IR 05000366/1979004
| ML19261C080 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Hatch  |
| Issue date: | 02/13/1979 |
| From: | Martin R, Vogtlowell R NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML19261C065 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-366-79-04, 50-366-79-4, NUDOCS 7903140536 | |
| Download: ML19261C080 (4) | |
Text
.
.
- p $nm:009'o,,
t UNITED STATES NUCLEAR RFGULATORY COMMISSION
[
REGloN il o
$
101 MARIETTA STREET, N.W.
~#
ATLANTA, GEORGIA 30303 os,...../
Report No. : 50-366/79-04 Licensee: Georgia Power Company 270 Peachtree Street, N.W.
Atlanta, Georgia 30303 Facility Name: Hatch, Unit 2 Docket No.: 50-366 License No.-
NPF-5 Inspection at Pla t H tch Site Inspector:
4tJ84
_
Date Signed
.2 - /3 - 79
,
R.Vogt-Lowe4 Approved by:
hf'[dg[
z-/2-77 R. D. Pfartin, Section Chief, RONS Branch Date Signed SUMMARY Inspection on January 16-19, 1979 Areas Inspected This routine, unannounced inspection involved 25 inspector-hours onsite in the area of review of startup testing activities.
Results No apparent items of noncompliance or deviations were ideutified in the areas inspected.
7903140536
.
DETAILS 1.
Persons Contacted Licensee Employees M. Manry, Plant Manager
- N. Nix, Assistant Plant Manager
- T. Greene, Superintendent, Plant Engineering Services
- S. Baxley, Superintendent, Operations
- D.
Brock, Startup Test Director C. Coggin, Startup Test Engineer
- C. Miles, QA Field Supervisor
- C. Belflower, QA Site Supervisor
- G. E. Spell, Senior QA Field Representative S. M. Mayhew, Plant Engineer C. R. Locke, Plant Engineer Other Organizations Southern Company Services Company - F. Tehranchi, Plant Engineer General Electric Company - R. M. Wyatt, Lead Startup Engineer
- Attended Exit Interview 2.
Exit Interview The inspection scope and findings were summarized on January 19, 1979 with those persons indicated in Paragraph 1, above.
The inspector indicated that subsequent inspections would continue to focus on the ongoing startup test program, including the final management review and approval of the test results.
3.
Licensee Action on Previous Inspection Findings Not inspected.
4.
Unresolved Items Unresolved items were not identified during this inspection.
5.
Startup Test Results Evaluation Five completed startup test procedures were reviewed by the inspector to ascertain whether uniform criteria are being applied for evaluating
.
%
-2-completed startup tests to assure their technical and administrative adequacy. Each procedure was reviewed to verify:
Each procedure change was approved in accordance with the pertinent a.
administrative procedures.
b.
That the test change had been completed if it entailed specific action.
c.
That the procedure change did not change the basic objectives of the test.
d.
That all test exceptions had been resolved and that the resolu-tion had been accepted by appropriate management.
c.
That outstanding exceptions have been identified and if completed, proper approval signature obtained.
f.
If required, the retest requirements have been completed.
g.
Licensee review and evaluation of the test results and acknow-ledgement that testing demonstrated system design requirements.
h.
That the licensee specifically compared test results with esta-blished acceptance criteria.
i.
That data sheets had been completed and that all data recorded where required are within acceptable tolerance.
j.
That those personnel charged with responsibility for review and acceptance of test results have documented their review and acceptance of test package.
The following documents were reviewed:
HNP-2-10305 Control Rod Drive System-Heatup Plateau HNP-2-10325 Main Steam Isolation Valves-Heatup Plateau HNP-2-10406 SRM Performance and Control Rod Sequence Testing-T.C.1 HNP-2-10419 Core Performance-T.C.1 HNP-2-10519 Core Performance-T.C.2 The above results of these five startup tests have received final management review and approval.
Within the areas inspected, no items of noncompliance or deviations were identifie e
.
.
,
-3-6.
Quality Assurance Audits The following QA audits of startup activities performed by the onsite QA staff were reviewed:
QA-78-266 Audit of the following Startup Test Procedures (STP's):
HNP-2-10526 Relief Valve Flow Demonstration HNP-2-10527 Generator Load Rejection-T.C.2 HNP-2-10531 Loss of Turbine-Generator and Off-Site Power QA-78-266 Audit of the following STP's:
HNP-2-10600 Power Testing-T.C.2, T.C.3 and T.C.7 HNP-2-10605 CRD-T.C.3 HNP-2-10609 Water Level-T.C.3 HNP-2-10618 Power Distribution-T.C.3 HNP-2-10619 Core Performance-T.C.3 Within the areas inspected, no items of noncompliance or deviations were identified.