ML20100G549

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Requests Info Re Dangers of Nuclear Power Station
ML20100G549
Person / Time
Site: Oyster Creek
Issue date: 03/14/1969
From: Salmond A
AFFILIATION NOT ASSIGNED
To:
US ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION (AEC)
Shared Package
ML20100F143 List:
References
FOIA-95-389 NUDOCS 9602230249
Download: ML20100G549 (2)
v • d • e


Text

l (Gyp,

syc N

,v Q

m

f'

,8b

& ~, i l

i:sfsr,uc 6%<

%W 62:da.o 4

a

~'

-,- m n

a t.p46"M.

2

-x.uaL.en.

a<1 2S a et'/ c-a-.4

  • Y

-we xa G A n e-

.c/4, a p,. /

d<.K &~A ~,

k y, a. m

.4s -

p

~.

e d. -cd &'

W " !-u i

>k.Ae-e.e.

oM

.n8 s t i aze.,s.<y/

o N '-

5 Ex-~' A b J

ua k w

.,.<.L.Ed 6 -l-.u, M s a' a J.<es e eY 2

Af m2 m &

a-

  • %"W

&m A

'IL d N A

p m.<

Jac M M '

~

J;d --m.-xa M ge& -.a.ak.~ cd

. g, i

a saat r~a J,_ w L wq w& -x f: A y ace..

a m n

a. u.e J o

-s c.e &

A zL '* "y~ f p nv u

& Wh; M QL p

<' -rya /w a #

.au M

,,l

., E -

'2 '"

"Y O Wyd

{ b a< Aexaa.u

-,x.a 4 m a edf/

Sf'm s

-*a & w&m m o x

,a,,

M

.j.A~~.w -ec u m &.-

e W

4sa g

& n'"# W 4

ea A &<

f.

A 9t a

umut A A '<

..mumn,n,,g, Eirddr h

Rec'd Off, Dj7 f ggg, D

ins nato.s/i,__g.np,p;y TOI A. _

syQu-v L Ln.

.a.

o -n cf y

en,L.L

'. ~ & u,

)

A p u.L -p

,a pk - a s s

,Lp%'

cL. L a A-s y

aAa

'ja.~/;y sgAAw p_

AMpA pk w&pna ~

~ m+ra y' a LyA afA m 4 x4m/

g1AAM A/>

.Ws.eA M,y L

ce a.g g e / M,.

u o.wc / p 4_

h S

m-A

r Y-/

~

~ /~yM,

~

n. J M

~

W O

E e

t G

4

- ^ ~ - - - - - -, _ _ _ _ _. _

y t.

N.'

l 4 f? f.i P ['[2 } '

.a

... L., t=

/s O**

GENFRAL PUBLIC UTILITIES CORPORATION d\\

1 i p.

,.m.,

Reply to:

260 Cherry Hill Road f'

Parsippany, New Jersey 07054 MEMORANDUM s

November 14, 1969 To:

A. Dohm (USAEC, DRL)

Via:

Pickard, Love & Associates (Mr. Keith Woodard)

Subject:

" AI/GPU Fast Breeder Project Local Newspaper Articles of Interest Enclosed is a file of letters to the editor and editorials printed in the Tunkhannock Republican & New Age from April to Novem-ber of this year which you expressed an interest in having during our telephone conversation of last week.

I will continue to forward copies of future articles of interest to you as I receive them from Penelec.

R. W. Heward, Jr.

RWH/brh Encls,a/n cc: Messrs. W. H. Hirst j

C.'J. Smith R. H. Sevy (w/en/ encl.)

K.

Woodard (w r'...

cl.)

, g..

g y q su.

~.

,3 g.

,~

l ^.y

  • d-7-e,,

d

,,..,.. ?w ;4.

- :. ;;: %jl.

  • Qg.$

k

.\\ 3 b'? l &

2.&

4 1..

.k., V :.g %.%'.,.' l

5' b.

f

'. l.0,Iniatipa in this rebord was deiefed

) @,( '../5 *

-l

/,_

.J s

y;p;. Y5 f.

in acccr13cce with the freedom of Information O'

~~

_. ht, cmngt

~.,

,yy ; 29. ~~wne

.w.

r:

g

~

.. q) u.,

s.-

at p....-..

3

~

Thursday, NovIml,er 6,1900,-- Pag 211.,, e gg M'

,. 3

(~fQ$hMUY {%'lOTG.&&:Y

~'

1IITOES=NT03 #:

1

~

k'

~y y9 [ @ MQ)it[5 N M I E i N-s..

t

~

s-

Dear Cecil:

-~.-..y..

i 2

3 I

In several of the past issues f

of the New Age there have been

, troubled letters about the new 4

Jtiomlc energy power plant to be built in Mohoopany. These

e letters express a common con-cern over the dangers involved with its operation, for example:

(1) Pollutionof airandwater.

(2) The disposal of waste

' products; (3) Possible har.ards of low and continuous radiation.'

(4)' ! ast but not least, who knows if the safety regulations t

for this andothers:uc!(arp! ants are adequate, and whoischeck-

'ing to sec if they are being ob.

. served?

'5 There will be a 'meetinC on.

i November 11,1969/ht the Cath-olle Youth Center, for all con-cerned citir.cos todiscuss these cogent issues and findout where, the truth really lies.

i

"}

Sincerely, t

JOAN DANIE!E AND, MARTHA ROBINSON

.t. s.

.>s g,.b.

6 g..

..c

.,,q,.,

g

~

4"- 5,

a

',i

.h.

,, ', i.

  • f sf 4 '

.rs a k.

k. F )-

.g f

Its 9

.Sh.

..* ;. ;;,c,$ ';@

y

~

t Q-

~

i<

ej Y,

.~,

N, hld;.W:.r.

?

Ei lt

.;.,.' p $f

,e

. ;n a y,

s.g:-l F,%yb_, % l e

B Martha Robinson (Mrs. Ma g p

Mr. Robinson is a former farmer and now a home builder (is building a

~ /

total electric development). Mr. and Mrs. Robinson have both been vocally interested in local school affairs, although they send their j

children to a private school. Bo'th have sought public office and i

Mrs. Robinson, this month, suffered a substantial loss in her candi,dacy for the school board.

1 i

. Sidn g I s

u Mr. Daniel is associated with Walter Maciorkoski at Bendix Aviation (South Montrose) and the Daniels are also associated with him in local i

Walter Maciorkoski is County Party Chairman, Democratic Party activities.

also the author of the first protest letter to the editor and, by virtue of being Democratic Party Chairman, will be at one of our briefing sessions.

