Proposed TS Bases 3/4.2.5,changing DNB Parameter for Pressurizer Pressure from 2,198 Psig to 2,189 psig,3/4.4.9, Removing Rv Matl Data Duplicated in UFSAR & 3/4.7.1.3, Changing Description of Limiting Design Bases AccidentML20094L220 |
Person / Time |
---|
Site: |
South Texas |
---|
Issue date: |
11/13/1995 |
---|
From: |
HOUSTON LIGHTING & POWER CO. |
---|
To: |
|
---|
Shared Package |
---|
ML20094L214 |
List: |
---|
References |
---|
NUDOCS 9511200110 |
Download: ML20094L220 (7) |
|
|
---|
Category:TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS
MONTHYEARML20217A2421999-09-30030 September 1999 Proposed Tech Specs Removing Parameters No Longer Applicable & Adding Tdf Value for Model 94 SGs in Place of Reactor Coolant Sys Flow ML20211Q2361999-09-0808 September 1999 Proposed Tech Specs 3/4.8.1,revised by Relocating 18-month Surveillance to Subject Sdg to Insps IAW Procedures Prepared in Conjunction with Mfg Recommendations to Section 3.8.1.1.4.8 of UFSAR ML20211Q8071999-09-0808 September 1999 Proposed Tech Specs & Associated Bases for Specification 3/4.8.1, AC Sources, to Eliminate Requirement for Accelerated Testing of Standby DGs & Associated NRC Reporting Requirements ML20211G2281999-08-24024 August 1999 Proposed Tech Specs Pages,Relocating Cycle Specific Operating Parameters from TSs to Colr,Including Moving Location of Insert 6 from Page 6-21 to Page 6-22 of Administrative Control Section & Renumbering Methods List ML20211C0371999-08-18018 August 1999 Proposed Tech Specs 3.4.9.3 Re Cold Overpressure Mitigation Curve Associated with Replacement SGs ML20209G9351999-07-15015 July 1999 Proposed Tech Specs 3.7.1.6 Re Atmospheric Steam Relief Valves ML20209G4461999-07-13013 July 1999 Proposed Tech Specs,Modifying 3.6.3 Action B,Clarifyin Use of Check Valve with Flow Through Valve Secured as Means to Isolated Affected Containment Penetrations ML20209C1511999-07-0101 July 1999 Proposed Tech Specs Pages Re Amend to License NPF-80, Changing TSs 3.3.2 & 3.7.8 Allowing All Fuel Handling Bldg Exhaust Air Sys Components to Be Inoperable for Period of 8 Hours to Facilitate Repair of Train B Exhaust Booster Fan ML20209B5341999-06-24024 June 1999 Proposed Tech Specs Section 6.9.1.6.a,adding Min Measured RCS Flow,Which Lists Parameters Included in COLR ML20195E4701999-06-0707 June 1999 Proposed Tech Specs Pages Re Proposed Amend to Licenses NPF-76 & NPF-80,deleting Total Allowance,Sensor Error & Z Terms from ESFAS & RTS Instrumentation Trip Setpoint Tables of TS 2.2.1 & 3.3.2 ML20195E4211999-06-0707 June 1999 Proposed Tech Specs,Relocating cycle-specific RCS-related TS Parameter Limits to COLR ML20205S3511999-04-19019 April 1999 Proposed Tech Specs Bases Page 3/4 8-3 Removing Reference to Fast Transfer Capability That Is Inconsistent with STP Design Bases as Described in UFSAR Chapters 8.2 & 8.3 ML20205G8081999-03-30030 March 1999 Proposed Tech Specs,Relocating Section 3/4.3.3.4, Meteorological Instrumentation & Associated Bases Description to STP Trm,Per NUREG-1431 ML20204J9681999-03-22022 March 1999 Proposed Tech Specs Incorporating New TS for Atmospheric Steam Relief Valve Instrumentation & Revising TS 3.7.1.6 Re Atmospheric Steam Relief Valves ML20204D1581999-03-15015 March 1999 Proposed Tech Specs 3/4.7.9 for Snubbers to TRM ML20207D9651999-03-0202 March 1999 Proposed