULTS - Table No.1
- 1. Laboratory Test Results A. Grain Size Distribution - Three Grain Size Distribution curves are presented in figures A.1 through A.3; representing the clam shell gradation in the natural state prior to compaction, after Shake Table (Vibratory) compaction and after modified proc' tor (impact) compaction.
A comparison of these curves shows a small breakdown in particle size during compaction using vibratory Lab methods and a large breakdown in particle size during compaction using Impact Lab methods. This suceptability to breakdown during compaction is further demonstrated - by the decrease in coefficient of uniformity from .44 natural to .28 vibration to .18 impact (the smaller the number, the less uniform'the gradation) and by the decrease in fineness modulus from 7.2 natural to r
... 6.8 vibration to 5.8 impact (the smaller the number, the finer the -
gradation). , . The important characteristic exhibited by these curves, is the fact that although 'various methods of compac tion will result in a break-down in the gradation in the shall, there is little or no increase in the i fine content (amount of material finer than a number 200 sieve). Almost all of the breakdown occured on the number 4 sieve'. It can therefore l - i be concluded that there will be little or no effect on the permeability l I of the clam shall filter blanket due to the breakdown of the shell during compaction. i l B. Maximum Laboratorv Density - the differeuce in the maximum - La e,, S Il laboratory density as determined by the vibratory Shake Tab la Test (70'.8 #/ft3 ) A1 and the modified proctor i= pact test (114.3 #/f3 t ) Figure No. 4, is strictly
; due to the breakdown in material during ce=paction, Considering the shake 1 -
4 l .
4.. I i '
, :), } /
table rest.lt as representing a minimum compactive breakdown and the modified proctor result as representing a maximum compactive breakdown the maximum laboratory density was determined as follows: (#/ft3) g N ' 70.8 X 14.3 DENSITY SCALE ' ' (%-44) # 19.5 MAX. IAB. DENSITY = 70.8 + X (43.5) = 70.8 + 2.23 X Where 19.5 I = % Passing #4, Sieve - 97. Based on a short statistical study of the % passing d4 siete for a variety of tests (as reported in Table #2), the value of "X" at . which 85% of the test results fall below that point is 23% passing the No. 4 Sieve (See Figure A.5). Substituting X = 23% into the above equation, the maximum laboratory density is computed as 102 #/ft3 .
?. Comparing this value to the maximum shake table and modified proctor -
s.- 3 results, 102 f/ft translates to be 144% of the maximum shake table density and 89% of the maximum modified proctor density. l C. Optimum Compactive Moisture - Test results from both the l Shake Table Test and Modified Proctor Test indicate that the oven dry 8-condition is optimum for compaction. The drier the clam shall the more
, effective the compaction. A point to note however, is that even af ter t
soaking the shall for four weeks, the moisture' content was only 8%, basically i' l comprised of free surface moisture.
- D. Minimum Laboratory Density - The minimum laboratory density as determined from the vibratory Shake Table Test is 57.2 #/ft3 compared to a maximum density of only 70.8 #/ft3 . This small difference between t
I l minimum and maximum density indicates a high degree of sensitivity in calculating relative density. Because of this sensitivity, and in light 1 l k
,i .
r
*M
+ ee e a w-p w w+m- M W meg m,wi- .
- 4 mmh em- -+ e-i-- *et+e- em
-r
, Q ') / i i I -
8. of the large percentage of breakdown in tne clam shell during compaction, relative density calculations would be subject to a sizable degree of error and should not be used as a parameter to evaluate in-place Engineering properties. E. Permeability - Permeability Tests were run on two compacted samples of clam shell; the first sample compacted on the Vibratory Shake Table and the Second sample compacted by the Modified Proctor Method of Impact. The results of these tests show that both sa=ples had the same order of magnitude permeability; approximately 2.5 x 10-3 cm/sec. The Proctor sample with a higher percentage of breakdown did however exhibit - slightly less permeability. During the running of these tests, it was noted that the permeability of the test sample decreased with time, indicating a clogging of the porous (:, stone at the bottom of the permeability apparatus. Back washing the stor.e, .
- tg increased the permeability to tF.a first measured valve. It was also felt
' O that the small sample, six inch diameter was perhaps c9 confined laterally to represent a filter blanket. For these reasons the test results should be only.in arpreted to show a satisfactory permeability.
F. Settlement - The settlement or deflection characteristics
. of the clam shell in three states, Natural Minimum Density, Shake Table Maximum Density and Modified Proctor Maximum Density are presented in Figure A.6. It can be concluded from these curves that at low stress levels comparative to the actual loading , conditions in the Field (4KSF), the deflections of both compacted samples are very small being in the order of one tenth of an inch in a six inch lift. Since these samples are completely confined I during load-deflection testing, tho actual settlement can be expected to be I
j , slightly larger but still of little concern engineering wise. { 1
?.
._- _ - .~._ - - , -_
me-
, d9 / l 1 J 9 d'7* 9,
- 2. Field rest Ren'21ts I
A. EI.-40 Clain Shell Filter Blanket Test Fill Results - This Test fill was constructed in top of a firm pleistocene clay in accordance with Ebasco Construction Procedure CP-203 attached, in Appendix D. The lt results of this test fill program are sununarized in Table No. 2 and discussed below:
- 1) Settlement - A plot of average settlement verses the number of passes on a single twelve inch lift, compacted with a 12 ton vibratory smooth drum roller is presented in Figure B.I. It should be noted at this time that based on a preliminary visual inspection of the .
i breakdown, settlement and density achieved after six vibratory passes, it was decided that static compaction would not be able to achieve the desired density in the clam shall filter blanket'. For this reason, the static Os I
'(g;,' compaction portion of the test fill was not performed and the vibratory -
compaction test fill was spread to both halves of the test area. Data collected for 2, 4,10,12 and 14 number of passes was obtained from the j south section of the test fill and data for 6 and 8 number of passes was obtained from the north section of the test fill. The splitting of the f ! test fill accounts for the offset of all data collected for 6 and 8 number of passes. ! From this settlement versus numbe'r of passes curve, the point at which the settlement becomes independent .of the number of roller , passes is approximately 12 passes.
- 2) Percent Compaction - A p. lot of the average percent compaction i .
- i versus the number of passes on a single twelve inch lift compacted with a twelve ton vibratory smooth drum roller is presented in Figure B.2.
l r. i, _
-e
() -) / l 6 :) ! 3 I
, 10.
} As was previously' discussed in Section 5.1.B of this report, percent , compaction is based on a maximum laboratory density of 102 #/f 3t . From this % compaction versus number of passes curve, the point at which the in place density r 7. Compaction of the clam shell becomes independent of the number of roller passes is approximately ten passes. The test results l of the 7. Compaction in the embedded molds is also plotted on this curve. The data exhibits a high degree of scatter : caused by the confining effect on shielding of the mold rendering non-representative test data. Additional discussion of this point is given in the following section.
- 2) Grain Size Dist.eibution - Due to the difficulty of obtaining a representative sample of clam shall from the compacted test fill without breakdown, twelve inch diameter molds were embedded in the fill prior to compaction. After each two passes, a. mold was dug out of the fill.
gl,. ,. Density, permeability and gradation tests were then performed on the material 9.* , in the molds. Based on the results of these tests as shown in Plots B.3 and 3 B.4, the confining effect of the mold appeared to have had a shielding effect t on the sample rendering a large degree of scatter in test results. For the purpose of comparative analysis, the averste of these compacted gradation test results in each type of test will be compared to the natural gradation
- test results since no apparent trend exists with increasing number of roller passes; the graphical comparison shown in Figure B.5.
This comparison shows the compacted samples having a finer.-
);
gradation than the natural gradation, the breakdown basically occuring from the 3/4 inch to Number 16 sieves with no noticeable increase in fines. t This type of breakdown is advantageous to the construction of the filter
- blanket since it alters the gradation toward the well grouped range thus increasing the capability to achieve a high density without decreasing the
'l . .
4 i f. ! I. t
.,_ _,..--_--_- _._._,, _ _ _ _ ._ _-. _ ,~.-_,-. _ _ ,_.,-,-...,._..__ _ . _ .,._- ._--,-.. _ --. _ _,. - - . --..-.m.
p.ag-, 4 @*,n ks p .. % NSMS -wow. ae sw.w e g e m p MW = = 9 s l M t .
.(. ; \\_
\
/
\
.- S N.~
4 I e 4
*4
( 6 6
, , .J .] / l ) .) / 53 Page 1 cf'9 A'l'T. I toh-W3-BYO
- Attachment I - Detailed Description of Noncenfermance W3-Item I: Compliance of Clam Shell Filter Blanket construction with the Test Fill.
Description of Nenconformance Contrary to ANSI-N-45.2, para. 6 The Test Fill Report (Att . III) does not provide specific criteria required by Q.C. in order , to verify compliance with requirements of Spec. LOU.1564.482, para. 6.2h or Spec. LOU.1564.482, Attachment. entitled Clam Shell Filter Blanket Placement and Comoaction Procedures, page 14, top paragraph.
- 1) This condition renders:
a) the acceptability of the source of the material actually used during construction indeterminate and q lW b) the acceptability of the compactive equipment actually used during construction indeterminate.
. h 2) The absence of quantitative acceptance criteria renders
/ the acceptability of the in-place density test resuits, for the in-place clam shell, indeterminate. Affects all work.
e ,. :. g Description of Nonconformance Contrary to ANSI-N-45.2, para. 6 and Spec. 1564.482 and Attachment entitled Clam Shell Filter Blanket Placement and Compaction Procedure, the construction work performed on the Filter Blanket uses techniques not provided for during the Clam Shell Filter Blanket Test Fill. These violations,'by strip, are as fc11ow:
- 1) I a) Report dated 10/24/75 indicates clam shell was not in place and Gunite was placed on entire horizontal surface of Strip 1. The test fill program made no provision for
( clam shell compaction, and effect of compaction on shell, on large gunite surfaces. (See Att. - II, page 1) b) Lift thickness for placement dated 10/28/75 is indicated
! as 15 %". Lift thickness for placement dated 10/29/75 1 is indicated as 15". A lift thickness of 14 %" maximum l is required. Site Soils Engineer review and approval of
! this modification is not documented on an Ebasco NCR, FCR, or DCN. (See Atc. II, pages 5 and 17) i i li i . l *. l 1
,+ . - - .
-) d/ ! ) 9 / 35 l
Page 2 of 9 ATT. I to NCR-W3 SSEL
- 2) Strip 2
.' Report dated 2/23/76 does not indicate authority for j replacement of gunite with 3 ft. thick concrete wall.
i There are no concrete inspection records for the concrete as required by Ebasco Procedures QCIP-6 and QCIP-7 and i , J.A. Jones Procedure W-SITP-7. Site Soils Engineer ,! review and approval of this modification is not documented
- ' on an Ebasco NG, FG, or DCN. (See Att. II, page 30)
)
4 Report dated 12/13/75 indicates shell placement in standing water. Site Soils Engineer review and approval for this i
, modification is not documented on an Ebasco NG, FG, or DCN. (See Att. II, page 42)
, % Report dated 12/15/75 indicates pan vibrator used on en-tire surface of strip. Site Soils Engineer authorized use on " soft spot" only. Test Fill does not provide
, for use of hand compactors except for restricted areas.
! (See Att. II, page 53)
- 3) Strip 5 pport 3, dated 2/10/76 does not indicate authority for g, ,, replacement of gunite with 3 ft. thick concrete wall.
- 'O There are no concrete inspection records for the concrete 1 as required by Ebasco Procedures QCIP-6 and QCIP-7 and J.A. Jones Procedure W-SITP-7. Site Soils Engineer review and approval of this modification is not documented on an Ebasco N G , F G , or DCN. (See Att. II, page 97)
V %est fill requires 10 passes of a vibratory roller on the clam shell. The Test Fill Report analyses the effect of up to 14 passes on the gradation and permeability characteristics of the clam shell. The inspection records indicate 40 passes of the vibratory roller were applied i to this strip. The effect, en the gradation and permeability 4 ' : characteristics, of this overcompaction are indeterminate. Site Soils Engineer review and approval of this modification is not documented on an Ebasco NG, FG, or DCN. (See Att. II, pages 98, 103, 105, 108, and 110a) { tem II- Traceability / Location Deficiencies I M scription of Nonconformance Contrary to ANSI-N-45.2, para. 18 and ANSI-N-45.2.9, para. 3.2.1, { records for the Clam Shell Filter Blanket do not provide suf-ficient data to accurately locate the individual placement 4 i strips by co-ordinates. Therefore, the square footage of the strips (individually) cannot be determined. Testing lj i s
. frequencies are based on square foctage cf the placement.
l' This renders compliance, with the required testing frequency, indeterminate. (This affects all strips) { i
. . _ - . - , . _ _-- _ _ _ _ _ j 0l/ 1 1 ] / 37 f
i Page 3 of 9 ATT. I to NCR *43!!M1 ] Description of Nonconformance r,
, Contrary to ANSI-N-45.2, para.18, report dated 2/13/76 adds
- as area to strip 5, the location of which is indeterminate.
l (See Att. II, page 111)
- 4 i! Item III: gineer's approval prior to shall placement i
Description of Nonconformance Contrary to QCIP-1, para. 6.1, the following placements of
! shell proceeded without the prior (or subsequent) approval
. of the Site Soils Engineer documented on Ebasco Form QC-132.
- 1) Strip 1 a) Placement on 10/24/75, 10/27/75, 10/28/75 or 10/29/75
- 2) Strip 4 ii a) Placement on 2/13/76 or 2/14/76
- 3) Strip 5 a) Placement on 2/5/76, 2/9/76, 2/10/76 er 2/13/76 t.c .
I . 4) Strip 6 a) Placement on 3/10/76 Item IV: Certification of Personnel i A) Description of Nonconformance Contrary to ANSI-N-45.2.6, the following individuals performed
, inspection without certification to a level and/cr to activity.
i 1) Strip 1 E
-- a) Inspector Kaminski (Jones)
(See Att. II, pages 1, 2, 7) b) Inspector Phillips (Ebasco) (See Att. II, pages 4,16) l l c) Technician T. Hazel (Site Test iab) (See Att. II, pages 20, 22, 23, 24, 26)
! . 2) Strip 2
- < ~25 a) Inspector Frick (Jones)
(See Att. II, pages 37, 36, 50, 53) i
. a, .
_ _ . . - - ~ ~ . .
.) l/ l } ) 7 $j Page 4 of 9
,, ATT. I to NCR-W3 54R1 Item IV: A) 2) (cont.)
b) Technician T. Hazel (Site Test Lab) (See Att. II, pages 58, 60)
- 3) Strip 3 a) Inspector Kaminski (Jones)
(See Att. II, page 70) b) Technician T. Hazel (Site Test Lab) (See Att. II, pages 81, 83) c) Inspector Eiff (Jones) (See Att. II, page 70)
- 4) Strip 4 T a) Inspector Frick (Jones),
(See Att. II, page 85) b) Technician T. Hazel (Site Test Lab) (See Att. II, page 92)
~. 5) Strip 5
' .2 ,
- a) Inspector Frick (Jones)
(See Att. II, page 98) b) Inspector Horton (Jones) (See Att. II, page 111) c) Technician T. Hazel (Site Test Lab) (See Att. II, pages 117, 118, 119, 120, 121)
- 6) Strip 6 a) Inspector Frick (Jones)
(See Att. II, page 126) b) Technician T. Hazel (Site Test' Lab) (See Act. II, pages 132, 133) . Item V: Testing A) Description of Nonconformance Contrary to ASTM-D-2167 '66, in-place density test holes do not meet minimum 0.1 ft3 required test hele size, per Table 2. In addition, moisture determination used in cocputation of in-place density was not performed in accordance with para. 4.4 Instances are as follow: i
.- - - - , - - -__._- - ~ -.-. - - _.__
- -_ - _~_
..u ~.--- --- ~~
9 ) / i 1 J / i 9 Page 5 of 9 ATT. I to NCR-W3 5991 Item V: (c ont.) , 1) Strip 1 (See Att. II, pages 20, 22, 23, 24, 26) l ,
- 2) Strip 2 (See Att. II, pages 58, 60) r i
; 3) Strip 3 (See Att. II, page 81) i
- 4) Strip 4 (See Att. II, page 92)
- 5) Strip 5 (See Act. II, pages 117, 118, 119, 120, 121)
- 6) Strip 6 (See Att. II, page 132) ,
Description of Nonconformance i Contrary to Spec. LOU-1564.469, para. 5.2 and Spec. LOU-1564.482, page 14, Attachment, which give testing frequencies in terms of square footage of placement for the foundation and
, filter blanket, the inspection records do not provide suf-ficient data to determine the square footage of the areas l inspected. The compliance of the testing program with the
! testing frequency is indeterminate. (All strips are affected) l 4 Description of Nonconformance-s D: i *** Contrary to ANSI ~N-45.2, para.18 and ANSI-N-45.2.9, para. !~ 3.2.1, the locatio'n of all in-place density tests on the
. foundation and the Clam Shell Filter Blanket are indeter-minate. The tests were performed in a three dimensional medium, but were located in only two dimensions. (All tests for all strips are affected) ll NOTE: Tests for Strip 1 do not fall anywhere within the Nuclear Plant Island as per co-ordinates given compared with i co-ordinate grid attached to test report (See Att. II, pages t
26, 27) (Test #453, #454, #455) ,t i
- i Description of Nonconformance Contrary to ANSI-N-45.2.9, para. 3.2.1, the in-place density tests on the foundation material cannot be traced to the cor-
, responding Laboratory Moisture-Density Relation Test Report used in conjunction with per-centage of compaction determina-4 l tion. (All foundation tests are affected. See QC-83 Forms i containing foundation tests, located in Att. II) r
- E) Description of Nonconformance
,! Contrary to ANSI-N-45.2.9, para 3.2.6, the f ollowing test reports (by strip) contain improper changes by unknown person-nel. These alterations change test locations or test readings. I As determined from the original, at the Site Test Lab, the j original entry had been noted on the report contained in Act. II. 4 f
..- - - .-_ . ~ -.
ie ? i 0
#)
. 'l 7 i 1 Page 6 of 9 ATT. I to NCR-W3 5W Item V: E) (cont.)
- 1) S ip 1 Form QC-83 for tests 452 thru 461 exists in two distinct versions. The two versions give different hole volumes for Test #452. Percentage compaction.is >
indeterminate. Other differences have been indicated on the reports. (See Att. II, pages 24, 26) These Zerox copies have ink entries by unknown. Form QC-83 for tests 486 thru 495 exists in two dis-tinct versions. One is dated 10/28/75, the other is dated 10/29/75. Both ara Xerox copies containing ink
, entries by unknown personnel. (See Att. II, pages 20, 22)
- 2) trip 5
) Forms QC-83 contain inproper changes made by unknown personnel. The chanses consist of erasuus of original data and entry of new data. The original records, coupleted in pencil, were reviewed at the Site Test
- Lab, and, where possible, the original data had been
., noted on the report contained in Att. II. (See Att. II,
*:#'. .' pages 117,118,119,120) (This is for dispositioning purposes only.)
- 3) rip 6 Forms QC-83 contain improper changes made by unknown personnel. The changes consist of erasure of original data and entry of new data. _The original records, completed in pencil, were reviewed at the Site Test Lab, and where possible, the original data had been noted on the report contained in Att. II. (See Att. II, page 133)
Description of Nonconformance Contrary to the Clam Shell Filter Blanket Test Fill Report, Att. III, the required value of 102 lbs./ft4 was not used to compute the pe centage of compaction of in-place clam shell.
- 1) Test "00 used 105.0 lbs./ft.3 (See Att. II, page 119)
- 2) Tests 833 thru 837 used 102.7 lbs./ft.3 (See Att. II. pg.132)
Item VI: ocumented Deficiencies without Documented Corrective Action s Description of Nonconformance Contrary to ANSI-N-45.2, para.18, the records do not indicate corrective action for the following documented deficieccies.
.) 3 7 i i 37 a I Page 7 of 9 ATT. I to NCR-W3 5%91 Item VI: A) (cent.) .
- 1) S rip 1 Report dated 10/27/75 does not indicate status of, in-pact on, or re-compaction of, in-place clam shell when gunite previously applied, was replaced. (See Att. II, page 2) f
- 2) S trip 2 ip Report dated 12/10/75 indicates unaccepcable trim of gunite and unacceptable removal of surplus material and overspray. Remarks section indicates the wooden stakes were not removed. No corrective action is indicated. (See Att. II, pages 28, 29)
Report dated 12/12/75 does not indicate adequate corrective action for the 4", compacted lift thickness, clam shell. (See Att. II, pages 36, 42)
. Report dated 12/13/75, first shift, indicates water , standing in West half of strip. Contractor allowed to place shell. Site Solla Engineer review and approvs1 of this modification is not documented on an Ebasco 3 ,,.. NCR, FCR, or DCN. See note by M. Tenchin at bottom ti, of page 37 of Att. II. (See Att. II, page 42) g Report dated 12/12/75 indicates 5 temporary sumps were dug. There is no indication of subsequent placement and cempaction of clam shell in these sumps. (See Att. II, page 33)
Report dated 12/15/75 indicates " West" area was cut and part of " East" area was filled. This disturbed the sur-face. Only one pass was applied with a pan vibrator. (See Att. II, pages 51, 52) NOTE: Refer to Item IB2c for use of pan vibrator on large, non-restricted area.
- 3) trip 3 g Report dated 12/19/75 indicates "... drainage ditch dug on both sides of Strip 3 ... lined with Mirafi cloth and filled with shell ..." The area identified is indeter-minate. Verification of the foundation material ex-posed is not documented. (The Test F'111 makes no provision for compaction of the 2 f t. lif t thickness used for this work.) (See Att. II, page 68)
Report dated 12/19/75 indicates "... temp. drainage
.- ditch dug on North side of Strip 3. App. 2 ft. deep and 3 ft. wide. Covered with Mirafi paper and loese clam shell . . . No compaction." The area identified is indeter=inate. There is no documented evidence of sub-sequent ccepactien. (See Act. II, page 69) t i
l
_ . - ~ , d 3/ l 1 d7 .) 2 Page 8 of 9 ATT. I t o NCR-W3 5W
. Item VI: A) (cont.)
- 4) rip 4 Report dated 2/11/76 indicates unacceptable trim of gunite. This entry has been changed to acceptable by unknown personnel. The acceptability of corrective action is not documented or verifiable. The current status of this work is indeterminate. (See Att. II, page 84)
There is no record of slope protection for the east two-thirds of the North Wall or on an indeterminate length of the north portion of the East Wall. Length of exposure time of the foundation material to the
- elements is indeterminate. (Ref. Spec. LOU.1564.482, Attachment, page 12, 2nd. para.)
- 5) rip 5 up Reports 1 and 2 dated 2/5/76 indicates unacceptable trim of gunite and unacceptable removal of surplus '
material and overspray. No quantitative description [ of these deficiencies is given. No corrective action is indicated. (See Att. II, pages 95, 96) [ .I . Report 2 dated 2/5/76 indicates "some" contamination of
, the clam shell due to overspray. No corrective action
, is indicated. (See Att. II, page 96) Report dated 2/13/76 indicates alternate methods of compaction used are unacceptable (per the Site Soils Engineer). No corrective action is indicated. (See Act. II, page 111) i .
- 6) Strip 6 Reports 1 and 2 dated 3/9/76 indicates unacceptable l' trim of gunite and unacceptable removal of surplus material and overspray. No quantitative description of these deficiencies is given. No corrective action is indicated. (See Act. II, pages 124, 125)
There is no record of slope protection for the West Wall or for approximately 177 ft. of the South, start-I ing from junction with West Wall and moving eastward. I - Length of exposure time of the foundation material to i the elements is indeterminate. (Ref. Spec. LOU.1564. 482, Attachment, page 12, para. 2) s , 9 I.
_ _ _ _ - . -.= _ - ._ - __ - , _ _ - .- . - _ - -- . -- 017 i i J / 33 t Page 9 of 9 ATT. I to NCR-W35%1 i Item VI: A) (cont.)
- 7) trip 2
, 4 Report dated 12/12/75 indicates the clam shell filter blanket was penetrated by a " mud spurt" of approximately 120 ft.2 There is no indication of corrective action, particularly placing Mirafi over area and subsequent replacement and compaction of clam shell. (Ref. The Clam Shell Filter Blanket Test Fill Recert, para. 4.2, page 5 (Att. III to the NCR) ) (See Act. II, pages 35, 36)
Based on the deficiencies noted above the acceptability of the Clam Shell Filter Blanket is indeterminate. i ._ . . .
.j.
ll: Ct; S I 4 1 1 4 8 6
,-..,-.m. , , , , , .,-____-,,.___,_,_,,L_, _ , , _ _ _ , . , , _ , . , -
.+ wra4 m4 tM' : a
~
e m ma a e j ) / ! 1 ; / ) 1
'N ~~ ,
m a 4 e 4 1 i i i i i
3
,,p-- -~ *"*
3 2 / \ ) .) !* > %, 9 L o e 4 9 (K
. g.
l i i t 1 l I a s # 5 i i l I 4 la l l ll l l I t I i
-=
J )
). . . . . . S c.K e s e M g
,, J. 1. JOSES CONSiRCC~I G CCMPANY WAIERFORD UNIT No. 3 .
SLOPE PROIECTION INSPECTION REPORT Raport No: / N -i Specification No: /. b l( -/fg 7 V6'] .I Quality Verification Inspectorr/. . d'#4 m s aidd's ~% ; Project No: 7f--M / '7 .
/.
Date: / o ,4 */- 7 (' Location: $78 [8 # / fuesIluf,.f} Weather Conditions: Ndiv c /cdo lt/
./ /
Horizontal Coments: A surface n, Iv ARec blades cleaned (3 feet from vertical face): YES NO r?el#aseed n a. n a? e /c a w elf,h . ~~r. , . A w . J Y - )[ .
} l 0 Installation of gunnite: Average thickness: /b14 ~
Gunite over entire exposed vertical surface and inimum 3 feet of width on ad-jacent horizontal surface: Yes V What Length ,3 # No Coments: Any equipment or materials on shell filter blanket. No Yes E.'
* Comment: hio .S e lI Ea A2eA e { cio n Tc teef? $.i$): ea 10 .3 9-)$
/
l Has polethlene mem rane been spread on shall mat adjacent to work area: Yes No Comment: AJ f, s A ,1/ / 0 A 4 +8s4 o iv /O - U v - 7 f~ Has gunIte been tri=med: Yes No Con: ment: //./e 4 7 tU A [/ A ns M I
>v. E. co n<a o ,e ic .a v - > c All surplus material and overspray removed: Yes No Co:=::ent:
O
}{c'/e: t u s' R e- tve 77/k: 9 se ~ cf y a h ~ "' + s ,dece w u r. h n'ai&~raf n n e e. Riuam{ d) f'{v ;3 ; ~ y, x.,r e r z . b e ,. - s , O JIc.// A Wo-a 14 ~lM-u,AS N OY & 't C % AY Eorm No. U-SITP-9.1 N s wesy n.g(I s.f)lk NoodN. S N .,c CC L w er:-- c' F N/ d 's 2 ** f * /
4 _ , , , . . , . . , ,. . -, .r E'!ED. BY-b',. \ . w . ; .i O r .k, *. ." s ,- u *s ,. g'Af g 3 1 *) - 7 ') . // ' % ' * ' fp^l~~ - l I.-.'. "! (, C. bI!ONldS
. NC 1 C- -
Y _ ..m _ _ _. u'.. .
gy 3 - -, -
,,,s___, _ . - -- .-=
r s
.: s o c .
j -) } / l T 3 id3*IN k .
' , J,Y A .' JONES CONS 3UCTION COMPANY l-
!. s ,
g WAERFORD UEIT No. 3: - e
' i V
\ , ,, . ' SLOFE PROECd,ON INSFECTION REF0E
, I- t
(.. J ,
\]
' , +%
> Report No: O -
.SpecilteationNo: 4 0 /L - 45"*4 9 .'1.
s .
~
- Project No
- /f mT/7 Quality Verification Inspecto A /tt/ /J f t Date: //- 77! _
I , 5
; g
' Location:67Mh0 / IAfDUAb Weather Conditions: A /2 0 [YO u F
/ / i
, ,%orizontal surface blade ' leaned (3 feet from vaitical face):
Comments: '~ YES M NO Installation 7f tunnite: Average thicknes's: f)I ' Gunite - over entire exposed verticaTj.urface and minim *m 3 feet of width on ad- - jacent horizotcal strriace: Yes V What Length d# No Comuments: AnyEquipmentormatakaldonshellfilterblanket. No . Yes
,i .s s s, Comment: .
t/. Has polethlene membyana been; spread onj shell mat adjacent to work area:
, ins 50 V . Corsent: JU U & h .e ll o.* A ?? A
( Has gunite en trinane.d: Yss 1No Comment: l t- , All surplus material and overspray removed: Yes V No Cottnant:
\ , *
&eY'by Y g/ )]o)( /0 L' h. W ft? WS h (,.go g& d c. N J"I f WO I l 0 "
O w}v c./r w,u A dens-d . SN N ' & " ' * , f"du 7 9 Sd E o A-)y g ^ < e 5 # ,Je / i.; m/ , av e e it. . - nu e Form Ne. W-SI17-9.L 5
- S 7~ b
\
& g l A- < e ck I
09 1
- f # f '~
(-s ' k (2. 9 C* (L * . nQ Q'{ s
\
i\ \ .
!! . 9 ; A 7) l!
l
'.t J.
pm Q 0 ~4 m/" i EV! EWE 0 & ACCEPTED
- i J4 C cap
- , r-n
- q. p
..i ..
-. . w": m -: .n 2
-a . ~.
h, - fB hNB1.AJ!DN DM .
_ m Ei;;E
.! / )
^~
J ) / 1 i i McR w svn Mg 3 b - bI 4 Afffi + /2-/S fees p=
,, ,,, Saru Mr.wrGsmrm,A f 3g S ot i m % s o r. e s E x
~~
0
/s/21/75 mig Engs 4 REVIEViED & ACCEPTED REVE.!' SY l J (2 'd J -/ 7- 7 7 ^ /
2' /4/7 3 i LEAu Q. C. EUGiNEER n;,wca q. c:.:-:'.
- wI k E__ g
s unm ..m_.g . N+ oo . -e.-- -we -- ~ l
. s .. ... mg o4
. 1980* I 1 ' h **13 S L 9k'IM T NO h 2'm I~- d
/ SOILS CONSTRUCTIO:4 77{g DAM S4_MA Y7Y AtEP NA/P WN / i o...a w An m.,t. Dsv ,.. .h ., /%ng #sawv ,, fx 7#A oa \
L l..u.; k4s'rsiaa sesn- ne symArne &ni ' ~ 4 , i...... . c a... , s.n , s,....tss;t, - # E 7 c 4.t sait, ~#4,SO
- T.,. i...s. /100 dree /Aed ; l ca.....<,s.n w.,u 'aa. e .h a. c..~
us a e,.iv.... 731Kl*srAb5= S72/ #^/ hAs;dkA' %0 $ i
\ , Amswsw.nAre 7Eswl@vnese H&ny / daw) Co7x. A /Skr Mur nsn !
n Saz. /%se Zsnaa' k&c Ssewn M4rxA mLkze .TD4e S7xt.u.m=so k 02se An7Fw Sru $//As/$Am S sr / A w % r A F /2 E Vt;t.$ A rvD A $ 7 9 5 G M e,. /AEAD b-,1El ve k .t s. ca. ...u e,i.n En ein e., t., s.il. - /f 7' Y E M L*59 N A S h M s Yh'k12 $ A TE O AFL A.G W D S A. 0 AldVE &'7AnwsA7nw A'D /AYej37Zy3? fDtWMA 7E'?3eh' - os,;..eu...u.s b S w r . , n *A>b ' ' r r, < ... ..s. n. a. . .,n,. c >.. i.o..... r.... tb! win Am &m1 ..... . Li.a,,, Svriz A-.k..ews ..n. :n. 27s..s. n..s..
