IR 05000272/1988149

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Design Bases Reconstitution Meeting Repts 50-272/88-149 & 50-311/88-149 on 890113.Major Areas Discussed:Status of Util Efforts to Reconstitute Design Bases for Plant.Util Presentation Matls Encl
ML18093B428
Person / Time
Site: Salem  PSEG icon.png
Issue date: 01/31/1989
From: Durr J
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION I)
To:
Shared Package
ML18093B427 List:
References
50-272-88-149, 50-311-88-149, NUDOCS 8902080271
Download: ML18093B428 (19)
v • d • e


Text

Meeting N U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

REGION I

Docket N /50-311 License N DPR-70/DPR-75 Licensee:

Public Service Electric and Gas Company Facility Name:

Salem Units 1 & 2 Conference Held At:

NRC Region I, King of Prussia, Pennsylvania Meeting Conducted:

January 13, 1989

Approved By:

Conference Summary:

Jacque P. Durr, Chief Engineering Branch Date A meeting was held at the request of Public Service Electric and Gas Company on January 13, 1989, to discuss the status of their efforts to reconstitute..

the design bases for Salem Units 1 and PDR ADOC~ 05000272 Q

PNU

    • .. **.
  • ,,.*

.**. *..... -..

Conference Scope A meeting was held on January 13, 1989, in the NRC Region I offices at the request of the Public Service Electric and Gas Company to discuss their efforts regarding Salem Units 1 & 2 design bases reconstitutio The licensee discussed the general program for design bases reconstitution, the contents of the design bases documents, affected systems, industry interactions, lessons learned, the processing of identified deficiencies and projected schedules for completio The program was preceded -by a formal slide presentation followed by a question and answer session with the staf Enclosure 1 is a copy of the slide presentation materia It was observed by the NRC staff that the meeting was beneficial to the understanding of the proce~s and the extent of the licensee's effort It was further noted that this program in conjunction with their safety system functi-0nal inspections were significant engineering s~fety initiatives and had the potential for broader applications in the futur Enclosure 2 is a list of the attendees.

.......

_-_'.____* __ ~-~~-**-

-:*......_

. ~. -.....

PSlOCI ENGINEERING AND PLANT BETTERMENT CONFIGURATION BASELINE DOCUMENTATION PROJECT SALEM GENERA TING STATION HOPE CREEK GENERA TING STATION NUCLEAR REGULA TORY COMMISSION PRESENTATION JANUARY 13, 1989 PROJECT MANAGER M. F. METCALF

... -*... '..

'*.. *....

-

.

. ' -

~*. ~-~**.*.*., *'..*::-.*.-~.

. *.*.

CONFIGURATION BASELINE DOCUMENTATION PROJECT NRC PRESENTATION JANUARY 13, 1989 AGENDA THE BIG PICTURE I PROGRAM OVERVIEW II CBD CONTENT I CBD RESULTS AND LESSONS LEARNED

. H. F. METCALF H. F. METCALF H. F. METCALF

  • N. F. METCALF DISCREPANCY MANAGEMENT J. V. BAILEY V SUMMARY R. A. BURRICELLI

-.... *

..

...

'*

...

.

,.

.

-.*

.. *.,

--

ENGINEERING & PLANT BETTERMENT CONFIGURATION BASELINE DOCUMENTATION PROJECT I. THE BIG PICTURE PSE&6 LICENSING CONllITIENTS F'SNI &

T. ARC SE/ERIC U:llER.1..LETINS G FEG SI/IDES GD Cs DESIGN BASIS DOCUMENTS DRAllINSS SPECIFICA Tia/S l'lRCHASE ORJERS SAFETY EVALl.IA TitNIS DESIGN BASIS - INFOR/tlA TION /ttHICH IDENTIFIES THE SPECIFIC FUNCTION TO BE PERFORNEO BY A STRUCTURE, SYSTEM OR CO/tlPONENT OF A FACILITY. ANO THE CONTROLLING PARAMETERS AS REFERENCE BOUNDS FOR THE DESIG....

... ~:.

.,... ; -.

....

..

...

~.....

