ML20154J395
| ML20154J395 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Beaver Valley |
| Issue date: | 05/03/1983 |
| From: | Tam P Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| To: | Varga S Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20154J385 | List: |
| References | |
| FOIA-85-808 GL-82-33, TAC-44282, TAC-45925, TAC-46068, TAC-51141, NUDOCS 8603100587 | |
| Download: ML20154J395 (6) | |
Text
{{#Wiki_filter:-_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ - . --_ ___ _
.b* .f. ,Ei%f- - - - . . . . . . . . ~ .
UNITECFSTATES
" '~ --
!' p, _ NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION g ; j wAssiscrow. o.c. rosss mar 0 3 1983 - -
~-
MEMORANDUM FOR: Steven A. Varga, Chief
. Operating Reactors Branch #1, OL FROM: 6 Project Manager --
Operating Reactors Branch fl. DL ,
SUBJECT:
NEGOTIATIONS WITH'THE LICENSEE ON HIS RESPONSE TO 1 GENERIC LETTER 82 BEAVER VALLEY UNIT 1 The licensee (Duquesne Light Company) provided his response to Generic Letter 82-33 on April 15, 1983. Subsequent to that, I have provided - ' ' ORRf 5 (W. Paulson) with 'a copy of his letter and a summarf sheet.
._ On_May 2,1933, L had_a meeting at _the si_te_with the licensee's repre .__ _ __
sentatives (K. Grada and S. Sovick) and the NRC Resident Inspector W. Troskosky. I was provided with background material and justifications l for the licensees April .15,1983 response. I consider the licensee's proposed implenentation dates, as stated in his April 15, 1983 letter, ., and as justified in the May 2 meeting, reasonable logical and based on his overall projected events for the next few years. Therefore, tinless I have been dir6cted otherwise, I consider all the proposed implementation f dates, summarized in the enclosure, acceptable. The Resident Inspector had no opposition to any proposed date.
/
lb , Peter S. Tam, Project Manager Operating Reactors Branch #1 Division of Licensing cc: W. Paulson , G. Dick . J. Lyons J. Shea W. Troskoski, Resident Inspector . at Beaver Valley l B603100507 860129 PDR FOIA ' OARDEO S-800 PDR e . O
~ , ;
L
- i . . ( ,
c s a ( c.o y l u .,.m j, r,b i ( t
.Isc n ,/ g, ,,(
l Q 7 5 o . l c. c., M6 ( fa e w v >.e n,
/
,. t t
eQ/ . c u$ fe l - 'e s.
- 7. c s
. c .
b s I ( ' y, ( 4 g
, ,. ^ I kLcD e x <
P l R U s Js c 'I C
- n. ,-
g p. u F h l. a s t lt '/ c e a t, i
, et k3 (
a (, nf G
- s. q- s (<, S e
./
i t t t r.. c r e i .
>t s ,
7 c W 4 t s, s.
~3/ ' 3 1
'" c.
, t , t, 1
. . s . n .
, ;, e ' - i e I c
^ ej' S. L i. j s /1 b cuh -..d
? . .
. J.
o e v i. t n%,7 1 t ,1 , sR C a, x t n, s. A ,soI y u c' 6 s
'e~ "
- s. 4 v P,n e i A
r
.'y a
" t
'. se p
R e ut< R D i h i w-t t ' ' y >< E
- t
'r l"'
/5 = .,
' t ( s.
t
..q.Ct - L ~
l C s
. r r c .
. s qm S u
c* a t n a u. t f t
- u.
l t h
- c oS J' %'
c- % c n ( c 1 4c t t w ve.
.g
/ (
e ( p o/ . c c 'u e v b L
- 7. .
6 [ f6
- a. c
& o r h
e evFu . ( t. t T - u/A a n, s e qc l _ e o d e c a C. , t l' t (
< i t ,R I
q stp-7, [' [ r '
. , a / c
. . l
. t A .
n n,c de ac ./f b e 4, e; c. e n.
- e. s
/. h t
s <. t
~ s . h .
ab y/ t s
- a c l <
- a. r, 1 , t fs c> s
~
c u s
. l c b a ..J a ;
s. i
. i s
c u w r u.
- , w .I f e . . . - ,
d.tu ar. '* Tc - a (n r c e
's
> }. .
.e
. f e l 5 . '.
a s f n t e uh<
- t . <}
7 L d e e c a. s u - r e e 4-
. 7 <
'c c a
t s s p. t c t + t r
,J y' e P v. ( "
c
- u. a. )u e t
t <.. u.
- s. i t
4r e u. ) e c h ai e - - rs 7, c vb
/r ;spt
, i k
/
t t. ki s s usi t
/ m1 i. c u. t h 7 .
9 - c . e b ,1 a t
,te i t
c , u. . s. r e a. c) a c s 5 m. a p s(t. i , . t c f t A c vL t
< t c s .
