ML17346B124

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Proposed Tech Specs,Revising Offsite Organization & Reportable Events,Per Generic Ltr 83-43
ML17346B124
Person / Time
Site: Turkey Point  NextEra Energy icon.png
Issue date: 08/20/1985
From:
FLORIDA POWER & LIGHT CO.
To:
Shared Package
ML17346B123 List:
References
GL-83-43, NUDOCS 8508280118
Download: ML17346B124 (76)


Text

TABLE OF CONTENTS Section Title ~Pa e TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS 1.0 DEFINITIONS l-l 1.1 Safety Limits 1-1 1.2 Limiting Safety System Settings 1-1 1.3 Limiting Conditions for Operation 1-1 1.0 Operable I-l 1.5 Containment Integrity 1-2 1.6 Protective Instrumentation Logic 1-2 1.7 Instrumentation Surveillance 1-3 1.8 Reportable Event 1-3 1.9 (Deleted) I-~s 1.10 Core Alteration Iw 1.11 Rated Power Iw 1.12 Thermal Power I-0 1.13 Design Power Iw 1.10 Dose Equivalent I-131 1-5 1.15 Power Tilt 1-5 1.16 Interim Limits 1-6 1.17 Low Power Physics Tests 1-6 1.18 Engineered Safety Features 1-6 1.19 Reactor Protection System 1-6 1.20 Safety Related Systems and Components 1-6 1.21 Per Annum 1-6 1.22 Reactor Coolant System Pressure Boundary Integrity 1-6 1.23 Coolant Looo 1-7 1.20 E-Average Disintegration Energy 1-7 1.25 Gas Decay Tank System I-S 1.26 Ventilation Exhaust Treatment System I-S 1.27 Process Control Program (PCP) I-S 1.28 Offsite r)ose Calculation Manual (OOCM) I-S 1.29 Dose Equivalent I-131 I-S 1.30 Pur ge-Purging 1-9 1.31 Venting 1-9 1.32 Site Boundary 1-9 1.33 Unrestricted Area 1-9 1.30 Member(s) of the Public 1-9 1.35 Heavy Loads 1-9 1.36 Operational Modes 1-9 2.0 SAFETY LIMITS AND LIMITINGSAFETY SYSTEM SETTINGS 2.1-1 2.1 Safety Limit, Reactor Core 2.1-1 2.2 Safety Limit, Reactor Coolant System Pressure 2.2-I 2.3 Limiting Safety System Setting, Protective Instrumentation 2.3-1 3.0 LIGHTING CONDITIONS FOR OPERATION 3.0-1 3.1 Reactor Coolant System 3.1-1 Operational Components 3.1-1 Pressure-Temperature Limits 3. 1-2 Leakage 3.1-3 Maximum Reactor Coolant Activity 3.1-0 Reactor Coolant Chemistry 3.1-6 DNB Parameters 3.1-7 8508280118'50820

'DR, -

ADOCK 05000250 Amendment Nos. and P PDR L j

'll 4

I

TABLE OF CONTENTS (Continued)

Section Title

~Pa e Control Rod and Power Distribution Limits 3.2-1 Control Rod Insertion Limits 3.2-1 Misaligned Control Rod 3.2-2 Rod Drop Time 3.2-2 Inoperable Control Rods 3.2-2 Control Rod Position Indication 3.2-3 Power Distribution Limits 3.2-3 In-Core Instrumentation "

3.2-7 Axial Offset Alarms 3.2-8 3.3 Containment 3.3-1 3.0 Engineering Safety Features 3.0-1 Safety Injection and RHR Systems 3.0-1 Emergency Containment Cooling Systems 3.0-3 Emergency Containment Filtering System 3.0-0 Component Cooling System 3.0-0a Intake Cooling )Vater System 3.0-5 Post Accident Containment Vent System 3.0-6 Control Room Ventilation 3.0-6

'.5 Instrumentation 3.5-1 3.6 Chemical and Volume Control System 3.6-1 3.7 Electrical Systems 3.7-1 3.8 Steam Power Conversion Systems 3.8-1 3.9 Radioactive Materials Release 3.9-1 Liquid %'astes 3.9-1 Gaseous IVastes 3.9-3 Containerized 4Vastes 3.9-5 3.10 Refueling 3.10-1 3.11 Miscellaneous Radioactive Materials Sources 3.11-1 3.12 Cask Handling 3.12-1 3.13 Snubber s 3.13-1 3.10 Fire Protection Systems 3.10-1 3.15 Overpressure Mitigating System 3.15-1 3.16 Reactor Coolant System Pressure Isolation Valves 3.16-1 3.17 Spent Fuel Storage 3.17-1 0.0 SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS 0.1-1 0.1 Operational Safety Review 0.1-1 0.2 Reactor Coolant System In Service Inspection 0.2-1 0.3 Reactor Coolant System Integrity 0.3-1 0.0 Containment Tests 0.0-1 Integrated Leakage Rate Test - Post Operational 0.0-1 Local Penetration Tests 0.0-2 Isolation Valves 0.0-3 Residual Heat Removal System 4.0-3 Tendon Surveillance End Anchorage Concrete Surveillance Liner Surveillance 0.0-7 0.5 Safety Injection 0.5-1 0.6 Emergency Containment Cooling Systems 0.6-1 0.7 Emergency Containment Filtering, Post Accident Containment Vent Systems and Control Room Ventilation 0.7-1 Emergency Power System Periodic Tests 0.8-1 Main Steam Isolation Valves 0.9-1 Amendment Nos. and

TABLE OF CONTENTS (Continued)

Section Title ~Pa e 4.10 Auxiliary Feedwater System 4.10-1 4.11 Reactivity Anomalies 4.11-1 4.12 Environmental Radiation Survey 4.12-1 4.13 Radioactive Materials Sources Surveillance 4.l.)-l 4.14 Snubbers 4.14-1 4.15 Fire Protection Systems 4.15-1 4.16 Overpressure Mitigating System 4.16-1 4.17 Reactor Coolant System Pressure Isolation Valves 4.1.7-1 4.18 Safety Related Systems Flowpath 4.1.8-1 4.19 Reactor Coolant Vent System 4.1.9-1 4.20 Reactor Materials Surveillance Program 4.20-1 5.0 DESIGN FEATURES 5.1-1 5.1 Site 5.1-1 5,2 Reactor 5.2-1 5D Containment 53-1 5.4 Fuel Storage 5.4-1 6.0 ADMINISTRATIVECONTROLS 6-1 6.l. Responsibility 6-1 6.2 Organization 6-1 6.5 Facility Staff Qualifications 6-5 6.4 Training 6-6 6.5 Review and Audit 6-6 6.6 Reportable Event Action 6-1.4 6.7 Safety Limit Violation 6-14 6.8 procedures 6-14 6.9 Reporting Requirements 6-l.5 6.1.0 Record Retention 6-23 6.11 Radiation Protection Program 6-25 6,1 2 Wigh Radiation Area 6-25 6.15 Environmental Qualification 6-26 6.14 Systems Integrity 6-26 6.!.5 Iodine Monitoring 6-26 6.16 'hack-up Methods for Determining Subcooling Margin 6-26 617 Process Control Program (P P) 6-27 6.18 Offsite Dose Calculation Manual (ODCM) 6-27

'32.1 Bases for Safety Limit, Reactor Core B2.l.-l 82.2 Bases for Safety Limit, Reactor Coolant System Pressure B2.2-1 92.S Bases for Limiting Safety System Settings, Protective Instrumentation B73-1 B3.0 Bases for Limiting Conditions for Operation, Applicability B).0-1 B 5.1 Bases for Limiting Conditions for Operation,

'Reactor Coolant System B>.l-l 93.2 Bases for Limiting Conditions for Operation, Control and Power Distribution Limits 93.2-1 Bases for Limiting Conditions for Operation, Containment B>.5-1 BS.4 Bases for Limiting Conditions for Operation, Engineered Safety Features B3.4-1 Amendment Nos. and