Although not noted in their' letter, the Daniel-Robinson meeting vill V.revson has told me it won't get covered be held at 8:00 p.m. on the lith.

because it is impossibic for anybody from the papcr to attend a meeting on a Tuesday night.

I expect Krewson vill not publicize our briefing sessions before we hold them, but vill report on them after the fact which would not be until his issue of the 20th. It vould appear then that we can minimize the possible interpretation of our briefing sessions being a response to the Daniel-Robinson meeting.

I would propose also to give Krevson a copy 3

of the Menhoppen Men's Club script.

Krevson has told me that the various letters to the editor and the,'

Daniel-Robinson meeting has not, so far as he can determine, stirred much

)

interest in the community, but he could not 'give what kind of attendance 4,

He also presumed the meeting would essentially quote they will have.

passages from the CARELESS ATOM, THE PERILS OF THE PEACEFUL ATOM, NUCS

]

,3 IN H(T.' WATER, etc.

e

m. 3,f <

..p.'i

<.9';.T.D t 4.4 u!u

^

CHARLES J. SMITH

, p.

s

,, 2

.e 4

9-p November 6, 1969

  • f,,. i;;M.

.c

. v. 4

  • sg*

2',

?*,

, i, j)>,

x is.t n

+

. r.,'

- +*

.4 I

e

  • Thursday, Oct:b;r 30, 1969.

b

- P'SN-?

YEY

~

~

~

Y 217 $ $ $ ? {' $f_? M S A Y iis

=

,z..,

... <. < )

Dear Sir:

I agree with Walter Mac.

iorkoskl, Martha Robinson and Joan Daniels that as respon.

sible citizens.in a democracy, we should show an active con-g g

9 corn regarding ihe possible dangerous effects to our en-

vironment posed by the build-ing of a pilot fast-breeder i plant for atomic energy in our community.

Progress is inevitable, par-ticularly in the field of* tech-nology, and no one can deny its impact on our vtay of living.

' Neither can anyono deny the disastrous harm that has been left in its path because of Ir-responsibility and apathy.

As for the excusp of ignor-ance on the subject-ocology

has become a household viord.

Our newspapers and magazines are carrying articles constant.

'ly that are informative and alarming if duly considered.

" Time" magazino has a nev '

section just on environment.

I wit! certainly be watchinE.

for the announcement of a pub-

~

11c meeting as one small way.

~

~

an individual can show his con-cern for what may happen to our community.

,1 s.

Sincerely,

....'...,',...V.IRGDilA SIIERET s

1 9

(.

' Elm,

g 6

o

.L.. ; -

.u,

.u..,, #c, r

. Y.

s-

- 7fQ. vt N.
  • 3:.;$l'?..!.*f ' ?E.

gl- _

.. w n, :... %: N. ' -

.n..

t

.e

,g.'

.a s _,,-

^

,g

) g1 f ',

.*'f

.lt G * ?sj 'l

"*J^

, :*,l ' Y. !. ~. *..df.,5 ~ f m.:s'gy]Ji.,. n, ? 7, n 1 b. 4 i I ! M,1pn: o ,. n. :~. :1., 8 ,c.a 3, 7..

s.t/-y;, ,n. ] n.% l <NEW AGE ,, Thursday, October 23, 1969

w/

.. ~. h b ddC)Mt.M /N6?s ?f]O,7;$ T0ilE }@ {.,

  • b*

1 fM = l

Dear Editor:

' coming generations oflife. To As a sympathetic reader of add to our already over-bur- ~ Walter Mactor):osk!'s Letter to dened atmostphere now comes the Editor, this paper, Septem-the prospect of nuclear reactor ber 18,1909, I was interested - wastes, elements which do not g in obtainir.g reactions to tho, break down, do not dishppear. facts and questions contained Once these wastes are allowed' lherein. Rep!!es to my quer.u to issue from a nuclear plant, reflected three attitudes con-they are "irretrcivable, out of corning Penelec's proposednu. the reach of man's control". clear power plant: (1) "This The Careless Atom. Novick.. is proCress! Why get excit-It is not only that we may ed"? (2) "Certainly it has its become " expendable" in the hazards, but what doesn't? event of an accident; this haz-a Maybe we just have to trust, ard and the pollution hazard the sc!cntists and designers." are only two of many. (3) "Yes, it seems insane, but We concern ourselves with what can you do"? all', manner of family, civic, What can te do? What cr.nwe national and world-wide. in-do, who do not condone prol;ress terests, and in the realm of without qualification, without personal matters which af-surety, without sufficient re- . f(ct the well-beinC of our ch!!- ^ search? Ilow can we argue dren, we are dilltent. And yet with the " experts" when we we have ceased to becomo re-know little or nothing shou'l sponsible when we find our-nuelcar matters?

  • selves sitting in the very lap Many labor under the mis-of a concern which overwhelms conception that any reading ma-all other concerns.

terial in this line must be If we have any faith that we strictly for the scientific mind. live in a democracy and thus This is not true. A wealth of have a voice in what befalls information 15 AVAILABLEnnd us, let us shed our apathy and ' has been compiltd specifically our sense of fatalism, and act 's for the, purpose of informing as responsible citizens. ~ the concerned public. A group is forming and is 'i ' ' One does not need an "Ein-plarming a public meeting in l stein" mind to realize that air l the near future. Watch your

3...

and water pollution are real ( paper for timo and date. .i *. y - ~!' and present hazards which ! multiply eaeh day and will Sincerely,. h1 A ' JOAN DANIEIE 'd h,l 4 eventually, if not curbed, pre - d 4,T . ' ' - sent a profound threat to the . ;,.:u,u., :x... ... a -y C [G. = +..,13* y., / e'y,, 5 '- l.,. "Q 1 ~ 4,3,,,, ~dsp.? % 4 -. w. cw.. v J.i; p - .w. , = *. .m m .~i A4 ! %' h [y*j.h 5 4 'a-' ,. h 8 *. i 'l',; {', + ,_,' k)h.ykg$ 't ^ e' yy i' ~ v wo ..;;ff .c ? u j, ( .. N.

