ML20080D255
Text
hh FT UNITED STATES
. *~
hU LEAR REGULATORY COf(f.'.!SSION
~
wAsmt.: ton. o. c. ross:
!!.G 1 5 1553
'_:ciet N:.:
53-410 APPLICAtG:
Niagara Mohawk Power Corporation (NMPC)
FACILITY:
Nine Mile Point-2
SUBJECT:
SU WARY OF CASELOAD FORECAST PANEL (CFP) MEETINGS AND FACILITY TOUR AT nit:E MILE POINT February 22 - 24, 1983
^ Pw' On Fet ca y 22 - 24,10E3, the !!RC Caseload Forecast Panel (CFP), consisting
- f Wil'ia: Lovelace (PX/D '.I), Mary liaughey (Licensing Project Manager) and E be-t Schul: (Sr. Resident Inspector), met with the applicant and toured the
[
Nine File Point-2 facility and site.
The purpose of these meetings and tour Jff'p
.j was to re'.iew construction progress and collect data for the purpose of making g
+r t:RC n:.f f est4 rate of hen the plant will be completed-and-ready-for-fueMj,F M s
// 78 iccding. The visit was organized in two parts:
i EY, 4 '
'A
)
?- Cebruary 22, a reeting was held with tne applicant to review des'ign' J c.
v, jp E.d encineering, crocurement, and construction progress on !!ine t'ile,/Ig(F g
- :i nt-2.
4 C,,#
ji" 2.
On February 23, a tour of the !!ine Mile Point-2 facility and site
'l T[y [
eas nade tc enserve the status of construction.
The CFP also held F
b-ief discussions with the applicant on February 23 and 24 concerning pp.
WL cuestions rEiseG during the meeting and tour.
L f
(Q&
fi t
- n Fe: uEry 24 a close-out meeting was held to d4'-"-- "c cr# "d en of_the' he aaplicant was infomed that,fbased on the percentage of completion p
- f stcr thirgs as concrete, pipe hangers, and cable, as detemined from inform tion
- rovided by the applicant and from the facility tour, the-estimated fuel lead
- te det:r-ined by the CFP a 4tn cuarter-of-1986,-nominaHy44te Noveer 1' E he ap:licant's projected fuel load date is late February 1986, 3;praximately-r.4 C.ths carlic h i
The ap;11 cant was informed that it is expected that data from this CFP visit l
will be compared to the infortnation gathered during subsequent visits to Nine "ile Point-2 during construction and the estimated fuel load date will
- e acjt.sted as necessary.
The data upon which the CFP projection is based is giveri in the following sections of the meeting summary.
l 8402090061 831031 PDR FOIA ROSENBA83-498 PDR
2-f.EETINGANDFACILITYTOURDETAILS Tuesday, February 22, 1983, at Nine Mile Point-2 Scriba, New York.
The CFP met with the applicant at the NMPC offices on the Nine Mile Point-2 si te.
A list of attendees is included as Attachment 1.
The applicant's presentation to the staff was supplied in eleven segments corresponding to the eleven items in the Caseload Forecast Panel Site Visit Meeting Agenda ( Attachment 2) which was included in the meeting notice.
Tr.e NMPC presentation included a general overview of project construction, najor milestones, and current and anticipated problems.
As of January 31, 1952, construction percent complete was reported by NMPC as 61.59%.
In 1982, 22.5E. construction completion was planned; 23.4% was achieved. Current eroblens include:
1.
contractor performance affecting schedule, notably the mechanical /
piping contractor.
2.
limited engineering lead time to construction.
- cture potential schedular problens include
1) power generation control complex (PGCC) modifications 2) contractor performance, notably the major mechanical contractor 3) eouipment qualification concerns 4) control rod drive systen schedule 5) craf t availability, notably welders 6) conversion from bulk basis project to a system based construction Major construction milestones completed in 1982 were:
1) set spent fuel pool liner 2) complete set spent fuel pool liner 3) cooling tower shell complete 4) intake and discharge tunnels complete m
9 O
-]
O Major construction milestones scheduled for 1983 are:
1) 115V switchyard ready to energize 2) cable trays 80% complete 3) set main PGCC console 4) large process pipe 80% complete (hang in place,' tacked in place) 5)
polar crane operational 6) diesel generator building enclosure 7) screenwell building enclosure complete 5) cooling tower complete 9) reactor building enclosure complete 10) walsh concrete 98% complete The status of bulk cuantities installed is indicated in Attachment 3.
The retcod uses by M"?: fcr determining partial credit for installation is indi ated in * :acheent 4 Engi.eering and design efforts were estimated by N"PC to be about 82% complete at : e end of 1982.
Engineering milestones completed in 1982 were c) conplete screenwall structural drawings and b) complete reactor building concrete and steel drawings.
A pr:jc:t restrairt file was made available to tne CFP for review. This file listed ecuipment need dates and status of delivery as of February 21, 1983.
T is list indicated 3 equipeent areas are experiencing short term delivery problems of 1 to 3 conths. The bulk of the equipment indicated on-site need dates in 1983.
N"?C noted a large craft work force is available in the Oswego area and craft workers are of ten used from the Nine Mile Point, Unit 1 and Fitzpatrick plants.
The availability of aualified welders however was indicated as a contineing problem.
Tne Nine Mile Point-2 project has recently undergone a major schedule revision to evaluate the potential for improving the fuel load date.
Present N:'.?C schedules are targeted for an August 1985 early fuel load date.
Critical cath items for each area were identified by HP.PC.
These items have float times (extra time available for contingencies before impacting the sc;1edule) of between zero to 4 weeks before impacting the August 1985 fuel load date.
This schedule allows little or no time for unexpected contingencies.
An extra six nonth period is bu,ilt into the total project float time, however, when con-sidering the February 1986 official fuel load date.
G a
e
1 4
i l
Separate float is identified in Nine Mile Point-2 schedules for engineering, construction, and test and startup.
Items are considered negative when they exhaust the float in any one of these areas, not the total project float, j
This system calls attention to schedule problems before they impact the total project.
Of the 1213 pre-op and acceptance test procedures identified by NMPC as required for fuel load, 263 were identified as approved, 81 in review, 286 started, and 583 not yet started.
(The number of procedures required in the areas of in Service Inspection, Operations Surveillance and Preventive Maintenance, Start-up Tests and Special Operating Procedures have not yet been identified and are not included in this total).
A total of 300 wcrkers were identified by NMPC as required resources for the c re-op and Acceptance Tests Program. Of these,125 are already employed by MMPC.
It was indicated by NMPC that the remaining personnel (mainly in the cperating, technician, and test engineer categories) could be drawn from the pool of workers in the Oswego area presently working at Nine Mile Point, Unit 1 and Fitzpatrick.
1 Wednesday, February 23, 1983, at Nine Mile Point-2 The CFP toured the Nine Mile Point-2 site on Wednesday to observe the status cf construction.