Tech Specs Change Clarifies Use of Check Valve with Flow Through Valve Secured as Means to Isolate Containment Penetration in TS 3.6.3 Action B ML20207C4721999-02-24024 February 1999 Proposed Tech Specs Bases 3/4.2.5,clarifying That Averaging of Only Three Channels Is Min Expected When Verifying DNB Parameter Compliance ML20202G6871999-01-26026 January 1999 Proposed Tech Spec Page 3/4 4-39,revising TS 4.4.10 for Alternate ISI of RCP Flywheels ML20199K5681999-01-20020 January 1999 Proposed Tech Specs Surveillance Requirement 4.7.1.2.1.a Re AFW Pump Performance Testing ML20198A2181998-12-10010 December 1998 Revised TS Pages,Adding Ref to TS Figure 2.1-2 to Bases Section 2.1.1 as Figure Provides DNBR Curves Appropriate to Alternate DNB Operating Criteria ML20198A1951998-12-0909 December 1998 Corrected TS Bases Pages B 3/4 8-15,-16 & -17,as Discussed During 981103 Telcon ML20196B8121998-11-23023 November 1998 Proposed Tech Specs Pages for Proposed Amends to Licenses NPF-76 & NPF-80,relocating Descriptive Design Info from TS 3/4.7.1.1 (Table 3.7-2) Re Orifice Sizes for Main Steam Line Code Safety Valves,To Bases Section ML20155J9031998-11-0303 November 1998 Proposed Corrected Tech Specs Bases 3/4 9-3 Re Water level- Refueling Cavity & Storage Pools ML20155D5561998-10-29029 October 1998 Proposed Tech Specs Pages for Proposed Amends to Relocate Snubber TS 3/4.7.9 to TRM ML20155D5801998-10-29029 October 1998 Proposed Tech Specs Pages for Amends to Relocate Portion of TS Surveillance Requirement for DG Fuel Oil Storage Tank to TRM ML20155D5441998-10-29029 October 1998 Proposed Tech Specs Pages for Proposed Amend to Relocate Turbine Overspeed Protection TS 3/4.3.4 to TRM ML20154M1621998-10-12012 October 1998 Revised Tech Specs Bases Pages B3/4 8-14 Through -17 ML20154C5071998-09-30030 September 1998 Proposed Tech Specs Bases Page B 3/4 9-2,removing Wording Re 10% Value for Clad Gap Iodine Isotopics ML20154C0051998-09-30030 September 1998 Proposed Tech Specs Reflecting Replacement SG Tube Insp Surveillance Differences & Deleting Provision Allowing Use of F* Alternate Repair Criteria ML20154A4281998-09-28028 September 1998 Proposed Tech Specs Re Requirements Associated with Control Room & Fuel Handling Bldg Ventilation Sys ML20151T1621998-08-31031 August 1998 Proposed Tech Specs 3.4.9.3 Re Cold Overpressure Mitigation Curve Associated W/Replacement SGs ML20238F0841998-08-28028 August 1998 Proposed Tech Specs Section 4.0.5,excluding Specified Containment Isolation Valves from ISI & Testing Requirements as Stated in Section XI of ASME Boiler & Pressure Vessel Code ML20236T5141998-07-22022 July 1998 Proposed Tech Specs Re Replacement SG Water Level Setpoint Differences ML20236R1461998-07-15015 July 1998 Proposed Changes to Current Tech Specs Bases ML20236L6311998-07-0707 July 1998 Proposed Tech Specs,Reflecting Rev of Criticality Analyses & Rack Utilization Schemes for Regions 1 & 2 of Spent Fuel Racks as Described in STP UFSAR & TSs ML20236N0001998-07-0606 July 1998 Proposed Tech Specs,Relocating RCS Design Features from TS Section 5.4 to UFSAR ML20236M6381998-07-0606 July 1998 Proposed Tech Specs,Relocating 3/4.3.3.3 Requirements for Seismic Instrumentation to Technical Requirements Manual ML20236K3481998-07-0606 July 1998 Proposed Tech Specs,Relocating 3/4.7.13 Requirements