PM-90-110, Forwards fitness-for-duty Program Performance Data for Jan-June 1990,per 10CFR26.71(d)

Forwards fitness-for-duty Program Performance Data for Jan-June 1990,per 10CFR26.71(d)

ML20058P271
Person / Time
Site:	Shoreham File:Long Island Lighting Company icon.png
Issue date:	08/13/1990
From:	Calone L LONG ISLAND LIGHTING CO.
To:	NRC OFFICE OF INFORMATION RESOURCES MANAGEMENT (IRM), Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
PM-90-110, NUDOCS 9008160170
Download: ML20058P271 (5)

Text

. . --. .

s

e. * ,

[gg LONG ISLAND LIGHTING-COMPANY sm.wenwa.a.m-rd SHOR6H AM NUCLE AR POWE R ST ATION

• P.O. BOX G28

• WADING RIVE R NEW YORK 11792 -

TE L. (616) 929 8300 i

i

)

I PM 90-110 I August 13, 1990  !

U.S. Nuclear. Regulatory Commission 5 Document Control Deak i

Washington, D.C. 205S5 Attnt- Office of NRR Division of Reactor Inspection and Safeguards Dear Siri In--accordance with 100FR26.71(d), enclosed is the.Shoreham  !

Nuclear Power Station's Fitness-for-Duty program performance .

'r data for the reporting period of January -~ June 1990.

Si erely, f f 0 '

Q4 Leonard Cdlone J. f Plant Manager j RP amo .

l Enclosure l ,

cci Thomas T. Martin, Regional Administrator ,

r g

L \

h>

l ^008160170 900813 p i ,

PDR ADOCK 05M0322 gi' R PDC \

FC 8687.2

i ' l Fitness for Duty Program Perf:rmance D:ta Personnel Subject to 10CFR 26 '

t l Iono Island Lichting o'roany June 30,1990 .

company 4 Wores Enong Shoreham Nuclear Ptwer Station, P.O. Box 628, Wading River, N.Y. 11792 Locs:en neorae D. Schnaars (516) 929-8300 Ext. 3263 cenac Name PhoneDntAdewee8086 Cutoff s: Screen / Confirmation (ng/mt) 3 Appendix A to 10CFR 26 Marijuana / Amphetamines / /

Cocaine / Phencyclidine / /  ;

Oointes / Alcoho!(% BAC) /' ,

Long Term Short Term Testing Results Contractor Contractor Licensee Employees Personnel Personnel Average Number with '

Unescorted Access *

'lG ; ,

4:1'"

500 g y N/A 250

1. # Referred Access # # # #

Categories Tested Positive to EAP Restored Tested Positive Tested Positive

-- wo _ >.y Pre employment ddfp, % JS N/A N/A SMv ' - F<M N/A N/A N/A N/A Pre badging **

61

@@ J e

'"b'N WO A l O N/A > N/A 102 1  !

4 < ,

l Perio$c 4+7 H ' .e , ' .

n 0 m -

N/A N/A 0 0 m:;, . s .m; ~

Forcause N 0 0 nb M< '

. "4 m N/A N/A 0 0 usa m.. m Post accident w gg;J jp' m Ws %*

0 0 N/A N/A -0 0 i Random I< a:TO a I 306' 1 F", W- k N/A N/A 109 1 3 sm , , a  ;

Follow up 7- -

eo" 2 0 W 'r,)' '^

M N/A N/A 0 0  !

Other ' Mii:' l '^'

0 0 > ,

N/A N/A 0 0 l

Total 369 1 1 0 N/A N/A 211 2 .

• The total randm sample population, including persons assigned to the E0P/ISC, is 800. i

• • Pre-badging numbers also include pre-sployment tests. -

t

Random Testing Program Results . e Individuals TGsted 1989 1990 1991 1M2 m3 -

1. Positive 2 ~

1. Tested

% Positive

, 4g >

Graph of 5

% Positive 4

3 2 _ _.

1 Confirmed Positive Tests for Specific Substances Maripana n

Cocaine y

Opiates O

Amphefarnines O

Phencycrv5ne O

Alcohol 2

e a y- --% . p -.-w - y- -r- w 9 5g-- p s --- s ,, ,,_ww--

9- 4

4

SUMMARY

OF MANAGEMENT ACTIONS' l.. Initiatives taken

a. Prior to_the effective'date of the Fitness-for-Duty (FFD) program, LILCO's proposed program was audited against the' requirements of.10vFR26. This program was reviewed again after being in place for-6 months.

b. The annual audit required by 10CFR26.80 was formally incorporated into the LILCO QA Manual ~and added to the

-1990 Nuclear Quality Assurance Department Audit Schedule.

c. Initial Fitness-for-Duty training was,provided to all applicable persons and incorporated into General Employee Training. Annual requalification training was also developed. Additionally; personnel received a separate briefing on the Employee Assistance Program.

2. Effectiveness Evaluation Based on the low number of positive test results;.LILCO's Fitness-for-Duty program has been effective in meeting its ob.iective of " maintaining a safe work environment by ensuring a drug and. alcohol free work force".. LILCO has also been submitting more blind performance test specimens than required in order to maintain a high level of confidence in the accuracy of the laboratory's test results.

3. Data Analysis and Actions

a. The low number of positive test results indicate that drug and/or alcohol abuse is not a-problem at Shoreham.'

Actions taken for the positive. test results were

1) terminating the two contractor persons, 2) removing the licensee employee from unrestricted access, referring this person to the EAP, and implementing a follo't-up drug testing program for this individual. The lattar action was taken even though.

this was the first positive test for this individual.

m r

(

< ..._ ..; \ ,

+

~

?< .:.. .;, ,

s .

N - : . -

One program wea'kness was:-diw., overed _during,this.

b' . '

reporting period.. The-Shoreham Fitness-for-Duty:

f. '

. . Alcohol-and Drug Screening: Procedure did'not require alcohol testing during' pre-access screening. . Actions-taken=intthisacatie were:- -1)' persons who"did not receive.the alcohol. screening were-: identified and.. _ -

either-had the scraening performed or else ha_d?their-badges pulled,r2) Emergency Planning verified that'no *

-unbadged personnel-ha'd been added:to_the. EOF /TSCs on-call lists,33).<the. internal checklists used by s , ,

Emergency Planning and.ScreeningLand' Badging were' 3' revised to ensure that'the" requirement for; alcohol. -

testing during_ pre-access screening was'mett and14)1 ai ,

revision.to the Shoreham Fitness-for-Duty? Alcohol an'd j '4 "

Drug ~ Screening, procedure was initiated.-~

. c ,

e

4. , List.of events reported ,

.s ,

Nol events were reported during this'reportin'g? period.'

- - 4. ,.

Eg . d I

1 g }

- ' " , m .

5 E 4 8

. i

.) t -. ,

s i

-(' t ,e4 ' _

t 3 Y 4

s

- 4 g, h c

4 3  ; h I.. ( y g

w

~ ,

z+

m . y

. , u u '

rpf n a. ci V 2 f -

h ., 4

'h

.- )]

, - - _j

, 4

< .i

. . , . . . . . , . . , ,, E