A [
'u s (<n
. s.
t r, S us D n. a t oc }' p s -
. i. o R e
P o , t S a I c .
%.. .. c
- 1 i c.,t I c _ M. . , i i [ C l I C e^
ety.n.- - - - M m. .. .
. t~
- g. c; f. p
,, . I- .v.s .. f c . .. ,fl . .s a-
< J . L j' j. .'<.
-. I. s,, y -
s -t t i (c. .ess- .
%r Ut," TM C. . . , GkV f
, 'J Ll f ' b 5' ).lL 'n NS5 I
G ..dc l. .. . s tar e s <. l -s i. 't . .t S . (t . / 9 ) *'5 f r .. .,(; ( j - v tt I,e p .. s .. -, a .., p .. u < c ~. e si cR n R
.. ~
i ; j v. .s a <e p .. .- t o.s c . .- . . a l> e s.a.m. n ,(
- g. , .. .a t7 ng.c g . <.
u .. e . . .. ... ay . 1i, c r&p . ... u.R .s..... ~ .,y c u Jap.. :. u ..,.,.-a.e , a c.. an3 - s .,, s: . 1 .u v.u ne u a . . t _.. n. . . . t < ,..4 e .- eo x.. . .v.t ac. e s/n ~ Un 1 re b<tt. l., f.,J e
- m , < c3 s'c ( m L ..u c.t t s. c :, ; <i a c. t( e 2 .rc , sr-1 t.- ca. , l.-t c c r A t . .. e t. A Qc, 5 ) N
.n) _
C. (c.i t c.t i - t j r a k L . .r., on ts e, sy;l( bc <tet( k.r c I;cn c. ( a .
^
ij s
- _S C, g,t (, s. t <.fi i.s t v .,.- L . .t s . .i
' [s e t re.c t - d c~ l t e .m ( c t G a' i. t an W , i cs CO .s i -s w . .:.. a -f l
g <. {c. c., t f. . s 6 v 9 , C\ L C . . (F. vg .g ( ( g g , g g\ l
. EOp cv . ( ( [h talt i u., t t i . .s (
't '
- c. t~ ( e
- D C- E 0
f'f"""-Ir a L t . .d. .
A f t < .- .3'^ 'cai-h"t
<t< e2
)
t . t . .. o . .. . .at u .. a.. .a r<.tL <t..). . t. re - -
.C05
~
As t c. t <,,( i w f. p t:g F t
. . i . t ~ c. . ( .
ib p. .ur ..1 ,,,e c ,,,,, e g ( g , , ,, , , ., , , f< p ,e r [ . . s th.s .ss. ,
i fu y .u e ' ) l .
~5 I * *\ L . en ,-
( Q'~2 ('d ' A u_4 n- t 4-{nffA -
. G cps -
. Ale.e EU l's are 6 ,t . d. e i eg < il $ ci.se . ( c, . t , C' s. y e. t w.>li .3 hn s . .(
ig e.~.y. g ac.p.... cz....ca...... , acc ,, c. 3 , t ae.o ., t i, e c .. . .<s. 1 yet to i m e' .w R o .. t t h e u. pg G ,,, c,,,,, I i',, u w <.u , ts
. I-e.,e, it1. g.i p <u A 6 < > . . A... . u,_,[ - ~t
' ~^t N R t.
(, / s'y T 3.~
.e.e.v i
V l l s -l, C ... e.s t a.1; c., a f-t u c .. .... ic t. s .> { , h is Lae..u l ta .ns l t uw
,I cJ.m .< l c. t e r s:c l . cl cr t . c., c..' & O > e >'a t.7,~
t:C s ct _s e .- <s i e h.i eI,U.i e ~ s'uta to't. o .1, < '
,,d< rne & .:n :s c.: ., = ..}.s.'l ., s y
Thss falt i. 3 ( , .<.,fcseie.1
' vued/(I
,g *' y y he cd i e.- tir e ,
,. l i
(~ Lte M .r' 6 tb e. 1 /7a'? Y :r ii l
)
.i
} 51 at
- f 1 6 i 6
t -i . e * , ) { l .
, %4W Etr H #l ' * *
- p.,
RECORD OF TELEPHONE CONVERSATION BEAVER VALLEY UNIT I Da te: August 6,1982 " Time: 2:00 p.m.
