IR 05000387/1980013
| ML17138B495 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Susquehanna  |
| Issue date: | 07/08/1980 |
| From: | Ebneter S, Koltay P NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION I) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML17138B494 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-387-80-13, 50-388-80-09, 50-388-80-9, NUDOCS 8009250302 | |
| Download: ML17138B495 (8) | |
Text
Report No.
Docket Nos.
'U.
S.
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
, OFFICE OF. INSPECTION AND ENFORCEMENT.
REGION I
50-387/80-13 50-388/80-09 50-388 License Nos.
CPPR-102 Priority Category Licensee:
Penns lvania Power and Li ht Com an 2 North Ninth'treet-Allentown Penns lvania 18101 Facility Name:
Sus uehanna Units 1 and
Inspection At:
Berwick Penns lvania Inspection Conducted:
June 2-5 1980 Inspectors:
o ay, eac or nspec or S.
D. Ebneter Chief.
En ineerin Su ort ec on o
rane ae ae Approved by:
ne er,
>e
,
ngsneersng upport Section No. 2, RC8ES Branch ae Ins ection Summar
ns ec son on une 2-5, 1980 (Combined Re ort Number 50-38l/80-13.
50-388/80-09 reas ns ec e
ou one, announce 1nspec son o.
e licensee s permanen p ant
>re preven son/protection program including:
installation of water supply and distribution systems, water and gaseous suppression systems, review ot specifi-cations and drawings, quality assurance program, fire brigade training, and in-spection of. plant areas where concentrations of combustible materials associated with equipment requ'ired for safe shutdown have been identified.
The inspector
~
also reviewed the construction site fire emergency program.
The inspection in-volved 46 hours5.324074e-4 days <br />0.0128 hours <br />7.60582e-5 weeks <br />1.7503e-5 months <br />'on site by one NRC regional based inspector and one supervisor.
Results:
No items of. noncompliance were identified.
Region I Form 12 (Rev. April 1977)
SOQOSSO
" gyp
Persons Contacted DEIAILS Penns lvania Power and Li ht Com an
"R. A. Beckley, Resident Nuclear qua]ity Assurance Engineer (Acting)
"I. Clymer, equality Assurance Engineer
".S.
H. Cantone, Plant Superintendent D. Dunn, Site Engineer
"J.
R. Ezchlin, Senior Project Engineer
"R.
H. Featenby, Assistant Project Director
"E: J. Gorski, guality Assurance Supervisor
"N. Gorski, Res>dent Engineer J.
Johnson, Security Supervisor
~J. Herring, Integrated Startup Group
~0.
M. Klinqer, Senior Project Engineer
"D. Kohn, Etre Protection Engineer M.
H. Lowthert, P1ant lrain1ng Supervisor
"L. D. O'Neal, Technical Supervisor
"R. J.
Prego, guality Assurance Engineer D. Roland, Plant Staff.
"A.
R.
Sabo1, Hanager of. Nuclear equality Assurance (Intercom)
H. Spagnola; Integrated Startup Group
".R.
A. Mebster, Integrated Startup Group, Nanager D. J. Marshaver, Construction Engineer Bechtel Cor oration J. Gillis, Eire Protection G. Griffin, Project Safety Supervisor
"F..
t1. Harvey, Subcontracts
"D. N., Kanouse, Subcontracts
~H.
E. Lilligh, guality Assurance
~J. O'ullivan, Assistant PEE Nuclear Re ulator Commission
"R.
M. Ga11o, Senior Resident Inspector denotes those persons present at the exit interview Fire Protection/Prevention Pro ram Review The inspector, by review of*records, drawings and specifications, and by observation of installed equipment, evaluated the 1icensee s compliance with commitments described in the Fire Protection Review Report for
Susquehanna SES, Units 1 and 2, dated January, 1978.