LIST OF FIGURES t ~Fi ure 2.1-1

2. 1-la 2.1-lb 2.1-2 3.1-1 Deleted Deleted Title Reactor Core Thermal and Hydraulic Safety Limits, Three Loop Operation Reactor Core Thermal and Hydraulic Safety Limits, Two Loop Operation DOSE EQUIVALENT I-131 Primary Coolant Specific Activity Limit Versus Percent of RATED POPOVER with the Primary Coolant Specific Activity > 1.0 p Ci/gram Dose Equivalent I-131 3.1-la Reactor Coolant System Heatup and Cooldown Pressure Limits 3.1-1b Reactor Coolant System Heatup and Cooldown Pressure Limits 3.1-lc Reactor Coolant System Heatup and Cooldown Pressure Limits 3.1-ld Reactor Coolant System Heatup and Cooldown Pressure Limits 3.1-2 Radiation Induced Increase in Transition Temperature for A302-B Steel 3.1-2c Radiation Induced Increase in Transition Temperature for A302-B Steel 3.1-2d Radiation Induced Increase in Transition Temperature for A302-B Steel 3.2-1 Control Group Insertion Limits for Unit 0, Three Loop Operation 3.2-la Control Group Insertion Limits for Unit 0, Two Loop Operation 3.2-1b Control Group Insertion Limits for Unit 3, Three Loop Operation 3.2-1c Control Group Insertion Limits for Unit 3, Two Loop Operation 3.2-2 Required Shutdown Vlargin t

3.2-3 Hot Channel Factor. Normalized Operating Envelope 3.2-3a Deleted 3.2-0 Maximum Allowable Local K)V/FT 0.12-1 Sampling Locations 6.2-1 Offsite Organization for Facility Vlanagement and Technical Support 6.2-2 Plant Organization Chart B3.1-1 Effect of Fluence and Copper Content on Shift of RTNDT for Reactor Vessel Steels Exposed to 550 F Temperature 63.1-2 Fast Neutron Fluence (E>1'MEV) as a function of Effective Full Power Years B3.2-1 Target Band on Indicated Flux Differ'ence as a Function of Operating Power Level B3.2-2 Permissible Operating Band on Indicated Flux Difference as a Function of Burnup (Typical)

-vi- Amendment Nos. and

1.7 INSTRUMENTATIONSURVEILLANCE

1) Channel Check Channel check is a qualitative determination of acceptable operability by observation of channel behavior during operation. This determination shall include comparison of the channel with other independent channels measuring the same variable or radioactive source check of the Area and Process Radiation Ulonitoring Systems for channels.
2) Channel Functional Test A channel functional test consists of injecting a simulated signal into the channel to verify that it is operable, including alarm and/or trip initiating action.
3) Channel Calibration Channel calibration consists of the adjustment of channel output such that it responds, with acceptable range and accuracy, to known values of the parameter which the channel measures. Calibration shall encompass the entire channel, including alarm or trip, and shall be deemed to include the channel functional test.

1.8 'EPORTABLE EVENT A REPORTABLE EVENT shall be any of those conditions specified in Section 50.73 to 10 CFR Part 50.

0 l-3 Amendment Nos. and

any consecutive 6 month period, prepare and submit a Special Report to the Commission pursuant to Specification 6.9.3 within 30 days indicating the number of hours above this limit.

b. )Vith the specific activity of the primary coolant greater than 1.0 microcurie per gram DOSE EQUIVALENT I-131 for more than 08 hours9.259259e-5 days <br />0.00222 hours <br />1.322751e-5 weeks <br />3.044e-6 months <br /> during one continuous time interval or exceeding the limit line shown on Figure 3.1-1, be in a SHUTDO)VN condition with average reactor coolant temperature less than 500 F within 6 hours6.944444e-5 days <br />0.00167 hours <br />9.920635e-6 weeks <br />2.283e-6 months <br />.
c. ~Vith the specific activity of the primary coolant greater than 100/ E microcuries per gram, be in a SHUTDOLViV condition with average reactor coolant temperature less than 500 F within 6 hours6.944444e-5 days <br />0.00167 hours <br />9.920635e-6 weeks <br />2.283e-6 months <br />.
2. For all modes of o eration
a. 5Vith the specific activity of. the primary coolant greater than 1.0 microcurie per gram DOSE EQUIVALENT I-131 or greater than 100/ E microcuries per gram, perform the sampling and analysis requirements of item l.h.l of Table 0.1-2 until the specific activity of the primary coolant is restored to within its limits.

3.1-5 Amendment Nos. and

1) The hot channel factors shall be determined within 2 hours2.314815e-5 days <br />5.555556e-4 hours <br />3.306878e-6 weeks <br />7.61e-7 months <br /> and the power level and trips adjusted to meet the requirements of Item 6a.

?) If the hot channel factors are not determined within two hours, the power shall be reduced from rated power 2% for each percent of quadrant tilt.

3) If the quadrant to average power tilt exceeds +10%, except for physics tests, the power level and high neutron flux trip setpoint will be reduced from rated power, 2% for each percent of quadrant tilt.
i. If after a further period of 20 hours2.314815e-4 days <br />0.00556 hours <br />3.306878e-5 weeks <br />7.61e-6 months <br />, the power tilt in h. above is not corrected to less than +2%, and
1) If design hot channel factors for rated power are not exceeded, an evaluation as to the cause of the discrepancy shall be made and submitted as a Report to the Commission pursuant to Specification 6.9.3.k.
2) If the hot channel factors are not determined, the Nuclear Regulatory Commission shall be notified and the overpower b T and overtemperature dT trip settings shall be reduced by the equivalent of 2% power for every 1% quadrant to average power tilt.
7. IN-CORE INSTRUMENTATION
a. A minimum of 16 thimbles, at least 2 per quadrant, and the necessary associated detectors shall be operable during the check and calibration of nuclear instrumentation ion chambers.
b. Power shall be limited to 90% of rated power for 3 loop or 50% of rated power for 2 loop operation if the requirements in Section 7.a are not met.

3.2-7 Amendment and

3.10 FIRE PROTECTION SYSTEMS A licabilit : Applies to the availability of fire protection systems in nuclear safety related areas.

To define those conditions of fire protection availability.

~ ~

O~b'ective:

S ecification: 1. FIRE DETECTION INSTRUMENTATION

a. As a minimum, the fire detection instrumentation for each fire detection zone shown in Table 3.10-1 shall be OPERABLE, whenever equipment in that fire detection zone is required to be OPERABLE.
b. If Specification 3.10.1.a cannot be met because one or more of the fire detection instrument(s) shown in Table 3.10-1 is inoperable:

(1) Within 1 hour establish a fire watch patrol to inspect the zone(s) with the inoperable instrument(s) at least once per hour, unless the instrument(s) is located inside the containment, then inspect the containment at least once per 8 hours9.259259e-5 days <br />0.00222 hours <br />1.322751e-5 weeks <br />3.044e-6 months <br /> or monitor the containment air temperature at least once per hour.

(2) Restore the inoperable zone(s) to OPERABLE status within 10 days, or prepare and submit a Report to the Commission pursuant to Specification 6.9.3.c.

c. A fire watch patrol shall be established to inspect the 18 foot level of the turbine area once each hour.
2. FIRE SUPPRESSION WATER SYSTEM
a. The fire suppression water system shall be OPERABLE, at all times with:

(1) Two fire suppression pumps, each with a capacity of 2,000 gpm, with their discharge aligned to the fire suppression header, (2) Separate water supplies, with a minimum contained volume of 30,000 gallons in the elevated storage tank (EST) and 150,000 gallons in the raw water storage tank, and 3.10-1 Amendment Nos. and

(3) An OPERABLE flow path capable of taking suction from the raw water storage tank and transferring the water through distribution piping with OPERABLE sectionalizing control or isolation valves to the yard hydrants and the last root valve ahead of each sprinkler or hose standpipe.

b. (1) If Specification 3.10.2.a cannot be met because one pump and/or one water supply is inoperable, restore the inoperable equipment to OPERABLE status within 7 days or, prepare and submit a Report to the Commission pursuant to Specification 6.9.3.c.

(2) With one water supply below the minimum specified limit for one day, connect the spool piece to make the screen wash pump available for fire water supply.

c. With the fire suppression water system otherwise inoperable, establish a backup fire suppression water system within 20 hours2.314815e-4 days <br />0.00556 hours <br />3.306878e-5 weeks <br />7.61e-6 months <br />.
3. SPRAY AND/OR SPRINKLER SYSTEMS
a. The following spray and/or sprinkler systems shall be OPERABLE, whenever equipment in the spray/sprinkler protected area is required to be OPERABLE.
1. Emergency Diesel Generator Building water curtain I
b. If Specification 3.10.3.a cannot be met because one or more of the above required spray and/or sprinkler systems is inoperable, establish a fire watch patrol with backup fire suppression equipment for the unprotected area(s) within 1 hour1.157407e-5 days <br />2.777778e-4 hours <br />1.653439e-6 weeks <br />3.805e-7 months <br />; restore the system to OPERABLE status within 10 days or, prepare and submit a Report to the Commission pursuant to Specification 6.9.3.c.

