IR 05000445/1988002

Insp Rept 50-445/88-02 on 880106-0202.No Violations or Deviations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Plant Tours & Part 21 Followup

ML20149J950
Person / Time
Site:	Comanche Peak
Issue date:	02/10/1988
From:	Kelley D, Joel Wiebe NRC OFFICE OF SPECIAL PROJECTS
To:
Shared Package
ML20149J941	List: IR 05000445/1988002 ML20149J937 ML20149J944
References
50-445-88-02, 50-445-88-2, NUDOCS 8802230297
Download: ML20149J950 (4)

Text

. .

'

U. S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION OFFICE OF SPECIAL PROJECTS NRC Inspection Report: 50-445/88-02 Permit: CPPR-126 Docket: 50-445 Category: A2 l

Construction Permit t Expiration Date:

Unit 1: August 1, 1988 Applicant: TU Electric  ;

Skyway Tower 400 North Olive Street Lock Box 81 Dallas, Texas 75201 -

Facility Name: Comanche Peak Steam Electric Station (CPSES), !

Unit 1 Inspection At: Comanche Peak Site, Glen Rose, Texas l

. spection Conducted: January 6 through February 2, 1988

Inspector: .

5O, cR!/4 88~

L Cate dOperations~ . Kelley, Seniof,Rosident Inspector, t (

I l

Reviewed by:

. h4 8//pl//'

{j/. S . Wicbo, Load Project Inspector ba(e Inspection Sunmary i l

Inspection Conducted: January 6 through February 2, 1988 (Report !

50-445/88-02)

Areas Inspected: Unannounced resident safety inspection including (1) Plant tours; and (2) Part 21 follow u :

Results: Within the areas inspected, no violations or deviations were identifie ;

8802230297 800210 PDR ADOCK 05000445 Q PDH

.

DETAILS Persons Contacted

• C. Aldridge, Engineering Assurance (EA), Stone & Webster Engineering Corporation (SWEC)

• P. Baker, EA Regulatory Compliance Manager, TU Electric

• L. Barker, Manager, EA, TU Electric

• P. Barry, Manager, ESG, SWEC

• N. Bize, EA Regulatory Compliance Supervisor, TU Electric

• R. Blevins, Manager, Technical Support, TU Electric

• T. Conly, Lead Licensing Engineer, SWEC

• C. Finneran, CPE-PSE, TU Electric

• M. Fitzgerald, HVAC Progr.tm Manager, Ebasco

• E. Halstead, Manager, Quality Control (QC), TU Electric

• L. Heatherly, EA Regulatory Compliance Engineer, TU Electric

• R. Hooten, CPE-Civil Engineering Unit Manager, TU Electric

• J. Kelley, Manager, Plant Operations, TU Electric

• W. Lowe, Director of Engineering, TU Electric

• W. Madden, Mechanical Engineering Manager, TU Electric

• D. M. McAfee, Manager, Quality Assurance (QA), TU Electric

• D. E. Noss, QA Issue Interface Coordinator, TU Electric

• E. Odar, Project Engineering Manager, Ebasco

• M. D. Palmer, Plant Evaluation, Nuclear Operations, TU Electric

• B. L. Ramsey, Project Manager Civil / Structural, TU Electric

• D. M. Reynorson, Director of Construction, TU Electric

• M. J. Riggs, Plant Evaluation Manager, Operations, TU Electric

• A. B. Scott, Vice President, Nuclear Operations, TU Electric

• C. E. Scott, Manager, Startup, TU Electric

• J. C. Smith, Plant Operations Staff, TU Electric

• M. R. Steelman, CPRT, TU Electric

• P. B. Stevens, Manager, Eleccrical Engineering, TU Electric

• J. F. Streeter. Director, QA, TU Electric

• C. L. Terry, * hit i Project Manager, TU Electric

• D. Walker, Manager of Nuclear Licensing, TU Electric The NRC inspecr?r also interviewed other applicant employees during this inspection perio * Denotes personnel present at the February 2, 1988, exit intervie . Plant Tours (71302)

The NRC inspector performed frequent tours of Unit 1 and common plant areas during this inspection period. In addition to the general housekeeping activities and general cicanliness of the facility, specific attention was given to areas where safety-related equipment was installed and where activities were in progress involving safety-related equipmen These areas were inspected to ensure that:

_

. ,

t

'

. Work in progress was being accomplished using approved ,

procedures.

<

. Special precautions for protection of equipment were t

'

implemented and additional cleanliness requirements were ,

being adhered to for maintenance and welding activities.

'

. Installed safety-related equipment and components were '

being protected and maintained to prevent damage or deterioratio [

,

, The NRC inspector also observed control room activities including operator response to alarms, control of maintenance and tagging activities, and the general demeanor of plant [

operation ,

!

No violations or deviations were identifie .

I 3. Part 21 Follow Up (92700)  !

'

The NRC inspector reviewed a 10 CFR Part 21 notification relating to Salem Unit 1 and 2 Containment Hydrogen Analyzer Systems. The Part 21 notification noted that CPSES was one of

,

three other sites using the same system.

'

The NRC inspector discussed the notification with several !

applicant representatives and learned that TU Electric had not i received the notification as of January 29, 1988. The Office of Special Projects received a copy from NRC Headquarters on

,

j i

January 11, 1988. When the applicant receives notification, 3 the NRC inspector will review the applicant's evaluation and j resulting actions. This item is considered open pending '

resolution (445/8802-0-01).

4. Open Items ,

,

Open items are matters which have been discussed with the

'

applicant, which will be reviewed further by the inspector, and which involve some action on the part of the NRC or ;

l applicant or bot Open items identified during the 1 t

inspection are discussed in paragraph t 5. Exit Intervj ew ( 30703)

i j On Januaty 10, 1988, R. F. Warnick, H. H. Livermore and

J. S. WAeve met with L. D. Nace and A. B. Scott to discuss i

) January inspection findings and the following items of '

interest

i Random errors by Ebasco and Impell during walkdowns !

I documented in recent inspection reports were discussed in r i meetings with TU Electric and the contractors on !

.- January 28. The error rate was reported by TU Electric

!

!

!  !

! ,

.

_ _ - . . . . _ - _.

i ,, -

i to be consistent with reinspection programs conducted at other nuclear plant HVAC gasket material nonconforming condition report has progressed satisfactorily since the stop work was issued, i

,

i TU Electric has committed to provide a supplemental ;

response to Inspection Report 50-445/8704; 50-446/870 ; The program for resolution of ASME issues is progressing satisfactoril :.

i NCRs are being generated faster than they are being '

closed out. The NRC will be monitoring TU Electric's ;

progress over the next several month l

! The NRC thinks tne responses to SDAR-Cp-83-08 and l l Inspection Report 50-445/8432; 50-446/8413 need to be :

supplemente A meeting to discuss the NRC's views will l be held first week in February, i Response to NRC Compliance Bulletin 87-02 was lacking in !

detail, TU Electric stop work in the HVAC area was considered to be very responsiv !

I An exit interview was conducted on February 2, ^88, with the applicant's representatives identified in paragraph 1 of this -

repor No written material was provided to the licensee by the resident inspectors during this reporting perio The !

licensee did not identify as proprietary any of the materials l provided to or reviewed by the resident inspectors during this :

inspection. During this interview, the NRC inspectors f rummarized the scope of the inspectio t i

l

t f

i  !

l  !

<

i  !

) I l l

)  !

!  !

i  !

,

i i

, ,