Text

Steam Generator Nozzle to Safe-End Dissimilar Metal (DM) Weld Inspection
	ML15225A104
Person / Time
Site:	Point Beach
Issue date:	08/13/2015
From:	Mccartney E; Point Beach
To:	; Document Control Desk, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
Shared Package
ML15226A288	List: NRC 2015-0040, Steam Generator Nozzle to Safe-End Dissimilar Metal (DM) Weld Inspection;
References
	NRC 2015-0040
	Download: ML15225A104 (136)
	v • d • e

Proprietary Information- Withhold from Public Disclosure Under 10 CFR 2.390 August 13, 2015 NRC 2015-0040 10 CFR 50.55a U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission ATTN: Document Control Desk Washington, DC 20555-0001 Point Beach Nuclear Plant Unit 2 Docket 50-301 Renewed License No. DPR-27 10 CFR 50.55a Request. Relief Request 2-RR-11 Unit 2 Steam Generator Nozzle to Safe-End Dissimilar Metal (OM) Weld Inspection

References:

(1) NextEra Energy Point Beach, LLC letter to NRC, dated December 27, 2013, 10 CFR 50.55a Request, Relief Request 2-RR-7 Re-Categorization of Unit 2 Steam Generator Nozzle to Safe-End Welds (ML13365A310)

(2) NextEra Energy Point Beach, LLC letter to NRC, dated June 11, 2015, 10 CFR 50.55a Request, Withdrawal of Relief Request 2-RR-7 Re-Categorization of Unit 2 Steam Generator Nozzle to Safe-End Welds (ML15162A831)

Pursuant to 10 CFR 50.55a(z), NextEra Energy Point Beach, LLC (NextEra) requests Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) approval of relief from the requirements of 10 CFR 50.55a(g)(6)(ii)(F) for the four (4) steam generator nozzle dissimilar metal (OM) welds installed in Point Beach Nuclear Plant (PBNP) Unit 2.

Due to the June 21, 2011 rulemaking change to 10CFR50.55a [FR36232 Volume 76, Number 119], the primary Steam Generator (SG) nozzle to safe-end OM welds were required to have a baseline examination performed in the first outage following August 22, 2011. This baseline examination was performed during U2R32 in November, 2012.

The rulemaking required the use of American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) Boiler &

Pressure Vessel Code (BPVC) Code Case N-770-1 with conditions specified in 10CFR50.55a(g)(6)(ii)(F). Based on these conditions, Point Beach Nuclear Plant (PBNP) Unit 2 primary SG nozzle to safe-end OM welds are classified as Inspection Item A-2 (Unmitigated butt weld at Hot Leg operating temperature~ 625°F) and Inspection Item B (Unmitigated butt weld at Cold Leg operating temperature.::::_ 525°F and <580°F). Inspection Item A-2 of this code case requires the butt welds to be volumetrically examined every 5 years.

Proprietary Information -Withhold Under 10 CFR 2.390.

Attachment 4 Contains Proprietary Information, Upon Separation of Attachment 4 this letter is Nonproprietary.

NextEra Energy Point Beach, LLC, 6610 Nuclear Road, Two Rivers, WI 54241

Proprietary Information - Withhold from Public Disclosure Under 10 CFR 2.390 Document Control Desk Page 2 An international Primary Water Stress Corrosion Cracking (PWSCC) Expert Panel has been organized by EPRI to develop equations for predicting the crack growth rate due to PWSCC of Nickel-based alloys. The Expert Panel effort is currently scheduled through 2016, with subgroups for Data Evaluation and Application experts.

In order to perform the volumetric examination of the SG nozzle OM welds, draining of the reactor coolant system to low levels (i.e., mid-loop) and opening the Steam Generator manways twice in seven years is required, thus impacting nuclear, radiological, and industrial safety.

Due to the impact on the outage from both a lowered inventory and radiation exposure stand point, planning for this examination must be completed at least 12-18 months prior to the commencement of the outage. Additionally, a contract with the examination vendor must be in place in that same timeframe. The next required examination for the SG hot leg nozzle OM welds will be during the Spring 2017 Refueling Outage (RFO). A relief request was previously submitted via Reference (1) for Re-Categorization of Unit 2 Steam Generator Nozzle to Safe-End Welds. After discussion with the NRC, the relief request was withdrawn by NextEra via Reference (2). NextEra proposes a one-time extension for the next examination of these welds to be performed no later than the Spring 2020 RFO. The proposed alternative would provide an acceptable level of quality and safety.

The enclosure contains the relief request. Attachment 1 contains U2R32 lSI examination reports. Attachment 2 is a copy of the archive weld sample chemistry report. Attachment 3 contains manufacturing information which addresses the identified items in Question 29 of Reference 4.

Attachment 4 contains one copy of LTR-PAFM-15-11-P, Revision 0, "Point Beach Unit 2 Steam Generator Primary Nozzle to Safe-end Weld Crack Growth Analysis." (Proprietary) Withhold from public disclosure under 10 CFR 2.390. Upon removal of Attachment 4, this letter is uncontrolled. contains one copy of LTR-PAFM-15-11-NP, Revision 0, "Point Beach Unit 2 Steam Generator Primary Nozzle to Safe-end Weld Crack Growth Analysis." (Non-Proprietary) contains the Westinghouse Application for Withholding Proprietary Information from Public Disclosure CAW-15-4207, accompanying Affidavit, Proprietary Information Notice, and Copyright Notice.

As Attachment 4 contains information proprietary to Westinghouse Electric Company LLC, it is supported by an Affidavit signed by Westinghouse, the owner of the information. The Affidavit sets forth the basis on which the information may be withheld from public disclosure by the Commission and addresses with specificity the considerations listed in paragraph (b)(4) of Section 2.390 of the Commission's regulations.

Accordingly, it is respectfully requested that the information which is proprietary to Westinghouse be withheld from public disclosure in accordance with 10 CFR Section 2.390 of the Commission's regulations.

Correspondence with respect to the copyright or proprietary aspects of the items listed above or the supporting Westinghouse Affidavit should reference CAW-15-4207 and should be addressed to James A. Gresham, Manager, Regulatory Compliance, Westinghouse Electric Proprietary Information -Withhold Under 10 CFR 2.390.

Attachment 4 Contains Proprietary Information, Unon Senaration of Attachment 4 this letter is Nonnronrietarv.

Proprietary Information -Withhold from Public Disclosure Under 10 CFR 2.390 Document Control Desk Page 3 Company, 1000 Westinghouse Drive, Building 3 Suite 310, Cranberry Township, Pennsylvania 16066.

NextEra requests approval of this request by December 31, 2015. The proposed relief request is applicable to the PBNP Unit 2 lnservice Inspection Program for the 51h interval. The proposed alternative is applicable until the Spring 2020 RFO.This letter contains no new Regulatory Commitments or revisions to existing Regulatory Commitments.

If you have questions or require additional information, please contact Mr. Bryan Woyak, Licensing Manager, at 920/755-7599.

In accordance with the provisions of 10 CFR 50.91, a copy of this submittal has been provided to the designated Wisconsin Official.

Very truly yours, NextEra Energy Point Beach, LLC

.f(:;r-Eric McCartney Site Vice President Enclosure cc: Regional Administrator, Region Ill, USNRC Project Manager, Point Beach Nuclear Plant, USNRC Resident Inspector, Point Beach Nuclear Plant, USNRC PSCW Mr. Mike Verhagan, Department of Commerce, State of Wisconsin Proprietary Information -Withhold Under 10 CFR 2.390.

Attachment 4 Contains Proprietary Information, Uoon Seoaration of Attachment 4 this letter is Nonnronrietarv.

ENCLOSURE RELIEF REQUEST 2-RR-11 NEXTERA ENERGY POINT BEACH, LLC POINT BEACH NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 2 PROPOSED ALTERNATIVE FOR STEAM GENERATOR PRIMARY NOZZLE OM WELD INSPECTION INTERVAL ASME Code Component(s) Affected Code Class: 1 Drawing Numbers: ISI-2120, ISI-2121 Table 1 Examination Code Case Description Category Inspection Item N-770-1 A-2 RC-34-MRCL-AI-05, Safe-End to "A" Inlet Nozzle N-770-1 B RC-36-MRCL-AII-01A, "A" Outlet Nozzle to Safe-End N-770-1 A-2 RC-34-MRCL-BI-05, Safe-End to "B" Inlet Nozzle N-770-1 B RC-36-MRCL-BII-01A, "B" Outlet Nozzle to Safe-End

Applicable Code Edition and Addenda

NextEra Energy Point Beach, LLC (NextEra) is currently in the Fifth Ten-Year inservice inspection (lSI) interval. The current lSI program is based on the American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) Boiler and Pressure Vessel (B&PV) Code,Section XI, 2007 Edition with Addenda through 2008.

Applicable Code Requirements Code Case N-770-1, "Alternative Examination Requirements and Acceptance Standards for Class 1 PWR Piping and Vessel Nozzle Butt Welds Fabricated With UNS N06082 or UNS W86182 Weld Filler Material With or Without Application of Listed Mitigation ActivitiesSection XI, Division 1."

ASME Section XI, Division 1, "Rules for lnservice Inspection of Nuclear Power Plant Components" 10 CFR 50.55a(g)(6)(ii)(F) requires that licensees of existing, operating pressurized water reactors implement the requirements of ASME Code Case N-770-1. Inspection Item A-2 of Code Case N-770-1 requires unmitigated butt welds at Hot Leg operating temperatures of

~625°F to be volumetrically examined every 5 years. Inspection Item B requires unmitigated Page 1 of 6

butt welds at Cold Leg operating temperatures of,::: 525°F and < 580°F to be volumetrically examined every second inspection period not to exceed 7 years.

Reason for the Request The next required examination for the Unit 2 Steam Generator Hot Leg nozzle to safe-end OM welds will be during the end of cycle 35 refueling outage (U2R35) in Spring 2017. Relief is being requested at this time to extend the Hot Leg inspection up to U2R37 scheduled for Spring 2020 in order to allow for a coordinated examination schedule between the Hot Leg and Cold Leg OM welds. This coordinated examination will allow PBNP to only drain the reactor coolant system to low levels (i.e., mid-loop) and open the Steam Generator manways once instead of twice in seven years, thus minimizing the impact to nuclear, radiological, and industrial safety.

A site-specific weld crack growth analysis for PBNP, Unit 2 (Reference 2, Attachment 5) provides the overall basis for extension of the current volumetric inspection interval for the Steam Generator Primary Nozzle Hot Leg OM welds. This technical basis demonstrates that the examination interval can be extended to the requested interval length while maintaining an acceptable level of quality and safety.

Proposed Alternative and Basis for Use 10 CFR 50.55a(z) states, in part:

"Alternatives to the requirements of paragraphs (b) through (h) of this section or portions thereof may be used when authorized by the Director, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation, or Director, Office of New Reactors, as appropriate. A proposed alternative must be submitted and authorized prior to implementation. The applicant or licensee must demonstrate that:

(1) Acceptable level of quality and safety. The proposed alternative would provide an acceptable level of quality and safety;"

Pursuant to 10 CFR 50.55a(z), NextEra proposes a one-time extension to the Code Case N-770-1, Table 1, Inspection Item A-2, volumetric examination from every 5 years. The extension requested is for a period not to exceed one ASME XI lSI interval. The examination will be performed no later than the Spring 2020 refueling outage, approximately 7.5 years from the previous examination (U2R32 in November 2012).

Point Beach Nuclear Plant (PBNP) Unit 2 has two (2) Delta 47 (1147) SGs which were installed as replacements in Fall 1996 (U2R22). The SGs are primarily carbon steel with the channel head and nozzles clad with austenitic stainless steel. The SG nozzle to safe-end weld (See Figure 1) is composed of Alloy 82/182 buttering and Alloy 82 weld material. The inside surface of the weld and adjacent base material was clad with Alloy 52 at the factory during fabrication.

These welds received ASME Section Ill examinations (liquid penetrant and radiography) prior to installation. In addition, the ASME Section XI pre-service examinations (liquid penetrant and ultrasonic examinations) were performed prior to installation at PBNP.

The subject welds received ASME Section XI, Appendix VIII-demonstrated, automated phased array ultrasonic (PA-UT) examinations as well as ASME Section XI Appendix IV-demonstrated automated eddy current (ECT) examinations in November 2012 delivered with remote tooling from the inside surface (I D). Neither the PA-UT nor the ECT recorded indications on any of the four OM welds. The use of both ECT and PA-UT techniques ensured that neither surface-Page 2 of 6

breaking flaws nor sub-surface flaws were located within the lower 1/3t of the weld which could propagate through the Alloy 52 cladding material into the Alloy 82 weld material.

NextEra is providing a copy of the U2R32 lSI examination reports (Attachment 1), as well as a copy of the archive weld sample chemistry report (Attachment 2). Finally, NextEra is providing manufacturing information (Attachment 3) and crack growth analysis (Attachment 5) which relate to items discussed within Question 29 of Reference 4.

The welds will continue to have direct bare-metal examinations performed in accordance with Code Case N-722-1 as modified by 10 CFR 50.55a(g)(6)(ii)(E) and are subject to VT-2 examinations during the RCS pressure test at the end of each refueling outage.

NextEra believes that the proposed alternative of this request provides an acceptable level of quality and safety.

Technical Basis The overall basis used to demonstrate the acceptability of extending the examination interval for Code Case N-770-1, Inspection Item A-2 components is contained in the site-specific weld crack growth analysis performed for PBNP Unit 2. The weld crack growth analysis demonstrates that the Point Beach Unit 2 SG primary nozzle OM welds possess adequate thickness to protect against failure due to PWSCC by performing a crack growth evaluation. In the weld crack growth analysis, a 1.5 mm inside surface flaw is postulated in the inlay and the amount of time is determined for the flaw to reach the maximum allowable end-of-evaluation period flaw size. This maximum allowable end-of-evaluation period flaw size would be the largest flaw size that could exist in the OM welds and be acceptable according to the ASME Section XI Code. Crack growth was calculated based on the PWSCC growth mechanism through both the inlay and the Alloy 82 OM weld.

The results in Table 8-1 of the analysis (Attachment 5) justify a longer examination interval for the SG inlet hot leg nozzles than the five years currently allowed for Code Case N-770-1 Inspection Item A-2 welds. Based on the results for the SG inlet nozzle OM welds in Figures 7-1 and 7-2 of the analysis, (Reference 2, Attachment 5), an examination interval of up to 7.5 EFPY is acceptable for the Point Beach Unit 2 SG inlet nozzle OM welds based on the flaw growth evaluation. This technical basis demonstrates that the re-examination interval can be extended while maintaining an acceptable level of quality and safety.

Weld Crack Growth Analysis An analysis has been performed for the PBNP Unit 2 Steam Generator primary nozzle to safe-end welds using several factors found in "Evaluation of the Inlay Process as a Mitigation Strategy for Primary Water Stress Corrosion Cracking in Pressurized-Water Reactors" (Reference 3), in particular:

1. Weld residual stress calculation

a. Assume a 50% weld repair during fabrication

b. Apply 3 weld layers and grind off outer layer

c. Use minimum thicknesses from construction records in the model Page 3 of 6

2. Flaw analysis

a. Initial flaw depth is 1.5 mm (half the inlay weld thickness)

b. Assume PWSCC growth of alloy 52 weld material with a factor of improvement of 10 versus the MRP-115 crack growth rate for alloy 182 materials

c. Calculate time to 75% through-wall for axial (c/a of 2) and circumferential flaws (c/a of 10).

d. See the image below for clarification.

a=Al82

~lode( 1 Pipe With Inlay (not to scale) /.--.,')

a0 = 1.5 mm c0 =5 mm c

'~,.~~,/

,7'A52 Modell-OD= 872:mm,

~~ao t=68mm:Inlay=3 mm 1-co=fT The crack growth curves and maximum allowable flaw sizes developed for PBNP Unit 2 are shown in Figures 7-1 through 7-4 of Reference 2 (Attachment 5). The maximum allowable end-of-evaluation period flaw sizes are also shown on these figures for the axial and circumferential flaw configurations analyzed. Based on these crack growth results, the time periods required for an assumed initiaiiD flaw 1.5 mm deep to grow to 75% of the through wall thickness for axial and circumferential flaws are tabulated below.

Duration for Postulated Flaw to Reach Maximum Allowable End-of-Evaluation Period Flaw Size Effective Full Power Years for a 1.5 mm Postulated Flaw to Grow to 75% Through-Wall Location Axial Flaw Circumferential Flaw (Aspect Ratio =2) (Aspect Ratio = 10)

SG Inlet (Hot) Leg 7.5 EFPY 8.5 EFPY SG Outlet (Cold) Leg 37.8 EFPY 44.9 EFPY Page 4 of 6

Conclusions Extending the required PBNP Unit 2 Steam Generator Primary Nozzle Hot Leg OM weld volumetric examination from U2R35 to U2R37 is justified given:

(1) the Alloy 82/182 weld metal has never been exposed to a PWR primary water environment; (2) no recordable indications were identified during the surface examination of the ID surface and volumetric examination of the OM welds in 2012 after more than 15 years of operation, (3) a 50% weld repair was assumed in the weld residual stress calculation while the actual welds have no repairs (4) an improvement factor of 10 was used in the weld crack growth analysis for Alloy 52 weld metal (no Alloy 152 weld filler metal was used for the inlay), and (5) the PBNP Unit 2 Steam Generator Primary Nozzle to Safe-end Weld Crack Growth Analysis demonstrates that an inside surface flaw with a depth of 1.5 mm would not grow to the allowable flaw size specified by ASME XI rules over the timeframe of the requested inspection interval.

The use of this proposed alternative will provide an acceptable level of quality and safety. For these reasons, it is requested that the NRC authorize this proposed alternative in accordance with 10 CFR 50.55a(z)(1 ).

Duration of Proposed Alternative This request is applicable to the PBNP Unit 2 lnservice Inspection Program for the 51h interval.

The proposed alternative is applicable until the Spring 2020 RFO.

Precedents None References

1. Code Case N-770-1, Alternative Examination Requirements and Acceptance Standards for Class 1 PWR Piping and Vessel Nozzle Butt Welds Fabricated with UNS N06082 or UNS W86182 Weld Filler Material With or Without Application of Listed Mitigation ActivitiesSection XI, Division 1

2. Westinghouse LTR-PAFM-15-11-NP, "Point Beach Unit 2 Steam Generator Primary Nozzle to Safe-end Weld Crack Growth Analysis" (Non-Proprietary)

3. Evaluation of the Inlay Process as a Mitigation Strategy for Primary Water Stress Corrosion Cracking in Pressurized-Water Reactors, [ML101260554]

Page 5 of 6

4. Summary of Public Meeting Between the Nuclear Regulatory Commission Staff and Industry Representative on Implementation of ASME Code Case N-770-1, [ML112240818] dated August 12, 2011 Page 6 of 6

SEE NOTE 29

~AUTI~N-00 NOT UNDERCUT m

()

CD I VT-F' ( 2X MIN_

-g_

0 3

- ~ ~~~~::::=----------""'-llli~~"J~'

.19 ~ 1.00 GTAW. SFA-5.~4 C~.

TYP. 4 PLACES

£0UALLY SPACFI)

ERNi Cr-3 SEE NOTES 5 AND 7 ~

CD "U (/)

!l)

(Q ~:::::!:11 CD CD

l (Q (Q

C..::rc 0

GTA10'. SFA-5.14 CL. ERNICr-3 OR 0 g (i3 SMAW. SFj-5.11 Ci.. ENICrF*-3 CD Ul

,..,..CD -"

N BACK GOUGE NEAF: SIDE ~. 0 SEE NOTES 5. 7 AND 8 i.U

§.

PT-.1 :::l SEE NOTE 13 (Q PT-.J.-8(;.-F (J) 4::>.

-...)

YT-F I m (J)

IRT-F~SEE NOTE

[

N Z7 UT-F~SEE NOTE 28

~

-a.......

