ML20127B594
Text
..
/ o
~,, UNITED STATES G\
8 o NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION i : E WASHINGTON, D. C. 20555
\,
/ February 22, 1985 O
L g-9 Ms. Billie Pirner Garde Ms. Lynne Bernabei Government Accountability Froject IN RESPONSE REFER 1555 Connecticut Avenue, NW, Suite 202 TO F0!A-84-455 Washington, DC 20036 i
Dear Ms. Garde and Ms. Bernabei:
{
l This is in further response to your letter dated May 31, 1984, in which you (
requested, pursuant to the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA), all records '
relevant to and/or generated in connection with any report or study of the basemat cracking and water leakage and seepage problems at the Waterford III plant conducted and issued subsequent to the formation of the NRC Waterford Task Force.
By letter dated August 20, 1984, with its attached Appendices A and B, we informed you that certain records subject to your request were available for your inspection and copying at the NRC Public Document Room (PDR). We also informed you that we would notify you upon review of additional records subject to your F0IA request.
At this time, we are placing the records identified on enclosed Appendix C in the PDR. These records will be filed in PDR folder FOIA-84-455 under your names. The records identified on enclosed Appendix D are filed in other PDR folders and retrievable by the accession numbers noted beside the record descriptions.
Additional records that are subject to your request are undergoing further review for disclosure detenninations and will be addressed in another letter to you.
Sincerely.
J. . Felton, Director Division of Rules and Records Office of Administration
Enclosures:
As stated as: ""-
APPENDIX C s , RECORDS IN PDR FILE F01A-84-455 1
Re: F01A-84-455 LP&L Correspondence and Other Documentation l
- 1. Undated Draft Form Letter to Louisiana Industries, Inc., from W. G. Griggs, Ebasco, Re: Uniformity in Concrete Batching (2 pages)
- 2. Undated Design Concept Outline; Figure 2.5-102 (4 pages)
- 3. Undated Waterford Unit 3 - Recharge Program (7 pages)
- 4. Undated Appendix I - Composite Foundation Mat Differential Settlement Contours (2 pages)
- 5. Undated Draft letter from Griggs to Von Farnsworth Regarding Concrete Batch Restrictions (2 pages)
- 6. 12/15/75 Letter to R. A. Hartnett from J. O. Booth Re: Concrete Placement Operating Audit (2pages)
- 7. 12/17/75 Letter from Meyer to Stampley Transmitting Stop Work Order No. 1 (15 pages)
- 8. 12/18/75 LP&L Stop Work Order Release signed by A. E. Henderson, QA Manager (2 pages)
- 9. 12/18/75 Letter from Griggs to Quality Control Engineers, Supervisors, and Inspectors
Subject:
Supplemental Instructions Re Control Concrete Inspection Activities (1 page) garding Quality
- 10. 12/19/75 Telephone Comunications Between W. G. Hubacek and T. 2 Gerrets Re: Construction Status (1 page)
- 11. 01/27/76 Letter from Gerrets to J. O. Booth
Subject:
Waterford SES Unit 3, Transmittal of Site Audit Report No. W3S 76-6 (7 pages)
- 12. 01/27/76 Letter from Gerrets to J. O. Booth
Subject:
Waterford SES Unit 3, Transmittal of Site Audit Report No. W3S 76-7 (6 pages)
- 13. 02/03/76 Letter from Gerrets to J. O. Booth
Subject:
Waterford SES Unit 3 Transmittal of Site Audit Report No. W3S 76-12 (16 pages)
- 14. 02/19/76 Letter from Gerrets to J. O. Booth
Subject:
Waterford SES Unit 3, Transmittal of Site Audit Report No. W3S76-19S (2 pages)
- 15. 03/22/76 Letter from Gerrets to J. O. Booth
Subject:
Waterford SES Unit 3, Transmittal of Site Audit Report No. W3S76-19S Reaudit #1 (5 pages) lu. 03/22/76 Letter from Gerrets to J. O. Booth
Subject:
Waterford SES Unit 3, Transmittal of Site Audit Report No. W35 76-295 (2 pages)
- 17. 03/23/76 Letter from Gerrets to J. O. Booth
Subject:
Waterford SES Unit 3, Transmittal of Site Audit Report No. W3S 76-5 Reaudit #1 (4 pages)
- 18. 03/23/76 Letter from Gerrets to J. O. Booth
Subject:
Waterford SES Unit 3 Transmittal of Site Audit Report No. W3S 76-8 Reaudit #1 (2pages)
- 19. 04/06/76 Letter from Gerrets to J. O. Booth
Subject:
Waterford SES Unit 3, Transmittal of Site Audit Report No. W3S76-315 (3 pages)
- 20. 04/06/76 Letter from Gerrets to J. O. Booth
Subject:
Waterford SES Unit 3,
. Transmittal of Site Audit Report No. W35 76-13 Reaudit #1 (9pages)
- 21. 05/03/76 Letter from Gerrets to J. O. Booth
Subject:
Waterford SES Unit 3 Transmittal of Site Audit Report No. W35 76-17S Reaudit #1 (4 pages)
- 22. 05/14/76 Letter from Gerrets to J. O. Booth
Subject:
Waterford SES Unit 3 Transmittal of Site Audit Report No. W35 76-5 Reaudit #2 (2pages)
APPENDIX C (Continu:d)
Re: F01A-84-455
- 23. 06/04/76 Letter from Gerrets to J. O. Booth
Subject:
Waterford SES Unit 3, Transmittal of Site Audit Report No. W3S75-63S Reaudit #1 (8 pages)
- 24. 07/19/76 Letter from Gallagher to W. C. Griggs
Subject:
Mechanical Splicing of Concrete Reinforcing Steel Specification LOV 1564.479 (21 pages)
- 25. 07/19/76 Letter from Gallagher to W. C. Griggs
Subject:
Mechanical Splicing of Concrete Reinforcing Steel Specification LOU 1564.479 I
(37 pages) 26 08/03/76 Letter from Gerrets to J. O. Booth
Subject:
Waterford Unit 3, Transmittal of Site Audit Report No. W35 76-8 Reaudit #2 (3 pages)
- 27. 09/02/76 Letter from Gerrets to J. O. Booth
Subject:
Waterford SES Unit 3, Transmittal of Site Audit Report No. W35 76-6 Reaudit #2 (3 pages)
- 28. 09/13/76 Memo to Frank Howard from Steve Gordy Re: LP&L Waterford Steam Electric Station 1980-1165 MW Installation Unit No. 3 (1 page)
- 29. 09/13/76 Memo to Frank Howard from Steve Gordy Re: LP&L Waterford Steam Electric Station 1980-1165 MW Installation Unit No. 3 (1 page)
- 30. 09/16/76 Memo to Frank Howard from Steve Gordy Re: LP&L Waterford Steam Electric Station 1980-1165 MW Installation Unit No. 3 (1 page)
- 31. 09/16/76 Letter from Gordy to Frank Howard
Subject:
LP&L - Waterford Steam Electric Station 1980 - 1165 NW Installation - Unit No. 3 (1 page)
- 32. 09/17/76 Letter from Gordy to Frank Howard/Abe Cochran Suoject: LP&L Waterford Steam Electric Station 1980 - 1165 MW Installation -
Unit No. 3 (2 pages)
- 33. 09/17/76 Letter from Gordy to Frank Howard/Abe Cochran
Subject:
LP&L Waterford Stea. Electric Station 1980 - 1165 MW Installation -
Unit No. 3 (1 page)
- 34. 09/20/76 Memo to Quality Control Document Control Supervisor from W. C. Griggs Re: List of People With Access to Quality
. Assurance Record Files (1 page)
- 35. 09/20/76 Memo to Frank Howard from Steve Gordy Re: LP&L Waterford Steam Electric Station 1980-1165 MW Installation Unit No. 3 (1 page)
- 36. 09/21/76 Letter from Gordy to Frank Howard/ Abe Cochran
Subject:
LP&L Waterford Steam Electric Station 1980 -'1165 MW Installation -
Unit No. 3 (1 page)
- 37. 09/22/76 Memo to Carl Fletcher from Steve Gordy Re
- LP&L Waterford Steam Electric Station 1980-1165 MW Installation Unit No. 3 (1 page)
- 38. 09/24/76 Memo to Frank Howard from Steve Gordy Re: LP&L Waterford Steam Electric Station 1980-1165 MW Installation Unit No. 3 (1 page)
- 39. 09/28/76 Memo to Abe Cochran from Steve Gordy Re: LP&L Waterford Steam Electric Station 1980-1165 MW Installation Unit No. 3 (1 page)
- 40. 09/29/76 Inter-Office Memo to Burgard from Steve Gordy Re: Transmittal of Admixture Qualification Report (1 page)
, 41. 10/13/76 Letter from Gerrets to J. O. Booth
Subject:
Waterford SES Unit 3, Transmittal of Site Audit Report W3S 76-8 Reaudit #3 (2 pages)
- 42. 10/14/76 Inter-0ffice Memo to R. A. Hartnett from S. Gordy Re: Items to be l Discussed at Meeting (1 page) i 43. 10/18/76 Inter-Office Memo to Frank Howard/ Cal Griggs/ Tim Getzlaff from Steve Gordy Re: Authori:ation for Paul Reynolds (1 page)
APPENDIX C (C:ntinued)
, Re: F01A-84-455
- 44. 10/20/76 Inter-0ffice Memo to Frank Howard from Steve Gordy Re: J. A. Jones Records for 565 and 593 Wall Placements (2 pages)
- 45. 10/20/76 Letter to G. A. Greathouse from W. C. Griggs Re: Records for Wall and Column Placements in the Fuel Handling Building (2 pages)
- 46. 10/21/76 Transmittal Form from Gordy
Subject:
Backfill Reports from J.A. Jones (1page)
- 47. 10/24/76 Inter-0ffice Memo from Steve Gordy Re: Cadweld Location Maps (1 page)
- 48. 10/27/76 Inter-0ffice Memo from Steve Gordy Re: Welding Electrode Requisitions (1page)
- 49. 10/28/76 Letter to W. C. Griggs from G. A. Greathouse Re: Q.A.
j Documentation (2pages)
- 50. 10/28/76 Inter-Office Memo from Steve Gordy Re: Rebar User's Test Reports (1 page)
- 51. 10/29/76 Inter-Office Memo from Steve Gord Missing Documentation for the FHB Wall Placements (1 page) y Re:
- 52. 11/03/76 Inter-0ffice Memo to Griggs from Steve Gordy Re: Items to Consider at Meeting (1 page)
< 53. 11/03/76 Inter-Office Memo from Steve Gordy Re: J. A. Jones Documentation for FHB Wall Placements (1 page)
- 54. 11/08/76 Inter-Office Memo from Steve Gordy Re: Admixture Dispensers (1 page)
- 55. 11/08/76 Inter-0ffice Memo from Steve Gordy Re: Admixture Dispensers (1 page)
- 56. 11/09/76 Inter-Office Memo from Steve Gordy Re: Test Reports from Barrow-Agee (1 page)
- 57. 11/15/76 Inter-0ffice Meruo from Steve Gordy Re: J. A. Jones Documentation for Placement 593-501-3AA/U242AA (1 page)
- 58. 11/16/76 Inter-0ffice Memo from Steve Gordy Re: Uniformity Testing (1 page)
- 59. 11/16/76 Letter to Rick Wilson Re: Q. A. Documentation (1 page)
- 60. 11/16/76 Letter to Mr. Von Farnsworth from W. C. Griggs Re: Equipment Calibration (1page)
- 61. 11/17/76 Inter-0ffice Memo from Steve Gordy Re: Level I Checks (1 page)
- 62. 11/17/76 Inter-Office Memo to Carl Fletcher / Bob Roffe from Steve Gordy Re: Documentation on Cadwelding (1 page)
- 63. 11/22/76 Inter-Office Memo to C. Griggs/R. Hartnett from Steve Gory Re: Meeting Scheduled For Nov. 24, 1976 at 9:00 a.m. (1 page)
- 64. 11/24/76 Letter to Lloyd Wilson from W. C. Griggs Re: Documentation Review (2 pages)
- 65. 11/30/76 -Inter-0ffice Memo from Steve Gordy Re: Discrepancy Notice W-19 (1page)
- 66. 11/30/76 Inter-Office Memo from Steve Gordy Re: Discrepancies (1page)
- 67. 11/30/76 Letter from Gerrets to J. O. Booth
Subject:
Waterford Unit 3 Transmittal of Site Audit Report No. W35 76-29S Reaudit #1 (3 pages)
- 68. 12/06/76 Inter-Office Memo from Steve Gordy Re: Geologic Mapping Documentation (1page)
- 69. 12/10/76 Letter to Distribution List from W. C. Griggs Re: Discrepancy
- Notices (1 page)
~
APPENDIX C (Continued)
, Re: F01A-84-455
- 70. 12/14/76 Transmittal Form to Howard from Gordy
Subject:
Housekeeping Inspection Report GH-12 (1 page)
- 71. 12/17/76 Transmittal Form to Howard from Gordy
Subject:
Slipforming Documentation (1 page)
- 72. 12/22/76 Transmittal Form to Howard from Gordy
Subject:
Documentation from Peabody Testing (1 page)
- 73. 12/28/76 Transmittal Form to Howard from Gordy
Subject:
J. A. Jones Placement Documentation (1 page)
- 74. 01/03/77 Letter from Gordy to F. Howard
Subject:
LP&L - Waterford Steam Electric Station 1980 - 1165 MW Installation - Unit No. 3, Documentation of Rebar User's Testing (4 pages).
- 75. 01/04/77 Inter Department Memo to Frank Howard from Steve Gordy Re:
Jones Documentation (1 page)
- 76. 01/04/77 Inter Department Memo to Abe Cochran from Steve Gordy Re:
QCIP-5-4 (1 page)
- 77. 01/05/77 Inter Department Memo to Larry Gilliland from Steve Gordy Re: Desk #155 (1 page)
- 78. 01/06/77 Inter Department Memo to John McCutchen from Steve Gordy Re:
Rebar User's Tests (1 page)
- 79. 01/07/77 Inter Department Memo to Cal Griggs from Steve Gordy Re:
Items for Consideration (1 page)
- 80. 01/10/77 Inter Department Memo to File Re: Contracts (1 page)
- 81. 01/11/77 Inter Department Memo to Carl Fletcher Re: Gulf EngineeringCo.(1page)
I 82. 01/12/77 Memorandum to Carl Fletcher from Gordy
Subject:
Cadweld Tensile Tests (I page)
- 83. 01/14/77 Memorandum to Griggs/Hartnett from Gordy
Subject:
QA/QC Interfacing (1 page)
- 84. 01/14/77 Memorandum to Frank Howard from Gordy
Subject:
Ingratitude (1page)
- 85. 01/14/77 Memorandum to Frank Howard from Gordy
Subject:
J.A. Jones Placement Records (1 page)
- 86. 01/17/77 Memorandum to Frank Howard/T. Getzlaff
Subject:
Closed Discrepancies (1 page)
- 87. 01/17/77 Memortndum to W. Griggs from Gordy
Subject:
LP&L - Waterford Steam Electric Station 1980 - 1165 MW Installation - Unit No. 3 (3 pages)
- 88. 01/17/77 Inter Department Memo to Carl Fletcher from Steve Gordy Re:
Storage Inspection Reports (1 page)
- 89. 01/31/77 Letter to Mr. Von Farnsworth from W. C. Griggs Re: Batch Plant Calibration (1page)
- 90. 02/01/77 Inter Department Memo to Tom Gutwall Re: Material Weld (1 page)
- 91. 02/16/77 Inter-Office Memo to Carl Fletcher from Ed Lemke Re:
EngineeringProcedurerPR12.0TravelerSystem(1page)
- 92. 02/16/77 Memorandum from Ed Lemke
Subject:
Engineering Procedure PR11.0(1page)
- 93. 2/23/77 Inter-Office Memo to Dick Sullivan from Ed Denne Re: Welding Rod Requisitions (1 page)
- 94. April /77 LP&L Waterford SES Unit No. 3 Re MatBearingPressure"(11pages)portEntitled" Allowable
- 95. 03/04/77 Note from Ed Lemke Re: PlacementPackages(2pages)
- 96. 11/23/82 Memo to L. Stinson from W. Yaeger
Subject:
Recommended Disposition for NCR Discrepencies Listed Per Attachment #1 (2pages)
APPENDIXC(Continued)
- i 3 Re: F01A-84-455
- 97. 06/08/83 Memo to Distribution from H.J. Kunis
Subject:
Trend Coding (1 page)
- 98. 06/09/83 Memo to L. Stinson from J. Czyrko
Subject:
Review of J.A.
Jones Seismic Class I Installation Records (7 pages)
- 99. 07/11/83 Memo to File from Gerrets
Subject:
Meeting Concerning Civil -
Records (1 page) 100. 09/21/83 Memo to R. Milhiser from A. Cutrona
Subject:
Review of J.A.
