ML051510289

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Core Operating Limits Report (Color), Revisions 0 and 1
ML051510289
Person / Time
Site: Columbia Energy Northwest icon.png
Issue date: 05/17/2005
From: Coleman D
Energy Northwest
To:
Document Control Desk, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
G02-05-094
Download: ML051510289 (121)


Text

E ENERGY

\People.NORTHWEST Vision* Solutions P.O. Box 968

  • Richland, WA
  • 99352-0968 May 17, 2005 G02-05-094 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Document Control Desk Washington, DC 20555

Subject:

COLUMBIA GENERATING STATION, DOCKET NO. 50-397; CYCLE 17, CORE OPERATING LIMITS REPORT (COLR),

REVISIONS 0 AND I

Dear Sir or Madam:

Energy Northwest herewith submits the Cycle 17 COLR, Revisions 0 and 1, as required by the Columbia Generating Station Technical Specification (TS) 5.6.3.d (previously 5.6.5.d).

The operating limits inthe COLR were developed in accordance with the requirements of TS 5.6.3.a, b., and c. The changes to the COLR have been reviewed and approved by the Columbia Generating Station Plant Operations Committee.

The Cycle 17 COLRs apply to the recently completed operating cycle. Revision 0 was issued in June 2003 and Revision I was issued in October 2003. The failure to submit the Cycle 17 COLRs upon their issuance, as required by the TS, was recently identified and this deficiency was entered into Energy Northwest's corrective action program. These two Cycle 17 COLRs are submitted at this time to bring the Columbia docket up to date. The failure to submit past COLRs is isolated to cycle 17.

Should you have any questions or desire additional information regarding this matter, please contact me at (509) 377-4342.

Respectfully, DW Coleman Manager, Regulatory Programs Mail Drop PE20 Attachments: COLR Rev. 0 COLR Rev. 1 cc: BS Mallett - NRC RIV JO Luce - EFSEC BJ Benney - NRC NRR WA Horin - Winston & Strawn NRC Senior Resident Inspector - 988C RN Sherman - BPAI1399

CYCLE 17, CORE OPERATING LIMITS REPORT (COLR), REVISIONS 0 AND 1 CYCLE 17, CORE OPERATING LIMITS REPORT (COLR), REVISION 0

COLR 03-17 Revision 0 Columbia Generating Station Cycle 17 Core Operating Limits Report June 2003

Columbia Generating Station Cycle 17 Core Operating Limits Report List of Effective Pages PAGE REVISION i.0 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 6.0 7.0 8.0 9.0 10 .0 11 .0 12 .0 13 .0 14 .0 15 .0 16 .0 17 .0 18 .0 19 .0 20 .0 21 .0 22 .: 0 23 .0 24 .0 25 .0 26 .0 Columbia Generating Station LEP-1 COLR 03-17 Revision 0

I.,

27 0 28 0 29 0 30 .0 31 .0 32 .0 33 .0 34 .0 35 .0 36 .0 37 .0 38 .0 39 .0 40 .0 41 .0 42 .0 43 .0 44 .0 45 .0 46 .0 47 .0 48 .0 49 .0 50 .0 51 .0 52 .0 53 .0 54 .0 55 .0 Columbia Generating Station LEP-2 COLR 03-17 Revision 0

Columbia Generating Station Cycle 17 Core Operating Limits Report Table of Contents 1.0 Introduction and Summary ................................................. 1 2.0 Average Planar Linear Heat Generation Rate (APLHGR) Limits for Use in Technical Specification 3.2.1 ................................................. 4 3.0 Minimum Critical Power Ratio (MCPR) Limit for Use in Technical Specification 3.2.2 ................................................ 12 4.0 Linear Heat Generation Rate (LHGR) Limits for Use in Technical Specification 3.2.3 ................................................ 51 5.0 Oscillation Power Range Monitor (OPRM) Instrumentation Limits for Use in LCO 3.3.1.3 ................................................ 54 6.0 References ................................................ 55 Columbia Generating Station i COLR 03-17 Revision 0

1.0 Introduction and Summary This report provides the Average Planar Linear Heat Generation Rate (APLHGR) limits, the Minimum Critical Power Ratio (MCPR) limits, the Linear Heat Generation Rate (LHGR) limits and the Oscillation Power Range Monitor (OPRM)

Instrumentation limits for Columbia Generating Station Cycle 17 as required by Technical Specification 5.6.5. As required by Technical Specification 5.6.5, these limits were determined using NRC-approved methodology and are established so that all applicable limits of the plant safety analysis are met. References 6.1, 6.2, 6.3, and 6.4 describe the LOCA analyses for rated power. These analyses were performed with methodologies that result in Single Loop Operation (SLO) APLHGR limits as well as Two Loop Operation (TLO) APLHGR limits. The thermal limits for ATRIUM-10 fuel given in this report are documented in Reference 6.3. The MCPR limits for the SVEA-96 fuel are also documented in Reference 6.3. The APLHGR and LHGR limits for SVEA-96 fuel are documented in References 6.1 and 6.6. The basis for the OPRM Instrumentation limits is documented in References 6.3 and 6.5.

The MCPR limit is the maximum of (a) the applicable exposure dependent, full power and full flow MCPR limit, (b) the applicable exposure and power dependent MCPR limit, and (c) the applicable flow dependent MCPR limit specified in this report. This stipulation assures that the safety limit MCPR will not be violated during steady-state operation and anticipated operational occurrences throughout the Columbia Generating Station operating regime. Full power MCPR limits are specified to define operating limits at rated power and flow. Power dependent MCPR limits are specified to define operating limits at other than rated power conditions. A flow dependent MCPR is specified to define operating limits at other than rated flow conditions. The reduced flow MCPR limit, set by the limiting Recirculation Flow Increase event, provides bounding protection for all events at reduced flow.

The reload licensing analyses for this cycle provide operating limits for Extended Load Line Limit Analysis (ELLLA) operation which extends the power and flow operating regime for Columbia Generating Station up to the 108% rod line which at full power corresponds to 88% of rated flow. The MCPR limits defined in this report are applicable up to 100% of rated thermal power along and below the 108% rod line. The minimum flow for operation at rated power is 88% of rated flow; the maximum is 106%.

Per Technical Specification 4.2.1, the 12 fresh SVEA-96 fuel assemblies shall be loaded and operated so they will be nonlimiting MCPR assemblies.

The specific topical report revisions and supplements which describe the methodology utilized in this cycle specific analysis are shown in Table 1.1.

Columbia Generating Station 1 COLR 03-17 Revision 0

Table 1.1 Columbia Generating Station Reference Topical Reports

1. XN-NF-81-58(P)(A) Revision 2 and Supplements 1 and 2, RODEX2 Fuel Rod Thermal-Mechanical Response Evaluation Model, Exxon Nuclear Company, March 1984.
2. XN-NF-85-67(P)(A) Revision 1, Generic Mechanical Design for Exxon Nuclear Jet Pump BWR Reload Fuel, Exxon Nuclear Company, September 1986.
3. EMF-85-74(P) Revision 0 Supplement 1(P)(A) and Supplement 2(P)(A), RODEX2A (BWR) Fuel Rod Thermal-Mechanical Evaluation Model, Siemens Power Corporation, February 1998.
4. ANF-89-98(P)(A) Revision 1 and Supplement 1, Generic Mechanical Design Criteria for BWR Fuel Designs, Advanced Nuclear Fuels Corporation, May 1995.
5. XN-NF-80-19(P)(A) Volume 1 and Supplements 1 and 2, Exxon Nuclear Methodology for Boiling Water Reactors - Neutronic Methods for Design and Analysis, Exxon Nuclear Company, March 1983.
6. XN-NF-80-1 9(P)(A) Volume 4 Revision 1, Exxon Nuclear Methodology for Boiling Water Reactors: Application of the ENC Methodology to BWR Reloads, Exxon Nuclear Company, June 1986.
7. EMF-2158(P)(A) Revision 0, Siemens Power Corporation Methodology for Boiling Water Reactors: Evaluation and Validation of CASMO-4/MICROBURN-B2, Siemens Power Corporation, October 1999.
8. XN-NF-80-1 9(P)(A) Volume 3 Revision 2, Exxon Nuclear Methodology for Boiling Water Reactors, THERMEX: Thermal Limits Methodology Summary Description, Exxon Nuclear Company, January 1987.
9. XN-NF-84-105(P)(A) Volume 1 and Volume I Supplements 1 and 2, XCOBRA-T: A Computer Code for BWR Transient Thermal-Hydraulic Core Analysis, Exxon Nuclear Company, February 1987.
10. ANF-524(P)(A) Revision 2 and Supplements 1 and 2, ANF Critical Power Methodology for Boiling Water Reactors, Advanced Nuclear Fuels Corporation, November 1990.
11. ANF-913(P)(A) Volume 1 Revision 1 and Volume I Supplements 2, 3 and 4, COTRANSA2: A Computer Program for Boiling Water Reactor Transient Analysis, Advanced Nuclear Fuels Corporation, August 1990.
12. ANF-1358(P)(A) Revision 1, The Loss of Feedwater Heating Transient in Boiling Water Reactors, Advanced Nuclear Fuels Corporation, September 1992.
13. EMF-2209(P)(A) Revision 1, SPCB Critical Power Correlation, Siemens Power Corporation, July 2000.

Columbia Generating Station COLR 03-17 Revision 0

14. EMF-2245(P)(A) Revision 0, Application of Siemens Power Corporation's Critical Power Correlations to Co-Resident Fuel, Siemens Power Corporation, August 2000.
15. EMF-2361(P)(A) Revision 0, EXEM BWR-2000 ECCS Evaluation Model, Framatome ANP, May 2001.
16. EMF-2292(P)(A) Revision 0, ATRIUM7-10: Appendix K Spray Heat Transfer Coefficients, Siemens Power Corporation, September 2000.
17. EMF-CC-074(P)(A) Volume 4 Revision 0, BWR Stability Analysis - Assessment of STAIF with Input from MICROBURN-B2, Siemens Power Corporation, August 2000.
18. CENPD-300-P-A. Reference Safety Report for Boiling Water Reactor Reload Fuel, ABB Combustion Engineering Nuclear Operations, July 1996.
19. NEDO-32465-A, BWR Owners' Group Reactor Stability Detect and Suppress Solutions Licensing Basis Methodology and Reload Applications, August 1996.

Columbia Generating Station COLR 03-17 Revision 0

2.0 Average Planar Linear Heat Generation Rate (APLHGR) Limits for Use in Technical Specification 3.2.1 The APLHGRs for use in Technical Specification 3.2.1, as a function of Average Planar Exposure, shall not exceed the limits shown in the following figures. Note that the APLHGR limits for single loop operation for ATRIUM-10 fuel are obtained by applying a 0.9 multiplier to the two loop operation APLHGR limits.

a. Figure 2.1 - SA- and SB-Type SVEA-96 reload fuel - Two Loop Operation
b. Figure 2.2 - SA- and SB-Type SVEA-96 reload fuel - Single Loop Operation
c. Figure 2.3 - SC- and SD-Type SVEA-96 reload fuel - Two Loop Operation
d. Figure 2.4 - SC- and SD-Type SVEA-96 reload fuel - Single Loop Operation
e. Figure 2.5 - SE- and SF-Type SVEA-96 reload fuel - Two Loop Operation
f. Figure 2.6 - SE- and SF-Type SVEA-96 reload fuel - Single Loop Operation
9. Figure 2.7 - ATRIUM-1 0 reload fuel Columbia Generating Station CCILR 03-17 Revision 0

10 I

to 3

I.

0 10oom 20000 30000 40000 Average Planar Exposure (MWd/MTU)

Average Planar Exposure MAPLHGR (MWd/MTU) (kW/ft) 0 9.6 5000 9.5 9000 9.3 12000 9.2 16000 8.9 20000 8.7 30000 8.6 42000 8.6 50000 8.5 59000 8.0 Maximum Average Planar Linear Heat Generation Rate (MAPLHGR)

Versus Average Planar Exposure - Two Loop Operation SA- and SB-Type SVEA-96 Figure 2.1 Columbia Generating Station COLR 03-17 Revision 0

0 10000 20000 30000 40000 50000 60000 Average Planar Exposure (MWd/MTU)

Average Planar Exposure MAPLHGR (MWd/MTU) (kW/ft) 0 9.3 5000 9.2 9000 9.0 12000 8.9 16000 8.6 20000 8.3 30000 8.3 42000 8.3 50000 8.2 59000 7.8 Maximum Average Planar Linear Heat Generation Rate (MAPLHGR)

Versus Average Planar Exposure - Single Loop Operation SA- and SB-Type SVEA-96 Figure 2.2 Columbia Generating Station COLR 03-17 Revision 0

10

¢-8

-J a8.8 I.