- s. liis ~o,.
.. .. <l. : .. .I.
Aesr :) rwcvrs 7E - C% na. uns uns. uni mw, nne brna. ' ut v.s.un... n.,.;,.a blikvss / d M S ' 1 ;7a a n ,,.. n , e ,...a $sp h2 .Amx __ 1a...u ,c,.'... t... s.- . s,. -o,. . o,...> AAA/E06tuezo .
;b .r n ,c-o.. . s.... >,. . .s. -s...> AW/E O demsD -hs u
92eifW
~
u. Placemen (levelim. ..ktas, lit, ,st.Lness; dese,it.e) Y lSSM lWAdd vN SU AAsxn Ms. &n12mnm Mrn e AvD l%wsr AL 6er 9S5~ nr.tr*Ewntn'nse ON 76s 6=-7EsA/ AGAR .&rrA [M?/. Es EsA.n Sw' 6(AS SPArAD d A=unian /467s- #A7 76-4s:s 'Amnsr Gasz SrAxes %r& M ^ 1s>< 2wsss _ Remsek tonel J. o . ent..ni,y ,. spe< t!Iee,l.as. ,l e s .nd f.e.. lens of e.e s ,em.,b l ~ g g-' g hdened raf h h a - - IFTdA tot GCIF- / , N (( n o 6) L__ km."2?f2 M=% D- % ~~ B [. Form No. QC-93 (9-17-75) V gcc,,,f,,iur ,s rua , t
'~ { 1~ ~~4~5M W U 5,?? FWMG
.ac'ctor 2 : 4 g' $ geni g*
3 ,
~
u/ . s e a. m.4,i. . . .. e. ... s ,..m6 e ,. f,e ,.e.,,, .i.e., .h .< 6 e s. .h e,, ,,, e i r.,,,, ion. s. ,... 44 e i o ,. , . 6 en fe , e .su c ou F.u C N T 40. uooc t. No. r rt C o u t' N cv Truc F ri tco u tt N C Y l T I,.s t F ri t o u c N c v T f,3 C Ohr1P "WwP4 -= TLUA/ AX/J'" (hvMs94 - __ Exin A s7Ps FAw1- Asu:w w= & Cer~ 9<~s- -5r>='pr 72;'s=AL h'> - Ay>i misp ~ 9o~vas A=s:4 ^
. 727- 4S' O f M M ' -.
E4146 /b> JPr *W O O *' V/Ll9647:wA4 *
/tM, \_
t >Cu% oI w . I P. , / - -W 5 pee J .I T..ing IE82A M/8// M t.ife Thicknes a Compe d SD-- /d \/#M/h8#/S C.ve, seas Re,uesned AWMAS *Ohl" WEA W C.ve,ege s Civen 30 ~ AWMbAA pro e,e. .he,e, h.n?. Wh.m t i s c.m nocti peerean? Is .: seeisf act.,v? If noe, .hy noi? 1,eing miss.d se,ah .,,.<u.do byppecs.,s? If
/xE/#nsr s.,HAzinF 5722A*/ ?Bo ~M 'Gr A~Asr' A% e s 7 e W22- A~zE' cNY 77/+- Krzt- Jm /JU>ATJh 1.rA+c 6 senn R/17R A9 AhTES AF TsMANiA;e inAsAnah M//7pf A 7he s%7- 8211>>As DivM>@ss. b Aks2s AoAkCsE/] ! Avo 7dskurs A%m n/s=s /Aun a6nrx /Misiv5 Ovse/As '9vs ca&rwrs R4m 2 4%= ;. Wiss Sw7wnes 6/ Asnt.
{ /oA9es;w_1 A'c Assesso, .', SA77sFAcroA'r' ~ Te s s feii;n,. mie. ,emeaies e., ion ,s ,es e,,7 wh en .e s ,he .,e. ...e s .s? No. en, e .,. ..we,e,.s ..,e ,eeoe s,es?. in .h., 4 o,e*s ? Wes ,e,eese fuifiiIed? YM / 2 2 h f A/s/ 7 Y /)="$75 NA="AE 'YPV.d4l* E ) ?W b}%ff 9722z. _Cu Yks Afr4 /7h7% Arrxc.u=A ) ,
. A A s1 7Maff /ww2w7xas /ES7x JV/a DE /AMGt/ ///Mwl D/!ctzssis
.7-se> /Mr //4DA4r dN M/M/7s'. Txirf AtbeL As A?s DM Tis 71 k WMM *i in S M L /-
,, e , e,,4 f.. .,,.,, , .I e e.u ,e m e, u ne,-,
_M-~a s,/g.,, n,4.__ ep..nf.,mier ME /McW4/ESG OP,. 7EE ,2. .u,e.$ e.<Net A/.ArJKEr'Jd/A.s,/f/Ess, amp 2} Mfg. hie'09S /n4 _pWAde & Arf DE %"A=YMM7MA,.* /DWJMD. ~~Y5217]A77ERJEsc A%serz;o FsAwsn=>m
~
.f~A rrAewnnp f))A16&,0 O;p ME;e 2;?E 3/Ed./FMAc7aw '
x o m ax.usw h=:.'stic_-A147~ 2 ige Lh 14C3'-de
'd riva.he, of c.ve,eges .a ille pe,sioily c.mpacted less shift 88/VE Number el lifes pieced end compacted this shift Al# ~ N/5S7' M' bel
$ Nua.be, .I ceve,.ges on life p.,tielly c.mpacted es end of this shife // d d/8 '""
A .he,eh mer be n,,e< hed ,. ,eele .I e,ee be.ng filled .nd <.nepee,sd lad,eering eend,, ion of e,e e e, end of ,hil,. <. vere,e s
<.mo re,ed, e. ..e,e s ne. dad in s d;<...d e,ee .
i.n s ,. ent asYA6' tar *$n......i.nsS,hsuse....,.,,) atl- L Av2Er rad 2 2"e= %wA+'An );%ry 14Mn's B A Eejdn
/ME de%05E f/AMME/ACPEs24/F7/s/Mr.#/5S O=l
.:'e /hr .?71s Fouai. nwAw;r.w 75w:sss ca.,1 A= Brnm) A0ATys2H!6 M M i
ADE 7%4xkt AvnAomH A//a En /JwE >Ge rw 'c, Avinc Ahn=172iAM&es 7/f2 t_'^Antt \! 5r2 % sxwc:e osv vornw e 7Dit & h i='k/Siin=u=om cR zuwraanemi< A%= 7DrDzsriz-0)= DE Avn Ei/ sus 7xss, ll' e. .mi,,.,i.n s si s . s si.a s, s..i si.,, s _ _
- w -s s t 51s DA2.spxp7 w M M w KE/berfrY7)VHEA , NMCDNFofftMCE.
5 *
.' o:
t
- i. ,,,,en, (d. .e , . ,,
w i w r>m e A,enim),, $ie,.,..,.:ai.crniserarsrr>> .. d. 4 ,, , ,.i.. e.,,. ..ed,,,,s. .,e., 1Guxev7 G 37s SA m2 M E' m n Asmw scosm n-no x<~o m= JMA7~54 A=_~fFA7s?wd. AAfr C'iArn <%fst >%714 MIArJeE7"A'sk"Arx-S M l$2*M-/& 30)$A"D'9ArTEP 5f/AS. 5/4rkd.EB Tfs 7$ n D ,2$ryt SM A d. ( #/MA SE _5 02xWAw /2e A% EAAn s, DjsrismEsA,xxrx/ AvAws2=w'.
- s. Joe 7N Avo *Ev>N Smz L&7 tass A% S&*/s iVzn=~ AA* rsAus' ~2.7~!srAtw'L Fo rm No. "QC-93 (-17-75) I M I b 8 n ",,g, ~,o 4- h mg 4CIP- / 3m= '
~
. ~- . . . .
- . . . . . . ~ .
Data //- d B 5,7,,ggf[,, (g, , ... .;,
. _ . . _ _ _ . _ - _ _ _ . . _. . . _ _ . _ . _ _ . . . .~. .~..m....,_._. .
d r't t st l .. g... I,
- s. g. j *.. _ .
g *
- 1. ,. !'!' ' ;.:. ..,
i I i i.!1: ... 1 . ....
. .6 . . .... .
1 e: :: / N * . , td 3 1,.:l'i. i I : i I . .s. ,s - 14
..i.
** i .., .
x ,, .. . .t
- .1;il;,: ;! . ;~ ;;
c a o . l }. j... I N:. % ;. i
, .... i t .!.! j .' j
.., .. .; I..}, try . ! '.; .!.
. i {,g, !lll
, ,. o 33 .
..,...a.. . . . .
. . s,. .._. , . i. ....... . ar -
4 ... . . 4.... .. i
. . . . . . .. .r 1
. . t....I
.. 2 , i ., ., .. r.
i 4 .,.,.... .. .
,., r., .
i
..a... as g ...o a... s., _. . m._. . .,.
, 4.;
...wi.
m.,t ..
- g. .w
..u a. ..
- r. : -- .L
. . . . - . . .- e . ,i ,, s
*.'..y'" .
..a ., .i m
il b !
.. . ; 4: ... ..
.:,.,r .
.O m
~.....
. _ . . . . . .. ! d .? . , , , ~' 'J s't II.* ~. . 4~;$~.~.f I : . .?
. i
"'t ._,..a
.._ ..: ,, i 2-1 3 -
P--,.r. .,.p...._[ ... 43 ,_ ,_.....%._ .> u.. _.u:- .-JM. .. ._ .. ._. ,
,.&._.. Q ,,
. . . . M c_. .
. I _w.+!!.i . . . .
_. { i 1
. .fg ,.~o~,.
. 1g o ,.. m._
f: .D _: - m , --w,,.
. .. _ ,.k _. ,., ,r_;_tCL*._y.g '~ .a . .
; .r.2 - --
. .c n
~
.. s . 9 --
. . ..- ;. . g . :9 g,3 6
.. . . . _ . . ., n
.e-l
= _:
v- _. __ . - .- -
. t
+.,.w. e. __.
_ .. . 4, _ _.
. - - - ~ ~ - -- ""
_. ' ~
._. .r .
4 g.._._..
.p _
.. = -~.*
.. _ s._ _~~ ,
3 -_ . i
, .g,__.
4_ 3 _ ____ _ r._.. .__ .
.. ._ _.. . . - s_ , . _ _ __ _
_ z 7
~ 4 , _
_____ = =_ _ _ s, _u - _ , w _= _
- - n =.l
+
..- d z_,m N
- u m -
.: ~
_,4
= m
. n . . t_.-_
~ _
= __ -
J. .,, y
., I
-Q L _
- a. . t
- -1
.ii
.i, .
_ i o. _ me.a= s q , , , , , , . . , , ,.,,. ,,,_ 4 yn
. w -- + _
t< m i'~
- 40- d --
_ , , . . c- = g - _... _e1 _ s _e - : e 1u-u-s , _
.= . .
g _,.
, ~ m x, m -
=
-_=
-y
- - ..q.-a '
= _ - ,
3_1 n
= =-
_-.u. u . y 1 =, m,, , 33_-c ' w, , n ._. _ _ a
= =
- = = =
, m4w
.: .q g .._ e. .. ._ ._.
.-,=--
=_ =c
=_ _. =._ . _== ==.. . _:- .
- x. e q- -
_u _==._=._ =.. =.
=== .'
_. =
=r = == = = u
---..--t- - - , . -
W _2 m .N w : - -- ,
. . . . . . . : :. = _ 21- _ _ _ .,
Vg y33_ : ' __ j.= .. -. = n 6
- -+= = = = = . ._4
.=.._=..
t - r --- --- ~.: - - ,:... - n yn -
=-;. = = = = =
. ._ a . .
a_ : _= ..
.,e_=._ =- = .: a
_- -..___ m _t __ _ . ...._ _ . - ,_
. .. . =... _ .
.,_,-..,,s_-__.g..=
..J . _
14 t,
.n. ...
. .r ._. .. ._ . :t .r. . ,. % ., .. . ._. .._. ..e
. . . . . . . . . _ . ._ _., ...a ..
..m . . . . , , . . - . ,. g..,,. g. _ . . . ,. .. .m. . . , . _ . . -
_c . . n.
.... ..a.. u : w , , w.v . ___ u .
. m_, ., .., , .m.,. .. . . . ., t. . ' um n, u..a,n,.. . .. a s : a2 ,' &,. ., .
- i. .. , .
.,. ..v.
.... .i. .n. . ,. ., . ..
.,_.... r, . .
- n. ,
..i.., . i . .x.
.g. .. . ,. ,
, i , :.. .
. ..,... i...
. . . ... i l > . ..
. r. ., . i. .
- n. .
. p. ,
pi ..
.n.
- w. 4, . ,
h W i' @ .. . . . .
-i.u.qp . , n .
me*.e * ^ " "
- _ _-
ns=upryens no. 0.8 W5 $'W
. , ~ .
h err f- p (l f
- CLAM SHELL F LTER k ' SP I EPOST j i
. gg3- )~Jwl i SpectfIcation No: 1 #ll - /.T't. 4 , 4/B . L {TC.
Project No: ~7( ".117 ' q. /. Inspector - Da te: /d -JW-73
~
- 1. Placement Area / Location: 87/[8 W /
w s J 2. Release for Installat.l.on and Compaction Obtained: Yes N
. REVIEWED ~BY / 3. Materials Released by the Engineer: Yes ~
4 Spreading and Compaction Equipment as Specified: Yes k EEIASCO Q. C. civil [
.5. Filter Cloth Properly Placed: Yes o Comments : .
6 Clam Shell Material Clean: Yes' o Comments: be[/v Av n M O/u t:. 7L..V lonJ w 2 c%d 6.e k 4k A + n b M . J oi,,/ ~ n M e ,r L
- 7. Number of" Passes: 7@* Comments:
- '[ a.
V E., .... CI'm a Shell Material, Properly . Compacted: Yes W Comments:
. . . . . ,~~~~--
( '9. Alternate Method (s) of ' Compacting Acceptable (if used): Yes
/ No
- 17. :.~ ~-
Corrrnents: J '/ Jt H k li+ Y 9 o k ' s~ DMD)4eYCA--- '
"10 Final Compacted Thic ess Acceptable (10 to 14.5 inches): Yes 'No' Comments:
NCE #L UA - s-. wc:7 fen > bd 9 7be Erwss .~ o a ec eWd{t g ' y 11 Repaired Areas Acceptable: . Yes ' No Conrnents: MS tles.cMed i o no rR8/Mf t 2 ,
- 12. Surface Tolerance Acceptable: Yes No Corrrnent s- *
~
Le
- 13. Veather *Cdriditions Acceptable: Yes ~
No Comments: @. au .6 m 14 Clean-up Properly Performed: Yes do Consnents: 15. Other Remarks or Comments: [+ , . ,' w ,,, , > M. 7'em M[,v 4 dire,$ e[ 7~,R u.c Ps PO
TT S tb, r 'N/
il
._p p o: .. ye , As /,w(' s l+// A n 0 ,-{A'i e e n gj e//.
'\ ;
(S*? reverse side for Instrue..lons) ~ ~ .7 3 Form No. : V-SITP-2.1['
,.% s.Y .
b - /7 - ?] -
. . . ......s. sO c
.I ,
. gg%n n a ***a evrt a 3 9 '.,t s/ .,1 o ...,, v3-6 o,
## O INSTRUCTIONS Item (1) To be completed by PQAE.
Icess (2) thru (9) To be completed by person reporting nonconformance, e.g., Ebasco Vendor QC Rep., mite QA or Ebasco Construction QC Personnel, etc. Items (10). (11) ac (12) To be completed by supplier or Ebssco. Construction Qualiry Control as applicable. Item (13) To be completed by Personnel Designated by PQAE as indicated in the appropriate box in Part 11I. Item (14) Past IV to be completed by Ebsseo Vendor QC Rep., shen generated in supplier's facility or site QA when generated at construction site. Completed form to be incorporated into Ebasco QA records. es. :wt On ymOJECT tas OR AwiMo asO./.sp sC seO. saa V terford Unit No. 3 SU/wb8En. COnsT RUCTION QC OR CONTR AC TOR tal P.O. NO.499 J.A. Jones Construction Company W3-NY-4 I.0U-1564.482 Rev. 3 twJ,a C Rt P TIOM O F C OesPope EN T. P A R T OR ST S_T EM te s . Sh911 Filter Blanket
- 8. DESCRIPTION OF NONCONFORMANCE 878 (leems involved, $pecification, Code or Ironderd to WhlCh leems Do Nee Comply,
- Submit $ ketch of Applicable)
The minimum thickness of the shell ft1 ear hi ante.e == cene.A <n %i. .482 is 10 inches. Due to fluctuating foundation conditions, the minimum thickness in the vest half of excavation strip fl (approximately between N4' 00 3 & N4200 & W3962 & W3800) is 8 inches. s
.i r , w . .. of.3w
./ r a -. .E... .
( 9 .,..##'
.z
,.e.,,,# 6 A M /
- e. . ... --- . .. .
QA Site Supervisor /O.1P/I
"*8 (Submit Sketch if Applicable)
- 18. RECOMMENDED DISPOSITION BY SUPPLIER OR COH5TRUCT10H QC OR CONTRACTOR I
New York Engineering to evaluate acceptance of below minimum reouired thickne=rs 5f i .s ,, < < , , , ,. u_ _ ___ m__.... REVIEWED BY
. n G- i !
r e a c.r n nN' t (Wll REC EN peM G POSITION 40 %) T e T 6E )=W " O A TC 4tal se/xI C.Ge,coss Ame O se sw a Tum E O F PEED SOm e d08 Sr. oc Suoervisor / o - t 8- 7=, ! III. EVALIIATION OF Di$ POSITION BY E$dCO, REASON FOR Di$ POSITION use t A chall filter thickness of 8 inches is accenenhie barne,=, a m <n < m,,m nr A <m h , mr unc'ontaminated shell is required for attainine oroner rechnrg nna ei,he q, .n,-
, ,7 14r*
Tha nonconformance as indicated in Section 1 above was evaluated and was determined to be cceeptable and meets the design intent. REVlEWED & AGUtfitU U KoJok ap -n-2 7 7=m n n ' M /5 t h l f"" D EpGIEd RING [ QU ALITY ASSURANCE O ccus daWi0nV " @WeAtr'a'ORizco Ptaso~scu WME LE e E 8e 1 4R a se Aad E 4 5 6 G N A T W R E 6 pe A.d E 486 Gst a T Q R E) eg aaieE ess GN A T WR E) 2 /b 91 p _ y'_yg E DaTE DATE
. . . . . . .. O a T. E .. - n S AccEPTEo Oacacetro O acecarro O acerci co O Accearco O'acacetro O acerarro Oacaccreo ACCEaTED WITH CoasM E N TS ] ACCCPTEo WITH COMMENTS ] ACCEPTED WITH CoWMENTS O *ccraveo =M coaura 5 IV. VERIFICATION OF D15PC11Tl0H "** f SY SacNATURE TIT t, E oATE Euasco wEnOOm OCite TE en l
- . . . . . . . - ~ ~ . . . . . .
,r.ASCO SERVICES l' C04POf:NrED Q Q b%%\ ,
- SPECT FICATIO Ot'M,71'1C \T70N r.ETORT
- $k. dAMAS Fron: N Wsr#/M
- y/wse l9& Suffensese S)71 Gas A#&wfse
~
atCT:
& SHER 5 TEA?h/,YA',ST~ADJSTPE lHwN /2.ST EcIrIcATIo:: REFERENCED: I6[/~/S6 NI82 3 SECTION: TM&#EVT
~# /O-27,7f nATs:
PORT: A/ 5 bt= 75 8 /N/24477/A'/ kh724l'EA/7$A33 [h:;$97
~ Fe Dmusem Cziw La 5swa. Atwe A'kwsm Asrws t;2wnwr&z% /k 7scossumv. swa sfs/s7va GrnvrMrSsm& dwaers>Ee _ -' '
Ersey sze dum hi:st% % u & ! T Akeneess Samse Msre Rm7xec 8s _ }rJ~ f ArE' $01AM770A/ hD A%2=D 0) F#tE (MMxkwu As E7zuws Anarsidhy Aw Hso /zrism Amrh u . jf5/A/EA h W-7" M bWJAL. lh EDJ~A/) SAhSS' /}/ArtJ ' on 9o' Ao}enes Gmwr: 7Fs nameier 71sym(%cd n CoMAumM4rx 3/ 7;s~ i%n Op-AS/s7 tips $Es77m 84wAs - 1 Aur?2= d-, '27 tines Ass >rry Msr.s 752 Aas7xee ksrs NAY E A/ 4 A ?f9A fo' WE k M s2fA/ P 0 F
'7EP At//>A6-J;-
A $ SIGNED: M STE1nttr10H: SUPERVISIFC SOII.S EPGR S7T" 1 RESIDEliT CI:CR ~ CIV3L QUALITY CO:IPLIAt:CE 13G;t / _SETTO! QUALI*Pt CONTRO1. SUrV _ / j N "O. QC-110 (9-17-75)
.n-;
. ; 13a w wacrr -
k.Qg/ / (N Data M N # 8 QB iPIIo
- - ^ C. CMC
/7c- - s O 4 1ya l) { f, ,r g hs 6
] ,
I h
, l .
l Vh! Es k disi &E ii 5 l L . _ . _ . ___
.g . r e gn . ~ 94-E g. 6 ese m "**#"#h~~- W.pe gemme- a'W9
- W,g m e_gN M N ItcR w3.sm ggh in
.1 ASCO SERVICl:S I:.00';rORATCD _
J- g SPECI F1 CAT 10*: Ol'ALTP1C'.TTON RETORT .
- ~5 FROM: # /E///CM!v SJ7E SHSbd/sEZW 33ECT: kl/MDA77DN ED244. 6697ALGV7" l ~s ECIFICATION REFERENCED: #E ~ SECTION:
s y DATE: /d/2 7.5" iOET: /}fE A hA/ hf h AYM!f/) SEET E /5Eb69770AJ
& /ns Ei-4e c %,n Sazi k.srXu' . Das 76 Mevfasw Avas Dx m/a' . & Aese Acers A Asraes2Srom 2%dse E ,Aarsr'7sl> /%, D ras Car Aux 7742swksrew -
h/A'0Y SL' O M) hAADED, h bVNFD $J7H$/MF/ /& - 0 7)V k /b 035 b Y M h N N L. WAS NN A/ M w;rk n AVsses de 7sf /z & %v7x i% &fs'sx7zw Aw . . h14h~va 2%esu do Aonssws7sn '/2286ds As /a'ls YM $7771/75 k DA7/CAJ D/AL /AS//7" ,, Gees 'Gs M/oa /dAsiLisu7so &Saxess l &&n %u Grae AowsarMss Cowstam diI72c Aleme-fMiriasrampi Ou 7ss 2" Sssa /s4sa
. h/S 5/S0F /AE4kwfMrll$kS h&pc012/6ky
/flEN
~
2M Ed/#EEAM/dfA'/DA70 l/lE /AlcseefAPR3enREE $DA/AE Asrasess22. 7cI Abcv720 ass AsvsesError l - 1 m /1
+ A 9 SICNED: /h _, _ _
STRinttr10!i: SUPERVISIFC SOILS EF; SOII.S nGR RESIDttiT ENGR ,_ CIVIL QUALITY C ,_S r. . . UALITY C t PV
'010', 1. QC-110 (9.-17 -75) (, byko/7,- M NU ~
EBASCO Q. C. DVlf. Date NO 2' ""
~
[A%V ' h%f
.b'u M Ub.b(E'f
' ~
v
.. . .:.. . . , . o .... .
,4.. . . ...
thCR em 4.1,, [. . ,.. .. . ..
. n. .I
... hMi q.
u
.. :.i...I .l.. .) ,i.
. .. . . .. t . ,,. : . e... ...
. i hc .11
. ..,...1. . ..l.aj I. j ,. .
f l 1.. .. g p.4.
. lf . .,
,1 .l .e:....
.. 4 .
4 !~ .. , . ..e .. -
;** - ..s . t. . . , _ - . ,,
. f..
a
.- ! I.l et .J..
- n. .
ll
. . - , . a ,. .
g ] *.
. ... J.". ,. . . .. .c. . _ i. * .; J a
.J. .g. . d
., !. .J.-r...' . w ... ...
.l ,.i g .' i. 4 ..- .
.i . . e n .l. . .
... . . . . 4: ..- o... . . . . ...r _.,. ,. ..
w n. ..s,. 11 ..s..
,. 1 o, s..7 _... ~. ...
I. ... . . 4. . . ., .t.1 + ..,4 .s. .._n
. e.4. .u.
- u. .gp. ,,r...;a- ,,r,.t y.n.. . v ;. ,. ,
.m._^i
.. -- . . .. a., t,.~_, t.. .,.,.%.. .
.'1.
'_." .."" .. Y -
N Wh.
- a. . - - -
~.)!m.1 ., m er,. Y.OY._$.
O +r. .h
, .~r* au--- u-D -~
N_m s - I- . ', +1-a ^- '
- ~
- a-
.__._. ...6.- . ,_e=.... ,
.8., I.
& p .
t_.
.. ' ' ~~ .,
*i"
^ ..- ' .
' 1
._.w..
4.'.,- 1 r b-" I"**-*
-,'t'
' 2
. . . . . r-*--- e_
-c.. . ,; .
g- e /
. . = .
.* 2 .g
., g .e
~ P-1 i i g
. .. .m. .. . _ _ . _ p
. g -
-= r=-
.. .4 . . >
>... ' -- _-. A. +T-Q I'
, -@ - .-. _. t 1. .-
-~.-
- p. _.7 .. .-
a
..- g. .,_... _ . . .
N. _ 4* ___. . . r.y _. ... \ .i . 7 , , , si s i _, - . .4
.4 s
g x~ _3
.a
-t --
x, . i
-L".L'"J y.,3 M \
. g >
g a a a s - <
'I-t#r
.iL W r g .
,e
- y. est_.
q . - ( ,1 -
.Q .g l
--() -d _
,' N
=
u A. _,.
+g-O -w -- d_
.- .... . .J "I , s ,
T_-, u.d u) a , ,,' - g I _ .- {
. . . N -
,~. M , f%
m 1
..q. . )= _ u. .---. *-
Q o , s, i
.A , 4
,6, .,l 3 ... e o o'
, 4 L--
..r._
n_6 us. 6 . se f _l_v -
,a 1 1
, 3.
w _. r. 2.. - o a:2 Q _. . . ._ - .s. 1
= .
.L hi - .
..' E t -
. -. . _ - e.
g
.y _
eA
..C. '@ l c::
i w
.,e
.g_ .
-t. ,
_+ 2 r-- r er .. , = L. . A. N
^^
. .I g ._i
-~+
at= g .
. .. l
, 1 w _ _, - , _
Q- -
.x,;-
t.g-3Q 4.e.
.. A --
1 _.--r.-- I. 3 C') m,
. . - ._. _-r ~ a
_r.j- ~ +t- - 2 x 1 w --t- C')
- -- i
- y. '
3 s --- 9 rt _.. .. _ . -=y- . s-- Oy 1 i_
= -
y 3 jg+ c . , . a ._. pm. _ mM 3-I-- _ _' 6. _ - -7
'""L. ...
_-- .- . . - t..;
, .= -
. _u
-- -e -- -- -
m. m 3 m._ n _ . 4. , _ 6_
+.
_-[
---_ { _...
.m.
...._s._-._..3 t..
.,n. s.
.e.,.
._. . L 3.3_._, .. .. _ .
p.,.L w i . _ ..n. ,
mi
_A_. , ...;
"T a.
, ...-.a_..u,._..
.a ._. u _
1
.-l .
_d'Ei. # a.
. . - .---s... _ :..... >
..t
- ... _. - . =..
i.. T. .. .. .. ,
.a.
. t.
_.._..L_....
- T
. - . i 6 .. .
- p. u .b_c x
. ... .t
.p
. . pmat.m J
.......i... ., i
_,J".,._ g.f.*,. _. ... . .. .
- . .. - i.. . . .. . .
._.....Fs....
u..... _ .._..-..
. . .,. . .u..4-- , , __
1 -
- _. .. . ._ . ., 4. i. ,
.--.a.., . ex
., . . _ , _ . . . i.,
.s. . . ,_ _
9 4 ... .m. . f.p p
.. ~
. . o- .<: : .. .. .. 3. . . . . . . ,
_ _. ,J
.. .. . . _ ..u . . . .... , .A. ,_.w.. .,.- , w .
[..
- . . L.4a.: , o[.
. 4 . . . . . , .. ,. . u' i ..'.s..... .. , 4 ..L .p... a__. a 9. -_ 5. 3. . . . . , .
.h, a. l .-- g, .e. , 47.... am-===. ~
- 4
.\. ,, . , ;. -. ...*l-,,,. 3. e..T.L t . . ,- ..., . q. .. t p,. . .-. ..4 e . .- -.t_, .,8 :
.i.*m" '.-
d ,-
;_,s ,e .m...,.
.a . r.. .L...U.
4.. . - t .- .' .'o., r, 2,,-.
.. -, u. a
.I,.-..,*-'...-....t - ,u . m -'!-
i l
. . ,. . s . .. . .
. . L .t.r -s.. 4;,4 ,a'
,,i . .t .I *
'.] . * .e
..- [.* r.
f'l' - , e,.*r. L". p . N. pm.
. .,6
- p. - ' J y ' .a* .' . - ; . .*4. q .. . &, e,,r.- 'T-
. . m _. . . .
. _ ,.g .
Lg . k.L
. ; J U 1 FM .
f i ii. I . eg NC , ,..,5
- b. e s m e
.3 M.: 1
,. . i i
.f ei .
r e g.. .
.+ . .:
i: . . .
. ! :s . .:i .
~g . .... ,. ..g_..
in.
- l. .g . .. .
,.. .,r. .p.....,
- 7. . . .,.. . .
. .,. .g
...C.
-. a
~
9
.l....- ....... . . . . . . . .
7 l ..
.. s. ,, .
- y. .... .... . . .
. l . .., .. .. ,. . l . . . .. . . . ... . . . . .
T, m .y + R....u_. ,. .. . . ..
=.-
=.~. . . .
. .T..g........,.
__2.........__......
..t._...._......... _ f . . . ..
- l. .
t
- w. [ .. . . .
I. > . . .. .... . . l . 44 t. 4.T l . --4 2. l i. ; . 4.1 . _ . .....l.. .. u p 7
- s. . 4
- t. , n ....
A4
..._..g..
. . ..- - - ,r . . .... , . . . . .
i s. ... .. .. ...
. .. a., )., 4. ; _ .. . u. .
- z. .. ;. i r ,
.. . . .e.f. ..
. A f
., . . p .
. _ 2 W . ._ _ _
p
., 1 .
. ,lg .. .
7, . .
- c. . j..
... . . _ ._. .. ...e-... ...l.
4.. . . . g t. v .... ..p .-. . . . . .t ... . . ... .; .
; -{ -
.g . . . ... .... .v. ..... ._. . _. .
. v
- 4. . _. .
n, . >g. s "4 a.
. .y t . . . . ; ..;z..._.,....q..
T. ._.. . _... w
. , . ... , . , . . . . . . L_. ...2._ i 1 P 5...._ ..J.~..
'...~
v . .
.. k... . , . . .
. . . _ . . . ... 6.. - .
. . . _7
- ir ,. . ... . 4.
- g. . _ L ._.
- i. . g, . . .;-- l _. < . . . . .._ . . .
. ..i...
. .. _ ... Fq
_. .a
. .[. . .. . a. .. ....p....
... .. ._._.3... . .,p._ ... .._ . . . _ ._._... .. .. ....
.. . . 4. .
