IR 05000425/1988030
| ML20150C387 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Vogtle  |
| Issue date: | 06/17/1988 |
| From: | Burger C, Schepens R, Sinkule M NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20150C366 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-425-88-30, NUDOCS 8807120461 | |
| Download: ML20150C387 (12) | |
Text
-
.,
$Q OEd UNITED STATES -
<
[{\\
-h o
WUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
,
REGloH it
.o S
j 101 MARIETTA STREET.N.W.-
2-ATLANTA, GEORGIA 30323
%.....O Report No.: 50-425/88-30 Ocensee: Georgia Power Company P.O. Box 4545 Atlanta, GA 30302 Docket No.:
50-425 Construction Permit No.: CPPR-109 Facility Name: 'Vogtle 2 Inspection Conducted:
ay 6 - June 10, 1988 Inspectors:
Aq W)6W)
6//7/7k M fchepensf Senior Resident Inspector Date Signed
-
b4.
6[/7 [93 C..W. Burger, Resident Inspector Date Signed I?!T9
"
Approved By:
,
M. V. Sinkule, Section Chief
_ Date Signed Division of Reactor Projects SUMMARY Scope:
This routine, unannounced inspection entailed resident inspection in the following areas: fire protection, containment and safety related structures, piping systems and supports, auxiliary systems, electrical equipment, raceways and instrumentation, preoperational testing, quality programs and administrative controls. af fecting quality, and follow-up on previous inspection identified items.
Results:
No violations or deviations were identified.
!
,
8807120461 880622
'"
PDR ADOCK 05000425 G
PNU i
i (
-
.,
i
.
.
,
.
DETAILS
"
1.
Persons' Contacted Licensee Employees
- P.
D. Rice, Vice President, Vogtle Project Director
- R.
H. Pinson, Vice President, Project Construction G. Bockhold, General. Manager T. V. Greene, Plant Support Manager C. W. Hayes, Vogtle Quality Assurance Mane.ger
- E. D. Groover, Quality Assurance Site Manager - Construction G. M. Fiquett, Project Construction Manager A. B. Gallant, Project Compliance Coordinator
.
C. L. Coursey, Maintenance Superintendent (Startup)
- H. M. Handfinger, Assistant Plant Support Manager A. W. Harrelson, Construction Electrical Manager
'
C. W. Rau, Construction Mechanical Manager L. N. Brooks, Constructica Civil Manager L. B. Glenn, QC Manager
- R. W. McManus, Readiness Review Manager J. E. Sanders, Assistant. Project Manager W. C. Ramsey, Project Engineering Manager L. D. Harless, Manager, Quality Concerns
- J. J. Gi11 martin, Construction Mechanical Engineer
- J. M. Agold, Supervisor Preservice Inspection Group
- I. Jamieson, Test Engineer Other licensee employees contacted included craftsmen, technicians, supervision, engineers, inspectors, and office personnel.
Other Organizations
C. Marcum, Westinghouse Project Manager D. L. Kinnsch, Project Engineering - Bechtel T. E. Richardson, Project Engineering Manager - Bechtel A. J. Ayob, VSAMU Supervisor - Westinghouse B. Edwards, Site Manager - Pullman Power Products J. Miller, Quality Assurance Maneger - Pullman Power Products
- D. D. Smith, Construction Engineer - Oglethorpe Power Company
- Attended Exit Interview
i 2.
Exit Interviews - (30703C)
The inspection scope and findings were summarized on June 10, 1988, with
,
those persons indicated in paragraph 1 above.
The inspector described
,
'
the areas inspected and discussed in detail the inspection results.
No dissenting com.ments were received from the licensee.
The licensee did L
!
u
.. _.,
-.
= _.
- -..
.
'
'
.
'
.
.
-
not identify as proprietary any of the materials provided to or reviewed by the inspector during this inspection. Region based NRC exit interviews were attended curing the inspection period by a resident inspector. _This-inspection closed (1) Violations, and -(3) Inspector Followup Items. One item was identified during this inspection:
Part '21 50-425/88-02 "TDI Diesel Engine Coatrol Device Failures."
-
-
Paragraph 13.
