|
---|
Category:LEGAL TRANSCRIPTS & ORDERS & PLEADINGS
MONTHYEARJPN-99-029, Comment Supporting Proposed Rules 10CFR50 & 72 Re Reporting Requirement for Nuclear Power Reactors1999-09-20020 September 1999 Comment Supporting Proposed Rules 10CFR50 & 72 Re Reporting Requirement for Nuclear Power Reactors ML20212E4181999-09-15015 September 1999 Petition Per 10CFR2.206 Requesting OL for Unit 2 Be Modified or Suspended to Prevent Restart Until Reasonable Assurance That Licensee in Substantial Compliance with Terms of OL & Has Proper Consideration for Public Health & Safety JPN-99-022, Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Requirements for Industry Codes & Stds1999-06-22022 June 1999 Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Requirements for Industry Codes & Stds ML20202J6321999-01-20020 January 1999 Transcript of 990120 Meeting in Peekskill,Ny Re Decommissioning.Pp 1-132.With Related Documentation ML20198L2731998-12-21021 December 1998 Comment Supporting NEI Re Proposed Rules 10CFR50, 52 & 72 Re Changes,Tests & Experiments JPN-98-052, Comment Supporting Proposed Rules 10CFR50,52 & 72 Re Changes,Tests & Experiments.Util Endorses & Supports Position Presented by NEI & Commends Commission for Initiative to Address Disconnects1998-12-21021 December 1998 Comment Supporting Proposed Rules 10CFR50,52 & 72 Re Changes,Tests & Experiments.Util Endorses & Supports Position Presented by NEI & Commends Commission for Initiative to Address Disconnects ML20198E9721998-12-21021 December 1998 Order Prohibiting Involvement in NRC-Licensed Activities. Orders That Wh Clark Prohibited for 1 Yr from Engaging in NRC-Licensed Activities JPN-98-050, Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Monitoring Effectiveness of Maint at Nuclear Power Plants.Encourages NRC Staff to Withdraw Proposed Change & to Work with Nuclear Power Industry & Other Stakeholders to Accomplish Goal1998-12-14014 December 1998 Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Monitoring Effectiveness of Maint at Nuclear Power Plants.Encourages NRC Staff to Withdraw Proposed Change & to Work with Nuclear Power Industry & Other Stakeholders to Accomplish Goal ML20155F4561998-08-26026 August 1998 Demand for Info Re False Info Allegedly Provided by Wh Clark to Two NRC Licensees.Nrc Considering Whether Individual Should Be Prohibited from Working in NRC-licensed Activities for Period of 5 Yrs IA-98-261, Partially Deleted Transcript of 980520 Enforcement Conference in King of Prussia,Pa Re J Stipek.Pp 1-461998-05-20020 May 1998 Partially Deleted Transcript of 980520 Enforcement Conference in King of Prussia,Pa Re J Stipek.Pp 1-46 ML20238F5271998-05-20020 May 1998 Partially Deleted Transcript of 980520 Enforcement Conference in King of Prussia,Pa Re J Stipek.Pp 1-46 ML20238F5241998-05-0606 May 1998 Transcript of 980506 Enforcement Conference Held in King of Prussia,Pa Re Con Edison,Indian Point.Pp 1-75 JPN-97-037, Comment on Final Direct Rule Changes to Paragraph (H) of 10CFR50.55a Codes & Standards. Effective Date of New Rule Should Be Delayed Until Listed Concerns Can Be Resolved & Appropriate Changes Incorporated1997-12-0101 December 1997 Comment on Final Direct Rule Changes to Paragraph (H) of 10CFR50.55a Codes & Standards. Effective Date of New Rule Should Be Delayed Until Listed Concerns Can Be Resolved & Appropriate Changes Incorporated ML20149D2521997-07-11011 July 1997 Exemption from Requirements of 10CFR50,App R,Section III.G.2.c to Extent That Requires Installation of Automatic Suppression Sys in Certain Fire Areas.Exemption Approved for Listed Fire Areas.Exemption for Fire Zone FH-FZ-5 Denied ML20148M6471997-06-19019 June 1997 Comment Opposing Porposed NRC Bulletin 96-001,suppl 1, CR Insertion Problems ML20133N0511997-01-0505 January 1997 Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR50, Draft Policy Statement on Resturcturing & Economic Deregulation of Electric Util Industry ML20149M4621996-12-0909 December 1996 Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Draft Policy Statement on Restructuring & Economic Deregulation of Electric Utility Industry ML20077G3481994-12-0808 December 1994 Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR2,51 & 54 Re Nuclear Power License Renewal ML20070P0561994-04-19019 April 1994 Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re NRC Draft Policy Statement on Use of Decommissioning Trust Funds Before Decommissioning Plan Approval ML20029C5771994-03-11011 March 1994 Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR20 Re Draft Rule on Decommissioning.Informs That 15 Mrem/Yr Unreasonably Low Fraction of Icrp,Ncrp & Regulatory Public Dose Limit of 100 Mrem/Yr ML20059C3031993-12-28028 December 1993 Comment Supporting Petition for Rulemaking PRM-21-2 Re Definition of Commercial Grade Item ML20045H8751993-07-19019 July 1993 Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR55 Re Exam Procedures for Operator Licensing.Supports Rule JPN-93-045, Comment on Proposal Re Radiological Criteria for Decommissioning NRC-licensed Facilities.Opposes Proposed Criteria1993-06-28028 June 1993 Comment on Proposal Re Radiological Criteria for Decommissioning NRC-licensed Facilities.Opposes Proposed Criteria ML20045F2451993-06-28028 June 1993 Comment on Proposal Re Radiological Criteria for Decommissioning NRC-licensed Facilities.Opposes Proposed Criteria ML20044F5681993-05-20020 May 1993 Comment on Draft Commercial Grade Dedication Insp Procedure 38703,entitled Commercial Grade Procurement Insp. Endorses NUMARC Comments JPN-02-034, Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR50.54 Re Receipt of Byproduct & Special Nuclear Matl1992-07-0606 July 1992 Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR50.54 Re Receipt of Byproduct & Special Nuclear Matl JPN-91-021, Comment on Proposed Rules 10CFR71,170 & 171, Rev of Fee Schedules;100% Fee Recovery. Endorses NUMARC