Anong the areas 05 served were the containment building l
(in:ludinc the cryvell and suppression pool), the turbine building, the control room building, the radwaste building, the diesel generator building, and the refueling area.
- Drief meeting was held af ter the tour to discuss additional information l
necessary for the NRC staff to make its estimate of the Nine Mile Point-2 fuel load date.
Thursday, February 20, 1983, at Nine Mile Point-2 A brief meeting was held with the applicant on Thursday norning to obtain the additional information requested by the NRC staff.
At 10:30 Thursday morning, a summary meeting was held with the applicant. The attenda'nce list for this meeting is included in Attachment 1.
At this meeting, the applicant was advised that the CFP estimated date that the plant will be ready for fuel load is 4th quarter 1986, nominally late November 1986.
?Qc i
]
M. Haughey, Project Manager
[
Licensing Branch No. 2 Division of Licensing Attachments:
As stated i
cc:
See next page e
.s,
,-n
,,-,-Q,
..,.,9w.-
e.
r--
=
O' Qine "ile Point 2 Mr. Gerald K. Rhooe Vice President, Systen Project Management Niagara Mohawk Power Corporation 300 Erie Boulevard West Syracuse, New York 13202 cc:
Mr. Troy B. Conner, Jr., Esq.
Conner & Wetterhahn Suite 1050 1747 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W.
Washington, D. C.
20006 Mr. Richard Goldsmith Syracuse University College of Law E. I. White Hall Campus Syracuse, New York 13210 T. K. DeBeer, Director Technological Development Programs New York State Energy Office Agency Building 2 Empire State Plaza Albany, New York 12223 Ezra I. Bialik Assistant Attorney General Environmental Protection Bureau New York State Department of Law 2 World Trade Center New York, New York 10047 Resident Inspector Nine Mile Point Nuclear Power Station P. O. Box 126 Lycoming, New York 13093 Mr. J ohn W. Keib, Eso.
Niagara Mohawk Power Corporation 300 Erie Boulevard West Syracuse, New York 13202 9
P
AT,TACHMENT 1 ATTENDANCE LIST CASELOAD F0PECAST PANEL MEET!NGS (2/22 - 24/83)
NAME ORGANIZATION Mary F. Haughey NRC - Licensing Project Man.
W. H. Lovelace NRC - RM Paul D. Eddy (2/22 and 2/24 only)
NYS - PSC A. F. Zallnick NMPC - Licensing F. M. Sheldon Stone & Webster - Construction J. B. Hadden NfiPC - AMC N. L. Rademacker NMPC - Licensing R. H. Pinney Stone & Webster - Licensing D. L. Pike (2/22 only)
NMPC - Engineering R. J. Cohen Nf PC - Scheduling 4
R. B. Abbott NMPC - OPRNS Robert D. Schulz NRC - Sr. Res. Inspector S. F. !! anno (2/24 only)
NMPC - V. P. Nuclear Construction J. McGrath (2/24 only)
l t
f
.s
MW^N^
KrrERr,ui; c
~
Dyervien cf project constructica schedule including progress and major milestones completed, current problems and any 2.
anticipated prob.lem areas that may impact the current projecte,d fuel load date.
Detailed review and current' status o design and engineering 2.
effort (by major discipl.ine) including any potential problems that may arise from necessary rework.
Detailed review and current. status of procurement ' activities
~
3.
including valves, pipe, instruments, cable, major components, etc.
/scrual and p'roposed craft work force (by major craft), craft availability, productivity, potential labcr negotiations and 4.
probl ems.
Detailed review and current status of all large and small bore 5.
pipe hangers, restraints, snubbers, etc., including design, rework, procurement, fabrication, delivery and installation.
Detailed review of project schedule identifying critical path 6.
ite.s, near critical itc,:s, arount of float for various activities, the current critical path to fuel loading, methods of implementation of terrective action for any activities with negative float, and provisions for contingencies.
31, 1983.~ '
The estimated project percent complete as of. January Detailed review and current status of bulk quantiti'es including 7.
current estimated quantities, quantities installed to date, cuantities scheduled to date, current percent complete for e'ach, actual versus forecast installation rates, in cubic yards /mo.,
. linear feet /ro., or number /re., and basis Tor Tigures.
~~
(a)
Ccncrete (CY)
~
(b)
Process Pipe (LF)
Large Bore Pjpe.(21/2" and larger)
Small Bore Pipe (2" and smaller)
(c)
Yard Pipe (LF)
Large Eore Pipe Hangers, Re's'traints., Snubbers (ea)
(d) e e
C.-
. j 1
e 6
\\
e a
O O 'OM e
e
'(c)
Smell 5 rh. Pipe Har.gers, F.estraints '(ea)
(f)
Cable Tray (LF)
(g)
Total Conduit (LF)
~
(h)
Total Exposed Hetal: C6nduit,(.LQ '
~*
(i)
Cable -(LF)
Fouer Control
^
Security
.'instru=entation
' Plint Lighting (j-).Terminatiens -(ea)
=
rover Control' U
~
~
Security
. Instrumentation
-' ' S~
Plant Ligh. ting (k)
Electrical Circuits (ea)
Fewer" g
7g Security
,~ ;
(1)
Instrumentatien (ea)
E..Dethiled review and current status of prepara'tich of preop and acceptance test procedures, iritegratica of preop and
- acceptance test acti~vities with constructi n schedule, system turnover schedule, preep and acceptance tes.ts s.chedule, current and proposed preep and acceptance tests progr.am manpcuer.
4
~ ~
(a)' Total number of proc,edures required for fuel load.
(b)
Number of draft procedures not started.
l '.
(c)
Number of draft procedures being written.
(d)
Humber of procedures approved.
l
.(e)
Number of procedures in review.
l (f) T'otal number of preep and acceptance tests required for fuel load.
Number df preep and acceptance tests completed.
..(g)
(h)
Number of preep.and acceptance tests currently
~
.in progress.*
I '-
- (i)
Numb'er of, systems turned over to start-up. -
y I
e g
n
Detailed discussion of potential schedular influence due to changes attributed to NUREG-0737 and otba-recent licensing re:;uirements.
10.
Discussion of schedular impact, if any, regarding potential deficiencies reported in accordance with 10 CFR 50.55(e).
11.
Ovarview of current construction and.s. tart'up management organization showing interfaces. between the two.
12.
Site tour and observation of construction activities.
~
c
?
~
s s:
\\
NINE MILE POINT NUCLEAR STATION - UtilT 2 C0 tlSTRUC T l otl INDICATORS 1/1/83 REVISED ACTUAL INSTALLED
% INSTALLED
. DESCRIPTION UOH BUDGET ESTitiATE AS OF 1/16/83 AS OF 1/16/83 Reinforcing Steel TN 37,676 31,787 Bli Formwotk SF 3,079,125 2,58's.320 8's Concrete
- CY 261,262 221,317 85 Structural Steel TN 20,282 15,816 78 216,332 II 9,99ti 61 Large Bore Pipe LF i
i Lhrge Bore Welds EA 18,669 11,1718 60 Large Bore Hangers
'EA 16,971:
6,81's 10 4
Small Bore Pipe LF 159,982 23,9fo 15 i
Conduit-and Supports LF 619,600 312,599 50 Cable Tray LF 126,235 81,897 65 Cable (Pwr, ' Instr,Cntrl)
LF 5,758,51:'
600,067 10 Cable Terminations EA 256.917 78 0
3IIn i
'a 62 L
ATTACHMENT 4 I
J.