3.
Licensee Action on Previous Enforcement Matters - (92702)
(Closed) Violation, 50-425/88-12-01 "Failure To Provide Adequate Instruc-tions To Ensure The Proper Installation Of Flow Elements And Orifices."
This violation identified three (3) examples of where flow elements were found to be installed _ backwards.
Georgia Power Company's response contained in Letter No. Gh-1456 dated May 19, 1988, outlined the correc-tive actions taken to correct the identified deficiency and to prevent recurrence.
The inspector reviewed the licensee corrective action and has determined that proper procedure and program enhancements have been accomplished; and appropriate construction and engineering field personnel have received instruction. Proper corrective action to prevent recurrence has been accomplished.
This violation 50-425/88-12-01 is closed.
4.
General Construction Inspection - (92706)
Periodic random surveillance inspections were made throughout this reporting period in the form of general type inspections in different areas of the facility.
The areas were selected on the basis of the
'
scheduled activities and were varied to provide wide coverage. Observa-tior,s were made of activities in progress to note defective items or items of noncompliance with the required codes and regulatcry requirements. On these inspections, particular note was made of the presence of quality control inspectors, supervisors, and quality control evidence in the form of available process sheets, drawings, material identification, material protection, performance of tests, and housekeeping.
Interviews were conducted with craft personnel, supervisors, coordinators, quality control inspectors, and others as they were available in the work areas.
The inspector reviewed numerous construction deviation raports to determine if requirements were met in the areas of documentation, action to resolve, justification, and approval signatures in accordance with GPC Field Procedure No. GD-T-01.
No violations or deviations were identified.
5.
Fire Prevention / Protection and Housekeeping Measures - (42051C)
The inspector observed fire prevention / protection measures throughout the inspection period. Welders were using welding permits with fire watches and extinguishers.
Fire fighting equipment was in its designated areas throughout the plant.
-. -. -
-
=-
.
.
-
,
j
-
>
(
'
l
\\
T
\\
The.' inspector reviewed and examined portions of procedures pertaining to' the fire prevention / protection measures and housekeeping measures to determine whether they comply with applicable codes, standards, NRC Regulatory Guides and licensee commitments.'
The inspector observed fire prevention / protection measures in work areas containing safety related equipment during the inspection period to verify the following:
,
-
Combustible waste material and rubbish was removed from the work areas as rapidly as practicable to avoid unnecessary accumulation of combustibles.
-
Flammable liquids were stored in appropriate containers and in designated areas throughout the plant.
-
Cutting and welding operations in progress have been authorized by an appropriate permit, combustibles have been moved away or safely covered, and a fire watch and extinguisher was posted as required.
-
Fire protection / suppression equipment was provided and controlled in accordance with applicable requirements.
No violations or deviations were identified.
6.
Containment (Steel Structures and Supports) - (48053C)
Periodic inspections were conducted to observe containment steel and support installation activities in progress, to verify the follewing:
-
Components were being properly handled (incluoed bending or straight-ening).
-
Specified clearances were being maintained.
-
Edge finishes and hole sizes were within tolerances.
-
Control, marking, protection and segregation were maintained during storage.
I Fit-up/ alignment meets the tolerances in the specifications and
'
-
drawings.
!
No violations or deviations were identified.
l 7.
Safety-Related Structures (Structural Steel and Supports) - (48063C)
Periodic inspections were conducted to observe construction activities of safety-related structures / equipment supports for major equipment outside l
the containment to verify that:
l l
l l
l l
+.. -,
.. -
-
..,--.
-
.
.
.
.
>
-
Materials and components were being properly handled ' to prevent damage.
-
Fit-up/ alignment were within tolerances in specifications and drawing requirements.
.g Bolting was in accordance with specifications and procedures.
-
-
Specified clearances from adjacent components were being met.
No violations or deviations were identified.
8.
Reactor Coolant Pressure Boundary and Safety Related Piping - (49053C)
(49063C)
System Walkdown Inspection Selected portions of the Component Cooling Water (CCW) System Train "A" were walked down.
The constructed piping system was compared to the
piping and instrumentation diagrams.