su.mtlE~_ ~E

'!o;CL. ERNi Cr Fe- 7 s=u w*

cL

E.."'* Cr Fe-

~~~ LO STOCK

J 21 REF" X ~ t;;'. )>0

_3 FOR. FlftlA{i.MACHIHING SEE NOTEf S, '7. a AND l t ...L: . ~ ~

"U <JlCD Q) ~~ -~ N~

o s*

f (Q "Tl CD - (Q -*

N YT*F Q) ::r (Q o.oc Q, 0. c .....

i~ -* en CD

~ ~

N

!r~~

1;:.

' .SEE NQTE 27 >-RT*F---1 CD 00

-r,, .CD. . . --.

m

~

)

SEE N01"E 28 >-UT*F---1 = s*

Q) ::E:

(Q

~-

0)

~

.l:>.

SEE NOTE 30 -...J MIN. ~ PT*F m I! 0)

N

Attachment 1 Automated Ultrasonic and Eddy Current Reports U2R32 - November, 2012 (7 4 pages follow)

IHI Southwest Technologies Examination Summary Record jSite: Point Beach Nuclear Plant Unit 2 Utility: NextEra Energy !Outage: U2R32 Summary Sheet No. 00100 System: Steam Generator Line Subassembly: Safe End to "A" SG In Noz Identification: RC-34-MRCL-AI-05 NUt: NDE 11Ja1mrauons *Exam Sheet Method Proc/Rev/Chg/ICN Examination heet No's. No. NRI Other Remarks AUT ISwT-POI-AUT11 /2/0/1 UT Probe 1 (60-88') 110002 1-2 X - UT TWO & AWY Exam AUT ISwT-POI-AUT11/2/0/1 UT Probe 2 (60-88') 110002 1-2 X - UT TWO & AWY Exam AUT ISwT-POI-AUT11 121011 UT Probe 1 (60-88') 110001 3-5 X - UT CW & CCW Exam AUT ISwT-POI-AUT11 /2/0/1 UT Probe 2 (60-88') 110001 3-5 X - UT CW & CCW Exam AET I SwT-POI-AET3/2/0/0 ET Probe 1 ET03-PTB-002 3-5 X - Eddy Current Exam AET ISwT-POI-AET3/2/0/0 ETProbe2 ET03-PTB-002 3-5 X - Eddy Current Exam Examination Summary:

This weld was examined from the inside surface using SG-NExT, T-Ill, & MS5800 examination equipment.

The examination coverage was 100%.

Prepared By: Steven J To~ '

Signature:

ISwT JJ-..

Projecl~ r-*

i .~ ~.\ Date: 1\{-z-1.11 'L Reviewed By: (;,)3. "'~~~ A. JeWS~ Reviewed By: ~"' ~vb~wt.Q.L'i Signature: U6e.,_rY __ /::JI5.- Date: /1-ZJ. ..,1 Z. !~,~atuT.tP/J ~n L. :~a.. ,. Date: f !/~). f~---

NextEra Energy Poinilfea-;

v ro .

IHI Southwest Technologies, Inc.

Site/Plant : Point Beach Unit 2 ffii SOUTHWEST TECHNOLOGIES AUTOMATED ULTRASONIC EXAMINATION RECORD Weld Identification: RC-34-MRCL-AI-05 Pro/Rev/Cbg/ICN: ISwT-PDI-AUT!l/2/0/1 I

i Examination No.: ID-1 Project No.: 12-0301 Weld

Description:

SE-to-A S/G In Noz (0"-185") Device Configuration: 136-00045 Mod.Conf.: 138-00032 Scan Path Drawing: 134-00079 Exam Date Examination Time Surface Temperature °F Data Acquisition Operator (s) I SNT Level:

Jeremy Howe /II 14Nov. 2012 Start I End Start I End 1505 I 1542 94.4 I

.. 94.4

. * . . . '> ." . . . *~* ,<c ,

..... ,. ' ********.*, ,,'(; .

i .*.*.....

i . , .* *.

i ...c .: '

<.i' ., .. i >:. '

c

napt :¥~.4uis~n9 ~.*** )**..*. . "'z:*. *.****c_.*.**. . :******...

- - *. < ~ i Scan Controller Parameters Increment Axis Planned Actual Scan Axis Planned Actual Positional Parameters Controller: SG-NExT Lower Limit 70.75 70.75 Lower Limit 0.00 0.00 Beam Direction: Twd/Awy Scan: X Rotator Drive Upper Limit 79.15 79.22 Upper Limit 49.77 49.77 Probe Type: PA22-001 Increment: Y Axial Drive Inc. Interval (Resolution) 0.15 DCI (Scan Resolution) 0.10 Scanning Speed: 2.0 inches per second Mode: Automatic Scan Conversion Units Inches Conversion Units Inches Number of Scans: 57 Scan Motion: Bi-directional Radius In. 15.38" Weld C/L: 72.262" Correction: N/A Elevation/Nozzle CII N!A Master Acquisition File: DM_Pipe_ID_90_AWY_270_TWD_Skew.acq Calibration Records: Examination Notes:

Probe Channel /Angle(s) Skew Scan Offset Step Offset Pipe Diameter= 30.83" Circumference= 96.86" Probe 1 l-(60-88°L) 90° + 69.92(in) - 1.52(in) 110002 Probe 2 2-(60-88°L) 270° + 59.22(in) - 2.90(in) 110002 Examination Remarks:

Probe 3 3-(0°Profilometry) oo + O.OO(in) + O.OO(in) 110002 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A

. < '\,,' :* >? >._:** .*** ~: * , : .. ** '. pafa~aly~~, *' , ,. (... :' * '.. *. * ~: >. '"': /c ;*, :: :'. :. **.,

1 J r,: **>*******

Increment & Scan Positions Actual Recordable Indications Analyst Remarks Increment Position Scan Position Yes No N/A

Attachment:

ScanNo.(s)

Start Stop Start Stop Channell 0 0 0 1-57 70.75 79.22 0.00 49.77 Probe 1 Channel2 0 0 0 0 Yes 0 No Channe13 0 0 0 Further Evaluation Channell 0 0 0 Required:

Probe2 Channel2 0 0 n Channel3 0 0 0 0 Yes 0 No Channell 0 0 0 Archive Media:

Probe3 Channel2 0 0 0 Channel3 0 D 0 0 External Hard Drive ETProbe 1 Channell-2 D D 0 ETProbe2 Channel3-4 D D 0 0 CD-ROM N!A N/A D 0 0 DVD-ROM Analyst I SNT Level I Date:

JesseR. Delgado I ill /14 Nov. 201y-:1

(\~-

I -~-~

ISWT FORM No. UT SO (Rev. 1111)

ID-1 SG A Safe-End to Inlet Nozzle {Away Towards)

Channel jLogtolin:Ch1 All **~

Sequence . .!.)

l 3 Layout .RJ l9 : Gain Information :

Soft Gain (dB}

Hard Gain jdB)

Global Gain (dB] I 20.5 .

0.00 in

IHI Southwest Technologies., Inc.

Site/Plant : Point Beach Unit 2 IHI SOUTHWEST TECHNOLOGIES AUTOMATED ULTRASONIC EXAMINATION RECORD Weld Identification: RC-34-MR.CL-AI-05 Pro/ReviCh!!IICN: ISwT-PDI-AUTII/21011 Examination No.: ID-lRR Proiect No.: 12-0301 Weld

Description:

SE-to-A S/G In Noz (0°-185°) Device Coni~ration: 136-00045 Mod.Conf.: 138-00032 Scan Path Drawing: 134-00079 Exam Date Examination Time Surface Temperature °F Data Acquisition Operator (s) I SNT Level:

Jeremy Howe I II 14Nov. 2012 Start I End Start I End 1720 l 1800 94.4 l 94.4

, . *'* **. :/, ; ,i)~*** ;,.. ". *\. >" * **.** . \' , .* .' ,..?. * *",,..* ... : . ' , ' c.'.**

.*. ... * . * * .*i>ata, A. UlSltiOn .. * . **.. , . .

. *.*.*. *.** ..... , *.. 9, .* . , '* .*. *.*. *...... ':.'

C Scan Controller Parameters Increment Axis Planned Actual Scan Axis Planned Actual Positional Parameters Controller: SG-NExT Lower Limit 70.75 70.75 Lower Limit 0.00 0.00 Beam Direction: Twd/Awy, Scan: X Rotator Drive Upper Limit 79.15 79.22 UooerLimit 49.77 49.77 Probe Type: PA22-001.

fucrement: Y Axial Drive fuc. futerval (Resolution) 0.15 DCI (Scan Resolution) 0.10 Scanning Speed: 2.0 inches per second, Mode: Automatic Scan Conversion Units fuches Conversion Units fuches Number of Scans: 57 Scan Motion: Bi-directional Radius In. 15.38" Weld C!L: 72.262" Correction: NIA Elevation/Nozzle C/I NIA Master Acquisition File: DM_Pipe_ID_90_AWY__270_TWD_Skew.acq Calibration Records: Examination Notes:

Probe Channei/Angle(s) Skew Scan Offset Step Offset Pipe Diameter- 30.83" Circumference- 96.86" Probe 1 1-(60-88°1) 90° + 69.92(in) - 1.52(in) 110002 Probe2 2-(60-88°1) 270° + 59.22(in) - 2.90(in) 110002 Examination Remarks:

Probe 3 3-(0°Profilometry) oo + O.OO(in) + O.OO(in) 110002 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A

. *. *,:*::'.~.*".:>/>,***** *:,F ,:~:**: *.; *.* ** * * *.*. *****,*.*.*.**,i :D~taAn~r 1.:

.. *** ',, .. ~.

iS *,

.* .*.. ** ..... ,< ...": : .* \ .. ;:

Increment & Scan Positions Aetna! Recordable Indications Analyst Remarks fucrement Position Scan Position Yes No NIA

Attachment:

ScanNo.(s)

Start Stop Start Stop Channell 0 0 0 I- 57 70.75 79.22 0.00 49.77 Probe 1 Channel2 0 0 0 0 Yes 0 No Channel3 0 0 0 Further Evaluation Channell 0 0 0 Required:

Probe2 Channel2 0 0 []

Channel3 0 0 0 0 Yes 0 No Channell 0 0 0 Archive Media:

Probe 3 Channel2 0 0 0 Channel3 0 0 0 0 External Hard Drive ETProbe 1 Channell-2 0 0 0 ETProbe2 Channel3-4 0 0 0 0 CD-ROM N/A N/A 0 0 0 DVD-ROM Analyst I SNT Level I Date:

JesseR. Delgado I ID I 14 Nov. 20~ (Lj\A_ I ISWTFORMNo. UTSO (Rev.l/11)

IHI Southwest Technologies., Inc:.

Site/Plant : Point Beach Unit 2 IHI SOUTHWEST TECHNOLOGIES AUTOMATED ULTRASONIC EXAMINATION RECORD Weld Identification: RC-34-MRCL-AI-05 Pro!Rev/CIU!IICN: ISwT-PDI-AUTI 1/2/0/1 Examination No.: ID-2 Pro.iect No.: 12-0301 Weld Descriution: SE-to-A S/G In Noz (180'-365') Device Confimration: 136-00045 Mod.Conf.: 138-00032 Scan Path Drawinl!: 134-00079 Exam Date Examination Time Surface Temperature °F Data Acquisition Operator (s) I SNT Level:

Jeremy Howe I II 14 Nov. 2012 Start I End Start I End 1551 I 1630 94.4 I 94.4 1,

.... .... *., **iJ

"'/.*,,**

,.* *. ,. .c, q<.i

>,;,i

/r:,.**- ...**:**

. <i

. * . : * , * * ...* * :** ** * *

.'**~~UJ.

. . . ,A~qllt~~.~o~,

-.; .. *;ri*r'* .....' ... .,,,

/.;*.1'. ,/*.;'<*.*.**.**.*** ***.*.

Scan Controller Parameters Increment Axis Planned Actual Scan Axis Planned Actual Positional Parameters Controller: SG-NExT Lower Limit 71.56 71.56 Lower Limit 48.43 48.43 Beam Direction: Twd/Awy Scan: X Rotator Drive Upper Limit 79.15 79.22 Upper Limit 98.20 98.20 Probe Type: PA22-001 Increment: Y Axial Drive Inc. Interval (Resolution) 0.15 DCI (Scan Resolution) 0.10 Scanning Speed: 2.0 inches per second Mode: Automatic Scan Conversion Units Inches Conversion Units Inches Number of Scans: 52 Scan Motion: Bi-directional Radius In. 15.38" WeldC/1: 72.262" Correction: N/A Elevation/Nozzle C/1 N/A Master Acquisition File: DM_Pipe_ID_90_AWY_270_TWD_Skew.acq Examination Notes:

Calibration Records:

Probe Channel /An!!le(sl Skew Scan Offset Steu Offset Pipe Diameter= 30.83" Circumference - 96.86" Probe 1 1-(60-88°1) 90° + 69.92(in) - 1.52(in) 110002 I

Probe 2 2-(60-88°1) 270° + 59.22(in) - 2.90(in) 110002 Examination Remarks:

Probe 3 3-(0°Profilometry) oo + O.OO(in) + O.OO(in) 110002 N/A N/A N/A N/A NIA N/A I, i

{ :: *y i

1 I, ','

,* ** : ( \, l ., .:

I r; i i **~*

. /f I

(

, n~t~~~~ly~ts,. .

')::

*'. **

,',

'i,, *. *. *i ',
1 Increment & Scan Positions Actual Recordable Indications Analyst Remarks Increment Position Scan Position Yes No NIA
Attachment:
ScanNo.(s)
Start Stop Start Stop Channell 0 0 0 1 -52 71.56 79.22 48.43 98.20 Probe 1 Channel2 0 0 0 0 Yes 0 No Channel3 0 0 0 Further Evaluation Channell 0 0 0 Required:
Probe2 Channel2 -Fl 0 t-r Channel3 0 0 0 0 Yes 0 No Channell 0 0 0 Archive Media:
Probe 3 Channel2 0 0 0 Channel 3 0 0 0 0 External Hard Drive ETProbe I Channell-2 0 0 0 ETProbe2 Channel3-4 0 0 0 0 CD-ROM N/A N/A 0 0 0 DVD-ROM Analyst I SNT Level I Date:
JesseR. Delgado I ill I 14 Nov. 2012~
-~
{\,t I ISWT FORM No. UT 50 (Rev. 1/11)
ID-2 SG A Safe-End to Inlet Nozzle (Away Towards) f)
Channel Sequence I -
I Hard Gain (dB)
Global Gain (dB) J 20.5
IHI Southwest Technologies, Inc.
Site/Plant : Point Beach Unit 2 IHI SOUTHWEST TECHNOLOGIES AUTOMATED ULTRASONIC EXAMINATION RECORD Weld Identification: RC-34-MRCL-AI-05 Pro/Rev/Che/ICN: ISwT-PDI-AUTll/2/0/1 Examination No.: ID-2 Partial J>roiect No.: 12-0301 Weld
Description:
SE-to-A SIG fn Noz (180°-365°) Device ConfigUration: 136-00045 Mod.Conf.: 138-00032 Scan Path Draw~: 134-00079 Exam Date Examination Time Surface Temperature °F Data Acquisition Operator (s) I SNT Level: Start I End Start I End Jeremy Howe I II 14Nov. 2012 0338 I 0342 94.4 I 94.4 I * *~~{'J. .:*\ :, ' :(**~~ ~ '* ~*: :* ~.\
I ** ** *** * , '. *::. ::\: I **** **~ *** * :.* :**,~,/.**** *******Da~l4.~4u~i~()D. . I \.******.**-**.**.,.. *** :/>:~ > <* **
i ; . :_ .* .* *:.*. . \
j ', .. ~:**.*.** ..*.***.* ..*.. . : .*.** >> :***.*~* * *.*** *.* . ,* .
Scan Controller Parameters Increment Axis Planned Actual Scan Axis Planned Actual Positional Parameters Controller: SG-NExT Lower Limit 70.75 70.75 Lower Limit 48.43 48.43 Beam Direction: Twd/Awy Scan: X Rotator Drive UvverLimit 71.95 71.95 Upper Limit 98.20 98.20 Probe Type: PA22-001 Increment: Y Axial Drive Inc. Interval (Resolution) 0.15 DC! (Scan Resolution) 0.10 Scanning Speed: 2.0 inches per second 72.26~..1 Mode: Automatic Scan Conversion Units Inches Conversion Units Inches Number of Scans:
Scan Motion: Bi-directional Radius In. 15.38" WeldCIL:
Correction: NIA Elevation/Nozzle C/l NIA Master Acquisition File: DM_Pipe_ID_90_AWY_270_TWD_Skew.acq Examination Notes:
Calibration Records:
Probe Channei/Ancle(s) Skew Scan Offset Step Offset Pipe Diameter- 30.83" Circumference - 96.86" Probe 1 l-(60-88°L) 90° + 69.92(in) - 1.52(in) 110002 Probe 2 2-(60-88°L) 270° + 59.22(in) - 2.90(in) 110002 Examination Remarks:
Probe 3 3-(0°Profilometry) oo + O.OO(in) + O.OO(in) 110002 NIA NIA NIA NIA NIA NIA
~iC
~*.c****
'*'i
.**.*\/: <**<; *** **. i*~<i *.
t;r. :,:* ' * . : '* * . }!i; 1
'* 1
.*

'*~**
. *.,* .* *.* . *.,c*'*',
.'. : .I J)~~****iGil ~
.,1lll.,, 1 }.X~~:
i.*. ' (
. 11
,.... *(:<;
(***<*. *.***
,**... **ii~
. *. .* *. * .* * * * * ****~
"'>.::: '.. *. ,* .. ,*~ .* ..*.* . *
~
Increment & Scan Positions Actual Recordable Indications Analyst Remarks Increment Position Scan Position Yes No NIA
Attachment:
ScanNo.(s)
Start Stop Start Stop Channell 0 0 0 1-9 70.75 71.95 48.43 9820 Probe 1 Channel2 0 0 0 0 Yes 0 No Channel3 0 0 0 Further Evaluation Channell 0 0 0 Required:
Probe2 Channel2 0 0 n Channel3 0 0 0 0 Yes 0 No Channell 0 0 0 Archive Media:
Probe3 Channel2 0 0 0 Channel3 0 0 0 0 External Hard Drive ET Probe 1 Channel 1-2 0 0 0 ETProbe2 Channel3-4 0 0 0 0 CD-ROM NIA NIA 0 0 0 DVD-ROM Analyst I SNT Level I Date:
JesseR. Delgado I ffi /14 Nov. 201~
I
~
ISWT FORM No. UT SO (Rev.llll)
ID-2 ( 48-99 Partial) SG A Safe-End to Inlet Nozzle (Away Towards)
Channel La)l<>ut
!Merged Data
IHI Southwest Technologies, Inc.
Site/Plant : Point Beach Unit 2 AUTOMATED ULTRASONIC EXAMINATION RECORD IHI SOUTHWEST TECHNOLOGIES Weld Identification: RC-34-MRCL-AI-05 Pro/Rev/Chf{ICN: ISwT-PDI-AUT11/2/0/1 Examination No.: ID-3 Project No.: 12-0301 Weld
Description:
SE-to-A S/G InNoz (0°-125°) lnevice Confi211ration: 136-00045 Mod.Conf.: 138-00032 Scan Path Drawing: 134-00079 Exam Date Examination Time Surface Temperature °F Data Acquisition Operator (s) I SNT Level:
Jeremy Howe I II 14Nov. 2012 Start I End Start J End 1045 I 1137 94.4 I 94.4
,: . 'j:) taX *. ' *tf 'i
. I
c. > .*
I yy :; {\ ', .*.* .* * . < ** **.**..**.***..*.* . ' :.:o>"
I .:' i *I , **. ,
'**.* .t' *.: * '*,,. ' ~ .. k. :.' ..~ *. *.,c.q~~~ ~:!~*. *.**.**.:**, .*.* *...
1 ,'*
.*'*' ' *:I '
i ' ' . *,*. *.
.:1 ' *<. , >
Scan Controller Parameters Increment Axis Planned Actual Scan Axis Planned Actual Positional Parameters Controller: SG-NExT Lower Limit 71.56 71.56 Lower Limit 0.00 0.00 Beam Direction: CwiCcw Scan: X Rotator Drive Upper Limit 76.24 76.24 Upper Limit 33.63 33.63 Probe Type: PA22-001 Increment: Y Axial Drive Inc. Interval (Resolution) 0.05 DCI (Scan Resolution) 0.05 Scanning Speed: 1.5 inches per second Mode: Automatic Scan Conversion Units Inches Conversion Units Inches Number of Scans: 95 IScan Motion: Bi-directional Radius In. 15.38" WeldC!L: 72.262" Correction: NIA Elevation/Nozzle C/I NIA Master Acquisition File: DM_Pipe_ID_o_CW_180_CCW_ Skew.acq Calibration Records: Examination Notes:
Probe ChanneliAngl~ Skew Scan Offset Step Offset Pipe Diameter= 30.83" Probe 1 1-(60-88°L) oo + 27.57(in) - 2.21(in) 110001 Circumference= 96.86" Probe2 2-(60-88°L) 180° + 37.0l(in) - 2.2l(in) 110001 Examination Remarks:
N/A NIA NIA NIA NIA N/A ETProbe 1 1-2 +22.5° + 5.35(in)
+ O.OO(in) ET03-PTB-02 ETProbe2 3-4 -22.5° - 5.35(in)
',<: .*.*.*** . *** ************ "'*,i .*.*.,*,f..* '.*. .*~,***** '. *, . . . ; .'. ~*
... ,., . ., ..:**./* .* '* ... , ' ' *
*J>ata ,., ... *,
A.riar sis
.*'*:*~** I'*L .*. . )'/ *. *,
'\.
. .,*.,... ', ':'* ... *.*: ' I' I * ,*.*.*.**** 'I I ' :, ***,* ,, **,,,.*.***.,:***
Increment & Scan Positions Actual Recordable Indications Analyst Remarks Increment Position Scan Position Yes No NIA
Attachment:
ScanNo.(s)
Start Stop Start Stop Channell 0 0 0 1-95 71.56 7624 0.00 33.63 Probe 1 Channe12 0 0 0 0 Yes 0 No Channel3 0 0 0 Further Evaluation Channell 0 0 0 Required:
Probe2 Channel2 0 0 0 Channel3 0 0 0 0 Yes 0 No Channell 0 0 0 Archive Media:
Probe 3 Channel2 0 0 0 Channel3 0 0 0 0 External Hard Drive ETProbe 1 Channell-2 0 0 0 ETProbe2 Channel3-4 0 0 0 0 CD-ROM NIA NIA 0 0 0 DVD-ROM Analyst I SNT Level/ Date:
JesseR. Delgado I ill /14 Nov. 201%1 IV-l --------
ISWT FORM No. UT 50 (Rev.l/11)
ID-3 SG A Safe-End to Inlet Nozzle {Cw CCw)
Channel
[Log to Un: Ch 1All Sequence Layout
[Merged Data Jzo.5J HardGain(dB) [QO Global Gain (dB) J20.5 0.00 in 0.00 in
Site/Plant :
IHI S<~>~.~lhw .. t T..chnoiOSII*J.lnc.
Point Beach Unit 2 llllSOUTHWESTTECBNOLOGffiS AUTOMATED EDDY CURRENT EXAMINATION RECORD Weld Identification: RC*34-MRCL-AL-05 Pro/Rev/Chg!ICN: ISWT-AET31210!0 Examination No.: ID-3 Project No.: 12-0301 Weld
Description:
jSE-to-A S/G In Noz (0"-125") Device Configuration: 136-00045 Mod.Conf.: 138-00032 Scan Path Drawinz: 134-00079 Exam Date Examination Time Surface Temperature °F Data Acquisition Operator (s) I SNT Level: William Angell I IT 14-Nov-12 Start I End Start J End 1045 I 1137 94 I 94 Data Acquisition Scan Controller Parameters Increment Axis Planned Actual Scan Axis Planned Actual Positional Parameters Controller: SG-NExT Lower Limit 71.56 71.56 Lower Limit 0.00 0.00 Beam Direction: CwiCcw Scan: X Rotator Drive Upper Limit 76.24 76.24 Upper Limit 33.63 33.63 ET Probe Size: .24 (in)i Increment: Y Axial Drive Increment Interval 0.05 Resolution 0.20 SC!llllling Speed 1.5 inches per second:
Mode: Automatic Scan Conversion Units Inches Conversion Units Inches Number of Scans: 95
Scan Motion

Bi-directional Radius In. 15.38" WeldCIL 72.262"1
Correction: NIA iE!evation/Nozzle CIL N/A Module Parameters: Calibration Records: Examination Notes:
Status Channel(s) Skew Scan Offset Step Offset Pi_l)!:_diameter= 30.83" Probe 1 On 1-2 +22.5° +5.35 (in) -2.21 (in.) ET-03-PTB-002 Circumference= 96.86" Probe2 On 3-4 -22.50 -5.35(in) -2.21 (in.) ET-03-PTB-002 Examination Remarks: Saved data as (ETID 3)
Data Analysis Increment & Scan Positions Actual Recordable Indications Analyst Remarks Increment Position Scan Position Yes No N!A
Attachment:
EXAMINATION C SCAN FOR ALL 4 CHANNELS ScanNo.(s)
Start Stop Start Stop Probe 1 Channel1 0 0 0 0Yes [No 1-95 71.56 76.24 0.00 33.63 Channel2 0 0 0 Further Evaluation Required:
Probe 2 Channel3 0 0 0 Channel4 0 0 0 DYes ~0 Probe 3 Channel 5 0 0 0 Archive Media:
ChannelS 0 0 0 0 External Hard Drive Probe 4 Channel 7 0 0 0 0 CD-ROM Channel a 0 0 0 DVD-ROM A~a~yst I SNT Level/ Date: / , ; Reviewed By/Analyst/ SNT !!~A Wtlliam Angell /IT ',; :{;;:~ -~
1
/,0'/ /~/;_- David R. Kleinjan I IT 1
-v~ ,.:"~ ~.,. 12.. ' . ~-
1(
ISWrl'ORMNo. ET 10108 If' ~
Project No. 12-0301 EXAMINATION ET-ID-3 Date: 14 NOV 2012 Instrument SIN 879328 STATION2 CALIBRATION SHEET: ET-03-PTB-002 j I File A I' Demo ECT 5800
' Demo IRIS 1 Demo!RIS2 Demo MFL 5700 *DE.
Demo MFL 5700 *ID *.
Demo MFL 5800 *DE.
Demo MFL 5800 *ID .
Demo RFT 57001 Demo RFT 5700 2 Demo RFT 58001 Demo RFT 5800 2 ETID~3 ETID_4 ETID_5
. P?~se~-
Start Next
_______ _]
--~~22~47 in~~34.?JLLr!.:.L~y:_I1A!~Jn_,_~5.0QJn:..L X: ~~.47 Irr,~£\ 2S.92 i~oJ ___Enc1 ~ . ~l;ll~I~--j
IHI Southwest Technologies, Inc.
Site/Plant : Point Beach Unit 2 AUTOMATED ULTRASONIC EXAMINATION RECORD IHI SOUTHWEST TECHNOLOGIES Weld Identification: RC-34-MRCL-AI-05 Pro/ReviChg/ICN: ISwT-PDI-AUTll/21011 Examination No.: ID-4 Project No.: 12-0301 Weld Descrilltion: SE-to-A S/G fu Noz (120"-245") Device Configuration: 136-00045 Mod.Conf.: 138-00032 Scan Path Drawing: 134-00079 Exam Date Examination Time Surface Temperature °F Data Acquisition Operator (s) I SNT Level:
Jeremy Howe Ill 14Nov. 2012 Start I End Start I End 1151 I 1232 94.4 I 94.4
(\ **.*.* .. *.* . ..*. *..*.; .. " ' *.. i ' ' ' ,.
. .**. .*.** . * **** . *<~' ' *. _* *. * , . ***i. *. * .*. *. ** ""***-****.-** ' ~at~~C:~.itisitiori:***** * ,_:.,..
1 '
'. *......*,_ * /',* _.*...*..**..** :,**..****... _:, .* '* ** .*.*. ,,.' .* ,. ** * *" :;.*.* '. . *.* . ,*.**** * * * * ;;* ' ' *. ;.. ~-:.* . *' ' .. ' . ;_;.' ' '
Scan Controller Parameters Increment Axis Planned Actual Scan Axis Planned Actual Positional Parameters Controller: SG-NExT Lower Limit 71.56 71.56 Lower Limit 32.29 32.29 Beam Direction: CwiCcw Scan: X Rotator Drive Upper Limit 76.24 76.24 Upper Limit 65.92 65.92 Probe Type: PA22-001 Increment: Y Axial Drive Inc. Interval (Resolution) 0.05 DCI (Scan Resolution) 0.05 Scanning Speed: 1.5 inches per second Mode: Automatic Scan Conversion Units Inches Conversion Units Inches Number of Scans: 95 Scan Motion: Bi-directional Radius In. 15.38" We1dC/L: 72.262" Correction: NIA Elevation/Nozzle Cll NIA Master Acquisition File: DM_Pipe_ID_O_CW_180_CCW_Skew.acq Calibration Records: Examination Notes:
Probe Channel IAngle(s)_ Skew Scan Offset Step Offset Pipe Diameter= 30.83" Probe 1 l-(60-88°L) oo + 27.57(in) - 2.2l(in) 110001 Circumference= 96.86" Probe2 2-(60-88°L) 180° + 37.01(in) - 2.21(in) 110001 Examination Remarks:
NIA NIA N/A N/A N/A N/A ETProbe 1 1-2 +22.5° + 5.35(in)
+ O.OO(in) ET03-PTB-02 ETProbe2 3-4 -22.5° - 5.35(in)
I' . ;'.(,>.:; i* ' , *' ' i ', '*
Increment & Scan Positions Actual
~ :I. *'" i *** ' ' !., \ ********** * /,*/* , ~~~ta;M~It~i~
Recordable Indications
t..

. :..
Analyst Remarks Increment Position Scan Position Yes No N/A
Attachment:
Scan No.(s)
Start Stop Start Stop Channell 0 0 0 1-95 71.56 76.24 32.29 65.92 Probe I Channel2 0 0 0 0 Yes 0 No Channe13 0 0 0 Further Evaluation Channell 0 0 0 Required:
Probe2 Channel2 [] [J] 0 Channel3 0 0 0 0 Yes 0 No Channell 0 0 0 Archive Media:
Probe 3 Channe12 0 0 0 Channe13 0 0 0 0 External Hard Drive ETProbe 1 Channell-2 0 0 0 ETProbe2 Channe13-4 0 0 0 0 CD-ROM N/A N/A 0 0 0 DVD-ROM Analyst I SNT Level I Date:
JesseR. Delgado I ill I 14 Nov. 20~
V\f. ----**- --
ISWT FORM No. UT 50 (Rev.l/11)
ID-4 SG A Safe-End to Inlet Nozzle (Cw CCw)
Channel ILogtoLin:Ch2AU iJ Sequence ~
Layout RJ Hard Gain (dB)
Global Gain (dB) j 20.5 0.00 in 0.00 in
Site/Plant :
IHI
$ot.nh..,..ut T*chn.aTotlc-i. Inc.
Point Beach Unit 2 llllSOUTHWESTTECHNOLOGffiS AUTOMATED EDDY CURRENT EXAMINATION RECORD Weld Identification: RC-34-MRCL-AL-05 Pro/Rev/Chg/ICN: ISWT-AETI/210/0 Examination No.: ID-4 Project No.: 12-0301 Weld
Description:
!SE-to-A S/G In Noz (120°-245") Device Configuration: 136-00045 Mod.Conf.: 138-00032 Scan Path Drawine:: 134-00079 Exam Date Examination Time Surface Temperature °F Data Acqnlsltion Operator (s) I SNT Level: William Angell/ II 14-Nov-12 Start I End Start I End 1151 J 1232 94 l 94 Data Acquisition Scan: Controller Parameters Increment Axis Planned Actual Scan Axis Planned Actual Positional Parameters Controller: SG-NExT Lower Limit 71.56 71.56 Lower Limit 32.29 32.29 Beam Direction: Cw/Ccw
'Scan: X Rotator Drive UwerLimit 76.24 76.24 U~Limit 65.92 65.92 ET Probe Size: .24(in)
Increment: Y Axial Drive Increment Interval 0.05 Resolution 0.20 Scanning Speed 1.5 inclles per =nd Mode: Automatic Scan Conversion Units Inches Conversion Units Inches Number of Scans: 95 Scan Motion: Bi-directional Radius In. 15.38" WeldCIL 72.262" Correction: N/A IE!evation!Nozzle C!L NIA Module Parameters: Calibration Records: Examination Notes:
Status Channel(s) Skew Sean Offset Step Offset Pipe diameter- 30.83" Probe 1 On 1-2 +22.5° +5.35 (in) -2.21 (in.) ET-03-PTB-002 Circumf=ce- 96.86" Probe2 On 3-4 -22.5" -5.35 (in) -2.21 (in.) ET-03-PTB-002 Examination Remarks: Saved data as (ETID 4)
Data Analysis Increment & Scan Positions Actual Recordable Indications Analyst Remarks Increment Position Scan Position Yes No N/A
Attachment:
EXAMINATION C SCAN FOR ALL 4 CHANNELS ScanNo.(s)
Start Stop Start Stop Probe 1 Channel1 0 0 0 0Yes CNo Interface of Stainless Steel Clad to Inconel 52 & 152 at 1-95 71.56 76.24 32.29 65.92 Channel2 0 0 0 Further Evaluation Required: 69.80" and Inconel52 & 152 to Safe End located at 72.60" Probe 2 Channel 3 0 0 0 Channel4 0 0 0 DYes 0{o Probe 3 Channel 5 0 0 0 Arcbive Media:
Channel6 0 0 0 0 External Hard Drive Pr be 4 Channel7 0 0 0 0 CD-ROM
° ChannelS 0 0 0 DVD-ROM Analyst I SNT Level/ Date: Reviewed By/Analyst I SNT rei/Signature:
Wllllam Angell/ II
~~X /J;~.J__ David R. Kleinjan I II ,1. M_ .
, .... , I A 1-ISWTFORMNo. ET 10108
'l.;
Project No. 12-0301 EXAMINATION ET-ID-4 Date: 14 NOV 2012 Instrument S/N 879328 STATION2 CALIBRATION SHEET: ET-03-PTB-002 C:\RDTech\M.** \DATA\
File
Demo ECT 5800
' Demo IRIS 1
Demo IRIS 2
Demo MFL 5700- DE.
Demo MFL 5700 *lD
I
Demo MFL 5800 *DE.
' Demo MFL 5800 -ID .
' DemoRFT57001
Demo AFT 5700 2
Demo AFT 5800 1
Demo AFT 5800 2
' ET1D_3
ET1D.:.4
ET1D_5
p~~se~.~
"\'
Start I Ne11t L~:cK~~,~]!~~i£~3-=~[I~: J--Y~tr1Jilfi~~4~I!I-:)~35lt:~~I~~~~~i-t£~~-=--=~~~~-= ~~~~~2 -;:-=1- _ -----*-
IHI Southwest Technologies, Inc.
Site/Plant : Point Beach Unit 2 AUTOMATED ULTRASONIC EXAMINATION RECORD liD SOUTHWEST TECHNOLOGIES Weld Identification: RC-34-MRCL-AI-05 Pro/Rev/ChldiCN: ISwT-PDI-AUTll/2/011 Examination No.: ID-4RR Pro.iect No.: 12-0301 Weld
Description:
SE-to-A S/G In Noz (120'-245'} Device Configuration: 136-00045 Mod.Conf.: 138-00032 Scan Path Drawing: 134-00079 Exam Date Examination Time Surface Temperature °F Data Acquisition Operator (s) I SNT Level:
Jeremy Howe Ill 14Nov. 2012 Start I End Start I End 1151 I 1232 94.4 I 94.4
>.*.... ***.*** . . . * * ' ., ,*. . . *.* .* **.*****, '" *. .*. ' ,,**.; ....* n*ta.~ '*t)':c. ' . **.*.: ***.* . *,-1' 1 1 1,
. ; *~ >.... :. . . ':**., !' ',: ..:.:** :... :**' : :::*'. / . ., :: ,, ... <*I ::':i :::. . .. >:. '. ,*~* ...*,,,,, ~q~IS~ 0~::** *..* ,. I * '. * . . .*.. ,.. :.**.* ........... *.>":.,. .* .: .
