ML20100G591

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Forwards Ltr from R Fisher of South Dennis,Nj,Concerning Nuclear Plants
ML20100G591
Person / Time
Site: Oyster Creek
Issue date: 02/27/1973
From: Sandman C
HOUSE OF REP.
To: Schlesinger J
US ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION (AEC)
Shared Package
ML20100F143 List:
References
FOIA-95-389 NUDOCS 9602230291
Download: ML20100G591 (10)
v • d • e


Text

- - . .- - . - _ - - - _ _ - - .

  • e j

r .

A L '. Ns (Qf

/v S. a""g";;;..,,,,

CHARLES W. 5ANDMAN. JR. -5

.g.

.~ .

7 L 5 ?. _ : Congettsof tfjeMnittbhtatt% -y h

.-- Douge of Representatibeg g, r; v.a u u :. on c . -- suadington,1e.C. 20515 7a. =_ "f.".,,.

February 27, 1973 I

L

!

  • Honorable James R. Schl'esinger Chairman 1 Atomic Energy Commission Washington, D.C. 20545

Dear Mr. Chairman:

' Enclosed is a letter concerning nuclear l power plants that I have received from Mrs. Ruth Fisher of South Dennis, New Jersey.

! , At your earliest convenience, I would appreciate your advice and comments on this matter. .

Thanking you and with all best wishes!

1 I am Sincerely, ba0a s , _ %: ^2 le 9602230291 960129 harles W.' San , Jr.

Member o fCong ess OK 89 PDR 429/ CWS:my vnnincora

. c g

. . ~P

[ ~J Ruth Fish Jan. 31, 1972 -

Dear Congressman Sandman last November regarding Many thanks for the na terial you sent While my major interest licensing for nuclear plants in Sou a Jersey.

continues to be in seeking alternatives to continued dependence upon fossil fuels and nuclear plants, I am still anxious to know how these h

sources of electrical power are planned and carried so far before t e Therefore, a few questions which public has a chance to participate.

I hope you can help me with follow.

1.

In the U.S. Atomic Energy Commission booklet Licensing of Power Reactors, it is stated that prospective applicants are encouraged to discuss informally possible sites for a reactor with the Commission's While no application for the Off-Shore nuclear plant Regulatory Staff.

i t near Birganton has apparently (?) yet been made, such discuss on mus investment for have been quite positive even to have made the $100,000 Can you please inquire of Mr. A. Giambusso, test borings in the area.

f how <

Director of Reactor Projecto 'aow the public can be kept abreast o i lection?

the private utility was encouraged in this particular s te se 2.

If the Salem Generating Station at Hancock's Bridge does not yet I have an operating license, can you please inform me of when and where If an Environmental the public hearing will be held for this plant?  !

to the Environmental Policy Act has been Impact Stateraent pursuant I filed, can you please tell me how to find it or obtain a copy?

g> g ,' r l t

l t- . ,

5 l

s 1

1

3. Last week, Friday January 26, 1973 an internal leak of 50,000 gallons of poisonous, radioactive was released at the Oyster Creek Plant according to Ivan R. Finrock of JCP&L. Can you please in-form of how the regulatory agency, AEC, permitted this amount to be released without closing the plant? And why announcement of this leak came from industry and not from government?

Many thanks for your ef forts to secure information and your continued opposition to the Deep Water Port.

Sincerely,

/s/

R. Fisher l -

i

RQA %f

/ ;gegsso

% &fe,.a-l q,.e.w.r:.,. 3S /m&:~ 9 7,,. 2e *'.e.s s* s r.n k s p.+ m.

e,su-m , / s

,9 ..:. 3 44cf Se-f:-r /.:## ,f4*-4 *~4-h

< '.M . mfe.-

p. .i p.%y.J ,-rny g g -

u e- e:m .,no

ue c.ccc g.u,,. >wr s.swe-6 n ff $%9 e, e

m ~ p f - % J a gg:w

.caa f<+u .&n f n.4.L.~ n ~.e s,~ e- m c~ p.

5 crht d~.' f.-
- w cs:.c- g o C. e r-:A c> ,& cc' & .a a3 g h -/ d C6. , s- %'is .A:.o pcCm eEd.<.hi

's;%).oc. , apa g-A" w&c4 u?/y g m y-

%./'.itd.- f m r:4 ,,>&Edm~. .

1

. h l. he '-$ hp* 'f  % '** E M.*$*a .