3.10-2 Amendment Nos. and

0. FIRE HOSE STATIONS
a. Fire hose stations shown in Table 3.10-2 in the vicinity of safety related equipment shall be operable at all times when the safety related equipment in their area of protection is required to be operable, or within one hour of finding an inoperable hose station, an equivalent capacity fire hose shall be run from an equivalent water source to the inoperable location.
5. FIRE BARRIER PENETRATIONS
a. All fire barrier penetrations (including cable penetration barriers, fire doors and fire dampers), in fire rated area boundaries, protecting safety related areas shall be functional at all times.
b. If Specification 3.10.5.a cannot be met because one or more of the above required fire barrier penetrations is non-functional, within one hour either;

'. Establish a continuous fire watch on at least one side of the affected penetration, or

2. Verify the OPERABILITY of fire detectors on at least one side of non-functional fire barrier and,establish a hourly fire watch patrol. Restore the non-functional fire barrier penetration(s) to functional status within 7 days or, prepare and submit a Report to the Commission pursuant to Specification 6.9.3.c.

3.10-3 Amendment Nos. and

TABLE 3.10-1 FIRE DETECTION INSTRUMENTS 0 INSTRUMENT LOCATION MINIMUMINSTRUMENTS OPERABLE+

HEAT FLAME SMOKE Unit 3: 0160V Swgr. and OSOV LC Rooms Unit 0: 4160V Swgr. and OSOV LC Rooms Unit 3: Elec. Penetrations (Inside Containment)

Unit 0: Elec. Penetrations (Inside Containment)

Control Room 12 Auxiliary Bldg. - El.

- El.

18'uxiliary Bldg.

10'nit 3: Elec. Penetration Rooms - 3'nd 3S Unit 0: Elec. Penetration Rooms - ON and 0hV Inverter and New Battery Rooms Emergency Diesel Generator Building

+ The fire detection instruments located within the Containment are not required to be OPERABLE during the performance of Type A Containment Leakage Rate Tests.

3.10-0 Amendment Nos. and

TABLE 3.10-2 FIRE HOSE STATIONS A. Hose Stations (Unit 3)

l. EL 18' East of 0160V SIVGR room on column
2. EL 18' )Vest of 3A Condensate pump on pedestal
3. EL 18' Passageway South of SG Feed Pump Room EL 30' East of 080V load center on column
5. EL 30' South end of mezzanine deck
6. EL 02' NhV end of turbine deck
7. EL 02' North of 6A HPFbV Heater
8. EL 02' N4V Corner of entrance to elevator B. Hose Stations (Unit 0)
1. EL 18' East of 0160V SIVGR room on column
2. EL l8'.

- Passageway South of SG Feed Pump Room EL 30' - East of 080V load center at stairway FL 30r - South end of mezzanine deck

5. EL 02' IVest end of turbine deck
6. EL 02' East side of turbine deck and north of 6A FlV Heater
7. EL 02' East side of turbine deck and east of 61 FlV Heater
8. EL 02' Southwest Corner of turbine deck C. Hose Stations (Auxiliar Buildin EL 18' East-EVest passageway at west end
2. EL 18' East-)Vest passageway at east end
3. EL 18' North-South passageway outside of Unit 3 Chg. Pump Room
0. EL 50' Roof of Unit 3 New Fuel Storage Area
5. EL 50' Roof of Unit 0 New Fuel Storage Area 3.10-5 Amendment Nos. and

generator tube from the point of entry (hot leg side) completely around the U-bend to the top support of the cold leg.

9. Preservice Ins ection means an inspection of the full length of each tube in each steam generator performed by eddy current techniques prior to service to establish a baseline condition of the tubing.
b. The steam generator shall be determined OPERABLE after completing the corresponding actions (plug all tubes exceeding the plugging limit and all tubes containing through-wall cracks) required by Table 0.2-3.

rt.2.5.5 ~Ro orts

a. Following each inservice inspection of steam generator tubes, the number of tubes plugged in each steam generator shall be reported to the Commission within 15 days.
b. The complete results of the steam generator tube inservice inspection shall be included in the Annual Changes, Tests and Experiment Reports for the period in which this inspection was completed. This report shall include:
1. Number and extent of tubes inspected.
2. Location and percent of wall-thickness penetration for each indication of an imperfection.
3. Identification of tubes plugged.
c. Results of steam generator tube inspections which fall into Category C-3 of Table 0.2-3 shall be reported to the Commission pursuant to Specification 6.9.3.j.

0.2-6 Amendment Nos. and

0 STEAM GFNERATOR TUBE INSPECTION 1st SAMPLE INSPECTION 2nd SAMPLF INSPECTION 3rd SAMPLE INSPECTION SAMPLF SIZE Result Action Required Result Action Required Result Action Required A minimum C None N/A N/A N/A N/A of S Tubes per S.Q. C-2 Plug defective tubes and C-1 None N/A N/A inspect additional 2S tubes in this S.Q. C-2 Plug defective tubes and C-1 None inspect additional 2S tubes tubes in this S.G.. C-2 Plug defective tubes Perform action for C-3 result of first sample C-3 Perform action for C-3 N/A N/A result of first sample Inspect all tubes in this All other None N/A N/A S.Q. plug defective tubes S.Q.s are and inspect 2S tubes in C-I each other S.Q.

Some S.Q.s Perform action for C-2 N/A N/A Notification to NRC C-2 but no result of second sample pursuant to Paragraph additional 50.72(b)(2) of LO CFR. 50 S.G.s are C-3 Additional Inspect all tubes in each N/A S.Q. is C-3 S.G. and plug defective tubes. Notification to NRC pursuant to P aragraph 50.72(b)(2) of 10 CFR 50 S = 5 N

% Vlhere N is the number of steam generators in the unit, and n is the number of steam generators inspected during an inspection.

n Amendment Nos. and

0.11 REACTIVITYANOMALIES O~b'ective: To require evaluation of reactivity anomalies within the reactor.

Following a normalization of the computed boron concentration as a function of burnup, the actual concentration in the coolant shall be periodically compared with the predicted value. If the difference between the observed and predicted steady state values reaches the equivalent of one percent in reactivity, make an evaluation as to the cause of the discrepancy and prepare and submit a Report to the Commission pursuant to Specification 6.9.3.1.

1.11-1 Amendment and

0.15 FIRE PROTECTION SYSTEMS Applies to the surveillance of the Fire Protection Systems.

~Ob'ective: To verify the operability of the Fire Protection Systems.

1- FIRE DETECTION SYSTEM

a. The Fire Detection System shall be demonstrated operable by:

TEST INTERVAL

1. Channel functional test (Fire detectors Semi-annual which are not accessible during plant operation shall be demonstrated OPERABLE by the performance of a CHANNEL FUNCTIONAL TEST during each COLD SHUTDOWN exceeding 20 hours2.314815e-4 days <br />0.00556 hours <br />3.306878e-5 weeks <br />7.61e-6 months <br /> unless performed in the previous 6 months).
2. Test NFPA Code 720 Class A Semi-annual supervised circuits associated with the detector alarms.
2. FIRE PROTECTION WATER SYSTEM
a. The Fire Protection Water System shall be demonstrated operable by:

TEST INTERVAL

1. Verify water supply volume(s) Daily
2. Simulate automatic actuation of Vionthly pumps on recirculation flow.

0.15-1 Amendment Nos. and

3. Verify that each valve (manual, power Monthly operated or automatic) in the flow path is in its correct position.

System flush Annually

5. Cycle each testable valve Annually
6. System functional test, which includes 18 Months simulated automatic actuation of the system throughout its operating sequence, and:
a. Verify that each pump develops at least 90%i rated flow and 93"4 system head.
b. Cycle each valve which is not testable during plant operation.
c. Verify that each pump starts sequentially to maintain the Fire Protection EVater System pressure

>125 psig. it

7. System flow test equivalent with 3 Years Chapter 5, Section 11 of the Fire Protection Handbook, 10th Edition, published by the National Fire Protection Association.
3. SPRAY AND/OR SPRINKLER SYSTEMS
a. The spray and/or sprinkler system shall be demonstrated OPERABLE:

0.15-2 Amendment Nos. and

l. At least once per 12 months by cycling each testable valve in the flow path through at least one complete cycle of full travel.
2. At least once per IS months:
a. By a visual inspection of the spray headers to verify their integrity, and
b. By a visual inspection of each nozzle's spray area to verify the spray pattern is not obstructed.
3. At least once per 3 years by performing an air flow test through each open head spray/sprinkler header and verifying each open head spray/sprinkler nozzle is unobstructed.
0. FIRE HOSE STATIONS
a. Hose stations in the vicinity of safety related equipment shall be demonstrated operable by:

TEST INTERVAL

l. Visual inspection of hose station Monthly equipment.
2. Visual inspection of hose, re-racking Annually and replacement of degraded gaskets in couplings.
3. Partially open each hose station valve Annually to verify valve operability and no flow blockage.
0. Hose hydrostatic test at a pressure of Annually l50 psi or 50 psi above system pressure, whichever is greater.