for Area Temp Monitoring Sys to Technical Requirements Manual ML20247F3321998-05-0707 May 1998 Proposed Tech Specs Pages,Reflecting Replacement SG Reactor Coolant Flow Differences ML20217P1441998-04-0202 April 1998 Proposed Tech Specs 3.4.5 Re voltage-based Repair Criteria ML20202H9771998-02-16016 February 1998 Proposed Tech Specs Pages,Implementing 1-volt voltage-based Repair Criteria for SG Tube Support plate-to-tube Intersections ML20198C3741997-12-31031 December 1997 Proposed Tech Specs 2.1,2.2 & 3/4.2.5 for Alternate Operation W/Reduced Measured RCS Flow ML20197A7211997-12-17017 December 1997 Proposed Tech Specs Pages,Revising TS 4.6.2.1 to Extend Surveillance Interval of Containment Spray Sys Nozzle Air Flow Test from Five Years to Ten Years ML20199H2081997-11-20020 November 1997 Revised TS Bases Page B 3/4 4-15 ML20199A6101997-11-0505 November 1997 Proposed Tech Specs Pages,Updating TS Bases Section 3/4.4.9, to Reflect Results of Revised Analysis That Was Reviewed & Accepted by NRC as Part of License Amends 55 & 44.Analysis Results Not Incorporated Into TS Bases Due to Oversight ML20210T7401997-09-0404 September 1997 Proposed Tech Specs,Revising TS to Allow Use of Elbow Tap Differential Pressure Measurements Instead of Precision Heat Balance Measurements to Determine RCS Total Flow Rate ML20217M8351997-08-18018 August 1997 Proposed Tech Specs Incorporating Revs to TS 3.7.1.6, Atomospheric Steam Relief Valves, to Ensure Automatic Feature of SG Power Operated Relief Valve Remains Operable During Mode 1 & 2 ML20210L5801997-08-14014 August 1997 Proposed Tech Specs Allowing Tolerance of RCS Volume Provided in Specification 5.4.2 to Account for SG Tube Plugging ML20198F2211997-08-0505 August 1997 Proposed Tech Specs,Providing Suppl Info Re Amends to Licenses to Convert STP TS to Improved STS Format ML20148G1531997-05-29029 May 1997 Proposed Tech Specs Providing Administrative Changes to Affected Page Re Removal of Surveillance Requirement 4.7.7.e.5 1999-09-08
[Table view] Category:TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS & TEST REPORTS
MONTHYEARNOC-AE-000661, Rev 4 to Severe Weather Plan, Including Summary of Changes.With1999-10-0404 October 1999 Rev 4 to Severe Weather Plan, Including Summary of Changes.With ML20217A2421999-09-30030 September 1999 Proposed Tech Specs Removing Parameters No Longer Applicable & Adding Tdf Value for Model 94 SGs in Place of Reactor Coolant Sys Flow ML20211Q8071999-09-0808 September 1999 Proposed Tech Specs & Associated Bases for Specification 3/4.8.1, AC Sources, to Eliminate Requirement for Accelerated Testing of Standby DGs & Associated NRC Reporting Requirements ML20211Q2361999-09-0808 September 1999 Proposed Tech Specs 3/4.8.1,revised by Relocating 18-month Surveillance to Subject Sdg to Insps IAW Procedures Prepared in Conjunction with Mfg Recommendations to Section 3.8.1.1.4.8 of UFSAR ML20211G2281999-08-24024 August 1999 Proposed Tech Specs Pages,Relocating Cycle Specific Operating Parameters from TSs to Colr,Including Moving Location of Insert 6 from Page 6-21 to Page 6-22 of Administrative Control Section & Renumbering Methods List ML20211C0371999-08-18018 August 1999 Proposed Tech Specs 3.4.9.3 Re Cold Overpressure Mitigation Curve Associated with Replacement SGs ML20210J0481999-07-28028 July 1999 STP Unit 