Participants:
S. Sovick (DLC) ' T. Vassello (DLC) P. Lk ng (SAI) R. Liner (SAI) - P. Ta ( .j , C / [L -
Background
SA!, contractor to flRC on NUREG-0737 items I.A.2.1 and II.B.4, prepared a draf t TER on these issues. The TER identified a number of open items to be resolved. Pages from the draf t TER have been telecopied to DLC and the . purpose of the conference call was to see how these may be resolved. Discussion and Agreemcnts' RE: P. 9, paragraph that reads "The .9eaver Valley training program appears to . . . . . . . . . . .does not believe. . . . . . . . training program meets thi s requirement..." DLC stated that IE Inspection Report 81-29 (12/28/81) should clarify and close this item. P. Tam agreed to provide copy of the report to SAI. RE: P. 9, Item A.2.e ' DLC indicated that non-licensed: instructors teach basic courses such as rathematics, physics, etc., they do not get involved in subjects such as plant operation. They therefore do not need to go through a reoualification program. RE: P.10 Item C,1 DLC pointed out that flRC does not have a document 'that gives the "80 hours core damage training" requirceent, Furthermore, it really depends on how hours are added up. P. Tam will follow up<g~f withit$0. !! igg {inton to clarify this.*
- Follow up calls were made on August 9,19 ihvolving S. Sovick, K. Grada, D. Wigginton and P. Tam. Nigginton exp ined that the "80 hours" requirement is considered by NRC to be the :S 'd..T. ' for core damage nitigation training. INPO has recomended 120-140 hours for the same training. It is, nevertheless, possible to count some hours in topics such as heat transfer, DNS, steam tables, etc. as hours in core damage mitigation training.
S. Sovick requested to know what other utilities h:v: claimed credit fdr. Wigginton informed him that reviews-of Ginna and Zion are most near completion. Sovick will contact these utilities. jWO _,s___. "'
% 2' l
l l RE: P.10. Item C.3 Requalification Program. See Item C.1 above. RE: P.ll, Iten II.B.4 See Item C.1 above. DLC indicated IE Inspection _ Reports 81-18 and 82-05 - should shed light on this. Copies will be provided SAI by P. Tam. t l P
. e s
e
^
r oM* a. d # M -- .---m. . rt* . *
= ci 'o
,g UNITED STATES -
;) NUCl(EAR'RE2ULATCRY COMMISSION wasumavow,0.c. rosss
's.,
...... / -
G
)DocketNo.50-334> 2S M MEMORANDUM FOR:
Darrell G. Eisenhut, Director, Division of Licensing, NRR ,. / TilRU: d Steven A. Varga, Chief, Operating Reactors Branch No. 1, DL l' Gus C. Lainas, Assistant Director for Operating Reactors, f4 - Division of Licensing FROM: _f aDProject Manager, Operating Reactors Branch No.1, DL I
SUBJECT:
BEdVERVALLEYUNIT1-NEGOTIATIONSWITHTHELICE NUREG-0737 ITEMS Per direction provided in your July 12 and June 1,1983 memoranda, I have documented the reasons for accepting the late implementation dates for the following items: Safety Parameter Display System (SPDS) - G. Dick, LPM Guidance provided states that "Without further negotiation, operability dates
,m through December 31, 1985, are pcceptable." The SPDS will be fully installed during 5/85 the 4th refueling outago, tentatively scheduled to occur from 2/85 to (V1 However, operators will not~ be trained by then; training will be done on the SPDS, and is scheduled to be completed during the 5th refueling outige, tentatively scheduled to occur in July 1986.
Since 'bperability" is defined as including completion of staff training, the licensee's proposed " operability" date would exceed the guidance provided. I discussed with the lead PM (June 15,1983) the date exceeds the guideline, it is reasonable and is thus acceptable.and he a Emergency Operating Procedures - J. Lyons, Lead PM Guidance provided states that "Without further negotiations, implementation of upgraded, human-factored, function-oriented E0Ps through December 31, 1985, are acceptable." The licensee has proposed to implement the new E0Ps after the 5th refueling cutage, since the next one, the 4th, would be too soon for him. The 5th one is tentatively scheduled to occur in July 1986. Since it is reasoiable to implement new procedures at the beginning of a fuel cycle rather tha's at the middle, and since the proposed implementation date is
~
O
\
(m) , e ~ C *
. /
4 629'l95 ./...,_ 4 -e -- Off t 99 tg e TC *t Y F0, + +
, e ai. ._ . . .* n c.n m s
/
~ less than 1 year beyond the guidelide," FEon' sider the licensee's date reasonable. I. discussed with the Lead PM (June 15, 1983) and he agreed that the proposed date is acceptable,,
Reg. Guide 1. 97 - J. Shea , Lead PM The licensee has committed to provide a report on his evaluation of R.G.1.97 instrumentation in November 1985. The evaluation of such instrumentation is plan. It isconcurrently perfonned with CRDR, according to the licensee's integrated reasonable to believe that complete implenentation of R.G.1.97 (defined by the licensee to include installation of equipment and staff trained) will not happen until some time after December 1985. Complete implementation of this R.G. is contingent upon procurement, receipt and installation of a large number of pieces of equipment. Prior to all these, the licensee has to test, analyze and identify equipment to be replaced / upgraded. Thus the above date is a reasonable one and should be considered acceptable. M eter S. Tam, Project Manager
. Operatfrig Reactors Branch No.1 Division of Licansing u
l d '
.}}