IR 05000272/1980002

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
IE Insp Rept 50-272/80-02 on 800121-25.Noncompliance Noted: Failure to Forward Change to Physical Security Plan to NRC & Failure to Assign Watchmen to Responsibilities Outlined in Plan.Details Withheld (Ref 10CFR2.790)
ML18082A440
Person / Time
Site: Salem PSEG icon.png
Issue date: 03/17/1980
From: Bailey R, Devlin J
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION I)
To:
Shared Package
ML18082A438 List:
References
50-272-80-02, 50-272-80-2, NUDOCS 8005220369
Download: ML18082A440 (2)


Text

'

s. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISIN OFFICE OF INSPECTION AND ENFORCEMENT

REGION I

Report N /80-02 Docket N License N DPR-70 Safeguards Group IV ----

Licensee:

Public Service Electric and Gas Company A'f'F! Mr. F. W. 3clt11eider, Vice flt es ide11t - Production 80 Park Place Newark, New Jersey 07101 Facility Name:

Salem Nuclear Generating Station, Unit 1 Inspection At:

Hancocks Bridge, New Jersey-Inspection Conducted: January 21-25, 1980 Date of Last Physical Security Inspection Visit: August 28-30, 1979 Type of InspectiRp:

Unannounce~ Physical Security Inspectors:

/~ sd ( !,.J ('..,

Rolantl\\J~ailey, Physical Security Inspector I date date Approved b I

s W. Devlin, Chief S curity and Investigation Section, Safeguards Branch Inspection mary:

Unannounced Ph sical Securit Ins ection on Januar 21-25, 1980 Re ort No. 50-272/80-02 Areas-Inspected:

An unannounced physical security inspection, by a regional based inspector, of the approved physical security plan, security program audit, security organization, physical barriers (PA/VA}, lighting, access control (search)(escorting), (vital areas}, alann station, detection aids, assessment aids, corrmunications, testing and maintenance, compensatory measures, power* supply, response, locks, keys and combinations and records and report The inspection involved 34 inspector-hours onsit The inspection was begun during regular hours *

Region I Form 167 (August 1979)

S00622 0369

-*.. "'

Results: The licensee was found to be in noncompliance with the Physical_

Security Plan and NRC requirements within three (3) of the nineteen areas examined during the inspection, i.e. (a) Failure to forward a change to the Physical Security Plan to the NRC as required by 10 CFR 50-54(p).

(b) Failure to assign watchmen only those responsibilities outlined in the pla (c)

Failure to revalidate vital area access*

control to all vital areas every 31 days.