IR 05000410/1986014
| ML17055B569 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Nine Mile Point  |
| Issue date: | 04/21/1986 |
| From: | Eselgroth P, Marilyn Evans NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION I) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML17055B568 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-410-86-14, NUDOCS 8605020193 | |
| Download: ML17055B569 (16) | |
Text
U.S.
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
REGION I
Report No.
50-410/86-14 Oocket No.
50-410 License No.
CPPR-112 Licensee:
Nia ara Mohawk Power Cor oration 300 Erie Boulevard West S racuse New York 13202 Facility Name:
Nine Mile Point Nuclear Station Unit 2 Inspection At:
Scriba New York Inspection Conducted:
March 31 - A ril 4 1986 Inspector:
M.
vans, Reactor Engineer date Approved by:
P.
Eselgro Chief Test Programs Section, OB date Ins ection Summar
Ins ection on March 31 - A ri 1
1986 Re ort No.
~/
Areas Ins ected:
Routine, unannounced inspection by one region based inspector of preoperational test program review, preoperational test procedure review, preoperational test witnessing, gA interface with the preoperational test program, independent verification and plant tours.
Results:
No violations were identified.
NOTE:
For acronyms not defined, refer to NUREG-0544 "Handbook of Acronyms and Initialisms."
(
8b05020i93 Sb0423 anR..Peace 0500nesn
I
I
DETAILS 1.0 Persons Contacted R. Abbott, Station Superintendent
- C. Beckham, Manager, Quality Assurance (QA) Projects
"D. Caplette, Special Projects (SWEC)
"J. Drake, Startup Special Projects Supervisor (SWEC)
- P. Eddy, Site Representative J. Gaines, Test Group Supervisor W. Hansen, Manager, Nuclear Quality Assurance Operations
- T. Lee, Special Projects J. Orlando, Operations QA Supervisor T. Perkins, General Superintendent J. Perry, Vice President Quality Assurance
- M. Ray, Manager, Special Projects
- I. Weakley, Special Projects Other NRC Personnel R.
Gramm, Senior Resident Inspector, Construction
~S.
Hudson, Senior Resident Inspector, Operations
- Denotes those present at the exit meeting conducted on April 4, 1986.
The inspector also contacted other members of the licensee's technical and QA staff.
2.0
- Prep erational Test Pro ram Review 2.1
~Sco e
The inspector completed a review of the licensee's preoperational test program to verify that formal administrative measures had been established to control the conduct of preoperational testing including:
A description of the preoperational test program and assignment of responsibilities; A method to control turnover of systems from the constructor to the startup department; A formal method to control preoperational test procedure format, content, review and approval and changes to procedures; A formal method to control interruption of testing and retest requirements; A formal method to control calibration and issuance of measuring and test (M&T) equipment; and
A method to control lifted leads, jumpers and temporary modifications.
2.2 Discussion The inspector reviewed the Startup Administrative Procedures (SAP)
listed in Attachment A and verified that the administrative measures identified in Paragraph 2. 1 above were established.
2.3
~Findin s
No unacceptable conditions were identified within the scope of this review.
3.0 Prep erational Test Procedure Review and Verification 3.1
~Sco e
The Preoperational Test Procedures (POT's) identified below were reviewed in preparation for test witnessing, for technical and administrative adequacy and to independently verify that testing is planned to adequately satisfy regulatory guidance and licensee commitments.
They were also reviewed to verify licensee review and approval, proper format, test objectives, prerequisites, initial conditions, test data recording requirements and system return to normal.
N2-POT-ll, Service Water, Revision 1, approved March 15, 1986.
N2-POT-31, RHR System, Revision 2, approved March 14, 1986.
N2-POT-34, Auto Depressurization System, Revision 0, approved February 5,
1986.
3.2 Discussion During the review of the above POT's, the inspector independently verified the acceptance criteria stated in the procedures were correct when compared to the acceptance criteria listed in the Nine Mile Point Unit 2 Final Safety Analysis Report ( FSAR), Chapter 14 and G.E. Preoperational Test Specification 22A2271BA.
The inspector had several minor questions which were satisfactorily answered by the licensee.
3.3
~Findin s
No violations were identifie.0 Preo erational Test Witnessin 4.1
~Sco e
Testing witnessed by the inspector included the following observations of overall crew performance:
I Approved procedure with latest revision available and in use by test personnel; A designated person in charge and conducting the test; Minimum test personnel requirements met; Qualified personnel performing the test; Test precautions followed and prerequisites met; QA/QC hold and witness requirements met (QA engineer present);
Proper plant supporting systems in service; Special test and measuring equipment required by the test procedure, its calibration and use; Procedure is technically adequate for the test; Testing being performed as required by the test procedure; and, Test personnel actions appeared to be correct and timely during performance of the test.