~' ~ 't.NEW AGE ~ Thursday, Celober 1$, ~1969 ^ 'h ~ ~ .n " [ M d W f ti d l N @ i N d E [ M / h ! LETT23S=IIT03 ' ~ ~ z [U M690f,R.gpM.M M S E Miihdt k k '.. Dear Edit'or ~ i '. Don't you think it advisable always to examine with. care the prejudicos neoplehavewhen , they take a pos.tlon? IAt us, examine impartia!!y,

  • if possible, some of the re-

~ , actions of experts to those ,, atomic power plants. 1 j I quote from Mr. Edward ' Teller. Everybody knows he tc has always been on the 8'let's ,< go" side for atomic develop-1 T' ment. Ile states categorically

  1. that all such plants should be

) e, an placed underground, as they 4 are in Sweden. Energy from

5. oil and from the Atom".
i. ~ D a y1*d Lilienthal, former. '

f n-AEC member, has stated he &.would be unwilling to live any-where near such a plant. 8'When , the atom moves next door". .' Thoy might be expected to o be for these plants. However, 4 on the whole, their interests are not economically motivat-ed. Is t.hls true of the authors w you quote so enthusiastically? e. Let us look'st the AEC as now constituted. It wears two a hats, ' as promoter of atomic 1:. power and in charge of its c; safety. Who ever heard of the t wolf guarding the sheep? The .r various safety allowances by f...the AEC have been consistent-h ly lowered and will no doubt be lowered further. u. 8'What is the matter with w man? What is it that causes

r us to plunge all out with such
t. devaste. ting s p e e d into, new n areas before we can begin to k

ii assess the ultimate conse-quences of what we do? Con-I i sider please how we rushed l -n into the use of DDT with such ,. - -i reckless abandon that today the -*/ s.i field and penguins, and even cc the fish on' remote Antartica f .m.are ' contaminated". (Quoted "j t, from The Living Wilderness .blagazine.)

,,, ~,

To any concerned person-- a " - ][?, => e look for a chance to do some-2

  • thing in next week's letter col-
+

N M .P ' 'm } .'. i.Cihr .' umn. -i' M'y.@'2

  • Sincerely,

,q'yQ'.j%)*. -y MARTilA M. ROBIN $ON-4*. I .1- ..e 6e.

3 NEW AGE Thursday, Siptember 18, 1909 nv~r ' e +w ., m ~. c-q. L d.4. G,. C W 3 M G,; k k 0 w --.%M.W.$MW " h F WI"ERS=3@Z01' /

wmm hs.

Dear Cec 11;. ' flf they are erroneous in their the' law to state that at least

  • F o

facts and conclusions, I feel one PUC member be designat-

r. I would Itko to take this op-that this great society of ours

'ed the consumer member,and portunity to add to your 11-will show them to be in error,. should, by law, bo required to ~ 'brary on the peaceful uses of and the Irfh wil! emerge v$c,E have a proven background in n ,muclear energy. I was hopinC ' toriously-.let them_ speak out. consumer affairs. Then es- ,that someone more learned on better'to have all doubts over-tablish a Consumer

  • Defense

,the sciences would tackle this come hefar.1 micring an err - ' Department which will help

very delicate task of express-which we acquiesce, without equalize the ' representation on ing the concern of a few well-the f ulle s t discussion a n d matters relative to the pub!!c
  • neaning citizens of this area, knowledge, in the destruction interest. The PUC was es.

84 It's becoming very evident of mankind. There is nothinC tablished basically to regulato that a concentrated and well-to fear but fear itself! in the public interest. planned attack is currently be-I believe it's a safe assump-With the passing of time and ing made on the authors of tion to state that the present the ' pressure of industry, and '"THE CARELESS ATOM" and members of the Atomic En-the power of money, one can "T 11 E P EIt I L S OF T!! E ergy Commission, responsible readily see what can happen PEACEFUL ATOM". They for the public safety and wel-to a well. intentioned commts-are, in my opinion, attaching fare policy decisions,have donc

sion, the semantics used bytheseau-a conscientious and outstand-A FAST BREEDER REAC--

'thors and not necessarily deny-ing job. But, as most rec-ing the facts and incidents 11" ulatory commissions tre fill-TOR PILOT PLANT TO DE lustrated in their books. These ed by appointment, this can COSSTRUCTED ALONG THE SUSQUEllANNA RIVER DE-reviewers, on the whole, r.ccm readily change, especiallywhen TWEEN. MESilOPPEN AND to be in v$olchearted acree* the public utthtles start exert-LACEYVILLE...... ment on the' necessity of hav-ing prescre in the immediate Some thoughts and reflee-ing full public discussion on future to get down tobrass tacks the impact cf science and tech-about profits andmpentes. Re-tions about the above, by a - mology upon the public welfaro cent history will bear this out poorly-informed citizen of this and safety, especially in the with every iosernmental reg. area: nuclear energy field. Theso ulatory agency....psessure a. You have minimized the authors might in their own vtay is either applied for a favor-key words " pilot plant"in most b rin g about such a fruitful .able appointment, reduction of of your editorials. The public public discussion and I, hope-power by an agency, or a cut. should be continously made fully, would like to see open , back in appropriallons reduc-aware of the fact that the gov. congressional hearings on this ing their efficiency; oramples: ernment is subsidizing thatpor- . subject by an appropriate con. Nixon Adminis(ration 11. E. W. tion of the costs of constnic-tion above what it would post gressional committec. Department and the American klany, other individuals in Medical Society, Food & Drug to build a plant to generate an 3, recent years have beenaccused Administration agency's lack equivalent amount of kilowatt of using semantics to their ad-of funds to oversee the foodand hours utilizing conventional fuels or sources of power, it vantage in espousing their drug industry, etc, etc, etc. is a fact that the proposedplant views; examples-Mr.Nader and Pennsylvania's Public Utility ~ is not an economically sound , thC automobile industry, Ad-Commission can be cited as a venture to be taken fully by the .miral Rickover and the nuclear - good example of what can hap-s submarine industry, some con-pen to a regulatory commis-ut111ty itself. 8gressmen with the help of Food sion. I, personally, cannot b. Pilot plant, pilot plant.. ' and Drug Administration ex-recall over the past twenty In recent years, we have read i about the loss of billions of perts versus the drug indus-years the PUC turning down dollars on defense projects, ' try in America, Senator Mca three (3) rate increases. The Govern on aid to the poverty consumer has been fleeced in missiles,* fighters, and trans. , stricken, conservationists, etc, the past and 'will continue to ports, if you will recall that 14 : etc,,etc. Who can deny that in be ficcced in the future. ' Con-in nearly every' case the in, O some cases tids method was sumers now have no effective dustry presented some sort of e Su, prototype and assurance that} * [f successful,in espousing their voice in rate-making hearings causes with the ultimate result before the PUC. The utilities their particular project would. .j can be a similarity or a se=.Q,Mfb. 7 succeed. I ask whether thero' gof attaining better protection have all the advantages that i.for the public? I, for one, will money can buy, high-powered mantics trick in using pilot 9,%;,,- peontinue to welcome the cru* public' relations, trained re. h for pro" searchers and a high-priced plant and prototypos and draw-?!,4%,

l'{saders in the searc

. Q j.. y -ff tection and safety of the public. l legal staff,...until,we change lags? a

m y c." If there is no doubt that h. Who will be responsible satisfactorily: ~, this facility will work, why not to make amends andretribution 1. Since the utility inter. construct it in Manhattan Doro if a catastrophe should occur? ests assure us that no catas-

