IR 05000272/1988015
| ML18093A939 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Salem, Hope Creek, 05000000 |
| Issue date: | 06/24/1988 |
| From: | Swetland P NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION I) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML18093A937 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-272-88-15-MM, 50-311-88-15, 50-354-88-21, NUDOCS 8807130102 | |
| Download: ML18093A939 (27) | |
Text
I Meeting N License N Licensee:
U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
REGION I
50-354/88-021; 50-272/88-15; 50-311/88-15 NPF-57; DPR-70; DPR-75 Public Service Electric and Gas Company P. 0. Box 236 Hancocks Bridge, New Jersey 08038 Facility Name:
Artificial Island (Hope Creek Nuclear Generating Station and Salem Generating Stations)
Meeting At:
USNRC, Region I, King of Prussia, Pennsylvania Meeting Conducted:
Approved By:
May 26, 1988
--b~
P. D. S\\'fetland, Chief Reactor Projects Section 2B
~k-<T-/ZT date Meeting Summary:
Meeting at NRC Region I on May 26, 1988 with Public Service Electric and Gas Company to discuss the licensee's Safety System Funtional Review Program including program goals, scope of completed SSFRs; and results achieve :::: :::: (> (:. :"2 *;-1 05000272 PDC
DETAILS 1.0 Participants Public Service Electric and Gas (PSE&G)
R. Burricelli, General Manager, Engineering and Plant Betterment C. Johnson, General Manager of Quality Assurance J. Gueller, Operations Manager - Salem B. Preston, Manager, Licensing and Regulation R. Skwarek, Project Manager - Special Projects D. Cooley, Onsite Safety Review Engineer - Hope Creek J. Fest, Onsite Safety Review Engineer - Salem F. Thomson, Principle Engineer, Nuclear Licensing L. Willen, Manager, Nuclear Engineering Services V. Polizzi, Manager, Electrical Engineering J. Myers, Electrical Supervisor, Engineering and Plant Betterment I. Nag, Electrical Engineer, Engineering and Plant Betterment 1.2 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC)
W. Kane, Director, Division of Reactor Projects (DRP)
E. Wenzinger, Chief, Projects Branch No. 2, DRP J. Durr, Chief, Engineering Branch, Division of Reactor Safety P. Swetland, Chief, Reactor Projects Section 2B, DRP W. Butler, Project Director, PDI-2, Nuclear Reactor Regulation 2.0 Purpose The meeting was held at the request of NRC Region I, to discuss the licensee's Safety System Functional Review Progra.0 Presentatiorrand Discussion Public Service Electric and Gas Company described their Safety System Functional Reviews (SSFR) which have been conducted at Hope Creek and Sale The following systems have been inspected:
Salem Auxiliary Feedwater System (1986)
Heating Ventilation and Air Condition System (1987)
Componenent Cooling Water System (1987)
Hope Creek Service Water System (1987)
The inspections were modeled after the NRC's Safety System Functional Inspection (SSFI) and utilized both.licensee personnel and contractor The major findings and conclusions reached by the team were presente The licensee plans to perform their next SSFR in the fall of 1988 and then continue these possibly at the rate of one or two per yea As licensee expertise increases, contractor support will be reduce Copies of handouts provided by the licensee is attached to this repor.0 Concluding Statements The Director of the Division of Reactor Projects thanked the licensee for their presentatio ATTACHMENT 1 SAFETY SYSTEM FUNCTIONAL REVIEWS
<SSFR'S)
SALEM AND HOPE CREEK
-
AGENDA o
BACKGROUND:
o REVIEW DISCUSSIONS o
FUTURE PLANS
SALEM ONSITE SAFETY REVIEW GROUP NUCLEAR SAFETY REVIEW DEPARTMENT.
