IR 05000410/1985009
| ML17054B591 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Nine Mile Point  |
| Issue date: | 04/05/1985 |
| From: | Gramm R, Linville J NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION I) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML17054B590 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-410-85-09-MM, 50-410-85-9-MM, NUDOCS 8505020143 | |
| Download: ML17054B591 (24) | |
Text
U.S.
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
REGION I
Report No.
85-09 Docket No.
50-410 Licensee No.
CPPR-112 Priority Category A
Licensee:
Nia ara Mohawk Power Cor oration 300 Erie Boulevard S racuse New York 13202 Facility Name:
Nine Mile Point Unit 2 Inspection At:
Scriba New York Inspection Conducted:
Inspector:
R
.
G Febr r
and March
1985 m, Senior sident Inspector da e
Approved By:
J
. Li ville, C, Reactor Projects ection 2C,DRP d te Meetin Summar
Mana ement Conference on Februar
and March
1985 Re ort No. 50-410/85-09
~Summer
- Special management conference convened at the request of Region I to discuss the scope of the planned Engineering Assurance technical audit for Nine Mile Point, Unit 2.
Niagara Mohawk presented tentative plans for the conduct of a dual design and hardware verification audit to focus on the Reactor Core Isolation Cooling System.
The meetings of February
and March 15 were both two hours in duration.
8505020i43 850419 PDR ADOCK 05000410 I
DETAILS 1.
Attendees Nia ara Mohawk Power Cor oration NMPC C.
G.
Beckham, Quality Assurance Manager, NMPC (MAC)
~ B. Charlson, Project Director, Stone and Webster Engineering Corp.
(SWEC)
W.
M. Eifert, Chief Engineer, Engineering Assurance Division (SWEC)
E.
B. Fleming, Chief Engineer, Quality Assurance Audit Division (SWEC)
B.
G. Hooten, Executive Director Nuclear Operations, NMPC (MAC)
C.
V. Mangan, Vice President Nuclear Engineering, NMPC
- J.
A. Perry, Director of Quality Assurance D.
L.
Quamme, Project Director, NMPC (MAC)
C.
D. Terry, Manager of Nuclear Engineering
~~ D. Twigg, Lead Engineer, Engineering Assurance Division (SWEC)
U.S. Nuclear Re viator Commission NRC
- G. T. Ankrum, Chief, Quality Assurance Branch, IE S. J. Collins, Chief, Reactor Projects Branch 2, DRP
- T. Uelgalzo, Manager (Westec Services, Inc.)
J.
P. Durr, Chief, Material and Processes Section, DRS S.
D. Ebneter, Director, Division of Reactor Safety (DRS)
R. A. Gramm, Senior Resident Inspector NMP-2 G.
Imbro, Senior Inspector, Quality Assurance Branch, IE
'!.
F.
Kane, Deputy Director, Division of Reactor Projects (DRP)
W. Lazarus, Project Engineer, Projects Section 2,
W. Starostecki, Director, Division of Reactor Projects (DRP)
- Attended meeting of February 27, 1985, only.
~~Attended meeting of March 15, 1985, only.
a.
Febr var
1985 Niagara Mohawk Power Corporation (NMPC)
opened the meeting by pre-senting an overview of the Engineering Assurance (EA) audit program.
The inter-relationship between the EA audits and the Quality Assur-ance (QA) audits was discussed.
The scope and conduct of previous EA audits were reviewed.
NMPC stated the tentative scope of the upcom-ing EA audit would be a vertical design slice of the Reactor Core Isolation Cooling (RCIC)
system.
The licensee discussed the FSAR verification program and the on-going QA hardware re-inspection ef-forts which supplement the normal audit activity.
Attachment 1 was provided by the licensee.
To gain a greater measure of confidence in
the site implementation of design documents, Region I requested that the audit scope include a verification of the installed hardware re-lative to the design criteria.
In response to previously identified deficiencies, Region I stated that the audit should include activ-ities performed by Reactor Controls, Inc.
(RCI)
and ITT-Grinnell ( ITT).
The involvement of NRC staff in the EA audit wi 11 include a
review of the detailed audit plans to monitor the audit conduct, and a
review of the final audit report and supporting documentation.
The meeting ended with a
commitment by NMPC to consider the NRC sug-gestions on the conduct of the EA audit and to hold further discuss-ions on the audit effort in the near future.
b.
March
1985 NMPC opened the meeting by discussing the plans developed in response to the meeting of February 27, 1985.
The justification for the se-lection of the RCIC system was discussed.
The audit personnel will be selected from off-project engineering personnel.
The audit scope will examine:
site initiated design changes; implementation of licen-sing design commitments; adequacy of design calculations; tracking of structural loads; stress reconciliation; equipment environmental qualification; and electrical separation.
NMPC proceeded to discuss the conduct of an integrated gA audit which will examine characteristics of installed hardware relative to the applicable design criteria.
Attachment 2 provides the licensee pro-vided details of both EA and gA audit plans.
Region I requested that NMPC provide copies of previously conducted design audits on the Residual Heat Removal, Service Water, and AC Power distribution systems.
The selection of the RCIC system audit is acceptable pending NRC review of the requested audit documents.