  • in the City of New York where We live in an area where we tropho can occur, then they
  1. it would be more economically see daily tho widespread evils can back that up by pooling

' sound? Or are we to gather of an industry that, because their resources and being , that there is some smalldoubt of a lack of foresight, that wholly responsible f o r any and we in the Endless Moun. Industry is not responsible; for eventuality. I say " pool" their talns and thecoalravaged areas examplo, the coalindustry. The resources....if no insurance of Scranton and Wilkes-Barre, homes of many citizens de-pooling is available, get the v are expendable? stroyed through cave-ins and government out of the insur-d. Where are the science. the industry not held respon-ance business and the utility departments of our local cen. sible. The sulphur pollution of interests willthen become more ters of higher le trning....'. all streams and again, they public safety ami welfare con. the Un1ye rsity of Scranton, vcere not held respon*sible. The scious in iheir operations. Wilkes and Kin,'s - Collecc5, widespread air pollution caus-There's an old say "Put your and Keystone Aator Collego? ed by mine fires in culm dumps money where your mouth is". and again, they were not hold 2. That.,the ecologists are It is unreasonal e, in rny es-timation, t_o contemplate a ven-responsible. The removal of g sblisfied with the procedures ture of this m: ;nitude with-whole sections of communities in storing nuclear wasto ma-out having some.ucstionsfrom due to mine fircs, and again, terials and the ut!!1tles are , the science comr. unity; for ex. they were not responsible. The held responsible and not the ' Ample: the use of liquid sodi. thousand of miners with black covernment. um as a coolant....the stor-lung disease, and again, they

3. That the conservation!sts were not responsible.

The are satisfied with the safe-3 ' age of nuc! car w nie, not from r a few plants but hur.dreds and thousands of deaths throughac-guards provided by the ut!!!tles 7 maybe thousands throut outit.e cid(nts, and aga2n,.they were in not raising the water tem-h world,by the year 2000. What not ljcid responsible; close to a perature of the river. ' effects on ecolo;y7 What about hundred years has elapsed Some, no doubt, w!!! say that sir.cc the minin; of coal teg.n I'm against progress, but I am the half life of some of these radioactive mat (rials whic h and we still have not (ffective. not, if it fits into the well- , sectn to live on indefinitely, safety regulations for the mines, meaning of our existence and taking into consideration that meinly due to the lobbying et. ' not progress just for progress' the whole world will be in-forts of thd coal industry. What sake or profits. We have had volved in nuc! car-powered en-takes precedence, the public a g r e a t e r prosperity for a ergy? welfare or profits? greater length of timo the past e. Where are the local com-1. Can these plants to ' eight years than any other ca ~ munica!!ou media? Shouldn't sabotaged? If so, they could j tion since the beginning of the industrial rcyolution, and this ihc S:ranton and Wilkes-Darre immobilize our whole nation 1 papers, television and radio in the years to come without wsM not a cure-all for many take an activo part in promot-a nuclear missile attack. Will of our domestic problems of ,1ng the fullest discuss 10n of the utilities take full respon-race, poverty, and the pursuit this project? If a catastrophe sibility for the prote ction of happiness. The pursuit of J should occur, their lives and against sabotage? love as the meaning of our ,' communities will be affected.

j. Can these nuclear waste existence probably would have
f. C on g r 9 s s m an McDade materials be safely transport-resulted in a more peaceful

'should come out publiclyif hels ed from the plants to the burial and fruitful society than the (*for this pilot plant. No equiv-grounds without incident? Rail pursuit of progress for prog-i accidents have increased in the ress' sake alone. ocation....just for or against. l' , He has more facts available past 10 years from an average, to him than the citizens of this of 9 a day to 15 a day.(Major Sincerely, accidents) WALTER MACIORKOSKI i

area,
g. Where is the Susquehanna Cecil, since I admitted ear-

' River Basin Commission? Are lier in this articlo that my S CN n[X 4 V/AT7 O e4 ? we to. surmise that they are knowledge in this fleidis very . wholly satisfied that the river 11mited, I can be satisfied " 3 y, 9 g g. ., water's temperature will never rather easily by the following

d.,,'

6 3.locreaset ..three points being answered r n. 'f s Y, p.h; g;* y ~ ? ). g. a.,s 'Yis e /, .a %y '=', +y&W t ~ J- .s.. MX * ' o t .e2 $ ~ L _ Y% .:1 1

l b lh69 TWOGANNOCK REPUBLICAN & NEW AGE AUGUST 21, 1969 ,-.m w. 4 ~ .u

e. < 5:.. -

Critics Clobbered N!

m...

