ML20092N579

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Forwards Procedures Generation Package Re Methods for Developing & Implementing function-oriented Emergency Operating Procedures,Per Generic Ltr 82-33
ML20092N579
Person / Time
Site: Beaver Valley
Issue date: 06/28/1984
From: Carey J
DUQUESNE LIGHT CO.
To: Eisenhut D
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
Shared Package
ML20092N580 List:
References
RTR-NUREG-0737, RTR-NUREG-737 GL-82-33, TAC-44282, NUDOCS 8407030303
Download: ML20092N579 (3)


Text

_

a 7%

4 Telephone (412) 393-6000 Nuclear Division P. O. Bor 4 Shippingport, PA 15077 0004 June 28, 1984 Director of Nuclear Reactor Regulation United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Mr. D. G. Eisenhut, Dir ector Division of Licensing Washington, DC 20555

Reference:

Beaver Valley Power Station, Unit No. 1 Docket No. 50-334, License No. DPR-66 Generic Letter 82-33; Procedures Generation Package for Emergency Operating Procedures Gentlemen:

In accordance with our submittals referenced in Attachment 1, we are providing a Procedures Generation Package (PGP) which describes the methods for developing and implementing function-oriented Emergency Operating Proce-dures (E0Ps). These upgraded E0Ps are based on the re-analysis of transients and accidents as described and clarified in item I.C.1 of NUREG-0737 and the Westinghouse generic Emergency Response Guidelines (ERGS), Rev. 1, with their background documents. The Duquesne Light Company has carticipated with the Westinghouse Owners Group during the re-analysis of transients and accidents and the development of the generic ERGS and background documents.

It is our intent to follow these generic guidelines as closely as possible in order to take full credit for the analysis effort, the human factors principles applied and the function and task analysis effort which has formed the basis for the operator information and control needs.

At present the upgraded E0P development status and schedule is as follows.

The upgraded E0Ps have been drafted and have received table-top validation.

Program descriptions are provided in detail in this submittal.

The first iteration of E0P verification is also being conducted on those procedures which have received table-top validation.

When all upgraded procedures have been through these two processes, the Control Room Design Review (CRDR) Team will complete a task analysis of these initial drafts to determine the characteristics of needed instrumentation and controls.

A walk / talk-through validation will follow this task analysis effort.

Follow-ing the upcoming fourth refueling outage, the plant specific simulator will be operational and validation of the E0Ps on the simulator will take place.

This effort will be managed by the CRDR Team.

It is with this coordination of tasks that we expect to integrate the development of upgraded E0Ps with the Detailed CRDR.

It is expected that an iterative process will follow where necessary which will resolve E0P discrepancies identified during the verification and validation phases.

The training program development and operator training effort will follow.

Implementation of the upgraded E0Ps will occur during the fifth refueling outage tentatively scheduled for July of 1986.

6 N

8407030303 840628 DtO PDR ADOCK 05000334 U

3 P

pop

)

\\

l

- \\

L B:av;r Valley Pow;r Station, Unit No.1

' Docket N3. 50-334, License No. DPR-66 Generic Letter 82-33; Procedures Generation

. Package for Emergency Operating Procedures Page 2 Through this stage of E0P development, there'has not been any deviations from the ERGS identified as having safety significance.

If any are iden-tified, they will be submitted under separate cover in accordance with the PGP. All deviations from the ERGS are documented and are available for NRC review at the site.

Clarification of what constitutes a deviation having safety' significance from one which does not was obtained from the NRC. Our understanding of this classification is documented in Attachment 1, Item 3 and has served as our basis for evaluating deviations.

Included with this submittal is Attachment 2, Procedures Generation Package for Beaver Valley Unit 1, which describes the methods utilized in preparing upgraded E0Ps from the generic ERGS. Section 3 of Attachment 2 has been drafted for incorpc-ation into the Station Operating Manual and will provide the administrative controls necessary for maintaining the E0Ps after implementation,- This section will receive additional reviews by the Onsite Safety Committee and is.therefore subject to minor revisions following this submittal. However, the intent of Section 3 will not change and is therefore included in this submittal for your review.

This PGP is being submitted for your review with sufficient time to pcrmit resolution of any NRC concerns in a timely fashion so as to not adversely impact operator training.

It is our desire to work closely with the NRC to accomplish successful implementation of the E0Ps in accordance with the identified schedule.

If you have any questions, please contact me or members of my staff.

Very tru

yours,

. Carey Vice President, Nuclear Attachments cc: Mr. W. M. Troskoski, Resident Inspector U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Beaver Valley Power Station Shippingport, PA 15077 U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission c/o Document Management Branch Washington, DC 20555 Mr. Peter Tam, Project Manager U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Phillips Building Washington, DC 20555

- Mail Stop 438 -

A y

,n-,

n.

,,~.-,,p.

ATTACHMENT 1 Correspondence to the NRC Regarding E0P Development 1.

April 15, 1983; Carey to Eisenhut, response to Generic Letter 82-33 Supplement 1 to NUREG-0737.

2.

July 25, 1983; Carey to Eisenhut, clarification for the scheduled completion of the tasks identified in Supplement 1 to NUREG-0737.

1 3.

March 14, 1984; Carey to Varga, documentation of a conference call to obtain clarification on the identification of significant deviations from generic technical guidelines.

4.

May 30, 1984; Carey to Eisenhut, request to revise schedule for submittal of PGP.

5.

September 27, 1983; Carey to Eisenhut, submittal of Detailed Control

-Room. Design Review 6.

. April 30, 1984; Carey to Eisenhut, schedule for starting various phases of the CRDR

_ - ---