Jones Concrete Placement Packages (12 pages) 101. 09/29/83 Letter to Richard DeYoung from J.M. Cain
Subject:
Waterford 3 SES Docket No. 50-382 (54 pages) 102. 11/17/83 Letter to G. Knighton from K. Cook
Subject:
Ground Water Sample Associated With Basemat (3 pages) 103. 11/17/83 Memo to R. DeDamo from H. Kunis
Subject:
Inspection Criteria For Instrumentation Supports Welds Identified by Review Personnel - Seismic Class I (1 page) 104. 12/13/83 Memo to A. Cutrona from B. Grant
Subject:
Nuclear Safety i Classification of Waterstops (1 page) j 105. 12/22/83 Letter to T. Gerrets from J. Davis
Subject:
Evaluation of Corrective Action Initiated As a Result of Memorandum W30AIRG-0215 dated 12/9/82 (3 pages)
IL6. 12/22/83 Letter to R. Leddick from T. Davis
Subject:
Letter Documentin
) Interview with the NRC and Summary of Investigation (5 pages)g 1 107. 05/19/83 Telephone Communication between Sam Horton-Ebasco and Brenda Willerkson-J.A. Jones
Subject:
Daily Cadweld Inspection '
Records (3 pages) l 108. 01/13/84 Letter to G. Constable from L. Bass
Subject:
Results of LP&L l QA's Review of Allegations (3 pages) 109. 03/26/84 LP&L Presentation to NRC Re: Waterford 3 SES Common Mat Integrity (22pages) 4 110. 03/26/84 Meeting List
Subject:
LP&L Presentation of Basement Adequacy (3 pages) q l
j l i
i
APPENDIX C (ContinuCd) j Re: F01A-84-455 Waterford Steam Electric Station - Discrepancy Notices 111. D.N.N. - C-7 (3pages 112. D.N.N. - C-12 2 pages 113. D.N.N.-C-13-{2pages 114. D.N.N. ; t-15 1 page) t 115. D.N.N. - C-27 3 pages)'
i 116. D.N.N. - C-42 1 page 117. D.N.N. - C-43 1 page a 118. D.N.N. - C-44 1 page .____
119. D.N.N. - C-45 1 page 120. D.N.9 - C-46 1 page 121. D.N.N. - C-47 1 page 122. D.N.N. - C-48 1 page l 123. D.N.N. - C-49 1 page) 124. D.N.N. - C-50 1 page) l 125. D.N.N. - C-51 1 page) ,
126. D.N.N. - C-52 3pages) 127. D.N.N. - C-54 2 pages) 128. D.N.N. - C-55 3eiges) 129. D.N.N. - C-58 1 page l
130. D.N.N. - C-61 1 page l 131. D.N.N. - C-62 1 page i
132. D.N.N. - C-63 1 page l
133. D.N.N. - C-65 3pages) 134. D.N.N. - C-72 5 pages) 135. D.N.N. - C-75 1 page)
! 136. D.N.N. - C-77 1page) 137. D.N.N. - C-78 1 page) 138. D.N.N. - C-80 2 pages l
139. D.N.N. - C-90 2 pages 140. D.N.N. - C-91 2 pages '
141. D.N.N. - C-92 2 pages l 142. D.N.N. - C-105 1 page l 143. D.N.N. - C-106 1 page l 144. D.N.N. - C-107 1 page 145. D.N.N. - C-108 1 page 146. D.N.N. - C-109 1 page 147. D.N.N. - C-114 1 page l 148. D.N.N. - C-115 3 pages l
149. D.N.N. - C-116 6 pages 150. D.N.N. - C-117 .4 pages l- 151. D.N.N. - C-118 2 pages) l 152. D.N.N. - C-119 153. D.N.N. - C-120 1page)) 10 pages -
154. D.N.N. - C-130 1'page 155. D.N.N. - C-133 1 page
- 156. D.N.N. - C-137 1 page i 157. D.N.N. - C-145 1 page 158. D.N.N. - C-147 1 page
[
159. D.N.N. - C-148 3 pages)
I
_ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ __ _ . _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ - - _ _ - _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ . _ . _ = _ _ . _ - - . _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - - - - . _ - _ - _ _ _ - . -
APPENDIXC(Continued) 3 Re: FOIA-84-455 160. D.N.N. - C-152 2pages) 161. D.N.N. - C-153 5 pages) 162. D.N.N. - C-154 4pages) 163. D.N.N.-C-155(1page) 164. D.N.N. - C-158 1page) 165. D.N.N. - C-166 10pages) 166. D.N.N. - C-170 1page) 167. D.N.N. - C-176 1 page) 168. D.N.N. - C-181 3page) 169. D.N.N. - C-182 1 page 17') . D.N.N. - C-183 1 page 171. D.N.N. - C-184 1 page l 172. D.N.N. - C-185 1 page l 173. D.N.N. - C-187 1 page l 174. D.N.N. - C-188 1 page l 175. D.N.N. - C-189 1 page j 176. D.N.N. - C-190 1 page ERASCO Services, Inc. - Discrepancy Notices
! 177. List of Voided Civil Discrepancy Notices, 1975-1977(17pages) l l
I l
l l
. _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ~
APPENDIX C (Continued)
Re: F0!A-84-455 Construction Site Daily Weather Records 178. Sheet identifying documents (1 page) 179. 12/01/75 1 page 180. 12/02/75 1 page 181. 12/03/75 1 page 182. 12/04/75 1 page 183. 12/05/75 1 page 184. 12/08/75 1 page 185. 12/09/75 1 page 186. 12/10/75 1 page 187. 12/11/75 1 page 188. 12/12/75 1 page 189. 1?/15/75 1page) 190. 12/16/75 1 page) 191. 12/17/75 1 page 192. 12/18/75 1 page 193. 12/19/75 1 page 194. 12/22/75 1 page 195. 12/23/75 1 page 196. 12/24/75 1 page 197. 12/26/75 1 page 198. 12/29/75 1 page 199. 12/30/75 1 page 200. 12/31/75 1 page 201. 01/05/76 1 page 202. 01/06/76 1 page 203. 01/07/76 1 page 204. 01/08/76 1 page 205. 01/09/76 1 page 206. 01/12/76 1 page 207. 01/13/76 1 page 208. 01/14/76 1 page 209. 01/15/76 1 page 210. 01/16/76 1 page 211. 01/19/76 1 page 212. 01/20/76 I 1 page 213. 01/21/76 I 1 page 214. 01/22/76 I 1 page 215. 01/23/76 i 1 page 216. 01/26/76 I,1 page 217. 01/27/76 (1page 218. 01/28/76 I,1 page 219. 01/29/76 1,1 page 220. 01/30/76 1 1 page 221. 02/02/76 ,1 page 222. 02/03/76 (I,1page
APPENDIXC(Continued) l Re: FOIA-84-455 Construction Site Daily Weather Records - Continued ,
l 223. 02/04/76 (1page l 224. 02/05/76 1 page i 225. 02/06/76 1 page 226. 02/09/76 1 page 227. 02/10/76 1 page
, 228. 02/11/76 1-page 1 229. 02/12/76 1 page i
230. 02/13/76 1 page 231. 02/17/76 1 page 232. 02/18/76 1 page 233. 02/20/76 1 page 234. 02/23/76 1 page 235. 02/24/76 1 page 236. 02/25/76 1 page 237. 02/26/76 1 page 238. 02/27/76 1 page 239. 03/01/76 1 page 240. 03/03/76 1 page 241. 03/04/76 1 page 242. 03/05/76 1 page 243. 03/08/76 1 page 244. 03/09/76 1 page 245. 03/10/76 I 1 page 246. 03/11/76 1,1 page 247. 03/12/76 I,1 page ,
248. 03/15/76 I '
249. 03/16/76 l l1page 1 page 250. 03/17/76 1,1 page 251. 03/18/76 1,1 pageJ l 252. 03/19/76 1,1 page) l 253. 03/22/76 1,1 pageJ
! 254, 03/23/76 i,1 page) 255. 03/24/76 1 page 256. 03/25/76 I(1 pageJ) 257. 03/26/76 dipage) 258. 03/29/76 259. 03/30/76 (11 page) 1 pageJ l ,
l 260. 03/31/76 I,1 page) l 2610 04/01/76 I,1 page) 262. 04/02/76 I 1 page) 263. 04/05/76 I 1 pageJ 264, 04/06/76 I 1 page 265, 04/08/76 I 1 page j) 266. 04/09/76 i I pagej 267. 04/12/76 I 1page) 268. 04/13/76 i I page) 269, 04/15/76 I 1 page) 270. 04/19/76 1 1 page)
- 271. 04/20/76 I,1 pageJ l
l APPENDIXC(C:ntinu:d)
L i I l Re: F0lA-84-455 i t
272. 04/21/76 1 page i 273. 04/22/76 1 page i l 274. 04/23/76 1 page ;
l t
275. 04/26/76 1,1 I page 276. 04/27/76 1,1 page 277. 04/28/76 1 page !
278. 04/29/76 1 ,,1 page [
i 279. 04/30/76 I )
l 280. 05/03/76 I ,,1 page) 1 page ,
j 281. 05/04/76 l 1 page '
282. 05/05/76 1 1 page 283. 05/06/76 I 1 page
)) ,
i 284. 05/07/76 i I page !
285. 05/10/76 .I ,1page)) ,
-286. 05/11/76 1 ,1page) )
287. 05/12/76 I,1 page t i
288. 05/13/76 I,1 page i 289. 05/14/76 1,1 page i 290. 05/17/76 i 1 page !
291. 05/18/76 I 1 page ;
292. 05/19/76 I 1 page) 293. 05/20/76 1 page)1 294. 05/21/76 I 11 page 295. 05/24/76 t 1 page' 296. 05/25/76 1,1 page))
297. 05/26/76 1 page) 298. 05/27/76 1 page)l t
.299. 05/28/76 1 page .
300. 05/31/76. Ipageh i.
t f
i i
A l 1 i
f
. - _ _ _ _ - _ - _ _ - . - _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - - - _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ - - _ _ - - - - - _ _ _ _ - - - _ _ _ _ - - _ . _ - _ _ _ _ _ = _ - _ - -
APPEN0!XC(Continued)
~
II - Re: FOIA-84-455 l Hygro-Thermograph Chart No. 207-WB l 301. 12/01/75 1page)I 302, 12/08/75 1 page l
303. 12/15/75 1page,)
i 304. 12/22/75 1 page) 305. 12/29/75 1 page,I 306. 01/05/76 1 page 307. 01/12/76 1 page 308. 01/19/76 1 page 309. 01/26/76 1 page 310. 02/03/76 1 page 311. 02/09/76 1,1 page 312. 02/17/76 i,1 page 313. 02/23/76I 1 page l
314. 03/01/76 1,1 page
! 315. 03/08/761,1 page 316. 03/15/76 1,1 page .
317. 03/22/76 I,1 page 318. 03/29/76 I,1 page 319. 05/28/76 I 1 page 320. 06/04/76 1 l,1page l
321. 08/23/76 1,1 page 322. 08/30/76 I' page I
l i
l e
APPENDIX C (Continued)
Re: FOI A-S4-455 Miscellaneous Occu-ents 323. 12/13/79 Fischbach and Moore. Inc., Rework Fem No. 355.
Subject:
" Modify Support as Required to Suit Ccnduit Installation" (1 page).
324 02/21/64 State-ent by Leonard T. Kaminski regarding signatures en daily reports being in same handwriting (page 4 only of 4 pages).
325. 05/24/84 List of cadwell test nu-ters and date that tests were perforred (1 page).
l 326. undated Attachnent to Surveillance Report No. SRC-76-2-1 (1 page). :
l 327. undated List of electrical penetration problees (1 page).
328. undated Notes on contour lines of cracks in base-at (1 page).
Kf . undated Crack rupping of reactor butiding (1 page).
330. undated Listsofwelds(3tpages).
331. undated List of tests of cadwell Operation # 203W (15 pages).
332. undated Waterford 3 - Plot Plan Figure 1.2-1 (1 page) l 333. undated Waterford 3 - General Arrange ent Reactor Auxiliary Building, i Figure 1.2-10 (1 page).
l l 334 undated Waterford 3 - General Arr6ngement Reactor Auxiliary Butiding-l Section. Figure 1.212(1page).
, 335. undated Waterford 3 - General Arrt.nge ent Reactor Auniliary Building--
Plan EL - 4.00'. Figure 1.2-19 (1 page).
1 336. uncated Waterford 3 - General Arrange ent-Reactor Auxiliary Building-Plans and Sections ($heet 4) Figure 1.2-23 (1 page).
337. undated Waterford 3 - General Arrangerent Cooling Towers-plan. Figure 1.2-24(1page).
338. undated Waterford 3 - General Arrangeeent Cooling Towers Sections.
Figure 1.2-25 (1 page).
339. undated HalsteadEngineeringAssociates.Inc.,MatCrackMap(6pages).
340. undated Waterford 3 - Design Concept Outline Figure 2.5-102(4pages).
341. undated Waterford 3 - Seismic Category 1 Structural Layout. Figure ,
3.8.1(1page).
342. undated Drawingofsurfacecracks(1page).
i APPENDIXC(Continusd)
Re: FOIA-84-455 343. Staff Notebook on NCR# 6234(287pages).
ACI MQUEST v4 4ss c/343
L j
APPENDIXC(Continued)
- 14 Re: F0!A-84-455 I
! 344. EXCERPTS FROM RECORD RELATED TO NCR-W3-7481 (192 pages) i I t
e I ,
l i ;
4 i
i i i i 1
i :
1 i i e i i i
1 1
I e +
i !
i
' KelIEQuf.M
$4 6455 c.f 34 l I 1 1
l 1
a l \
1 1
i
I
- f APPENDIXC(Continuod) i i
I ' !
l FOIA-84-455 I i l l
1 345. Numbered and unnumbered documents related to selected NCRs (415 pages). !
1 l
1 i
{
t I s ,
i 1
i d
i a
L 1 !
', i i i f l 1 .
1 1
ii i !
4 i
) 4 e
1
- i e f i I i i
. t
! l t
(
l I
! i
! i i
I i l r
i i 3 t AC) W WW&& i
)
1 4
m,Qu6st .
l I
84 ~%ss clstr l L
I F
i I I
APPENDIXC(Continued) 16 -
Re: F0!A-84-455 E8ASCO Services. Inc. - Correspondence i l
346. 7/? 74 Purchase Order to A. Giambelleca Construction, Inc. from [
Ebasco Services, Inc. A !
Waterford Site (1 page) gent, for Clam Shell Material for
.347. 05/30/75 To J. M. Wyatt, LP&L, from R. K. Stampley, Project Manager, {
Subject:
" Nuclear Quality Assurance Program" (6 pages) 348. 12/05/75 Purchase Order to Borthers Construction, Inc., from Ebasco Services, Inc. Agent, for Clamshell Material for Waterford I Site (1page) j i
349, 12/09/75 To G. A. Greathouse, Jones Construction Co., from !ktidar i Hussain. QA Site Supervisor,
Subject:
" Concrete Placement -
OperationsAudit"(5pages) !
I i l 350, 12/09/75 To R. J. Meyer, LP&L. from A. A. Ferlito, Chief, Concrete f
- Hydarulic Engineer,
Subject:
"Waterford SES Unit No. 3 Filter l l andBackfillSpecification"(113pages) 351. 12/17/75 To R. J. Meyer, LP&L, from J. O. Booth Project Superintendent, i
Subject:
"Stop Work Order Regarding Concrete Placement ;
Activities"(45pages) i 352. 12/18/75 to J. A. Jones Construction Company from J. O. Booth, !
Subject:
"Your Response to Stopwork Order No.1" (2 pages) 353. 12/18/75 To R. J. Meyer, LP&L, from J. O. Booth Project Superintendent,
Subject:
"Stop Work Order Regarding Concrete Placement l Activities"(7pages) :
354. 01/02/76 To A. E. Henderson, LP&L, from J. M. Brooks Ebasco,
Subject:
"Stop Work Order No. 1" with notes of 12/17/75 meeting with LpALRegardingSWONo.1(4pages) 355. 01/23/76 To R. A. Hartnett from J. 0. Booth,
Subject:
" Response to QASurveillanceReportNo.SRC-76-1-1ConcreteTestSpecimens ;'
(3pages) 356. 02/03/76 To Mr. Farnsworth, Louisiana Industries, from R. A. Hartnett, .
Q. A. Site Supervisor,
Subject:
" Concurrence between Q.A. 1 CorporationandEbascoPersonnel"(2pages) j 357. 02/11/76 LPAL, from J. 0. Booth,
Subject:
"LP&L Audit h To Mr. R. J. MeYerReport No. W35 6 5" (1 page) l r
358. 02/12/16 To G. A. Greathouse, Jones Construction Co., from R. A. !
Hartnett, QA Site Supervisor,
Subject:
" Surveillance of Concrete i Repairs of Placement #499 502 108 (2pages) l 1
l APPENDIXC(Continu:d) 1 1
17 -
Re: F0!A-84-455 I 359. 02/17/76 To Mr. G. A. Greathouse, Jones Construction Co., from R. A.
! Hartnett, Q.A. Site Supervisor,
Subject:
" Quality Assurance
! Surveillance Report #SRC-76-1-2 and Nonconformance Report #W3-27" (7pages) 360. 02/18/76 To G. A. Greathouse, Jones Construction Co., from R. A. Hartnett, Q.A. Site Supervisor,
Subject:
" Quality Assurance Surveillance '
Report No. SRC-76-2-2" (2 pages) 361. 03/03/76 To Mr. Farnsworth from R. A. Hartnett, Q. A. Site Supervisor, 1
Subject:
" Quality Assurance Surveillance Report No. SRC-76-2-4" l (2pages) 362. 03/08/76 To R. J. Meyer, LP&L from J. O. Booth, Project Superintendent,
Subject:
"LP&L Audit Report No. W3S-76-13" (10 pages) 363. 03/31/76 To R. J. Meyer, LP&L, from J. O. Booth, Project Superintendent,
Subject:
"LP&LAuditReportW35-76-295"(5pages) 364. 04/01/76 To Mr. G. A. Greathouse, Jones Construction Co., from R. A.
Harnett, Q.A. Site Supervisor,
Subject:
" Quality Assurance AuditReportJG-76-3-2"(9pages) 365. 04/06/76 To R. A. Hartnett, LPAL, from J. O. Booth and W. C. Griggs, Etasco,
Subject:
"QA Audit Report JG-761-2 (5 pages) 366. 04/19/76 To R. J. Meyer, LP&L, from J. O. Booth, Project Superintendent.
Subject:
"LP&L Audit Report No. W35 76 6" (5 pages) l 367. 05/10/76 To Mr. R. J. Meyer, LP&L. from J. O. Booth Project Superintendent.
Subject:
"LP&L Audit Report No. W35 76 8 Reaudit #1 (2 pages) i 368. 05/10/76 To Fegles Power Service Corp. from J. O. Dooth, Project Superintendent,
Subject:
" Housekeeping" (9 pages) 1 369. 05/13/76 To R. J. Meyer. LP&L, from J. O. Booth, Project Superintendent.
l
Subject:
"LP&LAuditReportNo.W35-766Reaudit#1"(6pages) 370. 05/17/76 To Mr. R. J. Meyer LP&L. from J. O. Booth, Project Superintendent.
l
Subject:
"LP&L Audit Report No. W3576 175 Reaudit No. 1 (4pages) {
l 371. 05/17/76 To Mr R. J. Meyer, LP&L, from J. O. Booth, Project Superintendent.
Subject:
"LP&LSiteSurveillanceReportW3576315(2pages 372. 05/17/76 to R. A. Hartnett, LP&L, from D. D. Fowler. Ebasco l
"QA Surveillance Report No. SRC 76 5 3" (3 pages) ,
Subject:
373, 11/24/76 To Mr. Lloyd R. Wilson. Jones Construction Corp., from W. C.
Griggs, Senior Q. C. Supervisor,
Subject:
" Documentation Review" (3pages)
APPENDIX C (Continu:d) 18 -
Re: F0!A-84-455 374. 01/31/77 To Mr. Von Farnsworth, Louisiana Industries, from W. C. Griggs, Senior Q. C. Supervisor,
Subject:
" Batch Plant Calibration" (1 page) 375. 06/29/77 To Mr. R. J. Drueding, Bob Brothers Construction Co., from J. O. Booth, Project Superintendent,
Subject:
" Contract W3-NY-1 ExcavationandDewatering,(3pages) l 376. 07/27/77 To J. O. Booth, Ebasco, from A. A. Ferlito, Chief Civil Engineer,
Subject:
"Waterford SES - Unit No. 3 Combination l
StructureMat"(2pages) 377. 07/27/77 To J. O. Booth Ebasco, from A. A. Ferlito, Chief Civil Engineer,
Subject:
Waterford SES - Unit No. 3 Combination StructureMat"(2pages) 378. 02/10/83 To Mercury Company of Norwood, Inc. from J. L. Wills, Project Superintendent.
Subject:
" Material Traceability for Piping, Tubing and Instrument Supports" (5 pages) 379. 04/15/83 To H. Dunis from P. Bergand,
Subject:
"Cadweld Tensile TestReports"(1page) 380. 04/21/83 To John Sullivan from Peg Burgard. 0A!RG Manager,
Subject:
" Implementation of QAl-9, Rev. 2" (1 page) l 381. 06/06/83 To John Cryrko, Ebasco, from George Hill,
Subject:
" Review of l SeismicClass1ConcreteRecords"(13pages) 382. 06/06/83 To John Czyrko, Ebasco, from George Hill
Subject:
" Review of Seismic Class I Concrete Records" (6 pages) 383. 06/11/83 To John Tompeck, Ebasco, from L. A. Stinson,
Subject:
" Draft QAIRG Problem Report Recomended for Nonconfortnance" (6 pages) 384. 06/13/83 File 35.0,
Subject:
"StatusingandTracking"(1page) 305. 06/25/83 To Peggy Burgard, OA!RG, from H. Kunis, Q. A. Site Supervisor,
Subject:
"CadweldTensileTestReports"(1page) 386. 07/12/83 To L. Dass, Ebasco, from J. OcBruin,
Subject:
"LP&L Waterford
[
SES Unit No. 3" (1 page) 387. 11/14/03 To L. Dass, LP&L from B. Grant, Ebasco, with six attached documents which describe the increased capacity for excavation dewatering installed in July,1977. Documents provided to LPAL in response to NRC request to LP&L pursuant to Joint l Intervenor'sContentionNo.22(31pages).
l l
l l
l APPENDIXC(C".ntinued) o l l Re: F01A-84-455 l
i 388. 02/01/84 To Q. A. Record Vault from S. Harton, Q. A. Site Supervisor.
Subject:
"Nonconfortnance Report Closure - No Corrective ActionRequired"(1page) l 389. 03/30/84 To B. Grant from E. S. Kowalski,
Subject:
"Waterford SES l Unit No. 3 Nuclear Plant Island Structure Wall Hairline l CrackMappingProcedure"(36pages) t
Y i APPENDIXC(C:ntinued)
"- *
- Re: F01A-84-455 l
! EBASCO Services Inc. - Correspondence To EBASCO 390. 07/09/76 Letter to Clay Boyce. Ebasco, from James E. Barry, ERICO -
Products, Inc., Re: "Cadweld Hebar Splices" (28 pages) 391. 10/24/79 Ta Ebasco Services, Inc., from Peabody Testing, Inc., Re:
" Certified Report of Nondestructive Examination" (1 page) j 392. 10/25/79 To Ebasco Services, Inc. from Peabody Testing, Inc., Re: ,
" Certified Report of Nondestructive Examination" (1 page) i 393. 01/28/83 To L. Stinson, Ebasco Services, Inc., from L. A. Gilbert.
