ML20023B357
| ML20023B357 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Beaver Valley |
| Issue date: | 04/15/1983 |
| From: | Woolever E DUQUESNE LIGHT CO. |
| To: | Eisenhut D Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| References | |
| RTR-NUREG-0737, RTR-NUREG-737 2NRC-3-017, 2NRC-3-17, GL-82-33, NUDOCS 8304190547 | |
| Download: ML20023B357 (14) | |
Text
.
} Vg, "F f 2NRC-3-017 A
(412)787-5141 Telecopy Nuclear Construction Division April 15, 1983 Robinson Plaza, Building 2 Suite 21o Pittsburgh, PA 15205 United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555 ATTENTION:
Mr. Darrell G. Eisenhut, Director Division of Licensing
SUBJECT:
Beaver Valley Power Station - Unit No. 2 Docket No. 50-412 Generic Letter 82-33 Supplement I to NUREG 0737 Requirements for Emergency Response Capability Gentlemen:
The attached report is the Beaver Valley Power Station Unit No. 2 (BVPS-2) response to your letter titled " Supplement I to NUREG 0737 Requirements for Emergency Response Capability" (Generic Letter 82-33) dated December 17, 1982.
This report addresses each of the items outlined in your letter and provides the information required regarding the response to the various requirements of Supplement I to NUREG 0737.
The proposed
" Summary Network Schedule" (Fig. 2-1) for implementation and integration has been developed following the guidelines contained in Generic Letter 82-33 and the NRC Region I guidance provided at the NRC Region 1 meeting to discuss Generic Letter 82-33 held February 21, 1983.
1 It is recognized that as stated in Generic letter 82-33 the provi-sions for scheduling supercede any previous NUREG 0737 schedules pertaining to these items.
BVPS-2 is currently under construction and the dates for the activities listed in the report affect the construction schedule. The NRC has provided the durations of its various review activities, and these reviews have also been accounted for in the construction schedule.
They are explicitly shown in each activity description.
The Duquesne Light Company welcomes this opportunity to work with the NRC in establishing realistic plant-specific schedules.
As indicated in your letter, implementing generic deadlines does not permit a utility to make the most efficient use of its staff when trying to integrate many related tasks.
This approach by the NRC is viewed as a step in the right 83o4190547 83o415 O
l paaAnocnosoog
Unitsd Stcteo Nuclect R73ulctory Connicsica Mr Darral G. Eissnhut, Dirsctor page 2 direction to permit both the NRC and the electric utility industry to maximize their resources, be responsive to the issue of emergency response capability and improve our ability to work together and get the job done.
DUQUESNE LIGHT COMPANY By E. Q. Woolever Vice President SDH/wjs Attachment Ms. L. Lazo, Project Manager (w/ attachment) cc:
Mr. G. Walton, Resident Inspector COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA )
)
SS:
COUNTY OF ALLEGHENY
)
On this
/M day of
/f [3, before me, a Notary Public in and for said Commonwe alth and County, personally appeared E. J.
Woolever, who being duly sworn, deposed ar.d said that (1) he is Vice President of Duquesne Light, (2) he is duly authorized to exe-cute and file the foregoing Submittal on behalf of said Company, and (3) the statements set forth in the Submittal are true and correct to the best of his knowledge.
Notary Public ANITA ELAINE RE!TER, NOTARY PUBLIC ROBINSON TOWNSHIP, ALLEGHENY COUNTY MY COMMIS510N EXPIRES OCTOBER 20,1985 l
e e
a a
c, RESPONSE TO E NERIC I2 TIER 82-33 ERC SUERETTAL l
Beaver Valley Power Station - Unit No. 2 l
Duquesne Light Company April 15, 1983
1 i
TABLE OF CDETENTS l
gection Title Page 1
INT RODU CTION............................................... 1-1 2
DESCRIPTIONS AND SCHEDULES................................. 2-1 2.1 Safety Paraseter Dis picy Sys tem............................ 2-1 2.1.1 Schedule and Current St atus................................ 2-1 2.1.2 NRC Rev i ew................................................. 2-1 2.1.3 Integration with Other Activities.......................... 2-1 2.2 Detailed Control Room Design Review........................ 2-2 2.2.1 Schedule and Current Status................................ 2-2 2.2.2 NRC Rev i ew................................................. 2 -2 2.2.3 Integration with Other Activites........................... 2-2 2.3 Regulatory Guide 1.97 Instrumentation...................... 2-2 2.3.1 Schedule and Current St atus............................... 2-2 2.3.1 NRC Rev i ew................................................. 2-2 2.3.3 Integration with Other Activites........................... 2-3 1.4 Emergency Operating Procedures Upgrade..................... 2-3 l
