ML19345B502

LER 80-039/03L-0:on 801025,valves V16-20-20 & LRW-83 Found to Have Seat Leakage in Excess of Tech Specs.Cause Not Stated.Valves Repaired

ML19345B502
Person / Time
Site:	Vermont Yankee
Issue date:	11/24/1980
From:	Murphy W VERMONT YANKEE NUCLEAR POWER CORP.
To:	NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION I)
Shared Package
ML19345B485	List: ML19345B484 ML19345B502
References
LER-80-039-03L, LER-80-39-3L, NUDOCS 8012010403
Download: ML19345B502 (2)

Text

. . . . - -.

AC FOJ.M 366 - U. S. NUCLEA3 REGULATORY COMMISSION v i7 771

-. f .

LICENSEE EVENT REPORT LER 80-39/3L CONTROL BLOCK: l 1

1 l 'l l l Ih 6

(PLEASE PRINT OR TYPE ALL REQUIRED INFORMATION) l 1011lIVlT l VI Yl Sl Il @l *501 Ol I Ol Ol Ol 01 01 l 01-Ol @264 Il uCENSE 11 11ITvet 1140@ I57 CATI l@

7 5 9 UCENSEE CODE 14 uCENSE NvMBER 25 68 CON'*

I, o i i j ,"C,3 I L l@l 01 5 l 010 ! OI 21 71 1l@l ll O! 21 51 81 Ol@l11112l4i810l@ 74 75 REPORT DATE 6C

' 8 4J 61 DOCK ET NUMBER 66 69 EV ENT QATI EVENT DESCRIPTION AND PROBABLE CONSEQUENCES h

, le 6: i I While perf or=ing the Type C Leak Rate Testing, two valves (V16-20-20 and LRW-83) 1

o,3, jwere found to have seat leakage in excess of that permitted by Tech. Spec. Section [

lo iai 1 4.7.A.4. Since a second valve in each line provided containment isolation, there l t o , i r were no adverse consequences to the public health and safety. Similar events were I io 46 ; l reported as RO 79-28/3L, RO 77-16/3L, and RO 76-24/3L. f

' {017j l 1 1069{ l t 80 7 8 9 SYSTEM OAUSE CAUSE COMP. VALVE OCDE CCCE SU8000E COMPONENT OODE Sus COE SUBOCDE toist 7 8 I S l 'OD l@ l E l@ l B l@ l V l A l L l V I El Xlh l X lh l Dl h 9 11 12 12 18 19 20

_, SE QUENTI AL OCCURRENCE REPORT REVISION gg fvENT VE AR . R E80RT NC. CCCE *YPE NC.

@ saf ,*e,RC g; I 81 01 2i 22 l-l 22 1013191 24 2s l/l 27 10!3i

s 29 W

20 bsi U

22 KN O P NT M WOURS SS t FOR 8. SU '

MANU8 RER iB l@l24 Zi@

2.

lasZ l@ l2l@ aj010IOIOI.o I Yl@

se ai l42Y l@ d@

42 IX 19 lo 19.7l@

CAUSE OESCRIPT;ON AND CORRECTIVE ACTIONS 11 1 c i lThe valve- failures summarized in this report and their recairs and retests vill be i f

l1 i : ; treported in accordance with Appendix J, lb CFR '9. V.B'.3. I

)

11 6:4 I I i t'!2ti I l i 14 1 I I 7 s e so ST A  % POWER CTMER STATUS is C Y DIS 00VERY DESCMtPT10N h it !s i In l@ l 0101 Ol@l ni l W @l m-,4 m m., m.. . I AfTiviW CMTENT RELEASE AuCUNT 08 ACTIVITY LOCATION OF RELEASE NA NA l : I 8e9 I-[z_l @D 7 IC 07 mELEASEL2J@l 11 44 I I 45 30 l

• ERSONNEl, EXPOSUR ES NUMBER TYPE OESCRtpTION NA l i I :l' 10 10 10 l@W@l

• l

. R$eN~A'INJES NUueE. oES: RiPrioN@

li h 18 9101010 l@l 7 11 12 NA 30 I

6055 CF CR CAMAGE TO FACluTY Q TY'E DESCRIPTION v li l 9 4F9lZ l@lto NA l 4 . .

30 ISSU E I : j o l d@lDE Caip*icN NA l l1IItIitiIiI l}

7 g g to 68 69 sc ;

anen P. Mudv P*aON E: M" W " ' ' E m8012 01 Ofd$08 PRE 8ARER.

i e

4 VTVYS1 i 05000271 LER 80-39/3L EVENT DESCRIPTION AND PROBABLE CONSEOUENCES During the performance of refuel related surveillance testing .

in accordance with Tech. Spec. Section 4.7.2.a. two primary -con-tainment isolation valves were found to have seat leakages in

~

l excess of that permitted by Tech. Spec. Section 4.7.A.4. For each of those valves, a second valve in the applicable line provided the Proper containment isolation capability. .It is, therefore, con-cluded that there were no adverse consequences of this event to the health and safety of the public. Similar events were reported as RO 79-28/3L, RO 77-26/3L, and RO 77-24/3L. The two valves and j their as-found leakage rates are as follows:

Valve As-Found Description Leakage Rate Test Date V16-20-20 (Contain- Indeterminable 9/29/80 ment Purge Makeup Isolation Valve)

LRW-83 (Drywell Indeterminable 9/30/80 Floor Drain)

Both valves were repaired and satisfactorily retested prior to plant startup as required by Tech. Spec. Section 3.7. A.4.

I