'L,,Incr' asing in direct proportion t'o on a massive national scale... 4 e our library on the peaceful use of "It should be stated at the outset - nuclear energy (which is reaching that the reviewers are compl'etely-convinced, as are the authors, that' . encyclopedia proportions) is our , conviction that if the Pennsylvania the impact of science and technology 'lElectric. Oompany niakes a. fh'1al. ' upon' the public welfare and safety. I < $ decision to construct a fast breeder must be given full public discussion. 'Ib bc, meaningful, however, 'such '. k.'. heactor along the Susquehanna River f ' } between Meshoppen and Laceyville,. discussion must be based upon (It'w'ill pose no danger whatsoever to thorcuchly undcrstood fact and upon h.,, Itlhe health and safety of any of us' honest and rational argument. The, '. in this area. .present volume is deficient.in both: l ' l' f Frankly, h'aving absolutely no respects." ~ '} .'.;selentific bent whatsoever, we were After a lengthy dissection of the !. [ \\{ afraid we might have gone a little new book on a variety of scientific ~ grounds, the reviewers conclude that , bit ' overlioard in our criticism a I couple of wecks ago of a condensa- "this book is'not a balance'd account { tion of the new book "The Perils of of the safety aspects of present and ithe Peaceful Atom" which appeared futu're nuclear power production. It. S ' in the Philadelphia Inquircr. is strictly a biased, misicading, sen-Now we feel better r. bout it how-sational political tract. It consti- ~ ,ever, for we have at hand a scientific tutes a public disservice. We are viewpoint which is in full agreement sorry to see it published, not just with,ours. 'Two noted nuclear scien- .tecause it is a bad book, but' because we sincerely feel that a factual, tists, Dr. James G. Beckerly, presi- ., dent of Radioptics, Inc., a frequent balanced, honest discussion of the, . ' advisor to the Atomi: Energy Com-problems of nuclear power, as they mission, m' ember of NASA's planet-really are, is badly needed by the ~ clogy subcommittee and co-author public." with Atomic Energy Commissioner Also coming to our' attent' ion ' [. ' Dr. Theos J. Thompson of the stand-this week is still another review of ard. reference works on nuclear Sheldon Novick's book "The Care-safety, ' and Dr. Norman 'Ililberry, less Atom," which is used as a text-i- -[ } professor of nuclear engineering 'at book by those who oppose the con- ' the University of Arizona, past pres-struction of a nuplear power plant ident of the American Nuclear So'- here. 2 clety'. and forn'icr director of the ' The review, by Dr. Arthur F. - ' Atomic Industrial Forum, are the' Scott, of Reed College, is a scholarly {. l men whom I find agreeing with me. .but sharp attack on this Ix>ok, which;. Their review of "The Perils of is summed up in two concise sen- ) E the' Peaceful. Atom" begins: "It is .tences: ,4 .. j' l, a relatively simple matter. o say ' "This is'a scare book which adds t l-what, this book is; it is difficult to inaccuracy to the usual ingredients S, ' of such books...... I believe' that ' ,S +. l' say why it was published. "It becomes obvious quickly that the book is documented with the in. ? 4, (it) is an undisguised foray into the tent to misicad and that it is better, a' D'M

  • xM

'e ," A:u _ r .,e .. ~, m..,,_ u,,i.,, u., a,,,, a o, m,...,,,,,

~ TUNKHAtlNOCK REPUBLICAN & NFl! AGE ~ APRIL 17, 1969 . -,,. m; s.m. r ' -y-yr i, ,.m. -.,;c.,..,. .~,.. h'y /*

  • v.

~ :. - ...., g* ;. 5 T. Fears Are Eased M E.M .,.? , 'Right now we're a lot less con ' The MIT expert says that this is cerned than we were back on March " completely and utterly false," and ' ' 20 'about the possible danger to life adds a personal note concerning one '. and property posed by the fast of his associates in the MfP nuclear breeder nuc! car reactor under con. engineering department. Dr. Thomp-sideration by Pennsylvania Electric' . son points out that the parents and. ^ ' Company power generating 22 close relatives;of this man live as a source in Wyoming County. within three miles of the Indian On that date we wrote an editor-Point platt and that he has no tal' entitled "A Boon or a Peril?" worries in regard to their safety.. o . which relayed a number of questions ,f d, A'@' % py'* l concerning the wisdom of using nu. - aping up with amazing frequency in clear power which were raised in an the research we have been doing on article in the magazine " Natural nuclear power plants. As is stated in a book prepared for Westinghouse We sm.cc have Icarned that the . Electric Corporation: "The stand-authors of the article do not have ard for nuclear reactor design is a the background in nuclear science t theoretical circumstance called the make them authorities'in the field. . maximum credible accident.' This Furthermor,e, we have come to be-means that the desihners consider lieve from talking' to knowledgeable every worst possible accident that people that the article must have could happen in a nuclear power been inspired to considerable extent Mt u a M d b M @@ by the book "The Careless Atom," series of events imag.mable -then. written by Sheldon Novick, who re. des.ign the-piant to assure public cently was seen on NBC's "Today" safety under these theoretical'cir-show. .. In our editorial, we pointed out { cumstances. a ~ " Designing within the ' maximum that Dr. Theos J. Thompson, of Massachusetts Institute of Tech-credible accident' safety standard is, like visualizing the worst 'possible

  • nology, who is coming to Tunkhan-nock on April 26 for a " Nuclear accident that can occur with a car, Energy Education Day," was quoted then designing an automobile where in the Natural IIistory article and the people in the auto would be safe t '

in that accident." f was identified as a " highly regarded . authority." Tlie Natural Science article dwelt And,Dr. Thompson, in reviewing on the terrible results which could ) "The Careless Atom," says: "There occur if a " convention explosion" .is no need for the d.istortion of facts should rupture the reactor mechan ' ; { and half truths and unqualified opin-Ism. But.when you learn that the.- /- t lons which dot the book.... It is a reactor of the type under considera- ]g 'p pity that this first book on the sub-tion for the Susquehanna River alte f g ject did not review the provisions woul.d be built undergrobnd, would- - _J ......,s. e ~

~ T '~

,J;U *,o$s
. 4 h ]s.

We since h:va learned th t th# ~ Electric Co'rporation: i'The stand. - ) Lczthirs of th3 crticia do not hive ard f:r nuclerr tretor d: sign is o l ...the background in nuclear science to theoretical circumstance called tha - ,_r w 3 e- < i. f v,.,.. ~ y.'c,., 7.t. x

S.'.

make them. authorities.in the field... ', maximum credible accident! This 5 e M,3 y. r ' c . Furthermor,e, we have come to be ' means that the de. signers consider e c. ," t.7 %;N'. e , lieve from talking to knowledgeable every worst possible accident that . 6 .n i h-p t.M ' -

people that the article must have could happen m. a nuclear. power 1 f.m.go cs c a

