IR 05000373/1992019

Insp Repts 50-373/92-19 & 50-374/92-19 on 920824-28.No Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Mgt Support,Protected & Vital Area Barriers,Detection & Assessments Aids,Access control-personnel,packages & Power Supply

ML20127D912
Person / Time
Site:	LaSalle
Issue date:	09/09/1992
From:	Creed J, Kniceley J NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION III)
To:
Shared Package
ML20127D855	List: IR 05000373/1992019 ML20127D849
References
50-373-92-19, 50-374-92-19, NUDOCS 9209150211
Download: ML20127D912 (6)

Text

. - _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ___. _ _ - _ _ . _ _ _ .. _ _ _ .m. _ _ _ _ _

.

U. S. HUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION l

REGION III

Reports No. 50-373/92019(DRSS); 50-374/92019(DRSS)  !

Docket Nos. 50-373; 50-374 Licenses No. NPF-ll; NPF-18

'

Licensee: Commonwealth Edison Company .

0 pus West 111  !

1400 Opus Place Downers Grove, IL 60515

Facility Name: LaSalle County Station, Units 1 and 2 Inspection At: LaSalle County Station Inspection Dates: August 24-28, 1992 Inspector: hb M N Y\h>

J. R. Kniceley 4 Date Physical Security inspector ,

Approved By:- Ouv"v b"'i1N h4 dO#

Jame's R. Creed, Chief V Date Safeguards Section

)'

Inspection Summary .

~

Inspection on Auaust 24-28. 1992 (Reports No. 50-373/92019(DRS1)_t

- 50-374/22919fDRSS))

- Areas Insoected: Routine, announced physical security-inspection involving Management Support; Protected and Vital- Area Barriers, Detection and

-

Assessment Aids; Access Control-Personnel, Packages, and Vehicles; Alarm Stations and Communications;-Power Supply; Testing, Maintenance-and Compensatory Measures; Training and Qualifications; and followup on Previous Inspection finding Results- The licensee was found to be-in c epliance with NRC requirements within the areas examine ~ We-have concluded that= tha security program is well implemented and is well managed, , Management attention to and involvement in the security program are good as evidenced by the resources devoted towards completion of_their new

- Main Access facility and relocation of the protected area fence, intrusion detection system and the elimination of their fo*mer access facility as part

.

of the protected area barrien .

9209150211 920909 n

- PDR ADOCK 0500037? "

O PDR J

- r+ . - --+r ,-aa +~ ..u, - +- ,,.---y -r -,,.,,1 wr yvn.-,--.,, ..,.,y-

-,y,-e- e, v.=v--=,,>c.-.,,

.

.

These construction projects were lengthy and labor intensive. Compensatory measures were extensive and the licensee completed the projects while maintaining regulatory compliance. Resources are adequate and reasonably allocated. The Training and Qualifie:ation progiam met regulatory requirements. Security personnel oburved were knowledgeable of their duties and responsibilities. Tested security equipment performed as require _

k

.

l l

--

- . .

..

_

~ _ - - . _ . - - . - - . - - - - . ~ . - - - . - - - - . - - . - . .

,

. . . ,

DETAILS Key Persons Contact in addition to the key members of the licensee's staff listed below, the inspector interviewed other licensee employees and members of the '

security orgaH ration. The asterisk (*) denotes some of those present at the f Ft Interview conducted on August 28, 199 * Diederich, Station Manager

• J. Walkington, Services Director

• Morley, Jr., Station Security Administrator D. Stapleton, Assistant Security Administrator

• S. Techau, Assistant Security Administrator

• B.-Saunders, Corporate Nuclear Security Administrator

• J. tockwood, Regulatory Assurance Supervisor H *D.- Carlson, Regulatory Assurance L *J.:Borm, NQP Cngineer J. Roman, Resident Engir,eer, Illinois Department of Nuclear Safety (IDNS)

• F. Sadnick, Site Manager, Burns International Security Services, Inc. (BISSI)

• C. Wilson, Assistant Site.Hanager, BISSI C. Phillips, '.asioent inspector, NRC Region 111

• D. Hills, Senior Resident inspector, NRC Region 111 Entrance and Exit Interv.im At the beginning of the inspection, Mr. J. Walkington, Services Director and other members of you: staff were informed of the purpose of this visit and the functional areas to be examine The inspector met with the licensee representatives denoted in

'Section 1 at the conclusion of the inspection on August 28, 199 A. general description of the scope.of the inspection was provide Briefly listed below are the findings discussed during this exit intervie The details of each finding dicrussed- are- referenced, as noted, in this repor (1) The licensee was informed of and acknowledged the inspector's comments that no violat Sns, deviations o unresolved items were identified duiing this inspectio (2) The inspector stated that tho' security program is well-implemented and well managed and that security program requirements are being adequately implemente '

,

,

3-

, -- . . , - - . - - - . - - . . - . - . - . . - - - - - . - - - - _ _ .

. . _ . _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ . _ _ _ _ _ - _ . _ _ _ _ . . _ . . _ _ . _ _ _ _ _

. .