Y

$ $cc,,- &3 g 60m Accelh *, -++' eb S'-t'</ tLtfy 7 yew au ~-~ga d s's ir.o -a e.0.-ys>..~. 4

p. w ac:. w ,A 7 m .~ e ,._ ;

-syan .wy.usnq

.w sA .-c_,en,t: .w pec. .~r e.yp-a eea- m y -m n

,0.1 c;c?fy 9;c.-
- .4.u.v n:wCo , p. ec.4 c;k,Jeum,',., ,
.
;;/k' % 7uMuy=.'i&!: t o ~c.~< A lw'n l Add?47.?,m cc:d4:/s;stc.-t7 Jer jOca.y k%y c-n R$

du:. 9 2 ;:fua c.ht a L+pri'q y

nn f}a. e.n.  !/ <0w.:s%a 4 ,1,.m. ,s_

7 -

._s ao m( rwr:.2hif;'y:v Ak swas Cecs=e-i.cyd. .c.; i;.

of.de-:v'f e

, mwd.e, .ge ne acer:a> e .

6

$ 4

R(JA R;b a.aru n, - .m p ua,,,s-a c aS6.;.p.,.&s,o:.+.gri:w~e.a.,cpvuhdp M u , oi4:i,e4 u.. ny'& ~ om 9 VEur ud wde.L' n m.w.e.Dawho.r.kf4 v$sSl'%' fA&pcL7.I' # : e % r- xnw u-, a f Q -

c cas. r m ak anncow.neA:.

3%C an wns.~rp=%,pu, enypn htf,;;,w ,lpu & yn/.4 l e N%n <? ey~zy ?

. M r/nwk,9 &"=q - - g a, inia:,s; % d ja.-A psg m an g p-i.cw, nuas;

/!/w.Aeik% a;' f4 6.yas $1yAz /:}4W d=cr=dq' % A4w /? B&weA 9 J c P e L. .

0%n. .< sv Mc c -

. q't s > . 9 NsW'.47[e.

Ac sec&p 9xw5.,,4u,ymA!64i s,,n,a. x - - a c. od-wwckw.g,n -sep.w

(;/te. &,.,,r ~P d?ow? 6nfy .

.--. -- ....-.~

O g

W g, mn:.e w4.,

i A, .m,._ , ._-

$' h &f bN:< '..'-7 "? -#n ,'&,,G N

,ewc manuni a r me.:, ewa..; .

Y I4' ( <

'I N,,f b5W$1 h .T .

$%y?3f7.,.CS&Cr x ; w/m,/ Vi . /*."y,yc ;z,LG e

4 4 .

c, .

. 4

. ~.

i i i

= .]

1

. 12!Cnifeb States Senale -

I.

j i t

l

.- . I I

N 13 DD I

Respectfully referred to: .

I Ccnt:::x : ::.1 .ula'>n l  ;

L;;.;J.;; : ..;;,f / 'A.CA"cica Waohington, D. C. 20545 . \

4

. f, .

Because of the desire of this office to be responsive to all inquiries and communications, '

your consideration of the attached if f, requested. Your findings and views, in  ;

duplicate form, along with return of the

  • enclosure, will be appreciated by Richard S. Schweiker Pennsylvania

.................................-.-~..---

Form #2

_InI0rmaljad in , .

I*l acccidance ;.lth' ICCord was gg;ggg 9

k t. cxemnygg, gthe Filedo;b ciinformation.

FotA.pg ~

R '. ? % . ,

I I

Sen. Richard S. Schweiker Room 6221 New Senate Office Build'ing l Washington, D. C. 19107 1

4 Dear Sen. Schweiker In preporation of this letter I reread your letter ofIt refeshes m June 2, 1972.

in touch with the nuclear issue.

This letter is in rerards to the charges made by Dr, Ernest l Steinglass. I feel that the issues must ifbethese beyond a doubt.

brought out and prov charges are l' vania and Maryland, New Jersey, and Delware, true. In view of numeruos plants being preposed for Pennsylvania and New Jresey.

Also it is most important to learn why the Oyster Creek plant was closed down on December 29, 1972 and entered into the records regarding nuclear plants.

' I would also like to thank you for your reports on action in the Senate.

ours Truly y,a .-? ff< K

! James G. Norton e

=

l 4%

e

c. . . . - - __ . _

r~ -

, NEw JERSEY SENATE .

~

?'

LEONARD T. CoNNoRs, JR. CHAIRMAN COMMUNITY AFFAIRS COMMITTEE SENATOR s'* DisTRsCT eso W. LACEY Roan Mzwaza SENION CITIZENS. VETER ANS AFIAIR$

. (CLOCRTOWEm BLDo.)