C'.
?.o.
12157 PERCEN' AGES AND CRITERIA FOR REPORTING PARTIAL CREDIT T
l j
FOR LARGE BORE' HANGER QUANTITIES INTO THE PPR i
Progress Values Status of Hanger X Credit Incremental / Cumulative..
J Loaded in building X
.30
/
.10 j
Start Erection XX
.25 /
.35 A.
Fermanent attachment made (hanger committed).
l Erection in Progress (1)
XXX
.30 /
.65-j l
}
A.
Tempora ry - Permanent.
E.
All p'.ts installed, no pressure 3
bcundary welds made.
C.
All hanger parts installed except suppressors.
D.
iiar.Eer inecuplete but will support pipe.
r 1
(2)
XXXX
.30 /
.95 Erection Complete A.
All parts installed.
l E.
All structure welding cce.plete.
I C.
All pressure boundary welding j
cceplete.
i Accepted ( )
XXXXX
.05 / 1.00 I
A.
Construction turnover operations' cc pleter: (Lot / cold set coc.plete; QC accepted).
i l
i (I) One or riore cr.::ditions uust be met to ' claim-credit.
r (2) All <<.n,ditionc ust, he n.ct' to claim credit.
l e
i
(
l
.' ;.'. 121E7-PERCENTAGES AND CRITERIA FOR REPORTING PARTIAL CREDIT
_. FCR LARGE EOS.E '":::R QUANTITIES INTO THE :PR Fife Progress Values Status of Ploe Spool X Credit incremental / Cur.mulative Loaded in building X
.15 /
15 Hung in position (Rigged)
XX
.45 /
60 Ready to weld XXX
.40 / 1.00 PERCENTAGES AND CRITERIA FOR REPORTING PARTIAL CREDIT FCR LARGE SCRE VALVE QUANTITIES INTO THE PPR Progress Values Status of Pioe Spool X Credit incremental /Cummlative Leaded in building X
.15;/
15 ti Hung in Position (Rigged)
XX
.45 /
60 r.ca d s to weld (Censt. Accept)
XXX
.40 / 1.00 PERCENTAGES AND CRITERIA FOR-REPORTING PARTIAL CREDIT FOR LARGE SORE VELD QUANTITIES INTO THE PPR Progress Values Status of Veld X Credit incremental /Cummulative in Progress X
.40 /.
40
- o ;'ete & Grour.d.. :..
Xi
.45 /
85-Q.C. Accepted XXX
.15 / 1.00 o a e
m-e'
$ 4 g
e 9 e
b 6
i
=
.. =
4
.i.. U. No. 1:157 1
?
i l
PERCENTAGES AND CRITERIA FOR REPORTING PARTIAL CREDIT FOR LARGE BORE liANGER QUANTITIES INTO T1E PPR Progress Values Status of Hanger X Credit _
Incremental / Cumulative i
Loaded in building X
.10 /
.10 Start Erection XX
.25 /
.35 i
A.
Permanent attach. ment made (hanger cer.mitted).
I o
Erecticn in Prcgress(I)
XXX
.30 /
.65 t
A.
Tempora ry - Percznent.
t L.
All parts installed, no pressure boundary welds cade.
C.
All hanger parts insta))ed except suppressors.
D.
Har.ger incer.plete but vill support i
l P Pe.
Erecticr. Ccrplete (
XXXX
.30 /
.95 i'
A.
All parts installed.
L.
All structure welding complete.
C.
All prer.sure boundary velding
?
complete.
Accepted (2)
XXXXX-
.05 / 1.00 4
A.
Construction turnover operations' completed (hot / cold set complete; l
QC accepted).
I l
l (1) One or more canditicas cest be n.et to claim credit.
l
'2) All ccaditions i.:s,t bc. r r t to cl sim credit.
a e
e e
+-y
.-c-
,,.my-.,-.-
,-a y e,a c.
9
(? $ f UNITED STATE:
i fiU' E A : RE-GULA. TORY 00tdral55!Ofe
' g-l wAssmoToN o.t.mst
.,?
L'A*.
- & G E3 Do:ket *:3.:
50-410 APPLICANT:
Niagara Mohawk Power Corporation (NMPC)
FACILITY:
Nine Mile Point-2 SUBJ ECT:-
SU!NAkY OF CASELOAD FORECAST PANFL (CFP) MEETINGS AND FACILITY TOUR AT HINE MILE POINT February 22 - 24, 1983 57 '.:Ry C-r brue y 22 - 24, 1983, the NRC Caseload Forecast Panel (CFP), consisting e
of villien Levelate (RM/D'<I), Mary Haughey (Licensing Project Manager) and R:5&rt Schul: (Sr. Resident Inspe: tor), met with the applicant and toured the
'Mne Mile Point-2 facility and site. The purpose of these neetings and tour was to review construction progress and collect data for the purpose of meheng aAl_+7 4 *-UR" staffjTstimaty.Tf A:n th3 -len will be ce@leted and-ready 4er-fttt4 W The visit was organized in two parts:
/
1.
Cr. re very 22, a resting was held with the applicant to revie,: design Enc e7pineering, procurement, anc construction progress on Mine F.ile
{..g 3,1-w g, P oi nt-2.
j,
$6Tyd 2.
On February 23, a tour of the Nine Mile Point-2 facility and site
/
h "'
v:as nade to observe the status of constructicn.
The CFP also held
./p/ O brief discussions with the applicant on February 23 and 24 concerning questions raised during the meeting and tour.
Ct.yebruary 24 a close-out meeting was held. to discuss the c' nelusion of the CFT.s The applicant was infor.ed that, based on the percentag of completion s
cf suQ thirigs as concrete', pipe hangers, andscable, as determ ned froa information i
\\
provided by the at plicant and from the facility, tour, the esti, ted fuel load cete cetermined by the CFP is. 4th ouarter of 19!L6, noninally la e November 1986.
The applicant's projected fuet load date is late ebruary 1986, hpproximately t
nine conths\\ earlier.
\\
The applicant 'was informed,that it is expected that ata from this {Pvisit will be comparekto the information athered during bsequent visits \\to Nine Mile Point-2 durir construction and e estimated fue load date will\\
be adjusted is rie~cdssary. 'The data upoNwhich the CFP hsojection is based is given in the fo11'owing sectidns of the' meeting summaryh
\\
~ g @ A,a.S&md i
.g.
