IR 05000302/1987015
| ML20216E091 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Crystal River  |
| Issue date: | 06/23/1987 |
| From: | Cunnningham A, Decker T NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20216D972 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-302-87-15, NUDOCS 8706300638 | |
| Download: ML20216E091 (14) | |
Text
{{#Wiki_filter:i
> ,
l
._ ,i < 1 . UNITED STATES . * /pmaovgo,. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 1 [. REGION 11 - 1 j,
<_ .
.'
,
- * ' 101 MARIETTA STREET, N.W.-
l , s ,.* * ATL ANTA, GEORGI A 30323 : ~,
. - % .....
l JilR 231987 Report.No.: 50-302/87-15
..
Licensee: ; Florida Power Corporation -
~3201 34th Street, South'- ' St.: Petersburg, rL 33733 . .
Docket No.: 50-302 License No.: DPR-72
-
Facilithname: Crysta'l River 3 4
!
Inspection. Conducted': June-2-5, 1987'
: Inspector:^ D /Pf/p/p5z (
. L.~Cunningham /' Dat6 Si%ned D. H. Schultz
'
. Accompanying Personnel: -j J. D. MacLellan! 7 "
'
W. Bradford G. E Simonds ' Approve'd by: .'b - 6 4 7 _ . nr ' T. R. Decker, Section-Chief Date Signed Division of Radiation Safety and Safeguards
,
SUMMARY
! ' Scope:- -This routine announced inspection involved evaluation of the ' annual radiological. emergency preparedness exercis Results: No' violations or deviations were' identifie ,
j
!
v D ADO K O [[ G ,
'
b
*
. REPORT DETAILS j Persons Contacte Licensee Employees
*E. E. Renfro, Director, Nuclear Operations
*J. Alberdi, Assistant to Director Nuclear Plant Operations
*P. McKee, Director, Nuclear Plant Operations
*S.G. Johnson.. Manager, Site Nuclear Services
*J. D. Stephenson, Supervisor, Radiological Emergency Planning
*J. R. Wright, Corporate Health Physicist
*H. Gelston, Supervisor, Site Nuclear Engineering Services
*S. L. Robinson, Chemistry and Radiation Superintendent
* Collins, Nuclear Safety and Reliability Superintendent
*J. Mogg, Supervisor, Telecommunications
*L. Kelley, Manager, Nuclear Operations Training
*B. J. Hickle, Manager, Nuclear Plant Operations Other licensee employees contacted included engineers, technicians, operators, mechanics, security office members, and office personne Other Organizations C. Wyatt, Administrative Coordinator /PIO, Martin City Emergency Management
*C. Hulquist, Planning Manager, Florida Emergency Management
*G. J. Allen, Director, Disaster Preparedness, Citrus County
,
NRC Resident Inspector i
*T. Stetka j
* Attended exit interview Exit Interview The inspection scope and findings were summarized on June 4,1987, with those persons indicated in Paragraph 1 above. The inspector described the areas evaluated and discussed in detail the inspection findings listed i belo The inspector also discussed the exercise weakness identified in Paragraph Sa, herein. The licensee committed to conduct a remedial inplant medical emergency drill. No dissenting comments were received from the licensee. The licensee did not identify as proprietary any of the material provided to or reviewed by the inspector during this inspectio I i
j
'
.
3. Licensee Action on Previous Enforcenent Matters (Closed) Violation (50-302/86-25-02): Senior Fire Protection Specialist not trained in accordance with Emergency Plan. Inspection and audit of Fire Brigade training records confirmed that the subject violation was corrected, and personnel qualification requirements were update (Closed) Violation (50-302/86-25-03): Communicator designated by Shift Supervisor to make notifications was not trained. Detailed inspection and audit of pertinent training records disclosed that the subject training, and scheduled updating thereof, was implemente ,
(Closed) Unresolved Item (50-302/86-25-04): Documentation indicating that corrective action taken to resolve 1985 emergency exercise deficiencies could not be located. The subject file and contained items was located and verified that all 1985 exercise deficiencies were corrected as require . Exercise Scenario (82301)
The scenario for the emergency exercise was reviewed to assure that provisions were made to test the integrated capability and a major portion of the basic elements defined in the licensee's emergency plan and organization pursuant to 10 CFR 50.47(b)(14), Paragraph IV.F of Appendix E to 10 CFR 50, and specific guidance promulgated in Section II.N of NUREG-065 The scenario was reviewed in advance of the scheduleo exercise date and was discussed in detail with licensee representatives on several occasion While no major scenario problems were identified, several inconsistencies became apparent during the exercise. The inconsistencies, 3 however, failed to detract from the overall performance of the licensee's ' emergency organizatio The scenario developed for this exercise was detailed, and fully exercised the onsite emergency organization. The scenario provided sufficient information to the State, counties, and local government agencies consistent with their participation in the exercis The licensee made a significant commitment to training and personnel through the use of implementors, evaluators, and specialists participating in the exercise. It was observed however, that additional training was required in management and control of site medical emergencies as discussed in Paragraph Sa below. The implementors provided adequate guidance throughout the exercise; however, some prompting was noted by the inspectors. This item was discussed during the exercise critiqu No violations or deviations were identifie '
.