The report describes the design basis for the fire protection program in response to NRC
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
uidelines set forth in the Branch Technical Position 9.5-1, Appendix A.
t the time of the inspection, the installation of fire protection hardware was approximately 80K to 90K complete.
The licensee stated that automatic fire suppression systems have not been placed into service inside vital plant areas.
By review of specHications and drawings, the inspector verified that the licensee requires fire protection equipment to be Underwriters Laboratories and/or Factory Mutuals listed, and installed in accordance with applicable National Fire Protection Association codes.
,
a.
Mater Su'
and Distribution The inspector reviewed Specifications C-31 and C-32, Installing and Testing of Utility Pipe and Eittings, and inspected the installation, of. the fire pumps, water storage tanks, yard hydrants and associated valves and. equipment.
The inspector verified that the installation meets the licensee's commitments as detailed in Section 2. 1 of the Fire Protection Review Report.
No items of noncompliance were identified.
b.
Mater and Gaseous Su ression S stems The inspector reviewed Specification M-343, Deluge and Sprinklers, Revision 6, September 6, 1977; Specification N-344, Carbon Dioxide Sy'stems, Revision 4, August 30, 1977; Specification M-345, Hose Racks and Reels for Met Standpipe System, Revision 4, February 2, 1979; and fire protection drawing M-122.
The inspector randomly observed the installations of. completed and partially completed systems throughout the site.
The inspector verified that the speci-fications and the installations meet the licensee's commitments in Sections 2.2, 2.3, 2.4; 2.5, 2.6 and 2.8 of. Table 6.1 ot the Fire Protection Review Report.
No items of noncompliance were identified.
c.
ualit Assurance for Fir e Protection/Prevention The licensee's commitments in relation to quality assurance are defined in Section 3.1, Item 26 and Section 3.2, Item 26 of. the Fire Protection Review Report.
The inspector reviewed the following Bechtel procurement documents and verified that the QA commitments were being implemente Procurement Specifications for Deluge and Sprinklers, H-343,,Revision 7; Addendum 2, specified in Section 12 that the subcontractors shall
- have and maintain a controlled gA/gC program.
A copy of the subcon-tracts program was available for review.
Section 9 contained further requirements for inspections and tests.
Specification M-344, Revision 4, Carbon Dioxide System detailed inspections and tests in Section 10 and required a system be.esta" blished for the control of quality throughout design, manufacture, shipping and erection 'in Section 12.
The inspectors verified that field inspections compatible with the licensee commitments were being performed to verify installation of fire protection systems during constructionlerection.
The licensee has developed procedure SP"12, equality Requirements for Fire Protection and Related Systems, Revision 0, February 7, 1980.
This document applies to fire protection systems following the turnover of such systems from Bechtel Construction to PP8L.
The insp'ector verified that the gA document satisfies the guidelines detailed in Section C of Appendix A to the Branch Technical Position
.9. 5-1-.
No items of noncompliance were identified.
Fire Protection S stems 0 erational Tests and Surveillance The inspector met with members of 'the Integrated Startup Group to discuss and review fire protection systems related turnover packages, startup/operational tests and associated procedures.
The inspector reviewed Procedure No..AD 6.1, Revision 6, February 13, 1980, Section J, and verified that equipment turned over by Bechtel Construction to PP8L is required to be identified by a blue tag.
The inspector reviewed the following turnover packages:
Deluge System, Nos.
013B.1, 013B.2, 1BB.4.5 Sprinkler Systems, Nos. 013.2.2, 13Gl.l 11361.2 Diesel Engine Driven Fire Pump, No. 0134.11.9 Carbon Dioxide System, Nos. 013Cl.l, 113C.l The licensee stated that the operational test program for fire protection systems will be initiated upon completion of the testing procedure e.
The inspector'oted that the diesel fire pumps turnover package indicates that the diesel'fire pump maintenance and surveillance has been terminated by Bechtel Construction upon turnover of the equipment in March 1980.