Q. ,. _ ._~.l.,. ..**~..~.._~.;~.~. t q; .'.~. t' rin.;. 1 n ~ - ~ - V -~~~~_~~_'~~.. , e ...
._ ., , . . . . . , _ "a. ~_~~-
. . . _ , . _ . , ..i,_...._.......!...
.__ .. _. .. .._ ..j.. .. . .. .._
4 . . .,,. S,. i ..., . , . . . . , . . . .. ... .
.... .C 7 s.
- t. . 4... .........m....
- a. v g.;
c ._ . . 4 ..
. . .. p,. _ . . ..
ie.. g. . e ..g
. ._i. y _ ._ . _.. _. p._ - _.
%s.3.,. .,
.L..
4._....
.y.. ,,,.,.
- b. .
..m..._
...e 4 . _ .
..e. . . . . :
_ ,.1j:. 4 L.. . g. .g. _ . . - p
.3... 3
- 5. . ...a ...i .. . ..y g. ...,
_ .. . . L. . . . . {', ,, .
, 9,
... r.. ;. .. .. g.. ..
,g , . ..r..., .. . . .
t s- ..
.1 _.
f._._.a._.._._..n _ . . _. m... . . n
. g. .....a_. . . . _ ._. .s... ..._ ..s..,,... . . .=p. . g. 3.
. ..s. ~.*- v
......-. X
.s...
r
.3 s y .t p.-. .
, g
. f,, . . . . <
n < y y
-,3 l .. .
..-f
- w. -
, s. . .f. .. . . . ,T."..~..... .-...... . ,, . . . . . . . s
, , t ,.? , *,.. . g*. ,
r.i.. 1 j g ,. ~ -*,
.- m o. 'Q- .
.. 4.I. -
- . " 2, -(
'.c .g,gs "[ . l t
. 4 ,
W d 4 ~ . 1
~
- i .
i a . 7 . , . ~-5, . W T a s . l
. d. .
f.'_ 33 - : '?. .' . . I , so A4
,r .c -j. .. . .e4
.i.. .3 ...g
, e **'s 13,-c o ... . . . . .. .....,.-.
. .. .a*. . :4. .w'... .,
.,. s. . ;.
>. . . ... ...A . 2- s .. . ...W_ . . . .
- l. 1,&o.., .
u (,p. . b ss , q.
._..R.....s.... .-- y W. ._..n .,_.
. ..s . ; ...,
, ., f. p. .~.t....-
. . .. A
).... ..s... ,#,..
. , . .......t...
i J
..,".L. . . _ .. .. . . . . .l
. g. ..t.. l e
......_4.__. .,,.P 9 . . . . . . p 1
_ . _ _ . \ .. . . .. . . . . .
. . . . .. . .4a.
.._.. . _ ... .]..
? -- ...- ... . . . . . . . ..j.. __ . . . . g . u..: .- . . p. . . . p.. .
a. s.s. (.a ...u g _ ~A
.. .=_.. .o. . .$_.. ...
. .. n J, .,
- t. ,r - _ 4
- . ..- . . . . . . . .......g... .. i .. j,
_ .E E -.- p . . .-!..- Z- .e.-.-...,.,g
..._ -. 6Ji - - . . -
+-
'N....-
.Y.e3 A .
.......t. - .- . ..1.
..r
. . e. .
f p... .
. ..- ._3... ._.. . ....
j ....;.. - .
-p.
. . . .. ..... .. .. e n.. ... _ .,.. - _ s.
...f.-
. . . . , a. .
aQ.
..e......
.. a . . ..
g... w. .. . . . .._.... , , . ......- l . .. x 3 . .y ,l) .. .. ; 4.
-Cg.l.
m c
.g..
_.t...m
....,g..
g,
...g. py., .
p
.. ..~... .
...4.. _. .
.g .
. . n .. . . . . _
.m .
....L.......
K s ..
.. . L,.
N.,.
- . g.!
. . _ . .t .. .
. 8
.... l . l.-
. .O ,
. ...i.._....l.......a...
.- . . . . . . .j ..t .
l i se . a i L .: .I . V.4 .
..............r
. . . .. . s ..... . .. . . , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
g . . .
.. . .. .;. .g s.... .. .. ,. .. . .
. . . _ .. . . . . . . . . . . . ..g f ,.
. , .. .. .. .s. . ........,
4 a. . . . . y : . . . . . . .. .... O W
.. . ... v .%.. . .s.A. . . . . .... ,...:. .
.......['*
. .a o.
m . .. I .. e . ; u a.. . .s._
.,.. .. .. ..4. . . . ,g. .. .. 1 ...
...... .,....4...
......v.
.s . . . l -
.-..e.e...; %n.O . . . l . . . ,.,. , d. . . .. ._ . .. _ ..; .:. . . . .- . . . ., a. . . .. ..
..a=.
l y. n
%. y . . . . _ .
. ll
..f. .
. .... . ... . . . . . y p .
% &.:.P 4
- g. . ......[.
..... . .,3.....,...
..... .:. i t. 3 ..
- ,5
, . .i.,,.
., -q, t g.
, g3.. ....l.
a . .
- g. . .. , : J... ,3 ig. .. , r.... . . ..l..,....l.
. .l..a j,..... ...; ,.
b y. . .. . ,
-7 n o
[-
...r... i,.
D e,. . - , . .<y;
- .s., ;e,
.. .., . . 1 M1 .... . ' '. - . .. ..f _. ...,. . ..
a.'....
. - _ ,.4 .. .t s y g . : 7. . .. .. .,..
dW ~"
.I
, ^ .M g g ', P ; ;, J i . ' '
4" .I r
. .. . .-li.:i...;3 j.
6, i. . I
.i.. . . (h s# 4 li-* ... . i I!.,!;l' .i
<!..I;l *
..l.h . .
m . . L 4 :' t ':.! t . w. *i- 4.L / I : . . y % \ 3 : e
, . .- wL
.N- . -
I
' EBASCO SERVICES INCORPORATED WATERFORD SES - UNIT NO. 3 SITE SOILS ENGINEER - APPROVAL FORM Dats /8287[
, Locccton $f'YMhf SU M N5 OA
$M / /Mfk2 $NA7W t , Con orms eavieved $& 98 $dEE7~k $6 $3$#ff7 2, hM) una --~b, a-M tua~L,. Iv&es ds7y7Zss oA- es.
Approval , Rej ec. tion Signature 1/sp/ -' M /)9 .6~ [ -
/ /
2!'H~'~ hE htkA/f3Sb /WA 2 h M b/25 4 4tC M A Ya/P.:::: w Svsa. Zip 7- %es An 2/msso Fs~w /4 /o
& Mexas. Amwax Ao 5sm kw 2hAmAw (h 4W h9AS lo kSpAE /AM $NM bMM23GC bf7" '
75hjm 'Zs~AtI7Mw-7x~s~ S2tVFMD bM7~$. Remedial Work Report o/f./ E Ea>/4A/S
/
/
N . **' L N /
~
V
- 's
' x QC Inspector: , N' '~
R:stdial : Accepted Rej ected
- Site Soils Engineer k.,tQC-132 M W b b hh .['M,b m_QC.ZP-/ ;
m 1/. d- ,s is .x e $ 4 - - G ,*3
/ % e
.fl .
i:
, ,. gn ws. syn AM.11 14 P..
EBASCO SERVICES INCORPORATED - WATERTORD SES - UNIT NO. 3 SITE SOILS ENGINEER - APPROVAL T0!U! cta
/O,l24, '7 <
Lo:3 tion fast WAU* W fLArt sdFI L fo M %%%p t 9 .- 9AC Sh-W H . AT't3h H t-D % Quality Control forms reviewed 4 0 - 93 syp:j-ff gg . 93 gg2 7_ Afprcval Rejection , Signature 2.t:- /0 s1 F S~ - f , Comm ts/Recom:nended Action . . . - .
\ ..
~
N Remedial Work Report . N ' i N .A D. N ' AcTWL**" ' _. N . ey . Nx "'
*\ n ff m
't m 138 11 s QC Inspector tenedial Action: Accepted Rejected _;
Site Soils Engin er .?crrg , ,@ , ,
! I 1
1
.....lu ;:,n ...
Nm wsm I,.il..,, .i.... .e M%l5 l i...g..fll...... ...l
,. .. . i . . . ; 1 r. . M i g.gl .l " . . *-
.,i s i. I. ....ng:..g,..4 . .....
- l. . . ...- i. .,
- a. i..
'!L ..l.,.
. ..i
.l.
l,. .. ...
..li i
g..i-..i. ....... I .l ], i a. g, , ,. .eijlIlle .
. I i
.pi,.. .g.. ..
i....-l n .. ,.
...l ., ...
. . . .ii ,. L
., .. ... .. , .i:
..... p. . l . l. ,,1. . ..I .s. . . ... .. ...
V
,\ . _ _ . .
i ,.....,. ,. . , . , _ . . .
........; .. .... .. x,.:
9 . b . _ .I.... . 1. ... . .l .l.l i., l t... 3....,, m.I.. . ,.. m.! . ,il .tl..i i L....... . .. .. . $. (_ 3
..4,.. . 6 . .i,.. l g .i g . . . . . ... . .. .._. LL
..1,. tl l., . g. j.. yt t.;.. ...
e
% h. ..
..I l._.....,.,._ . .......
$WA. .T.M_ . -/to .et ..
... i. -.. ...i .
- q. Nrrx/.,. ..,... . .._.
n . . ... .: + .
., . ...u... . .. .
.W o_. _ . . . . .
.r.:t*..i . . E,_. ,. / .. . .
. . _.... . .m...
.~.....
.e ys.m. .. .m. . .e. .. .m. m. . a. y . ..
_ . . .w
. . ......e ....
.n u_. ..-
.. __. ...L ,. A,.. .. .. _..._._..,._.1
. _._ .t .
___.~_..
., ._ w. -.
.i J a ::t- ._
i o . . ,. -, j ..
. g a) c .J..,.._.
~.
... .~,...a. . .
ct.% -- . . . _ _ . ==- . t
..___e__.__~_
e i
.s g
.. . . _ ._. .o. - . .
t _
. . .. . -- ..___...g._..._....._i____._.i.
. ,..,.,.a.._.T,._...
(_ __ . . . - . - . _ _- ..
. . . . ... . ,-. _. , y .
_ 4 S l
._.=__m_.g_..... .
_ _ . = --
._ ., m_ , .. . . . _
.m.
- l. ._
r
._ ~. _ .__
t.
. a. .. _. _ ._. $_ .
.j s
_, ? = 2 _ ~ ... . . . _s neo^ -. y
.. .n ay - --
m
,y 2
, . 1 ,- V xw-
.i_.._. __. ._
_m m - _._ g __.
.._. g-a.e s x ..
._. y
_3 _ .. .
-"~ M j ,., i n.
r
- p. -
.r
., i 1_..c
. mm
,~,m ,
, m. _ -
4
= _
. . , , .p g ._e ,
.--t _%.M, _ .
- r. qm 7. -_ a
, , ~ _
n
.I. 4 7g og _
.W 4
_. .e J *_.*) M g.C 1 N _. - - _ ._. . .. _ - g 4 3 , _._. .a. . 4 ._ .
. 1c ",,
a (f) 9 ,
.7 - _ _
y *.
.5 -
2* _- w M.. ._ r,_
.3 m .m in ... y .,w ._., _ _ _ _: ,__
"""". ""O-. u , @ ..-
' _. ._ _ _ . p . _ .... J.
jW O .
.d
- . 6
... 3...i,. _.g .
a .1 1
) _; - .
.g. l l- A q- . .._
4 . t.
. .; o".%. 4
, ..- . g
, -= _ . _ , .
a__. *._ ( pu
) _.._._e g --
e .. _ r _ __ 6_ ,
._ _ 6 ._ _ 6
- h. V" .
r.- - _ -
- y - _ _.
n' E w . . ----.t . . . _- _.- _. _~ _
=
6 -
=
M t _e. _ e.l g. h. [ _. -=--
- 9. ..
.p D-. -
.. .gi.-- 3 I r i.
n=m- * ** pp e . eg .. w M m
..
- _ + .
-=__ ..._... .._... - . _ . .
6 K~
."__N.
M _ _ _ _ .e . ..b r._ .. _ r
...e._.. - - -. . _ . . .. ., _- _.
p.m p= - _. ._ r., .. .. .
....f q . . a.. . .. .
. d
.... ... .. -_. .. _ _ . . _ _" . ......T__._-.....
, . .u ,_
_ I. _. _.I.
. . . . ..l. .-
p . pggggg _. . _ . .. ._. . _ . __
._...i. .4.
..._... .. .. _.....i ..
._ . ... . ..- . . . . . . l. . .6 ..
m--- i .. .
....._.l . _ . . . . . ._
.~
enemm
., p..... . . . . .. _ _ ... . . . . .
.l .
,7
-.... . ..o .i,.......
i . .
, . . _ + . . . .. i.
- e. . _ ._ =_. ._. _
.u
.e.
. _ _ . b., _ .. f.. , . .. . _ . . . . . , u, ,
=-
j
..f.g_..
. . . _ . _ . . . . ..Bi.... 4
. . . .A.,. .
q
. i. : -
t m.. . . . 6. . 6_ J ... . I. a_. .. L ...g. .M.J.. .....g@ , ,
.... . _ .4..
... s ., . I ,-
g 7., 4.... - . . L , I,. ;7 g ..
. . ._ . .....e. M. t. ... *
,.1 4
....6. . _ .; . .
*. 3.g .,. .*7 .. ;* b, g. . ' .6 8 . .J . .
.g g
.i
_I_. 4..
, . i .6 g ** ..
g
, .. . % ... i,*I I . . _ . _- -._. . ..
.r.,,,,
,.i .
.. 0,e. ._ .
l i s.. 2.!..
.l...,8 i . !6.. . . . s...i:
.. .3,. , . . . ,
. .,.;......6 .
e i. . . . . i.. -.....,i'
.t.
l...a.. ..l . .t.. i e.... il ir..... ... e . .. . . .
....h. r. . .
i I 6 i I ,i
, i l..
i t..i
. e .. .,.. T. ,II i...I!.If. ..,.i.t,
. .... l,;..{._
. .il.
. !Ii..ee. l .
amemmum ;i. . . 8; l i ,,1. !. f....ll.l's.
. . 6 i'.4..l!. ' . . . .
g e, . g . .;
.__._. i i .i..
- llel',..
1,, . ,l . .iL, ,. . ! ; '. i s , , , :, i . ig. i. e,
. .i
. i .. ..l ,,. i . 'l ! ,. . s. i .-
*Y...,,............
* .w . . . g ..... . . . ,.H
.___.__. __ .. I ' 7 Y rv w - -
/ s Act t ci .
M w3.svn I@P g WATEKrol;D STEMI E1.ECTRIO STATION - 1980 - 1165 ?!W INSTA1.L\ TION - ITNIT NO. 3 SOILS CONSTRUCTION Inspcesson Rcpc<t
. - %Ad. Dg i
t 0: 2_ /0 /2 9 /78 sr ife S'f w..ih .- fua/d'1* Dr- b A ,a v:, ..a FMi~ AIALF or 5*7 PIP dl - G EM $ H EYt. f:LT W Ls,vtt{ e..:,:,2 si.... .. s. . .r ssit. -46. A 7 r s .t 5 sit, - A > M-4554T.N.~6. ro4 Co Pic %,eos __
~
c e... os.. w.,G .. e us.k.a. ca.~ er,.,s ..e THC aMr m.b ca .rre op ** 1 anas: msneo ARD Atent1PAPHen . TNS) GoveeED soo w frfiMACI C'LCrrd . A 14/m/ 'Tdte LA VGQ eG . / tm <f* f/Aos <HMf) _ InA t RPPRA D usnm f$. deks O ppp JO 4$O 3~7" Eft, TypAb Ocy g Q 7Wecuess .t2.ketik. c .. ,.i; E.,s... t.,s.si.- / , #r- to pH:, d.gecceo. wu MAThe#4 i-La A s C h adtko l l~oe Oe&EG cwrArsousvou Ano *torsroer /Ovems Tsgr.,ax \ ' f A n'C ' 15:s> 1 ct u.s ,s.: To MT6h4PT~fA'In1 _ _ , _ ry s. c t . . . , s . t. d . . . a b . t A . . /- A . ,.. . . . ,. i . .. r,. . . .. .. . . . ,. ...... i. . .. s, .. . u., . - A . , . . . . s,. t . . e i. . . . .. A . 7 r
#", fF't AM6 u m TI: I' L AM M M ErLL
- kA A16sdd FZ'o et I " Tb *28 saJ SarM . ..
4 . te Th:16.. . . R a gs, . a n4 i A> e s e_s 4, ,,,, , , , p g. , , , /6 ,seg g3 . . c i 2.sx , t..*. . .. i.,. a . A, .n. ., ,,5.,. s AAw F 6. m a c_ r;, e e r aw t 8 .. a..
- A.
s . s., A. ,. i dooE feoo Reo sAJ STtip M / ' s:. . : s ts...r, ,, ..si.,. tu, esse s....: s .. a ) A I6 tutu
- l. M w P on etAM THET.L $ la A S I.
PLAden Ftem eisi ot>rsPi06 '72=oers' ou Tsp
' on rn- t*11A'n eci col 7en t* L 07W 1'WE R H nl. L U)$ t sPhnn Ann LEuEt. srb son'rH A .l b A 60 bo2 at'
-.__ A6 A n Af 9T G AAbG' *iTM& M SCT AT lb " TAICCIUG13 . I
. o
. ?x /)
...n.t....<........,...-.n,......,,..'.s,.........,...,,...s, "
'M L-rfJ 6%
(. as -M&W"' ~ . m- _
=- -- _ -.
ff .sv V .ba V d4a p $ m N*e".t.MM9 rem wo. qc-93 (9-17-75) , mmts(L__:{.
..;.. m. m .,,,r.
. - ,, .o 1 -- -1e _ %---------- - ---
. _ _ . . . .- -~
gn wa am rwy a .
,. , ' , , .= c _ r "
m- w. eesc8 w 8
. .e .
. y e , .
- a .
u.,e s . s e ,. ..d.t. . e..e e.e o . ... i.e i...e , .. ei...s e d. . .. .u e e ...d. .. . d;.i . e e, ..s e f.. ..a. . r eev *** t a ' wo. poort wo. H ratoutwcv ' v oe t omrovrucv v pe r paroucme, r es. c g namp .rece e-
-JA M en) MLC Ts eru -&6 aws M Dr# 62 bt-Lb 2 in 4Ah I YA 4t a KOLLEf 400 t}I APtWINl9 C3 .T. '7a* *> Ff .
/" t t .@ @
\
s ' g.Kr \ 3,.e4 .s T. 4., ML/ F#n P/3 fl. (*O ute thset.ee. c..p..,ed \ /d Mm > C..eee e.. R.e eeed - 10 MW ~ 9 fr~ C M L M - C' ev e,e s Ca.e. _ 10 #M A / e-T c ~tLA9 Ae e .e . . he i., .4. . e d 4, e..p.. e . ? It . ., .n.... .h..t. n. s . ..... ear .. p.nj ? 1. se e .e 4 e f.e e.., t it . .*, .s. , ... t t...es.nes .n.es.ds _E e !+ FA 4T* rel*HJ;" of *~ Tt I P l f f 3n ff* wn < f* MC 0 91 TMP
. FAC' f4r)' RY n,n- fuij , gn s a wegg } .as _s e ees irr p s wnw so Ms s e.g on
*" 7NE &n rt tJzR1*A TIA1A ra,n+ A G F*+9- eoMi44 r.u . =_"Ane Plt e. Tae = *
?MtB'e Af/* $ft)Ph. AMtt *1'aW" /k/ f $f Alba AA nuH I E a t 2 n't aulh'tw (Re n).3 110 KbIE $ AN e3 f fammore we ne > Pu ee- Tm en moun s unn t _ ee PIMstra Aw Aewruc0 ,
h te s e s f ei ta.,. n.e ...e di .e .e
- 6.. .. s 's.n t n.. . sh. ... . .... . 4 7 H.. ..., e a u. e .... .. .. .... e.g.e s s e d t 8. .A.e
$ .se et Wee e.e..es f.steHedt S O EL5ffH TES T't w &f'P" T44'6 AJ ra.i TftG ("2 4at l' M M o . 11 , THt2 Awn
=
- WB M K h* V !i) RIH't! V s . .
.. -- R .,6 s to. s.de ..t...ser e . no.e ase.es.... es.., e t. .e s . . ..ap ... u 5 ha f AMab TlktY t* Lhot *iRM S. L*?tt E * $ ILAN t FT- W M EO eU (W 4F~
4 rt ame: A> Fr emamrteil m eprencar7 Aten MTet TI'u Ctim.E M FM U-% w lirG
.CCLA24,2IDQ JbL JIM M *
- 56 / / =5' d'AMs t *M dR.s .Ti&T*t H A TTACAe"bOQJ j //-4=~Jf -
te b.e s s...e.... 14s p..e4.n, . ,.eeed s.a. . nase AloN E r H 6ee er 14 tee pl...d d ...r. sed ik4e .h6te NF -MW N c5 W # P '* 1 5 N.adee .i ee.es.ge e lite p.eei.Ily e..e.e e.J .e ..J .t ehs e shire MCWUI' A esenes er se eee.e see e. ee.o. .o .. se. estred ..e e reened s do<.no., e does.. .t . ee .o e.d .I e ste. s e..eu.see r d. e.....e. e ..ede d s. n.dse.ee d e..o .ee ..e. 8..=. ei... e. d e ... ..es 4 *h e.6 e ..e e.,( e) A P . . S . . e 4
. J
- U te .. i e. de s e s s s s de I.* Pim ob in e Al s AL L. A h dMr d $1.t%@
jw U/a 0:er<'et r %e. eses r:an ems-ee fere __unf Avi-P pat twam twr 0oe iJe, r e eum.e I e e ,4 a -L IMit tu *m Aa wer>e -sum hwrAJ Te w M =..e M An d
$ l'# ebA xede ersr4 e a'EW ,1 tr'tA t M ee f4M%
1
~, 0 Aee s . e e.eeee ed.... n., .o...e .. . ., d 4, sa, p l e..e at e . le.e s. ee .) M & n*KodT* 14rrCtYdas fLM MAtil 3 Re~ (%1A adied D' sucA es a#' 3*ce,* < envolu t. wMe r L4.im p'E vu D Jgurty -
1 .& P rrt TdC kta PMt er TW' Lku,Ay e esaManna Taa' cL Are see 6 L . ._ g
-MD 'LM T4L A(tt 13 UA A4?LJ A d4.'ptafic R.*2e McTtJ A ti 9thtrerat. e% 4 8t A tid
___ Lh I&k 7s a U .> A 6 g gg g, e. PW *z c 9%.. N W _
. Tom No. QC.93 (.17 75) p I "'
Qo 0 vO c I With 0 L _ _ g /q Y's _ q. p g : Q fJ ": " t
c.- ntK w3 svo Angpit ;
- l EBASCO SERV 3CES INCORPORATED I WATER ~CKD SES - WIT NO. 3 *
.e QUALITY CONTROL WORK SHEET
' DATE C ' ? r,' ' N ny 71 7,,..e , es l
- Alet.v4 dAG5" $ MTM ;.) STC/ dj .L
~~Ierde ~2c4 c., . y.15 Speu. Pace 6 ,{
i T~me Dud ~ikoccs i "Ta.a 4t1 , de1a OtEt JD l1So Dc24'4 \
. K9sa b o s t. # U.ElMTO C. l i
'.sestrat Mt 30 mb> bR -
s sil @ costea w a Pa a ac.~ rnerc e aci~ s u se o _ ma,,_ ,, ,,a cge,,,_ cto.n c4umT Rce.w. . 5' fas irng:A w<tred 6.vo A6CA M3 Atss s. rit U.ag4A Accuoo b' 46
% cwAm4 b %=bacs F.ezc<,ersa.
t SGs%1CO AEtemd Mk.s 'sMSTALL GO U.' THE' S $$iu CU Ou f., TnG
$ d ?s,tc Sos a c f h GCMen ZuSiturtsou%Ttnu A*KG.utest O'E ** 'I~' 'E"U'# ' * *' t t
WHgl su,Ls 5~t ew esho F~4ct!L4 C~tsm fx.Avarn+J I e I
- p ec%
+ 138 f f 4
l, ghb 9 I I t . e I iG E, R IM ' I f! MI l f e, l O e : t'- .. , , lhi$ Ok
i !!:,AlNDfl[Md80HI80~
' -- a
. . a f(
b i 0 N n Y
,. b< ,
b ' O Q t 3 l', k ,8 'k f A (I s N , O
~ .. svk , f: .
s w der s 2 ,
@ l
- I
,- % e !
L ;- 3 ( -
, _~f i
W 02 h6 ' 8 5.: sC ,
; I a
5 l 4
!s! : af 8j O a j $r1. a <
2 LJ C: '
)
O_ T
- LJ =o t
LJ j b h* 3.
- 2
'. ;l ,
i o l [3 b
\
w . :g
% l 59 , ;
E $ G <? Ci '(Np, ' og r
.t <m ..
- M -
+d f3A Ce 1 M f 2
l+., m y c= -Q o, - nN
.k_,"s
[Q .' Ed N (, f, S.- 9 /e,.b s Ni "r s e
.a x
a
. ~m l
s.
. y-s, .-
., C re . M 6
... M 5 5
N
!t I '. s*$3 % a ! g
!! . i E
i g , l ol M LuS Eh --
me., em h.s +w -- -.--Awe,, em me. , . . ,
*
- 11bE% F1J' d't t I m Ra&qy 1.C'
- r. t X au g -s) e
~ . g +
- %y b7
'~' o 1g ,
s v k$
~S MY 2 , P th 6 t k %%})A 3 i rQ vu ,m -
y -
.py >
r -3 ,8 g % % Q b [ h
,y
@ sa \i, ,s '~ V sy n., ;M.C%
sa i , o a- \N \>- 4 @ *
.c 33 F .
, El ', a u Q i R- 'Jx g Y d %8 4
# k
% w sl %"% i 1/
w;
- i a >2 % c. c s -
ekn , . , r8
, \
O m \ - -
/ 4 \ *J cac-'2 $ o o $ 4 $ % % y o ) l my g g s~ g n e a S e s e e , mg 01 s ~ d % > 4 6 2 s
m,
" . 4 E N 8 I 't g i o k BBe3 L 9 9 + > m 9 :9 Q'S P ii A .s . . @s e r u, 5 3 k $ 6 N 6 % .k@$NI. i g 7k rsh e sm _,z .
m h h D N g } e5 hE$ se B:a til
- g o
g em s m m N W h a G e N g g e g
- se g =i g:
ag s = s ~
< <, N m n- N Qs u {
ye 'e i l 25a . sa. 14 m 3 r<\ o 'uo R '5
- lq E.
OI g$ m - '3 '- (N l
,3 " ? 's i 4 i @M:s i, 9 4 # J 7 EMS x va b- %w m a e.
w 2 usA R im n w% % , se 5 4 q-s , cc M, "a r= 3 v 6 @ g\32 .
- y~ e t,%
4 Qc l% ' P 3eb
/2'e' a s .
n
%s~ 4 .
w 4o 7 %u g'u a ?, f! f., T I it,,F,S h 9 p Du0 e [. h.4 'i6 +5 <.h x 'r! N a ed W. h. o bqg t-
?, e A g &f' s 2 V i Jm4 T s ckj -
t !!: 43 % 4 > > a .h h \ P . . le s , 4 k\- it I mv .y, Q w ww N m w<3-~ \ 3 o- t;"- -- C--
,$ = $ '
h . Y 0 ,. .
'. = _Am e
s: e c. g
&\
, . MCR 43 5Yn Pt%11 A B 6 D E F G p&
N 5
=h ,
/ ,
N
\
/ r wN*
2'
// // W \ 2 3 3 f ,
I. i w .- 4 9 4
/
3
)tS. . - 5 .
f 5
/ .
6' /l '
\ G-T. ,
,s , ,
)I 7
\ ' -
/\
\/ J/ - f_ -
V hk' f/ '. l . A B 'C D ,E F G ' g n
' If OG-2fM Jo s
- micu. icon. cnio smcu ron i
( 0 5 -8DN, f0 5 ,'s ' -
"i"ge.b ed 080 db - --- 'd !
6yy-srai /G5 jl&.i
' Q.N TEST
'.i ~l,' isLoCATio!JS stL% ,,,,,.,,,_+, !
l s V _ L ; InluWEnATIIII fMY ;
-NWr " " - - - -
e,.pd I e . 9 :. . : .., ~ L. 3 '-
.' d___ 0 u
; r, :. ;:
'a :f s, w t'
- ,, .-.,i
_= v u
.t,.- i ) .:.
'> N.. 3 .
E v.- ,
'S- v- C' m)
\. 7- r1 h 5 \.,
N N d Y fi i.p b $ c:::::s ,)O :- t:5 e- c- e e r! e s; & 'J. c.c 8 g e e
' W N dvk- O @ N H se o 9 d E,-
s
% "% b to g bd /
q., y C 6 to n. bb a k $ 0 9
-~ $ S j , ,
. --- 2 O i
b_, o 4 o w [^^ f -= 1 n y! g w J L: ,, J- *J . r 3 - , L '8 - $ D D W=
> ~ ~ ~ bt t
y O Vi t-= 0c O N r
~
O 5 5 c4 N c-bb t:5--
.5 W y 5 &
W , y l E .
\V.
4m w P R t:i ~ a - - - , a ,,A4V
#E m =
.Y E2':: e
.I r-
-5 f+N d ea; L 9 o
% % cc e 9 2 T *
'M % j f oi N N g,
{ N.u
#5 4 ".
sN "ga - e .
!ans D L te o M N IN t>o 9 M 7 b
d B h. .E 4 te t6 rii \/3 8 G; 2 6 . n , 4,M 2 s; ., O w W
@4-y s
~
.N -- S. *
- EU a G '
.E". h 's '-
U' t'O !* IO 5"' h'
.a e
> s. O fB o 'u,
\st95s. 'O "o.
1 w- - -
~
- o. / I */*k/
m -
"O.
s
'a
\
M t#
.M V 4 to u (-o M 3 G- e-do s
'v3 M
'd o ta e g 'A' dA er.
*s T
_$ 5 @ @ 5 t?- <h m' % /
,\%l r, \.G e
o - y
.E -
g bl o M 3 3 O g, Q
/$ ' -(3 in h
> d u
E.u . q i.,6 . O
*" e Q (,0 t4"' e.
4' a' n M T E..t.' . u., aS'C e B, S- - S. y e M a
'o m o
x b w 5 ,
\ y, a tu sD C* 'st s 1
' Ve
' ' y u
"o " 'g (g? '
- . e N& v\.> %>s b %s 4 c. v t
4- '/3u
,' t ~ci- D 'S T3 d_ D 4 3 o o 9 s
. . y i h3 s 'oo 'N D
-o s A .r , 'D h d D u $. ,wg 1e M Go R W ';:~
'S
') - D St- g yy oc w
- zy ',. b, b- .a. -- .
. >~
m
.; g, c-V
w,4,g.4Ww. --ea .a4eWwh m a ^*4
- e'* - . . . -
-4M W5 >_Tl i FtT1JI C . =~J ,. ; ip .-
l
- = g .s 5 O
/
kY
/
1 2 /- yw .o U wf6= j' O L F = d 9 O rd
- g- o
/ y O w$ N d ed @ d' r-P , u g
l 9 0 t-
~
o
===c ,; , f -
S- , 95 c gg r 4 rg
.p o
r o 9 c:c:: a- - - _ = - ._ tllll::::3 , 1 n-n . - - s E N, m>4 -t 9
- _.m 3 a -
-> r- s C- WI 9
s*d Nt:
- en - '
9 d. d N gp lm-H ruppuw , s
=b jV
,2, .
u- - : 4- m- l (4 t - 3.E 2 , , =d M ,e r -
% % a . : 9 g- s . - - - -
. . e
== b '
= %
Y
% N $ % '8 . k l "s;sae a a e 4 %
at
. us n [s .