0 10000 20000 30000 40000 50000 60000 Average Planar Exposure (MWd/MTU)

Average Planar Exposure MAPLHGR (MWd/MTU) (kW/ft) 0 9.8 5000 9.9 9000 9.7 10000 9.6 12000 9.4 16000 9.1 20000 8.9 30000 8.8 42000 8.8 50000 8.7 54000 8.5 59000 8.1 Maximum Average Planar Linear Heat Generation Rate (MAPLHGR)

Versus Average Planar Exposure - Two Loop Operation SC- and SD-Type SVEA-96 Figure 2.3 Columbia Generating Station COLR 03-17 Revision 0

-9.

0 8.8 X

'-i

,X 8.6 0 10000 20000 30000 40000 50000 Average Planar Exposure IMWd/MTU)

Average Planar Exposure MAPLHGR (MWd/MTU) (kW/ft) 0 9.4 5000 9.6 9000 9.4 10000 9.3 12000 9.1 16000 8.7 20000 8.5 30000 8.4 42000 8.4 50000 8.3 54000 8.2 59000 7.9 Maximum Average Planar Linear Heat Generation Rate (MAPLHGR)

Versus Average Planar Exposure - Single Loop Operation SC- and SD-Type SVEA-96 Figure 2.4 Columbia Generating Station COLR 03-17 Revision 0

UL" 10 9.8 9.5 9.4 9.2 9

O 8.8

I 8 6 8.4 82 8

7.8 7.6 10000 20000 30000 40000 50000 Average Planar Exposure )MWd/MTU)

Average Planar Exposure MAPLHGR (MWd/MTU) (kW/ft) 0 9.4 5000 9.5 9000 9.4 10000 9.4 12000 9.3 16000 9.0 20000 8.8 30000 8.8 42000 8.7 50000 8.6 54000 8.5 59000 8.1 Maximum Average Planar Linear Heat Generation Rate (MAPLHGR)

Versus Average Planar Exposure - Two Loop Operation SE- and SF-Type SVEA-96 Figure 2.5 Columbia Generating Station .9_ CCLR 03-17 Revision 0

0 Zi

-a 0.

10000 20000 30000 40000 50000 Average Planar Exposure Average Planar Exposure MAPLHGR (MWd/MTU) (kW/ft) 0 9.2 5000 9.3 9000 9.1 10000 9.1 12000 9.0 16000 8.7 20000 8.5 30000 8.4 42000 8.4 50000 8.3 54000 8.1 59000 7.9 Maximum Average Planar Linear Heat Generation Rate (MAPLHGR)

Versus Average Planar Exposure - Single Loop Operation SE- and SF-Type SVEA-96 Figure 2.6 Columbia Generating Station COLR 03-17 Revision 0

13 12 w 10 3

0.

10000 20000 30000 40000 50000 70000 Average Planar Exposure (MWd/MTU)

Average Planar TLO SLO Exposure MAPLHGR MAPLHGR (MWd/MTU) (kW/ft) (kW/ft) 0 12.5 11.2 15000 12.5 11.2 64000 7.6 6.8 Maximum Average Planar Linear Heat Generation Rate (MAPLHGR)

Versus Average Planar Exposure ATRIUM-1 0 Figure 2.7 Columbia Generating Station 1 1 . COLR 03-17 Revision 0

3.0 Minimum Critical Power Ratio (MCPR) Limit for Use in Technical Specification 3.2.2 The MCPR limit for use in Technical Specification 3.2.2 shall be greater than or equal to the bounding limits determined from Table 3.1 a, Table 3.1 b, Table 3.2a, Table 3.2b, and Figures 3.1 through 3.33. For the purposes of cycle extension, the feedwater temperature entering the reactor vessel shall not be reduced to less than 355 "F.

The MCPR safety limit for Cycle 17 is 1.09 for two loop operation and 1.10 for single loop operation. The power dependent MCPR limits (MCPRp) for single loop operation (SLO) include a 0.01 adder to the two loop operation (TLO) MCPR limits due to the difference in the MCPR safety limit.

Columbia Generating Station COLR 03-17 Revision 0

Table 3.1a Columbia Generating Station MCPR Operating Limits Two-Loop Operation Core Average Exposures < 28307 MWd/MTU SLMCPR = 1.09(2)

EOOS, ii Condition ATRIUM-10 SVEA-96 Fuel Fuel Full power 1-3"3' 1.28X3)

NSS(1 ) Flow dependent 5 Figure 3.1 Figure 3.1 Power dependn ) Figure 3.2 Figure 3.3 Full power 1.31 (3 1.30 TSSS(') Flow dependents Figure 3.1 Figure 3.1 Power dependentd 4 ) Figure 3.10 Figure 3.11 NSS(1 ) Full power 11 (3) 1.28(3)

RPT Flow dependents Figure 3.1 Figure 3.1 Inoperable Power dependents Figure 3.26 Figure 3.27 Columbia Generating Station COLR 03-17 Revision 0

Table 3.1b Columbia Generating-Station MCPR Operating Limits Two-Loop Operation Core Average Exposures 2 28307 MWd/MTU SLMCPR = 1.09(2)

SLMCPR = 1.09(2) FFTR/Coastdown EOCore Average Exposures Extended Core Average Condition Limit  : 32203 MWd/MTU Exposures s 35226 MWd/MTU ATRIUM-10 SVEA-96 ATRIUM-10 SVEA-96 Fuel Fuel Fuel Fuel Full power 1.38 1.38 1.40 1.38 NSS(') Flow dependents Figure 3.1 Figure 3.1 Figure 3.1 Figure 3.1 Power dependents Figure 3.4 Figure 3.5 Figure 3.18 Figure 3.19 Full power 1.41 1.41 1.43 1.41 TSSS(') Flow dependents Figure 3.1 Figure 3.1 Figure 3.1 Figure 3.1 Power dependents Figure 3.12 Figure 3.13 Figure 3.22 Figure 3.23 NSS(') Full power 1.44 1.44 RPT Flow dependents Figure 3.1 Figure 3.1 Not analyzed Inoperable Power dependents4 ) Figure 3.28 Figure 3.29 Columbia Generating Station COLR 03-17 Revision 0

Table 3.2a Columbia Generating Station MCPR Operating Limits Two-Loop Operation Turbine Bypass System Inoperable Core Average Exposures < 28307 MWd/MTU SLMCPR = 1.09(2)

EOOSLit Condition ATRIUM-10 SVEA-96 Fuel Fuel Full power 1.31(3) 1.30 NSS(') Flow dependents Figure 3.1 Figure 3.1 Power dependents Figure 3.6 Figure 3.7 Full power 1.36 1.35 TSSS(') Flow dependents Figure 3.1 Figure 3.1 Power dependents Figure 3.14 Figure 3.15 NSS(') Full power 1.33 1.33 RPT Flow dependents Figure 3.1 Figure 3.1 Inoperable Power dependent Figure 3.30 Figure 3.31 Columbia Generating Station COLR 03-17 Revision 0

Table 3.2b Columbia Generating Station MCPR Operating Limits Two-Loop Operation Turbine Bypass System Inoperable Core Average Exposures 2 28307 MWd/MTU SLMCPR = 1.09(2)

SLMCPR = 1.09(2) FFTR/Coastdown Core Average Exposures Extended Core Average EOOS Limit 5 32203 MWd/MTU Expores Condition Expoure C 35226 MWd/MTU ATRIUM-10 SVEA-96 ATRIUM-10 SVEA-96 Fuel Fuel Fuel Fuel Full power 1.42 1.41 1.44 1.41 NSS(1 ) Flow dependents Figure 3.1 Figure 3.1 Figure 3.1 Figure 3.1 Power dependents Figure 3.8 Figure 3.9 Figure 3.20 Figure 3.21 Full power 1.45 1.44 1.46 1.44 TSSS(1 ) Flow dependents Figure 3.1 Figure 3;1 Figure 3.1 Figure 3.1 Power dependents Figure 3.16 Figure 3.17 Figure 3.24 Figure 3.25 Full power 1.48 1.48 NSS(')

RPT Flow dependents Figure 3.1 Figure 3.1 Not analyzed Inoperable Power dependents Figure 3.32 Figure 3.33 Columbia Generating Station COLR 03-17 Revision 0

Notes for Tables 3.1a, 3.1b, 3.2a, and 3.2b Note 1: The scram insertion times must meet the requirements of Technical Specification 3.1.4. The NSS MCPR values are based on Framatome ANP (FANP) transient analyses performed using control rod insertion times consistent with the following table. If Technical Specification 3.1.4 is met with the NSS insertion times shown below, the NSS MCPR limits in Tables 3.1a, 3.1b, 3.2a, and 3.2b are applicable. If the NSS insertion times are exceeded, then the MCPR limits shall be determined using the appropriate TSSS limits. The NSS and TSSS MCPR limits are based on analyses that account for up to 8 declared 'slow' rods, 1 stuck rod, and 1 rod assumed to fail to scram.

Control Rod NSS Position Time (notch) (sec) 45 0.43 39 0.72 25 1.60 5 2.95 Note 2: For Single Loop Operation (SLO), the SLMCPR increases by 0.01. This 0.01 increase must also be applied to the Two Loop Operation MCPRP Operating Limit to obtain the SLO operating limit.

Note 3: For the noted full power MCPR limits, the Rod Withdrawal Error (RWE) event is limiting. The RWE analysis was performed with a nominal Rod Block Monitor (RBM) setpoint of 1.06.

Note 4: Power dependent MCPR limits are provided for core thermal powers greater than or equal to 25% of rated power at all core flows. The power dependent MCPR limits for core thermal powers less than or equal to 30% of rated power are subdivided by core flow. Limits are provided for core flows greater than 50% of rated flow and less than or equal to 50% of rated flow. A step change in the power dependent MCPR limits occurs at 30% of rated power because direct scram on turbine throttle valve closure is automatically bypassed below 30% of rated power and not applicable per Technical Specification 3.3.1.1.

Note 5: Flow dependent MCPR limits are applicable to both TLO and SLO.

Columbia Generating Station COLR 03-17 Revision 0

UA 00 100 200 e00 40.0 50.0 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 Flow C%rided)

Flow MCPRf MCPRf

(% of rated) ATRIUM-10 SVEA-96 0 1.75 1.75 20 1.75 1.75 30 1 1.63 1.63 108.5 1.09 1.09 Reduced Flow MCPR Operating Limit Versus Total Core Flow ATRIUM-10 and SVEA-96 Figure 3.1 Columbia Generating Station COLR 03-17 Revision 0

2.80 Two Loop Operation 2.60 2.40 2.20 c, 2.00 0.

18 1.60 1.40 1.20 1.00 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 s0 100 110 Pwer (% rated)

Power TLO MCPRp SLO MCPRp

(%) Limit Limit 100 1.31 1.32 65 1.43 1.44 30 1.57 1.58 30 ats 50% flow 2.40 2.41 25 at S 50% flow 2.54 2.55 30 at > 50% flow 2.49 2.50 25 at > 50% flow 2.63 2.64 MCPRp Limits Versus Percent of Rated Power NSS, ATRIUM-10 Core Average Exposures < 28307 MWdIMTU Figure 3.2 Columbia Generating Station 19 COLR 03-17 Revision 0

2.80 I Two Loop Operation 2.60 -

Z40 220-a.

U.

1.80-1.60 1.40 1.20 20 30 40 50 O0 70 80 go 100 110 Poer(%rated)

Power TLO MCPRp SLO MCPRp

(%) Limit Limit 100 1.28 1.29 65 1.42 1.43 30 1.55 1.56 30 at s 50% flow 2.31 2.32 25 at s 50% flow 2.46 2.47 30 at > 50% flow 2.47 2.48 25 at > 50% flow 2.62 2.63 MCPRp Limits Versus Percent of Rated Power NSS, SVEA-96 Core Average Exposures < 28307 MWdIMTU Figure 3.3 Columbia Generating Station COLR 03-17 Revision 0

LnL-2.80 lTwo Loop Operation 2.60 2.40 220 0.