HOPE CREEK ONSITE SAFETY REVIEW GROUP o PRINCIPAL ENGINEER o PRINCIPAL ENGINEER o 3 SENIOR ENGINEERS o 3 SENIOR ENGINEERS OFFSITE SAFETY REVIEW
o MANAGER o PWR & BWR PRINCIPAL ENGINEERS o EACH WITH 3 PRINCIPAL STAFF ENGINEERS
. '
SSFR PROGRAM o
SELF-INITIATED/IMPLEMENTED EV NUCLEAR SAFETY. REVIEW.DEPARTMENT o
INITIAL MOTIVATION
-
COMMITMENT FOLLOWING INTERNAL REVIEW OF DAVIS-BESSE EVENT
-
INTERACTIONS AT OCTOBER 1985 INPO PLANT MANAGERS WORKSHOP
-
APPARENT COMPATIBILITY WITH ON SITE SAFETY REVIEW ROLE o
INITIALLY MODELED AFTER TURKEY POINT SSFI REPORT
.
o HAS BECOME A CONTINUING PROGRAM
SSFRS COMPLETED o
SALEM
-
AUXILIARY FEEDWATER SYSTEM <1986)
-
HVAC SYSTEMS (1987)
-
COMPONENT COOLING WATER SYSTEM (1987)
- o HOPE CREEK
-
SERVICE WATER SYSTEM (1987)
REVIEW PROCESS INFLUENCES:
o NRC SSFI REPORTS o
APPENDIX C TO SECTION 2515 OF NRC I&E MANUAL o
INTERNAL PHILOSPHY o
"LESSONS LEARNED" o
NRC PRESENTATIONS TO INDUSTRY GROUPS o
INTERACTION WITH A CONSULTANT o
FEEDBACK FROM.WITHIN THE NUCLEAR DEPARTMENT :
GENERAL AREAS IDENTIFIED FOR IMPROVEMENT
DOCUMENTATION
DESIGN CHANGE PROCESS
VENDOR MA"UALS
EQUIPMENT HISTORY
SPARE PARTS
ROOT CAUSE DETERMINATION.
STRESS ANALYSIS METHODS/DOCUMENTATION/INTERFACES
..,,,...
SALEN AUXILIARY fEEDWATER SSFR
SALEM __ ON~SlTE _sA[EIY __ RE_VI_EW_ G.ROUP_ __ -__
-
NQA FOR WALKDOWN
-
SPECIALISTS
FOUR REPORTS
-
OPERATIONS AND SURVEILLANCES
-
MAINTENANCE AND EQUIPMENT
-
DESIGN CHANGES AND tl>OIFICATIONS
-
MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS
INCORPORATED RECENT SAFETY REVIEW GROUP STUDIES
.o REVIEW PROCESS
-
PLAN BASED ON DAVIS-BESSE REPORT AND TURKEY POINT SSFI
-
INCORPORATED OUR PAST EXPERIENCE
-
FLEXIBLE.-
EXTENT OF THE EFFORT
- 3200 MAHHOURS
AUXILIARY FEEDWATER REVIEW PROCESS o
INVESTIGATIVE PLAN WRITTEN FOR OVERALL GUIDANCE DYNAMIC o
AREAS OF EMPHASIS EVOLVED DIFFERENCES FROM WESTINGHOUSE STANDARD DESIGN
-
POTENTIAL PROBLEM AREAS
- TURBINE DRIVEN PUMP
BACKLEAKAGE *
AS-BUILT VS DOCUMENTATION
-
PROCEDURES
-
GENERIC AREAS
- PLANNING
- SPARE PARTS
- VENDOR MANUALS
- EQUIPMENT HISTORY
- STRESS ANALYSIS
- DESIGN BASIS DOCUMENTATION
0
0
0
0
0
......
., -.
