IR 05000528/1981017

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
IE Mgt Meeting Repts 50-528/81-17,50-529/81-13 & 50-530/81-13 on 811006.No Noncompliance Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Regional Evaluation of Licensee Performance for June 1980
ML17297A958
Person / Time
Site: Palo Verde  Arizona Public Service icon.png
Issue date: 10/16/1981
From: Bishop T, Faulkenberry B
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION IV)
To:
Shared Package
ML17297A957 List:
References
50-528-81-17, 50-529-81-13, 50-530-81-13, NUDOCS 8110270352
Download: ML17297A958 (6)


Text

Cj U,

S ~

NUCLEAR'EGULATORY COMMISSION OFFICE OF INSPECTION 'AND ENFORCEMENT C

f REGION V-..

J" y

~l r>

lf Report No. 50-528/81-17 50-529/81-13 -';

50-530/81-13 Docket No. 50-528, 529, 530

-', -'Licens'e'-,No." CPPR-141, -142,'143 A

\\

Licensee:

Arizona Public Service-Compa'ny P. 0.

Box 21666 -',

,

h Phoenix, Arizona 85036 Facility Name:

Palo Verde Nuclear Generating Station Units 1, 2 and

Meeting at:

APS Nuclear Service Office, Phoenix, Arizona Meeting conducted:

October 6, 1981 i N~!i (

s op, se

, Reac or Prospects Section

Approved by:

au en erry, ctor Construction Proj cts Branch la/iG'/8)

a e signed Date Soigne Summary:

Meeti n of October

1981 Re ort 50-528/81-17 529/81-13 530/81-13:

Regional Evaluation of Licensee performance for the period of June 1, 1980 through June 30, 1981.

8110270352 811021

>,

PDR ADOCK 05000528

PDR

~ )

~ f 9 Q-','P j g)gQg+,5 I)

~

~llh

)<'%f QQ pA $

f>('q v

q p

g",, p qP~O

>]i ~a~~++ ~.g,

~

PQ~~

Og>

r c'l ')'"

q>

.sr)<>gnC i,~

y.,i'..q,~o3 carve

". ~i.f i.",;~a:xra"~:..as~~r J 8()" ~8 "a" B~Oi!";.>>nz r'A;:rove ""

<"16

~

~

2, f'l

~ AO:i" ~ fi>5l'8'6'fOfl3>> 'f'iQ~')ll'

>"l'"V Of i

~ g)e >g'f y 4 j I'gg,l

-<<z~~iaR,.-i uo<<~,oar>>",'~i'!n~

~ref'o,~'"

~""'~~fo9

~",: <<~ t ~ i ~~a>>~r~o~

a

)g

> f l!>>~j<"

Je

~if'~~j eq

~~g qr, >'9

--cs j>> 1,'~sp f,'

n<~r t~aP-

~ pre

~ iq~qQq+

$ gC. gv% f'+

N I"'l~

"'5'f ~')'1<

"I ))fqg Q s'"l'Ij

.~ fQ

')'>~'

g~pfgg~l)5 t

'VA'gQ('5

'g>'fthm~'V

'pl+

( ~-f..k~'..- 'N~'~

'-" N'~'-~>>

~-i~a~"

~

~~do~>> >i ~iver'~.,I f

~ * +

'w". '> 'sr<"

~

~~

aors

~a~"~a~".a::