U 180 1601 1.40 1.20 1.00 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 Power (% rated)

Power TLO MCPRp SLO MCPRp

(%) Limit Limit 100 1.38 1.39 65 1.47 1.48 30 1.57 1.58 30 at 5 50% flow 2.40 2.41 25 at S 50% flow 2.54 2.55 30 at > 50% flow 2.49 2.50 25 at > 50% flow 2.63 2.64 MCPRp Limits Versus Percent of Rated Power NSS, ATRIUM-10 28307 MWdIMTU 5 Core Average Exposures 5 32203 MWdIMTU Figure 3.4 Columbia Generating Station COLR 03-17 Revision 0

z80 I Two Loop Operation Z60 2.40 -

220

a. 2.00 U

1.80 1.60 1.40 120 20 30 40 50 60 70 so go 100 110

. Powr (%rated)

Power TLO MCPRp SLO MCPRp

(%) Limit Limit 100 1.38 1.39 65 1.48 1.49 30 1.55 1.56 30 at 5 50% flow 2.31 2.32 25 at s 50% flow - 2.46 2.47 30 at > 50% flow . 2.47 2.48 25 at > 50% flow 2.62 2.63 MCPRP Limits Versus Percent of Rated Power NSS SVEA-96 28307 MWdIMTU S Core Average Exposures S 32203 MWdIMTU Figure 3.5 Columbia Generating Station COLR 03-1.7 Revision 0

3.80 360 l Two Loop Operation 340 320 300 280 260 0.

cc IL) 240 Z20 ZOO 1.80 1.60 1.40 1.20 1.00 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 S0 100 110 Powe (% rated Power TLO MCPRp SLO MCPRp

(%) Limit Limit 100 1.31 1.32 65 1.48 1.49 30 1.65 1.66 30 at

  • 50% flow 3.06 3.07 25 at S 50% flow 3.43 3.44 30 at > 50% flow 3.24 3.25 25 at > 50% flow 3.61 3.62 MCPRP Limits Versus Percent of Rated Power NSS, Turbine Bypass Inoperable, ATRIUM-10 Core Average Exposures < 28307 MWd/MTU Figure 3.6 Columbia Generating Station COLR 03-17 Revision 0

380 a60 340 3.20 acx 280 260 0- 240 Z20 1.80 1.80 1.60 1.40 1.20 to8 20 30 40 0 60 70 80 90 180 110 PWer(%ratel Power TLO MCPRp SLO MCPRp

(%) Limit Limit 100 1.30 1.31 65 1.47 1.48 30 1.62 1.63 30 at5 50% flow 3.16 3.17 25 at s 50% flow 3.41 3.42 30 at > 50% flow 3.25 3.26 25 at > 50% flow 3.50 3.51 MCPRp Limits Versus Percent of Rated Power NSS, Turbine Bypass Inoperable, SVEA-96 Core Average Exposures < 28307 MWdIMTU Figure 3.7 Columbia Generating Station COLR 03-17 Revision 0

380 360 I Two Loop Operation 340 320 300 z80 2.60 of 0 2.40 2.20 2.00 1.80 1.60 1.40 1.20 1.00 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 Power(%rated)

Power TLO MCPRp SLO MCPRp

(%) Limit Limit 100 1.42 1.43 65 1.56 1.57 30 1.65 1.66 30 at 5 50% flow 3.06 3.07 25 at 5 50% flow 3.43 3.44 30 at > 50% flow 3.24 3.25 25 at > 50% flow 3.61 3.62 MCPRp Limits Versus Percent of Rated Power NSS, Turbine Bypass Inoperable, ATRIUM-10 28307 MWdiMTU S Core Average Exposures 532203 MWdIMTU Figure 3.8 Columbia Generating Station COLR 03-17 Revision 0

3.80 l 3.60 I Two Loop Operation 140 3.20 aCo 280 260 a.

IL 240 220 200 1.80 1.60 1.40 120 1.00 20 3 3 40 50 60 70 80 £0 100 110 PoWrMted)

Power TLO MCPRp SLO MCPRp

(%) Limit Limit 100 1.41 1.42 65 1.57 1.58 30 1.64 1.65 30 atS 50% flow 3.16 3.17 25 at s 50% flow 3.41 3.42 30 at > 50% flow 3.25 3.26 25 at > 50% flow 3.50 3.51 MCPRp Limits Versus Percent of Rated Power NSS, Turbine Bypass Inoperable, SVEA-96 28307 MWd/MTU S Core Average Exposures 5 32203 MWd1MTU Figure 3.9 Columbia Generating Station COLR 03-17 Revision 0

2.80 I Two Loop Operation 2.60 2.40 2.20 o, 2.00 It U

2 1.80 1.60 1.40 1.20 1.00 20 20 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 Power(% rated)

Power TLO MCPRp SLO MCPRp

(%) Limit Limit 100 1.31 1.32 65 1.46 1.47 30 1.60 1.61 30 at S 50% flow 2.40 2.41 25 atS 50% flow 2.54 2.55 30 at > 50% flow 2.49 2.50 25 at > 50% flow 2.63 2.64 MCPRp Limits Versus Percent of Rated Power TSSS, ATRIUM-10 Core Average Exposures < 28307 MWd/MTU Figure 3.10 Columbia Generating Station COLR 03-17 Revision 0

Z80

[Two Loop Operation Z60 Z40 Z20 a.

0.

U 1.80 1.60 1.40 i.20 20 30 40 50 60 70 60 90 100 110 Power (%rated)

Power TLO MCPRP SLO MCPRp

(%) Limit Limit 100 1.30 1.31 65 1.45 1.46 30 1.58 1.59 30 at 5 50% flow 2.31 2.32 25 at 5 50% flow 2.46 2.47 30 at > 50% flow 2.47 2.48 25 at > 50% flow 2.62 2.63 MCPRP Limits Versus Percent of Rated Power TSSS, SVEA-96 Core Average Exposures < 28307 MWdIMTU Figure 3.11 Columbia Generating Station COLR 03-17 Revision 0

I-2.80 I Two Loop Operation 2.60 2.40 2.20

, 2.00 a:

0.

1.80 1.60 1.40 1.20 1.00 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 Powe (% rated)

Power TLO MCPRp SLO MCPRp

(%) Limit Limit 100 1.41 1.42 65 1.47 1.48 30 1.60 1.61 30 at s 50% flow 2.40 2.41 25 at 5 50% flow 2.54 2.55 30 at > 50% flow 2.49 2.50 25 at > 50% flow 2.63 2.64 MCPRp Limits Versus Percent of Rated Power TSSS, ATRIUM-10 28307 MWd/MTU S Core Average Exposures 5 32203 MWd/MTU Figure 3.12 Columbia Generating Station COLR 03-17 Revision 0

2-80 I Two Loop Operation 160 Z40 220 M. 2-0 C.

0.

1.80 1.60 1.4U 120 1.00 20 30 40 50 s0 70 80 90 100 110 Pow(% rated)

Power TLO MCPRp SLO MCPRp

(%) Limit Limit 100 1.41 1.42 65 1.48 1.49 30 1.58 1.59 30 at S50% flow 2.31 2.32 25 at s 50% flow 2.46 2.47 30 at > 50% flow 2.47 2.48 25 at > 50% flow 2.62 2.63 MCPRp Limits Versus Percent of Rated Power TSSS, SVEA-96 28307 MWdIMTU < Core Average Exposures S 32203 MWdIMTU Figure 3.13 Columbia Generating Station COLR 03-11i Revision 0

3.80 I Two Loop Operation 3.60 3.40 3.20 3.00 2.80 2.60 CL a) 2.40 2.20 2.00 1.80 1.60 1.40 1.20 100 20 3D 40 50 60 7 SD 90 100 110 Poer (%rtec Power TLO MCPRp SLO MCPRp

(%) Limit Limit 100 1.36 1.37 65 1.52 1.53 30 1.71 1.72 30 at 5 50% flow 3.06 3.07 25 at < 50% flow 3.43 3.44 30 at > 50% flow 3.24 3.25 25 at > 50% flow 3.61 3.62 MCPRp Limits Versus Percent of Rated Power TSSS, Turbine Bypass Inoperable, ATRIUM-10 Core Average Exposures < 28307 MWd/MTU Figure 3.14 Columbia Generating Station COLR 03-17 Revision 0

3.80 r I Two Loop Operation a60 3.40 320 3.00 z80 Z60 a.

0.

0L 2.40 2.20 ZOO 1.80 1.60 1.40 120 1.00 20 3 40 50 60 70 80 S0 100 110 Poar (% rated)

Power TLO MCPRp SLO MCPRp

(%) Limit Limit 100 1.35 1.36 65 1.52 1.53 30 1.68 1.69 30 at5 50% flow 3.16 3.17 25 at s 50% flow 3.41 3.42 30 at > 50% flow 3.25 3.26 25 at > 50% flow 3.50 3.51 MCPRp Limits Versus Percent of Rated Power TSSS, Turbine Bypass Inoperable, SVEA-96 Core Average Exposures < 28307 MWd/MTU Figure 3.15 Columbia Generating Station COLR 03-17 Revision 0

3.80 360 I Two Loop Operation 3.40 3.20 300 280 260 0.

De

, 240 220 220 1.80 1.60 1.40 1.20 1.00 20 30 40 50 80 70 80 90 100 110 Per(% ratec Power TLO MCPRp SLO MCPRp

(%) Limit Limit 100 1.45 1.46 65 1.56 1.57 30 1.71 1.72 30 at 5 50% flow 3.06 3.07 25 at 5 50% flow 3.43 3.44 30 at > 50% flow 3.24 3.25 25 at > 50% flow 3.61 3.62 MCPRp Limits Versus Percent of Rated Power TSSS, Turbine Bypass Inoperable, ATRIUM-10 28307 MWd/MTU < Core Average Exposures < 32203 MWd/MTU Figure 3.16 Columbia Generating Station COLR 03-17 Revision 0

3.80 3.60 l Two Loop Operation 3.40 3.20 3.00 2.80 Z60 a.

U Z40

,C 2.20 2.00 1.60 1.60 1.40 120 1.00 20 30 40 50 60 70 60 90 100 110 Power (% rated)

Power TLO MCPRp SLO MCPRp

(%) Limit Limit 100 1.44 1.45 65 1.57 1.58 30 1.68 1.69 30 at s 50% flow 3.16 3.17 25 at s 50% flow 3.41 3.42 30 at > 50% flow 3.25 3.26 25 at > 50% flow 3.50 3.51 MCPRp Limits Versus Percent of Rated Power TSSS, Turbine Bypass Inoperable, SVEA-96 28307 MWdIMTU S Core Average Exposures S 32203 MWdIMTU Figure 3.17 Columbia Generating Station COLR 03-17 Revision 0

Two Loop Operation 2.40 2.20 0.

It 2.00 0.

U 1.40 1.20 1.00 20 30 40 50 a0 70 a0 9s 100 110 Pmwer rated Power TLO MCPRp SLO MCPRp

(%) Limit Limit 100 1.40 1.41 65 1.48 1.49 30 1.57 1.58 30 at S 50% flow 2.40 2.41 25 at S 50% flow 2.54 2.55 30 at > 50% flow 2.49 2.50 25 at > 50% flow 2.63 2.64 MCPRp Limits Versus Percent of Rated Power NSS, ATRIUM-10 FFTR/Coastdown Operation Figure 3.18 Columbia Generating Station COLR 03-17 Revision 0

280 l Two Loop Operation 2.60 2.40 2.20

, 2.00 0.