SAMPLE OBSERVATIONS AUXILIARY* FEEDWAIER--5SFR--- -* -
INCONSISTENT OPERATING PROCEDURES TRAINING/PROCEDURES INCONSISTENT WITH REQUIREMENT
. NEED FOR ADDITIONAL *
TRAINING/PROCEDURES ABNORMAL PUMP PERFORMANCE DURING MONTHLY SURVEILLANCE NOT ADDRESSED QUALITY/AVAILABILITY OF VENDOR INFORMATION SETPOINT DISCREPANCIES
<CALCULATIONS, DOCUMENTATION>
DESIGN CHANGE PROCESS CONCERNS DESIGN DOCUMENTATION PROBLEMS
<AVAILABILITY, UPDATING, ERRORS)
PROGRAMMATIC/SPECIFIC STRESS ANALYSIS ISSUES LUBRICATION INCONSISTENCIES WORK PLANNING ISSUES
MANPOWER BREAKDOWN AUXILIARY FEEDWATER STUDY ORGANIZATION MANHOURS*
ON-SITE SAFETY REVIEW
.1920 QUALITY ASSURANCE 580 METHODS & SYSTEMS 360 CONTRACTOR *
280 OFF-SITE SAFETY REVIEW 200 E&PB 220 TECHNICAL EFFORT, PLUS -
3200 CLERICAL SUPPORT 360
- NOT INCLUDED ARE:
A>
SECRETARIAL SUPPORT 8)
INTERACTION TIME (E.G. THE TIME OF THOSE INTERVIEWED)
C)
TIME SPENT FOLLOWING THE STATUS OF REPORT RECOMMENDATIONS 0)
TIME SPENT RESPONDING TO REPORT RECOMMENDATIONS
SALEM HVAc:ssFI o
SALEM ON-SITE SAFETY REVIEW GROUP
-
NOA FOR WALKDOWN
-
-OFF-SITE SAFETY REVIEW GROUP FOR DESIGN CHANGES AND MODIFICATIONS o
FOUR REPORTS
-
SINGLE FAILURE ANALYSIS
-
OPERATIONS AND SURVEILLANCES
-
MAINTENANCE AND EQUIPMENT
-
DESIGN CHANGES AND MODIFICATIONS o
REVIEW PROCESS PLAN EXPANDED FROM PREVIOUS SSFR
-
ADDED NRC I & E MANUAL GUIDANCE -
-
INCORPORATED "LESSONS LEARNED" o
EXTENT OF THE EFFORT
-
3800 MANHOURS
-
HVAC SYSTEMS ADDRESSED o
CONTROL AREA AIR CONDITIONING SYSTEM CCAACS)b INCLUDING THE EMERGENCY AIR CONDITI NING SYSTEM CEACS) ;.
o AUXILIARY BUILDING VENTILATION SYSTEM CABVS), INCLUDING PUMP ROOM COOLERS; o
SWITCHGEAR AND PENETRATION AREA VENTILATION SYSTEM CSPAVS);
o DIESEL GENERATOR AREA VENTILATION SYSTEM CDGAVS); AND o
CHILLED WATER SYSTEM CCWS>.
SINGLE FAILURE ANALYSIS AREAS OF EMPHASIS
SWITCH POSITION IN. EACS FAN START CIRCUIT
REDUNDANT EACS FANS WITH CH lA VITAL POWER
VIB FAILURE AND MANUAL ACTION FOR CHILLERS
POTENTIAL FOR EXPLOSIVE MIXTURES IN.
BATTERY ROOMS
AUXILIARY BUILDING CHARCOAL FILTERS
REQUIRED MANUAL ACTIONS IF SIGNAL**
TRANSMITTER FAILS
FIRE DAMPERS WHICH ISOLATE KEY AREAS
"'
CHILLED WATER COOLING LOADS
-*
SAMPLE OBSERVATIONS. HVAt*. ss*FR.
--
.
- -
-
- -
CHILLED WATER SYSTEM CONCERNS
QUESTIONABLE SURVEILLANCE TEST METHODS AND ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA
NEED TO IMPROVE/ADD TRAINING
MAINTENANCE ISSUES
SOME POST ACCIDENT SITUATIONS NEED CLARIFIED/PROCEDURALIZED
QUESTIONABLE INSTRUMENT SETPOINTS, CALIBRATION AND APPLICATION
DESIGN BASES AVAILABILITY
DESIGN CONTROL/CHANGE CONTROL CONCERNS
VARIOUS SYSTEM PERFORMANCE ISSUES..
- .