'e~'a~

1 ';,a ear~v if~v" f.".w)l':;'..",

.f') "<<'.,iJ~

~~~i~<

tll~uoat)~

DETAILS 1.

Meetin Attendees a.

Arizona Public Service Com an APS E." E.

Van Brunt, Jr., Vice President Nuclear Projects J.

A. Roedel, Corporate guality Assurance Manager G.

C. Andognini, Vice President Electric Operations D.

B. Fasnacht, Nuclear Construction Manager A. C. Rogers, Nuclear Engineering Manager J. M.,Allen, Nuclear Engineering Manager B.

S.. Kaplan, guality 'Systems Supervisor W. E. Ide, Sitetgua'lity Assurance Manager J.

E:

Behm, Oper,ations guality Assurance A. Gehr,',APS

"Legal Representative b.

Bechtel Power'Cor oration'echtel t

W. J.,Stubblefield, Construction Manager D. R. Hawkinson, Project guality Assurance Supervisor R.

M. Grant, Project guality Control Engineer c. 'uclear Re ulator Commission NRC J. L. Crews, Director, Division of Resident, Reactor Projects and Engineering Inspection B.

H. Faulkenberry, Chief, Reactor Construction Projects Branch T.

W. Bishop, Chief, Reactor Projects Section

L. E. Vorderbr ueggen, Senior Resident Inspector (Construction)

G. Fiorelli, Senior Resident Inspector (Operations)

J.

H. Eckhardt, Project Inspector J.

D. Kerrigan, Project Manager (NRR)

2.

NRC Presentation The Director, Division of Resident, Reactor Projects and Engineering Inspection and members of his staff discussed the results of the Regional Performance Evaluation for Palo Verde Nuclear Generating Station Units 1, 2, 3 covering the period of June 1, 1980 through June 30, 1981.

The Regional Evaluation was perfor med in conjunction with the second cycle of the Systematic Assessment of Licensee Performance (SALP Cycle II).

The. topics discussed included the following:

'~l.">> v>>q to", e7rva>. Ai'f li>'l s T0ziah

.s a:i'):),,0'T " 'Ts!)foo O'T!l')ia.3 TR a7rV

.'T4,8oi>'T~

n>>)V

~ 3

~ 3 wg,, - T"-"> Mo: sI~aah vfif u',)

.>. >>'o'.,~>3, f.";~~08.0

. f a>T0',."Tysy) lr) 7i if3-yf".'@~i'ie7~9 e7i V,i.sin~0!) 8.:)

.".>

~07S,T>>e" T3lÃ0.> I."an0,.

aS>)f7>j'l etrl7Sa~S3

.lT

.i".

aoP;.a'"',,

Ai Ta@oiPOl ay"f7>T',l ea",S70~>

.').",

'To;>so l >3ni t) n."I>A">> cry')kou ",'T~ff,h..tl

/0? fv"f3'3'T 2'".9'i8%

4'

f'y>> I '>>>fq"'~

a0,)a T<", ')pn'aJa~h g,Tif'nu" gtr~,9'>I

..".

');)AS fU38

"> g.l'ifr>'J0

'.A>)f i>> f990 e >T>h evi.s'>T.>aoxqa<l

'.~a,l,'?'8,"rrl-:),I.'l

',, >o.'>los~)

z0rt~"to po.'l'

'I09 fe.trl7->>

T; "sos'l,oo itoua.'aso'3, '>>'0 rate fd(f>)~~

1)Hiv.(9QO",

)DO"-MPHIL >.t: f'T>":)09'>3'T'l,ff0BOUM~",

<awip T3 fq.<.yo0".> qadi f '>)'l:)7r)'oT'l,Pn~yw~)

r')'l'g nolavi>r"0',l 'ga--f>)p<<~T, a

0fz

>'"

..l >~t;cvr'l TA':y->,", ia.'>ia. 1 %0 n~i ~ivi'l, T04),ni",,aNew3

.3

.f>

o7-.,).)qviI >oiaaeni>>>T~ 'is"

>

'b>T">'Ti~ >4"))[O'T'l T)i f301>P. 10.)

rn ~')5'

'i0 e'>'.'T f9:l~T'>)lfU>>>3 f'itq'3. aP:).>r0a9