Mercury Company of Norwood, Inc., Re: " Response to Site Surveillance Report No. W3-NY-15 SS-1" with attachments (16pages) t l
l r
5 I
t I
L 4
j: APPENDIX C (Continued) ;
t Re: F0!A-84-455 i
! E8ASCO Services, Inc. - Internal Correspondence i
394. 11/24/75 To J. O. Booth from R. F. Vine and A. H. Wern, Re: " Concrete i DesignMix"(3pages) -
l
-395. 05/20/82 Note by) Paul Elkins Re:
Concrete Placement Number 573-18-B/0-1 f (1 page i i
396. 01/27/84~ Note to Sam Horton, QA, from B. Grant, Civil ESSE, j Re: " ASP-IV-56 IR Procedure" (2 pages) ;
i 397. 02/18/84 Speedletter to Sam Horton, QA, from B. Grant, Civil ESSE, Re: "W3-Review of JA Jones Speedletters" (1 page) l r
[
i i
r i
t t
r f
{
l I
t i
I l
l l t :
[
I
APPENDIX C (Continued) 22 Re: F01A-84-455 EBASCO Services, Inc. Procedures 398. CP-203 Clam Shell Filter Blanket Test Fill (19 pages) 399. CP-203 Waterford Steam Electric Station - Unit No. 3 (8 pages) 400. CP-699 Handling, Storing, Installing, Cadwelding and Modification of Reinforcing Steel (7 pages) 401. CP-703 datchPlantActivitiesandOperations(22pages) 402. CP-803 Excavation and Backfill (8 pages) 403. OCIP-1 Density Contro of Shell (7 pages) 404. OCIP-2 Soils Control 405. OCIP-2 Soils Control 25pages)J 26 pages 406. OCIP-2 Soils Control 14 pages) 407. QCIP-2 Soils Control 14 pages 403. OCIP-2 409. OCIP-2 Soils Control 16 pages Soils Control 16 pages
))
410. OCIP-2 Soils Control 14pages)I 411. OCIP-4 Control of Concrete Materials and Mixes 12 pages 412. OCIP-4 Control of Concrete Materials and Mixes 11 pages 413. OCIP-4 Control of Concrete Materials and Mixes 11 pages
! 414. OCIP-5 415. OCIP-6 Control Concrete of Concrete Mixing Preplacement and 12 Inspection Transporting) pages (11 pages) 416. OCIP 6 Concrete Preplacement Inspection 417. OCIP-6 Concrete Preplacement Inspection 9pages))
10 pages 418. OCIP-6 Concrete Preplacement inspection 11 pages) 419. OCIP-6 Concrete Preplacement inspection 9 pages) 420. OCIP-7 Inspection of Concrete Placement, Curing and finishing 12pages) 421. OCIP-7 Inspection of Concrete Placement, Curing and Finishing 16 pages) 422. OCIP-7 Inspection of Concrete Placement. Curing and Finishing 8pages) 423. OCIP 8 Receiving Inspection, Storage and Testing of Concrete Reinforcing Steel (11 pages) 424. QCIP-9 Inspection of Concrete Reinforcing Steel Mechanical Splices (Cadwelds)(9pages) 425. QCIP-9 Inspection of Concrete Reinforcing Steel Mechanical Splices (Cadwelds)(19pages) 426. QCIP 9 Inspection of Concrete Reinforcing Steel Mechanical Splices (Cadwelds)(10pages) 427. QCIP 9 Inspection of Concrete Reinforcing Steel Mechanical Spitees (Cadwelds)(10pages) 420. QC 4.0 4 ConcretePrePlacementinspection(12pages)
APPENDIXC(Continued) !
{ .p-455
. . 23 - $
EBASCO Services. Inc. - Quality Assurance Instructions 1
429. 04/19/83 QAI No. 9 Review and Handling of Construction - Installation Records (27pages),
b !
f l
i i
i
[
I t
i T
l
}
r.
AC1 RLQUlst l 14-455 Cf4ti
r APPENDIXC(Continu;d) l Re: F01A-84-455 E8ASCO Services. Inc. - Quality Compliance Reports 430. SRC-76-5-2 05/05/76 Rebar Placement-Shield Wall (1 page) 431. W3QA-129 10/03/75 Quality Assurance Surveillance Report No. SRC-75-10-1 (2 pages) 432. W3QA-156 10/22/75 Quality)AssuranceSurveillanceReportNo.SRG-75-10-1 (1page 433. W3QA-241 12/18/75 Verification of Corrective Action to Audit Report JG-75-12-2 (1 page) 434. W3QA-293 01/23/76 Quality Assurance Audit Report No. JG-75 12 5. Sampling and Testing of Fine & Coarse Aggregate (5 pages) 435. W3QA-382 02/2//84 Quality Assurance Surveillance Report No. SRC-76-2-3 (2pages) 436. W30A 407 03/10/76 Quality Assurance Reaudit Report JG-7512 5A (3 pages) 437. W3QA 594 05/06/76 Quality Assurance Surveillance Report No. SRC 76 5-1 o (2pages) i l
e l
I l
(, APPEND 1X C (Continued)
Re: FOIA-84-455 Ebasco Ouality Assurance Nonconformance Reports f
438. W3-9 7pages) 439. W3 10/JAJ-W3-1 1 page) '
440. W3-11 6 pages 441. W3-12 5 pages 442. W3-19/JAJ-W3-8 4 pages l 443. W3-19A. W3-19/JAJ W3-8A (1page) f 444,
! 445. W3-23/JAJW3-12qlpage))
W3-24 (3page 446, W3-24 1 page 447. W3 25 ((1page 448. W3-25 (8pages;l t 449. W3-26/JAJ W3-13
! 450. W3 27 ((4pagesp 3 pages 451. W3-29 452. W3-31 ((2pages),
3 pages i l
l 453. W3-32 454, W3-33 ((6pagesJ 455. W3-34 2 pages)I (3pages 456. W3-35 (4pages, (2pages)j 457. W3-36 458, W3-37 459. W3 39 (3pagesJ) 34 pa9e 460. W3-40 ((2pages 461. W3 41 2 pages 462. W348/JAJW318((3pages 463. W361/JAJ.W332(3 pages '
464. W3 66/JAJ W3 35 1page) 465. W369/JAJ.W331((3pages;l 466. W378/JAJW345(9 pages) 467. W3-84/JAJ W3 51 4 pages j 468. W385/JAJW358((4 pages p ,
469. W3 86/JAJ W3 54 470. W389/JAJW355(2 pagesp I 3 pagesp 471. W3 92/JAJ W3 561l3pagesi 472. W393/JAJW57(28page) 473. W3 93 - Supp#1 6 pages 474. W393-Supp#2(I 475. W3 95/JAJ W3 59I 476. W3 96/JAJ W3 60g l3pages1page);l pages 477. W397/JAJW36th pages i '
473, W3 98/JAJ.W3 62L pagesh l 4;g, W3 104/JAJ.W3 66 4 pa9esl l 480. W3 106 h i
C1. W3 107 (q1pages11 pagesp 482. W3 108 (28 pages J c3, WJ 110 17pagesp ,
4d4. W3'lII ((28pagesJ 486. W3 113 1,10 pagesJ l
l
APPENDIXC(Continued)
. . Re: F0!A-84-455 ,
486.. W3-114 24 Page 487. W3-115 7pages))
488. W3-116 37 pages ,
C9. W3-123 28 pages i 490. W3-124 i 11 pages I
! 491. W3-127 10 pages 492. W3-128 (,26pages I ,
493. W3-130 ;
I 7 pages) 494. W3-131 ,8 pages) 495. W3-132 (7pages
! 496. W3-137 (6pages)) ,
497. W3-138 7 pages 498. W3-139 (,6pages))
I I
499. W3-141 I,7 pages) :
500. W3-148 I,8 pagesJ 501. W3-193 I!!page) !
502. W3-341A/JAJ-W3-239-A (2 ages) 503. W3 414/JAJ-W3-140 (2pages '
504. W3 491/JAJ-W3-341 (2 pa i 505. W3 535 (17 pages)ges 506. W3 1781/JAJ W3-569 (5 pa ) [
507. W3 5077 508. W3 5997 L;8pages)ges I
1 page) ,
509. W3 5997 ll23pages' 510. W3 5998 511. W3 6212 (,38pages)17pages)J I
i 512. W3 6234 (1page) !
513. W3 6234 189pages) 514. W3 6245 (57pages) 1 515. W3 7153 d5pages) '
516. W3-7154 (11pages 517. W3 7179 14 pages '
518. W3 7302 (37pages 519. W3 7315 ((8pages) ,
520. W3 7353 (2pages )
521. W3 7353 I 522. W3 7353 (, pages pages J,) l 523. W3 7355 i
, pages p 524. W3-7358 I page J 525. W3-7395 ( pages
$26. . W3 7423 8 page 527. W3 7431 528. W3 7481
((
i 1 page 1 page t 529. W3 7514 I!21pages) i i
I ,
[
j APPENDIXC(Continued)
'o Re: FOIA-84-455 E8ASCO Services, Inc. - Audit Rep 3rts 530. 12/02/75 JG-75-12-2 . Concrete Placement Operations Audit (1 page).
531. 12/02/75 JG-75-12-2 LOU 1564.472, QCAP-5 ASTM-C31, QCIP-7 (1 page).
532. 12/02/75 JG-75-12-2 ConcretePlacementOperationsAudit(1page).
533. 12/31/75 JG-75-12-6 Concrete Cylinder Testing, Audit of First 28-Day TestResults(2pages).
534. 01/26/76 JG-76-1-2 Documentation Audit of Placement 499502-7A(2pages).
l JAPPENDIX C (C:ntinued)
( . -
28 -
Re: F01A-84-455 EBASCO Services, Inc. - Field Change Reports 535. CH-3 (1 page) 536. CH-9 (1 page) 537. CH-19 (4 pages) 538. CH-21 (8 pages) 539. CH-26 (1 page) 540. CH-26 (1page) 541. CH-36 (1page) 542. CH-39 (1 page)
- 543. CH_40 (1 page)-
544. CH-45 (1 page) 545. CH-48 (1page) 546. CH-50_ (1 page) 547. CH-55 (1 page) 548. CH-57 (1 page) ,
549. -CH-61 (1 page) 550. CH-63 (1page) 551. CH-73 (1 page) 552. CH-83 (1 page) 553. CH-87~ (1 page) 554. CH-111 (1 page) 555. CH-116 _(1page) 556. 'CH-117 (3 pages) 557. CH-118 (2 pages) 558. CH-130 (18pages) 559. CH-131 (57 pages) 560. CH-586 (9 pages)
% 1 s
,C 'Y ,
t, g I
i
'g
., w a '*
,. ( ,.
d.
+ ,
, j . .
O
':t : ;' N. , .
APPENDIX C (Continued)
Re: F0!A-84-455 Concrete Placement Documents 561. 1973 Ebasco Services, Inc., Ebasco Specification " Mechanical Slipcing of Concrete Reinforcing Steel" (12 pages) 562. 03/11/75 Ebasco Services,-Inc., Ebasco Specification " Concrete Masonry" (60pages)
SC3. 09/23/75 Ebasco Services, Inc., Ebasco Specification " Mechanical Splicing of Concrete Reinforcing Steel - Seismic Class I" (1 page) 564. 10/04/75 Ebasco' Services, Inc. Ebasco Specification " Concrete Masonry -
Seismic Class I" (1 page) 565. 12/11/75 Concrete Placement Inspection Report, Placement No. 477-502-2 (7.pages) 566. 12/16/75 Concrete Placement and Consolidation Training Session, including roster, class outline, and selected notes (5 pages) 567. '03/17/76 Concrete Placement Inspection Report, Placement No. 499-11B (2 pages) 568. 03/22/76 Concrete Preplacement Checklist Record, Placement No. G 499502-5A (84 pages) 569. 04/12/76 Note by David Noss to be attached to Placement Inspection Report Re: Sample Testing of 04/12/76 Pouring (1 page)
~570. 04/22/76 Concrete Curing Log, Placement No. 499503-16 (1 page) 571. 05/12/76 Concrete Curing Log, Placement No. 499503-17 (1 page) ,
572. 08/09/76 Concrete Preplacement Checklist Record, Placement No. G 499503-19 (9 pages)-
573. 08/25/76 Concrete Curing Log, Placement No. 593501-UZ3Z AA (1 page) 574. 09/24/76 Conctete Curing Log, Placement No. 54050-1 (1 page) 575. 11/23/76 Concrete Preplacement Checklist Record, Placement No. 499504-2A-1 (4 pages)
APPENDIXC(Csntinued)
Re: F0IA-84-455 576. 05/19/82 Construction Installation Records Review and Transmittal, Transmittal No. 1645 (2 pages) 577. 06/18/82 Documentation Cross Reference Sheet, Concrete Placement No. 570-503-30, filed with Placement No. 570-502-23 signed by Leo Vial (1 page) 578. 06/18/82 Documentation Cross Reference Sheet, Concrete Placement No. 570-503-30 filed with Placement No. 570-502-23, signed by Leo Vial (1 page) 579. 06/18/82 Documentation Cross Reference Sheet, Concrete Placement No. 570-503-30A filed with Placement No. 570-502-29, signed by Leo Vial (1 page) 580. 06/18/82 Documentation Cross Reference Sheet, Concrete Placement No. 570-503-30C filed with Placement No. 570-503-30, signed by Leo Vial (1 page) 581. 01/04/84 Ebasco Services, Inc. Quality Assurance Instruction, " Quality Assurance Installation Review Group (QAIRG) (Concrete Structures), QAIRG No. 48-3, QAI No. 9 (3 pages) 582. 01/30/84 Concrete / Grout Package Index/ Documentation Guide (10 pages) 583. 09/25/84 LP&L Condition Identification Work Authorization (1 page) 584. Undated Note to Frank Howard and Abe Cochran, LP&L, from Steve Gordy, LP&L, regarding lack of copies of cement grab sample reports (1 page) 585. Undated List entitled " Missing Placement Package Da" (1 page) 586. Undated " Response to LP&L Site Audit Report No. W35-76-8" (3 pages) 587. Undated Charts of discrepancies and corrective actions for 28 placement numbers, each chart dr.ted by date of placement (28 pages)
APPENDIXC(Continued)
~
v .
Re: F01A-84-455 EBASCO Services, Inc..- Miscellaneous Documents 588. 05/24/83 W3-2462 Radiography Summary Report - (1 page).
589. 01/12/84 List of 88 Tensile Test Forms with Duplicate Copies Showing Different Signatures, list signed by Sam Horton, EBASCO (6 pages).
4 i
i I
i l
I i
i i
~
-- APPENDIX C (Continued)
~.. .
Re: F0IA-84-455 EBASCO Services, Incorporated Report :
590. " Clam Shell Filter Blanket Test Report" (Missing pages 66,145,156,and157)
.(244 pages).
i J
A e
i s
t 1
l l
l
_. , .a
APPENDIXC(Continusd) a- . i
. Re: F01A-84-455
- 591.. : EBASCO SERVICES ?NCORPORATED REPORT, " MAT 10B PLACEMENT REPORT",
DATED MAY 1976 (86 pages) 3 t
i f
f 4
9
-~~
,p, 4 ,- ,
APPENDIX C (ContinuQd) 34 -
Re: F01A-84-455 J. A. JONES CONSTRUCTION COMPANY CORRESPONDENCE 592. 06/18/75 QA Prograra for Phase I Concrete Construction - Waterford 3 (16 pages) 593. 12/09/75 Purchase Order from J. A. Jones Construction to Southern Pump Crete (1 page) 594. 12/17/75 Letter to Ebasco from Jerry P. Leonard, " Louisiana Power & Light Q.A. Stop Work Order No.1," with stated enclosure (9 pages) 595. 12/17/75 Letter to Ebasco froe' Jerry P. Leonard, " Louisiana Power & Light Q.A. Stop Work Order No.1," (3 pages) 596. 12/17/75 Letter to Mr.1ktidar Hussain frora G. A. Greathouse,
Subject:
"Ebasco Quality Assurance Audit of Concrete Pour for Placerent #6" (2 pages) 597. 12/17/75 Letter to Ebasco free Jerry P. Leonard, " Louisiana Power & Light Q. A. Stop Work Order No.1," (2 pages) 598. 12/18/75 Letter to Ebasco from Jerry P. Leonard, "Lcuisiana Pcwer & Light O. A. Stop Work Order No.1," (2 pages) 599. 12/18/75 Letter fron Jerry Leonard to Personnel Involved in The Placerent of Cencrete
Subject:
" Concrete Placement Directives" (1 page) 600. 12/18/75 Letter to Al Prince from Jerry P. Leonard,
Subject:
" Work Procedure W-h?-7 Revising Directive" (1 page) 601. 02/10/76 Letter to Mr. John Whalen from G. A. Greathouse,
Subject:
" Praise of Mr. R. Basha=, Field Manager at Waterford SER Unit #3 Site" (2 pages) 602. 01/12/82 Letter to George Hill fror. Kathy Krenzer,
Subject:
"Cadweld Certification of Jane Ogea," w/ enclosed certificate (2 pages)
APPENDIX C (Continued)
Re: F0lA-84-455 J. A. Jones Construction Company - Procedures 603-604. W-SP-1 Cadwelding, 2 sets (Total pages 12) 605-606. W-SP-2 Disposal of Unused Cadweld Powder, 2 sets (Total pages 5) 607-612. W-SP-6 Bending and Straightening of Reinforcing Bars Partially Embedc.ed-in Concrete and Placing of Bars in Hardened-Concrete, 6 sets (Total pages 23)
' 613-619. W-SP-7 Repair and Curing of Concrete Repair for Placement 499502-10B, 7 sets (Total pages 150) 620-621. W-SP-8 Backfill Test Fill, 2 sets (Total pages 13) 622. W-SP-9 Testing Reinforcing Steel Subjected to Cold Rebending, I set (Total pages 6) 623-625. W-SP-13 Repair, Inspection, Documentation and Verification of the Base Mat Foundation Beneath Columns H10A And H11A Lying on Placement 19, 3 sets (Total pages 34) 626-630. W-SP-16 Repair, Inspection, Documentation, and Verification of Placement 499503-19, 5 sets (Total pages 33) 631-633. W-SP-17 Additional Grouting of 499502-10B, 3 sets (Total pages 31) 634. W-SP-20 Concrete Core Drilling,1 set (Total pages 5) 635-636. W-SITP-2 Clam Shell Filter Blanket Inspection, 2 sets (Total pages 10) 637-647 W-SITP-4 Reinforcing Steel - Handling, Storage, Installing, Cadwelding and Modification Inspection, 11 sets (Total pages 134) 648 W-SITP-5 Embedded Items - Handling, Storage and Installation Inspection, I set (Total pages 6) 649-655. W-SITP-7 Inspection of Concrete Placing, Curing, finishing and Repair, 7 sets, (Total pages 67) 656-660. W-SITP-8 Waterstop Inspection, 5 sets (Total pages 28) 661-668. W-SITP-12 Backfill and Compaction Inspection, 8 sets (Total pages 53) 669. W-SITP-14 Welding Inspection, I set (Total pages 14) 670-671. W-SITP-16 Inspection of Concrete Mud Slab Placing, Curing, Finishing and Repair, 2 sets (Total pages 8) 672-673. W-WP-2 Clam Shell Filter Blanket Placement, 2 sets (Total pages 10) 674-677. W-WP-4 Handling, Storage, Installing, Cadwelding and Modification of Reinforcing Steel, 4 sets (Total pages 24) 678-684. W-WP-7 Concrete Placing, Curing, Finishing and Repairs, 7 sets (Total pages 84)
, 685-687. W-WP-8 Handling, Installation, and Field Repair of Waterstops, 3 sets (Total pages 20) 688. W-WP-12 Backfilling and Compaction, I set (Total pages 7) 689. W-WP-17 Housekeeping, I set (Total pages 5) 690-693. P0P-N-300 Control of Engineering Docur.nnts, 4 sets (Total pages 57) 694-700. P0P-N-301 Construction Engineering, 7 sets (Total pages 75) 701. P0P-N-605 Indoctrination and Training, I set (Total pages 6) 702-706. P0P-N-702 Personnel Training, Qualification and Certification, 5 sets (Total pages 33) 707-709. P0P-N-713 Use of Discrepancy Reports, 3 sets (Total pages 26)
I
, . < , :APPENDIXC(Continued)
Re: F01A-84-455 C. A.' Jones Construction Co. - Discrepancy Report 710. DRN-0005 (1 page) 711. DRN-0006 (1page) 712. DRN-0007 (1 page 713. DRN-0015 (1page 714. DRN-0016 (1 page 715. DRN-0017 (1page) 716. DRN-0019 (1page) 717. DRN-0020 (1page) 718. DRN-0021 (1page) 719. DRN-0025 (1page) 720. DRN-0026 1 page) 721. DRN-0028 2pages) 722. DRN-0029 1page) 723. DRN-0030 (1page) 724. DRN-0033 (1 page) 725. DRN-0038 (1page) 726. DRN-0040 (1 page) 727. DRN-0042 (1 page) 728. DRN-0043_ (1 page) 729. DRN-0045 (1 page) 730. DRN-0046 (1page) 731. DRN-0047 (2pages) 732. DRN-0048 (1page) 733. DRN-0049 (3 pages) 734. DRN-0050 (2pages) 735. DRN-0051 (1page) 736. DRN-0054 (2pages) 737. DRN-0056 (1page) 738. DRN-0058 (1page) 739. DRN-0059 (1page) 740. DRN-0063 (1page) 741. DRN-0064 (1page) 742. DRN-0065 (1 page) 743. DRN-0073 (1 page) 744. DRN-0074 (1page) 745. DRN-0075 (1 page) 746. .DRN-0076 (1 page) 747. 'DRN-0077 (1page) 748. DRN-0081 (1 page) 749. DRN-0003 (1page) 750.. DRN-0084 (1page) 751.. DRN-0095 (1page) 752. DRN-443 (8pages)
APPENDIX C (C*.ntinu:d)
-4 , . 4 Re: F01A-84-455 L 753. EXCERPTS FROM HARSTEAD ENGINEERING ASSOCIATED, INC. REPORT, ;
WATERFORD III SES ANALYSIS OF CRACKS AND WATER SEEPAGE IN FOUNDATION MAT" DATED SEPTEMBER 19, 1983 (106 pages) i i
i b
J 4
1 i
i i
1 I
3 l
9 4
i 5
+
i I
4 1
- 7 wy - . -- ---.