1,Cycle 9 Startup Testing Summary Rept ML20209G9351999-07-15015 July 1999 Proposed Tech Specs 3.7.1.6 Re Atmospheric Steam Relief Valves ML20209H2131999-07-13013 July 1999 Rev 4,revised Pages 29 & 30 of 102 to Procedure 0ERP01-ZV-IN01, Emergency Classification ML20209H3371999-07-13013 July 1999 Rev 0 to 0PGP02-ZA-0004, Station Performance Data Collection,Categorization & Reporting ML20209G4461999-07-13013 July 1999 Proposed Tech Specs,Modifying 3.6.3 Action B,Clarifyin Use of Check Valve with Flow Through Valve Secured as Means to Isolated Affected Containment Penetrations ML20209C1511999-07-0101 July 1999 Proposed Tech Specs Pages Re Amend to License NPF-80, Changing TSs 3.3.2 & 3.7.8 Allowing All Fuel Handling Bldg Exhaust Air Sys Components to Be Inoperable for Period of 8 Hours to Facilitate Repair of Train B Exhaust Booster Fan ML20209B5341999-06-24024 June 1999 Proposed Tech Specs Section 6.9.1.6.a,adding Min Measured RCS Flow,Which Lists Parameters Included in COLR ML20209H3151999-06-23023 June 1999 Rev 4 to 0PGP02-ZA-0003, Comprehensive Risk Management ML20195E4211999-06-0707 June 1999 Proposed Tech Specs,Relocating cycle-specific RCS-related TS Parameter Limits to COLR ML20195E4701999-06-0707 June 1999 Proposed Tech Specs Pages Re Proposed Amend to Licenses NPF-76 & NPF-80,deleting Total Allowance,Sensor Error & Z Terms from ESFAS & RTS Instrumentation Trip Setpoint Tables of TS 2.2.1 & 3.3.2 ML20209H3081999-06-0101 June 1999 Rev 3 to 0PGP04-ZA-0604, Probabilistic Risk Assessment Program ML20205S3511999-04-19019 April 1999 Proposed Tech Specs Bases Page 3/4 8-3 Removing Reference to Fast Transfer Capability That Is Inconsistent with STP Design Bases as Described in UFSAR Chapters 8.2 & 8.3 ML20205G8081999-03-30030 March 1999 Proposed Tech Specs,Relocating Section 3/4.3.3.4, Meteorological Instrumentation & Associated Bases Description to STP Trm,Per NUREG-1431 ML20204J9681999-03-22022 March 1999 Proposed Tech Specs Incorporating New TS for Atmospheric Steam Relief Valve Instrumentation & Revising TS 3.7.1.6 Re Atmospheric Steam Relief Valves ML20204D1581999-03-15015 March 1999 Proposed Tech Specs 3/4.7.9 for Snubbers to TRM ML20207D9651999-03-0202 March 1999 Proposed Tech Specs Change Clarifies Use of Check Valve with Flow Through Valve Secured as Means to Isolate Containment Penetration in TS 3.6.3 Action B ML20207C4721999-02-24024 February 1999 Proposed Tech Specs Bases 3/4.2.5,clarifying That Averaging of Only Three Channels Is Min Expected When Verifying DNB Parameter Compliance ML20202G6871999-01-26026 January 1999 Proposed Tech Spec Page 3/4 4-39,revising TS 4.4.10 for Alternate ISI of RCP Flywheels ML20199K5681999-01-20020 January 1999 Proposed Tech Specs Surveillance Requirement 4.7.1.2.1.a Re AFW Pump Performance Testing ML20198A2181998-12-10010 December 1998 Revised TS Pages,Adding Ref to TS Figure 2.1-2 to Bases Section 2.1.1 as Figure Provides DNBR Curves Appropriate to Alternate DNB Operating Criteria ML20198A1951998-12-0909 December 1998 Corrected TS Bases Pages B 3/4 8-15,-16 & -17,as Discussed During 981103 Telcon ML20196B8121998-11-23023 November 1998 Proposed Tech Specs Pages for Proposed Amends to Licenses NPF-76 & NPF-80,relocating Descriptive Design Info from TS 3/4.7.1.1 (Table 3.7-2) Re Orifice Sizes for Main Steam Line Code Safety