.p ,r -, been inspired to cons.derable extent plant as a result of the most unlikely i .,'r 7 o

m

~ by the book "The Careless Atom,". series of events imaginable-then. a, 6 +. e ' written by Sheldon Novick, who re. - design the. plant to assure public 1 0 l, cently was seen on NBC's "Today" safety under these theoretical cir. 6 .I W E show. cumstances. d- ,3! i:.. In our editorial, we pointed out " Designing within the ' maximum ( i _ that Dr. Theos J. Thompson, of I Massachusetts Institute of Tech-- credible accident' safety standard is, like visualizing the worst 'possible I nology, who is coming to Tunkhan-accident that can occur with a car, hj nock on April 26 for a " Nuclear then designing an automobile where > Energy Education Day," was quoted the people in the auto would be safe j, d in the Natural History article and in that accident." / was identified as a " highly regarded The Natural Science article dwelt h[ authority." on the terrible results which could And,Dr. Thompson, in reviewing occur if a " convention explosion" j J "The Careless Atom," says: "There fh should rupture the. reactor mechan- . is no need for the distortion of facts ism. But when you learn that the f [ and half truths and unqualified opin-reactor of the type under considera-i r lons which dot the book.... It is a tion for the Susquehanna River site g[ pity that this first book on the sub-would be built underground, would 1 , Ject did not review the provisions ,be capped by a concrete slab weigh-j i smade for reactor safety factually .na ruh " [ ing some 500 tons and would be en-crosco m -.R a.g M_4 damn CL .,)G z Dr. Thompson refss to an ad-w 7 able to withstand tremendous pres-f vertisement for the book in the New S York Times which said: "The. sure, you begin to wonder just what \\ ing-in Indian Point. Atoms for -type of " conventional e'xplosion" ' Hiroshima bomb is alive-and tick-j they had in mind. peac,e can blow us to pieces! When Frankly, our mind is' ftill of en-9 electricity is produced by an atomic tirely new concepts, such as the fact reactor, the danger is equivalent to that tliere is less radioactive mater-l 14 .tal released into the air from today's a fused H-bomb." ,_.) nuclear power plants than comes .. from the smokestack of a conven-j But space doesn't per. 3 tional plant. mit us to go into all.this informa. I h' / ~ i I ~ ition at one time, so we'll save some i .of it for future editorials,. 3 ' Be assured, however, that our mind, our ears and'our eyes are open p ' ~ r i-

  • ' ' to any valid data concerning the peaceful atom, and that as it is.re-,

l 4 ceived we'll pass it along. p.

~ z TUNIGANNOCK ' REPUBLICAN &, NER AGE ^ M] .s MARCH 20,1969 32 ?;.;, Jr.t."i.1 Boon oi a Peril?' $4 P i #'We spent' a very disturbing Sun-Jersey." day evening, with the nuclear plant But as frightening as these sti-proposed for a site along the Susque-tistics are, it is our understanding {,', hanna River between M'eshoppen and J that bf far the ' greatest problem of. . Laceyville as the source of our con-all involving. nuclear power. plants s lies in the storage - of radioactive cern.* An article, "The Myth of the waste which results from the pro: 4 Peaceful Atom," in the March issue cess. l ,r., of " Natural History" and a portion According to the material we .' of the CBS television show "The . have at hand, intense radioactivity , [21st Century" dealing with tfm in a reactor " core" eventually inter-feres with the fuel's efficielity. The , dangers of nuclear power, gave us , sufficient 'cause to become most spent fuel assemblies therefore must fearful about tpe proposed power be removed from time to time and ,' plant.' At least, they have left us replace.d by new uncontaminated i ' with.a lot of questions which we ones! ' hope can be answered satisfactorily The old assemblies are transport-when a group of the nation's top ex. . ed to reprocessing plants;where the h ' perts in the nuclear power field come contaminants are separated from to Tunkhannock for. a " Nuclear. ,the salvageable fuel.

However, Energy Education Day" on April 20

.since no satisfactory means 'has under the sponsorship of the Penn. been found to neutralize or safely sylvania Electric Company and the release into the environment the ' American Nuclear Society $ sadioactive liquid contained in the We were not too concerned when ~ contaminants, it must be stored we received a letter last week from until it is no longer dangerous - a Tracy Hibbard, of Meshoppen, which period of many years. In addition. urged everyone 'in the Endless it is held, routes between nuclear ~ Mountains area to become interested ., power plants arid the reprocessing ~ ' 'in the problems connected with -(* facility carry traffic bearing-high nuclear power. Until now, the only y quantities of " hot" and " dirty" ma-we had heard about, terial. c ;v ,. complaints nuclear power generation dealt with i,#One cf' the mcst frightenins L the danger of " thermal pollution"[.. statements contained in the "Nat-i sf the Susquehanna River, which.. < ural History" article quotes testf-i would result if water heated by the mony given at a 1967 congres'sional j,,,., generating process was returned to hearing by two men who have served 1* the river at a much higher temper- , as chairmen of the Atomic Energk ature than normal. ' Commission's Advisory, Coinmittee i- . Through information received on Reactor Safeguards.s. They} ah Q [ ,) from Penelee and from other quoted as'saying tliat "none' of the sources not involved in the utility large power reactors now.'undergork l.g -)Y 8 c' field, we have been assured that this struction is considered suitable.4or e . Y "s (' prob!cJn is well on its way to %1u. locatien in metropolitan. areas!'$ I* ,.- tion. b. If this still hold" tr$, w, 'd ~ But when Mr. Hibh.,rd bronght:.L end, none of_ them is s'ui.thh t

], ~~~ ~ ..........., sven though cur lesa dense'popula. '.i us a uw w um umuu m . : History," cnd when we'saw the CBS

  • ti:n wruld cut down the de:th't:11

~ I p'rogram Stinday night, we learned,

  • in tha event cf an cecident.
  • ~ -

d' ', j ,, inf the e'ven greater' potential danger But we irant to mak.e it've'ry posed by the very use of nucle'ar clear that we are NOT expressing ( , generating power itself.

Every assurance has beeri given opposition to the location of the pro-

~- l.

that nucl'ent reactors of the type'. posed nuclear power p'lant h Rather, our position is similar to

. proposed for this area' can not ex, that of Senator Thruston B. Morton, f J ' plode, since the complex apparatus l-

for detonating an atomic warhead' of Kentucky, who in February > of t

Iis absent. "This fact. however, is 19G8 intmduced into Congress a res- ~ of little consolation," ' the' article ' olution calling for comprehensive revie'w 'of federal' participation in states, "when it is realized that only j,, o j a conventional explosion which rup- , the, atomic energy power program. I Senator Morton said,at that time: j N,.. tures the reactor mechanism and its "What is past is past, cnd the dam- ,p. c,, containment structure could produce ' age we may already have done to ,{ Vpj havoc on a scale eclipsing any in. future generations can not be re-l ~ dustrial accident on record or any scinded, but we cannot shirk the 4 j single act of war, including the /, compelling responsibility to deter- ,?, atomic destruction of Hiroshima or mine if the course we are following ~ Nagasaki." ,) Outifriing several ways in which is one we should be following." This is equally true in the' case .such an explosion could occur, the 'of the nuclear power plant which story quotes from a 1957 study by some day may rise' alongside tho ., y sI 'the