Comments. Approx 300% Increase in NRC Fees for FY91 Will Have Major Impact Upon Operating & Maint Budgets of Plants1991-05-13013 May 1991 Comment on Proposed Rules 10CFR71,170 & 171, Rev of Fee Schedules;100% Fee Recovery. Endorses NUMARC Comments. Approx 300% Increase in NRC Fees for FY91 Will Have Major Impact Upon Operating & Maint Budgets of Plants JPN-91-005, Comment Re SECY-90-347, Regulatory Impact Survey Rept. Util Concurs W/Numarc Comments.Analysis of Info from NUREG-1395 Insufficient to Complete Evaluation.Root Cause Analysis of Seven Themes Listed in SECY-90-347 Recommended1991-01-28028 January 1991 Comment Re SECY-90-347, Regulatory Impact Survey Rept. Util Concurs W/Numarc Comments.Analysis of Info from NUREG-1395 Insufficient to Complete Evaluation.Root Cause Analysis of Seven Themes Listed in SECY-90-347 Recommended ML20066G4411991-01-23023 January 1991 Comments on Proposed Rule 10CFR2,50 & 54 Re Nuclear Power Plant License Renewal.Substantive Typo in 901015 Filing on Behalf of Licensee Noted ML20058G6341990-10-30030 October 1990 Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR26 Re fitness-for-duty Program JPN-90-068, Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR51 Re Renewal of Nuclear Plant OLs & NRC Intent to Prepare Generic EIS1990-10-22022 October 1990 Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR51 Re Renewal of Nuclear Plant OLs & NRC Intent to Prepare Generic EIS JPN-90-067, Comment on Proposed Rules 10CFR2,50 & 54 Re Nuclear Power Plant License Renewal.Endorses Comments Submitted by NUMARC1990-10-15015 October 1990 Comment on Proposed Rules 10CFR2,50 & 54 Re Nuclear Power Plant License Renewal.Endorses Comments Submitted by NUMARC ML20065H7541990-10-15015 October 1990 Comment Re Proposed Rules 10CFR2,50 & 54 on Nuclear Power Plant License Renewal.Commission Assessment of Four Alternatives Should Be Expanded to Include Not Only Safety Considerations But Other Atomic Energy Act Objectives JPN-90-052, Comment Supporting Petition for Rulemaking PRM-50-55 Re Revs to FSAR1990-07-0909 July 1990 Comment Supporting Petition for Rulemaking PRM-50-55 Re Revs to FSAR JPN-90-050, Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR55 Re Operators Licenses Mod for fitness-for-duty.Proposed Rule Will Place More Stringent Restrictions on Licensed Operators & Unnecessary1990-07-0202 July 1990 Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR55 Re Operators Licenses Mod for fitness-for-duty.Proposed Rule Will Place More Stringent Restrictions on Licensed Operators & Unnecessary ML20033G4331990-03-27027 March 1990 Order Impositing Civil Monetary Penalty in Amount of $50,000 for Safeguards/Security Violations Noted During 890605-07 Insp ML20012C6491990-03-0909 March 1990 Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR50, Fracture Toughness Requirements for Protection Against PTS Events. Any Utilization of NRC Proposed Application of Reg Guide 1.99, Rev 2,would Be Inappropriate W/O re-evaluation by NRC ML20006D3341990-02-0606 February 1990 Transcript of ACRS Subcommittee on Systematic Assessment of Experience 900206 Meeting in Bethesda,Md Re Proposed Power Level Increase for Plant.Pp 1-147.Supporting Info Encl ML20005F6521989-12-13013 December 1989 Comment on Proposed Draft Reg Guide DG-1001, Maint Programs for Nuclear Power Plants. Util Concurs w/industry-wide Position Presented by NUMARC & Offers Addl Comments ML20246P6061989-07-0707 July 1989 Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR50, Acceptance of Products Purchased for Use in Nuclear Power Plant Structures,Sys & Components. Significant & Independent Industry Efforts Already Underway to Address Issue ML20245K1941989-06-16016 June 1989 Comment on Proposed Rules 10CFR50,72 & 170 Re Storage of Spent Nuclear Fuel in NRC-Approved Storage Casks at Nuclear Power Reactor Sites JPN-89-008, Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Ensuring Effectiveness of Maint Programs for Nuclear Power Plants1989-02-27027 February 1989 Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Ensuring Effectiveness of Maint Programs for Nuclear Power Plants ML20235V9011989-02-24024 February 1989 Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Ensuring Effectiveness of Maint Programs for Nuclear Power Plants. Supports NUMARC Position.Proposed Rule Will Hinder Important Initiatives to Improve Maint JPN-88-063, Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR26 Re Fitness for Duty Program.Util Has Constitutional Concerns Re Proposed Random Testing Which Should Be Fully Addressed Prior to Rule Being Promulgated.Endorses NUMARC & EEI Comments1988-11-18018 November 1988 Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR26 Re Fitness for Duty Program.Util Has Constitutional Concerns Re Proposed Random Testing Which Should Be Fully Addressed Prior to Rule Being Promulgated.Endorses NUMARC & EEI Comments ML20205L8521988-10-21021 October 1988 Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR20 Re Cleaning or Disposing of Nuclear Waste.Incineration of Radwaste Oil Should Not Be Allowed JPN-88-015, Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Licensee Announcements of Inspectors.Rule Includes Requirement Contrary to Mgt Notification Practices.Rule Should Clarify Length of Time Applicable Once Inspector Arrives on Site1988-04-18018 April 1988 Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Licensee Announcements of Inspectors.Rule Includes Requirement Contrary to Mgt Notification Practices.Rule Should Clarify Length of Time Applicable Once Inspector Arrives on Site JPN-88-002, Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Proposed Policy Statement on Integrated Schedules for Implementation of Plant Mods.Concerns Re Schedule as License Amend Expressed1988-01-25025 January 1988 Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Proposed Policy Statement on Integrated Schedules for