-O K
J :;
- x-s m w w,
2 MEETING AND FACILITY TOUR DETAILS Tuesday, February 22, 1983, at Nine Itile Point-2 Scriba, New York.
The CFP met with the applicant at the NMPC offices on the Nine Mile Point-2 site.
A list of attendees is included as Attachment 1.
The applicant's presentation to the staff was supplied in eleven segments corresponding to the eleven items in the Caseload Forecast Panel Site Visit Meeting Agenda (Attachment 2) which was included in the meeting notice.
The HMPC presentation included a general overview of project construction, major milestones, and current and anticipated problems.
As of January 31, 1983, construction percent complete was reported by HMPC as 61.59%.
In 1982, 22.5F construction conpletion was planned; 23.4% was achieved.
Current problens include:
1.
contractor performance affecting schedule, notably the mechanical /
piping contractor.
2.
limited engineering lead time to construction.
Future ootential schedular problens include:
- 1) pcwer generation control complex (PGCC) modifications 2) contractor performance, notably the major rechanical contractor 2) ecuipnent aualificatier, concerns 4) control rod drive systen schedule 5) craf t availability, notably welders
- 6) conversion from Duik basis project to a system based construction Major construction milestones completed in 1982 were:
1) set spent fuel pool liner
- 2) complete set spent fuel pool liner
- 3) cooling tower shell complete 4) intake and distnarge tunnels conplete 9
e O
e e
~
-?-
Majer corstruction milestones scheduled for 1983 are:
11 115V saitchyard ready to energize 2) cable trays 83% complete 3) stt mcIn PGCC console 4) large process pipe 80% complete (hang in place,' tacked in place)
- 5) polar crane operational 61 diesel generator building enclosure 7) screenwell building enclosure complete 5) ccoling tower complete 9) reactor building enclosure complete 13) walsh concrete 981 complete Tne status of bulk quantities installed is indicated in Attachment 3.
The esth:d uses by t'"0C for deter-ining partial credit for installation is indicated in Attachment 4 Encicesring and design efforts were estimated by NMPC to be about 82i conplete at t*e end of 1982. Engineering milestones completed in 1982 were a) conplete screen.<all structural drawings and b) complete reactor building concrete and steel craaings.
A pr:je:t restraint file was nade available to the CFF for review. This file listed eauipment need dates and status of delivery as of February 21, 1983.
This list indicated 3 equipment areas are experiencing short term delivery probiers of 1 to 3 nonths. The bulk of the equipment indicated on-site need dates in 1983.
N"PC noted a large craf t work force is available in the Oswego area and craf t workers are often used from the Nine Mile Point, Unit 1 and Fitzpatrick plants.
The availability of aualified welders however was indicated as a continuing problem.
The ?:ine Mile Point-2 project has recently undergone a major schedule revision to evaluate the potential for improving the fuel load date. Present N",PC schedules are targeted for an August 1985 early fuel load date. Critical path itecs for each area were identified by N!'PC. These items have float times (extra time available for contingencies before impacting the schedule) of between zero to 4 weeks before impacting the August 1985 fuel ' load date.
This schedule allows little or no time for unexpected contingencies.
An extra six nonth period is built into the total project float time, however, when con-sidering the February 1986 official fuel load date.
4
4 Sepa ete float is icentified in ';ine Mile Point-2 schedules for engineering, construction, and test and startup.
Items are considered negative when they exhaust the float in any one of these areas, not the total project float.
This system calls attention to schedule problems before they impact the total proj ec t.
Of the 1213 pre-op and acceptance test procedures identified by NMPC as required for fuel load, 263 were identified as approved, 81 in review, 286 started, and 583 not yet started.
(The number of procedures required in the areas of in Service Inspection, Operations Surveillance and Preventive Maintenance, Start-up Tests and Special Operating Procedures have not yet been identified and are not included in this total).
A tetal of 300 workers were identified by NMPC as required resources for the Pre-op and Accectance Tests Program.
Of these,125 are already employed by tW C.
It was indicated by NMPC that the remaining personnel (mainly in the operating, technician, and test engineer categories) could be drawn from the pool of workers in the Oswego area presently working at t:ine Mile Point, Unit 1 and Fitzpatrick.
Wednesday, February 23, 1983, at Nine Mile Point-2 The CF; toured the !!ine Mile Point-2 site on Wednesday to observe the status Cf ccnstruction.
A cng the areas observed were the containment building (ir(.ucing the c yell and suppression pool), the turbine building, the control roo-building, the redwaste building, the diesel generator building, and the refusiing area.
A S*ief meeting was held af ter the tour to discuss additicnal information necessary for the fE staff to nuke its estimate of the Nine Mile Point-2 fuel load date.
inurscav. February 2',1953 at t;ine t',ile Point-2 A trief meeting was held with the applicant on Thursday norning to obtain the additional ir.fornation requested by the NRC staff.
At 10:30 Thursday morning, a sumary meeting was held with the applicant. The attendance list for this meeting is included in Attachment 1.
At this meeting, the applicant was advised tAst the Cro esti' :ted date that the-Mant will bc re&dy isc fuel load-is-4th 70 4i./ww-A.-~ md&.6& -y' ~~.%.du1900, ncminelly letc M quscta
- p Afv
.d~4
.&miA. ~ & ?4.ek'.wac.
yw au
&>-d'<dy d' 2%.
f. A n ~ - A A.A ars 4 & ~W 4 w &'r 4' y & m 9
cv:u..d n 4 SCC w[rxa nc:p >>u./*
G*
M. Haughey, Project Manager Licensing Branch !!o. 2 Division of Licensing Attachnents:
As stated cc:
See next page
- ?,ne "ile Point 2 Mr. Gerald K. Rhode Vice President, System Project Management Niagara Mohawk Power Corporation 300 Erie Boulevard West Syracuse, New York 13202 cc: Mr. Troy B. Conner, Jr., Esq.
Conner & Wetterhahn Suite 1050 1747 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W.
Washington, D. C.
20006 fir. P.ichard Goldsmith Syracuse University College of Law E. I. White Hall Campus Syracuse, New York 13210 T. K. DeBoer, Director Technological Development Programs New York State Energy Office Agency Building 2 Ec; ire State ' Plaza Albany, New York 12223 Ezra I. Sialik Assistant Attorney General Environmental Protection Bureau New York State Department of Law 2 Norld Trade Center New York, f ew York 10047 0.esident Inspector Nine Mile Point Nuclear Power Station P. O. Box 126 Lycoming, New York 13093 Mr. J ohn W. Keib, Esq.
Hiagara lichawk Power Corporation 300 Erie Boulevard West Syracuse, tiew York 13202-
~..
e S
e 4
e h-
+
c e
-e
ATTACHMENT 1 4
ATTENDATCE LIST CASELOAD FORECAST PANEL MEETINGS (2/22 - 24/83) i NAME ORGANIZATION Mary F. Haughey NRC - 1.icensing Project Man.