  • Atomic Energy Commission -

which says: "From the explosion of Susquehanna River. We have a feeling that after a 100 200 megawatt reactor as " Nuclear Education Day" on April many a's 3,400 people could be killed, s - 43,000 injured, and as mucf} as 7 26 a, good many of our fears will be laid to rest. We note with interest , billion dollars of property damage 'done. People 'could be killed at dis-that Dr. Theos J. Thompson, of Massachusetts Institute of Technol-tances of up to 15 miles and injured ogy, scheduled as one of the speak-up to 45. Land contamination could ers, also was quoted a't length in the i exten'd for far greater distances " Natural History" article, and was agricultural quarantines might pre. identified as a " highly regarded : l vail over an area of 150,000 square miles, more than the combined areas authority." ~ { of Pennsylvania, New York and New Others on the program include l - Rep. Craig W. Hosmer (Calif.). i i . member of the Joint Congressional . Committee on Nuclear Energy, and i ' ;, ' representatives of Atomics Interna- ~ j tional, Penn State University, West ' l inghouse ' Electric Corp., Gulf Re. and search and Dev,elopment Co., ~ j United Engineering, Inc. l j Certainly any decision as.to l 1 l whether to welcome *the proposed.* nu'elear power plant to Wyoming? County as a great boon to the local, j economy and the growth of a wide.. l I area' la the northeast, or to oppose

l - CITIZEE COMW"rEE for ENVIRONMENTAL "ONGRN l 71 WARREN G1REE.T i TUNKH Af 4 NOCK. PENNSYLV ANIA 18G'J7 i. l l (CUTIVE COMMI1 TEE

4. crYAN LEE. JR.

JAN DANIELS En'em: 70 ~1s319 r ,E CE..uaa f ILLIAM OHME m accxxx V. Capucci, Jr.

f. COL. V. SH ERET 4ANCIS HEl0LER August 14, 1970 '

ECILIA remus AVI)R.HOBBS couwsEL-t United States Atomic Energy Comatission ( Washington a D.C. 20545 l Gentlemen: We are forwarding e. copy of our petition of intent to you and others in : governfient who aie involved in decisions that any affect tho 5,196 citizens who wished to express themscIves. Although Pago 95 of this petition was accidentcly Icft out, it will be included with other pages of signers w'hich will be forthreaing, t It must be concluded that a very considerable proportion of the peoplo in the ytrea feel that the demand for clectricity necessary for futuro liv 3ng quality must be balanced against risks and deleterious environmental effects. We will in no way accept risks to our future generations in the name of progross. L Your careful consideration of this probica wJ11 be greatly appreciated. Sincerely, '[' e_.gu -[ttu.<. j {. f nm s A.. Dr.Bry[an1,ce .g Mrs. Joan Daniels Co-Chairacn of the Cath cns Conn 5ttee for Envirtwental Concern 1 5~ 1 I n2I P c,;L y o"* men 4

II.Th'JG TO T11. ELECTED OFFICERS AND REP 4 JENTATIVES OF bi VE THE PF,0PLE OF VYOMING COUNTY AND SURROUNDING AREA O& . _ b THE,1!NDERSIGNED,-.BEING-.VMN UID RESIDENTS OF VYOMING COUNTY,44' PENNSYLVANIA, AND THE IMMEDIATE SURROUNDING AREA, after ' careful and deliberate consideration, thought and. discussion, wich to bring to yotir attention the concern and mitgivings on our part and the part of many concerned people within a fifty-mile radius, relative to the proposed erection of a fast breeder. nuclear reactor intended to be constructed by ' Pennsylvania Electric Company, subsidiary of General Public Utilities Corporation,' near Mechoppen, Pennsylvania. The Meshoppen reactor facility is intended an'an experimental - Six to eight times largsr than any existing fast demonstration project. bree' der reactor in the United States, we believe that 'it would present a potential threat and danger to Vyo:aing County and the surroundin5 area and increase the natural level of radiation 'an unkno'wn number of millirens such that every living thing in the area would be sub'1ect to increased radiation, with definite damage to future Generations'of unknown extent. Available information indicates that the operation of this facility would bring about adverse local climatic conditions and tlist this will be a permanent condition,.which, together with other required procedures necessary for the operation of this facility, could upset and harm the ecological balance of the Susquehanna Rivar and surrounding woodis ids. The only other sodium-cooled fast. breeder reactor in the'. United States similar to this proposed reactor and licensed to produce elec-tricity on a commercia'l basis, is the Detroit Edison (Enrico Fermi) reactor, located near Monroe, Michi an, which has been inoperative duo 6 to a serious accident, since October,1966. There remains. the slight, but very real possibility of a larFe scale S' ch an accident, which may not result in a nuclear explosion tecident. u ld sesult in )ut which severely damaged or deotroyed the reactor, cou Sassive releases of radioactivity over a lar5e area, depending upon reather conditions at.;he time. VE ASK YOUR SUPPORT AND COOPERATION TO THE POLLOWING END To prevent the' construction of this proposed reactor at this location. !. ' To call 'for a moratorium on the construction of all such reactors located in or near populated press until further technical advances have established a. higher degree of safety of such reactors. To revise and amend the Trice Anderson Act in order to,make the utilities concerned directly financially. responsible for the results er any accidents at, or arising from, a reactor facility. Addre am Q* --- - M V 5 O[ %6Y,~ M.,4f 3.~ j A.._.4 dI4<dR<_.aad NEM.W.0M db.d.b_Q_._..._ J D .3 Dw., & %g2 }hx!w-

1 6.~ q

  • UN,

g a .s. l i -l t 1 i E l 3(stbb 8)(ct(es 8)ett4IS I [ June 3,1970 'f 7' Re: Mr. Herbert Lippmann 'I e t y P! Respectfully referred to Congressional Liaison Office U. S. Atomic Energy Commission Washington.,...D.. C......20.54..5.....-........---..-......-....~... for such consideration as the communication , s. l herewith submitted may warrant, and for a report 3 l thereon, in duplicate to accompany return of inclosure, p, s By direction of Clifford P. Case i U. S. S. i t CPC:1h ] .l 1 i 7 8 N w P 0 9 k Rec'd Off ir. Reg / 353recc7g O0d In accordanci y;;$s.gy,;g y,f# U MDMUon DMe. f, C "j'y t I'.~' :me L. J: r, ' t ' i Act excmg rara. pe.2623. I