2.4.1 Schedule and Current Status............................... 2-3 2.4.1 NRC Review.........................
.............. 2-3 2.4. 3 Integration with Other Activites....................... 2-3 2.5 Reergency Response Facilities...... ;...................
. 2-3 2.5.1 Schedule and Current St atus.............................. 1-3 2.5.2 NRC' Revi ew............................................. 2-4 2.5.3 Integratiotr with Other Ac tivites.....................
.... 2.-4 l
FIG. Z-I Network Sin==ey-l l
\\
.t
/
i 1
1
SECTION 1 INTRODUCTION Generic Letter 82-33 published Supplement I to NUREG-0737 and requested engineering and scheduling information for the five action items described.
This report presents Duquesne Light Company's approach to meeting the
~
requirements of Supplement 1 for Beaver Valley Power Station - Unit No. 2.
The report describes the interrelationships among activities, the expected commitments from the NRC for review of the various submittals, and the various descriptions and dates required by Generic Letter 82-33.
The interrelationships among activities suggested in Supplement 1 are not appropriate to the current construction and engineering status of EVPS-2, and consequently, the sequence of activities described in this report will be implemented. This sequence is designed to provide for completion of all activities, including NRC review, prior to the scheduled December 31, 1985, fuel load date.
i
(
l l
l l
l l
l i
1-1
SECTION 2 DESCRIPTIONS AND SCHEDULES i
2.1 Safety Parameter Display System 2.1.1 Schedule and Current Status The Safety Parameter Display System will operate from the Emergency Easponse Pacilities Computer System.-
Curra.ntly, a specification for hardware and sof tware has been written, and will be released for bids. An SPDS implementation plan and the safety analysis which describes the basis for parawter selec-tion will be submitted by August I, 1984.
The sPDS will be operational by October 7,1985.
Sof tware and hardware design will be fixed by May 1,1984, and will be available for use in the other activities at that time.
Operator training will be complete by December 1, 1985. DLC does not desire a pre-imple-mentation review.
Refer to Pigure 2-1 for a network. which shows the integration schedule for all activities.
2.1.2 NRC Review Tha three NRC review tasks,. along with their schedules for completion, era listed below:
- Implementation Plan.
Submit to NRC: 8-1-64 NRC review complete: 10-1-84 Safety Analysis Esport Submit to NRC:
8-1 NRC review complete: 10-1-84 Post-Implementation Review NRC stare review: 10-1-85 NRC complete review:
11-1 NRC issue SER:
12-1-85 2 l.3 Integration witts Other Activities The SPDE for B7PS-2 is being planned for completion and-instal-lation unrestrained by progress in any of the other four activ-ities.
The various design documents developed for the SPDS will serve as inputs. to other activities. The SPDS is expected to be the means of resolving certain types of Human Engineering Discrepancies found during the DCRDR.
2-1
--,ew- ~ - -
--,,,,ew_n,e,---.----r-wn-n.nm, - -, - -
2.2 Detailed Control Room Design Review 2.2.1 Schedule and Current Status Resources required to conduct the Detailed Control Room Design currently being evalu-Review and technical requirements are ated. The DCRDR Program Plan wil be submitted by September 1, 1983.
The DCRDE summary report wil be submitted by June 1,
1985.
