IR 05000261/1986002
| ML14175B356 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Robinson  |
| Issue date: | 02/10/1986 |
| From: | Belisle G, Latta R NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML14175B355 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-261-86-02, 50-261-86-2, NUDOCS 8602180104 | |
| Download: ML14175B356 (5) | |
Text
0 ptREG1j4 UNITED STATES
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
REGION II
101 MARIETTA STREET, Z &ATLANTA, GEORGIA 30323 Report No.:
50-261/86-02 Licensee:
Carolina Power and Light Company P. 0. Box 1551 Raleigh, NC 27602 Docket No.:
50-261 License No.:
DPR-23 Facility Name: H. B. Robinson Inspection Conducted:
January 21-24, 1986 Inspector:___
R. M. Latta ate Signed Approved by:____
.10/6 G. A. Belisle, Act ng Section Chief Date Signed Division of Reactor Safety SUMMARY Scope:
This routine, unannounced inspection entailed 32 inspector-hours on site in the areas of quality assurance (QA)/quality control (QC)
administration; QA program annual review; and licensee action on previous enforcement matter Results:
No violations or deviations were identifie )86021 QPDR APOCK PDR
- REPORT DETAILS 1. Persons Contacted Licensee Employees R. Abbott, Senior Specialist, Regulatory Compliance S. Barrett, Project QA Specialist D. Bates, Senior Engineer
- D. Baur, QA Supervisor
- J. Curley, Director, Regulatory Compliance D. Gainey, Senior QA Specialist, Radiation Control S. Greggs, Aid, Regulatory Compliance
- G. Honma, Senior Specialist, Regulatory Compliance F. Lowery, Operations Supervisor L. Lynch, Senior QA Specialist, Maintenance
- R. Morgan, Plant General Manager
- R. Slone, Document Control Supervisor
- J. Sturdavant, Technician, Regulatory Compliance
- J. Young, Director, QA/QC Other licensee employees contacted included engineers, technicians, and office personne NRC Resident Inspectors
- H. Krug, Senior Resident Inspector
- Attended exit interview Exit Interview The inspection scope and findings were summarized on January 24, 1986, with those persons indicated in paragraph 1 abov The inspector described the areas inspected and discussed in detail the inspection result No dissenting comments were received from the license The licensee did not identify as proprietary any of the materials provided to or reviewed by the inspector during this inspectio.
Licensee Action on Previous Enforcement Matters (Closed) Unresolved Item 261/84-36-03:
Licensee Program to Control all Vendor Manuals (Safety-Related Equipment)
Used on Site Not Fully Develope The inspector reviewed plant procedures RMP-007, Control of Technical Manuals, Revision 4 and AP-008, Review and Acceptance of Technical Manuals, Revision 0 and determined that the licensee had developed a program for the evaluation of all technical manuals and information affecting safety related equipment currently used on sit Based on a review of the above mentioned controlling plant procedures and discussions with licensee personnel, the program appears adequat (Closed) Unresolved Item 261/84-36-04:
Licensee Program to Control the Receipt, Storage, and Handling of Safety-Related Equipment is Not Fully Develope The inspector reviewed the corrective action and closeout inspection report for NCR-84/206 as well as the results of QA surveillance, QASR No.85-101 and determined that the licensee's programatic controls within the area of receipt, storage, and handling of safety-related equipment appear adequat. QA/QC Administration (35751)
References:
(a) 10 CFR 50.54(a)(1), Condition of Licenses (b) FSAR Section 17.2, Quality Assurance (QA)
During the Operating Phase (c) 10 CFR 50, Appendix B, Quality Assurance Criteria for Nuclear power Plants and Fuel Reprocessing Plants (d) Regulatory Guide 1.33, Quality Assurance Program Requirements (Operations)
(e) ANSI N18.7-1976, Administrative Controls and Quality Assurance for the Operational Phase of Nuclear Power Plants (f) Technical Specifications, Section 6 The inspector reviewed the licensee's QA/QC administration program required by references (a)
through (f)
to determine if QA/QC administration activities were conducted in accordance with regulatory requirements, industry guides and standards, and Technical Specifications. The following criteria were used for this review:
-
QA documents clearly identified those structures, systems, components, documents, and activities to which the QA program applie Procedures and responsibilities were established for making changes to QA program document Administrative controls were established for QA/QC procedures which assure procedure review and approval prior to implementation, control of changes and revisions, and control of distribution and recal Responsibilities were assigned to assure overall review of QA program effectivenes Methods existed to modify the QA program to provide increased emphasis on identified problem area The documents listed below were reviewed to determine if these criteria had been incorporated in to QA/QC administration activities:
QAP-101 Preparation and Approval of QA and QC Procedures, Revision 6 QAP-102 Quality Assurance/Quality Control Document Control, Revision 3 QAP-103 Introduction, Training, Qualification, and Certification of QA/QC Personnel, Revision 14 QAP-105 Calibration of QA/QC Inspection and Examination Equipment, Revision 9 TMM-003 Technical Support Management Manual, Q-List Control, Revision 14 CQAP/80-1 Procedure for Corporate QA Audits, Revision 10 QAA/X127-85-01, Quality Assurance Audit of QA/QC-HBR, dated February 20, 1985 QAA/X127-85-01, Quality Assurance Audit of QA/QC-HBR, dated September 6, 1985 Within the area, no violations or deviations were identifie. QA Program Review (35701)
References:
(a) 10 CFR 50.54(a)(1), Condition of Licenses (b) FSAR Section 17.2, Quality Assurance (QA) During the Operating Phase (c) 10 CFR 50, Appendix B, Quality Assurance Criteria for Nuclear Power Plants and Fuel Reprocessing Plants The inspector reviewed the licensee's QA program required by references (a) - (c) to determine if these activities were conducted in accordance with regulatory requirement The following criteria were used during this review to assess overall established program acceptability:
-
Personnel responsible for preparing implementing procedures understand the significance of changes to these procedure Licensee procedures are in conformance with the QA progra The following procedures were reviewed to determine conformance with the QA Progra Corporate Quality Assurance Department Quality Assurance Manual, Revision 8 QAP-102 Quality Assurance/Quality Control Document Control, Revision 3 QAP-103 Indoctrination, Training, Qualification, and Certification of QA/QC Personnel, Revision 14 AP-001 Project Organization and Responsibilities, Revision 2 AP-002 Plant Conduct of Operations, Revision 4 AP-017 Compliance to 10 CFR 21, Revision 2 AP-030 NRC Reporting Requirements, Revision 3 RMP-001 Plant Records and QA Records Storage, Revision 3 PMC-003 Storing Plant Material and Equipment, Revision 7 PMC-1001 Calibration of Special Tools and Equipment, Revision 8 PLP-024 Technical Specification Surveillance Program, Revision 9 The inspector discussed Quality Assurance Program implementation and other topics with the QA Supervisor, QA Specialists, a Project QA Specialist, Regulatory Compliance personnel, and the Director of Regulatory Complianc The inspector determined that the QA office interfaces effectively with other plant functionaries and that the QA personnel work sufficiently independent of other site groups to maintain objectivit The inspector also established that the QA staff are working with written procedures and that QA personnel utilize individual expertise within their group during performance of procedure reviews, surveillances, and other job specific function QA personnel actively oversee that regulatory requirements such as Technical Specification changes and amendments to the approved Quality Assurance Program (FSAR Sections 1.8 and 17.2) are incorporated into lower tier document Within this area, no violations or deviations were identified.