Valves,To Bases Section ML20155J9031998-11-0303 November 1998 Proposed Corrected Tech Specs Bases 3/4 9-3 Re Water level- Refueling Cavity & Storage Pools ML20155D5441998-10-29029 October 1998 Proposed Tech Specs Pages for Proposed Amend to Relocate Turbine Overspeed Protection TS 3/4.3.4 to TRM ML20155D5561998-10-29029 October 1998 Proposed Tech Specs Pages for Proposed Amends to Relocate Snubber TS 3/4.7.9 to TRM ML20155D5801998-10-29029 October 1998 Proposed Tech Specs Pages for Amends to Relocate Portion of TS Surveillance Requirement for DG Fuel Oil Storage Tank to TRM ML20154M1621998-10-12012 October 1998 Revised Tech Specs Bases Pages B3/4 8-14 Through -17 ML20154C0051998-09-30030 September 1998 Proposed Tech Specs Reflecting Replacement SG Tube Insp Surveillance Differences & Deleting Provision Allowing Use of F* Alternate Repair Criteria ML20154C5071998-09-30030 September 1998 Proposed Tech Specs Bases Page B 3/4 9-2,removing Wording Re 10% Value for Clad Gap Iodine Isotopics ML20154A4281998-09-28028 September 1998 Proposed Tech Specs Re Requirements Associated with Control Room & Fuel Handling Bldg Ventilation Sys ML20151T1621998-08-31031 August 1998 Proposed Tech Specs 3.4.9.3 Re Cold Overpressure Mitigation Curve Associated W/Replacement SGs ML20238F0841998-08-28028 August 1998 Proposed Tech Specs Section 4.0.5,excluding Specified Containment Isolation Valves from ISI & Testing Requirements as Stated in Section XI of ASME Boiler & Pressure Vessel Code ML20236T5141998-07-22022 July 1998 Proposed Tech Specs Re Replacement SG Water Level Setpoint Differences ML20236R1461998-07-15015 July 1998 Proposed Changes to Current Tech Specs Bases ML20236L6311998-07-0707 July 1998 Proposed Tech Specs,Reflecting Rev of Criticality Analyses & Rack Utilization Schemes for Regions 1 & 2 of Spent Fuel Racks as Described in STP UFSAR & TSs ML20236K3481998-07-0606 July 1998 Proposed Tech Specs,Relocating 3/4.7.13 Requirements for Area Temp Monitoring Sys to Technical Requirements Manual ML20236M6381998-07-0606 July 1998 Proposed Tech Specs,Relocating 3/4.3.3.3 Requirements for Seismic Instrumentation to Technical Requirements Manual ML20236N0001998-07-0606 July 1998 Proposed Tech Specs,Relocating RCS Design Features from TS Section 5.4 to UFSAR ML20247F3321998-05-0707 May 1998 Proposed Tech Specs Pages,Reflecting Replacement SG Reactor Coolant Flow Differences ML20217P1441998-04-0202 April 1998 Proposed Tech Specs 3.4.5 Re voltage-based Repair Criteria ML20202H9771998-02-16016 February 1998 Proposed Tech Specs Pages,Implementing 1-volt voltage-based Repair Criteria for SG Tube Support plate-to-tube Intersections ML20198C3741997-12-31031 December 1997 Proposed Tech Specs 2.1,2.2 & 3/4.2.5 for Alternate Operation W/Reduced Measured RCS Flow ML20197A7211997-12-17017 December 1997 Proposed Tech Specs Pages,Revising TS 4.6.2.1 to Extend Surveillance Interval of Containment Spray Sys Nozzle Air Flow Test from Five Years to Ten Years ML20199H2081997-11-20020 November 1997 Revised TS Bases Page B 3/4 4-15 1999-09-08
[Table view] |
Text
. .
EOWER DISTRIBUTION LIMITS BASES 3/4.2.5 DNB PARAMETERS (Continued) initial FSAR assumptions and have been analytically demonstrated adequate to maintain a minimum DNBR of greater than or equal to the design limit throughout each analyzed transient.