0.15-3 Amendment Nos. and

5. FIRE BARRIER PENETRATIONS
a. The fire barrier penetrations shall be verified to be functional:
l. At least once per 18 months by a visual inspection.

'2. Prior to returning a fire barrier penetration to functional status following repairs or mainte'nance by performance of a visual inspection of the affected fire barrier penetration(s).

0.15-0 Amendment Nos. and

6.0 ADMINISTRATIVECONTROLS 6.1 RESPONSIBILITY 6.1.1 The Plant Manager - Nuclear shall be responsible for overall licensed facility operation and shall delegate in writing the succession to this responsibility during his absence.

6.2 ORGANIZATION 6.2.1 OFFSITE The offsite organization for facility management and technical support shall be shown on Figure 6.2-1.

6.2.2 FACILITYSTAFF The Facility organization shall be as shown on Figure 6.2-2 and:

a. Each on duty shift shall be composed of at least the minimum shift crew composition shown in Table 6.2-1.
b. At least one licensed Operator shall be in the control room when fuel is in the reactor.
c. At least two licensed Operators shall be present in the control room during reactor start-up, scheduled reactor shutdown and during recovery from reactor trip.

6-1 Amendment Nos. and

EXECUTIVE VICE PRESIDENT GROUP CONPANY NUCLEAR VICE P ESIDENT QUALITY VICE PRESIDENT REVIEM BOARD ENGINEERING ASSURANCE NUCLEAR ENERGY PRMECT IQNAGENENT COMMITTEE AND CONSTRUCTION MANAGER VICE PRESIDENT DIRECTOR DIRECTOR OF LANNING AND CONTROL NUCLEAR OPERATIONS NUCLEAR LICENSING QUALIT Y ASSURANCE NNAGER QUALITY ASSURANCE SERVICES QA SUPERINTENDENT QA SUPERINTENDENT ST LUCIE TURKEY POINT NUCLEAR VICE PRESIDENT VICE PRESIDENT NANAGER NANAGER laNAGER STe LUCIE TURKEY POINT NUCLEAR NUCLEAR ENERGY NUCLEAR NUCLEAR SERVICES NAINTENANCE . TRAINING PLANT NNAGER PLANT NANAGER NUCLEAR ENERGY NUCLEAR SERVICES STAFF 3 FIGURE 6 2<<1 CL OFF-SITE ORGANIZATION FOR fACILITY NANAGENENT AND TECHNICAl SUPPORT

VICE PRESIDENT QUALITY ASSURANCE TURKEY POINT NUCLEAR l SUPERINTENDENT NUCLEAR ENERGY SERVICES STAFF f HEALTH PHYSICS I REFER TO FIG. 6.2-1 I I SERVICES PLANT SAFETY SITE PXUJtCT HAKAGER NANAGEK EVALUATION ltANAGEK NUCLEAR NUCLEAR GROUP CHAIRMAN PLANT SECURIT'Y SUPERVISOR PLANT NUCLEAR ENERGY SAFETY AND NUCLEAR SERVICES STAFF FIRE PROTECTION SAFETY FIRE PROTECTION CUHNITTEE ADNINI ST RATOR REFER TO FIG, 6.2-1 OPERATIONS QUALITY CONTROL TECHNICAL HAINT NANCE TRAINING SUPERINTENDENT SUPERVISOR DEPARTKENT SUPERINTENDENT SUPERVISOR SUPERVISOR NUCLEAR I

I I HEALTH REACTOR OPERATIONS CHEHISTR Y TECHNICAL IKSTRUNENT ASSISTANT ASSISTANT PHYSICS SUPERVISOR SUPERVISOR UPERVISOR STAFF 5 CONTROL SUPEKINTEttBENT SUPEXIKIEttttEKI SUPERVISOR SUPERVISOR KECHANICAL FLECTKICAL HAI NTE KAKCE KAIttTt,"KAKCL NUCLFAR ttuC LEAK RAD I ATION REACTOR PLANT RADIO SHIFT PROTECTION SUPERVISOR CHEHIST TECHNICAL HAN ENGINEER NUCLEAR *I I ADVISOR N L I~ SENIOR UPERATUK LICENSE MATCH 2. OPERATOR LICENSE INEER LICENSED PERSONNEL UN SHIFT AS SHOMN IN TABLE 6.2-1 NUCLEAR CONTROL CENTER UNLICENSED OPERATORS PLAttT ORGANllATION CHART FIGURE 6.2-2 '

i TAB E 6.2-1 MIMMUMSHIFT CREW COMPOSITION g LICENSE CATEGORY ONE OR TWO QUALIFICATIONS UNITS OPERATINGA ALL UNITS SHUTDOWN SRO +

RO Non-Licensed Aux iliary 0 erators Shift Technical Advisor None Required

+ This position may be filled by one of the MOs above, provided the individual meets the qualification requirements of 6D.l.

Includes the licensed Senior Reactor Operator serving as Shift Supervisor.

++ Does not include the licensed Senior Reactor Operator or Senior Reactor Operator Limited to Fuel Handling, supervising the movement of any component within the reactor pressure vessel with the vessel head removed and fuel in the vessel.

Operating is defined as Keff >0.99, % thermal power excluding decay heat greater than or equal to zero, and an average coolant temperature Tavg > 200 F.

Shift crew composition may be one less than the minimum requirements for a period of time not to exceed 2 hours2.314815e-5 days <br />5.555556e-4 hours <br />3.306878e-6 weeks <br />7.61e-7 months <br /> in order to accommodate unexpected absence of on-duty shift crew members provided immediate action is taken to restore the shift crew composition to within the minimum requirements of Table 6.2-L. This provision does not permit any shift crew position to be unmanned upon shift change due to an oncoming shift crewman being late or absent.

4,mendment Nos. and

d. An individual qualified in radiation protection procedures shall be on site when fuel is in the reactor.
e. ALL CORE ALTERATIONS shall be directly supervised by either a licensed Senior Reactor Operator or Senior Reactor Operator Limited to Fuel Handling who has no other concurrent responsibilities during this operation.
f. A site Fire Brigade of at least 5 members shall be maintained onsite at all times". The Fire Brigade shall not include 2 members of the minimum shift crew necessary for safe shutdown of the unit and any personnel required for other essential functions during a fire emergency.

6.3 FACILITYSTAFF UALIFICATIONS 6.3.1 Each member of the facility staff shall meet or'xceed the minimum qualifications of ANSI iV18.1-1971 for comparable positions except for the Shift Technical Advisor who shall have a bachelor's degree or equivalent in a scientific or engineering discipline with specific training in plant design and in the response and analysis of the plant for transients and accidents.

6.3.2 Health Ph sics Su ervisor ualifications 6.3.2.1 The Health Physics Supervisor at the time of appointment to the position, shall, except as indicated below, meet the following:

l. He shall have a bachelor's degree or equivalent in a science or engineering subject, including some formal training in radiation protection.
2. He shall have five years of professional experience in applied radiation protection; where a master's degree in a related field is equivalent to one year experience and a doctor's degree in a related field is equivalent to two years of experience.
3. Of his five years of experience, three years shall be in applied radiation protection work in a nuclear facility dealing with radiological problems similar to those encountered at Turkey Point Plant.

6.3.2.2 When the Health Physics Supervisor does not meet the above requirements, compensatory action shall be taken which the Plant Nuclear Safety Committee determines and the NRC Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation concurs that the action meets the intent of Specification 6.3.2.1.

Fire Brigade composition may be less than the minimum requirements for a period of time not to exceed 2 hours2.314815e-5 days <br />5.555556e-4 hours <br />3.306878e-6 weeks <br />7.61e-7 months <br /> in order to accomodate unexpected absence of Fire Brigade members provided immediate action is taken to restore the Fire Brigade to within the minimum requirements.

6-5 Amendment NNos. and

6.0 TRAINING 6.0.1 A retraining and replacement training program for the facility staff shall be maintained under the direction of the Training 0 6.5 Supervisor and shall meet or exceed the requirements and recommendations of Section 5.5, ANSI N18.1-1971 and Appendix A to 10 CFR Part 55.