,o. , _ . - +%.-- ~,c,. ,,m.
APPENDIX C (C:ntinued)
Re: F01A-84-455 Peabody Testing Services, Inc. - Reports '
754. 05/10/76 Letter to J. O, Booth, EBASCO Services, Inc., from John W.
Tingley, Peabody Testing Services, transmitting report of preliminary results of tests regarding proportioning of concrete, Class AA, using Type II cement (36 pages).
755. 09/20/77 Letter to J. O. Booth, EBASCO Services, Inc., from Garry Warren, Peabody Testing Services, Inc., transmitting report of preliminary results of tests regarding proportioning of concrete, Class AAA, using Type II cement (70 pages).
756. undated Portion of concrete test report by Peabody Testing Services (19 pages).
4, , APPENDIX C (C:ntinued)
Re: F0!A-84-455 t NRC-Generated Documents Not in PDR 757. 10/05/83 Memorandum for George Knighton, NRR, from George Lear, NRR, !
Subject:
" Preliminary Assessment of Waterford 3, Concrete i Mat Cracking and Water Seepage Issue" (2 pages) with attached 1 note to Darrell Eisenhut, NRR, et al., from Edward S.
Christenbury,OELD,
Subject:
"Waterford 3 Report on Water ;
Seepage and Concrete Cracking" (2 pages) !
758, 11/16/83 Memorandum for Darrell Eisenhut, NRR, from John D. Collins, Region IV, subject: " Inspection of Dewatering and Excavation Activities and Construction of the Common Foundation Mat for the Waterford 3 Project" (2 pages) 759. 11/28/83 ASLAB, "NRC Staff's Answer to Joint Intervors' Motions to Reopen Contentions 8/9 and 22" with Attachment 1, letter to R. S.
Leddick, LP&L, dated 10/17/83, subject: " Request for Additional Information Concerning Concrete Mat Cracking and Water Seepage Issues at Waterford 3" (4 pages); Attachment 2, letter to George W. Knighton, NRR, from K. W. Cook, LP&L, subject:
" Response to NRC Basemat Questions" (9 pages); Attachment 3, a Memorandum for Darrell G. Eisenhut, NRR, from John. T. Collins, Region IV, " Inspection of Dewatering and Excavation Activities t
and Construction of the Comon Foundation Mat for the Waterford 3 Project" (2 pages); and " Affidavit of Raman Pichumani " before ASLAB, dated 11/28/83, and "Affadavit of Raymond O. Gonzales, 11 before ASLAB, dated 11/28/83.
760. 02/15/84 Memorandum for Sherwin E. Turk, OELD, from John S. Ma, NRR,
Subject:
"Waterford 3 Concrete Base Mat" (3 pages) 761. 12/15/84 Memorandum for Sherwin E. Turk, OELD from John S. Ma, NRR,
Subject:
"Waterford 3 Concrete Base Mat" (3 pages) 762. 04/06/84 Memorandum to file from James H. Wilson, NRR,
Subject:
" Meeting Summary for LP&L's Presentation of Basemat Adequacy at Waterford3"(177pages) 763. 04/27/84 Memorandum for Dennis Crutchfield, NRR, from George Lear, NRR,
Subject:
" Structural Adequacy and Safety Evaluation of Waterford 3 Base Mat" (48 pages) 764. 05/11/84 Notes by Robert E. Shewmaker, IE, entitled " Bonding Solution Base Mat Shear Waterford" (9 pages)
- 765. 05/17/84 Memorandum for Waterford 3 Task Force Members from Dennis M.
Crutchfield, Manager, WTF,
Subject:
" Control and Distribution of Waterford 3 Tracking System Document" (3 pr.ges)
3 APPENDIX C (Csntinued)
Re: F01A-84-455 766. 05/18/84 Memorandum for J. Tapia, Region IV, and H. Wong, IE, from G. Arndt, RES, entitled "R. G.1.10, Rev.1, dated 1/2/73"
- (2pages) 767. 05/21/84 Memc'randum for Dennis Crutchfield, WTF, from L. C. Shao, RES,
Subject:
" Consultant's Evaluation of Construction Adequacy ofWaterfordBasemat"(15pages) 768. 05/31/84 Letter to Joseph I. Giarrusso, President, New Orleans City Counsel, from John T. Collins, Region IV, regarding New Orleans City Counsel resolution to make Waterford findings public (5pages) 769. 07/26/84 Memorandum to file from Lisamarie Lazo. NRR,
Subject:
" Summary of July 10, 1984 Meeting" (2 pages) 770. Undated Memorandum for Dennis Crutchfield, WTF, from Richard H. Vollmer, DE
Subject:
"Waterford 3 Basemat Evaluation" (45 pages) 771. Undated Notes entitled " Comments on Lear Memo" (4 pages) 772. Undated Notes entitled " Bill Crossman Request" (3 pages) 773. Undated Notes entitled " Addendum to Review of Waterford III Basemat Analysis" (6 pages) 774. Undated Notes entitled "WAT-3 Basemat HQ" (1 page) 775. Undated Briefing notes entitled " Louisiana Power and Light Company Waterford SES Unit 3" (10 pages) 776. Undated Note describing sequence of events surrounding Gambit newspaper article entitled "A Poor Foundation at Waterford III?" (3 pages) 777. Undated Draft description of contract program between NRC and R. A.
Muenow and Associates to perform non destructive examination of cracks in the Waterford 3 Basemat (2 pages)
APPENDIX C (Continu:d)
FOIA-84-455 Correspondence of Robert E.'Philleo, Consultant, to NRC 778. 05/08/84 Report entitled " Evaluation of Concrete in the Basemat Waterford Unit No. 3" by Robert E. Philleo (7 pages).
779. 05/14/84 Letter to Lawrence C. Shao, RES, from Robert E. Philleo,
Subject:
" Sheer Stress on In-plane Membrane" (2 pages).
780. 05/29/84 Robert E. Philleo, " Comments on Chen Report" (1 page).
781. 05/29/84 Robert E. Philleo, " Comments on Ma Report" (1 page). .
782. undated RobertE.Philleo,"TemperatureCrackinginBasemat"(2pages). '
1 1
I i
1 i
, ,~,---,e--my, wen--- s ~---a e ww-c. --w
APPENDIXC(Continued)
Re: F0!A-84-455 Industry Standards Comittee Documentation 783. 02/22/74 Draft revision of ANSI Standard entitled " Requirements for Auditing of Quality Assurance Programs for Nuclear Power Plants," draft 3, revision 4 (6 pages).
784. 10/30/80 Letter to William C. Black, Chairman, Working Group on Reinforcing and Prestressing Systems, from Geza Valentenyi
Subject:
" Testing Frequency of Rebar Splices" (1 page).
785. 06/17/81 ACI-ASME Minutes Working Group on Reinforcing and Prestressinmeeting in of 06/17/81 .
786. 10/19/84 Letter from Romuald E. Lipinski, NRR, to James Allen, Chairman, Joint Comittee ASME/ACI-359, urging comittee to reconsider its decision not to revise code, although code revision was recommended by Geza Valentenyi (2 pages).
.as . ,, APPENDIX D Re: F01A-84-455 DOCUMENTS SUBJECT TO F01A-455 WHICH ARE ALREADY IN PDR
- 1. 07/12/83 Note to M. Peranich, NRC, from R. Shewmaker, NRC,
Subject:
" Additional Information", included in F01A-83-508 (Lyon) (ANO 8312130039)(6pages)
- 2. 12/12/83 ASLAB, " Amended and Supplemental Motion to Reopen Contention 22" by Carole H. Burstein, Co-counsel for Joint Intervenors (ANO831216025)ADOCK50-382G(13pages)
Subject:
" Louisiana Power and Light Company Meeting on March 26,1984"(ANO8404110265)ADOCK50-382A(6pages)
- 4. 05/08/84 Memorandum to file from Dennis M. Crutchfield, NRR,
Subject:
" Memorandum from G. Lear to D. Crutchfield" (ANO 8405220267)
ADOCK 50-382A (2 pages)
- 5. 05/08/84 Memorandum to file from Dennis M. Crutchfield, NRR,
Subject:
"MemorandumfromG.LeartoD.Crutchfield"(ANO 8405220267)
ADOCK50-382A(50pages)
- 6. 07/25/84 ASLAB, "NRC Staff's Motion for Extension of Time" by Sherwin E. Turk, Deputy Assistant Chief Hearing Counsel (ANO 8407270176) ADOCK 50-382G (2 pages) with attached
" Affidavit of Dennis M. Crutchfield, (ANO 8407270269)
ADOCK50-382G(47pages)
s ; ..
i
. GOVERNMENT ACCOUNTADILITY PROJECT Institute for Policy Studies 1901 Que Street. N.W., Washington. D.C. 20009 (202)234 9382 Freedom of Information ket Request May 31, 1984 Director Office of Administration FREEDOM OF INFORMATK)N Nuclear Regulatory Commission ACT E UEST Washington, D.C. 20555 y.y g3 To Wh'om It May Concern: b N (p@f Y Pursuant to the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA), 5 U.S.C.1552, the Government Accountability Project (GAP) of the Institute for Policy Studies requests copies of any and all agency records and information, including but not limited to notes, letters, memoranda, draf ts, minutes, diaries, logs, calendars, tapes, transcripts, summaries, interview reports, procedures, instructions, engineering analyses, drawings, files, graphs, charts, maps, photographs, agreements, handwritten notes, studies, data sheets, notebooks, books, telephone messages, computations, voice recordings, computer run-offs, any other data compilations, interim and/or final reports, status reports, and any and all other records relevant to and/or generated "
in connection with (1) Any report or study of the basemat cracking and water leakage and seepage problems at the Waterford III plant conducted and issued subsequent to the formation of the Special Investigation Team, including such a report or study prepared without the input of the team by either contractors or other members of the staff.
This request includes all agency records as defined in 10 C.F.R. 59.3a(b) and the NRC Manual, Appendix 0211, Parts 1.A.2 and A.3 (approved October 8,1980) whether they currently exist in the NRC official, " working," investigative or other files, or at any other location, including private residences.
If any recorcs as defined in 10 C.F.R. $9.3a(b) and the NRC Manual, supra, and covered by this request have been destroyed and/or removed after this request, please provide all surr,ounding records, including but not limited to a list of all records which have been or are destroyed and/or removed, a description of the action (s) taken relevent to, generated in connection with, and/or issued. in order to implement the action (s).
GAP requests that fees be waived, because " finding the information can be considered as primarily benefitting the general public." 5 U.S.C. 3552(a)(4)(a). GAP is a non-profit, nonpartisan public interest organization concerned with honest and open government. Through public outreach, the Project promotes whistleblowers as agents N Nh 1h. ,
..'.. 'Direclor
'/
Tffice of Administration 2 ,
4
- of government accountability. Through its Citizer,s Clinic, GAP offers assistance to local public interest and citizens groups seeking to ensure the health and safety of their communities. The Citizens Clinic is currently assisting several citizens
,~
groups, local governments and intervenors in the mid-Michigan area concerning the construction of the Midland plant.
We are requesting the above infomation as part of an ongoing monitoring project on the adequacy of the NRC's efforts to protect public safety and health at nuclear
, power plants.
F.or any documents or portions that you deny due to a specific FOIA exemption, please
! provide an index itemizing and describing the documents or portions of documents withheld. The index should provide a detailed justification of your grounds for '
claiming each exemption, explaining why each exemption is relevant to the document or
! portion of the document withheld. This index is required under Vaughn v. Rosen (I),
t 484 F.2d 820 (D.C.Cir.1973), cert. denied, 415 U.S. 977 (1974),
W2 look forward to your response to this request within ten days.
i l
- Billie Pirner Garde Citizens Clinic Director l r 5
a l
l r
D .,1 .
J c ..,
4 ;
- l LOUIS!ANA m - r ev 4 . .c == =
P O W E R S, LI G H T ! NeWOE4.EANS.UoWGANA 2 53 4 l5381SGO BeDe esRawa: September 29, 1983 ,
..M. CAIN
. Presicent and Chief Executne otticer W3?83-3289 Richard C. DeToung. Director (
Office of Inspection and Enforcement U.S. Nuclear Regula:ory Co==ission * '
g Washi=gton, D.C. 20555 10 SUIJEC7: Waterford 3 SIS Docket No. 50-382 .
Zw ";CI GC Latter Dated August 4, 1983 -
Dear Mr. DaToung:
Enclosed for your review is the report prepared by LP&L's Independen: Safety -
Engineering Group (ISIG) covering the ac:fon plan outlined in our submittal of Sep:e=ber 1, 1983. 1 I would lika to point out that the Earstaad Engineering Associatas (EEA) re-pc : is their initial report covering an assessman: of the concrete cracking and water saepage problems. A second report covering the design adequacy of the base =a: is scheduled to be issued by EIA on oc:obar 15, 1983. The delay
. _ i= issuing this section of the report is due to m.'A perfc;=ing independen: .
i calenlations on the base =at design.
The L?&L Safety Review Cc ittaa (SRC) has reviewed the approach taken by ISIG for addressing the concerns of your latter of August 4,1983; and agrees that the approach represents a reasonable method to addrass the conearns. In =aking this judsman:, the SRC has reviewed the enciesed repor: and discussed 1: vith me= bars of ISIG. .
As you vill recall from our nesting of August 25, 1983, you suggested tha:
L?&*. look at as =uch as possible in addressing the issues contained in your le: tar of August 4, 1983. The ISIG ac:Los plar submitted to you on Septenbar 1,1983 was broader in scope than we had proposed in the mee:ing. In addition to the ac: ion plan, ISIG valked down four safety related ,synta=s, provided an evaluation of the American Bridge issue, and increased the LP&L Q.A. systa= status reviews by :vo.
.. M OFINFORMATOi h0h &1 Cs ACTletQUEST
$4-457
.aeteceosse. 330929 2
- i i PDR ADOCK OSC00 g g /f' -
Cg
i
- 9. * . +. ; e
. RichardC.D$Toung F:33 2
W3P83-3289 Plasse call if you wish to discuss the report, or if you have any questions.
Sincerely. ,
i g J eff_ 1/M ,
1
.. J.M. Cain ,
2 Juc/an/p, .
l 8 .
Enclosure J
~
cce E. Blake. W.M. Stevenson, J.T. Collins. G.L. Constable l
i f i
i ,
I I '
i 4
l J
i e
S
- e a
e em ,
b l .
M e
- a. .
O e
S e
e i
. - - . . . . . - . . ._ . - -- - - . . . _ _,,,__-v- , _ . - . . - . - , _ . _ , - m.
OE p yyO61(47 J
' 1 h'JJklueW k%*IRFORD 3 SES l .
INDEFENDENT SAFITY INCINEIKING CROUP i
) ISIG $7EC'AL REFCET -
i :
I "ISIC RETII'J OF NRC CCNCERUS"
~
4 Frepared by di j w A fo h Date ?/2?/r4
. s/
/ . . . '.A n. 'S
. Date a11 e19g
,. ll ud.?FI!A///
- u Date t 4\n
/3d . $1f Date 9 b3 tr e
, ,2 Date 4 hb If3 l "IL- e Date .= w s 1
- isl Y Date a ILR1ty' l
Reviewed by .
.// ,
./1 ,,
..Date ,
me. , /r3 Approved by /
- 1: e Date Phf/Pt '
N(clea Services Manager .
A F
8% 2 /A A yn yf [ s}~l/p:*, ' ,
D
~
d = V V f f r u j - ,
o- ., .
INrRCDUCTION AND
SUMMARY
2 i
3
. ISIG performed reviews and evaluations as required on each of the Additional Q.A. areas were ,
five issues contained in the action plan.
f '
reviewed that ver,e,not required by the action plan.
These additional
. i areas of review included cuo additional LFE Q.A. systems status reviews, i an evaluati*on of the American Bridge issue, and a walk down of four safety ralated systems. Details and cosclusions are included in the content of . .
the report.
Approximately 520 man-hours were expended in the preparation of this report. The I ISIG found no significant deficiencias in LP&L's Q.A. program. -
l Q.A. program is functioning as intended, and L7E is aware of all pro-s a tic aspects.
i l
i
- e e
e 9
e 1
i e
se ,
1 0
1 G
t l .- ._. - ..
0 ; ,
4 I. Issue - Deficiencias in four systema turned over to LF&L.
)
A. Reviev l l
ISEC reviewed the following documentation:
J ,.
- 1) USNRC 1stter 50-382/EA 82-109. Notice of Violation.
1 . ,
'2) LF&L's reply (W3I83-0001) and sunnary report (W3I83-0115),
i .
-Y The Associated Audit Report for the Quality ,
3)
Assurance /Ingineering Task Force Review of Installed
. ,., g;
- gg Structures / Components (LF&L Audit Report 1r35-43-3),
. . ;g . *
- < - .2
- 4) Ralated NRC inspection report 50-382/82-14, 4
l 1
- 5) LF&L Quality Procedure 19.1, ,
- v. . . ' ,
- 6) Related QA Site Audit Reports.
< , ,' (.
The results of L76L QA status review concerning the sixty-seven (67) of eighty-five (85) safety related systems turned over to LF&L startup and the associated quality procedure vote analyzed and reviewed.
se .
e e
I-1
^~
l,
--,nn- . - -- ., , ~ . . - - ,
- t i o*
- f ,g . .
1 s ISIC reviewed the four safety related systems transferred to the ,
4 * . .
plant staff before September 1, 1983 and an additional system I
4 transferred during September 1983. Additional procedures were.
I reviewed as necessary. t l .
j .
i ISEC aise reviewed documentatism associated with American Bridge
)
- Campany Quality Assurasse Task Force Baview and subsequent
}
l '.
actions. ,
I, j.
j; 3. Essalts 4
i . t 3
In response to the NRC Notice of Violation L76L developed a task fores actima plan for review of quality records and verification [
1, ,
l -
i I
of installation for selected activities performed by contractors
)
i
- who performed safety related activities prior to June 1, 1982. : ,
, Task force Installation Verification (Quality Procedure 19.1) was !
written to implement the provisions of the action plan and to I
- - provide specific details for verification of the physical
{
i
'.. configuration of structures and esaposants.
L
- ..~
LF&L's smeary report to the NRC stated that the adequacy of the l #
I areas enemined was confirmed, and the pnysical verification I indicated that' as-built configurations conformed to design i
drawings and documents. The deficiencies identified were
- followed up by two re-audits by LP&L Sonstruction QA. Three
!' . items remain open sad are being pursued by QA. A, third re-audit 1
is anticipated within the next mostA to closeout these remaining l
opea items.
I-2 l
, - . _ _ _ . _ , _*,--m.,&_,m-.- _
_---.-,_,_-----,.n-,
. - - - _ w.y.,- ,-,, , - _ _ _ _ . . , ,. - , - , , , . _ , _ , - , , . _ . , , ,.c -__.
O ,
E .
s
- ISEC reviewed the American Bridge audits and background. l 1
American 3 ridge (A-3) was one of the contractors selected for review in the Task Force Audit. LF&L started their task force i 6
l review of A-3 on February 7,1983 and completed the audit on
. I March 30, 1983. '
~
- The Task Force review was constrained due to the upcoming het l
functional testing and a concurrent review by Dasco Qua11ry .
l I
- Assurance Installation Review Group (QAIRC). Non-Conformance
',b layerts (NC1's) generated by Ibasco's review were utilized as an indication of probles areas. The Task force Review centered .
primarily on a documentation review with a physical inspection on ,
i A490 high strength bolting used on the steam generator framing.
The Task Torce Audit did not pursue physical verification of l ,
American Bridge welding since welding problems W re being noted and addressed by Dasco. ,
The Ibasco QAIRG review brought to light problems with American Bridge concerning welding deficiencies in the Reactor Containment , ;
luilding (Fotentially Reportable Deficiency FED 106 on 3/11/83) ,
and the laattor Aun111ary Building (FAD 111 on 3/29/83). FID 106 was upgraded to a Significant Construction Deficiency (SCD 73) on 4/11/83. PRD 111 was upgraded to SCD 78 en 4/28/83. Both SCD's were incorycrated into SCD 78 since it was the same contractor and probles. .. .
O 1-3 G
I mm e
I e.
'.' i
' - l
., -L l . 1
! O l.)'.
4 i
The Task Terce Audit Report related to American Bridge did not indicate the swateness of any welding deficiencies. The summary i
l i
l
+ [@f ef the report sa American Bridge stated "the physical walkdeva of i
j 7
.c,
- the selected area of review indicates that engineered drawings l l -
I a
reflest the as-built configuraties with a few exceptions being l A*. .,
asted is aedit findiass." LP&L was aware of the possible welding
.' ' ..L l
- .'. j 1
' ** - deficiaasies and, had addressed the problem through senaal shamaels. Sines SCD 78 had been reported, LP&L felt that it .
f i.?
j would be namesessary to restate this problem. Additionally, at f
- $.}
the time the task force report was prepared, a determination had i
..i 'd i 4?' not been ande as to the eatent of the problem. Accordingly, this .
l ..,
- n. .
informaties was met reflected La :.P&L's report to the NRC.
j ..is t j . s. .
f
.'$3 I
LF6L QA has determined that Ebasco has adequately responded to [
l ' ,[
j i 1- the Task Audit Findings and the A-3 items will*4e addressed La j
- l the response to SCD 78. !
