IR 05000220/1985013

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Enforcement Conference Rept 50-220/85-13 on 860205.Major Areas Discussed:Findings Identified in Insp Rept 50-220/85-13 Re Program of Qualification of Electrical Equipment Per 10CFR50.49
ML20153D742
Person / Time
Site: Nine Mile Point Constellation icon.png
Issue date: 02/11/1986
From: Anderson C
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION I)
To:
Shared Package
ML20153D730 List:
References
50-220-85-13-EC, NUDOCS 8602240234
Download: ML20153D742 (47)
v • d • e


Text

{{#Wiki_filter:. . . . U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

REGION I

Enforcement Conference for Inspection No. 50-220/85-13 Docket No.

50-220 License No.

DPR-63 Priority Category C -

Licensee: Niagara Mohawk Power Corporation , 300 Erie Boulevard West Syracuse, New York 13202 Facility Name: -Nine Mile Point Unit 1 Meeting At: USNRC,' Region I, King of Prussia, Pennsylvania Meeting Conducted: February 5,, 1986 z.

/ FG Prepared by: , C.J.Al@rson,[hief 'date Plant Systems Section, DRS i Meeting Summary: Enforcement conference at NRC Region I on February 5,1986 to discuss the findings identified in the Inspection Report No. 50-220/85-13 which reviewed the licensee's implementation of'a program per the requirements of 10 CFR E0.49 for establishing and maintaining the qualification of elec-trical equipment. The items discussed were the potential enforcement / unresolved items identified in the inspection report, licensee corrective actions and the status of licensee activities to complete their equipment qualification program.

i i l .,. 8602240234 8602 8 o ,,go

4

m., - -

g

- . - , ' ' - < - ql.

y ~ _.. .. M 9' _ s I DETAILS Participants

Niagara Mohawk Power Corporation-J. K. Jirousak, Project Manager Equipment Qualification T. E. Lempges, Vice President. Nuclear Generation Ci V. Mangan, Sr-Vice President . - R. J. Pasternak, Sr. Nuclear Engineer-T. W.-Roman, Station Superintendent, NMP-1 G. D. Wilson, System Attorney , 1.2 Gasser Associates . L. W. Price . U 1.3 Wyle Laboratories ,1

s J. F. Gleason , - 1.4 Nuclear Regulatory Commisiton T. Murley, Regional pdministrator S. Ebneter, Director, D bision of Reactor Safety.

R. Starostecki, Directorl Division of Reactor Projects J. Axelrad, Director, Enforcement, IE J. Guttierrez, Regional Counsel e J. Durr, Chief, Engineering Branch ' G. Zech, Chief, Vendor Programs Branch-U. Potapovs, Chief, Equipment' Qualification and' Inspection Section J. Linville, Chief, Reactor Projects Section~ 2C , J. Kelly, Project Manager, NRR D. Holody, Enforcement Specialist R. Wilson, Equipment Qualification Engineer C. Anderson, Chief,. Plant Systems Section E.0 Purpose The enforcement conference was held at the request of NRC Region'I, to; discuss the findings of the. inspection conducted to assess-the licensee'.s '~ implementation of a program per the requirements of 10 CFR 50.49 for _.

establishing and maintaining the qualification of electrical equipment.

3.0 Presentation and Discussion

NRC' Region I Regional Administrator'Dr. T.~Murley opened the conference.

, The licensee was requested to-respond to the inspection findings' and ~to-

7 + m ... .m m.. mms -. . .. - . - h a ..-. a.

a . m ai a - .. . ..s -. m- . m .- . .

g_ _ e

. discuss their corrective actions following the inspection.

The licensee was requested to address both specific deficiencies and programmatic deficiencies.

Mr. R. Pasternack, lead licensing engineer for Niagara Mohawk responded to NRC concerns. A copy of the licensee's presentation material is _ attached.

In-summary the licensee indicated that, as a result of the inspection they were sensitized to the type of detailed information NRC wishes licensees to have in component qualification files. As a result of-the inspection, changes were made in the supporting documentation. -The licensee' determined that no hardware changes were required.

They com-pleted a reaudit of all the component qualification files.

Furthermore, as a result of this reaudit, they did not identify' any areas where addi-tional tests were required. They stated that they have corrected the deficiencies identified during the inspection and their complete EQ program is now in place and implemented.

In response to questioning regarding the results of the licensee's reaudit of all the component files the licensee committed to contact the region within a few weeks to provide specific findings.

With regard to specific deficiencies identified by the inspection, the licensee made several observations. As a result of retesting of tht! EB-5 and EB-25 terminal blocks they confirmed that the blocks were acceptable for the original qualification envelope and that the original test methods were acceptable. With regard to the Rosemont 1151 transmitter they indicated that documentation in the original qualification file adequately established the transmitter life.

4.0 Concluding Statemer.ts The Director of the Division of Reactor Safety concluded the meeting by summarizing the licensee's prese mation. The licensee concluded that: their complete EQ program has been implemented; they conducted a rereview of all 73 qualification packages with no significant problems; they con-ducted a post inspection walkdown of all accessible components; they met all final dates for implementation of the complete EQ program; the ter-minal block tests were completed with no negative findings and they are in compliance with the equipient qualification rule 10 CFR 50.49. The NRC indicated that information presented in this conference of enforcement actions would be considered in the NRC's determinations of enforcement actions related to the inspection. The NRC plans to conduct a reinspec-tion of the Nine Mile 1 equipment qualification program.

J

_ . - _ -- -- _ ,

  • ~

. PRESENTATIONTONRC BYNIAGARAMONAR ON ' WINEMILEPOINTUNIT1 EQUIPMENTQUAllFICATION FEBRUARY 5,1986 . , em

l . .,.., _ ., - -, w r - -w

  • -- m4

- - +

' .

. ATTENDEES NIAGARAN0HAR C.V.MANGAN SENIORVICEPRESIDENT T.E.LEMPGES VICEPRESIDENTNUCLEARGENERATION T.W. ROMAN STATIONSUPERINTENDENT R.J.PASTERNAK LEADLICENSINGENGINEER G.D. WILSON SYSTEMATTORNEY J.K.JIR0VSEK PROJECTMANAGER,EQ . GASSERASS00lATES L.W. PRICE ' i

XYLELABORATORIES J.f.GLEASON

., e j - 2.- -

. -- -_ - _ _ - -

- --- -- -

, , O .. AGENDA 1.

GENERALRESULTOFAU0li0BSERVAil0NS

! A) GENERAL RESPONSE /PERCEPil0NS B) GENERAL ACTION FOLL0XING AUDIT . ll.

EQPROGRAMBACKGROUND-PRE-AUDIT , lil.

AUDIT ITEMS . J i !

3 . - - . _ -. - - -. - -. - - . _ .. ... - -

_.u . . . la. GENERAL RESPONSE /PERCEPil0NS-INCREASED SENSITlVITY TO DOCUMENTAIl0N REQUIREMEN NMPC - ENVIRONMENTALQUAllfl0 ail 0NVEND0R > -

i

I d

,

l

- - - - - vm - -w y ,, y--r------ - - -, - -y.g.

i-p,-_.-ay-m-, yw-- .,y g, - - w+ gc-y , ,y,-m---- - w m- ---,y-- g e--pyw

,ywe,-,ge Ww*-to---r--v-- ene- +w4

.. ._ .. . . ' ,. . Ib,GENERALACTIONFOLLMINGAUDIT INITIATEDPROMPTANDEFFECTIVEACTIONTO ADDRESSAUDITOBSERVATIONS , ' PROGRAMMATIC

' SPECIFIC

. $ - . - - -- .. -. - .. . - _ -.. - _ -.

.- ~ _

. . GENERAL ACTlH F0LlWING AUDIT PROGRMil0: REASSESSMENTOFREPORTS ' ' REVISIONOFREPORTS

' ADDIIl0NOFPAGE/PARAGRAPNREFERENCES . QUAllFl0 Ail 0NFILERP/IEWCNE0KllST ' TRACEABillTYMATRIX(SUNYTABLE)

' ' FUNCTIONALPERFORMANCEREASSESSNENT i

' , i j . i

- - .