W. H. Lovelace NRC - RM Paul D. Eddy (2/22 and 2/24 only)
A. F. Zallnick NMPC - Licensing F. M. Sheldon Stone & Webster - Construction J. B. Hadden NMPC - AMC N. L. Rademacker NMPC - Licensing R. H. Pinney Stone & Webster - Licensing D. L. Pike (2/22 only)
NMPC - Engineering R. J. Cohen NMPC - Scheduling j
R. E. Abbott NMPC - OPRNS Robert D. Schulz NRC - Sr. Res. Inspector l
S. F. l' anno (2/24 only)
NMPC - V. P. Nuclear Construction
~
J. McGrath (2/24 only)
i i
l l
9 e
F e
u-,.
w-4wy yetn,e-e +
e--
-r---ne
- i. w e.-
t--g-44-e,yw we wq w-
~
g fter-yuy-
-r--vywv--vy w gy - g y
,3,-na e
sw v-d w
='r
- ' ' + - - -
-if ye 79
N^
AN'
=
0verview of project construction schedule including progress ij:r miles:enes ccepleted, current problems and any ar.:
an:icipated prob.lem areas that ray impact the current projecte,d fuel lead date.
Detailed revieg and current' status o' design and engineering 2.
effort (by major discipl.ine) including any potential problems that may arise from necessary rework.
Detailed review and current. status of procurement activities 3.
including valves, pipe, instruments, cable, major components, etc..
If: cal and p'roposed craft work force (by major craft), craft
~
4.
avcilability, produc,tivity, potential labor negotiations and probl ems.
~
Detailed review and current status of all larce and small bore
~~
E.
pipe hangers, restraints, snubbers, etc., including design, rework, procurement, fabrication, delivery and installation.
Detailed' review of project schedule identifying critical path 6.
items, near critical items, arount of float for various activities, the current critical path to fuel loading, rath:ds of impier,entation of terrective action for any activities with negative float, and provisions for contingencies.
31, 1983.,
Tne estimated project percent complete as offanuary
- stailed review and current status of bulk quantiti'es including 7.
current estimated quantities, quantities installed to date, quantities scheduled to date, current percent complete for' ea:h, actual versus forecast installation rates, in cubic yards /mo.,
.iinear. feet /ro., or number /ro., and basis Tor 'rigures.
'(a)
Concrete (CY)
(b)
Process Pipe (LF)
Large Bore Fjpe (21/2" and larger)
Srall Bore Pipe (2" and smaller)
'(c)
Yard Pipe (LF)
(d)
Large Eore Pipe Hangers, Re'straints, Snubbers (ea)
\\
C-g 4
6;
(c)
Smeli Eore.Fipe Marcers,'.Ecstraints '(ca)
~
(f)
Cable Tray (LF)
(g)
Total Conduit (LF)
Total Exposed }!etal.Cdnduit,(.LF)..
(h) i (i)
Cable,(LF)
J'
.e power
' Control
. Security Instru=entation
~
' Plint-Li chting s
(j-). Terminations -(ea) z.
rever.-
': +
Contro1 V
Security y
. Instrumentation Plant Ligh. ting (k)
Electrical Circuits (ea)
_ ow e r.
r Control Security
~;
(1)
Instrumentation (ea)
. Ce: ailed review and current status of prepara' tion of preop E.
and acceptance test procedures, iritegration of preep and acceptance test activities with construction schedule, system turn' aver schedule, preap and acceptance tes.ts. schedule, current and proposed preep and acceptance tests program canpower.
(a)' Total number of proc,edures required for fuel load.
(b) flumber of draft procedures not started.
(c)
!! umber of draft procedures being written.
(d) liumber of procedures approved.
~
.(e)
Number of procedures in review.
l (f) T'otal number of preep and acceptance tests required for fuel load.
l
. (g)
Humber df preep and acceptance tests completed.
c l
(h)
Humber of preep.and acceptance tests currently
,in progres's.*
I
(
'(i)
Numb'er of systems turned over to start-up..
\\
t e
O g
e 6
~
te: ailed discussion of potential schedu'.ar influence due to changes attributed to liUF.EG-0737 and other recent licensing e
r e:;;irements.
10.
Discussion of schedular im,sact, if any, regarding poter.tial deficiencies reported in accordance_with 10 CFR 50.55(e).
Overview of current constru3 tion ~and.s.tartup management 11.
organization showing interfaces. between the tw.
12.
Site tour and ob'servation of construction activities.
e e
e 4
i b p O,
G e
4 e
e e
- =
e e
1 e
9 O
e O
e 9
e e
e
?
e b
o e
9 O
O e
e O
e 9
y e
e e
e e
s e
y g
\\
t,.
a e 9
e e
e O
OS i
l l
t
NillE fille P0ltlT !!UCLEAR STATION - UNIT 2 C0flS T RUC T 10tl I fl0I CATORS s
1/1/83 REVISED ACTUAL INSTALLED
% INSTALLED DESCRIPTION UOM BUDGET ESTir1A1C AS OF 1/16/83 AS OF 1/I6/R3 Reinforcing Steel TN 37,676 31.787 81:
Fo rnwdr k SF 3,079,125 2,58's,320 8ta Concrete CY 26l,262 221,3I7 85 Structural Steel TN 20,282 15,816 78 2f6,332 11 9,991:
61 Large Bore Pipe LF i
L'arge Bore Velds EA 18,669 11,1718 60 L ye Bore Hangers EA 16,971 6,811 1:0 Small Bore Pipe LF 159,982 2 3,91:0 15 Conduit and Supports LF 619,600 312,599 50 Cable Tray LF 126,235 81,897 65 Cable (Pwr, Instr,Cntrl)
LF 5,758,51: 1 600,067 10 Cable Terminations EA 256,9!7 78 0
3d M
9
-4 W
W D
9
ATTACHMENT 4 J. C. 'c
- 157 PERCENTAGEE AC CRI~lERIA FOR REPORTING PARilA1. CREDIT FOR LARGE BORE HANGER QL' ANT] TIES INTO THE PPR Progress Values Status of Hanger X Credit Incremental / Cumulative Loaded in build
- ng X
.30 /
.10 start Erection XX
.25 /
.35 A.
Permanent attachment made (hanter cc.mitted).
Erecticn in Progress (I)
XXX
.30 /
.65 A.
Tempera ry - Permanent.
E.
All p' ts installed, no pressure boundary welds made.
C.
All Langer parts installed except suppressors.
E.
hanger incc piete but will support pipe.
Erection Complete (2)
XXXX
.30 /
.95 A.
All parts installed.
E.
All s t ruc t r e welding cc mplete.
C.
All pressure boundary velding complete.
Acce;ted(2)
>>?:XX
.05
/ 1.00 A.
C nstruction turnover operations ~
co pleted (Lot / cold set coc.plete; Q: accepted).
(1) One or note cr.nditions must be met to claim credit.
