ML19329A970
| ML19329A970 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Davis Besse, Perry  |
| Issue date: | 03/20/1975 |
| From: | Kayuba T, Zimmerman R OHIO EDISON CO. |
| To: | Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8001280709 | |
| Download: ML19329A970 (140) | |
Text
. _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _
3 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA NUCEAR REGUIATORY COMMISSION BEFORE THE ATOMIC SAFETY AND LICENSING BOAPD In the Matter of ) ^
THE TOEDO EDISON COMPANY and )
- THE CEVEIAND ELECTRIC ILLtJMINATING ) AEC Docket 50-346A ' '
COMPAhi )
(Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station) .
THE CEVEIAND ELECTRIC ILLUMINATING ) AEC Docket Nos. 50-440A COMPANY, ET AL. , 50-441A (Perry Nuclesr Power Plant, Units 1 and 2)
I JOINT ANSWERS OF OHIO EDISON COMPANY AND PENNSYLVANIA POWER COMPANY TO THE SUPPIEMENTAL INTERROGATORIES BY THE DEPARTNENT OF JUSTICE Pursuant to Rule 2.740(b) of the Comission's Rules of Practice (10 C.F.R. 5 2.740(b)) and Applicant's statement at page 13 of the Applicants' December 16, 1974 Submission entitled " Applicants' Reply to Motions of AEC Regulatory Staff, the Department of Justice, and the City of Cleveland
, to Produce Documents in Washington, D.C., and to Submit Additional Infomation in Response to Interrogatories", Ohio Edison Company and Pennsylvania Power C apany submit the following joint responses to Supplemental Interrogatories 1 through 6 as propounded by the Department of Justice on February 14, 1975 Supplemental Interrogatory No. 1 Since September 1, 1965, has Company ever directly or indirectly tranamitted. electric power and/or energy (whether originating inside or outside l
l Company's system) from its transmission system to the transmission system of any l
electric utility (whether directly interconnected with Company or not) engaged 8oonso 797 M ,
, intheutilization,saleorfurthertransmissionofthatpowerand/orenergy?
If so, describe each situation, stating (a) the parties involved, (b) the time period (s) involved,(c)theamountofenergyand/orpowerinMWHinvolved annually, (d) the reason (s) for the transmission (s), (e) the date of and signatories to any agreement relating to each such situation, (f) the rate (s) at which the Company billed the other electric utility (s) for each transaction, and (g) the method and factors used to determine the rate (s) listed in response topart(f)above.
Response: Since September 1,1965 the Conrgany (as used hereinafter refers to both Ohio Edison Company and Pennsylvania Power Company except where separate answers are given where it was deemed appropriate to do so because of the nature of the question to which the response is made) has transmitted electric power and energy from its transmission system to the transmission system of another electric utility engaged in the utilization, sale or further trans-mission of that electric power. The Company is without knowledge of facts as to the ultimate receiver of such electric power unless utilized or sold to the customers of the electric utility with which the Company is directly inter-connected. However, it is known that the electric power and energy delivered pursuant to Interconnection Item 8(A) - Ohio Power Company (Buckeye) and Interconnection Item 10(A) - Ohio Valley Electric Corporation (OVEC) and pursuant to General Note C hereof, was utilized by an electric utility or corporate entity not directly interconnected with the Company. For a ;
description and details of each situation, see the attached sheets.
I l
1
o
, ,.. , i INTERCONNECTIONS
'f
- 1. (A) Parties: CAPCo (Including Pennsylvania Power)
(B) Time Period: September 14,1%7 continuing to date.
(C) Energy Supplied: KWH
- oE & PP (DL) (CEI) (TE) 1971 --------- --- 3 ,880,000 167,754,000 1972 ---------- 987 800 7 ,911,000 452,750,000 1973 ---------- 21,524,,000 1,841,000 333,378,000 1974 ---------- 9,845,000 --- 367,916,000
- Covers on1,y those transactions made directly in accordance with and pursuant to a CAKo Agreement. The parties have airo :Cle individual transactions with each other during the 7eriod (See details listed herein for the Company under The Cleveland E'.ectric T11"minating Co., The Toledo Edison Co.
and Duquesne Light Co. Interconnections).
! (D) Reasons: The CAPCo Companies entered into the CAPCo Transmission
! Facilities Agreement, as of September 14, 1967 providing for construction, operation and maintenance of an adequate transmission network to permit the five CAPCo Companies that are parties to the Agreement to utilize their respective capacity entitlements in various , jointly committed generating units for effective coordination of the operation of CAPCo Companies among themselves and with other systems, power pools and coordinating groups and for the equitable sharing by the parties of the resulting benefits and responsibilities.
(E) Dates: (1) Contract dated November 1, 1971, effective as of
( September 14,1967 ("CAPCo Transmission Facilities Agreement") is still in effect. This Agreement was l
tran mitted to FPC oli September 29, 1971, accepted l for filing on September 7,1972 so as to be effective l on September 30, 1971 (FPC Rate 963). This Agreement i
was modified by the parties by memorandum on April 7, 1972 as to certain investment responsibilities for CAPCo lines.
(2) Pursuant to the Agreement ("CAPCo Transmission Facilities Agreement") various members of CAPCo have entered into agreements with the Company in order that they may receive or provide the entitlements of capacity and energy from various short-lead time capacity units.
A tabulation of those agretanents involving the Companies are as follows:
(a) Agreement between Duquesne Light dated october 1, 1973 for the period beginning october 1, ~1973 and ending May 31, 1974. (SLTC #2 involving 9 m sale to DL). FPC - E-5863.
I i
l
. . l (b) Agreement between The Toledo Edison Company
' dated October 1,1973 for the period beginnina ,
October 1, 1973 and ending December 31, 1974 l (SLTC #1 involving 27 w sale to TE). FPC-8541. l (c) Agreement between The Cleveland Electric T11=4% ting Company dated October 3,1973 for the period b. gin-ning October 3, 1973 and ending May 31, 1974 .nd period beginning June 1, 1974 and ending December 31, '
1974. (SLTC #3 involving sale of 41 w and 46 m toOE). FPC-42.5 (d) Agreement between the CAPCO Companies ("Short Lead Time Capacity Agreement"), dated October 1, 1973 for the period beginning October 1, 1973 through December 31,1974 (Covering SLTC #1, 2 and 3 -
sales and deliveries). IPC No. 97, including supplements.
Duquesne Light Company agreed as of October 31, 1973 ("A =nd= nt of CAICO Short Lead Time Capacity Agreement") to awnd this agreement so as to cancel the provisions, as to puchases r.nd sales (2f and 2g) thereof and inseri. in place thereof a provision whereby Ohio Edison would provide Duquesne Light with 9 w from its SLTC #2 for period of October 1, 1973 through May 31, 1974 (F) Rates: The rates at which Company billed the other parties and the rate at which other parties billed the Company hereunder have been incorporated into the Company's Rate Schedule.
While the CAPCO Transmission Facilities Agreement does not contain rate provisions, each separate agreement listed herein does contain similarly structured rates for similar short-lead time capacity transactions by r.nd between the parties. The rate details of each agreement are found within the Article entitled Compensation. Copies of the relevant information have been made available at the' request of the NRC and DOJ at the Central Depository in Washington, D.C.
(G) Rate Basis: The rates between the parties were established by en-tended negotiations and are filed with FPC. The rstes and the methods and factors used to determine such rates are set forth in the contract between the parties and in any material which was supplied to the FPC in conjunction with each filing. Copies of the relevant information have been made available at the request of the ERC and DOJ at the Central Lepository in Washington, D.C.
-g-
./ '
l DlTERCONNECTIONS
?
- 2. (A) Party: The Cleveland Electric I11minating Company (B) Tbne Period: Agreement was executed prior to September 1, 1965 and continuing to date.
(C) Energy Supplied: 10E g .
1969 ---------- 653,134,000 1970 ---------- 753,533,000 1971 ---------- 165,198,000 -
1972 ---------- 398,339,000 1973 ---------- 304,998,000 1974 ~--------- 170,750,000 (See "CAPC0" Interconnection for CAPCO Transaction)
(D) Reasons: The parties mutually agreed to construct large steam-electric generating units on their respective systems (Sammia No. 6 and Avon No. 9), strengthen transmission interties, provide for the purchase and sale of capacity and energy for mutual back up of each unit. The ob-jective of the parties was the realization on their respective systems of the economies possible by the use of large steam-electric generating units then technically feasible, to-gether with the concomitant potentials of the strengthened transmission interties required to enable utilization of such units. It was recognized by the parties that neither party by itself was then able to economically utilize generating units of such size and was further recognized that by appropriate pinnning and mutual agreement, the economies inherent in the construction and oIeration of large steam-electric generating units and strengthened transmission interties could be jointly shared by the parties.
(E) Dates: Contract between the parties dated February 23,1965(FPC Rate W) is presently in effect. The parties have also entered into letter agreements dated December 3,1%8, May 8, 1972 and January 29, 1973 which modify the terms and condi', ions of the contract dated February 23, 1965.
(F) Rates: The rates at which Compary billed The Cleveland Electric T11=4nating Company have been incorporated into Company's Rate Schedule (FIC Rate 4, including M.1, accepted by FPC on April li 1969 and PUC0 33458). The details of each rate involved are shown on pages 6 through 10 of the February 23, 1965 Agreement and in the amendments listed in Item (E) hereof.
l l
l 1
4 (G) Rate Basis: The rates between the parties were established by ex- ,
tended negotiations and are filed with FPC. The rates 7 and the methods and factors used to determine such rates are set forth in the contract between the parties and in any material which was supplied to the FPC in conjunction with each filing. Copies of the relevant infomation i
were specially selected by the DOJ and NRC and have been made available at Central Depositor / in Washington, D.C.
S e
e 4
l
/' .
_. INTERCONNECTIONS
( 3. (A) Party: The Cleveland Electric Illuminating Company (B) Time Period: Prior to September 1, 1965 continuing to date.
(c) Energy Supplied: IGiH E
1%5 ----------- 420,610,000 1966 ----------- 574,460,000 1%7 -- ---- ----- 493,223,000 1968 ----------- 178,020,000 1969 ----------- 616,391,000 1970 ----------- 1,105,148,000 1971 ----------- 263,719,000 1972 ----------- 138,922,000 1973 ----------- 760,055,000 1974
(See "CAPCo}26,961,000 Interconnection for CA (D) Reasons: The parties mutually agreed to establish interconnected operations between their systems on a basis which will be consistent with conditions prevai14"6 on their systems so as to furnish interconnected services to each other consisting of one or more of the following: interchange power, including economy, on-peak, off-peak and emergency services and firm power parchased sales and short-term power transactions between the parties. The interim supplements described b A ein further provide a means for The Cleveland Ele - / Uminating Company to receive its entitlement t :pacity and energy from the W.H.
Sammis No. 7 unit auring fixed periods and to receive its entitlement of capacity and anergy from the 125 W short-lead time capacity installed on the ohio Edison 1 System during a fixed period.
(E) Dates: Contract between the parties dated July 29, 1964 (FPC Rate
- 42) is presently in effect. The parties entered into a letter <
agreement on MLrch 21,1967 (FPC Rate 42.1) to provide for short-term power exchanges. This letter agreement (March 21, 19C7) presently in effect was transmitted to the FPC on April 21, 1967 and made effective by them on May 25,1%7. l on September 16, 1971 the parties entered into an Interim l Supplement (FPCRate42.2)tobeeffectiveduringtheperiod I beginning with the date of commercial operation of W.H.
Sammis No. 7 Unit and ending with the date of commercial operation of Eastlake No. 5 Unit, on August 1, 1972 the parties transmitted notice of cancellation of the Interim i
i Supplement (datedSeptember 16,1971) to the FFC effective September 21,1972 (FPC Rate 42.3). The parties entered into t' an Interim Supplement dated January 1, 1973 (FFC Rate 42.4) for the period of January 1,1973 and ending September 30, 1973. This Agreement (dated January 1, 1973), covers The Cleveland Electric Illuminating Company's entitlement from the 125 W short-lead time capacity,was accepted by the FPC on November 16, 1973 and made effective on January 1, 1973.
(F) Rates: The rates at which Company billed The Cleveland Electric T11=4nating Company have been incorporated into Company's Rate Schedule (FFC Rate 42, including 42.1 through 42.5 and PUCo 34554). The details of such rates are found on pages 9 through 12 of the Agreement dated July 29, 1964 and each amendment thereto.
(G) Rate Basis: The rates between the parties were established by ex-tended negotiations and are filed with FPC. The rates and the methods and factors used to determine such rates
, ere set forth in the contract between the parties and in any material which was supplied to the FPC in conjunction with each filing. Copies of the relevant information were specially selected by the DOJ and ERC and have been made available at Central Depository in Washington, D.C.
k
, INIERCONNECTIONS
(
- 4. (A) Party: Columbus and Southern Ohio Electric Comcany (B) Time Period: Prior to September 1, 1965 continuing to date.
(C) Energy Supplied: KWH OE 1%5 ---------- 1,897,000 J 1%6 ---------- 3,750,000 1%7 ---------- 125,000 1968 ---------- 17,069,000 1%9 ---------- 5,706,000 1970 ---------- 1,784,000
. 1971 ---------- 801,000 1972 ---------- 4,023,000 1973 --------- 49,173,000 ,
1974 ---------- 6,637,000 j (D) Reasons: Both parties are electric utilities generating, i
transmitting Ond distributing electric power to areas which are contiguous at certain locations and whose lines intersect or parallel each other within the i State of Ohio. It was deemed s tually desirable that the systems be interconnented with each other to achiev* the benefits from cc.ordinated inter-connected operations.
(E) Dates: Contract dated november 29, 1957 end as amended on '
July 6, 1959, August 19, 1959, Noumber 1,1961 and April 16, 1963 Copies of the corbract including all supplements, amendments, or modifi":ations thereof,which were specifically selected by DOJ knd NRC,have been made available for inspection and 1:opy at Central Depository in Washington, D.C. .
(F) Rates: The rate (s) at which Company billed Columbus and Southern Electric Company are shown on page 9 and 10 of the contract dated November 29, 1957 and have been incorporated into the Company's Rate Schedule (FPC Rate ), copies of which are among those documents sp M Pically elected by DOJ and NRC for sMpment to War.ing 0, D.C (G; Rate Basis: The rates between the partis ver astablished by extended negotiations and a :-.ted with FPC with an effective date of September 13, 1964. The rates and the methods and factors used to determine such rates are set forth in the contract between the parties ties sudin any material which was supplied to the FPC in conjunction with such filing. Copies of the relevant information were specially selected by DOJ
- and NRC and are available at Central Depository in Washington, D.C.
a-
- lo -
, INTERCONNECTIONS
- 5. (A) Party: Duquesne Light Company (Inc1wHng Pennsylvania Power Company)
(B) Time Period: Various a6reements between the parties were in existence prior to September 1,1%5 and have continued, been modified or replaced so that services between the parties have continued uninterrupted to date.
(C) Energy Supplied: KWH oE PP 1965 ----------- --- 68,302,651 1966 ----------- 7,599,000 53,486,000 1967 ----------- 57,045,000 14,450,000 1%8 ----------- 3,870,000 7,h01,000 1969 ----------- 87,935,000 20,284,000 1970 ----------- 105,593,000 10,c99,000 1971 ----------- 68,o54,000 8,000 1972 ----------- 30,257,000 166,200 1973 ----------- 59 646,000 5,321,000 1974 ----------- 104,,305,000 850,000 (See "CAPC0" Interconnection for CAPCO Transaction)
(D) Reasons: The parties felt it would be mutually advantr.geous to realize the benef from more coordinated interconnected operations and rervices, including the interchange, sale and purchase of electric power and energy. The interim supplements, described below, provide a means for Duquesne Light Company to receive its entitlement of capacity and energy from the 125 IG short-lead time capacity installed on the Ohio Edison System during fixed periods.
(E) Dates: Pennsylvania Power and Duquesne Light Company entered into an agreement dated October 3, 1925 which was supplemented on octoDer 22, 1946 by the parties (PP's FPC Rate Schedule No.1).
Pennsylvania Power and otio Edisan entered into an agreement with Duquesne Light Compagr or October 17, 1966 to supply short-term power (PP's FIC Rate Schedule 18 and Ohio Edison's FPC Rate Schedule 65-). This Agreement, dated october 17, 1966 was supplemented by letter agreements dated June 26, 1967, December 20, 1967 and December 20, 1968. on January 1, "Ta, all three parties agreed to terminate all of the aforesaim agreements dated october 3, 1925, october 22, 1946, October 17, 1966, June 26, 1967, December 20,1%7 and December 20,1;58, and to enter a new agreement to govern and control the trans-actions between the parties. The Agreement was transmitted to
\
)
-u- ,
, the FPC on December 24, 1969, was accepted on March 18, 1970 and made effective as of January 1, 1970.
Accompanying the Agreement (FPC Rate 71 and 21) was Schedule I,
A " Emergency Power" (FPC Rate 71.1 and 21.1), Schedule B
" Interchange Power and Energy" (FPC Rate 71.2 and 21.2), and .
Schedule C "Short-Term Power and Energy" (FPC Rate 71.3 and 21.3). Subsequently, the parties have entered into interim (
supplement, datad Septembe- 8, 1972 (FPC Rate 71.4 and 21.4) which was effective beginning with the first full day (September 8,1972) of commercial operation of the last 3 such capacity to go in service and ending on December 31, l 1972.. On January 1, 1973,~the parties entered into an ;
interim supplement for the period beginning January 1, 1973 and ending September 30, 1973. On July 10, 1973 the {
i parties entered into two additional interim supplements j both for periods beginning July 10, 1973 and ending i September 30, 1973. A u supplements which have now expired j involved the entitlement of Duquesne Light to receive g capacity and energy from 125 MW of short-lead time capac'ity ;
installed on the Ohio Edison System. 0 (F) Rates: The rate (s) which Ohio Edison and Pennsylvenia Power b bined Duquesne Light have been incorpcrated into the l Companies' Rate Schedule (FPC Rate 71 for Chio Edison and FPC Rate 21 for Pennsylvania Power). The details of such rates are found in Schedules A,B and C of the agreement dated January 1, 1970 and the four interim supplements t thereto. The rates for contracts which have been terminated i are found within the agreements. All agreements, supplements, modifications and rate schedules have been made available at Central Depository as requested by 3RC and DOJ.
(G) Rate Basis: The rates between the parties were established by ex- j tended negotiations and are filed with FPC. The rates :
and the methods and factors used to determine such rates !
are set forth in the contract between the parties and in any material which van supplied to the FPC in conjunction ,
with each filing. Copies of the relevant infonnation were !
specian y selected by the DOJ end NRC and have been made available at Central Depository in Washington, D.C.
6 i
L
- :- 1 l
INIERCONNECTIoNS
- 6. (A) Party: The Dayton Power and Light Company (B) Time Pe.-iod: Prior to September 1,1%5 continuing to date.
(C) Energy Supplied: KWH 1% 5 ---------- ---
1%6 ---------- ---
1%7 ---------- ---
1968 ---------- 487,000 1969 ---------- 76,549,000 lo70 ---------- 128,750,000 1971 ---------- 8,o98,000 1972 ---------- 47,060,000 1973 ---------- 11,933,000 1974 ---------- 8,797,000 (D) Reasons: Both parties are electric utilities generating, transmitting and distributing electric power to areas which are contiguous at certain locations and whose lines intersect or parr.llel each other within the State of Ohio. It was deemed mutually desirable that the systems be interconnected with each other to achieve the benefits from coordinated interconnection services and transactions that may include among others
- 1) the interchange, sale and purchase of electric power to meet emergency or co-ordinated maintenance requirements;
- 2) the interchange, sale or purchase to affect operating economies;
- 3) the sale and purchase of firm power and associated energy; and
- 4) the sale and purchase of short-term electric power available on the system of one party and needed on the system of another.
(E) Dates: Contract dated May 1, 1949 and as amended on May 4, 1956 and June 6,1956 and effective through September 15,1%7.
on that date the parties entered into a new Interconnection Agreement which is still in effect. Copies of the contracts including all supplements, amendments, or modifications thereof, which were specifically selected by DoJ and NRC, have been made available for inspection and copy at Central Depository in Washington, D.C.
l l
(F) Rates: The rate (s) e.t which Company billed The Dayt.on Power and Light Company are shown in Service Schedule A and B attached to the contract dated September 15,1%7 end hsve been incorporated into the Company's Rate Schedules (FPC Rate 66 and PUC0 35018), copies of which are among those documents specifically selected by DOJ and ERC for shipment to Washington, D.C.
(G) Rata Basis: The rates for electric pcuer between the parties are special rates establisbad by extended negotiatione andwere filed with FPC (.n December 22, 1967, accepted on February 5,1968 and ade effective on January 26, 1968. 'Lhe rates and the methods and factors used to determine such rates are set forth in the contract between the parties and in any material which was supplied to the FPC in con, junction with such filing.
Copies of the relevant information have been made available at Central Depository in Washington, D.u.
V*** _ Sy ,
I INTERCONNECTIOFS
- 7. (A) Party: Monongahela Pcwer Company and West Penn Power Company (Including Pennsylvania Power Cc::rpany)
(identified Co11ectivel:7 as APS)
(3) Time Period: F:om approximately October 17, 1968 continuing to date.
(C) Energy Supplied: KWH PP OE 1%8 -------- 42,377,000 445,077,000 1%9 ------- 16,587,000 130,889,000 1970 -------- 735,000 46,.768,000 1971 -------- ---
25,210,000
- 1972 -------- ---
30,515,000 1973 -------- 8,000 53,303,000 1974 -------- ---
32,607,000 (D) Reasons: All parties are electric utilities generating, trans-mitting and distributing electric power within there respective service territories.In order that each party may further realize benefits from more coordinated interconnected operation, chat may include among others, emergency support, interchange power and energy on an economy or non-displacement basis, and short-ter:a power purchase, the parties deemed it mutually desirable to enter into the subject contract.
(E) Dates: Contract dated October 17,1%8 (FPC Rate 69 and 20),in .
ciuding Schedule A " Energy Service" (FPCRate69..'.&20.1),
Schedule B " Interchange Power and Energy" (FPC Rate 69.2 &
20.2), and Schedule C "Short Term Power and Energy" (FPC Rate 69.3 & 20 3),were transmitted to FPC on October 31, 1968, accepted for filing on December 16, 1968 and deemed effective as of December 1, 1969 On February 1, 1972, the parties agreed to amend (Amendment No. 1) Schedule C "Short Term Power and Energy" which was transmitted to FPC or. April 26, 1972, accepted for filing on July 12, 1972 and deemed effective on June 1, 1972 (FPC Rate 69 3.1 & 20.3.1). On June 1, 1973, the parties agreed to amend (Amendment No. 2)
Schedule A " Emergency Service" which was accepted for filing I by FPC on May 31, 1974 and deemed effective on June 15, 1973 i (FPC Rate 69.1.1 and 20.1.1). On May 6, 1974, the parties agreed to delete Schedule C and substitute a new Schedule C Short Term Power and Energy" (Amendment No. 3) which was accepted for filing on July 15, 1974 and deemed effective on May 15, 1974 (FPC Rate 69.4 and 20.4).
l
9
_ 15
'(F) Rates: Tbsrate(s)atwhichcompaniesbilledWestPennand Monongahela are shown in attachments to the contract of October 17,1%8, Schedule A, Schedule B, and
- Schedule C, as amended, and have been incorporated into the Company's R&te Schedule (FPC Rate 69 for Ohio Edison and FPC Rate 20 for Pennsylvania Power),
copies are among these decur.iants specifically selected by DOJ und NRC for production in Washington, D.C.
(G) Rate Basis: The re,tes for electric power between the parties are special rates established by extended negotia-tiona and are filed with FPC. The rates and the methods and factors used-to determine such rates are set forth in the contract between the parties and in any material which was supplied to the FPC in conjunction with such filing. Copies of .the relevant information has been madc avail;ble at Central Depository in Washington, D.C.