Implementation of Plant Mods.Concerns Re Schedule as License Amend Expressed JPN-87-062, Comment on Proposed Rules 10CFR4,11,25,30,31,32,34,35,40,50, 60,61,70,71,73,74,75,95 & 110 Re Retention Period for Records.Proposed Changes Ineffective in Reducing Record Vol & Rule Remains Inconsistent & Complex1987-12-31031 December 1987 Comment on Proposed Rules 10CFR4,11,25,30,31,32,34,35,40,50, 60,61,70,71,73,74,75,95 & 110 Re Retention Period for Records.Proposed Changes Ineffective in Reducing Record Vol & Rule Remains Inconsistent & Complex JPN-87-053, Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Revising Backfitting Process for Power Reactors.Minor Alterations Urged Re Conditions Under Which Backfit Needed to Assure Adequate Protection1987-10-15015 October 1987 Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Revising Backfitting Process for Power Reactors.Minor Alterations Urged Re Conditions Under Which Backfit Needed to Assure Adequate Protection JPN-87-051, Comment Opposing Draft NUREG-1150, Reactor Risk Ref Document. Reduced Uncertainty in Risk Assessment Found to Be Significant W/Respect to NUREG-1150.NUREG Also Does Not Consider Value of Operator Actions.Addl Comments Encl1987-09-28028 September 1987 Comment Opposing Draft NUREG-1150, Reactor Risk Ref Document. Reduced Uncertainty in Risk Assessment Found to Be Significant W/Respect to NUREG-1150.NUREG Also Does Not Consider Value of Operator Actions.Addl Comments Encl 1999-09-20
[Table view] Category:TRANSCRIPTS
MONTHYEARML20202J6321999-01-20020 January 1999 Transcript of 990120 Meeting in Peekskill,Ny Re Decommissioning.Pp 1-132.With Related Documentation ML20238F5271998-05-20020 May 1998 Partially Deleted Transcript of 980520 Enforcement Conference in King of Prussia,Pa Re J Stipek.Pp 1-46 IA-98-261, Partially Deleted Transcript of 980520 Enforcement Conference in King of Prussia,Pa Re J Stipek.Pp 1-461998-05-20020 May 1998 Partially Deleted Transcript of 980520 Enforcement Conference in King of Prussia,Pa Re J Stipek.Pp 1-46 ML20238F5241998-05-0606 May 1998 Transcript of 980506 Enforcement Conference Held in King of Prussia,Pa Re Con Edison,Indian Point.Pp 1-75 ML20006D3341990-02-0606 February 1990 Transcript of ACRS Subcommittee on Systematic Assessment of Experience 900206 Meeting in Bethesda,Md Re Proposed Power Level Increase for Plant.Pp 1-147.Supporting Info Encl ML20076H8011983-09-0101 September 1983 Table C-8 to Sc Sholly Testimony on Question 5,to Be Included as Page C-8 to App C ML20076J1551983-06-15015 June 1983 Corrections to Special Proceeding Transcripts ML20072A0791983-06-0808 June 1983 Testimony of J Holt,K Toscani & P Posner Before House of Representatives Subcommittee on Energy Conservation & Power Re Public Role in Planning,Testing & Implementing Emergency Response Procedures ML20023D7571983-05-26026 May 1983 Transcript of Commission 830526 Meeting in Washington,Dc, Re Emergency Planning & Preparedness.Pp 1-117.Supporting Documentation Encl ML20071L8821983-05-20020 May 1983 Testimony of RW Carlisle Re Potential Hazards of Nuclear accidents.Long-range Educ in Nuclear Radiation Should Be Implemented.Robots Should Be Developed to Dismantle Plant After Meltdown ML20071H1591983-05-20020 May 1983 Statement of Clergy,Religious & Laity Concerned About Indian Point.Common Citizens Reject Idea That Expertise Irrelevant. Value of Human Life Is Supreme Value ML20071H1841983-05-20020 May 1983 Testimony of AP Orourke Re Actions Taken to Improve Emergency Planning Since Commission 830505 Order.Unions Representing Bus Drivers Fully Support Orientation Course on Radiological Emergency Response Procedures ML20071H2311983-05-19019 May 1983 Statement of T Weiss Re Proposed Evacuation Plans.Plants Should Be Shut Down Permanently.Planning for Nuclear Accident Futile.Public Safety Should Be Top Priority ML20071H2221983-05-18018 May 1983 Statement to Be Incorporated in Minutes of Commission 830526 Public Hearing.State/Federal Govt Must Force Counties to Devise Evacuation Plans.Problems W/Emergency Plans Must Be Resolved Before 830609 ML20023B9681983-04-28028 April 1983 Testimony of La Cohen in Rebuttal to Testimony of D Gutman. Testimony to Be Included W/Aslb 830420 Transcript. Certificate of Svc Encl ML20204F3871983-04-26026 April 1983 Transcript of 830426 Hearing in White Plains,Ny.Pp 14,419-14,596.Supporting Documentation Encl ML20069L1211983-04-25025 April 1983 Testimony of Re Gendron Re 830309 Emergency Excercise Observation ML20073R3321983-04-19019 April 1983 Reorganized Testimony of Jr Thornborough & D Bohning Re Contention 6.2 Concerning Impact of Shutdown on Physical Environ Near Facility ML20073R3051983-04-19019 April 1983 Testimony of D Gutman Re Prevailing Wind Patterns ML20073R3261983-04-19019 April 1983 Testimony of RR Holt Re Sample Surveys & Bystander Behavior ML20073G3961983-04-12012 April 1983 Testimony of GL Fitzpatrick on Commission Question 6 Re Energy,Environ & Economic Impact of Shutdown of Units 2 &/Or 3.Certificate of Svc Encl.Related Correspondence ML20073H0341983-04-12012 April 1983 Testimony of Fc Dunbar Re Energy,Environ & Economic Consequences of Plant Shutdown.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20073G9921983-04-12012 April 1983 Testimony of CR Dean,Hm Hochman & Ph Rubin Re Energy,Environ & Economic Consequences of Plant Shutdown ML20073G3411983-04-12012 April 1983 Testimony of C Wang on Commission Question 6 Re Energy, Environ & Economic Impact of Shutdown of Units 2 &/Or 3. Related Correspondence ML20073G3111983-04-12012 April 1983 Testimony of Wj Wagers on Commission Question 6 Re Energy, Environ & Economic Impact of Shutdown of Units 2 &/Or 3. Related Correspondence ML20073G2391983-04-12012 April 1983 Testimony of RA Rosen on Commission Question 6.3 Re Economics of Closing Plants.