IR 05000373/1982029

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
IE Insp Rept 50-373/82-29 on 820526-27 & 0607-08.No Noncompliance Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Radiation Protection Procedures,Open Items,Sys Demonstrations,License Conditions & Preoperational Insp of Organizational Changes
ML20054K603
Person / Time
Site: LaSalle Constellation icon.png
Issue date: 06/17/1982
From: Greger L, Miller D
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION III)
To:
Shared Package
ML20054K589 List:
References
50-373-82-29, NUDOCS 8207020368
Download: ML20054K603 (4)


Text

.

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

REGION III

Report No. 50-373/82-29(DETP)

Docket No. 50-373 License No. NPF-11 Licensee: Commonwealth Edison Company Post Office Box 767 Chicago, IL 60690 Facility Name: LaSalle County Nuclear Station, Unit 1 Inspection At: LaSalle Site, Seneca, IL Inspection Conducted: May 26-27 and June 7-8, 1982 Inspector: D. E. Miller  ?

&lfff72-Approved By: L. er, I e b//7!8L Facilities Radiation Protection Section Inspection Summary Inspection on May 26-27 and June 7-8, 1982 (Report No. 50-373/82-29(DETP))

Areas Inspected: Routine, unannounced preoperatiotal inspection of organizational changes, radiation protection prccedures, open items, systems demonstrations and tests, and license conditions. The inspection involved 32 inspector-hours onsite by one NRC inspecto Results: No items of noncompliance or deviations were identifie PDR ADOCK 05000373 G PDR k

.

.

,

DETAILS 1. Persons Contacted

  • R. Bishop, Assistant Superintendent, Administrative and Support Services
  • Renwick, Technical Staff Supervisor F. Lawless, Rad / Chem Supervisor J. Lewis, Health Physics Coordinator L. Aldrich, Health Physicist C. Nash, Chemist Guldemond, Senior Resident Inspector, NRC The inspector also contacted several technicians and engineering assistants during the inspectio * Denotes those present at tle exit meetin . General This inspection, which bagan at 8:30 a.m. on May 26, 1982, was con-ducted to examine radir.cion protection procedures, open inspection and SER items, completed ystems demonstrations and tests, and license condition . Organization The following Rad / Chem related organizational changes have been recently made: P. Knoll and C. Magistro, former Nuclear Technicians, have been promoted to Rad / Chem Foreme B. Nelson, former Rad / Chem Foreman, has been appointed ALARA Coor-dinato K. Watson, former Rad / Chem Technician, has been promoted to Engineering Assistan T. Riner, formerly employed at Quad Cities, has been appointed Rad / Chem Training Coordinator, J. Schuster and P. Nottingham have been hired as chemist J. Nurrenbern, Health Physicist, is on loan from Dresden Statio Qualifications will be reviewed during a future inspection.

l

.

6 Open Items The following licensee responses to open SER and inspection items were reviewed during the inspectio (Closed) Open Item (373/81-14-31): Concerning installation of radiation measurement equipment in the EOF. A calibrated PING-3 is now installed in the EO (Open) SER Open Item (373/81-00-102): Concerning TMI Action Plan Requirements III.D. The inspector verified that the lodine monitoring, sampling, and counting requirements are me The in-spector reviewed the method and procedure for calibration of the licensee's five PING-3 monitors, which appear to be adequat The licensee has completed calibration of one PING-3 and is cali-brating the remaining four. Upon completion of calibration, this item will be further reviewed by a resident inspecto (Closed) SER Open Item (373/81-00-104): Concerning development of procedures for estimating noble gas and lodine release rate The inspector cursorily reviewed the licensee's gaseous effluent quantification procedures. No significant problems were identifie . Radiation Protection Procedures The inspector reviewed the following new or recently revised radiation protection procedures. They appear to be compatible with regulatory requirements and FSAR commitment LRP 1210-9 Revision 2 Timekeeping LRP 1210-10 Revision 2 Radiation Protection Exposure Timecard LRP 1270-5 Revision 0 The Operation and Calibration of Xetex Model 409A Digital Dosimeter LRP 1290-1 Revision 0 Radiation Evaluation Program (REP)

LRP 1340-7 Revision 0 Evaluation of Bioassay Results LRP 1820-2 Revision 1 Performance Testing of General Atomics Manifold Sampling System Noble Gas Detectors LRP 1820-10 Revision 1 Calibration of the Eberline SAM-2 Stabilized Assay Meter LRP 1920-1 Revision 1 Regulation and Use of Respiratory Protective Equipment LRP 2100-11 Revision 0 Radiation Protection for Reactor Feedwater Sparger Related Maintenance 6. Preoperational Tests The following preoperation tests have been completed and reviewed by the licensee. The inspector reviewed the completed tests. Minor out-standing deficiencies appear to be adequately addressed by facility change requests. No significant problems were note .

O I

PT-CM-102 Post Accident Primary Containment Monitoring System The Drywell High Range Gross Gamma Radiation Monitors, which are part of this test, appear to mera the calibration and range requirements of NUREG-0737 Table II.F.1- PT-PR-101 Process Radiation Monitoring l This test includes the instrumentation required by Section II. (Attachment 1) of NUREG-0737. The calibration and range requirements of Table II.F.1-1 appear to have been me (373/81-14-20)

7. Preoperational Systems Demonstrations SD-CM-101 HRSS Containment Air Sampling System (CASS)

As previously reported (373/82-09), testing had been partially complete Since then, the licensee has received the partitioning unit which is designed to replace the inadequate gas sampling uni No problems were noted during the inspector's review of the completed system demonstra-tion package. This system demonstration does not include establishment of operating procedures or procedures trainin SD-PS-102 High Range Sampling System This test has been completed and reviewed by the licensee. The inspector reviewed the completed test. Minor outstanding deficiencies appear to be adequately addressed by facility change requests. No significant problems were noted. This system demonstration does not include estab-lishment of operating procedures or procedures trainin . Exit Meeting The inspector met with licensee representatives (denoted in Section 1)

at the conclusion of the inspection on June 8, 1982. Discussed were the scope and findings of the inspectio .

4