REVIEV AND AUDIT 6.5.1 Plant Nuclear Safety Committee (PNSC) 6.5.1.1 FUNCTION The PNSC shall function to advise the Plant Manager-Nuclear on all matters related to nuclear safety.

6.5.1.2 COMPOSITION The Plant Nuclear Safety Committee shall be composed of the:

1. Chairman: Plant Manager - Nuclear
2. Vice Chairman: Operations Superintendent - Nuclear
3. Technical Department Supervisor
0. Maintenance Superintendent - Nuclear
5. Instrument and Control Supervisor
6. Health Physics Supervisor
7. Reactor Supervisor 6.5.1.3 ALTERNATES Alternate members shall be appointed in writing by the PNSC Chairman to serve on a temporary basis; however, no more than two alternates shall participate in PNSC activities at any one time.

6.5.1.0 MEETING FRE UENCY The PNSC shall meet at least once per calendar month and as convened hy the PNSC Chairman.

Amendment Nos. and

6.5.1.5 UORUM A quorum of the PNSC shall consist of the Chairman or Vice Chairman and four (0) members including alternates.

6.5.1.6 RESPONSIBILITIES The Plant Nuclear Safety Committee shall be responsible for

a. Review of 1) all procedures and changes thereto required by Section 6.8 and 2) any other proposed procedures or changes thereto as determined by the Plant Manager - Nuclear to affect nuclear safety.
b. Review of all proposed tests and experiments that af fect nuclear saf ety.
c. Review of all proposed changes to the Technical Specifications in Appendix A of the license.
d. Review of all proposed changes or modifications to plant systems or equipment that affect nuclear safety.
e. Investigation of all violations of the Technical Specifications and preparation and forwarding a report covering evaluation and recommendations to prevent recurrence to the Vice President - Nuclear Operations, to the Group Vice President - Nuclear Energy and to the Chairman of the Company Nuclear Review Board.

6-7 Amendment Nos. and

f. Review of facility operations to detect potential safety hazards.
g. Performance of special reviews and investigations and reports thereon as requested by the Chairman of the Company Nuclear Review Board.
h. Review of the Plant Security Plan and implementing procedures and submitting recommended changes to the Chairman of the Company Nuclear Review Board.
i. Review of the Emergency Plan and implementing procedures and submitting 'recommended changes to the Chairman of the Company Nuclear Review Board.
j. Review of changes to the PROCESS CONTROL PROGRAM and the OFFSITE DOSE CALCULATION MANUAL.
k. Review of all REPORTABLE EVENTS.

6.5.1.7 AUTHORITY The Plant Nuclear Safety Committee shall:

a. Recommend to the Plant Manager - Nuclear written approval or disapproval (in minutes of PNSC meeting) of items considered under 6.5.1.6(a) through (d) above.
b. Render determinations in writing (in minutes of PNSC meetings) with regard to whether or not each item considered under 6.5.1.6(a) through (e) above constitutes an unreviewed safety question.
c. Provide immediate written notification to the Vice President of Nuclear Operations and the Company Nuclear Review Board of disagreement between the PNSC and the Plant Manager - Nuclear; however, the Plant Manager - Nuclear shall have responsibility for resolution of such disagreements pursuant to 6.1.1 above.

Amendment Nos. and

6.5.1.S RECORDS The Plant Nuclear Safety Committee shall maintain written minutes of each meeting and copies shall be provided to the Vice President - Nuclear Operations and )

Chairman of the Company Nuclear Review Board.

6 5.2 COMPANY NUCLEAR REVIEW BOARD (CNRB)

P 6.5.2.1 FUNCTION The Company Nuclear Review Board shall function to provide independent review and audit of designated activities in the areas of:

a. Nuclear power plant operations.
b. Nuclear engineering.
c. Chemistry and radiochemistry.
d. Metal lur gy.
e. Instrumentation and control.
f. Radiological safety.
g. Mechanical and electr ical engineering.
h. Quality assurance practices.

6.5.2.2 COMPOSITION The CNRB shall be composed of the following members:

1. Chairman: Group Vice President - Nuclear Ener gy
2. Member: Vice President - Nuclear Operations
3. Member: Vice President - Engineering, Project Management, and Construction
0. Member: Chief Engineer - Power Plant Engineering
5. Member: Director - Nuclear Licensing
6. Member: Director - Quality Assurance
7. Member: Manager - Nuclear Energy Services
3. Member: Manager - Nuclear Fuels
9. Member: Power Plant Engineering Senior Project Manager
10. Member: Power Plant Engineering Principal Engineer 6-9 Amendment Nos. and

6.5.2.3 ALTERNATES Alternate members shall be appointed in writing by the (CNRB) Chairman to serve on a temporary basis; however, no more than two alternates shall participate as voting members in CNRB activities at any one time.

6.5.2.0 CONSULTANTS Consultants shall be utilized as determined by the CNRB to provide expert advice to the CNRB.

6.5.2.5 MEETING FRE UENCY The CNRB shall meet at least once per calendar quarter during the initial year of facility operation following fuel loading and at least once per six months thereafter.

6.5.2.6 UORUM A quorum of the CNRB shall consist of the Chairman or designated acting Chairman and four (0) members including alternates. No more than a minority of the quorum shall have line responsibility for operation of the facility.

6-lo Amendment Nm. and

6.5.2.7 REVIEW The CURB shall review:

a. The safety evaluations for 1) changes to procedures, equipment or systems and 2) tests or experiments completed under the provision of Section 50.59, 10 CFR to verify that such actions did not constitute an unreviewed safety question.
b. Proposed changes to procedures, equipment or systems which involve an unreviewed safety question as defined in Section 50.59, 10 CFR.
c. Proposed tests or experiments which involve an unreviewed safety question as defined in Section 50.59, 10 CFR.
d. Proposed changes in Technical Specif ications or Licenses.
e. Violations of applicable statutes, codes, regulations, orders, Technical Specifications, license requirements or of internal procedures or instructions having nuclear safety significance.
f. Signif icant operating abnormalities or deviations from normal and expected perf ormance of plant equipment that affect nuclear safety.
g. All REPORTABLE EVE NTS.

6-11 Amendment Nos. and

h. Any indication of an unanticipated deficiency in some aspect of design or operation of safety related structures, systems or components.
i. Reports and meeting minutes of the Plant Nuclear Safety Committee.

6.5.2.S AUDITS Audits of facility activities shall be performed under the cognizance of the CNRB. These audits shall encompass:

a. The conformance of facility operation to all provisions contained within the Technical Specifications and applicable license conditions at least once per year.
b. The performance, training and qualifications of the entire facility staff at least once per year.
c. The results of all actions taken to correct deficiencies occurring in facility equipment, structures, systems or method of operation that affect nuclear safety at least once per six months.
d. The performance of all activities required by the Quality Assurance Program to meet the criteria of Appendix "B", 10 CFR 50 at least once per two years.
e. The Emergency Plans and implementing procedures at least once per year.
f. The Security Plan and implementing procedures at least once per year.
g. The Facility Fire Protection Program and implementing procedures at least once per two years.

6-12 Amendment Nos. and

h. An independent fire protection and loss prevention inspection and audit shall be performed annually utilizing either qualified licensee personnel or an outside fire protection firm.
i. An inspection and audit of the fire protection and loss prevention program shall be performed by an outside qualified fire consultant at intervals no greater than three (3) years.
j. The radiological environmental monitoring program and the results thereof, at least once per year.
k. The OFFSITE DOSE CALCULATION MANUAL and implementing procedures at least once every two years..
l. The PROCESS CONTROL PROGRAM and implementing procedures for dewatering of radioactive bead resin at least once every two years.
m. The performance of activities required by the Quality Control Program to meet the criteria of Regulatory Guide 1.21, Revision 1 3une 1970 and Regulatory Guide 0.1, Revision 1', April 1975, at least once per year.
n. Any other area of facility operation considered appropriate by the CNRB or the Executive Vice President.

6.5.2.9 AUTHORITY The CNRB shall report to and advise the Executive Vice President on those areas of responsibility specified in Section 6.5.2.7 and 6.5.2.8.

6.5.2.10 RECORDS Records of CNRB activities shall be prepared, approved and distributed as indicated below:

a. Minutes of each CNRB meeting shall be prepared, approved and forwarded to the Executive Vice President 'ithin fourteen days following each meeting.
b. Reports of reviews encompassed by Section 6.5.2.7 e, f, g and h above, shall be prepared, approved and forwarded to the Executive Vice President within fourteen days following completion of the review.
c. Audit reports encompassed by Section 6.5.2.8 above, shall be forwarded to the Executive Vice President and to the management positions responsible for the areas audited within thirty (30) days after completion of the audit.