- - - ._ - - - . _ -. _ . . --- . d . . Al" ES0.."':0\\ AC"I"':ES -

(3
c 3w:s-h 1B-25

~IA.C01 3:IB-5

S ER

"

SE:-0-R::N3 S0.iN0] "iRM::NA.

"iRM::NA.

)0S::"::0N ROSEM01 A:"I"':ES )ESS. SCC-VA.Vi LOC (S 10C(S Sf"':- "lA\\SE""R )ER:01'ANCE X X X X X X SERVD:i1:0ND::"::0NS X X l } S.RE.ME/ X X KN"ENAN:E SERVD:E X X OPERENG"::ME X X S I K "Y X - . . . B..:: D.:::i X - -

. . . , . II.

EQ PROG M BACKGROUND - PRE-AUDIT QUAllFICATIONBYTESTINGPROGRAM - INSTALLATIONPROGW - THIRDPARTYREVIEW - INDEPENDENTVERIFICATION i - QUAllTYASSURANCE - , J , l ! j . % i - - _ -_ -- -

. . . -_ . . . . - _.

. .- ~ ~ BLIFICATIONBYTESTINGPROGRAM t , . ' Tran altter Testing-NELB l ' Thersocou)le With Seal-IIELB ' ' ' Cable Testing-LG ' ' Circuit Breaker Testing-HELB

' Grease Testing-Radiation l ' Ternina Block Testing-LM ) ' Power Su))ly Testing-HELB ! ' Fuse llo der Testing-HELB j ' Terninals Testing-LOCA l ' Relay Testing-IIELB

' Pressure Controller Testing-WELB

l ' Position Switch Testing-HELB J ' Conduit Seals Testing-LOCA ' Transsitter 0-Ring Testing-HELB , l ' S)are Paris Testing-IIELB l ' Cabe S) ce Testing-LOCA e j ' Insu ating/ Jacketing Tape Test;ng - LOCA ! ' Lubricants-Radiation !

l Twelve (12) 'ndependent tests including the above were conducted "or equ psent nstalled at 19F1 c -- - - - -

. . .- __ - ': , ' INSTALLATIONPROGM - THEFOLLWINGISTHECURRENTSURRYSTATUSOFTHECOMP0NENTSINCLUDEDI THENMPUNIT1EQUIPMENTQUAllFICATIONPROGW: TOTAL COMP 0NENTS ON CURRENT LIST THROUGH JANUARY 25,1986.. 621 ._________________.____________ > ______________________..._____ TOTAL ITEMS DETERMINED QUAllFIED IN PLACE,...... 242 , TOTAL ITEMS H0SE QUAllFICATION REQUIRED ACTION

l SUCH AS INSPECTION, PARTS CHANGE-0VIS, ET0 ...... 126 TOTAL ITEMS E 10W REQUIRED REPLACEMENT ........ 253 * , ..___.. ,

TOTAL 621

  • ITEMSYETTOBECOMPLETEDARELIMITORQUEVALVEOPERATORSASSi

> ! EMERGENCY CONDENSER ISOLAil0N VALVES IV-39-07, IV-39-06, IV-39-09, IV-39-10 (EXTENSION TO MARCH 30,1986 HAS BEEN APPROVED)

, , io

- -- - -. . .- -. - - - - - -.- . - -.- -

' . . . THIRDPARTYREVIEW THIRDPARTYINDEPENDENTREVIDS: A.

EQUIPMENT QUAllFICATION LIST B.

QUAllfl0 Ail 0NFILES

ASARESULTOFTHESEREVIEWS,ACTIONITEMSWEREESTABLISHED ANDCOMPLETED

4

. I ! !

a i h . . .- . -. . - _ _ _ - --.

. .- . ' .- . , - . SCOPEOFTHIRDPARTYREVIH , ' REANALYSl3 0F EM IPMENT B LIFICATION LIST . PIPIM E INSTRUMENTATIS DRAWINGS (P&lD'S) '

' FSAR ' TECHNICALSPE0lfl0ATl3S

' OPERATIMPROCEDURES

' ' SPE01Al0PERATIMPROCEDURES ' REVIEW 0FQUAllFICATIONFILES ' WYLEWAllFICATIONDOCUMENTS ' NUSWAllFICATIONDOCUMENTS . '

TESTREPORTS , I

.

/2 -

' .- . - . , . INDEPENDENTVERIFICATION ANINDEPENDENTDEPARTMENTOFNECVERIFIESALL > NR0COMITMENT-TYPESUBNITTALS.

VERIFIEDCORRELATIONOFSCEWSHEETDATAWITH ' QUAllfl0 ail 0NREPORTDOCUMENTATl0N ' ' VERIFIEDACCURA0YOFEQLIST ! J . j , . i s , G - - - .- _ __ - .- --__ _ - -. __ __

- , .' . ' QUAllTYASSURANCE/QUAllTYCONTROL , i QUAllTYCSTROL ALLEQ-RELATEDPROCEDURES, PROCUREMENT,INSTALLATIMWEREINA00RDANCE WITNNMPC'SQAPROGR ' VERIFIEDPROCUREMENTDOCUMENTS ' VERIFIEDINSTALLATIONPERINSTRUCTIONS QUALITYASSURANCE ' ENGINEERlWGDESIGNATTRIBUTESAUDIT ' FlWDlWGS, DISPOSITIONS AND CLOSE0VTS ACCEPTABLE TO THE INSPECTORS

- - - - - - - - -

. .- ' , Ill. E li ITEMS

1.

AUDITABillTY OF FILES

! 2.

STAil0-0-RING PRESSURE SWITCHES 3.

VALCOR $0LEN01D VALVES i

4.

GENERALELECTRIOEB25TEMINALBLOCKS > 5.

GENERAL ELECTRIO EB5 TEMINAL BLOCKS ' l 6.

FISHER 304 POSITION SWITCHES

l 7.

ROSEM0UNT 1151 TRANSNITTER OPENITEMS - , , ! ! i ! i !

i

/s .

. . . .. - . . . . . . APPEElXA

ITEN ISSUE ,

. l

Doomentation'nanauditablefors: e ! Lacko"specifccitationstopert'nent -

{ mterial n re"erence docuents ~ ! Didnotsafcallydocusttherequired - ! eyelofqualifcaton(00Rguidelnes,

IEEE-323-74,etc.)

f l Per"orsancerequresentsinthepantwere - notdeined, d ,l , ' Examples: RockbestosControCable ! ! S0RPressureSutches l Roseant1151Tranu'tters l { Plantseryceconditonshadbeen - i sproperlydef"ned ! l

i ! ! ! I i i i . l ! f /[ ' . .. _ - - - -. - - - - -. - - - - - -

_ _. . .- . . 00MENTAT10NINANAUDITABLEFORN i 1. FILE AUDITABILITY 2. BASl3 FOR "SIE LE SET OF ACCEPTANCE SIG ATURES" l 3. 00R WIDEllNES VS lEEE 323-1974 000VMENTAil0N . i . 5. PLANT SERVICE 00N01Il0NS

4 l l ! I

l

9 i i' f ( [

- . .- .- .- . -. _.

. . . ' . D003ENTATIMIWANAUDITABLEFOR - , . 1.FILEAUDITAllllTY a.SPECIFICREVINCRITERIA SMALL900P0FSKILLED, 100LEDGEABLE PBSMEL IlTN THIRD . PARTYREVIH l ' REVI N CRITERIA 0003ENTED PB 22 ' AMST 1985 MEM0 AND SUBSEQUENTLY INEQUIMENTQUAllfl0AT10N PROCEDRE NT-100.0 ' QUAllFICATIM FILE REVI N CHECXLIST b.SPECIFIOREFERENCES ' PAGE/ PARAGRAPH INDEXING 0F REPORT i TOAlDREVIDERS l ' TRACEABillTY TABLE !

!