(2) A)) na..ii t i o n s
..st be n.ct to claim credit.
e I
L
_m
/. O. :.o. ; ; '. 57
. W PERCE!.T :ES A!;D CRITERIA FOR REPOUltJG PARTIAL CRE0li I
)
- . L A.:E E3RE * * *:::' QUAT;TITIES It:TO THE PPR l
fife i
Progress Values a
Status of Ploe 50001 X Credit incremental /Cu enulative
}
Loaded in building X
15 /
15 i
]
Hung in position (Rigged)
XX 45 /
60 j
Ready to weld XXX 40 / 1.00 4
?
PERCENTAGES At!D CRITERIA FOR REPORTitJG PARTIAL CREDIT
)
FOR LAEGE BCF.E VALVE QUAT;TITIES liiTO THE PPR Progress Values i
Status of Pice 50001 X Credit incremental /Cummlative i
Leaded in building X
15,, /
15 Fung in Position (Rigged)
XX 45 /
60 cady te weld (Ocns:. Accept)
XXX 40 / 1.00~
1 FE:CEt;TAGES A'JD CRITERI A FOR REPORTiti; PARTI AL _.
C: EDIT FOR LARGE SCRE VELD QUAT 4TITIES It;TO THE PPR
.d j
Progress Values Status of Weld X Credit incremental /Cummulative in Frogress X
40 /
40 i
Xi
{
- om.picte & Ground 45 /
85 Q.C. Accepted XXX 15 / 1.00 I
i e
4
?
i e
p e
r r
r vr--
-<+*e---
, - +.
v
+v v
v-v
+
-+-v
-e---
j
- 1. O. ' c.. 12157 1
PERCENTAGES AND CRITERIA FOR REPORTING PARTIAL CREDIT FOR LARGE BORE' HANGER QUANTITIES INTO TIII PPR
'l i
Progress Values Status of Hanger X Credit incremental / Cumulative i
Loaded in building X
.10 /
.10 J
~
Start Erection XX
.25 /
.35 i
i A.
Per..anent attachment nade (hanger committed).
i Erectier. in Progress (I)
XXX
.30 /
.65 A.
Temporary - Perr.anent.
t B.
All parts installed, no pressure j
boundary welds cade.
C.
All hanger parts installed except suppressors.
.)
D.
nanger incceplete but vill support 4
1 T2Pe-i E:ecticn Corplete ( }
XXXX
.30 /
.95 i
A.
All parts installed.
E.
All structure welding complete.
C.
All pressure boundary welding cceplete.
i Accepted ( )
XXXXX
.05 / 1.00 A.
Construction turnover operations' completed (hot / cold set complete; i
QC accepted).
i i
(1) One or recre conditiens cust be n.et to claim credit.
(2) All ccaditions : us; b,e r+t to claim err dit.
i e
I 1
l e
O
,.. y
.. w'
$r :c c
'E'
,,[ '
g7 L*
U*.'ll E D IT/,TES f.'UCLE AR REGUL '. TORY COl/.lCSICN
}
3 reAs e :: Tere. o. c. 2:m Decket ":.:
50-410 ADPLICANT:
Niacara V.chawk Power Corporation (KMPC)
FACILITY: Nine Mile Point-2
SUBJECT:
SUM:iARY OF CASELOAD FORECAST PANEL (CFP) MEETINGS AND FACILITY TOUR AT NINE MILE P01NT February 22 - 24, 1983 SUF/AARY On February 22 - 24, 1983, the NRC Caseload Forecast Panel (CFP), consisting of William Lovelace (RM/DMI), Mary Haughey (Licensing Project Mancger) and Robert Schulz (Sr. Resident Inspector), met with the applicant and toured the Nine Mile Point-2 facility and site. The purpose of these meetings and tour was to review construction progress and collect data for the purpose of making an NRC staff estimate of when the plant will be completed and ready for fuel loading. The visit was organized in two parts:
1.
On February 22, a meetiny was held with the applicant to review design and engineering, procurement, and construction progress on Nine Mile Point-2.
2.
On February 23, a tour of the Nine Mile Point-2 facility and site was nade to observe the status of construction. The CFP also held brief discussions with the applicant on February 23 and 24 concerning cuestions raised during the meeting and tour.
On February 24 a close-out meeting was held to discuss the conclusion of the CFP. The applicant was infor.ned that, based on the percentage of conpletion cf such things as concrete, pipe hangers, and cable, as determined from information proeided by the cpplicant and from the facility tour, the estimated fuel load date deternined by the CFP is 4th cuarter of 1986, nominally late "ovember 1986.
The a;oii:E t's projected fuel load date is late February 1986, approximately nine onths earlier.
The applicant was informed that it is expected that data from this CFP visit will be compared to the information gathered during subsequent visits to Nine Mile Point-2 during construction and the estimated fuel load date will be adjusted as necessary.
The data upon which the CFP projection is based l
is given in the following sections of the meeting svamary.
s
- m p e
y v
. FIET:1.iED Ftr1LITY TOUF. DETAILS
~ esday, February 22, 1983, at Nine Itile Point-2 Scriba, New York.
u The CFP net with the applicant at the NMPC offices on the Nine '*.ile Point ;
site.
A list of attendees is included as Attachnent 1.
The applicant's presentation to the staff was supplied in eleven segments corresponding to the eleven items in the Caseload Forecast Panel Site Visit
!;eeting Agenda ( Attachment 2) which was included in the meeting notice.
The NMPC presentation included a general overview of project construction, najor milestones, and current and anticipated problems.
As of January 31, 1983, construction percent complete was reported by NMPC as 61.59%.
In 1982, 22.56% construction completion was planned; 23.4% was achieved.
Current problems include:
1.
contractor performance affecting schedule, notably the mechanical /
piping contractor.
2.
limited engineering lead time to construction.
Future potential schedular problems include:
1) power generation control complex (PGCC) modifications 2) contractor performanc,e, notably the major rechanical contractor 2) equipment qualification concerns l
4) control rod drive system schedule 5) craft availability, notably welders 6) conversion from bulk basis project to a systen based construction l'ajor construction rilestones completed in 1982 were:
1) set spent fuel pool liner 2) complete set spent fuel pool liner 3) cooling tower shell complete 4) intake and discharge tunnels complete
- e
i i
" jer ccett u: tion nilestones scheduled for 1983 are:
1) 115V switchyard ready to energize 2) cable trays E3% cc,plete 3) set main PSCC console 4) large process pipe 80% complete (hang in place, tacked in place) 5)
polar crane operational 6) diesel generator building enclosure 7) screenwell building enclosure complete 8) cooling tower complete 9) reactor building enclosure complete
- 10) walsh concrete 98% complete The status of bulk quantities installed is indicated in Attachnent 3.
The method uses by MMPC for determining partial credit for installation is indicated in Attachrent 4 Encineering and design efforts were estimated by N"PC to be about 82% conplete at the end of 1982. Engineering milestones completed in 1982 were a) complete screenwall structural drawings and b) complete reactor building concrete and steel dra.ings.
A project restraint file was made available to the CFP for review. This file listed equipment need dates and status of delivery as of February 21, 1933.