.
5. Drill Scenarios (82301) The scenarios for the medical emergency and fire drills were reviewed to assure that provisions were made to test specific functions in the licensee's emergency plan pursuant to 10 CFR 50.47(b)(14), Paragraph I of Appendix E to 10 CFR 50, and specific guidance promulgated in Section II.N of NUREG-065 The scenario developed for the medical emergency provided adequate information to the licensee organization and offsite local. support agencies consistent with the scope of their participation in the dril Observations conducted by the NRC evaluator included the inplant phase of the drill, and reception and treatment of the injured person at the offsite medical facility. Observations of the inplant drill disclosed the following: (1) inadequate management and control required to expedite prompt and effective assessment of the injured person's condition and treatment of same; (2) poor contamination control and health physics practices associated with treatment and transfer of the subject to the ambulance for transport to the offsite medical facility; (3) poor health physics practices required to preciude, or, at least, minimize radiation contamination of zones contiguous to the accident area; (4) inadequate security required to control personnel entry into the accident area, and preclude congestiti within the subject area; (5) medical emergency kit did not contain required cervical brace. In the latter item, the cervical or neck brace was immediately requested upon arrival of subject kit; however, the brace was not within the kit and provision of same resulted in delay in preparation of the injured person for transfer to the ambulance. The licensee was informed that the above findings constituted an exercise weaknes Licensee representatives were also informed that similar medical emergency findings identified during the previous annual exercise (50-302/86-18) would remain ope Exercise Weakness 50-302/87-15-01: Medical emergency teams and related support personnel require additional training to assure that subject emergencies are adequately managed and attending radiation contamination control and health physics practices are implemented as required. Based upon these findings, the licensee was informed that a remedial medical emergency drill, assigned for evaluation by the NRC, was require The licensee committed to conduct the subject drill, and inform the NRC of scheduling of sam The medical drill conducted by the offsite support agency was fully ' successful. The receiving hospital provided for entry, adequate emergency treatment, and decontamination of the injured perso { Adequate and effective health physics practices and contamination j controls were implemented throughout this phase of the medical i emergency. Minor findings regarding removal of protective clothing were observe )l b
*
i 4 The scenario developed for the fire drill was explicit, and adequately exercised the participating licensee organizations. No offsite local support was requested. The scenario, however, provided sufficient _information to the offsite organizations consistent with the scope of their participation in the dril No violations or deviations were identified. Assignment of Responsibility (82301) This area was observed to assure that primary responsibilities _for emergency response by the licensee were specifically established, and that 1 adequate staff was available to respond to an emergency pursuant to l 10 CFR 50.47(b)(1), Paragraph IV A of Appendix E to 10 CFR 50, and
.
specific guidance promulgated in Section II. A of NUREG-065 l The inspector observed that specific emergency assignments were made for the licensee's emergency response organization, and that adequate staff was available to respond to the simulated emergency. The initial response j organization was augmented by designated -licensee representatives;
'
however, because of the scenario scope and conditions, long term or continuous staffing of the emergency response organization was not required. Discussions with licensee representatives and detailed review of the site Radiological Emergency Plan indicated that a sufficient number of trained technical personnel were available for continuous staffing of the augmented emergency organization, if neede .l l The inspector also observed activation, staffing, and operation of the l emergency organization in the Technical Support Center (TSC), Operations j
' Support Center (0SC), and the Emergency Operations Facility (EOF). At the ;
above cited response centers, the required staffing and assignment of " responsibility were consistent with the licensee's Radiological Emergency Plan and approved Implementing Procedure No violations or deviations were identified, i Onsite Emergency Organization (82301) The licensee's onsite emergency organization was observed to assure that l the following requirements were implemented pursuant to 10 CFR 50.47(b)(2), Paragraph IV. A of Appendix E to 10 CFR 50, and s ecific guidance promulgated in Section II.B of NUREG-0654: unambiguous definition of responsibilities for emergency response; provision of adequate staffing to assure initial facility accident response in key functional areas at all times; (3) specification of onsite and offsite support organizational interaction The inspector observed that the initial onsite emergency organization was adequately defined and that staff was available to fill key functional positions within the organization. Augmentation of the initial emergency response organization was accomplished through mobilization of offshift
* .