, T

l g i

- -- -. _ - _. _- . . - - -_- . . si . , e s , i , . , . . . . . , ' - ,. ) Nie?_^^t. MONAWK estaLIF1 CATION FILE REVIEW CNECKLIST i j ITEM DESCRIPTION ___________________ _______________.,_ ________..,____ t MAKE:____ _______ __. __________ MODEL:__________.,________,__,_____,,__

, EQUIPMENT REQUIRED FOR: NELS __ LOCA.,_,_ - i

, EQUIPMENT QUALIFIED TO: DOR SUIDELINES.,,,___, IEEE 323-1974.___

<

' QUALIFICATION REPORT FILE CONTENTS: ) ASSESSMENT REPORT NOs.,______.,__.,___ REY.,__ DATE .,_,___ EQ REF __., , SUMMARY FORM COMPLETE / ACCEPTABLE __________,.,_.,________.,__.,__

REPORT EYALUATION FORM COMPLETE / ACCEPTABLE _.,______.,_,___ .. I PAGE/PARAGRAPN REFERENCES COMPLETE.,_____..,_.,_________,_ .,____, ! TEST REPORT / DEFICIENCY RESOLUTION REFERENCES SPECIFIED.,___,,.,_ TEST REPbRT NOs______ .,___.,___ _ REV_ _ DATE_.,.,,,, .,*EQ REF.,_ __

TEST FACILITY .,_____.,___.,______ __.,__ _ DEFICIENCY RESOLUTION Nos.,_,__, _ REV.,_ DATE_,___,_ EQ REF.,,__,_ i

J APPLICABLE EQUIPMENT P!ECE NUMBERS (EPN'S)_ .,,,_ _ _,_.,___,____.,_.,_

___________ ___________________________________________________________ a i APPLICABLE SCEWS.,,,___________________ .,_____.,____,________ .,_,_.,__,,

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _., _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ -., _ _ _ ' _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ s f APPLICABLE CALCULATIONS __,__________.,____ .,___,__________ . ..,,, ai ______ ____.,______ ___-__________~_ ___________- ~ ~ ________________ ! FIELD VERIFICATION DATA COMPLETE _____ ..,___,___ _ _ _.,_ ..,___,__,_ , '

.

l THE INSTALLED EQUIPMENT IS:

a) I DENT I CAL TO THAT TESTED ____.,___.,____.,_____,.,_.,__.,__ b) SAME FAMILY AS THAT TESTED __ .,__ ______,_.,______.,__.,_, c) SIMILAR TO THAT TESTED.,_.,___.,_.,____.,____ .,__.,_.,_.,_,__, IF b OR c, HAS DISSIMILARITY SEEN ANALYSED AND RESOLVED.,_.,_., j REFERENCE .,__ .,_____.. _ .,____. . __ .,__ __ . J TNE EQUIPMENT REOJIRES A QUALIFIED SEAL: YES__. NO., _ _., l

TvPE_____ __________ _________ ENGINEERING DESIGN PARANETERS SPECIFIED: ) ,

IP.1G QE!!Qti 1M891H j OPERATING TIME ., .., _ _ _ _ _ ., _ TEMPERATURE PROFILE OK_., ANALYSIS REO ' D~~~ .. ,, _., _ _ ., _ _ PRESSURE PROFILE: OK,.,_ ANALYSIS REQ'D ! , ,, _ _., .., _ ,, _ _,.., ~~~~

i

REL HUMIDITY ,___ _____ ______ j RAO!ATION j .___ _ _ _., _ ______

SPRAY ' ___.

_____ ______ SUBMERGENCE ., ,, _ _., _ ., < QUALIFIED LIFE ____ _____ ______ l . i ! l SNEET 1

- . - - - - -

_ __ . k.

. .' i e . .. INSTALLAT!ON DOCUMENTATION; .

LIgg [2K G8I1 INSTALLED s . o .--.--_ - --_ . _ -_. _.

. _.,- . -_ _--______ _-- _----. _ --_ -_ .-_ .. _ .-- --_-_ - _ ~ _ ~ _ - - - _.--.. ._ . -- _.. . _ _ _ -. ~ _ - - - - - - _ - - - _ --__ _ . -_ --. _.

__ .-_ _ - - - - - .. -- _-- . - - _ _ ._ _ . --. -_ ___. __ . _. _ - . -_-.---- . , _ ..__. . ___ - _ _ - - , . - - - - - - - _ - _ _ . - __.

_ (use additianal sheet if required) - _--- - . . EQUIPMENT IS INSTALLED IN A CONFIGURATION COMPATIBLE WITH THAT TESTED: YES-__ NO,.--, RESOLUTIOH..-_.. -_. -- . -_____ -_.,_ -- -,_.- REQUIRED SCEW PARAMETERS CORRECTLY ENTERED _, _ _. -_.

- . -__ o SUPPLEMENTARY DOCUMENTATION / CORRESPONDENCE NOT INCLUDED AS PART' OF THE QUALIFICATION REPORT (S): .,.,_ _-___ _. . _ .,- ., _ _ - - - - - _ - _ _ - - - - - _ - - - _ - _ - - _ - - - - - -. - - -. _ - _ - - - - _ _ . _ _ - _ - _.. _ - _ - _ - -. - - - - _. - - - - _ - - _ _ _ - - . _. ... - - .. - - _ _ _ . _ - - - - - - - - - _. - -. - _ ~ - ~. ~. . .. . . .. - - . _ _ _ - -. _ - _. - - - - - - - - - - - - _ - - - - - - - - - _ . - - _ _ _ . .. _ _. - - -. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - _ _ - _ _ - .. _ _.. - - ._----------------_---- , ---_---------------------_--.------_-_--- --_e--. . . .. - - - . - _ - - - - _ _ - - - - - - - _ - _ - - ~ _ - - - -. _ . - -

J LIST OF TEST ANOMALIES (!F ANY) AND REVIEW / RESOLUTION OF SAME: .. _. - - - - -. - - - -.. _ _ - - _ - -. _ _ _ - - - _ _ _ _ ~ - - - - _ _ . . _ _ _ - -. _. _ - -... - _. - - _ _. _ . - -. _ - - _ - - - - - - ~ _ - i , . _... - _ . .. .. - - - -. - -. - - _ - - - - - - - - - - - ~ ~. - - - - - -.. -. -. _ . _ . - -.... - - - - - - - - - - - _ - - - - - - - - ~ - _ - - _ -

. _ _ - _ - - _ - _ - - - _ - - - - - - _ - - - - - - - - - - - _ _ -... _ - - - - - - - - - COMMENTS:_ _... _ _ -__.. --. _ _ - _ - .., - _ _,, -. _ -. . - - - - _ -. _ - - - _ -. - _ - _ - - - - - - - - - ~ - - - .. ~. - -. _ _ _ - W i t .._----_ ------..----.-_--...-_---..---------------- -_ --_.. _------- I _ - -. _ - - _ - .. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -. - - - _ ~ -. - - - ~ . - - -.., - - -... - - - - -. - - - - _ _ - .... - - - _ - - - - - -. - - - - - - - _.. - - - - - - - - - - - _.... -. - - - _ _ - - - . '

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - _. - - - - - - - -.. _ - - - - - _ - - - - - _ - - - - _ - - - _ - - - - -. - - - . . . . THE LISTED EQUIPMENT QUALIFICATION DOCUMENTATION HAS DEEN REVIEWED ' AND APPROVED AND THE SPECIFIED EQUIPMENT FOUND TO DE OUALIFIED FOR ITS ENV!RONMENT.

j BY--------_---------/---_---.- < , REV I yWED BY:. --- . _/ -. .. , ,

i AFFROVED BY

----.

-- /--- .--_ SHEET 2 g , . - ~ - -

. . ._ - . _- . .. - . ._ . ' . 00CWEllTATIN IN M 3l TABLE FM - 1.FILEARITAllllTY e ! a. SPECIFIC E l5 CRITBIA ' 9lALL Gil0lp 0F RILLS, El0ILEDGEABLE PBSWEL IITil TillRD

PMTYREVl3 , i j ' REVI N CRITHIA 00 M ENT S P S 22

MRST 1985IEM0 AND 2BSENSTLY ' ) IN EW INENT R LIFICATI N ! PROCEDRENT-100.0 W LIFICATl3 FILE REVI N CHECKLIST . ! ! b.SPECIFICREFBENCES ' PAGE/PARAGRAPil INDEXING 0F REPORTS ! l TO AID REVISBS ! ' m CE2lLITY T M LE i , l l l ' !

i ' ' . ) i l l l , - - - - - - - -

- - _. -- - - . -.- .. .-- . '. 4. ?<.*.+. v n. m..T.n ?. s.,;

' ......... ~..,. v -....<. .. n. g.:.~ - . . . . . { . . .. v.