6-13 Amendment Nos. and

6.6 REPORTABLE EVENT ACTION 6.6.1 The following actions shall be taken for REPORTABLE EVENTS:

a. The Commission shall be notified and a report submitted pursuant to the requirements of Section 50.73 to 10 CFR Part 50, and b; Each REPORTABLE EVENT shall he reviewed by the PNSC, and the results of this review shall be submitted to the CNRB, the Vice President - Nuclear Operations, and the Group Vice President - Nuclear-Energy.

6.7 SAFETY LIMlTVIOLATION 6.7.1 The following actions shall be taken in the event a Safety Limit is violated:

a. The provisions of 10 CFR 50.36(c)(1)(i) shall be complied with immediately.
b. The Safety Limit violation shall be reported immediately to the Commission, the Vice President of Nuclear Operations and to the CNRB.
c. A Safety Limit Violation Report shall be prepared. The report shall be reviewed by the PNSC. This report shall describe 1) applicable circumstances preceding the violation,
2) effects of the violation upon facility components, systems or structures, and 3) corrective action taken to prevent recurrence.
d. The Safety Limit Violation Report shall be submitted to the CNRB, the Vice President of Nuclear Operations and the Commission within ten (10) days of the violation.

6.8 PROCEDURES 6.S.I Written procedures and administrative policies shall be established, implemented and maintained that meet or exceed the requirements and recommendations of Section 5.1 and 5.3 of ANSI N18.7-1972, Appendix "A" of USNRC Regulatory Guide 1.33, PROCESS CONTROL PROGRA M, OFFSITE DOSE CALCULATION MANUAL, Quality Control Program for effluent monitoring using the guidance in Regulatory Guide 1.21, Revision 1, 3une 1970, Quality Control Program for environmental monitoring using the guidance in Regulatory Guide O. l, Revision 1, April'1975, and the Facility Fire Protection Program except as provided in 6.8.2 and 6.8.3 below.

Amendment Nos. and

6.8.2 Each procedure and administrative policy of 6.8.1 above, and changes thereto, except the Quality Control Program for environmental monitoring, shall be reviewed by the PNSC and approved by the Plant Manager Nuclear prior to implementation and periodically as provided by procedure.

6.8.3 Temporary changes to procedures of 6.8.1 above may be made provided:

a. The intent of the original procedure is not altered.
b. The change is approved by two members of the plant management staff, at least one of whom holds a Senior Operators License on the unit affected.
c. The change is documented, reviewed by the PNSC and CLIENTS approved by the Plant Manager Nuclear within fourteen days of implementation.

6.9 REPORTING RE UIRE In addition to the applicable reporting requirements of Title 10, Code of Federal Regulations, the following identified reports shall be submitted to the Director of the appropriate Regional Office of Inspection and Enforcement unless otherwise noted.

6.9.1 ROUTINE REPORTS escalation testing shall be submitted following (1) receipt of an operating license, (2) amendment to the license involving a planned increase in power level, (3) installation of fuel that has a different design or has been manufactured by a different fuel supplier and (0) modifications that may have significantly altered the nuclear, thermal or hydraulic performance of the plant. The report shall address each of the tests identified in the FSAR and shall in general include a description of the measured values of the operating conditions of characteristics obtained during the test program and a comparison of these values with design predictions and specifications. Any corrective actions that were required to obtain satisfactory operation shall also be described. Any additional specific details required in license conditions based on other commitments shall be included in this report.

Startup reports shall be submitted within (1) 90 days following completion of the startup test program, (2) 90 days following resumption or commencement of commercial power operation, or (3) 9 months following initial criticality, whichever is earliest. If the Startup Report does not cover all three events (i.e., initial criticality, completion of startup test program and resumption or commencement of commercial power operation), supplementary reports shall be submitted at least every three months until all three events have been completed.

6-15 Amendment Nos. and

b. A tabulation of occupational exposure data shall be submitted annually.

A tabulation on an annual basis of the number of station, utility and other personnel (including contractors) receiving exposures greater than 100 mrem/yr and their associated man rem exposure according to work and job functions, i.e., reactor operations and surveillance, inservice inspection, routine maintenance, special maintenance (describe maintenance),

waste orocessing and refueling. The dose assignment to various duty functions may be estimated based on pocket dosimeter, TLD or film badge measurements. Small exposures totalling less than 20% of the individual total dose need not be accounted for. In the aggregate, at least 80% of the total whole body dose received from external sources shall be assigned to specific major work functions.

1. This tabulation supplements the requirements of Section 20.007 of 10 CFR Part 20.
c. Monthl 0 eratin Re ort - Routine reports of operating statistics and shutdown experience shall be submitted on a monthly basis to the Director, Office of Management Information and Program Control, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, )Vashington, D.C. 20555, with a copy to the appropriate regional of fices, to arrive no later than the fifteenth of each month following the calendar month covered by the report.

6.9.2 (Deleted) 6-16 Amendment Nos. and

6.9.3 SPECIAL REPORTS Special reports shall be submitted covering the activities identified below pursuant to the requirements of the applicable reference specification where appropriate.

Twenty copies of the following reports should be sent to the Director, Nuclear Reactor Regulation.

a. In-service inspection, reference 0.2
b. Tendon surveillance, reference 0.0
c. Fire protection systems, reference 3.10.
d. Peakin Factor Limit Re ort - The W(Z) function(s) for Base-Load Operation corresponding to a +2% band about the target flux difference and/or a +3% band about the target flux difference, the Load-Follow function FZ(Z) and the augmented surveillance turnon power fraction, PT, shall be provided to the Director, Nuclear Reactor Regulations, Attention Chief of the Core Performance Branch, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, D.C. 20555 at least 60 days prior to cycle initial criticality, whenever PT is < 1.0. In the event, the option of Baseload Operation (as defined in Section 3.2.6.a [3] ) will not be exercised, the submission of the )V{Z) function is not required. Should these values (i.e., W(Z), FZ(Z) and PT) change requiring a new submittal or an amended submittal to the Peaking Factor Limit Report, the values would be submitted 60 days prior to the date the values would become effective unless otherwise approved by the Commission.
e. With the calculated dose from the release of radioactive materials in liquid or gaseous effluents exceeding the limits of Technical Specifications 3.9.1.b, 3.9.2.b, or 3.9.2.c, submit a report which identifies the cause{s) for exceeding the limit and defines the corrective actions that have been taken to reduce the releases and the proposed corrective actions to be taken to assure that subsequent releases will be in compliance with the limits of 3.9.1.b, 3.9.2.b, or 3.9.2.c.
f. With untreated radioactive liquid ef fluents exceeding the limits of 3.9.1.d pursuant to Specification 3.9.1.d.3, submit a report which includes the following information:

{1) Identification of the inoperable equipment or subsystems and the reason for inoperability, (2) Action(s) taken to restore the inoperable equipment to OPERABLE status, and (3) Summary description of action(s) taken to prevent a recurrence.

'-17 Amendment Nos. and

go With untreated gaseous effluents exceeding the limits of 3.9.l.d pursuant to Specification 3.9.1.d.3, submit a report which includes the following information:

(1) Identification of the inoperable equipment or subsystems and the reason for inoperability, (2) Action(s) taken to restore the inoperable equipment to OPERABLE status, and (3) Summary description of action(s) taken to prevent' recurrence.

h. ~Vith the annual (calendar year) dose or dose commitment to any MEMBER OF THE PUBLIC from all uranium fuel cycle sources exceeding the limits of Technical Specification 3.9.2.h, submit a report that defines the corrective action to be taken to reduce subsequent releases to prevent recurrence of exceeding the limits of Specification 3.9.2.h and includes the schedule for achieving conformance with those limits.

This report, as defined in 10 CFR Part 20.005c, shall include an analysis that estimates the radiation exposure (dose) to a MEMBER OF THE PUBLIC from uranium fuel cycle sources, including all effluent pathways and direct radiation, for the calendar year that includes the release(s) covered by this report. It shall also describe levels of radiation and concentrations of radioactive material involved, and the cause of the exposrue levels or concentrations. If the estimated dose(s) exceeds the limits of Specification 3.9.2.h and if the release condition resulting in violation of 00 CFR Part 190 has not already been corrected, the report shall include a request for a variance in accordance with the provisions of 00 CFR Part 190. Submittal of the report is considered a timely request, and a variance is granted until staff action on the request is complete.