j
'
personne The on-duty Shif t Supervisor assumed the duties of Emergency-Coordinator promptly upon initiation of the simulated . emergency, and directed the response until formally relieved by the Station Manage Required interactions between the licensee's emergency response organization and State and local support agencies were adequate and j consistent with the scope of the exercis ) i No violations or deviations were identifie . Emergency Response Support and Resources (82301) This area was observed to assure that the following arrangements for requesting and effectively using assistance resources were made pursuant to 10 CFR 50.47(b)(3); Paragraph IV.A of Appendix E to 10 CFR 50, and guidance promulgated .in Section II.C of NUREG-0654, namely:
(1) accommodation of selected State emergency response representatives at 1 l the licensee's near-site Emergency Operations Facility; and l (2) identification of organizations capable of augmenting the planned respons .
Representatives of the State of Florida and designated counties were accommodated in the licensee's Emergency Operations Facility (E0F) and , Emergency News Center (ENC). Licensee contact with offsite organizations ' was prompt, effective, and consistent with the scope of the exercis Assistance resources from State and local agencies were available to the license No violations or deviations were identifie . Emergency Classification System (82301) This area was observed to assure that a standard emergency classification and an emergency action level matrix was in use by the nuclear facility licensee pursuant to 10 CFR 50.47(b)(4), Paragraph IV.C of Appendix E to 10 CFR 50, specific guidance promulgated in Section II.D of NUREG-0654, and IE Information Notice 83-2 An Emergency Action Level matrix was used to promptly identify and properly classify the emergency and escalate to more severe emergency classifications as the simulated accident sequence progressed. Licensee actions in this area were timely and effectiv Observations confirmed that the emergency classification system was effectively used and was consistent with the Radiological Emergency Plan and Implementing Procedures. The system appeared to be adequate for clas:ification of the simulated events. The emergency procedures provided for initial and continuing mitigating actions during the simulated emergenc No violations or deviations were identifie . _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ - _ - - - _ - _ - - _ - _ _ _ _ _ - - _ _ - - _ _ _ - - _ _ - ___
'
. I
10. Notification Methods and Procedures (82301) This area was observed to assure that procedures were established for notificdtion of State and local response organizations and emergency personnel by the licensee, and that the content of initial and followup , messages to response organizations were established. This area was t further observed to assure that means to provide early notification to the populace within the plume exposure pathway were established pursuant to 10 CFR 50.47(b)(5), Paragraph IV.0 of Appendix E to 10 CFR 50, and specific guidance promulgated in Section II.E of NUREG-065 The inspector observed that notification methods and procedures were established and available for use in providing information regarding the simulated emergency conditions to Federal, State, and local response organizations, and to alert the licensee's augmented emergency response organization. Notification of the State of Florida, and designated local offsite organizations was completed within 15 minutes following declaration of all emergency classifications involve The prompt notification system (PNS) for alerting the public within the plume exposure pathway EPZ was not actuated during this exercis No violations or deviations were identifie ' 11. Emergency Communications (82301) This area was observed to assure that provisions existed for prompt communications among principal response organizations and emergency personnel pursuant to 10 CFR 50.47(b)(6), Paragraph IV.E of Appendix E to 10 CFR 50, and specific guidance promulgated in Section II.F of NUREG-065 The inspector observed communications within and between the licensee's emergency facilities, the licensee and offsite agencies, and the offsite environmental monitoring teams and the E0F. The inspectors also observed information flow among the various groups within the licensee's emergency organizatio Emergency communications involving notification of the j State, local agencies and the NRC of all Emergency classifications discussed above, were adequate and consistent with the Radiological ( Emergency Plan and Implementing Procedure ; No violations or deviations were identifie , 1 Emergency Facilities and Equipment (82301) This area was observed to assure that adequate emergency facilities and equipment to support an emergency response were provided and maintained pursuant to 10 CFR 50.47(b)(8), Paragraph IV.E of Appendix E to 10 CFR 50, and specific guidance promulgated in Section II.H of NUREG-065 .
-
.