., , ',*...., #,,, *. *.., .. .- .- . .. .

.m.. ' - 7g n, .. . , , ,

j,r.

.. +

, , ,, n . , ., ,, p , , j.1 ,, t - -

i ,

e\\. ,, page 3 iw d, '. .,* [. o

. . ' ,. , j' i'. c. nave ad v. ate ,ine been al in ase.edanee !

- - - , , , . mita monse-esse, s.stie. 3 (c.t.

.c zzar G'8.,, ,, , - i.-

.

i 4j - (Cissie appropriate category) - I' D. If the qualification uses analyeie, are the basis.

~ U.- ! .' supporting enea, and method for analysis imeluded?.. N E8

P , j '

  • s. Es test esquence justified as per IEEE 333-1974

-- ,. j i,** Section 4.3.2 and MURAs-OSes category 1 peeltleet Oy, . l } *.' , ! ! F. Is the test sequence justified as per IEEE 323-1971

- I and Wase-Oste Categesy II posittent Y U'

, '

! g.

, ' - . 4. Were performance characteristice verified before, - ,' during, and after testing? Yss a , ! . <

  • N. Were temperature readings obtained by thermocouple

" location en, or as near as practical to the surface @ NO l l ,

of the sosponent? -

1. If not, is adequate jbetification provided showing

g ! l that the component was esposed to the,specified y33 No

temperature environment? - i . S.

Does the test report addrese thermal agingP h no f j A. Was a qualified life and/or replacement schedule

' .- j established? '.I$ "O , , )

  • s. use test sample therme11y aged by an acceptable

' -.

sothod7 Yts) up i l i i

  • 7 *C. Did thermai aging simulate design life at normal

,' ^ l conditione (temperatures? T.Es> up .i . . j v *0. Was test easyte operated ':e simulate expected ,,

sechanfest wear over doelp lifet (electromechanical Yst.8 "o N/A

equipment only)

!

  • t. Was test sample irradiated to the normai service

- j 11fe desage before seisade and DSA testingF N "U i r

1

  • *F. Was test sample irradiated to the ceshined nornei

, service life dosage plue Den desage before YES NOj , {, OsA testingt - , l i {.* 4.

Was equipment laepeated after type testingF k,a No A. Are the results of the inspection reeerded? 7ss) NO MA l / t l V 7.

Were any failures identified during environmental l ' - i j quali,ficatione7 y,g,

- , , .., A. Are failures justified? ytsj NO N/A .

' y8j 8.

Ze the test faellity (set up) described? t po g4 }., i 9.

Is a description of the instrumentation provided? th no t , i 10. Are test coneluelene consistent with test objectives and t ! supported by test reewits7 e I"8, "O ' I i {. I b,

-

. s.,.,' '3.lNdY.C*l2 k."*T.#- T"M7k 8 'd# "" f y - !" ^' ~.gy . .. : ' g$, Ejfy; 5P'"%-#w.Wc5]. @p3gg(w.- %w.

A g "

  • u
g

- t. 4..g,

-

. , - 'n

, . -

..- ,, P, age 3 og d-I,,' .

. , . a.

.. . o gg,,g,y..

, , . - .

C. nave adequate margias been allowed f a accordanes d!!P ,f....m . .

.ita G-.m., seas 2 cco.(p r 123, - . . . (circle appropriate category) '

- D. If the qualificaties uses analysis, are the bahia, I'8

  • supporting data, and mothed for aamiysis included?

. 1835 323-1974 ggy , .. .

  • s. Is test sequence justified as per Sectiep 4.3.2 and gussG-OSGS Category I positieaf

, , , ") f.X X-6., - 323-1971 F. Is the test sequence justified as per IEEE i o: - and WUntG-0548 Category II p sitionF f4tdsle .. G. Were performance characteristics verified before, d f. 2N-t during, and after testing?(Actiwny siwmited f. X-1 ' . N. Were tesgerature readings obtained by thersoccuple 47,gg,g location on, or as near as practical to the surface @ No gg of the coeponent? '. 1. If not, is adequate justification provided showing @ Yz3 leo that the component was exposed to the specified ! ,terperature environment, h N o W P.2,le f.Z v-A Does the test report address thermal aging? j 5.

A. Was a qualified life and/or replacement schMule establishedF -

  • s. Was test sample therme11y aged by an acceptable h too AtF.2.ls,$dC.ZY I

, l methodF i 7 *c. Did thersial aging simulate design life at normal , g g, y, ,, g conditions (tesgerature)? I

v *D. Was test sample operated to simulate expected mechanical wear over design liter (electromechanical h Iso MF.Lle,f.vg-t equipment only) " "U'13's*I'b

  • E. Was test saagle irradiated to the normal service I

E' life dosage before selsele and DsA testing 7 -

! V *F. Was test sample irradiated to the combined normal YEs h 84f'.11e,f. T -Il service life dosage plus ceA dosage before DBA testing? Was equipment inspected after type testing? (AttlMwt slewdh too Assr, s.lo, f.X1-i ' 6.

.' A. Are the results of the inspection recorded? Q peo) pyg f

I V 7.

Were any failures identified during environmental

MF, 2.10 qualifications 7 h NoJ r. ([[=[g , - A. Are f ailures justified? Is the test facility (set.up) describedr(MIpfM SINMts'o4 Q po f. X-l k k-1 ) Aar,gte , 8.

Is a description of the instrumentation provided? h no ggy.gge i l 9.

f.X-84 X*3l H

J Are test conclusions consistent with test objectives and

  • M85788 10.

supported by test resultst f. L(L-6x.. . , , Y6 - -..- - - -. - - - - -. - - - - - - _ - - - - - - -- , - - - - -., - - , -, - - -. - - . .__.,_--e , - - -.., - - -,,

e p .,;

p .I r -

g h h & L

. .

l

s a I a i a .a r.- .. o.. . n . . .- g -,>

.!g s.

t I.

u e x

, w F.

u a w u s ~ w - .=s.. . .=. n.

b-w u v.4 M u . . - - - g-EEr$ $ $ $ I $ $ % 'd ' . i c is:: .I.r] ff...f...f.f .f.. I.

f f. I I , . . C. !al. e 1.

L.- ihF L-L- Ifs.t. ' =c.. - ,c

c3.

I.; c#- 2*, e. - la'.,- - r

..!,i. 3-h. E'.i a*'=53 . ' ' .:

u

. -. . s aris sai sm as.1n.sa sa. sa 22:.L ..L.L.L L.L..L L L L L i

L L LLLLL L

L L I ,i-l.

.. L l.

l

i j i l

I i.

i.

.

.. i.

i.

L .L...L.. L...L.. L..L... L. L... L...l - , , . 8- . . . . . . . . .

............... ..r..r...x .x..... l r.

w i, g i i i , yI. sir u e r n E & i D e D fgD l= Fi F F !..!. 5.. 5. F5

!.

3... 5..r5.3.

.1

F F ' . . l L-l

2.. 5, z

r . . . L . . . . . . .e.n...a.i.a. i.e....=.. .a..a.s...s.a.:.=...i.a.

.:.a.

e i h i 6-L b h al l.! R R R . s h R is .s, e...s e. x = = s a .m-x . - - - . - '.E..I t rl.12 1..1.a. 1...?8.1 1.a. 1 . s t L L L t t t . K l $ '2 2 'l p : g

1. n= u x,

wa.s.

L y K ... ,

I ! !!.N. $ ! .l..h..! !.d.h,!N., . t: 1.

l.

n w.

V. h I

't

As k >- e - I.m.i. h.. h....i...B.. I.I... I...E.. G.. G. I.. . . g . I I In.

. l

i $tu *. .. . . . . . . . T... T T..e.

Y..Y... Y..T.

T... . 6 kLl l' (J b i - -l . .2 "..I ) E l.! u.! u.i! Li %.! i ]l m.5 2.5 ' li l .i .