. i p -e e
7 e
1 IETERCONNECTIONS
- 8. (A) Party: ohio Power Company (B) Time Period: From approximately August 1,1970 continuing to date.
1 (C) Energy Supplied: KWH 1970 ---------- 102,287,000 l 1971 ---------- 257,276,000 1 1972 ---------- 276,187,000 :
1973 ---------- 308,614,000 '
1974 ---------- 316,879,000 (D) Reasons: The purpose of the-Agrewt dated June 20, !
1968 is to provide for the sale by ohio Power Company ,
(oP) and the purchase by chio Edison Company (oE) of '
electric power at points of interconnection from time t to time existing between their respective system, and ;
the sale by oE and the purchase by oP of electric f power at specific points of delivery, and at such i other service points or delivery as may be established f per the agreement. OP is thus able to deliver electric [
power to Buckeye Power, Inc. at such points of delivery.
on the same basis upon which electric power is being '~
delivered to other members of Buckeye Power, Inc. The arrargements, as approved by the FPC and PUCo, with variable rates and charges and min 4== charges, are reason-able, practicable and advantageous to the parties inter-ested and to the public.
(E) Dates: Contract between the parties dated as of June 20,1%8 with e service commencing on or about August 1, 1970.'
(F) Rates: The rate (s) at which Company billed Ohio Power have been ;
incorporated into Company's Rate Schedule (FPC Rate 67) i and are shown on pages 5 through 7 (Article 7 & 8) and Exhibit C of the contract. Copies of the relevant in-formation have been made available at the request of DoJ !
and NRC at the Central Depository in Washington, D.C.
1 e
1 l
I
. (G) Rate Basis: The rates between the parties were established by ex-tenied negotiations and are filed with FPC. The rates and the methods and factors used to determine such rates are set forth in the centract between the parties and in any material which was supplied to the FPC in conjunction with each filing. Copies of the relevant information were specially selected by the DOJ and NRC and have been made available at Central Depository in Washington, D.C.
e 1
4 9
l
. i
, I
INTERCONNECTIONS
- 9. (A) Party: Chio Power Company ,
(B) Time Period: Prior to September 1, 1965 continuing to date.
(c) Energy Supplied: KWH 1965 --------- 3,734,000 1966 ---------- 15,035,000 080,000 1%7 1968----------
H,473,000 7, 1969 ----------237,537,000 919,000 1970 ---------- 79,450,000 1971 ----------
1972 ---------- 94, 41,083,000 1973 ---------- 26,285,000 1974 ---------- 10,949,000 (D) Reasons: The parties had for many years been interconnected and operated in synchronism before mutually agreeing to enter into a new contract providing for the farnishing of inter-connection services, incinMing the interchange, sale and purchase of electric power and energy. Such interconnection services may include among others:
- 1) The interchange, sale and purchase of energy to effect operating economies;
- 2) The furnishing of mutual emergency and standby assistance;
- 3) The coordination of z:aintenance schedules of generating and transmission facilities; and
- 4) The transfer of electric energy through the transmission system of one party for the benefit of the other; the sale and purchase of short-ter=
electric power and energy available on the system of one party and needed on the system of another so as to facilitate more economical construction of generating capacity on the systems of both
( parties.
l
, . - - . - - - , . - , , ~,, - -m
(E)~ Dates: Contract dated January 1, 1952 (FPC Rate 9) and as amended on May 1,1%7 (FPC Rate 91) is present],y in effect with the former having an FPC Certificate of Concurrence dated Jarn ary 1,1952 and the latter having an FPC acceptance date of July 7,1967 so as to be effective on June 29,1%7.
This contract was filed with PUC0 for information on February 20, 1952.
(F) Rates: The rates at which Company billed Ohio Power Company have been incorporated into Company's Rate Schedule (FPC Rate 9, including FPC Rate 9.1). The details of each rate involved are shown on pages of Service Schedule A " Inter-change Power" attached to Agreement dated January 1,1952 and on the May 1,1%7 amendment to said Agreement.
(G) Rate Basis: The rates between the parties were established by ex-tended negotiations and are filed with FPC. The rates
.and the methods and factors used to determine such rates are set forth in the contract between the parties and in any material which was supplied to the FPC in conjunction with each filing. Copies of relevant information were specially selected by the DOJ and NRC and have been made available at Central Depository in Washing'on, D.C.
1 4
4
'., I INTERCONNECTIOES
- 10. (A) Party: ohio Valley Electric Corporation (OVEC)
, (including Pennsylvania Power Company)
(B) Time Period: Prior to September 1, 1965 continuing to date.
(C) Energy Supplied: KWH CE PP 1971 ---------- 1,779,000 186,000 1972 ---------- 741,000 168,000 1973 ---------- 1,951,000 576,000 1974 ---------- 5,884,000 722,000 (D) Reasons: The U.S. Atomic Energy Commission constructed a project -
for enriching uranium services near Portsmouth, Ohio ,
and needed at the site of the project electric power i and energy in a large amount which was not then available. .'
OVEC entered an agreement relating to the supplying of
- Power and energy to the project. The Companies being a a sponsoring Company to such project entered into an Inter- ,
Compar:y Power Agreement which obligated each to supply ',
interim power and supplemental power in order that OVEC may fulfil.1 its obligation to the AEC and in turn ,
each sponsoring Company has the right to receive surplus '
! power as may be generated by OVEC. (AEC is now Nuclear
- Regulatory Commission.)
1 (E) Dates: The Agreements which relate to the undertaking are as follows: !
i I
ohio Edison l FPC No. Other Party Document Dated 5
12 OVEC Certificate of July 29, 1953 !
Concurrence in Inter-company Power Agreement of July 10, 1953 12.2 OVEC Certificate of March 23, 1956 .
Concurrence in l Inter-Company Letter Agreement of February 23, 1956. ;
i 12.2.1 OVEC Certificate of Con- November 19, 1956 currence in Supple- '
ment to Inter-Company .
Letter Agreement of February 23, 1956 r
l l :
. i U
e Chio Edison FPC No. Other Party Document Dated 12.2.2 OVEC Certificate of January 17, 1958 Concurrence in Supplement to Inter-company Letter Agreement of February 23, 19%, being consent to Modification No. 2 of January 13, 1958.
12.2.3 OVEC and' Certificate of December 26, o958 Ohio Power Concurrence in Supplement to Inter-company Ietter Agreement of February 23, 1956, consent to Modification No. 3 of December 8,1958.
12 3 OVEC and Certificate of June 19, 1956 Chio Power Concurrence in -
Letter Agreement of June 19, 1956..
.12.l+ Ohio Power Certificate of November 19, 1956 Concurrence in Inter-company Letter Agreement of November 10, 1956.
12.5 OVEC Certificate of December 26, 1958 Concurrence in Modification No. 1 dated August 20, 1958, to Supple-mentary Transmission Agreement of July 10, 1953.
12.6 OVEC Certificate of April 27, 1960 Concurrence in Ietter Agreement of April 18,1%0.
12.7 OVEC Certificate of July 1, 1965 Concurrence in Modification No. 2 of April 1, 1965, to Supplementary Transmission Agree-ment of July 10, 1953.
- e ,, .
Chio Edison FPC No. Other Party Document Dated 12.8 OVEC Certificate of July 1, 1966 Concurrance in Modification No. 1 of June 3, 1966, to Power Agreement of July 10, 1953 12 9 OVEC Certificate of January 12, 1967 Concurrence in Modification No. 4 dated January 7, 1967, to Power Agreement of October 15, 1952.
12.10 OVEC Certificate of February 7, 1967 Concurrence in Modification No. 3 of January 20,1%7, to Power Agreement of July 10, 1953.
(F) Rates: ihe rate (s) at which Company's billed OVEC for electric power supplied under Inese agreements have been in-corporated into Company's Rate Schedule (FPC Rate Schedule 12 for Chio Edison and FPC Rate Schedule 10 for Pennsylvania Pcwer Company.) The details of such rates are found in Article 6 of the Inter-company Power Agreement among OVEC and sponsoring companies dated July 10, 1953 and in Modification .
No. 1 dated June 3, 1966, Modification No. 2 dated January 7,1%7 and Modification No. 3 dated ,
January 20, 1967.
(G) Rate Basis: The rates between the parties were established by ex-tended negotiations and ere filed with FPC. The rates and the methods and factors used to determine such rates are set forth in the contract between the parties and in any material which was supplied to the FPC in conjunction with each filing. Copies of relevant information were specially selected by the DCJ and NRC and have been mede available at Central Iepository in Washington, D.C.
e,- . .e INTERCONNECT' IONS
- 11. (A) Party: Toledo Edison Company (B) Time Period: Prior to September 1, 1965 cont huing to date.
(0) Energy Supplied: KWH ~ g 1965 ---------- 780,000 1966 ---------- .227,000 1967 ---------- --
1968 ---------- ---
1%9 ---------- 945,000 1970 ---------- 12,450,000 1971 ---------- 1,075,000 1972 ---------- 58,159,000 1973 ---------- 11,780,000 1974 ---------- 2 311,000 (See CAPCO nterconnection for CAPCO Transaction)
(D) Reasons: The parties mutually agreed to provide interconnected operations between their systems so as to provide for interchange power; including on-peak, off-peak, or economy; firm power; short-term power or emergency support. That interim supplements, deceribed below, provide a basis for Toledo Edison to receive its entitlement of capacity and energy from the W.H. Sammis No. 7 Unit during fixed periods and to receive its entitlement of capacity and energy from the 125 M4 short-lead time capacity installed on the Ohio Edison System during a fhed period.
gE) Dates: (1) Contract dated Decemger 31, 1946 1 with letter amendments dated January 2, 1952 and october 27,1955(FpCRate41) continued in effect until terminated by, (2) Contract dated August 1, 1968 (FPC Rate 68) which is presently'in effect.
The parties entered into an interim supplement dated September 20, 1971 (FPC Rate 68.1) to be effective during the period beginning with the date of commercial operation of W.H. Sammis No. 7 and ending with the date of commercial operation of Eastlake No. 5. The parties entered into a second interim supplement dated August 1,1972 (FPC Rate 68.2) to be effective during the period beginning.with the date of commercial opera-tion of Eastlake No. 5 and ending with the date of enmrecial operation of Beaver Valley No.1. The parties have also entered into an interim supplement dated January 1, 1973 (FPC Rate 68.3) to be effective from January 1, 1973 until September 30, 1973 This agreement was transmitted to the FPC on March 16, 1973 and accepted on November 16, 1973 so as to be effective on January 1, 1973.
-2+-1 J. . %.
(F) Rates: The rate (s) at which Company bined The Toledo Edison Company are shown on pages 10through 13 of the contract dated August 1, 1968 and each supplement thereto which have been incorporated into the Company's Rate Schedule (FPC Rate 68 and PUC0 35671),
copies of which are among those documents specifically selected by DOJ and NRC for shipment to Washington, D.C.
(G) Rate Basis: The rates between the parties were established by ex-tended negotiations and are filed with FPC. The rates and the methods and factors used to determine such rates are set forth in the contract between the parties and in any material which was supplied to the FPC in conjunction with such filing. Copies of relevant information are available at Central Depository in Washington, D.C.
9 4
l i
A
,. , INTERCONNECTION 3
( 12. (A) Party: West Penn Power Company (Exclusively Pennsylvania Power Company)
(3) Time Period: From approximately January 14, 1966 to approximately october 17,1%8.
(C) Energy Supplied: 100f !
1966 ---------- 6,090,000 1%7 ---------- 10,836,000 ,
g (D) Reasons: It was desired to interchange electric power, [
both under emergency conditions and in order to ?
effect economics, and it was felt that the operating experience so obtained could possibly be used to develop operating arrangements to provide for more fully integrr.ted operations of the two systems.
(E) Dates: Contract dated January 14, 1966 was utilized until terminated by agreement between the parties dated october 17,1%8. (See Item 7A) hereof). Copies of this contract including any supplements, amendments, or modifications thereof which were specifically selected by DoJ and NRC have been made available for inspection and copy at Central Depository n Washington, D.C.
(F) Rates: The rate (s) at which Company billed West Penn Power
. Ccapany are shown on page 1 of the contract dated January 14, 1966 and have been incorporated into the f Company's Rate Schedule (FPC Rate 12), copies of which are among those documents,specificraly selected by DCJ ;
and 3RC,for shipment to Washington, D.C. '
(G) Rate Basis: The rates for electric power between the parties are special rates established by extended negotia-tions and are filed with FPC. The rates and the methods and factors used to determine such rates are set forth in the contract between the par-ties and in .uly material which was supplied to the !
FPC in conjunction with such filing. Copies of relevant information are available et Central l Depository in Washington, D.C.
INTERCONNECTIONS 13 (A) Party: West Penn Power Company (including Pennsr1vania Power Comoany) l (B) Time Period: From approximate 1;r June 24,1966 continuing to approximately October 17,1%8.
(C) Energy Supplied: KWH l
3 PW 1%6 -------- 121,178,000 10,832,000 1%7 -------- 245,440,000 39,310,000 (D) Reasons: West Penn needed short-term power in various amounts for a period extending to the date when Fort Martin No. 2 commences commercial operation and Pennsylvania Power and Ohio Edison were willing to furnish such amounts of short-term power as they may have available.
(E) Dates: Contract dated June 24, 1966 filed with FPC on July 1, 1966, was utilized until terminates by agreement be-tween parties dated October 17,1%8. (See Item 7(A) hereof). Copies of this contract including any supple-ments, amendments, or modifications thereof which were specifically selected by DCJ and NRC have been made available for inspection and copy at Centre.1 Depository in Washington, D.C.
(F) Rates: The rate (s) at which the Companies bined West Penn Power Company are shown in Article 5 of the contract dated June 24, 1966 and have been incorporated into the Company's Rate Schedule (FPC Rate 64 for Ohio Edison and FPC Rate 13 for Penn Pcwer), copies of which are crong those documents, specifically selected by DOI and NRC,for shipment to Washington, D.C.
(G) Rate Basis: The rates between the parties are special rates es-tablished by extended negotiations and are filed with FPC with an effective date of July 1, 1966. The rates and the methods and factors used to determine such rates are set forth in the contract between the parties and in any material which was suppLad to the FPC in conjunction with such filing. Copien of relevant information are avnilable at Centr:L1 Depository in Washirgton, D.C.
(., "
MUNICIPALITIES
- 1. (A). Party: City of Amherst (B) Time Period: . Prior to September 1, 1965 continuing
. to date.
(C) Energy Supplied: KWH OE 1% 5 ---------- 15,564,000 1966 -------~- 16,800,000 1%7 ---------- 17,862,000 1968 ---------- 19,962,000 1969 ---------- 22,956,000 1970 ---------- 25,062,000 1971 ---------- 28,560,000 1972 ---------- 31,902,000 1973 ---------- 34,530,000 1974 ---------- 35,1 % ,000 (D) Reasons: Pursuant to an ordinance by Council of the' Municipality, the Safety-Service Director was authorized on behalf of the Municipality to contract with Company for electric services for municipal resale. The Company being a
' public utility engaged in the production, transmission and distribution of electric power offered to provide such service to Municipality under terms and conditions acceptable to both parties. The parties then entered into the contracts described herein.
(E) Dates: 1) Contract dated october 1, 1957, filed with FPC on August 3,1964 and made effective September 3,1964 continued in effect until terminated by,
- 2) Contract dated December 30, 1964 which was effective for those meter readings taken after october 1,1965 which continued $n effect until a new rate schedule was 1 substituted by, l
- 3) Settlement Agreement between the parties dated as of '
February 9,1973. (Said Settlement Agreement was filed with FPC on September 24, 1973 and made effective by FPC as of September 1, 1972 pursuant to Ccmmission order issued August 29,1973). '
(F) Rates: The rate (s) at which Company bi2 bd City of Amherst have l been incorporated into Company's Rate Schedule (FPCRate !
Schedule 21 was utilized through approximately October 1, l 1965, FPC Rate Schedule 46 was utilized through approxi- '
mately September 1, 1972 and FPC Rate Schedule '98 in-cluding 2"rplement No.1 thereto is presently being utilized.
l However, note FPC assigned Rate Schedule 75 to cover the
- 1. interim period between the effective date of the requested l rate increase filed with FPC on January 27, 1972 by the
! Company and the acceptance by FFC of the Settlement-l.
Agreement on November 28,1973).
L -
I
. _ . . . . _ ,_ 1
(G) Rate Basis: The rates between the parties were established by ex-tended negotiations and are filed with FPC. The rates
, and the methods and factors used to determine such rates
, are set forth in the contract between the partiec and in any material which was supplied to the FPC in conjunction-with each filing. Copies of the relevant information were specially selected by the DOJ and NRC and have been made available at Central Depository in Washington, D.C.
I a
f I
L
.r NUNICIPALITIES
- 2. (A). Party: Village of Beach City
.(B) Time Period: Prior to September 1, 1965 continuing to date:
(C) Energy Supplied: KWH OE 1965 ---------- 3,171,600 :
1966 ---------- -3,345,600 1%7 ---------- 3,561,000 1968 ---------- 3,927,600 1969 ---------- 4 285,200 1970 ---------- 4,486,800 1971 ---------- 4,580,400 1972 ---------- 4,947,600
, 1973 ---------- 5,389,200 1974 ---------- 5,799,600 (D) Reasons: Pursuant to an ordinance by Council of the Municipality, the Safety-Service Director was authorized on behalf of the Municipality to contract with Company for electric services for municipal resale. The Company being a public utility engaged in the production, transmission and distribution of electric power offered to provide such servirt to Municipality under terms and conditions acceptable to both parties. The parties then entered into the contracts described herein.
(E) Dates: 1) Contract dated July 1,1956,. filed with FFC on i August 3,1964 and made effective Sehe.nber 3,1964 continued in effect until terminated by,
- 2) Contract dated January 24, 1966 which was effective for those. meter readings taken after october 1, 1965 which continued in effect until .a new rate schedule was substituted by,
- 3) Settlement Agreement between the parties , lated as of ,
February 9,1973. (Said Settlement Agreement was filed L with FPC on September 24, 1973 and made effective by !
FPC as of Septembe* 1, 1972 pursuant to Commission i
- order issued August 29, 1973.)
(F)- Rates: The rate (s) at which Company billed Village of Beach City have been incorporated into Company's Rate Schedule (FPC Rate Schedule 22 was utilized through approximately October 1, 1965, FPC Rate Schedule 47 was utilized through approxi-mately September 1, 1972 and FPC Rate Schedule 99 in-cluding Supplement No. 1 thereto is presentl However, note FPC assigned Rate Schedule to cover 76 y being the utilized. l interim Veriod between the effective date of the requested rate in; tease filed with FPC on January 27, 1972 by the Company and the acceptance by FPC of the Settlement
! Aer e, -.J. on November 28,1973).
._.- , , _- ~_ ._ ___ _ , _ _ - _ . , , _ _ .
30 -
. (G) Rate Basis: The rates between the parties were established by ex-
, tended negotiations and are filed with FPC. The rates and the methods and factors used to determine such rates are set forth in the contract between the parties and in any material which was supplied to the FPC in conjunction with each filing. Copies of the relevant information were specially selected by the DOJ and NRC and have been made available at Central Depository in Washington, D.C.
9 E y e
o k
e.
k
MUNICIPALITIES r
3 (A)'. Party: Village of Brewster I
(B) Time Period: Prior to September 1, 1965 continuing to date.
(C) Energy Supplied: KWH g 1%5 ---------- 3,730,800 1966~---------- 3,994,800 1%7 ---------- 4,212,000 1968 ---------- 4,814,400 1969 ---------- 5,352,000 1970 ---------- 6,418,800 1971 ---------- 7,146,000 1972 ---------- 7,980,000 1973 ---------- 9,352,000 1974 ---------- 9,652,400 (D) Reasons: Pursuant to an ordinance by Council of the Municipality, the Safety-Service Director was authorized on behalf of the Municipality to contract with Company for electric services for municipal resale. The Company being a public utility engaged in the production, transmission and distribution of electric power offered to provide such service to Municipality under terms and conditions acceptable to both parties. The parties then entered
. into the contracts described herein.
(E) Dates: 1) Contract dated May 23, 1962 3. filed with FPC on ,
August 3,1964 and made effective September 3,1964 ;
continued in effect until terminated by, ;
- 2) Centract dated December 20, 1965 which was effective for those meter readings taken after october 1, 1965 which continued in effect until a new rate schedule was sub-stituted by,
- 3) Settlement Agreement between the parties dated as of February 9, 1973. (Said Settlement A6reement was filed with FPC on September 24, 1973 and made-effective by FPC as of September 1, 1972 pursuant to Commission crder issued August 29,1973.)
(F) Rates: The rate (s) at which Company billed Villc.ge of Brewster:have been incorporated into Company's Rate Schedule (FPCRate i Schedule 23 was utilized through approximately October 1, 1965, .FPC Rate Schedule 48 was utilized through approxi- l1 mately September 1,1972 and FPC Rate Schedule 100 in-clnMng Supplement No.1 thereto is presently being utilized. l However, note FPC assigned Rate Schedule 77 to cover the interim period between the effective date of the requested rate increase filed with FPC on January 27, 1972 by the Company and the acceptance by FPC of the Settlezcant Agreement on November 28,1973).
e- w g _w- er - = , - , -
w
. (G) Rate Basis: The rates between the parties were established by ex-tended negotiations and are filed with FPC. The rates
/
and the methods and factors used to determine such rates are set forth in the contract between the parties and in any material which was supplied to the FPC in conjunction with each filing. Copies of the relevant information were specially selected by the DOJ and NRC and have been made available at Central Depository in Washington, D.C.
9 4
O b
I l
1 9
,. c, .
NUHICIFALITEC
/
- 4. (A) Party: Village of Columbiana I
(B) ' Time Period: Prior to September 1, 1965 continuing l to date. l
-(C) Energy Supplied: KWH
_oE 1% 5 ---------- 13,440,000 1966 ---------- 184,000 1967 ---------- 14,412,000 14, 1968 ---------- 15,282,000 1969 ---------- 16,002,000 1970 ----- -- --- 17,682,000 1971 ---------- 18,906,000 1972 ---------- 20,550,000 1973 ---------- 22,842,000
'1974 ----- _---- 23,604,000 (D) Reasons: Pursuant to an ordinance by Council of the Municipality, the Safety-Service Director was authorized on behalf of the Municipality to contract with Company for electric services for municipal resale. The Company being a public utility engaged in the production, transmission and distribution of electric power offered to provide such service to Municipality ander terms and conditions acceptable to both parties. The parties then entered into the contracts described herein.
(E) Dates: 1) Contract dated June 15, 1962, filed with tic'on August 3,1964 and made effective September 3,1964
- continued in effect until terminated by, "
- 2) Contract dated December 21, 1965 which was effective for those meter readings taken after october 1, 1965 which continued in effect until a new rate schedule was substituted by,
- 3) Settlement Agreement between the parties dated as of February 9, 1973. (Said Settlement Agreement was filed with FPC on September 24, 1973 and made effective by FPC as of September 1, 1972 pursuant to Commission order issued August 29, 1973.)
(F) Rates: The rate (s) at which Company' billed Village of Columbiana have been incorporated into Company's Rate Schedule (FIC Rate Schedule 24 was utilized through approximately october 1, 1965, FPC Rate Schedule 49 was utilized through approxi- .
mately September 1,1972 and FPC Rate Schedule 101 in- l'.
ciuding Supplement No. 1 thereto is presently being utilized. ~
t However, note FPC assigned Rate Schedule 78 to cover the !
- interim period between the effective date of the requested rate increase filed with FPC on January 27,1972 by the Caupany and the acceptance by FPC of the Settlement '
Ar,. a t on November 28,1973).
- , , , _ , , _ . . - - . . - . . - , , . , , _ . . - , , . - , ,e--. ---w- ,
-p.