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20073G3751983-04-12012 April 1983 Testimony of Pc Freudenthal on Commission Question 6 Re Energy,Environ & Economic Impact of Shutdown of Units 2 &/Or 3.Natural gas-fired & oil-fired Internal Combustion Engine Cogeneration Would Be Implemented.Related Correspondence ML20073H0081983-04-12012 April 1983 Testimony of Ma Conant Re Energy,Environ & Economic Consequences of Plant Shutdown.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20073G3631983-04-12012 April 1983 Testimony of Am Stewart on Commission Question 6 Re Energy, Environ & Economic Impact of Shutdown of Units 2 &/Or 3. Substantial Portion of Generator Capacity Would Be Lost to Natural gas-fired Cogeneration.Related Correspondence ML20073G9681983-04-12012 April 1983 Testimony of Wl Fleisher Re Economic Benefits of Plant Shutdown.Related Correspondence ML20073G3011983-04-12012 April 1983 Testimony of ET Meehan on Commission Question 6 Re Energy Environ & Economic Impact of Shutdown of Units 2 &/Or 3. Substantial Economic Penalty to State of Ny,Util & Util Svc Area Would Result.Related Correspondence ML20073H0041983-04-12012 April 1983 Testimony of Rh Bower Re 830309 Emergency Exercise ML20073G5491983-04-12012 April 1983 Testimony of Sh Streiter on Commission Question 6 Re Direct Costs of Closing Plants ML20073G8251983-04-11011 April 1983 Testimony of Mj Larkin Re Observations Made During 830309 Radiological Emergency Response Plan Exercise ML20073G6891983-04-11011 April 1983 Testimony of Wexler Re Observations Made During 830309 Radiological Emergency Response Plan Exercise ML20073G9491983-04-11011 April 1983 Testimony of Jm Parmelee Re Energy & Economic Consequences of Plant Shutdown ML20073G8011983-04-11011 April 1983 Testimony of C Northrup Re Observations Made During Nov 1982 Westchester County Nuclear Disaster Planning Training Session ML20073G7751983-04-11011 April 1983 Testimony of P Hochman Re Observations Made During 830309 Radiological Emergency Response Plan Exercise ML20073G6691983-04-11011 April 1983 Testimony of D Saltzman Re Observations Made During 830309 Radiological Emergency Response Plan Exercise ML20073G5631983-04-11011 April 1983 Testimony of N Mills Re 830309 Radiological Emergency Response Plan Exercise ML20073G7361983-04-11011 April 1983 Testimony of Bk Hickernell Re Observations Made During 830309 Radiological Emergency Response Plan Exercise ML20073G7161983-04-11011 April 1983 Testimony of W Conklin Re Observations Made During 830309 Radiological Emergency Response Plan Exercise ML20073H1591983-04-11011 April 1983 Testimony of K Toscani,K Feit & L Culpepper Re Observations Made During 830309 Radiological Emergency Response Plan Exercise ML20073H0251983-04-11011 April 1983 Testimony of N Powell Re 830309 Emergency Exercise ML20073G6231983-04-11011 April 1983 Testimony of M Waters Re 830309 Radiological Emergency Response Plan Exercise ML20073H1321983-04-11011 April 1983 Testimony of B Lang Re Observations Made During 830309 Radiological Emergency Response Plan Exercise ML20073H2111983-04-11011 April 1983 Testimony of ED Spilka Re Observations Made During 830309 Radiological Emergency Response Plan Exercise.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20073J2631983-04-11011 April 1983 Testimony of Dp McGuire Re 830309 Emergency Preparedness Exercise.Areas Discussed Include Public Info Ofc,Accident Assessment,Executive Decisionmaking,Operation Coordination & State Police Function.Affidavit of Svc Encl ML20073G5901983-04-11011 April 1983 Testimony of R Duffee Re Response of Peekskill Hosp to 830309 Emergency Evacuation Drill ML20073G8731983-04-11011 April 1983 Testimony of H Poritzky Re Observations Made During 830309 Radiological Emergency Response Plan Exercise 1999-01-20
[Table view] Category:DEPOSITIONS
MONTHYEARML20202J6321999-01-20020 January 1999 Transcript of 990120 Meeting in Peekskill,Ny Re Decommissioning.Pp 1-132.With Related Documentation ML20238F5271998-05-20020 May 1998 Partially Deleted Transcript of 980520 Enforcement Conference in King of Prussia,Pa Re J Stipek.Pp 1-46 IA-98-261, Partially Deleted Transcript of 980520 Enforcement Conference in King of Prussia,Pa Re J Stipek.Pp 1-461998-05-20020 May 1998 Partially Deleted Transcript of 980520 Enforcement Conference in King of Prussia,Pa Re J Stipek.Pp 1-46 ML20238F5241998-05-0606 May 1998 Transcript of 980506 Enforcement Conference Held in King of Prussia,Pa Re Con Edison,Indian Point.Pp 1-75 ML20006D3341990-02-0606 February 1990 Transcript of ACRS Subcommittee on Systematic Assessment of Experience 900206 Meeting in Bethesda,Md Re Proposed Power Level Increase for Plant.Pp 1-147.Supporting Info Encl ML20076H8011983-09-0101 September 1983 Table C-8 to Sc Sholly Testimony on Question 5,to Be Included as Page C-8 to App C ML20076J1551983-06-15015 June 1983 Corrections to Special Proceeding Transcripts ML20072A0791983-06-0808 June 1983 Testimony of J Holt,K Toscani & P Posner Before House of Representatives Subcommittee on Energy Conservation & Power Re Public Role in Planning,Testing & Implementing Emergency Response Procedures ML20023D7571983-05-26026 May 1983 Transcript of Commission 830526 Meeting in Washington,Dc, Re Emergency Planning & Preparedness.Pp 1-117.Supporting Documentation Encl ML20071L8821983-05-20020 May 1983 Testimony of RW Carlisle Re Potential Hazards of Nuclear accidents.Long-range Educ in Nuclear Radiation Should Be Implemented.Robots Should Be Developed to Dismantle Plant After Meltdown ML20071H1591983-05-20020 May 1983 Statement of Clergy,Religious & Laity Concerned About Indian Point.Common Citizens Reject Idea That Expertise Irrelevant. Value of Human Life Is Supreme Value ML20071H1841983-05-20020 May 1983 Testimony of AP Orourke Re Actions Taken to Improve Emergency Planning Since Commission 830505 Order.Unions Representing Bus Drivers Fully Support Orientation Course on Radiological Emergency Response Procedures ML20071H2311983-05-19019 May 1983 Statement of T Weiss Re