ENGINEERING & PLANT BETTERHENT CONFIGUR.4 TION BASELINE DOCUHENTA TJON PROJECT

-

-

II. PROGRAM OVERVIEW WHY DO A DESIGN BASIS RECOVERY PROJECT ?

e ENSURE DESIGN, OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE ARE CONSISTENT WITH THE DESIGN BASES OF THE PLANT

-

ESTABLISHMENT OF A CONSOL/DA TED DESIGN BASIS

-

IMPROVED AJYARENESS OF REGULA TORY COMMITMENTS AND DESIGN BASIS REGUIREMENTS

-

REDUCED DOCUMENTATION/INFORMATION SEARCH AND RETRIEVAL TIME/EFFORTS.. - INCREASE PRODUCTIVITY

-

ENSURE CONSISTENT ENGINEERING DA TA AND El/MINA TE REDUNDANCIES

-

IMPROVED ENGINEERING AJYARENESS THROUGH TRAINING ON USE OF THE CBD

-

ACHIEVE HIGHEST POSSIBLE STANDARDS FOR 10CFR50. 59 EVALUATIONS

  • .*

.,

_.*

  • ,.. *..

.

~

.

..

. -.. *.. :: *...

ENGINEERING & PLANT BETTERNENT CONFIGURATION BASELINE OOCUNENTA TION PROJECT PROJECT DEVELOPMENT

  • PROJECT TEAM FORMATION
  • PROJECT IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE PHASE I (P IL 0 T PROGRAN) 3/88 - 9/88 SALEH SYSTEHS -

UNITS J G 2

AUXILIARY FEEDJrfATER SYST£/rf

4160 VAC SYSTEM (VITAL, NON-VITAL)

CONTROL AIR/STATION AIR SYSTEMS (2 SYSTEMS)

CONTROL AREA - HVAC

-

CONTROL AREA AIR COND SYSTEM (CAACS)

-

CONTROL ROON SUPPLY SYSTEM

- EMERGENCY AIR SUPPLY SYSTEM

- BATTERY ROON EXHAUST SYSTEM

- MISC (TOILET ROON, ELEVA TOR ROON)

-

SJrfITCHGEAR G PENETRATION AREA VENT SYSTEM

- SilITCHGEAR G PENETRATION AREA SUPPL Y

-

CONTROL AREA EXHAUST

- PENETRATION AREA EXHAUST

- PIPING GALLERY RECIRC SYSTEM

- MISC (MACHINE ROON EXHAUST, 'INBOARD PENETRATION AREA EXHAUST)

..

.

.

'. *-*.

..

..-

. *-*..

ENGINEERING & PLANT BETTERMENT CONFIGURATION BASELINE DOCUNENTA TION PROJECT

--

. -

PROJECT DEVELOPMENT PHASE II 9/88 - 6/89 SALEN SYSTENS - UNITS 1 & 2

NAIN FEEDJ;A TER AND CONDENSATE

-

CONDENSER HOTJ;ELL TO S/G FEED PUNPS

- S/G FEED PUNPS TO STEAN GENERATORS

- S/G FEED PUNP G TURBINE LUBRICATING

& CONTROL OIL SYST£NS

-

CONDENSER HOTJ;ELL LEVEL INSTRUNENTA TION

- S/G LEVEL CONTROL & INSTRUNENTA TION

- STEAN-DRIVEN FEED PUMP TURBINE &

AUXILIARIES INCLUDING SPEED CONTROL

460/230 VAC SYSTEN

115 VAC SYSTEN

125 VDC SYSTEN

28 VDC SYSTEN

TECHNICAL SUPPORT CENTER BALANCE OF SALEN ANO HOPE CREEK SYSTEMS

  • INDUSTRY INVOL VENENT

-

PRESENTATION AT NOVEMBER INPO CONFERENCE

-

ATTENDED NSSS AND UTILITY CONFERENCES

-

MET WITH OTHER UTILITIES' MANAGEMENT NRCPRES48

- "\\.

__.. ____._* __ :__:*--~~...

--

ENGINEERING & PLANT BETTERHENT CONFJGURA TION BASELINE DOCUHENTA TION PROJECT SYSTEM SELECTION e BASED UPON A SIX LEVEL PRIORITY LISTING WHICH FOCUSES ON NUCLEAR SAFETY, RELIABILITY, ET e SOME SYSTEM CBDs TO BE DEVELOPED DURING SPECIAL/UNIGUE PROJECTS COST

  • SIGNIFICANT INVESTMENT
  • PSE&G AND A/E EST IMA TED EXPENDITURES

$22 MILLION - SALEM

$12 MILLION - HOPE CREEK

ENGINEERING & PLANT BETTERHENT CONFIGURATION BASELINE OOCUHENTA TION PROJECT NRCPRES6 ELEMENTS OF PSE&G'S CBD PROJECT SPECIFICATION

THREE SECTIONS

-

AONINISTRA TIVE CONTROL

-

TECHNICAL DOCUHENT

-

FORHA T ANO ilRltER Is GUI OE

-... **.