Examples of items checked were piping configuration, pipe class, weld location, and appearance type valve location and orientation, labeling, piping support. location, vent and drain connections, instrumentation connections, and engagement of threaded fasteners.
The inspectors conducted the walkdown inspection with the piping and instrumentation diagram to verify that the system was constructed as shown on the current, approved revision and in accordance with the piping and instrumentation construction specification X4AZ01.
The piping runs inspected were designed and constructed to ASME B & PVC,Section III Class II and seismic category I requirements. The following drawings were used in the walkdown.
P&ID/Rev.
Title 2X4DB136,R-15 Component Cooling Water System 2X4DB137,R-16 Component Cooling Water System No violations or deviations were identified.
9.
Safety Related Pipe Support and Restraint Systems - (50090C)
Periodic random inspections were conducted during the inspection period to observe construction activities during installation of safety-related pipe supports to determine that the following work was performed in accordance with applicable codes, NRC Regulatory Guides, and licensee commitments:
Spring hangers were provided with indicators to show the approximate
-
"hot" or "cold" position, as appropriate.
.
L_
..
..
. -.
-
._-
-.. - - - -...
.
-
.
.
W 1.
.
.I '
.
(
.
\\
.i
'
No deformation'or forced bending was evident.
- -
-Where pipe clamps are used to support vertical lines, shear lugs were-
-
welded to the pipe (if required by' Installation Drawings) to prevent slippage.
Sliding. or rolling supports were provided with material -and/or
-
lubricants suitable for the environment and compatible-with sliding -
contact surfaces, i
-
Supports are located and installed as specified.
The surface of welds meet applicable code requirements and are free
-
from unacceptable Orooves, abrupt ridges, valleys, undercuts, cracks, discontinuities, or other indicctions which can be observed on the
welded surface.
An inspection of the above attributes was conducted for the followir3 completed / accepted pipe supports:
Pipe Support Drawing No./Rev.
Class System Support Type Location V2-1202-231-H014,R-2
NSCW Rigid Strut Cnmt Bldg.-
V2-1302-012-H024,R-3
MS Rigid Strut AFV Pumphouse V2-1302-017-H001,R-3
Ar Rigid Strut AFV Pumphouse V2-1302-017-H002,R-3
Ahv Rigid Strut AFW Pumphouse V2-1302-109-H007,R-2
AFW Rigid Strut Cnmt Bldg.
No violations or deviations were identified.
10.
Electrical and Instrumentation Components and Systems - (51053C)(52153C)
Periodic inspections were conducted during the inspection period to observe safety-related electrical equipment in order to verify that the storage, installation, and preventive maintenance was accomplished in accordance with applicable codes, NRC Regulatory Guides, and licensee commitments.
<
'
During the inspection period inspections were performed on various pieces of electrical equipment during storage, installation, and cable termi-nating phase in order to verify the following as applicable:
Location _and alignment
-
Type and size of anchor bolts
-
Identification
-
-
Segregation and identification of nonconforming items Location, separation and redundancy requirements
-
I
\\
.
..
-
..
.
-.
.
-
.
-
.
..--
...
.
.,
.
.
6-Equipment space heating
-
Cable identification
-
Proper lugs used
-
Condition of wire (not nicked, etc.), tightness of connection
'
-
Bending radius not exceeded
'
--
Cable entry to' terminal point
-
-Separation
-
k No violations or deviations were identified.
11.
Electrical and Instrumentation Cables and Terminations - (51063C)(52063C)
(53053C)
i a.
Raceway / Cable Installation
'
The inspector reviewed and examined portions 'of the following
.
procedures pertaining to raceway / cable installation to determine whether they comply with applicable codes, NRC Regulatory Guides and licensee' commitments.
ED-T-02, Raceway Installation
-
-
ED-T-07, Cable Installation Perto' ic inspections were conducted to observe construction ~ activi-d ties of Safety Related Raceway / Cable Installation.
In reference to the raceway installation, the following areas were inspected to verify compliance with the applicable requirements:
-
Identification
-
Alignment
-
Bushings (Conduit)
Grounding
-
-
Supports and Anchorages In reference to the cable installation the following areas were inspected to verify compliance with the applicable requirements:
Protection from adjacent construction activities (welding, etc.)