Proposed Evacuation Plans.Plants Should Be Shut Down Permanently.Planning for Nuclear Accident Futile.Public Safety Should Be Top Priority ML20071H2221983-05-18018 May 1983 Statement to Be Incorporated in Minutes of Commission 830526 Public Hearing.State/Federal Govt Must Force Counties to Devise Evacuation Plans.Problems W/Emergency Plans Must Be Resolved Before 830609 ML20023B9681983-04-28028 April 1983 Testimony of La Cohen in Rebuttal to Testimony of D Gutman. Testimony to Be Included W/Aslb 830420 Transcript. Certificate of Svc Encl ML20204F3871983-04-26026 April 1983 Transcript of 830426 Hearing in White Plains,Ny.Pp 14,419-14,596.Supporting Documentation Encl ML20069L1211983-04-25025 April 1983 Testimony of Re Gendron Re 830309 Emergency Excercise Observation ML20073R3321983-04-19019 April 1983 Reorganized Testimony of Jr Thornborough & D Bohning Re Contention 6.2 Concerning Impact of Shutdown on Physical Environ Near Facility ML20073R3051983-04-19019 April 1983 Testimony of D Gutman Re Prevailing Wind Patterns ML20073R3261983-04-19019 April 1983 Testimony of RR Holt Re Sample Surveys & Bystander Behavior ML20073G3961983-04-12012 April 1983 Testimony of GL Fitzpatrick on Commission Question 6 Re Energy,Environ & Economic Impact of Shutdown of Units 2 &/Or 3.Certificate of Svc Encl.Related Correspondence ML20073H0341983-04-12012 April 1983 Testimony of Fc Dunbar Re Energy,Environ & Economic Consequences of Plant Shutdown.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20073G9921983-04-12012 April 1983 Testimony of CR Dean,Hm Hochman & Ph Rubin Re Energy,Environ & Economic Consequences of Plant Shutdown ML20073G3411983-04-12012 April 1983 Testimony of C Wang on Commission Question 6 Re Energy, Environ & Economic Impact of Shutdown of Units 2 &/Or 3. Related Correspondence ML20073G3111983-04-12012 April 1983 Testimony of Wj Wagers on Commission Question 6 Re Energy, Environ & Economic Impact of Shutdown of Units 2 &/Or 3. Related Correspondence ML20073G2391983-04-12012 April 1983 Testimony of RA Rosen on Commission Question 6.3 Re Economics of Closing Plants.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20073G3751983-04-12012 April 1983 Testimony of Pc Freudenthal on Commission Question 6 Re Energy,Environ & Economic Impact of Shutdown of Units 2 &/Or 3.Natural gas-fired & oil-fired Internal Combustion Engine Cogeneration Would Be Implemented.Related Correspondence ML20073H0081983-04-12012 April 1983 Testimony of Ma Conant Re Energy,Environ & Economic Consequences of Plant Shutdown.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20073G3631983-04-12012 April 1983 Testimony of Am Stewart on Commission Question 6 Re Energy, Environ & Economic Impact of Shutdown of Units 2 &/Or 3. Substantial Portion of Generator Capacity Would Be Lost to Natural gas-fired Cogeneration.Related Correspondence ML20073G9681983-04-12012 April 1983 Testimony of Wl Fleisher Re Economic Benefits of Plant Shutdown.Related Correspondence ML20073G3011983-04-12012 April 1983 Testimony of ET Meehan on Commission Question 6 Re Energy Environ & Economic Impact of Shutdown of Units 2 &/Or 3. Substantial Economic Penalty to State of Ny,Util & Util Svc Area Would Result.Related Correspondence ML20073H0041983-04-12012 April 1983 Testimony of Rh Bower Re 830309 Emergency Exercise ML20073G5491983-04-12012 April 1983 Testimony of Sh Streiter on Commission Question 6 Re Direct Costs of Closing Plants ML20073G8251983-04-11011 April 1983 Testimony of Mj Larkin Re Observations Made During 830309 Radiological Emergency Response Plan Exercise ML20073G6891983-04-11011 April 1983 Testimony of Wexler Re Observations Made During 830309 Radiological Emergency Response Plan Exercise ML20073G9491983-04-11011 April 1983 Testimony of Jm Parmelee Re Energy & Economic Consequences of Plant Shutdown ML20073G8011983-04-11011 April 1983 Testimony of C Northrup Re Observations Made During Nov 1982 Westchester County Nuclear Disaster Planning Training Session ML20073G7751983-04-11011 April 1983 Testimony of P Hochman Re Observations Made During 830309 Radiological Emergency Response Plan Exercise ML20073G6691983-04-11011 April 1983 Testimony of D Saltzman Re Observations Made During 830309 Radiological Emergency Response Plan Exercise ML20073G5631983-04-11011 April 1983 Testimony of N Mills Re 830309 Radiological Emergency Response Plan Exercise ML20073G7361983-04-11011 April 1983 Testimony of Bk Hickernell Re Observations Made During 830309 Radiological Emergency Response Plan Exercise ML20073G7161983-04-11011 April 1983 Testimony of W Conklin Re Observations Made During 830309 Radiological Emergency Response Plan Exercise ML20073H1591983-04-11011 April 1983 Testimony of K Toscani,K Feit & L Culpepper Re Observations Made During 830309 Radiological Emergency Response Plan Exercise ML20073H0251983-04-11011 April 1983 Testimony of N Powell Re 830309 Emergency Exercise ML20073G6231983-04-11011 April 1983 Testimony of M Waters Re 830309 Radiological Emergency Response Plan Exercise ML20073H1321983-04-11011 April 1983 Testimony of B Lang Re Observations Made During 830309 Radiological Emergency Response Plan Exercise ML20073H2111983-04-11011 April 1983 Testimony of ED Spilka Re Observations Made During 830309 Radiological Emergency Response Plan Exercise.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20073J2631983-04-11011 April 1983 Testimony of Dp McGuire Re 830309 Emergency Preparedness Exercise.Areas Discussed Include Public Info Ofc,Accident Assessment,Executive Decisionmaking,Operation Coordination & State Police Function.Affidavit of Svc Encl ML20073G5901983-04-11011 April 1983 Testimony of R Duffee Re Response of Peekskill Hosp to 830309 Emergency Evacuation Drill ML20073G8731983-04-11011 April 1983 Testimony of H Poritzky Re Observations Made During 830309 Radiological Emergency Response Plan Exercise 1999-01-20