Scan Controller Parameters Increment Axis Planned Actual Scan Axis Planned Actual Positional Parameters Controller: SG-NExT Lower Limit 71.56 71.56 Lower Limit 32.29 48.00 Beam Direction: CwiCcw Scan: X Rotator Drive Upper Limit 76.24 76.24 Upper Limit 65.92 66.00 Probe Type: PA22-001 Increment: Y Axial Drive Inc. Interval (Resolution) 0.05 DC! (Scan Resolution) 0.05 Scanning Speed: 1.5 inches per second Mode: Automatic Scan Conversion Units Inches Conversion Units Inches Number of Scans: 95 Scan Motion: Bi-directional Radius In. 15.38 Weld C/1: 72.262" Correction: NIA Elevation/Nozzle C/I NIA1 Master Acquisition File: DM_Pipe_ID_ 0_ CW_180_ CCW_ Skew.acq Examination Notes:
Calibration Records:
Probe Channel IAngle(s) Skew Scan Offset Step Offset Pipe Diameter= 30.83" Probe 1 1-(60-88°L) oo + 27.57(in) - 2.21(in) 110001 Circumference- 96.86" Probe 2 2-(60-88°L) 180° + 37.01(in) - 2.2l(in) 110001 Examination Remarks:
NIA NIA NIA NIA N/A NIA ETProbe 1 1-2 +22.5° + 5.35(in)
+ O.OO(in) ET03-PTB-02 ETProbe2 3-4 -22.5° - 5.35(in)
\/ .'*.::' ,.. .. ' .*.. ***** ...*.
. ,., :-*:.,. ......... * ........... I nat~AnaJ SiS
, .:*:.*, ~* . : .,'::*: ,*: **:,
--- . J*
.*... ,. *. .:.** L Increment & Scan Positions Actual Recordable Indications Analyst Remarks Increment Position Scan Position Yes No NIA
Attachment:
ScanNo.(s)
Start Stop Start Stop Channell 0 0 0 1-95 71.56 76.24 48.00 66.00 Probe 1 Channe12 0 0 0 0 Yes 0 No Channe13 0 0 0 Further Evaluation Channell 0 0 0 Required:
Probe2 Channel2 0 0 0 Channe!3 0 0 0 0 Yes 0 No Channell 0 0 0 Archive Media:
Probe 3 Channel2 0 0 0 Channe13 0 0 0 0 External Hard Drive ETProbe 1 Channell-2 0 0 0 ETProbe2 Channe13-4 0 0 0 0 CD-ROM NIA NIA 0 0 0 DVD-ROM Analyst I SNT Level I Date:
ISWT FORM No. UT 50 (Rev. 1111)
JesseR Delgado I ill /14 Nov. 20~
N.
IHI Southwest Technologies, Inc.
Site/Plant : Point Beach Unit 2 IHI SOUTHWEST TECHNOLOGIES AUTOMATED ULTRASONIC EXAMINATION RECORD Weld Identification: RC-34-MR.CL-AI-05 Pro/Rev/Ch1!11CN: ISwT-PDI-AUT!l/2/0/1 Examination No.: ID-5 Pro.iect No.: 12-0301 Weld
Description:
SE-to-A S/G In Noz (240'-365') Device Configuration: 136-00045 Mod.Conf.: 138-00032 Scan Path Drawing: 134-00079 Exam Date Examination Time Surface Temperature °F Data Acquisition Operator (s) I SNT Level:
Jeremy Howe Ill 14Nov. 2012 Start I End Start I End i
. \
.. : .'.* ~
. . *. * ])ata Ac'quisiti?n' . .* .* * . > ' * \ < .*.
1240 I 1321 94.4 I
94.4 Scan Controller Parameters Increment Axis Planned Actual Scan Axis Planned Actual Positional Parameters Controller: SG-NExT Lower Limit 70.75 70.75 Lower Limit 64.57 64.57 Beam Direction: Cw/Ccw Scan: X Rotator Drive Upper Limit 76.24 76.24 UpJ!.er Limit 98.20 98.20 Probe Type: PA22-001 Increment: Y Axial Drive Inc. Interval (Resolution) 0.05 DCI (Scan Resolution) 0.05 Scanning Speed: 1.5 inches per second Mode: Automatic Scan Conversion Units Inches Conversion Units Inches Number of Scans: 111 Scan Motion: Bi-directional Radius In. 15.38" WeldC/L: 72.262" Correction: N/A Elevation/Nozzle CII NIA Master Acquisition File: DM_Pipe_ID_O_CW_l80_CCW_Skew.acq Calibration Records: Examination Notes:
Probe Channel/Angle(s) Skew Scan Offset Step Offset Pipe Diameter= 30.83" Probe I 1-(60-88°1) oo + 27.57(in) - 2.2l(in) 110001 Circumference- 96.86" Probe 2 2-(60-88°L) 180° + 37.01(in) - 2.21(in) 110001 Examination Remarks:
NIA NIA NIA NIA N/A NIA ETProbe 1 1-2 +22.5° + 5.35(in)
+ O.OO(in) ET03-PTB-02 3-4 ETProbe 2
-22.5°
- 5.35(in)
.* ..
D11.~Ana~~~~ . *. . * .. *.
I. . ........ *:*. .
y. .. ' ..: . : .. ::
Increment & Scan Positions Actual Recordable Indications Analyst Remarks Increment Position Scan Position Yes No NIA
Attachment:
Scan No.(s)
Start Stop Start Stop Channell 0 0 D 1- 111 70.75 76.24 64.57 98.20 Probe 1 Channel2 D 0 D 0 Yes 0 No Channel3 D 0 0 Further Evaluation Channell D 0 0 Required:
Probe 2 Channel2 0 0 []
Channel3 0 0 0 0 Yes 0 No Channell 0 D 0 Archive Media:
Probe 3 Channel2 D 0 0 Channel3 0 0 0 0 External Hard Drive ETProbe 1 Channell-2 D D 0 ETProbe2 Channel3-4 D 0 0 0 CD-ROM N/A NIA D 0 0 DVD-ROM Analyst I SNT Level/ Date:
JesseR Delgado I Ill I 14 Nov. 2012~ _J~
~
ISWT FORM No. UT 50 (Rev. 1/11)
ID-S SG A Safe-End to Inlet Nozzle (Cw CCw)
~,:;Jup Channel ILogtoUn: Ch2all iJJo.Oin 'li 4 ; Hz v*-* *&iii 2.1 in 1
Sequence *.~J""'-**- . *-** -* *. . *- ** - - ***
I 3 Layout *_M
,,,0~
I~
-n I~
I -1oo Soft Gain [dB) l 205 I HardGain(dB) fD.O Global G'ain [dB) J 20..5
Sl te!Plant :
IHI S*l.llhwe~~ti.cl'm<:tlOSJT*a.l"c.
Point Beach Unit 2 llllSOUTHWESTTECHNOLOGffiS AUTOMATED EDDY CURRENT EXAMINATION RECORD Weld Identification: RC-34-MR.CL-AL-05 Pro/ReviChgiiCN: ISWT-AET3121010 Examination No.: ID-S Project No.: 12-0301 Weld
Description:
ISE-to-A SIG In Nez (240°-365") Device Configuratitm: 136-00045 Mod.Conf.: 138-00032 Scan Path Drawing: 134-00079 Exam Date Examination Time Surface Temperature °F i Data Acquisition Operator (s) I SNT Level: William Angell I IT Start l End Start I End 14-Nov-12 1240 l 1321 94 I 94 Data Acquisition Scan Controller Parameters Increment Axis Planned Actual Scan Axis Planned Actual Positional Parameters Controller: SG-NExT Lower Limit 70.75 70.75 Lower Limit 64.57 64.57 Beam Direction: Cw/Ccw Scan: X Rotator Drive Upper Limit 76.24 76.24 Upper Limit 98.20 98.20 ET Probe Size: .24 (in)
Increment Y Axial Drive Increment Interval 0.05 Resolution 0.20 Scanning Speed 1.5 inches per second Mode: Automatic Scan Conversion Units Inches Conversion Units Inches Number ofScans: Ill Scan Motion: Bi-directional Radius In. 15.38" WeldCfL 7226 Correction; NIA Elevation/Nozzle CfL N/A Module Parameters: Calibration Records: Examination Notes:
Status Channel(s) Skew Scan Offset Step Offset Pipe diameter= 30.83" Probe 1 On 1-2 +22.5° +5.35 (in) -221 (in.) ET-03-PTB-002 Circumference- 96.86" Probe2 On 3-4 -22.50 -5.35 (in) -221 (in.) ET-03-PTB-002 Examination Remarks: Saved data as (ETID 5)
Data Analysis Increment & Scan Positions Aetna! Recordable Indications Analyst Remarks Increment Position Scan Position Yes No NIA Attaclnnent EXAMINATION C SCAN FOR ALL4 CHANNELS ScanNo.(s)
Start Stop Start Stop Probe 1 Channel1 D 0 D BYes [No 1-111 70.75 76.24 64.57 98.20 Channel2 D 0 D Further Evaluation Required:
Probe 2 Channel 3 D 0 0 Channel4 0 0 0 DYes @lo Probe 3 Channel 5 0 0 0 ArChive Media:
Channel6 0 D 0 0 External Hard Drive Channel7 D D 0 D CD-ROM Probe 4 Channel8 D 0 0 DVD-ROM Analyst/SNTLeveliDate:
William Angell III
~
/u/.. ~
~
//Jf~..( David R. Kleinjan /II Jft.
Reviewed By/Analyst I SjLevell~~
~
-* --*-* .. .r
_f_'
, ./F
Project No. 12-0301 EXAMINATION ET-ID-5 Date: 14 NOV 2012 Instrument S/N 879328 STATION 2 CALIBRATION SHEET: ET-03-PTB-002 File
Demo ECT 5800
DemolAIS 1
DemolAIS 2
DemoMFL5700-DE. .
DemoMFL5700*1D. 'i
. : DemoMFL5800*DE. ~;I 1 Demo MFL 5800 *ID . "*j
Demo AFT 5700 1 ,
' Demo AFT 5700 2 Demo AFT 58001
Demo AFT 5800 2
ETID_3
ETID_4
ETID.:.S
' pbst2set2 Start_~-~,
IHI Southwest Technologies~ Inc.
Site/Plant : Point Beach Unit 2 IHI SOUTHWEST TECHNOLOGIES AUTOMATED ULTRASONIC EXAMINATION RECORD Weld Identification: RC-34-MRCL-AI-05 Pro!Rev/Chg/ICN: ISwT-PDI-AUTll/21011 Examination No.: ID-5RR . I Project No.: 12-0301 Weld
Description:
SE-to-A S/G In Noz (240°-365°) Device Configuration: 136-00045 Mod.Conf.: 138-00032 Scan Path Drawinl!;: 134-00079 Exam Date Examination Time Surface Temperature °F Data Acquisition Operator (s) I SNT Level:
Jeremy Howe I II 14Nov. 2012 Start I End Start I End i 1240 I 1321 94.4 I 94.4 l,i,, : ' *:*~},, *.
<:'... **;\, .<
)* i ., ;
! i ', ,. .*.*... **' * * *
>/* . . :*. . *.*, . . * . * .* * . . * . . ***** .... :l).~~.~cq~x~on.
) .
,r
' L ',
Scan Controller Parameters Increment Axis Planned Actual Scan Axis Planned Actual Positional Parameters Controller: SG-NExT Lower Limit 70.75 70.75 Lower Limit 64.57 64.00 Beam Direction: Cw/Ccw Scan: X Rotator Drive Upper Limit 76.24 76.24 Uj)per Limit 98.20 81.00 Probe Type: PA22-001 Increment: Y Axial Drive Inc. Interval (Resolution) 0.05 DCI (Scan Resolution) 0.05 Scanning Speed: 1.5 inches per second Mode: Automatic Scan Conversion Units Inches Conversion Units Inches Number of Scans: 111 Scan Motion: Bi-directional Radius ln. 15.38" Weld CIL: 72.262" Correction: N/A I:Elevation!Nozzle C/I N!A Master Acquisition File: DM_Pipe_ID_o_CW_180_CCW_Skew.acq Calibration Records:
Examination Notes:
Probe Channei/Angle(s) Skew Scan Offset Step Offset Pipe Diameter"' 30.83" Probe 1 1-(60-88°L) oo + 27.57(in) - 2.2l(in) 110001 Circumference- 96.86" Probe 2 2-(60-88°L) 180° + 37.0l(in) - 2.2l(in) 110001 Examination Remarks:
N/A N/A NIA N/A NIA NIA ETProbe 1 1-2 +22.5° + 5.35(in)
+ O.OO(in) ET03-PTB-02 I>
ETProbe2 3-4
'>.* ;c*: (.:.. *C ...:'/
-22.5° - 5.35(in}
.* **,", :*< . . .****.':\ ; ' . ', .:* *' .* ; . .*. . . * . 'n~t1l~~~iY:sis .: .*
(
.********** .~: *. :
'/ ' .. **' :
'.:(*.*
Increment & Scan Positions Actual Recordable Indications Analyst Remarks Increment Position Scan Position Yes No N/A
Attachment:
ScanNo.(s)
Start Stop Start Stop Channell 0 0 0 1 -Ill 70.75 76.24 64.00 81.00 Probe 1 Channe12 0 0 0 0 Yes 0 No Channe13 0 0 0 Further Evaluation Channell 0 0 0 Required:
Probe 2 Channel2 0 0 D Channe13 D 0 D 0 Yes 0 No Channell 0 0 0 Archive Media:
Probe 3 Channel2 D 0 0 Channe13 0 D 0 0 External Hard Drive ETProbe 1 Channell-2 0 0 0 ETProbe2 Channel3-4 0 0 0 0 CD-ROM N/A NIA 0 0 0 DVD-ROM Analyst I SNT Level/ Date:
JesseR. Delgado I m /14 Nov. 2012 4/i ISWT FORM No. UT 50 (Rev. Vll)
IHI Southwest Technologies Examination Summary Record Site: Point Beach Nuclear Plant Unit 2 Outage: U2R32 Identification: RC-34-MRCL-BI-05 Method Proc/Rev/Ch ICN Examination NRI Other Remarks AUT ISwT-POI-AUT11/2/0/1 UT Probe 1 (60-88') 110004 X UT TWO & AWY Exam AUT ISwT-POI-AUT11/2/0/1 UT Probe 2 (60-88') 110004 X UT TWO & AWY Exam AUT ISwT-POI-AUT11/2/0/1 UT Probe 1 (60-88") 110003 X UT CW & CCW Exam AUT ISwT-POI-AUT11/2/0/1 UT Probe 2 (60-88') 110003 X UT CW & CCW Exam AET ISwT-POI-AET3/2/0/0 ETProbe 1 ET03-PTB-001 X Eddy Current Exam AET ISwT-POI-AET3/2/0/0 ETProbe2 ET03-PTB-001 X Eddy Current Exam Examination Summary:
This weld was examined from the inside surface using SG-NExT, T-Ill, & MS5800 examination equipment.
The examination coverage was 100%.
Reviewed By: ":S' Signatur ANII ..J..H....U:.on>
Date: t
IHI SouthwestTechnologies,lnc.
Site/Plant : Point Beach Unit 2 ffii SOUTHWEST TECHNOLOGIES AUTOMATED ULTRASONIC EXAMINATION RECORD Weld Identification: RC-34-MRCL-BI-05 Pro/Rev/Chg!ICN: ISwT-PDI-AUT11/2/0I1 Examination No.: ID-11 Pro,iect No.: 12-0301 Weld
Description:
SE-to-B S/G In Noz (0°-185°) Device Configuration: 136-00045 Mod.Conf.: 138-00032 Scan Path Drawing: 134-00079 Exam Date Examination Time Surface Temperature °F Data Acquisition Operator (s) I SNT Level:
Bryan Wright I II 18Nov. 2012 Start I End Start I End 1750 I 1820 94 I 94
i .*. * . *.*.*.

.
r;, , : .: .. :. '
i *' :
v,'.,:* ..;,:** '
> *' . >. **.* \< :' **' .
,'/
.*.* i
, , .*.* :~afa :<\C(;lliisi~~~~ . , }. ,, , ..* ., *. :*. :. . *....
... . '. *< **. ) :: ' '
... '*, : **: . ; \.y* .:.' ,** **:.:
Scan Controller Parameters Increment Axis Planned Actual Scan Axis Planned Actual Positional Parameters Controller: SG-NExT Lower Limit 70.75 70.75 Lower Limit 0.00 0.00 Beam Direction: Twd/Awy Scan: X Rotator Drive Upper Limit 80.35 80.35 Upper Limit 49.77 49.77 Probe Type: PA22-001 Increment: Y Axial Drive Inc. Interval (Resolution) 0.15 DCI (Scan Resolution) 0.10 Scanning Speed: 2.0 inches per second Mode: Automatic Scan Conversion Units Inches Conversion Units Inches Number of Scans: 65 Scan Motion: Bi-directional Radius In. 15.38 11 We1dCIL: 72.262" Correction: NIA Elevation/Nozzle C/1 N/A Master Acquisition File: DM_Pipe_ID_90_A WY_270_TWD_Skew.acq Calibration Records:
Examination Notes:
Probe Channel /Ang)e(s) Skew Scan Offset Step Offset Pipe Diameter- 30.83" Circumference- 96.86" Probe 1 1-(60-88°1) 90° + 69.92(in) - 1.52(in) 110004 Probe 2 2-(6 0-88°L) 270° + 59.22(in) - 2.90(in) 110004 Examination Remarks:
Probe3 3-(0°Profilometry) oo + O.OO(in) + O.OO(in) 110004 NIA NIA NIA N/A NIA NIA i,f*.,.***** :\:..-.:~..... :,*>, ,_
.*:*,.. * :* <;:* ,,.
c. *,* . *.** ). . * * *: * ... * . . n*:1":ta*Ari~lsi~
.~'* * * , :',>:. . ,., .Y.' .*** * ** :<,
i
* * ~ ; :.*' ... .. *...*.: c': .:
.<o, .. :*..
Increment & Scan Positions Actual Recordable Indications Analyst Remarks Increment Position Scan Position Yes No N/A
Attachment:
Scan No.(s)
Start Stop Start Stop Channell 0 0 0 1-65 70.75 80.35 0.00 49.77 Probe 1 Channel2 0 0 0 0 Yes 0 No Channe13 0 0 0 Further Evaluation Channell 0 0 0 Required:
Probe 2 Channel2 0 0 0 Channel3 0 0 0 0 Yes 0 No Channell 0 0 0 Archive Media:
Probe 3 Channel2 0 0 0 Channel3 0 0 0 0 External Hard Drive ETProbe 1 Channell-2 0 0 0 ETProbe2 Channe13-4 0 0 0 0 CD-ROM N/A N/A 0 0 0 DVD-ROM Analyst I SNT Level I Date:
ISWT FORM No. UT SO (Rev. 1111)
Richard A. Riddles I ill I 18 Nov. 2012
~Q~\JJ)
IHI Southwest Technologies, Inc-Site/Plant: Point Beach Unit2 llil SOUTHWEST TECHNOLOGIES AUTOMATED ULTRASONIC EXAMINATION RECORD Weld Identification: RC-34-.MRCL-BI-05 CN: ISwT-PDI-AUTll/2/0/1 Examination No.: ID-1 2 Project No.: 12-0301 Weld Descri}ltio~: _SE*!<J-B S@InJioz {180.-365"/_ 136-00045
,Mod.Conf.: 138-00032 Scan Path Drawing: 134-00079 I Exam Date I Examination Time I Surface_Te111perature °F Data Acquisition Operator (s) I SNT Level: Start T End - I -- Start I End Bryan Wright Ill 18 Nov. 2012 1821 I I85o I 94 I 94
>*: j "* P#~~1~<Itii~~t1:()~.** ..
Scan Controller Parameters Increment Axis Planned I Actual Scan Axis Planned I Actual Positional Parameters Controller: SG-NExT Lower Limit 70.75 I 70.75 Lower Limit 48.43 I 48.43 Beam Direction: Twd!Awy Scan: X Rotator Drive Upper Limit 80.35 I 80.35 Upper Limit 98.20 I 98.20 Probe Type: PA22-001 Increment: Y Axial Drive Inc. Interval (Resolution) 0.15 DC! (Scan Resolution) O.IO Scanning Speed: 2.0 inches per second Mode: Automatic Scan Conversion Units Inches Conversion Units Inches Number of Scans: 65 Scan Motion: Bi-directional Radius In. 15.38" WeldC/L: 72.262" Correction: N/A Elevation/Nozzle C/I NIA Master Acquisition File: DM_Pipe_ID_90_AWY_270_TWD_Skew.acq Calibration Records: IE~ami~ation Notes:
Probe Channel/Angle(s) Skew Scan Offset Step Offset !Pipe Diameter= 30.83" Probe I I I-(60-88°L) 90° + 69.92(in) - I.52(in) 110004 LCircumference - 96.86" Probe2 I 2-(60-88°L) 270° + 59.22(in) - 2.90(in) 110004 Examination Remarks:
Probe 3 I 3-(0°Profilometry) + O.OO(in) + O.OO(in) 110004 NIA I N!A N!A NIA N!A
'~~i~~a~ys~**
Increment & Scan .Positions Actual Recordable Indications Analyst Remarks S N () Increment Position Scan Position Yes No N/A
Attachment:
can o. s Start Stop Start Stop Channel 1 D 0 0 1-65 70.75 80.35 48.43 98.20 Probe 1 Channel2 D 0 D D Yes 0 No I Channel 3 D 0 D Further Evaluation Channel I 0 0 D Required:
I Probe 2 Channel2 0 0 D Channel3 D 0 D DYes 0 No Channel I D D 0 !Archive Media:
1-----+-----+-----+----+-----t I Probe 3 . Channel2 Channel3 D
D D
D 0
0 0 External Hard D r i v e l - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 1 ETProbe 1 Channel1-2 D D 0 ETProbe2 Channe13-4 D D 0 0 CD-ROM N/A NIA D D 0 DVD-ROM Analyst I SNT Level/ Date:
RichardA.Riddles/ill/18Nov.2012 ~ ~v~
ISWTFORMNo. UT50 (Rev.l/11)
IHI Southwest Technologies~ Inc.
Site/Plant : Point Beach Unit 2 AUTOMATED ULTRASONIC EXAMINATION RECORD IHI SOUTHWEST TECHNOLOGIES Weld Identification: RC-34-MR.CL-BI-05 Pro/Rev/Chl11CN: ISwT-PDI-AUT11/2/0/1 I
Examination No.: ID-13 Pro.iect No.: 12-0301 Weld
Description:
SE-to-B S/G In Noz (0"-125") Device Configuration: 136-00045 Mod.Conf.: 138-00032 Scan Path Drawin~: 134-00079 Exam Date Examination Time Surface Temperature °F Data Acquisition Operator (s) I SNT Level:
Bryan Wright Ill 18Nov. 2012 Start I End Start I End 1433 I 1534 94 l 94
.. ,,.:, :: . ,:_:. ~-.
<c',',-_ ,;;.,:
,,, ':,,,i*.:: .*.:".
,'*:*'<** :.'.'*_.* :.Qata.Acquisiti()ii. \C'>
Scan Controller Parameters Increment Axis Planned Actual Scan Axis Planned Actual Positional Parameters Controller: SG-NExT Lower Limit 71.56 71.56 Lower Limit 0.00 0.00 Beam Direction: Cw/Ccw Scan: X Rotator Drive Upper Limit 76.24 76.24 U})ll_er Limit 33.63 33.63 Probe Type: PA22-001 Increment: Y Axial Drive lnc. Interval (Resolution) 0.05 DCI (Scan Resolution) 0.05 Scanning Speed: 1.5 inches per second Mode: Automatic Scan Conversion Units Inches Conversion Units Inches Number of Scans: 95 Scan Motion: Bi-directional Radius ln. 15.38" WeldC/L: 72.262" Correction: N/A Elevation/Nozzle C/I N/A Master Acquisition File: DM_Pipe_ID_O_CW_l80_CCW_Skew.acq Calibration Records:
Examination Notes:
Probe Channei/Angle(s) Skew Scan Offset St~!p_ Offset Pioe Diameter= 30.83" oo Circumference= 96.86" Probe 1 l-(60-88°L) + 27.57(in) - 2.2l(in) 110003 Probe2 2-(60-88°L) 180° + 37.0l(in) - 2.2l(in) 110003 Examination Remarks:
N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A ETProbe 1 1-2 +22.SO + 5.35(in)
+ O.OO(in) ET03-PTB-Ol ETProbe2 3-4 -22.SO - 5.35(in)
. :*.:, ,' **: ,_ ..... *:'*.:*, *. -: _'**:-.*- '<',***:: n~~~A.tatysls . -. ' ... , ",_,:* ', *.:* -*::** ' ,_
.i.e ':':':' '. , c.:' ,,,'. ***- :* '
Increment & Scan Positions Actual Recordable Indications Analyst Remarks Increment Position Scan Position Yes No N/A
Attachment:
ScanNo.(s)
Start Stop Start Stop Channell D 0 D 1-95 71.56 76.24 0.00 33.63 Probe 1 Channel2 D 0 D DYes 0 No Channel3 D 0 D Further Evaluation Channell D 0 D Required:
Probe2 Channel2 D 0 n Channe13 D 0 0 0 Yes 0 No Channell 0 0 0 Archive Media:
Probe 3 Channe12 D 0 0 Channel3 0 0 0 0 External Hard Drive ETProbe 1 Channel 1-2 0 0 0 ETProbe2 Channel 3-4 0 0 0 0 CD-ROM NIA N/A 0 0 0 DVD-ROM Analyst I SNT Level/ Date:
~~
Richard A. Riddles fill f 18 Nov. 2012 -, \ --
\ '\:}\\ *, \ *.

-----*-**- -----~----- -- ---- --

ISWTFORMNo. UT50 (Rev.l/11)
ID-11 SG B Safe-End to Inlet Nozzle {Away Towards)
ID-12 SG B Safe-End to Inlet Nozzle (Away Towards) sottGairi(cfBJ *J20.sl Hard Gain (dB) .1 o.o *.*
Global Gain (dB) j20.s
ID-13 SG B Safe-End to Inlet Nozzle (Cw CCw)
ID-14 SG B Safe-End to Inlet Nozzle {Cw CCw)
ID-15 SG B Safe-End to Inlet Nozzle (Cw CCw) sonGamldBJ lzo.sl
>Hart:l Sairi (dBJ jncr *
'Global Gain (dBJ.j2cr.s
llllSOUTRWESTTECHNOLOGffiS Site/Plant :
IHI Soutllw..-t:T*c:bl'!otogt.., lne.
Point Beach Unit 2 AUTOMATEDEDDYCURRENTEXAN.UNATIONRECORD Weld ldentificatian: RC-34-MRCL-BI-05 Pro/Rev/Chg/ICN: ISWf-AF:r312/0/0 Examination No.: ID-13 Project No.: 12-0301 Weld
Description:
jSE-to*B SIG In Noz (0"*125") Device Confi~uration: 136-00045 Mad.Conf.: 138-00032 Scan Path Drawing: 134-00079 Exam Date Examination Time Surface Temperature °F Data Acquisition Operator (s) I SNT Level: David R. Kleinjan Ill 17-Nov-12 Start I End Start I End 1433 I 1534 94 I 94 Data Acquisition I Scan Controller Parameters Increment Axis Planned Actual Scan .Axis Planned Actual Positional Parame~ers Controller: SG-NExT Lower Limit 71.56 71.56 Lower Limit 0.00 0.00 Beam Direction: CwiCcw' SC3Il: X Rotator Drive Upper Limit 76.24 76.24 Upper Limit 33.63 33.63 ETProbe Size: .24 (in)
Increment y Axial Drive Increment Interval 0.05 Resolution 0.20 Scanning Speed 1.5 inches per second Mode: Automatic Scan Conversion Units Inches Conversion Units Inches Number of Scans: 95 Scan Motion: Bi-directional Radius In. 15.38" WeldC/L 72.262" Cotreetion: NIA Elevation/Nozzle C!L NIA Module Parameters: Calibration Records: Examination Notes:
Status Channel(s) Skew Sean Offset Step Offset Pipe diameter- 30.83" Probe 1 On 1-2 +22.5" +5.35 (in) -2.21 (in.) ET-03-PTB-001 Circumference - 96.86" Probe2 On 3-4 -22.5" -5.35 (in) -2.21 (in.) ET-03-PTB-001 Examination Remarks:
Data Analysis Increment & Scan Positions Actual R~ordable Indications Analyst Remarks Increment Position Scan Position Yes No NIA
Attachment:
EXAMlNATION C SCAN FOR ALL 4 CHANNELS ScanNo.(s)
Start Stop Start Stop Probe 1 Channel1 0 0 0 0Yes [No 1-95 71.56 76.24 0.00 33.63 Channel2 0 0 0 Further Evaluation Required:
Probe 2 Channel 3 0 0 0 Channel4 D 0 0 DYes 0-ro ProbeJ ChannelS 0 0 0 Archive Media:
Channel6 D D 0 0 External Hard Drive P be 4 Channel? 0 D 0 0 CD-ROM ro Channel8 0 0 B DVD-ROM AnalystiSNTLevel/Date:
David R. Kleinjan I IT
),L 1
~ ReviewedByiAnalystl~ ../
17Aft77/~IZ--
William Angell/ IT h /.J
~ ~ ~
Project No. 12-0301 EXAMINATION ET-10-13 Date: 17 NOV 2012 Instrument S/N 131612 STATION 1 CALJBRATION SHEET: ET-03-PTB-001
ETID13.
ETID14.
PBETDSMTEST4
PBETDSMTESTS
PBST1CALSET2
PBST1CALSETa001
PBST1CALSET3
ST1CALSET1
t...tetswt~
te.lswtiZ
TESTSWRI3
' TESTSWRI40
' TESTSWRISD st.~
IHI Southwest Technologies, Inc.
Site/Plant : Point Beach Unit2 IHI SOUTHWEST TECHNOLOGIES AUTOMATED ULTRASONIC EXAMINATION RECORD Weld Identification: RC-34-MRCL-BI-05 Pro/Rev/Ch!!IICN: ISwT-PDI-AUTII/2/0/1 Examination No.: ID-14 Project No.: 12-0301 Weld
Description:
SE-to-B S/G In Noz (120°*245°) Device Confi2uration: 136-00045 Mod.Conf.: 138-00032 Scan Path Drawine: 134-00079 Exam Date Examination Time Surface Temperature °F Data Acquisition Operator (s) I SNT Level:
Bryan Wright/IT 18Nov. 2012 Start I End Start I End I I
... * . *. . . ' .,:,(: '
i** .* ****.,). ..,.,;:;
. .;~>J ' . k ).i,
.*..; *** . !.*.*.:* .. ***. > *. * / ;* * ( * .*. . ' ; .* . I)~t# ~cqliis~#~** . . . * . . * . *. ,
1610 1654 94 94 Scan Controller Parameters Increment Axis Planned Actual Scan Axis Planned Actual Positional Parameters Controller: SG-NExT Lower Limit 71.56 71.56 Lower Limit 32.29 32.29 Beam Direction: Cw/Ccw Scan: X Rotator Drive UooerLimit 76.24 76.24 UnoerLimit 65.92 65.92 Probe Type: PA22-001 Increment: Y Axial Drive Inc. Interval (Resolution) 0.05 DCI (Scan Resolution) 0.05 Scanning Speed: 1.5 inches per second Mo&: Automatic Scan Conversion Units Inches Conversion Units Inches Number of Scans: 95 Scan Motion: Bi-directional Radius In. 15.38" Weld C/L: 72.262" Correction: NIA Elevation/Nozzle C/1 NIA Master Acquisition File: DM_Pipe_ID_O_CW_l80_CCW_Skew.acq Examination Notes:
Calibration Records:
Probe Channei/Anele(s) Skew Scan Offset Step Offset Pipe Diameter= 30.83" oo Circtunference = 96.86" Probe 1 l-(60-88°L) + 27.57(in) - 2.2l(in) 110003 Probe2 2-( 60-88°L) 180° + 37.0l(in) - 2.2l(in) 110003 Examination Remarks:
NIA NIA NIA NIA N/A NIA ETProbe 1 1-2 +22.5° + 5.35(in) 3-4 -22.5° - 5.35(in)
+ O.OO(in) ET03-PTB-Ol ETProbe2
. ;,**.. * ' .\ r,';j i: :*. ',\ :,,? ;' < ( .*.* . *.* ) . .*.;,*;* .* * ,. *
Irbl'.Anaf ,~ ., '* **::* *,**: ;, ,,: *,... . :, ** ' :* *.* :*. * * * ./.* .....* *** * .' :'i: ......
i
?~ '. \ ;, , ~ >
J 1
I , *' :: > 1 l
1
/ * ;,
.:: :*.*< *. ,.,a...**, ,.*
ys~$ ; ..... > *. *.* '***: .**.:.*.,........ *' *. .** *:*.*:**::.. *.* ****** *"** .,*.
Increment & Scan Positions Actual Recordable Indications Analyst Remarks Increment Position Scan Position Yes No N!A
Attachment:
ScanNo.(s)
Start Stop Start Stop Channell 0 0 0 1-95 71.56 76.24 32.29 65.92 Probe 1 Channel2 D 0 D DYes 0 No Channel3 D 0 D Further Evaluation Channell D 0 D Required:
Probe 2 Channel2 0 0 n Channel3 D 0 D DYes 0 No Channell 0 D 0 Archive Media:
Probe 3 Channel2 D 0 0 Channel3 0 D 0 0 External Hard Drive I ETProbe 1 Channell-2 0 0 0 ETProbe2 Channel3-4 D D 0 0 CD-ROM NIA NIA D 0 0 DVD-ROM Analyst I SNT Level/ Date: I ISWTFORMNo. UT50 (Rev. 1/11)
Richard A. Riddles I ill I 18 Nov. 2012 v~~\~ I
llUSOUTffWESTTECHNOLOGffiS Site/Plant :
IHI
$oi.lthw**t'f'ldlfH7io,!cs,lrlc, Point Beach Unit 2 AUTOMATEDEDDYCURRENTEXAMITNATIONRECORD Weld Identification: RC-34-MRCL-BI-05 Pro/Rev/Chg/ICN: rswr-AETI/2/oto Examination No.: ID-14 Project No.: 12-0301 Weld
Description:
ISE-to-B S/G In Noz (120"-245") Device Configuration: 136-00045 Mod.Conf.: 138-00032 Scan Path Drawin~: 134-00079 Exam Date Examination Time Surface Temperature °F Data Acquisition Operator (s) I SNT Level: David R. Kleinjan Ill Start I End Start I End 17-Nov-12 1610 l 1654 94 J 94 Data Acquisition Scan Controller Parameters Increment Axis Planned Actual Scan Axis Planned Actual Positional Parameters Controller: SG-NExT Lower Limit 71.56 71.56 Lower Limit 32.29 32.26 Beam Direction; Cw/Ccw Scan: X Rotator Drive Upper Limit 76.24 76.29 Upper Limit 65.92 65.92 ET Probe Size: .24 (in)
Increment: Y Axial Drive Increment Interval 0.05 Resolution 0.20 Scanning Speed 1.5 inches per second Mode: Automatic Scan Conversion Units Inches Conversion Units Inches Number ofScans: 95 Scan Motion: Bi-cfuectional Radius ln. 15.38" WeldCIL 72.262" Correction: N/A Elevation/Nozzle C/L NIA Module Parameters: Calibration Records: Examination Notes:
Status Channel(s} Skew Scan Offset Step Offset IP+/-De diameter= 30.83" Probe 1 On 1-2 +22.5° +5.35 (in) -2.21 {in.) ET-03-PTB-001 Circumference- 96.86" Probe2 On 3-4 - 22.5" -5.35 (in) -2.21 (in.) ET-03-PTB-001 Examination Remarks:
Data Analysis Increment & Scan Positions Actual Recordable Indications Analyst Remarks Increment Position Scan Position Yes No N/A Attachment EXAMINATION C SCAN FOR ALL 4 CHANNELS ScanNo.(s)
Start Stop Start Stop Probe 1 Channel1 0 0 0 E!Yes CNo 1-95 71.56 76.24 32.29 65.92 Channel2 0 0 0 Further Evaluation Required:
Probe 2 Channel 3 0 0 0 Channel4 0 0 0 DYes 0ro Probe 3 Channel 5 0 0 0 Archive Media:
ChannelS 0 0 0 0 External Hard Drive Pr be 4 Channel? 0 0 0 0 CD-ROM
° ChannelS 0 0 0 DVD-ROM
~ ~-d~
Analyst/ SNT Level/ Da4 David R. Kleinjan/11 1
!?,. ~
/;
/ 7AJH~)Z- ReviewedBy/Analyst/SNT William Angell/ ll ~
