IR 05000445/1988002
| ML20149J950 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Comanche Peak  |
| Issue date: | 02/10/1988 |
| From: | Kelley D, Joel Wiebe NRC OFFICE OF SPECIAL PROJECTS |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20149J941 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-445-88-02, 50-445-88-2, NUDOCS 8802230297 | |
| Download: ML20149J950 (4) | |
Text
.
.
'
U.
S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION OFFICE OF SPECIAL PROJECTS NRC Inspection Report:
50-445/88-02 Permit: CPPR-126 Docket: 50-445 Category: A2 l
Construction Permit t
Expiration Date:
Unit 1: August 1, 1988 Applicant:
TU Electric
Skyway Tower 400 North Olive Street Lock Box 81 Dallas, Texas 75201
-
Facility Name:
Comanche Peak Steam Electric Station (CPSES),
!
Unit 1 Inspection At:
Comanche Peak Site, Glen Rose, Texas l
spection Conducted: January 6 through February 2, 1988
.
Inspector:
.
5O, cR!/4 88~
dOperations~. Kelley, Seniof,Rosident Inspector,Cate L
t (
I l
Reviewed by:
. h4 8//pl//'
0{j/. S. Wicbo, Load Project Inspector ba(e Inspection Sunmary i
l Inspection Conducted: January 6 through February 2, 1988 (Report
!
50-445/88-02)
Areas Inspected:
Unannounced resident safety inspection including (1) Plant tours; and (2) Part 21 follow up.
Results:
Within the areas inspected, no violations or deviations were identified.
8802230297 800210 PDR ADOCK 05000445 Q
PDH
.
DETAILS 1.
Persons Contacted
- J.
C. Aldridge, Engineering Assurance (EA), Stone & Webster Engineering Corporation (SWEC)
- R.
P.
Baker, EA Regulatory Compliance Manager, TU Electric
- J.
L. Barker, Manager, EA, TU Electric
- D.
P. Barry, Manager, ESG, SWEC
- D.
N. Bize, EA Regulatory Compliance Supervisor, TU Electric
- M.
R.
Blevins, Manager, Technical Support, TU Electric
- J.
T.
Conly, Lead Licensing Engineer, SWEC
- J.
C.
Finneran, CPE-PSE, TU Electric
- K.
M. Fitzgerald, HVAC Progr.tm Manager, Ebasco
- P.
E. Halstead, Manager, Quality Control (QC), TU Electric
- T.
L. Heatherly, EA Regulatory Compliance Engineer, TU Electric
- C.
R. Hooten, CPE-Civil Engineering Unit Manager, TU Electric
- J.
J. Kelley, Manager, Plant Operations, TU Electric
- 0.
W.
Lowe, Director of Engineering, TU Electric
- F. W. Madden, Mechanical Engineering Manager, TU Electric
- D.
M. McAfee, Manager, Quality Assurance (QA), TU Electric
- D.
E. Noss, QA Issue Interface Coordinator, TU Electric
- E.
Odar, Project Engineering Manager, Ebasco
- M.
D. Palmer, Plant Evaluation, Nuclear Operations, TU Electric
- B.
L. Ramsey, Project Manager Civil / Structural, TU Electric
- D.
M. Reynorson, Director of Construction, TU Electric
- M.
J. Riggs, Plant Evaluation Manager, Operations, TU Electric
- A.
B.
Scott, Vice President, Nuclear Operations, TU Electric
- C.
E. Scott, Manager, Startup, TU Electric
- J.
C. Smith, Plant Operations Staff, TU Electric
- M.
R. Steelman, CPRT, TU Electric
- P.
B. Stevens, Manager, Eleccrical Engineering, TU Electric
- J.
F. Streeter. Director, QA, TU Electric
- C.
L. Terry, * hit i Project Manager, TU Electric
- R. D. Walker, Manager of Nuclear Licensing, TU Electric The NRC inspecr?r also interviewed other applicant employees during this inspection period.