The inspectors observed activation, staffing and operation of the emergency response facilities, and the use of equipment therei Emergency response facilities used by the licensee during the exercise included.the Control Room (CR), OSC, TSC and the E0 Control Room - The Control Room was used and effectively managed throughout the exercise. The inspector observed that following review and analysis of the sequence of ucident events, Control Roem operations personnel acted promptly to initiate required responses to the simulated emergenc Emergency procedures were readily available, routinely followed, and factored into accident assessment and mitigation exercises. The Control Room staff identified minor scenario inconsistencies and promptly implemented required adjustment Control Room personnel involvement was essentially limited to those personnel assigned routine and special operational duties. Effective management of personnel gaining access to the Control Room precluded overcrowding, and maintained an ambient noise level required for orderly conduct of operations under emergency condition The Shift Supervisor and the Control Room operators were cognizant of their duties, responsibilities, and authoritie These personnel demonstrated an understanding of the emergency classification system and the proficient use of specific procedures to determine and declare the proper emergency classificatio It was observed that data and information provided during the course of the exercise sequence and conditions was readily managed by the Emergency Coordinator and the Control Room staff in implementing appropriate actions in a timely manner. The Control Room staff demonstrated the capability to effectively assess the initial conditions and implement required mitigating actions. It was noted that a bound log of the facility Emergency Coordinator's activities was maintained during the exercis Technical Support Center - The TSC was activated and promptly staffed following notification by the Emergency Coordinator of the simulated emergency conditions leading to the Alert classification. The facility staff appeared to be cognizant of their emergency duties, authorities, and responsibilitie Required operations at the facility proceeded in an orderly manner. The facility was provided with adequate equipment for support of the assigned staff. TSC security was promptly established and maintaine Security maintained a log or otherwise accounted for all personnel entering and exiting the facilit During operation of the TSC, radiological habitability was routinely monitored and documented, and personnel dosimetry was available for distribution if required. Status boards and related visual aids were strategically located to facilitate viewing by the TSC staf . . >
~
.
i Dedicated communicators were assigned to the facility and maintained all status boards curren Inspection disclosed the. following additional findings, namely:
(1) engineering, maintenance, and other technical support functions were readily implemented and factored into problem solving exercises; (2) assumption of duties by the Emergency Coordinator was definite and firm; (3) transfer of certain emergency responsibilities from the TSC to . EOF was firmly declared and announced to the TSC staff; (4) briefings of' the TSC staff were frequent, and consistent with changes in plant status and related ' emergency conditions; and (5) accountability, including identifying missing personnel, was readily implemented within the accepted time. regime and was consistent with the scenario scop Operations Support Center - The OSC was promptly staffed following activation of the emergency plan by the Emergency Coordinator. An inspector observed that teams were promptly assembled, briefed, and dispatched. The OSC Supervisor appeared to be cognizant of his duties and responsibilities. The OSC staff was frequently updated on plant status and impact of the accident sequence by the OSC Superviso Emergency Operations Facility - The E0F is located in the applicant's training center, approximately seven miles from the plant site. The facility was adequately staffed and equipped to support the required emergency response consistent with the scope ar.d objectives of the exercis E0F security was promptly established and was included as a routine requirement for preparation and activation of the facilit Status boards and other related visual aids were strategically located and were readily accessible for viewing by the E0F staf Dedicated communicators were assigned to the facility. It was observed, however, that the status boards were infrequently updated and were )
neither current with emergency classifications nor consistent with 4 the sequence of accident events. This finding was also observed by the licensee and documented for review and corrective action. The subject finding was thoroughly discussed during the licensee's-Implementor / Evaluator critique, and summarized during the NRC/ Licensee critiqu i The E0F principal staff freely interacted with State representatives 1 assigned to the facility. The State representatives were routinely informed of plant status, and were consistently factored into the decisionmaking process addressing required and proposed protective measures, and recovery / reentry planning. The Emergency Coordinator frequently consulted the EOF technical support staff and included representatives of the cited offsite agencie No violations or deviations were identifie ' .