. (G) Rate Basis: The rates between the parties were established by ex-tended regotiations and are filed with FPC. The rates and the methods and factors used to determine such rates ;
are set forth in the contract between the parties and in j any material which was supplied to the FPC in conjunction ,3 with each filing. Copies of the relevant infomation B were specially selected by the DOJ and NRC and have been j made available at Central Depository in Washington, D.C.
O e
l llI 1
i l
I 1
h l
. 1 i
l t
l
l
- 3y - ,
MUNICIPALITIES
/
-5. (A) Party: City of Cuyahoga Fall _s (B)- Time Period: Prior to September 1, 1965 continuing to date.
(C) Energy Supplied: KWH 9E 1965 ---------- 134,352,000 1966 ---------- 142,560,000 1%7 ---------- 150,582,000 1%8 ---------- 163,152,000 1969 ---------- 180,720,000 1970 ---------- 192,096,000 1971 ---------- 202,080,000 1972 ---------- 212,640,000 1973 ---------- 220,512,000 1974 ---------- 214,453,616 (D) Reasons: Pursuant to an ordinance by Council- of the Municipality, the Safety-Service Director was authorized on behalf of the Municipality to contract with Company for electric services for municipal resale. The Company being a public utility engaged in the production, transmission and distribution of electric power offered to provide
' such service to Municipality under terms and conditions acceptable to both parties. The parties then entered into the contracts described herein.
(E) Dates: 1) Contract dated December 15, 1956, filed with FPC on August 3,1964 and made effective September 3,1964 continued in effect until terminated by, 1
r
- 2) Contract dated December 30,1%5, which was effective for those meter readings taken after october 1,1965 which continued in effect until .a new rate schedule was substituted by,
- 3) Settlement Agreement between the parties dated as of February 9, 1973. (Said Settlement Agreement was filed with FPC on September 24, 1973 and made effective by FPC as of September 1,1972 pursuant to Commission order issued August 29,1973.) *
(F) Rates: The rate (s) at which Company billed City of Cuyahoga Falls have been incorporated into Company's Rate Schedule (FPC Rate Schedule 26 was utilized through approximately october 1, 1965, FPC Rate Schedule 50 was utilized through approxi- !
mately September 1,1972 and FPC Rate Schedule 102 in- {
cluding Supplement No. 1 thereto is presently being utilized. !
However, note FPC assigned Rate Schedule 79 to cover the i interim period between the effective date of the requested >
rate increase filed with FPC on Jaruary 27,1972 by the Company and the acceptance by FPC of the Settlement Agreement on November 28,1973).
i
-g.
(G) Rate Basis: The rates between the parties were established by ex-tended negotiations and are filed with FPC. The rates and the methods and factors used to determine such rates are set forth in the contract between the parties and in any material which was supplied to the FPC in conjunction with each filing. Copies of the relevant information were specially selected by the DOJ and NRC and have been made available at Central Depository in Washington, D.C.
m l
l l
l 5
6 4
m .
I M ICIPALITIES
- 6. (A): Party: City of Galion (B) Time Period: Prior to September 1, 1965 continuing to date.
(C) Energy Supplied: KWH g 1965 --------- 56,460,000 1966 --------- 61,836,000 I
1%7 --------- 65 3%8,000 1968 ---------- 70,3 W ,000 1%9 ---------- 76,296,000 1970 ---------- 80,o16,000 1971 ---------- 81,024,000 1972 ---------- 83,712,000 1973 ---------- 88,800,000
,1974 ---------- 93,048,000 (D) Reasons: Pursuant to an ordinance by Council of the Municipality, the Safety-Service Director was authorized on behalf of the Municipality to contract with Company for electric services for municipal resale. The Company being a public utility engaged in the production, transmission and distribution of electric power offered to provide such service to Municipality under terms and conditions ,
acceptable to both parties. The parties then entered into the contracts described herein. 1 (E) Dates: 1) Contract dated July' 12, 1960, filed with FPC on August 3, 1964 and made effective September 3, 1964 continued in effect until terminated by, O
- 2) Contract dated December 29, 1965 which was effective for those meter readings taken after october 1, 1965 )
which continued in effect until a new rate schedule was substituted by,
- 3) Settlement Agreement between the parties dated as of l February 9,1973. (Said Settlement Agreement was filed {
with FPC on September 24, 1973 and made effective by }
FPC as of September 1,1972 pursuant to Commission l
. order issued August 29,1973.) J (F) Rates: The rate (s) at which Company billed City of Galion have been incorporated into Company's Rate Schedule (FPC Rate H Schedule 27 was utilized through approximately october 1, 1965, FPC Rate Schedule 51 was utilized through approxi-mately September 1, 1972 and FPC Rate Schedule 103 in-f cluding Supplement No. 1 thereto is presently being utilized.
However, note FPC assigned Rate Schedule 80 to cover the interim period between the effective date of the requested rate increase filed with FPC on January 27, 1972 by the Company and the acceptance by FPC of the Settlement Agreement on November 28,1973).
- v. .v- ,,-nw. , . - , . , y - , ,_ ,w--
(G) Rate Basis: The rates between the parties were established by ex-tended negotiations and are filed with FPC. The rates and the methods and factors used to determine such rates are set forth in the contract between the parties and in any material which was supplied to the FPC in conjunction with each filing. Copies of the relevant information were specially selected by the DOJ and NRC and have been made available at Central Depository in Washington, D.C.
S
+
0 i
6 l
l t
I l
l
.4
MJNICIPALITIES
- 7. (A) Party: Village of Grafton (B) Time Period: Prior to September 1,1965 continuing to date.
(C) Energy Supplied: KWH
_OE 1%5 --------- 3,056,800 1966 ---------- 3,229,600 1%7 ---------- 3,363,200 1968 ---------- 3,860,000 1969 ---------- 4,255,200 1970 ---------- 4,523,200 1971 ---------- 4,840,800 1972 ---------- 5,296,000 1973 ---------- 6,193,600
,1974 ---------- 7,649,600 (D) Reasons: Pursuant to an ordinance by Council of the Manicipality, the Safety-Service Director was authorized on behalf of the Municipality to contract with Company for electric services for municipal resale. The Company being a public utility engaged in the production, transmission and distribution of electric power offered to provide such service to Municipality under terms and conditiens acceptable to both parties. The parties then entered into the contracts described herein.
(E) Datss: 1) Contract dated February 18, 1960, filed with FPC on August 3, 1964 and made effective September 3, 1964 continued in efi'ect until terminated by, x
- 2) Contract dated January 17,1%6 which was effective for those meter readings taken after october 1,1965 which continued in effect until a new rate schedule was substituted by,
- 3) Settlement Agreement between the parties dated as of February 9,1973. (Said Settlement Agreement was filed with FPC on September 24, 1973 and made effective by FPC as of September 1, 1972 pursuant to Ccmmission order issued August 29,1973.)
(F) Rates: The rate (s) at which Company billed Village of Grafton have I been incorporated into Company's Rate Schedule (FPC Rate U Schedule 28 was utilized through approximately october 1, 1965, FPC Rate Schedule 52 was utilized through approxi-mately September 1,1972 and FPC Rate Schedule 104 in-cluding Supplement No. 1 thereto is presently being utilized.
However, note FPC assigned Rate Schedule 81 to cover the interim period between the effective date of the requested rate increase filed with FPC on January 27,1972 by the Company and the acceptance by FFC cf the Settlement Agreement on November 28,1973).
?
. -(G) Rate Basis: The rates between the parties were established by ex-tended negotiations and are filed with FPC. The rates and the methods and factors used to determine such rates are set forth in the contract between the parties and in any material which was supplied to the FPC in conjunction with each filing. Copies of the relevant information were specially selected by the D0J and ERC and have been made available at Central Depository in Washington, D.C.
t e
1 I
I l
1 l
l
MUNICIPALITIES
- 8. (A) Party: City of Hubbard (B) Time Period: Prior to September 1, 1965 continuing to date.
(C) Energy Supplied: KWH
_oE 1965 --------- 17,017,600 1966 ---------- 17,968,000 1967 ---------- 19,728,000 1968 ---------- 21,560,000 1969 ---------- 22,904,000 1970 ---------- 24,160,000 1971 ---------- 26,512,000 1972 ---------- 28,224 000 1973 ---------- 30,144,,000 1974 ---------- 30,072,000 (D) Reasons:
Pursuant to an ordinance by Council of the Municipality, the Safety-Service Director was authorized on behalf of the Municipality to contract with Company for electric services for municipal resale. The Cocpany being a public utility engaged in the production, transmission and distribution of electric power offered to provide such service to Municipality under terms and conditions acceptable to both parties. The parties then entered into the contracts described herein.
Contract dated June 30, 1956, filed with FPC on (E) Dates: 1) August 3, 1964 and made effective September 3, 1964 continued in effect unti10 terminated by,
- 2) Contract dated December 20, 1965 which was effective for those meter readings taken after october 1,1%5 which continued in effect until a new rate schedule was substituted by,
- 3) Settlement Agreement between the parties dated as of ,
February 9,1973. (Said Settlement Agreement was filed with FPC on September 24, 1973 and made effective by FPC as of September 1,1972 pursuant to Commission order issued August 29,1973.)
(F) Rates: The rate (s) at which Company billed City of Hubbard have !
been incorporated into Company's Rate Schedule (FPC Rate Schedule 29 was utilized through approximately October 1, [
i 1965, FPC Rate Schedule 53 was utilized through approxi-mately September 1,1972 and FPC Rate Schedule 105 in- {
cluding Supplement No. 1 thereto is presently being utilized. ,
However, note FPC assigned Rate Schedule 82 to cover the f 8
interim period between the effective date of the requested rate increase filed with FPC on January 27,1972 by the Company and the acceptance by FPC of the Settlement 3
Agreement on November 28,1973). l -
b
. (G) Rate Basis: The rates between the parties were established by ex- -
tended negotiations and are filed with FPC. The rates and the methods and factors used to determine such rates are set forth in the contract between the parties and in any material which was supplied to the FPC in conjunction with each filirg. Copics of the relevant infomation were specially selected by the DOJ and NRC and have 'been made available at Central Depcsitory in Washington, D.C.
9 d
0
1 i
MUNICIPALITIES l I
9 (A)' Party: Village of Hudson (B) Time Period: Prior to September 1, 1965 continuing f to date. -
(C) Energy Supplied: KWH _OE 1%5 ---------- 20,880,000 1966 ---------- 22 980,000 1967 ---------- 24,720,000
, 8% ,000 1968 ---------- 27,476,000 1%9 ---------- 31, 1970 ---------- 36,156,000 1971 ---------- 42,864,000 1972 ---------- 56,180,000 51 1973 ---------- ,856,000 1974 ---------- 58,188,000 (D) Reasons: Pursuant to an ordinance by Council of the Municipality, the Safety-Service Director was authorized on behalf of the Municipality to contract with Company for electric services for municipal resale. The Company being a public utility engaged in the production, transmission and distribution of electric power offered to provide such service to Municipality under terms and conditions acceptable to both parties. The parties then entered into the contracts described herein.
(E) Dates: 1) Contract dated November 19, 1962, filed with FPC on August 3, 1964 and made effective September 3, 1964 continued in effect until terminated by,
- 2) Contract dated December 30, 1965 which was effective for those meter readings taken after october 1, 1965 which continued in effect until a new rate schedule was substituted by,
- 3) Settlement Agreement between the parties dated as of
' February 9,1973. (Said Settlement Agreement was filed with FPC on September 24, 1973 and made effective by FPC as of September 1, 1972 pursuant to Commission j
order issued August 29,1973.)
(F) Rates: The rate (s) at which Company billed Village of Hudson have been incorporated into Company's Rate Schedule (FPC Rate Schedule 30 was utilized through approximately october 1, 1965, FPC Rate Schedule 54 was utilized through approxi-mately September 1,1972 and FPC Rate Schedule 106 in-ciuding Supplement No.1 thereto is presently being utilized.
However, note FPC assigned Rate Schedule 83 to cover the interim period between the effective date of the requested rate increase filed with FPC on January 27,1972 by the !
Company and the acceptance by FPC of the Settlement Agreement on November 28,1973).
~
.W (G) Rate Basis: The rates between the parties were established by ex-tended negotiations and are filed with FPC. The rates and the methods and factors used to determine such rates are set forth in the contract between the parties and in any material which was supplied to the FPC in conjunction with each filing. Copies of the relevant information were specially selected by the DOJ and NRC and have been made available at Central Depository in Washington, D.C.
9 e
4
_ , - _ - y ..y3- M T' E '* ' -
.t
. MUNICIPALITIES
- 10. (A) Party: Village of Lodi (B) Time Period: Prior to September 1, 1965 continuing to date.
-(C) Energy Supplied: KWH 1965 --------- 8,883,000 1966 ---------- 9,528,000 1%7 ---------- 9,915,000 1%8 ---------- 10,089,000 1%9 ---------- 10,683,000 1970 ---------- 11,187,000 1971 ---------- 12,825,000 1972 ---------- 14,133,000 1973 ---------- 15,969,000 1974 ---------- 17,671,000 (D) Reasons: Pursuant to an ordinance by Council of the Municipality, the Safety-Service Director was authorized on behalf of the Municipality to contract with Company for electric services for municipal resale. The Company being a public utility engaged in the production, transmission and distribution of electric power offered to provide such service to Municipality under terms and conditions acceptable to both parties. The parties then entered 4 into the contracts described herein.
(E) D.ates: 1) Contract dated october 1,1957, filed with PPC on August 3, 1964 and made effective September 3, 1964 continued in effect until terminated by,
- 2) Contract dated December 28,1%5 which was effective for those meter readings taken after october 1, 1965 continued in effect until a new rate schedule was su ituted by,
- 3) Settlement Agreement between the parties dated as of February 9,1973. (Said Settlement Agreement was filed with FPC on September 24, 1973 and made effective by FPC as of September 1, 1972 pursuant to Commissien i order. issued August 29,1973.)
l l (F) Rates: The rate (s) at which Company billed Village of Lodi have i been incorporated into Company's Rate Schedule (FPC Rate l Schedule 31 was utilized through approximately october 1, ,
1965, FPC Rate Schedule 55 was utilized through approxi- ,'
mately September 1,1972 and FPC Rate Schedule 107 in-- 3 cinMng Supplement No.1_ thereto is presently being utilized. !
However, note FPC assigned Rate Schedule 84 to cover the
- l interim period between the effective date of the requested ,t ;
rate increase filed with FPC on January 27,1972 by the i-Company and the acceptance by FPC of the Settlement Aerc.c-.-.Lt on November 28,1973).
l (G) Rate Basis: The rates between the parties were established by ex-
' tended negotiations and are filed'with FPC. The rates l and the methods and factors used to determine such rates are set forth in the contract between the parties and in any material which was supplied to the FPC in conjunction with each filing. Copies of the relevant information were specially selected by the D0J and NRC and have been made' available at Central Depository in Washington, D.C.
4 l
4 '
- 47 MUNICIPAT TTTM
- 11. (A) Party: Vinage of Lowellville (7 ) Time Period: Prior to September 1, 1965 continuing to 1966.
(C) Energy Supplied: KWH g 1965 ---------- 4,640,000 1966 ---------- 273,600 (D) Reasons: Pursuant to an ordinance by Council of the Municipality, the Safety-Service Director was authorized on behalf of the Municipality to contract with Company for electric services for municipal resale. The Company being a public utility engaged in the production, transmission ,
and distribution of electric power offered to provide such service to Municipality under terms and condition-acceptable to both parties. The parties then entered into the contracts described herein.
(E)' Dates: Contract dated April 28, 1956, filed with FPC on August 3,1%4 and made effective September 3,1964 continued in effect until terminated by the acquisi-l tion of the system on December 28,1%5 (F) Rates: The rate (s) at which Company billed Village of Imellville have been incorporated into Company's Rate Schedule (FPC Rate Schedule 32).
(G) Rate Basis: The rates between the parties were established by ex-tended negotiations and are filed with FPC. The rates and the methods and factors used to determine such rates are set forth in the contract between the parties and in i any material which was supplied to the FPC in conjunction with each filing. Copies of relevant information were specially selected by the DOJ and NRC and have been made available at Central Depository in Washington, D.C.
l
~
~~ <
-u- -
l MUNICIPALITIES l
- 12. (A) Party: Village of Lucas (B) Time Period: Prior to September 1, 1965 continuing to date.
(C) Energy Supplied: KWH _OE 1%5 ---------- 1,627,200 1966 ---------- 1,762,650 1%7 ---- ------ 1,919,700 1%8 ---------- 1,946,700 1%9 ---------- 2,046,150 1970 ---------- 2,o80,800 1971 ---------- 2,217,150 1972 ---------- 2,491,200 1973 ---------- 2,499,750 1974 ---------- 2,587,950 (D) Reasons: Pursuant to an ordinance by Council of the Municipality, the Safety-Service Director was authorized on behalf of the Municipality to contract with Company for electric services for municipal resale. The Company being a public utility engaged in the production, transmission and distribution of electric power offered to provide such service to Municipality ncier terms and conditions acceptable co both parties. The parties then entered into the contracts described herein.
(E) Dates: 1) Contract dated May~3, 1962, filed with FPC on August ~3, 1964 and made effective September 3, 1964 continued in effect until terminated by,
- 2) Contract dated December 22, 1965 which was effective for those meter readings taken after october 1,1965 which continued in effect until .a new rate schedule was substituted by,
- 3) Settlement Agreement between the parties dated as of February 9,1973. (Said Settlement Agreement was filed with FPC on September 24, 1973 and made effective by FPC as of September 1, 1972 pursuant to Commission order issued August 29,1973.)
(F) Rates: The rate (s) at which Company billed Village of Lucas have been incorporated into Company's Rate Schedule (FPCRate Schedule 33 was utilized through approximately october 1, 1%5, FPC Rato Schedule 56 was utilized through approxi-mately September 1, 1972 and FPC Rato Schedule 106 in-cluding Supplement No.1 thereto is presently being utilized.
However, note FPC assigned Rate Schedule 85 to cover the l interim period between the effective date of the requested !
rate increase filed with FPC on January 27,1972 by the ,
Company and the acceptance by FPC of the Settlement l Agreement on November 28,1973). !
e .
- 49
.. (G) Rate Basis: The rates between the parties were established by ex- i tended negotiations and are filed with FPC. The rates ;
and the methods and factors used to determine such rates )
are set forth in the contract between the parties and in l any material which was supplied to the FFC in conjunction with each filing. Copies of the relevant information were specially selected by the DOJ and NRC and have been ,
made available at Central Depository in Washington, D.C. j T
. i l
)
\
?
9 t
h i
l 1 i
MUNICIPALITIES
- 13. (A) Party: Vinage of Milan (B) Time Pe:iod: Prior to September 1, 1965 continuing i to . tate.
(C) Energy Supplied: KWH
_oE 1965 ---------- n,718,400 1%6 ---------- 13,o94,400 1%7 ---------- 12,953,600 1%8 ---------- 15,665,040 1969 ---------- 16,848,000 1970 ---------- 16,9n ,ooo 1971 ---------- 20,004,300 1972 ---------- 20,84 ,000 1973 ---------- 22,548,000 1974 ---------- 21,672,000 (D) Reasons: Pursuant to an ordinance by Council of the Municipality, the Safety-Service Directo; was authorized on behalf of the Municipality to contract with Company for electric services for municipal resale. The Compar.y being a public utility engaged in the production, transmission and distribution of electric power offered to provide such service to Municipality under terms and conditions acceptable to both parties. The parties then entered into the contracts described herein.
(E) Dates: 1) Contract dated July 22, 1964, filed with FPC on August 3,199 ed made effective September 3,1964 continued in en ct until terminated by,
- 2) Contract dated December 14, 1965 which was effective for those meter readings taken after october 1,1965 which continued in effect until a new rate schedule was substituted by,
- 3) Settlement Agreement between the parties dated as of February 9, 1973. (Said Settlement Agreenent was filed with FPC on September 24, 1973 and made effective by FPC as of September 1,1972 pursuant to Commission order issued August 29,1973.)
(F) Rates: The rate (s) at which Company bined Village of Milan have been incorporated into Company's Rate Schedule (FPCRate Schedule 34 was utilized through approximately october 1, 1965, FPC Rate Schedule 57 was utilized through approxi- i mately September 1,1972 and FPC Rate Schedule 109 in- l cluding Supplement No. 1 thereto is presently being utilized.
However, note FPL assigned Rate Schedule 86 to cover the I interim perkd between the offective date of the requested l rate increase filed with FPC on January 27,.1972 by the Company and the acceptance by FPC of the Settlement j
Agreement on November 28,1973).
1
. (G) Rate Basis: The rates between the parties were established by ex-tended negotiations and are filed with FPC. The rates and the methods and factors used to determine such rates are set forth in the contract between the parties and in any material which was supplied to the FPC in conjunction with each filing. Copies of the relevant infomation were specially selected by the DOJ and IEC and have been made available at Central Depository in Washington, D.C.
h k
MUNICIPALITIES 14.-(A) Party: Vinage of Monroeville (B) Time Period: Prior to September 1, 1965 continuing
-to date.
(C) Energy Supplied: KWH
_OE 1% 5 ---------- 5,647,200 1966 ---------- 5,872,800 1967 ---------- 6,369,600 1%8 ---------- 7,120,800 t 1969 ---------- 7,339,200 1970 ---------- 7,675,300 1971 ---------- 9,998 400
- 1972 ---------- 10,286,,520 l
1973 ---------- H ,200,800 1974 ---------- H,841,600 (D) Reasons: Pursuant to an ordinance by Council of the Municipa7ity, the Safety-Service Director was authorized on behalf of the Municipality to contract with Company for electric services for municipal resale. The Company being a
' public utility engaged in the production, transmission and distribution of electric power offered to provide such service to Municipality under terms and conditions l acceptable to both parties. The parties then entered i into the contracts described herein.
(E) Dates: 1) Contract dated June 24, 1960, filed with FPC on August 3, 1964 and made effective September 3, 1964
- continued in effect until terminated by, 8
- 2) Contract dated March 9,1966 whun was effective for those meter readings taken after october 1,1965 which continned in effect until a new rate schedule was substituted by,
- 3) Settlement Agreement between the parties dated as of February 9,1973. (Said Settlement Agreement was filed with FPC on September 24, 1973 and made effective by <
FPC as of September 1, 1972 pursuant to Commission order issued August 29,1973.)
(F) Rates: The rate (s) at which Company bined Vinage of Monroevine have been iacorporated into Company's Rate Schedule (FPC Rate l
~
Scheduld 35 was utilized through approximately October 1, p 1965, FPC Rate Schedule 58 was utilized through approxi- 8 mately September 1,1972 and FPC Rate Schedule no in-cluding Supplement No.1 thereto is presentybeing utilized.
However, note FPC assi6 ned Rate Schedule 87 to cover the interim period between the effective date of the requested rate increase filed with FPC on January 27,1972 by the Ccapany and the acceptance by FPC of the Settlement Agreement on November 28,1973).
,, , . - , . ,,,---,-,.--,,-.---,,.v., -, n v -~---.a- -- --
53 -
. (G) Rate Basis: The rates between the parties were established by ex-tended negotiations and are filed with FPC. The rates.
and the methods and factors used to determine such rates are set forth in the contract between the parties and in any material which was supplied to the FPC in conjunction with each filing. Copies of the relevant informLtion were specially selected by the DOJ and NRC and have been made available at Central Depository in Washington, D.C.
D l
I l 4
.I 9
a -
~ '
MUNICIPALITIES
- 15. (A) Party: City of Niles (B) Time Period: Prior to September 1, 1965 continuing iJ to date. .