I l f I .
o .
Corrective actions included a semprehensive reinspection prograa -
- r i
j , ., :
that is couplete. Reverk which resulted from the inspecties is l t
1 alaest semplete and the weldias porties is scheduled to be .
}
l !
[,
]; .
sempleted by aid-Oetober. A respease to SCD 78 is due to the NRC ;
{ [
by 10/28/83.
tf .
.- i I
I ISEG, as a result of its review including audits, reaudits, and t t
i personnel interviews consindes that the A-3 Problem has been i 3
adequately addressed and that the proper terrective
- actions have ;
i been Lastituted. . l I. t
]ed '
t
.r .
t 5 I i ~
l
)
l
_ _ _ - - - ,, _ . ._._ .-~ . , _ _ - , _ _ . . _ _ _ , _ . _ _ _ . - ~ . _ . , _ - . . . _ _ _ - _ _ , . _
4 ,
. . . .? . .
s
. '.d In conclusion, the actions associated with the implementation of the Task force Audit Raport appear to be in order and adequate.
7
' The LP&L Construction QA system status review was' performed on a system basis (67 of 85 systems). The activities of each centractor performing safety related work was examined. The LP&L 3 .' .
% status review consisted of a review of documentation and a f j: system walkdown. At least 10% of the controlling documents for .
each contracter favolved was reviewed. The L?&L QA physical t
' .~b . . netallation inspections were randon for each system. ISIG also j .-
i performed a system walkdown on portions of four rsadenly selected .
]. ,
safety related systems. The directions of the systen turnover i ..
,. ".},' procedure and the applicable system drawings were used in .
- performing these inspections. Specific items observed included the following
l 1
i 1) correct veld nu:abers and locat,1on i
- 2) correct hanger and support location and identification .
- 3) general appearance of hangers and components (bclts, pins, i
- orifice plates, etc.)
- 4) correct location of branch lines, valves, strataars, I .
orifices, drains and vents 4 - 5) general configuration of the systen per the drawings.
~
i This additional review revealed no deffeiencies.
9
- I-5 M
~
s .
,. i*.
k
~.
Since the initial four systems' rejeetion by L7EL C :strue:1on Q&, appresimately thirteen systems have been rejected by QA.
The deficiencies identified by QA involve documentation related problems and isolated minor hardware installation errors.
Four of seven systems transferred to the plant staff before September 1,1983 have been audited by operations QA., na
,, following systems and number of findings were noted: .
J ,e Svstem Audit Date No. of Findists c.- 2A-12.5 Volt DC Safety Dec. 82 7 U.,3; '
- .Y. , 84-708/120 Volt Safety Jan. 83 2 .
.gg C- .
69-Vibration & Loose June 83 2
~
Parts Monitoring ** '
17-Seismic Monitoring July 83 0 These findings involved minor documentation errors. "he QA prograer procedures for audits and auditor training were written in compliance to requirements of the FSA1. nose procedures were in place before the auditing practices were employed on safety I system audits.
The QA auditing process included the following steps.
- 1) A selection of qualified auditors, lead audito,r, and technical advisor took place. .
1-4 I
I l
3c !
L ,
l , % %, -
l
- s , sc 1
...,.- - w % ., &
.; .~ n _% . m ,
, , .*' - , , s .
s 'l ~
s
. :.-- \
was held'to determine the scope of the
!~.# - 2) A' pre-audit,meerids%
- p-
~~
L. . .
., audit. 5 s n .
- 3) Check sheets were prepared to be used in performing the audit. These check sheets included requirements which have
.' b been committed by L?&L as listed in the 75A1, Reg. .
. c. ,. . . . ,
, g ,
I \ Guides, applicsble ANSI Standards, Technical Specifications.
9, ,
- * .s .
e and otbat docuacnts.
, g .
' ' 4) The audit was perforuid and the findings were compiled. -
')5 l .. : meeting was bald with perscnnel responsible for
! A post a.2dic
. . af, , 4
+
w
- r. , ,,
$,.g. ._
system ::ansfer.
. , s '
, 3 6) T$e audit report was f4 m14 red _and_ issued. '
. .~,r s .
7)' Iha audit findings were tracked and closed out.
.*_; egg a. s w ss 3
~.; .::. J p '
$N 3,f ,
s
-?
ISEG's review indicaced that Waterford 3 operations QA personnel N
3
- , perforrid audits W.th" strict compliance to he* approved auditing .
~
\, \
procedura. It is concluded that the nu=ber of deficiencies discovehd has been decreasing as. operations personnel gain 4, si experience in the' system turnover process. This trend is further i
JW substantiated by a recent audit performed after September 1, 1983
.. . . which reculted in no findings.
s, In su= mary,; ,other deficiencias have been identified during the
. ,* 1 .
cour,se.'cf ,L construction by LP&L QA. Some of ~ these deficiencies 1, +
i;. X* invelDe a breakdown in a QA progran as defined in 10CTR50.55(e).
'4 % , %
'heh
- Eovaver, ISIG does not consider that-these deficiencies involve w,
.i che same type of breakdown as those found by L?k QA concer=ing A. i .
i e' N N the first four systems. -
t
- .i A o
Q
- I-7
- -: /.- )y:,, s ' 3, d
l c. t .
l .-
g+=,.
. II. Issue - LP&L did not icnow whether its QA program was being e . .:. .
l implemented.
l l
l A. Reviev
~
ISIG reviewed approximately 1020 documents which included the
- following: ,
~
- 1) documentation associated with audits conducted by LP&L of CI, .
- .. . Ebasco, and other contracters from 1974 to 1977,
.6 .
q., 2) documentation associated with site audits during 1974-1977, x . ..:- .
. .:.n
. 15 . .
[
- 3) documentation associated with other audits the results c3 -
f .
I
^
which were reported to LP&L 1974-1977. -
I The Torrey Pines Technology (TPT) Report was reviewed and in particular the conclusion regarding Task A of the report as it l
relates to quality assurance. l
- 3. Results I
The 1974-1977 audits and surveillances were examined for conformance to the in place programmatic requirements, the management of corrective action reco==endations, the managenent of the auditing process, and the level of =anagement involved in the auditing process. The audit and surveillance matrix included II-1 O
s%
9
.s - .
,.; . as attachment II-1 displays the considerable amount of Quality
. .~ .:: -
1.YG; Assurance documents within the time frame of interest.
Ay
. The programmatic requirements from 1974 to 1977 are shown as attmehment II-2. This group of commitments, approved by the AtomicEnargyCommission,wascommonlyknownasthe" Gree;n
~,'. ).'
..s . :. '
" ^ LP&L included AEC Regulatory Guides (AIC position on ANSI
. _'. :P standards) as a further commitment. Since the LP&L QA -
'/-\ requirements encompassed those of all supplying organizations, corporate QA and field QA conducted a program audit to assure
[3[I{ (
that supply organizations were aligned with the program
.bc. . - requirements. The L?&L auditing process was carried out 1
'#p.%$~9 g.q. according to documented procedures and accepted standards.
>~~ <#
Requests for c=rrective action vere from the executive (Vice
,} President) level of L?&L =anagement. This restilted in effective and timely reply to deficient areas identified in audits.
. Raaudit was perfor=ed in areas where -Jte supply organization response to corrective action was desned insufficient. As a 4 check on internal QA effectiveness, jcint audits of the LP&L QA program were conducted by other members of the Middle South System. Again, corrective actions-vere performed and transmittals were routed through appropriate levels of management.
- L?&L delegated a portion of its auditing and surveillance respcasibilities to Ibasco QA while maintaining overall authority of the program. It should be noted that during this time frame 4
" II-2 1
f f'
_ _ _e ,_, . , , . . _ , . . _ . . . _ _ , . , . , . ~ -
r Ebasco generated the majority of QA documents. When these were
====%ed by ISEG certain questions and corrective actions were noted concerning D asco's QA activities.
1 (1) During the time in question Lasco transmitted requests for corrective action from the QA Supervisor level. Bis met
_' - Dasco's program requirements and was usually affective. It
,- should be noted that after this time period D asco installed.
a manager of QA on. site primarily due to a request from LP&L.
g.
(2) For nasco surveillances during 1974 and for Dasco site
.y contractor audits during 1974 and 1975, D asco's progran did
, ,Q not require distribution of the reports to L?&L if no findings were noted. During this period, L?&L's QA audii:s .
sampled Dasco audits including those vitHout findings.
Since this time period, L?&L QA has received all nasco QA reports. This was a required corrective action.
(3) Dasco surveillsaces with findings were closed (i.e.,
t acceptable corrective action performed) without supporting l documentation during 1975. On the surveillance index,
" Closed" was written and no explanation offered. LP&L QA )
, I
. corrected this situation in 1976 by requiring supporting documentation he'available for " Closed" findings. ,
(
II-3 I
l l
e .. . . l' (4) Some nasco surveillance findings in 1976 for routine items
~
(such as a tag missing from a piece of stored equipmEt) were not. closed until 1980. Closure was accomplished by an LP&L audit of Dasco QA activities. The LP&L QA program was
~
able to go in and find minor Ibasco QA deficiencies that had O -
been essentially forgotten, point them out, and correct; then 4 . .
. even though,some time had passed. Our review indicates that
., this variation in the program did not have an adverse effect ,
' ~
on quality.
A large area of auditing during the 1974-1975 time frame i=volved .
L asco corporate Quality Assurance. Areas investigated were NRC r -
inspections of nasco corporate QA, nasco QA management Audits ;
- $ and' D asco vender audits. The correc:ive ac:fons ini:1sted by NRC inspections of n asco QA vere answered under the direc:Lon of .
the D asco Vice President-Nuclear and were appropriately answered i= a timely fashion.
In the area of management audits, nasco's internal check of its
,QA program effectiveness, actions on findings were adequately resolved on an upper management level and appropriate corrective i
actions were perf armed.
n asco corporate QA had a strong progran of vender auditing.
,. D asco carried this out through the piecedures generated out of its NRC approved QA Topical Report ITR-1001. Vendors who would I
i not respond to corrective actions yere inferned that they would l not appear on the approved vendor list.
1 L . II-4 l
l l
b .
.a.
?
1*-audi: vas ==i=:ed := sss== tha: the ::::e 1ve a: d.= s vers
.. 1
. . .Q
- -7: parfc:=ed a=4 := ass =e ve= der ;=s:== ==:= tei=s, - '-- '--A. :
t 7;. .
Cc_:1= nous ac=1.::1:g cf Zhase: site OA by *.2C a=d a s g ,
-c . (
Zhasc: cerperate CA ;;;g n res=1:ed i= a ;csi:ive is;=veme=: 1 {
- g.. .. .
, ' . ' ~ . .'M Zhasco's site program.
b
.N != smeary. I?E's CA ;;;g = has dis;'.ayed stifizie== eversigh: .
[' , ,
cf supplis: QA and == ; w .E ati: daf * * - ' es have bee: =cted.
w .
- % ,, he w*-d g procass has bee = ,;; a:17 canied s: a=4 1 :=gh: :: :
x .,-
.. ' .. a=agene :'s a::e=:1:=. 12C 01 has ::=e::ed itsa'f a 41.s
~
.:w pg ..,,, .ie:S v at :ep:1:ed a 4 1: has ne: er ex:eeded :he ha.se 11=e ,
,..,~
W:
i
,-y-
@ eme=:s of psali:7 assura=ca.
r .
-- *asi
. A 1= the Z reper: sus a desig= ;=ced=rt review te .
~~ ;
1 deterzise if the sys:e= desig: :=:::1 ;;; cesses used by Zhase . j
,.. Mave. 3erge=-?arters:=. and Cethus.d= I=gineer.'=g (CI) were
. i 1
adec a:e. .
+
Z vas := de:ersi=a .he ;c : ins cf the Inerte==7 7eedvate: .
System (ITS) ce=s ==cted by, each ergn=1:ar'c=. . whe: hor the ;;;per desig= ce===1 ;nced::ss were 1= place. a 4 vie:he: these
- ced=es .=a;11ed
- = ay;;cpria
- e desig: ret:1.eme=:s. "e ,
l J = $ M k $ to w hs
.ms.
6
, O.
C-5 _
s h
k I
i
f2 ' .
! _ .O 3 e .
v .-: .
[.'l,5 1) A written procedure was developed to use in performing the
-- = '
' ~~; 9 task. *
. -Q
- 2) A design control process description for construction of the
, _ ;[ EFS was prepared.
- '- y.
. . . :f.
-j 3) A comparison. was made of CE procedures used for Waterford 3'
,!_ ~J to those used for either the San Onofre or Palo Verde plants -
(which were previously reviewed by TFT). .
4
-j.in
..e 3,r
) -
- 4) Procedures and manuals used for ETS construction vere
- :L obtained from CE,'LP&L, Dravo, 3ergen-Patterzon, and
, , .:: a .
.~ .+.
i . /J Zhasco for evaluation. .
. ":.P:
..L
. .T.. 5) Check sheets that included the requirezants for procedure and ,
manual content were developed. These check sheets were used during the review of each document.
- 6) IFS design work was evaluated for conformance to con =1tzents in the PSAR as amended.
i
?- 7) Design control procedures applicable in time periods other than the then current PSAR revision were reviewed for
. coup 11ance to the then current PSAR connitaants.
,.2: -
The efforts by TFT in accomplishing Task A fulfilled the objectives of 4
the task and the method in perfor=ing the task was appropriate. No g 11-6 eausse
+-
, - . . _ _ = _ . - . _ , _ - - . - _ . .., ___.- .-- ., _ , ,_
r
~ o
,j. '- potential findings were issued by TFT during the review performed on 3 ,' this task. Based on the review performed in Task A, it concluded that
.3 L?&L, Dasco, CE, and Bergen-Patterson each had control procedures in
. . - place during the design of the Emergency Teedvater System which satisfied the commitments in the PSAIL.
. .~.jg,. ~- -
4 1 .
g u. 0 e
6
. a &- .
....:s
.b 43 c -
-h D' Q.
.,,-,A,.
~*w
- 7* 5
.* . .i .
8 b
j .. it . . .
.W*) Sb
- .N,4 1
.M g.m
- f ;* n* * .
we e
II-7 .
.e .' .1s. e .
I i
l -
l - - - - . - . . _ .. . _ _ _
~
s . e *
- e. . .
c . .. .
M.m . .t.r '
III. Issue - LP&L did not taka appropriate action on independent QA Pf y '
M.' b' consultants <. report. .
nts-r
. , . , , . A. Review W* ~2
- '?~.- ,
% The 1979 Management Analysia Company (MAC) report, c.
- recsamendations,. corrective actions taken since the report was' l .1'. * *
- issued, and associated documentation were reviewed. Appropriate .
personnel vare also interviewed. The purpose of the 1979 MAC
'y
. f .'.
Mi~.'.
wn.+
study which involved 30 mandays of verk was to reces:=end, advise, n-
' ~
and report areas of construction nonitori:3 and supervision that-A: :.e LP&L staff members should be devoting time to at that time and in 6:p.;
. ~4Dic
- .gi the future. .
h m.*-:.
el ' **
. :.s 3. Rasults .
The 1979 MAC report is included as, attachment III-1.
- The following are MAC recosamendations followed by the LP&L response or action as found by this review.
,+ ^
)
' 1. LP&L should acquire additional nanpower in the QA area in order i to:
- p. . :..
, ~. .
- g. , l.
- a. audit critical activities such as cable pulli=g, velding, hanger / snubber work, etc.
III.1 i
- t 9
I l
ap . ag N . y'. b. provide more coverage in the field i
.s
. .-' ?
- c. ensure that contractor QA records are in auditable and
- P,f l- " buyable" order.
.u....
- T 'd.:
- m". - Response: LP&L has increased its authorized QA staffing from a
.:*:.. .;L, '
1evel of 10 at the time of the MAC report to the present level of
. ;?"W s 65 -
- 28. 'LP&L QA also has 16 contract employees currently on its J.7.'a7: scaff. -
.s
. . 'i
. .i rb
.. . 3
.g Since the MAC report was issued LP&L has conducted 115 audits and 105 surveillances (as of 8/1/83) .o.fl sitg sontractors (including -
..,.. . C.. . . - *
- f.
gn E3ASCO) including the following critical activities identified in
?ni '
-y8-if' w.y the report.
.5% . .
- f.*
- Audits Surve111ances
.-f :, ,
.- ~.
,;; Cable / Cable Pulling ,
7 9
. e.-
'Jelding 7 2 Piping / Hanger /5nubber Installation 2 , 20
. . c M=C -
QA Records 8
. 35 '
LP&L has established a surveillance group within Ebasco to follow in-process work.
LP&L QA reviews in detail approxi=ately 10% of the turnover fh.
documentation. ,
e p s>"~J$ ,
III-2 *
- n - - w ~~
- s. .
. \
-,v - . ., !
- . j
.+.
)
LP&L has set up a task. force to provide a limitdd scope audit of
- _g- . - contractor activities prior to the nornal turnover status review J. cycle. This audit has been geared as much as possible to the ,
.~ ' - physical verification of equipment in accordance with design
[': drawings.
._ u -
-.-:6. ..i. .
-i . 2. LP&L should anchorize Ebasco to make routine purchases within a' hh certain limit or obtain additional personnel to assist the .
> ~
- ' roject P Coordination group. ,
- ,i,-n . .
i&,
'.1 Response: In accordance with project procedures in azistence
. . :.ir. ,
- 4 during the FAC study period, Ibasco was already authorized to
- 17 5 purchase permanent plant items for ongoing constru,ction ,
.w.
i ?,., activities. The LP&L project coordinator group continued to .
.s ,
.e
. authorize all Ibasco purchases for temporary items (i.e. , office .
.~ furniture, test equipment, supplies, etc.). The Project j ,. Coordinatica Group staff was increased to assist in these
- approvals. ,
9 *. .r <-
- 3. LP&L should add contract administration expertise to the Project f:
Coordination group.
- s. Reduce contract adn1=istration verk being done by the l
engineers in this group.
..V,,
- Response LP&L has provided additional cost cent,rol/ contract administration personnel. .
. III-3
\
e .'
t j . .: . -
.7.' 4. LPE Project Coordination and QA groups should stagger their
~.. . .
3
".^/.- .
workday schedule to:
f r
^
- a. Enhance the construction monitoring credibility and
~
- visibility of LPE. .
-l a . . . .
! ~ ~. .* h. Zasare aestimetry of work accesplishment. (
i ....& .
- '.'a o1 Basponse
- LFE seasiders that staggering the workday would not
- _.l. .
r significantly enhance either the quality or quantity of work I W r4 M acaomplished. i k'sd
' JE '
rh 3. U&L shoald evaluate the zampower need in Basso's Contract M-*
! ::f Administ' ration sad Planetag Scheduling Sections.
f . . .
1 w
l
- Response LP&L monitors the nasco site organisation and evaluates each hasso request for, additional sampower. LP&L
. . established procedures to require LP&L approval for all personnel additions for hasco.
1 1
)
- 6. LP&L should assertata if Bases code saa be used on future proj ects.
i . .,
Responses ne plassing and scheduling computer sede was i
devaleped by hasse for the Waterford 3 startup program and was !
t utilised from 1978 to 1981. In 1981, LF6L made t,he decision to abandes the hasso progran in favor of the hiddle South Services III-4 I
e; * < .
. = s i
..6. .
Project 2 system which is currently in use. The Project 2 systan
- will also be used in outage planning and scheduling once the e
startup program is completed.
-C 7. LP&L should gain a better understanding of Dasco's work which
.:.V. rifleets project performance in the area of planning, schedluling,
,.(
productivity, performanca, percent complate, variance, etc.
I
"', ?
Responses LP&L has added additional personnel and has improved b'[ tts understanding of Ibasco's production work.
l
-).-,
- l
= .
l .:- 8. 9. LP&L should have a comprehensive understanding of the positions ,
-l,Q, and strategy taken by hasco and contractors and the impuns l 1;7,. >
u*did'ad to develop thasa. LP&L should closely =or.itor nasco and contractors in design changes, rasciutions of interfarence, '
and verification of total plant design coupletion.
Response LP&L has increased its Vaterford 3 project staff.
LP&L has located much of the additional engi= sering nanpower at the Waterford 3 site to ensure a proper understanding of the pisitions and strategies of nasco and to increase LP&L
+
involvement in engineering decisions. Additional LP&L nanpower has been devoted to reviewing the as-built system a=d to verify the total plant design completion.
I i
- 10. LP&L should authorize all personnel additiens for Dasco, l
particularly for Dasco Sita Support Engineering.