. a a e -
ta 2 w 3 a
- e 2_
k.,h+a ee Q 3, Q 3 . .
"k
- p.-
\ .C
-w
-)e la 1
2 s u :: 0 Es, e ki t
= a x a 4o s A e
b . e 8 'a .k ._ o$ ga s y <- - - g
-, 3 $ $ hh x.. E
1 l 73 _. !! t e ,. m ,y lic t ws m 1 g g t( ** <7 l
+, J "
!! hT . b r
.I .
a u RW
.- .x w
.e ..2 x -
u .
'. ..m !!. N .
y e
;:% g,
*3 9 %
e - A9 - W . i r-m
<(y3 B s4y l .w .- !
._d w w
. .s \ a 4k-
- 4. . ,m 35 $ Y g
w
,.. d d .
~
t 'g::::: d il s- = 0 . Ce m _ e- A . 3 CO T Q- T E y V) & 4 .j-
- b. a, E '
jg .Ij - - r--m, , M
!~ J r- o 'et' , e- .
rc ed iS n a 3 e0 r:
= -s . . $'$ 5 't o +2 .n t- % -
ist. ., a y g e
- v C
se e ' I;!! g- Si t!O + .'- ij x - - n .
*{#f-p.f.17 10 fn O'd , b b Q *
[pSC 3 K " 3
@ g g, d -
km1-~u -- 2 41 % 9 y
"a u ., %. t.~ V.~ r4. w U.
W U Y $~.--.O % ,
~~~
h zuh .
& d' .b' 'abh M) '
3 2 ec sauea j
! ! 3 s p er
? 2 m i !>g [ht a S' Ti s 5 b5k h h h hh
'G / M S
/ hsy 05
. S b v w ,
g .. - : n f,;: h 3d f h o - b d sw a a s $ e -s e .
~ '
/..
. , . *
- o r e ..s O tt i**
' c n E F > J '
L , o 6 '
=
/Ain l0 'a dl ' JESl
- utmwn pii m _,_ ,_ . a nyni x s ., 3 Gl5 6,, lid 8 J %l6
// # t s \\ \\ ,
- _ G D n r f\ ,
// 7 pe,< <e J N.x ,
a (
//s/
c1/ n j
#F -
\\ ),J l
__ go Q . RE/LEWED BY -
'~' dt 1lIvl%
/ ss EBASCO Q. .C'lVIL
//
\V\
~ -
i ,.
/\
s }A Y ! g4
= -
8 . n' /\ Y
/ / -
7 // is
/ / /
~
\\
p
\/
g
/ -.
IG
, l7 i
0 C D II F G .H J K L M N O P Q : I d . If/,#44. N TYPICAL 50 FT. GRID SYSTEM FOR .S[~
- f, ,,ep T e c r i.o c n Tio n c
.g ,, g ,, 7 7h 2- .
+fw f ,g riounc ,m 4.i
.we.d wAs/w i
l" --
.- !y k! k W SW1 fo u
o A= n - ~ 1 q cc 9 t
.3
.. . ~
d,s kN "d D k h M. 3
\ ,
o- e m,. _ v . 3 ,
. to
*.' H l
/
E hu % %g - g - 3y ~~ =w us Q m-N g W oc eg a e ge - o . as O Ch
- n. 3 8c a$u-3
, e ( ,, 5 t "
mg 2 .c % Y. -- e y u. N. Id d D DS * '# N 0 - E=2 <-- e' c- e- e . tr - g e-f 4%
~
lE,!- ,, 3 (, O v s ~ , U *
@ l sg g $ e f O 9% D M UdE "w O S
- r-- C (O.
wuM ~ g 'n - I
~ .
e [;j d y V D 04 , H e. I aC . ID= M,, " a. o .-a . v i Ec8 ' C- O t; i~ - J = g r C# h"* m & D 4 4 N M n - U G C Q- l 1 gog og - I . i W Om % ~
~
)
$s, tisa
%n . ' coh a S--
r- 1 r-- T 9 s .
& < en .-
q>g g 3 p w y s 's===""
- 4 O t'.
- - o. l D -
o ~ r i /' -ss
~_ ./
.N O q .c, 'N A t# co d- es N Vi g
{ s.v
" $. d >id M S.- % h"'T"" ikg u 3 (2
- n. g 3
u. F a
~
, i, g g
, ,s 9 u
E ./
,% .. 'a.
ei w - (-) \./ * . . . '- e .a c u. s Q.MQ. p .N. i, i A O t' e.1 1 m y , L. s) E $ t- - g I8 ' . i'~ I'J ??.,' .'a' I I
\- U m
1 u v . a N, i . *I 2 y . _ u M. l+I 8 .'i D*" \g p s
!, u e
.u.- .-'
6 :'
-) ..
w-
.p ;;.
- .;y ., ~
.. n 1
.a. ,
. v
.&,, & n,
~
1,1 C E ! O H J Q 1 : L M ff O
' P O l
l,__ g i y- !
- 2xy r'
, -g ,-
i
- - J7 _ !
h 4
% \_s
//
// r s \\ \\
C..;// _ i .mummam /
\ % n' 6
/ s
\\
7
. /,/ re '
&T b' N o/'I
\
. ::i // i
.__a v -
(p - s i
\
if z Fa :'
~
\\
11 7t . i m \\
~
/ // I N'=
g4 i
, C' '
j} /[" NN NJ / 7 //
\
/ D A
u ,s l MMg .
\$ 1.% ? )
g o
.gy B C D II F G .H J K L M N O P Q N-@ (
TYPICAL 50 FT. GRID SYSTEM FOR
,@ TEST Locations d b "B. 7 ST g7, g7 . -
, g p,d? o 'h" '.'l
, L....__. . _ . - - ..-. . - . . . ---- -
) / { } J ! '-
e D y t 4 b s
- 4' e
O r
Anp at
~
NcR w3 sm J. A. J0';IS CO;SnUCTICI COMPANY '
,.- WAIERICRD *"N!! :*0. 3 o .
SLOFE PROIECTION IIS?ICTICN RIPCRT Report No: / Specification No: 2 eu /_4d '/, MC Project No: 7f .3
~~
Quality Verification Inspector E I4 /. 5 - Date: A 2 * .'/* ~ 75 MTRI P 8 1. . Location: M u f.C // .C...- 9 A / Weather Conditions: . _' / i / J~ fl. ,- t. w e 4- l4 A Horizontal surface blade cleaned (3 feet from vertical face): YES i ' NO Coments: Installation of gunnite: Average thickness: / f4 C.
- k - .
Cunite over entire exposed vertical surface and minimum 3,. feet,o.f width on ad- - jacent horizontal surface: Yes / What Length 4,',.'.,*x #2'1 *~. No Coments: - Any i.quipment or materials on shell filter blanket. No [ Yes Coaxnent: $ s Il F, lb i' W \..' n. V t Y A:.- f ih'c A ~s k/4 f k.C 'Han polethlene membrane been spread on shell mat adjacent to work area: ,,,f Yes No t/ Coment: C/1/ // ML: f /- a* r t At, '. . i EM c'/ Has gunite been trinced: Yes / Cocunent: T
\,
s
-{AwT
- h All aurplus material and overspray removed: Ye o C - nt:
.a -
h y (A. . . . e ..
. => . - t' n ..s 'i w ,
.( _
go # %. k 'c. . mL 138c' s d- .* 4 . . . . Form No. W-SITP-9.1 .
. &>a # . .. .PC .
an,
^f0R IFORMAll01 D U O. t
y t
- . . _ _ - - ~ .- . ~ . . ._ _ _..
, # 4 f
f 9 - M.6% (' A
' J. A. CGJSTRUCTION COML d '
f WA2ERIORD UNIT NO. 3 b SLOFE PRCTIECTION INSFECTION REP RT A s'i V. e/ A' .') Specification No:lo /6 ' # . . e ., d Report No:_ 1 _ Quality Verificatic.n Inspector .d x , Project No: 7f- J /
,. . ' S -
Q g/f MA Date:~ Weather Conditions:_ .
'/ g Location:j< /l 'NO
.', 4 YES s
' vu
- 1- ~
feet from vertical face): Horizontal surfaca blade cleaned (3
~
.' d . '
Counents:_ - Average thickness: _and minimu:2 3 feet of vidth on a - Installation of gunnite: # P. - i .G~ M No .
,Cunita .. over entire ex posed vertical surfaceYes / _What Length ~
,{
jacent bmizontal surface: Y e *, ' No < Coaxnents: _ blanket. , ~~ ' Any equip-nt or materials on shell.*x3.?..n* ,. filter
.' is .
-r!.$i- /,5 i fe-l /c!
~
rtwenant: .cho // djacent to work area: *
~~., -
mbrane been spend asn". shallr ?mat' ~ - a~ l ,
'Has polethlene me!
) Tes_ _ No_ s.
Conxnant: :S/v // o [Consnent: N Has gunite1 .been trLwd: Yes [I U \ E fG.i N .. l No L. C'm ==nt: , ay removed: Yes _
~ / -
. All--surplcqmste_ rial and overspr
. a .it a. a ::P -
A L ,. s s .- e z < / , ^
,e ceg 138 A Form No. W-SITF-9.1 )
'), 4 ,
O . ed _ $g(j,_
. . _ . - _ w MC1275; EI '
k h
It R w .s m Mn so - J. A. JONES CONSTRUCTION COMPANY . WNIERFORD UNIT NO. 3 SLOPE PROIECTION INSPECTION REPORT
- At0htL 0F Svh Po.ercLrren
~, Report No: Specification No:
Project No: 76-317 Quality verification Inspector 0 o, 34 Date: 2[.23[76 " Location:bT 19 2 yMr.,7 Mou. Weather conditions: kMm (unV rizontal surface blade cleaned (3 feet from vertical face): YES NO C ts: Installat of gunnite: Average thickness: '
~
Cunite -over tre exposed vertical surface and minia - 3 feet of width on ad-jacent horizonta urface: Yes What Length No Consnants: Any dquipment or u.aterials on ell filter blanket. No Yes e d Consnant:
'/
[ Has polethlene membrane been spread e adjacent to work area: Tes No h9 Comment: Has gunite been trimmed: Yes No Commen N All surn - erial and overspray removed: Yes No C : f . ., & / (, em< Whate Gu~.rc Cmo liv , Couerrac Wn fcanso ls % o u, co , rene s vJuc ser r. Paovei CI"i Fen Gu,re , 4,co /r c o y,m,. v>4 u. 3n Tvice tdn ec s.tco Tu < cAacc G u ,v. rc , Q fd2 m No. W-SITP-9.1 m 138 1 i St4SI
. .. eQ
. E'- - o p@1
\ i r c, n M#I?" -
M lhtllliNiallu. 1muitti^M
l
~
, M' SM '
EBASCO SERVICES INCORPORATED 1 WATERFORD SES - UNIT NO. 3 !
- SITE SOILS ENGINEER - APPROVAL FORM I nata hfc,/z,/975~ '
$!00/4/)f ;
Location - V &7/k%k/SO s
'h) .
l Quality Control forms reviewed ~ k#d ~ 44, h07D6/A/,97c kB kMD6/c/$f$/#6 _hfYM WOA17GGfl N/S A22ff/Db h/7WfAASM $ASc. Approval , Rej ection j.ou-/56f 4%9.
- gf., $d///Weh ~
,f),fjp/hJ& Signature #fker? n' -
$)e/ . . &
Comments /Recoc: mended Action - .
.. = es er a s v g 'M" VfDDM Riiithi k nllV -
.11 1. R 1. 1V i h llt 11 cl1LI Residial Work Report REVIEWED & ACCEPTED I kn' h n FNCINFFR -
. Wn / ' /
.DATE 4 -G ' & SIG. * ^ N# "
l QC Inspector: 1 Remedial Action: Accepted Rej ected REVIEWED BY Site Soils Engineer
'- *~
g% v.u s w q. e c m . t, z ~,f'3a,c 1
% 4' -
r L
w - - n 491 1
* *" C' C ' * *' '
, ,* ; ; N eTo *E N
- A STEA!- TATIOM 1
. .IN .
) 4 - ll NIT NO. 3 l
.O
$ d)lLS CONSTRUCTION
. Inspection Rcpcet o,,, // -/)-7s* su,s t, M w.. u.. . $fNie . l An. ey //f}'Athgr w x, w.,s.4 .S7~dif M ?- Ex,sr AAuf [/Co ') '
i..s,... ei.... , s,.,, . ssa r. - 4's ' e,,, ,, ssir. - t'7 ' v...i t..s. N/+ c 2,...
.. w.,6 A... ,ir.s.s. c .. 4 c . ,.... IE/~ 46JFM s/ '
S/#/e e/ 2- yes JEso r-o c-opno A~o n a s's rs l'.wst:fo wi r - mise s/ i s, .o 1/se x o u jdri t /,s
/5~ " o.f (eo$f .
(44 ss,s/r u -
~~
- // .-TAhEt cyff't ts ,4 $
@ /10 svspoc w p Lur 7 n /L) f *G'SSES.
o wmk .r ,k. Con s,,u..i E.,l...r I., seii. Ifr ~T/,'/MNffl W4/ 6ffettfa 'TMf , _ , N0/27& /JvS LF Iv A ? .A, ,m o r3 M DIC /% r- $o y r x A4.;, p> Atoues - v o 1"' PA S ( . 19 t/W fO res ! s> &O lsJ A r-fdt. Got(ge.ysk.., y,_, pg y, 7 ,,, p
}Y1 /CA f a /W+'s) 6 ft l*'t L.
o,s,i. .,u.. s.i AA!!f Pb~r-dNAxt-/74 w ry,. . , . .i. 4. . .,n. r ...,.s..,r,..... . .. ...-i...s,.. .u.,.-6.,,-.si.
...i .,.s..)
.,, dC M <Hfit- 6.. /-a /....*4~4-s~e.f-r m- ( -Ja 1. s s.in <;- si z r- -
l W C+'d< *- AA /Cf , AY10 ffff of A. ./ /oe.sb sn4rffiE t
/
- Lir, Thick.ess vi .d ! Acto.!!y Pt...d lb '
/
/MN" b b/m }) hl<f d' <4 '
& /
#4,1,r. ,r,.'.... (. . n.- ..,.n. A.., A.,.) Nd M
~ .
Y teys.e t s,... s. k - . .k. k, .I /MVD NMS & 7- ,4L. 'n </ ks . /t.a Ct .7), ~ .6/2 ff 4s .
~
T4r p -.' AnSt ib o c o frai sk r v r Y. eu...,v.:.,s.,.u,,,.mh,,,2 0.. . ., s. . . . w Ph u adu.4 h 2 rwa d -
&~KAhat i - .# 4 isc~, Wu cwa. /-rul.s a s 2L w.~ f !s M L .a <Q !w a .a- &
A. 9'a<., eJ k so <,i so e . " A pisun i h ,. Amien
,o n s PLA c ro m ,StYeno wi rn -s'b 45~D . #
- ,..,6s r,.. , s. .. . r.. ,,,.. . .<,...,....,,-..,,...,,...,...s._., __.
s .. # '%.. PE,1EWED i 'J RED . "92 HI 3, W 199 Y . , _. . ., y . - .
=. . . . - - . -
..s..,"
. 6A W 'E -l g 7 9 . , EsApeo o. c. civtt 'P l1 rom no. oc-93 (9-17-W,t,y 3_fg_.,g__m yr gg ,cc,,,,,,,,,.,,,,.
l -- - _ .-. - . . - - - L - e - - t . . s.4, es.t. ..n......,* s nem6... f ....n e r h.n c h.ek .d. .h.a .If,,n e si.n.d. ..m. 43 1. .n s.k .e f., .. h c c,o *= c u t wo. wooct wo. racouracv viu s rarouracy viee r racoucwev I via c
&z w;,e- 3D 4S*O - -
V,c ur,%< fheen PMc A <-. Sfn' -Mr /RW ~ Skf. - A14 P- I >( fb'WA*-lh0m /*- Speed of Tewing # 00 ' / YO N - L.II: Thickn.s s Comp.pted ___M_ # Ceweseg.s Reqv.ssed lW MY E ' 0 '* '*# f Cese,.ge s C;,en /0 h% 2 ' 0"M ' A,e e,ses being mis s.4 by temp.Ctees? ll se, .h.,., . hen?. What is camp.ction p.Ite n? Is is notisfacto,y? Il not, .hy nes? f .. .a.. 5 .,,..nas h U - Ac*b-v A .C 9 d r d J 9 <'/- e ^ ^ i wL #A4 ! '
, # /% /M' A ' 2.
s u 0% f r. I' / o Ir
'O In i .c; To s . . f.ilin ,. res . ..m.di.I . ..i.a .. s . 6.n t wh .n .. . ,s. .,.. ,e .. s ,.d ? He. .ay . . ,e e,. .,e s .... .. . . . .d?. In .h. ,
6 ....1 v.s ..< .s e fulIiI!.d? 00 So.srH Abu .c L 4,o a 7wo ,A ,o en */, i u-
& Wr' ,
u y , ,, , , y,,_ gn,,a, , 3,,u_ p,i p,.,,, ( ,, ., 3 g,,,,,, s a. , , , , . m,, 9 - , O AJ L.A./ de /vsr'Distc A-c. r"/ b ~ s. ~+w TM frH M.i/S 5 15 r 4 oir"~-4 o 6&s!d $vo"$3 ** !Y rd h c c 'n , i - -rt' M d're' Ass ne v' r Dnv' r-e oreibt ' '/s13h y- I C r-n. n ei v h ~, l w n m.,6 a ten.i.,4. e.n.ent.,mi,y ,e . ..m.a u.a ., e sm.. .a s...ne . .i ...n ,.m.,o ( ~ T s l
\ s.,s.
\tw. .'
^
.Q I
i s. rev e,be, of cove,eg.s en life pe,si.lly camp.cs.4 less shife #M~ i
' /Al M /O AN #
$ Pfu nbe, .I lif ts pl.ced .ad comp.cied shis shife e
1 3 Nun.5e, .I coverages en life p.,si.lly compacted .e end of this shife
- , p A es.nek es.y be er,e<h.4 se e. ele .! e,e. beens filled .nd .emp.esed IndI<ering eendisi.a of e,.eevet end el shife.j/ ., eses l
.em ,.,a. ....,. .. . a a un oas...a .,.... ,. _ , , '
! la ssewesiens se end convers.elons -ith subceat,ecte,(s) 5' I . ._ -[
lo ~ x
//
p d, //
//
U Es.=ia.sions, discussions, decisiens 8#MAY /B /?MtT# #N M *' # NM //~ td>'*- f
& J.)/<.' /$%"/.) "f~ h 7" / ~/' &s4C be /~ od de d*>'rs/s s J s 0/s- /*L A'4*/N d'/ Ecol;d// .
to m u re is 'Du c- trHned 4u%i3 ro rsti re Owrke a to-l+re e D&o
}~~ Y* E67V/t' NdVr A'* V i/ L -!.' ' i$ l TD sbfrfK ' 'N A f"'9'/7 /~ 7k#
t-N f 1f f ALY/o% $f,'e~!d k* Of, * \
'l 7. 1
.e l g o:he, im pe,sene m eesee n ts,..e.,an, .,. .n.n., s,.s,in, p.)..m. ,4. ,..d;n,,, ....;
io ig m D:~\flD@ ? ) 8
.4 .. % 2' 8 "
N . 4*% _ l
': ' - noeK l- x- f .._O . . , r. c.
/,
Li e. e g 3t'. L36 a.) c - // l
/- / /
Forin No. QC-93 (-17-75)V On
. 3 g/f-f(a.._. a#;c@4mEVLEWED BY. ,
,g i fo
i e
*R m se - ~ ~
EBASCO SERVICES INCORPORATED VATERr0RD SES - UNIT NO. 3 Angf 39 -
- l QUALITY CONTROL WORK SHEET
, IDCAT10najTk'if a 2 E4, noters DATE /> -/> -7 s' at /xx. den s-,
. J ,
ft'C W56fAf~~- % .cla L ,f6 4 ed e~~A. i p
.k
/ sb g r a .c. S M w een in"- ow miheu krc+ 1*
Teaces. l.
& v~> < oneo 0+ -Pou k- erea,h .
a, am y a e,ics o.n ev+' I.- ea v Titucris <wa) a -r , ,a
" fn .4
- O yna asQ #7 i }cc MA ' - -
TP ' 5" M g AW Avud M , h 4 :
" %. ~~ wa . c Y b f
" *^7 R '
g ir end. o,~< s~ s =.J g y (pL"-J __
' # y c A d -- a Ji- I/* f v ye LL- , A ewLL % f - B, l. //:oo .
L //w- f f Ab' f (d #UA 7 RE/IP/l 0 & f.CCI.>.cv M -
-2 L9.n. .3v. .,. mi .wn i . e a.;
"d'/o (I6vd b DATE N N siG.
c:3 m .a a a r o ><ro l /.'os /Mo roa m oa wea,;, - ea,.vu<na ua~<0 rNe> m
.% ~ ceau ci y pu,;, ,,,,. ,sn,a !:l[ SrMaffA Gmfaer,4 e e s,,
a4 .
% REVIEWED BY
; i Un,i Of Nk h E i dlh*lIUit i -1 =smuan -
" ~~
Ng w 3.s m AB3 B5 i EEASCO SERVICES INCORPORATED WATERFORD SES - UNIT NO. 3 - -
!^ QUALITt CONTROL WORK SiiEET IDCATIORI///h # 2./s5r wcp DATE /.:2 -n rs'
- Ei brWAusntos-b f*Cl.d .
ll p. I E l' 1 q q . : I 1 !l 4 - j !
//g g y' RPi!C.'/ 0 6 ,.8g .gp- 7 A A 3 I' QQ Q' nD- e.....
UsuiUCCd ,. 3 l
;:,, 2, f . J J2, J.,
ff raresr 7e s,a s a g. / ; 4 - .
. 1 5% .
~
7 h - HeaBk r i fA o A p w At g ~ , so~ , A ~ ~ .ep a oc ./
. M %. W ar-/ & " e " M :.
f>a u & ~M y ( .xu A <% i
. ka .- A les + - A 9't , p n p. .ey q) i f n rn sd o>&, a A A M g to) r + &
hM %. p m a 6 7- s~ + " iMLu 4& 1 L Ad & z do e/ur f .
'n li J 1
p4. REWEWED BY - Il ! i
.1QlY:
l 33 3 G 4 ""f6 I
. _ . l ~ ! t -
k j/ EBASW Q.C. CR .
~ ~ ^ - - - - - - - . . . . . . ._ _.
Nqt m se ya % - EEASCO SERVICES INCORPORATID WATERFORD SES - UNIT NO. 3
** QUALITY CONTROL WORK SREET I4CA* ION # 4t't- A# 4 7.Srt h DATE _ / 2 M
. . BY ink eAl.n irrt. ~ ;
i
. N l!
~'
*g 0 ,
WW ~ i diL. % ('" ;.
',';;y?$' 7-n ya4@ ;
&l%'iT ofru h'lr t h ' h h5b ' ClucA<L $ i-- s.44L y ;
ou- p y' "
- p. l
[w Sffd '
.f. &
i
~ .
p , l'
. x4
' fudElQuj j
~7 .
/
REVIEWED & ACCEPTED REVIEWED BY (
- t 138 '
LEAD Q. C. E.1GillEER &, Q%g
- y . , , ,
qv 3.n-76
; fpdjc o.c.cm, 'A
~
L l
Attcc;hment.No. 8.1 WATERFORD UN k .' l di
'3 CLAM SHELL FILTER .
MR $5
- BLANKET P INSPE !
Specification No: Lou. - 15c4, WA a Project No: 75-317 q. v. inspector: A ' Eick. cate: l a -l a-75
- 1. Placement Area / Location: 5 rw A b
h.h
- 2. Release for installation and Compaction Obtain Yes' No
- 3. Materials Released by the Engineer: Yes V No 4 Spreading and Compaction Equipment as Specified: Yes / No
- 5. Filter Cloth Properly.Placed: Yes V No Coments: A/n r
- 6. Clam Shell Material Clean: Yes / No Coments: d ' *J lO Coments: Sv 27" Ars L,ourneerm (1-j Q 'Ntanbar of Passes: ,
; Satu khs Esroenr1 lht es Wene Ou t- Aun Oppur Arsaw.
- 8. Yes l No Coments:
S Clam Shell 'taterial PLriy Compacted:A Se s a s airk n, oc-n L
- 9. Alternate Method (s) of Compacting Acceptable (if used): Yes / No Coments:
A t a. ARra> kr (AWoc <?hsTv&Mr Awr . cen:scr,,a teac c- Gn.sserai,a ses ne (by smn- a-mr.r. Finaf,aCompacted Thickness Acceptable (10 to 14.5 inches): Yes / No Coments: 10. I ( Set li k I, ATTe win - . 1
- 11. Repaired Areas Acceptable: Yes ! No Coments:
P -//, 4,
'5~~
- 12. Surface Tolerance Acceptable: Yes / No Comments: [lo ,e - M E 1383 13 Weather Conditions Acceptable: Yes / No Coments: PmwCeu A #
- 14. Clean-up Properly Perfonned: Yes Y No Coments: /4 4
( Other Remarks or. Comments: bM6.Ar#. M u rHert 7e A b avarAY In.uces 0,v Te, Or Cu,,, Ylsu$EWTour To Srrt ap Omy), s) M/ 5' (See reverse side for instrucri orm No.: W-S ITP-2. h
, U+r: Sje// Sww fe hlued / n: <rN/M?['7 bd"yf /Oesa.r/ T
/
c' ' ' EBASCO SERVICES INCORPORATED , WATERFORD SES - UNIT NO. S - SITE SOILS ENGINEER - APPROVAL TORM Data /2 -/3 -75 Loc =tton S t)WP A2 )Vsg7-}fl9s.p ft20 2' ) i Quality Control forms reviewed A/S " 5 EA' MAS 077FA#A V/S- '/> hE0406ad$ mfd ASlAA' S,k& bEHR&M7wldo-/50 A 949 Apt.roval Rejection uns - s/A YA $#N bA Signature SIM?N - Consnents/ Recon = ended Action r/ G . Remedial Work Report
' ~
REViEWW & ACCEPIED LEAD Q. C. ENGINEER /-
. ;AT: ? 'A ' M ' S! I k -
QC Inspector: , Remedial Action: Accepted Rejected . Site Soils Engineer f , REVLEWED BY d' %
- 133 1 E easm o.c. cm. % e/
~
cTn 1980 - 1165 MW INSTAI.LATION - UNIT NO. 3 TT t N
.solts construction
, inspectson Reput .
g,g
. oss. /2 - /3 - 7 5: soir. / # e,;,,, , z#ee,< . 4 g% , g 4, y Aas. w.,na A>Gn~~ Aw o+
sy,ete a 2_ ;
- #7' M A.s,... ca....s.., s.... .r suite - 9'/'
ra . shit - - T...: t..,. N/.f c.n.. .. ,w.,6'An ,is.k.a.c,.. ,e,vi,..a. [ M e4 phL M4I row,f s kid. ' I e w C , w s.h . in. c .. ..: so.i.e.,r.,s.is. MdM M M A. 4 M + r/ * ' wA Mc. s.J xd, // ~ WA. sh d44. $wK -
,. & g. z~e ~ a I \
b .
'O.,s.in . M re,i.I ll5 ?o N 1""*/'A'4*W$A/
Type of mes .eie t. Jes cribe t.A.a /= A.,.. ...,.sa I,. .a. s -er, e.ae ata.eed, a.a r l' d.h MAL G 4,un. tr.,.. .A.e ,. 4,. t ..,s ... e.&.a 3 .j R ^: m' } ra 2. /Neit/s s' t-4g l $ W 4 <- iA s> OW .s' O .$'r;'Mf A/& At e s. k(fr/5* it44/~s'*v s-l l Lire Thicka..s Requi..J Acto.11y Pl.c.d
- 5- L 5l*. SA-l4 b k* t at~ /.1 b S',Yus EOaA.- f
' /
*seseta ,r,... I.e. n h. .A... -A.,.) A/ d M 8 y <ers ae t s.a. s .. s.. ..<s. .s...I fo 6. e- o r- Deo CW 64sr
' w,c. ., &r** AJ L/'
v i. L /M 1s er%
c A 7- 955 H duo L e se cert Pogo Iedo Ilw rTeT j
$perd cf Tewing C ected /b !
Ceeeeeg e s R e gve e 4U W sLL se,rr 7 ~ Ah., 'p'-
/=s, : '---- -
L /@WM t
~ - ,j * ' Ceeeeeges
' ?
t.ife Thickness C ee n,, fe=-r t/ ^ 0 ' _4w~ g A,e e,ses being missed b ompactees? If se, =he,e, . hen?. Mies i fw,e ss. .s .....sess NA.- l'" L D* empaction peere,n? Is is setisfecse,y? If nee, .hy nes? 4 mb- M DM " h mlAL ;;1 d . /hIM, d Mu h d oh 6,,ful '
.". r 1 'l . -_ : -
_= J 4 h T..is f 2116... n., ..medi.1 o cia.. .. .k en? n ... sh. .,e. ,e.e sied? N.. many e..,e ce,e,eg e s e,e ..,v e s,ed?. in oh., . 3 e,scs? Dfes ,egw.se fulfilled? N04d J
. I l
Rams, Ins finalvde e.ne.nle,mt,y to speestlee,t.n s, nime n .ad tes eelen s et ee<h ,eme,L1 Ocx t fD . . Ti n Nwmbe, of cave, ges en life pe,sielly compacted less al)ilt-_ e ,O _s MML u
/ bb/ d' -O- - * - ." v R Hwmbe, el lifts placed end compecsed this shift ~' ' Y,,- S
,i1 Hw be, of ceve,eges en lift pe,tielly compecsed et end of fhis shift Y A e 6 cesk es.y be e. .<hed to s eele .I e,ee be6n, filled end eempeened Indlee,le, condi,ien el e,e e et end of sosil,, ee.e e,ee ecogues. ...e,.... neeses 4. insi.e es e,e...
unsN ,,i.ns I%'"dc.n,. tw,-s.8
- .i,h s.s Ow
....,e,w N o &^ h .b. /A shM A:
A es so -c fvr e M W~ 3, . . a iJ ~ 1.M i - :: - - ? , J Esemia eiens, discus sie e, decisi as " -
.t C' .. P.-
c
= -
- A A' s
e em 7-# -74 -
-.2 #.:;% d,/
a j o:see 8.n ,e,.eo. ...., a ide...e,,n, e, ,..,.n e, s,e s,in, ,ei,e m e,,,, ,e esin, s , e.. 3 ' t I
-\.
.r L c.7.s Ferm No. 'QC-93 (-17-75)
[8
- 1 ,3 @i REVIEWED BY r.
3,
/ i I
l ._ _ EB ASCO Q, C. CIVtL
~
blckws5$n EtASCO SERVICES INCORPORATED Ag3 y l WATERFORD SES - UNIT No. 3 - i
' QUALITY CONTROL WORK SHEET
, LOCATION //sr- #eo' SR.'s * '
DATE _ /J - /3 - 7 r
- sr mma -
t l
. . U' !
b \. i gg pp / A *'/ N 7 5 swa, n,- n ,. w- . Sffs ~ i
/ L-Y , ,. .i i
Y Y Y i g
. /> /'V et i 1
1.
,l l
m 138 t i 1 n I,
- f?L'iEED & ACCEr72;, !
l LEAD Q. C. ENG NEER !
~
DATCJ-//- f4 g;g,[f_[ 50R IHRETION DNty REVLEWED BY l Y Y h* I l EBASCO Q. C. civil r
~~ ^ ^ - . . - - . . _ _ _ __
- U Sm EBASCO SERVIC::S,INCORPQRATED'.