(C) Energy Supplied: KWH E.E 1965 -- ------ 82,917,977 1966 ---------- 91,389,908 1967 ---------- 97,390 721 1%8 ---------- 103,584,000 1%9 ---------- 108,o72,000 1970 ---------- 116,976,000 1971 ---------- 125,544,000 1972 ---------- 138,864,000 1973 ---------- 131,536,000 1974 ---------- 151,600,000 (D) Reasons: Pursuant to an crdinance by Council .of the Municipality, the Safety-Service Director was authorized on behalf of the Municipality to contract with Company for electric services for municipal resale. The Company being a public utility engaged in the production, transmission and distribution of electric power offered to provide such service to Municipality under terms and conditions acceptable to both parties. The parties then entered into the contracts described herein.
(E) Dates: 1} Contract dated May 4, 1956, filed with FPC on August 1, 1964 and made effective September 3, le64 continued in effect until terminated by,
- 2) Contract dated December 30, 1965 which was effective for those meter readings taken after october 1,1%5 which continued in effect until a new rate schedule was substituted by,
- 3) Settlement Agreement between the parties dated as of February 9, 1973. (Said Settlement Agreement was fiP >
vith FPC on September 24, 1973 and made effective b3 FPC as of September 1,1972 pursuant to Commission order issued August 29,1973.)
(F) Rates: The rate (s) at which Company billed City of Niles have been incorporated into Company's Rate Schedule (FPC Rate Schedule 36 was utilized through approximately october 1, 1965, FPC Rate Schedule 59 was utilized through approxi- .
I mately September 1,1972 and FPC Rate Schedule 111 in-cluding Supplement No. 1 thereto is presently being utilized. !
However, note FPC assigned Rate Schedule 88 to cover the l I
interim period between the effective date of the requested rate increase filed with FPC on January 27,1972 by the Company and the acceptance by FPC of the Settlement l Agreement on November 28,1973). l 6
. (G) Rate Basis: The rates between the parties were e~stablished by ex-tended negotiations and are filed with FPC. The rates and the methods and factors used to determine such rates are set forth in the contract between the parties and in any material which was supplied to the FPC in conjunction with each filing. Copies of the relevant infomation were specia'ly selected by the DOJ and NRC and have been made avai2. Le at Central Depocitory in Washington, D.C.
0 0
0 t
4
MUNICIPALITIES
- 16. (A) Party: City of Norwalk (B) Time Period: From approximately July 7, 1969 to approximately March 18, 1972.
(C) Energy Supplied: KWH 1969 ---------- 324,000 1970 ---------- 1,708,800 1971 ---------- 8, % 1,120 1972 ---------- 25,008,000 (D) Reasons: on July 7,1%9, after riooding of the City's generating plant, the Company supplied emergency power.
Thereafter, contracts beneficial to both parties were entered into by which the Company agreed to furnish and the City agreed to purchase, part of the electric m ergy re-quired for operation of the electric system owned and operated by the City.
(E) Dates: Contract dated February 6, 1970 between the parties pro-vided for energy to be supplied by the Company to supple-ment power generated by the City, Service commenced under the agreement on March 2,1970, but the agreement was cancelled by City on May 6, 1970. Subsequently on April 14, 1971, a new agreement for sale of energy by Company to supplement energy generated by City was ente-ad into. Service was provided under FPC Rate Schedule No. 74 Council of City ultimately decided to sell its system to the Company, and the agreement was reached on March 18, 1972. The agreement for services dated April 14, 1971 was terminated by contract between the parties on october 31, 1972.
(F) Rates: The rate (s) at which Company billed the City of Norwalk were incorpcrated into Company's Rate Schedule (FPC Rate 74). Copies of which have been made available for inspection at the request of DoJ and NRC.
. (G) Rate Basis: The rates between the parties were established by ex-tended negotiations and are filed with FPC. The rates and the methods and factors used to determine such rates are set forth in the contract between the parties and in any material which was supplied to the FPC in conjunction with each filing. Copies of the relevant infomation were specially selected by the DOJ and NRC and have been made available at Central Depository in Washington, D.C.
W 9
Y l
e I
l e
e I
e l
l
MUNICIPALITIES
- 17. (A) City of orrville (B) Time Period: 1969 (C) Energy Supplied: KWH E
1969 ---------- 387,600 (D Reasons: In 1969, the City of orrville requeeted a connection (E Dates for emergency power to be supplied during flooding (F Rates of the City and generating plant on July 5,1969 (G Rate Basis While there were no rates on file, the rates charged for such service was at existing Company rates for municipal resale service then in effect.
. r MUNICIPALITIES 18.- (A) Party: City of oberlin (B) Time Period: From 1970 continuing to date.
(C) Energy Supplied: KWH 1971 ---------- 3,049,200 1972 ---------- 6,996,000 1973 ---------- 17,412,000 1974 ---------- 27,678,000 (D) Reasons: Pursuant to an ordinance by Council of the Municipality, the Safety-Service Director was authorized on behalf of the Municipality to contract with Company for electric services for municipal resale. The Company being a public utility engaged in the production, transmission and distribution of electric power offered to provide such service to Municipality under terms and conditions acceptable to both parties. The parties then entered into the contracts described herein.
(E) Dates: 1) Contract dated March 2, 1972 between the parties continued in effect until_a new rate ' schedule was substituted by,
- 2) Settlement Agreement between the parties dated as of February 9, 1973. (Said Settlement Agreement was filed with FPC on october 24, 1973 and made effective by FPC as of September 1, 1972 pursuant to Commission order issued August 29, 1973).
(F) Rates: The rate (s) at which Company billed City of oberlin have been incorporated into Company's Rate Schedule (FPC Rate Schedule 73 was utilized through approximately September 1,1972 and FPC Rate Schedule 112 including Supplement No. 1 thereto is presently being utilized. l However, note FPC assigned Rate Schedule 94 to cover the interim period between the effective date of the j
requested rate increase filed with FPC on January 27, 1972 by the Company and the acceptance by FPC of the Settlement Agreement on November 28,1973).
l l
l s
)
u (G) Rate Basis: The rates between the parties were esto.blished by ex-tended negotiations and are filed with FPC. The rates and the methods and factors used to determi i such rates are set forth in the contract between the par. i.es and in any material whirh was supplied to the FPC in emjunction with each filis, . Copies of the relevant infoi nation were specially selected by the DOJ and NRC and have been made available at Central Depository in Washington, D.C.
9 6
t
MUNICIPALITIES
- 19. (A) Party: Village of Prospect (B) Time Period: Prior to September 1, 1965 continuing to date.
(C) Energy Supplied: KWH 1% 5 ---------- 3,067,800 1966 ---------- 3,419,134 1%7 ---------- 3,784,200 1968 ---------- 3,936,300 1969 ---------- 4,137,600 1970 ---------- 4,551,800 1971 ---------- 4,796,000 1972 ---------- 5,183,200 1973 ---------- 5,730,400 1974 ---------- 5,603,200 (D) Reasons: Pursuant to an ordinance by Council of the Municipality, the Safety-Service Director was authorized on behalf of the Municipality to contract with Company for electric services for municipal resale. The Company being a public utility engaged in the production, transmission and distribution of electric power offered to provide such service to Municipality under terms and conditions ampt.31e to both parties. The parties then entered ist. the contracts described herein.
(E) Dates: 1) on March 1,1957 the Service Contract with Village of Prospect was terminated. Following which, service was furnished and accepted without interruption to date, on April 20, 1959, the Council of the Municipality adopted ordinance 445 directing the proper official. to enter a contract with Company. No contract was executed until July 25, 1965. This contract which was effective on July 25, 1965 continued ineffect until a new rate schedule was substituted by,
- 2) Settlement Agreement between the parties dated as of February 9, 1973 (Said Settlement Agreement was filed ,
with FPC on September 24, 1973 and made effective by '
FPC*as of September 1, 1972 pursuant to Commission order issued August 29,1973.)
(F) Rates: The rate (s) at which Company billed the Village of Prospect have been incorporated into Company's Rate Schedule (FPC Rate Schedule 37 was utilized through approximately September 1, 1972 and FPC Rate Schedule 113 including Supplement No.1 thereto is presently being utilized. However, note FPC assigned Rate Scheule 93 to cover the interim period between l the effectice date of the requested rate increase filed with l FPC on January 27, 1972 by the Company and the acceptance l_ by FPC of the Settlement Agreement on November 28,1973).
l
-o (G) Rate Basis: The rates between the parties were established by ex-tended negotiations and are filed with FPC. The rates and the methods and factors used to determine such rates are set forth in the contract between the parties and in any material which vaa supplied to the FPC in conjunction with each filing. Copies of the relevant information were specially selected by the DOJ and NRC and have been made available at Central Depository in Washington, D.C.
e 9
. 8 i
8 I
i i
e t
.N,
- - - , F
i.
MUNICIPALITIES t
- 20. (A) Party: Vinage of Sevine (B) Time Period: Prior to September 1, 1965 continuing to date.
(C) Energy Supplied: KWH
_oE 1965 ---------- 5,993,600 1%6 ---------- 6,414,400 1%7 ---------- 7,000,000 1%8 ---------- 7,468,800 1969 ---------- 7,905,600 1970 ---------- 9,075,200 1971 ---------- 9,705,600 1972 ---------- n,843,200
. 1973 ---------- 12,484,800 1974 ---------- 12,040,000 (D) Reasons: Pursuant to an ordinance by Council of the Muni::ipality, the Safety-Service Director was authorized on behalf of the Municipality to contract with Company for electric services for municipal resale. The Company being a public utility engaged in the production, transmission and distribution of electric power offered to provide such service to Municipality under terms and conditions acceptable to both parties. The parties then entered into the contracts described herein.
(E) Dates: 1) Contract dated May 6, 1957, filed with FPC August 3,1964 and made effective September 3,1964 continued in effect until terminated by, O
- 2) Contract dated December 29, 1965 which was effective for those meter readings taken after october 1,1965 which continued in effect until a new rate schedule was substituted by,
- 3) Settlement Agreement between the parties dated as of February 9, 1973. (Said Settlement Agreement was filed i
with FPC on September 24, 1973 and made effective by FPC as of September 1,1972 pursuant to Commission order issued August 29,1973.)
I (F) Rates: The rate (s) at which Company billed the Vinage of Seville have been incorporated into Company's Rate Schedule (FPC Rate q j Schedule 38 was utilized through approxi=ately october 1, ;
- 1965, FPC Rate Schedule 60 was utilized through approxi- !
! mately September 1,1972 and FPC Rate Schedule 114 in- l l cluding Supplement No. 1 thereto is presently being utilized. ,
l However, note FPC assigned Rate Schedule 89 to cover the :
interim period between the effective date of the requested rate increase filed with FPC on January 27, 1972 by the Company and the acceptance by FPC of the Settlement l
Jg e a t on November 28,1973).
l v-
(G) Rate Basis: The rates between the parties were established by ex-tended negotiations and are filed with FPC. The rates ami the methods and factors used to determine such rates are set forth in the contract between the parties and in any material which was supplied to tne FPC in conjunction with each filing. Copies of the relevant infomation were specially selected by the DOJ and NRC and have been made available at Central Depository in Washington, D.C.
O G
G i
i l
l l
. ~ .-
ll MUNICIPALITIES i
- 21. (A) Party: Village of Vienna (Clark County)
(B) Time Period: Prior to September 1, 1965 continuing to date.
(C) Ermrgy Supplied: KWH
_OE 1965 ---------- 1,539,100 1966 ---------- 1,571,700 1%7 ---------- 1,648,200 1968 ---------- 1,875,600 1969 ---------- 2,007,000 1970 ---------- 2,023,800 1971'---------- 2,262,300 1972 ---------- 2,523,900 1973 ---------- 2,543,400
.1974 ---------- 2,630,700 (D) Reasons: Pursuant to an ordinance tr Council of the Municipality, the Safety-Service Director wa enthorized on behalf of the Municipality to contract with Company for electric services for municipal resale. The Company being a public utility engaged in the production, transmission and distribution of electric power offered to provide such service to Municipality under terms and conditions acceptable to both parties. The parties then entered into the contracts described herein.
(E) Dates: 1) Contract dated November 26, 1956, filed with FPC on August 3, 1964 and made effective September 3, 1964 continued in effect until terminated by,
- 2) Contract dated December 27, 1965 which was effective for those meter readings taken after October 1,1965 which continued in effect until a new rate schedule was substituted by,
- 3) Settlement Agreement between the parties dated as of February 9,1973. (Said Settlement Agreement was filed with FPC on September 24, 1973 and made effective by FPC as of September 1. '.972 pursuant to Commission order issued August 29, = //3. )
(F) Rates: The rate (s) at which Company billed Village of S. Vienna have been incorporated into Company's Rate Schedule (FPC Rate Schedule 39 was utilized through approximately October 1, 1965, FPC Rate Schedule 61 was utilized through approxi- .
mately September 1,1972 and FPC Rate Schedule 115 in- l l
cluding Supplement No. 1 thereto is presently being utilized.
I However, note FPC assigned Rate Schedule 90 to cover the .
inter's period between the effective date of the requested
! rate increase filed with FPC on January 27, 1972 by the
! Compa.ny and the acceptance by FPC of the Gettlement a
! Agreerent on November 28,1973). - l l
e
. (G) Rate Basis: The rates between the parties were established by ex-tended negotiations and are filed with FPC. The rates and the methods and factors used to determine such rates are set forth in the contract between the parties and in any material which was supplied to the FPC in conjunction with each filing. Copies of the relevant infomation were specially selected by the DCJ and NRC and have been made available at Central Depository in Washington, D.C.
9 a
l 0
li 1
,1 p
MUNICIPALITIES
- 22. (A) Party: City of Wadsworth (B) Time Period: Prior to September 1, 1965 continuing ,
to date. 1 (C).EnergySupplied: KWH
_OE 1%5 ---------- 44,928,000 1966 ---------- 48,726,000 1967 ---------- 52,353,000 1968 ---------- 59,148,000 1%9 ---------- 66,078,000 1970 ---------- 71,802,000 1971 ---------- 73,638,000 1972 ---------- 78,084 1973 ---------- 81,954,000,000
.1974 --------- 82,791,600 -
(D) Reasons: Pursuant to an ordinance by Council of the Municipality, the Snfety-Service Director was authorized on behalf of the Municipality to contract with Company for electric services for municipal resale. The Company being a public utility engaged in the production, transmission 2nd distribution of electric power offered to provide such service to Municipality under terms and conditions acceptable to both parties. The parties then entered into the contracts described herein.
(E) Dates: 1) Contract dated July 19, 1958, filed with FPC on August 3, 1964 and made effective September 3, 1964
- continued in effect until terminated by, n
- 2) Contract dated December 21, 1965 which was effective for those meter readings taken after october 1,1965 which continued in effect untila new rate schedule was substituted by,
- 3) Settlement Agreement between the parties dated as of February 9,1973. (Said Settlement Agreement was filed [
with FPC on September 24, 1973 and made effective by FPC as of September 1, 1972 pursuant to Commission order issued August 29,1973.) ,
i (F) Rates: The rate (s) at which Company billed City of Wadsworth have been incorporated into Company's Rate Schedule (FPC Rate Schedule 25 was utilized through approximately october 1, 1965, FPC Rate Sebedule 62 was utilized through approxi-mately September 1,1972 and FFC Rate Schedule llb in-cluding Supplement No. 1 thereto-is presently being utilized.
however, note FPC assigned Rate Schedule 91 to cover the interim period between the effective date of the requested i
rate increase filed with FPC on January 27,1972 by the Company and the acceptance by FPC of the Settlement Aepe - ut on November 28,1973).
. (G) Rate Basis: Tbo rates between the parties were established by ex-tended negotiations and are filed with FPC. - The rates and the methods and factors used to determine such rates are set forth in the contract between the prxties and in )
any material which wa.s supplied to the FPC in conjunction I with each filing. Copies of the relevant information I were specially selected by the DOJ and HRC and have been 1 made available at Central Depository in Washington, D.C. !
l l
. l 4
i ll l
l
}, ,
MUNICIPALITIES 23.(A) Party: V_illage of Wellington (B) Time Period: Prior to September 1, 1965 continuing to date.
(C) Energy Supplied: KWH OE 1% 5 ---------- 15,690,000 1966 ---------- 17,4%,000 1%7 ---------- 17,514,000 1%8 ---------- 18,240,000 1%9 ---------- 19,284,000 1970 ---------- 20,520,000 1971 ---------- 21, % o,000 1972 ---------- 26,940,000 1973 ---------- 34,812,000 1974 ---------- 38,976,000 (D) Reasons: Pursuant to an ordinance by Council of the Municipality, the Safety-Service Director was authorized on behalf of the Municipality to contract with Company for electric services for municipal resale. The Company being a public utility engaged in the production, transmission and distribution of electric power offered to provide such service to Municipclity under terms and conditions acceptable to both parties. The parties then entered into the contracts described herein.
(E) Dates: 1) Contract dated July 19, 1962, filed with FPC on August 3,194 and made effective September 3,1964 continued in effect until terminated by, 9
- 2) Contract dated December 27,1%5 which was effective for those meter readings taken after october 1,1965 which continued in effect until a new rate schedule was substituted by,
- 3) Settlement Agreement between the parties dated as of February 9,1973. (Said Settlement Agreement was filed with FPC on September 24, 1973 and made effective by FPC as of September 1, 1972 pursuant to Commission order issued August 29,1973.)
(F) Rates: The rate (s) at which Company billed Village of Wellington have been incorporated into Company's Rate Schedule (F9 Rate Schedula 40 was utilized through approximately octoner 1, 1965, FPC Rate Schedule 63 was utilized through approxi-mately September 1,1972 and FPC Rate Schedule 117 in-
]
l cluding Supplement No. 1 thereto is presently being utilized. ;
- However, note FPC assigned Rate Schedule C2 to cover the I interim period between the effective date of the requested rate increase filed with FPC on January 27,1972 by the Company and the acceptance by FPC of the Settlement l
Agreement on November 28,1973).
. (G) Rate Basis: The rates between the parties were established by ex-tended negotiations and are filed with FPC. The rates and the methods and factors usei to determine such rates are set forth in the contract between the parties and in any material which was supplied to the FPC in con. junction with cach filing. Copies of the relevant infomatton were specially selected by the DOJ and NRC and have been made available at Central Depository in Washington, D.C.
e 9
e O
l
MUNICIPALITIES (ExclusivelyPennsylvaniaPower) 24.(A) Party: Ellwood City (B) Time Period: Prior to September 1, 1965 continuing to date.
(C) Energy Supplied: KWH rr 1% 5 ---------- 452,800 1966 ---------- 23,439,000 24, 1967 ---------- 25,334,400 1968 ---------- 27,388,800 1969 ---------- 28,411,00 1970 ---------- 30,777,600 1971 ---------- 814,400 1972 ---------- 33, 31,403,120
- 1973 ---------- 35,243,541 1974 ---------- 34,995,360 (I)) Reasons: The Company undertook to supply electric power to the Borough on a mutually agreeable and advantageous basis between the parties without interruption during the period listed above. In accordance with such agree-ment, the Company has agreed to supply all such electric power as the Borough may need for resale to their domestic and commercial customers at retail and for municipal purposes when served from the municipal dis-tribution system. -
(E) Dates: From approximately April h,1960, effective all meter reading
, on and after March 28, 1960, the Company supplied electric energy in accordance with Rate Schedule FPC 6. on June 1, 1966, the service schedule was replace by FPC Rate 17. Since then, Pennsylvania Power filed for a rate increase with FPC. The new rates went into effect on December 31, 1973 but are sub-ject to possible refund action by the Commission. The Borough filed an objection to the increase with the FPC and
, theratterhasbeenresolvedbytheFPCorder(E-8159), dated
!- January 24, 1975.
(F) Rates: - The rate (s) at which Company billed Ellwood City have been l incorporated into Company's Rate Schedule (FPC Rate Schedule 6 and 17 were utilized for period described herein)!
9
& O l
l
. (G) Rate Basis: The rates between the parties were established by ex-tended negotiations and are filed with s'TC. The rates and the methods and factors used te determine such rates are set forth in the contract between the parties and in any material which was supplied to the FPC in con,1 unction with each filing. Copies of the relevant inromation were specially selected by the DOJ and NRC and have been made available at Central Depository in Washington, D.C.
S S
8 1
11TICIPALITIl0 .
(Exclusively Pennsylvania Power)
'25. (A) Party: New Wilmington (B) Time Feriod: Prior to September 1, 1965 continuing to date.
(C) Energy Supplied: KWH pp i 1%5 ---------- 5,617,600 1966 --------- '6,038,280 1%7 ---------- 6,644,800 1968 ---------- 7,179,200 1%9 ---------- 7,701,400 1970 ---------- 8,212,800 1971 ---------- 8,465,600 1972 --- ------ 8,987,200 1973 ---------- 9,686,400 1974 ---------- 10,460,800 l
(D) Reasons: The Company undertook to supply electric power to
! the Borough on a mutually agreeable and advantageous ,
basis between the parties without interruption during the period listed above. In accordance with such agree-ment, the Costany has agreed to supply all such electric power as the Borough may need for resale to their i domestic and commercial customers at retail and for 1 nunicipal purposes when served from the nunicipal dis-tribution system.
(E) Dates: From approximately April 4, 1960, effective all meter reading Y on and after March 28,1960, the Company supplied electric .
energy in accordance with Rate Schedule FPC 3. on May 1, [
1966, the service schedule was replace by FPC Rate 14. Sincethen,l
+
Pennsylvania Power filed for a rate increase with FPC. The -
new rates went into effect on December 31, 1973 but are sub-L ject to possible refund action by the Countission. The Borough filed an objection to the increase with the FPC and shortly after the first of this year the matter had been resolved by the FPC order (E-8159), dated January 24, 1975 p
(F) Rates: The rate (s) at which Company billed New Wilmington have been
' . incorporated into Company's Rate Schedule (FPC Rate Schedule 3 and 14 were utilized for period described herein).
'i L
- l. l l
il
(G) Rate Basis: The rates between the parties were este.blished by ex-tended negotiations and are filed wii.h FPC. The rates and the methods and factors used to determine such rates are set forth in the contract between the parties and in any material which was supplied to the FPC in con.1 unction with each filing. Copies of the relevant information were specially selected by the DOJ and NRC and have been made available at Central Depository in Washington, D.C.
0 8
9 P
4
- + . - . . - , -w,e- w
l MUNICIPALITIES (Exclusively Pennsylvania Power)
- 26. (A) Party: Wampum (B) T12ns Period: Prior to September 1, 1965 continuing to date.
(C) Energy Supplied: KWH pp 1% 5 ---------- 1,650,400 1966 ---------- 1,808,800 1%7 ---------- 1,883,600 1%8 ---------- 2,056,400 1969 ---------- 2,153,600 1970 ---------- 2,276,000 1971 ---------- 2,346,000 W72 ---------- 2,419,440 1973 ---------- 2,523,200 1974 ---------- 2,561,600 (D) Reasons: The Company undertook to supply electric power to the Borough on a mutua14 agreeable and advantageous basis between the parties without interruption dr.11.ng the period listed above. In accordance with such agree- .
ment, the Company has agreed to supply all such electric power as the Borough may need for resale to their domestic and commercial customers at retail and for municipal purposes when cerved from the municipal dis-tribution system.
h (E) Dates: From approximately April 4,1960, effective all meter reading r on and after March 28, 1960, the Company supplied electric energy in accordance with Rate Schedule FPC 4. On May.1, T 1966, the service schedule was replace by FPC Rate 15. Since then, Pennsylvania Power filed for a rate increase with FPC. The ,
new rates went into effect on December 31, 1973 but are sub-ject to possible refund action by the Commission. The l l Borough filed an objection to the increase with the FPC and i shortly after the first of this yaar the matter had been l-
' resolved by the FPC order (E-8159), dated January 24, 1975.
(F) Rates: The rate (s) at which Company billed Wampum have been -
I inco2yorated into Company's Rate Schedule (FPC Rate Schedule 4 and 15 were utilized for period described herein).
_g.