1.80 1.60 1.40 120 1'no 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 Piers% laed)

Power TLO MCPRp SLO MCPRp

(%) Limit Limit 100 1.38 1.39 65 1.48 1.49 30 1.55 1.56 30 at S 50% flow 2.31 2.32 25 at s 50% flow 2.46 2.47 30 at > 50% flow 2.47 2.48 25 at > 50% flow 2.62 2.63 MCPRP Limits Versus Percent of Rated Power NSS, SVEA-96 FFTR/Coastdown Operation Figure 3.19 Columbia Generating Station COLR 03-17 Revision 0

380 3.60 l Two Loop Operation 340 3,20 300 280 260 CL

' 240 a

220 1.80 1.60 1.40 1.20 1.00 20 30 40 50 80 70 80 90 160 110 Paw~(%rdt Power TLO MCPRp SLO MCPRp

(%) Limit Limit 100 1.44 1.45 65 1.56 1.57 30 1.65 1.66 30 at s 50% flow 3.06 3.07 25 atS 50% flow 3.43 3.44 30 at > 50% flow 3.24 3.25 25 at > 50% flow 3.61 3.62 MCPRp Limits Versus Percent of Rated Power NSS, Turbine Bypass Inoperable, ATRIUM-10 FFTRlCoastdown Operation Figure 3.20 Columbia Generating Station COLR 03-17 Revision 0

I Two Loop Operation 3.60 3.40 320 3.00 280 2.60

0. Z40 220 2.00 1.80 1.60 1.40 1.20 1.00 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 Powur (% rSteKq Power TLO MCPRp SLO MCPRp

(%) Limit Limit 100 1.41 1.42 65 1.57 1.58 30 1.64 1.65 30 ats 50% flow 3.16 3.17 25 at < 50% flow 3.41 3.42 30 at > 50% flow 3.25 3.26 25 at > 50% flow 3.50 3.51 MCPRp Limits Versus Percent of Rated Power NSS, Turbine Bypass Inoperable, SVEA-96 FFTR/Coastdown Operation Figure 3.21 Columbia Generating Station COLR 03-17 Revision 0

I Two Loop Operation 260 240 220 a, 200 a.

1.80 1.40 1.20 1.00 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 Pi'Aer robteM Power TLO MCPRp SLO MCPRp

(%) Limit Limit 100 1.43 1.44 65 1.48 1.49 30 1.60 1.61 30 at s 50% flow 2.40 2.41 25 at

  • 50% flow 2.54 2.55 30 at > 50% flow 2.49 1 2.50 25 at > 50% flow 2.63 2.64 MCPRp Limits Versus Percent of Rated Power TSSS, ATRIUM-10 FFTR/Coastdown Operation Figure 3.22 Columbia Generating Station COLR 03-17 Revision 0

2.80 I Two Loop Operation 2.60 2.40 220 a.

E 1.80 1.60 -

1.40 120 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 Pow (% rated)

Power TLO MCPRp SLO MCPRp

(%) Limit Limit 100 1.41 1.42 65 1.48 1.49 30 1.58 1.59 30 at s 50% flow 2.31 2.32 25 at s 50% flow 2.46 2.47 30 at > 50% flow 2.47 2.48 25 at > 50% flow 2.62 2.63 MCPRp Limits Versus Percent of Rated Power TSSS, SVEA-96 FFTRlCoastdown Operation Figure 3.23 Columbia Generating Station COLR 03-17 Revision 0

380 3.60 lTwo Loop Operation 340 3.20 3.00 2.80 Q. 2.60 0.

a Z40 220 zoo 1.80 1.60 1.40 1.20 1.00 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 Poer (%Med)

Power TLO MCPRp SLO MCPRp

(%) Limit Limit 100 1.46 1.47 65 1.56 1.57 30 1.71 1.72 30 at 5 50% flow 3.06 3.07 25 at s 50% flow 3.43 3.44 30 at > 50% flow 3.24 3.25 25 at > 50% flow 3.61 3.62 MCPRP Limits Versus Percent of Rated Power TSSS, Turbine Bypass Inoperable, ATRIUM-10 FFTRlCoastdown Operation Figure 3.24 Columbia Generating Station COLR 03-17 Revision 0

a80 l a60 I Two Loop Operation 340 a2o 3.0 280 260 0.

0. 240 All U

220 200 1.80 1.60 1.40 120 1.60 20 31 40 50 60 70 80 90 160 110 Proac(%

Power TLO MCPRP SLO MCPRp

(%) Limit Limit 100 1.44 1.45 65 1.57 1.58 30 1.68 1.69 30 at s50% flow 3.16 3.17 25 at s 50% flow 3.41 3.42 30 at > 50% flow 3.25 3.26 25 at > 50% flow 3.50 3.51 MCPRp Limits Versus Percent of Rated Power TSSS, Turbine Bypass Inoperable, SVEA-96 FFTR/Coastdown Operation Figure 3.25 Columbia Generating Station COLR 03-17 Revision 0

2.80 l Two Loop Operation 2.60 2.40 2.20

,, 2.00 U

1.80 1.60 1.40 1.20 1.00 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 Power (% rated)

Power TLO MCPRp SLO MCPRp

(%) Limit Limit 100 1.31 1.32 65 1.43 1.44 30 1.57 1.58 30 at 5 50% flow 2.40 2.41 25 at 5 50% flow 2.54 2.55 30 at > 50% flow 2.49 2.50 25 at > 50% flow 2.63 2.64 MCPRp Limits Versus Percent of Rated Power NSS, RPT Inoperable, ATRIUM-10 Core Average Exposures < 28307 MWd/MTU Figure 3.26 Columbia Generating Station COLR 03-17 Revision 0

280 I Two Loop Operation 260 240 220 0.

C-1.80 1.60 1.40 120 2D 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 Prated)

Power TLO MCPRp SLO MCPRp

(%) Limit Limit 100 1.28 1.29 65 1.42 1.43 30 1.56 1.57 30 at s 50% flow 2.31 2.32 25 at S 50% flow 2.46 2.47 30 at > 50% flow 2.47 2.48 25 at > 50% flow  ; 2.62 2.63 MCPRp Limits Versus Percent of Rated Power NSS, RPT Inoperable, SVEA-96 Core Average Exposures < 28307 MWd/MTU Figure 3.27 Columbia Generating Station COLR 03-17 Revision 0

Z80 Two Loop Operation z60 240 220

0. 4W azw a.

0 1.80 1.60 1.40 1.20 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 180 110 PWr(%rut4 Power TLO MCPRp SLO MCPRp

(%) Limit Limit 100 1.44 1.45 65 1.49 1.50 30 1.57 1.58 30 at s 50% flow 2.40 2.41 25 at 5 50% flow 2.54 2.55 30 at > 50% flow 2.49 2.50 25 at > 50% flow 2.63 2.64 MCPRp Limits Versus Percent of Rated Power NSS, RPT Inoperable, ATRIUM-10 28307 MWdIMTU S Core Average Exposures 5 32203 MWdIMTU Figure 3.28 Columbia Generating Station COLR 03-17 Revision 0

280 I Two Loop Operation Z60 Z40 220 a, ZOO U

E 1.BO 1.60 1.40 120-20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 1X0 110 POW(%rztd)

Power TLO MCPRp SLO MCPRp

(%) Limit Limit 100 1.44 1.45 65 1.49 1.50 30 1.56 1.57 30 at s 50% flow 2.31 2.32 25 at 5 50% flow 2.46 2.47 30 at > 50% flow 2.47 2.48 25 at > 50% flow - 2.62 2.63 MCPRP Limits Versus Percent of Rated Power NSS, RPT Inoperable, SVEA-96 28307 MWdIMTU 5 Core Average Exposures < 32203 MWdIMTU Figure 3.29 Columbia Generating Station COLR 03-17 Revision 0

380 360 l Two Loop Operation 340 3.20 3.00 z80 Z60 Q.

Z40 U

Z20 200 1.80 1.60 1.40 1.20 1.00 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 Power (% rated Power TLO MCPRp SLO MCPRp

(%) Limit Limit 100 1.33 1.34 65 1.48 1.49 30 1.65 1.66 30 at S 50% flow 3.06 3.07 25 at S 50% flow 3.43 3.44 30 at > 50% flow 3.24 3.25 25 at > 50% flow 3.61 3.62 MCPRp Limits Versus Percent of Rated Power NSS, RPT Inoperable, Turbine Bypass Inoperable, ATRIUM-10 Core Average Exposures < 28307 MWd/MTU Figure 3.30 Columbia Generating Station COLR 03-17 Revision 0

380 3.60 ITwo Loop Operation 340 3.20 3.00 z80

0. Z60 U

2.40 2.20 ZOO 1.80 1.60 1.40 120 1.00 . .

20 31 40 50 60 70 80 go 100 110 Power(%fated)

Power TLO MCPRp SLO MCPRp

(%) Limit Limit 100 1.33 1.34 65 1.48 1.49 30 1.62 1.63 30 at5s50% flow 3.16 3.17 25 at S 50% flow 3.41 3.42 30 at > 50% flow 3.25 3.26 25 at > 50% flow 3.50 3.51 MCPRp Limits Versus Percent of Rated Power NSS, RPT Inoperable, Turbine Bypass Inoperable, SVEA-96 Core Average Exposures < 28307 MWd/MTU Figure 3.31 Columbia Generating Station COLR 03-17 Revision 0

380 I Two Loop Operation 360 340 320 300 280 260 a.

2240 220 ZOO 180 160 140 120 100 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 180 110 Pywar(%rAeq Power TLO MCPRp SLO MCPRp

(%) Limit Limit 100 1.48 1.49 65 1.59 1.60 30 1.65 1.66 30 at s 50% flow 3.06 3.07 25 at s 50% flow 3.43 3.44 30 at > 50% flow 3.24 3.25 25 at > 50% flow 3.61 3.62 MCPRp Limits Versus Percent of Rated Power NSS, RPT Inoperable, Turbine Bypass Inoperable, ATRIUM-10 28307 MWd/MTU S Core Average Exposures < 32203 MWd/MTU Figure 3.32 Columbia Generating Station COLR 03-17 Revision 0

3.80 3.60 3.40 3.20 3.00 2.80 a, 2.60 U 2.40 2.20 2.00 1.80 1.60 1.40 1.20 1.00 20 30 40 50 60 70 so 90 100 110 Power (% rated)

Power TLO MCPRp SLO MCPRp

(%) Limit Limit 100 1.48 1.49 65 1.58 1.59 30 1.65 1.66 30 at s 50% flow 3.16 3.17 25 at s 50% flow 3.41 3.42 30 at > 50% flow 3.25 3.26 25 at > 50% flow 3.50 3.51 MCPRp Limits Versus Percent of Rated Power NSS, RPT Inoperable, Turbine Bypass Inoperable, SVEA-96 28307 MWdIMTU 5 Core Average Exposures 5 32203 MWd/MTU Figure 3.33 Columbia Generating Station COLR 03-17 Revision 0

4.0 Linear Heat Generation Rate (LHGR) Limits for Use in Technical Specification 3.2.3 The LHGRs for use in Technical Specification 3.2.3 are given as a function of Average Planar Exposure for ATRIUM-10 and as a function of nodal pellet exposure for SVEA-96. The LHGRs shall not exceed the limits shown in the following figures:

a. Figure 4.1 - SVEA-96 reload fuel
b. Figure 4.2 - ATRIUM-1 0 reload fuel Columbia Generating Station COLR 03-17 Revision 0

14 r-J 10000 30000 00 60X0 Pelef Eposere IMWdIMTU)

Pellet Exposure LHGR (MWd/MTU) (kW/ft) 0 13.4 16000 11.0 65000 7.2 Linear Heat Generation Rate (LHGR)

Versus Pellet Exposure SVEA-96 Figure 4.1 Columbia Generating Station COLR 03-17 Revision 0

14 13 12 I I E

O 10

-j 9

8 7

0 10000 20000 30000 40000 50000 60000 70000 Average Planar Exposure IMWdI/MTU)

Average Planar Exposure LHGR (MWd/MTU) (kW/ft) 0 13.4 15000 13.4 64000 7.3 Linear Heat Generation Rate (LHGR)

Versus Average Planar Exposure ATRIUM-1 0 Figure 4.2 Columbia Generating Station COLR 03-17 Revision 0

5.0 Oscillation Power Range Monitor (OPRM) Instrumentation Limits for Use in LCO 3.3.1.3 The OPRM instrumentation limits for use in LCO 3.3.1.3 shall not exceed the following:

Function I Trip Setpoint Period Based Detection Algorithm (PBDA)

Amplitude Setpoint: Sp 1.09 Peak/Average Confirmation Count Setpoint: N2 12 Columbia Generating Station COLR 03-17 Revision 0

6.0 References 6.1 CE NPSD-883-P, Revision 0, 'COLUMBIA Cycle 16 Reload Licensing Report,"

Westinghouse CE Nuclear Power LLC, March 2001.

6.2 CE NPSD-801-P, Revision 5, 'WNP-2 LOCA Analysis Report," Westinghouse CE Nuclear Power LLC, February 2001.

6.3 EMF-2863 Revision 0, 'Columbia Generating Station Cycle 17 Reload Analysis,"

Framatome ANP, March 2003.