[Table view] Category:NARRATIVE TESTIMONY
MONTHYEARML20202J6321999-01-20020 January 1999 Transcript of 990120 Meeting in Peekskill,Ny Re Decommissioning.Pp 1-132.With Related Documentation ML20238F5271998-05-20020 May 1998 Partially Deleted Transcript of 980520 Enforcement Conference in King of Prussia,Pa Re J Stipek.Pp 1-46 IA-98-261, Partially Deleted Transcript of 980520 Enforcement Conference in King of Prussia,Pa Re J Stipek.Pp 1-461998-05-20020 May 1998 Partially Deleted Transcript of 980520 Enforcement Conference in King of Prussia,Pa Re J Stipek.Pp 1-46 ML20238F5241998-05-0606 May 1998 Transcript of 980506 Enforcement Conference Held in King of Prussia,Pa Re Con Edison,Indian Point.Pp 1-75 ML20006D3341990-02-0606 February 1990 Transcript of ACRS Subcommittee on Systematic Assessment of Experience 900206 Meeting in Bethesda,Md Re Proposed Power Level Increase for Plant.Pp 1-147.Supporting Info Encl ML20076H8011983-09-0101 September 1983 Table C-8 to Sc Sholly Testimony on Question 5,to Be Included as Page C-8 to App C ML20076J1551983-06-15015 June 1983 Corrections to Special Proceeding Transcripts ML20072A0791983-06-0808 June 1983 Testimony of J Holt,K Toscani & P Posner Before House of Representatives Subcommittee on Energy Conservation & Power Re Public Role in Planning,Testing & Implementing Emergency Response Procedures ML20023D7571983-05-26026 May 1983 Transcript of Commission 830526 Meeting in Washington,Dc, Re Emergency Planning & Preparedness.Pp 1-117.Supporting Documentation Encl ML20071L8821983-05-20020 May 1983 Testimony of RW Carlisle Re Potential Hazards of Nuclear accidents.Long-range Educ in Nuclear Radiation Should Be Implemented.Robots Should Be Developed to Dismantle Plant After Meltdown ML20071H1591983-05-20020 May 1983 Statement of Clergy,Religious & Laity Concerned About Indian Point.Common Citizens Reject Idea That Expertise Irrelevant. Value of Human Life Is Supreme Value ML20071H1841983-05-20020 May 1983 Testimony of AP Orourke Re Actions Taken to Improve Emergency Planning Since Commission 830505 Order.Unions Representing Bus Drivers Fully Support Orientation Course on Radiological Emergency Response Procedures ML20071H2311983-05-19019 May 1983 Statement of T Weiss Re Proposed Evacuation Plans.Plants Should Be Shut Down Permanently.Planning for Nuclear Accident Futile.Public Safety Should Be Top Priority ML20071H2221983-05-18018 May 1983 Statement to Be Incorporated in Minutes of Commission 830526 Public Hearing.State/Federal Govt Must Force Counties to Devise Evacuation Plans.Problems W/Emergency Plans Must Be Resolved Before 830609 ML20023B9681983-04-28028 April 1983 Testimony of La Cohen in Rebuttal to Testimony of D Gutman. Testimony to Be Included W/Aslb 830420 Transcript. Certificate of Svc Encl ML20204F3871983-04-26026 April 1983 Transcript of 830426 Hearing in White Plains,Ny.Pp 14,419-14,596.Supporting Documentation Encl ML20069L1211983-04-25025 April 1983 Testimony of Re Gendron Re 830309 Emergency Excercise Observation ML20073R3321983-04-19019 April 1983 Reorganized Testimony of Jr Thornborough & D Bohning Re Contention 6.2 Concerning Impact of Shutdown on Physical Environ Near Facility ML20073R3051983-04-19019 April 1983 Testimony of D Gutman Re Prevailing Wind Patterns ML20073R3261983-04-19019 April 1983 Testimony of RR Holt Re Sample Surveys & Bystander Behavior ML20073G3961983-04-12012 April 1983 Testimony of GL Fitzpatrick on Commission Question 6 Re Energy,Environ & Economic Impact of Shutdown of Units 2 &/Or 3.Certificate of Svc Encl.Related Correspondence ML20073H0341983-04-12012 April 1983 Testimony of Fc Dunbar Re Energy,Environ & Economic Consequences of Plant Shutdown.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20073G9921983-04-12012 April 1983 Testimony of CR Dean,Hm Hochman & Ph Rubin Re Energy,Environ & Economic Consequences of Plant Shutdown ML20073G3411983-04-12012 April 1983 Testimony of C Wang on Commission Question 6 Re Energy, Environ & Economic Impact of Shutdown of Units 2 &/Or 3. Related Correspondence ML20073G3111983-04-12012 April 1983 Testimony of Wj Wagers on Commission Question 6 Re Energy, Environ & Economic Impact of Shutdown of Units 2 &/Or 3. Related Correspondence ML20073G2391983-04-12012 April 1983 Testimony of RA Rosen on Commission Question 6.3 Re Economics of Closing Plants.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20073G3751983-04-12012 April 1983 Testimony of Pc Freudenthal on Commission Question 6 Re Energy,Environ & Economic Impact of Shutdown of Units 2 &/Or 3.Natural gas-fired & oil-fired Internal Combustion Engine Cogeneration Would Be Implemented.Related Correspondence ML20073H0081983-04-12012 April 1983 Testimony of Ma Conant Re Energy,Environ & Economic Consequences of Plant Shutdown.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20073G3631983-04-12012 April 1983 Testimony of Am Stewart on Commission Question 6 Re Energy, Environ & Economic Impact of Shutdown of Units 2 &/Or 3. Substantial Portion of Generator Capacity Would Be Lost to Natural gas-fired Cogeneration.Related Correspondence ML20073G9681983-04-12012 April 1983 Testimony of Wl Fleisher Re Economic Benefits of Plant Shutdown.Related Correspondence ML20073G3011983-04-12012 April 1983 Testimony of ET Meehan on Commission Question 6 Re Energy Environ & Economic Impact of Shutdown of Units 2 &/Or 3. Substantial Economic Penalty to State of Ny,Util & Util Svc Area Would Result.Related Correspondence ML20073H0041983-04-12012 April 1983 Testimony of Rh Bower Re 830309 Emergency Exercise ML20073G5491983-04-12012 April 1983 Testimony of Sh Streiter on Commission Question 6 Re Direct Costs of Closing Plants ML20073G8251983-04-11011 April 1983 Testimony of Mj Larkin Re Observations Made During 830309 Radiological Emergency Response Plan Exercise ML20073G6891983-04-11011 April 1983 Testimony of Wexler Re Observations Made During 830309 Radiological Emergency