ML20209H337

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Rev 0 to 0PGP02-ZA-0004, Station Performance Data Collection,Categorization & Reporting
ML20209H337
Person / Time
Site: South Texas  STP Nuclear Operating Company icon.png
Issue date: 07/13/1999
From:
HOUSTON LIGHTING & POWER CO.
To:
Shared Package
ML20209H296 List:
References
0PGP02-ZA-0004, PGP2-ZA-4, NUDOCS 9907200189
Download: ML20209H337 (6)


Text

-

SOUTH TEXAS PROJECT ElICFRIC GENERATING STATION D0527 Page 1 of 6

"~~ 7(jf OPGP02-ZA-0004 Rev.O g\L\^Mfation Performance Data Collection, Categorization, and Reporting Quality Non Safety-Related Usage: Available Effective Date: 00/0098 Ted Koser N/A N/A l l

PREPARER TECIINICAL USER COGNIZANT ORGANIZADON 1

4 Table of Contents Page 1.0 Purpo se an d S co pe . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .l 2.0 Definitions...........................................................................................................................................2 3 .0 Respo nsib iliti es . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . .. . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . ..... . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

4.0 Requirements.........................................................................................................................................3 5.0Pr6 arc...............................................................................................................................................3 6.0 References.............................................................................................................................................5 l 7.0 S upport Documents . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . .. . . . .. . . . .. .... .. . ..... .. . . ... .. . ........ . . ... . .. . .. . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Addendum 1 Departmental Performance Information (Typical)...................................................... 6 t I I

l t

3 l

}

o O

9 1

1 i

i 9907200189 990713 i PDR ADOCK 05000498 g P PDR  :

i Q

i

d n M A. OPGP02-ZA-0004 Rev. 0 Page 2 9 V

' \)W/ Station Performance Data Collection, Categorization, and Reporting

1.0 Purpose and Scope

1.1 This procedure prescribes the methock for identifying, collecting and categorizing performance data for use in STP Comprehensive Risk Management activities. This procedure supports the " feedback" loop requirement identified in the Operations Quality Assurance Plan, Chapter 2.0, Section 5.3.11.

2.0 Definitione .g;c iuif's 2.1 M.umance information is all information, including electronic media #that would indicate the relative performance level of the Operations, Meintenance, Engineering and Plant Support functional areas at the South Texas Project.

2.2 Weighting factors are significance factors automatic lly assigned by the computer, based upon performance information input coding. The higher the number,the greater the impact that r.rea would have on the performance data results. A weighting factor of 1, which indicates that all areas are of equal importance, has been assigned to the following areas:

Safety Focus / Management Attention Problem Identification / Resolution Equipment / Material Condition Quality of Work l Procedure Usage / Programs 2.3 Categorization is the assignment of a coding stmeture to performance data based upon factors such as system, component, and activity.

3.0 Responsibilities 3.1 All plant personnel are responsible for the identification of perfomiance information.

Performance information includes, but is not limited to, Condition Reports, operating logs, electronic media such as computer printouts, etc.

3.2 Department managers are responsible for ensuring performance data is captured in an existing sitewide database accessible to the Operating Experience Group. This performance data may include, but is not limited to, the following: i

'* Departinent Self-assessment Reports I

  • System Health Reports
  • Nuclear Regulatory Commission Inspection Reports including Resident Inspector's Reports, announced and unannounced inspections, etc.

. Institute of Nuclear Power Operations Reports including Evaluation and Assistance Reports, Trip Reports Significant Operating Experience Reports, etc.

OPGP02-ZA-0004 Rev.O Page 3 ofg

,9,,h

\) W Station Performance Data Collection, Categorization, and Reporting

  • Independent Oversight Results such as assessments, audits, and monitoring j activities  :
  • Equipment Performance 1

3.3 Quality Department personnel are responsible for inputtidg observed performance l information into the South Texas Project (STP) Performance Reporting & Identification Database (PR&ID).

3.4 The Operating Experience Group is responsible for categorization, assigning performance  !

classifications, assigning weighting factors, assigning trend codes, and ensuring the proper l

input of performance data, other than listed in 3.3 above, in the PR&ID.

3.5 The Operating Expedence Group is also responsibk for reporting performance data and forwarding that data to the Comprehensive Risk Management Working Group.

4.0 Requirements 4.1 Collection of Performance Information 4.1.1 Department managers are responsible for ensuring performance data is captured in an existing sitewide database accessible to the Operating Experience Group.

4.2 Categorization of performance information:

4.2.1 The Operating Experience Group shall review and categorize perfomiance information.

)

4.2.2 The Operating Experience Group shall categorize performance data by organization, system, components, risk significance and activity in accordance with the Corr ~tive Action Program and the Master Equipment Databases 4.3 Reporting of performance information:

4.3.1 The Operating Experience Group shall periodically, but at least bi-annually, generate performance reports, analyze captured data, and forward the reports and analysis to the appropriate Comprehensive Risk Management Working Group.

5.0 Procedure 5.1 Performance Data 5.1.1 Operating Experience Groep will compile performance data supplied by individual departments into categories in accordance with Addendum 1.

n98 OPGP02-ZA-0004 Rev.O Page 4 of

'\) Y 7 Station Performance Data CoIIcction, Categorization, and Reporting -

5.1.2 Performance will be evaluated against the following criteria ar.d assigned the appropriate grade:

=

4) Weakness: Performance or a condition that resulted in a significant condition adverse to quality. ,

e 3) Needs Improvement: Performance or a condition that resulted in a condition adverse to quality.

2) Satisfactory Performance: Performance that meets existing requirements.
1) Strength: Exemplary performance that exceeds goals / expectations.

5.1.3 Recording of pertinent information, categorization, grading, and input of performance indications will be accomplished on the Generic Performance Input form, within the PR&ID database.

5.1.4 Attribute codes will be assigned in accordance with OPQP02-ZA-0003, " Quality Monitoring Program," to completed Condition Reports.

5.1.5 Independent Ove: sight perfonnance data shall be input into the PR&ID database

)

in accordance with Quality procedures.

5.1.6 The Operating Experience Group shall compile performance data, sorted by organization / attribute codes using the Corrective Action Program Organizational codes and the attribute codes contained in OPQP02-ZA-0003, Quality Monitoring Program.

5.1.7 Compiled performance data output shall be graded 1 through 5 in accordance with the following criteria:

1) Sustained Excellence
2) Good with an improving trend
3) Good performance
4) Good with a declining trend
5) Poor perfonnance 5.1.8 The Operating Experience Group shall periodically report the data to the Comprehensive Risk Management Working Group for evaluation and use in the decision making process of the Comprehensive Risk Management Program. {

l l

1

Rev.O Page 5 of / )

_a9f(),e OPGP02-ZA-0004 VW Station Performance Data Collection, Categorization, and Reporting i

6.0 References 6.1 Operations Quality Assurance Plan 6.2 OPQP02-ZA-0003, Comprehensive Risk Management Program 7.0 Support Documents Addendum 1: Department Performance Infonnation (Typical) 1 1

l

P apkf OPGP02-ZA-0004 Rev.0 Page 6 of 6

~\/' Station Performance Data Collection, Categorization, and Reporting

, Addendum i Departmental Performance Information (Typical) Page1of1 Performance infonnation includes, but is not limited to the following:

  • Corrective Action Program (CAP) database ,

e Independent Oversight Results e Self-assessment Reports e Equipment Histoiy (successes / failures)

. System Health Reports e NRC Inspection Repons e INPO Repons 1