ORGANIZATION ON-SITE SAFETY REVIEW QUALITY ASSURANCE METHODS & SYSTEMS CONTRACTOR OFF-SITE SAFETY REVIEW TECHNICAL EFFORT, PLUS CLERICAL SUPPORT
- NOT INCLUDED ARE:
A>
SECRETARIAL SUPPORT MANHOURS*
2240 575 200 385 600 3800 200 B>
INTERACTION TIME <E.G. THE TIME OF THOSE INTERVIEWED>
C>
TIME SPENT"fOLLOWING THE STATUS OF REPORT RECOMMENDATIONS D)
TIME SPENT RESPONDING TO REPORT RECOtf4ENDATIONS
-*
SALEM COMPONENT COOLING WATER SSFR o
CONSULTANT <7-MEMBER TEAM>.WITH OFF-SITE SAFETY REVIEW OVERSIGHT o
TECHNICAL REVIEW PLANS
-
OPERATIONS
-
MAINTENANCE
-
DESIGN CHANGE PROCESS
-
QUALITY ASSURANCE o
SINGLE REPORT o
EXTENT OF THE EFFORT
-
1350 MANHOURS <CONSULTANT 1200.
HOURS1 OFf-SITE SAFE.TY REVIEW 150 HuURS>
. SAMPLE OBSERVATIONS COMPONENT COOLING WATER SSFR o
RECURRING/LONG-STANDING *SYSTEM..
OPERATIONAL PROBLEMS o
INCONSISTENT SETPOINT DOCUMENTATION AND CALCULATIONS/BASES NOT
- CONTROLLED o
MOTOR OPERATOR REMOVED FROM ISOLATION VALVE o
COMBINATION OF DEFEATED/DISABLED ALARMS COULD HAVE LED TO-CONTAMINATED FLUID INLEAKAGE o
NEED FOR HANDS-ON TRAINING o
DESIGN BASES AVAILABILITY PROBLEMS'
o -
.DESIGN CHANGE PROCESS CONCERNS
<ANALYSES, CALCULATIONS, CLOSEOUT>
o POOR REFERENCING OF VENDOR INFORMATION o
LACK OF TRENDING FOR DEFICIENCIES/NON-CONFORMANCES
HOPE CREEK SERVICE WATER SSFR
--
CONSULTANT C6-MEMBER TEAM> WITH HO*PE CREEK ON-SITE SAFETY ~EVIEW GROUP ASSISTANCE -
o TECHNICAL REVIEW PLANS
-
OPERATIONS
-
MAINTENANCE
-
DESIGN CHANGE PROCESS
-
QUALITY ASSURANCE
-
HUMAN FACTORS/TRAINING o
SINGLE REPORT o
EXTENT OF THE EFFORT
-
1400 MANHOURS <CONSULTANT 800 HOURS1 ON-SITE SAFETY REVIEW 600 HuURS>
SAMPLE OBSERVATIONS SERVICE WATER SSFR
NO PERIODIC INSPECTION JO DETECT EXCESSIVE PIPE*WALL EROSION/CORROSION
NO INSPECTION OF YARD VALVE PITS -
FOUND FLOODING
INCONSISTENT SETPOINT DOCUMENTATION
SYSTEM DESIGN FLOW CONCERNS
OPERATORS RECOVER FROM PARTIAL SYSTEM ISOLATION WITHOUT PROCEDURE
DESIGN BASES AVAILABILITY PROBLEMS**
DESIGN CHANGE PROCESS CONCERNS
<ANALYSES, CALCULATIONS, CLOSEOUT)
FOLLMJP OF FINDINGS o
COll4ITMENT TRACKING SYSTEM CCTS>
o OFF-SITE SAFETY REVIEW FOLLOWUP
'
(
&DJEML FUTURE STRATEGY *
o FOLLOW CONFIGURATION-BASELINE
~ECO\\'Ei(.Y o
UNDER DIRECTION OF ONSITE SAFETY REVIEW o
EXPANDED INVOLVEMENT o
NEAR TERM CONTRACTOR ASSISTANCE (IDEAS, EXPERTISE, TRAINING)
o
- EVENTUALLY IN-HOUSE o
DEAL WITH TRAINING ISSUES
.,.,p;*
..
..
SPECIFIC FUTURE INIENJIOHS
SINGLE REPORT
THREE tl>HTH SPAN
2500 MAHHOURS
.FULL TIME DEDICATED TEAMS
PRIORITIZED RECOMMENDATIONS
IEXT SSFRs o
SALEM
-
CONTROL/SERVICE AIR
-
AC ELECTRICAL DISTRIBUTION SYSTEMS o
tlOPE CREEK
-
INSTRlJtENT AIR
-
OTHER PNEUMATIC
"