Response Plan Exercise ML20073G9491983-04-11011 April 1983 Testimony of Jm Parmelee Re Energy & Economic Consequences of Plant Shutdown ML20073G8011983-04-11011 April 1983 Testimony of C Northrup Re Observations Made During Nov 1982 Westchester County Nuclear Disaster Planning Training Session ML20073G7751983-04-11011 April 1983 Testimony of P Hochman Re Observations Made During 830309 Radiological Emergency Response Plan Exercise ML20073G6691983-04-11011 April 1983 Testimony of D Saltzman Re Observations Made During 830309 Radiological Emergency Response Plan Exercise ML20073G5631983-04-11011 April 1983 Testimony of N Mills Re 830309 Radiological Emergency Response Plan Exercise ML20073G7361983-04-11011 April 1983 Testimony of Bk Hickernell Re Observations Made During 830309 Radiological Emergency Response Plan Exercise ML20073G7161983-04-11011 April 1983 Testimony of W Conklin Re Observations Made During 830309 Radiological Emergency Response Plan Exercise ML20073H1591983-04-11011 April 1983 Testimony of K Toscani,K Feit & L Culpepper Re Observations Made During 830309 Radiological Emergency Response Plan Exercise ML20073H0251983-04-11011 April 1983 Testimony of N Powell Re 830309 Emergency Exercise ML20073G6231983-04-11011 April 1983 Testimony of M Waters Re 830309 Radiological Emergency Response Plan Exercise ML20073H1321983-04-11011 April 1983 Testimony of B Lang Re Observations Made During 830309 Radiological Emergency Response Plan Exercise ML20073H2111983-04-11011 April 1983 Testimony of ED Spilka Re Observations Made During 830309 Radiological Emergency Response Plan Exercise.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20073J2631983-04-11011 April 1983 Testimony of Dp McGuire Re 830309 Emergency Preparedness Exercise.Areas Discussed Include Public Info Ofc,Accident Assessment,Executive Decisionmaking,Operation Coordination & State Police Function.Affidavit of Svc Encl ML20073G5901983-04-11011 April 1983 Testimony of R Duffee Re Response of Peekskill Hosp to 830309 Emergency Evacuation Drill ML20073G8731983-04-11011 April 1983 Testimony of H Poritzky Re Observations Made During 830309 Radiological Emergency Response Plan Exercise 1999-01-20
[Table view] |
Text
,.g BEMTpD CORRESPONDENCB UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 00g*EE3 NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION c
L ATOMIC SAFETY AND LICENSING BOARD
$3 gg,I A10:15 Before Administrative Judges:
James P. Gleason, Chairman Dr. Oscar H. Paris Frederick J. Shon.
i%
_a-
~ ~ &Q"$$NN In the-Matter of Docket No. 50-247-SP 50-286-SP CONSOLIDATED EDISON COMPANY
)
OF NEW YORK
-)
)
-(Indian Point, Unit No. 2)
)
)
POWER AUTHORITY OF THE STATE
)-
I OF NEW YORK
)
)
(Indian Point, Unit No. 3)
)
i l
SUPPLEMENTARY TESTIMONY ROCKLAND COUNTY l
NAME:
h DONALD P.McGUIRE i
Q. State'your name and position with the County.of Rockland.
A. My name is Donald P. McGuire.
I am Deputy Director of.the Office of Emergency Services for Rockland.
Q. Have you reviewed ~your testimony as previously submitted t'o the Atomic Safety and Licensing Board.
A. Yes, I have.
Q. Since the submission of your direct testimony, and your cross-examination during July.of 1982, have any facts arisen of which you wish to advise the Board now.
A. Yes.
At the time of my prior testimony, Rockland County, by Resolution-No. 320 of 1982 had disavowed the Radiological Emergency Response Plan prepared for Rockland County by Consolidated Edison and the Power Authority of~the State of New York, and directed the Office of Emergency Services to' develop a radiological response plan for Rockland County.
On passage of the County resolution to order the Office of' Emergency Services to develop the radiological response plan, it became quite apparent that this was almost an insurmountable task to have performed by December 31, 1982, which was the mandate.
Subsequent to the passage of the May 18th legislation which disavowed the plan prepared by Con Edison and PASNY and the contracts that they had let to provide the plan for the four counties, Rockland County established through Resolution 473 in July, 1982, which established a Citizens Advisory Committee to review Rockland County's nuclear evacuation and preparedness plan and general disaster preparedness plan.
This was perhaps the 8303020096 830222 PDR ADOCK 05006247 t -
T PDR
y l
I first otep in our davalopmsnt of tha plan.
The Offica of Emergancy Services took into consideration that there are a great number of emergencies that arise that must'have the same response or a very similar response as a radiological emergency.
EXAMPLE: a major flood, a major train derailment in or near the Village of Haverstraw, which could encompass a great number of people.
A transportation 1
accident also could be included as an example, whereas the releasing j
of gas or hazardous material would require an evacuation process of I
a good deal of people.
Trying to take into account all the factions of development of a plan where they would be similar, the generic portion of the plan which could be used for implementation of any 1
type of disaster or an emergency implementation was one of our first i
considerations.
We took a look at all the agencies in the County that would have to provide services to people who would be affected by any such disaster, and surmized that most of these agencies would be providing the same service during a radiological emergency as during come other type of major disaster that could possibly happen in the County.
With those thoughts in mind, we went ahead and developed our generic portion of the plan, and the response activities that would surround those actions that would have to be taken, t
During this time, the Citizens Advisory Committee was in the process of being, organized.
This whole process appeared to have taken approximately three-months from inception until the actual first meeting.
