IR 05000413/1987024

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Insp Repts 50-413/87-24 & 50-414/87-24 on 870713-24.No Violations or Deviations Noted.Major Areas Inspected: Licensee Action on Previously Identified Enforcement Matters & Insp Findings
ML20236J424
Person / Time
Site: Catawba  Duke Energy icon.png
Issue date: 07/30/1987
From: Belisle G, Mellen L
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II)
To:
Shared Package
ML20236J417 List:
References
50-413-87-24, 50-414-87-24, NUDOCS 8708060171
Download: ML20236J424 (3)


Text

_n___

_. - _ _.. _ _

__

_ _.

l

' D# 300

.

.. UNITED STATES

<

_ h[

3,,.

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION J [:

e.

REGloN il

l#

' a'

101 MARIETTA STREET. N.W., SUITE 2000 g

o ATLANTA, GEORGIA 30323

' Y-

+...+

P.eport Nos.: ' 50-413/87-24,50-414/87-24 Licensee: Duke Power Company 422 South Church Street Charlotte, NC 28242 Docket Nos.:

50-413, 50-414 License Nos'.: NPF-35,.NPF-52 i ~

Facility Names:

Catawba 1 and 2 Inspection Conducted: July 13-24, 1987 Q5.mw$m WsolsT Inspector:

'

O S. Mellen Date Signed -

Accompanying Personnel:

T. A. Cooper Approved by: b.Ni 1 [~60 l50 909u.)A.Belisle, Chief G

Date_ Signed

'i

,

i ality Assurance Programs Section Division of Reactor Safety

.i H

SUMMARY

Scope:

This routine, unannounced inspection was in the areas of licensee actions 'on previously identified enforcement matters and licensee actions on

.:

previously identified inspection-findings.

'

.

Resulhs:

No violations or deviations were identified.

8708060171 870731

.PDR ADOCK 05000413 o

.PDR t

.--_- -----.--- ------------ _

_

.

-__-

__

_

_

s

,.

'

il l

REPORT DETAILS 1.

Persons Contacted Licensee Employees i

l W. Bradley, Quality Assurance (QA) Surveillance. Supervisor

  • M. Cote', Compliance Specialist J. Gossett, Medical Staff
  • L. Hartzell, Compliance Engineer T. Newton, Surveillance Clerk J. Willis, Station QA Manager NRC Resident Inspectors K. Vandoorn, Senior Resident Inspector M. Lesser, Resident Inspector 2.

Exit Interview

,

The inspection scope and findings were summarized on July 23, 1987, with the personnel noted in paragraph 1.

No dissenting comments rere received from the licensee.

The licensee did not identify as proprietary any of the materials provided to or reviewed by the inspector during these inspections.

3.

Licensee Action on Previous Enforcement Matters (92702)

a.

(Closed) Violation 413/86-45-01: Failure to Use Calibrated Instrumentation for Technical Specification Required Surveillance.

The licensee's response dated January 14, 1987, was considered acceptable by Region II.

The inspectors reviewed Performance Test Procedure PT/1/A/4450/01D, Containment Purge Filter Train Performance Test and concluded the procedure adequately addressed the use of calibrated instrumentation for Technical Specification required surveillance.

The inspector concluded that the licensee had determined the full extent of the violation, taken action to correct current conditions, and developed corrective actions needed to preclude recurrence of

!

similar problems. Corrective actions stated in the licensee response have been implemented.

b.

(Closed) Violation 41?/86-45-02, 414/86-48-01: Failure to Provide Adequate Procedure for Nuclear Service Water Valve Verification.

The licensee's response dated April 8, 1987, was cansidered acceptable ' by Region II.

The inspectors reviewed Operations Procedure OP/0/A/6400/06C, Nuclear Service Water System, Revision

. _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ -

_D

- _ _ _ _ _ _ _

_.

_

)

'

s

which -verifies the seal water supply line valves are locked in the appropriate position.

The procedure appears to adequately address the requirements of Technical Specification section 4.7.4.a.

I The inspector concluded that the licensee had determined the full l

extent of the violation, taken action to correct current conditions, and developed corrective actions needed to preclude recurrence of similar problems. Corrective actions stated in the licensee response have been implemented.

c.

(Closed) Unresolved Item 413/86-45-03: Variation in the Effective Full Power day (EFPD) 31 Day Surveillance.

The inspectors reviewed Catawba Nuclear Station Memorandum For File Dated May 14, 1986, OAC Thermal Outputs Program, Burnup Adjustment and attachments.

This included cycle specific reactivity anomaly curves which demonstrate that boron concentration does not linearly decrease with core exposure at all times in ccre life, adequately addressing the inspector's concerns.

4.

Unresolved Items Unresolved items were not identified during this inspection.

5.

Licensee Action on Previously Identified Inspection Findings (92701)

a.

(Closed) Inspector Followup Item 413/86-45-04: Inadequate Storage of QA Records.

The inspectors reviewed the storage of medical records and determined the records were kept in a 90 minute fire rated filing cabinets, that have been appropriately tested, b.

(Closed) Inspfctor Followup Item 413/86-45-05, 414/86-48-02:

Surveillance F ndings Corrective Action.

The inspectors reviewed Maintenance Management Procedure 1.0, Work Request Preparation, Revision 22, Corrective Action Request (CAR)

CN-86-32, and the dispositioning documents associated with the CAR.

This documentation adequ_ cely addresses the concerns noted in the inspection followup item.

c.

(Closed) Inspector Followup Item 413/86-45-06, 414/86-48-03:

Unresolved Item Resolution.

The inspectors reviawed Quali ty Assurance Department Audit NP-86-06(CN) and Station Directive 3.8.12, Revision 3, Installation of Temporary Loads.

The revision to Station Directive 3.8.12 adequately addresses the installation of temporary loads.

.. - -.. _ _ _