. (G) Rate Basis: The rates between the parties were established by ex-tended negotiations and are filed with FPC. The rates and the methods and factors used to determine such rates are set forth in the contract between the parties and in any material which was supplied to the FpC in conjunction with each filing. Copies of the relevant informatien wen specially selected by the DOJ and NRC and have been made available at Central Depository in Washington, D.C.
S e
9 O
t
~.
?
-W- ,
MOPICIPALITIES .
(Exclusively Pennsylvania Power) )
- 27. (A) Party: 2clienople .
(B) Time Period: Prior to September 1, 1965 continuing j to date.
t (C) Energy Supplied: 10 01 pp 1%5 ---------- 8,177,600 1966 ---------- 8,790,720 1%7 ---------- 9,547,200 1968 ---------- 10,350,400 'j 1%9 ---------- 10,955,200 1970 ---------- 11,707,200 1971 ---------- 12,332,800 1972 ---------- 13,488,000 1973 ---------- 13,835,200 1974 ---------- 13,579,200
- (D) Reasons
- The Company undertook to supply electric power to the Borough on a mutually agreeable and advantageous
! p basis between the parties without interruption during the period listed above. In accordance with such agree- g ment, the Company has agreed to supply all such electric 1 power as the Borough may need for resale to their domestic and commercial customers at retail and for nunicipal purposes when served from the municipal dis-tribution system.
(E) Dates: From approximately April 4, 1960, effective all meter reading 1
on and after March 28, 1960, the Company supplied electric K energy in accordance with Rate Schedule FPC 5. on May 1, 1960, the service schedule was replace by FPC Rate 16. Since then, i.
Pennsylvania Power filed for a rate increase with.FPC. The g; new rates went into effect on December 31, 1973 but are sub-
' dect to possible refund action by the Conmission. The Borough filed an objection to the increase with the FPC and short],y after the first of this year the matter had been resolved by the FPC order (E-8159), dated January 24, 1975.
(F). Rates: The rate (s) at which Company billed Zelienople have been incorporated into Company's Rate Schedule (FPC Rate Schedule
-5 and 16 were utilized for period described herein).
f 6,
1 6
1..
L.
78 -
. (G) Rate Basia: The rates between the parties were established by ex-tended negotiations and are filed with FPC. The rates and the methods and factors used to determine cuch rates are set forth in the contract between the parties and in any material which was supplied to the FPC in conjunction with each filing. Copies of the relevant inforn:ation were specially selected by the DCJ and NRC and have been made available at Central Depository in Washington, D.C.
0 0
0 l
l l
l 4
MUNICIPALITIES (Exclusively Pennsylvania Power)
- 28. (A) Tirty: Crove City (B) Time Period: From approximately August 21, 1967 to date.
(C) Energy Supplied: KWH pp 1%7 ---------- 4,617,600 1968 ---------- 25,223,400 1969 ---------- 26,222,400 1970 ---------- 27,182,400 1971 ---------- 28,795,200 000 1972 ---------- 31,896,400 1973 ---------- 32,702, 1974 ---------- 32,001,600 (D) Reasons: The Company undertook to supply electric power to the Borough on a mutually ar.reeable and advantageous basis between the parties witnout interruption during the period listed above. In accordance with such agreement, the Company hr.s agreed to supply all such electric
, power as theBorough may need for resale to their domestic arri commercial customers at retail and for municipal purposes when served from the municipal distribution system.
(E) Dates: From approximately August 21, 1967, the Comp w supplied ;
electric energy in accordance with Eate Schedule FPC 19 l Pennsylvania Power has filed for a rate increase with FPC.
The new rates went into effect on December 31, 1973 but are subject to possible refund action by the Commission.
The Borough filed an objection to the increase with the FPC and the matter was resolved by the FPC order (E-8159),
dated January 24, 1975.
(F) Rates: 'Ihe rate (s) at which Company billed Grove City have been incorporated into Company's Rate Schedule (FFC Rate Schedule 19 was utilized for pericd described herein.)
Such applicable rate schadules were selected by NRC and DoJ and have been made available for inspection and copy at Central Depository in Washington, D.C.
l l
.. (G) Rate Basis: The rates between the parties were established by ex-tended negotiations and are filed with FPC. The rates and the methods and factors used to determine such rates are set forth in the contract between the parties and in any material which was supplied to the FPC in conjunction with each filing. Copies of the relevant information were specially selected by the DOJ and NRC and have been made available at Central Depositor /' in Washington, D.C.
4 4
P O
q
?
t I
l tl l
. I t
i i
R.E.A. COOPERATIVES i l
1.,(A) Party: Delaware Rural Electric Cooperative, Inc.
(B) T.me Period: Prior to September 1, 1965 to approximately August 1, 1970. !
(C) Energf Supplied: KWH OE 1965 ---------- 14,947,800 1%6 ---------- 16,156,200 1%7 ---------- 17,679,120 1%8 ---------- 19,168,300 1%9 ---------- 21,291,600 1970 ---------- 14,553,663 (D) Reasons: The Cooperative owned and operated electric dis- ;
tribution facilities to serve various consumers in and adjacent to Delaware County, Ohio; Cooperative desired I to secure an adequate supply of energy for resale to its customers; and Ohio Edison Company desired to furnish such supply.
(E) Datea: Contract dated October 14, 1958; Supplement #1 dated December 21, 1966; Supplement #2 dated June 29, 1967; Supplement #3 dated December 6, 1967; and Supplement
- 4 dated May 17, 1968.
Copies-of contracts, including any supplements, amendments, or modifications thereof are available for inspection and copy at Central Depository in Washington, D. C.
(F) Rates: The rate (s) at which Company billed Delaware Rural Electric )
Cooperative have been incorporated into Company's Rate 1 Schedule (FPC Rate 14), copies of which are among these documents l specially selected by DOJ and NRC and made spection and copy at Central Depository in asn ab on, e fc".in-D C.
(G) Rate Basis: The rates between the pe.rties were established by extended negotiations and are filed with FPC. The rates and the methods and factors used to determine such rates are set forth in the contract between the par-ties and in any material which was supplied to the FPC -
in conjunction with such filing. Copies of relevant !
information have been made available at Central l Depository in Washington, D.C.
l 1
1
R.E.A. CooPEBATIVES
- 2. (A) Party: Firelands Electric Cooperative, Inc. l (B) Time Period: Prior to September 1, 1965 to approximately August 1, 1970.
(C) Energy Supplied: KWH
_oE 1%5 ---------- 38,299,700 1966 ---------- 40,854,600 1%7 ---------- 43,313,970 1%8 ---------- 46,048,800 4 1%9 ---------- 49,104,600 1970 ---------- 33,518,400 .
(D) Reasons: The Cooperative os ned and operated electric dis-tribution facilitia to serve various consumers in and adjacent to Huron, hichland, Ashland and Lorain Counties, Ohio; Cooperative desired to secure an adequate supply of ener6y for resale to its customers; and Ohio Edison Company desired to furnish such supply.
(E) Dates: Contract dated october 14, 1958; supplement #1 dated December 21 1966; supplement #2 dated June 29,1%7; Supplement //3 dated December 6,1%7; and supplement
- 4 dated May 17, 1968.
Copies of contracts, including any supplements, amendments, or modifications thereof are available for inspection and copy at Central Depository in Washington, D.C.
(F)-Rates: The rate (s) at which Company billed Firelands Electric Cooperative, Inc. have been incorporated into Company's Rate Schedule (FPC Rate 15), copies of which are among those documents specially selected by DoJ and NRC and made avr.ilable for inspection end copy at Central Depository in Washington, D.C.
(G) Rate Basis: The rates between the parties were established by extended negotiations and are filed with FPC. The rates and the methods and factors used to determine such
. rates are set forth in the contract betweer ".e parties and in any material which was' supplied to the FPC in conjunction with such filing. Copies of relevant in-forms /cion have been made available at Central Depository
-in Washington, D.C.
1
~
R.E.A. COOIERATIVES 3 (A) Party: Hancock-Wood Electric Coorerative, Inc.
(B) Time Period: Prior to July 1,1%7 to appronmately August 1, 1970.
(C) Energy supplied: KWH
?
1%7 ---------- 1,577,400 1968 ---------- 1,824,8ho 1969 ---------- 2,430,000 1970 ---------- 1,961,160 (D) Reasons: The Cooperative owned and operated electric distri-bution facilities to serve various consumers located on Kelleys Island, Ohio; Cooperative desired to secure an adequate supply of energy for resale to its customers; and Ohio Edison Company desired to furnish such supply.
(E) Dates: Contract dated October 14, 1958; supplement #1 dated December 21, 1966; supplement #2 dated June 29, 1967; Supplement #3 dated December 6,1%7; and supplement
- 4 dated May 17, 1968.
Copies of contracts, including any supplements, amendments, or modifications thereof are available for inspection and copy at Central Depository in Washington, D.C.
(F) ilates: The rate (s) at which Company billed Hancock-Wood Electric Cooperative, Inc. have been incorporated into Company's Rate Schedule (FPC Rate 20), copies of which are among those docu-ments specially selected by DOJ and 11RC and made available for inspection and copy at Central Depository in Washington, D.C.
4 .
(G) Rate Basis: The rates between the parties were established by extended negotiations and are filed with FIC. The rates and the methods and factors used to determine such !
rates are set forth in the contract between the par-ties and in any material which was supplied to the FPC l in conjunction with such filing. Copies of relevant l information have been made available at Central Depository l in Washington, D.C.
l
- 4 l
I i
. '. _ gg _
R.E.A. COOPERATIVES
- 4. (A) Party: Holmes-Wayne Electric Coorerative, Inc.
(B) Time Period: Prior to September 1, 1965 to approximately August 1, 1970.
(C) Energy Supplied: KWE oE 1965 ---------- 8,668,800 1%6 ---------- 9,295,200 1967 ---------- 9,952,800 1%8 ---------- 10,876,800 1969 ---------- 11,919,600 1970 ---------- 7,974,120 (D) Reasons: The Cooperative owned and operated electric distri-bution facilities to serve various consumers in and adjacent to Ho.bnes, Wayne, Ashland and Medina Counties, ohio; Cooperative desired to secure an adequate supply of energy for resale to its custocers; and Ohio Edison Company desired to furnish such supply.
(E) Dates: Contract dated october 14, 1958; Supplement #1 dated December 21,. 1966; Supplement #2 dated J me 29, 1967; Supplement #3 dated December 6,1967; and Supplement
- 2 dated May 17,1%8 Copies of contracts, including any supplements, amendments, or modifications thereof are available for inspection and copy at Central Depository in Washington, D.C.
(F) Rates: The rate (s) at which Company billed Holmes-Wayne Electric Cooperative, Inc. have been incorporated into Company's Rate Schedule (FPC Rate 16), copies of which are among those docu-ments specially selected by DoJ and NRC and made available for inspection and copy at Central Depository in Washington, D.C.
(G) Rate Basis: The rates between the parties were established by extended negotiations and are filed with FPC. The rates and the methods and factors used to detennine such rates are set forth in the contract between the parties and in any material which was supplied to the FPC in conjunction with such filing. Copies of relevant in-formation have been made available at Central Depository in Washington, D.C.
. 85 -
R.E.A. COOPERATIVES
- 5. (A) Party: Lake Erie Electric Cooperative. Inc.
(B) Time Period: Prior to September 1, 1965 to approximately July 1, 1967.
(C) Energy Supplied: KWH 0,,1 1% 5 ---------- 1,375,800 1%6 ---------- 1,1+11,800 *
(D) Reasons: The Cooperative owned and operated electric distri-bution facilities to serve various consumers located on Kelleys Island, Ohio; Cooperative desired to secure an adequate supply of energy for resale to its ena+omers; and Ohio Edison Company desired to furni i such supply.
(E) Dates: Contract dated October' 14, 1958; Supplement #1 dated December 21, 1966.
Copies of contracts, including any supplements, amendments, or modifications therec. are available for inspection and copy at Central Depository in Washington, D.C.
4 (F) Rates: The rate (s) at which Company billed Lake Erie Electric Cooperative, Inc. have been incorporated into Company's Rate Schedule (FFC Rate 20), copies of which are among those docu-ments specially selected by DOJ and NRC and made avamble for inspection and copy at Central Depository in Washington, D.C.
-(G) Rate Basis: The rates between the parties were established by extended negotiations and are filed with FPC. The rates and the methods and factors used to determine such rates are set forth in the contract between the par-ties and in any maf;erial which was supplied to the FPC.
in conjunction wit.h such filing. Copies of relevant
. information have been made available at Central Depository in Washington, D.C.
-* OnJuly1,196t,LakeErieElectricCooperativeandHancock-Wood
- . Electric Cooperative were merged into one corporation. As the surviving corporation in this merger, Hancock-Wood becomes the successor to Lake Erie, so far as wholesale power contract, dated October 11+,1958 'is concerned. Hancock-Wood, therefore, assumed responsibility for purchase for power for use on Kelleys Island t under the terms of that contract.
i 1
l
R.E.A. COOPERATIVES l
- 6. (A) Party: Lorain-Medina Rural Electric Cooperative, Inc. .
(B) Time Period: Prior to September 1,1965 to approximately Au6ust 1, 1970.
(C) Energy Supplied: KWH OE 1% 5 ---------- 53,93T,400 1966 ---------- 56,454,000 1967 ---------- 58.,548,000 1%8 ---------- 61,209,600 1969 ---------- 65,504,000 1970 ---------- 44,276,160 (D) Reasons: The Cooperative owned and operated electric dis-tribution facilitiera to serve various consumers in and adjacent to Lorain and Medini Counties, Ohio; Cooperative desired to secure ar adequate supply of energy for resale to its customers; and Ohio Edison Company desired to furnish such supply.
(E) Dates: Contract dated october 14, 1958; Supplement #1 dated December 21 1966; Supplement #2 dated June 29, 1967; Supplement h3 dated December 6,1%7; and Supplement
- 4 dated May 17, 1968.
Copies of contracts, including eny supplements, amendments, or modifications thereof are available for inspection and copy at Central Depository in Washin6 ton, D.C.
(F) Rates: The rate (s) at which Company billed Lorain-Medina Rural Electric Cooperative, Inc. have been incorporated into Company's Rate Schedule (FPC Rate 17), copies of which are among those documents speciall,y selected by DoJ and RRC and made available for ins Depository in Washington, D.C.pection and copy at Central (G) Rate Basis: The rates between the parties were established by extended negotiations and are filed with FPC. The rates and the methods and factors used to determine such rates are set forth in the contract between the parties and in any material which was supplied to the FPC in conjunction with such filing. Copies of relevant information have been made avMlable at Central Depository in Washington,D.C.
~' '
R.E.A. CooPEllATIVES 7 (A) Party: Marion Rural Electric Cooterative. Inc.
(B) Time Period: Prior to September 1,193 to approximately August 1, 1970.
(C) Energy Supplied: 10GI S.
1965 ---------- 20,346,600 1966 ---------- 20,911,560 1967 ---------- 22,486,900 1%8 ---------- 24,197,400 1969 ---------- 26,171,400 1970 ---------- 17,827,926 (D) Reasons: The Cooperative owned and operated electric distri-bution facilities to serve various consumers in and adjacent to Marion, Wyandot and Morrow Counties, Ohio; Cooperative desired to secure an adequate supply of energy for resale to its customers; and Ohio Edison Company desired to furnish such supply.
(E) Dates: Contract dated october 14, 1958; supplement #1 dated December 21 g 1966; supplement #2 dated June 29, 1967; Supplement #3 dated December 6,1967; and supplement
- 4 dated May 17,1%8.
Copies of contracts, including any supplements, amendments, or modifications thereof are available foi inspection and copy at Central Depository in Washington, D.C.
(F) Rates: The rate (s) at which Company billed Marion Rural Electric Cooperative, Inc. have been incorporated into Company's Rate Schedule (FPC Rate 18), copies of which are among thode docu- '
ments srecially selected by DoJ and NRC and made available for inspection and copy at Central Depository in Washington, D.C.
'(G) Rate Basis: The rates between the parties were established by extended negotiations and are filed with FPC. The rates and the methods and factors used to determine l such rates are set forth in the contract between the J parties and in any material which was supplied to the FPC in conjunction with such filing. Copies of relevant information have been made available at Central Depository in Washington, D.C.
I I
- l l
i I
i I
\
l 1
. '. R.E.A. CooFEBATIVES ,
l
- 8. (A) Party: Morrow Electric Cooperative, Inc.
(B) Thne Period: Prior to September 1, 1965 to approximately :
August 1, 1970. :
(C) Energy Supplied: KWH 1965 ---------- 28,109,400 1%6 ---------- 29,599,207 1%7 ---------- 31,593,600 1%8 ---------- 34,o54,157 1969 ---------- 39,084,600 1970 ---------- 19,006,906 (D) Reasons: The Cooperative owned and operated electric distri-bution facilities to serve various consumers in and adjacent to Knox, Marion, Richland and Delaware Counties, Ohio; Cooperative desired to secure an adequate supply of energy for resale to its customers; and Ohio Edison Company desired to furnish such supply.
(E) Dates: Contract dated october 14, 1958; Supplement #1 dated December 21, 1966; Supplement #2 dated June 29, 1967; Supplenent A3 dated December 6,1%7; and supplement
- 4 dated May 17, 1968.
Copies of contracts, including any supplements, arendments, or modifications thereof are available for inspection and copy at Central Depcsitory in Washington, D.C.
(F) Rates: The rate (s) at which Company billed Morrow Electric Coopera-tive, Inc. have been incorporated into Con:pany's Rate Schedule (FPC Rat' 19), copies of which are among these documents specially selectec av DoJ and hRC and made available for in-spection at Central Depository in Washington, D.C.
(G) Rate Basis: The rates between the parties were established by extended negotiations and are filed with FPC. The rates and the methods and factors used to determine such rates are set forth in the contract between the parties and in any material which was supplied to the FPC in conjunction with such filing. Copies of relevant information have been made avmilable at Central Depository in Washington, D.C.
l l
1 l
l r
- General Rotes A. It must be recognized that in day-to-day operation of inter-connected systems, the transmission facilities of either party may, as a natural result of the physical and electrical character-istics of the interconnected network of transmission lines of which the transmission lines of the partics are a part, carry power from one portion of the system of one of the parties to another portion of that party's system, or carry power intended to be transmitted to or from the system of one of the parties from or to a third party's system. The Companies (CE and PP together) experienced the following system transfers during the period 1965 to 1974.
Inadvertent Energy Flow KEH Received Delivered 1%5 ---------- --- 45,000 1966 ---------- --- 53,000 1%7 ---------- --- ---
1%8 ---------- --- 460,000 1969 ---------- 313,000 ---
1970 ---------- 50,429,000 ---
1971 ---------- --- 50,582,000 1972 ---------- 130,000 ---
1973 ---------- 2,385,000 2,844,000 1974 ---------- 2,208,000 2,152,000 B. The CAPCO and oVEC Agreements require the parties to recognize the increaaes or decreases in electrical losses incurred on the party's systems from the transmission of electrical energy.
Towcrd this end, Ohio Edison has, received and delivered during the years in question electrical energy to compensate for re-placement of losses associated with such transfers for the years, in which records are rearH1y available. (PP had no reported replacement losc transfers) A tabulation of OE transactions is as follows:
Replacement Loss Transfer Received Delivered 1974 ---------- 7,058,000 14,428,000 1973 ---------- 5,605,000 13,508,000 1972 ---------- ---
1,570,000 C. Tha Company has on file with FPC in NEPooL Docket (E-8710) a Rate Schedule FPC-119 concerning an Emergency oil Conservation Tariff to forestall imminent threats to the reliability of service in tne East Coast area of the nation as a consequence of oil and l
I I
natural gas shortages. The Company has made deliveries to West Penn in 1973 and 1974 under this Rate Schedule. While these amounts are contained within the West Penn deliveries (FPC-69, etc.), the details are as follows:
KWH Deceder 1973 1,375,000 January 1974 1,763,000 February 1974 3,975,000 7,113,000 D. While Ohio Edison anc Pennsylvania Power are interconnected as far back as 1952 and fully integrated, and for operating purposes are treated as a single electric system, there have been trans-actions between the Companies as follows:
Interchange Power PP Received PP Delivered P" Purchased
- from OE to OE from OE 1% 5 --------- 56,488,000 262,936,000 10,637,002 1966 --------- 56,254,000 251,919,000 10,734,379 196 7 --------- 78,950,000 225,835,000 13,801,567 1968 --------- 291,095,800 174,452,000 33,183,636 1969 --------- 410,593,000 % ,078,000 66,415,731 1970 --------- 595,118,000 % ,226,000 108,008,671 1971 --------- 428,130,552 281,343,600 217,236,047 1972 --------- 691,235,604 648,420,000 ---
1973 --------- 808,791,103 590,771,800 ---
1974 --------- 879,875,583 438,313,932 ---
- (Purchased Power - FPC 11A)
E. The CAPCo Transmission Facilities Agreement described in Item 1(A).
("CAPCo") hereof requires that individual transmission of each of the CAPCo parties are to be mutually available for the purpose of said Agrecrent. While the Company has transmitted to other CAPCo parties that power generating on its own system by the W.H. Sammis Unit No. 7 and from the SLTC units, all of which are fully described herein, it hcs also from time to time supplied indirect service for Eastlake 5 and SLTC electric power generatin6 off the Company's system to those CAPCo parties which are not directly interconnected with the CAPCo party generating such electric energy. Replacement loss transfers have been received and delivered by Company as de-scribed in General Note (B) hereof.
Supplemental Interrogatory No. 3 Since September 1,1%5, has Ccmpany ever refused any request, either fomal or informal, to transmit electric power and/or energy in the manner described above 11 Interrogatory No. 17 If so, describe each such request by (a) the date o.? the request, (b) the party making the request, (c) the proposed supplying and receiving parties, (d) the requested trans-mission route, (e) the amount of power involved, (f) the time period involved, (g) the reasons for Company's decision with regard to this request, and (h) the identity by date, author (s) and subject matter of any documents relating thereto.
Response: Since September 1,1%5, the Company has not refused to trnnamit electric power from its transmission system to the transmission system of another electric utility engaged in the utilization, sale or further trans-mission of that electric power.
Supplemental Interrogatory No. 3 Since September 1,1%5, has Company had electric power and energy transmitted to it either directly or indirectly from the transmission system of any other electric utility (whether or not said utility is directly inter-connected with Company)? If so, describe each situation, stating (a) the parties involved, (b) the time period (s) involved, (c) the amounts of energy and/or power in NWH involved annually, (d) the reason (s) for the transmission (s), (e) the date of and signatories to any agreements relating to each such situation, and (f) the rate (s) at which Company was billed for each transaction.
j Response: Since September 1,1%5, the Company has received electric power on its transmission system frem the transmission system of another electric utility with which it is interconnected. The Company is without knowledge as to the producer of such power unless it was generated on the system (s) with
l
.which Company is directly interconnected. However, clectric power received pursuant to Interconnection Item 11(A) -Ohio Valley Electric Co.Pration (OVEC) and Interconnection Item 2(A)-CAPCO (Michigan Power Purchase) was generated by an electric utility or corporate entity with which the Company is not directly interconnected. For details and description of each situation, see the attached sheets.
l L
D
.- '/ INTERCONNECTIONS
- 1. (A) Parties: CAPCO (Including Pennsylvania Power)
(B) Time Period: September 14, 1967 continuing to date.
(C) Energy Received: KWH
1972 ---------- ---
1973 ---------- 16,761,000 1974 ---------- 257,375,000
- Covers only those transactions made directly in ace rdance with and pursuant to a CAPCO Agreement. The parties have also made individual transactions with each other during the period (See details listed herein for the Co=pany under The Cleveland Electric T11nminating Co., The Toledo Edison Co.
and Duquesne Light Co. Interconnections).
