ML12038A242

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Email from G. Wilson, NRR to W. Kemper, NRR Et Al. North Anna Seismic Event - Questions Which Would Need to Be Responded to and Evaluated by the NRC Hq Staff, W/Handwritten Notes
ML12038A242
Person / Time
Site: North Anna  Dominion icon.png
Issue date: 09/15/2011
From: George Wilson
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
To: Kemper W, David Rahn
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
FOIA/PA-2011-0357
Download: ML12038A242 (2)


Text

Rahn, David From: Wilson, George nc r' Sent: Thursday, September 15, 2011 2:19 PM To: Kemper, William; Rahn, David Cc: Stattel, Richard; Carte, Norbert

Subject:

Re: North Anna Seismic Event--Questions Which Would need to be responded to and *****

evaluated by the NRC HQ Staff The time reponse tests are the critical evaluations for relay performance Sent from nrc blackberry Georae wilson From: Kemper, William R To: Rahn, Davtd Cc: Wilson, George; Stattel, Richard; Carte, Norbert Sent: Thu Sep 15 13:04:39 2011

Subject:

RE: North Anna Seismic Event--Questions Which Would need to be responded to and evaluated by the NRC HQ Staff Hi Dave, I have been out of the office for a few days and just saw this message. My recommendation would be to have the licensee verify the RPS and ESFAS channel calibration is within acceptable limits, in addition to a functional checks. This would be equivalent to their refueling calibration surveillance, and perhaps they could satisfy this action by performing calibrations on at least two channels, and if necessary, based on the results of the channels calibrated, calibrate the other two channels of RPS and ESFAS--only if needed. Hope this helps.

Thanks, Bill Kemper, EICB/DE/NRR 301-415-0927 (office)

L (b)(6) J(cell)

From: Rahn, David Sent: Tuesday, Sep mber 13, 2011 2:08 PMY1 To: Alvarado, Rossnyev, hung, Pong; Darbali, Samir; Dittman, Bernard; Mossman, Timothy; Singh, Gursharan; Stattel, Richard; Wyman, Stephen Cc: Carte, Norbert; Kemper, Wii; Wilson, George

Subject:

North Anna Seismic Event- uestions Which Would need to be responded to and evaluated by the NRC HQ Staff Hi EICB Team:

Per our conversation this morning at the branch meetin-*l*ease provide a list of questions you believe we would need to follow up on with the licensee from a long-te &C Design standpoint in order to arrive at a nformation in this record was deleted 1 n accordance with tie Freedom of information Ct., exem.tions OWA. :CI- -30 Z7

reasonable asý rance determination that it is OK to restart one of the units at North Anna. Please keep in nkd that there i Iready an Augmented Inspection Team at North Anna site composed of personnel from our Region II Office, w are looking at issues related to the actions taken by the licensee immediately upon experiencing the eart uake. Also keep in mind that the Licensee has already informed us that they intend to perform functional testin of all Reactor Trip system and ESFAS system initiation channels prior to start-up.

In addition to understanding e earthquake's impact on IC equipment functionality, there are issues we discussed this morning pertaini to the operability of the seismic monitoring equipment, which need to be addressed.

s\

From Meena Khanna's meeting announcement fora meeting to be held on Wednesday, Sept 14, 2011 from 1:30 pm until 2:00 pm.

"I request that all of you please try to attend this m ting, as we need to meet to address path forward with regards to this issue. I will bring a copy of the d action plan and will lay out expectations, guidance, schedules, etc. PIs note that this is a high p Irity initiative, in that it involves plant restart.

We are looking to issue questions starting this week, so I r fly would like for each branch, if not already done, to pls develop questions regarding short term ior to plant restart) and long term (post restart) licensee's actions."

Thanks, dfe.t- ,

Dave David L. Rahn, P.E.

Senior Electronics Engineer, Instrumentation and Controls Branch Mail Stop O9-E3 Division of Engineering Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington', D.C. 20555-0001 Office: (301) 415-1315 Fax: (301) 415-2444 2