With the measured levels of radioactivity in environmental samples as a result of plant effluents pursuant to Specification 0.12.1.b, submit a report that identifies the cause(s) for exceeding the limit(s) and defines the corrective actions to be taken to reduce radioactive effluents so that the potential dose to a MEMBER OF THE PUBLIC is less than the limits of Specifications 3.9.l.b, 3.9.2.b and 3.9.2.c.

Whenever the results of steam generator tube inspections fall into Category C-3 of Table 0.2-3, a Special Report shall be submitted within 30 days and prior to resumption of plant operation. This report shall provide a description of investigations conducted to determine cause of the tube degradation and corrective measures taken to prevent recurrence. Reference T.S. 0.2.5.5.c.

6-1S Amendment iVos. and

k. If the power tilt in Technical Specification 3.2.6.h is not corrected to less than 2% within 20 hours2.314815e-4 days <br />0.00556 hours <br />3.306878e-5 weeks <br />7.61e-6 months <br /> and its design hot channel factors for rated power are not exceeded, a Special Report with an evaluation as to the cause of the discrepancy shall be submitted within 30 days. Reference T.S. 3.2.6.i(l)
l. Following a normalization of the computed boron concentration as a function of burnup, if the difference between the observed and predicted boron concentration reached the equivalent of one percent in reactivity, a Special Report shall be submitted within 30 days. Reference T.S. 0.11.

6-19 Amendment Nos. 'nd

6.9.0 UNI UE REPORTING RE UIREMENTS 6.9.0.a SEMIANNUALRADIOACTIVE EFFLUENT RELEASE REPORT>>

Routine Radioactive Effluent Release Reports covering the operation of the unit during the previous 6 months of operation shall be submitted within 60 days after January 1 and July 1 of each year.

The Radioactive Effluent Release Report shall include a summary of the quantities of radioactive liquid and gaseous effleunts released from the unit as outlined in Regulatory guide 1.21, "Vleasureing, Evaluating, and Reporting Radioactivity in Solid ~Vastes and Releases of Radioactive Materials in Liquid and Gaseous Effluents from Light-'iVater-Cooled Nuclear Power Plants", Revision 1, June 1970, with data summarized on a quarterly basis following the format of Appendix B thereof.

The Radioactive Effluent Release Report to be submitted within 60 days after January 1 of each year shall include an annual summary of hourly meteorological data collected over the previous year. This annual summary may be either in the form of an hour-by-hour listing on magnetic tape of wind speed, wind direction, atmospheric stability and precipitation (if measured),

or in the form of joint frequency distributions of wind speed, wind direction and atmospheric stability.++ This same report shall include an assessment of the radiation doses due to the radioactive liquid and gaseous effluents released from the unit or station during the previous calendar year.

>> A single submittal may be made for a multiple unit station. The submittal should combine those secitons that are common to all units at the station; however, for units with separate radwaste systems, the submittal shall specify the releases of radioactive material from each unit.

>>>> In lieu of submission with the Radioactive Effluent Release Report, the licensee has the option of retaining this summary of required meteorological data on site in a file that shall be provided to the NRC upon request.

6-20 Amendment Nos. and

The Radioactive Effluent Release Report shall also include an assessment of the radiation doses from radioactive liquid and gaseous effluents to 'MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC due to their activities inside the SITE BOUNDARY (Figure 5.1-1) during the report period. All assumptions used in making these assessments, i.e., specific activity, exposure time and location, shall be included in these reports. The meteorological conditions concurrent with the time of release of radioactive materials in gaseous effluents, and determined by sampling frequency and measurement, shall be used for determining the gaseous pathway doses. Approximate and conservative approximate methods may be used in lieu of actual meteorological measurements. The assessment of radiation doses shall be performed in accordance with the methodology and parameters in the OFFSITE DOSE CALCULATIONMANUAL(ODCM).

The Radioactive Effluent Release Report to be submitted 60 days af ter 3anuary 1 of each year shall also include an assessment of radiation doses to the likely most exposed MEMBER OF THE PUBLIC from reactor releases for the previous calendar year. Acceptable methods for calculating the dose contribution from liquid and gaseous effluents are given in Regulatory Guide 1.109, March 1976.

The Radioactive Effluent Release Reports shall include the following information for each class of solid waste (as defined by 10 CFR Part 61) shipped offsite during the report period:

a. Volume,
b. Total curie quantity (speci fic whether determined by measurement or estimate),
c. Principal radionuclides (specify whether determined by measurement or estimate),
d. Type of waste (e.g., dewatered spent resin, compacted dry waste, evaporator bottoms),
e. Type of container (e.g., LSA, Type A, Type B, Lar ge Quantity), and
f. Solidification agent or absorbent (e.g., cement, urea formaldehyde).

The Radioactive Effluent Release Reports shall include a list and description of unplanned releases from the site to UNRESTRICTED AREAS of radioactive materials in gaseous and liquid effluents made during the reporting period.

The Radioactive Effluent Release Reports shall include any changes made during the reporting period to the OFFSITE DOSE CALCULATION MANUAL(ODCM) and the PROCESS CONTROL PROGRAM (PCP) as well as a listing of new locations for dose calculations and/or environmental monitoring:

6-21 Amendment Nos. and

a. Necessitated by the unavailability of environmental samples, pursuant to Specification 0.12.1.c; report shall also include the causes for unavailability of samples
b. Identified by the land use census pursuant to Specification 0.12.2.

6.9.0.b ANNUAL RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMEiVTAL OPERATING REPORT+

Routine Radiological Environmental Operating Reports covering the operation of the unit during the previous calendar year shall be submitted prior to May 1 of each year.

The Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Reports shall include summaries, interpretations, and information based on trend analysis of the results of the radiological environmental surveillance activities for the report period, including a comparison, as appropriate, with preoperational studies, with operational controls and with previous environmental surveillance reports and an assessment of the observed impact of the plant operation on the environment. The reports shall also include the results of land use censuses required by Specification 0.12.2.

The Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Reports shall include the results of analyses of all radiological environmental samples and of all environmental radiation measurements taken during the period pursuant to the locations specified in the Table and Figures in the ODCM, as well as summarized and tabulated results of these analyses and measurements in the format of the table in the Radiological Assessment Branch Technical Position, Revision 1, November 1979. In the event that some individual results are not available for inclusion with the report, the report shall be submitted noting and explaining the reasons for the missing results. The missing data shall be submitted as soon as possible in a supplementary report.

The reports shall also include the following: a summary description of the radiological environmental monitoring program; at least two legible maps++ covering all sampling locations keyed to a table giving distances and directions form the centerline of the plant vent stack; the results of the Interlaboratory Comparison Program required by Specification 0.12.3; discussion of all deviations from the sampling schedule of Table 0.12-1, and discussion of all analyses in which the LLD required by Table 0.12-3 was not achievable.

+ A single submittal may be made for a multiple unit station.

"+ One map shall cover stations near the SITE BOUNDARY; a second shall include the more distant stations.

6-22 Amendment Nos. and

RECORD RETENTION 6.10.1 The following records shall be retained for at least five (5) years:

a. Records and logs of facility operation covering time interval at each power level.
b. Records and logs of principal maintenance 'ctivities, inspections, repair and replacement of principal items of equipment related to nuclear safety.
c. All REPORTABLE EVENTS.
d. Records of surveillance activities, inspections and calibrations required by these Technical Specifications.
e. Records of reactor tests and experiments.
f. Records of changes made to Operating Procedures.
g. Records of radioactive shipments.
h. Records of sealed source leak tests and results.
i. Records of annual physical inventory verifying accountability of sources on record.

6-23 Amendment Nos. and

4 /

6.10.2 The following records shall be retained for the duration of the Facility Operating License:

a. Records and drawing changes reflecting facility design modifications made to systems and equipment described in the Final Safety Analysis Report.
b. Records of new and irradiated fuel inventory, fuel transfers and assembly burnup histories.
c. Records of facility radiation and contamination surveys.
d. Records of radiation exposure for all individuals entering radiation control areas.
e. Records of gaseous and liquid radioactive material released to the environs.
f. Records of transient or operational cycles for those facility components designed for a limited number of transients or cycleso
g. Records of'training and qualification for members of the plant staff for the duration of their employment.
h. Records of in-service inspections performed pursuant to these Technical Specifications.
i. Records of Quality Assurance activities as required by Corporate Quality Assurance Manual except as listed in Specification 6.10.1.
j. Records of reviews performed for changes made to procedures or equipment or reviews of tests and experiments pursuant to 10 CFR 50.59.

6-20 Amendment Nos. and

k. Records of meetings of the PNSC and the CNRB.