- f t......~
-- - f " v
Project No. 12-0301 EXAMINATION ET-ID-14 Date: 17 NOV 2012 Instrument SIN 131612 STATION 1 CALIBRATION SHEET: ET-03-PTB-001 Setup j lnspe.:l. Analy~s C:\ROTeoh\M...\OATA\ 0 Fie
ET1013
ETID14
' PBETOSIJTEST 4
' PBETDSMTEST5
PBST1CALSET2
' PBST1CALSET3.001
PBST1CALSET3
ST1CALSET1
le$telsW!l1
le$lswri2
' TESTSWAJ3
' TESTSWRI4D
' TESTSWRI5D Stall
IHI Southwest Technologies., Inc.
Site/Plant: Point Beach Unit 2 llllSOUTHWESTTECHNOLOGffiS AUTOMATED ULTRASONIC EXAMINATION RECORD Weld Identification: RC-34-MR.CL-BI-05 CN: ISwT-PDI-AUTll/2/0/1 Examination No.: ID-15 Pro.iect No.: 12-0301 Welc:ID~cription~E-to*B S/GinNoz(240"-365" 136-00045 IScan Path Drawing' 134-00079 I I Examination Time Mod.Conf.: 138-00032 Data Acquisition Operator (s) I SNT Level: Bryan Wright 1n I
Exam Date 18 Nov. 2012 t Start 1700
_t 1End 7
45 Surface Tem_p_erature °F Start 94 J
l End 94
.. *' .' . ' . i. '.. ,. '.'
,>D,ata, *'Acqntsifio~ . *. *
. ' *I ___ 1,,* I* ,__:'.: __*, ' * ._' ,, ____-,
I Scan Controller Parameters Increment Axis Planned I Actual Sean Axis Planned I Actual Positional Parameters Controller: SG-NExT rLower Limit 71.56 I 71.56 Lower Limit 64.57 I 64.57 Beam Direction: Cw/Ccw Scan: X Rotator Drive JUpperLimit 76.24 I 76.24 Upper Limit 98.20 I 98.20 Probe Type: PA22-001 Increment: Y Axial Drive Inc. Interval (Resolution) 0.05 DCI (Scan Resolution) 0.05 Scanning Speed: 1.5 inches per second Mode: Automatic Scan Conversion Units Inches Conversion Units Inches Number of Scans: 95 Scan Motion: Bi-directional Radius In. 15.38" Weld C/L: 72.262" Correction: N/A Elevation/Nozzle C!l N/A Calibration Records:!t;E~x~a~m~~*~n~a~ti~o~n~N~o~t~eJs:~----------------J Master Acquisition File: DM_Pipe_ID_0_ CW_180_ CCW_ Skew.acq Probe Channel /A11gle(~ Skew Scan Offset St~ Offset J.P.fu_e Diameter 30.83" I Circumference= 96.86" Probe 1 I 1-(60-88°L) I 0° I + 27.57(in) - 2.21(in) 110003 Probe 2 2-( 60-88°L) 180° + 37.01(in) - 2.21(in) 110003 Examination Remarks:
N/A NIA N/A N/A N/A N/A ET Probe 1 I 1-2 +22.5° + 5.35(in)
+ O.OO(in) ET03-PTB-Ol ET Probe 2 I 3-4 -22.SO - 5.35(in)
, ~~~t~~al~~fs,
Increment & Scan Positions Actual Recordable Indications Analyst Remarks S N () Increment Position Scan Position Yes No N/A J
Attachment:
8 can o. Start Stop Start Stop Channell D 0 0 1 - 95 71.56 76.24 64.57 98.20 Probe 1 Channel2 D 0 0 DYes 0 No I Channel 3 D 0 D Further Evaluation 1 Channel 1 D 0 D Required:
Probe 2 Channel 2 D 0 0 Channel 3 0 0 0 0 Yes 0 No I Channell 0 0 0 jArchive Media:
Probe 3 Channe12 D D 0 r-------+-----~r------+-------r------;
Channe13 D D 0 0 External Hard Drive 1 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - l ETProbe 1 Channell-2 D 0 0 ETProbe2 Channel 3-4 D 0 0 0 CD-ROM N/A N/A D D 0 DVD-ROM Analyst I SNT Level I Date:
Richard A. Riddles/ill/ 18 Nov. 2012 ~ CJ..~~
ISWT FORM No. UT 50 (Rev. 1111)
llllSOUTKWESTTECHNOLOGffiS Site/Plant:
IHI
~outhwut Tfthn*l01ri*Jo Point Beach Unit 2 lac. AUTOMATEDEDDYCURRENTEXAN.ITNATIONRECORD Weld ldeotifkation: RC-34-M:R.CL-BI-05 Pro/Rev/Chg/ICN: ISWT-AETJ/2/0/0 Examination No.: ID-lS Project No.: 12-0301 Weld
Description:
ISE-to-B S/G ln Noz (240°-365") Device Configuration: 136-00045 Mod.Couf.: 138-00032 Scan Path Dra~: 134-00079 Exam Date Examination Time Surface Temperature °F Data Acquisition Operator (s) I SNT Level: David R. Kleinjan I II 17-Nov-12 Start I End Start I End 1700 I 1745 94 I 94 Data Acquisition Scan Controller Parameters Increment Axis Planned Actual Scan Axis Planned Actual Positional Parameters Controller. SG-NExT Lower Limit 71.56 71.56 Lower Limit 64.57 64.57 Beam Direction: Cw/Ccw Scan: X Rotator Drive U~Limit 7624 76.24 U_pJler Limit 98.20 98.20 ET Probe Size: .24 (in)
Increment Y Axial Drive Increment Interval 0.05 Resolution 0.20 Scanning Speed 1.5 inches per second Mode: Automatic Scan Conversion Units Inches Conversion Units Inches Number of Scans: 95 Scan Motion: Bi-directional Radius ln. 15.38" WeldC/L 72.262" Correction: N/A Elevation/Nozzle C/L NIA Module Parameters: Calibration Records: Examination Notes:
Status Channel(s) Skew Scan Offset Step Offset Pipe diameter- 30.83" Probe 1 On 1-2 +22.5° +5.35 (in) -2.21 (in.) ET-03-PTB-001 Circumference- 96.86" Probe2 On 3-4 - 22.5" -5.35 (in) -2.21 (in.) ET-03-PTB-001 Examination Remarks:
Data Analysis Increment & Scan Positions Actual Recordable Indications Analyst Remarks Increment Position Scan Position Yes No N/A Attachment EXAMINATION C SCAN FOR ALL 4 CHANNELS ScanNo.(s)
Stmt Stop Stmt Stop Probe 1 Channel1 0 B 0 0.fes CNo 1-95 71.56 76.24 64.57 98.20 Channel2 0 B 0 Further Evaluation Required:
Probe 2 Channel 3 0 0 0 Channel4 0 0 0 DYes @o Probe 3 Channel 5 0 0 B Archive Media:
ChannelS 0 0 B B External Hard Drive P be 4 Channel? 0 0 B 0 CD-ROM ro ChannelS 0 0 B DVD-ROM Analyst/ SNT Level/Date) ~ Reviewed By/Analyst I SNT Level/:2.
David R. Kleinjan I II kf?
.. ~ /7/1)::)1/ZB 12.-- WlUiamAngell/II ~
-~ ------* ---- J '
Project No. 12-0301 EXAMINATION ET-ID-15 Date: 17 NOV 2012 Instrument S/N 131612 STATION 1 CALIBRATION SHEET: ET-03-PTB-001
. Se\Up jlmpeCt. Anal)o~ r.
' ETID 13
' ETID 14
' ETID 15
' PBETDSMTEST4
PBETDSMTESTS
PBST1CALSET2
PBST1CALSET3.001
PBST1~SET3
ST1CIILSET1
' testellwn1
lest1Wii2
' TESTSWAI3
' TESTSWAI4D
' TESTS\i/AISD
\ETIJl!S ~~:25
IHI Southwest Technologies Examination Summary Record Identification: RC-36-MRCL-AII-01A Method Proc/Rev/Ch IICN Examination NRI Other Remarks AUT ISwT-PDI-AUT11/2/0/1 UT Probe 1 (60-88") X UT TWD & AWY Exam AUT ISwT-PDI-AUT11/2/0/1 UT Probe 2 (60-88") X UT TWD & AWY Exam AUT ISwT-PDI-AUT11/2/0/1 UT Probe 1 (60-88") X UT CW & CCW Exam AUT ISwT-PDI-AUT11/2/0/1 UT Probe 2 (60-88") X UT CW & CCW Exam AET ISwT-PDI-AET3/2/0/0 ET Probe 1 803-PTB-002 X Eddy Current Exam AET ISwT-PDI-AET3/2/0/0 ET Probe 2 ET03-PTB-002 X Eddy Current Exam Examination Summary:
This weld was examined from the inside surface using SG-NExT, T-Ill, & MS5800 examination equipment.
The examination coverage was 100%.
Reviewed By: /;dtt..t."(.~ * :Jc:WJ'e:-v Signature: /(f.J2..0/---/-=w- Date: I(- :23 -ll..
NextEra Energy Point"';ach
-IHI Southwest Technologies, Inc:.
IHI SOUTHWEST TECHNOLOGIES AUTOMATED ULTRASONIC EXAMINATION RECORD Site/Plant : Point Beach Unit 2 Weld Identification: RC-36-MRCL-AII-OlA Pro/Rev/Chg/ICN: ISwT-PDI-AUT11/2/0/1 Examination No.; ID-6 Pro.iect No.: 12-0301 Weld
Description:
A S/G Out Noz-to-SE (0°-185° Device Configuration: 136-00045 Mod.Conf.: 138-00032 Scan Path Drawing: 134-00079 Exam Date Examination Time Surface Temperature °F Data Acquisition Operator (s) I SNT Level:
Bryan Wright Ill 18Nov. 2012 Start I End Start I End 0945 I 1118 94 I 94
( . . . . . . . . . . . . .. it-.:.:.< . .* : . '} " ... , *. *. n~ta .A~qlli~~~o~ . . . . '*.**** \'* ' ,,. ::
....* .. *.*.:*. / ..... * *..*...
*.*. . **.** '. ' .. ' 'I:: ,:.. ; *~ r .
I I <. c .* . J ** *. :i Planned Actual Scan Axis Planned Actual .*.**** Positional Parameters Scan Controller Parameters Increment Axis Controller: SG-NExT Lower Limit 70.75 70.75 Lower Limit 0.00 0.00 Beam Direction: Twd/Awy Scan: X Rotator Drive Upper Limit 80.35 80.35 Upper Limit 49.77 49.77 Probe Type: PA22-001 Increment: Y Axial Drive Inc. Interval (Resolution) 0.15 DC! (Scan Resolution) 0.10 Scanning Speed: 2.0 inches per second Mode: Automatic Scan Conversion Units Inches Conversion Units Inches Number of Scans: 65 Scan Motion: Bi-directional Radius In. 15.38" WeldCIL: 72.262" Correction: N/A Elevation/Nozzle C/I N/A Master Acquisition File: DM_Pipe_ID_90_AWY_270_TWD_Skew.acq Calibration Records: Examination Notes:
Probe Channei/Anf!le(s) Skew Scan Offset Step Offset Pipe Diameter- 30.83" Circumference= 96.86" Probe 1 1-(60-88°L) 90° + 69.92(in) - 1.52(in) 110002 Probe 2 2-(60-88°1) 270° + 59.22(in) - 2.90(in) 110002 Examination Remarks:
Probe 3 3-COOProf!lometry) oo + O.OO(in) + O.OO(in) 110002 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
'.*'j/*~?(:.*<
.>*.,. , . ;' r*. '....':,: ' . ' :*. ."~. . . *'***. *.* .*~ *~tai~~~Y~is .. ;. .*.***** j >::*~ *. . . * * * *.*. ***.* :'*:_~; <.*
1:,': c .:*
, **..*. . ,; j,' *.; .. :
: * <)~."'- .....
Increment & Scan Positions Actual Recordable Indications Analyst Remarks Increment Position Scan Position Yes No N/A
Attachment:
ScanNo.(s)
Start Stop Start Stop Channell 0 0 0 1-65 70.75 80.35 0.00 49.77 Probe 1 Channel2 0 0 D DYes 0 No Channel3 D 0 D Further Evaluation Channell D 0 D Required:
Probe2 Channel2 D 0 D Channe13 D 0 D DYes 0 No Channell D D 0 Archive Media:
Probe 3 Channel2 D D 0
. Channel3 D D 0 0 External Hard Drive ETProbe 1 Channell-2 0 0 0 ETProbe2 Channel3-4 D D 0 0 CD-ROM N/A N/A D D 0 DVD-ROM Analyst I SNT Level/ Date:
JesseR. Delgado I ill f 18 Nov. 2012 ..----:2[ 1\{\J_-
ISWTFORMNo. UTSO (Rev.l/11)
ID-6 SG A Outlet Nozzle to Safe-End (Away Towards)
Channel

:..:1 I Log to Lin: Ch 1 an

~-~
~ IO.Oin Sequence ~-*=~
Lay~ut RJ jMerged Data _:j
IHI Southwest Technologies, Inc.
Site/Plant : Point Beach Unit 2 IHI SOUTHWEST TECHNOLOGIES AUTOMATED ULTRASONIC EXAMINATION RECORD Weld Identification: RC-36-IvfR.CL-ATI-01A Pro/ReviCh!diCN: ISwT-PDI-AUT11/2/0/1 Weld
Description:
AS/GOut Noz-to-SE (180'-365') Device Configuration: 136-00045 Examination No.: ID-7 Project No.: 12-0301 Mod.Conf.: 138-00032 Scan Path Drawine: 134-00079 Exam Date Examination Time Surface Temperature °F Data Acquisition Operator (s) I SNT Level:
Jeremy Howe I II 18Nov. 2012 Start I End Start I End 1127 I 1209 94 I 94
, * .* '* ~ '*' ::*:.:/. /*Y '<,t .. ,.*.. y;.. J-'j i**/*~;-. _*_ .* :::.c** .
Ji', **.. ~: .. ~~ta,*~~<I~~~t~oJ1 >.t *:*.:. ~*-***. ,.,(:(:*,* *>' ' *. . ,.*. ~;' ::
'*' *, i . .
..... :* ',.:',,.,. '.':*'*:.o**> *.
Scan Controller Parameters Increment Axis Planned Actual Scan Axis Planned Actual Positional Parameters Controller: SG-NExT Lower Limit 70.75 70.75 Lower Limit 48.43 48.43 Beam Direction: Twd/Awy Scan: X Rotator Drive Upper Limit 80.35 80.35 Upper Limit 98.20 98.20 Probe Type: PA22-001 Increment: Y Axial Drive Inc. Interval (Resolution) 0.15 DC! (Scan Resolution) 0.10 Scanning Speed: 2.0 inches per second Mode: Automatic Scan Conversion Units Inches Conversion Units Inches Number of Scans: 65 Scan Motion: Bi-directional Radius In. 15.38" WeldC/1: 72.262" Correction: N/A Elevation/Nozzle C!I N/A Master Acquisition File: DM_Pipe_ID_90_AWY_270_TWD_Skew.acq Calibration Records: Examination Notes:
Probe Channel/Anele(s) Skew Scan Offset Step Offset Pipe Diameter- 30.83" 1-(60-88°1) + 69.92(in) - 1.52(in) Circumference- 96.86" Probe 1 90° 110002 Probe 2 2-(60-88°1) 270° + 59.22(in) - 2.90(in) 110002 Examination Remarks:
Probe 3 3-COOProfilometry) oo + O.OO(in) + O.OO(in) 110002 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A IU-:;* *,:r,:' . ;.;:~t:*
.* *.*. , ,:.: ; > ~*: \ ></:**.*
** '*c*.
{ ~** ':c.~ ,fL ~r-.~*:c*
. * :r*' :-:* , *.**.**~*
......:/? .* * -*. . *****_._,**<~*~~a~***- .:. ~2i~.*"~***' '*- ..c.~,'
,-, -*:.;i<*.i*:,<;.*****
.C' .r:~:_ .< i_* * <**. *. * ** *_. ** .;i..
>c ...*. * .

*"*
,() -***
Increment & Scan Positions Actual Recordable Indications Analyst Remarks Increment Position Scan Position Yes No N/A
Attachment:
ScanNo.(s)
Start Stop Start Stop Channell 0 0 0 l-65 70.75 80.35 48.43 98.20 Probe 1 Channel2 0 0 0 0 Yes 0 No Channel3 0 0 0 Further Evaluation Channell 0 0 0 Reqnired:
Probe2 Channel2 D 0 0 Channel3 D 0 D 0 Yes 0 No Channell D D 0 Archive Media:
Probe 3 Channel2 D 0 0 Channel3 D D 0 0 External Hard Drive ETProbe 1 Channell-2 0 0 0 ETProbe2 Channel3-4 0 0 0 0 CD-ROM N/A N/A 0 0 0 DVD-ROM Analyst I SNT Level I Date:
JesseR. Delgado I ID /18 Nov. 2012 ~
Jl' fvv ISWT FORM No. UT 50 (Rev. 1111)
ID-7 SG A Outlet Nozzle to Safe-End (Away Towards)
Channel jLogtoUn: Ch2~U 3 s~~~ ~*~~~~~~~~~;;~====~
I 3 Layout RJ l9 I :1oa SOft Gain (dB) I 20.5 I Hard Gain {dB) ro:o Global Gain[dBl I 2D.5
IHI southw***T*chnologies,lnc. AUTOMATED ULTRASONIC EXAMINATION RECORD IHI SOUTHWEST TECHNOLOGIES '
Site/Plant: PointBeachUnit2 Weldldentification: RC-36-MRCL-All-OlA Pro!Rev/ChW!CN: ISwT-PDI-AUTll/2/0/1 E . ti N xamma on o.:
ID - g Pro.iect No.: 12-0301 Weld
Description:
A S/G Out Noz-to-SE C00-125° Device Configuration: 136-00045 Mod.Conf.: 138-00032 Scan Path Drawing: 134-00079 Exam Date Examination Time *surface Temperature °F Data Acquisition Operator (s) I SNT Level: B w . ht In 18 N 20I2 Start I End Start I End ryan rig ov. 0524 I 0635 94 I 94
' . : ' . ; ,1 : ' , : ***** >*',,(** /, . . i.*'i'; ';,,,,,: .... ,<, .,;'*"< ,*', ',** .'* :.*.,** c, "i: *,*'*.*.* ' , .*,**>*.*** .' '
'.:~ J?~~~C<,IU~Ii;!O~ *~ ., ':. ,,
' ;1, , . , :**,*:***',. ,,
. *<*,, '.,' ,;,**.* ' '"*.' I ,* ',,'./,1 ,,' ** .** I ' I *.'* .* ,<:.,,'I '* .: . * ': ; . ', '* *..*. *. I. i . ' ,I , I * * ' .:.
Scan Controller Parameters Increment Axis Planned Actual Scan Axis Planned Actual Positional Parameters Controller: SG-NExT Lower Limit 71.56 71.56 Lower Limit 0.00 0.00 Beam Direction: Cw/Ccw Scan: XRotatorDrive UpperLimit 76.24 76.24 UpperLimit 33.63 33.63 ProbeType: PA22-00I Increment: Y Axial Drive Inc. Interval (Resolution) 0.05 DCI (Scan Resolution) 0.05 Scanning Speed: 1.5 inches per second Mode: Automatic Scan Conversion Units Inches Conversion Units Inches Number of Scans: 95 Scan Motion: Bi-directional Radius In. I5.38" Weld C/L: 72.262" Correction: N/A Elevation/Nozzle C/I N/A Master Acquisition File: DM_Pipe_ID_O_CW_180_CCW_Skew.acq Calibration Records* I::E~xa=::m:::in:::a:::ti""on::..:.:Nc=:ot=:e::::s:'":-::---------------
Probe Channei/Angle{s) Skew Scan Offset Step Offset ' Pipe Diameter= 30.83" Probe 1 l-(60-88<>L) oo + 27.57(in) - 2.2l(in) 110005 rC:..oir'""cum=fi'""er""en=c:.;:.e_=-'-9""'6.:.;:.86.:..'_'- - - - - - - - - - - - -
Probe 2 2-(60-88°L) I80° + 37.0l(in) - 2.2I(in) 110001 1:-:E:---.:---:-,---:-R,-----:ks--------------
xammation emar :
NIA NIA NIA NIA NIA NIA ET Probe 1 I-2 +22.5o + 5.35(in) + 0 OO(in) ET03-PTB-02 ET Probe 2 3-4 -22.5° - 5.35(in) .
l*:c,,' >:,' ,;','::::. ,"' .', ',, <,*;:;,:/,' ', ' <.: ', ,' ,.'!:' ' * ':' '. ~ ~;:,* '.:i,.*;*:*:' '*' :,!:*:
, ~. :_ ;,,~~~ta~lys~' .:~ >.' ..*...'. *:c ;.*.**. : ..* .*.*,*. * *
,i : ,* ,'* ,* ';*,* J.' : .. 'I ' I I '*' I' I . I' ': ' ' *,:;, ,, :- i, i, :' . ' .. ' ,I: .* **.' *** ' ,: *,,i' r" *. .* ***.... ,* :. *, *:*<:<.<; .* , .:;:**,****.:, . \ ,<, '**.****) **. *...*.* * *:. ,,
Increment & Scan Positions Actual Recordable Indications Analyst Remarks ScanNo.(s) IncrementPosition ScanPosition Yes No NIA
Attachment:
Start Stop Start Stop Channel I 0 0 0 I- 95 71.56 76.24 0.00 33.63 Probe 1 Channel2 D 0 0 D Yes 0 No Channel 3 D 0 0 Further Evaluation Channell D 0 0 Required:
Probe 2 Channel 2 0 0 D
!-----1-----+----+----1-----1 Channel3 0 0 0 0 Yes 0 No Channel 1 0 0 0 Archive Media:
Probe 3 Channel 2 0 0 0
!-------1-----+----t-----l-----i Channel3 D D 0 0 External H a r d D r i v e i - - - - - - - - - - - - -
ETProbe I Channeli-2 0 0 0 ET Probe 2 Channel 3-4 0 0 0 0 CD-ROM N/A N/A 0 0 0 DVD-ROM Analyst I SNT Level I Date:
JesseR. Delgado/ ill/18 Nov. 2012 4-1\J__
ISWTFORMNo. UTSO (Rev.llll)
ID-8 SG A Outlet Nozzle to Safe-End (Cw CCW)
Channel
\Logtolin:CH1 3 Sequence ~
1 -2:..1 Layout RJ l9
~~of I -
!' 1 IT~
I L:
I -1o~
Soft Gain (dB)
HardG<!in(dB)
GIOOal Gain {dB) \ 20.5
llllSOUTffWESTTECHNOLOGffiS Site/Plant :
IHI S:outh"o~ftT~~:chnologlu,.ln<.
Point Beach Unit 2 AUTOMATEDEDDYCURRENTEXANITNATIONRECORD Weld Identification: RC-36-MRCL-AII-OlA Pro!Rev/Che!ICN: rswr-AET312/oto Examination No.: ID-8 Project No.: 12-0301 Weld
Description:
lAS/GOut Noz-to-SE (0"-125") Device Confi2uration: 136-00045 Mod.Conf.: 138-00032 Scan Path Drawine: 134-00079 Exam Date Examination Time Surface Temperature °F Data Acquisition Operator (s) I SNT Level: David R. Kleinjan I II 18-Nov-12 Start I End Start I End 0524 I 0736 94 J 94 Data Acquisition Scan Controller Parameters Increment Axis Planned Actual ScanA:xis Planned Actual Positional Parameters Controller: SO-NExT Lower Limit 71.56 71.56 Lower Limit 0.00 0.00 Beam Direction: Cw/C=
Scan: X Rotator Drive UIJI>ef Limit 76.24 76.25 Upper Limit 33.63 33.63 ET Probe Size: 24 (in)
Increment Y Axial Drive Increment Interval 0.05 Resolution 0.20 Scanning Speed 1.5 inches per second Mode: Automatic Scan Conversion Units Inches Convemon Units Inches Number of Scans: 95 Scan Motion: Bi-directional Radius ln. 15.38" WeldCIL 72.262" Correction: N/A Elevation/Nozzle CIL N/A Module Parameters: Calibration Records: Examination Notes:
Status Channel(s) Skew Scan Offset Step Offset Pipe diameter- 30.83" Probe 1 On 1-2 +22.5" +5.35 (in) -2.21Jjn._l ET-03-PTB-002 Circumference- 96.86" Probe2 On 3-4 -22.5° -5.35 (in) -2.21 (in.) ET-03-PTB-002 Examination Remarks:
E;TID8 71.56-74.07 ETID8 72-76.24 Data Analysis Increment & Scan Positions Actual Recordable Indications Analyst Remarks Increment Position Scan Position Yes No N/A Attachment EXAMINATION C SCAN FOR ALL 4 CHANNELS ScanNo.(s)
Start Stop Start Stop Probe 1 Channel1 0 0 0 0Yes [No 1-95 71.56 76.24 0.00 33.63 Channel2 0 0 0 Further Evaluation Required:
Probe 2 Channel 3 0 0 0 Channel4 0 0 0 DYes 0-l"o Probe 3 Channel 5 0 0 0 Archive Media:
ChannelS 0 0 0 0 External Hard Drive Pr be 4 Channel7 0 0 0 0 CD-ROM
° Channel8 Rl DVD-ROM Analyst I SNT Level I Dat1 J: 4, 0 0 Reviewed By/Analyst I SNT Level /Signature:
WilliamAngell/ll %£~
. /I~Zt>-12---
David R. Klelnjan /ll
~
1
-~--* *- - I
Project No. 12-0301 EXAMINATION ET-ID-8 71.62-74.07 Date: 18 NOV 2012 Instrument S/N 131612 STATION 1 CALIBRATION SHEET: ET-03-PTB-001 C:\ADT ech\M ...\DATA\ D .'
IFile '"' *, ,
Demo AFT 5700 1
' Demo AFT 57002
Demo RFT 5800 1
' Demo AFT 5800 2
ETID10
ETIDBJ1S2_7407 X ETIDB 72-78
ETID9-
ETID_3
ETID_4
ETID_5
pbst2set2
pbst2set4.001
pbst2set4
' pbst2set4V1
~~-"'
1 X: 990 smpl. 61698 smpl. i Y:14t!fsmPG\54Smpl. I X: 19.79 in. 6 25.47. in. i
Project No. 12-0301 EXAMINATION ET-10-8 72-76 Date: 18 NOV 2012 Instrument S/N 131612 STATION 1 CALIBRATION SHEET: ET-03-PTB-001
- - - .- - - - - -
1 P2CH3 30K if Setup jlmpect. Analysis) ! - M5.oov C:\RDTech\M... \DATA\ CJ 1'---*-
File
Demo RFT 5700 1
' Demo RFT 5700 2
Demo RFT 5800 1
DemoRFT 58002
' ETID10
ETID8_7162_7407
' ETID8_72-76
ETIDS
ETID_3
' ETID_4
' ETID_5
' pbsl2set2
' pbst2set4.001
' pbst2set4
'" pbst2set4V1
,..,.,,..,.,f"'ooo_ .....
Start Next
~*-*~*---*------****------*-!
':._~ -217346~!!!P'- lJ ~J62 sm~.! *.Y:50830 Sll}pLll.~-~-S}!!PL~)t -4346.95 in. lJ21.62 !r!:_l
IHI Southwest Technologies, Inc.
Site/Plant : Point Beach Unit 2 IHI SOUTHWEST TECHNOLOGIES AUTOMATED ULTRASONIC EXAMINATION RECORD Weld Identification: RC-36-MRCL-AII-0 !A Pro/Rev/Cbg!J:CN: ISwT-PDI-AUTll/2/0/1 Examination No.: ID-9 Pro.iectNo.: 12-0301 Weld
Description:
AS/GOut Noz-to-SE (120°*245°) Device Configuration: 136-00045 Mod.Conf.: 138-00032 Scan Path Drawinl!;: 134-00079 Exam Date Examination Time Surface Temperature °F Data Acquisition Operator (s) I SNT Level:
Bryan Wright Ill 18Nov. 2012 Start I End Start I End 0750 I 0835 94 I 94
1
',~.:.: :':1:!, ,;;)
,,<.;( *,,* ,;J I : 
\
I > ;:~.,
_])~~"' ~C~~tll$m 0~***
'1 .
' 1 ;':,'
I
(,
\ 1
1 .
J 1
'.\
i
,1 '
1
)
1 1
'* .i'***
'i 1 Scan Controller Parameters Increment Axis Planned Actual Scan Axis Planned Actual Positional Parameters
,Controller: SG-NExT Lower Limit 71.56 71.56 Lower Limit 32.29 32.29 Beam Direction: Cw/Ccw Scan: X Rotator Drive Upper Limit 76.24 76.24 Upper Limit 65.92 65.92 Probe Type: PA22-00I Increment: Y Axial Drive Inc. Interval (Resolution) 0.05 DCI (Scan Resolution) 0.05 Scanning Speed: 1.5 inches per second Mode: Automatic Scan Conversion Units Inches Conversion Units Inches Number of Scans: 95 Scan Motion: Bi-directional Radius In. 15.38" We1dC/L: 72.262" Correction: NIA Elevation/Nozzle CII NIA Master Acquisition File: DM_Pipe_ID_O_CW_l80_CCW_Skew.acq Examination Notes:
Calibration Records:
Probe Cbannel/Angle(s) Skew Scan Offset Step Offset Pipe Diameter- 30.83" oo Circumference- 96.86" Probe 1 1-(60-88°L) + 27.57(in) - 2.21(in) 110005 Probe 2 2-(60-88°L) 180° + 37.01(in) - 2.21(in) 110001 Examination Remarks:
NIA NIA N/A NIA N/A N/A ETProbe 1 1-2 +22.5° + 5.35(in)
+ O.OO(in) ET03-PTB-02 ETProbe2 3-4 -22.5° - 5.35(in)
ic .

i:: *..',..,,.*yr<,. ** .* //,..**.,, ,..*...' ,' *'~' >.,/ . ; * (*f:' ****** * *** ;':!: **,. '. . ,. .'ri't':iUrt
. .',iJ a a a ysrs. ~~~~. .i. *.*.**.*.***. )1 .' .....*.
> ; .*' .. *' . ':i .<
. . . , ,_:,:~, } .... * :;.*) . . .:...
. .. *, ...:,.\
.,i * '..'::_:,*~ * I'* *,' "<.'>,:, : li; ,I ,*,* 1 *,:**
Increment & Scan Positions Actual Recordable Indications Analyst Remarks Increment Position Scan Position Yes No NIA
Attachment:
ScanNo.(s)
Start Stop Start Stop Channell 0 0 0 1-95 71.56 76.24 32.29 65.92 Probe 1 Channel2 0 0 0 0 Yes 0 No Channel3 0 0 0 Further Evaluation Channell 0 0 0 Required:
Probe 2 Channel2 0 0 0 Channel3 0 0 0 0 Yes 0 No Channell 0 0 0 Archive Media:
Probe 3 Channe12 0 0 0 Channel3 0 0 0 0 External Hard Drive ETProbe 1 Channell-2 0 0 0 ETProbe2 Channel 3-4 0 0 0 0 CD-ROM NIA N/A 0 0 0 DVD-ROM Analyst I SNT Level/ Date:
JesseR. Delgado I ill /18 Nov. 201~' _(\
lSWTFORMNo. UTSO (Rev.l/11)
ID-9 SG A Outlet Nozzle to Safe-End (Cw CCW)
File Overlay Pane Layouts Proc-.,ssing Tools '1-Vindow 'olew Help
~lliill~l ~lslrnl _!J i-~ ~~!j
ml~l~li!iiil~l~l1niGJI~I*"~i:t::lrs:/~lfmliDI)1~Qj~Jr$ll~l~lml i i 1.-i '-ltll~i.
~\IJI~Iii~!JJI ~~J;:fi!illiillfii~lm! ill M !:J~tM!ro-1~! ~~ -- .
'--* -*- f.,;il;;i,, ... .__ , .... , ,_,,_ -"***-* ,_,,_ ..... ___ ..... -"' '
Channel Sequence
!Sf Son Gain (dB} I 20.S I Hard Gain [dB} fM Global Gain [dB) ] 20.5 .
Site/Plant :
IHI Sovth-~tTechnoloSIIO. tnc.
Point Beach Unit 2 llllSOUTHWESTTECBNOLOGffiS AUTOMATED EDDY CURRENT EXAMINATION RECORD Weld Identification: RC-36-MRCL-AII-QlA Pro/Rev/chg/ICN: JBWT-AKr312/0/0 Examination No.: ID-9 Project No.: 12-0301 Weld
Description:
lAS/GOut Noz-to-SE (120"-245°) Device Confi~ration: 136-00045 Mod.Conf.: 138-00032 Scan Path Drawine: 134-00079 Exam Date Examination Time Surface Temperature °F Data Acquisition Operator (s) I SNT Level: David R. Klein] an f ll 18-Nov-12 Start I End Start I End 0750 I 0835 94 i 94 Data Acquisition Scan Controller Parameters Increment Axis Planned Actual Scan Axis Planned Actual Positional Parameters Controller: SG-NExT Lower Limit 71.56 71.56 Lower Limit 32.29 32.29 Beam Direction: Cw/C~
Scan: X Rotator Drive Upper Limit 76.24 76.24 Upper Limit 65.92 65.92 [BT Probe Size: .24 (in)
Increment Y Axial Drive Increment Interval 0.05 Resolution 0.20 Scanning Speed 1.5 inches per second Mode: Automatic Scan Conversion Units Inches Conversion Units Inches Number of Scans: 95 Scan Motion; Bi-directional Radius In. 15.38" WeldC/L 72.262" Correction: N/A EICMU:ion/Nozzle C/L N/A Module Parameters: Calibration Records: Examination Notes:
Status Channel(s) Skew Sean Offset Step Offset Pipe diameter- 30.83" Probe 1 On 1-2 +22.SO +5.35 (in) -2.2lfin.S ET-Q3-PTB-002 Circumference= 96.86" Probe2 On 3-4 -22.5° -5.35 (in) -2.21 (in.) ET-03-PTB-002 Examination Remarks:
Data Analysis Increment & Scan Positions Actual Recordable Indications Analyst Remarks Increment Position Scan Position Yes No NIA Attachment EXAMINATION C SCAN FOR ALL 4 CHANNELS ScanNo.(s)
Start Stop Start Stop Probe 1 Channel 1 0 0 0 0Yes [No 1-95 71.56 76.24 32.29 65.92 Channel2 0 0 0 Further Evaluation Required:
Probe 2 Channel 3 0 0 0 Channel4 0 0 0 DYes RN'o Probe 3 Channel 5 0 0 0 Archive Media:
ChannelS 0 0 0 0 External Hard Drive Pr be 4 Channel 7 0 0 0 0 CD-ROM
° Channel6 0 0 0 DVD-ROM Analyst I SNT Level I Date: Reviewed By/Analyst I SNT Level /Signature: ~
David R. Kleinjan Ill
,#://d. ~ / $,4b-YP/2--- WilliamAngelllll ~~~
Project No. 12-0301 EXAMINATION ET-ID-9 Date: 18 NOV2012 Instrument SIN 131612 STATION 1 CALIBRATION SHEET: ET-03-PTB-001 Setup llnspecl Analysi~ j C:\RDTech\M: .*\DATA\ D 1 I Rie
Demo AFT 58002
' ETID10
ETID8 71S2 7407 X ETID8)2-7S X ETID9 X ETID_3 X ETID_4 X ETID_5
pbst2set2 x pbst2set4.001
pbst2set4
pbst2set4V1
' recms5800 932171
" swri dlock wha
tesMD3 X: -~356.66 in.IJ._ 43.24 in. i X: -33~6J~Jn. tJ 11:62l!!:_l_!!!_tl -- i-~_Enc2 -=-_!
IHI Southwest Technologies, Inc.
Site/Plant : Point Beach Unit 2 ffii SOUTHWEST TECHNOLOGIES AUTOMATED ULTRASONIC EXAMINATION RECORD Weld Identification: RC-36-MRCL-All-0 IA Pro/Rev/Chg}ICN: ISwT-PDI-AUTll/2/0/1 Examination No.: ID-10 Pro,iect No.: 12-0301 Weld
Description:
AS/GOut Noz-to-SE (240'-365') Device Confi~uration: 136-00045 Mod.Conf.: 138-00032 Scan Path Drawin~: 134-00079 Exam Date Examination Time Surface Temperature °F Data Acquisition Operator (s) I SNT Level:
Bryan Wright I II 18Nov. 2012 Start I End Start I End 0845 I 0929 94 1 94
. .*.* .. *,. ; '.',!; r ., , '** , *' . ..r: ,\, > .* . * : !.' : ';:'_', *.*. \ 'j). !!ta'\{'cq~I
*.. ' ***, . ~ti'_on.*, *:'* : i
~ . ,_: ' ~.*._.,.,. t.:. ~: ,
', .'. ' :* ! . ~. ' :,
I ' ,[ ' ,:. ~* ' : ,: ' ! ' / ) ,' ',*: **. '*'*'-**** ,, ' ' '*' *' *,
I
,:* ' < C':: . : :'