1+ m gggf l 8 WATERFORD SES - UNIT No. 3 d -
.. . .: ad 8- - -QUALITY CONTROL,,WQRK
" SEEET-IDCATION h/fr w
- tsen,k t .. , f
/2-'s te
# 9
* * ~ * ~ ~h 5 . b !
DATE 35 .=
- 1 s y u gr.6 3 ,
jL __
. f 2:00 wa YOU %. M uxtyf~; afed d" T l_
q */ws q- T l lb,e n [s /_ y-- - , q gawo n, n - I fLa w~ L ; 2L +4~ ~ d Y ' , i A 4A wA ~ , g, c M .~~ A N - M ! M m & y v' M Q b I .
- doorn'y sme pian .grocx pil.e wik cn u s &<. l
"" # t" ~ ^-
cne & ' q759gg9 g.gggEgE9 O .
~- e ca. , cw.7 .
LEAD Q. C. ENG!NEEit ci'
~
DATE 1 8-76 sic,If , H
~
TQ k6 w, w f 4 ~ % ; G /p W , , , mp- e a y4 m Ce@ d .l i W$ D 1 As~' n i y l' fs/J<" L Q Q / q. w . J
- y U"0" 7 N
*\
. pudmdN1+ nM. ~N~ fAls /b f f^~ "i l 4 , 4 m f,6,
/xz L m 4 Ac.t G U W >
t& by .. & %' & AM, # - d i / s d d > ~ L --
' w k w[
fx*w ' n asfw fJA- ~ s8lL<A . L . J % REVLEWED BY r. gA . y /2%'o'. 138,e; C7 % %7 ~ 4
- EBASCO Q. C. CIVu.
' ~ '
. E'T l' " ' * ? ' "". ?
, 'f ) ,
ric e , cir ;
',.(
hO h Aj a
., g . y p 1) g
.0 A . iSTAL}Qh -
IT NO. 3 gn 50lLS CONSTRUCTION
~
Inspection Repeet &.$9p 0../S-/.3~7I shi r, _ 8 we.sti,e, $4L [.
,' Mir 1 Br / MI/Tth 4 --
x.:. rr..u.< K'eir ik cr 4 Lrrlie it 2 \
. e....... e r... .t. , s ,.. . . ai r. '/~7W' ea ., sur. -
#7G v... t..,. d#
c........ w.,L 'Ac c pia.k.d. c... J E wip .n. M/ ^ [MM M .4 A i u l A u .-- l h'-a.<A.- <~- / V //M. ' (Au-- u.J 2: & v _-
$ b4 .4 rl;..n: /> -H- W aA ,de, . - L E '
m / o . . wen .t*.. c ,on,<et En,i a.,t.,s.is. b' _---wA *:lld ns wd L $% &K tu Etl /+en On D -i.r >s- cu, L nLA,aL & ,76 w , ~ -
/.3. - h */ - 75~ ' '
o ,i. .t u...,i . M d~/c/vd:M ' r ,,. .t .s. ;. . a..aan. c.s.. / o..... ..... ... r .. . . .. .. - in... ... ;r.... .s..
.ch: lt-- LtA. .. J d L Mn---- ./7.u--. / 4.. it. :2... d... . ..s..s
- b. wt ,
- w. /h% tl.a~ As "L /--. e < /A iv ' d r' > k A in f d W / /. /.
. u r. T u .6,.... n...i..e /6 A..u.Ily Pl..ed *
//. by md~ *d- w - a N. r ,. a'<.-< Z-s/ .
g - i
- n. .i , e .. .. t... s . o,. s ... .o ..> L' n Y
<.r s. ,e s... o,. .u . ...s. .s...
S 6Aci- L a&LL w. , wt- g<,,. ., w> Mt A ,, -+ G, M. 3 i l l er. , e s.l.:i ,. ..u.,. ::1, ,,,sa s ...; s....as , r.o m i/ m i- ' -L e L .4 G .., .;.7 '
>M r '.~!tEJ h .C.,5C.C
/
t$.. .- .s -. . ..
- ~ . -
l ,
, s. .. . . . , . .
. J
\
=-..Lseo. rs... ..r :,,,..e me..o....,; ..a 1.<.,e....t...n..
r _ e 2.-19 '76 ss "
. .' T/2) //
. up.
n REVIEWED RY ' S. _ N C W "l'W .i 1 p ca 1 c ewrn " crn r r. Form No. QC-93 (9-17-75) gm,,,,,ot o o g,,
~
. j .
I e weed, stedel, confescto,'s nwn be,, I,equency . hen checked . hen melfunctioned, ,emediel action f oken Io, each E QU pu TNT NO. MODEl. NO. F rt E QU E N CY TIM E P R EQU f! N CY T ifA E FREQUENCY TIM C
~
'/46 V/& Mtk J bfd. VMO d-
- 1 *
$7,esd of Te.ing ./80 ' Nd A. I-M/ - UM*.*U -
Life Thickness Compacted / 0 Cees, sees Requested <
# 5W > U ' l- O- ^ ^ Cove,ege s Civen U0" A& ~
^" * # -
v A,e e,ses leeing mis sed by compecte,s? If se, he,e, . hen?. When is compaction poete,n? Is is seeis facto,y? If noe, .hy nos?A fuse stench e. eeked) b' f' - M '
$/'-f t ' 4'!!' ' ' ' ' U"
- WC
. /t L,W .W G 2'/7 de %
- e4 <. - 't*AM
/:
9 6-U g re s.s rain.,,. m,.. .emedi.i ec,i. .e s ,ei. . ? wh e .e s ,1,. e,ee ,e.e s,ed ? so. men, e.,,e ceve,e,e s .e.. ,e,.e s ,ed?. In .he, . O c,ess? Wes requese fulfilled? A.'c u d" U Rsms,in s finelude noneonte, miry to spe<IIIeerlens, nimes end lecertene el eeek ,eme,k) A/**'%'~~ C9 er taumbe, of cove,eges en life pe,rielly compacted less shift 5 Humbe, of lifes placed end compacted this shift d h Numbe, of cove,oges en life pe,elelly compacted es end of this shife M A ekstch may be e,teched to scole of e,ee be,n, filled end compeared Indicesi,,, eendialen of e,ee er end el shift, cove,e.es ec pseed, cove, epee needed in indseered e,een. I _ _ . I
/MW+ .# #w A /v<' > M/ -
, las.. H:sii.nEs .y* d cenee,s.
Jr 2. ;enxJ- s .ieh sobe.nb, cee,(s) _-___ .< -c%,/ A <.4 .t- L n - /d r r C l 3 O i / s / w - g;:c,-j 3 i 4-m
- c d .
I .= 2 - tS $ e - -- b Es eminesion s, di scussions, decislens -
- A '** ' ' ' ' ' *
- G / //
h g
. n ~~ -R~/Q $/h Y $ W ll
.. . p n,qy y 4
m . . M 9 _- g oih t, im ,e,..n. m e..., s Ide-e ,e,i,,, e,e,..,e.,e, 4,ed,i,,, ,ei,em e,,,e ,e ed% s , e,e ., M N 3 - ! A. i,M, . \ l ro m uQ. 'ac 93 <-17-75) [?' 138 h REVIEWED BY [-
% G r
.. -. ~ -- . .
EBASCO Q. C. CW4.
. . ~ . . . . _ . . - - - _ _ _ . . _.-m..,._, . _ _ . , _ _ . _ _ . - . - _ _ _ _ . _ . . _ M* N$3 E ERVICES INCORPOPATED
."C WATETJORD SES - UNIT NO. 3 QUALITY CONTROL WORK SHEET /
r LOCATION }lffr h,ger e #2 :k Ad DATE /.': - /3 - 7 f
- BT MfAbuisr&w i
pygg., $$Wd DVSA Al/f f NO *Vfff$ . E=s sr & cf a 4 mer , ie p .s % ~a no a A:eekm i. By myn rruNa eo y sus .So n pu eze.~r of i muo w r. w ,; u. ,a, ,,,, ,;~
, p .,., g,, e a.o [.
Af YSW 5 A Mr7- y4pg, o I M ub f 4,p4h /W ^- l^/d ' Or iz-iv ic' & & ff* l. 1 i i i
~33 1 -
, . y -
e v e - " e M. Y' M i
.: .. .. ; 7. 9 i
ilid~ lhillnWIRil i REVIEV!ED & A002irr:, LEliD Q. C. E!iG!,'iE R DATE_Y V f- 74 33g . gyp _ L' a 138 i
~ .
REVIEWED BY _M k dr/ EBASCO Q. C. CIV[ I7P [- I
. m , pa ow """
g y Attoc,'nment .No. 8.1 -
.I
. i \ \
1 ' J. 4. CON [I i FORD .
, j li i II ,
CtAM SHELL FILTER BLANKET INSPECTION REPORT Specification Ho: l._0 tt - 15(A , @
@b# o Project No: 75- 3 7 q. v. inspector ( 0 a 12 Cate: I) 43-7.5 .
- 1. Placement Area /Locatlon: S ra ,, 2; old,' :
r I.m . /I // l J.WEf GC. V .?d.' H .M // 'Qd-fl,,
- 2. Release for Installation and Compaction Obtained: Yes / No
- 3. Materials Released by the Engineer: Yes / No 4 Spreading and Compaction Equipment as Specified: Yes V No
'5 Filter Cloth Properly. Placed: Yes / No Comments: ,b r [,
- 6. Clam Shell Material Clean: Yes / No Coments: i^lc ri,7
, h Number of Passes: b Coments: 'lfoutFre,*reni //M Aun Re nue rn Av Op pr wa c, r Ano A < ' tata , ra,v e. Pavem aeru m %n s 8 Clam Shell Material Properly Compacted: Yes o Comments: A- -e N l'Cdr Sa/(cr-H Fe1 F,w e ih ne . .-e ) l 9. Alternate Nethod(s) of Compacting Acceptable (if used): Yes / No Coments: .
*LecsY (See $neer 4- Fen &:su Or. awed 10 F!nal Compacted Thickness Acceptable (10 to 14.5 inches): Yes / No Coments:
9et /Lo l , ATr voo . O
- 11. Repaired Areas Acceptable: Yes i/ No Coments: ,l.ic ew t
- 12. Surface Tolerance Acceptable: Yes / No Coments: i b ,e 1QQ b Ve 1*. -
eather Conditions Acceptable: Yes / No Comments: C u M - !( r w n _, 'u ! l ' 4. . ,qloan-up Properly Performed: Yes / No Comen ts : - A e ._' ~ - M Ot'her Remarks, or. Coments:
** ~~
~ i .\.l h ' g. , , _
~
i. (See reverse side for instructions) om No.: W-SITP-2.h"
$$.. -l.1.$ ,
_w .- _ _ . _ _ _ _ . . - . . _ ,
_ _ ~ _ . _ _ . _ _ _ _ _.
- =='
7 PJO I
. 1980 - 1165 }r.i INSTA . ,.
.. .i.
5011.5 CONSTRUC 7
.~
- lenspection Rap \, &*U&
oso, l.0 " lh 7W shtte lV veerk.,l'U d't 0 (MM ar _ $fl' <YoMSrXh*t-A,ee w..L.4 iL'fs!' //At- C i
- 2 S W'D
.i..e,s.. Er...el.a: se.,e .t shire . - 4 Y # I " rad .t shiri -d7' i
- T.e. t...d. -M//3- '
c.n.e,. css w. L'Acc pts.hed, c,.. .ad E, rp.. e ///#dE ' MA-S[ d 485.58i ' d ^) _ s ICJ'S 7~ MALF-5 w 5 e _
^
w k et ih. c . cis Engia.., t., s.31. - O,leta .I Moserier - bl$$ N MWN! Type of ei.e_e i.1, describe t. hen /=Ae,.. ...essee, (,.s en, e.. ..#. c..#. , (s't n s; Ha c-. c A tr e e. cu.4.s la eed. nea. aire,=, .A # emedie f eset.a -es ee&ea) i
~*
e u.HAi Anw) Acf/ -fao n m At t- So nisen* v m e rs m s.c .
%fe e. - -/Mim /b
.s2 si. cwc 6 < n .i.e I . '
{ ure Ts.r.tn... n.gi,.4 -
- 4. .::,pi...J gh- -
4 w as. , t. .. e. s . s. .s... .o,... Alo>>c [ chin t-s,. . se. 5. ...,,, .x..., A//d- - Pl.ce.. , (r&..ria.y, ,.11as, life eAsc a... ; 4...,st,,} 7-// 8 4~ 'g ,4M, , M.,,,,.4 gy f _ _. --- u 7 en t gnipr . eu v u u t v e- c.uvi.r t c , I ESO O '[ - F W !'jF 7 - 4 / R DiTE3W-74_. c:c.,2;'A' #4sd,
*ek. (8a.fede ...e.af.,mier t. st'etificeed.as. ft.a.s . d f.cesi.as .( e scs ..s ,4 2 L .
gm REVLEWED BY \ . I?. ,% C M '/* CL , - _C- - O. M f/ EBASCO Q. C. CIVE.,,,# [ $ Fsrm No. QC-93 (9-17-75) Q' .
,g, ,,,,g , ,,,]
4 e
- , , - - - w-- - , e w w- -w 9-w w-
- ea e ted whea .lf.asilead. es-ediel eulea s.k.a fe eos U47 weed. snedel, ceausei..'s a =ber, feegvees FnCOh9. d y" f "
'T s u t Me NN F H eiOU E ** C Y T ied C FRCOUCNCY B
l T IM C ateu puCwv mo. MoOCL NO. N,%$CAc NC ( L ? s2- (l10eLA T~c t . SpeeJ cf Tewing 68M M MR#d fo N ##W 1.Ife Thicknes s Compected M
.p. 'g/fac M Cseeeoges Roguessed /$!CAC(f S h> 'iN- A ' WOM Ceeerege s G;,ea/C
- ppggfr utir /+
Ane .. .. being missed by co-pectees? If ye. where. whea?.what is comp ctiea7essera? Is is setiefectory? fMiZhIl nee / why nes?MM f.se es.eck eeeeskedl NO ' fWWMMM /A'A[ v6@ $Mr\ ~ JiA T < f'E /4 7" f 'b o M/ - ~1 CM.5Yf1' '4-/~ NE Al; & ' A t s -v. '
-l ri, A t .WAMM /0 Y~ / /'
. Ao A7M i .
I t i Tense feitias. nee eemediel acsieay s tekea? nea was she esse resessed? How eieny estre coveneges were requested?. la =he 5 seess? .Wes eagvese fulfilled? /// . 3 / . ns msek s (Ine fede noncentenmier ee ere<III<eelene, el=en end lesertens et e ek u merU At/4" E F4 ber of coverages en lift poesiellr **=Pected lost shift M 5 ffw-bee of lifts ,Isced and compeened this shift D '/ #d h* b 8' M N h Nue.See of cceeeeges en life poesielly compacted as end of this shife bMMde /d % bM bdY A e%erek e.er be neuecked ne scele of eroe be.n, filled end compeened indleesing sendieten of ereo er end et shire. <evere,es sse.ptered eevereses needed In todte.eed ereen. In s e. si... i. and c.n.ee seisen s wish sobc.au.cs.e(s) A/O 4) E a
)
)
- I J
J l $ Go.niaees.as, discus sions deaisions Odd /Dya 70 <7At-M/2 ~ 09-Effs t" r // y .3 fr e c*.d . r;1fg s j e . C T.f.i.;'Uf. R F
._ . ,. . i .'. '. ' 2 7 9 4
- 3 r= a q p p. r-.. . ,. - - m
- umu y, v. u . a . 4 t. .\
3 t
- o:kee se.,.e..n e .siee s (de-eee,in, .,e,.el.ne, d,ed,in, ee.s. e e,4< .d1, .. e...
# / A l //
.~. .r ,-
.-r-t/G W r. ; ., 'Y D J
-i -
~r - y~p l
i i R. . 1 '
. @.-# g.Ag.-REVIEWED BY
~
For.m No. QC-93 ,- (-17-275) - - - 1- e (5 -- r[ I w ' *
-l 7p
% EBASCO Q, C. CIVIL
.. . . . . _ _ _ . . . . . . ._ .. . . . . . . . . . . . ..s"'.. .. . . .
m.m . . _ _ _ _ . . _ , Mf ' l T 4 1 0 QMU C0#L 0# MCATION NFSr Hnts Sr&M '- DATE /1 -/* - 7
- BY
+/FAma-%
N "' F.*oo n no sr.wes s u n. soas i s9em & L pn .m .s,a nep 6 l Af'A M w- Ayt~ M f.n n pm e~ ' W *~' + E e & gn 4 A o &- db 4 A L ~ fn= ~-r is.so b i pkt ~Am-o p n f m a.t p , A o M & 5-r d W $ A~ wdu- P n M /! ;. G ypd rn. ,_. ~fu o M p"~ & H - N 5
/*vyv HA M~ M
%.tf4. i in m' & + p A-i
& W id O i ode #-- & W A A }'*- '
/
l , j~iiEVIEWED & ACCEPTED
% , g LEAD Q. C. ENG!NEER
, ATE N I'7d StG.7
~
T REVIEWED BY
- / EBASCO Q. C CIVtL.
bf t. (.
l Attcc,hment.No. 8.1 W)* D11 1 i = am
% DO <
, P ES C E ~
ERFC
/ .
- l. . ,
Ct.AM SHELL FILTER BLANKET INSPECTION REPORT l Specification No: (_ 0 tt - 1 5 4'I V $ 1 Y Project No: "I6 -3 17 q. V. Inspector: $ b bdh Date: /2-/Y-75 1 Placement Area / Location: S T,:,g 2, Wu l
- 2. Release for Installation and Compaction obtained: Yes / No (Su 5al" h
- 3. Materials Released by the Engineer: Yes / No
- 4. Spreading and Compaction Equipment as Specified: Yes / No
~5. Filter Cloth Properly Placed: Yes /No Coments: Neve ;
- 6. clam Shell Material Clean: Yes / No Comments: ,V-a r I
9 Coments: /le,y h Number of Passes:
- 8. Clam Shell Material Properly Compacted: Yes / No Coments: 5'EE Sm7kbu
, F. w . r)porwa e Alternate Method (s) of Compacting Acceptable (if used): Yes / No Coments: Se g 9.
%s . r 4 Fee Fr v,w AppacJ e
- 10. Final Compacted Thickness Acceptable (10 to 14.5 inches): Yes r/ No Coments:
Str (% 1 , Arre ceev . -
- 11. Repaired Areas Acceptable: Yes / No Coments: Sir Swir V b .h Nht
- 12. Surface Tolerance Acceptable: Yes No Comments: Nc ,W e.
- 13. Weather Conditions Acceptable: Yes / No Coments: C_ cc u o V
- 14. Clean-up Properly Performed: Yes u' No Coments: NWE (h+ L v.M/ o c)
' W
(. Other Remarks or. Coments: s
?e rm No.: W-SITP-2.{.
(See reverse side for instructions) .h? ... ' " _,4---s -, ,-ua - y.;._.y.p... ____..,w,,.wa 2 -,rs m.,s. - . + - ~m... e.--+.w..-e,w.-- .,=<w-,w~e,.% .,..---.,w--..---.
- . _ . _ . l l
1 l r p racc:or STE d: : 19C .- l $$ }fW $d i > SOILS CONSTRUCTION N & '"-f4 T'se n leR}l o,,, /2 -/s- 7C s,s t, I d v..,u.11' ace ! 50 a V - e, G M r d r d s'd-A, w..L.4 h A4' e# #T4/s 8 -
. A....,. r e.... .n, si... .t ssa ti ~#7' nnomi. *7'~ v. .. u .. d.
^/M Cons e...ss.n W ek'Ae e pli.hed. C,.. .nd Egut dFT 44/8s/~ &# A A'B b c 4 de> D
, /T* e4rv- *> 0 f- f4 C r- HM F. SG' ('r nv94crsA to Me t1 G7 VSP.wiFNi 5
a ob t//dtfAho A- it....,Nei ssw. nsw h IP . . e ~ - wz,L s t 4.. c.n.,n,.,;.n gn,; nee, t., s.ns. NYM Di ah e,
/
'J'r:FwcH Mc u.'-s e A'u<xau n u -T*
- A f fA ir- F M T- HP9c/=, T Ar2ist w4S ~Sd J "< > T~c ,'
A /* >c.CE;rr'W r 7: t ? 1"H f Soiti fkA . Oi Us5fo ~
/XfNC M Al^ 'o V'inir w r c o k k+ f'b" MB 4e r e a:. -
'o,s ein .t u...,s.l AME o d C " MA'*/ '
irp,.tmeseus.t.4ee.s6.t k../~se .. ,s, t ..n.o....o. ..o. ,n o.a.n.n ..a,.Leni rm ~3i,,e fc <- sm /4 2 /wew1 n,r.....k.,,em.di.I..
/6 s 2 d~
oi. R f a " " r> th-Aw -Acw, ,ccewin .ms ess;sc Life Tlitckne.s Regu,3,ed b' , Aesv.lly Pl.c.d Al b
- I es e s uta, t .'.... r... s . s. .s... .s. s A)0 ^I&
~
d reysa
,t.A...A. A.. ..d. .s...; C/ &
pryjE',5ED & F .,Lc:' ' u _, , ,, ....,r-. t_ _u.J v e i,. .n. m 4.,. ..u .. ::,, x,a...., s....n ) A/j/3- .
\
/
m - ja -n' ,., 6 . 6 % d
, p u,e w- - - - -
I 't t r. .L Q 6 zi c 1 i i.
- t. y -
a .. .. t . t,. . i s. . . ..< . ,,, . . ,,. . ,<,. . .,.. . . ,, . .., t.. . . ,.. . .r . .. a .. ,6 ~ REVLEWED BY Wk \ l
. L..
b/S~4,_
- i<(
. EB ASCO O_ C CIVE.
. .. 7 .
Farun No. QC-93 (9-17-75) i gec,,srsi,uto oi # .
eaC a c7 *.
' J v1 ur n = .
d y
?- -l- .: Wl 0 ) ,$. h h k
[yl?
~ '
u i.. ..e 4, e. 4eI, ..n ,e....'s nhbe., f,'e den;7.IeI k.cLes,'def .EnL;".n". C.fe ed*e("o f.MenN., ..ah'*' ' ' A l r S tu f.es C N T 68 0. 6a O O C L N O. FnCOUCNCY 70MC F n t*QUF. ed C Y T ite l FMCQUCNCY TIM E G 6 'l WK/t fl9 as / ricrarv s' t 5psso el Tewin, $^# f'4 W ' M MPd t.lf Thickness Compected / Caeeecess Requessed U #M N U Ceeee g.s Civen / 7'-*d-4.. ..s.s i.ei.,, .4esed 6,..m ,b i .: .. .. M ent. m,e,is ..m ,... ,....e.n: i s i, s ..i s f.. ..,t if ,,e. .h, n.. , fuse s&s8sk especked) M """ bNf e f ** b '" Mb (
. { f I
{ i Teses I;ilin ,. Men remediel essien my sehen? hen was the eres eecessed? How eneny estre severages weee eequessed?. In .het i reses? Y'es sequese fulfilled? AHA * *
/ .
t R1mseine (Joeiede asn<entermeer to e,eetts<ertens. romen end I.<ertens et ee<k reme,st N/ / W m f ' \\ _ N E livenber .I covereges en life poesielly compacted lese shnis I%\ \ ifwanber of lifts placed end compected this shift * \ 3 Nsse.' set of cewereges en life persielly compected es end ekthis shift - A ehs'esk me.y be eere<hed to seele et eroe been, filled end eemp edladI<este,se orien el etre et end el eklin, severeses stentsesd, severopen needed in indleered erees. in......:.n o .e end .. .. . . ,c s ) E, md & we e, A (W e A t.L. AH w ..n... s..lenfr-. sJwi.h - soAs. /L. t>a ~ -dek . JA w /+ n .e m -xLV An l .ou.ii
- w
&&- , /
l v g g.'. ;;;:n 2. c ~ r~ -
- - ~
t e . e. .
~
l Esemin:eiens, discus sions, de<isions ==' M "' ' ' ' " ' '
~ ~ '
1 , , cnr W9-76 -. . . . ,-/.mw nd // l w of l l . .a ze im , ..n. ....e, s (se e.e.,n, e,e,..,e n e, d,ed ,.,, ,e in em e,,,, ,e ed,, s. e ,.e. , 1 . i m
,o -
/3
- c l.
l$ 138 c)j ! "fZm ao. , . . e ., REVIEWED BY {~ 1
%, _ k.g % -
n m - % . rg;V\G/E76U6Lf5LfcWPL ?'L
AitcOlnent.44o. 8.1 ., , I a> i G i
<* I a Ull s' X CLAN SHELL FILTER BLANKET INSP I lE O SpectfIcation No: L'OL8.-l&r#,4dA h")\M.) b Project No: "7 $ - 317 q. V. Inspector C a 3.~n oate: R-15 -75
- 1. Placement Area / Location: S TA f 4 2 , W1 E"vr.er Sen'A
- 2. Release for installation and Compaction obtained: Yes v No ( J E r b'ff E T
- 3. Materials Released by the Engineer: Yes /' No 4 Spreading and Compaction Equipment as Specified: Yes L/ No
'5. Filter Cloth Properly Placed: Yes v' No Coments: th e ,
- 6. Clam Shell Material Clean: Yes / ' No Coments: NwJ -
Number of Passes: M O Comments: Me G Asc ree n A ., # c a ,. feb Or t*eo r s a w %. n t. rec 0+) baruoAre hP.EAs .
- 8. Clam Shell Material
/ Coments: (fM A . e/ CrnfmhrNN)7A:= 2 perly Compacted: Yes V No h m,b- Se< Soc /o 541CIC 75 h?/he$N$d+4
- 9. Alternate Method (s) of Compacting Acceptable (If used): Yes No Concents: . _
fsWD be&AWh)7A/ 4Ah*/WA)b,e 5 $0M'097]'550$ / $A) 10 Finaf Compacted Thickness Acceptable (10 to 14.5 Inches): Yes / No Corraents: Scc /b i 47mcm .
- 11. Repaired Areas Acceptable: Yes '[ No Comments: Sec s ner / ,6.
- 12. Surface Tolerance Acceptable: Yes / No Coments: 4 ,v e- ISQ v
- 13. Weather Conditions Acceptable: Yes No Coments:.C J M - S Arn C e,.s 1 14 . Clean-up Properly Perfonned: Yes V No Coments: N,
( Other Remarks or. Comments: "u"
..- e
*(See reve Na s.ide.foy jnst,'ructioits) , Form i .
W-S I TP-2. [- h f pq T T
-----u_, __ ,
"*""**dh= , - * ***Md'4N-a _,
. O 4- .
. . ... = . .
. Ne ws sm hM3 P 59 -
j o . 7 k A" i
~
~
- i. e i
~ , u t C w, ',':
-)
m
.J., 3
~
e
.=
W 3 b
. GO Q.4 t
- CO di co l 3
D4 i d Et hL N , u au sumsm8 ' i
. i ! C'llllllP +f .
lllllI:3 R &
+z A
sim uus"8 Clllllll3.
. M +I '(
EEE -
&2
=
r"~<~~c~ . c. t.
~~*-*~-~r-~n,--.,,,,,-~., , . _ , _ _
ins egia.es NLK . MSREQUISITION . >m OH WARE 3 bb 3OO LlC To m usen can h A (1 IN or Arks'Bv\ 1 .... .. . ., M3 d'7 EM *" ab oAyg l1 lN gg h
. . ... ... _ / 5'o/ 777 '
....... LUPs-ts'1 A.flCLES OU AN TIT 4 UMlf (DeceMbe fullpl 3 %l6 M caf: Fh hr-te. (
- 1 4 o r 2 L c c. ,)
~ -
W &-
/ %#e6 -
1
- sL A -
! - - . . WEN . ....A . - 4,# 4 . 4 _. . - - i. 9 l --.0fM-lt dv .
32%~M"3t%91'th
=
gg . 4, i's,13.8 >*
~
, ~ -
,,,,e. .
l
* . C p ,QNSp .co
. .. o l .
Q gn 7'15 ;
.......... a
' cal @
- . f*TA " ~ ~ .
e
~
FOR INf0RMATl0N . DND' 3, %.y/ 3
- esseni 7s .. NCK,REQUIS w3 W TION CH WAREHOUSE $h5fo mef .
,....s.... A s +. n s s .. z -
......... 3+9
. DATE !E /4 to I
[d-2 .2 SY
. man m.,
f P... M.. W.T1Ti UN8T ARTICLES
~
gg,,,,qy, y,gg,y ff v v J%4J3. :M //d ," V V
/2- /3-75 aren.vso ' ' % * *C-M*'k AtcElvto As.vt &# * "
- r. --.
& _ an . s w .> r.o. u >
. .Q. .. ..... 4 ee.e Jg . .
. t' m n CI s.
1 s 10.a c 1
) -
- . ... A : -
- y '
.9. qonsr n c
. o.
. .s ..
- s Ja J$ 7'73.s.. $
.cl eloc
- c. ..
1 . c._c nti:TED Q
. MWG f -
*M '.
... a s. :s.. , ,c, 4e JVe y
, , L'tCINU.M k.
~
~
- 0R IN:0RKl0N DN Y . :
_ _ _ _ .. .-,:*.. , - - - - - ~ - _ ~ + .-- - - - - -
, i
~~
i%K WW, neo.miion 1 os winsuousenW - R b \
. . s.,. . P .
7 .oo#
,. w u ,e, .. . MJ Mat 6 <eAn #29 ...... ,,. 24 4
#4700 ,,7 f
,. F/eefabn .A,e /2 - /2
.... .. A o/772.
/ ... .. wes-/ r7 ARTIC3.Ef OUANTITY UNIT (p ,grg{,, f,tly) 4--
raits MireR Shl>ci<- (Wfd f~ bric) i -
.. ll- .
4% wk: (/' W.w g s-
/."2 = /f2. _7 G
mactivco Aeovt # '* g
..ocl,oA
- g. . ..&m %._.s~' a , w .. 3_.>~_ % o ~
ece O c2 G. > 138s 2. 4 -
.:, ,... :rg. .
' g dNSW:
".i + ctC'.12*- ,
n' l g h,k ' I I {,
, . A %
. spl$
.~
('[ . hb *
+ RECE1V q
.4 .
d- m 05 751, -- . DeCINEERIMC
- 0R INiDRMA~l0N ON Y .
1 1 - _ . _ _ __ _ _ - _ -
)
.o .I".
! ) '..
';n P.t t40t w sm
- . ~^
1[ s.3 u s jb:.& Q 'l Amh52 .
;s n s k.
i - 8% . L3
.k:.>a' Q
~~'~
- h. N- r'- D N <- U V .
. .i
~
d N 0-- . [$T d i 5 Q % I
)
U *
. * {5,k o
O O O ' r-
'" ' ' ~ ~ ' ~ ~ ~ ' ~~ '~
. 14 55
' .a 3 ,[ h_ d' 'h- '
..rd 0 0 0 y( O ~
"3 . . , m a. -
r-p a. - s y
.m E $ $ ed t \/1 o - -
N ' #
~
e a5 *
- N 4'20%
is. 87:=!oet.2
. i . .e c- 03 to 00 .
l s 4 :o i l
'iE E a
,a c E c4 i {sg
~ 4 E .' e .
.. . . . w __. r-2 '
1
- jp02 " $ a N, d "j-
.< b l.
&q f c.;
2: 'i i'.QVs unna h . Q h v ~ 5 g5,a n.u . es - J c e.1,.g El d i
,O, _*. o, A. O J "
$_ _- k ,
v4 0. U
.,y ,, -- CD -
A EU - rw I
*;5 a
. _ o ro d m ,
/ 1 -
=
Ba. + r-- 9 1 e< u q, CC D p& 3 3 c
= =
- j. N Y
to do DO o O ,k N} ICE %e m N g 5 w m
" ' ] .
w M g F t= d n C*
't e "
.o o g
- .::r . E dm.m.i .ti g4 .