- Denotes personnel present at the February 2, 1988, exit interview.
2.
Plant Tours (71302)
The NRC inspector performed frequent tours of Unit 1 and common plant areas during this inspection period.
In addition to the general housekeeping activities and general cicanliness of the facility, specific attention was given to areas where safety-related equipment was installed and where activities were in progress involving safety-related equipment.
These areas were inspected to ensure that:
-
-
-
-
.
-
_
.
,
t
Work in progress was being accomplished using approved
.
procedures.
'
,
Special precautions for protection of equipment were
<
t
.
implemented and additional cleanliness requirements were
,
'
being adhered to for maintenance and welding activities.
Installed safety-related equipment and components were
'
.
'
being protected and maintained to prevent damage or deterioration.
[
,
The NRC inspector also observed control room activities
,
including operator response to alarms, control of maintenance and tagging activities, and the general demeanor of plant
[
operations.
,
!
No violations or deviations were identified.
.
I 3.
Part 21 Follow Up (92700)
!
'
The NRC inspector reviewed a 10 CFR Part 21 notification relating to Salem Unit 1 and 2 Containment Hydrogen Analyzer Systems.
The Part 21 notification noted that CPSES was one of three other sites using the same system.
,
The NRC inspector discussed the notification with several
!
applicant representatives and learned that TU Electric had not
'
i received the notification as of January 29, 1988.
The Office j
of Special Projects received a copy from NRC Headquarters on
,
January 11, 1988.
When the applicant receives notification, i
the NRC inspector will review the applicant's evaluation and
j resulting actions.
This item is considered open pending
'
resolution (445/8802-0-01).
4.
Open Items
,
,
Open items are matters which have been discussed with the applicant, which will be reviewed further by the inspector,
'
and which involve some action on the part of the NRC or
l applicant or both.
Open items identified during the
inspection are discussed in paragraph 3.
t t
5.
Exit Intervj ew ( 30703)
i j
On Januaty 10, 1988, R. F. Warnick, H. H. Livermore and
J. S. WAeve met with L. D. Nace and A. B. Scott to discuss i
)
January inspection findings and the following items of
'
interest
i a.
Random errors by Ebasco and Impell during walkdowns I
documented in recent inspection reports were discussed in r
i meetings with TU Electric and the contractors on
!
January 28.
The error rate was reported by TU Electric
.-
!
!
!
!
,
.
_
_ -.
.
.
.
_
-
_.
i
,,
-
i to be consistent with reinspection programs conducted at other nuclear plants.
b.
HVAC gasket material nonconforming condition report has progressed satisfactorily since the stop work was issued, i
,
i c.
TU Electric has committed to provide a supplemental
response to Inspection Report 50-445/8704; 50-446/8704.
d.
The program for resolution of ASME issues is progressing satisfactorily.
- .
e.
NCRs are being generated faster than they are being
'
i closed out.
The NRC will be monitoring TU Electric's
progress over the next several months.
l f.
The NRC thinks tne responses to SDAR-Cp-83-08 and l
!
l Inspection Report 50-445/8432; 50-446/8413 need to be
supplemented.
A meeting to discuss the NRC's views will l
be held first week in February, i
g.
Response to NRC Compliance Bulletin 87-02 was lacking in
!
detail, h.
TU Electric stop work in the HVAC area was considered to be very responsive.
!
I An exit interview was conducted on February 2,
^88, with the applicant's representatives identified in paragraph 1 of this
-
report.
No written material was provided to the licensee by the resident inspectors during this reporting period.
The
!
licensee did not identify as proprietary any of the materials l
provided to or reviewed by the resident inspectors during this
inspection.
During this interview, the NRC inspectors f
rummarized the scope of the inspection.
t i
l
t f
i
!
l
<
i
!
)
I l
l
)
!
i
,
i i
,
,