I Scan Controller Parameters Increment Axis Planned Actual Scan Axis Planned Actual Positional Parameters Controller: SG-NExT Lower Limit 71.56 71.56 Lower Limit 64.57 64.57 Beam Direction: CwiCcw Scan: X Rotator Drive Upper Limit 76.24 76.24 Upper Limit 98.20 98.20 Probe Type: PA22-001 Increment: Y Axial Drive Inc. Interval (Resolution) 0.05 DCI (Scan Resolution) 0.05 Scanning Speed: 1.5 inches per second Mode: Automatic Scan Conversion Units Inches Conversion Units Inches Number of Scans: 95 Scan Motion: Bi-directional Radius ln. 15.38" WeldCIL: 72.262" Correction: NIA Elevation/Nozzle CII NIA Master Acquisition File: DM_Pipe_ID_O_CW_l80_CCW_Skew.acq Examination Notes:
Calibration Records:
Probe Channel/Angle(s) Skew Scan Offset Step Offset Pipe Diameter- 30.83" Probe 1 1-(60-88°L) oo + 27.57(in) - 2.21(in) 110005 Circumference- 96.86" Probe 2 2-(60-88°L) 180° + 37.01(in) - 2.21(in) 110001 Examination Remarks:
NIA NIA NIA NIA NIA NIA ETProbe 1 1-2 +22.5° + 5.35(in)
+ O.OO(in) ET03-PTB-02 ETProbe2 3-4 -22.SO - 5.35(in) 1 .. * 'i:(*i.',,*. i,* .i' c,*:.:.c;,:.,:::"** :>
, , .*,, *:******.*.' '*::D*ili.Aiif':s******'*'
' , ..1l,.,.,n.Y,si.. :*. :..:. * :c':'*'*,<< .*. ,. >*,.:,* ..~**:, ,,,, ':*,'i*, * * .**** *\.' .\
Increment & Scan Positions Actual Recordable Indications Analyst Remarks Increment Position Scan Position Yes No NIA
Attachment:
Scan No.(s)
Start Stop Start Stop_ Channell 0 0 0 1-95 71.56 76.24 64.57 98.20 Probe 1 Channel2 0 0 0 0 Yes 0 No Channe13 0 0 0 Further Evaluation Channell 0 0 0 Required:
Probe 2 Channel2 0 [J] 0 Channel3 0 0 0 0 Yes 0 No Channell 0 0 0 Archive Media:
Probe 3 Channel2 0 0 0 Channel3 0 0 0 0 External Hard Drive ETProbe 1 Channell-2 0 0 0 ETProbe2 Channel 3-4 0 0 0 0 CD-ROM N/A NIA 0 0 0 DVD-ROM Analyst I SNT Level/ Date:
Richard A. Riddles I ill I 18 Nov. 2012
~0~ ---------****-
ISWT FORM No. UT 50 (Rev. 1/11)
ID-10 SG A Outlet Nozzle to Safe-End {Cw CCW) c.. J ChanneI .::::J JLogtoUn:CH1 iJ1o.Oin Sequence ~
I J Layout ~
l2o.51 Ha1d Gain (dB) ro.o Global Gain (dB) .J 20.5
Site/Plant :
IHI
$o\&ttnrl'ut:T*d\~low:l***lne.
Point Beach Unit 2 llllSOUTffWESTTECHNOLOGffiS AUTOMATED EDDY CURRENT EXAMINATION RECORD Weld Identification: RC-36-MRCL*AII*01A Pro/ReviChi/ICN: ISWT-AET3121010 Examination No.: ID-10 Project No.: 12-0301 Weld
Description:
lA SIG Out Noz-to-SE (240°-365°) Device Configuration: 136-00045 Mod.Conf.: 138-00032 Scan Path Drawln11:: 134-00079 Exam Date Examination Time Surface Temperature °F Data Acquisition Operator (s) I SNT Level: David R. Kleinjan Ill L Start 1 End Start I End 18-Nov-12 I 0845 I 0929 94. I 94 Data Acquisition Scan Controller Parameters Increment Axis Planned Aetna! Scan Axis Planned Aetna! Positional Parameters Controller. SG-NExT Lower Limit 71.56 71.56 Lower Limit 64.57 64.52 Beam Direction: Cw/Ccw Scan: X Rotator Drive Upper Limit 76.24 76.24 Upper Limit 98.20 98.20 ET Probe Size: .24(in) 1 Increment Y Axial Drive Increment Interval 0.05 Resolution 0.20 Scanning Speed 1.5 inches per second Mode: Automatic Scan Conversion Units Inches Conversion Units Inches Number of Scans: 95 Scan Motion: Bi-directional Radius In. 15.38" WeldC/L 72.262" 1 Correction: NIA IE!evstion!Nozzle C!L N/AI Module Parameters: Calibration Records: Examination Notes:
Status Channel(s) Skew Scan Offset Step Offset Pipe diameter- 30.83" Probe 1 On 1-2 +22.5" +5.35 (in) -2.21 (in.} ET-03-PTB-002 Circumference - 96.86" Probe2 On 3-4 -22.5° -5.35 {in) -2.21 (in.) ET-03-PTB-002 Examination Remarks:
Data Analysis ...
Increment & Scan Positions Actual Recordable Indications Analyst Remarks Increment Position Scan Position Yes No NIA
Attachment:
EXAMINATION C SCAN FOR ALL 4 CHANNELS ScanNo.(s)
Start Stop_ Start Stop Probe 1 Channel1 0 0 0 0Yes rno 1-95 71.56 76.24 64.57 98.20 Channel2 0 0 0 Further Evaluation Required:
Probe 2 Channel 3 0 0 0 Channel4 0 0 0 (]Yes 12No Probe 3 Channel 5 D 0 0 Archive Media:
ChannelS 0 0 0 0 Extemsl Hard Drive Probe 4 Channel? 0 0 0 0 CD-ROM Channel a 0 0 0 DVD-ROM Analyst/SNTLeveliDateJ k~
DavidR.Kleinjan!II 1
,.tt.._.-/
/, /~tflt?i.2J:;;~
ReviewedByiAnalyst/ SNTLevel/Signatnre:
WtlliamAngell/ll j$~A
~
Project No. 12-0301 EXAMINATION ET-ID-10 Date: 18 NOV2012 Instrument S/N 131612 STATION 1 CALIBRATION SHEET: ET-03-PTB-001 Setup jlnspect. Ana~sis j C:\ROTech\M.*.\DATA\ 0 1 1 File ,,
I '* ETID10 Demo AFT 5800 2 I
ETID8_7162_7407 I
ETID8_72*76
ETID9
ETID_3 I ' ETID 4 I
ETID-5 i
pbst&t2 I ' pbst2set4.001 I ' pbst2set4
.' pbst2set4V1
recms5800 932171 I " swri dlock wha 1,: ~, . . .. I
- -~t:t~~~-Nex~ \
\___}<: -36~4 .1 0 in. l\ 4~1.4.1~. Y: 1727.51 in. l\ 34~60 in, : X: -3684.10 in. l\ 21.62 in. i E~c1- ~--Er!Ci=]
IHI Southwest Technologies Examination Summary Record Identification: RC-36-MRCL-BII-01A xam Method Proc/Rev/Ch /ICN Examination No. NRI Other Remarks AUT ISwT-POI-AUT11/2/0/1 UT Probe 1 (60-88') 16-17 X UT TWO & AWY Exam AUT ISwT-POI-AUT11/2/0/1 UT Probe 2 (60-88') 16-17 X UT TWO & AWY Exam AUT ISwT-POI-AUT11/2/0/1 UT Probe 1 (60-88') 18-20 X UT CW & CCW Exam AUT ISwT-POI-AUT11/2/0/1 UT Probe 2 (60-88') 18-20 X UT CW & CCW Exam AET ISwT-POI-AET3/2/0/0 ET Probe 1 ET03-PTB-001 18-20 X Eddy Current Exam AET ISwT-POI-AET3/2/0/0 ETProbe2 ET03-PTB-001 18-20 X Eddy Current Exam Examination Summary:
This weld was examined from the inside surface using SG-NExT, T-Ill, & MS5800 examination equipment.
The examination coverage was 100%.
Reviewed By:
//-2 )..-11... Date:
IHI Southwest Technologies, Inc.
Site/Plant : Point Beach Unit 2 ffii SOUTHWEST TECHNOLOGIES AUTOMATED ULTRASONIC EXAMINATION RECORD Weld Identification: RC-36-MRCL-Bll-OlA Pro/Rev/Chg/ICN: ISwT-PDI-AUT11/2/0/1 Examination No.: ID-16 Project No.: 12-0301 Weld
Description:
B S/GOutNoz-to-SE(0°-l85° Device Configuration: 136-00045 Mod.Conf.: 138-00032 Scan Path Drawing: 134-00079 Exam Date Examination Time Surface Temperature °F Data Acquisition Operator (s) I SNT Level:
Jeremy Howe I II 18Nov. 2012 Start I End Start I End 1206 I 1258 94 I 94
.*... >* \,/,**'*:
,,,-,'/.. **:; ,,
. t. '. i',.J?a~;_Acq~isiti~{ .*.;*.',c** .*. /:!'*./.' >****.,,'.' ....... ******,*.,i.* . *"** * * * * .. _.* .* . .*.******* .*. . i .* *.*... * ...*..**..**.**...*
Scan Controller Parameters Increment Axis Planned Actual Scan Axis Planned Actual Positional Parameters Controller: SG-NExT Lower Limit 70.75 70.75 Lower Limit 0.00 0.00 Beam Direction: Twd!Awy Scan: X Rotator Drive Upper Limit 80.35 80.35 Upper Limit 49.77 49.77 Probe Type: PA22-001 Increment: Y Axial Drive Inc. Interval (Resolution) 0.15 DCI (Scan Resolution) 0.10 Scanning Speed: 2.0 inches per second Mode: Automatic Scan Conversion Units Inches Conversion Units Inches Number of Scans: 65 Scan Motion: Bi-directional Radius In. 15.38" WeldCtL: 72.262" Correction: N/A Elevation/Nozzle C!l NIA Master Acquisition File; DM_Pipe_ID_90_AWY_270_TWD_Skew.acq Calibration Records: Examination Notes: '
Probe Channei/Angle(s) Skew Scan Offset Step Offset Pipe Diameter- 30.83" i Circumference- 96.86" Probe 1 l-(60-88°L) 90° + 69.92(in) - 1.52(in) 110004 Probe2 2-(60-88°L) 270° + 59.22(in) - 2.90(in) 110004 Examination Remarks:
Probe 3 3-(0°Prof:tlometry) oo + O.OO(in) + O.OO(in) 110004 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A I,*> . : *>..<*'.,'**
* . ,.,. *.***.'.* *.> : ..** ********.>(.j . ,, <*
> ~','( ....**.o.***, . *-.***..*.*. *.,. :.*.*. r . '* ..;*
D~1:a., ~alysis
' .,* '- .. _, .---"**'. . ' .' *.: :~:: *,:: - ***** ' ), **: . .\:.*' .***
' i Increment & Scan Positions Actual Recordable Indications Analyst Remarks Increment Position Scan Position Yes No N!A
Attachment:
ScanNo.(s)
Start Stop Start Stop Channell 0 0 0 1-65 70.75 80.35 0.00 49,77 Probe 1 Channel2 0 0 0 0 Yes 0 No Channel3 0 0 0 Further Evaluation Channell 0 0 0 Required:
Probe 2 Channel2 0 0 []
Channel3 0 0 0 0 Yes 0 No Channell 0 0 0 Archive Media:
Probe 3 Channel2 0 0 0 Channel3 0 D 0 0 External Hard Drive ET Probe 1 Channell-2 D D 0 ETProbe2 Channel3-4 D 0 0 0 CD-ROM N/A N/A D D 0 DVD-ROM Analyst I SNT Level/ Date; Richard A. Riddles I ill /18 Nov. 2012
~o_\2~~ -
ISWT FORM No. UT 50 (Rev. Vll)
IHI Southwest Technologies, Inc.
Site/Plant : Point Beach Unit 2 AUTOMATED ULTRASONIC EXAMINATION RECORD liD SOUTHWEST TECHNOLOGIES Weld Identification: RC-36-MRCL-BII-0 !A Pro/Revlch.21icN: ISwT-PDI-AUTll/2/0/1 Examination No.: ID-17 Project No.: 12-0301 Weld
Description:
B S/GOutNoz-to..SE (180'-365') Device Confie:uration: 136-00045 IMod.Conf.: 138-00032 Scan Path Drawine:: 134-00079 Exam Date Examination Time Surface Temperature °F Data Acquisition Operator (s) I SNT Level:
Jeremy Howe I II 18 Nov. 2012 Start I End Start I End 1302 I 1356 94 I 94 1{ -.
I*:* **..:. ,:
<>'*:. _._. *: ~,~-.. .. .. *.-*_ .* .-*...**. *.-...*-. ..
,.;,: \ ... o:':-, *. *' , .
r. <,:, _. . *.-. ...,,..- i '. * *,-::*. *. *. *
__:*; .nafu:Ac}riisitid~*, *. * -, ',-* ,*, ._,*:. .. . * --** -*-* *. ..:
'* ....,. ******* ,q, .:. '* .:... * ,.. :*.**. i** -.**.. .- *. . *.
i *' *_, :
_t;: *. ****** *-*--.!***--.* * -* ....- __
i. ....,.:e, .. :-,-.:_,_ , - r:** . : **:: ,*.,*....
Scan Controller Parameters Increment Axis Planned Actual Scan Axis Planned Actual Positional Parameters Controller: SG-NExT Lower Limit 70.75 70.75 Lower Limit 48.43 48.43 Beam Direction: Twd/Awy Scan: X Rotator Drive Upper Limit 80.35 80.35 Upper Limit 98.20 98.20 Probe Type: PA22-00I Increment: Y Axial Drive Inc. Interval (Resolution) 0.15 DCI (Scan Resolution) 0.10 Scanning Speed: 2. 0 inches per second Mode: Automatic Scan Conversion Units Inches Conversion Units Inches Number of Scans: 65 Scan Motion: Bi-directional Radius In. 15.38" WeldC/L: 72.262" Correction: N/A Elevation/Nozzle C!I NIA Master Acquisition File: DM_Pipe_ID_90_AWY_270_TWD_Skew.acq Examination Notes:
Calibration Records:
Probe Channel /Ane:le(s) Skew Scan Offset Step Offset Pipe Diameter= 30.83" Circumference = 96.86" Probe I l-(60-88°L) 90° + 69.92(in) - 1.52(in) 110004 Probe2 2-(60-88°L) 270° + 59.22(in) - 2.90(in) 110004 Examination Remarks:
Probe 3 3-(0°Profilometry) oo + O.OO(in) + O.OO(in) 110004 NIA N/A N/A N/A NIA N/A I . : ,i*: . .* . ~- , f . ;- _, .<.* :t ...* '.
Increment & Scan Positions Actual
-_ . _.i 1*. -----.. -*r *- *. ,:..:'i":I>;.~~~i~his* , *:, .-* -.
Recordable Indications
._*-To : ,' -* , --x :_' ..
} :.. ':_:
Analyst Remarks Increment Position Scan Position Yes No N/A
Attachment:
Scan No.(s)
Start Stop Start Stoo Channell 0 0 0 1-65 70.75 80.35 48.43 98.20 Probe 1 Channel2 0 0 0 0 Yes 0 No Channel3 0 0 0 Further Evaluation Channell 0 0 0 Required:
Probe2 Channel2 -ri 0 n Channel3 0 0 0 0 Yes 0 No Channell 0 0 0 Archive Media:
Probe 3 Channel2 0 0 0 Channel3 0 0 0 0 External Hard Drive ETProbe 1 Channell-2 0 0 0 ETProbe2 Channel 3-4 0 0 0 0 CD-ROM N/A N/A 0 0 0 DVD-ROM
~()~
Analyst I SNT Level I Date:
Richard A. Riddles I ill 118 Nov. 2012 ISWTFORMNo. UTSD (Rev.l/11)
I HI southwestTechnologi**.lnc.
liD SOUTHWEST TECHNOLOGIES AUTOMATED ULTRASONIC EXAMINATION RECORD Site/Plant: PointBeachUnit2 Weldldentification: RC-36-MRCL-Bll-01A Pro/Rev/Ch!!IICN: ISwT-PDI-AUT11/2/0/1 Examma . tion No.: ID - l&
Project No.: 12-0301 Weld
Description:
B S/G Out Noz-to-SE (0°-125°) Device Conf12uration: 136-00045 Mod.Conf.: 138-00032 Scan Path Drawing: 134-00079 Exam Date Examination Time Surface Temperature °F Data Acquisition Operator (s) I SNT Level: B W . ht I II 18 N 2012 Start I End Start f End ryan ng ov. 0915 I 1014 94 I 94 1./. *,,,, . , :*;; : >\ ,c. !.' <: > ** .* *** ** * *. *. /' . :;,;:,,,, *** . . . *.~' . J?i~§~quiS.i~6~ ; .. : {
1 ,,*. 1 ' * ., '*, *** ** C. ., *. *. ***
i *... *...*. *.
Scan Controller Parameters Increment Axis Planned Actual Scan Axis Planned Actual Positional Parameters Controller: SG-NExT Lower Limit 71.56 71.56 Lower Limit 0.00 0.00 Beam Direction: Cw/Ccw Scan: XRotatorDrive UpperLimit 76.24 76.24 UpperLimit 33.63 33.63 ProbeType: PA22-001 Increment: Y Axial Drive Inc. Interval (Resolution) 0.05 DC! (Scan Resolution) 0.05 Scanning Speed: 1.5 inches per second Mode: Automatic Scan Conversion Units Inches Conversion Units Inches Number of Scans: 95 Scan Motion: Bi-directional Radius In. 15.38" Weld C/L: 72.262" Correction: N/A Elevation/Nozzle C/I N/A Master Acquisition File: DM_Pipe_ID_0_CW_180_CCW_Skew.acq Calibration Records: EE'7xa=mm:::::::*=a=ti:::.:on::..:..:N-=:ot::=e:::s:c:-::-_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __
Probe Channel/Angle(s) Skew Scan Offset Step Offset Pipe Diameter- 30.83" 6
Probe 1 1-(60-88°L) 0° + 27.57(in) - 2.21(in) 110003 pC:.::irc::cum=fi=ere~n~c::::.e_-..::.9::::*::::.86~"-------------
Probe 2 2-(60-88°L) 180° + 37.01(in) - 2.21(in) 110003 1-::E::---:-.--:-.--::R:------,ks:---------------
xammation emar :
N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A ET Probe 1 1-2 +22.5o + 5.35(~) + O.OO(in) ET03-PTB-01 ET Probe 2 3-4 -22.5° - 5.35(m)
.:. ;<*; .. : *':*({* . ..:,*':*.:>:*. '.*. :::*, :.'*'** . *,.>'*.*.... '*: '***.****',::*'.',.; *,. . , .*. *.,. ,',,( .
.*,. *:, .. *.*<: :,i** ,' :* .r :,**** '. .:* *,., ** : *. .., . . *, .,,J)lil_ta.~~lill~sis :: ,:.*.* I,.'!' . , ,, , ,, ~. ..*. ,, *., ,, : ,*., ,
Increment & Scan Positions Actual Recordable Indications Analyst Remarks ScanNo.(s)
IncrementPosition ScanPosition Yes No N/A
Attachment:
Start Stop Start Stop Channell 0 0 0 1-95 71.56 76.24 0.00 33.63 Probe 1 Channel2 0 0 0 0 Yes 0 No Channel 3 0 0 0 Further Evaluation Channel 1 0 0 0 Required:
Probe 2 Channel2 0 0 0
~----+-----+----+----1!------1 Channel3 0 0 0 0 Yes 0 No Channel 1 0 0 0 Archive Media:
Probe 3 Channel2 0 0 0 1-----+-----+----+----1!------1 Channel3 0 D 0 0 External Hard D r i v e l - - - - - - - - - - - - -
ET Probe 1 Channel1-2 0 0 0 ET Probe 2 Channel 3-4 0 0 0 0 CD-ROM N/A N/A 0 0 0 DVD-ROM Analyst I SNT Level/ Dat~:- -- Richard A. Riddles I ill /18 Nov. 2012--~-\ _ _'. ' ~\.~- -
ISWT FORM No. UT 50 (Rev. 1/11)
ID-16 SG B Outlet Nozzle to Safe-End (Away Towards)
ID-17 SG B Outlet Nozzle to Safe-End (Away Towards)
ID-18 SG B Outlet *Nozzle to Safe-End (Cw CCW)
ID-19 SG B Outlet Nozzle to Safe-End {Cw CCW)
ID-20 SG B Outlet Nozzle to Safe-End (Cw CCW) 0.00 in Index}
0:00 in St:t Enco&1~J
llllSOUTHWESTTECHNOLOGffiS Site/Plant :
IHI SO<Ithw*A T..:hqefOfl~, In<,
Point Beach Unit2 AUTOMATEDEDDYCURRENTEXAN.ITNATIONRECORD Weld Identification: RC-36-MRCL-BII-0 1A ProiRev/Ch!!iiCN: ISWT-AET3J2/0/0 Examination No.: ID-18 Project No.: 12-0301 Weld Descrintion: IB S/G Out Noz-to-SE (0"-125") Device Confu!uration: 136-00045 Mod.Conf.: 138-00032 Scan Path Drawine: 134-00079 Exam Date Examination Time Surface Temneratnre °F Data Acquisition Operator (s) I SNT Level: David R.. Klelnjan I II 18-Nov-12 Start J End Start I End 0915 ! 1014 94 I 94 Data Acquisition Scan Controller Parameten Increment Axis Planned Aetna! Scan Axis Planned Actual Positional Parameten Controller: SG-NEx.T Lower Limit 71.56 71.56 Lower Limit 0.00 0.00 Beam Direction: Cw/Ccw Scan: X Rotator Drive UoocrLimit 76.24 76.24 umJerLimit 33.63 33.63 ET Probe Size: .24 (in)
Increment: Y Axial Drive Increment Interval 0.05 ,Resolution 0.20 Scanning Speed 15 inches per second Mode: Automatic Scan Conversion Units Inches Conversion Units Inches Number of Scans: 95 I Scan Motion: Bi-directional Radius ln. 15.38" WeldCIL 72.262" Correction: N/A Elevation/Nozzle CIL NIA Module Parameten: Calibration Records: Examination Notes:
Status Channel(s) Skew Scan Offset Step Offset Pipe diamct:er=30.83" Probe 1 On 1-2 +22.50 +5.35 (in) -2.21 (in.) ET-03-PTB-001 Circmnference- 96.86" Probe2 On 3-4 -22.5" -5.35 (in) -2.21(in.) ET-03-PTB-001 Examination Remarks:
Data Analysis Increment & Scan Positions Actual Recordable Indications Analyst Remarks Increment Position Scan Position Yes No N/A
Attachment:
EXAMINATION C SCAN FOR ALL 4 CHANNELS .
ScanNo.(s)
Start Stop Start Stoll Probe 1 Channel 1 0 G 0 0Yes [No 1-95 71.56 76.24 0.00 33.63 Channel2 0 0 0 Further Evaluation Required:
Probe 2 Channel 3 0 G 0 Channel4 0 0 0 DYes EN'o Probe 3 Channel 5 0 0 G Archive Media:
Channel6 0 0 0 0 External Hard Drive Probe 4 Channel? 0 0 G 0 CD-ROM Analyst/ SNT Level/Date~.
David R.. Kleinjan I II t
ff~~.'------ /# /!Jt:J J '2~ /:z-Channel a 0 0 0 DVD-ROM Reviewed By/Analyst/ SNTLevel/Signature:
William Angell/ II //b ~
.//::/ .X/.
/-~-
. ---- "-*-- -/' / /
Project No. 12-0301 EXAMINATION ET-ID-18 Date: 18 NOV2012 Instrument S/N 131612 STATION 1 CALIBRATION SHEET: ET-03-PTB-001
' ETID13
' ETID 14
' ETID 15
ETD 20
' ETID18
.ETID19
' PBETDSMTEST4
PBETDSMTESTS
PBST1rALSET2
' PBST1rALSETl001 ,
' PBST1rALSET3
ST1 rAl. SETl
letletswn1
lellswli2
TESTSWRI3
IHI Southwest Technologies, Inc.
Site/Plant : Point Beach Unit 2 ffil SOUTHWEST TECHNOLOGIES AUTOMATED ULTRASONIC EXAMINATION RECORD Weld Identification: RC-36-MRCL-BII-01A Pro/ReviChg!ICN: ISwT-PDI-AUT11121011 i
Examination No.: ID-19 Pro.iect No.: 12-0301 Weld
Description:
B S/G Out Noz-to-SE (120'-245') Device Configuration: 136-00045 Mod.Conf.: 138-00032 Scan Path Drawing: 134-00079 Exam Date Examination Time Surface Temperature °F Data Acquisition Operator (s) I SNT Level:
Bryan Wright/IT 18Nov. 2012 Start I End Start I End 1024 I 1105 94 I 94
Da~~-Afqjiisitioh
' '-<,**.;.*:r_ ;.'* . / c":'):*.*:;*,'.* ****'*). Y* .*.*
,****:. ******/.> ' .; . ,:;:,.:cc ',\: . r.*_.,;*f{;. .. )> .{<: *.*CO,,,, *' *., ", ', *,' . ,.,):****c<
' ,,*,. , ,, ***. '.. ',;! :* * ..*.*." i i::':'i**'
c .* , i* *'******,,* J'.' ;.* -*** ' , ,' ,' / ! ' ,. ' !. *;*.< *.. .. .
Scan Controller Parameters Increment Axis Planned Actual Scan Axis Planned Actual Positional Parameters Controller: SG-NExT Lower Limit 71.56 71.56 Lower Limit 32.29 32.29 Beam Direction: CwiCcw Scan: X Rotator Drive Upper Limit 76.24 76.24 Upper Limit 65.92 65.92 Probe Type: PA22-001 Increment: Y Axial Drive Inc. Interval (Resolution) 0.05 DCI (Scan Resolution) 0.05 Scanning Speed: 1.5 inches per second Mode: Automatic Scan Conversion Units Inches Conversion Units Inches Number of Scans: 95 Scan Motion: Bi-directional Radins In. 15.38" WeldC/L: 72.262" Correction: NIA Elevation/Nozzle C/1 N/A Master Acquisition File: DM_Pipe_ID_O_CW_l80_CCW_Skew.acq Examination Notes:
Calibration Records:
Probe Channel IAngle(s) Skew Scan Offset Step Offset Pipe Diameter- 30.83" Probe 1 1-(60-88°L) oo + 27.57(in) - 2.2l(in) 110003 Circumference- 96.86" Probe2 2-(60-88°L) 180° + 37.01(in) - 2.21(in) 110003 Examination Remarks:
N/A N/A NIA NIA N/A N/A ETProbe 1 1-2 +22.5° + 5.35(in)
+ O.OO(in) ET03-PTB-Ol ETProbe2 3-4 -22.5° - 5.35(in)
' ,., :. *-',_:~
.1 *.*
.*)~ u::d\_.):;_*;,}:** .?it~, ',: .: . *: . _.~*. * ,*:>',*il.', '; ;.*' 1 I ' 'i * .* .*1. * *

I * " *.*.~.*.*
' .:.* * - J:1>ata:Anillysis
,' ,f :*- I_ *' ,, , ','* - ': * " " * ' ,: ; * - ~ :* .'~
i
~- -,1 '
I '
.*1 '11':'.* :
', *__t . ',' _' ' . ***.****. ******* *
' :_(,
,I I *
'*I:
~**.** *. -*-
I*
I**
I I I
'_i* * .
Increment & Scan Positions Actual Recordable Indications Analyst Remarks Increment Position Scan Position Yes No NIA
Attachment:
ScanNo.(s)
Start Stop Start Stop Channell 0 0 0 1-95 71.56 76.24 32.29 65.92 Probe 1 Channel2 0 0 0 0 Yes 0 No Channel3 0 0 0 Further Evaluation Channell 0 0 0 Required:
Probe2 Channel2 0 0 _[l Channel3 0 0 0 0 Yes 0 No Channell 0 0 0 Archive Media:
Probe 3 Channel2 0 0 0 Channel3 0 0 0 0 External Hard Drive ETProbe 1 Channel1-2 0 0 0 ETProbe2 Channel 3-4 0 0 0 0 CD-ROM N/A NIA 0 0 0 DVD-ROM Analyst I SNT Level I Date:
Richard A. Riddles I ill I 18 Nov. 2012
~ CJ,~ ------
ISWT FORM No. UT 50 (Rev.l/11)
Site/Plant :
IHI SouthwutT<<h"ologtd.,rnc.
Point Beach Unit 2 llllSOUTffWESTTECHNOLOGffiS AUTOMATED EDDY CURRENT EXAMINATION RECORD Weld Identification: RC-36-:MRCL-BII-01A Pro/Rev/Cii.21fCN: rswr-AETI/2/o/o Examination No.: ID-19 Project No.: 12-0301 Weld Descriotion: IB S/G Out Noz-to-SE (120°-245"\ Device Confie:uration: 136-00045 Mod.Conf.: 138-00032 Scan Path Drawin~: 134-00079 Exam Date Examination Time Surface Temperature "F Data Acquisition Operator (s) I SNT Level: David R.. Kleinjan Ill Start I End Start I End 18-Nov-12 1024 l 1105 94 l 94 Data Acquisition Scan Controller Parameters Increment Axis Planned Actual Scan Axis Planned Adual Positional Parameters Controller: SG-NExT Lower Limit 71.56 71.56 Lower Limit 32.29 32.29 Beam Direction: Cw/Ccw Scan: X Rotator Drive Upper Limit 76.24 76.24 Upper Limit 65.92 65.92 ET Probe Size: .24 (in)
Increment: Y Axial Drive Increment Interval 0.05 Resolution 020 Scanning Speed 1.5 inches per second Mode: Automatic Scan Conversion Units Inches Conversion Units Inches Number ofScaos: 95 Scan Motion: Bi-directional Radius ln. 15.38" WeldC!L 72.262" Correction: N/A Elevation/Nozzle C/L N/A Module Parameters: Calibration Records: Examination Notes:
Status Chanoel(s) Skew Scan Offset Step Offset Pipe diameter= 30.83" Probe I On 1-2 +22.5" +5.35{ilif -221(i:IL) ET-03-PTB-001 Circumference= 96.86" Probe2 On 3-4 -22.5° -5.35 (in) -2.21 (in.) ET-03-PTB-001 Examination Remarks:
Data Analysis*
Increment & Scan Positions Actual Recordable Indications Analyst Remarks Increment Position Scan Position Yes No N/A
Attachment:
~ATIONCSCANFORALL4~
ScaoNo.(s)
Start Stop Start Stop Probe 1 Channel1 0 0 0 0Yes CNo 1-95 71.56 7624 32.29 65.92 Channel2 0 0 0 Further Evaluation Required:
Probe 2 Channel 3 0 0 0 Channel4 0 0 0 DYes ~0 Probe 3 Channel 5 0 0 0 Archive Media:
ChannelS 0 0 0 0 External Hard Drive Probe 4 Channel 7 0 0 0 0 CD-ROM Channel8 0 0 0 DYD*ROM
~ ReviewedBy/Analyst/S~.d Analyst I SNT Level/ Date.:d.
David R. Kleinjan Ill
/2. ~
,., /AJFb,~
/~ AJd2 D/z_. William Angell I IT ~
--* ------ - -- .... /' -.,
Project No. 12-0301 EXAMINATION ET-ID-19 Date: 18 NOV2012 Instrument S/N 131612 STATION 1 CALIBRATION SHEET: ET-03-PTB-001 13
ETID14
ETID 15
' ETID 20
' ETJD18
ETID1S
PBETDSMTEST4
' PBETDSMTEST5
' PBST1 CALSET2
PBST1 CALSET3.001
PBST1 CALSET3
ST1CALSET1
IHI Southwest Technologies, Inc.
Site/Plant: Point Beach Unit2 IHI SOUTHWEST TECHNOLOGIES AUTOMATED ULTRASONIC EXAMINATION Weld Identification: RC-36-MRCL-Bll-01A CN:
RECORD ISwT-PDI-AUT11/2/0/1 Examination No.: ID-20 Pro.iect No.: 12-0301 Weld
Description:
136-00045 Mod.Conf.: 138-00032 IScan Path Drawin!!:: 134-00079 I Exam Date I Examination Time Surface Temperature °F Data Acquisition Operator (s) I SNT Level:
Bryan Wright I II I8 Nov. 20I2 Start I End Start I End m4 I 1153 94 I 94 Scan Controller Parameters Increment Axis Planned Actual Scan Axis Planned J Actual Positional Parameters Controller: SG-NExT Lower Limit 71.56 71.56 Lower Limit 64.57 I 64.57 Beam Direction: Cw/Ccw Scan: X Rotator Drive Upper Limit 76.24 76.24 Upper Limit 98.20 I 98.20 Probe Type: PA22-00I Increment Y Axial Drive Inc. Interval (Resolution) 0.05 DCI (Scan Resolution) 0.05 Scanning Speed: 1.5 inches per second Mode: Automatic Scan Conversion Units Inches Conversion Units Inches Nmnber of Scans: 95 Scan Motion: Bi-directional Radius In. 15.38" WeldCIL: 72.262" Correction: N/A Elevation/Nozzle Cil NIA Master Acquisition File: DM_Pipe_ID_O_CW_I80_CCW_Skew.acq Calibration Records: E_xami~ation Notes:
Probe ChanneiiAilg)e(s) Skew Scan Offset Ste Offset Pr e Dmmeter = 30.83" Circmnference = 96.86" Probe I I I-(60-88°L) I oo I + 27.57(in) - 2.2I(in) 110003 Probe 2 2-(60-8 8°L) I80° + 37.0I(in) - 2.2I(in) 110003
!Examination Remarks:
NIA N/A NIA N/A N/A NIA ETProbe I I ET Probe 2 I 1-2 3-4
+22.5°
-22.5° I
I
+ 5.35{in)
- 5.35(in)
+ O.OO(in) I ET03-PTB-Ol
. * ~~~ A.~~~~sls ***' .*
Increment & Scan Positions Actual Recordable Indications Analyst Remarks "lr .........
Scan No.(s) ~..,,
No N/A
Attachment:
cnannell 0 ---"'"0 0 I- 95 Probe I Channel2 0 0 0 0 Yes 0 No Channel3 0 0 0 Further Evaluation Channell 0 0 0 Required:
>>------t-----+-----+-----+-----1 Probe 2 Channel2 0 0 0 Channel3 0 0 0 0 Yes 0 No Channell 0 0 0 Archive Media:
11-----+-----+----+-----+-----t Probe 3 Channel2 0 0 ~
Channel3 0 0 0 0 External Hard Drive ET Probe 1 Channell-2 0 0 0 ETProbe2 NIA Channel 3-4 0 NIA 0 0
0 ~I 0
0 CD-ROM DVD-ROM Analyst I SNT Level I Date:
Richard A. Riddles I ill/ 18 Nov. 2012 ~ c\..~
ISWT FORM No. UT 50 (Rev. 1/11)
Site/Plant :
IHI
5o..ttr...utTit<htlol01iJI--..Inc.
Point Beach Unit 2 TIITSOUTHWESTTECHNOLOGffiS AUTOMATED EDDY CURRENT EXAMINATION RECORD Weld Identification: RC-36-MRCL-BII-01A Pro/ReviChg/ICN: lSWT-AET3/2IOIO Examination No.: ID-20 Project No.: 12-0301 Weld
Description:
IB SIG Out Noz-to-SE (240°-365°) Device Configuration: 136-00045 Mod.Conf.: 138-00032 Scan Path Drawing: 134-00079 Exam Date Examination Time Surface TemJleratnre "F Data Acquisition Operator (s) I SNT Level: David R. Kleinjan I II 18-Nov-12 Start I End Start I End 1114 I 1153 94 I 94 Data Acquisition Scan Controller Parameters Increment Axis Planned Actual Scan Axis Planned Actual Positional Parameters Controller: SG-NExT Lower Limit 71.56 71.56 Lower Limit 64.57 64.57 Beam Direction: CwiCcw Scan: X Rotator Drive Upper Limit 76.24 76.24 Upper Limit 98.20 98.20 ET Probe Size: .24 (in)
Increment y Axial Drive Increment Interval 0.05 Resolution 0.20 Scanning Speed l.S inches per second!
Mode: Automatic Scan Conversion Units Inches Conversion Units Inches Number of Scans: 95 Scan Motion: Bi-directional Radius ln. 15.38" WeldC/L 72.262"!
Correction: N/A Elevation/Nozzle CIL N/A Module Parameters: Calibration Records: Examination Notes:
Status Channel(s) Skew Scan Offset Step Offset Pipe diameter - 3 0.83" Probe 1 On 1-2 +22.5° +5.35 (in) -2.21(in.) ET-03-P'IB-001 Cir=ference- 96.86" Probe2 On 3-4 - 22.5" -5.35 (in) -2.21 (in.) ET-03-PTB-001 Examination Remarks:
Data Analysis Increment & Scan Positions Actual Recordable Indications Analyst Remarks Increment Position Scan Position Yes No NIA Attachment EXAMINATION C SCAN FOR ALL 4 CHANNELS ScanNo.(s)
Start Stotl Start Stop Probe 1 Channel 1 0 0 0 BYes [No 1-95 71.56 76.24 64.57 98.20 Channel2 0 0 0 Further Evaluation Required:
Probe 2 ChannelS 0 0 0 Channel4 0 0 0 DYes ~0 Probe 3 Channel 5 0 0 0 Archive Media:
ChannelS 0 0 0 0 External Hard Drive Probe 4 Channel 7 0 0 0 0 CD-ROM ChannelS 0 0 0 DVD-ROM Analyst/SNTLevei/Date: ) , ;2~ Reviewed By/Analyst I SNT Leve~ature:
David R. Klelnjan Ill
, ".r.-o ;
~ /J'~o-1l!-tl/Z- WilllamAngell/ll ~~ ...;?~
Project No. 12-0301 EXAMINATION ET-ID-20 Date: 18 NOV 2012 Instrument S/N 131612 STATION 1 CALIBRATION SHEET: ET-03-PTB-001
ETID 14
ETID 15
' ETID 20
ETID1B
ETID19
PBETDSMTEST 4
' PBETDSMTEST5 .
' PBST1CALSET2 [
PBST1CALSET3.00! I
' PBST1CAlSET3 .
' ST1CAI.SET1
'testetswril
'testswri2
' TESTSWAI3
Attachment 2 Exelon Powerlabs, LLC Report NEX-77991 Analysis of Archive Weld Samples (7 pages follow)
n Exelon PowerLabs, LLC Technical Services East www.exelonpowerlabs.com 800-971-LABS Power labs 175 North Cain Road 610-380-2532 fax Coatesville, P A 19320-2309 To: Steve Forsha, Point Beach From: Chris Reilly, (610)380-2432 chris.reilly@ExelonPowerLabs.com Project Number: NEX-77991
Subject:
Analysis of Archive Weld Sample Purchase Order No.: 02320872 Date: September 17,2013 Two archive weld samples for the Point Beach Unit 2 replacement steam generator nozzle dissimilar metal weld were submitted for chemical analysis of the fuconel ID bore overlay. The station requirement is that the weld contains 24% chromium, minimum.
Attachments 1 and 2 show the weld and overlay detail.
The fuconel overlay of both weld samples exhibited greater than 24 wt% chromium. The full chemical analysis is shown in Table I. The weld deposit chemistry is consistent with ERNiCrFe-7.
The Exelon PowerLabs Quality System meets 10CFR50 Appendix B, NQA-1 (1994), ANSI N45.2, ANSIINCSL Z540-1and 10CFR21/10CFR50.55 (e). Exelon PowerLabs is ISO 9001:2008 Registered and ISO/IEC 17025 Accredited.
1. Photograph as-received sample
2. Etch overlay side to display welds
3. Section as needed for OES of overlay Testing was performed with standard equipment that have accuracies traceable to nationally recognized standards, or to physical constants, by qualified personnel, and in accordance with the Exelon PowerLabs Quality Assurance Program.
Technician(s): Stephen Merjanian, (61 0)380-24 72, stephen.merjanian@ExelonPowerLabs.com Reviewed &
Approved by: Chris Reilly Sr. Engineer 09/17/2013 Project review and approval is electronically authenticated in Exelon PowerLabs project record cc:
Exelon PowerLabs, LLC Project Number: NEX-77991 Page 2 of7
Figure 1: As-received Weld Samples The samples were labeled A and B in the lab for identification. The star in each photograph indicates the approximate location of the chemical analysis.
Exelon PowerLabs, LLC Project Number: NEX-77991 Page 3 of7
Figure 2: Macroetch of Weld Samples Both samples were prepared and etched to highlight the Inconel overlay. The dissimilar metal weld joining the nozzle and safe end are also visible.
Exelon Power Labs, LLC Project Number: NEX-77991 Page 4 of7
Table 1: Chemical Analysis by Optical Emission Spectrometer (weight percentag e)
Element Sample A SampleB c 0.02 0.02 Mn 0.29 0.29 Fe 10.6 10.0 p <0.01 <0.01 s <0.01 <0.01 Si 0.18 0.19 Cu 0.01 0.01 Ni 57.9 58.3 Co 0.02 0.02 Al 0.60 0.62 Ti 0.51 0.54 Cr 29.4 29.6 Nb+Ta 0.09 0.10 Mo 0.02 0.02 Al+Ti 1.1 1.2 Other, Total 0.36 0.29 Exelon PowerLabs, LLC Project Number: NEX-77991 Page 5 of7
Attachment 1 c
&TEP 1 E!!~b.JI~~~~$}iK1(~~
Exelon PowerLabs, LLC Project Number: NEX-77991 Page 6 of7
Attachment 2 j¢,
.. . . .STEP 7 *. .
NOZZLE SAFE END ..
..fllit\L WElD >AND j'I_~~L MACHINING Exelon PowerLabs, LLC Project Number: NEX-77991 Page 7 of7
Attachment 3 Information Requested in Question 29 from Summary of Public Meeting Between the Nuclear Regulatory Commission and Industry Representatives on Implementation of ASME Code Case N-770-1 Pre-inlay/onlay examinations performed including eddy current examination and acceptance criteria followed The inside surface of the weld and adjacent base material was clad with Alloy 52 at the factory during fabrication. These welds received ASME Section Ill examinations (liquid penetrant and radiography) prior to installation. In addition, the ASME Section XI pre-service examinations (liquid penetrant and ultrasonic examinations) were performed prior to installation at PBNP.
Repairs performed and any fillers materials used, The PBNP SG safe-end to inlet and outlet nozzle to safe-end welds were fabricated and then "inlaid" at the Westinghouse fabrication facility in Pensacola, FL. The welds and inlay were examined in accordance with the rules of ASME Section Ill, 1986 Edition (liquid penetrant, ultrasonic for lack-of-bond, and radiography). No flaws were recorded during fabrication of the welds or inlay materials which required repair.
Manufacturing records including Material Disposition Reports (MDRs) were reviewed. MDRs 363065, 364360, 366879, 366918, and 366919 applied to the primary nozzle OM welds for the Point Beach steam generators. No weld repair dispositions were required for the primary nozzle OM welds.
lnlay/onlay materials used, including chromium content and the method used to determine the as-deposited weld bead chromium content From review of manufacturing records, Westinghouse material code RX81 filler metal was used for the inlay weld. This weld wire meets ASME SFA-5.14 Class ERNiCrFe-7 filler metal requirements. This weld filler metal was manufactured by INCO Alloys International (heat NX8278JX).
Based on review of the manufacturing records, the inner portion of the double U-groove welds was also made using ERNiCrFe-7 filler metal (Westinghouse material codes SV20 and SV64).
The chemical analyses for the primary elements(> 0.01 WT %) from the CMTRs for these filler metals are as follows:
ID# INCO HEAT# c Tl RX81 NX8278JK 0.02 0.26 9.19 0.17 60.19 28.97 0.64 0.53 0.02 SV20 NX9203JK 0.02 0.25 9.03 0.14 60.39 28.91 0.67 0.56 0.010 SV64 NX9203JK 0.02 0.25 9.03 0.14 60.39 28.91 0.67 0.56 0.010 Also, two (2) archive weld samples for the Point Beach Unit 2 replacement steam generator nozzle dissimilar metal weld were submitted for chemical analysis of the lnconeiiD bore overlay. The archive weld sample was made with the same base metal and weld filler material Page 1 of 4
as used for the PBNP Unit 2 SG. The lnconel overlay of both weld samples exhibited greater than 24 wt% chromium. The chemical analysis results are shown below and the report is included as Attachment 3. The weld deposit chemistry meets the requirements for ERNiCrFe-7 weld filler metal and is consistent with the RX81 filler metal chemical analysis.
SAMPLE# C MN FE 51 Nl CR AL Tl CO A 0.02 0.29 10.6 0.18 57.9 29.4 0.60 0.51 0.02 B 0.02 0.29 10.0 0.19 58.3 29.6 0.62 0.54 0.02 Methods used to identify the dissimilar metal weld fusion zones and the accuracy of the methods used The PBNP SG safe-end to inlet and outlet nozzle to safe-end welds were fabricated and then "inlaid" at the Westinghouse fabrication facility in Pensacola, FL. According to Westinghouse drawing numbers 6147E62-3 and 6147E62-6, the dissimilar metal weld (Alloy 82/182) was fabricated and as-built dimensions were recorded prior to weld overlay (inlay) build-up with Alloy 52 material. The build-up (inlay) area was shown to be 2.25 +/-.025 inches from the center-line of the dissimilar metal weld (Step 3 on drawing 6147E62-3).
During the 2012 lnservice Examination (lSI), the PBNP SG safe-end to inlet and outlet nozzle to safe-end welds had the fusion zones identified by eddy current (ET) and phased array UT (PAUT) examination techniques. The ET equipment was calibrated utilizing a mock-up/calibration block which was designed to replicate approximately the inner 1/3t of the PBNP SG nozzle/safe-end region, including the carbon-clad nozzle, dissimilar metal weld, Alloy 52 inlay, and stainless steel safe-end. The response from the fusion zones were detectable by both ET and PAUT (see Attachment 1). The mechanical accuracy of the automated scanning equipment was reported by the examination vendor to be approximately +/-0.125 inches.
Qualifications of the weld procedure specifications, welders and welding operators The following Weld Procedure Specifications (WPSs) were submitted by Westinghouse for the identified processes, base metals, and filler materials. The WPSs were qualified per ASME Section IX. The Procedure Qualification Records (PQRs) were submitted with these WPSs.
Page 2 of 4
WPS PROCESS BASE METALS FILLER COMMENTS MACHINE BUTTERING OF 4532 GTAW (HOT P3 ERNiCr-3 PRIMARY NOZZLE (WP-WIRE) 01A & B)
MACHINE DOUBLE-U GROOVE 4288 P43 TO P8 ERNiCr-3 GTAW (WP-02A & B)
MACHINE 4244* GTAW (HOT P8 TO P43 ERNiCrFe-7+ INLAY WIRE)
MACHINE 4393* P43 TO P43 ERNiCrFe-7+ INLAY GTAW
Weld Status Sheets also refer to other WPS numbers. These other WPSs could not be located.
+ Inlay made with ERNiCrFe-7 filler metal which is Alloy 52.
Welders and welding operators were qualified per ASME Section IX. Welder Performance Qualification (WPQ) records were not submitted to Point Beach. Utility employees monitored welding activities for these welds and documented activities monitored in Source Surveillance Reports. Standard practice for source surveillances was to check personnel qualifications, including welders.
Pre- and post-weld heat treatment or temper bead welding requirements followed The PBNP SG safe-end to inlet and outlet nozzle to safe-end welds were fabricated and then "inlaid" at the Westinghouse fabrication facility in Pensacola, FL. WPS 4532 specifies a minimum preheat of 250°F, maximum interpass temperature of 400°F, and postweld heat treatment (PWHT) of 1100- 1150°F.
The PWHT Summary indicates that the channel head (including the primary nozzle buttering) underwent a PWHT of 2 hours2.314815e-5 days 5.555556e-4 hours 3.306878e-6 weeks 7.61e-7 months and 29 minutes for assembly 12172 and 2 hours2.314815e-5 days 5.555556e-4 hours 3.306878e-6 weeks 7.61e-7 months and 30min for assembly 12173.
The other WPSs (4288, 4244, and 4393) specify a minimum preheat of 60°F and maximum interpass temperature of 350°F. None of the other WPSs require PWHT.
No temper bead welding was performed during the manufacture of the channel head.
Design and analysis requirements used, in detail The PBNP Unit 2 SG were designed and built to ASME Section Ill, 1986 Edition, No Addenda.
Preservice and inservice inspections performed since installation of the inlays/onlays The PBNP SG safe-end to inlet and outlet nozzle to safe-end welds were fabricated and then "inlaid" at the Westinghouse fabrication facility in Pensacola, FL. The welds and "inlay" were examined in accordance with the rules of ASME Section Ill, 1986 Edition (liquid penetrant, ultrasonic for lack of bond, and radiography).
Page 3 of 4
During the 2012 lnservice Examination (lSI), the PBNP SG safe-end to inlet and outlet nozzle to safe-end welds were examined by automated eddy current and phased array UT examination techniques.
ASME Code Editions and Addenda associated with requirements used, where applicable, and figures, as applicable, to assist in describing the information submitted The PBNP Unit 2 SG were designed and built to ASME Section Ill, 1986 Edition, No Addenda.
Thickness of inlay/onlay Westinghouse fabrication drawing 6147E62-3, Step 4 indicates that the design thickness of the cladding and "inlay" was approximately 0.22 inches nominal with a minimum thickness of 0.13 inches (approximately 3 mm).
Flaw evaluation to show adequate thickness against stress corrosion cracking.
Westinghouse LTR-PAFM-15-11-NP, "Point Beach Unit 2 Steam Generator Primary Nozzle to Safe-end Weld Crack Growth Analysis" is provided as Attachment 5. Based on the crack growth analysis, a postulated ID flaw 1.5 mm deep in the hot leg OM weld would remain below the maximum allowable flaw size for 7.5 EFPY.
For primary water stress corrosion crack growth rates for Alloy 52/152 weld materials. at this time, NRC recommends using the Alloy 182 crack growth rate curve provided in MRP-115. with an improvement factor (IF) of 100 for Alloy 52 welds and an IF of 10 for Alloy 152 welds.
Westinghouse LTR-PAFM-15-11-NP, "Point Beach Unit 2 Steam Generator Primary Nozzle to Safe-end Weld Crack Growth Analysis" is provided as Attachment 5. An IF of 10 was conservatively used for the crack growth analysis. Based on review of manufacturing records, the inlay weld was made with Alloy 52 filler metal.
Page 4 of 4
Proprietary Information- Withhold from Public Disclosure Under 10 CFR 2.390 Attachment 4 Westinghouse LTR-PAFM-15-11-P, Revision 0 Point Beach Unit 2 Steam Generator Primary Nozzle to Safe-end Weld Crack Growth Analysis (Proprietary)
(28 pages follow)
Proprietary Information -Withhold Under 10 CFR 2.390.
Attachment 4 Contains Proprietary Information, Upon Separation of Attachment 4 this letter is Nonproprietary.
Attachment 5 Westinghouse LTR-PAFM-15-11-NP, Revision 0 Point Beach Unit 2 Steam Generator Primary Nozzle to Safe-end Weld Crack Growth Analysis (Non-Proprietary)
(28 pages follow)
WESTINGHOUSE NON-PROPRIETARY CLASS 3 LTR-PAFM-15-11-NP Revision 0 Point Beach Unit 2 Steam Generator Primary Nozzle to Safe-end Weld Crack Growth Analysis June 2015 Author: N. L. Glunt*, Piping Analysis and Fracture Mechanics Verifier: A. U dyawar*, Piping Analysis and Fracture Mechanics Approved: J. L. McFadden*, Manager, Piping Analysis and Fracture Mechanics
Electronically approved records are authenticated in the electronic document management system.
© 2015 Westinghouse Electric Company LLC e)
All Rights Reserved Westinghouse
Westinghouse Non-Proprietary Class 3 LTR-PAFM-15-11-NP Revision 0 FOREWORD This document contains Westinghouse Electric Company LLC proprietary information and data which has been identified by brackets. Coding (a,c,e) associated with the brackets sets forth the basis on which the information is considered proprietary. These codes are listed with their meanings in WCAP-7211 Revision 7 (April 2015), "Proprietary Information and Intellectual Property Management Policies and Procedures."
The proprietary information and data contained in this report were obtained at considerable Westinghouse expense and its release could seriously affect our competitive position. This information is to be withheld from public disclosure in accordance with the Rules of Practice 10CFR2.390 and the infonnation presented herein is to be safeguarded in accordance with 10CFR2.903. Withholding of this information does not adversely affect the public interest.
This information has been provided for your internal use only and should not be released to persons or organizations outside the Directorate of Regulation and the ACRS without the express written approval of Westinghouse Electric Company LLC. Should it become necessary to release this information to such persons as part of the review procedure, please contact Westinghouse Electric Company LLC, which will make the necessary arrangements required to protect the Company's proprietary interests.
The proprietary information in the brackets has been deleted in this report, the deleted information is provided in the proprietary version of this report (LTR-PAFM-15-11-P Revision 0).
Page2 of28
Westinghouse Non-Proprietary Class 3 LTR-PAFM-15-11-NP Revision 0 1.0 Introduction Service induced cracking of the nickel-base alloy components and weldments have been occurring more frequently in recent years due to Primary Water Stress Corrosion Cracking (PWSCC), resulting in the need to repair and/or replace these components. The Steam Generators (SO's) for Point Beach Unit 2 were fabricated with factory welded stainless steel safe ends attached to the SG primmy nozzles with Alloy 82 dissimilar metal (DM) welds. The inside surface of the welds and adjacent base materials were clad with PWSCC resistant Alloy 52 material during fabrication.
These DM welds m*e currently categorized as Code Case N-770-1 (Reference 1) Inspection Item A-2 for the SG inlet (hot leg) nozzles and Inspection Item B for the SG outlet (cold leg) nozzles.
In accordance with Code Case N-770-1 guidelines, volumetric examinations are required for the Inspection Item A-2 welds every 5 years and for Inspection Item B every second inspection period not exceeding 7 years. NextEra Energy has submitted a relief request to the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) in Reference 2 in order to extend the SG inlet and outlet nozzle DM weld inspection intervals. To complete the review of the relief request, the NRC requested a flaw evaluation be performed to demonstrate that the SG DM welds possess adequate thickness to protect against failure due to PWSCC.
The flaw evaluation shall be consistent with several factors found in Reference 14, "Evaluation of the Inlay Process as a Mitigation Strategy for Primary Water Stress Corrosion Cracking in Pressurized Water Reactors" (Accession Number ML101260554), in particular:
1. Perform Weld Residual Stress Calculation
a. Assume a 50% weld repair during fabrication.
b. Apply 3 weld layers and grind off outer layer.
c. Use minimum thicknesses from construction records in the model.
2. Flaw Analysis
a. Initial flaw depth is 1.5 mm.
b. Assume PWSCC growth of Alloy 52 weld material with a factor of improvement of 10 versus the MRP-115 crack growth rate for Alloy 182 materials.
c. Calculate time to maximum allowable end-of-evaluation period flaw size for axial flaw with an aspect ratio of 2 and for circumferential flaws with an aspect ratio of 10.
d. See Figure 1-1 for clarification.
The objective of the analysis is to demonstrate that the Point Beach Unit 2 SG primary nozzle DM welds possess adequate thickness to protect against failure due to PWSCC by performing a crack growth evaluation using the factors outlined above. The crack growth evaluation is used to detetmine the maximum time allowed between inspections for the SG DM welds. The crack growth analysis will be performed through both the inlay and DM weld material.
The following sections provide a discussion of the methodology, geometry, loading and the crack growth analysis.
Page 3 of28
Westinghouse Non-Proprietary Class 3 LTR-PAFM-15-11-NP RevisionO Idealized C1*ack G1*owtb a =A182
\Iodel 1 Pipe With Inlay (not to scale) '
}'
a0 = 1.5 mm
..)A"~~....
c 0 = 5 mm /
~,."'1,_
Modell - OD = 872: mm, .:
t= 68 mm: Inlay= 3 mm Figure 1-1: Sample Flaw Analysis Characterization (image reproduced from Reference 14)
Page4 of28
Westinghouse Non-Proprietary Class 3 LTR-P AFM-15-11-NP Revision 0 2.0 Methodology In order to support the technical justification for a proposed extension to the examination intervals for the Point Beach Unit 2 SG primary nozzle DM welds, it is necessary to demonstrate the structural integrity of the SG primary nozzle DM welds subjected to the PWSCC crack growth mechanism. To demonstrate the structural integrity of the DM welds, it is essential to determine the operation duration for which it would take the postulated initial axial and circumferential flaws to grow to the maximum allowable end-of-evaluation period flaw size. The maximum allowable end-of-evaluation period flaw size is determined in accordance with ASME Code Section XI (Reference 3). As stated previously, an assumed initial flaw depth of 1.5 mm (half the inlay weld thickness) is used for the flaw evaluation.
To determine the maximum allowable end-of-evaluation period flaw sizes and the crack tip stress intensity factors used for the PWSCC analysis, it is necessary to establish the stresses, crack geometry and the material properties at the locations of interest. The applicable loadings which must be considered consist of piping loads acting at the DM weld regions and the welding residual stresses which exist in the region of interest.
The loadings considered in the analysis included the latest piping loads, taking into consideration the replacement steam generator and the Extended Power Uprate (EPU) programs. In addition to the piping loads, the effects of welding residual stresses are also considered. The nozzle geometty and piping loads used in the fracture mechanics analysis are shown in Section 3.0. A discussion of the plant specific welding residual stress distributions used for the DM welds is provided in Section 4.0. The determination of the maximum allowable end-of-evaluation period flaw sizes is discussed in Section 5.0.
For PWSCC, the crack growth model for the DM weld material is based on that given in MRP-115 (Reference 10). An improvement factor is incorporated into the MRP-115 crack growth rate for the more PWSCC resistant Alloy 52 material. The flaw growth is determined due to the PWSCC growth mechanism in the SG primary nozzle DM welds and inlay material. The PWSCC crack growth is calculated based on the normal operating temperature and the crack tip stress intensity factors resulting from the normal operating steady state piping loads and welding residual stresses as discussed in Section 6.0. Section 7.0 provides the flaw growth curves used in determining the allowable inspection interval for the Point Beach Unit 2 SG primary nozzle DM welds.
Page 5 of28
Westinghouse Non-Proprietary Class 3 LTR-PAFM-15-11-NP Revision 0 3.0 Nozzle Geometry and Loads Geometry, Material Properties, and Normal Operating Parameters The Point Beach Unit 2 SG inlet and outlet nozzle dissimilar metal weld geometries were based on Reference 4. The dimensions are shown in Table 3-1 below. The limiting material properties used were based on those for the weaker stainless steel safe end material in lieu of the DM weld material. The nozzle normal operating temperatures were based on plant operating data. A normal operating pressure of2250 psia was used in the analysis.
Table 3-1 Point Beach Unit 2 Steam Generator Primary Nozzle Geometry, Normal Operating Temperatures, and Material Properties Total Inlay DMWeld OD ID Temperature Flow Stress Thickness Thickness Location (in.) (in.) (oF) (ksi)(t)
(in.) (in.)
Inlet Nozzle 605 38.6 41.54 31.03 5.25 0.13 Outlet Nozzle 543 39.4 Note:
1) Material properties are based on the stainless steel safe end material, which is more limiting than the DM weld material. Flow stress is defined as the average of yield strength and ultimate strength. The values shown here were obtained using the ASME code values for the stainless steel safe end material SA-336 F316LN (Reference 5).
Piping Loads The piping loads due to pressure, deadweight, 100% power normal operating thermal expansion, seismic events, and Loss of Coolant Accident (LOCA) events were considered for the analysis of the SG inlet and outlet nozzles. The Operation Basis Earthquake (OBE) loads are assumed to be the same as the Safe Shutdown Earthquake (SSE) loads for conservatism. The axial force and moment components for various loadings are summarized in Table 3-2. The loadings considered in this analysis included the effects of the replacement steam generator program and the EPU program (Reference 6). The loads in Table 3-2 bound both loops of the Point Beach Unit 2 reactor coolant system.
Page 6 of28
Westinghouse Non-Proprietary Class 3 LTR-PAFM-15-11-NP Revision 0 Table 3-2 Point Beach Unit 2 Piping Loads Location Loading Fx (kips) Mx (in-kips) My (in-kips) Mz (in-kips)
...., DW 4.88 -122.9 111.4 127.8
<])
,£:1 <U p 1701.5
~
1-<,......
0 N
....,<U ~ N Thermal -69.02 261.9 -184 6323.7 Cll 1-<
<U 1:::
z0 OBE/SSE 76.26 1959.7 4661.4 2793
<U d LOCA 1076.8 3637.4 7664.4 13313 1-< DW 14.32 193.3 127.1 72.2 0 <])
~- p
~ ~ 1701.5 Q
<])
d"'Q) z 0 Thermal -23.07 -634 942 543.2
~~ OBE/SSE 34.92 2994.3 8821.2 3537.3
~0 Cll LOCA 841.17 6188.7 7298.5 16993.1 DW Deadweight Thermal Normal (100% Power) Thermal Expansion OBE Operational Basis Earthquake SSE Safe Shutdown Earthquake LOCA Loss of Coolant Accident p Axial force due to normal operating pressure of2.25 ksi Fx Axial force Mx Torsion moment My,Mz Bending moment components Page 7 of28
Westinghouse Non-Proprietaty Class 3 LTR-PAFM-15-11-NP Revision 0 4.0 Dissimilar Metal Weld Residual Stress Distribution The residual stresses used in the generation of the crack growth evaluation charts are obtained from the fmite element residual stress analysis for the Point Beach Unit 2 Steam Generator dissimilar metal weld geometty in Reference 7.