TV cut FtB Cyv l.

a.

a , u ..m.a.. a.

m.. mv .I..V.S.W.I..C..I..V.$... ty.. d r.. s...3.3..r g r.

.y *:33.

I99" .

t hs yr t !!he - . . .. '-

.:.i :

. . . . s a..a.. b $.u pt. 4h..f. 3!.u.. 5...a.t.. . r s. s...h ua - !l . r a- .. l . . i . n.

. l g 'a d . (i : I aj d A i IF I ! d.!I!.ti l!i!! I b 111 I! l!!lllII U '.A / - -- - --

. , , ..,r,' .f k ' .- - ( ,

000M BTAT10N IN AN D ITABLE FORM ^ w '

a ,

TREEREVIH/ACCEPTEESTAGES(8/22/85 2.BASISFM"SINGLESET ' gig).

s

0FA00'EPTEE " ' - . SISTRES"

  • 0003ENTATl0N0F(REPORT)REVIH,'

i ~ . ' i '

  • D00$GTATl3 0F BLIFICATIM

! '* D00$ENTATIM'0FPROGRAM . ! IMPLSENTATION .t .'

.

' MULTIPLE REPRTS/DOCESTS APPLICABLE TO A ) QUAllFICATIONFILEARESIGNED; ' ... .

- ' i ! ~ .* SLIFICATIM TEST REPWT(S) ' . ' GENERIC / SPECIFIC - - . . t . . ,

  • QUAllFICATION ASSESSMENT.0F i

. . i QUAllFICATIONREPMI(S)FM ! l W1 . !

  • QUAllFICATIM ASSESSBT REPRT l

0FDEFICIENCYRESOLUTIONS ' ~ ~ EllF10 Ail 0NSMARYANDEQCHECKLIST (IYLE) INCLUDED IN "ASSESSENT FM ! N1USE" REPORT 2'

- . i D003 STAT 10N OF Ellfl0ATIM BY.

' "ACTIONCOMPLETE"NOTATIONONTHEEQ

'" ! '. MASTERLIST - . ' ! EllFICATIONFILEREVIEMCHECKLIST ' i ' EQPR00EMENT-100.0 ' ' -

d5 ' ' , - . .. -- -,-. . --

.. --- - - ... -....-.- - -.. . - - - - - . -. - - - _ .... - -.-.- . - -. . -. ..

. .. .. , -{ . . DOCUMENTATION OF REVIEW THE REVIEWER INDICATES HIS SATISFACTORY REVIEW OF AN ELEMENT OF THE.

! DOCUMENTATION PACKAGE BY SIGNING THE REVIEWED DOCUMENT. ALL DOCUMENTS WHICH FORM.THE EVIDENCE OF QUALIFICATION FOR A GIVEN COMPONENT (AS NOTED.

. ON THE SCEW) SHALL BE SO SIGNED.

j DOCUMENTATION OF QUALIFICATION . ~ WHEN DOCUMENTATION OF QUALIFICATION HAS BEEN SATISFACTORILY ESTABLISHED FOR AN ITEM THE " CONTROLLED EQUIPMENT QUALIFICATION LIST" IS MODIFIED TO ' REFLECT " ACTION COMPLETE".

DOCUMENTATION OF PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION . , WHEN FORMAL EQUIPMENT QUALIFICATION REQUIRED MAINTENANCE SHEETS (EORM ' S) ~ AND FORMAL EQUIPMENT QUALIFICATION SPARE PARTS LISTS HAVE BEEN PROVIDED TO MAINTENANCE, AN ENVIRONMENTAL-QUALIFICATION CHECKLIST IS GENERATED.

, THIS SHEET SUMMARIZES INFORMATION APPLICABLE TO THE DOCUMENTATION i PACKAGE, LISTS APPLICABLE SCEW'S AND EPN'S AND CONTAINS A POSITIVE STATEMENT THAT THE QUALIFICATION-OF THE EQUIPMENT HAS BEEN FOUND - ACCEPTABLE FOR THE APPLICATION.

a a i . _ -

_. _ _. _.

. _ - . _ \\. . =.. . v,se. +,+ es.w; wn.v , yQ.; g l ~~- - __ w q %.,, ,, ,, .'. ' - Report flo. 17655-T3W-2 MVISI0ll A i. . EuvimossenrEAL quALIF.scATIou seemer up. /7dsf-7h/-2 l NEAGAIE MoNANK POWER Guf. NDE NEIa POTTF = 1 ! spec. TITia N A hdA P.o.

NfA vEuDea FDsvet.

spec. no.

c l Test ITEx nEsc. rsoesservas sw, Yen ~ unEE pauwns.

nonst l'apot-4o vamon TEsY mEpos? TITIa 7,MSMX"eTer "s "".2TMileTJXtL'*4**" " " " APPLIcAB12 STANDARDS TEST REPCgt No. /*7fh9-t C WXT3BAC f)$$K300 l IEEE 3 33 M W IEEE TEST METNoD Teha #s/ s%5h DoctasprTATIon Acb:PTABILITY Actegte&/c IEEE 3vv /975' IEEg ontER. - NUBEG 0588 CAT. f QUALIFIED LIFE 4O yddt C Test stoCENCE (REF. Q/O MMC (t )

I. B/EstiNf FUNcT/nMAl 6. AMIDfM7" TIIY10LM770A/ I I. RAbiAT/on.1 lFstMers*oMAL.

1.

fL/A/Cr/ CAP &l 3. gsgr 1/Ft. ASr'nd lFuncricuum. s.

Pos:r Tesy 7NSPetn%/ v 4. CYcArAG406r lCowTibMAL.

9.

5. Cffstr//c lhialcfiGNAL 10.

' .f nst EwinouMpIT (DEA) (MEF. 2/0 A96F X-18- / X -/ 9 ' ) LPPLIcABI.E ' ENV. f4 CATIONS j.j df TIME orJ/n f '7

/go 5.9c.

/ 4-55 As & : of

'

TDtP.*F) 327 /80 /FO /00 M0 320 230 250 aso sw / enc mm AuM PRES. PSIG

0

O 1S w ie g la yn.S >S o a , R.R.

/08 % WS f or. TI.ME Doc 24. hai r-s - Acc/PERF DDeo . i mADIA Ies AGING t mEr. 0/o Pese E-/ > nEnMAL aGIz < mEr. 2/o. Pose zv-/ 3

l DOSE RATE / CE c / S.064 RAD /hR AGED TO SIMUIATED-l LIFE OF

vas.

DOSE PRIOR TO .. EuV. Test /,J5 F7 MADS nAsED ou AMsIEwT_.

TEMP or /VoF M% 4 tia'e

  • r

, i60 F/ t,' af fressee.

ENV. TEST NoNE M AGING TDW./ DURATIOu //d 'C / 4TO $ Cud TOTAL DOSE /*3567 RADS cicIs AGING t nEr. 9/O Pav vr-t > nEI mDI1T t/nkn wn s - NDr AGED-JUSTIFIED cycIzs mEcolmED 520 sT ANALYSTS To A///? Yas.

" CYCLES PERFORMED 5 12 (Electro-Mechanical Equip. only)

3 REVIEWER: N.

M DATE:/d/h/8f a -

17 i . .. .. - - -. -. -.. - - -.. - -. . -. - -

. _ _ _ _ _. _. - -- _- _ -- - - _ "~ , . .wo w ..m.. w.exw. .. . .,.... -. , ,, -

  • .

. . REVISION A Report No. 17655-TSW-2 - .

.

. J.O. no.11400.02 Page 1 of 4 . EWIEDIOmrtM. QUALIFICATION RErdRT EVAIBkf205 font ' "***** IMRIE PCIER COID. WIN MII2 POINF = 1 unc unses-oses Cat' gory 1* and II Positions TR- /7dfg.8W-2 - (Please type or print) . . EQUIFlert IDElffIFICkrIm Equipment Types ff/tt#rtMuAar s h*rc# vendor : FruwAL Specification Iso.:

  1. M

- Purchase (P.O.)30.