13. AccidentAssessment(82301) This area was observed to assure that adequate methods, systems, and equipment for assessing and monitoring actual or potential offsite consequences of a radiological emergency condition were in use as required by 10 CFR 50.47(b)(9), Paragraph IV.B of Appendix E to 10 CFR 50, and specific guidance promulgated in Section II.I of NUREG-065 The accident assessment program included an engineering assessment of plant status, and an assessment of radiological hazards to onsite and offsite personnel resulting from the accident. During the exercise, the engineering accident assessment team functioned effectively in analyzing ! plant status to provide recommendations to the Emergency Coordinator concerning mitigating actions required to reduce damage to plant systems i and equipment, mitigation of releases of radioactive materials, and termination of the emergency conditio Radiological assessment activities involved several groups. An inplant group estimated the radiological impact within the plant based upon inplant monitors and onsite measurements. Offsite radiological monitoring teams were dispatched by the licensee and the State of Florida to determine the level of radioactivity in those areas within the influence of the plume and determine dose projections based upon data derived therefro I Dose assessment and projections were conducted in the TSC and E0F based upon data derived from inplant leakage sources, and offsite radiological measurements conducted by a field monitoring team. Several items of confusion involving dose assessment were disclosed during the exercise, namely: (1) identification of RCS leak source, (2) leak rate determination, (3) delay in source term identification, (4) delay in deployment of field monitoring team, (5) delay in confirmation of source term. All of these ; findings were observed by the licensee and fully discussed during the licensee Implementor / Evaluator critique and documented for review and correction as require These findings were also summarized by the licensee during the Licensee /NRC Critique held on June 5,1987. The licensee's actions on their observations cited above will be reviewed by NRC during the subsequent _ Annual Emergency Preparedness Exercis Inspector Followup Item (IFI) 50-302/87-15-02: Verify correction of dose assessment items observed and documented by license No violations or deviations were identifie . Protective Response (82301) This area was observed to determine that guidelines established for j protective actions consistent with federal guidance, were developed and in i place, and that protective actions for emergency workers including j evacuation of non-essential personnel, are promptly implemented pursuant Il i
)
l
- !
'
to 10 CFR 50.47(b)(10) and specific guidance promulgated in NUREG-0654, Section I The protective measures decisionmaking process was observed by the { inspectors. Recommendations implemented by the E0F staff were timely, ! effective, and consistent with the above criteri Protective measures l recommendations were provided by the licensee to the State of Florida as i part of the exercise. It was noted that all protective action responses recommended by the EOF staff represented input and concurrence by Stat ! representatives assigned to that facilit ) No violations or deviations were identifie I 15. Radiological Exposure Control (82301) This area was observed to determine that methods for controlling radiological exposures in an emergency were established and implemented for emergency workers, and that these methods included exposure i consistent with EPA recommendations pursuant to 10 CFR 50.47(b) (11),andguidelines
'
specific guidance promulgated in Section II.K of NUREC-065 An inspector noted that radiological exposures were controlled throughout the exercise by issuing supplemental dosimeters to emergency workers and by conducting periodic radiological surveys in the emergency response facilitie Exposure guidelines were in place for various categories of emergency action Adequate protective clothing and respiratory protection was available for use as required. . Consistent with the scope of the exercise, use of respiratory protection equipment by emergency response teams was simulated, except during the fire drill and specific reentry exercise It was observed that a Control Room Operator dispatched to investigate a reported leak in the auxiliary building was not respirator qualifie This finding was also observed and documented by the licensee for review and corrective action during the licensee's ' Implementor / Evaluator Critiqu The inspector was informed that a detailed training program was in progress to requalify all applicable plant and 1 emergency response organization personnel on newly acquired SCBA Completion of the training is scheduled for early fall of the current ' calendar year. The inspector informed licensee representatives that this item would be tracked and reviewed during subsequent routine inspection Inspector Followup Item 50-302/87-15-03: Completion of training, retraining, and qualification of all applicable emergency response personnel on recently acquired SCBA I Health Physics control of radiation exposure, contamination control, and radiation area access appeared adequate, except as noted during the onsite medical drill (Paragraph 5). Health physics specialists were observed to thoroughly brief survey teams prior to their deployment. Dosimetry was available and was used. High range dosimeters were also available in case they were neede I l l
'
.