At the first meeting of the Citizens Advisory Committee, Mrs. Judith Kessler was appointed Chairman, and Donald Hastings, the Director of Office of Emergency Services was appointed Vice Chairman. Once organized, the. committee basically broke up into sub-committees, addressing the primary concerns of the total. Committee, I was given the responsibility as a resource person and coordinator to meet with the different sub-committees, obtaining information or taking information they were gathering and incorporating it into the j
plan as we could see necessary.
Many of the items discussed did not J
have any validity and we did not incorporate them into our final draft that was presented by the 31st o'f December.
In those areas where we felt i
there was a valid suggestion made, we tried to weigh the suggestion l
as to how it would work or how it would not work based on previous knowledge and on previous experience with this plan.
The Office of Emergency Services was very cognizant of the fact that Rockland County did not have major highways criss-crossing the County and tried to take into consideration a proposal whereas we would utilize the Palisades Interstate Parkway and the New York State Thruway with the Garden State Parkway in New Jersey to work our l
evacuation portion of the plan.
t I
We took the suggestions that had been made, discussed them with traffic people, primarily.the State Police traffic people out of Troop F in Middletown, some of our local police agencies and State DOT as to the feasibility of that particular portion of the plan.
Currently, those suggestions are still in the process of review. Nothing has been formally accepted and as of this date.
One important aspect of the whole process was that we were finding that since we had been removed from the 4 county process, we were meeting with some minor problems in dealing with getting information from organizations that had been involved with the original process and the original plan and this means
~
that the Power Authority and Con Edison and we had been left out of some of the training programs that were currently being conducted in the review of the 120 day process of the NRC.
^ :,
'The Office of Emergency Services personnel attended two or.three of these sessions and it appeared that we were being criticized by some.of the citizens in Rockland County _because were were looked upon as being participants, although in each case, we stated that we were only there as observers.and went back to the County Legisla-ture and asked that two resolved clauses in the original legislation passed on May 18th'be changed.. These two-resolved clauses that pro-hibited us from seeking or prohibiting us from taking part in any of this process that;we felt we should be a part of was amended with resolution passed on~ December 7, 1982 3y-the county Legislature, changing those two resolved clauses that were mentioned just pre-viously. _After the passage of those two resolved clauses, it appeared that,: and we have to remember that this did not happen until December, we had a mandate to reach by the 31st of December to submit a plan.With a great deal of assistance from a person con-tracted by the State of New York, we were able to get much of the information out together and submitted to the Legislature by our i
deadline of December 31st.
There has been much activity. surrounding this response plan by the r
Citizens Advisory Committee. In review, although no formal conclusion or adoption of the plan has come forward'as of this time, we still feel tnat there is a-lot of progress being made.
Since May,J1982, there'has been continuous training being accomplished in regard to police agencies, although to say_that all police departments have been' represented is not a true statement.
We have been able to I
reach a good deal of police ~ officer's in at_least presenting some l
information on radiological incidents.
We anticipate that.since the income'of monies from the State of New York to the County has been processed, we are attempting to get the training accomplished to meet our mandates in those lines with ambulance corps, fire departments of the County, the entire County, and police departments in the entire Count training programs. y.
There presently is the need for County As with any other process, it is a lengthly processing in doing training, making sure thtt we get in contact with all these people, setting up training sessions, etc., and'the State Office of Disaster Preparedness has been very helpful in vist of the f act that we do -
not have a radiological officer on board at this time in the County to provide us with the assistance in the training areas that we have felt we require.
It is certain a valid point that I think should be made that the position that Rockland County took in May certainly was of a beneficial nature not only to the Office of Emergency Services in Rockland County, but to the various other counties considering that we set a precedent in this County by not accepting something that had been processed as the plan that we should go with.
In review of this, it has given us the opportunity to be able to draw up this plan, and really take a close look at what we had to deal with..
y
At tho prosent tims, wa, manning ths Office of Emergency Servicas, would have to say that we-are probably much better equipped, much better able to respond to any type of an emergency that we were at this time a year ago.
The awareness of any type of an emergency that'would threaten the lives and safety of the people of Rockland County certainly has been brought to light in view of all the. controversy surrounding Indian Point, and we must place emphasis that these emergencies.can develop in this County many times without any warning, any notice of whether it was with the radiological incident or whether it was with another serious type of accident or with a natural disaster.
In regard to the implementation of the draft of our plan, it is very difficult at this particular time to comment, inasmuch as there are many aspects that have not been fulfilled.
The training requirements are not complete and will be an ongoing process.
We have received equipment we thought we needed, and more equipment is on order.
But as far as the total amount of equipment which may be required to implement this plan, it appears at this time that we have to rely on other resources.
We have to have agreements with our police and fire agencies within the County, ambulance agencies operating within the County, plust letters of agreement with Bergen County to supplement us on many aspects of the plan.
One particular aspect in Bergen County's-relationship is that we have taken steps to meet with them. They have taken steps to proceed along the lines of providing a congregate care shelter for our people as required.
They have been put on our notification list for emergencies, so that they are made aware of an incident at the same time or within reasonable time of our own County notification.
One of the aspects of the testimony presented in July last year was in.the communication field.
We have taken the steps to try to correct some of the gaps that exist in the communi-cation lines.
We understand and fully recognize that this is not the ultimate, and our approach to completely meet all the require-ments that have been suggested and/or are to be put into place.
I previously stated that we did receive some money from the State of New York for various items.
It did take what seemed to us an unreasonable amount of time from which process of the State passing the money that had been collected from the utilities was funneled down to Rockland County, and it'did create a difficult position for the County.
We could not go out and start the process of acquiring any of the equipment we thought we needed until we were reasonably assured that the money was in hand.
Once that money was processed through our County, we took steps to acquire some of the equipment.
Rockland County has, t'o date, received approximately
$88,000, and has been promised an additional $30,000 for additional staff for assistance in development of our plan.
At this point, the process continues in respect to training and acquisition of equipment and in respect to planned development, I would not venture to' guess at which time this plan would be ready for formal acceptance due to the process that has to go through with the Citizens Advisory Committee from the Office of Emergency Service's aspect of reviewing the plan.
It is very difficult at this time to ascertain what will be the final direction recommended by the Citizens Advisory Committee.
At the time of an appearance before the hearing, additional testimony will be discussed..
...,