-
-
Coiled cable ends properly secured
-
Non-terminated cable ends taped
-
Cable trays, junction boxes, etc., reasonably free of debris
-
Conduit capped, if no cable installed
-
Cable supported Bend radius not exceeded
-
Separation
-
.
-
.
.-
~
'
.
.
'
.
b.-
Cable Termi.1ations
.The inspector reviewed and examined portions of the following procedures pertaining to cable termination to-determine whether they comply' with applicable codes, NRC Regulatory Guides and licensee commitments.
-
ED-T-08, Cable Termination In reference to cable terminations the following areas were inspected to verify compliance with the applicable requirements.
Cable identification
-
Proper lugs used
-
-
Condition of wire (not nicked, etc.)
-
Tightness of connection
-
Bending radius not exceeded
-
Cable entry to terminal point
-
Separation No violations or deviations were identified.
12.
Followup on Previous Inspection Items - (92701)
(Closed)
Inspector Followup Item, 50-425/88-12-03
"Review Revised Calculation X4C1202V43 Regarding Design Objectives And Conclusions." The inspector reviewed Revision 3 to calculation X4C1202V43 issued on May 19, 1983, and determined that this item has been resolved.
(Closed)
Inspector Followup Item, 50-425/88-12-04
"Review Revised Calculation X4C1202V18 Regarding Case 3C Description."
The Inspector reviewed Revision 4 to calculation X4C1202V18 issued on April 6, 1988, and determined that this item has been resolved.
(Closed)
Inspector Followup Item, 50-425/88-12-05
"Review Revised Calculation X4C1202S00F1 Regarding The Evaluation Of Flow Failure Detec-tion And Ef'ect On System Safety Function For Item No. 85b, 86b, 87b, 88b
,
and 90b."
The inspector reviewed Revision 3 to calculation X4C1202S00f1 issued on May 5, 1988 and determined that this item has been resolved.
13.
Review of Licensee Reports (92700)
In-Office Review of Periodic and Special Reports l
(0 pen)
50-425/P21-88-02 "TOI Diesel Engine Control Device Failures."
'
On April 29, 1988, the NRC received notification from IMO Delaval, Inc.
'
that a potential problem existed with engine control devices in the air start, lube oil, jacket water systems, and crankcase systems. As a result
,
i i
-.
-
.
'
.
.
!
8'
of field. reported failures, the Calcon manufacturing -facility was audited by IMO.
This audit identified that there was no objective evidence of product testing.
IMO recommends that all warehouse stock be returned, and installed components should received additional surveillance. A copy of the letter was provided to the licensee.
This-item will remain open.
pending completion of corrective action.
-
14.
Spent Storage Racks (50095)
This inspection consisted of a review of the documents listed below to ascertain that the technical requirements detailed or referenced in the facility Safety Analysis Report associated with spent fuel storage racks have been adequately addressed in the construction / installation specifica-tion.
The following documents were reviewed:
j Document Title FSAR 9.1.3 Spent Fuel Pool Cooling & Purification System GPC Letter No. GN-1441, Spent Fuel Storage Racks Dated 4/20/88 s
GPC Letter No. GN-1441, Spent Fuel Storage Racks Dated 5/5/88 X6AN10A Construction Specification For High Density Spent Fuel Storage Racks AX6AN10A-32-2 Spent Fuel Racks - Lif ting, Handling, Installation Procedures, HPP-70810-5 The design and purchase specification and drawings were reviewed to ensure that specific technical requirements and commitments contained in the Safety Analysis Report have been incorporated into vendor purchase documents. The inspector verified that the following items were specified in the design document:
Structural, welding, and neutron absorption material were appro-priately specified and adequately described.
Applicable design and fabrication codes were specified.
Critical dimensions and tolerances were specified.
Special design or fabrication requirements were specified with respect to neutron absorbing materials.
No violations or deviations were identified
-
-
.--
_
-
.
.
_
.
.-
.
.
.,
-
.
,
.
(
,
I.