The finite element analyses in Reference 7 were performed to simulate the weld fabrication process for the nozzle safe end weld region assuming an initial 50% inside surface weld repair in accordance with the guidelines in MRP-287 (Reference 8). A two-dimensional axisymmetric finite element model of the nozzle was used in the ftnite element analysis. The ftnite element model geometry includes a portion of the low alloy steel nozzle, the stainless steel safe end, a portion of the stainless steel piping, the DM weld attaching the nozzle to the safe end (along with an inlay on the inside surface), and the stainless steel weld attaching the safe end to the piping.
Figure 4-1 shows a sketch of the fmal nozzle DM weld configuration. The following fabrication sequence was simulated in the ftnite element residual stress analysis:
The SG nozzle is buttered with weld-deposited Alloy 82 material. The inside surface of the buttering and the nozzle is clad with weld deposited Alloy 52 material.
The nozzle and buttering are post weld heat treated.
The nozzle is welded to the safe end ring forging with an Alloy 82 weld, with a layer of Alloy 52 on the inside surface.
A repair cavity of 50% of the wall thickness is machined out of the weld region as per the guidance in MRP-287 (Reference 8). The repair cavity is filled with Alloy 82 weld metal, with a layer of Alloy 52 on the inside surface.
The outside and inside diameters of the weld region m*e machined to final size.
A shop hydrotest is performed.
The safe end is machined with the piping side weld prep.
The safe end is welded to the piping with a stainless steel weld.
A plant leakage test is performed.
The resulting hoop and axial welding residual stresses under normal operating conditions in the DM weld region are shown in Figures 4-2 and 4-3 respectively. The normal operating hoop welding residual stresses have been modifted slightly from Reference 7 as shown in Figure 4-2 and used in the crack growth analysis. This is done so that the 3'd order polynomial fit of the modifted hoop stress will adequately represent the original hoop stresses at the inside surface of the inlay from Reference 7, as shown in Figure 4-2. The 3rd order polynotnial stress ftt provides a better fit for the hoop stresses than a 4th order polynomial.
The axial residual stresses from Reference 7 have also been modifted as shown in Figure 4-3, and the modified stresses m*e fttted to a 4th order curve fit in order to adequately represent the original axial stresses from Reference 7. The modifted axial stresses shown in Figure 4-3 are used in the crack growth analysis.
The axial stresses used in the PWSCC crack growth analysis are based on the combination of the axial welding residual stresses and the stresses due to pressure, normal operating thermal expansion loads and the deadweight loads.
Page 8 of28
Westinghouse Non-Proprietary Class 3 LTR-PAFM-15-11-NP Revision 0 As stated previously, the weld residual stress calculation should model the inlay in three weld layers before the weld is machined to final size; however, in the Reference 7 residual stress evaluation, the inlay is made of two weld layers and is then machined to the final size. It is important to note that the Point Beach Unit 2 SG inlay was applied during fabrication, and not as an inservice repair. Since the inlay was applied during fabrication, the inlay is built out even with the inside surface of the cladding and safe-end and the final machining is applied to the entire inside surface of the component, including the inlay, nozzle cladding, and safe-end. For a traditional inservice repair, the inlay is built out past the inside surface of the surrounding material and only the inlay is machined, which would result in higher stresses in the inlay. Since, for the Point Beach Unit 2 SG, the inlay is machined to final size along with the surrounding material, the differences that would result in the residual stress distribution due to applying two weld layers as opposed to three will be insignificant based on engineering judgment. The consideration of the 50% inside surface weld repair which was conservatively modeled in the finite element analysis even though the Point Beach Unit 2 SG primaty nozzle DM welds m*e free of repairs, provides additional basis that the residual stress evaluation is conservative.
Safe End- Stainless Steel Base Metal Weld Inlay-Safe End to Nozzle Weld-Alloy 82 Filler Metal Nozzle Buttering -
Alloy 82 Filler Metal Nozzle (Chatmel Head Forging)-
Carbon Steel Base Metal Channel Head Cladding -
Weld Cladding -
Stainless Steel Filler Metal Alloy 52 Filler Metal Figure 4-1: Point Beach Unit 2 Steam Gene1*ator Dissimilar Metal Weld Configuration (Reference 4)
Page 9 of28
Westinghouse Non-Proprietary Class 3 LTR-PAFM-15-11-NP Revision 0 a,c,e Figure 4-2: Through-Wall Hoop Residual Stress at the SG Inlet and Outlet Nozzle DM Welds Under Normal Operating Conditions Page 10 of28
Westinghouse Non-Proprietary Class 3 LTR-PAFM-15-11-NP Revision 0 a,c,e Figure 4-3: Through-Wall Axial Residual Stress at the SG Inlet & Outlet Nozzle DM Welds Under Normal Operating Conditions Page 11 of28
Westinghouse Non-Proprietary Class 3 LTR-PAFM-15-11-NP Revision 0 5.0 Maximum Allowable End-of-Evaluation Period Flaw Size Determination In order to develop the technical justification for a longer interval between examination of the SG primary nozzle DM welds, the first step is the determination of the maximum allowable end-of-evaluation period flaw sizes. The maximum allowable end-of-evaluation period flaw size is the size to which an indication is allowed to grow to until the next inspection or evaluation period.
This particular flaw size is determined based on the piping loads, geometry and the material properties of the component. The evaluation guidelines and procedures for calculating the maximum allowable end-of-evaluation period flaw sizes are described in paragraph IWB-3640 and Appendix C of the ASME Section XI Code (Reference 3).
Rapid, nonductile failure is possible for ferritic materials at low temperatures, but is not applicable to the nickel-base alloy material. In nickel-base alloy material, the higher ductility leads to two possible modes of failure, plastic collapse or unstable ductile tearing. The second mechanism can occur when the applied J integral exceeds the Ire fracture toughness, and some stable tearing occurs prior to failure. If this mode of failure is dominant, then the load-carrying capacity is less than that predicted by the plastic collapse mechanism. The maximum allowable end-of-evaluation period flaw sizes of paragraph IWB-3640 for the high toughness materials are determined based on the assumption that plastic collapse would be achieved and would be the dominant mode of failure. However, due to the reduced toughness of the DM welds, it is possible that crack extension and unstable ductile tearing could occur and be the dominant mode of failure.
To account for tllis effect, penalty factors called "Z factors" were developed in ASME Code Section XI, which are to be multiplied by the loadings at these welds. In the current analysis for Point Beach Unit 2, Z factors based on Reference 9 are used in the analysis to provide a more representative approximation of the effects of the DM welds. The use of Z factors in effect reduces the maximum allowable end-of-evaluation period flaw sizes for flux welds and thus has been incorporated directly into the evaluation performed in accordance with the procedure and acceptance criteria given in IWB-3640 and Appendix C of ASME Code Section XI. It should be noted that the maximum allowable end-of-evaluation period flaw sizes is 75% of the wall thickness in accordance with the requirements of ASME Section XI paragraph IWB-3640 (Reference 3).
The maximum allowable end-of-evaluation period flaw sizes determined for both axial and circumferential flaws have incorporated the relevant material properties, pipe loadings and geometry. Loadings under normal, upset, emergency and faulted conditions are considered in conjunction with the applicable safety factors for the corresponding service conditions required in the ASME Section XI Code. For circumferential flaws, axial stress due to the pressure, deadweight, thermal expansion, seismic and pipe break loads are considered in the evaluation.
As for the axial flaws, hoop stress resulting from pressure loading is used.
The maximum allowable end-of-evaluation period flaw sizes for the axial and circumferential flaws at the SG primary nozzle DM welds are provided in Table 5-1. The maximum allowable end-of-evaluation period axial flaw size was calculated with an aspect ratio (flaw length/flaw depth) of 2. The aspect ratio of 2 is reasonable because the axial flaw growth due to PWSCC is limited to the width of the DM weld configuration. For the circumferential flaw, an aspect ratio of 10 is used.
Page 12 of28
Westinghouse Non-Proprietary Class 3 LTR-PAFM-15-11-NP Revision 0 It should be noted that the resulting maximum allowable end-of-evaluation period flaw sizes were limited by the ASME Code limit of75% of the weld thickness for both flaw configurations.
Table 5-1 Maximum End-of-Evaluation Period Allowable Flaw Sizes (Flaw Depth/Wall Thickness Ratio- aft)
Axial Flaw Circumferential Flaw (Aspect Ratio = 2) (Aspect Ratio= 10) 0.75 0.75 Page 13 of28
Westinghouse Non-Proprietary Class 3 LTR-PAFM-15-11-NP Revision 0 6.0 PWSCC Crack Growth Analysis The crack growth analysis involves postulating a flaw in the dissimilar metal weld inlay for the nozzles of interest. The objective of this analysis is to determine the service life required for a postulated inside surface flaw to propagate to a size that exceeds the maximum allowable end-of-evaluation period flaw depth as described in Section 5.0. An initial flaw depth of 1.5 mm (0.06")
into the inlay will be used in the crack growth evaluation.
Crack growth due to PWSCC was calculated for both axial and circumferential flaws based on the normal operating condition steady-state stresses combined with the welding residual stresses.
For axial flaws, the hoop stresses are due to pressure and residual stresses. For circumferential flaws, the axial stresses considered are due to pressure, thermal expansion, deadweight, and residual stresses. The input required for the crack growth analysis is basically the information necessary to calculate the crack tip stress intensity factor (KI), which depends on the geometry of the crack, its surrounding structure, and the applied stresses. The geometry and loadings for the nozzles of interest are discussed in Section 3.0 and the applicable residual stresses used are discussed in Section 4.0. Once K 1 is calculated, stress corrosion crack growth due to the applied stress can be calculated using the applicable crack growth rate for the Alloy 82 nickel-base alloy from MRP-115 (Reference 10) and Alloy 52 inlay material. An improvement factor is incorporated into the MRP-115 crack growth rate for the more PWSCC resistant Alloy 52 material as determined below.
It should be noted that fatigue crack growth was not considered for these inside surface flaws, and only crack growth due to the PWSCC mechanism was considered.
Using the applicable stresses at the dissimilar metal welds, the crack tip stress intensity factors can be determined based on the stress intensity factor expressions from References 11 and 12.
Since the hoop welding residual stresses are best fitted with a 3'd order polynomial, the stress intensity factor expression for the axial flaws will be based on the NASA database from (Reference 11). The axial residual stresses were fitted with a 4 111 order polynomial; therefore, the circumferential stress intensity factor expressions are from API-579 (Reference 12). A 4th order polynomial stress distribution profile is defined as:
Where:
cr 0 , cr1, cr2 , cr3 , and cr4 are the stress profile curve fitting coefficients; x is the distance from the wall surface where the crack initiates; tis the wall thickness; and cr is the stress perpendicular to the plane of the crack.
The stress intensity factor calculations for semi-elliptical inside surface axial and circumferential flaws are expressed in the general form as follows:
Page 14 of28
Westinghouse Non-Proprietary Class 3 LTR-PAFM-15-11-NP Revision 0 Where:
a Crack depth c Half crack length along surface t Thickness of cylinder R Inside radius
<!> Angular position of a point on the crack front n Order of polynomial fit Gj Gj is the influence coefficient for jth stress distribution on crack surface (i.e., G 0 ,
G~, G2, G3, G4)
O"j O"j is stress profile curve fitting coefficient for fh stress distribution (i.e., cr0, cr~,
0"2, 0"3, 0"4)
Q The shape factor of an elliptical crack is approximated by:
Q =I + 1.464(alc)L65 for ale.::: I or Q = 1 + 1.464(c/a)L65 for ale> 1 Once the crack tip stress intensity factors are determined, PWSCC crack growth calculations can be performed using the crack growth rate below with the applicable normal operating temperature.
The Point Beach SG inlet and outlet nozzle to safe end dissimilar metal weld regions are primarily made of nickel based alloys (Alloy 82) with a layer of Alloy 52 inlay on the inside surface. The Alloy 52 inlays were installed as a protective barrier for the Alloy 82 weld against PWSCC. Alloy 52 weld metal is known to be more resistant to PWSCC than the lower chromium content Alloy 82; however, due to limiting testing data, the exact PWSCC crack growth rate (CGR) for Alloy 52 cannot be easily ascertained. Current industry data suggests that the PWSCC crack growth rate for Alloy 52 is on the order of 1/I 00 the PWSCC crack growth rate of Alloy 182, or better as discussed in Reference 13. However, for the evaluation contained herein, a conservative improvement factor of 10 over the Alloy I82 crack growth rate will be used to represent the crack growth rate of Alloy 52. An additional crack growth evaluation was performed in Appendix A of this report using an improvement factor of 3 0 over the Alloy I82 crack growth rate to represent the crack growth rate of Alloy 52.
The PWSCC crack growth rate used in the crack growth analysis is based on the EPRI recommended crack growth curve for Alloy 182 material (Reference 4) with the appropriate improvement factors as discussed above. The PWSCC crack growth rate is:
-da =exp [-Qg- (1- )] a(K)P dt R T Tref Page 15 of28
Westinghouse Non-Proprietary Class 3 LTR-PAFM-15-11-NP Revision 0 Where:
da
- Crack growth rate in m/sec (in/hr) dt Qg Thermal activation energy for crack growth = 130 kJ/mole (31.0 kcallmole)
R Universal gas constant= 8.314 x 10"3 kJ/mole-K (1.103 x 10"3 kcal/mole-oR) 0 T Absolute operating temperature at the location of crack, K ( R)
Tref Absolute reference temperature used to normalize data = 598.15 K (1076.67°R) a Crack growth amplitude 1.50 x 10" 12 at 325°C (2.47 x 10"7 at 617°F)
~ Exponent= 1.6 K Crack tip stress intensity factor MPa-fm (ksi-lin)
IF Improvement Factor= 2.6 for Alloy 82, 10 for Alloy 52 The PWSCC crack growth rate is highly dependent on the temperature at the location of the flaw, furthermore, the crack growth rate increases as the temperature increases. Therefore, during periods when the plant is not in operation, such as refueling outages or shutdowns, the temperature at the SG nozzles is low such that crack growth due to PWSCC is insignificant.
Therefore, PWSCC crack growth calculation should be determined for the time interval when the plant is operating at full power. For Point Beach Unit 2, a conservative power availability factor of 95% is used to account for the time in which the plant is not operating at full power.
Page 16 of28
Westinghouse Non-Proprietary Class 3 LTR-PAFM-15-11-NP Revision 0 7.0 Technical Justification for Deferring the Volumetric Examination Currently, the Point Beach Unit 2 SG nozzles are categorized as Code Case N-770-1 (Reference
1) Inspection Item A-2 for the SG inlet nozzles and Inspection Item B for the SG outlet nozzles.
A crack growth analysis is to be performed to support an increase to the inspection interval of the SG primary nozzle DM welds. A 1.5 mm (0.06") initial flaw depth is to be postulated for the flaw growth evaluation and an aspect ratio of 2 is used for the axial flaw, and an aspect ratio of 10 for the circumferential flaw.
The PWSCC crack growth was calculated in two stages. The first stage is growth through the Alloy 52 inlay material. As discussed in Section 6.0, and improvement factor of 10 over the crack growth rate for Alloy 182 in MRP-115 is used for growth through the inlay. The second stage is growth through the Alloy 82 DM weld. The crack growth through each material is then combined to determine the length of time it would take for the postulated initial flaw to grow to the maximum allowable end-of-evaluation period flaw size.
Deadweight, normal thermal expansion and pressure (2.25 ksi) loadings along with through wall axial residual stresses were used to generate the through wall axial stresses used in the PWSCC analysis for the circumferential flaw. Since the axial welding residual stresses are compressive at locations through the wall, PWSCC analyses were performed with and without residual stress in order to determine the most limiting PWSCC crack growth results. Only through wall normal operating hoop residual stresses were used in the PWSCC analysis for the axial flaw. It should be noted that no fatigue crack growth calculation was performed since crack growth due to PWSCC is the controlling crack growth mechanism.
The PWSCC crack growth curves for an axial flaw and a circumferential flaw are shown in Figures 7-1 and 7-2 respectively for SG inlet nozzle and Figures 7-3 and 7-4 for the SG outlet nozzle. The horizontal axis displays service life in Effective Full Power Years (EFPY), and the vertical axis shows the flaw depth to wall thickness ratio (aft). The SG inlet nozzle crack growth results in terms of EFPY are based on a temperature of 605"F, while the SG outlet nozzle crack growth results in terms of EFPY are based on a temperature of 543 "F. The maximum allowable end-of-evaluation period flaw sizes are also shown in these figures for the respective flaw configurations.
Based on the crack growth results from Figures 7-1 through 7-4, the duration of time for the postulated axial and circumferential flaws to reach the ASME Section XI maximum end-of-evaluation period flaw sizes in the SG inlet and outlet nozzle DM welds are tabulated in Table 7-1.
Page 17 of28
Westinghouse Non-Proprietary Class 3 LTR-PAFM-15-11-NP Revision 0 Table 7-1 Duration for Postulated Flaw to Reach Maximum Allowable End-of-Evaluation Period Flaw Size Effective Full Power Years for a 1.5 mm Postulated Flaw to Grow to a/t = 0.75 Location Axial Flaw Circumferential Flaw (Aspect Ratio = 2) (Aspect Ratio= 10)
SG Inlet Nozzle 7.5 EFPY 8.5 EFPY SG Outlet Nozzle 37.8 EFPY 44.9 EFPY a = flaw depth t = thickness Aspect Ratio = flaw length/flaw depth The results in Table 7-1 demonstrate that it would take more than 30 EFPY for the postulated 1.5 mm deep flaw in the Point Beach SG outlet nozzle DM weld inlay to grow to the maximum allowable end-of-evaluation period flaw sizes. As a result, re-categorization of the Point Beach Unit 2 SG outlet nozzles to Inspection Item G of Code Case N-770-1 is technically justified since the results of the flaw growth evaluation in Figures 7-3 and 7-4 demonstrate that postulated initial inside surface flaws with postulated depths of 1.5 mm would not grow through the DM welds in less than 10 years.
The results in Table 7-1 justify a longer inspection interval for the SG inlet nozzles than currently allowed for Code Case N-770-1 Inspection Item A-2 welds, which is five years. Based on the results for the SG inlet nozzle DM welds in Figures 7-1 and 7-2, an inspection interval of up to 7.5 EFPY is acceptable for the Point Beach Unit 2 SG inlet nozzle DM welds based on the flaw growth evaluation. Since the PWSCC crack growth rate is highly dependent on the temperature at the location of the flaw, and during periods when the plant is not in operation, such as refueling shutdowns, the crack growth due to PWSCC would be insignificant, the plant power availability factor can be used to determine the calendar time allowed between inspections. Based on a conservative power availability factor of 95%, the maximum inspection interval for the Point Beach Unit 2 SG inlet nozzle DM welds is 7.9 calendar years (7.5 EFPY).
Page 18 of28
Westinghouse Non-Proprietary Class 3 LTR-PAFM-15-11-NP Revision 0 0.8
I I II
_ ~ _1 _ _ ,_ -r- _ Ma:ximu:n A1Io:vable End:of- ~ 1'1:-
_ -i- _ _ _ __ _ _
l~f-1---,~~*~,,--1---l--+---1--+--j-....:.._f---..::=.L~
1 1 1 Evaluation Penod Flaw SIZe 0.7 I I I I I 1-1 7 \. I I I I I I I I I I 1-r--T*~-~~-~*-~--+--+1--~-~~
I I I 7__j__ ~ l I I I I I I II I 0.6 1 1 1 I 1 1 ! -1 Allowable Flaw Size 1
11-+-i-+-1-+--<
I I I I Reached in 7.5 EFPY I I I I I I I I I I I I : I I I 20:: I I l II I .
I I I I ~-rJ I ' I i
.9
';;;' 0.5 I
I I I
I I I I
I ! I I
II
E"'
E-<
=; 0.4 I I I I I I I I II I T 1'--1---1---+--+--+---+-
~.
I I 1 I ~
I I I I I
~
I I I I I A I I 1/ I I I I I
~ 0.3 I I I I I I I
~ I J I I I I I I I I 0.2 I I I I I I I I I I ! I I I / I I I I I 1/ I 0.1 I I I .11 I I 1 1 I / I I I I I ""I I I I I I jl-"'V I I I I-~
0 I I I I I I I ! I 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 Effective Full Power Years (EFPY)
Figure 7-1: Flaw Growth Evaluation Chart for SG Inlet Nozzle Axial Flaw (AR=2)
(EFPY based on inlet temperature of 605oF)
Page 19 of28
Westinghouse Non-Proprietary Class 3 LTR-PAFM-15-11-NP Revision 0 0.8 I L__l l I I I I I +: i--
..--=.:;:-L. ...:=:-= _ Max:imumAllowableEnd:of-Evaluation Period Flaw Srze 11--
11
+-
+- -+-
/
-l-~-o-!-- - + - -~
\ : !
-~
1 I I 7 \ I 0.7 I ~ : I I I I 1/ . \I ! I I I ' I I I \1 I I i II I I 'I / I -~ 1 '
L-~---L--+-~-----~--~--~-4--~--t---~'--t-~---t--i-~-
I II I I I ' 1 1
, ! /' ~ Allowable Flaw Size 1>--L,--1---1 0.6 : ] 1 i 1 : 1 1 1 Reached in 8.5 EFPY I I I L__ ' i I / I I I i I I i : / I I !
I I
'i~ 0.5 I I I 1 i I I I '-----1----+-----l---
, 1 i : i J I I -~
1 I I I I I ! i I I I
.§ I I i I I i i
"" I i I 1/ I I --1 I
~ 1---1--_L_--i-+---11---!1-_I I I I
I i
I '
I
0.4

1 I I I 7 I I I
~ II I I I '
I I' I 'I I I 1I i Q
.::l.
1---i----i------f---f-----~,: ---~~---r
I 1 1 i
1 I. I r------1 I ~I 1 1 I1 i---i-----
I 1 1
?:: 0.3 0:: 1 i__j1 '
-~. 1/
I I I
I I I i I
~
-+
I 1---1--ll--+--___J--1 I
1 '
1 I
1 I
I
/1 1 I
-r I
i 1
f----- ---r--
I i
1I
-r !
i I
! F' 0.2 I !I I I/ ' I I II I I I I I II
' I i '/ I l I I
: I ' / I I I I I I ~ !
I I
II II I I
I -1I / i I I I ! I I I
' i i I I I I -]1 I ! I I I I I I '
0.1 I i i ; /1 I I I I I I I I I I I I
I I 1-----:;;J' 1/ I i .I I '
I I i I I + e.--:-
1
_...1 I
_/ L_
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
i I
I I I i
I I I
I I
1---t----+~---
I 0
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 Effective Full Power Years (EFPY)
Figure 7-2: Flaw Growth Evaluation Chart for SG Inlet Nozzle Circumferential Flaw (AR=lO)
(EFPY based on inlet temperature of 605.F)
Page 20 of28
Westinghouse Non-Proprietary Class 3 LTR-PAFM-15-11-NP Revision 0 0.8 1 1 I I I T I I I I : I II 1 , I 1 I I 1 . I I I , I I
+ ~I I
1=:1 ::t I _,_ H Maxnnum Allowable End-of- 1"---1 _ -1,._ .,_ _ ,...._ __. _ -L ..J.......
r 1-l """"t I i i; n Evaluation Period Flaw Size I T 1.] 1**1 I I]
H I
II\.
J__\]
I
~-~
I J
I I I]
I -1*
I O.? Ff=§j+/-H I I 14-14 I I I I V T\FT-=It--Fl1+=+=\ i Allowable Flaw Size l=l=tl )
l I .J Reached in 37.8 EFPY H--J----1 f---1-----1-1----1-i I I I I I T 8--~/1 I' I I I I, .f.---+--+-
I/ I ~~-- I I
I I 1
I J1 II I I I I I I I r l*l- II 1~**1 I=T.A f T1- I I 1- , . 1= l=r -: I I ! I I I I I I_ I 1=-1--¥ 71 I I I FFFFFH
-~ I -~ 1---r l~l -1 I 1-+-~
I \ I I I ll I I ll 1=1 VI I IE-Fll I I I I I ~-' 1 1
Ol 0
1-W=ffi I I I I U$1 II r i lllul~i Tl I I I H=
I 1
, \ ~ I I I ::t] I ml I i I I I l---l3 ED ~ I I F 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 Effective Full Power Years (EFPY)
Figure 7-3: Flaw Growth Evaluation Chart for SG Outlet Nozzle Axial Flaw (AR=2)
(EFPY based on outlet temperature of543oF)
Page 21 of28
Westinghouse Non-Proprietary Class 3 LTR-PAFM-15-11-NP Revision 0 0.8 I I I I I I I I : : I I I I y I I I
I L__\ I I I I /1 I I 1 i F -e 1- -
I
L
_u Maximum Allowable End-of-

d Fl s* II- -+ -+ -
'I +- ~ 11........,* - !!
1 '
"'t::._:t:::_l-I ,
l , Evaluation Perro aw 1ze )__ I I .--1----+--',..--:--+--j
~ I~ ~
1 I T I ! II I I I I I / i\. : I ! !
0.7 I : 1 I 1 : 1 j I 1 l 1 I I I I 1/ I '\
1 f ! ! I I I I I I I ! I I ' /1 : '\. f-----1---i I I I J I I l j I l I l I I I ..t:J I I ~ I I Rl

~'IH~

! LJ 1' ' I ,-*~ I I I 1 i I -[ Allowab;e Flaw Size L.
' II I I- 1I - - Ti I'/L J-1 R =h ' d
44.9 EFPY . - iI m
o.6 r I I
I I I
I l I
I : /1 y
I I I I
H ' ' I I i
'--I*
~r- I~:
I !/ I I I I f-.~,;
i I i III II '
1--i'
~ ~'
I II J' J r--1I I I '
C' : 1 I I ---1I !
I
-;; I ,, I J~~~--,--~~
1' '/
.9
'-'0.5
"-1 I
'.l.i i ' . i' i
I 1
'1
'1
~
"Zl I LLI-1.
I '-1 I
=r=_ r--
ll I
/
) I I '
II I' I I
I I
-- i I ' - ' ' ,
I t: i I
=
r' 04 I
I I
I
' I i
I I
I : I i
I /1 I/
lI I
I l
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I II II I
Ii i
I'
--eI I