No violations or deviations were identifie . Public Education and Information (82301) This area was observed to assure that information concerning the simulated emergency was made available for dissemination to the public pursuant to ; 10CFR50.47(b)(7), Paragraph IV.D of Appendix E to 10 CFR 50, and specific guidance promulgated in Section II.G of NUREG-065 Information was provided to the media and the public in advance of the exercis The information included details on how the public would be notified and the initial actions which should be taken in an emergency. A rumor control program was also in plac The licensee activated and fully staffed the Emergency News Center (ENC). i The facility was used by the licensee for preparation, coordination and dissemination of emergency news information. Written press releases were prepared and issued from the ENC. Releases issued were timely, and adequately reflected plant emergency conditions. A corporate spokesman was designated to conduct periodic press briefings. The briefings were technically accurate and presented in a manner readily understood by j laymen. Visual aids were provided and were consistently use l Interaction and direct cooperation of the licensee with the State and counties was effective. Representatives of State, and county agencies were accommodated at the EN The cited representatives fully participated in the composition of news releases. News releases were the product of the integrated activity of the licensee and the above cited support group State and county representatives assigned to the ENC fully participated in planning and presentation of periodic press briefings held during the exercise. Operation and management of the ENC was effectively implemented, and was ' consistent with the emergency plan requirements and approved implementing procedures ; I No violations or deviations were identifie ' 17. Recovery Planning (82301) This area was reviewed pursuant to the requirements in 10 CFR 50.47(b)(13), Paragraph IV.H of Appendix E to 10 CFR 50, and the specific guidance promulgated in Section II.M of NUREG-065 The licensee conducted an effective recovery planning meeting prior to termination of the exercise. Licensee planners discussed and established 1 the following: administrative and logistical support, manpower and { engineering services; radiological surveillance; development and ! assignment of a recovery organization consistent with the Emergency Plan ! and Implementing Procedure A comprehensive review of reentry plans and ] status was conducte l
)
!
!
'
.
No violations or deviations were identifie . Exercise Critique (82301) ,
The licensee's critique of the emergency exercise was observed to determine that shortcomings identified as part of the exercise, were , brought to the attention of -management and documented for corrective j action pursuant to 10 CFR 50.47(b)(14), Paragraph IV.F of Appendix E to 10 CFR 50, and specific guidance promulgated in Section II.N of NUREG-065 A formal critique was held on June 5, 1987, with exercise. implementors and evaluators, licensee management, and NRC representative Findings identified during the exercise designated for licensee corrective action were discussed. Licensee action on identified findings will be reviewed during subsequent inspections. The licensee's critique was detailed, and addressed both substantive findings and indicated deficiencies and improvement items. All items identified were documented for review and correction. The conduct and content of the critique was consistent with regulatory requirements and guidance cited abov The NRC Evaluation Team observed the licensee's Implementor / Evaluator critique conducted prior to the above cited formal critiqu Inspec tion disclosed that the subject critique was comprehensive, and addressed activation, detailed operation and responsibilities of the emergency response facilities, the Control Room, dose assessment and projection, the fire and medical emergency drills, and field monitoring team. All deficiencies and indicated improvements were fully discussed and documented for required review and corrective action These findings and respective corrective actions will be routinely reviewed by NRC during the subsequent annual radiological emergency preparedness exercis . Followup Items (92703)
(Closed) Inspector Followup Item (IFI) (50-302/85-02-02): Develop usage of visual aids and schematics in ENC press briefings and conference Inspection disclosed that additional visual aids and related props were provided and effectively used during ENC press briefings and conference (Closed) IFI (50-302/85-41-04): Review the licensee's progress to resolve the SPDS computer point problems (Item 1.D.2). Inspection confirmed that the subject item was resolved as require (Closed) IFI (50-302/86-IN-98): Offsite Medical Services. Inspection disclosed that the licensee was in full compliance with guidance and recommendations regarding offsite medical services and facilities defined in the subject Information Notic l (0 pen) IFI (50-302/86-18-01): Poor contamination control and health l physics practices attending inplant preliminary treatment and
l - _ -A
'*
..
decontamination. of injured ' perso This item remains to be resolved (See Paragraph Sa, above).
(0 pen) IFI: (50-302/86-18-02)': Provide medical emergency team with - assigned emergency kits for immediate response. This item remains to be resolved (see Paragraph Sa, above).
(0 pen) IFI (50-302/86-18-03): Required training of security regarding ] This item j duties., remains of to same in resp be resolved (onse see to onsite Paragraph Sa,medical above). emergencie {
(Closed) IFI (50-302/86-18-04): Implementation of notification of State within 15 minutes following' declaration of each emergency classificatio Inspection disclosed all notifications were implemented within 15 mir,utes following declaration of emergency classifications defined during the subjectexercise(50-302/87-15).
(Closed)IFI(50-302/87-EP-01): Verify audibility of. alarms in high noise area This item addresses IE Bulletin 79-18. This item was formally closed.during Inspection No. 50-302/81-0 The appropriate correction of the Open Items List has been mad (Closed) IFI (50-302/86-25-01): Notification message form in Control Roo almost unreadable.- Inspection disclosed that the subject finding was resolve I t
,
i l
_ }}