6.4 EMF-2841(P) Revision 1, 'Columbia Generating Station LOCA-ECCS Analysis MAPLHGR Limit for ATRIUM T "-10 Fuel," Framatome ANP, March 2003.

6.5 NE-02-00-03, Revision 0, 'Oscillation Power Range Monitor (OPRM) Trip Setpoints," Energy Northwest, June 7, 2000.

6.6 CE NPSD-792-P, 'Fuel Assembly Mechanical Design Report for WNP2, ABB Combustion Engineering Nuclear Operations, May 1996.

Columbia Generating Station COLR 03-17 Revision 0

CYCLE 17, CORE OPERATING LIMITS REPORT (COLR), REVISIONS 0 AND I CYCLE 17, CORE OPERATING LIMITS REPORT (COLR), REVISION I

COLR 03-17 Revision 1 Columbia Generating Station Cycle 17 Core Operating Limits Report October 2003

Columbia Generating Station Cycle 17 Core Operating Limits Report List of Effective Pages PAGE REVISION i.0 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 6.0 7.0 8.0 9.0 10 .0 11 .0 12 .0 13 .. 0 14 .0 15 .0 16 .0 17 .0 18 .0 19 .0 20 .0 21 .0 22 .0 23 .0 24 .0 25 .0 26 .0 Columbia Generating Station LEP-1 COLR 03-17 Revision 1

27 0 28 0 29 0 30 .0 31 .0 32 .0 33 .0 34 .0 35 .0 36 .0 37 .0 38 .0 39 .0 40 .0 41 .0 42 .0 43 .0 44 .0 45 .0 46 .0 47 .0 48 .0 49 .0 50 .0 51 .0 52 .0 53 .0 54 .0 55 .1 Columbia Generating Station LEP-2 COLR 03-17 Revision 1

Columbia Generating Station Cycle 17 Core Operating Limits Report Table of Contents 1.0 Introduction and Summary ................................................ 1 2.0 Average Planar Linear Heat Generation Rate (APLHGR) Limits for Use in Technical Specification 3.2.1 ................................................ 4 3.0 Minimum Critical Power Ratio (MCPR) Limit for Use in Technical Specification 3.2.2 .12 4.0 Linear Heat Generation Rate (LHGR) Limits for Use in Technical Specification 3.2.3 ................................................ 51 5.0 Oscillation Power Range Monitor (OPRM) Instrumentation Limits for Use in LCO 3.3.1.3 ................................................ 54 6.0 References ................................................ 55 Columbia Generating Station . j COLR 03-17 Revision 0

1.0 Introduction and Summary This report provides the Average Planar Linear Heat Generation Rate (APLHGR) limits, the Minimum Critical Power Ratio (MCPR) limits, the Linear Heat Generation Rate (LHGR) limits and the Oscillation Power Range Monitor (OPRM)

Instrumentation limits for Columbia Generating Station Cycle 17 as required by Technical Specification 5.6.5. As required by Technical Specification 5.6.5, these limits were determined using NRC-approved methodology and are established so that all applicable limits of the plant safety analysis are met. References 6.1, 6.2, 6.3, and 6.4 describe the LOCA analyses for rated power. These analyses were performed with methodologies that result in Single Loop Operation (SLO) APLHGR limits as well as Two Loop Operation (TLO) APLHGR limits. The thermal limits forATRIUM-10 fuel given in this report are documented in Reference 6.3. The MCPR limits for the SVEA-96 fuel are also documented in Reference 6.3. The APLHGR and LHGR limits for SVEA-96 fuel are documented in References 6.1 and 6.6. The basis for the OPRM Instrumentation limits is documented in References 6.3 and 6.5.

The MCPR limit is the maximum of (a) the applicable exposure dependent, full power and full flow MCPR limit, (b) the applicable exposure and power dependent MCPR limit, and (c) the applicable flow dependent MCPR limit specified in this report. This stipulation assures that the safety limit MCPR will not be violated during steady-state operation and anticipated operational occurrences throughout the Columbia Generating Station operating regime. Full power MCPR limits are specified to define operating limits at rated power and flow. Power dependent MCPR limits are specified to define operating limits at other than rated power conditions. A flow dependent MCPR is specified to define operating limits at other than rated flow conditions. The reduced flow MCPR limit, set by the limiting Recirculation Flow Increase event, provides bounding protection for all events at reduced flow.

The reload licensing analyses for this cycle provide operating limits for Extended Load Line Limit Analysis (ELLLA) operation which extends the power and flow operating regime for Columbia Generating Station up to the 108% rod line which at full power corresponds to 88% of rated flow. The MCPR limits defined in this report are applicable up to 100% of rated thermal power along and below the 108% rod line. The minimum flow for operation at rated power is 88% of rated flow; the maximum is 106%.

Per Technical Specification 4.2.1, the 12 fresh SVEA-96 fuel assemblies shall be loaded and operated so they will be nonlimiting MCPR assemblies.

The specific topical report revisions and supplements which describe the methodology utilized in this cycle specific analysis are shown in Table 1.1.

Columbia Generating Station 1 COLR 03-17 Revision 0

Table 1.1 Columbia Generating Station Reference Topical Reports

1. XN-NF-81-58(P)(A) Revision 2 and Supplements 1 and 2, RODEX2 Fuel Rod Thermal-Mechanical Response Evaluation Model, Exxon Nuclear Company, March 1984.
2. XN-NF-85-67(P)(A) Revision 1, Generic MechanicalDesign for Exxon Nuclear Jet Pump BWR Reload Fuel, Exxon Nuclear Company, September 1986.
3. EMF-85-74(P) Revision 0 Supplement 1(P)(A) and Supplement 2(P)(A), RODEX2A (BWR) Fuel Rod Thermal-Mechanical Evaluation Model, Siemens Power Corporation, February 1998.
4. ANF-89-98(P)(A) Revision 1 and Supplement 1, Generic Mechanical Design Criteria for BWR Fuel Designs, Advanced Nuclear Fuels Corporation, May 1995.
5. XN-NF-80-19(P)(A) Volume I and Supplements 1 and 2, Exxon Nuclear Methodology for Boiling Water Reactors - Neutronic Methods for Design and Analysis, Exxon Nuclear Company, March 1983.
6. XN-NF-80-19(P)(A) Volume 4 Revision 1, Exxon Nuclear Methodology for Boiling Water Reactors: Application of the ENC Methodology to BWR Reloads, Exxon Nuclear Company, June 1986.
7. EMF-2158(P)(A) Revision 0, Siemens Power Corporation Methodology for Boiling Water Reactors: Evaluation and Validation of CASMO-4/MICROBURN-B2, Siemens Power Corporation, October 1999.
8. XN-NF-80-19(P)(A) Volume 3 Revision 2, Exxon Nuclear MethodologyforBoiling Water Reactors, THERMEX: Thermal Limits Methodology Summary Description, Exxon Nuclear Company, January 1987.
9. XN-NF-84-105(P)(A) Volume I and Volume 1 Supplements 1 and 2, XCOBRA-T: A Computer Code for BWR Transient Thermal-Hydraulic Core Analysis, Exxon Nuclear Company, February 1987.
10. ANF-524(P)(A) Revision 2 and Supplements 1 and 2, ANF Critical Power Methodology for Boiling Water Reactors, Advanced Nuclear Fuels Corporation, November 1990.
11. ANF-913(P)(A) Volume 1 Revision 1 and Volume I Supplements 2, 3 and 4, COTRANSA2: A Computer Program for Boiling Water Reactor Transient Analysis, Advanced Nuclear Fuels Corporation, August 1990.
12. ANF-1 358(P)(A) Revision 1, The Loss of Feedwater Heating Transient in Boiling Water Reactors, Advanced Nuclear Fuels Corporation, September 1992.
13. EMF-2209(P)(A) Revision 1, SPCB Critical Power Correlation, Siemens Power Corporation, July 2000.

Columbia Generating Station COLR 03-17 Revision 0

t
14. EMF-2245(P)(A) Revision 0, Application of Siemens Power Corporation's Critical Power Correlations to Co-Resident Fuel, Siemens Power Corporation, August 2000.
15. EMF-2361 (P)(A) Revision 0, EXEM BWR-2000 ECCS Evaluation Model, Framatome ANP, May 2001.
16. EMF-2292(P)(A) Revision 0, ATRIUM"'-10: Appendix K Spray Heat Transfer Coefficients, Siemens Power Corporation, September 2000.
17. EMF-CC-074(P)(A) Volume 4 Revision 0, BWR Stability Analysis - Assessment of STAIF with Input from MICROBURN-B2, Siemens Power Corporation, August 2000.
18. CENPD-300-P-A, Reference Safety Report for Boiling Water Reactor Reload Fuel, ABB Combustion Engineering Nuclear Operations, July 1996.
19. NEDO-32465-A, BWR Owners' Group Reactor Stability Detect and Suppress Solutions Licensing Basis Methodology and Reload Applications, August 1996.

Columbia Generating Station COLR 03-17 Revision 0

2.0 Average Planar Linear Heat Generation Rate (APLHGR) Limits for Use in Technical Specification 3.2.1 The APLHGRs for use in Technical Specification 3.2.1, as a function of Average Planar Exposure, shall not exceed the limits shown in the following figures. Note that the APLHGR limits for single loop operation for ATRIUM-1 0 fuel are obtained by applying a 0.9 multiplier to the two loop operation APLHGR limits.

a. Figure 2.1 - SA- and SB-Type SVEA-96 reload fuel - Two Loop Operation
b. Figure 2.2 - SA- and SB-Type SVEA-96 reload fuel - Single Loop Operation
c. Figure 2.3 - SC- and SD-Type SVEA-96 reload fuel - Two Loop Operation
d. Figure 2.4 - SC- and SD-Type SVEA-96 reload fuel - Single Loop Operation
e. Figure 2.5 - SE- and SF-Type SVEA-96 reload fuel - Two Loop Operation
f. Figure 2.6 - SE- and SF-Type SVEA-96 reload fuel - Single Loop Operation
g. Figure 2.7 -ATRIUM-10 reload fuel Columbia Generating Station COLR 03-17 Revision o

a 8.8 0.

,c8.8 10000 20000 30000 40000 50000 60000 Average Planar Exposure (MWd/MTU)

Average Planar Exposure MAPLHGR (MWd/MTU) (kW/ft) 0 9.6 5000 9.5 9000 9.3 12000 9.2 16000 8.9 20000 8.7 30000 8.6 42000 8.6 50000 8.5 59000 8.0 Maximum Average Planar Linear Heat Generation Rate (MAPLHGR)

Versus Average Planar Exposure - Two Loop Operation SA- and SB-Type SVEA-96 Figure 2.1 Columbia Generating Station COLR 03-17 Revision 0

w8.8 E8.6 0 10000 20000 300D0 4000 50000 6000 Average Planar Exposure IMWd/MTU)

Average Planar Exposure MAPLHGR (MWd/MTU) (kW/ft) 0 9.3 5000 9.2 9000 9.0 12000 8.9 16000 8.6 20000 8.3 30000 8.3 42000 8.3 50000 8.2 59000 7.8 Maximum Average Planar Linear Heat Generation Rate (MAPLHGR)

Versus Average Planar Exposure - Single Loop Operation SA- and SB-Type SVEA-96

.Figure 2.2 Columbia Generating Station . COLR 03-17 Revision 0

LA" 10 9.8 9.6 9.4 9.2 9

c0 8.8 I 8.8 84 82 7.8 7.6 10000 20000 30000 40000 50000 60000 Average Planar Exposure (MWd/MTU)

Average Planar Exposure MAPLHGR (MWd/MTU) (kW/ft) 0 9.8 5000 9.9 9000 9.7 10000 9.6 12000 9.4 16000 9.1 20000 8.9 30000 8.8 42000 8.8 50000 8.7 54000 8.5 59000 8.1 Maximum Average Planar Linear Heat Generation Rate (MAPLHGR)

Versus Average Planar Exposure - Two Loop Operation SC- and SD-Type SVEA-96 Figure 2.3 Columbia Generating Station COLR 03-17 Revision 0

10 9.8 9.6 9.4 9.2 X 8.8 I8 E 8.6 8.4 83.2 8

7.8 7.6 0 10000 20000 30000 40000 50000 60000 Average Planar Exposure (MWdIMTU)

Average Planar Exposure MAPLHGR (MWd/MTU) (kW/ft) 0 9.4 5000 9.6 9000 9.4 10000 9.3 12000 9.1 16000 8.7 20000 8.5 30000 8.4 42000 8.4 50000 8.3 54000 8.2 59000 7.9 Maximum Average Planar Linear Heat Generation Rate (MAPLHGR)

Versus Average Planar Exposure - Single Loop Operation SC- and SD-Type SVEA-96 Figure 2.4 Columbia Generating Station COLR 03-17 Revision 0

W88 5X 24 8s 0 10000 20000 30000 40000 50000 60000 Average Planar Exposure IMWd/MTU)

Average Planar Exposure MAPLHGR (MWd/MTU) (kW/ft) 0 9.4 5000 9.5 9000 9.4 10000 9.4 12000 9.3 16000 9.0 20000 8.8 30000 8.8 42000 8.7 50000 8.6 54000 8.5 59000 8.1 Maximum Average Planar Linear Heat Generation Rate (MAPLHGR)

Versus Average Planar Exposure - Two Loop Operation SE- and SF-Type SVEA-96 Figure 2.5 Columbia Generating Station g COLR 03-17 Revision 0

E9.~

w 8.8 8.