NM + Manufacturer: FE"NWAL nodel No.: 17003.-40 l serial no.: N/A ochLxrICATIm DoctaerraTIm sv,uvenA evWoo***M"z s"WF*/*4 f** f !"*** ***' " G e -u r,-aws, ,: m s m n..,- e u n r).

,1t1.

A sthor(organization) : W V4 ( 4AgotATdA/($ i Identific.ation No.: /7509-/ Isx7aAc.7) Rs.No Date: MAY /4, /983 [#N 8! MN - N goalification Method , , REVIENER'S f N Im Acceptable? h NO If YES, any limitation, exceptions, special conditions: 7## Tryrrn 71rmpgf.sn eg- ' Co7ctf wu svPMrb m A Pan.!dinunf es sffic, c/ve,ns* free,wr i.,,,, , Peree s s' oefderumrur Fen Nmp-1 is n. s A,a.

?r n,.a e wr, sa docentsra. IN WYut REPedtf No. IIIP5F-TSN-1.1 ( REF. AIA).

, If No, what specific deficiencies could be corrected in order to achieve ' !

I acceptability? , l.

I !

!

- I t REVIEWED BY: // M') /Id///VERIFIEDBY: MM-/7

Signathre Date signature Date (*)' Applicable to NUREG Category 1 positions only.

Rev ....A L .i,-c.-. -- -- --,L.n ,,, - - - - ~.. - - --,---,-,,.-.-.n,..-..,-_.,..-.-.n_...-,.--..._-.. - -... -,..., -. - _, -...,...., - - - ~

_.

. .. .. . .- _ ~ - ' w ~- m*vmW .&%;e,.. / ~m ~- m *'~~,wrw m n-w .

- Report No. 17655-TSW-2 REVISION A

. ' Page 2 of 4 .

1 . TWsf racILITY , W Vlf L :tlx A 4 Tb 2 IE S A Esme: ciers MUA/13V//e.

j A4:w/ water ' state l arrLxcanta sYstun/Iccarrow cenas ' ' sTstum /f zocarzens o/ i i 1.

TEST conDITIcus , ! See Environmental qualification Summary Sheet No.: /7666-T84/ - 2-l Does the model naber of the component (s) tested coincide h NO MF.MO* Pd 2.

  • with the model naber of the. component (s) being reviewed?

' , . A.

If not, is adequate justification provided showing that the component (s) tested adequately represent (s) YES NO @ component (s) being reviewed? , ) 3.

Does the Test Program Outlina include: A.

Test Objectives h 50 MF.2ao, P.I, l . B.

Test Sample Description k 30 Mp.ALO,f.11(xi j C.

Number of units to be tested . NO NIF. Ate, F.xil 9[ Mounting requirements (ActI0gMT SIMutATI#N)

}; l D.

1.

If yes, was the equipment being tested mounted M F A38,f. X~$.3 E

j in a manner that simulates its espected instal-h N0 j l 1stion when in actual usef I 2.

If no, has justification been provided showing that equipment performance is not altered by the YES NO N/A

====ar or position in which it is mounted? E.

Aging Simulation Procedure 50 AEF.110, F.IV-1 Parameters to be be measured [%& ACdDf8'T NO)g,,gg, y, g g F.

. 1.

Accuracy ( ) h 30J .2.

Response time YES N0' C.

The range, sequence, and combination of environments f to simulate DEA conditions?

  • II's * N N.

Acceptance Criteria NO REF.18o the ability of the equipment to perform its h NO, I* M -# 1.

Are the acceptance criteria adequate to verify ' ~ required safety function? 4.

Are the tests ne'thods in accordance with the following: r IWF.14e , A.

Does the test demonstrate that the equipment - f '5'- 4.

j r. 24 ! satisfies the acceptance criteria? (This should be h Nd

,2y.4, vg.g _

demonstrated for all phases of testing) (f. 71-1, X1-1 . B.

Do the parameters in the qualification documentation ES NO WN p. M at least meet ' accident requirements? J 1.

If acc. are deviations justified? .YES NO . y . . - -. . - . .. - -

. ._ __ _ '. . conseconcasaccccccccccccccccccccccasecesscesso ' LC a LOCATION CODE HHPS1 EQUIPMENT QUALIFICATION - M.0. #1927 u a REVISION TO 3/29/85 LIST COMPLETE LIST SORTED BY SYSTEM / E.P.H . JANUARY 25, 1986 + a REVISION TO 4/11/85 LIST

J s REVISION TO 8/14/85 LIST EQUIP. PC. NO. / VERIFIED MODEL'/' ACTION - SYSTEM 4 LC COMPONENT TYPE MANUFACTURER REQUIRED ACTION COMPLETE EQRM SCEM cacasus********************************************cs****************************************************************************s 036

PT-36-08D 1151GP-9ET00b3PB' APPLY KA0 WOOL E YES 14B 142 4 TRANSMITTER ROSEMOUNT BISCO TO SEAL LEAD WIRES.

036

PT-36-23A 1153GA9 .' VERITY / REPLACE YES 14C 155 TRANSMITTER ROSEMOUNT SEALED CONDUIT E CONNECTOR.

036

PT-36-23B 1153GA9 ' VERIFY / REPLACE YES 14C 156 TRANSMITTER ROSEMOUNT SEALED CONDUIT E CONNECTOR.

i 036

PT-36-31 1153GD9PB ITEM REPLACEMNT YES 14E '062 4 TRANSMITTER ROSEMOUNT 036

PT-36-32 1153GD9PB ITEM REPLACEMNT YES 14E 063 TRANSMITTER ROSEMOUNT 036

TE-36-29A 10231710 820395 RPL NEAD SEAL YES 131 119 4 TEMPERATURE ELEMENT PYC0 GASKET. ADD SEAL ON CONDUIT 036

TE-36-295 10231710 820395 RPL NEAD SEAL YES 13A 120 4, , TEMPERATURE ELEMENT PYC0 GASKET. ADD SEAL ON CONDUIT , 036

TE-36-29C 10231710 820395 APPLY BISCO TO YES 13A 121 4 TEMPERATURE ELEMENT ,PYC0 SEAL.

i 036

TE-36-29D 10231710 820395 APPLY BISCO TO YES 13A 122 4 TEMPERATURE ELEMENT PYC0-SEAL.

, 036

36-03A 510DU245026A005 ITEM QUALIFIED.

N/R

377 ELECTRONIC TRIP UNIT ROSEMOUNT 036

36-03B 510DU245026A005 ITEM QUALIFIED.

N/R

378 ELECTRONIC TRIP UNIT ROSEMOUNT , l 036

36-03C 510DU245026A005 ITEM QUALIFIED.

M/R

379 ELECTRONIC TRIP UNIT ROSEMOUNT i 036

36-03D 510DU245026A005 ITEM QUALIFIED.

M/R

380 ELECTRONIC TRIP UNIT ROSEMOUNT

IbG

. -.

_ . -. _. .. __. , _.. _.... . ... __.

. _.

. . ,.- . i.

ENUIRONMENTAL GORLIFICATION CHECKLIST

- MANUF/ETURER-WP-1 C 00R GUIDELINES MODEL NO.- imp-2 IEEE 323-1974 COMPONENT-EPN(3) IEEE 323-1971 . R. CNECK THE FOLLOBilNE: I.

O NRC SueniTTAt<S/3 ire 4) SECTiON.