(D) Reasons: The CAPCO Companies enetered into the CAPCO Transmission i Facilities Agreement, as of September 14, 1967 providing i:.
for construction, operation and maintenance of an adequate tranamission network to permit the five CAPCO Companies that are parties to the agreement to utilize their respective capacity entitlements in various jointly co-4tted generating units for effective coordination of the operation of CAPCO Companies among themselves and witl 1 other systems, power -
pcols and coordinating groups and for the equitable sharing by the parties of the resulting benefits and responsibilities. ,
(E) Dates: (1) Contract dated November 1, 1971, effective as of ,
September 14, 1967 ("CAPCO Transmission Facilities Agreement") is still in effect. This agreement was transmitted to FPC on September 29, 1971, accepted i
for filing on September 7,1972 so as to be effective on September 30, 1971 (FPC Rate 96B). This agreement
( was modified by the parties by memorandum on April 7, !
1972 as to certain investment responsibilities for CAPCO lines.
(2) Pursuant to the Agreement ("CAPCO Transmission Facilities Agreement") uricus members of CAPCO have ,
entered into agreements with the Company in order that they may receive or provide the entitlements of capacity and energy from various sho t-lead time capacity units.
A tabulation of those agreements involving the Companies are as follows: ,
I (a) Agree =ent between Duquesne Light dated October 1, 1973 for the period beginn4to October 1,1973 and ending May 31, 1974. (SLTC #2 involving 9 m sale to DL). FPC - E-5863
s.
.p-(b) Agreement between The Toledo Edison Company dated October 1,1973 for the period be-r ginning October 1, 1973 and ending December 31, 1974 (SLTC #1 involving 27 W sale to TE). FPC-8541.
(c) Agreement between The Cleveland Electric T11=4nating
, Company dated October 3,1973 for the period beginning October 3, 1973 and ending May 31, 1974 and period beginning June 1,1974 and ending December 31, 1974, (SLTC #3 involving sale of 41 m and 46 W to OE).
FPC-42 5 (d) Agreement between the CAPCO Companies ("Short Lead Time Capacity Agreement"),-dated October 1, 1973 for the period beginning October 1, 1973 through December 31, 1974 (Covering SLTC #1, 2 and 3 -
sales and deliveries). FPC No. 97, including supplements.
Duquesne Light Company agreed as of October 31, 1973 (" Amendment of CAPCO Short Lead Time Capacity Agreement") to amend this agreement so as to cancel the provisions, as to purchases and sales (2f and 2g) thereof and insert in place thereof a provision ,
whereby Ohio Edison would provide Duquesne Light l with 9 m from its SLTC # 2 for period of October 1, '
, 1973 through May 31, 1974 (F) Rates: The rates at which Company billed the other parties and the rate at which other parties billed the Company hereunder have been incorporated into the Company's Rate Schedule.
While the CAPCO Transmission Facilities Agree =ent does not '
contain rate provisions, each separate agreement listed j herein does contain similarily structured rates for similar short-lead time capacity transactions by and between the parties. The rate details of each agreement is found within the Article entitled Compensation. Copies of relev:nt infor-mation have been made available at the request of the ERC and DOJ at the Central Depository in Washington, D.C. i (G) Rate Basis: The rates between the parties were established by ex-tended negotiations and are filed with FPC. The rates ;
and the methods and factors used to determine such rates l
are set forth in the contract between the parties and in any material which was supplied to the FPC in conjunction
! with each filing. Copies of relevant information were i :
specially selected by the DOJ and NRC and have been made available at Central Depository in W mhington, D.C.
I 9
e
,n - - ~ * ^
l I
_ 93 ;
l l
IIEERCONNECTIONS
- 2. (A) Party: CAPCO (Michigan Power Purchase)
(B) Time Period: May 29,1%7 continuing to October 6,1974.
(C) Energy Received: KWH OE & PP 1973 ---------- 988,wo 1974 ----------11,066,o%
(D) Reasons: The CAPCO Parties, are all engaged in the generation, transmission and distribution of electric power and energy and their systems are interconnected directly or indirectly. All of the CAPCO parties are also parties to the CAPCO Group memorandum of Understanding, dated September 14, 1967 which contemplates coordinated action to provide the capacity requirements of the parties, including the installation of generating and trammnission facilities as required for future periods and specifying the facilities to be brought into operation through 1974.
It appeared that during the period October 1, 1973 through December 31, 1974 the aggregate of the caracity requirements of the parties would be in excess of that which wou11be available from the generating units to be brought into operation pursuant to the CAPC0 agreements during such years and from other resources expected to be available to the parties. In order to assure additional capacity to the extent needed, the parties entered into a Power Agreement on May 29, 1969. The Power A greement provides that Toledo Edison should exercise the option it had to make a Short-Term Power Reservation from Consumers Power Company and the Detroit Edison Company.
Such power was then used by the CAPC0 Companies in the amounts provided for on pages 4 and 3 of the Power Agreement. Ohio Edison purchased the quantities of power herein listed during the period involved.
(E) Dates: (1) Agreement between the CAPCO parties dated May 29, 1969 (FPC Rate 97) and as amended on May 26, 1971 (FPC Rate 97.1) and November 1, 1973. (E-8480) The parties then agreed to cancel the agreement as of 12:00 P.M., October 6, 3974 (F) Rates: The rates at which The Toledo Edison Company billed the Companies have been incorporated into the Compcny's Rate Schedule (FIC Rate 97) and into The Toledo Edison's Rate Schedule (FPC Rate 23), accepted by the FPC on December 10, 1973 so as to be effective on October 1,1973 The rstes herein involved, for Chio Edison's purchase are shown on page 10 of the Agreement dated May 29, 1969
(G) Rate Basis: The rates between the parties were established by ex-tended negotiations and are filed with FFC. The rates -1 and the methods and factors used to determine such rates
/
are set forth in the contract between the parties and in i any material which was supplied to the FPC in con, junction I with each filing. Copies of the relevant infomation were specially selected by the DOJ and NRC and have been
)
l made available at Central Depository in Washington, D.C. '
e l
6
b l- . -n-INTERCONNECTICIG
- 3. (A) Party: The Cleveland Electric Illuminating Comoany l
(B) Time Period: reement was executed prior to September 1, I
1 5 and cantinuing to date.
(C) Energy Received: KWH OE
\
1969 ----------- ---
l 1970 ---------- 130,230,003 l 1971 ----------- 465,965,000 l
1972 ----------- 245,230,000 i
1973 ----------- 121,874,000 1 1974 ----------- 408,816,000 !
(See"CAPCo" Interconnection for CAPCo Transaction)
(D) Reasons: The parties mutua11,y agreed to construct large steam-electric generating units on their respective syste=s >
(Sammis No. 6 and Avon No. 9), strengthen transmission interties, provide for the purchase and sale of capacity and energy for mutual back up of each unit. The ob- ,,
jective of the parties was the realization on their respective t-systems of the economies possible by the use of large steam- !!
electric generating units then technically feasible, to- h gether with the concomitant potentials of the strengthened tranamission interties required to enable utilization of l such units. It was recognized by the parties that neither party by itself was then able to economically utilize generating units of such size and was further recognized :
that by appropriate planning and mutual agree =ent, the !
economies inherent in the construction and operation of I large steam-electric generating units and strengthened l:
transmission interties could be jointly shared by the parties.
II (E) Dates: Contract between the parties dated February 23,.1965 (FPC Rate 4 ) is presently in effect. The parties have also entered into letter agreements dated December 3, 1968, May 8,1972 and January 29, 1973 which mdify the terms ani conditions of the contract dated February 23,1%5.
(F) Rates: The rates at which The Cleveland Electric Illuminating Company billed Company have been incorporated i,pto Company's Rate Schedule (FIC Rate W, including 44.1, accepted by FIC on April 11 1969 and FUCo 33458). The details of '
each such rate schedule involved are shown on pages 6 I through lo of the February 23, 1965 Agreement and in I the amendments listed in Item (E) hereof.
. (G) Rate Basis: The rates between the parties were established by ex-tended negotiations and are filed with FPC. The rates and the methods and factors used to determine such rates are set forth in the contract between the parties and in any material which was supplied to the FPC in conjunction with each fili"6 Copies of the relevant information were specially selected by the DOJ and NRC and have been made available at Central Depository in Washington, D.C.
6 6
4
-W-N *' INTERCONNECTIONS
- 4. (A) Party: The Cleveland Electric Illuminating Company (B) Time Period: Prior to September 1, 1965 continuing to date.
(C) Energy Received: KWH
_OE 1%s ---------- 49,000 1966 ---------- 813,000 1%7 ---------- 1,49,000 1%8 ---------- 5,W8,ooo 1%9 ---------- 7,307,000 1970 ---------- ~5,390,000 1971 ---------- 33,884,000 1972 ---------- 147,115,000 1973 ---------- 33,583,000 1974 ---------- 11,955,000 (See CAICo " Interconnection for CAPCo Transaction") i (D) Reasons: The parties mutually agreed to establish interconnected ..
operations between their systems on a basis which will be consistent with conditions prevailing on their systems so as to furnish interconnected services to each other consisting of one or more of the following: interchange power, inclurling economy, on-peak, off-peak and emergency services and firm pcwer purchased sales and short-term power transactions between the parties. *fhe interim supplements described herein further provide 1) a means for The Cleveland Electric Illuminating Company to receive its entitlement of capacity and energy from the W.H.
Sammis No. 7 unit during fixed periods and to receive its entitlement of capacity and energy from the 125 IN short-lead time capacity installed on the Ohio Edison System during a fixed period.
(E) Dates: Contract between the parties dated July 29,1%4 (FPC Rate
- 42) is presently in effect. The parties entered into a letter agreement on March 21,1%7 (FPC Rate 42.1) to provide for
~
short-term power exchanges. This letter agreement (March 21, 1%7) presently in effect was transmitted to the FPC on April 21, 1967 and made effective on May 25,1%7.
on September 16, 1971 the parties entered into an Interim Supplement (FPC Rate 42.2) to be effective during the period .
~ beginning with the date of commercial operation of W.H.
Sammis No. 7 Unit and ending with the date of commercial operation of Eastlake No. 5 Unit. on August 1, 1972 the parties transmitted notice of cancellation of the Interim i
I I
m e v e g .-- -m- y w m-w- pp
,o. *
~ 100 Supplement (dated September 16,1971) to the FIC effective September 21,1972 (FPC Rate'42 3). The Parties entered into an Interim Supplement dated January 1,1973 (FPC Rate 42.4) for the period of January 1, 1973 and andins September 30, 1973. This agreement (dated January 1, 1973) covered The Cleveland Electric T11=inating Company's entitlement from the 125 lei short-lead time capacity was accepted by the FPC on November 16, 1973 and made effective on January 1, 1973.
(F) Rates: The rates at which Tne Cleveland Electric Illuminating Company billed Company have been incorpor..ced into Com Rate Schedule (FPC Rate 42, including 42.1 through 42.pany's and RJCO 34554). The details of such rates are found on pages 9 through 12 of the Agreement dated July 29, 1964 and each amendment thereto.
(G) Rate Basis: The rates between the parties were established by ex- )
tended negotiations and are filed with FPC. The rates l
and the methods and factors used to determine such rates !
are set forth in the contract between the parties and in ;
any material which was supplied to the FPC in conjunction :
with each filing. Copies of relevant information were i specially selectec by the DOJ and NRC and have been made F available at Central Depository in Washington, D.C. I 1
d
. 1 1
1
- 101 -
INTERCONNECTIONS 5 (A) Party: Columbus and Southern ohio Electric Comoany (B) Time Period: Prior to September 1, 1965 continuing to date.
1 (C) Energy Received: KWH i CE
- l 1965 ---------- 2,997,200 1%6 ---------- 4,693,400 1967 ---------- 4,986,400 1%8 ---------- 12,408,600 1%9 ---------- 31,648,800 1970 ---------- 25,361,600 1971 ---------- 26,559,000 1972 ---------- 16,512,800 1973 ---------- 60,492,000 1974 ---------- 160,323,400 (D) Reasons: Poth parties are electric utilities generating, trensmitting and distributing electric power to areas which are contiguous at certain locations and whose lines intersect or parallel each other within the State of Ohio. It was deemed mutitally desirable that the systems be interconnected with each other to achieve the benefits from coordinated inter-connected operations.
(E) Dates: Contract dated November 29, 1957 and as amended on July 6, 1959, August 19, 1959, November 1, 1961 and April 16, 1963 Copies of the contract including all supplements, amendments, or modifications thereof,which were specifically selected by DoJ and NRC,bsve been made available for inspection and copy at Central Depository in Washington, D.C.
(F) Rates: The rate (s) at which Columbus and Southern Electric Company billed Company are shown on page 9 and 10 of thu contract dated November 29, 1957 and have been incorporated into the Company's Rate Schedule (FPC Rate 43), copies of which are among those documents specifically selected by DoJ and NRC for shipment to Washington, D.C.
(G) Rate Basis: The rates between the parties were established by extended negotiations and are filed with FPC with an effective date of September 13, 1964. The rates and the methods and factors used to determine such rates are set forth in the contract between the par-ties andin any material which was supplied to the FPC in conjunction with such filing. Copies of relevant information are available at Central Depository in Washington, D.C.
, - 1% -
F INTERCONNECTIONS r .
, l t
- 6. (A) Party: Duquesne Light Company (Including Pennsylvania Power Commy)
(B) Time Period: Various agreements between the parties were in existence prior to September 1, 1965 and have continued, been modifed or replaced so that services between the parties have continued uninterrupted to date. ;
(C) Energy Received: IGiH oE PP 1%5 ---------- --- 15,034,746 1%6 ---------- --- 11,924,000 1%7 ---------- --- ---
1%8 ---------- --- 917,000 1969 ---------- --- 2,609,000 1970 ---------- 21,368,000 ---
1971 ---------- 48,495,000 ---
1972 ---------- 103,327,000 637,000 1973 ---------- 51,157,000 ---
1974 ---------- 16,231,000 ---
(See "CAPCo" Interconnection for CAPCo Transaction details).
(D) Reasons: The parties felt it would be mutually advantageous to L realize the benefits from more coordinated interconnected l' operations and services, including the interchange, sale and purchase of electric power and energy. The interim
[
e supplements, described below, provide a means for Ddquesne Light Company to receive its entitlement of capacity and energy from the 125 MW short-lead time capacity installed on the Ohio Edison System during fixed periods.
(E) Dates: Pennsylvania Power and Duquesne Light Company entered into an Agreement dated october 3,1925 which was supplemented on october 22, 1946 by the parties (PP's FPC Rate Schedule No. 1).
Pennsylvania Power and Ohio Edison entered into an Agreement 1%6 to supply with short-term power (PP's FPC Rate Schedule 1 and Ohio Edison's Duquesne Light Company on october 17,8 FPC Rate Schedule 65). This Agreement, dated october 17,1966 ;
F was supplemented by letter' agreements dated June 26, 1967, December 20, 1967 and December 20,1%8. on January 1, 1970, l all three parties agreed to terminate all of the .Nresaid -l Agreements dated october 3,1925, october 22, 1946, october 17, l 1966, June 26, 1967, December 20, 1967 and December 20,1%8 1 and to enter a new agreement to govern and control the trans-actions between the parties. The Agreement was transmitted to e-
-g-,
- 103 -
- ! the FPC on December 24, 1969, was accepted on March 18, 1970 and,made effective as of January 1, 1970. t Accompanying the Agreement (FPC Rate 72 and 21) was Schedule A " Emergency Power" (FPC Rate 71.1 and 21.1), Schedule B
" Interchange Power and Energy" (FPC Rate 71.2 and 21.2), and Schedule C "Short-Term Power and Energy" (FPC Rate 71.3 and 213). Subsequently, the parties have entered into interim supplement, dated September 8,1972 (FPC Rate 71.4 and 21.4) which was effective beginning with the first full day (September 8, 1972) of commercial operation of the last such capacity to go in service and ending on December 31, 1972. On January 1, 1973, the parties entered into an ;
interim supplement for the period beginning January 1, 1973 and ending September 30,-1973 On July 10, 1973 the parties entered into two additional interim supplements ,
both for periods beginning July 10, 1973 and ending September 30, 1973 All supplements which h_ ave now expired involved the entitlement of Duquesne Light to receive capacity and energy from 125 MW of short-lead time capacity installed on the Ohio Edison System.
(F) Rates: The rate (s) which Duquesne Light billed Ohio Edison and i Pennsylvania Power have been incorporated into the Companies' Rate Schedule (FPC Rate 71 for Ohio Edison and FPC Rate 21 for Pennsylvania Power). The details of such ,
rates are found in Schedules A, B and C of the Agreement
- dated January 1,1970 and the four interim supplements !
thereto. The rates for contracts which have been terminated are found within the agreements. All agreements, supplements, modifications and rate schedules have been made available at Central Depository as requested by NRC and DOJ. ,
(G) Rate Basis: The rates between the parties were established by ex-tended negotiations and are filed with FPC. The rates and the methods and factors used to determine such rates are set forth in the contract between the parties and in any material which was supplied to the FPC in conjunction with each filing. Copies of relevant information were specially selected by the D0J and NRC and have been made available at Central Davository in Washington, D.C.
l I
l 1 -
/ ,
- 104 -
INTERCONNECTIONS I
- 7. (A) Party: The Dayton Power and Light Coreany (B) Time Period: Prior to September 1, 1965 continuing to date.
(C)-EnergyReceived: KWH
_CE 1% 5 ----------- ---
1966 ----------- 468,000 1%7 ----------- ---
1%8 -----------
2,257,000 1%9 ---------- - 19,110,000 1970 ----------- 45,552,000 1971 ----------- 107,916,000 j 1972 ----------- 126,126,000 i 1973 ----------- 116,674,000 1974 ----------- 244,831,000 ,
I, (D) Reasons: Both parties are electric utilities generating, .i transmitting and distributing electric power to areas which are contiguous at certain locations and whose i{
lines intersect or parallel each other within the State of Ohio. It was deemed mutually desirable that the systems be interconnected with each other a to achieve the benefits from coordinated interconnection services and transactions that may include among others !
- 1) the interch%e, sale and purchase of electric power to meet emergency or co-ordinated maintenance requirements; h !
- 2) the interchange, sale or purchase to affect
'perating economies;
- 3) the sale and purchase of firm power and ;
associated energy; and l
- 4) the sale and purchase of short-term electric ,!
power available on the system of one party and needed on the system of another.
(E) Dates: Contract dated May 1, 1949 and as amended on May 4, 1956 and June 6,1956 and effective through September 15,1%7. tt I
On that date the parties entered into a new Interconnection
},
Agreement which is still in effect. Copies of the contracts l
including all supple =ents, amendments, or modifications l1 thereof,which were specifically selected by DoJ and NRC, .
have been made available for inspection and copy at l Central Depcsitory in Washington, D.C. ,
1 h
. .I
105 -
,, ? .
~
(F) Rates: The rate (s) at .thich The Dayton Power and Light Company bined Company are shown in Service Schedule A and B attached to the contract dated September 15, 1967 and have been incorporated into the Company's Rate Schedule (FPC Rate 66 and PUC0 35018), copies of which are among those documents specifically selected by DOJ and NRC for shipment to Washington, D.C.
(G) Rate Basis: The rates for electric power between the parties are special rates established by extended negotiations and are filed with FPC on December 22,1%7, accepted on February 5, 1968 and made effective on January 26, 1968. The rates and the methods and factors used to determine such rates are set forth in the contract between the parties and in any material which was supplied to the FPC in conjunction with such filing.
Copies of relevant information were specially selected by the DOJ and ERC and have been made available at Central Depository in Washington, D.C.
l 4
4
. C s
1 1
l i
b q
_ ._ ._ . _ - _ _ - _~_ __ _
- - 106 - I INTERCONNECTIONS
- 8. (A) Party: >=Tala Power Company and West Penn Power Comp (any (Incinding Identified Pennsylvania collectively as APS) Power Company)
. (B) . Time Feriod: From approximately October n , 1968 4
continuing tc date.
(C) Energy-Received: KWH PP OE i 1%8 ---------- 325,000 WO,000 1%9 ---------- 40,000 7 74k,393,000 197o ---------- --- ,570,000 1971 ---------- --- 77,092,000 1972 ---------- 1,820,000 122,312,000 1973 ---------- --- 191,168,000 1973 -- -------- --- 301,963,000
(
t (D) *2 sons: All parties are electric utilities generating, trans-mitting and distributing electric power within their respective 1, service territories. In order that each party may further j
.a realize benefits from more coordinated interconnected operation, thr.t may include among others, emergency support, interchange power and energy on an economy or non-displacement basis, and short-term power purchase, the parties deemed it mutually desirable to enter into the sub,1ect contract.
G '
(E) Dates: Contract dated October 17, 1968 (FPC Rate 69 and 20) in-cluding Schedule A " Energy Service" (FPC Rate 69 1 & 20.1), fI Schedule B " Interchange Power and Energy" (FPC Rate 69 2 &
20.2), and Schedule C "Short Term Power and Energy" (FPC Rate !
693&203) were transmitted to FPC on October 31,1%8, accepted for filing on December 16, 1968 and deemed effective as of December 1,1969 on February 1, 1972, the parties agreed to amand (Amendment No. 1) Schedule C "Short Term Power and Energy" which was tranamitted to FPC on April 26, 1972, accepted for filing on July 12, 1972 and deemed effective on June 1, 1972 (FPC Rate 69 3 1 & 20.3.1). On June 1,1973,thepartiesagreedtoamendfAmendmentNo.2)
Schedule A " Emergency Service" which was accepted for filing by FPC on May 31, 1974 and deemed effective on June 15, 1973 i (FPC Rate 69 1.1 and 20.1.1). On May 6, 1974, the parties !
agreed to delete Schedule C and substitute a new Schedule C
[
"Short Term Power and Energy" (Amendment No. 3) which was !
i accepted for filing on July 15, 1974 and deemed effective
. on May.15,1974 (FPC Rate 69.4 and 20.4).
4 i.
j 4
L -
'h' -107- .
.. .c l
'(F) Rates: The rate (s) at whibb West Penn and Monongahela billed Company are shown in attachments to the contract of October 17, 1968, Schedule A, Schedule B, and Schedule C, as amended, and heNe been in:orporated into the Company's Rate Schedule (FPC Rate 69 for Chio Edison and FPC Rate 20 for Pennsylvania Power),
copies of which are among those documents specifically selected by DOJ and NRC for production in Washington, D.C.
(G) Rate Basis: The rates for electric power between the parties are special rntes established by extended negotia-tions and are filed with FPC. The rates and the methods and factors used to determine such rates are set forth in the contract between the parties and in any material which was supplied to the FPC in conjunction with such filing. Copies of relevant information were specially selected by DOJ and NRC and have been made available at Central Depository in Washington, D.C.
I f
(4 s
9
+ - 108 -
INTEPCOMECTIpNS i ;
l 9 (A) Party: Ohio aver Company (L) Time Ibriod: Irem approximately August 1, 1970 continuing to date.
(C) E argy Received: KWH '
OE -
1970 d--------- 109,264,000 1971 ---------- 274,474,000 1972 ---------- 294,%8,000 1973 ---------- 329,761,000 19'T* ---------- 338,143,000 (D) Reasons: The purpose of the Agreement dated June 20, 1968 is to provide for the sale by Ohio Power Company (OP) and the purchase by Ohio Edison Company (CE) of electric power at points of interconnection from time to time existing between their respective system, and the sale by CE and the purchase by OP of electric power at specific points of delivery, ard at such other service points or delivery as may be established per the agreement. OP is thus able to deliver electric power to Buckeye Power, Inc. at such points of delivery on the same basis upon which electric power is being
, delivered to other members of Buckeye Power, Inc. The arrangements, as approved by the FPC and PUCO, with variable rates and che ges and mininnnn charges, are reason-able, practicable and advantageous to the parties inter-ested and to the public. _
(E) Dates: Contract between the parties dated as of June 20,1%8 with service commencing on or about August 1, 1970.