0 10000 20000 30000 40000 50000 60000 Average Planar Exposure Average Planar Exposure MAPLHGR (MWd/MTU) (kW/ft) 0 9.2 5000 9.3 9000 9.1 10000 9.1 12000 9.0 16000 8.7 20000 8.5 30000 8.4 42000 8.4 50000 8.3 54000 8.1 59000 7.9 Maximum Average Planar Linear Heat Generation Rate (MAPLHGR)

Versus Average Planar Exposure - Single Loop Operation SE- and SF-Type SVEA-96 Figure 2.6 Columbia Generating Station COLR 03-17 Revision 0

.1JI1-13 12 11 10 3

I 9

8 7

0 10000 20000 . 30000 40000 60000 70000 Average Ptanar Exposure (MWd/MTU)

Average Planar TLO SLO Exposure MAPLHGR MAPLHGR (MWd/MTU) (kW/ft) (kW/ft) 0 12.5 11.2 15000 12.5 11.2 64000 7.6 6.8 Maximum Average Planar Linear Heat Generation Rate (MAPLHGR)

Versus Average Planar Exposure ATRIUM-10 Figure 2.7 Columbia Generating Station 1 1- COLR 03-17 Revision 0

3.0 Minimum Critical Power Ratio (MCPR) Limit for Use in Technical Specification 3.2.2 The MCPR limit for use in Technical Specification 3.2.2 shall be greater than or equal to the bounding limits determined from Table 3.1a, Table 3.1b, Table 3.2a, Table 3.2b, and Figures 3.1 through 3.33. For the purposes of cycle extension, the feedwater temperature entering the reactor vessel shall not be reduced to less than 355 OF.

The MCPR safety limit for Cycle 17 is 1.09 for two loop operation and 1.10 for single loop operation. The power dependent MCPR limits (MCPRp) for single loop operation (SLO) include a 0.01 adder to the two loop operation (TLO) MCPR limits due to the difference in the MCPR safety limit.

Columbia Generating Station COLR 03-17 Revision 0

Table 3.1a Columbia Generating Station MCPR Operating Limits Two-Loop Operation Core Average Exposures < 28307 MWd/MTU SLMCPR = 1.09(2)

EOOSLit Condition ATRIUM-10 SVEA-96 Fuel Fuel Full power 11 13) 1.28(3)

NSS(1) Flow dependent(5 ) Figure 3.1 Figure 3.1 Power dependent(4 ) Figure 3.2 Figure 3.3 Full power 1.31(3) 1.30 TSSS(') Flow dependent(5) Figure 3.1 Figure 3.1 Power dependent(4) Figure 3.10 Figure 3.11 NSS(') Full power 1.31(3) 1.28(3)

RPT Flow dependent(5) Figure 3.1 Figure 3.1 Inoperable Power dependent(4) Figure 3.26 Figure 3.27 Columbia Generating Station COLR 03-17 Revision 0

Table 3.1b Columbia Generating Station MCPR Operating Limits Two-Loop Operation Core Average Exposures 2 28307 MWd/MTU SLMCPR = 1.09(2)

SLMCPR = 1.09(2) FFTR/Coastdown Core Average Exposures Extended Core Average Condition Limit < 32203 MWd/MTU Exposures 5 35226 MWd/MTU ATRIUM-10 SVEA-96 ATRIUM-10 SVEA-96 Fuel Fuel Fuel Fuel Full power 1.38 1.38 1.40 1.38 NSS(') Flow dependent(5 ) Figure 3.1 Figure 3.1 Figure 3.1 Figure 3.1 Power dependent( 4 ) Figure 3.4 Figure 3.5 Figure 3.18 Figure 3.19 Full power 1.41 1.41 1.43 1.41 TSSS("' Flow dependent( 5 ) Figure 3.1 Figure 3.1 Figure 3.1 Figure 3.1 Power dependent(4 ) Figure 3.12 Figure 3.13 Figure 3.22 Figure 3.23 NSS(') Full power 1.44 1.44 RPT Flow dependent(5 ) Figure 3.1 Figure 3.1 Not analyzed Inoperable Power dependent( 4 ) Figure 3.28 Figure 3.29 Columbia Generating Station COLR 03-17 Revision 0

U AL.

Table 3.2a Columbia Generating Station MCPR Operating Limits Two-Loop Operation Turbine Bypass System Inoperable Core Average Exposures < 28307 MWd/MTU SLMCPR= 1.09(2)

EOOS Condition Limit ATRIUM-10 SVEA-96 Fuel Fuel Full power 1.31(3) 1.30 NSS(') Flow dependent( 5 ) Figure 3.1 Figure 3.1 Power dependent( 4 ) Figure 3.6 Figure 3.7 Full power 1.36 1.35 TSSS(') Flow dependent(5 ) Figure 3.1 Figure 3.1 Power dependents 4 ' Figure 3.14 Figure 3.15 Full power 1.33 1.33 NSS(')

RPT Flow dependent(5 ) Figure 3.1 Figure 3.1 Inoperable Power dependent( 4 ) Figure 3.30 Figure 3.31 Columbia Generating Station COLR 03-17 Revision 0

Table 3.2b Columbia Generating Station MCPR Operating Limits Two-Loop Operation Turbine Bypass System Inoperable Core Average Exposures 2 28307 MWd/MTU SLMCPR = 1.09(2)

SLMCPR = 1.09(2) FFTR/Coastdown Core Average Exposures Extended Core Average EOOS Limit 32203 MWd/MTU Expores Condition s 35226 MWd/MTU ATRIUM-10 SVEA-96 ATRIUM-10 SVEA-96 Fuel Fuel Fuel Fuel Full power 1.42 1.41 1.44 1.41 NSS(') Flow dependent( 5 ) Figure 3.1 Figure 3.1 Figure 3.1 Figure 3.1 Power dependent(4 ) Figure 3.8 Figure 3.9 Figure 3.20 Figure 3.21 Full power 1.45 1.44 1.46 1.44 TSSS(') Flow dependent( 5 ) Figure 3.1 Figure 3.1 Figure 3.1 Figure 3.1 Power dependent(4 ) Figure 3.16 Figure 3.17 Figure 3.24 Figure 3.25 Full power 1.48 1.48 NSS(')

RPT Flow dependent(5 ) Figure 3.1 Figure 3.1 Not analyzed Inoperable Power dependent( 4 ) Figure 3.32 Figure 3.33 Columbia Generating Station COLR 03-17 Revision 0

. nL-Notes for Tables 3.1a, 3.1b, 3.2a, and 3.2b Note 1: The scram insertion times must meet the requirements of Technical Specification 3.1.4. The NSS MCPR values are based on Framatome ANP (FANP) transient analyses performed using control rod insertion times consistent with the following table. If Technical Specification 3.1.4 is met with the NSS insertion times shown below, the NSS MCPR limits in Tables 3.1a, 3.1b, 3.2a, and 3.2b are applicable. If the NSS insertion times are exceeded, then the MCPR limits shall be determined using the appropriate TSSS limits. The NSS and TSSS MCPR limits are based on analyses that account for up to 8 declared 'slow" rods, 1 stuck rod, and 1 rod assumed to fail to scram.

Control Rod NSS Position Time (notch) (sec) 45 0.43 39 0.72 25 1.60 5 2.95 Note 2: For Single Loop Operation (SLO), the SLMCPR increases by 0.01. This 0.01 increase must also be applied to the Two Loop Operation MCPRp Operating Limit to obtain the SLO operating limit.

Note 3: For the noted full power MCPR limits, the Rod Withdrawal Error (RWE) event is limiting. The RWE analysis was performed with a nominal Rod Block Monitor (RBM) setpoint of 1.06.

Note 4: Power dependent MCPR limits are provided for core thermal powers greater than or equal to 25% of rated power at all core flows. The power dependent MCPR limits for core thermal powers less than or equal to 30% of rated power are subdivided by core flow. Limits are provided for core flows greater than 50% of rated flow and less than or equal to 50% of rated flow. A step change in the power dependent MCPR limits occurs at 30% of rated power because direct scram on turbine throttle valve closure is automatically bypassed below 30% of rated power and not applicable per Technical Specification 3.3.1.1.

Note 5: Flow dependent MCPR limits are applicable to both TLO and SLO.

Columbia Generating Station COLR 03-17 Revision 0

I15J?

1.75 1.70 1.65

.es 1.55 1.50 P 1.45 6 1.40 1.35 1.30 1.25 1.20 1.15 1.10 1.05 0.0 10.0 20 0 30.0 40.0 50.0 80.0 70.0 80.0 900 100.0 110.0 Flow (%rated Flow MCPRt MCPRt

(% of rated) ATRIUM-10 SVEA-96 0 1.75 1.75 20 1.75 1.75 30 1.63 1.63 108.5 1.09 1.09 Reduced Flow MCPR Operating Limit Versus Total Core Flow ATRIUM-10 and SVEA-96 Figure 3.1 Columbia Generating Station COLR 03-17 Revision 0

.ILL 260 2.60 240 220 200 0.

1.80 1.60 1.40 1.20 1.00 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 go 100 110 Power (%rated)

Power TLO MCPRp SLO MCPRp

(%) Limit Limit 100 1.31 1.32 65 1.43 1.44 30 1.57 1.58 30 at 5 50% flow 2.40 2.41 25 atS 50% flow 2.54 2.55 30 at > 50% flow 2.49 2.50 25 at > 50% flow 2.63 2.64 MCPRP Limits Versus Percent of Rated Power NSS, ATRIUM-10 Core Average Exposures < 28307 MWd/MTU Figure 3.2 Columbia Generating Station 19 _ COLR 03-17 Revision 0

Fao.

l Two Loop Operation Z60 -

Z40 2.20 U

1.60 1.40 120 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 Pa raeMO Power TLO MCPRp SLO MCPRp

(%) Limit Limit 100 1.28 1.29 65 1.42 1.43 30 1.55 1.56 30 at 5 50% flow 2.31 2.32 25 at 5 50% flow 2.46 . 2.47 30 at > 50% flow 2.47 i 2.48 25 at > 50% flow 2.62 2.63 MCPRp Limits Versus Percent of Rated Power NSS, SVEA-96 Core Average Exposures < 28307 MWd/MTU Figure 3.3 Columbia Generating Station COLR 03-17 Revision 0

-UL-Z80 - l I Two Loop Operation Z60 Z40 Z20 2.00 a.

a.

U 1.80 1.60 1.40 120 1.00 20 30 40 50 80 70 80 90 100 110 Pow (% rated)

Power TLO MCPRp SLO MCPRp

(%) Limit Limit 100 1.38 1.39 65 1.47 1.48 30 1.57 1.58 30 at S 50% flow 2.40 2.41 25 at 5 50% flow 2.54 2.55 30 at > 50% flow 2.49 2.50 25 at > 50% flow 2.63 2.64 MCPRp Limits Versus Percent of Rated Power NSS, ATRIUM-10 28307 MWd/MTU < Core Average Exposures < 32203 MWdIMTU Figure 3.4 Columbia Generating Station COLR 03-17 Revision 0

280 ITwo Loop Operation Z60 Z40 220 a.

M 1.8 1.60 1.40 1.20 100.