This list indicated 3 equipment areas are experiencing shcrt term delivery problems of 1 to 3 conths. The bulk of the ecaipnent i.ndicated on-site need dates in 19B3.
':"3C noted a large craft work force is available in the Oswego area and craft cor%ers are of ten used from the Nine "ile Point, Unit 1 and Fitzpatrick plants.
The availability of qualified welders however was indicated as a continuing problem.
The Nine Mile Point-2 project has recently undergone a major schedule revision to evaluate the potential for improving the fuel load date.
Present NMPC schedules are targeted for an August 1985 early fuel load date.
Critical path items for each area were identified by NP.PC. These items have float times (extra time available for contingencies before impacting the schedule) of between zero to 4 weeks before impatting the August 1985 fuel load date.
This schedule allows little or no time for unexpected contingencies.
An extra six nonth pericd is built into the total project float time, however, when con-sidering the February 1985 official fuel load date.
, \\
Separate ficat is identified in "ine Mile Point-2 schecules for engineering, ccnstruction, and test and startup.
Items are censidered negative when they i
exhaust tne float in any one of these areas, not the tetal project float.
This systen calls attention to schedule probiers before t*ey impact the total
?r0 ject.
Of the 1213 pre-co and acceptance test procedures identified by "MPC as required for fuel load, 263 were identified as approved, El in review, 286 started, and 583 not yet started.
(The number of procedures required in the areas of in Service Inspection, Operations Surveillance and Preventive t'aintenance, Start-up Tests and Special Operating Procedures have not yet been identified and are 1
not included in this total).
4 l
A total of 300 horkers were identified by NMPC as required resources for the i
Pre-op and Acceptance Tests Program. Of these,125 are already employed by NMPC.
It was indicated by NMPC that the remaining personnel (mainly in the j
operating, technician, and test engineer categories) could be drawn from the pool of workers in the Oswego area presently working at Nine Mile Point, Unit 1 and Fitzpatrick.
Wednesday, February 23, 1983, at Nine Mile Point-2 The CFP toured,the Nine Mile Point-2 site on Wednesday to observe the status of construction.
Anong the areas observed were the containcent building (including the drywell and suppression pool), the turbine building, the control roon building, the radwaste building, the diesel generator building, and the refueling area.
.s A brief neet,ing was held af ter the tour to discuss additional information necessary for.<the NRC staff to make its estimate of the Nine Mile Point-2 fuel load date.
1 Thursday, Febsuary 24, 1983, at Nine Mile Point-2 A brief meeti,g was held with the applicant on Thursday norning to obtain the f
additional internation recuested by the NRC staff.
At 10:30 Thursday mornino, a sunmary meeting was held with the applica'nt. The attendancs list for this neeting is included in Attachnent 1.
At this meeting, the applicant was advised thtt the CFP estinated date that the plant will be reacy for fuel load is 4th cuarter 1956, neninally late November 1986.
/
h:a, f WSw.&,
M. Haughey, PFoject Manager Licensina Branch No. 2 Division ~of Licensing Attachnents:
As stated cc:
See next page l
l l
,w-p myn4m,a
-Te w
www'-
"ine ".ile Point 2 1
1 Mr. Gerald K. Rhede Vice President, Systen Project Management Niagara '4chawk Power Corporation 300 Erie Boulevard West Syracuse, New York 13202 cc: Mr. Troy B. Conner, Jr., Esq.
1 Conner & Wetterhahn Suite 1050 1747 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W.
Washington, D. C.
20006 Mr. Richard Goldsmith i
Syracuse University College of Law i
E. 1. White Hall Campus 1
Syracuse, New York 13210 T. K. DeBoer, Director Technological Development Programs New York State Energy Office Agency Building 2 Empire State Plaza l
Albany, New York 12223 4
Ezra I. Sialik i
Assistant Attorney Gene'ral Environmer.tal Protection Bureau New York State Department of Law 2 World Trade Center New York, New York 10047 Resident Inspector Nine Mile Point Nuclear Power Station P. O. Box 126 Lyccaing, New York 13093 "r. J ohn W. Keib, Esq.
Niagara Mohawk Power Corporation 300 Erie Boulevard West Syracuse, New York 13202 f
i
+.
1 l-o
. L,
ATTACH::ENT 1 ATTE:: DANCE LIST CASELOAD FORECAST PANEL MEETINGS (2/22 - 24/83)
NA"E ORGANIZATION Mary F. Haughey NRC - Licensing Project Man.
W. H. Lovelace NRC - RM Paul D. Eddy (2/22 anc 2/24 'only)
NYS - PSC A. F. Zallnick NMPC - Licensing F. M. Sheldon Stone & Webster - Construction J. B. Hadden NMPC - AMC N. L. Rademacker NMPC - Licensing R. H. Pinney Stone & Webster - Licensing D. L. Pike (2/22 only)
NMPC - Engineering R. J. Cohen NMPC - Scheduling R. B. Abbott NMPC - OPRNS Robert D. Schulz NRC - Sr. Res. Inspector S. F. !! anno (2/24 only)
NMPC - V. P. Nuclear Constructio 1 J. McGrath (2/24 only)
.O O
l 1
MEETING AGENDA ATTAC W,ErlT 2 Cvervie,e :f project constructica schedule including progress 1l:r :.iies:enes cc pieted, current probiems and any 2.
- .:ici;::ed prcblem areas that ray impact the current projected fuel icad date.
Cetailed review and current' states of design and engineering 2.
eff:rt (':y maj:r discipl.ine) including any potential problems tha: may arise frca necessary rework.
- etailed revieg and current status of procurement activities 3.
including valves, pipe, instrurents, cable, major components, etc.
Actual and proposed craft work force (by major craft), craft I
~
availability, produc,tivity, potential labor negotiations and 4.
probl ems.
~
Detailed review and current status of all large and small bore-5.
pipe hangers, restraints, snubbers, etc., including' design, rework, procurement, fabrication, delivery and installation.
Detailed review of project schedule identifying critical path 6.
ite-.s, near critical items, aroent of float for various activities, the current critical path to fuel loading, methods of implerentation of torrective action for any activities with negative Yloat, and provisions for contingencies.
31, 1 983.,
The estimated project percent complete as of.Janoary Detailed review and current status of bulk quantiti'es including 7.
current estimated quantities, quantities installed to date,.
cuantities scheduled to date, current percent complete for each, actual versus forecast installation rates, in cubic yards /co.,
. linear. feet /ro., or number /ro., and basis for figures.
'(a)
Concrete (CY)
(b)
Process' Fipe (LF)
Larce Bore P.ipe (21/2" and larger)
Small Eore Pipe (2" and staller) 1 l
(c)
Yard Pipe (LF)
(d)
Large Sore Pipe Hangers, Re'straints, Snubbers (ea) l k
A s
g
(.*
\\
\\
e y
~
r'.