Region I further requested the submission of EA audits previously conducted regarding the RCI design effort.
NRC concurrence was re-quested for the exclusion of the CRD system from the upcoming audit pending review of the RCI audit reports for resolution of previously identified deficiencies.
Region I personnel asked if the RCIC system accounted for 2 hour2.314815e-5 days <br />5.555556e-4 hours <br />3.306878e-6 weeks <br />7.61e-7 months <br /> loss of all AC power; if the EA audit would verify design commitments not specified in the FSAR; and the means by which audit findings deter-mined to be invalid will be tracked.
The licensee responded that the total station blackout scenario is under analysis; that all commit-ments will be reviewed; and that sufficient documentation will be retained to justify the handling of invalid items, respectively.
There will be further NRC participation during the audit.
At this time, the NRC agrees with the proposed methodology for the forth-coming EA/gA audi f
ATTACHMENT 1 - MATERIAL PROVIDED BY NIAGARA MOHAWK POWER CORPORATION AT FEBRUARY 27, 1985 MEETING
t
AGENDA Introduction Review of Audit Program
~
Engineering Assurance Quality Assurance Scope of Upcoming E/A Technical Audit Independent Owners'ctivities
~
FSAR Commitment Verification Hardware Surveillance Conclusions
~
~
STONE R
k'EBSTER ENGI.NEERING CORPORATION AUDIT COVERAGE ENGINEERING ASSURANCE AUDITS QUALITY ASSURANCE R:
SOURCE OF BASIC REQUIREMENTS A:
ACTIVITY AUDITED TO BASIC REQUIREMENTS I
W C)
W I
~
LU C/)
I W
I M
I I
I I
A A
I I
A A
CD CD o
c)
cY cr LU W
Cl O
I I
I I
I I
A I
a
<<C W
A I
ED I
tY CD CD A
~
LU I
Z )
I Z W
CL O.
A CA SAR (10CFP50)
DESIGN CRITERIA DESIGN DEVELOPMENT (FSK, LSK)
SPECIFICATIONS, ENGINEERING DRAllINGS, PROCEDURE R
WORK INSTRUCTIONS FIELD ENGINEERING a
CHANGES (ISOs, ERDCRs)
PROCUREMENT FABRICATION (HARDWARE)
INSTALLATION/ERECTION (13ARDHARE)
INSPECTION (HARDWARE)
TEST I NG (HARD1'lARE)
R R
R R
A A
A A
A A
A A
A A
A A
A A
A A
A.A A
A A
R R
R R
A R
R R
R A
A A
A A
A A
-
A A
A A
A A
A A
A A
A
NIAGARA MOHAWK POWER CORPORATION NHP2 QA AUDITS AUDIT COVERAGE QA AUDITS R:
SOURCE OF BASIC REQUIREHENTS A:
ACTIVITY AUDITED TO BASIC REQUIREMENTS CD I
I CD SAR ( 1 OCFR50/ANS I STDs) )
DESIGN CRITERIA SPECIFICATIONS, ENGINEERING DRAWINGS, PROCEDURES R
WORK INSTRUCTIONS FIELD ENGINEERING 8 CHANGES ( ISOs, ERDCRs)
PROCURENENT FABRICATION (HARDWARE)
INSTALLATION/ERECTION (HARDWARE)
INSPECTION (HARDWARE/PERSONNEL QUALS.)
TESTING (HARDWARE)
RECORDS
I
EA AUDITS 2/83 TO PRESENT AUDIT DATE SITE PROJECT SAR 2/83 DIAGRAMS SPECS (+DESIGN (+TECH CRITERIA)
DOCS, )
DRAWINGS OTHER (+CHANGE (CALCULATIONS DOCUMENTS)
ANALYSES, ETC.)
HARD'jlARf X
X 3/83 5/83 6/83 8/83 9/83 11/83 12/83 X
2/84 3/84 5/84 8/84 8/84" 9/84 11/84" 12/84 2/85
"SPECIAL AUDITS
SCOPE OF SCHEDULED EA TECHNICAL AUDIT (5-1-85 through 6-21-85)
Assess adequacy of design process, design change control, associated structures and interface within the RCIC System, Design consistent with FSAR and NSSS requirements/criteria, Adequacy of calculations, diagrams, specs, and drawings, Structural Load Tracking As-Built/Stress Reconciliation Environmental Qualification Cable Tray and Conduit Supports Electrical Separation
l
INDEPENDENT OWNERS 'CT IVTIES FSAR Commitment Verification t
Ver ify that commitments within the FSAR are identified for design, preoperational and operational phases of the Prolect.
Obiective evidence of incorporation of the commitments will be provided in all cases, Hardware Surveillance Selectively reinspected a cross section of key commodities previously accepted by Ouality Control, All reinspections performed to latest design disclosure documents,
CONSLUSION The scope of the Engineering Assurance and Quality Assurance Audit Program (particularly when viewed together)
provide reasonable assurance that FSAR commitments have been adequatly translated into as-installed hardware conditions,
J l
ATTACHMENT 2 MATERIAL PROVIDED BY NIAGARA MOHAWK POWER CORPORATION AT MARCH 15, 1985 MEETING