(F) Rates:
The rate (s)into incorporated at Company's which Ohio Power Rate billed Schedule FPCComp (any have bee Rate 67) and are shown on pages 5 through 7 (h ticle 7 & 8) and Exhibit C of the contract. Copies of relevant information were specially selected by the DOJ and NRC and have been '
made available at the Central Depository in Washington, D.C. *#
9 e
I i
I l
i'
$l ll
. -109-
. (G) Rate Basis: the rates between the parties were established by ex-tended negotiations and are filed with FPC. The rates and the methods and factors used to determine such rates
! are set forth in the contract between the parties and in any material which was supplied to the FPC in conjunction with each filing. Copies of the relevant informatica were specially selected by the DOJ and URC and have been made available at Central Depository in Washington, D.C.
0
\
(
s i
I b
t E
l l.
~
- INTER 00iCECTIONS lo. (A) Party: Ohio Power Comuany (B) Time Period: Prior to September 1, 1965 continuing to date.
(C) Energy Received: KWH OE 1965 ----------- 11,540,800 1966 ----------- 15,975,100 1%7 ----------- 16,150,500 1%8 ----------- 19,460,400 1969 ----------- 22,100,000 1970 ----------- 100 32,885,400 1971 ----------- 57,131, 1972 ----------- 30,797,800 1973 ----------- 39,766,800 1974 ----------- 41,250,600 (D) Reasons: The parties had for many years been interconnected and operated in synchronism before mutuaRy a6reeing to enter into a new contract providing for the furnishing of inter- Q connection services, including the interc%rge, sale and g purchase of electric power and energy. Such interconnection services may include anong others:
- 1) The interchange, sale and purchase of energy to effect operating econocies;
- 2) The furnishing of =atual emergency and standby assistance; ,
- 3) The coordination of maintenance schedules of generating and transmission facilities ; and
- 4) The transfer of electric energy through the transmission system of one party for the benefit .
of the other; the sale and purchase of short-term l electric power and energy available on the system ',
of one party and needed on the system of another so as to facilitate more economical construction i of generating capacity on the syste=s of both parties.
l
9
, - 111
- - (E) Dates: Contract dated January 1, 1952 (FPC Rate 9) and as amended on May 1, 1967 (FPC Rate 9.1) is presently in effect with the former having an FPC Certificate of Concurrence dated January 1,1952 and the latter having a.n FFC acceptance date of July 7,1%7 so as to be effective on June 29, 1967.
This contract was filed with PUC0 for information on February 20, 1952.
(F) Rates: The rates at which Company billed Ohio Power Company have been incorporated into Company's Rate Schedule (FPC Rate 9, including FPC Rate 9.1). The details of each rate schedule involved are shown in Service Schedule A " Inter- '
change Power" attached to Agreement dated January 1, 1952 and on the May 1,1967 amendment to said Agreement.
(G) Rate Basis: The rates between the parties were established by ex-tended negotiations and are filed with FPC. The rates and the methods and factors used to determine such rates are set forth in the contract between the parties and ir any material which was supplied to the FPC in conjur.ction with each filing. Copies of relevant information were specially selected by the DOJ and NRC and have been made available at Central Depository in Washington, D.C. ,
5 t
I 0
S
- 112 -
INTERCoMECTIoIQ
- 11. (A) Party: ohio Valley Electric Corporation (oVEC)
(Including Pennsylvania Power Company)
(B) Time Period: Prior to September 1, 1965 continuira to date.
(C) Energy Received: KWH oE PP 1%5 -------- 887,805,000 128,742,000 1%6 -------- 1,397,185,000 211,670,000 1967 -------- 1,590,146,000 227,432,000 1968 -------- 1,736,369,000 269,950,000 1969 -------- 1,669,739,000 273,372,000 1970 -------- 1,708,o75,000 231,581,000 1971 -------- 1,920,438,000 243,132,000 1972 -------- 1,518,363,000 183,652,000 1973 -------- 1,554 221,380,000 1974 -------- 1,294,165,000
,486,000 179,678,000 (D) Reasons: The U.S. Atomic Energy Comission constructed a project i er enriching uranium services near Portsmouth, Ohio and needed at the site of the project electric Jower and energy in a large amount which was not then svailable. oVEC entered an agreement relating to the supplying of power and energy to the project. The Companiec being a sponsoring C. cpany to such project entered into an Inter-Company Power Agre: tent which obligated each to supply interim power and supw. mental power in order that oVEC may fulfill its obligation co the AEC and in turn each sponsoring Company has the righ to receive surplus power as may be generated by oVEC. , Atomic Energy Commission now known as Ruclear Reguistory Commission)
(D) Dates: The Agreements which relate to the undertaking are as follows:
ohio Edison FPC No. Other Party Document Dates 12 OVEC Certificate of July 29, 1953 Concurrence in Inter-Company Power Agreement of July lo,1953 12.2 OVEC Certificate of March 23, 1956 Concurrence in ;
Inter-Cempany Letter Agreement of February 23, 1956. '
l 12.2.1 oVEC Certificate of November 19,19%
Concurrence in Supplement to Inter-Company Letter Agreement of February 23, 1956.
i
-H3-Ohio Edison FIC No. Other Party Document Dated 12.2.2 OVEC Certificate of January 17, 1958 Concurrence in Supplement to Inter-company Letter Agreement of February 23, 1956, teing consent to Modification No. 2 of January 13, 1958.
12.2 3 OVEC and Certificate of December 26, o958 Ohio Power Concurrence in Supplement to Inter-company letter Agreement of February 23, 1956, consent to Modification No. 3 of December 8,1958.
12 3 OVEC and Certificata of June 19, 1956 Chio Power Concurrence in Ietter Agreement of June 19, 1956.
12.4 Chio Power Certificate of November 19, 1956 Concurrence in Inter-company Letter Agreement of November 10, 1956.
12 5 OVEC Certificate cf December 26, 1958 Concurrence in Modification No. 1 dated August 20, 1958, to Supple-mentary Transmission Agreement of July 10, 1955 12.6 OVEC Certificate of April 27, 1960 Concurrence in Ietter Agreement of April 18, 1960.
12.7 OVEC Certificate of July 1,1%5 l Concurrence in Modification No. 2 of April 1, 1965, l
to Supplementary Transmission Agree-ment of July 10, 1953
- 114 -
Ohio Edison FPC No. Other Party Document Dated la.8 OVEC Certificate of July 1, 1966 Concurrence in Modification No. 1 of June 3,1966, to Power Agreement of July 10, 1953 12 9 OVEC Certificate of January 12, 1967 Concurrence in Modification No. 4 dated January 7, 1%7, to Power Agreement of October 15, 1952.
12.10 SVEC Certificate of February 7,1%7 Concurrence in Modification No. 3 of January 20, 1967, to Power Agreement of July 10, 1953.
(F) Rates: The rate (s) at which OVEC billed Company for electric power supplied under these agreements have been in-corporated into Company's Rate Schedule (FPC Rate Schedule 12 for Chio Edison and FPC Rate Schedule 10 for Pennsylvania Power Company). The details of such rates are found in Article 6 of the Inter-company Power Agreement among OVEC and sponsoring companies dated July 10, 1953 and in Podification No.1 dated June 3,1%6, Modification No. 2 dated January 7,1%7 and Modification No. 3 dated January 20, 1967 (G) Rate Basis: The rates between the parties were established by ex-tended negotiations and are filed with FPC. The rabts and the methods and factors used to determine such rates are set forth in the contract between the parties and in
.any material which was supplied to the FPC in conjunction with each filing. Copies of relevant information were specially selected by DOJ and NRC and were made available at the Central Depository in Washington,D.C.
\
- 115 -
INTERCONNECTIONS
- 12. (A) Parties: ohio Power and Akron Parties (B.F. Goodrich)
(B) Time Period: Prior to September 1, 1965 continuing to date.
(C) Energy Received: KWH Total oE B.F. Goodrich 1965 ------ 210,006,875 20,o43,814 189,965,001 1966 ------ 225,159,678 31,989,868 193,169,810 1967 ------ 219,707,408 47,200,105 172,507,303 1968 ------ 230,362,548 26,088,734 204,273,814 1%9 ------ 230,315,380 27,927,712 202,385,668 1970 ------ 229,710,843 32,469,032 197,241,811 1971 ------ 228,781, % o 41,054,331 187,727,629 1972 ------ 232,458,079 48,666,498 183,791,581 1973 ------ 245,781,801 65,287,288 180,494,513 1974 ------ 308,497,051 131,152,783 177,344,268 (D) Reasons: In 1918, because of financial and var conditions, Central Company (now ohio Power Company) was unable to complete the Windsor Generating Station. The Akron Parties, of which B. F. Goodrich and Ohio Edison's predecessor, the Northern Ohio Traction & Light Company were members, had also contemplated constructing there own new generating station, but owing to existing conditions and the request of representatives of the federal government, it was agreed that the Akron Parties would join Central Company in constructing the Windsor Station. The Akron Parties agreed to pay certain percentages of the costs of the Windsor Station based on the portion of capacity reserved for their use and to pay actual cost of producing such power taken by them.
(E) Dates: (1) Station Contract dated June 1, 1918; (2) Transmission Contract dated June 1, 1918; (3) Amendatory Agreement of January 1,1951, including all contracts continued in effect thereby which are still in effect; (4) Subsequent amendments and supplements to the Amendatory Agreement of January 1, 1951 and the Station and Trans-mission Contract referred to above, including the letters embodying interpretations and procedures; (5) Administrative interpretation letter, dated December 22, 1966; and (6) Termination Agreement dated Decunber 22,1%6 which is to be effective on December 31, 1975 1
~ M6 -
, (F) Rates: Presen:1y, Ohio Power bins the Company for power del.5ered
- in accordance with the terms and conditions shown in the Letter Agreement dated May 31, 1963 with a Working Copy of Letter of A=nd=nt dated September 24, 1957 attached thereto.
Ohio Edison has incorporated the terms of this undertaking into its present Rate Schedules (FPC Rate 5, etc.). Copies of which have been furnished pursuant to a request of the DOJ and NRC and are available for inspection and copy at Central Depository in Washington, D.C.
(G) Rate Basis: The rates between the parties were established by ex-tended negotiations and are filed with FP". The rates and the methods and factors used to determine such ratet are set forth in the contract between the parties and in any material which was supplied to the FPC in conjunction with each filing. Copies of relevant information were specially selected by the DOJ and HRC and have been made available at Central Depository in Washington, D.C.
l l
I
- 117 -
INTERCONdECTIONS
- t. 13. (A) Party: Toledo Edison Company (B) Time Period: Prior to September 1, 1965 continuing to date.
-(C) Energy Received: KWH S
1965 ---------- .---
154 ---------- 1,086,000 19G7 ---------- 400,000 1968 ---------- 2,345,000
- 1%9 ---------- 123,015,000 1970 ---------- 158,203,000 ,
1971 ---------- 215,615,000 19'i2 ---------- 51,220,000 1973 ---------- 135,469,000 1974 ---------- 276,272,000
. (See "CAICo" Interconnection for CAlCo Trausactions).
(D) Reasons: The parties mutually agreed to provide interconnected operations between their systems ao as to provide for interr+ange power; including on-peak, off-peak, or econecy; firm pcwer; short-tem power or emergency support. The i interim supplements, described below, provide a basis for i Toledo Edison to receive its entitlement of capacity and energy from the W.H. Sarmin No. 7 Unit during fixed periods and to receive its entitlement of capacity and energy from the 125 W short-lead time capacity installed on the Ohio Edison System during a fixed period.
(E) Dates: (1) Contract dated Decemger 31, 1946 with letter a_ma
- ants dated J uuary 2, 1952 and october 27,1955 (FPC Rate 41) continued in effect until terminated by, (2) Contract dated August 1, 1968 (FPC Rate 68) which is presently in effect.
?
\
The parties entered into an interim supplement dated ,l September 20,1971 (FPC Rate 68.1) to be effective during the period beginning with the date of co=mercial operation of W.H. Sammis No. 7 and ending with the date of commercial operation of Eastlake No. 5 The parties entered into a second in;arin supple =ent dated ,
l August 1, 1972 (FPC Rate 68.2) to be effective during '
l the period beginning.vith the date of commercial opera-
! tion of Eastlake No. 5 and ending with the date of commercial operation of Eeaver Valley No. 1. The parties j have also entered into an interim supplement dated 1 January 1, 1973 (FPC Rate 68.3) to be effective from l January 1,1973 until September 30,1973 This agreement l was transmitted to the FPC on March 16, 1973 and 1
- accepted on November 16, 1973 so as to be effective on January 1, 1973.
1
-n8-
~(2) Rates: The rate (s) at which Cearpeny billed The Toledo Edison Company are shown on pages 10 through 13 of the contract dated August 1,
- 1968, and each supplement thereto, all of which have been incorporated into the Company's Rate Schedule, (FPC Rate 68
, and PUC0 35671), and copies cf which are among those documents specifically selected by DOJ and NRC for shipment to Washington, D.C.
(G) Rate Basis: The rates between the parties were established by ex-tended negotiations and are filed with FPC. The rates and the methods.and factors used to determine such rates are set forth in the contract between the parties and in any material which was supplied to the FPC in con-junction with such filing. Copies of relevant informa-tion were specially selected by the DOJ and NRC and have been made available at Central Depository in Washington, D.C.
\
e l
- 219 -
, INTERCONEECTIORS i
- 14. (A)' Party: West Penn Power Company (Exclusively Pennsylvania Power Company) ,
(B) Time Period: From approximately January 14, 1966 to approximately October 17,1%8.
1 (C) Energy Received: FWH pp 1966 --------------- 225,000 1% 7 --------------- ---
1%8 --------------- (See details of new Interconnection Agreement between parties, Item 8(A) hereof). (
(D) Reasons: It was desired to interchange electric power, both under emergency conditions and in order to effect economics, and it was felt that the operating experience so obtained could possibly be used to develop operating arrangements to ]
i pzovide for more fully integrated operations of the two systems.
(E) Dates: Contract dated January 14, 1966 was utilized until terminated by agreement between the parties dated October 17,' 1%8. (See Item 8(A) hereof) Copies of this contract,inc1 Ming any supplements, =M=nts, or
- aodifications thereof,which were specifically selected by DOJ and ERC,have been made available fce inspection and copy at Central Depository in Washington, D.C.
(F) Rates: The rate (s) at which West Penn Power Company billed Company are shown on page 1 of the contract dated January 14, 1966 and have been incorporated into the Company's Rate Schedule (FPC Rate 12), copies of which are among those documents specifically selected by DOJ and ARC for shipment to Washington, D.C.
- i (G) Rate Basis: The rates for electric power between the parties !
are special rates established by extended negotia-tions and are filed with FPC. The rates and the methods and factors used to determine such rates are set forth in the contract between the par-ties and in any taterial which was supplied to the FPC in conjunction with such filing. Copies of relevant information were specially selected by the DOJ and NRC and have been made available at Central Depository in Washington, D.C.
e
- 120 - l '
k Supplemental Irterrogatory No. 4 h
Stato each request, either formal or infor.al, since Geptember 1,1965 made by any electric utility to company for a new or altered inter- l connection arrangement, giving (a.) the name of the entity, (b) the .iate l of the request, (c) the date of any agreement to interconnect, (d) the l reasons for any refusal to interconnect, and (e) the date and author (s) of l any document relating to any such refusal. ll l I
Response: The following requests for a new or altered interconnection -l Arrangement were made since September 1,1965, by an electric utility to Company:
A. City of Orrv111e In 1965,the City of Orrv111e indicated an in-terest in an interconnection for the purpose of controlling its frequency. Ohio Edison Company offered to provide such service but its offer was not accepted, presumably because of the cost required to construct the necessary facilities. In 1969,the City of Orrville re-quested a connection for emergency power to be supplied during flooding of the City's gener-ating plant on July 5, 1969 This request was granted. In 1970,the City asked for the cost for "non-connected service availability" for certain loads on their system. The standard municipal rate was offered to the City and they took no further action at that time. On April 24, 1973, the City requested a meeting to dis-cuss a synchronous intertie so they could become a contributing member to any power pool with their generating capacity and stating that they were making the sae request of Ohio Power Com-pany. A meeting was i. eld in June 1973, an engi- '
neering study was made and we replied in August 1973, stating the conditions under which we could provide such service. In December 1973, the City requested a 23 kV interconneciton with a capability of 2500 to 3000 kVA for an " interim t
period" of the next one or two or two and one-half }
years for the purpose of providing baakup service to an industrial customer soon to be served by >
Orrv111e while they evaluate proposals from Ohio Edison Company and Ohio Power Company to i furnish a 138 kV synchronous tie with Orrv111u.
i On February 7, 1974, a proposed contract for such i services was presented to a representative of (
the City of Orrv111e. On June 13, 1974,an article t
i e
..g i
f
~~
- 121 -
I appeared in The Courier Cresent stating that "an agreement has been reached which will allow Orrv111e to connect its power plant to Chio Power Company's system." On November 19, 1974, the City advised Ohio Edison Company that it was no longer interested in the offer.
On November 11, 1974, the Ohio Energy Commission (CEEC) contacted the Company requesting informa-tion on whether the Company would be in a position to interconnect and provide electric energy to the City of Orrv111e during the coal strike.
The Company advised the OEEC that preser.:: con-ditions would permit the Company to provide up to 2500 kVA to the Cit 3 of Orrv111e. This could be accomplished by replacing some taps and closing in a 23 kV line switch to energize the transformer capacity of the City of Orr-ville. In order to affect this interconnection, the City was to contact the Company so that arrange-ments could be made for closing the interconnection and for arriving at a proper method of payment for the energy. While the City has not made a request 4
and c.pparently the emergency has past with the coal strike settlement, presumably the City is no lor.ger interested in the Company's offer.
B. City of Oberlin The City of Oberlin indicated ::.n interest in an interconnection in 1970, and Ohio Edison Company expressed its willinaness to make such an inter-connection. On March 20, 1970, the City and the Company entered into an agreement under which the Company provided an interconnection for the purpose of selling energy at wholesale to supplement energy generated by Oberlin's own facilities. At t e time of the contract, service at 69 kV was contemplated, but delays in construction of facilities to take service at 69 kV led to service being supplied tem-porarily by the Company at 12.5 kV until June 1, 1971. Service at 69 kV is provided pursuant to FPC Rate Schedule No. 73. The service at 12.5 kV was sup-plied under FPC Rate Schedule No. 73.1 Service to Oberlin presently being provided under the Company's standard rate schedule for municipal resale service
' transmission voltage effective September 1, 1972, pursuant to Federal Power Constission letter of accept-ance dated November 28, 1973, in Docket No. E-7705.
l l
- 122 -
i In letters dated March 8, 1974 and May 7, 1974, the City requested infomation concerning the Company's requirements for the Oberlin Power Plant to operate in parallel with the Company's system.
After meetings on September 13, 1974 and October 12, 197L, the Company advised the City on October 21, 1974 of four facility modifications required'for such operations. Representatives of Ohio Edison met with representatives of City to discuss require-ments of Company letter to City dated Octcber 21, 1974. City's consultant asked for additional infor-mstion in a letter dated Newmber 19, 1974 with.the requested information being transmitted to City's consultant on December 18, 1974. City then re-quested additional information by letter of January 3, 1975 which was answered on February 6, 1975 City's consultant requested additional information by letter on January 23, 1975 which was answered at a meeting held with the City. City requested an interim synchronous interconnection by letter January 23. 1975. These matters are under discussion with the City at this time.
C. City of Norwalk The City of Norwalk indicated an interest in an inter-connection and discussions were held between Ohio Edison Company and the City on the subject from time to time during the period mid-1969 to late 1971.
During that period, on July 7, 1969, emergency power was supplied by the Company to the City during flooding of the City's generating plant. The als-cussions referred to above concerned possib' urchase by the City of all or part of its requiremer.. and possible sale of the City's electric system u the Company. The Company expressed its willinaness to consider any of these alternatives. On February 6, 1970, the City and the Company Ontered i*to an acue- ,
ment under which the Compat.y agreed to provide snergy '
to supplement power generated by the City. Service consnenced under that agreement ou March 2,1970, but the agreement was cancelled by the City on May 6,1970.
Subsequently on April 14, 1971, a new agreement for sale of energy by the Company to supplement energy generated by the City was entered into. Service was first supplied under FpC Rate Schedule No. 72. Couned of the City ultimately decided to sell its system to the Company, and an agreement therefor was made on March 18, 1972. On September 22, 1972, the Securities and Exchange Commission approved the Company's applicaticn to acquire the City'c l
-M3-(
electric system. The acquisition was con-summated on October 31, 1972.
D. Village of Hiram From time to time the Village of Hiram in-dicated an interest in an interconnection and on March 12, 1971, the Village asked the Company to make proposals respecting possible purchase by the Village of all or part of its requirements and possible sale of the Vil-lage's electric system to the Company. The Company made proposals respecting each of these alternatives.
Council of the City ultimately decided to sell its system to the Company, and an agree-ment therefor was made on January 27, 1972.
The Company's application for authority to acquire the system was approved on January 5, 1973 by order of the Securities and Exchange Commission. Acquisition was consummated on
, January 31, 1973 E. City of East Palestine In March, 1972, the City of East Palestine, through its consulting engineer, requested a proposal.from Ohio Edison Company to supply a 69 kV service connection at the northeast corner of its corporate limits sufficient to accommodate a normal system load of 6000 kW.
In July, 1972, Company representatives con-tacted certain City officials and informed them that Ohio Edison Company is willing to -
constry.ct the necessar/ 69 kV facilities from its system to the northeast corner of East Palestine at no cost to the municipality.
4 They were informed at that time that the Com-pany would begin planning and constructing upon receipt of a contract for service. The munic-ipality has the matter under consideration at this time.
In January of 1973, the City requested the Company to examine the municipal' plant and distribution system and make a proposal to w e - . , - , - , . - ,
i the City for its purchase. In June of 1973, the Company submitted its proposal to the City for the entire electric system of the City of East Palestine. On May 28, 1974, City Council decided to sell its system to the Company and on August 23, 1974, Company resubmitted its bid along with specifications in accordance with the City's re-quirements. An agreement was subsequently reached on January 27, 1975 for the sale of the system to the Company. On February 25, 1975, the Company made application to the Securities and Exchange Connission for approval of said purchasc. Company is presently awaiting its disposition.
F. Rural Electric Cooperatives Prior to August 1,1970, theCompany supplied service at wholesale to seven Rural Electric Cooperatives under FPC Rate Schedules 14, 15, 16,17,18,19 and 20 and supplements thereto.
Since 1960, and prior to the effective date of the agreement with Ohio Power Company referred to below, seven requests were made for addi-tional delivery points: two for Marion Rural Electric Cooperative, Inc., which were complied with; two from Icrain-Medina Rural Electri c
(
Cooperative, Inc., which were complied vi t ,
(a third request was made but was subseqtiently withdrawn); two for Firelands Rural Electric Cooperative, Inc., one of which was established in 1972 and the second of which was established in 1973. Under an agreement dated June 20, 1968, however, between the Company and Ohio Power Company, provisions was made for purchase of power by the Company from Ohio Power Company beginning in 1970 and sale of power to Ohio Power Company at delivery points supplying the Company's former cooperative customers.
Five requests for the establishment of addi-tional delivery points under that agreement for service for ultimate use by Delaware Rural Electric Cooperative, Inc., Lorain-Medina Rural Electric Cooperative, Inc.,
Morrow Electric Cooperative, Inc., Lickhg Rural Electrification, Inc., and North Central Rural Electric Cooperative, Inc.,
are under consideration by the Company and Ohio Power Company. A sixth request by Hohnes-Wayne Electric Cooperative, Inc.
l was complied with.
i' G. Borough of Grove City Since 1960_one request was received by Penn-L 'sylvania Power Company from the Borough of
- 125 -
t Grove City, Mercer County, Pennsylvania, for the supply of bulk power at whole-sale, and it was granted. A connection was made and on Oct.ober 7, 1967, the Borough began receiving service as a municipal resale customer under Pennsyl-vania Power Company's FPC Rate Schedule No. 19 -
H. Borough of Ellwood City, Grove City, New Wilmington, Wampum and Zelienople In a current rate proceeding before the Federal Power Commission (E-8159) in- I volving Pennsylvania Power, the Intervenors have taken the position that the Company should be required to file a rate schedule for 69 kV service, notwithstanding testimony by witness to the fact that none of the Boroughs are presently equipped to take or receive 69 kV service, or has any specific plans to do so at the moment.