The T., value of 598'F and the pressurizer pressure value of 2189 psig are analytical values. The l readings from four channels will be averaged and then adjusted to account for measurement uncertainties before comparing with the required limit. The flow requirement (392,300 gpm) includes a measurement uncertainty of 2.8%
The 12-hour periodic surveillance of these parameters through instrument readout is sufficient to ensure that the parameters are restored within their limits following load changes and other expected transient operation.
SOUTil TEXAS - UNITS 1 & 2 B 3/4 2-6 Uni: 1 - Anicadmca: No. Si 1108-95 Uni: 2 - Amcadmca: No. 50 i
1 9511200110 951113 i PDR ADOCK 05000498 l P PDR i
_ _a
, ,l '
REACTOR COOLANT SYSTl BASES
^ _
PRESSURE TEMPERATURE!
GASES can cause an increase in the p ased upon usingthe thefluene PP
[ hod de EBESSuaE TEMPf.fMIUBEllMlIS (Con mputed me Allowable combinations of pressure an sh:2 ements on Predicted Radiatlo a. i dbd gg t curves of Figures 3'4-2 " change rates are below and f end of 32 EFPY as well a "'
sensing instruments. Figures 3.4-2 and 3.4-3 define limits
- b. For normal operation, other inherent d c(p Values of 4RT and pressurizer heater capacity, may lim ;
surveillance program, eval fed be achieved over certain pressure-tempe removed in accordance with the ' h ds prol and new values of 4RT Revision 2,' Radiation Yrnb ttl These limit lines shall be calculated perio I
- 2. t not be pressuri2+
surveIIIance specimens can b ey side of the steam generatorF mus material by using the lead f 3. The seconds cooldown curves must be re temperature of the steam generator (s below d 100'q exceeds the calculated 4RTso for 4
The pressurizer heatup and cooldown rate F d Allowable pressure-te calculated using methods der ed f respectively. The sprayhshall d tests *
)
essef Code as required bY detall in WCAP-7924.A.
nc 5.
System preservice hydrotests and inserv pressures in accordance with the require Section XI, The general method f i the e principfes of the linear elastic f The fracture toughness properties of the procedures a semiettj t; '
These propert a length of 3/2T is assu ed ' determined accordance with inadditional accordance reactorddenda with tothe vessel N, Section requ vessel wall. The d,mensions i of his ; ib d in WCAF lif as the reference flaw am i emfore, the reactor operat on i '
accordance with Appendix G of tf
, provide sufficient safet '" I and Cooldown Limit Curves," April 1975.
radiation embrittlement effects are ace Heatup and cooldown limit curves are limiting value of th * " such that the ll radiation induced shift, 4R cooldown curves are genera $d P nil-ductility reference 9 temperatur "9
" ' 9" assures that all components A ME pproach for calc I selection of such a limiting RTyn co0ldown rates specifies that the k stress inte s ty ac or, g m, for the metal The reactor vessel materials h Reactor operation and resultant f ast neutro 1 MeV) l reference SOUTH TEXAS - UNITS 1 & 2 B 3/4 4-7 UNt+
SOUTH TEXAS - UNITS 1 & 2 u _.
REACTOR COOLANT SYSTEM BASES PRESSURE TEMPERATURE LIMITS (Continued)
- a. Allowable combinations of pressure and temperature for specific temperature change :ates are below and to the right of the limit lines shown. Limit lines for coolde en rates between those presented may be obtained by interpolation; and
- b. Fipe 3.4-2 and 3.4-3 define limits to assure prevention of non-ductile failure only.
For nm,nal operation, other inherent plant characteristics, e.g., pump heat addition and pressurizer heater capacity, may limit the heatup and cooldown rates that can be achieved over certain pressure-temperature ranges.
- 2. These limit lines shall be calculated periodically using methods provided below,
- 3. The secondary side of the steam generator must not be pressurized above 200 psig if the temperature of the steam generator is below 70'F, 4 The pressurizer heatup and cooldown rates shall not exceed 100'F/h and 200*F/h, respectively. The spray shall not be used if the temperature difference between the pressurizer and the spray fluid is greater than 621*F, and
- 5. System preservice hydrotests and inservice leak and hydrotests shall be performed at i pressures in accordance with the requirements of ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code, l Section XI.