20 30 40 50 60 70 8D 90 100 110 Power(% rated)

Power TLO MCPRp SLO MCPRp

(%) Limit Limit 100 1.38 1.39 65 1.48 1.49 30 1.55 1.56 30 at S 50% flow 2.31 2.32 25 at S50% flow 2.46 2.47 30 at > 50% flow 2.47 2.48 25 at > 50% flow 2.62 2.63 MCPRp Limits Versus Percent of Rated Power NSS, SVEA-96 28307 MWdIMTU S Core Average Exposures S 32203 MWdIMTU Figure 3.5 Columbia Generating Station COLR 03-17 Revision 0

3.80 3.60 l Two Loop Operation 3.40 320 3.00 Z2O 2.60 C.

at U Z40 I

220 ZOO 1.80 1.60 1.40 120 1.00 20 30 40 50 80 70 80 90 100 110 Power (%rate Power TLO MCPRP SLO MCPRp

(%) Limit Limit 100 1.31 1.32 65 1.48 1.49 30 1.65 1.66 30 at 5 50% flow 3.06 3.07 25 at s 50% flow 3.43 3.44 30 at > 50% flow 3.24 3.25 25 at > 50% flow 3.61 3.62 MCPRP Limits Versus Percent of Rated Power NSS, Turbine Bypass Inoperable, ATRIUM-10 Core Average Exposures < 28307 MWd/MTU Figure 3.6 Columbia Generating Station COLR 03-17 Revision 0

380 I Two Loop Operation 3.60 -

3.40 -

3220 300 -

280 -

Z60-(, 2.40 220 Z2.0 -

1.80-1.60 1.40-120-20 20 40 50 60 70 80 s0 100 110 Gr-(%mtd)

Power TLO MCPRp SLO MCPRp

(%) Limit Limit 100 1.30 1.31 65  ; 1.47 1.48 30 1.62 1.63 30 at5 50% flow 3.16 3.17 25 at s 50% flow 3.41 3.42 30 at > 50% flow 3.25 3.26 25 at > 50% flow 3.50 3.51 MCPRp Limits Versus Percent of Rated Power NSS, Turbine Bypass Inoperable, SVEA-96 Core Average Exposures < 28307 MWdIMTU Figure 3.7 Columbia Generating Station . COLR 03-17 Revision 0

.I&L-3.0-3.60 I Two Loop Operation 3.40-3.20 3.00 -

2.80 -

Z60 -

Z40 Z20 ZOO*

1.60-1.40-1.20-1.00 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 Power (% rated)

Power TLO MCPRp SLO MCPRp

(%) Limit Limit 100 1.42 1.43 65 1.56 1.57 30 1.65 1.66 30 at S 50% flow 3.06 3.07 25 at s 50% flow 3.43 3.44 30 at > 50% flow 3.24 3.25 25 at > 50% flow 3.61 3.62 MCPRp Limits Versus Percent of Rated Power NSS, Turbine Bypass Inoperable, ATRIUM-10 28307 MWd/MTU S Core Average Exposures S 32203 MWdIMTU Figure 3.8 Columbia Generating Station COLR 03-17 Revision 0

I Two Loop Operation 3.60 3.40 3.20 38OD Z60 b 240 220 1.80 1.60 1.40 120 1.00 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 Power(% raed Power TLO MCPRp SLO MCPRp

(%) Limit Limit 100 1.41 1.42 65 1.57 1.58 30 1.64 1.65 30 atS 50% flow 3.16 3.17 25 at s 50% flow 3.41 3.42 30 at > 50% flow 3.25 3.26 25 at> 50% flow I 3.50 3.51 MCPRp Limits Versus Percent of Rated Power NSS, Turbine Bypass Inoperable, SVEA-96 28307 MWd/MTU < Core Average Exposures S 32203 MWd/MTU Figure 3.9 Columbia Generating Station COLR 03-17 Revision 0

-j An Two Loop Operation 2.60 Z40 2.20

, 2.00 U

1.80 1.60 1.40 120 20 30 40 50 60 70 60 90 190 110 Poer (% rated)

Power TLO MCPRp SLO MCPRp

(%) Limit Limit 100 1.31 1.32 65 1.46 1.47 30 1.60 1.61 30 at S 50% flow 2.40 2.41 25 at S 50% flow 2.54 2.55 30 at > 50% flow 2.49 2.50 25 at > 50% flow 2.63 2.64 MCPRp Limits Versus Percent of Rated Power TSSS, ATRIUM-10 Core Average Exposures < 28307 MWdIMTU Figure 3.10 Columbia Generating Station COLR 03-17 Revision 0

z80 Two Loop Operation Z60 2.40 2.20

a. 2.0 a-U 1.80 1.60 1.40 120 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 gO 100 110 PoAYS(% rated)

Power TLO MCPRp SLO MCPRp

(%) Limit Limit 100 1.30 1.31 65 1.45 1.46 30 1.58 1.59 30 at s 50% flow 2.31 2.32 25 atS 50% flow 2.46 2.47 30 at > 50% flow 2.47 2.48 25 at > 50% flow 2.62 2.63 MCPRP Limits Versus Percent of Rated Power TSSS, SVEA-96 Core Average Exposures < 28307 MWd/MTU Figure 3.11 Columbia Generating Station COLR 03-17 Revision 0

2ED,-

ITwo Loop Operation 2.40 2.20 a

1.60 1.40 1.20 1.00 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 9s . 100 110 Powr (% rated)

Power TLO MCPRp SLO MCPRp

(%) Limit Limit 100 1.41 1.42 65 1.47 1.48 30 1.60 1.61 30 atS 50% flow 2.40 2.41 25 at

  • 50% flow 2.54 2.55 30 at > 50% flow 2.49 2.50 25 at > 50% flow 2.63 2.64 MCPRp Limits Versus Percent of Rated Power TSSS, ATRIUM-10 28307 MWd/MTU < Core Average Exposures < 32203 MWd/MTU Figure 3.12 Columbia Generating Station COLR 03-17 Revision 0

z80 l Two Loop Operation 260 240 220 a.

0.

U 1.60 1.40 120 1.00 20 30 40 50 6O 70 60 90 100 110 Powr1% ted)

Power TLO MCPRp SLO MCPRp

(%) Limit Limit 100 1.41 1.42 65 1.48 1.49 30 1.58 1.59 30 at S 50% flow 2.31 2.32 25 at s 50% flow 2.46 2.47 30 at > 50% flow 2.47 2.48 25 at > 50% flow 2.62 2.63 MCPRp Limits Versus Percent of Rated Power TSSS, SVEA-96 28307 MWd/MTU 5 Core Average Exposures S 32203 MWd/MTU Figure 3.13 Columbia Generating Station COLR 03-17 Revision 0

3.80 3.60 l Two Loop Operation 3.40 320 3.00 z80 Z60 0.

a- 240 220 2Z0 1.80 1.60 1.40 1.20 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 Poywer(%rted)

Power TLO MCPRp SLO MCPRp

(%) Limit Limit 100 1.36 1.37 65 1.52 1.53 30 1.71 1.72 30 at s 50% flow 3.06 3.07 25 at 5 50% flow 3.43 3.44 30 at > 50% flow 3.24 3.25 25 at > 50% flow 3.61 3.62 MCPRp Limits Versus Percent of Rated Power TSSS, Turbine Bypass Inoperable, ATRIUM-10 Core Average Exposures < 28307 MWd/MTU Figure 3.14 Columbia Generating Station COLR 03-17 Revision 0

380 3,60 I Two Loop Operation 540.

320-3.00-160 -

2.60-ffi 240-2 2.20 -

ZOO -

1.80-1.60-1.40-120-20 30 40 50 eo 70 80 90 100 110 PANS(% YAt Power TLO MCPRp SLO MCPRp

(%) Limit Limit 100 1.35 1.36 65 1.52 1.53 30 1.68 1.69 30 at s 50% flow 3.16 3.17 25 at s 50% flow 3.41 3.42 30 at > 50% flow 3.25 3.26 25 at > 50% flow 3.50 3.51 MCPRp Limits Versus Percent of Rated Power TSSS, Turbine Bypass Inoperable, SVEA-96 Core Average Exposures < 28307 MWd/MTU Figure 3.15 Columbia Generating Station COLR 03-17 Revision 0

3.80 3.60 ITwo Loop Operation 3.40 a20 a60 280 260 0.

2.40 220 2z0 1.80 1.60 1.40 120 1.00 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 PFr/.%r.MM Power TLO MCPRp SLO MCPRp

(%) Limit Limit 100 1.45 1.46 65 1.56 1.57 30 1.71 1.72 30 at s 50% flow 3.06 3.07 25 at 5 50% flow 3.43 3.44 30 at > 50% flow 3.24 3.25 25 at > 50% flow 3.61 3.62 MCPRP Limits Versus Percent of Rated Power TSSS, Turbine Bypass Inoperable, ATRIUM-10 28307 MWdIMTU S Core Average Exposures S 32203 MWd/MTU Figure 3.16 Columbia Generating Station COLR 03-17 Revision 0

380 -

l Two Loop Operation 3.60 3.40 3.20 3.00 2.60 a.M 2.40 2.20 2.00 11B0 1.60 1.40 120 1.00 -

20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 Poar (% rated)

Power TLO MCPRp SLO MCPRp

(%) Limit Limit 100 1.44 1.45 65 1.57 1.58 30 1.68 1.69 30 atS 50% flow . 3.16 3.17 25 at 5 50% flow 3.41 3.42 30 at > 50% flow 3.25 3.26 25 at > 50% flow 3.50 3.51 MCPRp Limits Versus Percent of Rated Power TSSS, Turbine Bypass Inoperable, SVEA-96 28307 MWdIMTU < Core Average Exposures < 32203 MWdIMTU Figure 3.17 Columbia Generating Station COLR 03-17 Revision 0

I Two Loop Operation 2.40 2.20

a. 2.00 a:

0.

C.

1.40 1.20 20 30 40 50 00 70 so So 100 110 Power(% ruted)

Power TLO MCPRp SLO MCPRp

(%) Limit Limit 100 1.40 1.41 65 1.48 1.49 30 1.57 1.58 30 at s 50% flow 2.40 2.41 25 ats 50% flow 2.54 2.55 30 at > 50% flow 2.49 2.50 25 at > 50% flow 2.63 2.64 MCPRp Limits Versus Percent of Rated Power NSS, ATRIUM-10 FFTR/Coastdown Operation Figure 3.18 Columbia Generating Station COLR 03-17 Revision 0

z80

[Two Loop Operation 2.60 \

Z40 i 220 z2.0 a:

a.

U 1.80 1.60 1.40 120]

1.00 . .

20 30 40 50 60 70 80 00 100 110 Po trd)

Power TLO MCPRp SLO MCPRp

(%) Limit Limit 100 1.38 1.39 65 1.48 1.49 30 1.55 1.56 30 at s 50% flow 2.31 2.32 25 at 5 50% flow 2.46 2.47 30 at > 50% flow 2.47 2.48 25 at > 50% flow 2.62 2.63 MCPRp Limits Versus Percent of Rated Power NSS, SVEA-96 FFTR/Coastdown Operation Figure 3.19 Columbia Generating Station COLR 03-17 Revision 0

I Two Loop Operation 3.60 340 3.20 3.00 280I 260 Z0.

220 200 1.80 1.60 1.40 120 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 Pom r%rAeA Power TLO MCPRp SLO MCPRp

(%) Limit Limit 100 1.44 1.45 65 1.56 1.57 30 1.65 1.66 30 at 5 50% flow 3.06 3.07 25 at s 50% flow 3.43 3.44 30 at > 50% flow 3.24 3.25 25 at > 50% flow 3.61 3.62 MCPRp Limits Versus Percent of Rated Power NSS, Turbine Bypass Inoperable, ATRIUM-10 FFTR/Coastdown Operation Figure 3.20 Columbia Generating Station COLR 03-17 Revision 0

3.80 a60 Two Loop Operation 240 -

320 -

1,00"-

280 -

260 -

0.

