ML20040C639

Forwards Environ Qualification Rept for Class IE Equipment for Shoreham Nuclear Power Station-Unit 1 Re SER Outstanding Issue 9.Requests NRC Audit in Feb 1982

ML20040C639
Person / Time
Site:	Shoreham File:Long Island Lighting Company icon.png
Issue date:	01/25/1982
From:	James Smith LONG ISLAND LIGHTING CO.
To:	Harold Denton Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
Shared Package
ML20040C640	List: ML20040C639 ML20040C645
References
IEB-79-01B, IEB-79-1B, SNRC-663, NUDOCS 8201290110
Download: ML20040C639 (3)

Text

1 s .

. o , .

LONG ISLAND LIGHTING COM PANY FAC'O SHOREHAM NUCLEAR POWER STATION

. , P.O. BOX 618, NORTH COUNTRY ROAD + WADING RIVER, N.Y.11792 January 25, 1982 SNRC-663 l*: 3 ~l1982 E a Mr. Harold R. Denton, Director Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulati g%enk.,, $j3 //

)

'fQ t s

Q

\\

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission M' /

Washington, DC 20555 g q- -q Fl m' Equipment Environmental 7 1 cation , ,,

r SER Outstanding Issue No. 9 g{_! 7 ,,.,,, ". ,,g,'d g Shoreham Nuclear Power Station - Unit 1 \. ' h a: -',trJ u f Docket No. 50-322 Y, N G

Dear Mr. Denton:

Enclosed are forty copies of the documents entitled " Environmental Qualification Report for Class lE Equipment for Shoreham Nuclear Power Station - Unit 1", Revision 1, dated January 15, 1982. This submittal is a revision to our previous submittal on the same subject, transmitted by LILCO letter SNRC-576 dated May 27, 1981, and supersedes that earlier submittal.

The significant dif ferences between the earlier submittal and this one include the following:

1) Re-organized format for the purpose of editorial aesthetics;

2) Expanded discussions on:

primary containment sprays aging considerations surveillance and preventive maintenance quality assurance;

3) Update of the Equipment Qualification Status Report (in Appendix F) and the Squipment Qualification Summary Sheets (in Appendix B);

4) Addition of Appendix G which provides qualification summaries and justifications for interim operation for equipment identified as having incomplete environ-mental qualification documentation.

8201290110 820125 l P

PDR ADOCK 05000322 1 E PDR fl ) Q F C-893 5

January 25, 1982 SNRC-663 Page 2 As in the earlier submittal the qualification requirements are given in the Equipment Qualification Status Report (in Appendix F), while the qualification results are given in the Equipment Qualification Summary Sheets (in Appendix 3).

The computerized Equipment Qualification Status Report (EOSR) in Appendix F provides the current qualification status of individual equipment items. A summary of status is given in the table attached to this letter. This status determination indicates that approximately 79% of the equipment in this program has been evaluated.

l Due to the advanced stage of completion of the evaluation program, and the detailed description of the program provided herewith and in the earlier submittal, we believe that our equipment and documen-tation are ready for NRC staff audit. We request that the audit be held in February, 1982. We look forward to your early and favorable reply to this request.

Very truly yours, h I' b' J. L. Smith Manager, Special Projects Shoreham Nuclear Power Station JPE:mp ,

Attachment / Enclosure cc: J. Higgins

.-.- ~ , . . . . . . . - - - .

ATTACHMENT '

ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REPORT

SUMMARY

January-25, 1982 f-BOP'& NSSS BOP NSSS CURRENT STATUS Quantity  % ' Quantity  % Quantiity  %

377 3 8 .~ 8 50.8 37 12,3

• EQ- Equipment qualified 340

• QG- Equipment qualified, except for aging 2 .2 0 0 2 .7

• TA- 31 '3.2 23 3.4 8 Testing or analysis program initiated 2.6

• FT- Further testing or analysis recommended 36 3.7 4 .6 32 10.6

-* MR- Modification recommended 13 1.3 13 1.9 0 0-

• RR- Replacement recommended 124 78 11d7 46 12.8 15.2-

• DR- 159 16.4 94 14.1 21.5' EQ documentation in review 65

, IJ- Completion of documentation not expected ,

prior to fuel load; justification 226 23.3 116 17.3 ,110 36. 4 for interim operation provided Undetermined '3 .3 1 1 '2 .7 Total 971.0 100. 669 100, 302 100' i

• Equipment evaluated 776.0 79.9 571 85.4- 205

.