C3 .L l l, , 3 e ,. g, pO .
=-
L ld W '> e i """ - em . e . . -= 0 * ' g c-M. !wo%e _ i e:::::s . s
A- b -
. v v e. i- ,, -,
~
ha- - m.sss, M11l> si .
', tA=t e ma % g 3T
~
v n s pam e. n pp . 4 .' 5 .- ., l , l .n tUs G_ sap s 9-L
/ f
- i.It ;i s in a.3e_l r 1 h
5
/
/
N \ 2 3 r e , b 3 le. e 9 , i 3 4-'
. l ,
/ -
\
5
/
- I
\'N
(?)l- [ \ ,
.- L
\, 6
/ 11-- -
s .) . 7 Nw~ / / -- V A p . h; - f.--
. . . h .+ ~
/ --
k -
/ -
5 '
~
hk V - [/ a
.1 -
l A B C D E F G is.
- I@Di3D ug TYPICAL IOOFT. GRID SYSTEM FOR REVIEWED BY
]i" g g,j TEST LOC h, -
7
- g. ' EBASCO Q.c, cyC 7b r.
e 138 I L
. - . . . . . . (\ .
l V' - t= t .
% ~
/ \'2. \ \Q \ 1,(
ricUnE NO. 4.l* l
. .. siOD STE/Ji 1.ic..J. 4..i.-* .GK .
'S
.sY , y*q Dennity 1980 - 1165 MW INST TION - UNI? E0. 3 l DENSIW 0F SOIL - IN@*rdCE*- RUMM MLLOON Jensi.y , H31sture % q g
- ASTH D-2167 OAST $M d% '
l Moisture Dry Lab. Std. Vet Volume . Wet ! Test No. Test Location Weight Ft.3 . Density f/Ft.3 % Density f/Ft.3 Density Compr.c, tion , Co=ents wasr tmy ( 2-t syE'S ' l M k' Es-Losa Io.47- (o 9 41
. h 82. 3 '? B. 2. lo k o %.~l - $1eJJ. '
2- a sost wee /a' 90,0 y0 0 ' ! l 669 l cs- sgs, im '/.83 (.6810 - 944 to2 ;o ' 9Z.7 , o z-3 syE ' LO2 ,<c g2,8 (d'O 23-6s,ng 5 ffS .o04o FS I '945-r z-+ D3 64,uss 4.08 clobl; syj7 lONO ~lTi Y. w=~E$a "N'
.~
6'// 9 S. G 8 l. D d . r nllrWrD & AcG. .'i f.D l
, e 73 o.c.. rNGINEER 4 f .. i.. -
W r .
/
,,v ue bw.x4 /2 T i i
n ,
; '.u ;
[ j . ! i i i i
'! _' mnwe Mih M Ph M+!
W
. , . . . . ni _ . . _ _
~
I.\,.lH. lMRill . il. - til J 1 _I PM d,CRtsi' m ._ ; s p7. ,. m . L' : T. 'A:' r L-.
- Date : I $ l'l {'I $"
.,-. . % J -
-.-. = .. .. . - . . - . . - - - - - . - _ _ .-
M~ W3 5W1 kg M,[ _" - g: 2 ^- 1 ' g l-
/ * -
4 J m
/ /[
/C .
. M _
\
\
\\ # -
2 maus _. w - .n erai,= lc_
/ k, 6 '
-s d)
Q' 3
\
r. sg * - g 2. 4. h
- E s
Y? 4
. / \ 1^--w -
- I . . Imme.use,t j .
t s
- 5 3-Q):). / l L '
q'
'/ /
s L_ _ _ _ J \.
.6
\ , -. }}
. ) .-
NV'
,v
/ /
xA'. M (- 7 g; l f ' V % rg w cgg\ B
. x e.
- . .A .
. B C D E F G O DijD~rs TYPICAL 100FT. GRID SYSTEM FOR REVIEWED BY
~
9 Shell *
~
4
. . . . . . . .lG. .c.:t .
'~~
.&D \ z \\q M g # **
FIGUflE No. 4.l*
r, m ...de%0 .so.e 44 99 eM ' a'.Mo m , * -erare we@vm +- *=moe~-m- m -+eem-o t I
$ $ 1 ) I S
0 m
' 3
' 4 *. -
I l t e
J. A. JONES CONSTRUCTION COMPANY WAERFORD UNIT NO. 3 SLOPE FROIECTION INSFECTION REPORT 474 Report No: [ Specification No: 20tv /4 V' b Project No: 7 03/7, Quality verification Inspector .b Date: / fart _ 7i
- Location: w @ [fY 3 W er Conditions: C A8 dC/6/
YES NO Horizontal Comments: surface E~4 f nO blade 4 // 6 cleaned n/ 4 (3[ feet from vertical face):
/ i
- Installation of gunnite: Average thickness: I.
- Gunite over entire exposed vertical surface and minimum 3 feet of vidth on ad-F V LL. No jacent horizontal surface: Yes # What Length Comments:
Any inquipment or materials on shall' filter blanket. No V Yes Coussent: g Has polethlene membrane been spread on shall mat adjacent to work area: Yes No X Coument: NO MQ_I_ WM 'cR2EAD. MEMcMMG FotDGO civ4. Has gunite been tricanad: Yes N No Comment: All surplus material and overspray removed: Yes X. No Cocnent: i s 138c l
- s
- Form No. W-SITP-9.1 g;u. .
5 G +1b p-t j o h #O 4 0 l FOR lFORRigg Ogy
-O h -
J. A. JONES CONSTRUCTION COMPANY WA'IERFORD UNIT NO. 3 SLOPE PROIECTION INSPECTION REPORT Report No: G Specification Ho:l C O ( % 4 . 4 7 h Project No: Y 3(7 Quality Verification Inspector 9 h . Date: I'I. I R T b Location: TRtP b NOT W4L.L Weather Conditions: 6LGIO2-- 2.0 t D Horizontal surface blade cleaned (3 feet from vertical face): YES # NO Comments:
~
Installation of gunnite: Average thickness: l ~ Gunits over entire exposed vertical surface and minimum 3 feet of width on ad-jacent horizontal surface: Yes V What Length 5:'OL.L - No Connents: Any Equipment or materials on shell filter blanket. ~ No X Yes Comment: Has polethlene membrane been spread on shell mat adjacent to work area: Yes No A Comment:rio tMG4.L- WAS tPE. GAD ktGiAON RX.DGD 6#-K Has gunite been trimmed: Yes % No Comment: All surplus material and overspray removed: Yes )< No Cc:n=ent: oe %g i i 138 L b 4 b~ orm No. W-SITP-9.1 h?5 - C,0 N S y ~ o
+ 9
,, u ; ac247s 9 h
_ . . _ _ .. . . ~ . ,
> N' b p W3
_ke .yI MI g f- EEASCO SERVICES INCORPORATED WATERFORD SES ,- UNIT No. 3 f g [ppgcogp SITE SOILS ENGINEER - APPROVAL FORM + t - Date f5 / 5 f Location l 5 N M - _s hg se}s
/2//f/75 Zk N/M/75 Quality Contro1 forms resteved h/)/l/E ~ hfGwd/& k./f N67D6fp/N* jE hpf/}s.y Gearr.ao A 2sax Essus Spsc. Abu'-m4,4H Approval Rej ection 4
w Signature g r ." Comments / Recon: mended Action s x w} 6, ? b Remedial Work Report
- .nnemen
^v v " ' ' - ~
R&lEWW 6 LEAD Q. C. ENbit" , 7 7 _- n- ll-76 sna. !#- UA e c ; - -
?"S QC Inspector:
! Remedial Action: Accepted Rejected Site Soils Engineer { g
- 0 R I F D P N I0l1R Yi1% !
g . 6 8l C ,
' ' ^ " ' "
WATErJORD STEA}l ELECTRIC STATION ~ 1980 - 1165 }!W INSTAL 1.ATION - tJNIT NO. 3 SOILS CONSTRUCTION - Inspection Rcpc<t om /A-/9- 75 shit.. /Y we. ,s., l'///92 h figio e, /77& gin 37pt& A, w. 6.e 6W I P
- 3 As 'PER <d~E rCH A T rA C HEh
. i.e....
El...;.a: 1s.se of Shift " Yk ' 7 End .I 5hife - " M / Tes.1t.. 4. c.n e .... .n w.,L'Ac c ,1:shed, c.e. .od E,. ,.en. - s E 5 W.:L of sk. C.nservesi n Easineer f.e 5.ils kfffdllE/) 47~$1 P Ji 3 kl. 2 Pc)QC./5l--Lh
/fl cui A ,a o s u.ee t- -
Origin .f Meseel ! b M~ A3 I'C N O C T-R A d Typ* .f .s ees.t. Je scrib. f-A.a /=Aer. we t. e.ae.= ta v.4. a.a. air.. . = Aes rea e dse t c es.a -es e.i e al G.L A m %kech - 5...,s0wn se.. I,.a.a. I- 2:e1%e a si in o2s - Gl.fA ^ ANb W1E-OYlicm ' A tu 'tl S c iC f o<T H ' m A T & fth L
~
Thickn.: Re, vie.J ' Actu.Ily Pl.ced /
- Lsts.f$li e:. .,Ly /.5 7~n )?M Jfa vvE Asr G GmRecrfb SH/k-44'5eias (<E s.a (en. A.- = A. -A a. -bre) AD d E N by tac (-h a. A. A.- ... A. - A.,.! OLh OL v"t m 6 A s6 Mi 61 T 6 A c k' T C-Aacw ~m~ ease ro . xw ;n r0 , r.
Pirc emene (f 6..I;.9, e.ht ,, fste eng.a..seg s...,st,,) h(f* MEA 7 [oNE. dy- ,3" O //,$d "
,g g Ru R t3n=C - YlS'C D DL.01 O T h ( t' $ - Q L.c 2 GorprAen? GrAx:
.m m - e in m m e e e ra maeem1 -
. l ii H 'I N l.N !!WA SN Ps $ H liN l U RT iV i, ouitH WN on...
. u .1 W H t H.!s.M.9 .. El119 .,i .ltr .I #%
e..=.n (s .r.s. .. ..<.. .., ,. ,, . rs...s. .. .s
' .n dMM~ >y 1?R ~y i .
REVIEWED . . s
& u. XNNTEU. . n~' 7)
.-.m n n rursm ero . / -
L.r n u v. v. um - "., p ygww gy (. F:rm No. QC-93 (9-17-75 g /, g . SIG. ' [h cl u m sts @e
- f. _ % m .s m
.hH 9 0
,..... ...... ......... - ... .,....,wh...h.. . .h.. ..,,........... ...... .. ........h (rC U GadC N T .40. WODC4. NO: F f1 C OU E N CY TIME F H tC Q U F. se C Y T 1.A C F FI C O U C N C Y Y tM C N'Z /G/s* _Q "MIb besd cf Tewia, M/ Lire Thi ka... C.m,. sed #M Ca.ses,.. Reque.se J W/[
, C...e.ge. C3.ca ,l '/P As. ...c. b.ing mi . .'. d by ..m p..t.. .? If ... wh. e. wh.n ?. %.e i . ..m p.. si.n pot r e,n ? l . is ..si . f.. .,y ? fr n.t. wh y n. ?
r .. .s.. 6 ..,. 5.ss ai/n VV / l' -
- e 1
C j T. .es r;ilias. t'h.e ,...d8.1..sien we. s.k.n? %.a . . sh. .... ,eie.s ed ? H.= .ny mir. ce,ee.g e, w. . e.qu e.s.d?. In h.e
> ... .? w.... ...er.,irier.a? -
4 1 / U--- - I v',/ V U
- a so s . to. t.,s. .. ..r.,-o,r o. .o. .in .a. .. a.. , ..s t. .n... .r ...s .. .,u
, / 11
. A I / (14-K4. ._. _ .___.. IV/ V- - -
/
; 3 4. s., . t ....,... . . ii r, ... . .ii, . ,.. . 4 i . . . .h i ri e r //) -
! I a
=
re H., 6., .t tire. ,r...a .a4 ... ....a .hi. .hir. s., .t . ....... .. ii ri , i.iir ...,. ...J .. .nd . esi . . hire f/lU j ,M - 4 .s...n ..,s......n.s.. ...r..i . 6..., rut.s ..s ...,....ssosi..a ,...sta...i.... .,..s .i.xu,..... ....
... ,ra.s. ......,.. ..s.s s u si....s ......
i.... .n. . .. .oe .. .....a. . .iih . 6. .......t.) g - i fL a - i A / 16\ 4 e O FM:Pe9 W m m mem,> e -,, _ i v%/ I Lu is 4 M rns ) i n s 9 Pi N o 4 u 9 s n 3 V W 9 ;1 1) ' ji e, I 4 f il ii 4 Hs f/'d # !iS M .H H is .i W W 18 3H 4 2 i.co . 43..v . . .. . 4.. i.i . 4 U$i i! Mile 5eRil65nW 9844h4
!!5M # )l,
= = = u .i n u a v o g h uty 5 .
. .,I n ~~~
i _ lillbu
, . I~**-
1 41 Esh j : o... i. , . . . .. . .. . u. . . . a.. . ... .a.. . . s, . s, ,.. ,. r. .. . ,a. .. .si, . . . . . 3 /9 ___~%
! C I M M ,.
.\. k .G l2 AI fd .____g Y~ 7
_- m.eum.c .M.. n ACU WLtu
- X, I - -
g l f - _ = a a a . a ** P' ,
@ Q. U. Lt1binCLn"i . .
F:rm No. 'QC (-17a75)
~
- .- , SEVIEWED BY . .- . r.
DATE7-/!-IS - SIG -
#fy
_ _ mmmmm
7 tgk e wn hW1p68 EEASCO SERVICC3 INCORPORATED WATERFORD SES - UNIT NO. 3 E QUALITY CONTROL WORK SitEET
.M 94 T DATE l A - IC/ ' 7f gy ws ousurets^ v STw a .3 SKercR' i
p m' p 9' !
\ rlIT ;
i a
\ )%
V e~ j JH % ;
,- ~g 4'3 h 36 '
(,y C Artd A'G-E bthc h- Da tr Cru 6cTH flOB L gh $7 kip ' m 03 A PP. 9 4T DEsp AO 3 FT wlu ps , T H ESE- - D /Tcti e.s t u s ic s t._ ,,o s o g,7 y . m , cs a y , g~ n (fu.so { 6 t4 ct <. . Tif E ' m,h A rt VN
\(O t T l+ vt n$ L&fr \M I T ik g
'00EC To 'i HAN1 R Lt m ~-(l'tL f2c Pg gz
[ufGL A f' tr o r />'- Mfd th s w n o .
. L- M E4 u sN Qti.E i4ITI4 T(2v'cics t]n a GPCfr9 bih ( rd lt t+- ED Y[0 - U St'h A in ) l6' ' '
L./Mrs Te #EilW& AC6EPTED r /> c mro<.rso u s LEAD Q. C. ENGINEER REVlEWED BY . i 138 el DATE 6-//'75 S!G. f j ts7 M-~b_'.'y EBASCO Q. C. DIVil.
-- =---~ . . - - . . . . - _-_ _ _
Mce, ws sm gp (BASCO SERVICES. INCORFORATED WATERFORD SES - UNIT NO. 3 ,
~
QUALITY CONTROL WORK SHEET IDCATION FTN// # 5 DATE /C ~ /c 77
- BY
/71/r A&wynIt-e-i
/
' N j .
.,,'s j s,
+/bs <>f Si d / \
jTamP- flormdc-s puy sa
,wznt
,e 5 /1;ge. c2g. Dw es a +r aubs. du'exa (,
IGiM /YlieAn popsa + o w se u n grippc. dscs ' To smencepr VAwl in ccon rar noxx AWA . i 1 rsy Drey. A/O GfmP* er"~ *
. t
. /
6 . t i REVIEWED & ACCEPTED 1O138 LEAD Q. C. ENGINEER , y DATE 3 d/*76 SIG.I ' W E co y 7A
Attcciwnent No. 8.1 s g.pg J. A. JONES CONSTRUCTION COMPANY WATERFORD UNIT NO. 3 CLAN SHELL Fit.TER BLANKET INSPWIN REPORT ,
. \\@ '
Spectfication No: 2 #tt /d M W 'l */U/75 Project No: 7[~.3 / ~7 q. V. Inspector k// te:/9/)cc7[ ' 1 Placement Area / Location: N 7[/[ . E _ Lo'YUf && .4,IH e Gul.
- 2. Release for Installation and Compaction Obtained: Ye's V No h 6 f'c 7t- d 0 N
/o R/us t
- 3. Materials Released by the Engineer: Yes N
- 4. Spreading and Compaction Equipment as Specified: Yes / No Filter cloth Properly.Placed: Yes No Comments- .
'5.
I
- 6. Clam Shell Material Clean: Yes / No Coments:
~
Number of Passes: IO Comments:
.s
- 8. Clam Shell Material Properly Compacted: Yes V No Coments:
Alternate Method (s) of Compacting Acceptable (If used): Yes No Coments: 9. 10 Final Compacted Thickness Acceptable (10 to 14.5 inches): Yes / No Coments:
- 11. Repaired Areas Acceptable: Yes / No Coments: e Surface Tolerance Acceptable: Yes / No Coments: 1m o
- 12. : wvc -
4 A _ W ,, Wa4N
- 13. weather Conditions Acceptable: Yes t/ No Coments: # "" ~ #o\
14 Clean-up Properly Perfonned: Yes r/ No Coments: DEC 2.4'75 $
^
U ' Other Recarks or. Comments: A M / U NS . k
- qr9 q g t' y race i er
,f'Id Nm ! STEAt o
g { E I
'gp 'giTATION .
W dis LI.ATION - UNIT NO. 3 h)f % ((,f R-SOILS CONSTRUCTION M5W
. - Inspcessor, Repc<t J S 7" f ,,n
~
- <,, i 2 .r 2 - 7 S~ so.it, / ve. s.afeto klenW o, ,,
x n v..u. A c L or wift/ #3
. I
. Am.... ci....I. s ... .r su r. ~ /S, 2 > c,.4., sair. - #7' y... i...,, /Q// ,
c..:..... v.,CAu-,si.he 4. c... .a4 r,a, . ser 4,u em7 eas a c;/f;'// *__; we<, t r, pnp. e 4)r TM / 6~'l d1 f L AWE d / e r rer TM24./ #NO $/?#DO'/) AsU Y u.s b W;ek .f the Cenas,vesi.a En.tae., f., s.Ils NM /- Origin el biete,let b b N5 0 l M N N Y YW Y'Y *
- m - - - . . . - -
Typ 2 o f me s..l.l. Je s cribe (-A.. /.h.,.. ...,sie . (, s ea. e .e. c.a r..ta.se d, a.a.atten.. - A.e e...dr.l eert a ... e.E al
/* l e4-ws *!dM l_ A //-A & r>J<<* 5 % / re '~2 s M Ne-C 1st $ / 23*
- d d #f #e7 ** MNM 6&MI /*^ / Maa p.*1/
M /./ d 8 8C #7 N rv V bM 8/c4 A_/ n1 /*- /W/ J WI *
- 1.Its Thickness Reqv,ie.J Actv. fly Pt. sed
#:e 2 etas (,..... (... h.- e n. =A.a. - A.,.s M CA/8~ .
;l chsa, c-o
- a. s s. ..es. .s...> rn un d <Heu &
- ccR' st wn A<rn o i d n Art sw se r+ w.r~ N e w n/n w m.n it i-v in ro i r .
Place.s.at tib..lias ,.htas. life ekte hneess done,II.e) kbM c orN1 / b 1/m .. f Wm b ~ Af t*~ n,t'l.ln'e-, m e. c wa m/'xA L,L 40 - 9 s oc R
/ r " XR,.2,.., _. . m (9 ~%
l
-$136#.
~
nt.. 6. <,as,.s. a..ai ,,,.. .r.e, , . . . . as , gg 5,. ,is ,* /, xif -Dj{, 1. E
' REVS /ED BY n.n m6to
~
. __._ - r, b' . Js B- 4. h. i -
, .- .. 2 .- Ltau y. + i"uuw-" .
,, y p'g --
g@f$d
~
ror. No. QC-93 (9 5) 7g, g, gcc,,,,,yg , o g,
d - g h s s w 4. 6 d - = - u.je. es e,. e..
...(.geg, a e.-6.e. Ise .ee.., . hee, el.ees e . . hee. ..if e. e,. s. e sisi e s sien ,es.e, g w3e5m C C#U Ges E N T N O. seO O c t. N O. l F et C QU E N CY T esA E FREQUENCY T leJ C F f1 C O U C N C Y l 71810 b l./l. kP'ir d fb Y W*'
Manir.u;Sw e,* se r 9a wu- 4*en c an
. l
$,g:d cf Tewin, N# 1.Ife Thickness Compacted NM Ca **c,* s R e gve s sed NM Co ee ges Ci.en W8 Aes esses being missed by compeesees? If so. wheee, when?. What is compostion poeteen? Is is seeisfactety? If not, why nes?
(wee s& seek eseecked) M
^
l
- Tessa f
- lling, het eemediel easion was taken? hen was the sees eesessed? How eieny estre severeges were seqwested?. In . hee
,A/ 8 8 :sses? Ces reqwess fulfilled? -
I . Rimes k s (Ins twde none entermle r es specificeelene, elmee end lesentene et e,eh e me 61 N$ 6 -- . O Nue.ber of covereges en life poesielly compeesed last shife N r/ ' h ti hee of lifts pleseJ end eempeesed shis shife WM *
$ Hve. bee of eeweveges en life peestelly compacted es end of this shife N8
- A eksesk mey be esteeked se neele et osee be.no Illied end sempeared IndleerIns eeedieten el etee er end et shife, eevereses see.;tsesd. eewereses needed on Indieeted eteen.
laneevetiens to end eenveeseviens with subeenesseres(s) NM e 3 3 E i Esemin:elen s, disews sions. Jeelsions NM ~ f i e -
- . ~
,' . . go' 'aA \
W -n 9 osks, s.n,.e e.n e e... ee s (de...e,4n, .,ee.e s.a s 4,ed,sa, ,el..m.eese ,s.dsn, s e e' e.s ## $ 100 9 !
%- 2')
i x-/ _ . _ . . ~ , , o annenTen - M KtVitVit.u a imi e - , s _ . _ . _ _ _
.mm n o uv q. v. m
-s .~ m. . . . ---
/
' . REVIEWED BY m . . ,. ~ y
- g. i-
.ox7t 3 .a 4 s.iu. y gg ~ y e
- ~
EBASCO Q. C. CIVu. D . _ _ , - ~ _ _
f AG E l C*r
.. .s ,
WATERFORD STERI ELECTRIC STATION
'. 1980 - 1165 MW INSTALIATION - UNIT NO. 3 SOILS CONSTRUCTIO:4 laspcetion Rcp.<, & '$ & , 3 sea r> ~cz- 7 7 alte '2- w..ek.. Cee D Y[ &OY 81 b w/
- x. ..u.s s u s s m u' ~
*3 '
. i..:.... ci.... .., s.... .r air. -M' ra ., air. 7 / T...:t..<. N#
c . . . .,.. . c4. . , u. .<. c... .a e,.ir. . nM /cd _ BJ saAd A n, .- - .,.J MaA u n /s A %- m2 *J~ b W .
/* < s, h -
~~ / '"s -
th 7 W o . c.s .t ik. c .. .is E., .... t.. s.u. M/F o.s,:. '. t u....s.s O bh VM .
. . ... .,. ,. . .. s. ... :r.. . . s. , .. ..W. , . . , e... ..y .
ai iy ,,. . s .. . ..s. t. t. .t' . ; s.Lt.>./' .. /.s .N. . ... / e ./... w z nA 2:, A / sM Q A n. A~ b o , *.- ~ 4, ,1/ " -
" ' ~
f
~
u t, vi.i.u... a.,e,.e ,
'to 4. .. .n , ,,i. . . , Was -
e,=.u , c.:... e... s . s. .s... ., , Mswe . f i ! ;l J ri < u. . , s.. . s. .s..., ## - t . t 1
,. ,n . . m:.u.,. .., su. .as. u.. ., s....,m N# -
a y ,g
- ' O T1 R U.E" D ;'? m G A T e m '! nes1y j 138 k .
l
!"$ 3 M 1 M M i M ini!! M s E W D l at 4 V 4- _ 9 s uit stu uanno m inuit unt! A 2 ~-a' A - -
l i LJ* 2 -f 7 L, 6 . . s s ~ z~i oi, m i, & .ds /t. Nt.vit.wt.u e m w itv
~
i - nc.vic.vvw e t r. , L L. _ -
!nn O. C. ENGINEER
~~ '
.9 , ,3 , 5,, t l rar= wo. qc-93 (9-17-75) N. WPMT stagge.j AAsco Q.c.ch [. g, gc c,,,,,yyg g o g, l nm't.//- 74 :
erv e,.
&GR O i '
u :.. ...e. ..e. . .
..ui.. . e6e,. f....ea , -hea hake d. hea -eifer.ii.ae d. .e-e diei e is.- esL ea Ie. e-h
/
1 FnCQUENCY T ikt C l te O O C4. N O. FnEcuCNCY T IM E .' N t(Q U F, te C Y T IM C (tu PSA E N T NO. M%%. K - A-A' owc c e ,V %-.nW , . s s,.s e, 7.w; , meyeo m tu v- m zu ) uf Thi.t ... c.-,uie4 . I C' M M 6 ' - / E N // h coe..:.e. a e ,.. ..e 4 ' W d 'IM@ c.e e,e.e . cie..
... -6. ?. w e i i . ..
4.. c.e....se.e ..ui.e.....s.d> io, .4. . e s 6, G w, .. .h...- -hA-zC. e if e... a- d -no..;. ." ,Ne'ie, U? i,. ..ii.fu he il g... kr ayEd e.,1?2~~ an.e.tl. /ff m L AeX L // n/ / 'A e v on-. SJ A d 1 Y $w /% 4 L ' n x,4 d A w' w l. i1. - t s . W .a f J' ~ ad ' J 4
.h Tese. falling. nos remediel usion we. eehen? non wu the sees eeee. sed? How meny estee ..werege. were req e. sed?. In -hee 3 cesc.? .we. esq.e.s I.llilled? '
//A J .
>m..<,.....,.............p...... ...n.........d........
- ; . .. .e..',,, m
. .g a". ti. ber f enverage. en life peesielly ..mputed le.: .hile M .r N Hrm6er .I inf o. ple.e4 end ..mpe. sed thi. .hlf e / 28 /O Ilw 's wf d ad ' / / / M 8 M t' O '
= -* ' '/
3 N.e.See of ..eeeege. .a life poesielly .empacted as and of th3. sh3fe A a bee.k e.ey be este ked t. s. ele et eroe be.n, titled end ..mpe.ned Indl.eein, eeediolen et er.e et end et s kite, .eeere,e. ssertsted. eeverese s needed I. Indi.ored ereen. in.... . is. . .. en a . .. e .. . .. :.a . wi .h . 6. .. .. ...c .)
., A/14 ? .g=, .J, j t, .ms...; .. a; .n. . .s.. .. Je.Ss ~ - - .a .se F 'i ' O ? 6 - U~
c t M T" ,R M 9 E 4 9 e - 4.W F lii M i 4 _m- i (~: l 14314 fi tM h 43.9 6t'FFRR464bM n a iM 1 1 __ bet (IK M M *fil i fi s td M P. M. $ S h 9. M U t Ti l= 1 1 11461 IWAu t ii t ts k s e s * * " "
=*-- -
z- 3 by n a 4 * ' '*A - 4,e 4, s., ,e h..e.,4e 41, . . .,e.) f*v . snn qo m h e s , . . m...e, . rde -e,e,s., .,e . 4...
.A
. . aj s .L s.) O c '
5 fy (T \Q p) j _ _ . m e. ,. ,- n K- 1 HFVIEWEU & %btr I E.U x U AD Q. C. ENGINE 0 Fon. NO. Qc-93 ,' (-17'75) - -' - - -
- .. - t-
-) REVIEWED BY N
. DATE 3 7/' Slu $'C " Di
.i rpyyvsu t_f,w [ .
~ . PAGC4(F l .
WATERFORD STEAM ELECTRIC STATION
. . 1980 - 1165 MW INSTA1,LATION - UNIT No. 3 f.
$ OILS CONSTRUCTIO;4 -
. , inspection Repc<t om 'd .? 3' - 7f sm t, /E w...u.,f/ Aar: / det e, /M's&,r737tasc-.
Aan v..n.a STA/P M .5
. A c.... er....:. si... .t su r, - 4/Z 2. e d or sair. - 4/ A 2- T...:t..s. #A-c..u .a w.,u'Au..etu.s.o. c .. aee. s ... M)#M LArr rw fs .ssa r e ^J
, _)AsAs r A44L F db 67W/P '
M3 - 4~A'r77* A M/f dvr w/r4 / fE 4*At-1en/ t A.4d A'd &q4'd erfo twhp PA M 4kN*/Mrex . o w..k .tek , c.e.sau es.n E. ,ta..,t.,s ;s. ht'Louso $7/ Zip # _T de r:. ft' 4 cay,,s s ,e aro msv . 4 o ,tss n .t u er.au.l AWA ?MdNef'rX As s - - Ty p 2 .f .i.s e,f. f, de s .,th. <=A /.A.,.. ...,.l... f,.. ... e.. ..e, .#..in e e.s. n.nw.ireen,. . A.e . .ss. t ..es.a .. . e.& e n ) l'/./9m M ft4 - At c. CHSze. C'lEda 4;>o s'Lfs /sf .44/ QJ -helle /$w MAff4 t c. .
- SMFfc filer, / "' 74 2*
IN S/76-Life Tht.ka... Rego,te.d
' ein n ,so
/2 ' A. ..gg y p g. .. g /N -
u see . au aa,,,t,;... <.e. .. s. . .... ,,, nsxe
;j c.I rs , t. . 5... n.. n. 5.,,, A/M .
m . EFih e u. . . c,./ ,,.....u .. ,,,, ,. ....,s... u i de ~ E,M g 'vo g rare m u n e y=e n re n m e u m u r e n n s N'Y - U HJ IPd LO WHHB 5 W M HRH U -
!. 6 14.H. .i .iM.H.-~H a H,.H1.H. 5..H n .h.i H .i i.i .! 1 n .. n , eo . o.s. .. . ..r.. 4,, ..% uri. .. .. . . ,;- . s u.. . ,s.
pg,s iuUS R elg g. g
' A' orv1FWED
"~
. r-1 io . 7/
_ ,, emmCFR
.q.. u. "". ;,-
3'
..w w q. w w.
'b -
t..,ggu .-[- , = --- ,../.y . F;rm No. QC-93 (9-17-75) 7p ggg, N M' gev,rsnuto ove DATEq ,jf _ . -
....e . . !
* . *Y
. . . . . . g .