4.2 Discussion The inspector observed several portions of the performance of pre-operational test procedure N2-POT-31, Residual Heat Removal (RHR)
System.
. On April 1, 1986, the inspector witnessed performance of sections 4.2. 14. 1 through 4.2. 14. 11 for the Division
LOCA Interlock Checks.
On April 3, 1986, performance of Section 4.2.22, RHR Pump B perfor-mance curve and suppression pool spray flow testing was observed.
All testing was conducted in accordance with the criteria of para-graph 4.1 above.
4.3
~Findin s
No unacceptable conditions were observe.0 A Interface With the Prep erational Test Pro ram 5. 1 Discussion The inspector reviewed several recent Nuclear Quality Assurance Surveillance R'eports (QASR) regarding various activities of the licensee's startup department.
The following QASR's were reviewed:
QASR-86-10245, witnessing of a retest of the automatic initiation and vessel injection capability of the Low Pressure Core Spray ( LPCS) System, conducted under N2-POT-32 on March 9, 1986.
Valve 2CSC"MOV-104 failed to close during the initial test.
Deficiency Report (DR) ¹13885 was issued and the valve was subsequently modified.
On retest, vessel injection was successfully achieved, however the results of the test were negated when the valve again failed to close.
The test engineer issued Problem Report (PR) ¹3424 to reinvestigate the problem.
QASR's 86-10190, 86-10258, 86-10263 and 86-10269; surveillances of the performance of POT prerequisites for N2-POT-100B, High Pressure Core Spray Diesel Generator (conducted March 5, 1986);
N2-POT-11, Service Water (conducted March 16-17, 1986);
N2-POT-100A-2, Division 2 Emergency Diesel Generator (conducted March 17, 1986);
and N2-POT-31, RHR System (conducted March 18, 1986).
The QA inspectors used QA Prerequisite checklists SQA-5-047-85, Revision 2; SQA-S-130-86, Revision 1;
and SQA-S-080-85, respectively, to check various attributes of the above proced-ures prior to actual testing.
For all survei llances, the QA inspectors noted that the prerequi sites were satisfactorily accomplished.
5.2
~Findin s
No.unacceptable conditions were identified.
6.0 Inde endent Verification The inspector independently verified that the acceptance criteria stated in POT-11, POT-31 and POT-34 satisfied the appropriate reference documents as stated in paragraph 3.2 of this report.
Also, during the RHR test witnessing discussed in paragraph 4.2 of this report, the inspector independently verified suppression pool spray flow by direct observation in containment.
7.0 Plant Tours The inspector toured various areas of the facility to observe work in progress, housekeeping, cleanliness controls and status of construction and testing activitie ~
~
7.1
~Findin s
No violations were observed.
8.0 Exit Interview I
A management meeting was held at the conclusion of the inspection on April 4, 1986 to discuss the inspection scope, findings and observa-tions as detailed in this report (see Paragraph 1 for attendees).
No written information was provided to the licensee at any time during this inspection.
The licensee did not indicate that any proprietary informa-tion was contained within the scope of this inspectio ~
a
~
v
ATTACHMENT A Procedure Number Procedure Title R
.R AAR RR N2-SAP-100 Startup and Test Program prescription
& Organization 12/10/84 N2-SAP-102 Joint Test Group 12/10/84 N2-SAP-103 equal ity Assurance and Control 12/18/84 N2-SAP-105 Tept Index 10/25/85 NC-SAP-106A Test Procedure Format 10/25/85 N2-SAP-106B Test Procedure Review, Approval and Revision 10/25/85 N2"SAP-106C Conduct of Testing 10/23/85 N2-SAP-107A System Release 10/25/85
~
I Cl
~
~
Attachment A
N2-SAP-107B System Turnover 10/23/85 N2-SAP-108 Planning and Scheduling 10/25/85 N2-SAP-109 gualification and Certifica-
tion of Startup and Test Personnel 07/01/85 N2-SAP-110 Training of Startup and Test Personnel 10/23/85 N2-SAP-114 Preventive Maintenance of Plant Equipment and Systems 12/02/85 N2-SAP-115 Control of Measuring and Test Equipment 10/28/85 N2-SAP-117 Work Control and Work Control
Report 02/15/86 N2-SAP-118 Temporary Modifications 12/05/85 N2-SAP-121A Deficiency Reporting System
12/20/85 N2-SAP-1218.
Deficiency Tracking System 10/28/85
s.
P,