III-5 l
', Response: L7&L has established procedures requiring L?&L approval for all personnel additions for Ibasco. ,
11-12. An LP&L electrica:. engineer should become totally immersed in cabling and cable pulling. Cable pulling should be monitored by L7&L whenever it is in progress.
~'
- - Response L?&L does not concur with the MAC recommandation. . .
',. Dasco and LFEL audit and monitor subcontractors involved in
- cable pulling, .and 17&L audits Basco's QA cable pulling program.
h(t.
v s
1 13-14. LP&L should ascertain the reason for pipe and pipe associated ;
j, 1
e( delays and lay the basis for legal delay-of-project completion "J'
I I ?/, ,
clitas. ,
1 <
- . Rasponse The MAC report did not specifically identify pipes awaiting work. An effort to ident,1fy the items prompting MAC's
. *e, w endations was unsuccessful. LP&L is continuing its efforts
- to deter =ine the reason for construction delays and to institute l ,
delay claims where appropriate.
- 15. LP&L QA and Project Coordination should monitor and LP&L Ingineering should resolve problems associated with:
- a. , Mechanical installation - hangers, snubbers, embed. Class 1 piping, etc. ,
- b. Welding .
III-6
i . '
. c. Tying onto existing rebar . .
.r '-
>! d. Cable pulling , ,
4 Baspense: As reported in the responses to reconnendations 1, 8 l .
i and 9. LP E has increased its support staff at the Waterford.
sit's. The regular audits and surveillances contimes to be .
-(,
j
- esaduated by LFE sad engineering involvement has been incrassed. - ,
i .
16.
LP&L should evaluate spara parts status.
l , ,
1 l Basponse L?&L is continuing to monitor and audit spara parts >
! procurement. LP&L contracted with Stone sad Webster Ingineering Corporation and with Burns and toe to assist in the evaluatten l and management of the spara parts progran.
l.
- . I 1
- 17. It would be beneficial for LP&L Project Coordination and L7&L QA . ;
- to maintain physical separation a,t the site. -
i I
i i~
1asponse: The various groups are stationed at several different I
locatsans where they can best perforn their function.
i i
1 l
l l *
- 18. LFEL should strive to have more of the perranent Waterford 3 4
staff actively participating in startup.
1 Responses LP&L instituted an aggressive.progran to actively .
t involve pennanent Waterford 3 personnel in startyp functions, e.g. hot functional tests, system turnover, etc.
i 111-7 I
c- .
e
- 19. UEI. should confirm that a reasonable return is being realized for the dollars being spent for startup consultants.
l *,
.'.', Response D EL continuously reviews utilisation and cost of 3, * ,
consultants.
a 20-21. The D&L Waterfeed 3 Projoet Manager should consider establishing P an offica at the site and should become more conversant with .
The problems from a participation-in-site-activities standpoint.
a
. . .: UkL Vaterford .3 Project Manager should have a higher level of
- -M. .
approval authortry and should be provided the authority to Y approve expenditures that have been budgeted to that of the 44 .
, ';,., ,, cognizant asecutive. .
.4
=
~,
- Response: The veterford 3 project staff has b'een estensively
- reorganized seversi times since the 1979 MAC report. At present, the Senior Vice-Presidant-Nuclear, Operations is located on site
" resulting in Senior Managers becoming more conversant with Re
,; . ..' problems from a participation-in-site-activities standpoint.
- ?
has appropriate fiscal authertry.
,7 t
- 22. Participation in public relations activities by the Waterford 3 Project Manager sad Engineertag Manager should be reduced. _
Response Senior Nuclear Managers do not routinely participate in public relacions activities. ,
III-8 I
L
o .
e - .
y . .
I '
It was found as a result of this review that LFH. has taken l
l appropriatecorrectiveactionsconcerningMAC'sreco$nesdations.
It should be noted that the MAC report dealt = w ==11y with %
issues. These were addressed h LPM..
4 . . i e .
' =
1 .
O e
> *= .
- 9
. l i . l l
b a l.
, e
- \
4 9 .
4 .g 9
(
a I
e 1
i
< e k
99 0 l
9 I .
III-9 9
G en.
f
. 4 .~ '
- e-i ,. .
a f IV. Issue - Er? ors in design assumptions by Ebasco.
o A. Review ,
1 Earstead Engineering Associates (IEA) is providing an independent regimEofthedesignadequacyofthebaseast. To date. LPE has
. received IIA Report No. 8304-1 "Weterford III SES Analysis of h This report was Craaks and Water Seepage in Foundation Mat". , ,
l
, l i
i reviewed for information. This Laitial report dealt with i i .
concrete cracks and water seepage problems. An additional 1
1 Earstead report will cover the design adequacy of the basemat. .
- *e
- 3. Essalts 4
3
{
- A espy of the Marstead report is included as attachment IV-1.
w :
This report concludes that no evidence was found of any process
- which has been or could be detrimental to the structural
.. integrity of the foundation aat. Results concerning the design ,
adequacy of the foundacion mat is due to be issued by EEA on October 15, 1983.
9 LF E will develop a program to implement the reconnesdation noted ,
t in Sections 8.4 and 10.1 of the tattial report.
i i
I 4
IT-1 s
p y. - ,.-- - -. -. ,
~ . '.
- r. . .
e T. Issus - LP&L 1974 Audit of CI found that CI was not in compliance with LP&L's "new" QA program requirenants. Zhasco 1976 audit of CE identified problems with CI compliance with LP&L's "new" :
QA requirements for records.
I l
- l
.. A. Review * .
i,.
15EG reviewed documentation associated with the LP&L 1974 audit ind the Ibasco 1976 audit of CE for programmatic requirements.
SEG also, reviewed the D&L/CE contractual dispute as it relates to Quality Assurance and the Canhis artigles. Apprezinately .
seventy-five (73) documents were reviewed. .
i
- 3. Rasults e .
Copies of the 1974 and 1976 audice of CI described above are attachments V-1 and 7-2 respectively.
ne LP&L 1974 audit findings were addressed by CE and the findings were closed by a re-audit on December 1,1975. no Dasco 1976 audit findings concerned CE Chattanooga storage facility for QA records. Our review indicates that CI replied to ,
the 1976 findings on April 12, 1977. na 1976 findings, however, were not formally re-audited at a later date by Ebasco. LF6L conducted an audit of CI's Chattanoogg fac,ility during May 5-7, 1981 for collection, storage and maintenance of QA records and had no findinbs. .
v-1 q l 4
- ~
4 , .
re s 1
1 Also, during the week of September 26-30, 1983 LFE QA conducted
, ' i
! as medit of the C1 Chattanooga' facility. This included a' '
i . ,
re-audit of the types of findings identified in the December 1976 4
f
. audit, an audit of the physical condition of LFE's records, and i
! i l
an overall audit of the records ansagement system. LF4L QA ,
) .. ~
saasiders the CI Chattanooga records management system and the t
ll . present physisal condition of the LFE records to be satisfactory. . .
k j The CE Quality Assurance Manual was updated from the requirements '
j of 10CFR50 Appendix 3 in 1974 to include recommendations of -
j 1
lavision 0 and Revision 1 of the Atomic Energy Cosmission j BASE-1283 " Gray took" and American National Standards Institute
- . - 'I j (ARSI) standards. Since the time that LF&L committed in 1974 to
) . implement the Regulatory Guides and ANSI Standards listed in PSAR '
- -i j % ,
A==ad=ent 44, sixteen (16) QA audits of CI have been performed by 1
4 LFE/Dasc: for compliance. It is through these autits that
,, LPE/Dasco ensurad that the QA progra covered LPE PSAR j commitments and was implemented by CI.
! A letter from CE to Deseo dated November 10, 1976 states that C1 l followed 10CF190 Appendiz 3, ANSI 45.2-1971, and the " Gray Book"
_ Revision 0 and Revision 1 for Waterford 3 equipment. Also in a
- May 31, 1977 CE to Darco letter, CI states that it has proceeded j in ,sood faith to perform the engineer,ing., purchase and I mammfacture of equipment for Waterford 3 in accordance with i .
. 1 Y-2 !
l l
l
~ '
l, '
< ts.
.. . , l o
quality requirements in excess of those 1:i the contract, as LP&L had committed to these increased requirements in the PSn."
In conclusion, the CZ QA program met 1F&L PSR (Amendment 44) i commitments and there are no program deficiencies as a result of this review. The question was not QA program implementation, but
- f I= =-d=1 responsibility for that program. It was a case of contract " hardball" as CE believed the increw ed QA costs were , ,
n6e covered under the contract and LP&L believed that they were.
This question was resolved in 1978 by a fo: mal change to the .
contract with C1. -
D 1
1 e
e l
9 0
9 e4 6 1
t
, V-3 e
e
_, ,.r .-m-- . - , , - _ . - . - a m __ . - _
, v
e - . s .
. i
. r t
o-
- - - . . i
- : ~ . . . ~
S ~
e
__ ~ _. :.
i.
. - e .e -
. 3 e e - .. t i
3 t :
, : ___.__!________'__________________i_!
!. i. _. i.
=! - _ _ - _ _
_ i. . ! :
.M._-
g = :
! e ,
a 8
wI . = = = m - m _ _ .:._
- l
. I. *g
= i s
- .l i !
_ _ _ _ _ .I l* l
- g a1m 28i__._______
!. w _3 6 I
- 2: 2 ,
i~I I :
l,
- _ _ _ ! _ I l: _ _ _ _ _ _ _g _ _ _ _ _ _ _.l_! _____
= . . = w I ."
. gel.g e .
- _. ~
. - - ~ _ m g=g I
I
. .g
- . !. _g3I'l_______________________-
~
EI.:
g
_ . . S S 3 . g _~ .
4
- g. .
=l
- g__ __________________________ ._l I : W ! E _ g' * ~
. U"I = :. E ! .". B
. I 3 - 3
. 2 * =
4m 2- C . 2 l **= l.
i E_
7,g l' _ W_ _ ;. _ _ ;.
! s * '.
___ ______________________ !_i ; ;
j = : _ .
. 2 _ . .
3 . l. .. ._. .
3I . _ .
~
.l De_ .
I i
III5l~~..~~~~~-~~~~~~3..~~*~~~~~~~~~~I~I e
. e e
m 3 -
e
..~
n.,
I. _ _w .
g.
.: _ g _ _" :: *
- m m .
- : Et .!
i.. !._.*.!. .
- l. .
I'
~:.m :.
Iw :
. g 1 : M* .
. I. g -_!.__________.__.________~__=____. .
n t =l i i
- g_________...
4, 8
i =M = . i.I _. _m. .
l .
i .E
. _ e e n e e e e n _
.MI gI. '
, i
- l. i.
! l i
_ l _ ; ! l. i
- i. l. w i - . . . - - .fI .
.m -
i
- _ _.__!__ ___ _______________ ___;_ u i
l ,.
- i n m ..: -
1, I .W :
. r
- . w-g 1
.3 g g. .
' E 'E' t :. _ _ :I *
~ ~
2 l
.E '.L.'.
!. G. .
.. n 2 - .r
=
i..a ._."._
I l
l-y l ~ _
~.
~
~
~.
~. ~.
E
_ ~
3...t. at !. "w*' w
. E_ 8 . .E.
l e
.e g ,
g
. . i- __ . -
4 e e .
. e i
I , -- - . . - - .
-.- . , - , - . .. . - . ~ . -
e -
o QA COSD'*.05NTS . .
Ragula:ory Guide 1.37 3-16 Regulatory Guide 1.38 3-16-73 .
Regulatory Guide 1.39 3-16-73 Regulatory Guide 1.54 6-73 .
6
. Kalulatory Guide 1.58, 5-73 -
Regulatory Guide 1.74 2-74 OCTLINE OF CA GUIDANCE 1ZLATID TO TEI CONSTRUCTION PLLSI (C010CTXE. T I)
A;;endix "3" to 10C7R50 See:Lon 50.55a of 10CTR50 Safety Guide 28 6-7-72 Safety Guide 30 8-11-72 25% N45.2.5, Draf e 3. K1,1 ,
ANSI N45.2.6, 1-23-73 .
MSI N45.2.8, Dral: 3, 13, 4-74 .
C SI N!.5.2.9, Draf: 11, lov. C l'-17-73 MSI N!.5.2.9, D:af: 15 * , Rev. O , /.-3-74 1 . c f
- (Not Co _-itted to Draf: 15)
MSI N45.2.12. Draf: 3, Rev. 4, 2-12-74 MSI N45.2.14 Draft 2. Rev. 4, 4-74 .
s t 7.agulator*/ Guide 1.70.:oc Draf t 2, 4-25-74 .
Co=e:ts and Guidance (3/.5.2.5 and X45.2.13) .
MSI N101.2, 5-30-72 M5:':'101.4, 11-25-72
~ ' '
ANSI N45.2.1, 2-25-73 .
ANSI N45.2.3, 3-15-73 .
hfr%iMEM Z-L -
. Fase 1
ATT4CitMENT JLL ~l .
, l l . g , .7:ge 1 cf 11 P:::s - j
- s. ;
- Man ge:nen: Analysis Cc=;:any l
{ :::ce no eue St san Diese. CA 92::: !
- 4 4s:.:m , ;
h l July 31, 1979 l MAC-c:3-1227
, ), .
. . , . .. .s. s ,
l -
,, ((*' /k3 !5N h,\
n:
, y ,
Mr. Den Asvell '
j , Louisiana Power & Light p' fDAgMcc;y& ggg
\,j {
1 142 Delarssda '$ i s ,V
' a s.w erie =, ti % igg: , t i l
Dear Don:
i
} Inclosed is the draf: report of MAC's study of LF&L's construe:1on moni:or1=g i cc:1rities of :he LP&L Watarford 3 project.
1
) MAC recosat=es the difficul:7 in providing or =alstaining appropriataly
) qualified nuclear power pla=: construe:1cn and startup pe:sennal. However, the provision of this expertise now will save futura LP&L Watarford 3 con-i struction dallars far and above the currant essas of such expertise. An
- eleenr'. cal eng1= ear dedica
- ed to cabla put"=3 should be added to si:e staff.
l XAC feels that presence in the field : tally saves the owner's dollars in the -
j long run. MAC feels 1: is asadatory for LP&L to develop a* be::ar mderstanding .!
I of the nu=bers sad inputs generated by Zhases which i= pacts and reflects in 'i
! the areas of planning, scheduling, produe:1vi:y, perfor=saca, and pe:ce=
- j coupletion variance. LP&L needs to casure it is get:ing naminu= recurs for l l 1 d a'-- dollars spent - assurance of this is possible by providing planning /
j scheduling / con rcis expertise. >
l t?&L should closaly nonitor:
e Machanical ins:alla:1on concent sting on hangers, snubbers, enheds 1
a=d Class : pipi=g installa:1cus.
i e Welding, especially of Class I installations. ;
e #
1 Tying into existing rebar.
e Cable pui"a!. [
l Please contac: se or non stinson for discussion or clarification of itens l
- harain. ,
I j 3et reguh, .
i d_ _ _
j -
George,X. 3revn USW l enalesure -
~
i .
i ,
- - - , - , - - - - . . - - , - - . . ~ - . - , - - - . . - . - , , _ , , - - - . . . - - - - - , , , . . - . . . - , ~ - . - - , . , . - . - . . - - - -
+..
,. ..'. . I
- o. n* ;!
. w. , 3 m m-2 1 - -
4
% medan, i h w.
s.
unw h w 5MT'.,
s J
y '
{- ..
1A' 3 MA PE'CL & UENT '4&~DFCC 3 ,
r C3572:.%"UM MONIT"wAINE 5
e.
s
- 3 .
1 .
- - :::NT!:S*T R :: RAFT
~ f o- + **m .p, 4
r.. -
s O
W- '
W@Mi!!!i i'.
, - 4
.g'r.i:. e
%. . ;w.y -
.,- = .. :2 :
.: a.r%-
namey - .
.~, o .c e . ..
rt ~ - "E;.~
4 t *:.
- .*,7 '\ Al*v 21, 11 5
- .; - 1-
. . C.1
. .. -i, .
N. ..e.;-
.? a qv'n,
, 3. . -
r-: u., * . .<=
- :3u wy . , .
. .s . w. ...
, . . . ,w
... co * * :: :. ' ,
- g. ..c
. r, -
A.ws:s c:. .;e
- ' g - w Act. .t
~*
- '- '! E Nr, m:: R:s'sTF.irl
'Ul g g g .. s%-llI "O SAN 2:!lll . "s,;.;pcx. ;4 g : ,,;
=.
.r* '"
.: I
. .. .:.*,g.-
T
'.=isiana 8:we- i '.t ;n: 3==a y (UE) ea:a1.e: ?.ar.a;e en A aly:ts 0.:=4 y (y.A.-) u zerf:m a ute:y.r.araay n;;y =# DE's =311:-1s; :# :: n :.t= :f cair *.*aterf:.-: 2 A:lta- Pl an. nt ;cr;:se :# ue 1 :7 was u es = nea. ,
aavise, and repen arsas =f ::r.st. -4 : tan manit: ring anc s :e-vistan ?.4% UL sudd ammes s satult be gevating time u now anc in :na f . n.
. In a==s:lissing tais st ry, FM as .t:a anc inarviewet Ut Wata ':-: 3 -
- its=ss a.: ass ess ust r =tt es in . t' att = = wen
^
. ...s: ..-:1= pa.-s:nnel keing f.:.3, we t .= M : ne, s:ne::It, =anl:4 tny, : ;ani:nie an: =ce- 3 1cae areas, ar.: = evalusta ce = n= s:na e' .: .n .=t = e' ue vna.#:-
2 7 :f oc. A:.2:r=== 1 l'su UL st:a :t-::..nti t ua.-rt ewe an: Ana:r=an I lisu IIAI :: a-: un_ an:.- :e-s:=e1 wi .a e.z: :M ef :ts::::t:.s .e.e nais, Pase :rie' cis=ssic. - s == - et =he zon:nnel -e s a==n.e se in us halls, in ancing r.=s ar.: =rta; stia ins:e::it.-s - h=weve , ne f:: al see ings :-
i=a.-views w s nela :ar Un' ins: ::.t:. s a:.a.-ta= u u.is n;:y.
.X w aner4ed :2ti.want weer8 y site settin;s r:::f r.ely hel: a=n; UE. IIA.O -
c: :=t s:::- ::a::=el, ara =act ins:ectus as :.: .s :# u n st t u ::st et l
a=ivttias 1: ;-::ar: an: view = .n. ::1:n c lette :: 4::.
Af ar n t #21 analysis, asset::t-. an *t v' tw :# .tst et s::::t:n, tita-view, l i
=aatin;s t.: stia f .::enius an: ::grs an: fan:M ; FM's t::aMe : .*. u cue =:1aar nr.st ::1:r. ;-tje:u in: ce O L Wata.#:-: 2 2-:jt::, y.a*
he.s y s;=i.s .he f:llewint ::se-rati:ns arx: ry===mee44:1:ns.
. , m_ ...
,. . %. . .... g ; .c.. . . . .e. . . . . <..*5
- 1. I: .wM*s ::ini:n. as an aftsmata :f nes stie Islaes, ut n: v111 st;.
.-i f t un17 i n tasa u e :=-te te.rn':a1 staff' ; et::i n t-ts ;M :P ::
tss;an t =# a y new ::tratta; 11:ansas. As 'r:1-na in FM's :tain: sit:
- .c y e t.-s a t: . O l'. *.as a n 4: .-ca ly l aa n :Ir:.ni:21 staff. V i'. ts = nt-
...s.
._s.t ..... .
... .s. ..:
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .- .a . a ,s. .
... . . . ...at:(....._.a...
tr.;t n e t-: an: :st :etnet:: An. .
e
. i
.? - ..p , )
2 4 . . .
MA* is n:t aware of any cuer n=les ;-:'act in this ::untry whenin l
. ::nstrunien is being m: nit:nd Dy few as cear in:ivicuals. De :anennel ~
c-=:risi
. a.; the Pnject C=cedinnien and CA g-:ups 1:e L?R at the Wa:n-f:rd l In spita of these 3 sita are hanworting, dedicated and lcyal individuals.
--aita, thes'ai persannel cannst, in MAC's opinion, adequately cover thosa g
)
facets af construcsion monitsring that should be* covered to ensure L7E is :
. . Further l enceiving approscia.a perfarsan=a for the d=11ars being expanded.
l LFE is missing an c;;ct unity to have key technical pa-s:nnel became fa-miliar viu the physical plant.
L he ir.givicuals in .he Pr=jee: C::rdincien ge:u: and the QA gr:c worz l
clessly with ea:h cther, ::::erata with eacn c her and assantially icot en .
I for asu c: hor. The CA 3. .= cvarall is nr:ng in FAC's cpinica, het few I
in nu=:er, and it a;;aars by and large t: be d:ing a satisfac::ry .fch in
! the trus 1; is a21e :s effee.ively' esver. Sinca the wcrs the QA gr=up is i
[
now d ing should he in: sased, it is FAC's re==usentati:n that aeditional
~
=an::we- be c::ained.
