ML20117P902
| ML20117P902 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Calvert Cliffs, Nine Mile Point, Indian Point, FitzPatrick |
| Issue date: | 11/21/1988 |
| From: | Capra R NRC |
| To: | Eccleston K NRC |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20116D885 | List:
|
| References | |
| FOIA-96-237 GL-88-02, GL-88-2, NUDOCS 8812070054 | |
| Download: ML20117P902 (2) | |
Text
. -.
Cert 4rmJ 44lo
.h",'
ga i
,g l j.'.
].h Havecber 21, 1988 X!
' C.
s, I
4 l *-
NOTE TO:
K. Eccleston I
t.
FROM:
R. Capra
SUBJECT:
LICENSEES
provide a list of plants in our PDs that have volunteered. or have indicated they probably will volunteer, to participate in ISAP-II.
There are seven plants (four utilities) in PD I-1.
None of the utilities have volunteered to participate at this time.
In its February 1988 response, NNPC stated it would be interested in,
discussing the program further for possible consideration of HMP-1; however, based upon the problems that have developed at NMP-1 since their February 1988 response. NMPC may not be as interested in participating in the program as their letter implies. Con-Ed (IP-2) and PASNY (IP-3 and FitzPatrick) indicated they would like more information on the program and would be willing to participate in an NRC/ industry seminar on the program.
but do not appear to be strong candidates.
BG&E (Calvert Cliffs 1/2) is not interested in participating in the program.
t A summary of utility responses is included as Enclosure 1.
.O. M R. A. Capra
Enclosure:
As stated ec: B. Boger PD I-1 PMs 6
N' 'Y {.
hE?
f
,b.
I n-
'V(-
-[
i I
[~
t 1,, m W_ _ $Wtt.
1,f} '
/
L f'
w:q k b
. c t
j I
j.
Calvert Cliffs 1/2 response dated 02/23/88:
'?.
BG&E has no interest in participating in the proposed program.
Indian Point 2 response dated 02/17/88:
Con-Ed is not in a position to participate in ISAP II starting in j_
1988.
Should ISAP II efforts continue they sould be interested l
j in discussing participation upon completion of their efforts to update the IP-2 PRA.
Cond-Ed is not interested in a one-on-one 4
meeting with the NRC on ISAP II at this time.
}
Indian Point 3 & FitzPatrick response dated 02/22/88:
PASNY does not have enough information to make a decision regarding participation in ISAP II.
PASHY vould participate in an NRC/ industry meeting to discuss the topic.
PASNY does not believe an individual meeting with NRC would be useful until a general meeting was held with all interested licensees.
i Nine Mile Point 1 and 2 response dated 02/19/88:
HMPC is interested in participating in ISAP II for NMP-1 with II some reservations.
NMPC will need more information regarding the i
program's scope, schedule, and engineering acceptance criteria j
before it could make a definitive commitment.
NMPC would be interested in participating in either an industry /NRC seminar or i
j a one-on-one meeting to discuss the subject further.
NMPC would i
consider NMP-2 for participation only if the program for NMP-1 developed acceptably.
a i
l I
l i
f k
l
}
l
.