<0>>s3", ei.'Q,q) l>'"

,'T" i"t.)".> Tt;:;0')) "f0 ')o~>'lI o')'."rP.;.':

r')i'A7-.,>T),>'1)o l<h0l)aoV

.',l..I (ano,',;;a)<<'))

To,".)aq T'. 'n)')i;.0P warm~,i'f'n0ih.')

Tv.>77qzoI J3:>'31'l,4l."t rl'la3.:l

.f>

19')siTf>

T t7.)r,0 f~i e

Tb,'? r I'T ) l

~ iT

~,y AO>iP!T i fl9P.'3"f>l

,>rl>" T'-'.,>)Ai>>o

"3os

~f')r>I;,)'T

",.

'T,)

0>i">>'..

i.>> T'>>)i~3,'T,),T3iBivH '!0t3 li'~ PflT f "~A0r'>>). 9>ll3

.> fl)291

'>>> y '>')88J78f'

~'.i 3P. ~i )

>1 P."r')J>iH'i c>os n0f~o>",>r>I P. r'T3 o>> f.r:y-'>A",i!j'T7o)+~ '/Q>)f7o

> 9) T)>>

1$ P~'I 'T07 n')r'is')fsv~>

"37oci'>>;f0'~ j) l

. r."y"r.'.)F.'n!.

1<>now l')","f.,". ~o.>"

> >>0iv7< ale pnn7voa

~

>n37:>8 9>l4 i~ r v '1" r, 3 o)"ni30 nr

~',"fO>"n)6'>y'8 A0ffsy'3l sv fsAOf'>9>" ") IT 9fq';,'T 'lJ'">",)

.3g;~.'.") r0 'T >"

'.l "Tg).l

') "'T."Tsz.-),.p~> 7i.l6 ~9gpy3 gg'g qr-)v>

,~ ti.nff0"; 3>l+ '<<0'>>)"0ni '9~~ >7z'3

".<<ignis erlf

.(I'.

, 0

3

a.

A description of changes in the NRC's Systematic Assessment of Licensee Performance Program.

b.

A summary of the current Performance Evaluation including:

enforcement history; reportable events; inspection findings; status of Licensee actions resulting from previous SALP appraisals; and the NRR performance evaluation.

In general, Licensee performance was noted to have improved over previous appr aisal periods.

c.

Identification'of areas where Licensee performance may be further improved:

storage and maintenance of components; and quality of vendor supplied materials and equipment.

3.

~APE

Licensee representatives acknowledged the results of the evaluation and indicated that appropriate attention would be addressed towards improving performance in the noted areas.

'I 333

",o frIo'zazaah vier>ngfayP. a'3flP

.)9P rli,arr55rlo ~o,rloitai.losel A

.I

'

"I">'I Q 5. ~5')5)

> 9')farl ~')" I I;I~ Ianotn'-: )rlil)llforlirl'iverJfsv~

s>I)GIa50 aa<l

. rI:-.aalIa.")rlt to ya'>~vua P

,<<oa I"..)i J

>~> a))4.-.".," al)rli')5it I)oi.~-~~z;5;

>.j~.".Vo ofd~laoqe I:y~adaiII

,"U'rl"

" 8 ffiP.,"., g>'5P<l."

~ I ',"

P~IA,",'vO'I'Io'lW

",<<"Ii,<IP.')'I 3"IAi436

",r>> ~).5s-) vA.I);,I ~~as)sr I, foal)~n rl'..550'-f..~vf~v~ o~~s~s~o ~aoq

.~'~iw~q

~'lI'~j~"fr,

<)

~~jolv~5"" '5)'.,'5) r>Av')5l Ii

~,'~~I

)I'

~J't)>1 5>>II I,Ir )'I, I <<).I. aA~a;.I ea,5~>'.I,)5~

I >,,.'.-) 55

)a)5iih s.'">i~m')7 y,)ihl,) ')3~

.'~.'~I) lo", ~io 70 )~l)rIa'I ',~~

")I)6 3~) Iq>. )

)whoa,lli e'srI">~'tgrlllD') l I) >f6~'"f~. 0)

~ 3')rr<IrI>f" 'fo ~II)v

')p.rIAp!3 i

,5aifs'sfhv)

o,IS "ro;..if>>aaa a I" ">>)!.)f">0~53>> ae'~r

~5)")5l) I eoaz~0ii

')'"P )"II>I).,a ')~I I',fIIc'~'( rl )r j0 ii~ 3,~f>r'50A'5<05 J'"iJ> ).)~,')f )rlr I)IIi

~ ".,"0'5b

>!). 0"I

") 'I; f5

",3 Ihrl'l)O'5.) I,'Ilrv05'>.li