ENGINEERING & PLANT BETTERHENT CONFIGURATION BASELINE OOCUHENTA TION PROJECT NRCPRES7

--

.

  • -

ADMINISTRATIVE CONTROL OF CBD PROJECT e MAJOR ELEMENTS

-

RESPONSIBILITIES

-

DEFINITIONS

-

DATA RETRIEVAL

-

INDEX OF DA TA

-

COMPARISON TO AS-BUILT (AS NECESSARY)

-

DRAFT/FINAL ISSUANCE

-

PSE&G REV JEW

    • -*****.. -.~*.. *.**.****

.

. :.. *.*-*:..*. *-.-,::.***.. *,... __ *:-*.-.* **-~**_**-***~~*~**~~~**~**--~

.. __

.*._

..

~.:.. ;..

.*. ~--~ ~ :.._.~:._:_*,-*:.

__ * -~. _* -

ENGINEERING & PLANT BETTERMENT CONFIGURATION BASELINE DOCUMENTATION PROJECT II CBD CONTENT TECHNICAL DOCUMENT MAJOR ELEMENTS:

1. 0 FUNCTIONAL DESCRIPTION

-

PURPOSE

-

SYSTEM BOUNDARIES

  • COIMJV/GENERIC GUIDELINES OV PO/ER G INSTRIMENTA TION 2. 0 APPLICABLE CODES, STDS,

& REGULATORY DOCS

-

GENERAL DESIGN CRITERIA

-

REGULA TORY DOCUMENTS

-

CODES G STANDARDS 3. 0 SYSTEM OPERATION

-

FUNCTIONAL G OPERABILITY NA TRIX

-

SYSTEM INTERFACES

-

SYSTEM INTERLOCKS

' - : '.

  • :
  • .:. '..¥ -

. -:.,,._

.

,

ENGINEERING & PLANT BETTERMENT CONFIGURATION BASELINE DOCUMENTATION PROJECT TECHNICAL DOCUMENT 4. 0 SYSTEM DESIGN BASIS

-

SYSTEM PERFORMANCE REQUIREMENTS

-

--

1 SAFETY /NON-SAFETY RELATED

-

SYSTEM PARAMETER REQUIREMENTS

-

STRUCTURAL REQUIREMENTS

-

SEPARA-TION/REDUNDANCY/DIVERSITY REQUIREMENTS

- -

'EXTERNAL HAZARDS

-

SPECIAL NAT'L OR SYS CHEMISTRY CONSIDERATIONS

-

SPECIAL TESTING FEATURES

-

INSERVICE INSPECTION REQUIREMENTS

-

SYSTEM DESIGN G SAFETY ANAL YSIS MARGIN 5. 0 COMPONENT DESIGN BASIS 6. 0 SYSTEM DIFFERENCES- -

-

UNITJ / UNIT 2 DIFFERENCES NRO+ES9

  • ' *~*.,*~~---*-*

'

  • ,*.,.*.*,. *

':w':.**.. ' * *~..

l

.~:

,* *

--

ENGINEERING & PLANT BETTERMENT.

CONFIGURATION BASELINE DOCUMENTATION PROJECT TECHNICAL DOCUMENT 7. 0 ACCIDENT ANAL YSIS 8. 0 BASIS EVOLUTION 9. 0 REFERENCES TABLES/FIGURES/APPENDICES

.-

-..

.

o'

.

.. -... : *..

..

.*...... *

..

-.

. ;_ :....... :.. : ; *....

~... *. :. -

~

.... *.. --~* -. *, - -.,....

..

.

-

..

..

.

-

.*.

..

~....