The fracture toughness properties of the ferritic materials in the reactor vessel are j determined in accordance with the NRC Standard Review Plan, ASTM E185-73, and in !
accordance with additional reactor vessel requirements. These properties are then evaluated in '
accordance with Appendix G of the 1976 Summer Addenda to Section lli of the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code and the calculation methods described in WCAP-7924-A, " Basis for Heatup and Cooldown Limit Curves," April 1975.
Heatup and cooldown limit curves are calculated using the most limiting value of the !
nil-ductility reference temperature, RTuor, at the end of 32 effective full power years (EFPY) of l service life. The 32 EFPY service life period is chosen such that the limiting RTuor at the 1/4T l location in the core region is greater than the RTuor of the limiting unirradiated material. The ;
selection of such a limiting RTuor assures that all components in the Reactor Coolant System will i be operated conservatively in accordance with applicable Code requirements. l I
The reactor vessel materials have been tested to determine their initial RTuor.
Reactor operation and resultant fast neutron (E greater than 1 MeV) irradiation l
SOUTH TEXAS - UNITS 1 & 2 B 3/4 4-7 Unit i Amendment No. 4 1108-95
l REACTOR COOLANT SYSTEM BASES I
PRESSURE TEMPERATURE LIMITS (Continued) )
can cause an increase in the RTuor. Therefore,4RTuor and an adjusted reference temperature, based upon the fluence, copper content, and nickel content of the materials in question were computed using the method described in Regulatory Guide 1.99, Revision 1 " Effects of Residual Elements on Predicted Radiation Damage to Reactor Vessel Materials." The heatup and cooldown limit curves of Figures 3.4-2 and 3.4-3 include predicted adjustments for this shift in RTuor at the end of 32 EFPY as well as adjustments for possible errors in the pressure and temperature sensing instruments.
Values of 4RTuor determined in this manner may be used until the results from the material surveillance program, evaluated according to ASTM E185, are available. Capsules will be removed in accordance with the requirements of ASTM E185-73 and 10 CFR Part 50, Appendix H and new values of 6RTuor will be computed using the method described in Regulatory Guide 1.99, Revision 2 " Radiation Embrittlement of Reactor Vessel Materials". The results obtained from the ,
surveillance specimens can be used to predict future radiation damage to the reactor vessel l material by using the lead factor and the withdrawal time of the capsule. The heatup and ;
- cooldown curves must be recalculated when the 4RTuor determined from the surveillance capsule f exceeds the calculated 6RTuor for the equivalent capsule radiation exposure.
, 1
! Allowable pressure-temperature relationships for various heatup and cooldown rates are i calculated using methods derived from Appendix G in Section 111 of the ASME Boiler and Pressure i
Vessel Code as required by Appendix G to 10 CFR Part 50, and these methods are discussed in detail in WCAP-7924-A.
i The general method for calculating heatup and cooldown limit curves is based upon the principles of the linear elastic fracture mechanics (LEFM) technology. In the calculation procedures a semlelliptical surface defect with a depth of one-quarter of the wall thickness, T, and 1
a length of 3/2T is assumed to exist at the inside of the vessel wall as well as at the outside of the vessel wall. The dimensions of this postulated crack, referred to in Appendix G of ASME Section 111 as the reference flaw, amply exceed the current capabilities of inservice inspection techniques.
Therefore, the reactor operation limit curves developed for this reference crack are conservative and provide sufficient safety margins for protection against nonductile failure. To assure that the i radiation embrittlement effects are accounted for in the calculation of the limit curves, the most limiting value of the nil-ductility reference temperature, RTuor, is used and this includes the radiation-induced shift,4RTuor, corresponding to the end of the period for which heatup and cooldown curves are generated.
The ASME approach for calculating the allowable limit curves for various heatup and cooldown rates specifies that the total stress intensity factor, K,, for the combined thermal and pressure stresses at any time during heatup or cooldown cannot be greater than the reference
, stress intensity factor, Kin, for the metal temperature at that time. Km is obtained from the reference SOUTH TEXAS - UNITS 1 & 2 B 3/4 4-8 Unit i Amendment Nc. 30 1108-95 Unit 2 Amendment No. 27 I
_ .. . . - . - = . . _ . . . . . . . _ - . . _ . - ... . . - . . . . _ . . . . _ . . .
