ML20091K752

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Submits Info for Project Managers Re Status of BWR Single Loop Operation Review.Ge Advises That ECCS Analysis Considered No Longer Valid & Must Be Redone.Completion of Review Awaits Receipt of Corrected ECCS Analysis
ML20091K752
Person / Time
Site: Monticello, Dresden, Nine Mile Point, Pilgrim, Brunswick, Vermont Yankee, Duane Arnold, Quad Cities, 05000000
Issue date: 10/13/1977
From: Baer R
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
To: Goller K
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
Shared Package
ML17139C189 List:
References
FOIA-84-105 NUDOCS 8406070191
Download: ML20091K752 (1)


Text

_

c0 UNITE 3 STATES

- js' t

NUCLEAR RE2ULATORY COMMissl3 f

WASHING T0 *f. D. C. 205S5

{

jg

=

l OCT I a 1977 l

MEMORANDUM FOR:

X. R. Goller, Assistant Director for Operating Reactors, DOR FROM:

R. L. Baer, Chief Reactors Safety Branch, D0R

SUBJECT:

BWR SINGLE LOOP OPERATION' BWR operation with'less than all loops operating is presently prchibited by Technical Specifications.

The following BWR licensees have proposed Tech Spec changes to permit less than full loop operation:

"3 Pilgrim No TACS-Brunswick 2 TACS #6170 32 4 Monticello TACS #6190 2 3 7g l

Dresden 2/3 TACS #6184 2 5

  • 7, i

Quad Cities 1/2 Tact #6184 2 5 % *,

l Duane Arrold TACS #6500 35L Nine Mile Poirt TACS #6831 2 ' 'A E - 9 ' *

  • Vennont Yankee TACS #6369 > 91 P f

This memo is intended to provide information for project managers about the status of this review.

GE has told us (memo Rooney to Coffman dated October 12,1977) that ECCS analysis on which licensees based their justification for less than full loop opert: ion, is now considered no longer valid for that purpose and must be re-done.

GE has also told us that presently this effort does not have top pri-crity with GE, and probably will be completed no sooner than the end of the i

year. Arrangements for reanalysis and the schedule for such reanalysis are r..stters for resolution between GE and the licensees.

No safety censiderations are compromised by continued operation with the pre-sent Tech Specs.

Our completion of this review awaits receipt of corrected ECCS analysis.

I M

1 l

84J6070191840319 BELL 05 PDR R. L. Baer, Chief Reactor Safety Branch Division of Operating Reactors (tN~']r l

cc:

V. Stello P. O'Conno l

D. Eisenhut W. Butler R. Snaider i

F. Coffman R. Clark C. Berlinger S. howicki S. Weiss J. Siegel i

V. Rooney D. Ross Z. Roszteczy t

l