ENGINEERING & PLANT BETTERMENT CONFIGURATION BASELINE DOCUNENTA TION PROJFCT I CBD RESULTS AND LESSONS LEARNED

  • MAGNITUDE OF UNRETRIEVABLE INFORNA TION IS CONSISTENT JtllTH OTHER PLANTS OF SANE VINTAGE e NO DISCREPANCIES RESULTING IN REPORTABILITY e TREMENDOUS EFFORT INVOLVED IN DA TA RETRIEVAL e OFFSITE INTERVIENS e DEVELOP METHOD FOR MANAGING CBD DA TA IN RELATIONSHIP Jt/ITH EXISTING DA TA BASE SYSTEM e DEVELOP METHOD FOR MANAGING CBD SYSTEM DISCREPANCIES e DEVELOP SYSTEM FOR CONTROL AND MAINTENANCE OF CBDs e DEVELOP A TRAINING PROGRAM TO PROVIDE SKILLED USE OF CBD DOCUMENTS

. NRCPRESJJ

. *.

..*..

  • ....... *..,...

ENGINEERING & PLANT BETTERHENT CiJNFIGURA TION BASELINE OOCUHENTA TION PROJECT V. DISCREPANCY MANAGEMENT PROPOSED DISCREPANCY RESOLUTION PROCESS e PROCESS DEVELOPED AS AN EXTENSION OF EXISTING PROCEDURES

  • EXISTING PROCESS DEVELOPED TD ADDRESS INDIVIDUAL DISCREPANCIES e PROCESS DEVELOPED TD ENSURE A CONSISTENT APPROACH TD PRIORITIZA TIDN AND EVALUA TIDN IRCPRE12

- DEDICATED GROUP IS BEING ESTABLISHED WITHIN ENGINEERING TD PRIORITIZE, TRACK, EVALUATE AND INITIATE RESOLUTION OF DISCREPANCIES

- PROCEDURES DEVELOPED TD COMPLEMENT EXISTING PROCESSES AND NOT SUPERSEDE ANY REGUIREMENTS

  • .

.

..

-**

.

.

.

...

~...

..,

...... -..

'.... *,*.,.*.*

...

____ ~
  • ~--~

ENGINEERING & PLANT 8£TTERNENT CONFJGURA TION.BASELINE OOCUNENTA TJON PROJECT PRIORITIZATION OF DISCREPANCIES e ENGINEERING ASSESSMENT GROUP (EAG) WILL USE LEVEL 1 PRA FOR SALEM TO PRIORITIZE DISCREPANCIES e: NOT ALL ITEMS WILL LEND THEMSELVES TO PRA EAG WILL PRIORITIZE EXAMPLES:

-

DEGRADED FLO/II.FRON A PUNP

-

POTENTIAL DISCREPANCIES AFFECTING SYSTEMS DURING SHUTDO/llN

-

POTENTIAL DISCREPANCIES AFFECTING SYSTEMS DURING REFUELING OPERATIONS

  • PRIORITIZATION WILL BE BASED ON POTENTIAL CHANGE IN CORE DAMAGE FREGUENCY e PRIORITIES

-

IMMEDIATE ACTION

-

NEAR TERM ACTION

-

LONG TERM ACTION

-

LOW PRIORITY fRCPRESJ3

.-....-. :. *~. ~.:. *......

.. ;...... *.

..

.

.

  • .... *.* **._*"*.... *.

. *..

.,,

ENGINEERING & PLANT BETTERMENT CONFIGURATION BASELINE DOCUMENTATION PROJECT REPORTING e NOTIFICATIONS HILL BE MADE TO SENIOR MANAGEMENT NHEN A DISCREPANCY IS DETERMINED TO BE EITHER AN IMMEDIATE OR NEAR TERM ACTION ITEM e REPORTABILITY ADDRESSED DURING THE FOLLOWING

-

INITIAL SCREENING IF AN ITEM IS DETERMINED TO BE A POTENTIAL VIOLATION OF TECH SPECS/LICENSE

-

AS A RESULT OF PRIORITIZATION AN ITEM IS CLASSIFIED AS IMNEDIA TE ACTION OR NEAR TERN ACTION

-

DURING SUBSEQUENT £VALUATION OF INDIVIDUAL DISCREPANCIES

.* *.:.... -.....

  • .:_ __ -----*~.... ----

ENGINEERING & PLANT 8£TTERNENT CONFIGURATION BASELINE DOCUHENTA TION PROJECT CURRENT STATUS e PROCEDURES WRITTEN AS TECHNICAL STANDARDS

  • -

PROCEDURES IN FINAL REVIEH AND APPROVAL e TEST CASES SELECTEa PROCEDURES EXERCISED SUCCESSFULL Y llRCPFESJ5

.. *.

. *.**

.

-..... :*.

. _..... -..

  • ........
Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=IR_05000272/1988149&oldid=5007224"