2.2.2 NRC Review Two reviews are required by the NRC:
- Program Plan submit to NRC: 9-1-83 NRC review complete:
11-1-83
- Summary Report Submit to NRC: 6-1-85 NRC review complete: 8-1-85 NRC issue SER: 8-1-85 2.2.3 Integration with Other Activities The DCEDE review phase will take place late in the proj ect schedule.
Although-NRC guidance suggests that the planning phase report be submitted. within two sonche of the str.rt of the review, DLC has chosen to complete the planning phase early to identify and allocate resources required during the review in an efficient manner.
The start of the DCRDR Review Phase is restrained by the availability of operatorsL, ptocedures, and control rocum equipment.
Ie wiLL be started,. however,. in sufficient timme to allow for submittal of the Summary Raport by June 1,1985.
l 2.3 Regulatory Guide 1.97 Instrumentation 2.3.L Schedule and Current Status The report and sumary tah>1eo describing implementation of Regulatory Guide 1.97 are contained in. the BVPS-2 PSAR, Section-7.5.
Detailed tablee listing all instrumentation, and deviations with their supporting justification will be provided by September 15, 1983.
Instrumentation listed in the tables will be installed and operational by December 31., L985.
2.3.2 NRC Review There is one review required by the NRC:
- Implementation Plan 2-2 f
Submit to NRC: 9-15-83 NRC review complete:
11-15-83 NRC issue SER: 11-15-83 2.3.3 Integration with Other Activities Engineering studies using Regulatory Guide 1.97 (Rev. 2) were performed and completed to support preparation of BVPS-2 Final Safety Analysis Report, Section 7.5.
These studies and the engineering and design information derived from them, will be used.as information inputs to the other four activities.
i l
2.4 Emergency Operating Procedures Upgrade I
Z.4.1 Schedule and Current Status Westinghouse Owners Group generic technical guidelines will be the basis for BVPS-2 EOP's.
They have been submitted to the NRC.
The procedures generation package will be submitted by August 1,. 1984. The integrated training plan will be initiated by August 1,1984.
Operators will be licensed using upgraded E0P's.
Z.4.Z NBC Review The NRC review tasks, along with. their; schedules for comple-tion,. are shown below:
I
- BTPS-2 Procedures Generation Package submit to NRC: 8-1-84 NRC' review complacer 10-1-84 2.4.3 Integration with Other Activities Upgraded. E0P's,, developed from the Westinghouse Owners' Group generic EmerRency Beeponse Guidelines,. will use plant informa-tion identified in the Regulatory Guide 1.97 engineering l
studies Initially,, the EOP' a wi.1L be developed without the j
operation of the SPDs considered.
When-the SPDS software I
becomes arallable, it will be reviewed. for possible incorpora-l tion into the EOF"s 1.5 Emergency Response Facilities I.5.I Schedule and' current Statue The ERF's that support operation of BVPS-I are shared facil-ities designated. so site ERf's.
Refer to DLC's submittal for BVPS-L for details of ERF construction Structure, procedures, and' staff training actione will be completed. in time for the June 1, 1985, site drill.
Since the ERF computer system and 2-3
~
SFDS will not be available until October,1985, NRC assessment of these activities should be performed in two phases.
1.5.1 NRC Review The quality of RRF installation will. be appraised by the 'NRC.
Actions concerning structure, procedures, cad staff training will be complete prior to June 1, 1985, when the Site Drill will be conducted.
The NRC should plan on appraising these aspects of the REF's during this site drill.
The instrumenta-tion systes for the TSC and EOF will be installed and opera-tional by December 31, 1985.
The NRC will be performing site audits during the time periods indicated.
1.5.3 Integration with Other Activities Refer to Figure 2-1 for the integration schedule of the ERF instrumentation system.
l l
l l
l e
2-4 f
e DOCUVIENT
$o' PAG.E
~
PU _ LED
~
ANO.we -
NO. OF PAGES REASON O PAGE ILLEGIB2 O HARD COPV FILED AT. PDR CF o,nER 1
3 D BETTER COPY REQUESTED ON d PAGE100 LARGE10 FILM.
POR h
h MARDM FRID AT:
OTHER
$ FILMED ON APERTURE CARD NODMNNNh-eT,
e w-n,
--