IR 05000528/1981021

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
IE Insp Rept 50-528/81-21 on 811001-30.No Noncompliance Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Preoperational Testing,Maint Startup Testing Qa,Water Chemistry & Administrative Control of NRC Publications
ML17297B032
Person / Time
Site: Palo Verde Arizona Public Service icon.png
Issue date: 11/06/1981
From: Fiorelli G, Zwetzig G
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION IV)
To:
Shared Package
ML17297B031 List:
References
50-528-81-21, NUDOCS 8111240769
Download: ML17297B032 (8)


Text

~

~

.S.

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISS sr OFFICE OF INSPECTION AND ENFORCEMENT REGION V

Report No.

Docket No.

Licensee:

License No.

Safeguards Group Facility Name:

Inspection at:

Inspection conducted:

Inspectors:

iore li Senior Resident Inspector nit

( lcpr Date igned Date Signed G

Z tzig, hief, Reactor Projects Section

Date Signed 0 /%/

Date S gned Summary:

Ins ection on October 1-30, 1981 (Re ort No. 50-528/81-21)

Areas Xns ected:

Routine, unannounced resident inspection of preoperational testing, maintenance, startup testing QA, water chemistry and administrative control of NRC publications.

The inspection involved 104 inspector-hours on-site by the resident inspector.

Results:

No items of noncompliance or deviations were identified.

PDR ADaCK DaOOOMB

"8 IPDR>

RV Form 219 (2)

f I

DETAILS Persons Contacted p,

W.

C.

M.J.

J

~

R.

M.

  • J ~

M. Hartley, Nuclear Operations Manager B. McLane, Startup Manager N. Russo, Operations Quality Assurance Manager B. Garrett, Maintenance Control Supervisor F. Mennicks, Instrumentation and'Contxol (IGC) Supervisor B. Cederquist, Chemistry Supervisor Badsbard, Licensing Engineer Jackson, Principal Startup Engineer (Mech.)

Mathis, Startup Engineer (l&C)

Ide, Supervisor, Construction Qaulity Assurance (QA)

Hargon, Project Staxtup Engineer (Becthel)

>>Reports to Arizona Public Service (APS) Startup Manager Trainin The inspector attended an operat'or training class conducted by Dr. Holmes who is a contract 'instructor from the Oak Ridge National Laboratory.

The subject dealt with nuclear physics and was being given to the second class of senior reactor operator candidates.

The course duration is four, weeks, at, which time, it will have been completed by 34 individual's.

"

,('o items of non'compliance'x, d'eviati'on's-, were identified.

f'he maintena'nce"oxg'aniza'tion...is,.',headed by, a ~maintenance superintendent",

',,Reporting to himqam'e,,give supervisors who supervise activit$ eq.anvolving'me'cha'nical maintenance, electrical

)i maintenance, ins~tx'u'm'e'nt <and 'contr'ol maintenance, station services and maintenance "control services,'!,'@he.'.,latter group is responsible for scheduling,'.,coordinating and c'ontrolling the preventive and lp corrective maj'nt'ena'nca

'program's!

Px'ocedures have been written which describe the manner in whichthe" program will be implemented and,controlled'.

The:-m'aintenance

"contirol se'rvice group also will develop document packages to s'uppoxt the maintenance act-ivities, thereby 'relieving the first line foreman and craftsmen of this task.

The group will also trend equipment performance.

The control activities will, be accomplished with the aid of com-puters and a projected staff of approzimately 30.

Requirements for maintenance surveillance and preventive maintenance have been minimal, since few systems have been turned over to APS thus far.

Procedures are being written for the conduct of work.

This effort appears to be the most critical from the standpoint of maintaining pace with the turnover of systems to AP r'

1

Jl

,

J'

-'J 1J f

&

I

(

1

U '

CJ(J" 1'

U J'

'1 I

((J1 1(

(U-(

1 JJ 1't

1 U

No items of noncompliance or deviations were. identified.

4.

Wa ter Chemis tr The chemical analysis of the water used to fillthe reactor vessel during pre-service inspection (ultrasonic testing) of the vessel was reviewed.

Several samples per day had been taken of the demineralized water used.

The analysis of these samples showed chloride and flouride levels within the specification which will apply during normal operation.

No items of noncompliance or deviations were identified.

5.

0 erations ualit Assurance A report of findings made by the APS QA auditor dealing with test control was reviewed by the inspector.

The report identified a series of items that dealt with procedure implementation and procedure availability which will require corrective actions.

The report receives a wide distribution which includes the Vice President of Electric Operations.

i No items of noncompliance, or deviations. were identified.

't 6.

IE Bulletins Circula'rs',

Information 'Notices f

hl A review of the 1'icensee"s foliow-up,efforts on actions requested and recommended by "IEiBulletins, Circu1ars and Information Notices confirmed that, a system currently-exis'ts for tracking task responsibility, due dates, and action completions.

Information related to these publications will be made a part of the licensee's licensing comm'itment list currently tracked by computer.

A procedure, describing the flow of reviews has also been written. A'review of the licensee's handling of Bulletins 80-12 and 80-16 confirmed the procedure was being implemented; No items of noncompliance or deviations were identified.

7.

Plant Tours Several tours of the reactor building were made during the month.

The inspector observed that the cleanliness of areas ajacent to the open reactor vessel had deteriorated.

This was brought to the attention of APS construction QA who had made similar observations and had initiated action to correct the condition.

Follow-up tours confirmed that action had been taken to improve this con-dition in those areas

.adjacent to the open vesse e

/

ti

),

IC O

y L

l'f c

I t

E.

(

8.

Exit Interview

'-3-

No items of noncompliance'r<deviatXons),were identified.

The inspector met with t'e.-nuclear Opera'tio'ns; Manager on October 31, 1981, and discussed the fi'nd$ ng's",of Ii't-inspe'ction.

The s tatus of startup testing was,~d'is'cussed',.in'he,co'ntex't of ':having the necessary procedures in placebo;;forithe contr'ol<an'd, condu'ct" of;;the tests, as well as having systems wh'ich'e'e appropriately completed prior to conducting the test.

Assurance'as'rovided that not only would procedures be f<nali'zed,and 'the,s'taff familiar with the procedures, but that'esting'ould be realistically scheduled to insure proper control and continuit v w

~ 1 C

1.

li',

L D~

I I

h 1 ~

J

'a<

pf

+C i'

c~

Ci C

A

'(

!k l

Il

),

I 4