TERNO ! SCEWS i flELD YERIFICATION SHEETS /flELD PHOTOS REFERENCES-WYLE REPORTS, TEST REPORTS: REF.NOS MAINTENANCE: REYlEW QUALIFICATION REPORTS , , REYlEW MAINTENANCE MANUAL ! NO REY DATE- ! REYlEW EXISTlHG PROCEDURE (S),if ANY NO REY DATE-B. ACTION:

' UPDATE THE FOLLOWING(AS REQUIRED): N/A SCEWS N/A O riEtD-YERiriCATiON SNEETS/eNOTOS I ON/A REFERENCES (MARK UP COPY ONLY) LIST AND ATTACH MAINTANANCE REQUIREMENTS EQRM NO - LIST AND ATTACH PARTS /ASSY. REPLACEMENTS EQPL NO.- C. CONDUlT SEAL REQUIRED N/A YES ' ! D. COMMENTS: . , I

l

.l THE ABOYE EQUIPMENT AND ITS QUALIFICATION DOCUMENTS HAYE BEEN REYlEWED. THIS EQUIPMENT HAS BEEN FOUND TO BE QUALIFIED FOR ITS ENYlRONMENT.

i BY- / REYlEWED BY- _/ j REYlEWED BY- / l \\ t .- .. -.. -. .. - - - -

.- . - . ' DOCUMENTATIONINANAUDITABLEFORM 3. 00R ElDEllNES VS IEEE 323-1974' LEVEL 0F QUAllFICATION SPECIFIC PER 100FR50.49 (IE. ORIGINAL PLANTEQUIPMENTORSPARESIN STOCKPRIORTO2/22/83AREUNDER . D0RGUIDELINES) ' REQUIRED QUAllFl0ATl0N LEVEL IASDETERMINEDS0LELYONEQUIP-MENTPROCUREMENTDATE ' WYLE ASSESSMENT REPORT SPECIFIES QUALIFICATIONLEVELACNIEVED ' DOCUMENTAIl0N OF QUAllFl0ATl0N

' LEVELIMPLI0liFROMNOTATIONSIN j EQEQUIPMENTLIST ' REVIEf CRITERIA IS SPE0lFIED IN8/22/85MEM0 - ' EQ CNE0KLIST , ' OUAllFICATION FILE REVIEW ~ CNickLIST ' E4 PROCEDURE NT-100.0

. .... - - - _. -. ._ . . ,..w- - - .,p.. .. 9,._,.

  1. wc., p..y

,, .,,. . Report No.17655-TSW-2 REVISION A ' '.. -

  • .

, , . , L suvraomerras eaALxrscATsom smesar so. f 7ssr-7hi-2 o stacAnA nauwa pousa cour. was arra porw - 1 - , i spec. Trn s NA NIA vEmoon FENymt, hdA p.o.

i spec. no.

usT ITun asse. rsewes44rJ4s s.s,w , nonst l'Apo2.-do l nAzz fauwat - ,, mon asT manoer m!= c.P#Mrr'<M %STMNM,5mim' ".r~f tgKate ! TEST 27 ORE uo. /*7h9-1 (fXwAc ) ApFLICAgga stmHOARDS , IEEE 323 197Y IEEE TEST MTNoD Tee...d.3/ M/* occumuTATIon MILITT /Jee gf.,R ,' IEEE 34y 1975* -IEEg I , orum.

nunc osas CAT. I ouurrIED LIFE 4o ysar c

TEST SEQutNCf. (nr. 0/o P49e //

! 1. 8RGRINf FUNCT/enA L $. AMIDEArT* Tiir10LM/DA/ 2. RAb(Adort lFetNeflowAl-7. filAlcTt'ONkL- ) 3. 7Mrstr1RL AGr*e4 lFuncrioom. a. fosf TEsr 1NSPecrib4 A. CverAGMe /F~awribent s.

' s. Cristr1/c /fdr'ef/0NAL lo.

/ M6F X-/8 / X-/9 ) appg,Icaggg D TEST ENVInoNMEWr (DBA) (REr. 2/0 ENV. IDCATIONS TINE tW3 fit $ 'I

'80 55E.

I

SS Bhs A : 0; TEny.*r) 327 /80 /FO /00 220 320 230 250 Jso lye fenca m h et, A e r M -. j ,l PRES. PSIc

0

0

  • 18

'4 18 > n.5 >5 o 'I R.E.

/oo

. YES j 'I op. TI.ME DEno 24 her-M ACC/PERr DEMO i RADIATICM ACINc ( REr. O/o Pese Ir-/ _) TxERnAL Acnes ( REr. 2/O. Pose Iv-/ 3 oosE RATE 1. ore / 5054 RAD /h1 ACED To SIMULATED-LIFE or

yrs.

' oost enton to ... ENV. TEST /,df 8'I RADS BASED oN AMSIENt.. TEnr or /VO A" 9f % stf />=e

  • r oost oumInc

/"N

ENV. TEST NoN# RADS j .ouRArzou //o'c / 440 />our.r wru. oost /. 3 5 F 7 RAos " " """" //d*dWe

h Cx!z Ac!No t REr. a/0 Pase-vr-/ ) "DT AGED-JUSTIFIED CvCZzs REcoIREn 52o aY ANALYSIS TO A///2 yng, . CYCLES PERFORMED 572 , (Electro-Mechanical Equip. only) REv! EWER: ' N.

/Yi6F M4I !7 OATE:/db[N l - .. , .// . . .. .. .. . . . -

. _ _, ~. .-. - -. . _ - -. .- _.

. - - - _ - - -.. . - - -. . - -. - a '. . cacccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccacccc LC a LOCATION CODE NMP41 EQUIPMENT QUALIFICATION - M.O. 41927 .

u a REVISION TO 3/29/85 LIST COMPLETE LIST SORTED BY SYSTEM / E.P.H JANUARY 25, 1986 + e REVISION TO 4/11/85 LIST

' J e REVISION TO 8/14/85 LIST EQUIP. PC. NO. / VERIFIED MODEL / ACTION SYSTEM S LC COMPONENT TYPE MANUFACTURER REQUIRED ACTION COMPLETE EQRM SCEM ussaus*************************************massass*********ssas**************sss**sassassassassassassasssstsassssssssssssssssssses 036

PT-36-08D 1151GP-9ET0003PA APPLY KA0 WOOL E YES 14B 142 d ' TRANSMITTER ROSEMOUNT BISCO TO SEAL LEAD WIRES.

, 036-

PT-36-23A 1153GA9 VERIFY / REPLACE YES 14C 155 TRANSMITTER ROSEMOUNT SEALED CONDUIT C CONNECTOR.

. 036

PT-36-23B 1153GA9 VERITY / REPLACE YES 14C 156 TRANSMITTER R0"' MOUNT SEALED CONDUIT t E CONNECTOR.

036

PT-36-31 1153GD9PB ITEM REPLACEMNT YES 14E 062 o TRANSMITTER ROSEMOUNT

I ! 036

PT-36-32 1153GD9PB ITEM REPLACEMNT YES 14E 063 ' TRANSMITTER ROSEMOUNT ~ '036

TE-36-29A 10231710 820395 RPL HEAD SEAL YES 13A 119 d , i TEMPERATURE ELEMENT PYC0 GASKET. ADD . SEAL ON CONDUIT !' 036

TE-36-298 '10231710 820395 RPL HEAD SEAL YES 13A 120 d { TEMPERATURE ELEMENT PYC0 GASKET. ADD ' SEAL ON CONDUIT ! 036

TE-36-29C 10231710 820395 APPLY BISCO TO YES 13A 121 0 TEMPERATURE ELEMENT PYC0 SEAL.

, l 036

TE-36-29D 10231710 820395 APPLY' BISCO TO YES 13R 122 o " TEMPERATURE ELEMENT PYC0 SEAL.

l I 036

36-03A 510DU245026A005 ~ ITEM QUALIFIED.

M/R

377 ELECTRONIC TRIP UNIT ROSEMOUNT 4. . i 036

36-03B 510DU245026A005 ITEM QUALIFIED.

M/R

378 ELECTRONIC TRIP UNIT ROSEMOUNT !

i + 036

36-03C 510DU245026A005~TE ' ITEM QUALIFIED.

M/R

379 ' ELECTRONIC TRIP UNIT ROSEMOUNT

, ,

  • i

! 036

36-03D 510DU245026A0057"~' ITEM QUALIFIED.

N/R

380 ELECTRONIC TRIP UNIT ROSEMOUNT I O .. . ! ('/YA ,

- _ _ _. _ _ _ _. _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _.........,

-

.. DOCUMENTATIONINANAUDITABLEFORM 4) FUNCTIONAL PERFORMANCE FUNCTIONALREQUIREMENTS

IN00RPORATEDINTESTACCEPTANCE CRITERIA (ie.ALLOWABLEVARIATION INOUTPUTSIGNALFORGIVENINPUT SIGNAL) ' ASSESSMENTREPORTSDOCUMENT EVALUATIONOFTESTRESULTS ' BASISOFSPECIFIEDPERFORMANCE REQUIREMENTSNOTUNIFORMLY DOCUMENTED . , ' RE-REVIEW 0F TEST REPORTS WITN . RESPECT TO DOCUMENTATION OF . PERFORMANCE CONSIDERATIONS , ' TERMINALBOARDTESTPROGRAM . i 3y .. . . -. _ - - - . . . - _ _ -. -.. . - -. -

. . ..