4 L. 5~ p u"u ~U C~g ~ ~ ~ gpggg u m aa nitoufm, e a D214 59)BA476 MWB129 POM PDF MW NEW YORK NY 12 213P EDT CLIFFORD CASE RE MR SIMPSON) MAY 14 EJ ENATE OFFICE BLDG WASHOC 70RE APPROPRIATION FOR' AEb PLEASE EXAMINE THREE FAILURES OTOTYPE OYSTER CREEK POWER PLANT SAFETY, RELIABILITY COST YOUR PUSLIC CERVICE COMMISSION HERBERT LIPPMANN AIA RYLM 1 sums = e e 8 O e t 9 6 e s e g O f e 4 G m

(3s l .) ' uvan occ rr PENN6 fa t ANtA i '%Cniteb Stats.: 2 enate WASHINGTON. D A .I October 8,1970 i I f ,i r. [ Respectfully referred for s,uch y consideration as the, attached communication may wa rant, and for a report in duplicate to accompany return of enclosure. i By direction of (. i f l I l United States Senator o 1 I e e o U 011 0)r, et elL. ~ ~ Iclormxto ?

  • Mxb$c

A ms delegg Date I o Ii N 7 f lg.eg,f,l. nme i% ft. Cumanamm 33

I '~ '. ..g c-if ~ ~ l i

Dear Mr. Scott:

s At the behest of the Myo Beach Association I am writing ~ g you to register our objection to the atomic pouer plant proposed for our area on the 310quehanna River near ~~~ ~ Hoehoppen, Pe.. '/ Ve have taken long hours to study and listen to the " Pro" and 8 Con". We have given the r.atter our most inte111 cent concern. Dieposing of waste, ecological concerns, the possibility ~ of a break or leak with poten'tial extermination of the area and other concerns are significant. H owever the over-arching concideration is the effect of such a plant on our ^ naturally beautiful area and the nature of it. You must know that in a national survey this area of 'the e Sisquehanna River was deemed one of the top 6-12 in the l entire country to be preeerved in its natural state. We cottagers watch hundreds of canoes, thousands of canpers and sportsnen%njoying this river end its environs-cne of the very few such lef t in this part of the country. Certain-ly it would be nad and not to the best interests of ovr. g state to harm this. Moreover there is a blatant contradiction in the statements that such plants are perfectly safe and yet chose such an isolated and remote region for their lo-cation. I On behalf of us more than 100 property owners representing j families and guests of more than a thousand we urge.your opposition to this plant in particular and other fast-breeding 4 j . reactor plants in general. j Jhrther study and experimentation may alter the future but at this time and in this place we ask you to use your good office and name to stop this insane proposal. 1 f I have been asked to report to our association your response j f to this letter. I shall await it with interest. t Sincerely, T 9 h ,y

n yT,. -. .. a } ~. .n i c i) t., .i. 3 '21Cnifeb Sfafes Senale N October 9,1970 .i atherine Gramlich y s g [ 'i .t i 1 Respectfully referred to 7 l Congressional Liaison l Atomic Energy Commission l. V 1 Washington...D.... C........20545.................................... r for such consideration. as the communication j herewith submitted may warrant, and for a report r . thereon, in duplicate to accompany return of ~ inclosure. i I By dircetion of j. .r s i Clifford P. Case r i U. S. S. i l CPC/vna 4 g hm On. Dir. of < g, a

into, I "4.h,,

nius it,e 7,;; khtes. D A'Jh$'r])!)' jaa 'n in t!;;s' i m j t ' "ce et,, g,,, ,.o,, m p 2842 1 Ql Infortnation '~ ~ ' " ~ ~

y. 2a - a 6 9 9

    • R{sfi

+ e I d'.?$ f, . -. 7. I' .i..' i n ..L )' l f c .)W l_ ,\\ t /xud A - A.. _.. A / e L).'nt.ouE '...)Cb d LbhL'GA.L A h & Aeskv I A.b'.. ...h Y ' wlM.444.4A7 p o. k,. n pys.AAmu&./

  • y?

16 itL-3 -.e.t u b.O,&. h t & W & y ab, ' ........... _. y. u1 Jldso 4ed.,& < p> a.~A.,s h ue1 As Ant cw~., 2-...-...,c.L.ubl. pl.& ax p,n a. y sedJD. i d ' Llu,v .p._;L,a.e- . L. :.- .< < d .ht.<' j .....-.~..,: ......... ~. \\ l se, c <.e ...........b... a... .. ~.................. -. = 47( bt. ) = 1 i e i ........4. .e. ...a..... ........-...............a i f S t l l l i i

  • ~'

f g

..... ~. ,,n~ 3- ~. -,s - )..,.. o a W* f.. n n.* e I / T ytilcD M ICEfCS M CTIGIC f ~ February 3, 1971 Respectfully referred to: (, Congression'al Liaison AEC a Washington, D. Q. C. be Because of the desire"of this office to -l nications, responsive to all inquiries and commu d is [- your consideration of the attache in 8 requested. Your findings and views, f the du_plic, ate' formJLong.wititraturn n _. en. closure, will be appreciated by .~ p I s A' gg,,,N s. E ?h ?.'- ys.n. :..:.M. ( $ #3 Q/ 1 v lnformat;M in th '#'A LV35 deleteg Act. exempm., the freedom og ggyoimation Rec *d gag yI Of Neg 6n Dccord3nce t. Daf, 4 n 0 y, w F0iA. p~ g N n e-m N dW., .c -.m e, ~.. - vh ^^^~~^------..-

_ ~ - - .~ _ .<_s. - - - -- g j s e-4 l I'W7/ Y ~gl s-l' y adMpig K~+Aau 8-eau w;gw) kwt MxicaP-/%s ~r y~ afp s ha n yu,ku,. r ?AM4sr, s tw,39. ) m nw uga.g,j p_ g gg,, ~ fi s s-peak.ta rs k e? %s. a w, firs YAL Act hn pt 1Gr14. hew,~ uc n a %ecs gQu fm'u+e.<2 (4v mA <Juu nohci.? al. f vw s Acc Im fAlak &c /,14 d'rMAm paa se pJenOwak)* %&CY"J-- a (ap.,. n g(n +,,) p_J, .pgru cP waA IOk k?f 1M inG~di ' 4 / yt e w y y ,/ 1 / .a / ) e / / l l 0 e e 8 + e}}

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML20100G549&oldid=4310556"