15. Reactor Coolant System Hydrostatic. Test (70462)
On May 6-9,1988,.the inspector witnessed the final preparations for and the. successful completion of the Reactor Coolant System Cold Hydrostatic Test.
Licensee activities were observed to verify the following:
i
' Testing was conducted in accordance with approved procedures and the latest revision of the test procedure, VEGP-2, 2-300-03, Revision 1, was available and in use by personnel conducting the test.
Test Procedure prerequisites'were met.
Valve lineup and system check sheets were completed, as required.
Water quality and system temperatures were monitored and met vendor requirements.
..
Pressure gauges of the required range and special test equipment ~
g
'
as specified by the test procedure were properly calibrated and installed, as required.
Relief valves were installed where required and relief paths verified for system overpressure protection.
Data requited were collected by the proper personnel.
Adequate coordination existed r.mong the responsible organizations to conduct the test properly.
A pretest briefing was conducted and potential problem areas were discussed.
,All leakage was properly documented.
Leakage was directed away from other components under test to avoid masking leaks from other joints.
Proper plant systems were inservice.
Hydrostatic test pressure was reached on May 9,1988, at approximately 5:28 p.m.
Syste:n temperature and pressure were verified to be within the required limits for the specified hold time.
The inspector observed QC and ANI inspections of various primary systems and components.
The inspector considered that performance of the test was acceptable. The direction ana coordination showed evidence of prior planning and experience.
Problems that developed throughout the test were handled expeditiously and properly.
No violations or deviations were identifie ___.
.
.
_ _
,
~
'
.
.
,.
.
'
t
16.
Preoperational Test Progra'm Implementation / Verification (70302)(71302)
The inspector reviewed the present implementation of the preoperational test program.
Test program attributes inspected included review of administrative requirements, document control, documentation of major test events and deviations to procedures, ' operating practices, instrumentation calibrations, and correction of problems revealed by testing.
Periodic inspections,were conducted of Co$ trol Room.0perations to assess plant condition and conduct of shift personnel.
The inspector observed that Control Room operations were being conducted in an orderly and professional manner.
Shif t personnel were knowledgeable ' of plant condi -
tions, i.e., ongoing testing, systems / equipment in or out of service, and l
alarm /annunciatcr statas.
In addition, the~ inspector observed shift turnovers on various occasions to verify the continuity of plant testing, operational problems and other pertinent plant information during the turnovers.
Control Room logs were reviewed and various entries were discussed with operations personnel.
Periodic facility tours were made tu assess equipment and plant condi-tions, maintenance and prcoperational activities in progress.
Schedules for program completion and progress reports were routinely monitored.
Discussions were held with responsible personnel, as they were available,-
-
to determine their knowledge of the preoperational program. The Inspector reviewed numerous operation deviation reports to determine if requirements were met in the areas of documentation, action to resolve, justification, corrective action and approvals.
Specific inspections conducted are listed below:
Test Witnessing (70312)
The inspector witnessed selected portions of the following preopera-tional test procedures as they were conducted.
The inspection included attendance at briefings held by the test supervisor to
,
observe the coordination and general knowledge of the procedure with the test participants. Overe'.1 crew performance was evaluated during testing. A preliminary review cf the test results was compared to the inspector's own observations.
Problems encountered during performance of the test w?re verified to be adequately documented, evaluated and dispositioned on a selected basis.
Procedure NRC Insp.
Test Title Activity Observed No.
No.
2-3EG-01,R-0 70439 Component Cooling Train "B" Pump Water Breaker Logic Integrated Test -
Section 6.2.4
.-
.
.
i
.
Procedure NRC Insp.
Test Title Activity Observed
.
No.
No.
(cont'd)
2-3BC-01,R-0 70436 Residual Heat Train "B" RHR Removal System Status Monitor Panel Checkout Train "A" RHR Pump Loop Suction Valve 2HV-8701A Control Circuit Checkout 2-38G-02 70433 Chemical Volume 2HV-15214-CVS Control System Let Down Pipe Break Protection Isola-tion Valve Checkout 2HV-8160-CVS
, Let Down Line Isolation Valve Checkout
.