E '- L- 1 ' I I ' ' '
~
1 I I ' '
L----~+----4-,----,
£ I : ' , . 1 ' I I I ! 1 I i
' . I' II . ' ' '
I IIJ
! I
' ' I I I Ii ' I ' '
A.. II I I I I I i I I , I I , II i i I ,
~::=::
0.3
II I
I II I I l_j._j.j I I :I I I I
I/
if- + I I
' I I I -+ I -+
I l lI ' '1 0.2
_J: I I 1
I I
1 I
~ :
I n"7 L__l 1 1-' 'I ,I ,I ,,
1
' I 1 I I I ' 1/ I I ' 1 I I I ; I I I i 1 ' I 1 -; I !
0.1
-:I
' i I I I T/
' / f- :
I'_)
I i :
I I
I I
I
-+-
I+-
' l I 'I j
~
171- 1./
L__L Ii __j_L-J L____j_,
I I I I II

----+------4 _I II I

II I
L __i I
I I I
I I
I I I::t I
lI I
0 ~~~~~~ttE~tlE 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 Effective Full Power Years (EFPY)
Figure 7-4: Flaw Growth Evaluation Chart for SG Outlet Nozzle Circumferential Flaw (AR=lO)
(EFPY based on outlet temperature of 543 *p)
Page 22 of28
Westinghouse Non-Proprietary Class 3 LTR-PAFM-15-11-NP Revision 0 8.0 Summary and Conclusions NextEra Energy submitted a relief request to the Nuclear Regulatmy Commission (NRC) in Reference 2. To complete the review of the relief request, the NRC requested a flaw evaluation be performed to demonstrate that the SG DM welds possess adequate thickness to protect against failure due to PWSCC.
Therefore, the objective of the analysis performed in this report is to demonstrate that the Point Beach Unit 2 SG primary nozzle DM welds possess adequate thickness to protect against failure due to PWSCC by performing a crack growth evaluation. In the crack growth analysis a 1.5 mm inside surface flaw is postulated in the inlay and the amount of time is determined for the flaw the reach the maximum allowable end-of-evaluation period flaw size. This maximum allowable end-of-evaluation period flaw size would be the largest flaw size that could exist in the DM welds and be acceptable according to the ASME Section XI Code (Reference 3). Crack growth was calculated based on the PWSCC growth mechanism through both the inlay and the Alloy 82 DM weld.
The results in Table 8-1 demonstrate that it would take more than 30 EFPY for the postulated 1.5 mm deep flaw in the Point Beach SG outlet nozzle DM weld inlay to grow to the maximum allowable end-of-evaluation period flaw size.
The results in Table 8-1 justify a longer inspection interval for the SG inlet nozzles than currently allowed for Code Case N-770-1 Inspection Item A-2 welds, which is five years. Based on the results for the SG inlet nozzle DM welds in Figures 7-1 and 7-2, an inspection interval of up to 7.5 EFPY is acceptable for the Point Beach Unit 2 SG inlet nozzle DM welds based on the flaw growth evaluation. Based on a conservative power availability factor of 95%, the maximum inspection interval for the Point Beach Unit 2 SG inlet nozzle DM welds is 7.9 calendar years (7.5 EFPY).
Page 23 of28
Westinghouse Non-Proprietary Class 3 LTR-PAFM-15-11-NP Revision 0 Table 8-1 Point Beach Unit 2 SG DM Weld Allowable Inspection Interval Effective Full Power Years for Postulated Flaw to Grow to ASME Section XI Maximum Allowable End-of-Evaluation Location Period Flaw size (a/t = 0.75)
Axial Flaw Circumferential Flaw (Aspect Ratio = 2) (Aspect Ratio= 10)
SG Inlet Nozzle 7.5 EFPY 8.5 EFPY SG Outlet Nozzle 37.8 EFPY 44.9EFPY a = flaw depth t = thickness Aspect Ratio = flaw length/flaw depth Page 24 of28
Westinghouse Non-Proprietary Class 3 LTR-PAFM-15-11-NP Revision 0 9.0 References I. ASME Code Case N-770-1, "Alternative Examination Requirements and Acceptance Standards for Class 1 PWR Piping and Vessel Nozzle Butt Welds Fabricated with UNS N06082 or UNS W86182 Weld Filler Material With or Without Application of Listed Mitigation Activities,Section XI, Division 1."
2. NextEra Energy Point Beach, LLC Letter to NRC, dated December 27, 2013, "10 CFR 50.55a Request, Relief Request 2-RR-7 Re-categorization of Unit 2 Steam Generator Nozzle to Safe-End Welds." [ML13365A310]
3. ASME Boiler & Pressure Vessel Code,Section XI, Rules for Inservice Inspection ofNuclear Power Plant Components, 2007 Edition with 2008 Addenda.
4. Westinghouse Drawing 6147E62, Revision 3, Sheets 1 through 6. "Point Beach Unit 2 Model 47F Replacement Steam Generator Channel Head Welding Machining and Assembly."
5. Technical Manual No. TM 1440-C370, Revision 1. "Vertical Steam Generator Instructions for Wisconsin Electric Power Company Point Beach Nuclear Plant- Unit 2." Westinghouse General Order No. MK-77054. June 2012.
6. Westinghouse Document, WCAP-16983-P, Revision 0. "Point Beach Units 1 and 2 Extended Power Uprate (EPU) Engineering Report." April2011.
7. Dominion Engineering, Inc, Document C-8850-00-01, Rev. 0, "Welding Residual Stress Calculation for Steam Generator Nozzle DMW."
8. Materials Reliability Program: Primary Water Stress Corrosion Cracking (PWSCC) Flaw Evaluation Guidance (MRP-287), EPRI, Palo Alto, CA: 2010, 1021023.
9. Materials Reliability Program: Advanced FEA Evaluation of Growth of Postulated Circumferential PWSCC Flaws in Pressurizer Nozzle Dissimilar Metal Welds (MRP-216, Rev. 1): Evaluations Specific to Nine Subject Plants. EPRI, Palo Alto, CA: 2007. 1015400.
10. Materials Reliability Program: Crack Growth Rates for Evaluating Primary Water Stress Corrosion Cracking (PWSCC) of Alloy 82, 182, and 132 Welds (MRP-115), EPRI, Palo Alto, CA: 2004. 1006696.
II. S. R. Mettu, I. S. Raju, "Stress Intensity Factors for Pati-through Surface Cracks in Hollow Cylinders," Jointly developed under Grants NASA-JSC 25685 and Lockheed ESC 30124, Job Order number 85-130, Call number 96N72214 (NASA-TM-111707), July 1992.
12. American Petroleum Institute, API 579-1/ASME FFS-1 (API 579 Second Edition), "Fitness-For-Service," June 2007.
13. W. H. Bamford, G. DeBoo, "Alloy 690 & Weld Metal Reference SCC Growth Rate Models for ASME Section XI," 16th International Conference on Environmental Degradation:
Asheville, NC, August 14,2013.
14. Rudland, David L. et al, "Evaluation of the Inlay Process as a Mitigation Strategy for Primary Water Stress Corrosion Cracking in Pressurized Water Reactors," April 2010. (Accession Number ML101260554)
Page 25 of28
Westinghouse Non-Proprietary Class 3 LTR-PAFM-15-11-NP Revision 0 Appendix A: Crack Growth Charts for Improvement Factor of 30 for Alloy 52 As discussed in Section 6.0, the exact PWSCC growth rate for the Alloy 52 inlay cannot be easily ascertained. Current industry data suggests that the PWSCC crack growth rate for Alloy 52 is on the order of 1/100 the PWSCC growth rate of Alloy 182, oi- better (Reference 13). However, for the evaluation contained in Section 7.0 of this report, a conservative improvement factor of 10 over the Alloy 182 crack growth rate was used to represent the crack growth rate of Alloy 52.
Contained in this appendix are the results of the crack growth evaluation in which an improvement factor of 30 over the Alloy 182 crack growth rate was used to represent the crack growth rate of Alloy 52.
Contained in Figures A-1 and A-2 are the flaw growth results for the SG inlet nozzle in which an improvement factor of 30 over the Alloy 182 crack growth rate is used to represent the crack growth rate for the Alloy 52 inlay material. Included in the figures are also the flaw growth curves for an improvement factor of 10 for comparison purposes, as well as the maximum allowable end-of-evaluation period flaw size. It should be noted that the crack growth results for the outlet nozzle are not contained in this appendix as Section 7.0 demonstrated that it took longer than 30 years for the postulated flaw to grow through the outlet nozzle DM weld and inlay using an improvement factor of 10. The SG inlet nozzle crack growth results (Figures A-1 and A-2) in terms ofEFPY are based on a temperature of 605°F.
The results in Figures A-1 and A-2 demonstrate that it would take more than 10 EFPY for the postulated 1.5 mm deep flaw in the Point Beach SG inlet nozzle DM weld inlay to grow to the maximum allowable end-of-evaluation period flaw size using an improvement factor of 30 over the Alloy 182 crack growth rate to represent the crack growth rate for the Alloy 52 inlay material.
Page 26 of28
Westinghouse Non-Proprietary Class 3 LTR-PAFM-15-11-NP Revision 0 0.8 -t--1 I I ; I I I I I II i I I i I I
-~-j
-+----+'1-1 MaximumAllo:VableEnd:of-Evaluation Penod Flaw S1ze
~--;;;;::-:;;;;;;:--b-;;:;;;:--.;;;;;;*-+/--::::-~~
I' 1 1
-- -- r-1--~/
11
+/-~
, I 1-------ri I I I I 0.7 I I I I I I

l-e-- I --1-FF---- ----=t --r---~l--+-----l------j-1 I I Improvement Factor = 10 17 1 1 1 0.6 1 I I

~ , II I 1"'- I I J I 20:: : , .I
'-' 1 "'1 I 1 1 Improvement Factor= 30 '
"'"' 0.5 I I I I
.§"' ' I I I I ""I I-
<J I I I 1 T ~ I
.2 I I I I I ~~ I E-< i J I i---+-1 I I I II I 0.4
~ I I ! I I I I I I Ll--+---+-----+-----1
..c
~
i:l..
"' 0.3
~I 1_1_(
I I I i
I I I I
I I
II
, II I
I I
1 I
I I
I l-l+----+--+----11----jf\----+l--1---+--i----t-1 I I
_LI I I I I I
I I I
I I I, Lf-
0:: I I
I I I ' I I I l_J_L__I---+1-/1--+1-1---+--+--+----1
! ! I
~ I I I I I --,I I I '
l--4-~-+-~+-~-+~l--+l~!-+l~-i--~1-~~-r-f I I I , I II II IL_L___f---
1-,
0.2
____L_j I I I I I I I I I I I j i I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1-1---l----1---t----/
0.1 I l- I ) 1 I I 17 T
! I I I / , 1 ' I i .II I I I
, 1 ! I l I I 17' I I I l-+--li-----~--~----11-:V" I I 1/ I I i I I l .....J.-"" . ...-"1 I -+---1+---+--1-----+--1 0 I I I I -1 I I I II I I I I I 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 Effective Full Power Years (EFPY)
Figure A-1: Flaw Growth Comparison for SG Inlet Nozzle Axial Flaw (AR=2) with Alloy 52 Improvement Factors of 10 and 30 (EFPY based on inlet temperature of 605.F)
Page 27 of28
Westinghouse Non-Proprietary Class 3 LTR-PAFM-15-11-NP Revision 0 0
8 1 1 ' I ' I I I I L II ' _!_l 11 H I _I1 i: 1I 1-=f
, 1r__[' __ l I Maximum Allowable End-of- ~ _,.... r- -1~ _+/-:-_!=:::+=
1 1 , ,
I + 1- _1:::: - -+1-r- too=
1-- I- - I Evaluation Period Flaw Size 1_;_ _/_I I I ~-1-+-f--!-r--1 0.7 I
I , I
_L t I I I I I I ! I i I I I I I _L I ~II : i I I! ! ~
I I
I I I
I I
i I
I I; I IW-1 I I j
j i J I I I I I ! I -J --f- I + -+ r1--
I T T -1 I I I /1 I I I I I I : I I ; I I L 1 i 1 I Improvement Factor= 10 l-1 1 1 1 1 ' 1 1 1 1 i 1 1 1 1 1 06 I I I I I ' I ...... I I if I I il i ! I
' I I I I ""-I I II I Improvement Factor= 30 I I II I I 1 1 I I i l I I I 1'..1 J/il I I ..l I I
~_tilI
~
1 I
~ I I II ";;!;
0.5
.i<
L-J1--,---
1 l l ; I, H-rI I IIi ---,I* II +->*' tt ' .I tv-~
'K I 1/1 II ,
f'
!I 1 I I1 I
I7 I' -r-"-
! I I II I 1
~
=
!04
* - II
"--- T
~----1 I tl 1 I
I 1' I
I
1 Ij 1I i i !1, 7
I if I
I I
. I F~-
I " '
e--LZLI I /I I I i
I
,___1 I1 1--!-+-1 I I I H -+
~~I
.,. ,_ I ' . II 1
1 I I T ;---r-1
~ ~ ~:
<=>-'- 1t-i * : 1 i 11-,
1 T I -r-- I iii O.c:> -]
_ 1 _ 1I i .I !
I, ' ,1 1
11/
I -j I I TI II I
1! 11 1 ' 1 I
11I 1
0.2
_l I
I
_L I
I I
'j 1' i
I I I
l I
I Ll 1 TT I
I I
1
+ l;
. l
+'
II I j I 1
I I' l I
' lI I
I
' 1 I
I
]'1
! m I
i lI I ! I T I , iI I I ! I _j I II I' I _l l
I' I
I 1 '
I I I
(-+-1--U!
1 i /IY II i
I I
I* !'
1 1
I I
171I Ill T
I :'
I It
'-j I
I~
1
' 1 i I j ' I . I I vI L I I I '
I l j l i l j j 1 ', j II T---"J-'
I I ' ,
I I -1 O.l I I I I i=QZI I ! I i I ~~-~ ffillllll~i-il 1
-~ --+-f I I I -r I 1 I ER4_1_T_PT I I I I: H 1
o l I 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 Effective Full Power Years (EFPY)
Figure A-2: Flaw Growth Comparison for SG Inlet Nozzle Circumferential Flaw (AR=lO) with Alloy 52 Improvement Factors of 10 and 30 (EFPY based on inlet temperature of 605.F)
Page 28 of28
Attachment 6 Westinghouse CAW-15-4207 Application for Withholding Proprietary Information from Public Disclosure (7 pages follow)
@Westin ouse Westinghouse Electric Company Engineering, Equipment and Major Projects 1000Westinghouse Drive, Building 3 Cranberry Township, Pennsylvania 16066 USA U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Direct tel: {412) 374-4643 Document Control Desk Direct fax: (724) 940-8560 11555 Rockville Pike e-mail: greshaja@westinghouse.com Rockville, MD 20852 Proj letter:
CAW-15-4207 Jlffie 9, 2015 APPLICATION FOR WITHHOLDING PROPRIETARY INFORMATION FROM PUBLIC DISCLOSURE
Subject:
LTR-PAFM~15~11~P, "Point Beach Unit 2 Steam Generator Primary Nozzle to Safe-end Weld Crack Growth Analysis" (Proprietary)
The proprietary information for which withholding* is being requested in the above-referenced report is further identified in Affidavit CAW-15-4207 signed by the owner of the proprietary information, Westinghouse Electric Company LLC. The Affidavit, which accompanies this letter, sets forth the basis on which the information may be withheld from public disclosure by the Commission and addresses with specificity the considerations listed in paragraph (b)(4) of 10 CPR Section 2.390 of the Commission's regulations.
Accordingly, this letter authorizes the utilization of the accompanying Affidavit by NextEra Energy.
Correspondence with respect to the proprietary aspects of the Application for Withholding or the Westinghouse Affidavit should reference CAW~15~4207, and should be addressed to James A. Gresham, Manager, Regulatory Compliance, Westinghouse Electric Company, 1000 Westinghouse Drive, Building 3 Suite 310, Cranberry Township, Pennsylvania 16066;
Very truly yours,
.-1r-v~t* . fl
/J\)
f 1'WlMttw---
Jiames A. Gresham, Manager Regulatory Compliance
CAW-15-4207 June 9, 2015 AFFIDAVIT COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA:
ss COUNTY OF BUTLER:
L James A Gresham, am authorized to execute this Affidavit on behalf of Westinghouse Electric Company LLC (Westinghouse), and that the averments offact set forth in this Affidavit are true and correct to the best of my knowledge, information, and belief.
"mes A Gresham, Manager Regulatory Compliance
2 CAW-15-4207 r
(1) I am Manager, Regulatory Compliance, Westinghouse Electric Company LLC (Westinghouse),
and as such, I have been specifically delegated the function of reviewing the proprietary information sought to be withheld from public disclosure in connection with nuclear power plant licensing and rule making proceedings, and am authorized to apply for its withholding on behalf of Westinghouse.
(2) I am making this Affidavit in conformance with the provisions of 10 CFR Section 2.390 of the Commission's regulations and in conjunction with the Westinghouse Application for Withholding Proprietary Information from Public Disclosure accompanying this Affidavit.
(3) *
I have personal knowledge of the criteria and procedures utilized by Westinghouse in designating information as a trade secret, privileged or as confidential commercial or financial information.
(4) Pursuant to the provisions of paragraph (b)(4) of Section 2.390 of the Commission's regulations, the following is furnished for consideration by the Commission in determining whether the information sought to be withheld from public disclosure should be withheld.
(i) The information sought to be withheld from public disclosure is owned and has been held in confidence by Westinghouse.
(ii) The information is of a type customarily held in confidence by Westinghouse and not customarily disclosed to the public. Westinghouse has a rational basis for determining the types of information customarily held in confidence by it and, in that connection, utilizes a system to determine when and whether to hold certain types of information in confidence. The application of that system and the substance of that system constitute Westinghouse policy and provide the rational basis required.
Under that system, information is held in confidence if it falls in one or more of several types, the release of which might result in the loss of an existing or potential competitive advantage, as follows:
(a) The information reveals the distinguishing aspects of a process (or component, structure, tool, method, etc.) where prevention of its use by any of Westinghouse's competitors without license from Westinghouse constitutes a competitive economic advantage over other companies.
3 CAW-15-4207 (b) It consists of supporting data, including test data, relative to a process (or component, structure, tool, method, etc.), the application of which data secures a competitive economic advantage, e.g., by optimization or improved marketability.
{c) Its use by a competitor would reduce his expenditure of resources or improve his competitive position in the design, manufacture, shipment, installation, assurance of quality, or licensing a similar product.
(d) It reveals cost or price information, production capacities, budget levels, or commercial strategies of Westinghouse, its customers or suppliers.
(e) It reveals aspects of past, present, or future Westinghouse or customer funded development plans and programs of potential commercial value to Westinghouse.
(f) It contains patentable ideas, for which patent protection may be desirable.
(iii) There are sound policy reasons behind the Westinghouse system which include the following:
(a) The use of such information by Westinghouse gives Westinghouse a competitive advantage over its competitors. It is, therefore, withheld from disclosure to protect the Westinghouse competitive position.
(b) It is information that is marketable in many ways. The extent to which such information is available to competitors diminishes the Westinghouse ability to sell products and services involving the use of the information.
(c) Use by our competitor would put Westinghouse at a competitive disadvantage by reducing his expenditure of resources at our expense.
(d) Each component of proprietary information pertinent to a particular competitive advantage is potentially as valuable as the total competitive advantage. If competitors acquire components of proprietary information, any one component
4 CAW-15-4207 may be the key to the entire puzzle, thereby depriving Westinghouse of a competitive advantage.
(e) Unrestricted disclosure would jeopardize the position of prominence of Westinghouse in the world market, and thereby give a market advantage to the competition of those countries.
(f) The Westinghouse capacity to invest corporate assets in research and development depends upon the success in obtaining and maintaining a competitive advantage.
(iv) The information is being transmitted to the Commission in confidence and, under the provisions of 10 CPR Section 2.390, it is to be received in confidence by the Commission.
(v) The information sought to be protected is not available in public sources or available information has not been previously employed in the same original manner or method to the best of our knowledge and belief, (vi) The proprietary information sought to be withheld in this submittal is that which is appropriately marked in LTR~PAFM 1 I -P, "Point Beach Unit 2 Steam Generator Primary Nozzle to Safe-end Weld Crack Growth Analysis (Proprietary), for submittal to the Commission, being transmitted by NextEra Energy letter and Application for Withholding Proprietary Information from Public Disclosure, to the Document Control Desk. The proprietary information as submitted by Westinghouse is that associated with technical justification to *suppolt extended volumetric examination interval for Point Beach Unit 2 steam generator primary nozzle to safe-end dissimilar metal welds, and may be used only for that purpose.
(a) This information is part of that which will enable Westinghouse to:
(i) Provide technical justlfication to support extended volumetric examination interval for Point Beach Unit 2 steam generator primary nozzle to safe-end dissimilar metal welds.
5 CAW-15-4207 (b) Further this information has substantial commercial value as follows:
(i) Westinghouse plans to sell the use of similar information to its customers for the purpose of providing technical justification to supp01t extended volumetric examination interval for steam generator primary nozzle to safe-end dissimilar metal welds.
(H) Westinghouse can sell support and defense of industry guidelines and acceptance criteria for plant-specific applications.
(iii) . The information requested to be withheld reveals the distinguishing aspects of a methodology which was developed by Westinghouse.
Public disclosure of this proprietary information is likely to cause substantial hatm to the competitive position of Westinghouse because it would enhance the ability of competitors to provide similar technical evaluation justifications and licensing defense services for commercial power reactors without commensurate expenses. Also, public disclosure of the information would enable others to use the information to meet NRC requirements for licensing documentation without purchasing the right to use the information.
The development of the technology described in part by the information is the result of applying the results of many years of experience in an intensive Westinghouse effort and the expenditure of a considerable sum of money.
In order for competitors of Westinghouse to duplicate this information, similar technical programs would have to be perlormed and a significant manpower effort, having the requisite talent and experience, would have to be expended.
Further the deponent sayeth not.
PROPRIETARY INFORMATION NOTICE Transmitted herewith are proprietary and non-proprietary versions of documents furnished to the NRC associated with technical justification to support extended volumetric examination interval for Point Beach Unit 2 steam generator primary nozzle to safe~end dissimilar metal welds, and may be used only for that purpose.
In order to conform to the requirements of 10 CFR 2.390 of the Commission's regulations concerning the protection of proprietary information so submitted to the NRC, the information which is proprietary in the proprietary versions is contained within brackets, and where the proprietary information has been deleted in the non-proprietary versions, only the brackets remain (the information that was contained within the brackets in the proprietary versions having been deleted). The justification for claiming the information so designated as proprietary is indicated in both versions by means of lower case letters (a) through (f) located as a superscript immediately following the brackets enclosing each item of information being identified as proprietary or in the margin opposite such information. These lower case letters refer to the types of infonnation Westinghouse customarily holds in confidence identified in Sections (4)(ii)(a) through (4)(ii)(f) of the Affidavit accompanying this transmittal pursuant to 10 CFR 2.390(b)(1 ).
COPYRIGHT NOTICE The repo1ts transmitted herewith each beat a Westinghouse copyright notice. The NRC is permitted to make the number of copies of the information contained in these rep01ts which are necessary for its internal use in connection with generic and plant-specific reviews and approvals as wen as the issuance, denial, amendment, transfer, renewal, modification, suspension, revocation, or violation of a license, permit, order, or regulation subject to the requirements of 10 CFR 2.390 regarding restrictions on public disclosure to the extent such information has been identified as proprietary by Westinghouse, copyright protection notwithstanding. With respect to the non-proprietary versions of these reports, the NRC is permitted to make the number of copies beyond those necessary for its internal use which are necessary in order to have one copy available for public*viewing in the appropriate docket files in the public document room in Washington, DC and in local public document rooms as may be required by NRC regulations if the number of copies submitted is insufficient for this purpose. Copies made by the NRC must include the copyright notice in all instances and the proprietary notice if the original was identified as proprietary.

v t e Letter Sequence Request
CAC:MF6615, (Withdrawn, Closed)
Initiation Request, Request Acceptance... Administration Withholding Request Acceptance, Withholding Request Acceptance Questions Answers Results Withdrawal Other: ML16063A058
MONTHYEAR2015-08-13 [Table View]

NRC 2015-0040, Steam Generator Nozzle to Safe-End Dissimilar Metal (DM) Weld Inspection

Text

References:

Applicable Code Edition and Addenda

Description:

Attachment:

Description:

Attachment:

Attachment:

Description:

Attachment:

Description:

Attachment:

Description:

Attachment:

Attachment:

Description:

Attachment:

Description:

Attachment:

Description:

Attachment:

Description:

Description:

Attachment:

Description:

Attachment:

Attachment:

Description:

Attachment:

Description:

Attachment:

Description:

Attachment:

Description:

Attachment:

Description:

Description:

Attachment:

Description:

Attachment:

Description:

Attachment:

Description:

Description:

Attachment:

Description:

Description:

Attachment:

Description:

Attachment:

Description:

Attachment:

Description:

Attachment:

Description:

Attachment:

Attachment:

Description:

Attachment:

Attachment:

Description:

Attachment:

Description:

Subject:

Subject:

Navigation menu

Search