U ies ess#, emedel, senseessw*s ndbee, feegvency = hen checked, when mielf.nceiened, see.ediel action teken fee eesh a lu cin c u t w o.. W o o c t. w o. pncoucwev Tout reieouRwcv T iee t pncoucNCY T eM C t'4S CsdL SE tf - fs Wfte.ph UtE1 men Spe:d cf Tewin, S'/~cf 'A**/%'ess /tc ' No Ssc . t.lle Thickness Compe< sed I5 C2v:e:g1s Requessed ~e2 fat <<R tvs 78 2 47. d s'fA'tASP Coveege e Ci en 'A f/'SSf-.S p.s7-n .9+7. t afath Asa oesse being missed by compectees? If se, where. = hen?. nee is compection pesteen? Is is seeisfectory? If nee, why nes? fuse eksesk eere<hed) Al n = Teres freling. nee eemediel ection was sehen? Men was she sees essessed? How meny estes coveesses were sequessed?. In = hat retos? Wes esquese fulfilled? N 0 Al E -
' teisshs linelude noneenformier 'ee speettiseelene. sime n end les'erlene et ee'<E e.me,bl NOAJE e'r 14weibee of coverages en life partially compacted lose shife V
- 5. Itxmbee of lifes placed'end compected ehls shife MN #N MWi 1 NIU*
! Nun.See of coveveges en life pereielly compersed et and of this shife M/Y A g6sesk mer be necesked se seele et euee beong titled end eenpeered Indtseries <endisten et eroe es end et skIto, eewereges ete;!se14. eeverese s needed in ledleered eueen.
Inteesselens se end eenveeseeluis wish subtentencese(s) NIN
)
I s J
$ Er emia:eiens, diseus sten s, de<Is8ees N Af7BA $b/f'd/OAD
- SWft't-
. DAPN/i dEt'//kf/J Mt Ar 47YZip p- .p gu 45 pri7s,j .t"e a nny m n y. ,
l 3 ____--e,. - ev nma ' 4mt 7s5 5 i i lj cn u n ru ww w u a t e m nau 4 s , w ta u rw iim s n.m m rout - e (i "
, . EW W e 2 4 t '8M B M tt E 91 R %s e .i B G M '.4 /o~ % -
.i ohw. .e,M EleM,wou 8 ,ts,'s ,=,re:e as 4 ,e eeed,e.,e, e,s., wo- g e 1p p-m .
- __ _ e n n e-nTe n % ^/
f REVIEWt.U & tW W "" . v i _ 1. ieAn w~ n. x -C FNUiNttK ,i
. .- -- j y"; /// REVEWED BY._
,ers...,rw...,: . .,-ggty_// 7-# Jic._ -
.o p .,
y,^. [
. - e EBASCO Q. C. CIVU. .
ggm
~
)ld
- un EBASCO SERVICES INCORFORATED i
j WATERFORD SES - UNIT NO. 3
/ '
QUALITY CONTROL WORK SHEET
. IDCATION IIDA 3 DATE /S .#3 - 7.5-
' ST #7Mr/CM3rcov- e I
i i 1 1 i.
/}ea 72vo f,9.g;,., ,,, , , , , , y,,, ,9 gig n, pmpatr i.
to pussss nra. ;. YMN O SNEL L Yd/c ' Matt rf b j~, b
+
fN p n
~
j . . X X/y - h 13 *' \ Q . r. t 7 Iq- xiq.. .
. I I 138 c. i 1
. 's a 1 g}gED 8L ,
ACCEPTED ,, ENG\MEER LEAD Q. 0 n ./ .
/
p stG. .
- i. 1 REVLEWED BY
. 5. & Yg -
1 g . EBASCO Q.C. DIVIL y
Mck w m, Mi p'it . EBASCO SERVICES INCORPORATED
. WATERFORD SES - UNIT NO. 3 SITE SOILS' ENGINEER - APPROVAL FORM Data fE S3 ?S Loc tion kAl- f Iklf b Quality Control forms reviewed fC- 98 / Od[4 #EA? .
Approval Rejection [oA ! N #7 '
$F[sfDSJ7 Signatu dan,/# jm Comments / Recommended Action te 1-e e _ _ _ .
t"'A g . W ' Remedial Work Report
. . .- n o arr5PTED
, .gtht,VEU *
. '..".r~t 9 C C Q /'
@O k U*
n
/[
_ ,, y i- m e - un. - QC Inspector: Remedial Action: Accepted Rejected Site Soils Engineer k, a QC-132 REVIEWED BY ,
. ..s n . N E . v " A 1 .sitio s o M h M , 30oY8
. .. .. ... . ... M s A u vi str;w' =r 2, ca ....;. ... M .
EW ,k , -4tc' ... 12 -- m ,. E
...... a c.t r o .
p... n.. W E 7. " 15 7
.W ANTITY UNIT gg. p gg p r sfI NA ;can % \, c t v. ( w 140 6t,cie) .
/) . > *
~
A m])b$N/
' - 1
,if ~
F i% c<fM w ,y -
--!f co; vg. mestavso As.vs I IV N
, YE '*/.9w. .
. g --- .. . ..
N..h..iQ. . :.FYYiftYjb". . . . .... .
. . - . . I l ., . , ,
t
'r r... . .
o n g,, ["" 4 -- * ' ' 5;
.. , a l
* , N.%p A atttNCD Q
\ M *
.a y5 05 75 =1 i , .
i l .
ggg. wSSMi REQUl51T10h OH WAREHOUSE fff't U v ww w
. v. . .E . , . .
' S.].e l_ 4.e5 :s& LL 5 ' I 4er 'R /a.n le e f...... .. OO DATE b 19
. _.unn n.. '502 % SY
~
.. n.. WA3-Ila6 ARTICLES OU AN TITY UM47 (Desube Folly)
.a wo irt;m+:;- 3=': I4..< h In k- +
, ,. g r
~
. . 4 A A .
g, a . mECElvtOAS.YE-
,,o..
^^ "
-
- e1 E6 .
.... a % -
- I ' '**
l .
. l, l a 138b .
i
%d .
.a
> . a n t ,q o,
. Q g T15 *L l' .
(E?pf/__3 c.f4 ^
. ,q ,
l-l- 'RS> t
... . ;:t
- : '::, y,*
l i l';'. ...,, .
~
FBB lFBBMRTlBN W,y..$ BN1 !
~'~
ge . .rO2] S7/.A. ..... .. .... ' Dry '. L'er Density 1si.G - 1165 HV INSTA h 0N - UdIT NO. 3 ; Wit 7 T1 .oistura Z DENSITY OF S0IL - IN ibACE - RUBBER BALLOON' ASTM D-2167 e' FD LD . Lab. Std. ! Vet Voltme Wet Moisture Dry % lM l Tc:it No. Test Location Veight Ft.3 Density f/Ft.3 % Density f/Ft.3 Density Compaction C g* j 3 -l f Y e - SY-(,7v 6Cl2es,v/J '],1o ( .015f) loV. 2 c.. Too. 6 to2,0 q(,.9 . 5-z 747 N,(o 673 P 6- % 52f6 to.o1 . loi'l )' 77.0 V.
42,7 '.G-a .s / 'l
,o Qg10l
&M C G 0 y 42 6 '(911 f I g,9 {.C. .s' c3,6 e- ,
I s'-4 , tw" ~ p.. (,K - 55,-Ze,25# 'I.W/ ;093/ t o0,:$ L,,@. 9/,/ -
-C 2, 3, -
s-s , bv1,h,- 11.5 4 4l,q 67/o c s,-oc , oJ /l.72q ,o76r. J (00 8- g M Ffli;5BATfilil NtB w '
.11 JI ,lVilil L 11
~
c ..
?~ . . Iaf
.C I
. k I L
k> i
= k - ,(-- L .- T l sto i
\
h
~
n!?#ED & ACCEPTEn f [ 38 CN '& J teia o. c. nacineta a 1 _ .. _ _ _ g-E IG. L \ Ac[#, _ .yg
. DATE V IEASCO Q. C. C Vit .r go 3
[ l l l [.\
- - Date: I 'L3 3y: i ~
%" J - . - -
N-33%rt Form (9-30-75)
6 ----.--waimumm-s ..we., ,m m, - . - - . . . ts U U t r u
..!~A NA m5m AHlph ~
- .N .
41 chh ' fk N. M, 5 ' m . sn
=
". 8 ?, '
3 f
\ $
/ E o =
E
= G
/
s I
- 4 O
e 5
/ \
ai-O .
/, -
s . e
\
m
\
% Nw~
V
/
A ,/ J/- n
/j l
f
- 7
/\ /
_ / e
. v y z< .
A B C D E F G , TWICAl.100 FT. GRID SYSTEM FOR g:
'. . 1Ee1 <-_e JOR Ef0R K l0N D E'M "'E -H
. ' - ~
I . .anar.nruau car.An ELELTRIC STATION . **a. Dry .S t Density 1980 Density 1165 W INS . TION - UNIT NO. 3 ' Moicturo 2 DENSITY OF SOIL - 1 O CE - RUBBER BALLOON. ASTM D-2167 , , .-
. ~
Vet Volbee Wet Moisture Dry . Test No. - Test location Weight Lab. Std. I Ft.3 Density I/Ft.3 % Density I/Ft.3 Density Compsetion s Comments
#7 (s-/3g.og 9.97 .0%
'Y n99 2cc2. 99.9 111.7-- 89.7 )m- !
p' T fo73 Es-37-v/06 C).6% .ti7h 12 3.7 2.1,-) to g, L, i n i.o g(,, g j 3, -
."r .
47f Ef--45,2ta 8. Lo ,0foSi n.L.o 2'$.(o tol.9 LI G 7 - 8il y
' / !
[g
/
/ To_
.ne
/ . g
'~' '..
.' '. .'l ,\ v l '!.. *
.I y
'. -- / '
3 y . a i
.. . / n -
/ '
y
~ . +
g t m s ,NM
/ '
1" O 1El32" O N N M Pit T7.'i"* 3 S ITT l'h M E 51f16)
\ j f
l' r
/ \'
, , n A By: /} b Date: /2!3 7I
'\ 8- 30-)fr W"H QC-53 Short Form'(R-30-75) .,
= . _ . . - - - - -- .. -
, .3 .) / i 1 ; ; i :1
, N
~..
e
' . * .*
- l v
k e h I* I-, I I 9 6 h r I
l 4 Na e 5m Ahap 8%
~
J. A. JONES CONSTRUCTICU COMPANY
~
WATERFORD UNIT NO-.3 .
~ SLOPE PRDIICTION INSPECTION REPORT Report No: / Specification No: /CC/GI. M2 - __
Project No: N-8l Y Quality verification Inspector .b Date: 7 Il 9 [p ll*N D. .. . . . Location: N. NM-6M b Weather conditions: 4.lldsO 6Mes MD MN
' NE4r rM2D cF- N WAt.-
Horizontal surface blade cleaned (3 feet from vertical face): YES # NO
. Coments:
Installation of gunnite: Average thickness: C*N47_ ~2.- __ Gund te over entire exposed vertical surface and minimum 3 feet of vidth on ad-jecent horizontal surface: Yes / What LengthoGP *d No Couments: Any aquipuent or materials on shell filter blanket. No Yes Consnent: 1 Has polethlene ownbrane been spread on a 11 mat adjacent to work arca: l Tes No # Consnent: Has gunite been trizumed: Tes o Cocment: ___
,A t d. ~
1( etent%esGM coma e - All surprus materi=1 and. overspray es no Ce==nene: l h hh Form No. W-3ITP-9.1
*g@%h, ss- fl o@ y .'.Y t .
m aw y 101IN?0RN U DNI Wi
AttccEme'nt No. 8.1 N3*h$$)
- h J. A. JONES CONSTRUCTION COMPANY ' '
WATERFORD UNIT NO. 3 _ CLAM SHELL FILTER BLANKET INSPECTION REPORT _
- ^ #
- f, e b , $ f' Specification No: [rX/ /SZPI,#B2 - J'~."'
i% ~" ," 7 ' ' l Project No: 3b'3l7 q V. Inspector O Date: 1~f3~7b 1 Placement Area / Location: 8TRie h ( "d O t- \ ( \ 4,W ' y
- 2. Release for installation and Compaction Obtained: Yes No
) Z /:) .
Materials Released by the Engineer: Yes l No A /./t ( Gw/c .) hh.
- 2 /3 fi ct 3.
4 Spreading and Compaction Equipment as Specified: Yes No
~
- 5. Filter Cloth Properly.Placed: Yes No Comments: -
- i
- 6. Clam shell Material Clean: Yes i No Coments:
a-g Nts:5er of Passes: /O Comments: d /4&d#S ,
- 8. Clam Shell Material Properly Compacted: Yes No Coments: 07 E h
- 9. Alternate Method (s) of Compacting Acceptable (if used): Yes No Coments TNe/
l 10. Final % acted Thickness Acceptable (10 to 14.5 inches): Yes No Comments a m an n saan,n -
- 11. Repaired Areas Acceptable: Yes No coments: OA/ d- .
- 12. . Surface Tolerance Acceptable: Yes / No Coments: IA.
g-.
- k 04 /n- Y
. 13. Weather Conditions Acceptable: Yes o Comments: bLoudy t
! 14 Clean-up Properly Performed: Yes No Coments:
; ( Other Remarks or. Comments: V sf 4 4/ w E /
d
] .
l
~
gk h3 Sii7 Ip o
\
.s <
z-n-u Zver xrseer sra,p d.i. . I. i. goezs-. rw e ~m , . , , Y su
, g 7an- a s i useY .1.49 ~42.06 ~4s C7 yb fr~
tot w ug.ur.w.urci;, .ue e w .2 -
. ,. N 41 er- B t rzg ./co 756 0 ?'; , ___9 , ff ro 9f /co TIO s.?
l
. r,
. l u
O .4
'.' 6.}f f.2 5 Sin 195 6.0 43- ~ ;/ g.ro g tjs gd (y '
4 3 *I$~ 1m str too 7s; so 2gl ~0 _, g s so >s soo i so . I
+ ,s
.;kcSN*' ? s s.a w .u, i:ro a c.os- GE* 9 4-f W N
,.,x n , s,, ,, so r ,- 6 a - ~ --- -
.n.
..s a
i d.
- o. .
a.2
.s
- 138
% ! REVIEWED & ACCEPTED
% / , t.EAD q. C. ENGiMEER . .
i te 2 f , ,, g - DATE_ JOR INFORMAIl0N RY ' _ - o
h \ '
' ~
- _3=11-74 X-<<i1* %eaf s A s)), .s9:.,s *4-9X WB fW .
us. % ,s'>J., >> p n; M far p
,,'r .,. n,
-si.1r 1xr, l'
,.i, , .;,... ;<
n ( f*1fdetf./7e u ,i
~-
wni er .ur y "so r.e su s., , - t i
/3 n' /3r- *. 7.s~
- do 2., r
~ in w sz. or an m
-.s o arso re". /** '**
i
? I
~_
f) .T Y$ f(4 >27 .R*7Y .9*3 E 3*Le
,,(
' ff9"
. .. ; ~ 7 ,. u- d'ff Jo Ys f Ef fZJ NF Ze4
-1 . un ir - .
>. = ~
s, l
*
- m rz su m rs,
- f. ' Y **T' Me 7 ~~ re 2,. sn .r<-
gy 9 s,,I ,,, u, sv u. I
, k= re fr Isme ,/Je
'% %:,'n- .
,na 3.i z.
-ar.za -
., .i
'N.- ,
i i . .t
- f te% REVIEWED & ACCEPTED
- i. ig138 AL 4 1.EA.D q. C. Ela\MEER f6 g gn .g %
r. g _stG. DATE. k
'/
- s. 5 gg g " ^ " ' ' '
WATERFORD STEA11 ELECTRIC STATION W 1980 - 1165 PN INSTALLATION - UNIT No. 3 ' SOILS CONSTRUCTIO;4 - laspection Repert
, osen d ~/'/ ~ 7&~ sheto / w..uk.a feca/ - hfA7/L or //fl8:bn m 4-A,..w..i.4 STX*/# Rf M
~
A n ... EI... I..: si.,e .t ssite End .t shari T.e.1 t.. 4. c....... I w..k'A.. ,tisk.4. c... .od r,. ,... SN#4a - PElwNep 4. o4 CM4d'ec 3 - A-D 114A uf /C PAffff Ar/ rn t* wri-ra'r ' cf f'Ar>1,9 6a
$ h.16di'7~ 'S}/v- Hn Fite3C PlV c .O E4Sr S*/M E5 o
Jeek .t ik c si, vest.a ra,ineer fee s ils
~
o.I,i. .f A4.e.,s.t M d IC h7-M/ Typs.f. . ele t. de s.rik f.se. /.s.r.. ...e.t... ( : .a. s ..e. ..ae.-taer.#,a.a air.,., .o e ,. .<t. t ..,t..
. ..&.a)
,, S N d*l '- A9?fp / ~ ~2 s ubMf /^ S/ 3 d .
y m, . uir -
, t. Ifs Thi.k...s tt.g.,is.4 M~ bYAf/Id '~
A.8..Ilr Pl.c.4
- I
\ as .,n.,c.:....e. s..s....o , Mone s yanyfn S, bCM?T2 x tuu q. . .. . . . -. - . . .
, j
;;a ,3 ,c.
in.
. .. . . . .s..., Wk-
.. , ,- - i n L--;//
p;g r/i iw w .s. : l rg.. e tta.'.ti.e. Okt.,. tote oss n ...; d....is,.) f6&Cd'O <//fE t. /S' W " 6fr l 1'*d iNSuK6 f/J* *PF/L $t/EYl'
,, ., - - = As la
<i '
we e mse=catar 4 m 9 U Cf o I Fli 1 !' 11 HiW L 10 M! i 4.! !&T38 2 l M-
%)RM 1A l~l HillHili4 5 Him 11, ll Es R I W B I;5 W $3 t M Sitw a u I
LM i \1 t/ l c - -. 6 <u . r. s. is.. , , , . ,<,. . . .. . . ,, . .., t.. .
'lw 0 ut a
. ,.. . , . . . s . . , a ,
m v . g BY
\
Y. YAL*6E41.- I!_
- * '/V EBA wnt1t'e'nm -
.: = , , . - .4 I
Faru No. QC-93 (9-17-75) . I _ _ _ _ __ ( QG**ts'!Ul*'__o*1 _ _.
e r . e+ = gg m sm M.21p
/
..... .. ....-..... . z ....>.. ..... .h... .. ....h.. .. ,-..i... .... i. ...i .. ..r.....,
cou eucur uo. uooc s. wo. l rncoucacy viue racour=cv v in c racoucuev vin c 5'r> Y.5L' D01w.A i ' '
\/ 18,lMee .'s! d~ t r FA (SM Pr!D,W') ) '
s,.24 . T. ., <## #A'o/:e'N'M ut. Thick....c. ,...J Jo nism 2 W 6ww /6i,ih+ 2#oW& ca....,.. n.v.. a c.,...,.. c , .
- 4. . .. . . 6. i., -i . . . e 6, . ,. . ... . ? : . .. .h . . .. h .. ?. wk . i s . ... , . . .i , . .. . ..? . i. . . . . r. . . .,y 7 it . . .. .h r . . . t r .. .a...n ..... has AM, As 5 -
Y. t '
'; T . . . . r. ; i. . . n . . ..ai . : . .. .. .. . . 6 ? n .. .. . h. .. . . .. . . . . eJ ? H. ., .. .y . a ., . . .. e e .g . . . . . e e . g. e . i .d ?. l . .h . .
S .....? .w.. ..w... r.,in::a7
.a .
Rsmo,L. (I..r de .... ..t. ter .. e,..t!I..ei..., ,Im.. ..d I...,s... .Ie..k , m.,L)
.. kit .: -. _..
f, n .s., . .... .. . . .. is t ,.. .i r 7 . ,... 4 i. .. .h a re o -
j ti 6., . tir . , ..a .a ...,....a .hi . .hir. # a n., s., . ..... .. . . n t. e...i.i rr ..... .. a .. .a . i .hi . .hi r. /d 4 .n...h r s......hs ..... ..I ..s....resta .a . ,...a ,ai..., ,4.a,,,...t.,...,.a .I.6,1,..........
. . .or . ,a. ...... , . . ~ aa s. oat. . .. a ... . . . .
to... ..i... .. . a ......... . .i h ..,6. ....... M 3 3 - f 1 4 ca% v.- si r air n 9 A o r D'T C- -G
.s g y . .w s .u . s w + ~ ~
$ E. i...i .. Ji..w..i .. Je.l.i . N I9S $ *-.- ~a -' "'*-**"""^
2 (; -""L 8,.rAU t). V. f ;Ns;amLat ,
* . . 4 Af i A 'E . W _ _ _ _ n ,,i,r ,n/ -,.t'D.4 //
s yme v ~ m
, , . = _7x t
3
~
, ot h., i. , ., . . ... .. . . u. ..,4,., . ,. 4.. .. s.a. : . ,. ) . . .. .. . ain . . . .. .)
MhM !! N Y # "N
;' E R P li n . 4
' tH E E H 4 W H fs N ii fl '4 G 65 Inti %
J %! M iM P'4 9 W pX 2 A n e t h sti i l Ett i I L. ht
.J n!' < m Iaa.
M P I ? E t '.i G. W, . E. e S- N 3 5 tf
. 31W L i myg
', ;fq . .., .- . . .. .m - -
3
.-m ~. ~ -
- . - _ ____- _ _ -_ _ er n n . ,
ee-M-Mck w3 590 MD pcio EDASCO SERVICES INCORPORATED WATERFORD SES - UNIT NO. 3 SITE SOII.S ENGINEER '- AFPROVAf FOR!! ..Dato 0/lh/lb " Locction TA/P 'T4 [i,i9,97 $sEsi. 5irx 8mgpr - Quality Control forms reviewed $6-93 gd$b //2. d)C-83 Approval Rejection Signaturc //&i /f 2 2f}+ 74 f
/ /
Comnents/ Recon: mended Action .... .
~ 1 1
/
Noxe .
- ~ .
Kem:dia!
. m -
N
- - , , ,m.*C D
~
~
8 ' d * '.' - - u.pa y. a. - --
~
@/-7h _o'.I^ #
QC Inspector: tenedial Action: Accepted Rejected br(, C-132 Site Soils Engineer
. u . ., <
NLA m ia n ><
. - W 3 5 ' 3 REov.sition oH WAREkOUSE @3fM 'T- O/3 d
~
i cio:, ,.., ,M'/" / // /I 'I2 ' / $ d- ...... .. */ /c' - _- ..., 8 = ,
,,,,no,dF/*.I, d i Y ut-? /
s ..o. no. <4/ 3 -/.TN-. --
***"'" *" to.S'$*.v'$n,s
_ h. ) ?Y- /. .,'.c a :. i S t. 9 d- 3 L. v e ep"
# -2. / J . , f 7 c
.- O N a.: .. n. 'd\J E -
,,c,,,,..,, %, M ,e & %
kn Mck.<. eg?f547y1Q-'~~"'c"~' 6 e 9 9 g e b REVIEWED & ACCEPTED Q8p 20 g. =ya , _SIG. f DATE 6 .
- i . - .
O I 'gt O
; ,'S2376y .
~
IDR INf0HMAiluidDNLY !4*
. T.
}
a k'
sw,w - w r:m e 2
--etty g , - +j t.
)n %"~.,,
- t 1 t 3'- g _
- .:: 1'2 3 ; .i c 1 o '5 y 9 a L
}. g f .8y c
~" f. I- Nn ;;,; 4
% 6 3 3 1 a 3. .3. !
()
$ w,,e !
e tv1 p 3 ,3 v I y5 ed - co. . t .- s. a - w e - t, n l C o3 e- .o e q m: re e :- as o - e 5 g- en e o co co m m H-g 3 J ' u o - *
%. s 3558 y !
ml g g- - u i 4 r - e ': 3 .= n , ya. p n . o . o m . m. ,A .- - a
-_ 4 s
' 3' (0 ,
is o-
d E- -
o e o 0 -
- '- 2
- 79
., 's; Ma u
- a, = _
3- : v s ac
- e. .
c, -
== =1 .o 3, a,
Cw e -* m e W, - ni 3 a
,8 : m co . t~. - .-
- r.. g c
. :s ,., . . ,_3 t . . .
w o r n-e- s sn e= y
.eo >e
- ==. t: o a_
6' e, e : S i iMe%- w c,
- s ==a _ - ,u _
' j-1 E ll: , !P - +fto -
l .
< ro so ; - u -.
u E es u A - 3 d L ~3 A 2 J "q C-A - [$ r3 q' ts Y
,N -
3, J. d
.( '
Mk e,
}
)s h i #i' T N <. @ .'. -
E . ir T-5 a m G d e, y il!c4 i 3} . M i + L_<4
;(. .g g ' "
x m s -s :
- 1. H .=: n. . ..
' a .a e CO S 'P '^ *
E -
- E,l 2 3 -
rI O . 5 i
's.n e e s
'h- .
2
.n L. 6 -
C ts3
': *
- I q\
f- '..'
- -o u .?? c'I O t'l -
ac
. o o _o
~ .
u
- p - - .
7 s3, y P i .o N o 7 . r\ mm \ -
%g .A
- :o . FM Mo a.
.o I .4 p w- % n --A o 5". k W 6- N.{ n
-a hao t-
'e- @ o .o c4- to mo in I r.
- q. - I9 S
~
k, c3 N ,
) $
(0 O . 9- 9 9 %f Pr ' h' - u r-- (1 o .a <l: . J4-C d
.c et - , o 's- L 4 c--
tg a sn. e ss . o fu c .a . $hsgg f.4 -fO
>& c:. D ci, c ci, to f cb to t#'
e 3 .. 3
- ( t
\u e 4) y o 5 s- ( O. b ;-- 3 .2 M '::' h$ cp$ 9 - ;:'
i . ,, ,f
, o,, 3 q v-p .'y
.i;-
v .. -
. 7
.s
,.'[NN-s :. S ,s
.s.
+
.z s
'. ,v.[t0 . .-
3 og c;> 9 f... ( .
- .c w .. .:,. s,a. - 7 s :t
.a:
. _ - .A.
t e a - c - s s 9 .o .-
.i iu n.
5,: " 'E bc- s- i w - .- - hbis ,5 o c-;, njxo u = " . i. ,e .i vi i
- c.g u.i E,
g o i # 7 og , ra ' to a f/. o i-- ' tci ,- ..s i-tn '. cs3 i W .; @ $ f.: o Ch ca O, cJ T ---- 5(i
; m + + % W. _
L { ( o a o p .
.w.
N 4 N
--s
. #3 +\.i CE". 16J l- M C
of L-D y u @:: R y rs c~. tQN b. e r~ - P-
' V
'~
~ 3,G =
; .c, v
a -- . . - . - . . . . - . _ . . . . . . . . . . -. . .. Q s ,.,,/
s.-
, , gm eya a n
- ATERFORD STEAM ELECTRIC STATIr
'1980 - 1165 MW INSTALLATION - UNIT NO. 3 g -
_" r LOC OF LABORATORY SAMPLES g Leb. .
' Date Na. Location
- Sample No.- In Date Test Testi Required Completed Result
%*l't' P A
'/.76 r3 - a~ , c ~
*ai 9 *9 A- 56v4-L 4./17 2,u -l h ,a 2o
/0),3 9g j 17I o s - s'oa . t w s 4 -2.
0 4T f.i9 4 c omig 1 2. p-17v t,s - < w ,n ssa < 4 -b .. '- ~
"~ u, 9 & a 7q. g
'77.3 $ 3 b ,C,z e
- 4-( ~ 1i - ~6
~
s re
- r + foy,g /co, 4
#77Y b 3 - 119 , Qo s h0 Mon . si
' ~ ~ ,
~
e, B7. I, O.75'I 'D3 38% toe . 'a do#Ac'DN
~' 8 7 '
s rc ia + i, ic8.tG19.Tf'/o
'1 76- D 3 -iss , tce i.
,, 6. goirm o e3.7
'I W 0% usa,1-s e n.
Car.1R,<.rel,n
'11b' gr es.eer sca. are + "
<< ts D
- e. Ma e4 7 74 e 3'-ira,one 'i com pscruoa i, s n.,
S ,,,,,,., 7 M cca tetP roa. 4t m "
'u R. Siis i,
- 68. o N3 - Try trJ,iA U l.
te g,gpjeg,pgg wL 69. L. gf sre e + ,
'l81 05~ sonaou) ** '<
R. %t\w lt 96.9 : 3 t. 5 - ao ,;,w i'
&nnpe<:nm u Eg73M' l .
4 ce itEVIEWED & ACCEPTF0 k f
..neuren //
l.EAD Q. U. tnumygf f . nATE FEB 3E StG. Y~I T s. A qc-109A (9-30-75) Recorded By: [ 26 b - r. __ 3 !k --
-4.= MN _ -
NMe-w eth 4 *** *
- J ) / 1 ) i i i 7 4
e G
.o ;
b i
*,i i
1 s 9 f 4 1
.- - ~~ -
J l/ i 1 1 ) / ) I-A Use As Is: The Clam Shell Filter Blanket was installed in accordance with an attachment to technical specification LOU-1564.482. This attachment was a direct result of the Clam Shell Filter Blanket Test Report (Attachment III) and is a method specification. It requires a roller type and a number of par.ies on suitable clam shell. Compliance with this method specification is documented on the Ebasco Inspection Report Forms QC-93 typically shown in Attachment II Pages 5, 33, 72, etc. In place density tests were run for information to be provided to the Site Soils Engineer for review and technical evaluation. I-B-1A - Use As Is: The Gunite installed on the west wall of Strip #1 and on the adjacent 3 foot horizontal berm at el -40 Attachment II, page 1 was authorized by the Site Soils Engineer, prior to the placement of Clam Shell at this area. This was done to comply with specification requirements stated in the Clam Shell Filter Blanket Attachment to the technical specification LOU-1564-482 (Attachment III) requiring slope protection of the exposed vertical faces of the final phase IV excavation within 8 hours of excavation. Delays in Clam Shell placement prevented the placement of the shall prior to the guniting; therefore, to
- protect exposed faces, guniting was approved out of sequence by the Site Soils
(; / I Engineer. The horizontal surface mentioned was on the EL -40 berm at the top of V. - the vertical face and not in Strip #1 as indicated'in the NCR. No effects were a realized on the Clam Shell Blanket. I-B-lb - Use As Is: The thickness requirements of 10-inch minimum and 14 inch maxi =um for the _ Clam Shell Blanket as defined in the Attachment to technical specification LOU-1564.482 Page 13. " Placement" Attachment III) were designed for the following reasons: ,gk 1. rv0)< The.10-inch din imum % thickness Y was specified to provide the required permeability of the filter blanket.
- 2. The 14h inch maximum thickness was specified so as not to allow an overthick clam shell layer which could conceivably encroach into the base mat above elevation -47 and effect the concrete
,, . cover thickness under the bottom rows of rebar. 1 Practical experience gained during the actual Phase IV excavation indicated
~
- that excavatien usually exceeded the elevation -48.25 goal. Over thick shell I
areas (plus 1-2 inches) were therefore found to be below the elevation of the
; bottom of the mud mat and not into the area of the structural mat. In cases i where thick shell areas were measured, the shell was either shaved or the mud i mat thickness was adjusted. In all cases however, the bottom of the Class I foundation mat was kept to El -47.
t
= - . .; ~=.,.:.-- .
007 i J 0 91 0
.m 'e. i
_ The recorded thickness of 15 " on 10-28-75 (Attachment 2, page 5) and 15" on 10-29-75 (Attachment 2, page 17) are therefore found to be acceptable as is. I-B-2A - Use As Ist t : ( In localized areas where the permanent vertical faces of the Phase IV excavations caved in, and the gunite slope protection was destroyed, lean concrete backfill was used to reconstruct the vertical face and gunite layer. Since these areas were very localized, and since the lean concrete always provided the strength of the pleistocene clay it replaced and offered a vertical , face to form the structural mat against, this backfill procedure was approved l and used as necessary throughout the Phase IV excavation operation. The case described in 2-23-76 (Attachment II Page 30) is a typical example where concrete backfill was used for repair without influencing the design of the structural Ebasco procedures QCIP-6 and 7 and J. A. Jones procedure W-STIP-7 covers mat.
- structural concerate only. Therefore, no FCR or DCN was required for the use of lean concrete as a substitute for soil.