L7E shes1d == nit:r, audit and wat:h all of ca ,
critical activi:1as such as caMe pulling, welding,' hanger /snuthat wort, ,
lis W. 1: the site. De additi:nal ;an:nnel c:uld
- . att., as they are ac.
he technicians cr j:nier engineers. They would wert with ,the CA elec:M.
I i
cal, mechanical and I C engineers, the aby par =it-ing cert c:verage in the field ans, cf c:ene, providing additional un;:ver fur covering the j
ar:une.ne-c1::k wcrs 24: Ifas anead. Addi:1:nal OA r =c::wer sh:uld be l' applied :: ensurs C:ntract:r CA ete:r".s are in cauditable and buyable creer, i
- 2. The angineers of De Pr:jen C=:rdinatica gr:up spend mest of their time They desirs := spend m rt time in
- aper precazzing and attending intetings.
ce field, tc they cannet. If LFR desirts := aff anively =: nit:r and c:n:n1,the ecs: cf c=nstrue:icn of Waterford 2, and cevelop technicai
- hysical plant expertise, than the paperwork and meetings must be recuced l ,
te acced.
and acettianal tecnical =anscwar mus:
i.
9
! -: nates' witnin a M: re::=enes LFIL au:n=ri:e !!A5": : take r:u-ine car.ain limit (13,0007); h: wever, if LPR ce(tras :: c:n-inua reviewing an:
i
.st;ntng all surenase cc:ers, then aediti:nal =an;:*er sh:uld te c::a ned.
- ecifically, ne .n:n.:achnical indivicual ::uld pr::ess nuttne at=ints. t .
...............er,.'.m.
i l
~- '
i 6 .;, -
- l. ._ . . _ . _ _ . . _ _ _. __ . .
I S. - l
.n o f'
4 Similarly. E n==ments L?tL add c.:crac. , ad=inistrati:n ex t-.ise in be feria cf :ne incivicual is won wi2 all the engineers in the Pr:je= C:me- ,
gina-ion group, 2ert:y ndu-ing 2e "f:m1* c:nra=: ac=inistration work
- , gyrrer.ly being d=ne by the Projec Caerdinatica engineers. De engineers have to 'ba involved in his work, hu. they should not be "c=ces= ad=ini- .
!$ stratsrs" to 2e estar. af being so occupied in the office that prehless in
. os field are no. recogni:ed and carrected (or hal.ed) before they reach
.- castly magnitudes. The engineers' involveman wi2 this c==rac acminis- '
I *
- rstion work should cantar ar:und verifying the field situatien : "s.z'.=s*
- and ne essaa-ching c=n -
ac hinsry. L*1L, in sa=e ins.ances, is incur-ring arra c=s- because hold ups in the field are o=ur-ing when paper has ne keen pr:cassed .by einer L7R or BAsct. 'The field must esceive an- s j sws s := cair valid incuiries and questicas en a =re ti=ely basis - h=ves
. and days rathe- than days and weeks.
[ 3. A n=rs A starting of the wert day in high gear and wie full viger This also would enhanta the c=structi n =ni.sring 4 .
~ wuld be =f hansfit. .
a credibility and
- visibility of LFR in the eyes =# P.1SCO. If individuals cf the LFE Pr:Jec Ca'sedina:ica and QA g-:uss c:uld stag;e- their schedule j
,s I
so 24: =nsister. ArHval, overlapping graveyard and day shift..and days
- i. and swing shift c=vered, den LPR could =n ably help instill c==invity cf w=rk a= 11shment f == shift. s. shift in adcition := s;arting =re *
- edibility and visibility.
1
- 4. Aa DAsCD staffing evaluation was not made; however, it appears tha: the-1 SAICD Planning and Scheduling Department is heavy with people as well =ey
- - be DA300 Can rec Ac=inistration Depa/
- mer.. L?&L has paid BASCO a significar. an=um of money to develes a planning and scheduling c== outer c=de. L'E sh=uld take ' steps to assure maxt=n ensurn fr== DAICQ vsage of 0 -
j thiscEds. F.opefully, LFE has the rights to the c:de and can u:ili:s 1:
I for fv:u-a pr:jects. L'E should verify the nu=ar of pers=nnel in f ;1anning/. s2eculing/c:ntr:1 anc contract ad=inistra:ica are really i 1 1 2
- *stuirts, anc =ake any necessary adjus =ents. .
L I: gul te ve y wer hwntie, an: in l'.AC's c;inica car:af nly =anca::ry, ::
- evelo= .a te::er unterstancing of the nu==ers and in;uss generated by l
4 i
- i -
, 3 l
- l .
n 1 .
E5ASCO wnich r #1e:: ; :Je:: pe 3:-=a=e in the a tas =f ;1anning, s: nee.
I uling, pr:cuctivity, ;ed:r=an=a pe e= c:=:l ete, varian=e, e.:. These l .
l are the significant casa used u justify changes (usually ir. eases) in l
crgani:stien, =anpower, additional shif.s of wert, ever:i=a, e::. All cf I these, of coursa, dire =tly affect cost. MAC're: rmends L?it pr= vide a -
! 1 l ,
planning, scheduling and centesis sort of individual ts _ work in the Project '
l i
1 Cec-dir.ation g==u; 23 bec=me in.1=ataly ennve-sant with' E5ASCO planning, i, scheduling, and e s: c=ntrol tracking, evaluati:n and pr:Jeni=ns. This -
i vill ; ovida L?at -he necassary infer =atien to assist in =aking e-itical l cecisi=ns. This individual c=uld also land insight i== the a;;11: ability
! cf staffing in these armas as sugges.ad in !.. The uisting L?it P-:jec
- s C
- =rdinatien and CA pe. s==nel de n= have this ser: cf upertise (nce de ,
they clai= to have it). It is MAC's epinien that L?&L shculd have the a:ertisa u fully u=erstand the origin, logic, and enienale cf pr=jee c::: 31 infc'r=ati:n.
. 5. It is beneficial := L?it at this ti=e that EIASCC has been able .: s.aff -
with several very c==petant individuals who by their nature will attem :s sa-ve me owner's irterts: while still serving E3ASCO's interests, while i as. %11shing the weirk. Mcwever, there are p ential c=flic:s cf c: ;:r-f att interests, and L?il is paying .ha mal bill. Hence, in MAC's c;inien, the need is part=cu= fer a c:=:rthensive unde-s anding c' p siti=s and stra:agy taken by E5A5 0 anc C:n rac : s and the in;uts utili:ed : cavel :
these. -
L?&L should also be uarcisjng influence :s keep the c==;eten: E3ASCO
~
pe:ple now on *datarford 3, and should 1:sa no c;; rtunity is an=:urage
!!ASCO to provide =cre cf the sa=a. However, L71L sh uld be exercising a ;reval. autheri:ati:ns for E5ASCO additicas u :ne .EASCO-Waterferc 3 s:sff,'es;ecially in the case of EIsE, which will be increasing its staff
- = a enher large si:n unless appr:;riately c:ntr:11ed.
l 1
I uttere :r: 3 is rt;i:iy 1::rta=ing =e 1. age wntre Ons: u::icn will te l l
- ving fr. hu;h ir.s:alini= c systa= c:n: ci.
. his is the itaal ti=e ::
have L7?A enginatring ta==a =cre involved in .he pnysical ;1 ant. r. lign:
- f h te :cile .slan:f, it will te i=erative the caer de=ns:.-ne ta=r.ical . l i
l l
r e
. : r == .
.o -:-
h -3=seten a cver ce physi:41 plan . Tr,e' presen:a er par.,1:1:ati n cf L?1.
.4
, 3 ngineering in all' site engineeHng =anars sneuld be in=reased. LP&L
~ -
gngineering sheuld be =lesely c:: nit: ring I3ASCO and C:=ra ::rs in design
.h
=
changes, res 1u ica cf inta-ferences, and veHfica:ica cf tc:a1 plan i
. .'. . y "Y design completion sa tha: : nst:.:::ica is ne: held up becau:e cf the lack
- f. 3, , . af it. L?IL E'agineeHng sh uld be participating in veHfication" cf GASCD/
.. $ Cecrac sr engineering inpu:s in the areas =f planning, scheduling, and
- l. "$ c n: :1 on a spct-chack ': greata- hasis, as apse =pMate. MAC suggests f
- aat a very W an: L?&L elec: Heal engineer bec==a ::: ally imersed in F. , =2tles aM cable pulling. Such an individual c uld have caugh; aM pre-vented some of the a:isting cable pulling pr:ble=s. The scener L?&L
.2r-
= su;;11es su=h an individual :: "dMye" EAS:D and the electrical : n:ra:-
1 :: , the he=ar f:r L?&L in the inng r=n. With the a==un ef ele:: Heal
=n=uit and cable trays installed in the plan:, cable pulling shcuid be
- r==seding as rapidly as pessible. Aleng with res 1ving the pr
- ble=s ass::iated with cables already ;ulled, the previcusly =entiened L:1L elec:H:a1 engineer, dedicated := cables, c:uld help insure tha fu:=re
- ulls are satisfa==H1y ac
- =:lished. MAC als: feels, cable pulling shculd
- ,- . he ::vered by L?&L whensiver it is in process. This c:verage could he a:- :
- ==11sned by CA technicians er a :"i:stien cf :echnicians and engineers.
4 j Cable pulling c:uld be =e the significan ite= celaying startu;, and it is
[ evicen: that an additi:nal dMving f:r:e and = nit:Hng activity is i a:;r pMate := push the work and prevent cM:ical delays. S ASCD and the
. '!ij. c:n:rac::- need :: be dHven and f:rced := c:rn :1y de the werk.
7 L In s=me areas of the plant pipes have bean in "s:uhbed-out" conditien for
. 1.
i s=me time awaiting either =anpower, mateHals, hangar ins alla:ica, or
,. ,f
- c:her ac ivity. Likewise,. several slabs have cured and are awaiting c:n-tinuing work. L?tL Project Cecrtinatica shcuit ascertain the resacn for I
, the delay and =ake en-:ain IIASCO is nc incaver:anly h:1 ding =r refrain-j in; fr._. work en these. L?&L Insintering sh:uld, determine if Drave er l l
.' ~IA 0 Inf in:eH .; i rn;:nsible f:r the lach :# pi;e a-d ;ipe-ass =iated l
=ataeH ais,lan: lay -he tasas f:r legal :elay-of-projet ~c:=;isti:n clai=s tha sa:uld act be :: the ac::unt cf L?&L. .
ee
,e .
,. . f. ....
s
/- 3
. L:1* .A and ?r:Je:: C:cedina: ten she:.:14 ci:seiy =: nit:r and L?'.L ngineering sr.:ui: assure res:iu-icn of pr:ble=s ass::iata win :ne f =11 ewing:
. . .Macnanical installati:n, c:ncecrating :n hangers, snuhhe-s, n=6e:s
~
- and class I piping ir.sta11ations. . .
if. .
- v. . -
4b - Welding, especially of Class I installa:icas.
+
? .
? - Tring in.: exis:1ng rebar 3
- - Cable ;ulling (as previcusly =en.icned, an elen-ical engineer is .
rec == ended u be dedicated t: this eff:r:.)
i
- :::. NRC site relaticas a;; ear := he ved g::d, sta=ing ;-imaH1y fr== .he ' '
e-edibility which L?&L Site QA has achieved. This credibility will sta-:
I
- = e-=de, h:weve , unless E3A3d ar.d C:=ran:r QA/QC re==-ts are placed in audiuble, 'huyable" cede- s: that NRC audits =f sa=e are su=essfully '
ac::=lished. L:&L QA. =us: " drive' this effer: wit:r c:hasis u;:n GASC3
" vend:. ;;aiity assu. an:s activities and GMC3/C:= ras:cr site rec:rts.
- ::. It wculd heTe5eficiaT" cr : s i+ Jec:.C: rdina:ica ant' L:EL QA ::
=ai=ain physical separati:n at the site.
e
- c. 13. L?it sh uld evaluate and ascar:ain that s;a a par:s are being pr:perly t.
A purchased in quanity and quality and that pr:per certificati:ns and e
traceshility exist.
I, s
.s L:1L sh uld s:Hva := have =:rt cf the per=anen aterf:rd 3 staff actively 1 i
T. II.
- par.icipating in s
- arsup as is ;:ssible. Further, L?lt sh:uld ::sfi= hn ;
a reassnable re: rn is being reali:ed f:r the d=11ars being spent for f d I star:v; c :sulu=s.
k J. Tat *.?L'. unt #:r: 3 P-0;e:: :untger sneuid ::nsicer es:2:iishin; an Office a: -.e si e EM :h:u!: ht:::e ::re ::nva-sz O d *.h ??: bit:
5 #Tt: a ?!" ici-
- 1:1:n-in-site-activities stanc;: int. Tne Frd;e:: 'anager sh:uli als: have hi 7.e- inval :f a::r: val su:h:rity and he sh:uic be :reviced the av:::rity .
i l
. 1 i
5 e
.(-
. ..s-
- 4 I c a:; ve e-:endit; es tha- have bee . bu:geted e:ual :: tha: =f :ne ::;ni-
-i
-an: ese:Utive. *
.t u*
par:icipa-icn in public rela icns a=:ivities by the ',iate: #:-d 3 ? je::
f," , s.
- 4 ..
mnager and Engineering Manager have been beneficial. H: wever. :::::inued M. . . . '
${, - par:icipatian should be decrsased sc that more ti=e can be spent in their
.R *
.* titled wort.
.e. ,
- e e
.e'**-
L.
- } , .
- .4, T=
Ye
-l. .
S
. e .
- e
= w
- e e 0
s O
4 O
e t
e e
W 3
.F i
l 1
6 6 1 l
5
"=-
4 ATTAC-?.ENT I ,
. j s - -
j' L?iL site e-s==nel intarviewed .
.s-i_ 1 L*&L 7 : ject C: rdinatica 3- Cesir De:aranux ?.anzgnr .
a i
re Paul Jacks n D ec:rical .
5:b Ga:.:: azu Mechanical se
- i .
-. 1. L=&L Quati:y Assurznce
.C'
. Tc= Ge. :~e:~.5 Yanager .
- m. .
'l .
Een Erewn Mechanical .
f- Jic Weeds D ec.rical
(
C*iff Chatelain-~ I&C ,
e;.
s
.s-a. y eu::ss eachnician .
c:
a-.1 .
- . r.
- s. = , * .
.g
. .p g .
j .J . t.3 * .a Tc: Ar=ing :n Manager u.
- =r
.i .
.r'..
--s .- l w:
. . .: l
~~.'t
-s.,
? i W,. l
...,,,s l
v: 1. .
l
\
, 4,.., >
i ... .
.s*- #
. .o. .
y.si .
.a.. -
9.:. . .
. j e.
I
..s
' W,.* .
l
- l 1
l l
- 7. g -
es. A MAC;v .~ . -
- I 7
E!*sOnnel wiON knCCunterms -2 * . .
kh:::: bi .' e
.he n.e};~, ' - CisCussic<a.
fo m 1 =es:1ngs -
or $";*Niews **;1"5 no
- were n.e;g' .
were y,3g, cs, nn:****M ni site in' #**~~****I *tre
- 1. spe::$ ng; y, .
. E34SCO - -
ICD Stampley John cente *$*** Panager Sob nf1h;,,, M;* Yantser
- Jchn W111 Ur'7 S:inson E- kper-in:engen
- ich Zais: "= * *** SU9e.~1n~ '
2111 Argen f"*II;XEC3 uran:eyacew
^"'* ., y,'.
SupeM n:enten:
Mar:7 Sonihr St= xa1g: ^ "# IU9t~1n'.e enc .v.
11,s Hubria C*"*;ruC;1cn Control -
Con:rg ~- ^d=1nis~ra:
W,, .
- 7 5upenn:engen.,
Manage,- '
~
I 8C=:: kins-seetg. 3 I
C"U:k Sea::v " ,
Ecb caugey3
- "*r&T I C11e cay 1neerSuperintencen:
e l'
J. A. Jone:
Mi Ky Woole y t Residen: Engineer 1
- i ELic:t .
\
\
Ji= fifeg}, \
- "*I*r>
CC;0?:
size g,.3y, e .
d'"'a'a=== .
\
=
7.. % -
i
~~
PrrAcasol7 E
\ .
.m . m . m. e e e e . e- ,e em em . e . .w. - e.-
- ene m o em , m ee .. .
9 e Ollalww R W
~
T -
~ ~
. . //cn "
.? //a _ . no . '
$ . '9 /f D
, 4
._ . .... - . . . . .. m . .. . .. . .
m se . -
e
- weer 6 - -6e6 @Me + e6 e @@ . e . em
..m eea w e
& 9em S @ 'e . 4 Om9 86 *mN &
N e - e.
- 66 e o e e
. .- . ... . . . - .6 g
=49 e
e I
1 l
......-.,m-.. -
l . . ?cg3 1 of 5 pages
&' - lii y . m.
JgUISIAiUA w d ._:
- -- 6=am P O W E R & . L I G H T / w =s.__
4mouer staart . ~ s w = = m s. unu s - vo n .
WrOOtt SOV?d t.wus sys su .
July 29, 1974 LPL 3226 Q-3-A35.02.04
- tir. L. J treber Dasco Services , !=c.
Two lac::: S::ss:
New T :k, New Tc:k 10006 SU2. IC : *TJWCC SIS ITSI: No. 3 AUDIT 07 CC) GUST.CN CTGC mC.NG, INC.
L*CCS01, CONXIC ICU- J LT 11 AIG 12,1974
Dear F.:
. Webar:
A: ached is the reper of the subject audit. T o =c=-c==for=ancas vara f=--E vi:ii= the scope of his audit. .
Secti = Sc. .? of the "Nc=-Cc=fe==anca Repor:s" . should be used by CI-L'i=dso fc cc ective cc:I:s replies to L?nI,. Kaspe=se is recuss:ad vi:hi: ' . i. .
days of thei recaip: cf :his la::ar.
Very uly yours, -
M
\ .
h -
/ J. F f.Na:: i Se-le: hice Preside ==
./
J3GT:= : s=w 1: ach=a=:s c=: Dasco (5) , J. F., 3 ceks.c L. F Illi= :, D.1. Aseall, L. V. Maurin, A. I. Ec darses, D. 3. Lastar, C. G. Che:s=,11. 5:evasse , E. W. O:1111o, P. v. ?:asa=k==4 , L. 3i==delillo, I. I. Shaugh=essy 9
.3 e
s . . . j LOUISIANA ?CWII & LICE CDyJL?
WATIRECRD SIS UNI 3 QUALIr? ASSURANCI AUDII EI? ORT
- 1. Repor: No. : 74-2 :
I. Da:e: July 11 e d 12, 1974 f . .
- 3. Audi: Pe fc:=ed A:t Cc=bustic: I=ghearing, Inc. l I .-
4., Loca ic=: W1:idsor, Con =acticut
- 5. Audi: ? arf ===ed By: A. I. Eenderse: ed 1. I. Eastings
- 5. A=di: Scope:
a.' Ope = 1:e=s f s= previous audits
- b. I=le===:a:1c= cf CI's respc=se to AIC 62 QA Questic=s as ce=:sised i:
A=e:d=en: 44 :s ?SA1.
- c. I:e=s c= '?u=ure Audi: 1:e=s SW' Lis:
- 7. ? arse =s Centac:ed Duri=,g Audit:
- a. Pre-Audi: - A. L. Gaines - ?:cjec: Ma=ager
- b. Audi: - 1. L. Gahes - Projec: M eage:
- 1. M. Keller - Lice =st=g T. R. Swif: - GSQA Supe::visc:
G. Requa - Desigs QA Ma=ager
- J. I. Medinger - Ma= age: G =up QA J. C. Packa.d - GSQA
- 3. Kapla: - GSQA
- c. ?ost-Audi: - A. L. Gaines - ? = ject Ma=ager R. M. Keller - Licensing I. R. Swif. - GSQA Supervisc:
G. Requa - Desis: QA Manage:
J. C. Packa_d - GSQA .
. 3. Kapla: - GSQA
- 2. Su==ary of Audi: Resul:::
- a. Gameral CI persc=e1 i=velved i= this audi vere cecpera:ive cd helpful.
- b. Iraluz:ic: cf QA ?:cs: = based en ele =e=:s audi:ed CI's QA activi:ies a *4L dsor vere generally fcued to be adequate. vo Neu-Cc=fer:ances were found.
(
I
i e =~ - ,,
T. Nc:-ce fc =z=cas: ' .
3t=Se-
'7h 2/1 .
7b 2/2
~
_ 0. 5 a:us of Pravi=us Nc -Cc=f===a=cas: -
4 Ft =be- ,
Dese-tecie 73-1/2 No: Audited - Ra a.i=s Ope
~
_ 73-1/6 ?;ccad::a for Racerd Re:astice issued i:: has ::: bes:
1 zple=a=:ad - ?-- m'- s Ops:
73-1/7 " App;cved Shaa:" i=cluded i: Revist== 3 ef T. .-1S.