I. Records for Environmental Qualification which are covered under the provisions of paragraph 6.13.

m. Records of the service lives of all snubbers listed in Table 3.13-1 including the date at which the service life commences

, and associated installation and maintenance records.

n. Annual Radiological Environmental Monitoring Reports and records of analyses transmitted to the licensee which are used to prepare the Annual Radiological Environmental Monitoring Report.

RADIATIONPROTECTION PROGRAM Procedures for personnel radiation protection shall be prepared consistent with the requirements of 10 CFR Part 20 and shall be approved, maintained and adhered to for all operations involving personnel radiation exposure.

HIGH RADIATIONAREA 6.12.1 In lieu of the "control device" or "alarm signal" required by paragraph 20.203(c)(2) of 10 CFR 20:

a. Each High Radiation Area in which the intensity of radiation is greater than 100 mRem/hr but less than 1000 mRem/hr shall be barricaded and conspicuously posted as a High Radiation Area and entrance thereto shall be controlled by issuance of a Radiation EVork Permit and any individual or group of individuals permitted to enter such areas shall be provided with a radiation monitoring device which continuously indicates the radiation dose rate in the area.
b. Each High Radiation Area in which the intensity of radiation is greater than 1000 mRem/hr shall be subject to the provisions of 6.12.1(a) above, and in addition locked doors shall be provided to prevent unauthorized entry into such areas and the keys shall be maintained under administrative control.

6-25 Amendment Nos. and

POST ACCIDENT SAMPLING A program which will ensure the capability to obtain and analyze reactor coolant, radioactive iodines and particulates in plant gaseous effluents, and containment atmosphere samples under accident conditions. The program shall include the following:

1. Training of personnel,
2. Procedures for sampling and analysis,
3. Provisions for maintenance of sampling and analysis equipment.

SYSTEMS INTEGRITY The licensee shall implement a program to reduce leakage from systems outside containment that would or could contain highly radioactive fluids during a serious transient or accident to as low as practical levels. This program shall include the following:

Provisions establishing preventative maintenance and periodic visual inspection requirements, and

2. Integrated leak test requirements for each system at a frequency not to exceed refueling cycle intervals.

IODINE MONITORING The licensee shall implement a program which, will ensure the capability to accurately determine the airborne iodine concentration in vital areas under accident conditions. This program shall include the following:

l. Training of personnel, Procedures for monitoring, and
3. Provisions for maintenance of sampling and analysis equipment.

BACKUP METHODS FOR DETERMINING SUBCOOLING MARGIN The licensee shall implement a program which will ensure the capability to accurately monitor the Reactor Coolant System subcooling margin.

This program shall include the following:

Training of personnel, and

2. Procedures for monitoring.

6-26 Amendment Nos. and

g PROCESS CONTROL PROGRAM (PCP) 6.17.1 The PCP shall be reviewed by PNSC prior to implementation.

6.17.2 Licensee initiated changes to the PCP:

I. Shall be submitted to the Commission in the Semiannual Radioactive Effluent Release Report for the period in which the change(s) was made. This submittal shall contain:

a. Sufficiently detailed information to totally support the rationale for the change without benefit of additional or supplemental information;
b. A determination that the change did not reduce the overall conformance of the dewatered bead resin to existing criteria for radioactive wastes; and
c. Documentation of the fact that the change has been reviewed and found acceptable by the PNSC.
2. Shall become effective upon reivew and acceptance by the PNSC.

OFFSITE DOSE CALCULATIONMANUAL(ODCM) 6.18.1 The ODCM shall be reviewed by the PNSC prior to submittal to the Commission.

6.18.2 The ODCM shall be approved by the Commission prior to implementation.

6.18.3 Licensee initiated changes to the ODCM:

a. Shall be submitted to the Commission in the Semiannual Radioactive Effluent Release Report for the period in which the change(s) was made ef fective. This submittal shall contain:
l. Sufficiently detailed information to totally support the rationale for the change without benefit of additional or supplemental information. Information submitted should consist of a package of those pages of the ODCM to be changed with each page numbered and provided with an approval and date box, together with appropriate analyses or evaluations justifying the change(s);
2. A determination that the change will not reduce the accuracy or reliability of dose calculations or setpoint determinations; and
3. Documentation of the fact that the change has been reviewed and found acceptable by the PNSC.
b. Shall become effective upon review and acceptance by the PNSC.

6-27 Amendment Nos. and

J Pg ~

B3.10 BASES FOR FIRE PROTECTION SYSTEMS OPERABILITY of the fire detection instrumentation ensures that adequate warning capability is available for the prompt detection of fires. This capability is required in order to detect and locate fires in their early stages. Prompt detection of fires will reduce the potential for damage to safety related equipment and is an integral element in the overall facility fire protection program.

In the event that a portion of the fire detection instrumentation is inoperable, the establishment of frequent fire patrols in the affected areas is required to provide detection capability until the inoperable instrumentation is restored to OPERABILITY.

The OPERABILITY of the fire suppression systems ensures that adequate fire suppression capability is available to confine and extinguish fires occurring in any portion of the facility where safety related equipment is located. The fire suppression system consists of the water system, spray and/or sprinklers, fire hose stations and yard fire hydrants. The collective capability of the fire suppression systems is adequate to minimize potential damage to safety related equipment and is a major element in the facility fire protection program.

In the event that portions of the fire suppression systems are inoperable, alternate backup fire fighting equipment is required to be made available in the affected areas until the inoperable equipment is restored to service.

In the event the fire suppression water system becomes inoperable, immediate corrective measures must be taken since this system provides the major fire suppression capability of the plant.

The functional integrity of the 'fire barrier penetrations ensures that fires will be confined or adequately retarded from spreading to adjacent portions of the facility.

This design feature minimized the possibility of a single fire rapidly involving several areas of the facility prior to detection and extinguishment. The fire barrier penetrations are a passive element in the facility fire protection program and are subject to periodic inspections.

Fire barrier penetrations, including cable penetration barriers, fire doors and dampers are considered functional when the visually observed condition is the same as the as-designed condition. For those fire barrier penetrations that are not in the as-designed condition, an evaluation shall be performed to show that the modification has not degraded the fii'e rating of the fire barrier penetration.

Ouring periods of time when a barrier is not functional, the fire detectors on at least one side of the affected barrier must be verified OPERABLE and a hourly fire watch patrol established, until the barrier is restored to functional status.

B3.10-1 Amendment Nos. and

f) ~

Item 7.3 - Steam Generator Tube Ins ection The Surveillance Requirements for inspection of the steaw generator tubes ensure that the structural integrity of this portion of the RCS will be maintained. The program for inservice inspection of steam generator tubes is based on a modification of Regulatory Guide I.83, Revision l. Inservice inspection of steam generator tubing is essential in order to maintain surveillance of the conditions of the tubes in the event that there is evidence of mechanical damage or progressive degradation due to design, manufacturing errors, or inservice conditions that lead to corrosion. In service inspection of steam generator tubing also provides a means of characterizing the nature and cause of any tube degradation so that corrective measures can be taken.

The plant is expected to be operated in a manner such that the secondary coolant will be maintained within those parameter limits found to result in negligible corrosion of the steam generator tubes. If the secondary coolant chemistry is not maintained within these parameter limits, localized corrosion may likely result in stress corrosion racking. The extent of cracking during plant operation would be limited by the limitation of steam generator tube leakage between the primary coolant system and the secondary coolant system (primary-to-secondary leakage = 1 gallon per minute, total). Cracks having a primary-to-secondary leakage less than this limit during ooeration will have an adequate margin of safety to withstand the loads imposed during normal operation and by postulated accidents. Operating plants have demonstrated that primary-to-secondary leakage of I gallon per minute can readily be detected by radiation monitors of steam generator blowdown. Leakage in excess of this limit will require plant shutdown and an unscheduled inspection, during which the leaking tubes will be located and plugged.

'wastage-type defects are unlikely with the all volatile treatment (AV'A of secondary coolant. However, even if a defect of similar type should develop in service, it will be found during scheduled inservice steam generator tube examinations. Plugging will be required of all tubes with imperfections exceeding the plugging limit which, by the definition of Specification 0.2.5.0.a is 00% of the tube nominal wall thickness.

Steam generator tube inspections of operating plants have demonstrated the capability to reliably detect degradation that has penetrated 2096 of the original tube wall thickness.

'Vhenever the results of any steam generator tubing in-service inspection fall into Category C-3, of Table 0.2-3, these results shall be reported to the Commission pursuant to Specification 6.9.3.j.

B0.2-13 Amendment Nos. and

lp Ci rP