The inspector could not find documentation to verify that equipment maintenance and surveillance activities has been assumed by PP&L in accordance with Plant Staff Administrative Procedure AD-00-047.
During the inspection of yard fire protection equipment, the inspector noted that post indicator valves KPI116 and IPI104, controlling water supplies to hydrants 116 and 104, were shut.
The blue tags on both valves indicated that the equipment has been turned oyer to PP&L.
The inspector could not find documentation identifying valve positions and licensee surveillance thereof.
The inspector notified the licensee that apparently the maintenance and surveillance program of certain fire protection equipment has not been initiated by PP&L=after equipment turnover by Bechtel has been completed.
The licensee indicated that based on a review of the above items, corrective action will be initiated as needed.
This item is considered unresolved pending NRC review of the licensee's corrective actions.
{387/80-13-01; 388/80-09-01)
Fire Bri ade Trainin The inspector witnessed the initial fire fighting training given to the members of the permanent plant staff.
The training was held at the Luzerne County Volunteer Fire Department Facility under the direction of a state certified instructor.
The training consisted of the use of protective clothing, self-contained breathing equipment and the discharge of various types of fire extinguishers.
The training session also included practice in actual fire extinguishment inside unventi.lated concrete enclosures.
The inspector verified that the segment of training witnessed by the inspector satisfies the guidelines of the NRC document titled, "Functional Responsibilities, Attachment No. 2, Section 2".
The licensee stated that additional traininq including classroom instructions will be scheduled for all fire brigade members.
No items of noncompliance were identified.
3.
Construction Emer enc Res onse As part of the inspection of construction fire prevention, the inspector reviewed site emergency response.
The licensee has prepared a Construction Site Emergency Plan which defines responsibilities and authorities, location of emergency command centers and general procedures for response to emergencies such as fire and bomb threats.
This plan was approved on December 6, 197 The inspector discussed the plan with site personnel and determined that the plan has not been 'fully'implemented.
The following observations were made:
~
security personnel at the Secondary Command Center (Main Gate - Post Nl) were not aware ot the notification matrix which defines personnel te.be notified in the event of an emergency.
discussions with security personnel revealed that apparently no training had been performed to implement the plan.
Appendix 0 oX the plan prescribes that on the first normal work day
. of the month the Security Officer assigned to Post Nl on the day shift will verify the key notification matrix telephone numbers.
This apparently has not been done an'd in at least one case an indi-vidual on the matrix has been reassigned.
These observations were discussed with site management.
The site is resently in a transition phase wherein responsibility for security is eing transferred from a contractor to the licensee and full implementation of the Construction Site Emergency Plan has not been attained.
This area will be reinspected prior to receipt ot fuel onsite.
Facilit lour The inspector examined new installations and also reviewed fire protection capability in the Upper and Lower Electrical Cable Spreading Rooms, Upper and Lower Relay Rooms and Control Room, and remaining areas of the Control Structure.
The inspector verified that portable 'fire extinquishers and temporary hose stations were available for fire fighting sn the areas inspected.
The inspector observed that the permanent wet standpipe system and hose reels have been turned over to PP8L by Bechtel Construction and, according to the licensee, the system was pressurized.
At the time 'of the inspection, however, the permanent hose stations were not equipped with fire hoses.
The above observation was discussed with the licensee at the exit interview, at which time it was also noted that Hechtel Construction turned off the water supplies to a temporary hose header at.elevation 749 feet of the Control Structure, leaving the area without standpipe hose coverage.
No items of noncompliance wer e identifie.
Unresol ved Item's Unresolved items are matters about which more information is required to determine whether they are acceptable, items of noncompliance or deviations.
Unresolved item is discussed in paragraph 2.d.
/
6.
Exit Interview Ihe inspector met with the licensee representatives (denoted in Details, paragraph 1) at the site on June 5, 1980, and summarized the purpose and
.scope of the inspection and findings.