The Company has stated on the record that if, as, and when any of such Boroughs is physically prepared to take or receive service at 69 kV and to contract with Com-pany for such service, the Company will file the appropriate rate, under the rules and regulations of the Federal Power Commission s and subject to, of course, review of that Commission.
I. Ohio Valley Electric Company 1
Pursuant to an agreement of April 1, 1965, known as Modification No. 2 to the First Supplementary Transmission Agreement between Ohio Valley Electric Company and various d other companies including Ohio Edison Company and Pennsylvania Power Company, Ohio Edison Company has established an interconnection at Dayton Power and Light Company's Greene Substation (operated and maintained by Dayton at Ohio Edison's expense) and has established an interconnection between
, Columbus and Southern Ohio Electric Company's Delaware Substation and Ohio Edison's Tangy
- 126 Substation operated and maintained by Ohio Edison at its own expense. The agreement is filed with the Federal Power Commission A3 Ohio Edison Company's FPC No. 12.7.
J. West Penn Power Company Pursuant to an agreement of April 23, 1965, between Pennsylvania Power Company and West Penn Power Company, Pennsylvania Power Company has established two inter-connections with West Penn at Krendale and Keister Substations in Pennsylvania.
K. Monongahela Power Company Pursuant to an agreement of April 4,1%7, between Ohio Edison Company and Ohio Power Company and Monongahela Pcwer Com-pany, Ohio Edison has established three
( interconnections with Ohio Power at Galion, South Canton and Canton Central Substations in Ohio and one interconnection with Monongahela Power at Wylie Ridge Substation in West Virginia.
L. The Cleveland Electric Illuminating Company Pursuant to an agreement dated March 21, 1972, between Ohio Edison Company and The Cleveland Electric Illumhting Comparrj, an inter-connection has been established between Ohio Edison's Hanna Substation and Cleveland Electric Illuminating's Juniper-Canton Central lire.
It was determined by representatives of CEI and Ohio Edison that it would be mutually desirable to strengthen the 138,000 volt inter-connection facility between the Lorain Switching Station of CEI and the Johnson Substation of Ohio Edison by construction of a second 138,000 volt transmission line between these two points. On April 2, 1974 the agreement covering the new facil-ity was consummated.
- 127 -
4 M. Wholesale Customers of Ohio Edison On November American Municipal Power-OhioInc.(AMPO27,)1972, inquired as to the Company's v4114nr esa to discuss participation in matters relating to bulk power supply. The Company has indicated by letter its v4114" r ess to discuss these matters. It has previously agreed with the municipalities to which it sella power at whole-sale to discuss and explore similar mhtters with those municipalities. On October 16, 1974, a meeting was held between Ohio Edison and the municipalities at which time a comprehensive outline was established of engineering, economic and legal studies directed toward the implemen-tation of the general objectives of the agreement to discuss and explore participation. As agreed during numerous meetings between the parties, each of the parties is presently collecting data and information for exchange in order that such on-going studies may continue.
N. City of Newton Falls From time to time, the City of Newton Falls has I
indicated some interest in an interconnection arrangement with Chio Edison. On September 5, 1973, the City Council directed the City Manager "to continue to get facts, figures, and terms" from Ohio Edison regarding a tie-in with their municipal electric system. On January 24, 1974, Ohio Edison replied by offering to supply 69 kV subtransmission locp sa.rvice. A meeting was held June 3, 1974 with the City to discuss parallel operaticn. Pursuant to the above offer, a formal contract was pre-sented to the City on October 28, 1974. On January 17, 1975, representatives of the Company met with the City and its consultants to discuss the proposed service at which time the City asked for updated costs and certsin contract revisions.
An appointment with the City is scheduled for March 20, 1975 in order that the Company may present its revisions to the contract.
4 I
I
- 128 -
f O. CAPCO Under CAPCO Tran miasion Facilties Agreement dated as of September 14, 1967, and the Memorandum of CAPCO Executive Comittee on April 7,1972, each CAPCO Party had agreed to and been required from time to time to design, construct, operate and main-tain various transmission lines which have in some cases interconnected the Systems. Whether such transmission lines have been designated as a CAPCO line or individually owned, they are to be mutually available for the purposes of this Agreement. Con-struction of these lines and interconnections are a part of the undertaking associated with the forma-tion and operation of the CAPCO Group. A description ,
of these arrangements have been provided in the Agreements between the Palt,ies.
4 i
r I
J
- 129 -
Supp1emental Interrogatory No- 5 Since September 1, 1965, has Company ever purchased a discernible quantityofelectricpowerand/orenergyfromanotherelectricutilityat one point on its system and, within about 48 hours5.555556e-4 days <br />0.0133 hours <br />7.936508e-5 weeks <br />1.8264e-5 months <br />, sold a comparable quantity of electric power and/or energy to the same electric utility at another point on the Company's system? If so, describe each situation, stating (a)thepartiesinvolved,(b)thetimeperiod(s) involved,(c)the amount of power and/or energy in NWH involved ==n=11y, (d) the reason (s) for the transaction (s), (e) the date of and signatories to any agreements relating to each situation, (f) the rate at which Company billed the other l electric utility, (g) the rate at which the other electric utility bil1ed the Company, and (h) the method and factors used to determine the rates listed 1.n response to parts (f) and (g). 1 liesponse: Since September 1, 1965 the Company has purchased i
electric power from Ohio Power Company at various points on the Company's !
System e.c4 sold a comparable quantity of electric power to Ohio Power 1 Company at various points on Company's System. For details of the purchase transactions and amounts received, see Interconnection Item 9(A) - Ohio Power Company (Buckeye),as set forth above in Supplemental Response No. 3, and for details of sa1e transactions and amounts delivered, see Interconnection i
Item 8(A) - Ohio Power Company (Buckeye), as set forth above in Supplemental Response No. 1.
?
- 130 -
Sursplemental Interrogatory No. 6 Since Sept aber 1, 1965, has Capany ever purchased a discernible quantity of electric power and/or energy fccm another electric utility at one point on its system and, within about 48 hours5.555556e-4 days <br />0.0133 hours <br />7.936508e-5 weeks <br />1.8264e-5 months <br />, sold a comparable quantity of electric power and/or energy to another electric utility (or utilities) at another point (or points) in Capany's systm? If so, describe each situation, stating (a) the parties involved, (b) the time period (s) involved, (c) the amount of power and/or energy in WH involved annually, (d) the reason (s) for the transaction (s), (e) the date of and signatories to any agrements relating to each situation, (f) the rate at which Capany billed the other electric utility (or utilities), (g) the rate at which the other electric utility billed the Capany, and (h) the method and factors used to detemine the rates listed in response to Parts (f) and (g).
Respon s: In each of the years since September 1, 1965, with the exception of 1965, the capany has purchased electric power and energy fra another electric utility and sold a comparable quantity of electricpowerand/orenergytoanotherelectricutility.
(a),(b),(f),(g),(h) Parties Involved, Time Period, Rates and Rate Basis:
The parties involved are listed below, together with the identification of the Capany's Rt.te Schedule (FPC Rate No.)
under which the transactions took place in the period starting Sept aber 1, 1965. The rates between the parties were estab-lished by extended negotiations and are filed with FPC. The r.stes and the methods and factors used to detemine such rates are set forth in the contract between the parties and.in any material which was supplied to the FPC in conjunction with each filing.
Copies were specially selected by the DOJ and NRC and have been made available at Central Depository in Washington, D.C.
- 1) Monongahela Power Capany and West Penn Power Company (identified collectively as APS) - FPC Rate 69
l
_ 13 4 'Ibe Dayton Power and Light Capany (DP&L) - FPC Rate 66.
, 5 Duquesne Light Cmpany (DUQ) - FPC Rate 71.
6 Ohio Power Cm pany (OP) - FPC Rate 9
(d),(e) Reasons and Date:
As set forth in each of the Agreements described in rare detail in the answers to Supplemental Interrogatory No. 1, the parties mutually agreed to provide interconnected operation. In addi-tion to one party furnishing power and energy fra its own resources to the other, the Agreements pemit providing power and energy from a third party. Practically all power and energy described in this answer to Supplemental Interrogatory No. 6 was supplied to assist one of the parties during times of system emergencies. An exception was in 1974 when a minor amount of power and energy for economy purposes was sold by the Capany to CEI (45,880 m) and by the Capany to DUQ (2900 m) wbile comparable quantities were purchased by the Cmpany fra TE.
(c) Amount:
The amount of power and energy sold during each year by the Capany to any party and the other party or parties from which a caparable quantity of power and energy was purchased by the Capany is as follows:
In 1965 no electric power and energy of this type was inter-
, changed.
In 1966 CEI purchased electric power and energy fra Capany totaling 1905 m and Cmpany purchased a emparable quantity of electric power and energy frem C&SOE.
In 1966 C&SOI purchased electric power and energy from Cmpany totaling 238 m and Capany purchased a comparable quantity of electric power and energy from APS.
In 1966 OP purchased electric power and energy from Cmpany totaling 1086 m an. mpany purchased a emparable quantity of electric power anf energy fra TE.
In 1966 TE purchased electric power and energy from Cmpany totaling 30 m and Cmpany purchased a comparable quantity of electric power and energy from OP.
In 1967 CEI purchased electric power and energy frm Cmpany totaling 1512 m and Capany purchased a comparable quantity of electric power and energy frem two electric utilities (C&SOE and TE).
In 1968 CEI purchased electric power and energy fra Capany ,
totaling 8010 m and Capany purchased a caparable quantity I of electric power and energy fra three electric utilities t (CSSOE, DP&L and TE).
- 132 -
In 1968 Ct40E purchased electric power and energy from Capany totaling 1675 m and Company purchased a emparable quantity
' of electric power and energy fra two electric utilities (CEI and TE).
In 1969 CEI purchased electric power and energy frcan Capany totaling 152,649 M and Cmpany purchased a comparable quantity of electric power and energy fra six electric utilities (Cte0E, DPE, DUQ, APS, OP and TE).
In 1969 APS purchased electric power and energy from Company totaling 6154 m and Capany purchased a emparable quantity of electric power and energy frcan three electric utilities (C860E, DPE and TE).
In 1969 OP purchased electric power and energy frcan Ccanpany totaling 1915 m and Ccapany purchased a ecmparable quantity of electric power and energy from two electric utilities (TE and C&SOE).
In 1970 CEI purchased electric power and energy frcan Ccinpany totadng 922,398 M and Company purchased a comparable quantity of electric power and energy frcin six electric utilities (C&SOE, DPE, DUQ, APS, OP and TE).
In 1970 DPE purchased electric power and energy from Capany totalin6 167 M and Capany purchased a ccanparable quantity of electric power and energy from two electric utilities I
(DUQandTE).
- In 1970 DUQ purchased electric power and energy frcan Ccanpany totaling 4370 m and Cmpany purchased a ecmparable quantity of electric er and energy frcan two electric utilities (DPE and TE ,
In 1970 APS purchased electric power and energy frcxn capany tota 14n6 2080 m and Ccepany purchased a comparable quantity of electric power and energy frcan three electric utilities (CEI, C&SOE and DPE).
In 1970 OP purchased electric power and energy frcan Capany totaling 1260 M and Company purchased a ccanparable quantity of electric power and energy fr a DP&L.
In 1t370 TE purchased electric power and energy from Company totaling 12,175 N and Cmpany purchased a emparable quantity of electric power and energy frcxn two electric utilities (CEI andDUQ).
In 1971 CEI pinchased electric power and energy from Cmpany totaling 209,877 m and Ccanpany purchased a comparable quantity of electric power and energy frcxn five electric utilities (C&SOE, DP&L, DUQ, APS and TE).
(
In 1971 DP&L purchased electric power and energy fra Capacy totaling 4200 m and Capany purchased a caparable quantity of electric power and energy fra two electric utilities (CEI andDUQ).
In 1971 DUQ purchased electric power and energy from C= pany totaling 56,621 m and Cmpa y purchased a caparable quantity of electric power and energy fra two electric utilities (DPE and 'IE).
In 1971 APS purchased electric power and energy fra Capany totaling 3930 m and Capany purchased a emparable quantity of electric power and energy fra two electric utilities (CEI and DPE).
In 1971 OP purchased electric power and energy fr a Capany
. totaling 1709 m and Capany purchased a cmparable quantity of electric power and energy fra three electric utilities (C&SOE, DP&L and TE).
In 1971 TE purchased electric power and energy fr a Capany totaling Som and Capany purchased a emparable quantity of electric power and energy from DP&L.
In 1972 CEI purchased electric power and energy fr a Capany totaling 80,504 m and Capan/ purchased a caparable quantity of electric power and energy from six electric utilities
( (C&SOE, DPE, DUQ, APS, OP and TE).
In 1972 C&SOE purchased electric power and energy from Capany totalins 1987 m and Capany purchased a cmparable quantity of electric power and energy from three electric utilities (CEI,DUQandAPS).
In 1972 DPE purchased alectric power and energy fra Capany totaling 41,950 m and ' Company purchased a cmparable quantity of electric power and energy fra five electric utilities (CEI,DUQ,APS,OPandTE).
l In 1972 DUQ purchased electric power and energy from Capany totaling 11,351 m and Capany purchased a caparable quantity of electric power and energy fra three electric utilities (CEI, DPE and TE).
In 1972 APS purchased electric power and energy frm Capany totalins 5932 m and Company purchased a emparable quantity of electric power and energy from four electric utilities (C&SOE, DP&L, OP and TE).
In 1972 OP purchased electric power and energy from Capany totaling 1345 m and Cmpany purchased a c= parable quantity of electric power and energy fra five electric utilities (CEI, DP&L, DUQ, APS and TE).
s 1
-Q-In 1972 TE purchased electric power and energy from C apany totaling 58,954 m and Capany purchased a emparable quantity r of electric power and energy fra four electric utilities (CIC, C&SOE, DPE and DUQ).
In 1973 GI purchased electric power and energy fra Company totaling 285,075 m and Capany purchased a comparable quantity of electric power and energy from five electric utilities ..(CMOE, DPE, DUQ, APS and TE).
In 1973 CMOE purchased electric power and energy from Capany totaling 26,245 m and Capany purchased a c aparable quantity of electric pcwer and energy from five electric utilities (CEI, DUQ, APS, OP and TE).
In 1973 DPE purchased electric power and energy fra Caparn-totaling 7152 NH end Capany purchased a emparable quantity of electric power and energy from five electric utilities
In 1973 DUQ purchased electric power and energy fram Company totaling 36,126 WH and Capany purchased a caparable quantity of electric power and energy from five electric utilities (CEI, C&SOE, DPE, OP and TE).
In 1973 APS purchraed electric power and energy from Capany totalins 2230 wa and Cmpany purchased a ecmparable quantity of electric power and energy fra four electric utilities (CEI, C&SOE, DPE and TE).
In 1973 OP purchased electric power and energy fram Capany totaling 3129 WH and Capany purchased a emparable quantity of electric power and energy from three electric utilities (C&SOE, DPE and APS).
In 1973 TE purchased electric power and energy from Company totaling 4568 NH and Capany purchased a camparable quantity of electric power and energy from two electric utilities (DUQ and APS).
In 1974 CEI purchased electric power and energy from Company totaling 241,468 WH and Capany purchased c. caparable quantity of electric power and energy from five electric utilities (C&SOE, DPE, DUQ, APS and TE).
In 1974 C&SOE purchased electric power and energy fra Capany totalins 3007 WH and Company purchased a caparable quantity of electric power and energy fra two electric utilities (APS and TE).
In 1974 DPE purchased electric power and energy fram Company 3 totaling 5994 wH and C=pany purchased a emparable quantity of electric power and energy from two electric utilitiel )
q l
35 -
In 1974 LUq purchased electric power and energy from Ccanpany totalina 97,924 rR and Company purchased a comparable quanti.ty of electric pever and energy from three electric utilities (C&SOE, DP&L 9ad TE}.
In 1974 TE purchased electric power and energy from Ccmpany totaling 498 IMH and Coupany purchased a ecunparable quantity of electric power and energy from two electric utilities (CEI and DP&L).
1 e' # !
! .' s hr.
, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA t NUCIEAR REGUIATORY COMMISSION I ..
Before the Atomic Safety and Licensing Board
- h. In the Matter of )
- )
THE TOIEDO EDISON COMPANY and )
THE CIEVEIAND_ ELECTRIC II1UMINATIIU )
CCMPANY )
- j. (Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station) } Docket Nos. 50-346A
) 50-440A THE CLEVEIAND EIECTRIC ILLUMIIULTING ) 50-441A COMPANY, ET AL. , )
(Perry Nuclear Power Plant, )
Units 1 and 2) )
i l
AFFIRMATIONS I, Thomas A. Kayuha, am Attorney for Ohio Edison Company and hereby affirm that the Response contained herein to Supplemental Interrogatories Nos. 1, 3 and 5 of the Department of Justice is true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief.
I 4 ,h
- "hn A. Kayuha V March 20, 1975.
WITNESS my hand and notorial seal.
. .].71.* . )!~ N y & /
[l PATRICIA M/C" CNos) t,, Notary, PuMic Sc: - w dhio ,
}- My commission expires i.cc.14,1978 r I, Robert G. Zimnarman, am Vice President of Ohio Edison Company I
and hereby affirm that the Response contained herein to Supple = ental
' Interrogatories Nos. 2 and 4 of the Department of Justice is true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief.
. Lut/J.,4u4u.)
Robert G. Zimmer: min)
- . March 20, 1975. L./
[. WITNESS my hand and notorial seal.
.t i
)
t E L .- %l1. .$tm .
l i'
a
< EATRi~ !E GOROG
'] Mry, P' nn'y, Ohid
, Bfcommu .,;cc.14,1973
j
. I, Clyde W. Frederickson, am General Superintendent of System Operations for Chio Edison Company and hereby affirm that the Response contained herein to Supplemental Interrogatory No. 6 of the Department of Justice is true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief.
&&YU M = -- _-
C1fEle W. Frederickson March 20, 1975 WITNESS my hand and notorial seal.
0 u ,~, : . i) s A - i n. ,
i U
PATRICIA MAmE GOR 0G Notary, Pubhc Sun f:ounty, Ohio My commiss'on ex,' ire., Occ.14,1978 S
?
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA NUCIEAR REGUIATORY COMMISSION Before the Atomic Safety and Licensing Board In the Matter of )
)
THE TOI~'D0 EDIGON COMPANY and )
THE CLEVEIAND ELECTRIC ILLUMINATDU ) AEC Docket No. 50-3MA COMPANY )
(Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station) )
THE CLEVEIAND ELECTRIC ILLUMINATING AEC Docket Nos. 50-M OA COMPANY, ET AL., ) 50-M1A (Perry Nuclear Power Plant, )
Units 1 and 2) )
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE i I hereby certify that copies of the foregoing " Joint Answers Of Ohio Edison Company And Pennsylvania Power Company To The Supplemental Interrogatories By The Department Of Justice" were served upon the United States Department of Justice, Washington, D.C. 20530, and each person listed on the attached Service List, by miling the same, postage prepaid, this 21st day of March, 1975 t
y Thomas A. % yuha i
l i
UllITED STATES OF AMERICA i NUCLEAR REGULATORY COliMISSION
- o -
Before the Atomic Safety and Licencint Board
't *
- In the Matter of ) .
)
THE TOLEDO EDIS0!! COMPANY and )
- THE CLEVELA!!D ELECTRIC ) -
. _ ILLUMINATING COMPA!!Y )
) . .
(Davis-Besso Nuclear Power ,) Docket Nos. 50-3!6A 1
Station, Unit 1) ) 50 1110A 1
THE CLEVELAND ELECTRIC
) 50 lllA il
)
ILLUMINATING COMPAHY, ET AL. )
) -
(Perry Nuclear Power Plant, )
~
Units 1 and 2) ) .
SERVICE LIST .
Douglas V. Rigler, Esq. Mr. Chase R. Stephens Chairman, Atomic Safety and Docketing & Service Section
( Licensing Board U.S. Nudlear Regulatory Commission
. Foley, Lardner, Hollabaugh 1717 H Street, N.W.
and Jacobs Washington, D. C. 20006 Schanin Building
- 815 Connecticut Avenue, N.W. Benjamin H. Vogler, Esq.
Washington, D. C. 20006 *
' Office of General Counsel Regulation John H. Brebbia, Esq.
Atomic Safety and Licensing Board U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D. C. 20555 Alston, Miller & Gaines 1776 K Street, N.W.
Robert J. Verdisco, Esq.
Washington, D. C. 20006 Office of General Counsel John-M. Frysiak, Esq. Regulation Atomic Safety and Licensing U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Board Panel Washington, D. C. 20555 U. S..Nuc1' ear Regulatory Commission p, Washington, D. C. 20555 >
Office of General Counsel
. 1 Regulation
-Atofnic Safety and Licensin8 Commission Board Panel Washington, D. lad.orvOS55 U.S.NuclearReE.
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission ,
Washington, D. C. 20555 i
e a
, ~2- .
l l
Joseph J. Saunders, Esq. Lculic Henry, Esq. ;
, Steven M. Charno, Esq. Fuller, Henry, llodge & Snyder Antitrus.t Division 300 Madison Avenue Department of Justico Toledo, Ohio !!36011 Washington, D. C. 20530 Wm. Bradford Reynolds
- Melvin C. Berger, Esq. Shaw, Pittman, Potts & Trowbridge -
Antitrust Division 910 17th Street, N.W., Barr Building '
Department of Justice Washington, D.C. 20006 Washington, D. C. 20530 '
Thomas J. Munsch, Esq.
Reuben Goldberg, Esq. '
General Attorney David C. Hjcimfelt, Esq. Duquesne Light Company 1700 Pennsylvania Ave., N'.U. 135 1 Sixth Avenue Washington, D. C. 20006 Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15219 Frank R. 01okey, Esq. David Olds, Esq.
Special Assistant Reed, Smith, Shaw & McClay Attorney General Union Trust Building Room 219 Box 2009 Towne House Apartments Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15230 Harrisburg, Pennsylvania 17105 '
John Lansdale, Esq.
Mr. Ray'aond Kudukis~ Cox, Langford & Brown Director of Utilities
~
21 Dupont Circle, N.W.
City of Cleveland Washington, D. C. 20036 1201 Lakeside Avenue 1' -
Clevoland, Ohio 41114, .Wallace L. Duncan, Esq.
Jon T. Brown, Esq.
Herbert R. Whiting, Director Duncan, Brown & Palmer
. Robert D. Hart, Esq. '
l'/00 Pennsylvania Ave. , N.V.
Department of Law Washington, D. C. 20006 1201 Lakeside Avenue Cleveland, Ohio 11:4 11'14 Dwight C. Pettay, Jr.
Assistant Attorney General John C. Engle, President Chief, Antitrust Section AMP-0, Inc. 30 East Broad Street, 15th Floor Municipal Building Columbus, Ohio 13215 1 20 High Street <
Hamilton, Ohio 115012 Deborah Powell Highsmith, Esq.
Assistant Attorney General Donald H. Hauser, Esq. .
Antitrust Section Corporate Solicitor 30 East Broad Street, 15th Floor The Cleveland Electric Columbus,.0hio 113215 Illuminating Company 55 Public Squarc Christopher R. Schraff, Esq.
Cleveland, Ohio 11101 11 ' Assistant Attorney Concral Environmental Law Section 361 East Broad Street, 8th Flooc Co, lumbus, Ohio 183215 4
l
.