Fomaso Ravra, NJ 08731 AND AonscuLTunz Coww1TTre LzonsLArsvz Stavacas Cowwssstow (609)693 67o0 (2o1)240 o266 May 25, 1995 Deer Mr. Anste' tit: l 1

I an in receipt of your May 23, 1995 letter on behalf of the Citizens' Conservation Council. .

By way of this reply, I certainly wanted you to know that your -

thoughtful remarks about my efforts to represent the people of the 9th District with integrity and openness are very meaningful to me. .

I take my responsibilities with profound seriousness. I truly value your generous support and continued friendship.

I also thank you for your leadership efforts with Citizens' Conservation Council in striving to build a better environmental -

future for the residents of ocean County and for our children.

i i

Your efforts on a number of key issues have helped to preserve i our natural resources and marine ecology here at the New Jersey -

Your stewardship will, in fact, touch generations to come.

i Shore.

l I wanted you to also understand that I and my colleagues,

Assemblyman Jeffrey W. Moran and Assemblyman Christopher C. Connors, 4

also share your concerns about the immediate and long-term issues ~

surrounding the oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station and other

' nuclear power plants in New Jersey as well as across America. As you so correctly pointed out, these facilities do indeed hpve a regional impact. I also wanted you to be assured that we Vill do everything feasible to work cooperatively with the Federal Nuclear Regulatory Commission to maintain a vigilant watch over the nuclear ~

industry so that our families can be as safe as possible. I think everyone would like to turn the clock back to another era and another time. Hindsight is a perfect science.

Informahen in this record was dele!ed in accordance withjhe Freedom of Information Act, exemp!!cne 6 '

F0lA. ISY[

c. _ ._ ._ . _ . _ . . _ . . _ _ . . _ _ _ _ _ _ __ .. _ _ _

1 l

A /

  • o -

May 25, 1995 3 Mr. Robert Anstatt _

Page.2 -

Thank you, again, for taking your time to write to me and share the views from the Citizens' conservation Council on this facility.

By copy of this letter, I am forwarding your comments to the Feder;I

, Nuclear Regulatory Commission for their information and leview. The NCR-is the licensing agency for nuclear generating stations not only here in New Jersey but throughout America, and I believe it is important that agency have the opportunity to attentively consider your important concerns.

Best wishes.

Sincerely, . .

%  % d, wm -<-4

~

LEONARD T..CONNORS, JR.

Senator - 9th District LTCJR/gpl/jb _

c: Mr. Ivan Selin, Chairman .

United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission (with Enclosure) ,

g **

i .

k -

i 4

1 9

4,

e e NATGDRikl of X CITIZENS' CONSERVATION COUNCIL 1623 Whitesville Rd., Toms River. NJ 08755 9720 (3n0 sL f ; 0Au VW " N Y U /'" " $ g gh s

Open Letter to NJ Senator Len Connors, 9th Dis. . /

I .

~

Robert An

Dear Senator Connors:

An observer to the New Jersey Legislative Process can only_ admire your openness and integrity 'as a consistent personna through ~

the years in terms of sincerity 'despite other points of view in Trenton. On behalf of the citizens' Conservation Council of Ocean County you should realize that; even when we disagreed w i t h y'o u r position (Coastal Commission), we know that you are firm and that you can be counted on to batk up your perceptions with support.no matter what.. -

This open letter is something you already know about - our people are. concerned with the storage of,radhot nuclear fuel rods at Oyster Creek - the CCC Executive Board does not want to indulge in a rehash of citizen upheaval seen during the Ciba-Gigy or Co-Gen or garbage burn plant - and we do want to observe elected -

officials scrutinizing what is proposed over there. We would and honest attention paid to the like strong, objective, application to place dangerous and* hazardous bulk into the ground of our local environment. ,

As you probably know, NJ Assembly Speaker Haytaian chaired a Special Assembly Task Force on Land Use Issues for the Legislature and one finding says, " Countys should be given e

more responsibility and authority on land use issues which have ,

a regional impact": if the burial of highly radioactive fuel . - 1

, rods - when the NRC admits that half of New Jersey would be lost - does not have a regional impact; what does? j

. I went to to the County Freeholders and asked for a _Special l j Commission to oversee what will occur with the Lacey 7wnsp.  !

Planning Board during the new hearings on June 5th. P,erhaps the Solid Waste Advisory Council or the O.C. Env. Agency?< But apparantly the County will not intrude until there is a violation as in the case of Ciba.

This is an issue which shall not go away; but will only escalate.- '

There is much apprehension at the Citizens' conservation Council and since we usually have the pulse of caring people here, the issue will rema;in a strong activist project of our 42 organizations here . in*

Ocean County. Thank you for any, consideration of these views.

, Your friend always,

&h hOMT

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML20100G591&oldid=3483539"