I TABLE B 3/4.4-1a [
t (This table number not used) i r
i i
l
)
i l
i SOUTH TEXAS - UNITS 1 & 2 B 3/4 4-9 Unit 1 A nend ;;nt N;. 4 i
1108-95 l
l 1 l l
l l
t i l l
, - ,e -
- - , -- , , , . - . - . - . . . _ _ _ - - _ _ . - _ _ _ _ _ _ . - - _ _ - _ _ - l
TABLE B 3/4.41b (This table number not used)
L r
l l
SOUTH TEXAS - UNITS 1 & 2 83/4410 Uni: 1 - ?..T.:nd.T,;n; No. 4 1108-95 i
i l
1 l
- _. _ ._ _ _ _ . _ _ _ - . _ _ . . _ . . . _ . _. _ . _ _. . __._ _ _ . .~.. __.__ _____ _ _ _ . _ . .
J t
j' i
i 1
- l FIGURE B 3/4.4-1 (This figure number not used) i i
t i
t i
i L
l l
SOUTH TEXAS - UNITS 1 & 2 B 3/4 4-11 Unit 1 A ; ; n d.m : n; N ;. 4 1108-95
PLANT SYSTEMS BASES 3/4.7.1.2 AUXILIARY FEEDWATER SYSTEM The OPERABILITY of the Auxiliary Feedwater System ensures that the Reactor Coolant System can be cooled down to less than 350'F from normal operating conditions in the event of a totalloss of offsite power.
Each auxiliary feedwater pump is capa'o le of delivering a total feedwater flow of 300 gpm at a pressure of 1363 psig to the entrance of the steam generators. This capacity is sufficient to ensure that adequate feedwater flow is available to remove decay heat and reduce the Reactor Coolant System temperature to less than 350*F when the Residual Heat Removal System may be placed into operation. The AFW pumps are tested using the test line back to the AFST and the AFW isolation valves closed to prevent injection of cold water into the steam generators. The STPEGS isolation valves are active valves required to open on an AFW actuation signal.
Specification 4.7.1.2.1 requires these valves to be verified in the correct position.
3/4.7.1.3 AUXILIARY FEEDWATER STORAGE TANK (AFST)
The OPERABILITY of the auxiliary feedwater storage tank with the minimum water volume ensures that sufficient water is available to maintain the RCS at HOT STANDBY conditions for 4 hours4.62963e-5 days <br />0.00111 hours <br />6.613757e-6 weeks <br />1.522e-6 months <br /> with steam discharge to the atmosphere concurrent with total loss-of-offsite power and failure of the AFW automatic recirculation control (ARC) valve followed by a cooldown to 350*F at l 25'F per hour. The contained water volume limit includes an allowance for water not usable because of tank discharge line location or other physical characteristics.
3/4.7.1.4 SPECIFIC ACTIVITY The limitations on Secondary Coolant System specific activity ensure that the resultant l offsite radiation dose will be limited to a small fraction of 10 CFR Part 100 dose guideline values in {
the event of a steam line rupture. This dose also includes the effects of a coincident 1 gpm primary-to-secondary tube leak in the steam generator of the affected steam line. These values ;
are consistent with the assumptions used in the safety analyses. i 3/4.7.1.5 MAIN STEAM LINE ISOLATION VALVES The OPERABILITY of the main steam line isolation valves ensures that no more than one steam generator will blow down in the event of a steam line rupture. This restriction is required to: )
(1) minimize the positive reactivity effects of the Reactor Coolant System cooldown associated with the blowdown, and (2) limit the pressure rise within containment in the event the steam line rupture occurs within containment. The OPERABILITY of the main steam isolation valves within the closure times of the Surveillance Requirements are consistent with the assumptions used in ;
the safety analyses.
SOUTH TEXAS - UNITS 1 & 2 B 3/4 7 2 Unit 1 Amendment No. 01 l
. . . . . m,....m..... .m. - j 1108-95 i
_ __ __ __- _ - _ - - _ - - - - _ _ _ .