I-B-2b - Use As Is: A review of the referencad inspection report (Attachment II, Page 42) 4 (gg indicates the possibility of placement of clam shell into standing water 3
\r/ however, it is not clearly defined. The record further states that a meeting was held between construction (K. Flanigan) and Engineering (B. Watt) and the '
Site Soils Engineer (M. Teachin) allowing placement of shell. A review of the . technical specification LOU-1564.482, Attachment on clam shell, shows that the ! only moisture content requirement is af ter compaction. In-place density tests on this Strip (Attachment II Page 58. Tests 2-3 (670) and 2-4 (671)] indicate moisture contents of 5.f and 5.7% respectively. Therefore, the after compact 1on moisture content tests show the shell fill to be acceptable. t I-B-2c - Use As Ist t i Note: Refer to page 51 for problem statement, in addition to page 53. The inspection report referenced in Attachment II, Page 51 is explained in greater detail on page 53. From page 51, it is noted that no new shell was
, placed, only that localized areas of thick shell on the west half of Strip #2 were bladed to thin sections on the east half of Scrip #2. These localized areas were then recompacted by the pan (plate) vibrator. Page 53 clearly
{ indicates that the entire Strip #2 was properly compacted with a large roller. j , The exception of the localized repair areas which were properly compacted with the pan vibrator to the Site Soils Engineers satisfaction is in accordance with the specification requirements. i'- ! i t
%e ]
I 'i l 5 i
- . - - . . . - , --c - . . ,
-,-_--,,m., , -,n,, , ,-,.---.,_---,-n.-.,,_, - - - - - --.-_..m - --,- m- ,w. , - - - . - - ,y. -
..7_..._.
-. _ . .- f I
l 00/ l J 0 9 3 I l
.-., k. .;
I-B-3A - Use As Is: This is an identical case as described in Section I-B-2a of this NCR. Please see that disposition, which applies in this case as well. I-B-3b - Use As Is: In a review of the. number of passes placed on Strip #5 clam shall the following understandings were developed:
- 1. Shell placed and compacted 9-76 day (Pg. 102-103)
- 2. Thickness checked 9-76 night (Pg. 104-105) Notation of 6 passes given in previous shift is in error. Should have read 10 passes
- 3. Shell recompacted with 10 passes 10-76 day (Pg. 107-109)
- 4. Survey error in width of Strip #5 lead to the addition excavation of a narrow strip of soil on the south and of Strip #5 (approximately 8' wide). Clam shell was placed and properly compacted on this narrow strip on 2-13-76 (Pa'ges 110-113).
- 5. Site Soils Engineering approval of the original (narrow strip) was
; given on 2-11-76 (Pg. 109) prior to the discovery of the survey error.
- 6. Approval was given for the narrow strip on 2-13-76 by the Site Soils Engineer (Pg. 111).
In conclusion, it appears that 20 passes were given to ene originally cut Strip #5 which is contrary to the method specification stated in the attachment to LOU-1564.482, requiring 10 passes. The effects of this overcompaction of the clam shell are found to have a negligible effect on the quality of the final clam shell blanket for the , following reasons:
- 1. An extrapolation of the Settlement vs number of passes curve from the Clam Shell Filter Blanket Test Report (Attachment III) presented as page 138, Attachment IV indicates that less than " of addition settlement is realized by the application pf the addition 10 passes of compaction equipment.
i 2. An extrapolation of the % compaction vs. number of passes curve from i the Clam Shell Filter Blanket Test Report (Attachment III) presented j as page 139 indicates that approximately 1% additional compaction will p r be realized by the additional 10 passes of compaction equipment. f l ef . k l
- .. _ - .s_. ,_ .- . . _ . . _ . . . . . _ _ . . . . .
i 00/ I 1 0 -> J 2
.- . s .-
, 3. An Extrapolation of the gradation vs. number of passes curve from the
' Clam Shell Filter Blanket Test Report (Attachment III) presented as page 140 indicates that although the surface of the clam shell may undergo some alight additional breakdown from the 3/4" to #16 size l, screens, no additional - #200 particles will be created which could i effect the permeability of the shell blanket.
In conclusion, the overcompaction of the Clam Shell Filter Blanket in Strip
#5 created a less compressible, slightly denser blanket without effecting the permeability of the filter which is therefore found to be acceptable.
ITEM II - Traceability / Location Deficiencies II-A - Use As Is: The documented sizes of each of the Clam Shell Filter Blanket strips is presented in the geologic mapping report dated February, 1977 Figure No. I attached as page 141 in Attachment IV. The square fpotage of each of the strips is thus calculated to be: Number of Tests 7 Strip No. Surface Area ft Required h Actual 1 267(97.5) = 26.032 6 6 2 267(58.5) = 15,619 4 4 3 267(70) = 18,690 4 5 . 1 4 267(48.5) = 12,976 ft. 3 - 4 5 267(58.5) = 15,619 4 5 ,l 6 267(47.0) = 12,549 3 5 j 267(380) 24 29 4 l' Review of the above table indicates that each of the six strips had at 'l least the required number of tests and in fact, five (5) additional tests were performed in total. ji 4 Ii t
, , ~. - - , . .
, ,- ,~7-
,] tj */ l j I.} ')
33
.s ..
h II-B - Use As Is: As previously described in the response to NCR Item I-B-3B, due to a survey error, Strip #5 was cut 8 feet too narrow in the North-South direction. The
- addition strip excavated on 2-13-76 is documented to be on the South side of
, Strip #5 (pg.110) and is documented to be called the "Deyo Strip", and is 8 foot wide (pg. 112).
Item III - Engineer's Approval Prior To She .lacement III-A-(1-4) - Use As Is: In all of the strip placements listed except Strip #1, the J. A. Jones Clam Shell Filter Blanket Inspection keport Form W-SITP-2 was signed by the Site Soils Engineer on the line entitled " Release for Installation and Compaction obtained Yes I No ." It is true that the Ebasco Site Soils Engineer Release Form QC-132 From QCLP-1 cannot be found. However, the existing signatures on the J. A. Jones Documentation and the Release on Strip #1 indicate that the engineers approval was given. Refer to the following Site Soils Engineer Releases: Strip #1 Page 6 & 7 2 31, 37 & 38 . 3 64 & 70 4 85 5 98 6 126
, Item IV - Certification of Personnel - Use As Is t
Certification of the personnel referenced in this section of the NCR has been reviewed by Ebasco QA, GEO QA, and the Site Soils Engineer. In their responses to this issue, attached in Attachment IV, pages 154 - H59 , it is stated that all of the personnel listed in this NCR were qualified to perform
, the inspection they did, at the time they did them, although Employer i Certification did not exist. Therefore, the inspection by these personnel, t . based on their qualification, is acceptable. .
( , l, . t i
, , ~
. . = ._ , _ _ _ _ .
. , .. .z .- - -
007 i 1 0 9 34 Item V - Testing V-A-1 Use As Is: An analysis of the gradation of the compacted Clam Shell After 10 passes indicates that over 90% of the shell is smaller than 3/4 of an inch (page 140) and over 60% of the material is smaller than of an inch. In accordance with the Site Soils Engineer's interpretation of the intent of Table 2 of ASTM D-2167-67 it is our understanding that a minigum test hole volume ranging from .050 (b" material) to 0.075 (l" material) ft would be - acceptable (page 142) using this interpretation all of the 29 clam shell dehdity
, tests are found to be valid. The variance in the use of minor reduced vplume in the size of the density hole has a negligible effect on the test result in this Case.
V-B'- Use As Is: As stated in the response to NCR Sectiot II-A, the Clam Shell Filter BlanketTestingfrequencieswerecompgledwichusingtherequirementsfor density testing of 1 test per 5000 ft for the foundation materials, 24 tests were required and 27 tests were performed as shown in foundation material property table presented in Attachment IV on page 141. V-C - Use As Is: 3ased upon the geometry of the phase IV excavation, as shown on design drswing 10U 1564-G-489, Section A-A, the elevations of the foundation and clam shall tests are known as follows: Bottom of Plant Island Material: -47.00 2-3" Mud Mat (Avg. 3") -47.251 l 10-14 Shell Blanket (Avg. 12") -48.252 Using this information, elevations recorded on each Ebasco Inspection Report (QC-93) typically shown on pages 32, 65, etc., and the North-South and East-West coordinates on the density tests forms typically shown on pages 31, 132, etc. , the three dimensional location of all foundation. tests (El -48.25) and clam shell tests (El -47.25) is found. l Relative to the note on the location of clam shell density tests 453-455, these tests were located properly but plotted on the wrong grid (pg. 27). A ,; second grid was used for the foundation and clam shell testing program locations
, as typically shown on pages 61, 82 etc. Replotting the density tests 453-455 on
- this grid, as shown on Attachment IV, page 143 shows these tests to fall d ,
randomly within Strip #1 as indicated on page 27. b l
. -_m..
007 1 1 J 9 3 5
.c 3, .-
V-D - Use As Is: In accordance with page 9 of the geologic mapping report dated February, 1977, and enclosed in Attachment IV, Page 144, each foundation density test had a proctor test run on the density hole material and surrounding material (50# sample) to determine the exact percent compaction. The results of the in-place ., density tests and their corresponding proctor tests are presented on the final geologic map presented in Attachment IV, page 141 along with the minus 200 data and the exact location of the test within the appropriate strip. Final acceptance of foundation density tests was made in NCR-W3-193 copy attached as pages 145-149. V-E - Use As Is: A general review of all of the changes discussed in this section of the NCR are the result of a review of by testing results performed by the laboratory itself. Although the changes were improperly entered on the test records, it is believed that these changes were performed in the interest of correcting errors detected during quality reviews within the testing laboratory itself and are
, therefore acceptable.
V-E-1-a - Use As Is The following discussion may explain the discrepancy in the volume recorded in test 452. Onthe.initialdensityrecordrecordedinthefieldfQC-83Pg.24)avolume of .0736 ft was recorded yielding a density of 85.0 #/ft . Upen review in the lab, on the same day, the inspector reced that the volume of this hole was larger than the two following holes he dug which he may have felt was not true ' dug to his negory of the situation. He therefore adjusted the volume to .0636 ft , a .01 ft adjustment which he believed could have been a reading error on the sight tube on the densometer (pg. 26). This is a possible explanation of the change and if it is accepted or not, this cast 452 can be voided without influencing the quality of the shell since it was taken af ter only 6 passes, and not included in the permanent record of required tests taken after 10 passes. t
, V-E-1-b - Use As Is:
The Density Test Record on page 20 is a field copy dated 10-28-75. Due to t a significant number of changes and noted recorded in the field, the form was rewritten for clarity on the following day (gage 22 10-29-75) and a recording
- error in density test 495 in volume (8.01 f t ) was corrected. In addition, i -
foundation proctor valves were inserted in the proper boxes and percent compactions were calculated. The form shown on page 22 a corrected record and g superceded the form on page 20 and is acceptable as is. L. ..-- L' i
+
1
. -. -. . - .. .- - ..= . ..- - =_ ~ -
Y* t 00/ I J 0 9 4 6 to r :t w. V-E-2a, 3A - Use As Is: A review of these records indicates that in several places, data was erased and changed. In all cases, corrected data appears to be consistent with other data recorded in this strip. It can only be concluded that these changes were i made on the spot by the inspector for the purpose of correcting errors in recording the data. Example; page 118 test number 751 changed to 752; Test 748 location E6-84N changed to 74N. Although these changes were documented improperly the corrected data is consistent with the valves of unaltered test data on the same scrip and is
- therefore considered to be acceptable.
] V-F-1 & 2 - Use As Is: 4 On page 119 of Attachment II the note at the bottom of the page indicates that in the inspectors opinion (due to a local compaction operation by the hand operated plate compactor) the clan shall was broken to a greater extent than ) normal. In this case the increase in Lab Standard Density from 102 to 105f/Ft3 d was more severe on the % compaction calculation.and is considered to be conservative and acceptable.
- Inasimi14rmanner,theugeofaclamchellmaximumproctorvalveof 3
{,".;.' .
. 102.7#/Ft instead of 102.0f/ft on page 132 could only yield a slightly lower :
L>" compaction and is therefore considered acceptable. Item VI - Documented Deficiencies Without Corrected Action , VI-A-la - Use As Is: - As per the NCR response to Section I-B-la and I-B-2a, the replacement of gunite is outside of the neat line of the Class I excavation and above the shall
- , blanket. This type of operation was performed so as not effect the quality of the in-place shell blanket. Even if minor effect were realized on the surface of i the shell blanket, this area (10' wide) is so localized that effects on the permeability of the shell will be negiglible.
i VI-A-2a - Use As Is: i
- i l; , The wooden stakes referred to in inspection reports for gunite in Strip #2 l page 29 and 29 are in the 3 foot horizontal gunite berm at E1 -40 at the top of ll the Class I vertical face. They are outside of the Class I area and although it ij was preferable to remove these stakes after guniting, in some cases they were j l- left in place to support the gunite facing without any effect on the quality of
!! the slope protection. " !l
.~,.
4* .f
- ii.
'i.
- - . , . . - . ~ . - -- - -- --
007 1 1 0 037
,e7. V VI-A-2B - Use As Is:
I The defective shell thickness shown on page 36 (12-12-75) of Attachment II was corrected as stated on page 42 (by blading shall from the west half of the strip). The final thickness of 9 inches is documented on the inspection report 3 attached as page 41 with the statement "0K on 12-12-75". The East half of Strip
+
#2 was reviewed by the Site Soils Engineer the following day on 12-13-75 and
; found acceptable for mud sat placement as documented on page 45 of Attachment II.
VI-A-2c - Use As Is: As per the inspector's notes on page 42 of Attachment II, in a decision , between the Site Soils Engineer and the Construction Superintendent, clam shell was placed in standing water (in order to preserve the condition of the , foundation materials which would continue to swell and then dry and crack if left uncovered). In place density tests performed on the West half of Strip #2 numbered 670 and 671 (pg. 58) indicate that at the time of final compaction the standing water had drained away and moisture contents of 5.5 and 5.7% were i; realized compared to a maximum allowable moisture content of 20%. ' VI-A-2d - Use As Is: ("*.o Y A review of the documentation from Attachment II pages 32 through 53 indicate that in two locations on the South half of the East half of Strip #2 contained saturated localized spots of foundation silts. Upon compaction of the Clam Shell Blanket, water from these silt foundation materials was vibrated to . the surface of the shall rendering the shall compaction unacceptable. Five i shell drainage sumps were excavated and pumped to remove excess water. Upon
- further compaction, foundation silts pumped up through the shell causing a small
- I; localized " MUD" pocket. The sumps were backfilled with shell and recompacted with a plate vibrator (pg. 37) and the mud pocket was allowed to relieve its hydrostatic pressures for a day (pg. 36). Similar liquification problems of the
;, foundation silts were noted and treated (pg. 46) on the West half of Strip #2.
li Final approval of the entire strip was given by the Site Soils Engineer on
- 12-15-75 as stated on page 45 & 53 noting hand compaction of mud pocket areas ii and that the sumps adequately compacted and approved.
9
, VI-A-2e - Use As Is:
- The understanding of the cut and fill operation documented on pg. 51 of ji Attachment II is as follows
i 1 1 1 L' . %
.i ii I
i . . . . . . . . . _ _ . - .-
~
-. . .L _. .. . . . . . . - - - . -__
.-9-..: y:-[ , ~ . .
007 1 0 0 933 gr. f 12-13 day Cut & Fill +2 passes Pg. 42 12-13 Night 4 passes Pg. 43 Total So Far 6 passes As Per Pg. 46 t 12-14 Day Remainder of 6 passes Pg. 47, 48 This documentation indicates that the original Clam Shell Filter Blanket was compacted with twelve passes prior to the cut and fill operation documented on page 51. The inspection report on page 51 indicates that only one inch of material was moved and that the plate compaction of this one inch of loose material was found acceptable by the Site Soils Engineer as documented on page 53 approving the entire Strip #2. . VI-A-3a, 3b - Use As Is: 4 Based upon the problems documented in Strip #2 concerning liquification of the foundation siles during compaction, drainage ditches were cut along the North and South lengths of Strip #3. This is partially documented on page 69 of Attachment II. The drainage ditches were 2 foot deep and 3 foot wide, covered with Miraff; Filter cloth and filled with shell. The normal Clam Shell Filter
- Blanket was then placed on top of these ditches (acting as foundatiou material)
, gy?. and due to their narrow size needed no special compaction since compaction to a N3D reasonable density would be achieved during Clam Shell Filter Blanket Compaction Oper,ations. This same drainage scheme was used in Strip #5 and is adequately documented i as to location and geometry on page 100 of Attachment II which is typical for ! Strip #3 as well. . VI-A-4a - Use As Is: No special knowledge is known of how this change was made. Documentation available indicates that gunite placement on the West third of the North Wall cf
~ '
, Strip #4 originally need to be trimmed. Later during the shift, the gunite was trimmed and the original form entry was changed by J. S. G. or D. S. G. or
- MR "X" (unknown).
Since the gunite was later inspected and accepted by the Site Soils Engineer prior to clam shell placement (page 85. Attachment II) on 2-13-76 and
' since the gunite is not a Class I material and is documented to be structurally thick enough the gunite, as placed should be considered to be trimmed back in an i acceptable manor. .
i } l 2
- 1 i
e 1 I . . . . . . - . . . . . . . . . .
i - . . - . . ---~~n . - + - - 00/ I J 0 94 9 i VI-A-4b - Use As Is: Although missing documentation is indicated in the placement of gunite on Strip #4, the Strip #4 was released for clam shell placement by the Site Soils Engineer on 2-13-83. Completed gunite slope protection is indicated'in Ebasco Record Photographs #607 (West Face And West Half of the North Face), #620 - (Entire East Face) and #624 which indicates a portion of the East half of the jl North face of Scrip #4. Copies of the photo's are attached as page 150 of ] Attachment IV and originals are available from the site photographer. t VI-A-5a - Use As Is: Review of the inspection reports on the gunite placeman't of both faces of Strip #5 dated 2-5-76 (pages 95 & 96, Attachment II) indicates that the
- overspray gunite was not trimmed off. The same day, the Site Soils Engineer and i Field Engineer approved the strip for clam shall placement (pg. 98). This indicates that either the overtrim was removed or it was located in a spot (example the outer edge of the 3' horizontal berm on E1 -40) that would not affect the Class I clan shell blanket or structural foundation mat. Therefore, the overspray is found to be acceptable without removal.
IV-A-5B - Use As Is: ( 'As in the discussion above, without the adequate documentation, it can only be assumed that the gunite contamination of the clam shall along the West wall l of Strip #5 was on the small amount of shall exposed on the Southwest Corner Strip #3 under the mud mat. This is believed to be the case since Clan Shell Placement in Strip #5 itself did not start until 2-9 4 days after the i placement of the gunite slope protection (pages 102-108, Attachment II). In all . strips excavated, clam shall in the common excavation face (in this case, the South edge of Strip #3 is the North edge of Strip #5) was cut.back to key the new shell into the existing shall blanket if the filter cloth was not present. Although not documented for Strip #5, this was a required construction operation, documented on the QC-93 form under the heading " KEYING" on page 1 of the form. Review of this item on pages 102, 104 and 107, indicates that the localized nature of this contamination (3' from the West wall in the Northwest corner) by , the documented entry "None". Keying was not required for this strip when the i filter blanket itself was placed. Therefore, it is believed that the small quantities of contaminated clam shell were removed and replaced and found j acceptable by the Site Soils Engineer on 2-11-76 (pg.109, Attachment II). 1 1 e 'f f ... . .. . . . . . . - . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
007 I J 0 190
. s. 13 VI-A-Sc - Use As Is:
l . A review of the Clam Shell Filter Blanket Inspection Report for the "DEYO" strip added to the South side of Scrip #5 (pg.111 Attachment II) indicates that the Site Soils Engineer approved the compaction of this Strip (Line 8) and indicated that alternate methods of compaction were not used (Line #9). The
; "DEYO" strip was cut after most of Strip #5 was already finished due to a survey !' error. The original planned size of Strip #5 ( SS') was originally cut to 50'
? wide and then expanded by 8' to a total width of 58'. The 3' oversize (58' compared to 55') was specified so as to allow for normal compaccion of this strip by the 12 con rubber tire, vibratory smooth drum roller which is 8' wide. The "No" on Line 9 is a statement that alternate methods were not used. This strip is therefore found acceptable. VI-A-6-a - Use As Is: As stated previously in responses to similar portions of this NCR the gunite is not a safety related material. In this case (pg. 124-125 Attachment II) the Class I Clam Shell was not in place when the gunite was placed. The tria and overspray indicated are primarily associated with gunite placement at the top of the vertical face on the E1 -40 berm. Therefore, no impacts on the Clam She* 1. Blanket or Structural l'oundation Mat can be realized by the lack of
?
.J. trined activities on the gunite slope protection. Signatures by the Site V Soils Engineer and the Field Engineer (pg. 126, Attachment II) indicate that the minor trimming activities documented on 2-9-76 were indeed performed and
, approved prior to the placement of Clam Shell the following day.
VI-A-6b - Use As Is: . Record photographs #648 (3-16-76), #550 (3-18-76), #662 (4-2-76) and #666. (4-2-76) located on the strip key plan (Attachment IV Pg. 151) and shown on pages 152 and 153 show the presence of the gunite slope protection in question. Although there exists at the present date, no documentation on its placement, it is known to exist and Clam Shell Filter Blanket Placement against it was found to be acceptable and approved by the Site Soils Engineer on 3-12-76 (pg. 130, Attachment II). VI-A Use As Is: i As per the discussion presented in this response to the NCR for section i VI-A-2d. The corrective action for the " Mud Spurt" was found to be acceptable l by the Site Soils Engineer and approved on 12-15-75. f'. i b i i
+
- l
s T A B Cgg D W3 590 E g G t B,
,. ,/;- zy i x
7 - s X
/ _ 2
(
.- C 5 6
g .g , b .
/ . .
b - s .
/'$ $ h
\}
O s )l A
. ~V '/
,! A B C D E F G [
.,,1
( ($ TYPICAL IOOFT. GRID SYSTEM FOR l s 138cA l TEST t.OCATIONS 5 4 W sP C ,
h(h W36W gg J. A. JONES CONSTRUCTION COMPANY ~ WATERFORD UNIT NO. 3 SLOPE PROIECTION INSPECTION REPORT Report No: / Specification No:_ [/)c//[d@, @2-Project No: 75- 3/7 Quality Verification Inspector N2/ d Date d f l$Yh Location: d n o #8 R/rM ///r[ Weather Conditions: N /" I // (Of/ Horizontal Comments: surface blade cleaned (3 feet from vertical face): Y'S / NO Installation of gunnite: Average thickness: Ipera y /3/,/ Gunite over entire exposed vertical surface and mini =um 3 feet of width on ad- ~ jacent horizontal surface: Yes V What Length er eor:= Y . X ' No Commenta: Any ' equipment or materials on ahell filter blanket. No Yes T, 0-7 Coaxnent:LNell h Ihr N N affd Usf M6NY/a/ d -S - W Has pelethlene Yes / No membrane Cpmment: po/14 beenDu/ spread
<SA) on<//M shell mat <2 6adjapent 4 ar/[to work ares A10^l d P r~ M d 42- 3 ' f.e-7"f Has gunite been trimmed: Yes No( l / Comment:
7~f*//!!N/NA O n b # f M s**f>l/.S ,
/Y/~S S/ -
\
All surplus material and overspray removed: Yes 1 No WCo= ment: T
&rs r>rm '
s.N -f alas,)L/A\ " ' SY \ g pgSa. l
'E 138 L REVIEWED & ACCEPTED Fom No. W-SITP-9.1 LEAD Q. C. ENGINEER c, FEB 219T/
SIG.g o DATE [Dgg,? X k % ef
~
l , L I
hCK e S"' J. A. J0tES CONSTRUCTICE COMPANY ggg - WATERIORD UNIT NO. 3 SLOPE PROIECTION INSPECTION REPORT i Report No: 2 Specification No:. c>v' 669,908-Project No: 74 ef/ 7 Quality Verification Inspector N M O __ Date: -55 I, [ /9 74 Location: 8b/o h FAS [ Weather Conditions: [/hdr* [ d.gf#/ Horizontal surface blade cleaned (3 feet from vertical face): YES NO Coments: Installation of gunnite: Average thickness: / M / k) Cunite over entire exposed vertical surface and minimum 3 feet of width on ad-jacent horizontal surface: Yes t/ What Lengthe y roy .5~4" # No Coments: Any Equipment or materials on shell filter blanket. No Yes Coment: Has polethlene membrane been spread on shel mat adja ent ps / un e~"e -nts An amm . Ps /4aworkarea:/ Pa sets 4 y_,' M r..s b W T$mmedi'Tes
& ** m m u d - v2cgp (TEs TJnT W Nor" V omment: _ ~
L ~ T"t"Im M s}A a L0n. s AoS d.reernDb$bsl / k/A e$ // Alt surplus material and overspray removed: Yes N Cet:xcent: owesora v ud e / nan / ao WW l g.p, % REVIEWED & ACCEPTED rorm No. W.51Tr_,.1 WD Q. C. EMG1MEER ffb StG. oATE--
,FEB25.yg[;
s . s,138 c EDB INFORMAil0N Ok !
g w3 sm gg
.- J.' A. JONES CONSTRUCTIm COMPANY '
~
WA2IRFORD UNIT NO. 3 SLOPE PROIECTION INSPECTION REPORT .-
**[ctarg O/: $ccac fdcTecretA/ ..'
Report No: 8 Specification No: [Al /E 9, [h Project No: ~I$~3I7 Quality Verification Inspecto& QM f m -- Date: */0/9A /V76 , Location: 87Rf9 5 M/EST NtLL Weather Conditions: -4
, ,u, 0
Eo Consne ental
- aurface blade cleaned (3 feet from vertical face): YES NO Installation gunnite: Average thickness.:
Cunite over en a exposed vertical surface and =4"4== Jacent horizontal a face: Tes What Length 3 feet of vidth on ad- ' No Coannents: Any iguipment or materials on filter blanket. No. Yes
#4 Connent:
Q. w 7 Has polethlene membrane been spread o/sh I adjacent to work area: Yes No Comment: Has gunite been trimmed: Yes No Consment: p
.All surplua material
^ N d overspray removed: Yes No Comment-
[ rrc%1%%
\ t v' '
N y (ws,te rs : WHur Gwsre C.sveo la , Cenyere 4 kaaso As Garr L ,% , o sea , fe rm.s ' . tvur ser Ti /a c pu, Liar Feg G u rr, Aivo J Ceneurt v4su Annex #nre's 3#r Tnex wn !:'aco E
/2uuce Gua;.rr, Form No. W-SITP-9.1 a e <%e REVIEWED & ACCEPTED
- 138 -%
% / LEAD Q. C. ENGINEER [feonst ay;a2.5'16; N.. ~
2 1977 y37g FEB sto. .-
-- + #
h (2 I!
** ttcE ent No. 8.1
; Strp+d'[M}$0$Og[y CLAM SHELL FILTER BLANKET INSPECTION REP R SpecifIcaeion No: [W /nd. @Z - p / ,. \l t.
Project No: D-3l7 q. V. Inspector: [ 'O - I Date: M $ "'74
- 1. Placement Area / Location: b"TA14 b \ / ~
V
- 2. Release for installation and Compaction Obtained: Yes No 4 .-
- 3. Materials Released by the Engineer: Yes / No /Y. 42 4 Spreading and Compaction Equipment as Specified: Yes No
'5. Filter Cloth Properly Placed: Yes / No Coments: ,
- 6. Ciam Shell Material Clean: Yes / No _ Comments:
h-Number of Passes: i iO
.) Comments: N N'8[7'
')
Clam Shell Material Properly Compacted: Yes Comments:/ 2 /4
- 8. No
- 9. Alternate Method (s) of Compacting Acceptable (If used): Yes N Coments:
N klof7
- 10. Finar Conpacted Thickness Acceptable (10 to 14.5 inches): Yes ts:
>< 8 AlI0l74 NfWh'H6*D Q% $ 56rws41A, SMYWY Mf T
- 11. Repaired Areas Acc le: s No Coments: @ '
Ce
')<. 'A/ 10 d
- 12. Surface Tolerance Acceptable: Yes X No4"go Cchraen/7 t, e1 E\4,i,\
f138s 13 weather Conditions Acceptable: Yes No Coment ^4 d!76
- 14. Clean-up Properly Perfonned: Yes No Coments: ,. w h e
Other Remarks or. Comenes: ogyjgwED g Act'FPTFD [ N i.EAD Q. C. ENCINEER M h * '73!) . s. (See reverse side for instructions) DATE FEB 2 sig,f g x/ ' o.-
-S I TP- 2. [-
r ! L- _
i 1 _ __ _ - - - - - - -~
- 08IEDRMAll0fiDRV
-j
, . . . . . .. .~ ... _
N sM.nlle
'l- 5 ~lt. k'- 5EC. -- strip T* ?vactAce i T4 N* *l*f MCr?O
- f 3&le (~
4.
, Th% 4. s t. -27.13 -3'. fir i.
, TP z.t e - la .o # It.1C -44.tf '-
-41.4'1
, ., T*P t .n c. 8.85 -4l.1 % . -
~~
,; % WE4r O=w332f EAST
&l
-t
.I I
J~ N84l18T 4.l f. i _ fL F 3_ m M.8 q.g 4.1 4.9 re 4.s 84 . 9 G, '
,. 11 7 N. yer er vore w los TT T* 2N O sV C0 TV l00 13 0
.y.'
.,_ I NVIDO 4 'l _ 4.C . 4A. 4. t_ 4B 4.7 21 s 4.s 4.s MA CD
.s lof too '1s* fo 2.5" o tr So it s** sso -
,a i j ; h l . i N '/o o l
.,. il.7 4A_ 4.8 4. 8 47 4.3 5* 4.s 4.1 4.s F.t lif ro r er 100 onc.n 35 $* 5 o Er So Tf los I%
z l ._. roe two sen nan
.e _. . i, I 2 REVIEWED & ACCEPTED d LEAD Q. C. ENGlMEER , ,
DATE FEB 2 GT/ stG.- 2' r-t,.
+
4
. ,a . . . . . .--
s
}o.
vn 5"' mupioo . J:DilIFDMIl01QU
, .' n.e - n .s . - - -- . w . --
.. l i ' ';,4 2
- f*'ll ' '
X-ssib. - STRs G~ , 1 s 3 6 , L't'r _l . _ . . . . - . . - - - - - -- *~~
._,_ -m.n -l ,I i I I TP i i
.. ' s. o i -2 r i s e t.,c
-ac .1 s .
l
.,, _ T! i I* M '
l~t4 4o l s Ia* -Ho I . 21 i . . l n~ ' l lr.w -u.rrs '
- I .
l i n d I l
- a. i il - -
xl I ru i. -
-v- , . . . .
\ l 4 'N
- g l. ;
s' a; I .., i L- i i 4 A f6 souTM DmH' I l
/
l ue o , ,, i ; l l
\y / - ? ,'- ,
i
~
l 1 ! i i > AVE rJOLTM 6/TCH I
'- t
.- l l r :
l l ; l , .. Q*% 4 138* ' REVIEWED & ACCEPTED LEAD Q. C. ENGINEER (' FEB 2WWStG,g
- DATE .
s V r
S Q &* N'$O , M'N VATERFORD STEA}l ELECTRIC STATION 1980 - 1165 }!W INSTALIATION - UNIT NO. 3 SOILS CONSTRUCTION Inspection Rcput
, om E '/'2/24 shire Z2 M w..ih. d z < a /6,z - ny R. he<ra,/
Fla #8ra m') A ,. w.,s.a s
. A.c.1,. tr... ;..: si.,e et shire .'Je:e "e.> > ~~~~
End .f shife - se:r e a> T.e.tt...d. c .e,..es w.,L'A.. pil.hed, c... d E,.ip..a t
- oc Ma # <~(- >ew) fmMei wn FP,# AP;*es Ms ~ GA
^
w z m o}}