~
(e)
Small Eore Fife HaDeers,'F.estraints '(ec)
(f)
Cable Tray (LF)
(g)
Total Cenduit (LF)
(h)
Total E.xp: sed Metal: Conduit,(LF.) -
e
..e (i)
Cable,(LF)
Power Control
' Security
- Instrumentation
.s.
P1. t.Lignting an
..5 (i). Terminations -(ea)
=
rower.-
';. r:
r.
Control Security i
. Instrumentation 9
'l Piant Ligh. ting (k)
Electrical Circuits (ea) power-2 Control Security (1)
Instrumentation (ea)
- 8.. Detailed review and current status of prepara' tion of preop and acceptance test procedures, int;egration of preop and acceptance test actnities with construction schedule, systein turnover schedule, pre:p and acceptance tes,ts schedule, current and proposed preep and acceptance tests program manp:wer.
. Total number of proc,edures required for fuel load.
(a)
(b) 11 umber of draft procedures not started.
(c)
!! umber of draft procedures being written.
(d)
Number of procedures approved.
.(e)
N, umber of precedures in review.
(f) Total number of preop and acceptance tests required for fuel Joad.
Number df preep and acceptance tests ccmpleted.
l (g)
(h) Humber of preep.and accepta. ce tests cu'rrently l,
. in progress.-
~
\\*
,(i )
Nucoer of systems turned over to start-up..
3.
S.
g e
betr.iled discussion of potential schedular. influence due to changes attributed to !;UF.EG-0737 and other recent licensing requirements.
e e
e 10.
Discussion of schedular impact, if any, regarding potential deficiencies repcrted in accordan:e.awith 10 CFR 50.55(e).
Overview of current ccnstrudtio$'and startup management 11.
orcanization sh: wing interfaces. between the two.
Site tour and ob' ervation of construction activities.
12.
s t
O-e 9
@e 4
O S
6 y
9 e
e e
m*em a
m 9
e e
c e
9 a
D 9
e e
O i
e e
e e
e G
e 9 p
e em D
4 9
4 e
e G
G g
g e
e 9
9 a
g 4
e 6
g 9
e e
'S e
e o
9 e
e 4
e 4
e g
e e
g e
O
'l 9
.\\
c-O 9
e e*
b q
.,4 e
O 4
6 g
a M
e NINE MILE POINT NUCLCAR STATION - UNIT 2 CONSTRUCTION INDICATORS I/1/83 REVISED ACTUAL INSTALLED 7, INSTALLED DESCRIPTION 00ft BUDGET ESTitiATE AS OF 1/16/83 AS OF 1/ l f/_83 Reinforcing Steel Til 37,676 31,787 84 Formwork SF 3,079,125 2,584,320 84 Concrete CY 261,262 221,317 85 Structural Stect TN 20,282 15,816 78 Large Bore Pipe LF 246,332 149,994 61 Large Bore Welds EA 18,669 11,174 60 Large Bore Hangers EA 16,974 6,814 40 Small Bore, Pipe LF 159,982 23,940 15 Conduit and Supports LF 619,600 312,599 50 Cabic Tray LF 126,235 81,897 65 Cable (Pwr, instr,Cntrl)
LF 5,758,541 600,067 10 Cable Terminations EA 256,917 78 0
2, dn 5
9 w
.~
ATTACHME'ii 4 J. C. Sc..
12157 PEECESIAGES A';D CRITERI A F0h EEKKTING PARTIAE CiGDIT FOR LO.GE E;RE P. ANGER QUANTITIES INTO TliE PPR Progress Values Status of Hanger X Credit incremental / Cumulative Leaded in building X
.30 /
.10 start Erection XX
.25 /
.35 A.
Permanent attachment made (hanger com.mitted).
Erection in Progress (I)
XXX
.30 /
.65 A.
Tempora ry - Percanent.
B.
All p' ts installed, no pressure bound ry welds made.
C.
All hange. parts installed except suppressors.
D.
Hanger inccmplete but will support pipe.
Erection Complete (2)
XXXX
.30 /
.95 A.
All parts installed.
E.
All structure welding ccmplete.
C.
All pressure boundary velding complete.
Acre;ted(2)
>3333:
.05
/ 1.00 A.
C;:struction turnover operations cc. pleted ('.ot/ cold set ec..plete; QC accepted).
(1) 0:.e or ::> ore cr.nditions r.:ust be met to claim credit.-
l (2) All nr.nditions
..s t bc.:.et to clai:n credit.
1 t
n J. O. Sc. l'ii7 i
i FEi. ENTAGES AND CRITEEI A FOR REIGRTING PARTI A1. CREDIT FOR IMGE BCKE PJ.NGER QUANT] TIES INTO TIE PPR i
j Progress Values S:stus of Eanter X Credit Incremental / Cumulative 4
i Leaded in building X
c10 /
.10 i
).
I Start Erection XX
.25 /
.35 T
A.
Permanent attachment made (hanger committed).
I Erection in Progress (I)
XXX
.30 /
.65 i
A.
Temporary - Permanent.
r B.
All parts installed, no pressure j
boundary velds cade.
C.
All hanger parts insts))cd except suppressors.
D.
Eanger incomplete but will support j
pipe.
i XXXX
.bb /
.95-Erecticn Complete ( }
i.
a A.
All parts installed.
E.
All structure velding complete.
C.
All pressure boundary welding complete.
- t.
Accepted (2) i XXXXX
.05 / 1.00 A.
Censtruction turnover operaticns cc pletad (hot /ccid set cetplete; 1
QC accepted).
1 f
(1) One or r. ore conditiens cust be v.et to claim cr. edit..
(2) All ccaditicns ; :st be :
r-t to cl-im credit.
y
- -.. - - - - - - - -,. = -
e e.
r
J, D. Ne, 121E7 FE;;ENTAGES AND CRITE:.l A FOR REPORT!';0 F A:,TI AL CREDIT FOR LARGE EORE
- C' QUANTITIES INTO THE ??R b?E Progress Values Sta:es of Pice Spool X Credit incre. ental /C+.- ulative Lcated in building X.
.15 /
15 Hung in position (Rigged)
XX
.45 /
60~
Ready to weld XXX
.40 /.1.00 PERCENTAGES AND CRITERIA FOR REPCRTING PARTIAL CREDIT FOR LARGE BORE VALVE QUANTITIES INTO THE PPR Progress Values Status of Pice Spool X Credit inc remental /C umla t ive Leaded in building
.X
.15,/
.15 Is Hung in Position (Rigged)
XX
.43 /
60 Ready to weld (Const. Accept)
XXX
.40 / 1.00 PERCENTAGE $ A'iD CRITERIA FOR REPORTING PARTIAL CREDIT FOR LARGE EORE VELD QUA'4TITIES INTO THE PPR_.
~
. Progress Values Status of Veld X Credit i ncremental /Cummul at ive -
In Progress X
.40 /
40.
M p'.:te & Ground XX
.45./
85 Q.C. Accepted XXX
.15 / 1 '. 00' m
o,ea en
~
M' e4 h
.