DOCUMENTATIONINANAUDITABLEFOR-I RE-REVIE10FTESTREPORTSFORPERF0M0ECONSIDERATIONS ' PERF0M0EEVALUATIONREPORT ' EQUIPMENTCATEGORIZEDINFOURCATEGORIESAS: 1.

PERF0M0E DETERMINED BY A000RA0Y - ITEM THAT MUST FUNCTION WITHINAGIVENACCURACYORTOLERANCEONOUTPUTORSETP0lNT 2.

-PERFORMANCE DETERINED BY OPERATING HISTORY - ITEMS WICH A REQUIREDTOOPERATEINA"RADIATIONONLY"ACCIDENTENVIRONMENT , ANDMUSTTHEREFORE,CONTINUETOPERF05ASTHEYHAVEDURING NORMALSERVICE ' 3.

PERF0MANCE DETEMINED BY G0/N0-G0 ACCEPTANCE - ITEMS H0S! ' FUNCTIONISTOPROVIDEAG0/N0-G0 OPERATION,SUCHASSWITCHES, SOLEN 0IDVALVESANDMOTORS.

4.

PERF0M0E DETEMINED BY GENE 310 ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA - IT i HICHMUSTMAINTAINVOLTAGEANDCONTINUITY,SUCHASCABLES, SPL10ESANDTEMINALBLOCKS ' ALLREVIEWEDEQUIPMENT#ASFOUNDQUAllFIEDTOPERF05ITSREQUIRED FUNCTIONWITHINTHENECESSARYLEVELSOFPERFORMANCE.

3f -. . _.

-.. .. -. . . - - -.

._ - l .. '. DOCUMENTATIONINANAUDITABLEFORM , i 5. PLANT SERVICE CONDITIONS ' QUAllfl0 Ail 0N MAXIMlZED FOR EACN COMP 0NENTHEREFEASIBLE ' INDIVIDUAL SC H IS RE-EVALUATED FOR TNEAPPLICABLEENVIRONMENTIFTNE ' MORECONSERVATIVETESTCRITERIA ' CANNOTBEMET ' MEM0 0F EXPLANATION TO FILE ' LICENSING CON 0URRENCE REQUIRED , ! ., _ .. .. -. -. . . .. --

_.

.- . . . . _ _ _ - _ - - _ - . . .. l: - t . STATIC 4-RIE PIES $1RE WITO . APPBellA SECilW 8 ITS 2 ITH (1) - RRTIER ACTIM 'DBelSTRATE/- lilADERTE0003EUAil5 000 WENS: 0003EU FN: ELIFICAT10ll

' PRFOREllCE ' FETl0llAL PBF0BIAll0E 'SERICEC051T10ll$ ' REPORT REVISS FM LG , 'WWEILLEE/ ' ROUTIE ElHEEllCE

ElHEllAliCE EWELOPESBWlELATS REWIRBEU$ l ' l I i I . -- - . --

- - . . - . . , ' .. . ~ . VALCORS0LEN0IDVALVE APPENDIXA SECTION4D ITEM 3 ITEM (2) FURTliERACTIONS ' DEMONSTRATE / INADEQUATEDOCUMENTATION DOCUMENTED DOCUMENT FOR: QUAllFICATION 'SERVICECONDITIONS 'APPENDIXRREVIEWREMOTE

SHUTDOWNPANEL, REPORT - REVISEDFORLOCARADIATION 'SURVElllANCE/ 'ROUTINEMAINTENANCE MAINTENANCE ENVELOPESEQ-RELATED REQUIREMENTSDOCUMENTEDON EQRM#9 . e

]

. . _ -. . -- ._- - --

- .- . - - _ - - --. .. , .. . GEEEL BETRIC B-5 TERIEL K006

APPBBlXA SECTI0ll8 ITH 4 ITH @ All1ERACTIM , ' DBOISTRATE/ IWESTE D00MBITAil0ll D00llHTS D005HT FOR: SLIFICATION ' SERVICE 'SERVICEIRWIN CONFI M ATI M N LOCATIM l ' FETIML PERFORNEE ' PERFORENCE IRLWIM ADDITIML TEST OF WSTCASEAPPLICATIM < ' QPBATIM TIE 'OPRATIMTIEIRWIM

ARITl0EL TEST IITil

BRGIN ' l I , a { i b -- - . -. - _ _ - - _ -. _ -. . -. - - - -.

- __ . .- ._- - _-. . -- _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _

., !, BERL ELECRIC B-5 TEMIRL K0GS i l APPEBlXA SECTIN 8 ITS 5 ITH @ FETE ETIM ,

  • DBMSTRTE/

IEDEUTE DOMENTATIND005 HTS D0MRT FN: NALIFICATIM l 'SERICE 'SENICElELBIN CNFIGRATIM AB LOCATIM FET10RL PBF0M0E ' PHF0MCE lELllDIM ADDITIORLTEST0F NRSTCASEAPPLl0 Ail 0NS ' ' QPERTIM TIE 'QPEMilMTIEIELBIM l ADDITIORLTESTIITH , EMil ' ! , - , !

,

i ! f/ . - _ - _ - - _ . - - - - - - -

- -- .- - . .--- - . - _ _.

,

, . . Fi3R P0$1 TIN WITCil APPEBl1A SECTIN 4 ! .ITH 6 ITH @ FWilER Milm 'DENESTRATE/ ' IRESTE SUPPRTIM ' 0005 ENS M BA$l3 DOCWEE DOCWHTATINFR FM$1NilMITY WALIFICATig SINILARITY llillVEE0R'S l EMlllERIE DEPARTMENT

  • PROVIDEDEElllERIN

-

MLYSES OF MIN As . , l DSONSTRATS RADIATl0ll BYTEST

,... !

! ! ~ i.

d ! . ,

' . - - - _. _ . - . - - - - - -

. - ._

. *

. ROSEM0UNT1151 TRANSMITTER ' APPENDIXA SECTION4D ITEM 7 ITEM (6) FURTHERACTIONS ' DEMONSTRATE / INADEQUATE D000MENTAil0N DEMONSTRATED DOCUMENT OF: QUAllfl0ATl0N ^ 'REQUIREDLEVEL0F 'REQUIREDLEVEL0F

QUAllfl0ATl0N QUAllFICATIONIS00R j GUIDEllNES(RESOLVED DURINGAUDIT)

'QUAllFIEDLIFE 'QUAllFIEDLIFE ESTABLISHEDBY ENGINEERINGANALYSl8 l ! b - _ - - _ _ . . - - _ -. -. .. - - _ _ -

._.

_- .. ._ -_ .? I .OPENITEMS ITS FURTHERACTION ' EQ PROCEDURE ' IMPLBENTED EQ PROGRAM INLSENTATION PROCEDURENT-100.0(JAN'86) ' TRAINI M PROGRAM IMPLBENTED ' CLOSED LOOP C0OLING ' ADJUSTED Oll LEVEL TO l PUMPMOTOR, NORMALOPERATINGBAND j Oil 0VERFLOW ' A000Sil0 ENITOR ' PROCURED AS R00KBESTOS

CABLE,PR000RENENT CABLE (P.O.#52567, DATED

! DATA 05/02/78). GENERICALLY QUAllFIED ' LAURENCE S0LEN01D VALVE (QAITEMSONLY, NOTEQ) , ' a. SEISHIC ' PERFO RED ANALYSIS EICH A00EPTABillTY SHOWSSUPPORTMEETSSEISMIC REQUIRGENTS , b. GASKET POSSIBLY ' REPLACED GASKET OVERT 0RQUED (R33478, DATED 09/11/85)

. -_ - - - - -. .- }}

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=IR_05000220/1985013&oldid=5491038"