I, 240 -

220-200 -

1.80 1.60-1.40 -

120-1.00 20 30 40 50 O0 70 80 90 100 110 Powr% rated)

Power TLO MCPRp SLO MCPRp

(%) Limit Limit 100 1.41 1.42 65 1.57 1.58 30 1.64 1.65 30 at5s50% flow 3.16 3.17 25 at s 50% flow 3.41 3.42 30 at > 50% flow 3.25 3.26 25 at > 50% flow 3.50 3.51 MCPRp Limits Versus Percent of Rated Power NSS, Turbine Bypass Inoperable, SVEA-96 FFTR/Coastdown Operation Figure 3.21 Columbia Generating Station COLR 03-17 Revision 0

_.I 280 Two Loop Operation 260 240 220 0.

a.

1.40 1.20 20 30 40 5O 60 70 80 90 180 110 Piers(%Mad)

Power TLO MCPRp SLO MCPRp

(%) Limit Limit 100 1.43 1.44 65 1.48 1.49 30 1.60 1.61 30 at s 50% flow 2.40 2.41 25 at s 50% flow 2.54 2.55 30 at > 50% flow 2.49 2.50 25 at > 50% flow 2.63 2.64 MCPRp Limits Versus Percent of Rated Power TSSS, ATRIUM-10 FFTR/Coastdown Operation Figure 3.22 Columbia Generating Station COLR 03-17 Revision 0

280 I Two Loop Operation Z60 Z40 Z20 a.ZO 2 l:

0 1.60 1.40 1.20 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 P %rated)

Power TLO MCPRp SLO MCPRp

(%) Limit Limit 100 1.41 1.42 65 1.48 1.49 30 1.58 1.59 30 at 5 50% flow 2.31 2.32 25 at 5 50% flow 2.46 2.47 30 at > 50% flow 2.47 2.48 25 at > 50% flow 2.62 2.63 MCPRp Limits Versus Percent of Rated Power TSSS, SVEA-96 FFTR/Coastdown Operation Figure 3.23 Columbia Generating Station COLR 03-17 Revision 0

- lL-l Two Loop Operation 3.60 3.40 320 3.00 28W 260 no W.

0 E 240 220 zoo 1.8W 1.e0 1.404 1.00 20 30 40 50 60 70 s 90 100 110 PVAW(% rtec Power TLO MCPRp SLO MCPRp

(%) Limit Limit 100 1.46 1.47 65 1.56 1.57 30 1.71 1.72 30 at s 50% flow 3.06 3.07 25 at S 50% flow 3.43 3.44 30 at > 50% flow 3.24 3.25 25 at > 50% flow 3.61 3.62 MCPRp Limits Versus Percent of Rated Power TSSS, Turbine Bypass Inoperable, ATRIUM-10 FFTRlCoastdown Operation Figure 3.24 Columbia Generating Station COLR 03-17 Revision 0

I Two Loop Operation 340.

320*

280-260-CL 9.

> 240-0 220-200-1.80-1.60 1.40-120-20 30 40 s0 60 70 80 90 1X0 110 POar(%M Power TLO MCPRp SLO MCPRp

(%) Limit Limit 100 1.44 1.45 65 1.57 1.58 30 1.68 1.69 30 at5 50% flow 3.16 3.17 25 at 5 50% flow 3.41 3.42 30 at > 50%/6 flow I 3.25 3.26 25 at > 50% flow 3.50 3.51 MCPRp Limits Versus Percent of Rated Power TSSS, Turbine Bypass Inoperable, SVEA-96 FFTR/Coastdown Operation Figure 3.25 Columbia Generating Station COLR 03-17 Revision 0

Z80 I Two Loop Operation Z60 Z40 220 C. 2.DO C.)

2 1.80 1.60 1.40 -

1.20 20 20 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 Pow" (% redm Power TLO MCPRp SLO MCPRp

(%) Limit Limit 100 1.31 1.32 65 1.43 1.44 30 1.57 1.58 30 at S 50% flow 2.40 2.41 25 at S 50% flow 2.54 2.55 30 at > 50% flow 2.49 2.50 25 at > 50% flow 2.63 2.64 MCPRp Limits Versus Percent of Rated Power NSS, RPT Inoperable, ATRIUM-10 Core Average Exposures < 28307 MWd/MTU Figure 3.26 Columbia Generating Station COLR 03-17 Revision 0

Z80 l Two Loop Operation 260 240 220

0. 200 U

1.80 1.60 1.40 120 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 1t0 110 Pvr(%

Power TLO MCPRp SLO MCPRp

(%) Limit Limit 100 1.28 1.29 65 1.42 1.43 30 1.56 1.57 30 at s 50% flow 2.31 2.32 25 at S 50% flow 2.46 2.47 30 at > 50% flow 2.47 2.48 25 at > 50% flow 2.62 2.63 MCPRp Limits Versus Percent of Rated Power NSS, RPT Inoperable, SVEA-96 Core Average Exposures < 28307 MWd/MTU Figure 3.27 Columbia Generating Station COLR 03-17 Revision 0

fnL.

z80 -

Two Loop Operation 2.60 -

Z40 -

220

0. zoo Ix 1.80 1.60 1.40 120 1.a0 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 MtO 110 PW"r(% Mod)

Power TLO MCPRp SLO MCPRp

(%) Limit Limit 100 1.44 1.45 65 1.49 1.50 30 1.57 1.58 30 at s 50% flow 2.40 2.41 25 at s 50% flow 2.54 2.55 30 at > 50% flow 2.49 2.50 25 at > 50% flow 2.63 2.64 MCPRp Limits Versus Percent of Rated Power NSS, RPT Inoperable, ATRIUM-10 28307 MWd/MTU < Core Average Exposures < 32203 MWd/MTU Figure 3.28 Columbia Generating Station COLR 03-17 Revision 0

280 I Two Loop Operation 260 240 220

  • . 2W0 EL 2 1.80 1.60 1.40 120 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 1CO 110 Pa- ru Mted)

Power TLO MCPRp SLO MCPRp

(%) Limit Limit 100 1.44 1.45 65 1.49 1.50 30 1.56 1.57 30 at s 50% flow 2.31 2.32 25 at 5 50% flow 2.46 . 2.47 30 at > 50% flow 2.47 2.48 25 at > 50% flow 2.62 2.63 MCPRp Limits Versus Percent of Rated Power NSS, RPT Inoperable, SVEA-96 28307 MWdIMTU S Core Average Exposures S 32203 MWd/MTU Figure 3.29 Columbia Generating Station COLR 03-17 Revision 0

3.80 3.60 I Two Loop Operation 3.40 3.20 3.00 2.80 Z60 20 CLi2.40 I

220 1.80 1.60 1.40 120 1.00 20 30 40 50 80 70 80 g0 100 110 Power(% rated)

Power TLO MCPR, SLO MCPRp

(%) Limit Limit 100 1.33 1.34 65 1.48 1.49 30 1.65 1.66 30 at s 50% flow 3.06 3.07 25 at s 50% flow 3.43 3.44 30 at > 50% flow 3.24 3.25 25 at > 50% flow 3.61 3.62 MCPRp Limits Versus Percent of Rated Power NSS, RPT Inoperable, Turbine Bypass Inoperable, ATRIUM-10 Core Average Exposures < 28307 MWdIMTU Figure 3.30 Columbia Generating Station COLR 03-17 Revision 0

380 360 I Two Loop Operation a40 320 aoo 2.80' s' 260' 0.

a Z40' 220' 2.00 1.80 1.60 1.40 120' 1.00 20 30 40 50 60 70 so g0 100 110 Powar(% rated)

Power TLO MCPRp SLO MCPRp

(%) Limit Limit 100 1.33 1.34 65 1.48 1.49 30 1.62 1.63 30 at5s50% flow 3.16 3.17 25 at 5 50% flow 3.41 3.42 30 at > 50% flow 3.25 3.26 25 at > 50% flow 3.50 3.51 MCPRp Limits Versus Percent of Rated Power NSS, RPT Inoperable, Turbine Bypass Inoperable, SVEA-96 Core Average Exposures < 28307 MWd/MTU Figure 3.31 Columbia Generating Station COLR 03-17 Revision 0

3 _ .I 3ae l Two Loop Operation 340 a20 3.A0 zoo Z20 0.

U 240 220 280 1.80 1._0 1.40 1.20 IM20" 30 40 80 70 s0 90 1_0 110 Pm r(%rated)

Power TLO MCPRp SLO MCPRp

(%) Limit Limit 100 1.48 1.49 65 1.59 1.60 30 1.65 1.66 30 at 5 50% flow 3.06 3.07 25 at 5 50% flow 3.43 3.44 30 at > 50% flow 3.24 3.25 25 at > 50% flow 3.61 3.62 MCPRp Limits Versus Percent of Rated Power NSS, RPT Inoperable, Turbine Bypass Inoperable, ATRIUM-10 28307 MWd/MTU S Core Average Exposures 5 32203 MWd/MTU Figure 3.32 Columbia Generating Station COLR 03-17 Revision 0

3.80 3.60 3.40 3.20 3.00 2.80

r. 2.60 B.

Q 2.40 2.20 200 3.80 1.60 1.40 1.20 1.00 20 30 40 50 60 70 s0 90 100 110 Power (% raled)

Power TLO MCPRp SLO MCPRp

(%) Limit Limit 100 1.48 1.49 65 1.58 1.59 30 1.65 1.66 30 at5s50% flow 3.16 3.17 25 at s 50% flow 3.41 3.42 30 at > 50% flow 3.25 3.26 25 at > 50% flow 3.50 3.51 MCPRp Limits Versus Percent of Rated Power NSS, RPT Inoperable, Turbine Bypass Inoperable, SVEA-96 28307 MWd/MTU < Core Average Exposures < 32203 MWd/MTU Figure 3.33 Columbia Generating Station COLR 03-17 Revision 0

4.0 Linear Heat Generation Rate (LHGR) Limits for Use in Technical Specification 3.2.3 The LHGRs for use in Technical Specification 3.2.3 are given as a function of Average Planar Exposure for ATRIUM-1 0 and as a function of nodal pellet exposure for SVEA-96. The LHGRs shall not exceed the limits shown in the following figures:

a. Figure 4.1 - SVEA-96 reload fuel
b. Figure 4.2-ATRIUM-10 reload fuel Columbia Generating Station COLR 03-17 Revision 0

14 0 1ODDO 2X00 3000 4000 5=

POWleExposure (MWdWrmU)

Pellet Exposure LHGR (MWd/MTU) (kW/ft) 0 13.4 16000 11.0 65000 7.2 Linear Heat Generation Rate (LHGR)

Versus Pellet Exposure SVEA-96 Figure 4.1 Columbia Generating Station COLR 03-17 Revision 0

0 10000 20000 30000 40000 50000 60000 70000 Average Planar Exposure (MWd(MTU)

Average Planar Exposure LHGR (MWd/MTU) (kW/ft) 0 13.4 15000 13.4 64000 7.3 Linear Heat Generation Rate (LHGR)

Versus Average Planar Exposure ATRIUM-10 Figure 4.2 Columbia Generating Station COLR 03-17 Revision 0

5.0 Oscillation Power Range Monitor (OPRM) Instrumentation Limits for Use in LCO 3.3.1.3 The OPRM instrumentation limits for use in LCO 3.3.1.3 shall not exceed the following:

Function I Trip Setpoint Period Based Detection Algorithm (PBDA)

Amplitude Setpoint: Sp 1.09 Peak/Average Confirmation Count Setpoint: N2 12 Columbia Generating Station COLR 03-17 Revision 0

.m 6.0 References 6.1 CE NPSD-883-P, Revision 0, 'COLUMBIA Cycle 16 Reload Licensing Report,"

Westinghouse CE Nuclear Power LLC, March 2001.

6.2 CE NPSD-801-P, Revision 5, 'WNP-2 LOCA Analysis Report," Westinghouse CE Nuclear Power LLC, February 2001.

6.3 EMF-2863 Revision 1, 'Columbia Generating Station Cycle 17 Reload Analysis,"

Framatome ANP, September 2003.

6.4 EMF-2841 (P) Revision 1, 'Columbia Generating Station LOCA-ECCS Analysis MAPLHGR Limit for ATRIUM'-10Fuel," Framatome ANP, March 2003.

6.5 NE-02-00-03, Revision 0, 'Oscillation Power Range Monitor (OPRM) Trip Setpoints," Energy Northwest, June 7, 2000.

6.6 CE NPSD-792-P, 'Fuel Assembly Mechanical Design Report for WNP2," ABB Combustion Engineering Nuclear Operations, May 1996.

Columbia Generating Station COLR 03-17 Revision 1