I.am Closed.
I i
l l
22/bedwoobi L':.W $$)}-4rA7 L-//T7ryxsB5n= v4ci . '
ar :;_x exan yac <
q.i. nuou y :c - y _e ;m v o, -
l 1
,/ .
" Yo 's . ) Y*
/ ) ? * *Y*/
'cus:r.n y em -
I i
~. -
'.i * ".
NCM-C ...n,,..,,.C Re ,...,.
c v. a. 6. w r
Ju* r 12. 1874 Reper: N=. L-7 af Audit.
C:=bustic Incitee-int Ne -C:sf o----ee No . 74-2/1 tv Aadi ed:
'Jizdser. C ::ectice: Requir -:: C S . A=end 44 : ?S.G r.. c.* Aude...
Gaines, ?.equa, 5 id:, ?t:.<.ar:..
A. Gaines Discussed with: Xelle- Xeele- sed *:edi .cer sy T.sco ::
ell = vins Nc -C::.fe=ance is broush: :o your at::::ics for app =pria:e ec rec:ive c:ic: in- .
c== active ac:icn 1 the space ,:=vided
=g es:te: :o preven: rec ==:ence. Please' indica:e In the even: thi: co=ac:tve ac:ica cz==c: be c =ple:ed vidi .hir:7 days,121: include the
=f c==ee:ive actie:. Re:u= dis f === :s se-de- days eld. da:e f : c =ple:ic ase-19: ice ef Cbse-varie.:
Cb jective evide=ce lackd e te shev '=z .aeeeen: diree te 1: e e ti-t the it 22: and sutdece c AIC Rer:1:: -v Gcides 1.30 (A"5: 45.2.41. 1. 31. 1. 37 (ANST 45. 2.15 . z-d
- 2. CI has ze: rescended te e ':=en: =ade in */, 3- 7 51-7 3 .
1.38 (Kis! !.5.2.2') .
ure __endarie- hv Auditer: .
ta. age =en: sheuld direc: these rescensible vidin CI :e ree: the in:en: red .:1dzece ef th:re
- e. __i z . s en:1 :ed Re ult :-- Gcides c d :: dec==e:: the i=:le=en:::ien. Alse -esteese :: .
.ada ,= - w s-i 5, G.. Q .';Um * ~ sa w . ,y;". f2 .123 5./ . ,, ..
^*:08:8 : ^2, : '- 33 Da:a e -- o-
^ 5- -
- (s) Sis =a:::e:
T1018 ?r#j*c y'z=a *= t***
t~~~
- 1a ged by- Sit "d DY A* ~** O'i ** !
co--ee::.ve Ae: ... . Reciv: ,
i daled Ds:e cf C:::ee:ive Ac:L::: .
i 1
Ti:le: - Date
- v. --de bv: . _
lor cc Lv4 AO:. n dvalua:CU and Ef 6:5 5l 3. 1 Date !
.a-
. c o .,. . .
1
[ - .
. ' . . . .N03-CO'7CT.'i.1MC2 RI?OIt!
T
,.. , , s , 3c-1 Report No. 74-2
.5 Audi::
Nen-C:nfor= :ca No. 74-2/2 .
7 Andi:ad: Ce-buseden inrineer'.nr .
Recuire=ent: 07. A=end La ?S/J.
- = of Audi:: :indse . Cenneetteu: ..
Discussed vi.h: Kaller .
- y 7,,sco::: A.C ai=es to your atra=:icn for appr:priate cc : activa action 1.n- .
=11 vi=g Neo-C==for-~ca, is br= ugh:Plassa' indicata ec=ec:iva action is the space p:cvided
.s ac:ics :o preve== : cu nesca. be c=r.pleted within thir:y d ys, include :he
. In the aves: tha: cc= active action ca==c: Raturs this fc:= to sa=dar withis day
=1c6 d :a fc: c==plation af es=ac:iva acti==.
cre-1,cie_ ef Obse-ve:te.: .
4.4 3,e.s_,e. ,e.c ed ,, i. rid e- e e e' - e thed t te E ..e..: ...,e.g.. *s'._ . ..g.,.. .
--le eet ;- seed : e a-e treki .e .
_se. _endatien 'ev Audi ce:
= ===rs: i_=le=en:atien of =recedure. .
Q. TE.w *. m ;r.t. Hii.w-e al-h I . was(ines Da e 7- 12 -71.
.:: (s) Si;=a:: e: 1 v -de-s-e . _t .
- l'itle: ? eiec Manate- Oa:a 7-12 =v1:dgad by: Sir ed bv A. ' . Gaines 2--*::t e A::_en ?.estv:
l j :d=1cd 3::a of Correc:ive Ac:icn: .
'ti:le: Da:a 7 =:d: by: -
l
~. ::cc:2.va A::: un :.vsluateu ::.c T..:ni:.:=cu. ,
Da:e '
red by: i (c . ,,,-n 1
T. -- - .
Arcp._,4uzur Z-e Pass 1 of 4 Pag:n 4
p.
EDASCO S rilVI C E S INCCUPGnATCD , ,
t ::1.;;Y C O N s *.! . *. ANTS
O './ .
i . N EW i'O KK. N.Y.10CCS A.
- . L n. . 4.<. ' - -
nacr-az/e-nIn-3 I March 3, 1977 LW3 402 77 / -
File: 1.q.2 M: '4 3 Xavhi==sy, ? sj ec: Ma=aga C:=husti== I=gi=aart=g, heerpora:ad -
N=laa ?cvs: Depar.=a==
- 10C0 ? sspes: 1111 Road .
W htser, C ==ac: ::: 06095
- Es: I.T. JEi PCh"Il & LICC CCEPANT UG013 SIS UNC NC. 3 ..
q'*"-'T AS3t1ANCE A:::= .
CZ-CEA- A::CCCA .
Des: Mr MJvh1==ay: .
J
- A:: ached is a,c=py of tha :sper: c= the subjas: audit. ha :sper: ,
ida. iftas sa-nral . .c=c= .f===a==ss as well as i:n=s of ====sr= vhich
-he audi ::s f:=d duri=3 het: : visu of records a=d d'a :ses ds
=a:ageme== systa=. La udica:ed i: :he las: see:1 = of the reper=,
l va ara requas:hg a wri::s= respe:.se :n these .1:a=s vi.his ^' Ty (30) days of :scaipt of the repor:.
If :hara are a=y questic=s, please ca=:ac: 3 N Calliga= (212) 733 4208. ,
Very :: J.17 yc=s ,
- 1RHh-i7 m l
Z%3/2NG::= K 3:a= play ,
l Projes: Manager .
es: 7 D Mawh h=sy (2) j D L Asve11 J C 3coth (2)
L 7.Mauri: W C LaFoi=:a .
A I Isedersc=
i D 5 Les:a fgpgg#d.,
- ? 7 ? asankuma 8 4 .
Power 7:cd=c:1o= Depart =e :-Nucles: (3)
E.. = C..,,,o
..... . p,,9N4,,.,nf7a.% .fj ci.,vj, ,p
'a 8.5%
\%. $ -h ,q,s. if 7
I T Garrecs S V i
C C Chesen p Sha g .=< ggg . h 'i*s.
.w,s.....-
9
.f l - I Cc==s p .-
E: n-., TQp3 .
J M 1=..- -
l . .
I t
l
-.m o
. _ _ , . _ . , - .__. m. _ . _ _ - - . , _ . . _ - . - . . _ _ _ . ._ .-___. - __m_._.m. _ - - _ _ _ _ - _ _ , _ _ , _
< ja - .
t ..
c= 3ece=se: 15 trous: 19, 1976 halusive, Zhasco a=d 1.=uisiana ? cue; and I.ight Cc=pe=y conducted an audi: a: C.I. Chattanooga Mfs. fa=ili:7 Car ai: :scords, pertai=ing to '.;aterford III Rese:o; Pressure vessel, and -
(1) ene 5:es= cenerator :oge:ner vi:n o:se randomly selec:ed i:e=s of equipme==, vers given an i=-depth review and evaluation. .
The main onjec:1ves of the audi: vere: -
I -
- 1) To ascertain the availanilir7 of ce== sis records.
!l 2)- To assure the cos:ent and comple:eness of ther records.
.he records =a= age =ar.: systa= a: C/I - Chat.a= cogs
- 3) To assure -J.a was operatic =al and a: :he 6:e= cf ANSI 45.2.9 a=d amend =e== dt.A to the ?SAR. -
l . +
Audi Team Me=se: - Mr. Ralph Eastings,- Quality Assura=ce I=gineer I 3aprese=:i=g Louisia=a Power and I.igt: Company Audi: Tese I.aade - M=. Idvard J. Male =ey - ? inciple Quali:7 Assurs=ce !=gineer Represen:6s I3asco Se: vices I= corpora ad, N.T.C.
= ?a== Ti=e at:a= dance or as : squired!
Re:rese-et : C/I Tindser. Co== g) All other attendees e- esen-i== Cha:.=neo:2.
Mr. Joh= Sel==y - C:== aci, Q. A. G)
- M.. Roni=sen'*- ?iping .
M=. Za =y Milli *e.a= - ?;:jects F)
- M=. Wally Raad - Chief Q. A. Chatta=cesa
- M . 1.C. Kivet: - I,4ad Q.A. I=gi=se
- Mr. 3 J 3ates 4 Audi: Caerdinator
- Mr. Paul Kiefer - Q.I. Isac::: Vessel
- Larry Ice =is - Desis: I=gineeri=g
- Mr. Jeff Asd:ses - Records Storass
- De Diger - C.I. Ray a: Chattancoga
. f== IJE, Jo e .
Aedi: fi-di-rs: . -
Non-Cc=fc- a=ce to ANSI 45.2.9 and Com=ustics I=gineeri=g ? ocedure 17.3 Re r. C.
- . I i
The auditors found' 6 adequate i=ple=en:stion of squirese=:s for record -
l
- sta=:ica in the vault area, as listed eelow:
a.- There was =o fire ra:6s on the vaul: decr. -
t 3 .- The enviro ==ent in the veul: vas dusty. .
- c. There was =o c= ren: dec=nented con::31 of ta=perature a=d hu=idi:7 ,
(Canectite action has seen taken en ::.is 1:e=).
- 4. "he vaul: cus:odian was =c: usi=g, nor was he aware of the 14:es:
revisic: c: :he procedure for records reta=: ton, procedure 17.3.
. (He had Revisi'en 3 vnen Kevision C has seen ,issuad. Es should
! also have revtaked Rancision C.) ,
i en
- e
}
i 3
I
_ _~ , , , _ _ _ _ , _ . , . . . _ _ _,__. _,____._ _ _ ,_ _ _ _ _ _,
- e s
=
- e. != accordas e vi:h pr edure 17.3, Kevisi n C, :he vaul: cus== dias
~
seeds to de:e=i== if he has :he la:es: a:plicamle =anufae:::er's reco=enda:i::s ::: : e s:crage of ::diographs. ,
- f. nere was :o wri: e procedure :o de:sil :he specifics as :s who would have access :: :he docu=ents i: :ne vaul:; a ces: 31 regis:e for ta=porary vi:hdrawal of docu====s and de pe: iodic audi: of the ,
vault, its c=:ents and control loss. ,
Recemmenda ten ne audi:s:s rece=end tha: the vaul: cus:cdiz: c: = der respc si:le ~
individual exa=i=a the i==le===:stics cf require =ents f c; the re:en:1==
of required rece ds, and :ha: appropria:e ac:ic he :ake: :s es====
== c==f==asces, :s ree::d rete =:io= require =e .a.
C ~en ns Se defini:1== of a c= ce= as pe= aims :s de audi: is - a= i:e= ca: is
=c: fully c=plia=: vi:5 require =e=:s a-d c :ake: care of vill sec==a a :=-c==f :=a=:e. ,
Se f=11=vi=g dree c=====s were ide=:1fied durt=g the audi::
- 1) A esver or signa:v:e app.-. 1 shee: fo: :he Quality ?:rg:s= 3aviev .
k=cvs as 17-3, Iav. C vas no: available when doc =es:s were prese=:ed. .
- ). ne reviev a:d appr: val cycle of :he susjec: c=ver smeet did to: hear the C.I. ' Quality ha:ager's sig:4:ure.
Rece=eeda: ten: I: is :he audi:or's ' rec ==e=dati = that a= in-
,. s::..=:i= or p;ccedure se vri::e= :s iden:ify de sequential s:eps c fiev mecha=is= required i= the i..ple=a=:ati== of :his p:=cedu e. .
- 3) C':se--racice er Cence-: / Ins: vetiens. rreesdures and d:n -ines) nose i=dividuals who 'v ers con: acted duri=3 the c=c se o'f .his audi:
could act show the audt: ors a procedure, le::a or ada: docu=a=:
au:hori=i=g he use of the review form (review of p:=ceduras).
"he' for= alicus the recipie== :s signify review a:d/ : as=epta=ce l
cf a procedure leg by =c: recu=i=3 the f===. na: is,if def:=
is no: re:urned vi:hi= a specified ti=e period, it indi=a:es acceptance of the p scadure. (ne review /ce=en:s loop does =c:
i require a positi== response fro = :he reviewer.)
I.) ne audl: :s =oted :ha: ~al: hough de equipne== has seen ec= slated and shipped :s the si:e f== ser:e :1=s, : e associa:ed re==rds were
=o: located i= a ce:::alized locati==, =c had a=y of':he recorda
'seen processed or s:sred is the vaul:. We were usasle :o es:aslish a= exae: date, .when,:he subjec: records veuld me p;ccessed a=d fL= ally s:ored in : e vaul:.
m a
,,, ,,, , _ , , , , - . - ,c,--- - - - , , - , - , , - - , - - , . - - - - , - - , _ , . - - - - - . - _ , _ , . . - _ . , , _ , , , . , , , __ , . _ . . , . - , - - . _ _ , - , .
~ - . . . - - _ . .- __ __
f-.
4-a) 34spcase reques:ed as := s:crage envi;e==e== of areas uners re : ds are seing =ais:sised i: :he in eri parted ?
b) Ras .he ;;ccessi=g cf rec = ds for storage seen s:aned a: this poi == in ti=e? -
c) What is the expected con =le:ics date fs s = rage of :aa sumjec .
recorda? 9 Evaluatien o' Audits he rece ds and docu===:stics f== varicus he=s of equipme== lis:ed below which vers sed ==ly sales:ed =y :he audi:c s and the susjac doc*~-d = ents
-* :1:n reviewed :o asce: at: and assure tha: specift: son-des t:-ac tive
~
and testi=g of cperaticus a=d veldi=g vera ac=o=plished, p:=pcely signed off and dated. .
All of the dravi=gr, i= spec:.== : spor:s' and c:her peninen: 4:cu=e=:s :ha:
sses reques:ed by .he audh tes= vere re::ieved it=d cade availasis f==
- sview duri.g the audi:. All doc =en:s :ha: vare checked were fou=d :s de c =pla:e and =ee:hg thel: specified req = ire =en:s.
All i= spec:1==, tes: or specially desigza:ed a=a=i=atio= pei=:s li.sted ,
en :he :::velers and == :he reports cf i=spect:.e= vere evide=ca'd as ha ri=g -
bes= ac===plished :7 proper sig= off a=d date.
A detailed Its: =f .hese 1:e=s ha: vere selec:ed, reviewed a=d verified as satisf:::c 7 is a=:1: led attach =e:: "A" to :his report and will be re:aised my Isaste Quali:7 Ass =asce I=gineering LY. Office Cne exce;:i=t to the above stata=es vas a lis of Qualified Welder
~.=1:ials were espied f-:= :aa Weld Eistory Char:s of the various he=s of equi;=an: lis:sd in :his reper:. Ihe audi: :s reques:ac verifica:i:=
of the velder and pr:cedura qualhicaric= vhich was no: available pris;
- s the a d o' the exi: cri:ique of =he Audi:.
A lis: of qualified velders has shes been c:=siled and ::a=s=1::ed to -
the lead audits . I: has been reviewed and found satisfae:: 7 I: is :se reco=enda:ic: c: -he lead audi:s -ha: the lis: be-::sss referenced vi:h the actual velder serfor=asce qualifications and procedure qualidi=stic=s
- ' at.
- he nex: visi: :s C =susti== I:si= ear.sg Chattaccoga, my Louisia=a
?:ver and 1.13 3: Qualhy Assurs=ce I=gineeri=g. , -
Cen:1usiens:
We a s requesting a vri:: res.m:se indicating,"Codec:1ve Ac: ion" take= ,
, . or pla==ec by C.I. to c:::::: :se nesec=f c =a:ces lis:ed as ite=s (a) l
-"sugh (f) in:1csive. Y=u: res; case is requested vi:si: :114 (30)-
1 calendar days of .he da e of :his report.
Ve are further askia; : hat C.I. give a wri::en':ssn' osse to :se four 1: ens of esacern, indicating wha: re=edial corree:1ve action has, bee = or vill -
! he taken i= each of :he 4:aas of concurs. ,
1 l
l I
T w c' laUISIANA P O W E R & L I G H T .w
! , o%.aus
. o.-o~o. er
..r LoveANA
. a oo-7os74-ecos e t-c4i see-as as M100LE SOUTH UT;UTIES SYSTEM November 17, 1983 W3P83-3827 3-Al.16.07 3-A101.04 Director of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Attention: Mr. G.W. Knighton, Chief g Licensing Branch No. 3 {p ' ', pg Division of Licensing (/**
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D.C. 20555
SUBJECT:
Waterford 3 SES Docket No. 50-382 Ground Water Sac:ple Associated with Basemat Pleaes find attached, the water chemistry report for the ground water - N sample associated with the Wate'rford 3 basemat. The information provided in the report was orally provided at the meeting on this subject on November 3, 1984.
Very truly yours, v/ n a. w K.U. Cook Nuclear Support & Licensing Manager KWC/RWP/ch Attachment cc: E.L. Blake, W.M. Stevenson, J. Wilson, G.L. Constable
. .T
.?
r.
FREEDOM w mgg M REQUEST gy-YST* l toz - .
%ll2 p
& ~0 ~
^
1
. ^
g ...
- m. %d6 ,, .. pr5 .
fnhs- . m: k.,. .i , , ., h, J h.,
prow Tcc CoSMB DEF! ;4pasar 20.1983.
n
~NEW[ YORK .T.Ewr.xNG LABORATORTW,.INC.. (e153 33677?S' . (IfflSWT16 g(gar 1at1,73unaM6AVEHus,PresTSURV.L.1 NT. f 33s4. .
REPORT. OFTESTS.
83-70193;.- Ebasco. Services: Inc. j p ,g cient -.
ms:51 -
one. 0} m e e sample. 7., ,,y. c..,b.6iw.
Pendfng.:
4 4,/q. /ge, f ,4, cueneeorder No. A O* b"# ' **'
. M%n -- - 9/26183' ' A F ~ 3 5' h 5 L.. ( Cel. M
- f, Chemical' Analysis-5 Wwfor -
~ I. Ju =ty pA(ea(. sa(r.
.t. 5;'imple &sHle pleed tu8 M Temp..#/cc.
We find a'.. follows: Condidh svke*c4 /c9k Results. ,, g g . ,
. 8'.15' pH at 20 deg. C..
Results in -- (mg/1) _
170:
Total Dissolved'5011ds:
207 Alkalinity.as CaC0y 60 Sulfate at'S0g. 207.
Bicarbonate Alkalinity as CACO 3 15.
Chloride as.ci- '8.1 ,
ij
'Qissolved Onyggn: -
1.3 catton Dioxide. < 0.01 l Ry#rogen. Sis 1 fide 0.773
.l Iron. 55.30'-
Calciun 22.91:
l Sodium.
147 CaTctun Hardness.as CACO3.
c . tess in,.
l
. . NDY YMN TB5TW9 ****">^
Page 2 of 2 Lab No. 83-70193-Report' prepared by:
Ramo Gtgante Laboratory Director-CERTIFICATIOH-We certify that thfs: report.1s.a true.
report,of. resu7tse obtained from our-tests. of- this material.
Respec: fully submitted..
HEW YCP.R TESTING LABORATORIES', INC..
V . f G. J(% x5Mdth,'ChiaC.C1ficar- ~
To::
Ebasco Services Ihe.
One Jericho Plaza Jericho. NL Y,11753- ,
Att:: Me'. Williact Gundaker- '
mg' '
I
- l n rmi en..mge tir esw.ccm .ati se samree.. 1 tar n. r.,sen.psmmyu. sis e,sewounphe. '
theeenveit.wam4nuaeiisnemedm corvoeuo . ,n g .psw p.mhaan,. ,
Nempim arearnN fee (Mny Weys mamienemohev 4Me of espost untras aymfiull) vowessentgehewese by Par-,va.hievins Immamm8 es.8 art =iett rostnerie 4k = vim cameste.i..;..: sneuan ne uvent ee.neew emovat
. ei-3 o t,
i
, , , --.- ---