(3) The inspector stated that the contract security force rnembers who were questioned and observed during this inspection were knowledgeable and proficient in their assigned dutie (4) The inspector stated that the regulatory requirements  !

associated with their new Main Access Facility were adequately being irnplemente (5) The inspector stated tha+ compensatory measures associated  !

with the two ttorm related power failures at the Main Access facility were adequately and effectively implemente Cooperation between the security staf f and plant personnel during these pnwer failures was exceptiona .- Etagram Area W pn ted Listed below are the areas examined by the inspector in which no findings-(strengths,-violations, deviations, unresolved items or inspection followup items) were identified. Only findings are described in subsequent Report Details section The below listed clear areas were reviewed and evaluated as deemed necessary by the inspector to meet the specified Inspection Requirements" (Section 02)-of the applicable NRC luspection Procedure (IP). Sampling reviews included interviews, observations, and document-reviews that provided independent verification of compliance with i requirements. Gathered data was also used to evaluate the adequacy of the reviewed program and practices to adequately protect the facility ,

I- and the health and safety of the public. The. depth and scope of inspection activities were conducted as deemed appropriate and necessary for the_ program area and operational-status-of the security syste _

IP 81730-Physical Security Insocction Prooram for Power Reactors  ;

'

0 ling.tment. Plans._AtMit: (a) Degree of Management Support for-

'

Program; (b) Security Program Plans Changes; (c) Audits Program Corrective Action, Auditor Qualification, i 0 Protected anLVital Area Phyli_ cal Barriers JetectionJLrtd i AssessntenUMg: (a) PA and VA Barrier Resistance; (b) Isolation

'

Zones Maintained; (c) PA and VA Detection Functional and Ef fective; (d) Assessment Aids Functional and Effective.

,

03, 2totected and _ Vital Area Access Centrol of Personnel._fackages and Vehicles:

(a) Personne1~ Access: _(l')_ Identification and Authorization Checked Before_ Access; (2) Changes Made for Terminations; ,

,

4-

- , . . - , , a:----;..  :- _ a . - . - . . - . _ - - . .. _ -- _ -. -

__ _., _ ____ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

. . . .

(3) List /ComputerAreProtected;(4)PersonnelAreSearched;

,

(5) Badges Are Displayed; (6) Visttors Are Escorted; (7)

Rapid Ingress and Egress in Emergencies; (8) Access Limited for Nee (b) Eitd;Lqt_C9n11pl: (1) Packages Authorization Checked; (2)

Handcarried Packages Searched at PA; (3) Material Controlled at Containmen (c) Yehicle Con _t_rol: (1) Vehicles Are Searched; (2)

Authorization Verified Prior to Entry; (3) Two Officers at Open Gates; (4) All Self-Propelled and Towed Vehicles Are Controlle . Alarm Stations and Communi n tion * (a) CAS and SAS Are Manned, Equipped, independent and Diverse and Can Call For Assistance; (b) l No interference of CAS Activities; (c) CAS and SAS Have Continuous -l Communications Witi. Each Onsite and Can Call Offsit '

0 Eps t i nply: Alarms and Nonportable Communications Equipment on Standby Power System, Equipment Located in VA, Automatic Indication of f ailure of Us ;

'

0 Testina and Main _Lenancu (a) Licensee implements Programs To Verify Installation, Testing, Maintenance and Correction; (b)

Compensatory Measures Implemented That Do Not Decrease Effectivenes '

.0 Securtty Tuinino anLQgalificationj (a) Each Individual is Trained, Qualified and Equipped For Each Task Prior To Assignment; ,

(b) Security Personnel Have Knowledge and Ability To Perform '

Duties; (c) Response Capabilities Are Adequate and Effective Te Meet Plans and Protect Against Design Basis Threat;'(d) Size and

'

_ Leadership of Response Adequate; (e) Non-Security. Personnel Are '

Traine Physig]_parriers - Protected Area: (01) Adequacy of PA Barriers;

-(02)-PA Barrier; (03) Separation of Barriers; (04) Isolation Zones; (05) Parking Areas; (06) Censtruction of PA Barriers;.(07)

Barrier Maintenanc Detection Aids - Protected Area: (01) Detection System Capability; (02) Zoning of alarm System; (03)' Alarming of

_

' Emergency Exits; (04) Detection System Security; (05) Maintenance

_

of Detection Zones, q 4, Physical Securit'y Proaram for Power Reactors (IP 817001 Construction of -the licensee's new Main Access Facility (MAF),

Service Building and Warehouso has been complete *

,

i l;

- . . - - - - - . - - . - - - - - .

_ _ . _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ . - _ . _ _ - _ . _ _ _ .

... .

The inspector determined through tours and observatfuns of equipment testing that the new MAf complies with regulatory and security alan requirements. The inspector evaluated the MAf physical Jarriers, intrusion detection equipment, closed circuit television assessment system (CCTV) and ingress search equipment and determined that the licensee is in compliance with their ,

approved security plan. At the request of tne inspector. the !

-licensee tested the above mentioned equipment and all equipment I performed as required. The new MAF also houses, all security I contractor management, administrative and training personne : On August-26 and 27, 1992,.the licensee experienced two power outages to tha power distribution system which supplies power to ,

'

the new HAF, Service Building and Warehouse. The power outages were caused by a storm. At the time of the storm, power was being

-

supplied by the alternate power distribution system. A new primary distribution system transformer was recently installed and final cor ective maintenance items were identified during testing whichLdelayed operabilit On August 27, 1992, this new primary feed was ) laced in operatio This feed is more reliable and is designed wit 1 a automatic-switchover to an alternate power source should the primary source bn lost. The inspector observed that appropriate compensatory measures were implemented during the power outages at the MA :

!

i l-

,

.

6 l

-~ = =L . . . :. . - . = = - . >